HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-11-23 Agenda
Council
Post-Meeting Agenda
Date:November 23, 2020
Time:7:00 p.m.
Location:Council Members (in Chambers or MS Teams) | Members of the Public (MS
Teams)
Inquiries & Accommodations: For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for
accessibility accommodations for persons attending, please contact: Michelle Chambers,
Administrative Assistant, at 905-623-3379, ext. 2101 or by email at mchambers@clarington.net.
Alternate Format: If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the
Accessibility Coordinator, at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Audio/Video Record: The Municipality of Clarington makes an audio and video record of Council
meetings. If you make a delegation or presentation at a Council meeting, the Municipality will be
recording you and will make the recording public by publishing the recording on the Municipality’s
website, www.clarington.net/calendar.
Cell Phones: Please ensure all cell phones, mobile and other electronic devices are turned off or
placed on non-audible mode during the meeting.
Copies of Reports are available at www.clarington.net
*Late Item added after the Agenda was published.
Pages
1.Call to Order
2.Moment of Reflection
3.Land Acknowledgement Statement
4.Declaration of Interest
5.Announcements
6.Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting(s)
6.1.Minutes of a regular meeting of Council dated November 2-3, 2020 7
7.Presentations
7.1.Regional Chair John Henry - Annual Address
8.Delegations
8.1.Laurel Kahler regarding Agenda Item 14.1, Reducing the Speed Limit in
the Northglen Community
23
(Attached is the Motion that Councillor Jones intends to introduce for Ms.
Kahler's Delegation)
8.2.Laura Markovic regarding Public Access to Municipal Property east of
Mearns Avenue at Longworth Avenue (Agenda Item 13.3)
*8.3.Carl Van Belle regarding Agenda Item 13.1 - Proposed Motion to
Remove the Greenbelt Condition on Ministerial Zoning Order for 2423
Rundle Road, Bowmanville
*8.4.Jim Hamilton regarding Agenda Item 13.1 - Proposed Motion to Remove
the Greenbelt Condition on Ministerial Zoning Order for 2423 Rundle
Road, Bowmanville
*8.5.Dave Bass regarding Reducing the Speed Limits Residential Streets
Page 2
9.Communications – Receive for Information
9.1.Correspondence and Petition regarding Agenda Item 13.1 - Council's
Support of Resolution #C-418-2 regarding the Ministerial Zoning Order to
Change the Zoning of 2423 Rundle Road Bowmanville
24
Note: A petition containing approximately 100 signatures was received
regarding Council's Support of Resolution #C-418-20, regarding the
Ministerial Zoning Order to change the zoning of 2423 Rundle Road
Bowmanville, previously adopted by Council at the Special Council
Meeting of October 26, 2020.
The correspondence and a sample of the form letter for the petition have
been included.
9.2.Petition regarding Agenda Item 13.3 - Public Access to Municipal
Property east of Mearns Avenue at Longworth Avenue
26
Note: A petition containing approximately 40 area resident signatures
and approximately 500 electronic signatures was received regarding
Resolution #GG-325-20 from the General Government Committee
meeting of September 28, 2020, regarding public access to municipal
property east of Mearns Avenue at Longworth Avenue, previously
adopted by Council at the Council Meeting of November 2, 2020.
The wording from the petition has been included.
*9.3.Confidential Memo from Robert Maciver, Director of Legislative
Services/Municipal Solicitor regarding the Anaerobic Digester –
Mediation Update
(To be Distributed Under Separate Cover)
10.Communications – Direction
10.1.Memo from Steve Brake, Director of Public Works regarding Found
Farm Road Closure – Additional Information
27
(Motion to refer to Item 13 of the General Government Committee
Report)
10.2.Chris Darling, Chief Administrative Officer, CLOCA, regarding Bill 229,
An Act to Implement Budget Measures and to Enact, Amend and
Repeal Various Statutes
31
(Motion to Endorse)
Page 3
*10.3.Linda J. Laliberte, CAO/Secretary/Treasurer, Ganaraska Region
Conservation Authority, regarding Bill 229 Section 6, Proposed
Amendments to the Conservation Authorities Act
33
(Motion to Endorse)
*10.4.Memo from Trevor Pinn, Director of Financial Services/Treasurer
regarding ONE JIB Investment Returns
35
(Motion to refer to the consideration of Item 6 of the General
Government Committee Report)
*10.5.Devon Daniell, Kaitlin Corporation, Regarding Report PSD-051-20
Update to Jury Lands (Camp 30) and Draft Amendment No. 121 to the
Clarington Official Plan (Item 2 of the Planning and Development
Committee Report)
133
(Motion to refer to the consideration of Item 2 of the Planning and
Development Committee Report)
*10.6.Melissa Knight regarding Agenda Item 13.3 - Public Access to
Municipal Property east of Mearns Avenue at Longworth Avenue
135
*10.7.Jim Hamilton regarding Agenda Item 13.1 - Council's Support of
Resolution #C-418-2 regarding the Ministerial Zoning Order to Change
the Zoning of 2423 Rundle Road Bowmanville
136
*10.8.Wendy Bracken regarding Correspondence from Ravi Mahabir, Dillon
Consulting responding to Wendy Bracken's Concerns regarding a
Discrepancy in Dioxin Furan Between Dillon Consulting's Presentation
and Posted DYEC Reports
137
11.Committee Reports
11.1.Advisory Committee Reports
11.1.1.Minutes of the Agricultural Advisory Committee dated
November 12, 2020
142
11.1.2.Minutes of the Clarington Accessibility Advisory Committee
dated November 5, 2020
147
*11.1.3.Minutes of the Samuel Wilmot Nature Area
ManagementAdvisory Committee dated October 13 and
November 10, 2020
151
*11.1.4.Minutes of the Clarington Heritage Committee dated October
20 and November 17, 2020
156
Page 4
*11.1.5.Minutes of the Newcastle Village Community Hall Board dated
June 16, August 18, September 22 and October 20, 2020
166
11.2.General Government Committee
11.2.1.General Government Committee Report of November 9, 2020 178
11.3.Planning & Development Committee
11.3.1.Planning and Development Committee Report of November
16, 2020
186
11.4.Audit Committee Minutes
*11.4.1.Minutes of the Audit Committee dated November 16, 2020 188
12.Staff Reports
None
13.Business Arising from Procedural Notice of Motion
13.1.Motion to Amend Something Previously Adopted (Proposed Motion to
Remove the Greenbelt Condition)
199
Regarding Council's Support of the #C-418-20, regarding the Ministerial
Zoning Order to change the zoning of 2423 Rundle Road Bowmanville,
previously adopted by Council at the Special Council Meeting of
October 26, 2020.
13.2.Motion to Amend Something Previously Adopted (Proposed Motion to
Remove All Remaining Conditions)
200
Regarding Council's Support of the #C-418-20, regarding the Ministerial
Zoning Order to change the zoning of 2423 Rundle Road Bowmanville,
previously adopted by Council at the Special Council Meeting of
October 26, 2020.
13.3.Motion to Amend Something Previously Adopted (Proposed Motion
Regarding Public Access to Municipal Property)
201
Regarding Resolution #GG-325-20 from the General Government
Committee meeting of September 28, 2020, regarding public access to
municipal property east of Mearns Avenue at Longworth Avenue,
previously adopted by Council at the Council Meeting of November 2,
2020.
Page 5
14.Unfinished Business
14.1.Laurel Kahler regarding Reducing the Speed Limit in the Northglen
Community
202
(Referred from the November 9, 2020 General Government Committee
Meeting)
15.By-laws
15.1.2020-077 - Being a by-law to amend the Procedural By-law 2015-029 204
(As approved by Resolution #GG-374-20 at the November 2, 2020
Council Meeting)
15.2.2020-078 - Being a By-law to Exempt a Certain Portion of Registered
Plan 40M-2627 from Part Lot Control
206
15.3.2020-079 - Being a By-law to Exempt a Certain Portion of Registered
Plan 40M-2612 from Part Lot Control
209
15.4.2020-080 - Being a By-law to Amend 2010-139, to Designate the
Municipality of Clarington as a Site Plan Control Area, to Define Classes
of Development that my be Undertaken Without Approval of Certain
Plan and Drawing & Delegate the Approval Authority
(Item 3 of the Planning and Development Committee Report)
16.Procedural Notices of Motion
None
17.Other Business
18.Confirming By-Law
19.Adjournment
Page 6
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility
Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
Council Minutes
Date:
Time:
Location:
November 2-3, 2020
7:00 p.m.
Council Members (in Chambers or MS Teams) | Members of
the Public (MS Teams)
Present Were: Mayor A. Foster
Present Via Electronic
Means:
Councillor G. Anderson, Councillor R. Hooper, Councillor
J. Jones, Councillor J. Neal, Councillor M. Zwart
Regrets: Councillor C. Traill
Staff Present: J. Gallagher, M. Chambers
Present Via Electronic
Means:
A. Allison, G. Acorn until 11:05 p.m., R. Albright until 11:05 p.m,
S. Brake until 11:05 p.m, F. Langmaid, R. Maciver, M. Marano
until 11:05 p.m, T. Pinn until 11:05 p.m,
_____________________________________________________________________
1. Call to Order
Mayor Foster called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Moment of Reflection
Councillor Anderson led the meeting in a moment of reflection.
3. Land Acknowledgement Statement
Councillor Anderson led the meeting in the Land Acknowledgement Statement.
4. Declaration of Interest
Councillor Jones declared an indirect interest on Item 1c of the General
Government Committee Report regarding Ambulatory Services at Ajax Pickering
Hospital.
Councillor Neal declared an indirect interest on Item 1g of the General Government
Committee Report - Section 18.1 of Report CAO-020-20 - Clarington Response to
COVID-19.
Page 7
November 2-3, 2020
Council Minutes
2
5. Announcements
Members of Council announced upcoming community events and matters of
community interest.
6. Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting(s)
6.1 Minutes of a regular meeting of Council dated October 13, 2020
6.2 Minutes of a special meeting of Council dated October 26, 2020
Resolution # C-421-20
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the minutes of the regular meeting of the Council held on October 13, 2020, be
approved; and
That the minutes of the special meeting of the Council held on October 27, 2020, be
approved.
Carried
7. Presentations
7.1 Susan Siopis, Commissioner, Works, and Gioseph Anello, Director, Waste
Management Services, Region of Durham, regarding Waste Diversion and the
Organics Management Project
Susan Siopis, Commissioner, Works, and Gioseph Anello, Director, Waste
Management Services, Region of Durham, were present via electronic means
regarding Waste Diversion and the Organics Management Project. They made a
verbal presentation to accompany an electronic presentation. Ms. Siopis thanked
the Members of Council for the opportunity to address Council. She noted that
there have been several updates to Regional Council since the last update to
Clarington and they are looking to provide some of that information. Mr. Anello
explained that a review was done in 2018 of the composition of Durham Region’s
residential waste, and he noted the cost of processing waste at the Durham York
Energy Centre (DYEC). He reviewed the drivers for managing organic waste which
includes both the Durham Region and the market drivers. Mr. Anello added that the
Region of Durham has recently declared a climate change emergency. He
explained what is included in the mixed waste, pre-sort and anaerobic and reviewed
the objectives of this process. Mr. Anello continued by providing an overview of
the Anaerobic Digestion process and the various steps involved. He reviewed the
digestate management and noted it can be used as liquid fertilizer. He added that
the Ministry of the Environment has guidelines for fertilizers but noted they do not
have guidelines for facility separated organics. Mr. Anello stated that no digestate
will go to the DYEC. He continued by providing an overview on renewable natural
gas and it’s uses. Mr. Anello addressed some of the concerns and issues with the
mixed waste pre-sort AD project. He concluded by reviewing the impacts on the
DYEC and noted that this will not increase the amount of garbage going to the
Page 8
November 2-3, 2020
Council Minutes
3
DYEC. Mr. Anello and Ms. Siopis answered questions from the members of
Council.
Resolution # C-422-20
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Neal
That the presentation of Susan Siopis, Commissioner, Works, and Gioseph Anello,
Director, Waste Management Services, Region of Durham, regarding Waste
Diversion and the Organics Management Project, be received with thanks; and
That the Region of Durham be requested to respond to Linda Gasser's questions.
Carried
7.2 Carlyle Khan, Deputy General Manager (Acting), Solid Waste Management
Services, City of Toronto, regarding the City of Toronto’s experience with
Anaerobic Digestion
Carlyle Khan, Deputy General Manager (Acting), Solid Waste Management
Services, City of Toronto, was present via electronic means regarding the City of
Toronto’s experience with Anaerobic Digestion. He made a verbal presentation to
accompany an electronic presentation. Mr. Khan reviewed the City of Toronto's
organics processing facilities and noted that they have a third facility on the
way. He provided an overview of the organic waste process. Mr. Khan highlighted
the estimated green house gas reductions with the additional facility. He reviewed
how they compare with the Durham Region with respect to waste composition. Mr.
Khan explained that there continues to be a global climate crisis and noted the City
of Toronto has declared a Climate Emergency. He explained that there is a
convergence of three global issues and reviewed these issues. Mr. Khan answered
questions from the Members of Council.
Resolution # C-423-20
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That the presentation of Carlyle Khan, Deputy General Manager (Acting), Solid
Waste Management Services, City of Toronto, regarding the City of Toronto’s
experience with Anaerobic Digestion, be received with thanks.
Carried
7.3 Ruben Plaza, Corporate Environmental Manager, St Marys Cement & Bridget
Mills, Senior Environmental Engineer, BCX Environmental Consulting,
regarding St. Marys Cement, Alternative Low Carbon Fuels Environmental
Compliance Approval Amendment
Ruben Plaza, Corporate Environmental Manager, St Marys Cement (SMC) and
Bridget Mills, Senior Environmental Engineer, BCX Environmental Consulting, were
present via electronic means regarding St. Marys Cement, Alternative Low Carbon
Fuels Environmental Compliance Approval Amendment. They made a verbal
presentation to accompany and electronic presentation. Mr. Plaza reviewed the
Page 9
November 2-3, 2020
Council Minutes
4
definition of an alternative low carbon fuel (ALCF). He provided some background
information on ALCF and explained how they are used in cement production. Mr.
Plaza summarized the environmental benefits and noted Clarington and SMC share
the same common objectives. Ms. Mills noted that their objective is to address the
questions and comments from the October 26, 2020, Planning and Development
Committee meeting. She provided an overview of the 2023 SO2 POI Standards
and how that SMC will meet the 2023 SO2 standards. Ms. Mills explained why SO2
emissions are not prorated in the ESDM report and why the SO 2 emission rate was
highest during the use of alternative fuels. She continued by reviewing the kiln
emissions while using ALCF and why the emissions of PM, NOx, NH3 and CO are
not prorated in the ESDM Report. Ms. Mills reviewed the nitrogen oxides and air
quality standards and explained why the Ministry POI limits were used instead of
CAAQS. She continued by reviewing the particulate matter source testing results
and noted why the PM emissions were higher when ALCF was used. Ms. Mills
answered the question of why the dioxins and furans emissions are higher when
ALCF is used. She concluded by answering why SMC isn't conducting more
ambient air monitoring or using carbon injections. Mr. Plaza and Ms. Mills
answered question from the Members of Council.
Resolution # C-424-20
Moved by Councillor Zwart
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That the presentation of Ruben Plaza, Corporate Environmental Manager, St Marys
Cement & Bridget Mills, Senior Environmental Engineer, BCX Environmental
Consulting, regarding St. Marys Cement, Alternative Low Carbon Fuels
Environmental Compliance Approval Amendment, be received with thanks; and
That St Marys Cement be requested to provide a written response to the Wendy
Bracken's questions asked at the October 26, 2020 Planning and Development
Committee meeting.
Carried as Amended, see following motion
Resolution # C-425-20
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Neal
That the foregoing Resolution be amended by adding the following at the end:
"That St Marys Cement be requested to advise, in writing, on the
discrepancy on the PM 25 reporting."
Carried
Page 10
November 2-3, 2020
Council Minutes
5
7.4 Hamish Corbett-Hains, Associate, Dillon Consulting Limited, regarding St.
Marys Cement, Alternative Low Carbon Fuels Environmental Compliance
Approval Amendment – Air Quality Advisor Comments
Hamish Corbett-Hains, Associate, Dillon Consulting Limited, was present via
electronic means regarding St. Marys Cement, Alternative Low Carbon Fuels
Environmental Compliance Approval Amendment – Air Quality Advisor Comments.
He made a verbal presentation to accompany and electronic presentation. Mr.
Corbett-Hains provided an overview of Dillon Consulting Limited's role, which
included supporting the Municipality. He reviewed the qualifications of the project
team, and the overall review methodology and highlighted the studies
reviewed. Mr. Corbett-Hains continued explaining the variables affecting cement
kiln emissions and emissions estimation best practices. He reviewed the SMC
conclusions on ALCF, impacts on emissions, and the other available testing on
ALCF impacts on emissions. Mr. Corbett-Hains reviewed two other areas that were
of a concern including the air quality criteria and dioxins and furans. He concluded
by advising they have reviewed the recommendations from Municipality of
Clarington and noted that they agree with the recommendations and added that the
Municipality consider a real time ambient air monitoring network. Mr. Corbett-Hains
answered questions from the Members of Council.
Resolution # C-426-20
Moved by Councillor Zwart
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the presentation of Hamish Corbett-Hains, Associate, Dillon Consulting
Limited, regarding St. Marys Cement, Alternative Low Carbon Fuels Environmental
Compliance Approval Amendment – Air Quality Advisor Comments, be received
with thanks.
Carried
Recess
Resolution # C-427-20
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the Council recess for 10 minutes.
Carried
The meeting reconvened at 9:57 p.m. with Mayor Foster in the Chair.
8. Delegations
None
Page 11
November 2-3, 2020
Council Minutes
6
9. Communications – Receive for Information
9.1 Confidential Memo from Ron Albright, Manager of Infrastructure, regarding
Port Granby Low Level Waste Facility – Disposal of Wastewater Treatment
Plant Residual Waste
Resolution # C-428-20
Moved by Councillor Zwart
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That Correspondence Item 9.1, Confidential Memo from Ron Albright, Manager of
Infrastructure, regarding Port Granby Low Level Waste Facility – Disposal of
Wastewater Treatment Plant Residual Waste, be received for information.
Carried
10. Communications – Direction
10.1 Susan Siopis, P.Eng., Commissioner, Works, and Gioseph Anello, M.Eng.,
P.Eng., PMP, Director, Waste Management Services, regarding Mixed Waste
Pre-Sort and Anaerobic Digestion (AD) Facility in the Municipality of
Clarington
Resolution # C-429-20
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That Correspondence Item 10.1 from Susan Siopis, P.Eng., Commissioner, Works,
and Gioseph Anello, M.Eng., P.Eng., PMP, Director, Waste Management Services,
regarding Mixed Waste Pre-Sort and Anaerobic Digestion (AD) Facility in the
Municipality of Clarington, be received; and
That the Region of Durham be requested to provide a written response to Ms.
Gasser's concerns and any further written submissions received, with the
responses being copied to the Members of Clarington Council.
Carried
10.2 Linda Gasser regarding Mixed Waste Pre-Sort and Anaerobic Digestion (AD)
Facility in the Municipality of Clarington (Agenda Item 10.1)
Resolution # C-430-20
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That correspondence Item 10.2 from Linda Gasser regarding Mixed Waste Pre-Sort
and Anaerobic Digestion (AD) Facility in the Municipality of Clarington, be received;
and
That Ms. Gasser be thanked for her submission and advised of the action's taken
on Agenda Item 10.1.
Carried
Page 12
November 2-3, 2020
Council Minutes
7
11. Committee Reports
11.1 Advisory Committee Reports
11.1.1 Minutes of the Agricultural Advisory Committee dated October 8, 2020
11.1.2 Minutes of the Accessibility Advisory Committee dated October 7, 2020
11.1.3 Minutes of the Newcastle Arena Board dated October 13, 2020
11.1.4 Minutes of the Active Transportation and Safe Roads Advisory Committee
dated September 9, 2020
11.1.5 Minutes of the Clarington Heritage Committee dated October 20, 2020
Resolution # C-431-20
Moved by Councillor Jones
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That Advisory Committee Report Items 11.1.1 to 11.1.5, be approved.
Carried
11.2 General Government Committee
11.2.1 General Government Committee Report of October 19, 2020
Resolution # C-432-20
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That the recommendations contained in the General Government Committee
Report of October 19, 2020 be approved on consent, with the exception of items 1c,
1g, 1h, 6, 8 and 11.
Carried
Item 1c - Sarah Moore, Acting Manager of Legislative Services/Deputy Clerk,
Town of Ajax, Regarding Support of Ambulatory Services at Ajax Pickering
Hospital
Councillor Jones declared an indirect interest in Item 1c of the General Government
Committee Report, as she is an employee of Lakeridge Health. Councillor Jones
muted her audio and video and refrained from discussion and voting on this matter.
Resolution # C-433-20
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That Correspondence from Sarah Moore, Acting Manager of Legislative
Services/Deputy Clerk, Town of Ajax, Regarding Support of Ambulatory Services at
Ajax Pickering Hospital, be received for information.
Carried
Councillor Jones returned to the meeting.
Page 13
November 2-3, 2020
Council Minutes
8
Item 1g - Clarington Response to COVID-19
Councillor Neal declared an indirect interest on Item 1g of the General Government
Committee Report (Section 18.1 of Report CAO-020-20) as he is a member of
Autism Home Base Durham. Councillor Neal muted his audio and video and
refrained from discussion and voting on this matter.
Resolution # C-434-20
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That Report CAO-020-20 be received for information.
Carried
Councillor Neal returned to the meeting.
1h - Organization Structure Review Update
Resolution # C-435-20
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That Report CAO-021-20 be received for information.
Carried
Item 6 - Community Funding Program
Resolution # C-436-20
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That Report CSD-009-20 be received;
That the Community Funding Program, as outlined in Attachment 1 of Report
CSD-009-20, be approved;
That Council direct staff to review applications and recommend funding to the CAO
for approval following the recommendations made by the Fun ding Review
Committee;
That staff report annually to Council with the details on the funding provided to the
community agencies; and
That all interested parties listed in Report CSD-009-20 and any delegations be
advised of Council’s decision.
Carried
Page 14
November 2-3, 2020
Council Minutes
9
Item 8 - Health Benefit Program 2020 Renewal of ASO and Non-ASO
Resolution # C-437-20
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That Report COD-019-20 be received;
That the Health Benefit Programs be renewed with Sun Life, to November 1, 2021
at an overall net decrease of 4.4 per cent, with the realized surplus from the current
year to remain in the Municipal reserve fund; and
That the Library be advised of the renewal program, and that they continue to be
invoiced for their portion of the benefit program as applicable.
Carried
Item 11 - Off-Leash Dog Park
Resolution # C-438-20
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Jones
Whereas 57% of Canadian households own pets;
And whereas the Dave Boyd Memorial Off Leash Dog Park in South Bowmanville
has been well-used since its inception in 2012;
And whereas due to COVID-19 more Bowmanville residents are working from home
and using local parks more on a daily, rather than weekend -only basis, including
the off-leash dog park;
And whereas it is expected that many residents will continue to work from home or
work reduced office hours for the foreseeable future as a result of COVID -19;
And whereas the existing off leash facility in Bowmanville is not sufficient to address
the influx of residents and their dogs from the five new residential developments in
Bowmanville (Modo, Lakebreeze East, Lakebreeze West, Brookhill, Camp 30 and
Soper Springs).
Now therefore be it resolved that Staff report back, at the General Government
Committee meeting of November 9, 2020 on:
1. Including the cost of an off-leash dog park in North Bowmanville in the
2021 budget;
2. Possible park locations, including preference to the following:
a. The north end of the former Bowmanville Zoo lands
b. Adjacent to Camp 30
c. In the vicinity of Concession Road 3 and Liberty Street; and
Page 15
November 2-3, 2020
Council Minutes
10
3. Including, as a Schedule B option, LED lighting for the new off leash
dog park to be operated via user-activated timer buttons.
Yes (2): Councillor Jones, and Councillor Neal
No (4): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, and Councillor Zwart
Absent (1): Councillor Traill
Motion Lost on a recorded vote (2 to 4), see following motions
Resolution # C-439-20
Moved by Councillor Jones
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That the foregoing Resolution #C-438-20 be amended by adding as number 4:
"4. Including, as a Schedule B option, LED Lighting for the existing Courtice
and Bowmanville off leash dog parks.”
Carried
The foregoing Resolution #C-438-20 was then put to a recorded vote and lost.
Resolution # C-440-20
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That the costing of a new off leash dog park in North Bowmanville and LED
Lighting, be referred to the 2021 Budget.
Carried as Amended, see following motions
Resolution # C-441-20
Moved by Councillor Jones
Seconded by Councillor Neal
That the foregoing Resolution #C-440-20 be amended by adding the following at
the end:
"That the LED lighting for the existing off leash dog parks be included as a
Schedule B option; and
That the LED lighting for the new proposed off leash dog park, be costed."
Carried
The foregoing Resolution #C-440-20 was then put a vote and carried as amended.
Page 16
November 2-3, 2020
Council Minutes
11
11.3 Planning & Development Committee
11.3.1 Planning and Development Committee Meeting of October 26-27, 2020
Resolution # C-442-20
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the recommendations contained in the Planning and Development Committee
Report of October 26-27, 2020 be approved on consent,
Carried
12. Staff Reports
12.1 Report LGS-002-20 - Appointment of Municipal Clerk
Resolution # C-443-20
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Report LGS-002-20 be received;
That June Gallagher be appointed as Municipal Clerk; and
That the draft By-law, appointing June Gallagher as Municipal Clerk and repealing
previous appointment by-laws (Attachment 1 to Report LGS-002-20), be approved.
Carried
13. Business Arising from Procedural Notice of Motion
None
14. Unfinished Business
14.1 Report EGD-006-20 - Cedar Crest Beach Rd and West Beach Rd Berm Review
and Estimates (Tabled from the May 25, 2020 Council Meeting)
Resolution # C-444-20
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That Resolution #GG-113-20 regarding EGD-006-20, regarding Cedar Crest Beach
Rd and West Beach Rd Berm Review and Estimates, be lifted from the table.
Carried
Page 17
November 2-3, 2020
Council Minutes
12
The following Resolution was now before Council:
That Report EGD-006-20 be received;
That no further flood mitigation work be undertaken on West Beach Rd at this time;
and
That all interested parties listed in Report EGD-006-20 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
Resolution # C-445-20
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Resolution #GG-113-20 regarding Report EGD-006-20, Cedar Crest Beach
and West Beach Road Berm, be referred to the November 30, 2020 General
Government Committee meeting.
Carried
14.2 Resolution #GG-379-20 - Anaerobic Digestor (Referred from the October 19,
2020 General Government Committee Meeting)
Resolution # C-446-20
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That Clarington proceed with the Arbitration phase with the Durham Region on the
Anaerobic Digestor dispute.
Carried as Amended, later in the meeting, following closed session
Resolution # C-447-20
Moved by Councillor Zwart
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That the foregoing Resolution #C-446-20 be referred to the end of the Agenda to be
considered during Closed Session.
Carried
Suspend the Rules
Resolution # C-448-20
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to extend the meeting to 12:00 a.m.
Carried
Page 18
November 2-3, 2020
Council Minutes
13
14.3 Memo from Amy Burke, Acting Manager – Special Projects, Planning &
Development Services, regarding St. Mary's Cement, Alternative Low Carbon
Fuels Environmental Compliance Approval Amendment - Comments from
Dillon Consulting Limited, Air Quality Advisor
Resolution # C-449-20
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the briefing prepared by Dillon Consulting Limited, dated October 23, 2020 be
submitted to the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks as additional
comments from the Municipality of Clarington on St. Marys Cement’s Alternative
Low Carbon Fuel Environmental Compliance Approval Amendment application; and
That Municipal Staff be requested to work with MECP and industry (e.g. SMC,
DYEC) to set up a real-time air quality monitoring network within the Municipality.
Carried
14.4 Memo from Andy Allison, Chief Administrative Officer, regarding Non-
Affiliated Staffing Levels
Resolution # C-450-20
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That that Memo from Andy Allison, Chief Administrative Officer, regarding
Non-Affiliated Staffing Levels, be received for information.
Carried
14.5 Memo from Andy Allison, Chief Administrative Officer, regarding Spry Avenue
Property Disposition
Resolution # C-451-20
Moved by Councillor Zwart
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That the Memo from Andy Allison, Chief Administrative Officer, regarding Spry
Avenue Property Disposition, be received for information.
Carried
Page 19
November 2-3, 2020
Council Minutes
14
14.2 Resolution #GG-379-20 - Anaerobic Digestor
Closed Session
Resolution # C-452-20
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That, in accordance with Section 239 (2) of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended,
the meeting be closed for the purpose of discussing a matter that deals with
litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals
affecting the municipality of local board.
Carried
Rise and Report
The meeting resumed in open session at 12:18 a.m.
Mayor Foster advised that one item was discussed in “closed” session in
accordance with Section 239(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001, three resolutions were
passed on a procedural matter and one resolution was passed to provide direction
to staff.
Resolution # C-453-20
Moved by Councillor Neal
Seconded by Councillor Jones
That foregoing resolution #C-446-20 be amended by adding the following before
the word "Clarington":
"subject to the confidential instructions provided to staff,”
Carried
The foregoing Resolution C-446-20 was then put to a vote and carried as amended.
Suspend the Rules
Resolution # C-454-20
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Zwart
That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to extend the meeting for an additional
three minutes.
Carried
Page 20
November 2-3, 2020
Council Minutes
15
15. By-laws
15.1 2020-070 - Being a By-law to Amend Property Standards By-law 2007-070
(Item 7 of the General Government Committee Report)
15.2 2020-071 - Being a By-law to Amend By-law 2010-142, to Require the Payment
of Fees for Information and Services (Item 1 of the Planning and Development
Committee Report)
15.3 2020-072 - Being a By-law to Amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning
By-law for the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington (Item 3 of the
Planning and Development Committee Report)
15.4 2020-073 - Being a By-law to Amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning
By-law for the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington (Item 4 of the
Planning and Development Committee Report)
15.5 2020-074 - Being a By-law to Appoint a Municipal Clerk and Repeal By-law
2014-043 and By-law 2019-019
15.6 2020-075 - Being a By-law to Amend By-law 2010-139, to Require the Approval
of Plans and Drawings Prior to Any Development on the Lands Identified as
302 Given Road, in the Site Plan Control Area (Item 2 of the Planning and
Development Committee Report)
Resolution # C-455-20
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That leave be granted to introduce By-laws 2020-70 to 2020-75; and
That the said by-laws be approved.
Carried
16. Procedural Notices of Motion
None
17. Other Business
None
18. Confirming By-Law
Resolution # C-456-20
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Councillor Anderson
That leave be granted to introduce By-law 2020-076, being a by-law to confirm the
proceedings of the Council of the Municipality of Clarington at a regular meeting
held on the 2nd – 3rd day of November, 2020; and
That the said by-law be approved.
Carried
Page 21
November 2-3, 2020
Council Minutes
16
19. Adjournment
Resolution # C-457-20
Moved by Councillor Anderson
Seconded by Councillor Neal
That the meeting adjourn at 12:26 a.m.
Carried
Mayor Municipal Clerk
Page 22
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE
RESOLUTION #_________________
DATE November 9, 2020
MOVED BY Councillor Janice Jones
SECONDED BY Councillor Joe Neal
BE IT RESOLVED that
1. Receive the delegation with Thanks
2. Staff report back at the General Government Committee
Meeting on decreasing the speed limit to 40km/h on all Clarington
Neighbourhood Collector B roads
3. That all interested parties be notified including the Clarington Active
Transportation Safe Roads Committee
Page 23
Page 24
This Petition is Addressed to: The Clerk & Mayor & Council of the Municipality of Clarington.
Please add this Petition to the Clarington Council Meeting agenda for of November 2 3,2020 .
I,
(print name)
hereby petition Clarington Council to:
•Amend Resolution# C-418-20 removing any reference to Clarington Council request to expand the Greenbelt to
include my property, and the 2,000 acres described in Resolution# C-418-20.
•Recall any letter(s) or communications Mayor Foster sent to Minister of Municipal Affairs requesting a review of
the lands located south of Highway 2 between Hwy 418 and Maple Grove Road for consideration to be included
within the Greenbelt.
I am one of more than 200 individuals who collectively own property within the 2,000 acres of land described in
Resolution # C-418-20.
Clarington Council has petitioned the Province of Ontario to expand the boundaries of the Greenbelt to beyond the 81%
with the objective to include an additional 2,000 acres -described above.
Clarington Council did not notify or consult me prior to petitioning the Province on this matter.
Clarington Council acted contrary to Clarington Corporate Policy Fll -Transparency and Accountability.
Policy Fll states: The purpose of this Policy is to detail the guiding principles for Municipal service delivery with
Section 270 of the Municipal Act.
Corporate Policy Fll states: "Transparency includes the principle that the Muni cipality of Clarington actively encourages
and fosters stakeholder participation, clarity and openness in the decision-making processes."
Clarington Council failed to act according to Corporate policy Fll. Expanding the Greenbelt to include an additional
2,000 acres of future Urban and Employment Lands is a very important matter. Important matters such as these
require stakeholder participation in the decision-making process.
Clarington Council provided no notification and no opportunity for myself and the 200+ other stakeholders directly
affected by the decision to invite the Province of Ontario to expand the Greenbelt onto their property.
The purpose of the Greenbelt Act is to protect "prime agricultural lands" from expansion of urban lands.
In June 2018, the Municipality of Clarington received Provincial approval of the Clarington Official Plan. Within that
Official Plan the 2,000 acres in question are designated "Rural", "Environmental Protection" and "Hamlet". None of the
2,000 acres in question a re designated "Prime Agricultural Area".
I respectfully request Claringto
Resolution C #418-20
cil consider this Petition. Do the right thing and act accordingly. Reconsider
(date) Contact information (optional)
Page 25
STOP Fence Building at the end of
Longworth BLVD E, preventing public
access to nature !
We are asking you to sign this petition to stop the building of the fence
at the east end of Longworth Blvd. This fence will prevent public
access to the natural area beyond the fence including access to Soper
Creek. This access allows people to walk their dogs, hike, fish, and
explore nature. Families use this area to help their children develop a
relationship with nature. There is no good reason for this fence to be
built. It is being built using tax payers money to prevent taxpayers
from accessing the area. Especially during the pandemic when
having access to fresh air and natural areas is so important we ask
that you support this important endeavour.
Page 26
MEMO
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the
Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
As requested by Council during the General Government Committee meeting
November 9, 2020, this memo provides additional information to report PWD-
003-20 regarding the road closure proposal for the Right-of-Way (ROW) located
within the Found Farm property, just west of Prestonvale Rd and south of Bloor
Street in Courtice.
Currently the adjacent property owners are: to the north, Municipality of
Clarington (existing pond); to the east and west Tribute Prestonvale Limited;
and to the south, Municipality of Clarington where the unopened ROW
continues. See Attachment 1 for ownership and context.
The ROW is located within the area of the Southwest Courtice Secondary Plan
which is currently underway. Attachment 2 depicts the latest preferred Land Use
Plan which shows a conceptual neighbourhood layout plan for the roads, parks,
greenspace etc. The red line indicates the approximate location of the ROW .
The majority of the ROW is currently within the future greenspace where trails
will be appropriately accounted for. Approximately one third of the ROW is
within developable land. Through the process of the Secondary Plan,
appropriate land uses and layout will be determined including trail locations and
connectivity. As part of the subdivision requirement, greenspace lands will be
transferred to the Municipality as appropriate.
If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me.
Regards,
Steve Brake
Director of Public Works
SB/KR/FL/kb
To: Mayor and Members of Council
From: Steve Brake, Director of Public Works
Date: November 16, 2020
Subject: Found Farm Road Closure – Additional Information
File: RC.D.01.34
Page 27
MEMO
cc: Andy Allison, CAO
Faye Langmaid, (A) Director of Planning and Development
Rob Maciver, Director of Legislative Services
June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk
Page 28
Attachment 1
Page 29
0 1 km
LEGEND
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Utility
Parkland
Stormwater Managment Facilities
Environmental Protection Area
Cemetery
Overlay Features
Special Study Area
Green Spaces
Preferred School Site
Land Use Designations
High Density Residential
Neighbourhood Commercial
BLOOR STREET
SOUTHGATE DRIVE PRESTONVALE ROADTOWNLINE ROADFENNING DRIVEGRANDVIEW DRIVE
DOWN CRESCENT
GORD VINSON DRIVE
SOUTHFIELD AVE
BASELINE ROAD WEST
FENNING DRIVE EXTENSION
HIGH
W
AY 401
CN RAIL
C P R A I L
S
OUT
HP
OR
T
DRI
VE ROBINSON CREEKR
OB
I
NS
ON
C
R
E
E
K
DOWN CRESCENT
TOWNLINE ROAD EXTENSION
August 2020 DraftBayview (Southwest Courtice) Secondary Plan
0 1 km
LEGEND
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Utility
Parkland
Stormwater Managment Facilities
Environmental Protection Area
Cemetery
Overlay Features
Special Study Area
Green Spaces
Preferred School Site
Land Use Designations
High Density Residential
Neighbourhood Commercial
BLOOR STREET
SOUTHGATE DRIVE PRESTONVALE ROADTOWNLINE ROADFENNING DRIVEGRANDVIEW DRIVEDOWN CRESCENT GORD VINSON DRIVE
SOUTHFIELD AVE
BASELINE ROAD WEST
FENNING DRIVE EXTENSION
HIGH
W
AY 401
CN RAIL
C P R A I L
S
OUT
HP
ORT
DRI
VE ROBINSON CREEKR
OB
I
NS
ON
C
R
E
E
K
DOWN CRESCENT
TOWNLINE ROAD EXTENSION
Schedule A - Land Use 0 500m
Approximate location
of Right-Of-Way
Attachment 2
Page 30
Healthy watersheds for today and tomorrow.
Member of Conservation Ontario
WHEREAS the Province has introduced Bill 229, Protect, Support and Recover from COVID 19 Act - Schedule 6
– Conservation Authorities Act
WHEREAS the Legislation introduces a number of changes and new sections that could remove and/or
significantly hinder the conservation authorities’ role in regulating development, permit appeal process and
engaging in review and appeal of planning applications
WHEREAS we rely on the watershed expertise provided by local conservation authorities to protect residents,
property and local natural resources on a watershed basis by regulating development and engaging in reviews of
applications submitted under the Planning Act
WHEREAS the changes allow the Minister to make decisions without CA watershed data and expertise
WHEREAS the Legislation suggests that the Minister will have the ability to establish standards and requirements
for non-mandatory programs which are negotiated between the conservation authorities and municipalities to meet
local watershed needs
WHEREAS the changes to the ‘Duty of Members’ contradicts the fiduciary duty of a CA board member to represent
the best interests of the conservation authority and its responsibility to the watershed
WHEREAS conservation authorities have already been working with the Province, development sector and
municipalities to streamline and speed up permitting and planning approvals through Conservation Ontario’s
Client Service and Streamlining Initiative
WHEREAS changes to the legislation will create more red tape and costs for the conservation authorities, and their
municipal partners, and potentially result in delays in the development approval process
AND WHEREAS municipalities value and rely on the natural habitats and water resources within our jurisdiction
for the health and well-being of residents; municipalities value the conservation authorities’ work to prevent and
manage the impacts of flooding and other natural hazards; and municipalities value the conservation authority’s
work to ensure safe drinking water
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED
THAT CLOCA’s Board of Directors request that the Government of Ontario remove Schedule 6 from Bill 229.
AND FURTHER THAT the Boards resolution and a copy of this report be forwarded to the Premier, Minister of Environment,
Conservation and Parks, the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the
Minister of Finance, MPPs in our jurisdiction, and CLOCA’s partner municipalities.
Page 31
Central Lake Ontario Conservation
Distribution list:
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
MEMO
The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON L1C 3A6
1-800-563-1195 | Local: 905-623-3379 | info@clarington.net | www.clarington.net
Page | 1
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the
Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
To: Mayor and Council
From: Trevor Pinn, CPA, CA – Director of Financial Services/Treasurer
Date: November 19, 2020
File No:
Re: ONE JIB Investment Returns
At General Government Committee on November 9, 2020, Committee asked for the
investment returns of ONE JIB, JIB stands for Joint Investment Board. The ONE JIB is
the joint municipal services board that was established by six municipalities in Ontario
under the regulations for municipal investment using prudent investor standards. The
ONE JIB started investing in July 2020 and have public agendas, minutes and videos of
their meetings at https://www.oneinvestment.ca/onejointinvestmentboard/meetings
Attachment #1, is the Quarterly Performance Reporting which is publicly available on
the ONE JIB website. This 96 page report provides individual performance reporting for
each of the six municipalities. The returns on each of the funds is the same for each
investor; however, overall each municipality will have a slight difference because they
have a different investment mix.
ONE JIB invests in six different portfolios:
Fund Return since July 2, 2020
ONE Canadian Equity Fund 5.4%
ONE Global Equity Fund 3.4%
ONE Canadian Corporate Bond Fund 0.7%
Page 35
(Insert Reference Number if applicable)
The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON L1C 3A6
1-800-563-1195 | Local: 905-623-3379 | info@clarington.net | www.clarington.net
Page | 2
Fund Return since July 2, 2020
ONE Canadian Government Bond Fund 0.7%
ONE Global Bond Fund 1.8%
The returns in this report are for the quarter (not annualized) July to September. I would
highlight that the Canadian Equity Fund had a 5.4 per cent return, the Global Equity
Fund had a 3.4 per cent return in the quarter, while five-year GICs I can get are
approximately 1.5 per cent annual return and one-year is 0.85 per cent return.
The Performance By Outcome provides the return based on the investing strategy of
the individual municipalities. Each outcome has a different mix of the investment
portfolios, there is a higher mix of equity in the longer-term outcomes and a lower
amount of equity in shorter term outcomes. These outcomes are determined by each
municipality based on their financial needs.
If there are any additional questions, please let me know.
Trevor Pinn, CPA, CA
Director of Financial Services/Treasurer
Financial Services
cc: Department Heads
Page 36
1
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Report:
ONE Joint Investment Board
Keith Taylor, Chief Investment Officer
November 18, 2020
Quarterly Performance Reporting
20-034
1.RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that the Board:
1)Receive the report for information.
2.SUMMARY
ONE Investment has distributed quarterly reporting packages to the founding
municipalities, using the template approved by ONE JIB (see Report 20-028 Overview of
Prudent Investor Quarterly Client Reporting Package). These reporting packages can be
found in the appendices to this report.
3.BACKGROUND
The quarterly reporting package provides comprehensive information for founding
municipalities
The reporting package is generated from ONE Investment’s portfolio management system and is
intended to provide relevant investment reporting details to founding municipalities in the
Prudent Investment Program. The presentation of investment results is provided on several
different bases:
(1)On a consolidated basis that covers all MNRI invested in the Prudent
Investment Program;
(2)On a fund by fund basis so the returns of the individual investment products
can be reviewed; and,
(3)On an Outcome basis, which is reflective of how the investments of each
municipality were allocated based on ONE JIB’s Revised Outcomes
Framework.
4.ANALYSIS
There are seven quarterly reporting packages for the six founding municipalities
Attached in Appendices 1 to 7 to this report are the seven investment reporting packages for the
REPORT
Page 37
six founding municipalities. Not included are the reporting package are portions of the
appendices, which consist of static information such as a summary of the ONE JIB Revised
Outcomes Framework, and a glossary section. The City of Kenora’s report is separated into two
reports—the Kenora Citizens’ Prosperity Trust Fund (CPTF) and the “General” account. Kenora
has requested a separate performance reports segregating the Citizens’ Prosperity Trust funds
from the general investment portfolio. The CTPF is a segregated pool of monies within the City’s
portfolio of Investments. Kenora’s remaining accounts are reflected in the reporting package for
the ‘General’ account. The separation of the two accounts for Kenora is consistent with how the
investment returns are presented to City Council.
These reporting packages were released to the founding municipalities on 13/11/20.
Unfortunately, the quarterly return columns in the reports did not properly populate as the
investments started on July 2, 2020 and do not represent a full quarter. This is a limitation of
the performance reporting system. This will not be an issue in the future. The ‘inception’ date
columns reflect the performance in the funds for the first quarter of operation.
The reporting packages also include ‘in-kind’ securities that ONE JIB is holding to
maturity for three founding municipalities
Appendices 8 to 10 provide quarter end details of ‘in-kind’ securities of Kenora, Whitby and
Muskoka. The municipalities have identified these securities as MNRI and have directed ONE JIB
to hold them until maturity.
5.CONCLUSION
ONE Investment has distributed investment performance reports to allow staff and council of the
founding municipalities evaluate the performance of MNRI invested under the ONE JIB. These
reports will be distributed to clients on a quarterly basis.
Drafted by: Keith Taylor, Chief Investment Officer
Approved for submission by: Judy Dezell and Donna Herridge - Co-Presidents/CEO
Page 38
QUARTERLY
INVESTMENT
REPORT
Bracebridge Prudent Investor Portfolio
1000 Taylor Court
Bracebridge, ON
P1L 1R6
ONE Investment
200 University Ave, Suite 801
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 3C6
Relationship Manager
Wardah Mir, Client Service Representative
416-971-9856 x 351
wmir@oneinvestment.ca
Paul Judson
(705) 645-5264
pjudson@bracebridge.ca
For The Period Ended September 30, 2020
Director of Finance/Treasurer
Appendix 1
Page 39
Bracebridge Prudent Investor Portfolio
Executive Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
Year to date 3 Years
Since
InceptionQuarter5 Years1 Year 2 Years
Inception
Date
------3.2%07/02/2020Consolidated Portfolio Returns
Starting
IncomePortfolio
Change in
Contribution Withdrawals
Ending
Time-Weighted Rate of Return in CAD for Consolidated Holdings
Consolidated Portfolio Activity for Quarter
Overall Asset Allocation
Balance Market Value Balance
272,487.50CAN Bond Fund --820.63 274,398.081,089.95
1,138,087.50CAN Equity Fund --62,342.84 1,200,430.34-
272,487.50Corp Bond Fund --904.09 274,481.541,089.95
1,271,608.40GLB Bond Fund --16,971.05 1,294,619.596,040.14
2,655,537.60GLB Equity Fund --91,258.08 2,746,795.68-
-PI-HISA ---54.9054.90
5,610,208.50Total 0.000.00 172,296.69 5,790,780.138,274.94
2
Page 40
Bracebridge Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History At
September 30, 2020
Year to
5 YearsQuarter1 Year 2 Years
Since
Performance by Fund
Date 3 Years Inception
Inception
Date4 Years
% Annualized Returns
-One High Interest Savings Account ------0.0 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Equity Fund ------5.4 07/02/2020
-ONE Global Equity Fund ------3.4 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ------0.7 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Government Bond Fund ------0.7 07/02/2020
-ONE Global Bond Fund ------1.8 07/02/2020
Year to
5 YearsQuarter1 Year 2 Years
Since
Performance by Outcome
Date 3 Years Inception
Inception
Date4 Years
% Annualized Returns
-Contingency Outcome ------3.0 07/02/2020
-Target Date 10+ Year Outcome ------3.4 07/02/2020
-Cash Outcome ------0.0 07/02/2020
3
Page 41
Manager Commentary - Equity
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
QUARTERLY REVIEW
The market’s Q2 enthusiasm continued in the third quarter. However more investors recognized that valuations have
come a long way from the lows of March, leading to more modest gains in Q3. The rally in the market is less about
optimism on the economy and is more reflective of massive fiscal and monetary stimulus injected by governments around
the world, providing a positive foundation for markets.
However, market uncertainty remains: spiking coronavirus infections coupled with new restrictions in some countries, as
well as the magnitude of damage already done to the economy, continue to weigh on company fundamentals. While the
world may have entered a deep recession, the impact on corporate profits have been blunted by government’s and central
bank’s quick response in providing fiscal and monetary stimulus. Now, investors are weighing the possibility that the
economic downturn could be more punishing and long-lasting as additional stimulus remains uncertain and governments
may have to intensify restrictions on business in order to halt the spread of the pandemic.
The ONE Canadian Equity Fund returned 5.4% in the quarter, while the ONE Global Equity Fund returned 3.4% in
Canadian dollar terms. The lower performance of global equities reflects timing issues related to the transition of the
funds being deployed into global mandates. The industrial sector outperformed, gaining almost 14% in the quarter while
the energy sector had sharply negative performance in the quarter. This contributed to the performance of both the ONE
Canadian Equity Fund and the ONE Global Equity Fund which had overweight allocations to industrials and significant
underweight exposure to the energy sector. The low exposure to the energy sector reflects the investment manager’s
style which places emphasis on higher quality, sustainable business versus firms whose financial prospects are driven
primarily by gyrations in commodity prices. The Global Equity Fund’s positioning includes a significant underweight to the
Asia Pacific and Japanese equities with an overweight to European equities. European holdings have no exposure to the
still struggling European banks.
4
Page 42
Manager Commentary - Fixed Income
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
QUARTERLY REVIEW
The key theme influencing capital markets in the quarter was the massive "wall of money" supplied by global central
banks, which placed downward pressure on credit spreads. Despite volatility in capital markets remaining elevated, the
strong technical backdrop offset outstanding risks such as concerns of a second surge of virus infections, commodity price
weakness, global trade tensions, the upcoming U.S. presidential election, and tight valuation levels.
The Canadian fixed income market generated positive returns in the third quarter supported by a modest tightening of
credit spreads, with corporate bonds outperforming federal and provincial bonds. Both Canadian fixed income funds
generated positive returns of approximately 0.7% in the quarter. Within corporate bonds, BBBs outperformed the higher
quality A and AA segments of the Canadian fixed income market. The Canadian bond holdings are focused on the higher
credit quality segments of the market and hence did not benefit from this trend.
The ONE Global Bond Fund, which represents about 70% of the fixed income investments within the ONE JIB Outcomes,
performed better than Canadian fixed income exposure, with returns of 1.8% in the quarter. Performance in the quarter
was primarily driven by overweight exposures to high-yield corporate and convertible bonds, combined with underweight
exposures to U.S. Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities. Currency management slightly contributed as
gains from an underweight exposure to the U.S. dollar were partially offset by an underweight exposure to the euro.
Duration positioning (interest rate sensitivity) had a relatively neutral impact on performance.
Global bond holdings include emerging market and high yield debt, which tend to have a higher risk profile. The ONE
Global Bond Fund has avoided exposure to the more speculative segments of the high yield bond market which may be
more vulnerable to an extended economic slowdown but it remains positioned to benefit from further credit spread
tightening. Positioning also remains selective in emerging markets and remains cautious about the further spread of
COVID-19 in countries that lack infrastructure and the ability to treat a widespread viral outbreak.
5
Page 43
QuantitySecurity Price % WeightUnit Cost Book Value
Bracebridge Prudent Investor Portfolio
As of September 30, 2020
Market Value
Consolidated Portfolio Holdings in CAD
PI-HISA 1.00 1.00 0.00%54.900 54.9054.90
CAN Equity Fund 1,000.00 1,054.77 20.73%1,138.087 1,200,430.341,138,087.50
GLB Equity Fund 1,000.00 1,034.36 47.43%2,655.537 2,746,795.682,655,537.60
Corp Bond Fund 1,000.01 1,003.31 4.74%273.573 274,481.54273,577.45
CAN Bond Fund 1,000.01 1,003.01 4.74%273.573 274,398.08273,577.45
GLB Bond Fund 1,000.06 1,013.34 22.36%1,277.569 1,294,619.591,277,648.54
100.00%5,790,780.13
6
Page 44
Bracebridge Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Bracebridge - Contingency Outcome
Account Number: 570050021
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
Corp Bond Fund 166.27 1,000.01 166,274.95 1,003.31 166,824.39 5.8%549.44 662.45
CAN Equity Fund 496.83 1,000.00 496,837.50 1,054.77 524,053.56 18.4%27,216.06 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 166.27 1,000.01 166,274.95 1,003.01 166,773.66 5.8%498.71 662.45
GLB Bond Fund 776.48 1,000.06 776,529.48 1,013.34 786,844.17 27.6%10,314.69 3,671.08
GLB Equity Fund 1,159.28 1,000.00 1,159,287.60 1,034.36 1,199,126.75 42.1%39,839.15 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------3.0 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
2,765,204.48 2,843,622.53 100.0%78,418.05 4,995.98
Bracebridge Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
7
Page 45
Bracebridge Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Bracebridge - Target Date 10 Year Plus Outcome
Account Number: 570050039
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
Corp Bond Fund 107.30 1,000.01 107,302.50 1,003.31 107,657.15 3.6%354.65 427.50
CAN Equity Fund 641.25 1,000.00 641,250.00 1,054.77 676,376.78 22.9%35,126.78 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 107.30 1,000.01 107,302.50 1,003.01 107,624.42 3.6%321.92 427.50
GLB Bond Fund 501.08 1,000.06 501,119.06 1,013.34 507,775.42 17.2%6,656.36 2,369.06
GLB Equity Fund 1,496.25 1,000.00 1,496,250.00 1,034.36 1,547,668.93 52.5%51,418.93 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------3.4 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
2,853,224.06 2,947,102.70 100.0%93,878.64 3,224.06
Bracebridge Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
8
Page 46
Bracebridge Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Bracebridge - Cash Outcome
Account Number: 9021979612
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
PI-HISA 54.90 1.00 54.90 1.00 54.90 100.0%0.00 54.90
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------0.0 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
54.90 54.90 100.0%0.00 54.90
Bracebridge Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
9
Page 47
Bracebridge Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Bracebridge - Contingency Outcome
Account Number: 570050021
165.61 165,613.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
165.61 165,613.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
772.85 772,858.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
496.83 496,838.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
1,159.28 1,159,288.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
0.66 662.4509/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
0.66 662.4509/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
3.62 3,671.0809/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
10
Page 48
Bracebridge Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Bracebridge - Target Date 10 Year Plus Outcome
Account Number: 570050039
106.87 106,875.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
106.87 106,875.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
498.75 498,750.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
641.25 641,250.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
1,496.25 1,496,250.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
0.42 427.5009/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
0.42 427.5009/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
2.33 2,369.0609/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
11
Page 49
Bracebridge Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Bracebridge - Cash Outcome
Account Number: 9021979612
54.86 54.8608/06/2020 08/06/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
0.04 0.0409/03/2020 09/03/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
12
Page 50
Bracebridge Prudent Investor Portfolio
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
September 30, 2020
With respect to the quarter ended September 30, 2020 to the best of the knowledge and belief of ONE Investment, all assets of the
Participating Municipality under the management and control of ONE JIB pursuant to the ONE JIB Agreement have been invested and are held
In accordance with the terms of section 8.02 of the ONEJIB Agreement dated as of July 2, 2020 (the “ONE JIB Agreement”) ONE Investment
confirms as follows:
in accordance with the terms of the ONE JIB Agreement, and in a manner consistent with the IPS and the Investment Plan of the Participating
Municipality.
Keith Taylor, Chief Investment Officer, ONE Investment
On the behalf of the ONE Joint Investment Board
13
Page 51
QUARTERLY
INVESTMENT
REPORT
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
37 Main St. East
Huntsville, ON
P1H 1A1
ONE Investment
200 University Ave, Suite 801
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 3C6
Relationship Manager
Wardah Mir, Client Service Representative
416-971-9856 x 351
wmir@oneinvestment.ca
Julia McKenzie
(705) 789-1751 x2251
julia.mckenzie@huntsville.ca
For The Period Ended September 30, 2020
Manager of Finance/Treasurer
Appendix 2
Page 52
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
Executive Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
Year to date 3 Years
Since
InceptionQuarter5 Years1 Year 2 Years
Inception
Date
------1.9%07/02/2020Consolidated Portfolio Returns
Starting
IncomePortfolio
Change in
Contribution Withdrawals
Ending
Time-Weighted Rate of Return in CAD for Consolidated Holdings
Consolidated Portfolio Activity for Quarter
Overall Asset Allocation
Balance Market Value Balance
427,500.00CAN Bond Fund --1,288.66 430,498.661,710.00
825,000.00CAN Equity Fund --45,192.35 870,192.35-
427,500.00Corp Bond Fund --1,419.62 430,629.621,710.00
1,995,000.00GLB Bond Fund --26,624.41 2,031,100.669,476.25
1,925,000.00GLB Equity Fund --66,153.01 1,991,153.01-
2,401,258.51PI-HISA ---2,405,014.233,755.72
8,001,258.51Total 0.000.00 140,678.05 8,158,588.5316,651.97
2
Page 53
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History At
September 30, 2020
Year to
5 YearsQuarter1 Year 2 Years
Since
Performance by Fund
Date 3 Years Inception
Inception
Date4 Years
% Annualized Returns
-One High Interest Savings Account ------0.1 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Equity Fund ------5.4 07/02/2020
-ONE Global Equity Fund ------3.4 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ------0.7 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Government Bond Fund ------0.7 07/02/2020
-ONE Global Bond Fund ------1.8 07/02/2020
Year to
5 YearsQuarter1 Year 2 Years
Since
Performance by Outcome
Date 3 Years Inception
Inception
Date4 Years
% Annualized Returns
-Contingency Outcome ------3.0 07/02/2020
-Target Date 3-5 Year Outcome ------1.4 07/02/2020
-Target Date 10+ Year Outcome ------3.4 07/02/2020
-Cash Outcome ------0.1 07/02/2020
3
Page 54
Manager Commentary - Equity
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
QUARTERLY REVIEW
The market’s Q2 enthusiasm continued in the third quarter. However more investors recognized that valuations have
come a long way from the lows of March, leading to more modest gains in Q3. The rally in the market is less about
optimism on the economy and is more reflective of massive fiscal and monetary stimulus injected by governments around
the world, providing a positive foundation for markets.
However, market uncertainty remains: spiking coronavirus infections coupled with new restrictions in some countries, as
well as the magnitude of damage already done to the economy, continue to weigh on company fundamentals. While the
world may have entered a deep recession, the impact on corporate profits have been blunted by government’s and central
bank’s quick response in providing fiscal and monetary stimulus. Now, investors are weighing the possibility that the
economic downturn could be more punishing and long-lasting as additional stimulus remains uncertain and governments
may have to intensify restrictions on business in order to halt the spread of the pandemic.
The ONE Canadian Equity Fund returned 5.4% in the quarter, while the ONE Global Equity Fund returned 3.4% in
Canadian dollar terms. The lower performance of global equities reflects timing issues related to the transition of the
funds being deployed into global mandates. The industrial sector outperformed, gaining almost 14% in the quarter while
the energy sector had sharply negative performance in the quarter. This contributed to the performance of both the ONE
Canadian Equity Fund and the ONE Global Equity Fund which had overweight allocations to industrials and significant
underweight exposure to the energy sector. The low exposure to the energy sector reflects the investment manager’s
style which places emphasis on higher quality, sustainable business versus firms whose financial prospects are driven
primarily by gyrations in commodity prices. The Global Equity Fund’s positioning includes a significant underweight to the
Asia Pacific and Japanese equities with an overweight to European equities. European holdings have no exposure to the
still struggling European banks.
4
Page 55
Manager Commentary - Fixed Income
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
QUARTERLY REVIEW
The key theme influencing capital markets in the quarter was the massive "wall of money" supplied by global central
banks, which placed downward pressure on credit spreads. Despite volatility in capital markets remaining elevated, the
strong technical backdrop offset outstanding risks such as concerns of a second surge of virus infections, commodity price
weakness, global trade tensions, the upcoming U.S. presidential election, and tight valuation levels.
The Canadian fixed income market generated positive returns in the third quarter supported by a modest tightening of
credit spreads, with corporate bonds outperforming federal and provincial bonds. Both Canadian fixed income funds
generated positive returns of approximately 0.7% in the quarter. Within corporate bonds, BBBs outperformed the higher
quality A and AA segments of the Canadian fixed income market. The Canadian bond holdings are focused on the higher
credit quality segments of the market and hence did not benefit from this trend.
The ONE Global Bond Fund, which represents about 70% of the fixed income investments within the ONE JIB Outcomes,
performed better than Canadian fixed income exposure, with returns of 1.8% in the quarter. Performance in the quarter
was primarily driven by overweight exposures to high-yield corporate and convertible bonds, combined with underweight
exposures to U.S. Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities. Currency management slightly contributed as
gains from an underweight exposure to the U.S. dollar were partially offset by an underweight exposure to the euro.
Duration positioning (interest rate sensitivity) had a relatively neutral impact on performance.
Global bond holdings include emerging market and high yield debt, which tend to have a higher risk profile. The ONE
Global Bond Fund has avoided exposure to the more speculative segments of the high yield bond market which may be
more vulnerable to an extended economic slowdown but it remains positioned to benefit from further credit spread
tightening. Positioning also remains selective in emerging markets and remains cautious about the further spread of
COVID-19 in countries that lack infrastructure and the ability to treat a widespread viral outbreak.
5
Page 56
QuantitySecurity Price % WeightUnit Cost Book Value
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
As of September 30, 2020
Market Value
Consolidated Portfolio Holdings in CAD
PI-HISA 1.00 1.00 29.48%2,405,014.230 2,405,014.232,405,014.23
CAN Equity Fund 1,000.00 1,054.77 10.67%825.000 870,192.35825,000.00
GLB Equity Fund 1,000.00 1,034.36 24.41%1,925.000 1,991,153.011,925,000.00
Corp Bond Fund 1,000.01 1,003.31 5.28%429.205 430,629.62429,210.00
CAN Bond Fund 1,000.01 1,003.01 5.28%429.205 430,498.66429,210.00
GLB Bond Fund 1,000.06 1,013.34 24.90%2,004.351 2,031,100.662,004,476.25
100.00%8,158,588.53
6
Page 57
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Huntsville - Contingency Outcome
Account Number: 570050047
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
Corp Bond Fund 180.71 1,000.01 180,720.00 1,003.31 181,317.84 5.8%597.84 720.00
CAN Equity Fund 540.00 1,000.00 540,000.00 1,054.77 569,580.44 18.4%29,580.44 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 180.71 1,000.01 180,720.00 1,003.01 181,262.70 5.8%542.70 720.00
GLB Bond Fund 843.93 1,000.06 843,990.00 1,013.34 855,200.01 27.6%11,210.01 3,990.00
GLB Equity Fund 1,260.00 1,000.00 1,260,000.00 1,034.36 1,303,300.15 42.1%43,300.15 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------3.0 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
3,005,430.00 3,090,661.14 100.0%85,231.14 5,430.00
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
7
Page 58
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Huntsville - Target Date 3 to 5 Year Outcome
Account Number: 570050054
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
PI-HISA 400,625.55 1.00 400,625.55 1.00 400,625.55 19.7%0.00 625.55
Corp Bond Fund 210.83 1,000.01 210,840.00 1,003.31 211,536.81 10.4%696.81 840.00
CAN Equity Fund 60.00 1,000.00 60,000.00 1,054.77 63,286.72 3.1%3,286.72 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 210.83 1,000.01 210,840.00 1,003.01 211,472.48 10.4%632.48 840.00
GLB Bond Fund 984.59 1,000.06 984,655.00 1,013.34 997,734.19 49.1%13,079.19 4,655.00
GLB Equity Fund 140.00 1,000.00 140,000.00 1,034.36 144,811.13 7.1%4,811.13 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------1.4 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
2,006,960.55 2,029,466.88 100.0%22,506.33 6,960.55
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
8
Page 59
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Huntsville - Target Date 10 Year Plus Outcome
Account Number: 570050062
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
Corp Bond Fund 37.65 1,000.00 37,650.00 1,003.31 37,774.97 3.6%124.97 150.00
CAN Equity Fund 225.00 1,000.00 225,000.00 1,054.77 237,325.19 22.9%12,325.19 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 37.65 1,000.00 37,650.00 1,003.01 37,763.48 3.6%113.48 150.00
GLB Bond Fund 175.82 1,000.06 175,831.25 1,013.34 178,166.46 17.2%2,335.21 831.25
GLB Equity Fund 525.00 1,000.00 525,000.00 1,034.36 543,041.73 52.5%18,041.73 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------3.4 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
1,001,131.25 1,034,071.83 100.0%32,940.58 1,131.25
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
9
Page 60
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Huntsville - Cash Outcome
Account Number: 9021979515
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
PI-HISA 2,004,388.68 1.00 2,004,388.68 1.00 2,004,388.68 100.0%0.00 3,130.17
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------0.1 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
2,004,388.68 2,004,388.68 100.0%0.00 3,130.17
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
10
Page 61
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Huntsville - Contingency Outcome
Account Number: 570050047
180.00 180,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
180.00 180,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
840.00 840,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
540.00 540,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
1,260.00 1,260,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
0.71 720.0009/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
0.71 720.0009/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
3.93 3,990.0009/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
11
Page 62
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Huntsville - Target Date 3 to 5 Year Outcome
Account Number: 570050054
210.00 210,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
210.00 210,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
980.00 980,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
60.00 60,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
140.00 140,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
0.83 840.0009/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
0.83 840.0009/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
4.59 4,655.0009/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
314.57 314.5708/06/2020 08/06/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
310.98 310.9809/03/2020 09/03/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
400,000.00 400,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020Transfer In PI-HISA
12
Page 63
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Huntsville - Target Date 10 Year Plus Outcome
Account Number: 570050062
37.50 37,500.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
37.50 37,500.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
175.00 175,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
225.00 225,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
525.00 525,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
0.15 150.0009/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
0.15 150.0009/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
0.82 831.2509/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
13
Page 64
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Huntsville - Cash Outcome
Account Number: 9021979515
1,573.85 1,573.8508/06/2020 08/06/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
1,556.32 1,556.3209/03/2020 09/03/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
2,001,258.51 2,001,258.5107/02/2020 07/02/2020Transfer In PI-HISA
14
Page 65
Huntsville Prudent Investor Portfolio
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
September 30, 2020
With respect to the quarter ended September 30, 2020 to the best of the knowledge and belief of ONE Investment, all assets of the
Participating Municipality under the management and control of ONE JIB pursuant to the ONE JIB Agreement have been invested and are held
In accordance with the terms of section 8.02 of the ONEJIB Agreement dated as of July 2, 2020 (the “ONE JIB Agreement”) ONE Investment
confirms as follows:
in accordance with the terms of the ONE JIB Agreement, and in a manner consistent with the IPS and the Investment Plan of the Participating
Municipality.
Keith Taylor, Chief Investment Officer, ONE Investment
On the behalf of the ONE Joint Investment Board
15
Page 66
QUARTERLY
INVESTMENT
REPORT
Innisfil Prudent Investor Portfolio
2101 Innisfil Beach Rd.
Innisfil, ON
L9S 1A1
ONE Investment
200 University Ave, Suite 801
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 3C6
Relationship Manager
Wardah Mir, Client Service Representative
416-971-9856 x 351
wmir@oneinvestment.ca
Audrey Webb
(705) 436-3740 x2302
awebb@innisfil.ca
For The Period Ended September 30, 2020
Treasurer
Appendix 3
Page 67
Innisfil Prudent Investor Portfolio
Executive Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
Year to date 3 Years
Since
InceptionQuarter5 Years1 Year 2 Years
Inception
Date
------3.0%07/02/2020Consolidated Portfolio Returns
Starting
IncomePortfolio
Change in
Contribution Withdrawals
Ending
Time-Weighted Rate of Return in CAD for Consolidated Holdings
Consolidated Portfolio Activity for Quarter
Overall Asset Allocation
Balance Market Value Balance
900,330.60CAN Bond Fund --2,713.19 906,645.113,601.32
2,700,992.00CAN Equity Fund --147,956.56 2,848,948.56-
900,330.60Corp Bond Fund --2,987.97 906,919.893,601.32
4,201,543.10GLB Bond Fund --56,072.46 4,277,572.8919,957.33
6,302,314.60GLB Equity Fund --216,580.30 6,518,894.90-
-PI-HISA ---243.35243.35
15,005,510.90Total 0.000.00 426,310.48 15,459,224.7027,403.32
2
Page 68
Innisfil Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History At
September 30, 2020
Year to
5 YearsQuarter1 Year 2 Years
Since
Performance by Fund
Date 3 Years Inception
Inception
Date4 Years
% Annualized Returns
-One High Interest Savings Account ------0.0 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Equity Fund ------5.4 07/02/2020
-ONE Global Equity Fund ------3.4 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ------0.7 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Government Bond Fund ------0.7 07/02/2020
-ONE Global Bond Fund ------1.8 07/02/2020
Year to
5 YearsQuarter1 Year 2 Years
Since
Performance by Outcome
Date 3 Years Inception
Inception
Date4 Years
% Annualized Returns
-Contingency Outcome ------3.0 07/02/2020
-Cash Outcome ------0.0 07/02/2020
3
Page 69
Manager Commentary - Equity
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
QUARTERLY REVIEW
The market’s Q2 enthusiasm continued in the third quarter. However more investors recognized that valuations have
come a long way from the lows of March, leading to more modest gains in Q3. The rally in the market is less about
optimism on the economy and is more reflective of massive fiscal and monetary stimulus injected by governments around
the world, providing a positive foundation for markets.
However, market uncertainty remains: spiking coronavirus infections coupled with new restrictions in some countries, as
well as the magnitude of damage already done to the economy, continue to weigh on company fundamentals. While the
world may have entered a deep recession, the impact on corporate profits have been blunted by government’s and central
bank’s quick response in providing fiscal and monetary stimulus. Now, investors are weighing the possibility that the
economic downturn could be more punishing and long-lasting as additional stimulus remains uncertain and governments
may have to intensify restrictions on business in order to halt the spread of the pandemic.
The ONE Canadian Equity Fund returned 5.4% in the quarter, while the ONE Global Equity Fund returned 3.4% in
Canadian dollar terms. The lower performance of global equities reflects timing issues related to the transition of the
funds being deployed into global mandates. The industrial sector outperformed, gaining almost 14% in the quarter while
the energy sector had sharply negative performance in the quarter. This contributed to the performance of both the ONE
Canadian Equity Fund and the ONE Global Equity Fund which had overweight allocations to industrials and significant
underweight exposure to the energy sector. The low exposure to the energy sector reflects the investment manager’s
style which places emphasis on higher quality, sustainable business versus firms whose financial prospects are driven
primarily by gyrations in commodity prices. The Global Equity Fund’s positioning includes a significant underweight to the
Asia Pacific and Japanese equities with an overweight to European equities. European holdings have no exposure to the
still struggling European banks.
4
Page 70
Manager Commentary - Fixed Income
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
QUARTERLY REVIEW
The key theme influencing capital markets in the quarter was the massive "wall of money" supplied by global central
banks, which placed downward pressure on credit spreads. Despite volatility in capital markets remaining elevated, the
strong technical backdrop offset outstanding risks such as concerns of a second surge of virus infections, commodity price
weakness, global trade tensions, the upcoming U.S. presidential election, and tight valuation levels.
The Canadian fixed income market generated positive returns in the third quarter supported by a modest tightening of
credit spreads, with corporate bonds outperforming federal and provincial bonds. Both Canadian fixed income funds
generated positive returns of approximately 0.7% in the quarter. Within corporate bonds, BBBs outperformed the higher
quality A and AA segments of the Canadian fixed income market. The Canadian bond holdings are focused on the higher
credit quality segments of the market and hence did not benefit from this trend.
The ONE Global Bond Fund, which represents about 70% of the fixed income investments within the ONE JIB Outcomes,
performed better than Canadian fixed income exposure, with returns of 1.8% in the quarter. Performance in the quarter
was primarily driven by overweight exposures to high-yield corporate and convertible bonds, combined with underweight
exposures to U.S. Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities. Currency management slightly contributed as
gains from an underweight exposure to the U.S. dollar were partially offset by an underweight exposure to the euro.
Duration positioning (interest rate sensitivity) had a relatively neutral impact on performance.
Global bond holdings include emerging market and high yield debt, which tend to have a higher risk profile. The ONE
Global Bond Fund has avoided exposure to the more speculative segments of the high yield bond market which may be
more vulnerable to an extended economic slowdown but it remains positioned to benefit from further credit spread
tightening. Positioning also remains selective in emerging markets and remains cautious about the further spread of
COVID-19 in countries that lack infrastructure and the ability to treat a widespread viral outbreak.
5
Page 71
QuantitySecurity Price % WeightUnit Cost Book Value
Innisfil Prudent Investor Portfolio
As of September 30, 2020
Market Value
Consolidated Portfolio Holdings in CAD
PI-HISA 1.00 1.00 0.00%243.350 243.35243.35
CAN Equity Fund 1,000.00 1,054.77 18.43%2,700.992 2,848,948.562,700,992.00
GLB Equity Fund 1,000.00 1,034.36 42.17%6,302.314 6,518,894.906,302,314.60
Corp Bond Fund 1,000.01 1,003.31 5.87%903.919 906,919.89903,931.92
CAN Bond Fund 1,000.01 1,003.01 5.86%903.920 906,645.11903,931.92
GLB Bond Fund 1,000.06 1,013.34 27.67%4,221.237 4,277,572.894,221,500.43
100.00%15,459,224.70
6
Page 72
Innisfil Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Innisfil - Contingency Outcome
Account Number: 570050070
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
Corp Bond Fund 903.91 1,000.01 903,931.92 1,003.31 906,919.89 5.8%2,987.97 3,601.32
CAN Equity Fund 2,700.99 1,000.00 2,700,992.00 1,054.77 2,848,948.56 18.4%147,956.56 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 903.92 1,000.01 903,931.92 1,003.01 906,645.11 5.8%2,713.19 3,601.32
GLB Bond Fund 4,221.23 1,000.06 4,221,500.43 1,013.34 4,277,572.89 27.6%56,072.46 19,957.33
GLB Equity Fund 6,302.31 1,000.00 6,302,314.60 1,034.36 6,518,894.90 42.1%216,580.30 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------3.0 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
15,032,670.87 15,458,981.35 100.0%426,310.48 27,159.97
Innisfil Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
7
Page 73
Innisfil Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Innisfil - Cash Outcome
Account Number: 9021979418
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
PI-HISA 243.35 1.00 243.35 1.00 243.35 100.0%0.00 243.35
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------0.0 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
243.35 243.35 100.0%0.00 243.35
Innisfil Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
8
Page 74
Innisfil Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Innisfil - Contingency Outcome
Account Number: 570050070
900.33 900,331.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
900.33 900,331.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
4,201.54 4,201,543.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
2,700.99 2,700,992.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
6,302.31 6,302,315.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
3.59 3,601.3209/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
3.58 3,601.3209/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
19.69 19,957.3309/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
9
Page 75
Innisfil Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Innisfil - Cash Outcome
Account Number: 9021979418
243.19 243.1908/06/2020 08/06/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
0.16 0.1609/03/2020 09/03/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
10
Page 76
Innisfil Prudent Investor Portfolio
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
September 30, 2020
With respect to the quarter ended September 30, 2020 to the best of the knowledge and belief of ONE Investment, all assets of the
Participating Municipality under the management and control of ONE JIB pursuant to the ONE JIB Agreement have been invested and are held
In accordance with the terms of section 8.02 of the ONEJIB Agreement dated as of July 2, 2020 (the “ONE JIB Agreement”) ONE Investment
confirms as follows:
in accordance with the terms of the ONE JIB Agreement, and in a manner consistent with the IPS and the Investment Plan of the Participating
Municipality.
Keith Taylor, Chief Investment Officer, ONE Investment
On the behalf of the ONE Joint Investment Board
11
Page 77
QUARTERLY
INVESTMENT
REPORT
Kenora General Account - Prudent Investor Portfolio
1 Main Street South
Kenora, ON
P9N 3X2
ONE Investment
200 University Ave, Suite 801
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 3C6
Relationship Manager
Wardah Mir, Client Service Representative
416-971-9856 x 351
wmir@oneinvestment.ca
Charlotte Edie
(807) 467-2013
cedie@kenora.ca
For The Period Ended September 30, 2020
Treasurer
Appendix 4
Page 78
Kenora General Account - Prudent Investor Portfolio
Executive Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
Year to date 3 Years
Since
InceptionQuarter5 Years1 Year 2 Years
Inception
Date
------2.7%07/02/2020Consolidated Portfolio Returns
Starting
IncomePortfolio
Change in
Contribution Withdrawals
Ending
Time-Weighted Rate of Return in CAD for Consolidated Holdings
Consolidated Portfolio Activity for Quarter
Overall Asset Allocation
Balance Market Value Balance
1,122,508.10CAN Bond Fund --3,383.80 1,130,381.944,490.04
2,513,624.80CAN Equity Fund --137,692.85 2,651,317.65-
1,122,508.10Corp Bond Fund --3,725.64 1,130,723.784,490.04
5,238,371.10GLB Bond Fund --69,910.70 5,333,164.0624,882.26
5,865,124.60GLB Equity Fund --201,556.18 6,066,680.78-
599,227.67PI-HISA ---600,160.56932.89
16,461,364.37Total 0.000.00 416,269.17 16,912,428.7734,795.23
2
Page 79
Kenora General Account - Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History At
September 30, 2020
Year to
5 YearsQuarter1 Year 2 Years
Since
Performance by Fund
Date 3 Years Inception
Inception
Date4 Years
% Annualized Returns
-One High Interest Savings Account ------0.1 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Equity Fund ------5.4 07/02/2020
-ONE Global Equity Fund ------3.4 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ------0.7 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Government Bond Fund ------0.7 07/02/2020
-ONE Global Bond Fund ------1.8 07/02/2020
Year to
5 YearsQuarter1 Year 2 Years
Since
Performance by Outcome
Date 3 Years Inception
Inception
Date4 Years
% Annualized Returns
-Contingency Outcome ------3.0 07/02/2020
-Target Date 3-5 Year Outcome ------1.4 07/02/2020
3
Page 80
Manager Commentary - Equity
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
QUARTERLY REVIEW
The market’s Q2 enthusiasm continued in the third quarter. However more investors recognized that valuations have
come a long way from the lows of March, leading to more modest gains in Q3. The rally in the market is less about
optimism on the economy and is more reflective of massive fiscal and monetary stimulus injected by governments around
the world, providing a positive foundation for markets.
However, market uncertainty remains: spiking coronavirus infections coupled with new restrictions in some countries, as
well as the magnitude of damage already done to the economy, continue to weigh on company fundamentals. While the
world may have entered a deep recession, the impact on corporate profits have been blunted by government’s and central
bank’s quick response in providing fiscal and monetary stimulus. Now, investors are weighing the possibility that the
economic downturn could be more punishing and long-lasting as additional stimulus remains uncertain and governments
may have to intensify restrictions on business in order to halt the spread of the pandemic.
The ONE Canadian Equity Fund returned 5.4% in the quarter, while the ONE Global Equity Fund returned 3.4% in
Canadian dollar terms. The lower performance of global equities reflects timing issues related to the transition of the
funds being deployed into global mandates. The industrial sector outperformed, gaining almost 14% in the quarter while
the energy sector had sharply negative performance in the quarter. This contributed to the performance of both the ONE
Canadian Equity Fund and the ONE Global Equity Fund which had overweight allocations to industrials and significant
underweight exposure to the energy sector. The low exposure to the energy sector reflects the investment manager’s
style which places emphasis on higher quality, sustainable business versus firms whose financial prospects are driven
primarily by gyrations in commodity prices. The Global Equity Fund’s positioning includes a significant underweight to the
Asia Pacific and Japanese equities with an overweight to European equities. European holdings have no exposure to the
still struggling European banks.
4
Page 81
Manager Commentary - Fixed Income
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
QUARTERLY REVIEW
The key theme influencing capital markets in the quarter was the massive "wall of money" supplied by global central
banks, which placed downward pressure on credit spreads. Despite volatility in capital markets remaining elevated, the
strong technical backdrop offset outstanding risks such as concerns of a second surge of virus infections, commodity price
weakness, global trade tensions, the upcoming U.S. presidential election, and tight valuation levels.
The Canadian fixed income market generated positive returns in the third quarter supported by a modest tightening of
credit spreads, with corporate bonds outperforming federal and provincial bonds. Both Canadian fixed income funds
generated positive returns of approximately 0.7% in the quarter. Within corporate bonds, BBBs outperformed the higher
quality A and AA segments of the Canadian fixed income market. The Canadian bond holdings are focused on the higher
credit quality segments of the market and hence did not benefit from this trend.
The ONE Global Bond Fund, which represents about 70% of the fixed income investments within the ONE JIB Outcomes,
performed better than Canadian fixed income exposure, with returns of 1.8% in the quarter. Performance in the quarter
was primarily driven by overweight exposures to high-yield corporate and convertible bonds, combined with underweight
exposures to U.S. Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities. Currency management slightly contributed as
gains from an underweight exposure to the U.S. dollar were partially offset by an underweight exposure to the euro.
Duration positioning (interest rate sensitivity) had a relatively neutral impact on performance.
Global bond holdings include emerging market and high yield debt, which tend to have a higher risk profile. The ONE
Global Bond Fund has avoided exposure to the more speculative segments of the high yield bond market which may be
more vulnerable to an extended economic slowdown but it remains positioned to benefit from further credit spread
tightening. Positioning also remains selective in emerging markets and remains cautious about the further spread of
COVID-19 in countries that lack infrastructure and the ability to treat a widespread viral outbreak.
5
Page 82
QuantitySecurity Price % WeightUnit Cost Book Value
Kenora General Account - Prudent Investor Portfolio
As of September 30, 2020
Market Value
Consolidated Portfolio Holdings in CAD
PI-HISA 1.00 1.00 3.55%600,160.560 600,160.56600,160.56
CAN Equity Fund 1,000.00 1,054.77 15.68%2,513.624 2,651,317.652,513,624.80
GLB Equity Fund 1,000.00 1,034.36 35.87%5,865.124 6,066,680.785,865,124.60
Corp Bond Fund 1,000.01 1,003.31 6.69%1,126.983 1,130,723.781,126,998.14
CAN Bond Fund 1,000.01 1,003.01 6.68%1,126.985 1,130,381.941,126,998.14
GLB Bond Fund 1,000.06 1,013.34 31.53%5,262.926 5,333,164.065,263,253.36
100.00%16,912,428.77
6
Page 83
Kenora General Account - Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Kenora - Contingency Outcome
Account Number: 570050161
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
Corp Bond Fund 811.13 1,000.01 811,145.26 1,003.31 813,826.92 5.8%2,681.66 3,231.66
CAN Equity Fund 2,423.74 1,000.00 2,423,740.70 1,054.77 2,556,509.82 18.4%132,769.12 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 811.13 1,000.01 811,145.26 1,003.01 813,580.44 5.8%2,435.18 3,231.66
GLB Bond Fund 3,787.93 1,000.06 3,788,172.05 1,013.34 3,838,489.34 27.6%50,317.29 17,908.75
GLB Equity Fund 5,655.39 1,000.00 5,655,394.90 1,034.36 5,849,743.68 42.1%194,348.78 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------3.0 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
13,489,598.17 13,872,150.20 100.0%382,552.03 24,372.07
Kenora General Account - Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
7
Page 84
Kenora General Account - Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Kenora - Target Date 3 to 5 Year Outcome
Account Number: 570050187
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
PI-HISA 600,160.56 1.00 600,160.56 1.00 600,160.56 19.7%0.00 932.89
Corp Bond Fund 315.84 1,000.01 315,852.88 1,003.31 316,896.86 10.4%1,043.98 1,258.38
CAN Equity Fund 89.88 1,000.00 89,884.10 1,054.77 94,807.83 3.1%4,923.73 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 315.84 1,000.01 315,852.88 1,003.01 316,801.50 10.4%948.62 1,258.38
GLB Bond Fund 1,474.98 1,000.06 1,475,081.31 1,013.34 1,494,674.72 49.1%19,593.41 6,973.51
GLB Equity Fund 209.72 1,000.00 209,729.70 1,034.36 216,937.10 7.1%7,207.40 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------1.4 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
3,006,561.43 3,040,278.57 100.0%33,717.14 10,423.16
Kenora General Account - Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
8
Page 85
Kenora General Account - Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Kenora - Contingency Outcome
Account Number: 570050161
807.91 807,914.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
807.91 807,914.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
3,770.26 3,770,263.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
2,423.74 2,423,741.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
5,655.39 5,655,395.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
3.22 3,231.6609/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
3.22 3,231.6609/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
17.67 17,908.7509/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
9
Page 86
Kenora General Account - Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Kenora - Target Date 3 to 5 Year Outcome
Account Number: 570050187
314.59 314,595.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
314.59 314,595.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
1,468.10 1,468,108.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
89.88 89,884.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
209.73 209,730.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
1.25 1,258.3809/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
1.25 1,258.3809/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
6.88 6,973.5109/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
466.79 466.7908/06/2020 08/06/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
466.10 466.1009/03/2020 09/03/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
599,227.67 599,227.6707/02/2020 07/02/2020Transfer In PI-HISA
10
Page 87
Kenora General Account - Prudent Investor Portfolio
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
September 30, 2020
With respect to the quarter ended September 30, 2020 to the best of the knowledge and belief of ONE Investment, all assets of the
Participating Municipality under the management and control of ONE JIB pursuant to the ONE JIB Agreement have been invested and are held
In accordance with the terms of section 8.02 of the ONEJIB Agreement dated as of July 2, 2020 (the “ONE JIB Agreement”) ONE Investment
confirms as follows:
in accordance with the terms of the ONE JIB Agreement, and in a manner consistent with the IPS and the Investment Plan of the Participating
Municipality.
Keith Taylor, Chief Investment Officer, ONE Investment
On the behalf of the ONE Joint Investment Board
11
Page 88
QUARTERLY
INVESTMENT
REPORT
Kenora CPTF - Prudent Investor Portfolio
1 Main Street South
Kenora, ON
P9N 3X2
ONE Investment
200 University Ave, Suite 801
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 3C6
Relationship Manager
Wardah Mir, Client Service Representative
416-971-9856 x 351
wmir@oneinvestment.ca
Charlotte Edie
(807) 467-2013
cedie@kenora.ca
For The Period Ended September 30, 2020
Treasurer
Appendix 5
Page 89
Kenora CPTF - Prudent Investor Portfolio
Executive Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
Year to date 3 Years
Since
InceptionQuarter5 Years1 Year 2 Years
Inception
Date
------2.1%07/02/2020Consolidated Portfolio Returns
Starting
IncomePortfolio
Change in
Contribution Withdrawals
Ending
Time-Weighted Rate of Return in CAD for Consolidated Holdings
Consolidated Portfolio Activity for Quarter
Overall Asset Allocation
Balance Market Value Balance
1,962,000.00CAN Bond Fund --5,913.25 1,975,761.257,848.00
1,962,000.00CAN Equity Fund --107,475.61 2,069,475.61-
1,962,000.00Corp Bond Fund --6,512.23 1,976,360.237,848.00
9,156,000.00GLB Bond Fund --122,193.92 9,321,684.9243,491.00
4,578,000.00GLB Equity Fund --157,323.89 4,735,323.89-
2,180,000.00PI-HISA ---2,183,393.293,393.29
21,800,000.00Total 0.000.00 399,418.90 22,261,999.1962,580.29
2
Page 90
Kenora CPTF - Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History At
September 30, 2020
Year to
5 YearsQuarter1 Year 2 Years
Since
Performance by Fund
Date 3 Years Inception
Inception
Date4 Years
% Annualized Returns
-One High Interest Savings Account ------0.1 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Equity Fund ------5.4 07/02/2020
-ONE Global Equity Fund ------3.4 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ------0.7 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Government Bond Fund ------0.7 07/02/2020
-ONE Global Bond Fund ------1.8 07/02/2020
Year to
5 YearsQuarter1 Year 2 Years
Since
Performance by Outcome
Date 3 Years Inception
Inception
Date4 Years
% Annualized Returns
-Stable Return Outcome ------2.1 07/02/2020
3
Page 91
Manager Commentary - Equity
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
QUARTERLY REVIEW
The market’s Q2 enthusiasm continued in the third quarter. However more investors recognized that valuations have
come a long way from the lows of March, leading to more modest gains in Q3. The rally in the market is less about
optimism on the economy and is more reflective of massive fiscal and monetary stimulus injected by governments around
the world, providing a positive foundation for markets.
However, market uncertainty remains: spiking coronavirus infections coupled with new restrictions in some countries, as
well as the magnitude of damage already done to the economy, continue to weigh on company fundamentals. While the
world may have entered a deep recession, the impact on corporate profits have been blunted by government’s and central
bank’s quick response in providing fiscal and monetary stimulus. Now, investors are weighing the possibility that the
economic downturn could be more punishing and long-lasting as additional stimulus remains uncertain and governments
may have to intensify restrictions on business in order to halt the spread of the pandemic.
The ONE Canadian Equity Fund returned 5.4% in the quarter, while the ONE Global Equity Fund returned 3.4% in
Canadian dollar terms. The lower performance of global equities reflects timing issues related to the transition of the
funds being deployed into global mandates. The industrial sector outperformed, gaining almost 14% in the quarter while
the energy sector had sharply negative performance in the quarter. This contributed to the performance of both the ONE
Canadian Equity Fund and the ONE Global Equity Fund which had overweight allocations to industrials and significant
underweight exposure to the energy sector. The low exposure to the energy sector reflects the investment manager’s
style which places emphasis on higher quality, sustainable business versus firms whose financial prospects are driven
primarily by gyrations in commodity prices. The Global Equity Fund’s positioning includes a significant underweight to the
Asia Pacific and Japanese equities with an overweight to European equities. European holdings have no exposure to the
still struggling European banks.
4
Page 92
Manager Commentary - Fixed Income
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
QUARTERLY REVIEW
The key theme influencing capital markets in the quarter was the massive "wall of money" supplied by global central
banks, which placed downward pressure on credit spreads. Despite volatility in capital markets remaining elevated, the
strong technical backdrop offset outstanding risks such as concerns of a second surge of virus infections, commodity price
weakness, global trade tensions, the upcoming U.S. presidential election, and tight valuation levels.
The Canadian fixed income market generated positive returns in the third quarter supported by a modest tightening of
credit spreads, with corporate bonds outperforming federal and provincial bonds. Both Canadian fixed income funds
generated positive returns of approximately 0.7% in the quarter. Within corporate bonds, BBBs outperformed the higher
quality A and AA segments of the Canadian fixed income market. The Canadian bond holdings are focused on the higher
credit quality segments of the market and hence did not benefit from this trend.
The ONE Global Bond Fund, which represents about 70% of the fixed income investments within the ONE JIB Outcomes,
performed better than Canadian fixed income exposure, with returns of 1.8% in the quarter. Performance in the quarter
was primarily driven by overweight exposures to high-yield corporate and convertible bonds, combined with underweight
exposures to U.S. Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities. Currency management slightly contributed as
gains from an underweight exposure to the U.S. dollar were partially offset by an underweight exposure to the euro.
Duration positioning (interest rate sensitivity) had a relatively neutral impact on performance.
Global bond holdings include emerging market and high yield debt, which tend to have a higher risk profile. The ONE
Global Bond Fund has avoided exposure to the more speculative segments of the high yield bond market which may be
more vulnerable to an extended economic slowdown but it remains positioned to benefit from further credit spread
tightening. Positioning also remains selective in emerging markets and remains cautious about the further spread of
COVID-19 in countries that lack infrastructure and the ability to treat a widespread viral outbreak.
5
Page 93
QuantitySecurity Price % WeightUnit Cost Book Value
Kenora CPTF - Prudent Investor Portfolio
As of September 30, 2020
Market Value
Consolidated Portfolio Holdings in CAD
PI-HISA 1.00 1.00 9.81%2,183,393.290 2,183,393.292,183,393.29
CAN Equity Fund 1,000.00 1,054.77 9.30%1,962.000 2,069,475.611,962,000.00
GLB Equity Fund 1,000.00 1,034.36 21.27%4,578.000 4,735,323.894,578,000.00
Corp Bond Fund 1,000.01 1,003.31 8.88%1,969.822 1,976,360.231,969,848.00
CAN Bond Fund 1,000.01 1,003.01 8.88%1,969.824 1,975,761.251,969,848.00
GLB Bond Fund 1,000.06 1,013.34 41.87%9,198.918 9,321,684.929,199,491.00
100.00%22,261,999.19
6
Page 94
Kenora CPTF - Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Kenora - Stable Return Outcome
Account Number: 570050179
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
PI-HISA 2,183,393.29 1.00 2,183,393.29 1.00 2,183,393.29 9.8%0.00 3,393.29
Corp Bond Fund 1,969.82 1,000.01 1,969,848.00 1,003.31 1,976,360.23 8.8%6,512.23 7,848.00
CAN Equity Fund 1,962.00 1,000.00 1,962,000.00 1,054.77 2,069,475.61 9.3%107,475.61 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 1,969.82 1,000.01 1,969,848.00 1,003.01 1,975,761.25 8.8%5,913.25 7,848.00
GLB Bond Fund 9,198.91 1,000.06 9,199,491.00 1,013.34 9,321,684.92 41.8%122,193.92 43,491.00
GLB Equity Fund 4,578.00 1,000.00 4,578,000.00 1,034.36 4,735,323.89 21.2%157,323.89 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------2.1 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
21,862,580.29 22,261,999.19 100.0%399,418.90 62,580.29
Kenora CPTF - Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
7
Page 95
Kenora CPTF - Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Kenora - Stable Return Outcome
Account Number: 570050179
1,962.00 1,962,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
1,962.00 1,962,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
9,156.00 9,156,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
1,962.00 1,962,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
4,578.00 4,578,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
7.82 7,848.0009/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
7.82 7,848.0009/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
42.91 43,491.0009/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
1,698.18 1,698.1808/06/2020 08/06/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
1,695.11 1,695.1109/03/2020 09/03/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
2,180,000.00 2,180,000.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020Transfer In PI-HISA
8
Page 96
Kenora CPTF - Prudent Investor Portfolio
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
September 30, 2020
With respect to the quarter ended September 30, 2020 to the best of the knowledge and belief of ONE Investment, all assets of the
Participating Municipality under the management and control of ONE JIB pursuant to the ONE JIB Agreement have been invested and are held
In accordance with the terms of section 8.02 of the ONEJIB Agreement dated as of July 2, 2020 (the “ONE JIB Agreement”) ONE Investment
confirms as follows:
in accordance with the terms of the ONE JIB Agreement, and in a manner consistent with the IPS and the Investment Plan of the Participating
Municipality.
Keith Taylor, Chief Investment Officer, ONE Investment
On the behalf of the ONE Joint Investment Board
9
Page 97
QUARTERLY
INVESTMENT
REPORT
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
70 Pine Street
Bracebridge, ON
P1L 1N3
ONE Investment
200 University Ave, Suite 801
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 3C6
Relationship Manager
Wardah Mir, Client Service Representative
416-971-9856 x 351
wmir@oneinvestment.ca
Laurie Bissonette
(705) 645-2100 x4208
laurie.bissonette@muskoka.on.ca
For The Period Ended September 30, 2020
Director, Finance
Appendix 6
Page 98
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
Executive Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
Year to date 3 Years
Since
InceptionQuarter5 Years1 Year 2 Years
Inception
Date
------2.2%07/02/2020Consolidated Portfolio Returns
Starting
IncomePortfolio
Change in
Contribution Withdrawals
Ending
Time-Weighted Rate of Return in CAD for Consolidated Holdings
Consolidated Portfolio Activity for Quarter
Overall Asset Allocation
Balance Market Value Balance
10,577,757.60CAN Bond Fund --31,882.53 10,651,951.1642,311.03
13,146,387.50CAN Equity Fund --720,140.70 13,866,528.20-
10,577,757.60Corp Bond Fund --35,109.63 10,655,178.2642,311.03
49,362,868.90GLB Bond Fund --658,787.37 50,256,129.90234,473.63
30,674,904.40GLB Equity Fund --1,054,149.23 31,729,053.63-
11,089,921.78PI-HISA ---11,107,413.9717,492.19
125,429,597.78Total 0.000.00 2,500,069.46 128,266,255.12336,587.88
2
Page 99
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History At
September 30, 2020
Year to
5 YearsQuarter1 Year 2 Years
Since
Performance by Fund
Date 3 Years Inception
Inception
Date4 Years
% Annualized Returns
-One High Interest Savings Account ------0.1 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Equity Fund ------5.4 07/02/2020
-ONE Global Equity Fund ------3.4 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ------0.7 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Government Bond Fund ------0.7 07/02/2020
-ONE Global Bond Fund ------1.8 07/02/2020
Year to
5 YearsQuarter1 Year 2 Years
Since
Performance by Outcome
Date 3 Years Inception
Inception
Date4 Years
% Annualized Returns
-Contingency Outcome ------3.0 07/02/2020
-Target Date 3-5 Year Outcome ------1.4 07/02/2020
-Target Date 5-10 Year Outcome ------2.7 07/02/2020
-Cash Outcome ------0.1 07/02/2020
3
Page 100
Manager Commentary - Equity
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
QUARTERLY REVIEW
The market’s Q2 enthusiasm continued in the third quarter. However more investors recognized that valuations have
come a long way from the lows of March, leading to more modest gains in Q3. The rally in the market is less about
optimism on the economy and is more reflective of massive fiscal and monetary stimulus injected by governments around
the world, providing a positive foundation for markets.
However, market uncertainty remains: spiking coronavirus infections coupled with new restrictions in some countries, as
well as the magnitude of damage already done to the economy, continue to weigh on company fundamentals. While the
world may have entered a deep recession, the impact on corporate profits have been blunted by government’s and central
bank’s quick response in providing fiscal and monetary stimulus. Now, investors are weighing the possibility that the
economic downturn could be more punishing and long-lasting as additional stimulus remains uncertain and governments
may have to intensify restrictions on business in order to halt the spread of the pandemic.
The ONE Canadian Equity Fund returned 5.4% in the quarter, while the ONE Global Equity Fund returned 3.4% in
Canadian dollar terms. The lower performance of global equities reflects timing issues related to the transition of the
funds being deployed into global mandates. The industrial sector outperformed, gaining almost 14% in the quarter while
the energy sector had sharply negative performance in the quarter. This contributed to the performance of both the ONE
Canadian Equity Fund and the ONE Global Equity Fund which had overweight allocations to industrials and significant
underweight exposure to the energy sector. The low exposure to the energy sector reflects the investment manager’s
style which places emphasis on higher quality, sustainable business versus firms whose financial prospects are driven
primarily by gyrations in commodity prices. The Global Equity Fund’s positioning includes a significant underweight to the
Asia Pacific and Japanese equities with an overweight to European equities. European holdings have no exposure to the
still struggling European banks.
4
Page 101
Manager Commentary - Fixed Income
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
QUARTERLY REVIEW
The key theme influencing capital markets in the quarter was the massive "wall of money" supplied by global central
banks, which placed downward pressure on credit spreads. Despite volatility in capital markets remaining elevated, the
strong technical backdrop offset outstanding risks such as concerns of a second surge of virus infections, commodity price
weakness, global trade tensions, the upcoming U.S. presidential election, and tight valuation levels.
The Canadian fixed income market generated positive returns in the third quarter supported by a modest tightening of
credit spreads, with corporate bonds outperforming federal and provincial bonds. Both Canadian fixed income funds
generated positive returns of approximately 0.7% in the quarter. Within corporate bonds, BBBs outperformed the higher
quality A and AA segments of the Canadian fixed income market. The Canadian bond holdings are focused on the higher
credit quality segments of the market and hence did not benefit from this trend.
The ONE Global Bond Fund, which represents about 70% of the fixed income investments within the ONE JIB Outcomes,
performed better than Canadian fixed income exposure, with returns of 1.8% in the quarter. Performance in the quarter
was primarily driven by overweight exposures to high-yield corporate and convertible bonds, combined with underweight
exposures to U.S. Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities. Currency management slightly contributed as
gains from an underweight exposure to the U.S. dollar were partially offset by an underweight exposure to the euro.
Duration positioning (interest rate sensitivity) had a relatively neutral impact on performance.
Global bond holdings include emerging market and high yield debt, which tend to have a higher risk profile. The ONE
Global Bond Fund has avoided exposure to the more speculative segments of the high yield bond market which may be
more vulnerable to an extended economic slowdown but it remains positioned to benefit from further credit spread
tightening. Positioning also remains selective in emerging markets and remains cautious about the further spread of
COVID-19 in countries that lack infrastructure and the ability to treat a widespread viral outbreak.
5
Page 102
QuantitySecurity Price % WeightUnit Cost Book Value
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
As of September 30, 2020
Market Value
Consolidated Portfolio Holdings in CAD
PI-HISA 1.00 1.00 8.66%11,107,413.970 11,107,413.9711,107,413.97
CAN Equity Fund 1,000.00 1,054.77 10.81%13,146.387 13,866,528.2013,146,387.50
GLB Equity Fund 1,000.00 1,034.36 24.74%30,674.904 31,729,053.6330,674,904.40
Corp Bond Fund 1,000.01 1,003.31 8.31%10,619.928 10,655,178.2610,620,068.63
CAN Bond Fund 1,000.01 1,003.01 8.30%10,619.941 10,651,951.1610,620,068.63
GLB Bond Fund 1,000.06 1,013.34 39.18%49,594.254 50,256,129.9049,597,342.53
100.00%128,266,255.12
6
Page 103
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Muskoka - Contingency Outcome
Account Number: 570050088
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
Corp Bond Fund 316.85 1,000.01 316,861.10 1,003.31 317,908.41 5.8%1,047.31 1,262.40
CAN Equity Fund 946.79 1,000.00 946,796.20 1,054.77 998,660.37 18.4%51,864.17 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 316.85 1,000.01 316,861.10 1,003.01 317,812.74 5.8%951.64 1,262.40
GLB Bond Fund 1,479.69 1,000.06 1,479,789.87 1,013.34 1,499,445.85 27.6%19,655.98 6,995.77
GLB Equity Fund 2,209.19 1,000.00 2,209,191.20 1,034.36 2,285,110.50 42.1%75,919.30 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------3.0 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
5,269,499.47 5,418,937.87 100.0%149,438.40 9,520.57
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
7
Page 104
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Muskoka - Target Date 3 to 5 Year Outcome
Account Number: 570050096
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
PI-HISA 9,264,283.87 1.00 9,264,283.87 1.00 9,264,283.87 19.7%0.00 14,587.87
Corp Bond Fund 4,875.45 1,000.01 4,875,514.76 1,003.31 4,891,632.99 10.4%16,118.23 19,424.36
CAN Equity Fund 1,387.45 1,000.00 1,387,454.40 1,054.77 1,463,457.21 3.1%76,002.81 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 4,875.45 1,000.01 4,875,514.76 1,003.01 4,890,151.51 10.4%14,636.75 19,424.36
GLB Bond Fund 22,767.98 1,000.06 22,769,398.54 1,013.34 23,071,838.12 49.1%302,439.58 107,643.34
GLB Equity Fund 3,237.39 1,000.00 3,237,393.60 1,034.36 3,348,647.28 7.1%111,253.68 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------1.4 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
46,409,559.93 46,930,010.98 100.0%520,451.05 161,079.93
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
8
Page 105
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Muskoka - Target Date 5 to 10 Year Outcome
Account Number: 570050104
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
Corp Bond Fund 5,427.62 1,000.01 5,427,692.77 1,003.31 5,445,636.86 7.3%17,944.09 21,624.27
CAN Equity Fund 10,812.13 1,000.00 10,812,136.90 1,054.77 11,404,410.62 15.4%592,273.72 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 5,427.62 1,000.01 5,427,692.77 1,003.01 5,443,986.91 7.3%16,294.14 21,624.27
GLB Bond Fund 25,346.57 1,000.06 25,348,154.12 1,013.34 25,684,845.93 34.6%336,691.81 119,834.52
GLB Equity Fund 25,228.31 1,000.00 25,228,319.60 1,034.36 26,095,295.85 35.2%866,976.25 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------2.7 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
72,243,996.16 74,074,176.17 100.0%1,830,180.01 163,083.06
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
9
Page 106
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Muskoka - Cash Outcome
Account Number: 9021979213
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
PI-HISA 1,843,130.10 1.00 1,843,130.10 1.00 1,843,130.10 100.0%0.00 2,904.32
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------0.1 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
1,843,130.10 1,843,130.10 100.0%0.00 2,904.32
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
10
Page 107
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Muskoka - Contingency Outcome
Account Number: 570050088
315.59 315,599.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
315.59 315,599.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
1,472.79 1,472,794.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
946.79 946,796.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
2,209.19 2,209,191.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
1.25 1,262.4009/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
1.25 1,262.4009/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
6.90 6,995.7709/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
11
Page 108
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Muskoka - Target Date 3 to 5 Year Outcome
Account Number: 570050096
4,856.09 4,856,090.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
4,856.09 4,856,090.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
22,661.75 22,661,755.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
1,387.45 1,387,454.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
3,237.39 3,237,394.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
19.36 19,424.3609/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
19.36 19,424.3609/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
106.22 107,643.3409/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
7,396.61 7,396.6108/06/2020 08/06/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
7,191.26 7,191.2609/03/2020 09/03/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
9,249,696.00 9,249,696.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020Transfer In PI-HISA
12
Page 109
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Muskoka - Target Date 5 to 10 Year Outcome
Account Number: 570050104
5,406.06 5,406,068.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
5,406.06 5,406,068.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
25,228.32 25,228,320.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
10,812.13 10,812,137.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
25,228.32 25,228,320.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
21.55 21,624.2709/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
21.55 21,624.2709/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
118.25 119,834.5209/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
13
Page 110
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Muskoka - Cash Outcome
Account Number: 9021979213
1,471.56 1,471.5608/06/2020 08/06/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
1,432.76 1,432.7609/03/2020 09/03/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
1,840,225.78 1,840,225.7807/02/2020 07/02/2020Transfer In PI-HISA
14
Page 111
Muskoka Prudent Investor Portfolio
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
September 30, 2020
With respect to the quarter ended September 30, 2020 to the best of the knowledge and belief of ONE Investment, all assets of the
Participating Municipality under the management and control of ONE JIB pursuant to the ONE JIB Agreement have been invested and are held
In accordance with the terms of section 8.02 of the ONEJIB Agreement dated as of July 2, 2020 (the “ONE JIB Agreement”) ONE Investment
confirms as follows:
in accordance with the terms of the ONE JIB Agreement, and in a manner consistent with the IPS and the Investment Plan of the Participating
Municipality.
Keith Taylor, Chief Investment Officer, ONE Investment
On the behalf of the ONE Joint Investment Board
15
Page 112
QUARTERLY
INVESTMENT
REPORT
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
575 Rossland Rd. E.
Whitby, ON
L1N 2M8
ONE Investment
200 University Ave, Suite 801
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 3C6
Relationship Manager
Wardah Mir, Client Service Representative
416-971-9856 x 351
wmir@oneinvestment.ca
Ann McCullough
(905) 430-4300 x2246
mccullougha@whitby.ca
For The Period Ended September 30, 2020
Director of Finance/Deputy Treasurer
Appendix 7
Page 113
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Executive Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
Year to date 3 Years
Since
InceptionQuarter5 Years1 Year 2 Years
Inception
Date
------2.2% 07/02/2020Consolidated Portfolio Returns
Starting
IncomePortfolio
Change in
Contribution Withdrawals
Ending
Time-Weighted Rate of Return in CAD for Consolidated Holdings
Consolidated Portfolio Activity for Quarter
Overall Asset Allocation
Balance Market Value Balance
8,971,756.20CAN Bond Fund --27,040.59 9,034,683.8235,887.03
11,442,856.10CAN Equity Fund --626,823.63 12,069,679.73-
8,971,756.20Corp Bond Fund --29,778.73 9,037,421.9635,887.03
41,868,195.50GLB Bond Fund --558,764.82 42,625,834.25198,873.93
26,699,997.30GLB Equity Fund --917,550.74 27,617,548.04-
9,546,946.58PI-HISA ---9,563,782.1016,835.52
107,501,507.88Total 0.000.00 2,159,958.51 109,948,949.90287,483.51
2
Page 114
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History At
September 30, 2020
Year to
5 YearsQuarter1 Year 2 Years
Since
Performance by Fund
Date 3 Years Inception
Inception
Date4 Years
% Annualized Returns
-One High Interest Savings Account ------0.1 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Equity Fund ------5.4 07/02/2020
-ONE Global Equity Fund ------3.4 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ------0.7 07/02/2020
-ONE Canadian Government Bond Fund ------0.7 07/02/2020
-ONE Global Bond Fund ------1.8 07/02/2020
Year to
5 YearsQuarter1 Year 2 Years
Since
Performance by Outcome
Date 3 Years Inception
Inception
Date4 Years
% Annualized Returns
-Contingency Outcome ------3.0 07/02/2020
-Target Date 3-5 Year Outcome ------1.4 07/02/2020
-Target Date 5-10 Year Outcome ------2.7 07/02/2020
-Asset Management Reserves ------3.7 07/02/2020
-Target Date 10+ Year Outcome ------3.4 07/02/2020
-Cash Outcome ------0.0 07/02/2020
3
Page 115
Manager Commentary - Equity
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
QUARTERLY REVIEW
The market’s Q2 enthusiasm continued in the third quarter. However more investors recognized that valuations have
come a long way from the lows of March, leading to more modest gains in Q3. The rally in the market is less about
optimism on the economy and is more reflective of massive fiscal and monetary stimulus injected by governments around
the world, providing a positive foundation for markets.
However, market uncertainty remains: spiking coronavirus infections coupled with new restrictions in some countries, as
well as the magnitude of damage already done to the economy, continue to weigh on company fundamentals. While the
world may have entered a deep recession, the impact on corporate profits have been blunted by government’s and central
bank’s quick response in providing fiscal and monetary stimulus. Now, investors are weighing the possibility that the
economic downturn could be more punishing and long-lasting as additional stimulus remains uncertain and governments
may have to intensify restrictions on business in order to halt the spread of the pandemic.
The ONE Canadian Equity Fund returned 5.4% in the quarter, while the ONE Global Equity Fund returned 3.4% in
Canadian dollar terms. The lower performance of global equities reflects timing issues related to the transition of the
funds being deployed into global mandates. The industrial sector outperformed, gaining almost 14% in the quarter while
the energy sector had sharply negative performance in the quarter. This contributed to the performance of both the ONE
Canadian Equity Fund and the ONE Global Equity Fund which had overweight allocations to industrials and significant
underweight exposure to the energy sector. The low exposure to the energy sector reflects the investment manager’s
style which places emphasis on higher quality, sustainable business versus firms whose financial prospects are driven
primarily by gyrations in commodity prices. The Global Equity Fund’s positioning includes a significant underweight to the
Asia Pacific and Japanese equities with an overweight to European equities. European holdings have no exposure to the
still struggling European banks.
4
Page 116
Manager Commentary - Fixed Income
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
QUARTERLY REVIEW
The key theme influencing capital markets in the quarter was the massive "wall of money" supplied by global central
banks, which placed downward pressure on credit spreads. Despite volatility in capital markets remaining elevated, the
strong technical backdrop offset outstanding risks such as concerns of a second surge of virus infections, commodity price
weakness, global trade tensions, the upcoming U.S. presidential election, and tight valuation levels.
The Canadian fixed income market generated positive returns in the third quarter supported by a modest tightening of
credit spreads, with corporate bonds outperforming federal and provincial bonds. Both Canadian fixed income funds
generated positive returns of approximately 0.7% in the quarter. Within corporate bonds, BBBs outperformed the higher
quality A and AA segments of the Canadian fixed income market. The Canadian bond holdings are focused on the higher
credit quality segments of the market and hence did not benefit from this trend.
The ONE Global Bond Fund, which represents about 70% of the fixed income investments within the ONE JIB Outcomes,
performed better than Canadian fixed income exposure, with returns of 1.8% in the quarter. Performance in the quarter
was primarily driven by overweight exposures to high-yield corporate and convertible bonds, combined with underweight
exposures to U.S. Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities. Currency management slightly contributed as
gains from an underweight exposure to the U.S. dollar were partially offset by an underweight exposure to the euro.
Duration positioning (interest rate sensitivity) had a relatively neutral impact on performance.
Global bond holdings include emerging market and high yield debt, which tend to have a higher risk profile. The ONE
Global Bond Fund has avoided exposure to the more speculative segments of the high yield bond market which may be
more vulnerable to an extended economic slowdown but it remains positioned to benefit from further credit spread
tightening. Positioning also remains selective in emerging markets and remains cautious about the further spread of
COVID-19 in countries that lack infrastructure and the ability to treat a widespread viral outbreak.
5
Page 117
QuantitySecurity Price % WeightUnit Cost Book Value
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
As of September 30, 2020
Market Value
Consolidated Portfolio Holdings in CAD
PI-HISA 1.00 1.00 8.70%9,563,782.100 9,563,782.109,563,782.10
CAN Equity Fund 1,000.00 1,054.77 10.98%11,442.856 12,069,679.7311,442,856.10
GLB Equity Fund 1,000.00 1,034.36 25.12%26,699.997 27,617,548.0426,699,997.30
Corp Bond Fund 1,000.01 1,003.31 8.22%9,007.524 9,037,421.969,007,643.23
CAN Bond Fund 1,000.01 1,003.01 8.22%9,007.534 9,034,683.829,007,643.23
GLB Bond Fund 1,000.06 1,013.34 38.77%42,064.450 42,625,834.2542,067,069.43
100.00%109,948,949.90
6
Page 118
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Whitby - Contingency Outcome
Account Number: 570050112
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
Corp Bond Fund 262.60 1,000.01 262,609.76 1,003.31 263,478.14 5.8%868.38 1,046.26
CAN Equity Fund 784.69 1,000.00 784,690.60 1,054.77 827,674.85 18.4%42,984.25 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 262.60 1,000.01 262,609.76 1,003.01 263,398.02 5.8%788.26 1,046.26
GLB Bond Fund 1,226.35 1,000.06 1,226,427.79 1,013.34 1,242,718.45 27.6%16,290.66 5,797.99
GLB Equity Fund 1,830.94 1,000.00 1,830,944.60 1,034.36 1,893,865.38 42.1%62,920.78 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
-------3.0 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
4,367,282.51 4,491,134.84 100.0%123,852.33 7,890.51
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
7
Page 119
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Whitby - Target Date 3 to 5 Year Outcome
Account Number: 570050120
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
PI-HISA 9,563,782.10 1.00 9,563,782.10 1.00 9,563,782.10 19.7%0.00 16,835.52
Corp Bond Fund 5,032.12 1,000.01 5,032,195.59 1,003.31 5,048,831.64 10.4% 16,636.05 20,048.59
CAN Equity Fund 1,432.04 1,000.00 1,432,042.00 1,054.77 1,510,487.26 3.1% 78,445.26 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 5,032.13 1,000.01 5,032,195.59 1,003.01 5,047,302.36 10.4% 15,106.77 20,048.59
GLB Bond Fund 23,499.65 1,000.06 23,501,121.69 1,013.34 23,813,279.84 49.1% 312,158.15 111,102.59
GLB Equity Fund 3,341.43 1,000.00 3,341,431.30 1,034.36 3,456,260.25 7.1% 114,828.95 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
------- 1.4 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
47,902,768.27 48,439,943.45 100.0% 537,175.18 168,035.29
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
8
Page 120
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Whitby - Target Date 5 to 10 Year Outcome
Account Number: 570050138
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
Corp Bond Fund 3,264.24 1,000.01 3,264,285.62 1,003.31 3,275,077.17 7.3% 10,791.55 13,005.12
CAN Equity Fund 6,502.56 1,000.00 6,502,561.10 1,054.77 6,858,762.29 15.4% 356,201.19 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 3,264.24 1,000.01 3,264,285.62 1,003.01 3,274,085.27 7.3% 9,799.65 13,005.12
GLB Bond Fund 15,243.76 1,000.06 15,244,712.45 1,013.34 15,447,203.62 34.6% 202,491.17 72,070.05
GLB Equity Fund 15,172.64 1,000.00 15,172,642.40 1,034.36 15,694,053.29 35.2% 521,410.89 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
------- 2.7 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
43,448,487.19 44,549,181.64 100.0% 1,100,694.45 98,080.29
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
9
Page 121
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Whitby - Asset Management Reserve Outcome
Account Number: 570050146
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
Corp Bond Fund 3.59 1,000.08 3,595.22 1,003.31 3,606.83 1.4%11.61 14.32
CAN Equity Fund 64.45 1,000.00 64,456.80 1,054.77 67,987.65 27.4% 3,530.85 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 3.59 1,000.08 3,595.22 1,003.01 3,605.74 1.4%10.52 14.32
GLB Bond Fund 16.78 1,000.08 16,790.38 1,013.34 17,013.06 6.8%222.68 79.38
GLB Equity Fund 150.39 1,000.00 150,399.30 1,034.36 155,567.80 62.7% 5,168.50 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
------- 3.7 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
238,836.92 247,781.08 100.0% 8,944.16 108.02
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
10
Page 122
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Holdings by Account
At September 30, 2020
Account Name: Whitby - Target Date 10 Year Plus Outcome
Account Number: 570050153
Holdings Quantity Unit Cost Book Value Price Market Value Weight
Market Value
Gain (Loss)
Income
Received
For the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2020
Corp Bond Fund 444.95 1,000.01 444,957.04 1,003.31 446,428.18 3.6% 1,471.14 1,772.74
CAN Equity Fund 2,659.10 1,000.00 2,659,105.60 1,054.77 2,804,767.68 22.9% 145,662.08 0.00
CAN Bond Fund 444.95 1,000.01 444,957.04 1,003.01 446,292.43 3.6% 1,335.39 1,772.74
GLB Bond Fund 2,077.88 1,000.06 2,078,017.12 1,013.34 2,105,619.28 17.2% 27,602.16 9,823.92
GLB Equity Fund 6,204.57 1,000.00 6,204,579.70 1,034.36 6,417,801.32 52.5% 213,221.62 0.00
% Annualized Returns
Return Net of Fees
Quarter
Year to
Date 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Since
Inception
Inception
Date
------- 3.4 07/02/2020
% Calendar Year Returns
Return Net of Fees
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
-----
11,831,616.50 12,220,908.89 100.0% 389,292.39 13,369.40
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Performance History
At September 30, 2020
11
Page 123
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Whitby - Contingency Outcome
Account Number: 570050112
261.56 261,564.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
261.56 261,564.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
1,220.63 1,220,630.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
784.69 784,691.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
1,830.94 1,830,945.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
1.04 1,046.2609/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
1.04 1,046.2609/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
5.72 5,797.9909/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
12
Page 124
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Whitby - Target Date 3 to 5 Year Outcome
Account Number: 570050120
5,012.14 5,012,147.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
5,012.14 5,012,147.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
23,390.01 23,390,019.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
1,432.04 1,432,042.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
3,341.43 3,341,431.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
19.98 20,048.5909/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
19.98 20,048.5909/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
109.63 111,102.5909/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
9,410.23 9,410.2308/06/2020 08/06/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
7,425.29 7,425.2909/03/2020 09/03/2020Reinvested Distributions PI-HISA
9,546,946.58 9,546,946.5807/02/2020 07/02/2020Transfer In PI-HISA
13
Page 125
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Whitby - Target Date 5 to 10 Year Outcome
Account Number: 570050138
3,251.28 3,251,281.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
3,251.28 3,251,281.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
15,172.64 15,172,642.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
6,502.56 6,502,561.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
15,172.64 15,172,642.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
12.96 13,005.1209/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
12.96 13,005.1209/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
71.12 72,070.0509/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
14
Page 126
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Whitby - Asset Management Reserve Outcome
Account Number: 570050146
3.58 3,581.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
3.58 3,581.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
16.71 16,711.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
64.45 64,457.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
150.39 150,399.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
0.01 14.3209/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
0.01 14.3209/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
0.07 79.3809/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
15
Page 127
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
Transaction Summary for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2020
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
TRANSACTION TYPE SECURITY
TRADE
DATE
SETTLEMENT
DATE QUANTITY
TRADE AMOUNT
(CAD)
Account Name: Whitby - Target Date 10 Year Plus Outcome
Account Number: 570050153
443.18 443,184.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Bond Fund
443.18 443,184.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCorp Bond Fund
2,068.19 2,068,193.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Bond Fund
2,659.10 2,659,106.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyCAN Equity Fund
6,204.58 6,204,580.0007/02/2020 07/02/2020BuyGLB Equity Fund
1.76 1,772.7409/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions CAN Bond Fund
1.76 1,772.7409/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions Corp Bond Fund
9.69 9,823.9209/30/2020 09/30/2020Reinvested Distributions GLB Bond Fund
16
Page 128
Whitby Prudent Investor Portfolio
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
September 30, 2020
With respect to the quarter ended September 30, 2020 to the best of the knowledge and belief of ONE Investment, all assets of the
Participating Municipality under the management and control of ONE JIB pursuant to the ONE JIB Agreement have been invested and are held
In accordance with the terms of section 8.02 of the ONEJIB Agreement dated as of July 2, 2020 (the “ONE JIB Agreement”) ONE Investment
confirms as follows:
in accordance with the terms of the ONE JIB Agreement, and in a manner consistent with the IPS and the Investment Plan of the Participating
Municipality.
Keith Taylor, Chief Investment Officer, ONE Investment
On the behalf of the ONE Joint Investment Board
17
Page 129
City Of Kenora - CPTF
Securities Pledged to ONE JIB
As at September 30, 2020
Securities Pledged to ONE JIB - Appendix 8
City of Kenora - CPTF
Page 130
The District of Muskoka
Securities Pledged to ONE JIB
As at September 30, 2020
Securities Pledged to ONE JIB - Appendix 9
The District of Muskoka
Page 131
The Town Of Whitby
Securities Pledged to ONE JIB
As at September 30, 2020
Securities Pledged to ONE JIB - Appendix 10
Town of Whitby
Page 132
220 Duncan Mill Road, Suite 505, North York, ON M3B 3J5
T 905-642-7050 F 905-642-8820 E info@kaitlincorp.com W kaitlincorp.com
November 20, 2020
Mayor’s Office
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, ON L1C 3A6
RE: Report PSD-051-20 Update on Jury Lands (Camp 30) and Draft Amendment No 121 to
Clarington Official
Dear Mayor Foster and Members of Council
Thank you for your consideration of our proposal for the development of Camp 30 at the November
16th P&D Committee meeting. I have been engaged in an ongoing discussion with planning staff for the
past number of months over modifications to Draft OPA 121 that would be acceptable to both parties.
Successful modification of Draft OPA 121 would leave a framework that will let us proceed with
applications for rezoning and draft plan of subdivision, while also protecting for certain attributes that
are of most importance to staff.
Kaitlin Corp. and Fandor Homes are interested in continuing negotiations with Clarington staff - and we
are optimistic that progress can be made. But we are also concerned that adoption of the resolution
from Committee will actually limit the ability to have meaningful discussions, by limiting too severely the
range of options available. For example, by accepting the DTAH concept and design, there will no longer
be any scope for accommodating anything other than exactly what DTAH has proposed, effectively
closing down any meaningful negotiation.
Simply put, a meaningful negotiation should be given a chance, BEFORE decisions are made.
Development within the ring road has been a major issue of difference. We are aware that staff were
seeking an indication of the views of members of Council before continuing negotiations further. The
recent Committee meeting has made it clear to all where members of Council stand on this
question. That being done, it would be appropriate to now continue negotiations with these views in
mind - but without unnecessarily limiting the ability to have meaningful negotiations with the objective
of delivering an Official Plan proposal that achieves mutually satisfactory planning objectives.
We are somewhat troubled by the comments in the Planning Report suggesting that the existing legal
agreement is not valid. While we are quite willing to negotiate all these matters, the existence of this
agreement cannot simply be declared away.
Page 133
220 Duncan Mill Road, Suite 505, North York, ON M3B 3J5
T 905-642-7050 F 905-642-8820 E info@kaitlincorp.com W kaitlincorp.com
As you know, PSD-051-20 had the following recommendations:
1. That Report PSD-051-20 be received;
2. That the Community Vision for Jury Lands, Urban Design Master Plan + Design Guidelines for former
Ontario Boys Training School and WWII Prison of War Camp 30 by DTAH dated April 2019 be accepted;
3. That Official Plan Amendment 121 and the Block Master Plan implement the Community Vision by
DTAH;
4. That Official Plan Amendment 121 prohibit private residential development buildings within the ring
road of the Jury Lands;
5. That the consulting team for Soper Hills Secondary Plan be retained to assist with refining draft
Official Plan Amendment No 121;
6. That Staff continue to work with the land owners on other issues to be brought forward a subsequent
report; and
7. That all interested parties listed in Report PSD-051-20 and any delegations be advised of Council’s
decision.
Although well intentioned, I believe that #’s 2, 3 & 4 will actually make it harder to get to the finish line
on this. These items should be addressed as part of OPA 121, rather than in advance of it. For instance,
by accepting the DTAH plan in advance of OPA 121 you will make it harder to properly negotiate the
details on all of the other areas outside of the ring road. There are details that would limit certain types
of development in areas that we didn’t even have a chance to discuss at committee the other night. This
will make it significantly harder to come to an agreement.
I think Council’s position on the ring road has been made clear to all, and staff should now be in a
position to negotiate the final strokes of this Official Plan Amendment with us.
In conclusion, I would respectfully ask that you do not include #’s 2,3,4 in any resolution made on this
matter. The more appropriate time to include these items is when you have the final Official Plan
Amendment in front of you for the entire site.
Thank you,
Devon Daniell
Devon Daniell
Kaitlin Corporation
CC: Municipal Clerk
Page 134
From:Chambers, Michelle
To:Chambers, Michelle
Subject:FW: Fence on Longworth
Date:November 23, 2020 12:01:04 PM
From: Melissa Knight <knight.e.melissa@gmail.com>
Sent: November 20, 2020 5:04 PM
To: Hooper, Ron <rhooper@clarington.net>; Jones, Janice <JJones@clarington.net>; Anderson,
Granville <GAnderson@clarington.net>; Neal, Joe <JNeal@clarington.net>; Mayor Shared Mailbox
<mayor@clarington.net>; Zwart, Margaret <MZwart@clarington.net>
Subject: Fence on Longworth
EXTERNAL
Good Evening,
I just wanted to follow up after the meeting to express a few thoughts. Thank you for listening to our
concerns and coming up with potential solutions that would allow us to still keep access to this
beautiful land which our children love.
I am wondering in considering the solutions if the following could be put into place or at least put
into discussion:
1. Please remove the whole fence for a variety of reasons it's not great :(
2. If not remove the whole fence please remove the gate and put in a removable post for ATV's if
there is still a concern about these (again i've never seen them down there or behind my home on
Longworth)
3. Please remove the section of fence attached to the fence at 285 Longworth, it serves no
purpose and is not nice to look at
4. Please remove the trespassing signs and reinstall the keep dog on leash (and poop and scoop :)
and the no dumping signs, please also add a no motorized vehicles sign
Thank you for considering and have a wonderful weekend,
Melissa
Page 135
From:Chambers, Michelle
To:Chambers, Michelle
Subject:FW: Resolution #C-418-20 (Home Hardware at Rundle Road)
Date:November 23, 2020 12:02:23 PM
From: Jim Hamilton <welcomefeeds@gmail.com>
Sent: November 23, 2020 8:10 AM
To: Mayor Shared Mailbox <mayor@clarington.net>
Cc: martha@vanbelleflowers.com
Subject: Resolution #C-418-20 (Home Hardware at Rundle Road)
EXTERNAL
We are writing to express our opposition to having this resolution stand.
-Our business has been serving Clarington and it's farm community for over
100 years.
-This resolution/motion with it's amendment will greatly increase our
difficulty to continue to do so when we need to expand to serve the increasing
demands of our customers.
-The lack of transparency in putting forward this amendment is deeply disturbing
to us.
-We will be able continue to create employment in Clarington if this
resolution/motion
is withdrawn and resubmitted without the amendment.
We ask that you rescind the resolution/motion with it's amendment tonight.
Please support small business in these difficult times during Covid19.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Jim and Kettly Hamilton
Property owners of 2165 Hwy #2 (the big blue building) and
2161 Hwy #2 in Bowmanville
Page 136
November 23rd, 2020
Dear Clarington Council Members, Amy and Faye,
You are considering correspondence from Dillon tonight at Clarington Council. I am writing
regarding this correspondence. Below is a short summary, followed by my supporting
information.
Summary
Dillon’s reporting was based on a unit error in a Golder report done for the
incinerator. The Golder report (Appendix C) showed a dioxin/furan emission rate
of 𝟎.𝟔× 𝟎𝟎−𝟎g/s instead of the correct value of 𝟎.𝟔× 𝟎𝟎−𝟖 g/s resulting in a
discrepancy factor of 1,000,000 (one million).
This accounts for Dillon’s assertion that the incinerator was one million times
worse than St Marys for dioxin/furan emissions. Correct calculations show that St
Marys emissions are actually worse.
In addition, the comparison was not worst-case to worst-case with both facilities
operating at their operational limit. Dillon’s comparisons favour St Marys in this
regard.
It is imperative that the review of the application considers correct information.
I urge Clarington Council to address this issue tonight and take appropriate
corrective actions.
Supporting Information
Dillon presented Slide 13 below to Clarington Council on November 2nd, 2020 to compare St
Marys dioxin/furan emissions against the incinerator.
Page 137
According to this slide the DYEC incinerator’s emission rate is higher than the St Marys rate by
a factor of one million and that point was also made by the consultant during their presentation.
I wrote to you on November 12th, 2020 regarding the discrepancy I found between the emission
rate for the incinerator found in the 2019 DYEC ESDM report done for the fall compliance
testing and what Dillon reported to Council. The rate Dillon reported was about 28.3 million
times greater than the incinerator rate shown in that DYEC 2019 ESDM compliance report.
Dillon was made aware of my concern and responded by email on November 13th, 2020 which
you are considering as correspondence tonight. They responded that “the data shown for SMC
and DYEC both represent reasonable worst-case scenarios from ESDM reports for each site”.
In short, they stood by their original slide.
I called Amy as I could not determine where Dillon was getting their numbers from. S he advised
that the 2019 data they were using was from Appendix C in the Technical Memorandum prepared
by Golder for Durham Region, dated February 19th 2019, to support their proposal to move from
140,000 TPA to 160,000 TPA.
The Golder Report can be found at https://www.durhamyorkwaste.ca/en/facility-
approvals/resources/Documents/AppendixB_GolderTechnicalMemorandum.pdf .
There is a unit error in Appendix C of the Golder report used by Dillon. Golder stated the
emission rate using incorrect units. The emission rate was shown as being in g/s (grams per
second), but it should have been in 𝜇𝑔/𝑠 (micrograms per second) so the rate shown was a
million times more than what should have been used. Golder showed the wrong units in
Appendix C and then Dillon, in turn, used Golder’s incorrect rate.
Appendix A - Emissions Calculation by Scenario of the same Golder report states the
emission rate with the correct units, and that rate is a million times lower than what Dillon
reported. It should also be noted that Golder also used incorrect units for the 160,000 TPA
scenario in Appendix B. Appendix C Comparison of Predicted Concentrations was a comparison
analysis between 140k TPA and 160k TPA and was not the source of the emission rate
calculation so it is unclear why Dillon used Appendix C.
Page 138
I have pasted in a table I have made showing the various dioxin/furan emission rates from
various noted sources as well as the emission rates reported for St Marys. I have circled the rates
that are incorrect (i.e. using incorrect units that differ from Appendix A) in red.
The Golder dioxin/furan emission rate (140,000 TPA), with correct units, is 𝟎.𝟔× 𝟎𝟎−𝟖 g/s.
The St Marys dioxin/furan emission rate is 𝟎.𝟖𝟖 × 𝟎𝟎−𝟖 g/s.
St Marys’ dioxin/furan emission rate is higher. This information is the extreme opposite of
the information you were told about the incinerator emissions being a million time s worse.
Had Council known this information, it would have affected the comments Clarington Council
sent to the MECP. Council needs to address this issue immediately.
If Clarington had known that the St Marys emission rate for dioxin and furans was higher, and
considered that St Marys present ECA stack limit for dioxins and furans is 80 𝑝𝑐𝑔
𝑚3 while the ECA
Page 139
limit for the incinerator is 60 𝑝𝑐𝑔
𝑚3 , Clarington Council could have, and, in my opinion, should
have asked the MECP to lower the stack limit for St Marys significantly.
Ambient air monitoring for dioxins and furans in addition to the requested PM2.5 ambient
monitoring should also have been strongly considered. There are many implications.
The Dillon consultants have been working on the false premise that St Marys emissions for
dioxins and furans are a million times lower than the incinerator. That likely affected their level
of analysis and recommendations to you.
In addition to the above errors, there is another major problem as well with the Dillon analysis
and with their response dated November 13th.
In their November 13th response, Dillon stated that
• “the data shown for SMC and DYEC both represent reasonable worst-case scenarios from
ESDM reports for each site”
• “The numbers from the DYEC source test report quoted in the community member ’s letter
are actual operating conditions for DYEC – not the worst-case emissions, and therefore
not the worst-case potential impact.”
• “When applying for an air permit a facility is required to document the worst -case
scenario, such that the Ministry can approve an operation based on it’s predictable worst-
case impact.”
The problem is that the St Marys and incinerator emissions are not being compared on the same
“worst-case” basis.
The DYEC incinerator dioxin/furan emission rates in the Golder report were based on the
ECA stack emission operating limit for dioxins/furans of 60 𝑝𝑔
𝑚3.
The St Marys dioxin/furan emission rate, however, is not based on St Marys operating limit.
Instead, their maximum emission rate was based on actual operating conditions – source tests –
for the four demonstration scenarios (baseline (conventional fuel only), LCF fuel + conventional,
ALCF + conventional, post-base (conventional only)). St Marys took the maximum of the four
Page 140
emission rates found during their demonstration stack tests and used it to calculate their emission
rate.
The Executive Summary of the St Marys ESDM, the Emission Summary and Dispersion
Modelling Report in Support of an Alternative Low-Carbon Fuel Application under Ontario
Regulation 79/15 to amend and Environmental Compliance Approval (Air) with Limited
Operational Flexibility, BCX Environmental Consulting, March 2020, states so below:
In short, the St Marys - DYEC incinerator emission rate comparison provided by Dillon was not
an apples-to-apples comparison.
Comparing the St. Marys maximum scenario emission rate, which was based on actual stack test
results, to actual 2019 stack test results from the incinerator is a fairer comparison. I gave you
that comparison in my last letter. That comparison showed St Marys emission rate was 28.6
times higher than the incinerator.
Further, all of the above raises further critical questions. Did the St Marys application properly
represent a worst-case scenario in their ESDM which supports their application? Should they
have calculated the emission rates used in their ESDM based on their current ECA stack limits
instead of using demonstration stack test results?
All of the above needs to be addressed immediately. The MECP reviewer for the St Marys
application has already received Clarington comments that were based on incorrect information.
It is imperative that the review of the application considers correct information.
I urge Clarington Council to address this issue tonight and take appropriate corrective actions.
Sincerely, Wendy Bracken
Page 141
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington November 12, 2020
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington Meeting
Thursday, November 12, 2020
Members Present: Eric Bowman John Cartwright Don Rickard
Ted Watson Tom Barrie Henry Zekveld
Richard Rekker Les Caswell Brenda Metcalf
Ben Eastman Councillor Zwart
Regrets: Jennifer Knox
Staff: Amy Burke, Faye Langmaid – Planning and Development Services
Guests: Mayor Adrian Foster; Ryan Cullen, City of Greens Farm; Allison
Brown and Stacey Jibb, Region of Durham Planning and Economic
Development; Carolyn Puterbough, OMAFRA
Due to COVID 19 restrictions and to ensure social distancing, participation in the
meeting was electronic (using Microsoft Teams) and by conference call.
Eric welcomed all to the meeting, with introductions.
Declarations of pecuniary interest
None.
Adoption of Agenda
020-21 Moved by Richard Rekker, seconded by Tom Barrie
That the Agenda for November 12, 2020 be adopted.
Carried
Approval of Minutes
020-22 Moved by John Cartwright, seconded by Ben Eastman
That the minutes of the October 8, 2020 meeting be approved.
Carried
Page 142
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington November 12, 2020
Presentation
Ryan Cullen, City of Greens Farm: Ryan Cullen, co-owner of City of Greens farm,
provided an introduction and overview of their new farm operation. City of Greens
moved to Clarington in late 2019 and began growing in 2020, starting with 0.5 acres of
50’x50’ production beds. The farm focuses on small scale, high yield, high market value
quick to maturity produce crop production. Ryan reviewed the start-up of the farm,
including field preparation, planting and infrastructure development, all of which was
done low- or no-tech. Marketing is primarily done via social media, online and through
word of mouth. Sales uses an online purchase model with pick up being facilitated by
multiple partner locations in Durham Region, including MacMillan Orchards and All or
Nothing Brewery. The first year of operations have proven the viability of their business
model and achieved an objective to grow to meet the needs of 150 people. Ryan
indicated that in the coming years, City of Greens hopes to add edible forest crops
amongst the woodland areas of the property and grazing hens for egg production.
Questions from the Committee brought discussion on no-tillage cover crop and
overwintering approaches, how the COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to a greater
awareness and appreciation of buying locally grown and produced food, and the scale
and type of agriculture that may be achievable and sustainable on a smaller scale. The
Committee thanked Ryan for his presentation and an invitation was extended by Ryan
to come and tour the farm in the future.
Delegations
None.
Business Arising from Minutes
Fairlife – Peterborough Facility Tour: A tour has been arranged for Committee
members at the end of the month. Committee members available to attend were
confirmed.
On-Farm Special Events By-law: Third working group meeting held on October 21
and looked at potential approaches for regulating on-farm special events, including
licencing and site-specific zoning. The working group input received to date will inform
reporting back to Council on the matter. Meeting date to be confirmed and sent to the
Committee, once known.
Migrant Farm Worker Accommodations – COVID-19 Requirements: Durham
Region Public Health hosted a virtual information session on October 15, 2020. Farm
operators who employ temporary foreign workers and/or seasonal agricultural workers
were provided an overview of recent recommendations related to enhanced standards
and tips for reviewing existing accommodations and considering whether modifications
may be necessary to follow public health guidance. It is not known at this time whether
the recommended standards will become required by regulation. Ted Watson, who
attended the session, explained the necessity for having sufficient advanced notice of
any proposed regulatory changes. Farmers could be required to build additional
bathrooms or bunkhouses, requiring time for planning, permits and construction.
Page 143
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington November 12, 2020
AACC 2021 – 2024 Member Applications: The deadline for applying to the
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington is November 13 at 12:00 pm. Four
appointments will be made for the 2021 – 2024 term.
Correspondence, Council Items and Referrals
By-law Amendment Request to Allow Backyard Hens: At the General Government
Committee meeting held on October 19, Committee considered a Resolution brought
forward by Councillor Traill requesting the drafting of a by-law to permit and regulate no
more than four backyard hens in urban areas. Multiple delegations were heard, and
correspondence was received from numerous residents, both in favour of and in
opposition to the matter. On November 2, Council approved Resolution #GG-346-20,
which includes a referral of the matter to the Agricultural Advisory Committee of
Clarington for input. The matter was discussed by the Committee. A summary of
comments follows:
In general, egg producers do not have significant concerns with backyard chickens
when rules that serve to minimize the risk of the spread of disease are strictly
followed.
Multiple layers of biohazard protection are placed on the egg industry to manage
the potential biohazard risks, which are strictly followed by egg producers and
enforced by industry oversight.
The importance of and need for a mechanism to report and track the number and
cause of backyard hen deaths is important in determining the risk of disease in the
community.
The risks associated with the spread of disease applies to all feathered animals in
the area, not only hens. Further, the potential risks are not only of interest to
larger local egg producers, but also to local farms with smaller outdoor chicken
flocks.
Concerns were raised regarding the proper management of other risks, including
the attraction of rodents and predatory animals, roosters being added to flocks,
and proper housekeeping and animal care over the long-term.
There was general disagreement with the concept of food insecurity in Clarington.
While consumer preference has attributed to the reduced availability of large eggs,
oversupply of medium eggs due to reduced restaurant sales during the first wave
of COVID-19 resulted in the need for early flock removal at many farms across the
province.
Committee members re-stated the position taken on the same issue in 2010,
which did not support allowing chickens on non-agricultural lands in the
Municipality.
Comments specific to the proposed draft regulations included the following:
Written permission from landlords must be mandatory;
Setback from all windows and doors or a neighbour’s house must be as far away
as possible (i.e. greater than the 3 metre minimum, where possible); and
Gender of a chicken can be determined at one day old.
Page 144
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington November 12, 2020
Ontario Barn Preservation Advocacy Letter: The Ontario Barn Preservation sent a
letter to municipalities in Ontario identifying an issue whereby historic barns are being
demolished as part of applications to sever surplus farm dwellings, contributing to a loss
of cultural heritage and rural character. The matter was discussed at the October 20
Clarington Heritage Committee meeting, where the letter was referred to the Agricultural
Advisory Committee of Clarington for comment. The Committee expressed an
appreciation for the value of historical barns to the rural landscape but is mindful of the
function of barns as infrastructure to facilitate farm production. Farming and the needs
of agricultural operations and operating parameters have changed over time. Barn
replacements may be necessary to maintain farm viability. Continuing to repair and
maintain a barn that is no longer serving its purpose as part of the agricultural operation
is costly expense for the business.
Liaison Reports
Durham Agriculture Advisory Committee: Tom Barrie provided an update from the
November 10 DAAC meeting in his email to all prior to the meeting.
Mike Scott, Project Planner, is the new DAAC Staff Liaison.
DAAC has formed a sub-committee to examine and follow the development of the
Federal Clean Fuel Standard. The proposal includes land use and biodiversity
criteria that are of a concern to the farming sector. Of key concern are the
proposed setbacks from a watercourse or wetland and the restriction on growing
biofuel crops on recently cleared land.
The Region has received concerns about new ‘Share the Road” signs, thought to
contain too much information to be effective. Works Staff will attend the December
DAAC meeting to discuss the signs. They are also scheduled to attend the
January 2021 AACC meeting to review rural area capital projects and can be
asked about the signs then.
Durham Region Federation of Agriculture: Rickard Rekker provided an update from
the October 21 DRFA meeting in his email to all prior to the meeting. Durham Farm
Connections is reviewing nominations for the Celebrate Agriculture 2020 Awards. An
online awards ceremony will be announced soon, and an online fundraising auction is
pending for early 2021.
Clarington Board of Trade: CBOT continues to work to coordinate a local response to
COVID for businesses, including campaigns to encourage local dining and shopping.
New Business
Request of Ministerial Zoning Order Resolution: Committee members brought
forward concerns and questions being asked in the community in response to
Resolution #C-418-20 approved at the Special Meeting of Council on October 26, 2020.
These relate primarily to the paragraph in the resolution asking the Province for a
commitment “to reviewing the lands south of Highway 2 between Hwy 418 and Maple
Grove Road for inclusion in the Greenbelt based on their contributions to the systems of
agriculture, natural heritage and water resources.” They include questions about the
relationship of this request to the request from Home Hardware for Municipal Council
Page 145
Agricultural Advisory Committee of Clarington November 12, 2020
support for a Minister’s Zoning Order, concern about public notice, and seeking
clarification on the potential implications of the request and the process for study of a
Greenbelt expansion. Mayor Foster was in attendance and responded to questions.
For background and context, Staff provided the Committee with a copy of the Clarington
Official Plan - Special Study Area 2 policies, and an excerpt from the Official Plan
Review – Countryside Discussion Paper (section 4.6.5) that gives some history on the
Committee’s past consideration of the value of this area to agriculture. Committee
members commented that growth and development in the surrounding areas is
increasingly challenging the ability to farm in the area and, in particular, the ability to
move farm equipment on public roads.
Next Meeting
Thursday, December 10, 2020 @ 7:30 pm (Virtual Meeting)
Page 146
Clarington Accessibility Advisory Committee
Minutes for the meeting of
November 5, 2020, 6:30PM
Via Microsoft Teams
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Present: Sylvia Jaspers-Fayer, Vice-Chair
Pinder DaSilva
Councillor Janice Jones (until 7:00 p.m.)
Deb Kalogris
Sarah McConaghy
Catherine McConaghy
Marina Ross
Tim Van Leeuwen
Also Present: Erica Mittag, Community Development Coordinator
Jack Ammendolia, Watson & Associates Economists Ltd.
Regrets: Shea-Lea Latchford, Chair
Sarah Taylor
The meeting was called to order at 6:03 p.m. Sylvia Jaspers-Fayer chaired the
meeting.
1. Guest Presentation and Q&A
1.1. Jack Ammendolia, Managing Partner and Director, Education of Watson &
Associates Economists Ltd. Jack shared a presentation about the current Ward
Boundary Review in the Municipality of Clarington. Clarington currently has 4
wards. This review will look at the population and housing forecasts for today
and into the future (next 3 election cycles). The review looks to keep
communities of interest intact, balance urban and rural, receive community
feedback.
1.2. Phase 1 of the review focused on awareness and connecting with communities
to help identify priorities and options. Through public consultation, the initial
assessment is that the current boundaries do not meet Clarington’s guiding
principles or the population growth that has resulted in disparities (concentration
of growth in Ward 1 and 2). Results to date show that population parity /
representation principle is the most important to the community (46%).
Page 147
Clarington Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes – October 7, 2020
Page 2 of 4
1.3. Mr. Ammendolia provided an overview of the options being recommended:
o Option A – population distribution with 2 wards maintaining a mix of rural
and urban combinations; Courtice and East end intact with an East / West
split for Bowmanville.
o Option B – reflects distinctive communities of interest but results in large
population disparities; Ward 1 and Ward 2 are very large in comparison
with the others.
o Option C – adds a rural ward north of Courtice and Bowmanville for a
total of 5 wards; has decent population disparity and keeps communities
of interest together.
o Option D – includes 6 wards; 2 of them largely rural areas but results in
significant population disparity.
1.4. Members are asked to visit https://engageclarington.ca/ward-boundary-review to
complete the survey by November 24, 2020. Members are asked to share this
link with their networks to ensure more resident participation.
2. Review of Previous Meeting Minutes
2.1. The Members reviewed the meeting minutes from the October 7, 2020 meeting.
Moved by Tim Van Leeuwen; seconded by Deb Kalogris
That the minutes of the meeting of October 7, 2020 be approved.
Carried
The Members reviewed the meeting minutes from the October 22, 2020 meeting.
Moved by Tim Van Leeuwen; seconded by Marina Ross
That the minutes of the meeting of October 22, 2020 be approved.
3. Business Arising out of Previous Minutes
3.1. Request from Newcastle resident for additional accessible parking in Downtown
Newcastle
Erica will continue to follow up with Public Works on the status of this project.
3.2. Accessibility of Air Travel
Page 148
Clarington Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes – October 7, 2020
Page 3 of 4
Erica has invited MPP Park to an upcoming meeting to discuss advocacy to other
levels of government. Erica will reach out to the Ministry of Transportation to see
if a representative could attend an upcoming meeting.
3.3. Service Ontario Bowmanville – Accessibility Concerns
Erica Mittag followed up with the manager of the Service Ontario locations for an
update. He advised the technology in use at the public sites is not always
available for the privately owned sites. Erica recommended that for consistency
of service this technology should be offered at all locations. Erica will continue to
follow up.
3.4. Region of Durham Accessibility Awards
Members determined a virtual celebration event will be held on Wednesday,
December 2 at 7:00 p.m. to recognize businesses and organizations in
Clarington who have made contributions that improve accessibility. Erica Mittag
will coordinate invitations and plan for the evening. Members offered to hand
deliver (with physical distancing measures) the certificates and prizes (swag
bags) to the nominees following the ceremony.
4. New Business:
4.1. International Day of People with Disabilities – December 3, 2020
Members discussed recognizing International Day of People with Disabilities on
December 3, 2020 by sharing social media content through Clarington’s social
media channels. Erica will coordinate this with the Communication Department.
4.2. Ontario Raising Awareness about Accessibility
The Province of Ontario is launching a new public education campaign which will
help organizations identify and remove barriers. It will help b usinesses learn
more about accessibility, inclusion and hiring people with disabilities.
4.3. Website Accessibility
Organizations are obligated to have accessible websites by January 1, 2021.
Erica has been in contact with the Municipality of Clarington’s Communications
team and confirmed the website is compliant.
4.4. Abilities Virtual Conference
There is a free virtual conference being held globally November 20 to 22, 2020.
There will be seminars discussing new products coming to market, key note
speakers and panel discussions. Erica will share the registration link for those
who are interested.
Page 149
Clarington Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes – October 7, 2020
Page 4 of 4
5. Adjournment
4.1 The meeting was adjourned at 7:46 p.m.
Moved by Sarah McConaghy; seconded by Pinder DaSilva
That the meeting be adjourned.
Carried
Next meeting Wednesday, December 2, 7:00 p.m. (Awards Celebration)
Via Microsoft Teams
Page 150
SAMEL WILMOT NAURE AREA MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
VIRTUAL MEETING OF OCTOBER 13, 2020
VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS
Present: Carrie-Anne Atkins, Kate Potter, Leo Blindenbach, Tom Hossie, Brian
Reid, Ken Mercer, Patrick Bothwell, Rod McArthur, Jocelyn Whalen
Regrets: Corinna Traill, Meaghan Vandenbrink, Maggie
Welcome and Introduction of new Staff Liaison : Brian welcomed the members
to our first virtual meeting and introduced Ken Mercer . Ken is known to many of
us on the Committee by virtue of his role on the Operations side of things with
the Municipality of Clarington. Ken shared some details of his experience with the
municipality and this committee. We look forward to working together.
Approval of the Agenda: moved by Jocelyn, seconded by Leo that the agenda be
accepted. Carried
Approval of the minutes of the meeting of September 8th: moved by Carrie Ann,
seconded by Patrick, that the minutes of the meeting of September 8th be
approved. Carried.
Updates/Status Reports:
Monarch Tagging – Tom Hossie advised that as of the time of the meeting, he had
received tagging data for approximately 230 monarchs. And that others had tags
yet to be submitted. Brian reported that he had an additional 75 that he would be
getting to Tom shortly. It is clear that the concentration of monarchs this year was
quite different from the past two years, probably due to hot dry weather early in
the season ( affecting the growth of pollinator plants ) and an fall cold snap that
affected the duration of the migration.
Wildflower meadow project – Leo advised that Mr. Kemp had been in contact
with him and will do the final cultivation and planting later this fall.
Spring Wildflower Planting Project – members will recall that this was postponed
due to our inability to do this as a public event. OPG has advised us that they will
allow the money they had allocated for this year’s project to be carried over to
Page 151
next year. It was suggested that if we are not able to do this in our usual manner
in the spring of 2021, we could still undertake the project as a public event by
scheduling small numbers of participants at different times.
Retractable Banner – Brian and Kate will continue to work on this project with a
view to having something available for events in the new year. The previous cost
estimate for this was approximately $465 plus HST. Ken will investigate where
funds could be made available to pay for this.
Possible Winter Event – Brian reminded members that we had previously
scheduled Dt. Sheila Colla, a professor from York University, to do a presentation
for us on her specialized work with bees. This had been cancelled due to covid.
Brian will follow up with Dr.. Colla with a view to holding this event in the spring of
2021 subject to covid. It was also suggested that this might be done virtually.
Brian will explore this option with Dr. Colla as well.
Great Lakes Local Action Fund – Leo reviewed what he had sent to members
previously concerning the possibility of obtaining funding to undertake a smart-
phone information project for SWNA similar to what Valleys 2000 has undertaken.
After some discussion, Jocelyn agreed to take a lead role in this project with
assistance from Carrie-Ann and Kate. Ken will provide contact information for
Jocelyn and review any requirements from the municipality.
COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS FOR KEN:
Ken was asked to review the mowing schedule for the area along the Lakebreeze
waterfront where we have been panting pollinator plants for the past three years.
The idea is that a mowing should be done late each season to allow for fresh
growth of these perennials in the spring.
Ken was asked to look into the possibility of having an annual budget of some sort
for the work of the committee.
Garbage and removal: Ken was asked to look into the possibility of having some
type of lids for the various garbage receptacles throughout the Nature Area
and/or the possibility of obtaining a heavier grade of plastic bags. Ken advised
that the municipality is looking into different types of waste receptacles as well.
Ken was also asked if the municipality could take a larger role in the emptying of
the containers themselves.
Page 152
Repairs: two major items were discussed: repairs to the sign at the snake
hybernacleum and the reconstruction of the observation platform at the foot of
the Cobbledick side of the nature area. The latter is in the budget for 20121.
Repairs at the snake pit are on the operations to-do list.
Next Meeting: Tuesday November 10th, 2020
Adjournment: moved by Carrie-Ann, seconded by Patrick. Carried.
The meeting adjourned at approximately 8:00 p.m.
Page 153
SAMUEL WILMOT NATURE AREA ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF MEETING OF NOVEBER 10, 2020
7:00 P.M. BY Google Meets
Present: Patrick Bothwell, Leo Blindenbach, Meaghan Vandenbrink, , Tom Hossie,
Jocelyn Whalen, Maggie Luczak, Brian Reid, Ken Mercer ( staff ) , Rod McArthur
Regrets: Kate Potter
Adoption of Agenda: moved by Patrick Bothwell, seconded by Tom Hossie, that
the agenda be approved. CARRIED
Approval of Minutes: Moved by Leo Blindenbach, seconded by Patrick Bothwell,
that the minutes of the meeting of October 13, 2020, be approved . CARRIED.
Updates/Status Reports:
Monarch Tagging Program, 2020: Tom reported that as of the current date he
had 375 completed tags with some still outstanding. Meaghan advised that she
had an additional 50 which would be forwarded to Tom. Once all have been
received Tom will upload them to the central data base. The combined total is
very satisfying , particularly given that the tagging could not be done as a
community event this year but rather was done entirel y by committee members .
Well done, everyone. Special thanks to Tom for leading the campaign again this
year.
Wildflower/Pollinator Garden Project: Leo reported that this project, which
commenced in August of 2019, has been completed. Final cultivation an d seeding
was done on November 4th by Mr. Kirk Kemp, owner of Algoma Orchards of
Newcastle, who generously provided the labour and equipment o make this
happen. Brian advised that he had submitted an article about the project for
insertion on the SWNA blog site and that a formal letter of appreciation would be
prepared and sent to Mr. Kemp. The Committee will also look into the possibility
of having a Certificate of Appreciation generated by the Municipality to thank Mr.
Kemp for his contribution. The committee also extended its appreciation to Leo
for spearheading this project.
Page 154
Tom noted that some type of signage might be available through Wildlife
Preservation Canada who provided the grant to us in the first place. Brian will
contact the organization to ad vise them that we have competed the planting and
enquire about signage.
Great Lakes Local Action Fund Project: Jocelyn advised that we were unable to
meet the short deadline to submit our application for this year but that she had
been able to assemble the application package, relevant information including
costing etc. She has also had discussion with representa tives of Connected Creeks
who have undertaken a similar project. She noted that there were opportunities
for a collaborative approach going forward. It was suggested that we approach
the local MPP about possible extension of the application deadline. But it was also
noted that we require approval from the municipality to proceed with submission
. Ken and Brian will look into the steps required to obtain that approval. It was
also noted that we will need to involve the communications department of the
municipality to some extent because of the project’s potential connection to the
municipal website. Jocelyn was thanked for her efforts in working on this
application and project.
Considerable discussion took place including around the possibility of establ ishing
an independent website in conjunction with a process of generating QR codes and
placing them on existing signage. This might help us determine the degree of
interest in/and usage of this type of mechanism for disseminating information
about the SWNA. It might also be possible to incorporate connection to our I
Naturalist “ site “ into this initiative. A subcommittee was formed to investigate
these things. Members are Tom Hossie, Maggie Luczak, Patrick Bothwell and
Jocelyn Whalen.
Other business: none
Next Meeting: scheduled for Tuesday December 8th. Members were asked to
enter this date in their calendars recognizing that the meeting might be cancelled
by the Chair if there is insufficient information or materials to justify a meeting.
Adjournment: Moved by Leo Blindenbach, , seconded by Patrick Bothwell that
the meeting be adjourned. Carried.
The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
Page 155
Clarington Heritage Committee
Minutes
October 20, 2020
- 1 -
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility
Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
Minutes of the Clarington Heritage Committee held via Microsoft Teams on October
20, 2020, at 7:00 PM.
Members Present were: Peter Vogel, Victor Suppan, David Reesor, Ron Sproule,
Noel Gamble, Marina Ross (Museum), Steve Conway,
Councillor Ron Hooper, Myno Van Dyke (NVDHS)
Regrets: Katharine Warren, Jason Moore (ACO)
Staff Present: Faye Langmaid, Amy Burke, Sarah Allin, Planning and
Development Services
Guests: Hyder Syed; Applicant Re: 62 King St. W.
1 Declaration of Interest
There were no disclosures of interest stated at this meeting.
2 Land Acknowledgement Statement
P. Vogel read aloud Clarington’s Land Acknowledgement Statement.
3 Adoption of Agenda
20.33 “Approved by Consensus”
That the Agenda be adopted.
4 Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting
20.34 “Approved by Consensus”
That the minutes of the September 15, 2020 Clarington Heritage Committee
meeting be adopted.
“Carried”
5 Delegations/Presentations
5.1 Heritage Permit Application HPA2020-005 for 62 King Street West, Bowmanville;
Presentation by H. Syed
H. Syed provided an overview of the proposed works at 62 King Street W. in
Bowmanville, which includes the removal of a more recent alteration to the front
façade (newer section of brick, two windows and a single door), and replacing with
a new double door entrance, and two large windows. The proposed works would
not alter/remove any of the original brick and would reverse a previous alteration to
create a façade that more closely resembles the original style of the building. The
applicant has submitted elevation and floor plan drawings in support of the
proposed Heritage Permit application.
Page 156
Clarington Heritage Committee
Minutes
October 20, 2020
- 2 -
Committee members received the presentation and requested confirmation that
the original brick façade would not be affected by the proposal, and that the new
double door would be of black aluminum and designed to match the new entrance
recently installed next door in the same building (66 King Street W.). Committee
members also inquired about accessibility considerations, the rear entrance to the
building.
Committee members and staff thanked the applicant for his appreciation for and
commitment to caring for the building, and for demonstrating how heritage
buildings can be adapted for continued use.
6 Business Arising
6.1 Heritage Permit Application: 62 King Street West, Bowmanville
A Heritage Permit application has been received for 62 King Street West,
Bowmanville remove a newer section of brick, two windows and an entrance, and
replace with a new double door and two large windows in a style that more closely
resembles that of the original building façade. In 1998 the property was designated
under the Ontario Heritage Act by By-law 98-34.
A Heritage Permit is required for proposed alterations that may affect the identified
heritage attributes of the property. Based upon the drawings, prepared by ISM
Architects Inc., dated July 6, 2020 and the information provided in support of the
application, the Committee considers the proposed application to be appropriate,
provided no original brick is altered/removed.
20.35 Moved by N. Gamble, seconded by S. Conway
That the Heritage Committee supports Heritage Permit Application File No.
HPA2020-005 as presented in the elevation drawings prepared by ISM Architects
Inc., dated July 6, 2020 as a minor application to be approved by the Director of
Planning and Development.
“Carried”
Page 157
Clarington Heritage Committee
Minutes
October 20, 2020
- 3 -
6.2 Belmont House (302 Given Road) Update:
The applicant provided a response to the Committee’s comments as provided at
the September 2020 Heritage Committee meeting. Committee members
reiterated the desire to see the front façade restored with pillar and balustrade
detailing consistent with photo evidence provided to the applicant. Members of
the Committee have corresponded with a resource who may be able to assist with
the location of the artesian well. Committee members discussed the consideration
of a heritage conservation easement to address the long-term maintenance of the
property. Staff will continue to work with the applicant to address the Committee’s
comments and will prepare recommendation report for the Belmont House
Heritage Permit application in accordance with the Committee’s September 2020
recommendations.
6.3 Heritage Committee Budget for 2021
20.36 Moved by S. Conway, seconded by N. Gamble
That the Clarington Heritage Committee requests $1500 from its account in the
2021 budget for the Municipality.
“Carried”
6.4 Ontario Barn Preservation Letter
The Ontario Barn Preservation sent a letter to municipalities in Ontario identifying
an issue whereby historic barns are being demolished as part of applications to
sever surplus farm dwellings. Committee members discussed the matter and
referred the letter to Planning and Development Services staff with the suggestion
that it be forwarded to the Agricultural Advisory Committee.
20.37 Moved by R. Hooper, seconded by S. Conway
That the Heritage Committee receives the Ontario Barn Preservation Letter, dated
May 28, 2020 as information and refers the letter back to staff for consideration,
along with the Agricultural Advisory Committee.
“Carried”
7 Correspondence and Council Referrals:
7.1 Email re: Designation of the Fletcher Tree: An email was received through R.
McEachern from a descendent of Alexander Fletcher extending appreciation to
Council and the Heritage Committee for the designation the Fletcher Tree and
recognizing the contribution of the Fletcher family to Bowmanville’s history.
Page 158
Clarington Heritage Committee
Minutes
October 20, 2020
- 4 -
8 Reports from other Committees
8.1 Bowmanville, Newcastle, and Orono CIPs –The next CIP Liaison Group meetings
are scheduled for November.
8.2 Architectural Conservancy of Ontario (ACO), Clarington Branch – None.
8.3 Newcastle Village District Historical Society (NVDHS) – The NVDHS room
remains closed, however the newsletter is still being sent. Recently donated items
included a very interesting wooden table made from an original drive wheel from
the Wilmot Mill.
8.4 Museum – The Sarah Jane Williams Heritage Centre is open for research and
self-directed tours. The structural work at Waverley Place is ongoing.
8.5 Heritage Conservation District Advisory Committee – None
8.6 Wilmot Creek Heritage Park – None.
9 Project Reports
9.1 The sub-committee evaluated the following properties and recommended as
follows:
The McGill Gates at the Bowmanville Cemetery; 1330 Haines Street,
Bowmanville: the gates be considered for designation under Part IV of the
Ontario Heritage Act; significant to the cultural heritage of the community; and
172, 175, and 192 Liberty Street N., Bowmanville: the properties be
considered for addition to the Municipal Register; significant as a group, being
‘Law, Medicine, and Gospel’ to the cultural heritage of the community.
20.38 Moved by V. Suppan, seconded by R. Sproule
That the Heritage Committee recommends to Council that the McGill Gates at
the Bowmanville Cemetery located on the property at 1330 Haines Street,
Bowmanville be considered for designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage
Act.
“Carried”
20.39 Moved by N. Gamble, seconded by D. Reesor
That the Heritage Committee recommends to Council that the properties at 172,
175, and 192 Liberty Street N. in Bowmanville be considered for addition to the
Municipal Register.
“Carried”
Page 159
Clarington Heritage Committee
Minutes
October 20, 2020
- 5 -
9.2 Outreach/Education Committee:
The Outreach/Education Committee will work with Planning and Development
Services staff and the owner of 1697 Highway 2 on the cultural heritage
information initiative.
10 New Business
10.1 Proposed Regulation under the Ontario Heritage Act (Bill 108): The Province has
released for comment a proposed Regulation to accompany the changes to the
Ontario Heritage Act as part of Bill 108. The proposed regulation is intended to
provide improved provincial direction on how to use the Act, clearer rules and tools
for decision making, and support consistency in appeals processes. The
Regulation is posted for comment on the Environmental Registry of Ontario until
November 5, 2020.
10.2 Land Registry Office Changes: Effective October 13, 2020, land registration
services including self-service options will only be accessible online.
10.3 Orono Town Hall: The Orono Town Hall clock tower has been repaired and the
clock is ringing again. Committee members expressed their appreciation for the
completion of the repair work.
11 Adjournment
Adjournment, 9:25 pm.
Next Meeting: November 17, 2020, 7:00 p.m.
Page 160
Clarington Heritage Committee
Minutes
November 17, 2020
- 1 -
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility
Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
Minutes of the Clarington Heritage Committee held via Microsoft Teams on November
17, 2020, at 7:00 PM.
Members Present were: Peter Vogel, Victor Suppan, David Reesor, Ron Sproule,
Noel Gamble, Steve Conway, Councillor Ron Hooper, Myno
Van Dyke (NVDHS), Katharine Warren
Regrets: Marina Ross (Museum), Jason Moore (ACO)
Staff Present: Faye Langmaid, Amy Burke, Sarah Allin, Planning and
Development Services
Guests: None
1 Declaration of Interest
There were no disclosures of interest stated at this meeting.
2 Land Acknowledgement Statement
P. Vogel read aloud Clarington’s Land Acknowledgement Statement.
3 Adoption of Agenda
20.40 “Approved by Consensus”
That the Agenda be adopted.
“Carried”
4 Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting
20.41 “Approved by Consensus”
That the minutes of the October 20, 2020 Clarington Heritage Committee
meeting be adopted.
“Carried”
5 Delegations/Presentations: None
6 Business Arising
6.1 Newcastle Village District Historical Society (NVDHS) Membership Renewal:
The Committee’s membership to the Newcastle Village District Historical Society is
due for renewal. The membership fee for organizations is $25.00.
20.42 Moved by R. Hooper, seconded by K. Warren
That the Newcastle Village District Historical Society membership be renewed for
the value of $25.00.
“Carried”
Page 161
Clarington Heritage Committee
Minutes
November 17, 2020
- 2 -
6.2 Belmont House (302 Given Road) Update:
Recommendations of staff report PSD-044-20 to approve the Heritage Permit
application for 302 Given Road subject to conditions were adopted at the Planning
and Development Committee meeting on October 26, and ratified at the
November 2 Council meeting, along with the minutes of the October Heritage
Committee meeting containing Heritage Committee’s comments on the
application. The Heritage Permit application was approved subject to conditions
relating to (i) the applicant addressing the outstanding comments from the
Heritage Committee, and (ii) the property being placed under site plan control to
address matters relating to landscaping, access, and servicing as well as to
ensure the proposed restoration is undertaken in accordance with the
Conservation Plan by persons with expertise in heritage building restoration.
Other conditions relate to the significance of the artesian well and determination of
its location on the property to avoid and mitigate adverse impacts on the well to
the extent possible. By-law 2020-075 to place the lands under site plan control
was passed by Council on November 2, 2020.
Committee members indicated they have been in touch with a former resident
who may be able to help locate the artesian well. The former resident of 302
Given Road also advised the brick base in the photograph provided by the
Committee to the applicant was not original to the home but had been added to
address rotting at the base of the columns. The original columns were likely
wooden from the bottom to the top, in keeping with what has been proposed by
the applicant. The second storey railing shown in the photograph is likely original
to the dwelling.
Planning and Development Services staff will continue to correspond with the
applicant to address the Committee’s outstanding comments and work towards
the submission of a site plan application.
6.3 Fletcher Tree
Committee members highlighted the Fletcher Tree represents the first time
Clarington has designated a living heritage resource. Along with the
recommendation for designation of the Fletcher Tree, the Committee put forward
information relating to tree protection by-laws in effect in other municipalities.
Similar feedback was provided by Committee members as part of the
Neighbourhood Character Study process. Committee members inquired whether
there might be opportunity to develop provisions similar to those within the
Property Standards By-law for designated heritage properties.
Planning and Development Services staff indicated the further protection and
commemoration of the Fletcher Tree can be addressed as part of applicable
planning approvals processes relating to the eventual development of the
property. Broader tree-protection measures are matters for consideration by the
Public Works Department. Planning and Development Services staff will ensure
Public Works staff is aware of the Committee’s interest in developing additional
tools for tree protection.
Page 162
Clarington Heritage Committee
Minutes
November 17, 2020
- 3 -
Committee members asked that the Fletcher Tree be added as a standing item on
the Committee’s agenda.
7 Correspondence and Council Referrals: None
8 Reports from other Committees
8.1 Bowmanville, Newcastle, and Orono CIPs –The next CIP Liaison Group meetings
are scheduled for November. Updates will be provided at the next meeting.
8.2 Architectural Conservancy of Ontario (ACO), Clarington Branch – None
8.3 Newcastle Village District Historical Society (NVDHS) – The NVDHS room
remains closed, however the newsletter is still being sent. The document
component of the digitization project has been completed. Work has now
commenced on the digitization of artefacts.
8.4 Museum – None
8.5 Heritage Conservation District Advisory Committee – The approved works at 5
Beech Avenue including a replacement perimeter fence, a replacement detached
garage and covered walkway are underway. The fencing is complete. Committee
members acknowledged the property owner’s commitment to ensure the
alterations to the property uphold the significance of the Heritage Conservation
District.
8.6 Wilmot Creek Heritage Park – Committee members who have been involved in the
Wilmot Creek Heritage Park project raised concerns relating to their ability to
continue to provide input into the project. Committee members would like to
continue their history of active involvement in this project with the intent to create a
heritage park that celebrates the heritage of the area and educates young people.
Committee members also inquired about the status of the Wilmot Crown Lands.
Planning and Development Committee approved a report to establish street
names for the Foster Creek plan of subdivision that specifically relate to the history
of the area. The report will be considered for ratification at the next Council
meeting.
Planning and Development Services staff will work with Public Works staff to
enable the continued participation of Committee members in this initiative.
Discussion with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry staff has been
initiated.
The Committee requested that this item remain a standing item on future
Committee meeting agendas. …
9 Project Reports
9.1 The sub-committee evaluated the following properties and recommended as
follows:
Page 163
Clarington Heritage Committee
Minutes
November 17, 2020
- 4 -
77 Scugog Street, Bowmanville: the property be considered for addition to
the Municipal Register; significant to the cultural heritage of the community.
20.43 Moved by V. Suppan, seconded by R. Sproule
That the Heritage Committee recommends to Council that the property at 77
Scugog Street in Bowmanville be considered for addition to the Municipal
Register.
“Carried”
26 Hunt Street, Bowmanville: the property be documented and removed from
the Heritage Merit category on the Cultural Heritage Resource List.
20.44 Moved by V. Suppan, seconded by R. Sproule
That the Heritage Committee recommends to Council that (i) the property at 26
Hunt Street be photographically documented for Clarington’s archives, and (ii)
the property no longer needs to be included on Clarington’s Cultural Heritage
Resource List.
“Carried”
75 Wellington Street, Bowmanville: the property be considered for addition to
the Municipal Register; significant to the cultural heritage of the community
and the fabric of the surrounding neighbourhood.
20.45 Moved by V. Suppan, seconded by S. Conway
That the Heritage Committee recommends to Council that the property at 75
Wellington Street in Bowmanville be considered for addition to the Municipal
Register.
“Carried”
9.2 Outreach/Education Committee:
The Outreach/Education Committee will work with Planning and Development
Services staff and the owner of 1697 Highway 2 on the cultural heritage
information initiative. The sub-committee will plan to meet to discuss the priorities
and parameters for the project.
10 New Business
10.1 Recent Passing of Councillor Don MacArthur: The Heritage Committee wished to
express their regret over the recent passing of former Councillor Don MacArthur
and recognize his valuable contributions to the Committee and cultural heritage
matters, particularly his efforts and insights on the Beech Avenue Heritage
Conservation District and Tooley’s Mill Park projects. The latest edition of the
Orono Times includes an editorial on Councillor MacArthur.
Page 164
Clarington Heritage Committee
Minutes
November 17, 2020
- 5 -
10.2 Title Searches for Heritage Purposes: Committee members requested training for
conducting title searches on heritage properties to help them undertake property
evaluations given Ontario Land Registry services are now exclusively online. It
was also requested that Fire Insurance Plans for Bowmanville be made available
to Committee members for the purpose of their research. Planning and
Development Services staff will make best efforts to address the Committee’s
requests.
10.3 December Meeting of the Heritage Committee: The Committee has conducted the
minimum number of meetings for 2020, in accordance with the Clarington Heritage
Committee Terms of Reference.
20.46 Moved by D. Reesor, seconded by K. Warren
That the Heritage Committee has opted not to hold a December 2020 meeting,
as it has achieved the minimum number of meetings for 2020 in accordance with
the Clarington Heritage Committee Terms of Reference.
“Carried”
10.4 81 Scugog Street, Bowmanville: It has come to the attention of Committee
members that identified heritage attributes of the designated property at 81
Scugog Street have fallen into disrepair and may pose a safety risk. Committee
members asked staff to look into this matter in the context of the Property
Standards By-law provisions for heritage properties.
10.5 Highway 407 ETR: V. Suppan provided an update on the status of the Highway
407 ETR signage matters relating to the indigenous monument at the interchange
to Highway 35/115, ‘Downtown Clarington’ signage and community gateway
signs.
Adjournment
K. Warren moved, D. Reesor seconded adjournment, 8:55 pm.
Next Meeting: January 19, 2021, 7:00 p.m.
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Committee
Report to Council
If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Report To: Council Report Number: GGR-016-20
Date of Meeting: November 23, 2020
Report Subject: General Government Committee Meeting of November 9, 2020
Recommendations:
1. Receive for Information
(a) 9.1 Minutes of the Bowmanville Business Improvement Area
dated September 15, 2020
(b) 9.2 Minutes of the Newcastle Business Improvement Area dated
October 8, 2020
(c) 9.3 Ralph Walton, Regional Clerk, Region of Durham, Regarding
Natural Resources Canada Small Nuclear Reactor Action
Plan 2020
(d) 9.4 Memo from Rob Maciver, Municipal Solicitor/Director of
Legislative Services, Regarding Licensing of Payday Loan
Establishments
(e) 9.5 Sue Bernardi, CMO BA, MPS Team Leader, Municipality of
Port Hope, Regarding the Transfer of Low Radioactive Waste
Material from Port Granby Site to Port Hope Long-Term
Waste Management Facility
(f) 9.6 Confidential Memo from Ron Albright, Manager of
Infrastructure, Regarding Potential Property Purchase
(g) FND-028-19 Prudent Investor Standard for Municipal Investments – Update
and Options Analysis
Page 178
Municipality of Clarington Page 2
Report GGR-016-20
2. Jim Boate, Regarding Snow Clearing on the Samuel Wilmot Nature
Area, Valleys 2000, Soper Creek, and Farewell Creek Trails
Whereas Outdoor exercise is beneficial, especially now during COVID-19 for
our physical, mental health and general overall well being;
And whereas there will be more residents in Clarington this winter as they
will not be travelling;
Now therefore be it resolved that the Public Works Department include snow
removal on the following Clarington Trails (as listed in Communication 10.1
General Government Committee Meeting) for the 2020/2021 Winter Season:
a. Bowmanville Valley 2000 Trail
b. Soper Creek Trail Bowmanville
c. Farewell Creek Trail Courtice;
That Staff be directed to include the trails as a consideration for the 2021
Budget;
That pre-budget approval be given for the 2020/2021 Winter Season for the
following:
a. Bowmanville Valley 2000 Trail
b. Soper Creek Trail Bowmanville
c. Farewell Creek Trail Courtice; and
That all interested parties including the Clarington Active Transportation Safe
Roads Committee be notified of Council's decision.
3. Delegation of Patrick McNeil, Chair of the Board of Directors, Elexicon
Corporation, Lesley Gallinger, President & Chief Executive Officer,
Elexicon Energy, and Karen Fisher, Interim President & CEO, Elexicon
Group, Regarding Elexicon Update
That the Delegation of Patrick McNeil, Chair of the Board of Directors, Elexicon
Corporation, Lesley Gallinger, President & Chief Executive Officer, Elexicon
Energy, and Karen Fisher, Interim President & CEO, Elexicon Group, regarding
Elexicon Update, be received with thanks.
4. Orono Town Hall Elevator Project – Additional Funding
That Report CSD-012-20 be received; and
That additional funds as indicated in Report CSD-012-20 be approved.
Page 179
Municipality of Clarington Page 3
Report GGR-016-20
5. December Parking
That Report LGS-003-20 be received;
That courtesy parking for Downtown Bowmanville be provided for the month of
December 2020;
That Staff will work with the Bowmanville BIA to develop a further parking
recommendations for downtown Bowmanville; and
That all interested parties listed in Report LGS-003-20 and any delegations be
advised of Council’s decision.
6. Investment Options Update
That Report FND-038-20 be received; and
That the Director of Financial Services/Treasurer be directed to work with the ONE
JIB to become a member of the joint investment board and adopt the prudent
investor standard.
7. Request of Extension for Asset Management Regulation
Implementation
That Report FND-039-20 be received;
That the letter dated October 22, 2020, from the Municipal Finance Offi cers
Association of Ontario attached to report FND-039-20, as attachment 1, be
received for information;
That the draft resolution attached to report FND-039-20, as attachment 2, be
approved as follows:
W hereas the COVID-19 pandemic has had significant financial and
operational impacts on Ontario municipalities;
And whereas municipalities have had to divert resources towards addressing
the immediate needs of the pandemic and maintaining service delivery
standards despite evolving restrictions and limited funds;
And whereas the Government of Ontario has delayed timelines with respect
to several pieces of legislation;
And whereas the Government of Ontario has regulated municipal asset
management through O. Reg. 588/17: Asset Management Planning for
Municipal Infrastructure under the Infrastructure for Jobs and Prosperity Act,
2015;
Page 180
Municipality of Clarington Page 4
Report GGR-016-20
And whereas O. Reg. 588/17 mandates that every municipality shall prepare
an asset management plan in respect of its core municipal infrastructure
assets by July 1, 2021, and in respect of all of its other municipal
infrastructure assets by July 1, 2023;
And whereas the key components of an asset management plan as required
by the regulation are:
1.Infrastructure asset inventory
2.Levels of service
3.Lifecycle management and financial strategy
And whereas there is a concern amongst Municipal Finance Officers’
Association of Ontario (MFOA) members and their municipalities that current
capacity challenges (redeployment of staff, and lack of available resources)
will result in limitations for purposeful asset management planning;
And whereas Ontario municipalities do not anticipate the current capacity
challenges to be resolved in the short-term;
Now therefore be it resolved that the Municipality of Clarington supports
MFOA’s letter to the Ministry of Infrastructure requesting a one-year
extension of deadlines in O. Reg. 588/17: Asset Management Planning fo r
Municipal Infrastructure under the Infrastructure for Jobs and Prosperity Act,
2015; so that all municipalities can focus on the immediate needs of the
pandemic and engage in municipal asset management planning when
capacity challenges are resolved.; and
That all interested parties listed in Report FND-039-20 and any delegations be
advised of Council’s decision.
Page 181
Municipality of Clarington Page 5
Report GGR-016-20
8. Emergency Services Master Plan Update
That Report FND-040-20 be received;
That Pomax Consulting Inc. with a bid amount of $69,400.32 (net HST rebate),
providing the lowest overall cost and meeting the passing threshold and all terms,
conditions and specifications of RFP2020-8, be awarded the contract for the
provision of Consulting Services as required to complete the Fire Master Plan
Update;
That the funds required for this project in the total amount of $69,400.32 (net HST
rebate) is in the approved budget allocation as provided, be funded from the
following account; and
Description Account Number Amount
EMS-Admin.-Consulting 100-28-280-00000-7160 $69,400
That all interested parties listed in Report FND-040-20 and any delegations be
advised of Council’s decision.
9. Bond Head Park Jetty – Erosion Analysis and Report
That Report FND-041-20 be received;
That WSP Canada Inc. with a bid amount of $37,638.99 (Net HST Rebate),
providing the lowest overall cost and meeting the passing threshold and all terms,
conditions and specifications of RFP2020-12 be awarded the contract for the
provision of Consulting Services as required to complete the Bond Head Park Jetty
– Erosion Analysis and Report;
That the funds required for this project in the total amount of $37,638.99 (Net HST
Rebate) is in the approved budget allocation as provided, be funded from the
following account; and
Description Account Number Amount
Retaining Walls (2020
Budget)
110-36-330-83438-
7401
$37,639
That all interested parties listed in Report FND-041-20 and any delegations be
advised of Council’s decision.
Page 182
Municipality of Clarington Page 6
Report GGR-016-20
10. Supply and Delivery of One All Wheel Drive Cargo Van
That Report FND-043-20 be received;
That Donway Ford Inc., with a bid price of $49,443.15 (Net HST Rebate) being the
low compliant bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Q2020 -23
be awarded the contract for the Supply and Delivery of One All-Wheel Drive Cargo
Van as required by the Municipality;
That the total funds required for this project in the amount of $57,443.15 (Net HST
Rebate), which includes the vehicle cost of $49,443.15 (Net HST Rebate) and other
costs including decals, stripping, beacon lights, radio equipment, cargo partitions
and storage containers in the estimated amount of $8,000.00 ;
That the approved budget of $35,000 and the over budget amount of $22,443.15 be
funded from the Animal Services Fleet Replacement and the Animal Services
Reserve Fund as provided from the following accounts:
Description Account Number Amount
Animal Services Fleet
Replacement
110-19-388-81909-
7401
$35,000
Animal Services Reserve Fund 523-00-000-00000-
7418
$22,443
That all interested parties listed in Report and any delegations be advised of
Council’s decision.
11. Bowmanville Trail Extension
That Report FND-044-20 be received;
That CSL Group Ltd. with a total bid amount of $1,260,376.26 (Net HST Rebate)
construction costs and being the lowest compliant bidder meeting all terms,
conditions and specifications of Tender CL2020-21 and subject to a satisfactory
reference check, be awarded the contract for the completion of the Bowmanville
Trail Extension in accordance to the specifications of the bid document;
Page 183
Municipality of Clarington Page 7
Report GGR-016-20
That total funds required for this project in the amount of $1,560,757.75 (Net HST
Rebate) include $1,260,376.26 (Net HST Rebate) construction costs and other
costs such as design, material testing, inspection and contract administration,
permits, contingencies in the amount of $300,381.49 (Net HST Rebate), the Public
Works Department advises of the following funding exceeds the approved budget
allocation and additional funds of $417,296 are required. The project will be funded
by as follows:
Description Account Number Amount
Bowmanville Valley Trail (2020
Budget)
110-32-325-
83257-7401
$667,162
Erosion Protection Work (2019 &
2020 Budget)
110-32-340-
83437-7401
444,300
Pedestrian Crossover (2020
Budget)
110-32-331-
83245-7401
32,000
Funding Shortfall to be funded as
follows:
417,296
Development Charge Reserve
Fund – Roads
586-00-000-
00000-7418
101,365
Development Charge Reserve
Fund – Parks
584-00-000-
00000-7418
174,332
Municipal Capital Works Reserve
Fund
511-00-000-
00000-7418
141,599
That all interested parties listed in Report FND-044-20 and any delegations be
advised of Council’s decision.
12. Remuneration Freeze
Whereas the COVID-19 pandemic continues to negatively impact economic
realities for residents and businesses, now and into the foreseeable future;
And whereas Clarington Council wishes to support residents and businesses
throughout this crisis by continuing to provide critical programs and services to the
community with minimal increases to service costs and property taxes.
Now therefore be it resolved that Staff be directed to freeze Council Members’
salary, travel allowance, and benefits for 2021 and 2022 at the approved 2020
rates.
Page 184
Municipality of Clarington Page 8
Report GGR-016-20
13. Proposal to Close and Convey a Portion of an Unopened Road
Allowance (Found Farm) Situated Between Lot 34 & 35, Concession 1,
Former Township of Darlington
That Report PWD-003-20 be received;
That Communication Item 10.4 from Steve Brake, Director of Public Works
regarding Land Appraisal Value for Found Farm Right of W ay be Closed and
Conveyed as Part of Adjacent Development Proposals be received; and
That the Municipality of Clarington retain the land situated between Lot 34 & 35,
Concession 1, Former Township of Darlington, for possible future public purposes.
Page 185
Committee
Report to Council
If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Report To: Council Report Number: PDR-013-20
Date of Meeting: November 23, 2020
Report Subject: Planning and Development Committee Meeting of November 16, 2020
Recommendations:
1. Receive for Information
(a) 10.1 Memo from Amy Burke, Acting Manager of Special Projects,
Regarding PM2.5 Monitoring at St. Marys Cement –
Bowmanville Site
(b) 10.2 Correspondence from Ravi Mahabir, Partner, Dillon
Consulting Limited, Responding to Wendy Bracken’s
Concerns Regarding a Discrepancy in Dioxin Furan Between
Dillon Consulting’s Presentation and Posted DYEC Reports
(c) PSD-047-20 Review of BILD Municipal Benchmarking Study
2. Update on Jury Lands (Camp 30) and Draft Amendment No. 121 to the
Clarington Official Plan
That Report PSD-051-20 be received;
That the Community Vision for Jury Lands, Urban Design Master Plan + Design
Guidelines for former Ontario Boys Training School and WWII Prison of War Camp
30 by DTAH dated April 2019 be accepted;
That Official Plan Amendment 121 and the Block Master Plan implement the
Community Vision by DTAH;
That Official Plan Amendment 121 prohibit private residential development
buildings within the ring road of the Jury Lands;
That the consulting team for Soper Hills Secondary Plan be retained to assist with
refining draft Official Plan Amendment No 121;
Page 186
Municipality of Clarington Page 2
Report PDR-013-20
That Staff continue to work with the land owners on other issues to be brought
forward a subsequent report; and
That all interested parties listed in Report PSD-051-20 and any delegations be
advised of Council’s decision.
3. Update to Site Plan Control By-law
That Report PSD-048-20 be received;
That the By-law attached to Report PSD-048-20, as Attachment 2, regarding
updating the Site Plan Control By-law, be approved; and
That all interested parties listed in Report PSD-048-20 and any delegations be
advised of Council’s decision.
4. Street Names in Foster Northwest Neighbourhood, Newcastle
That Report PSD-049-20 be received;
That the street names proposed for the Foster Northwest Neighbourhood
development, as outlined in Report PSD-049-20, be approved; and
That all interested parties listed in Report PSD-049-20 and any delegations be
advised of Council’s decision.
Page 187
Audit Committee
Minutes
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Date: November 16, 2020
Time: 3:00 PM
Place: Held Virtually via Microsoft Teams
Present: Mayor Foster, Councillor Neal, Councillor Hooper
Staff Present: Andy Allison, Trevor Pinn, Catherine Carr, Heather Lynch
1. Call to Order
Councillor Neal called the meeting to order at 3:04 PM.
2. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest
2.1 None
3. Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting(s)
Resolution #AAC-001-20
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Mayor Foster
That the minutes from the Audit and Accountability Committee meeting held
September 10, 2020 be approved.
Carried
4. Presentations
4.1 None
5. Delegations
5.1. None
6. Communications – Receive for Information
6.1 None
Page 188
Audit Committee Minutes – November 16, 2020 Page | 2
7. Items for Direction
7.1 Report IAS-001-20, Internal Audit Policy
Resolution #AAC-002-20
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Report IAS-001-20, Internal Audit Policy, be approved with the following
amendment added to section 6.3 of the Policy:
“in accordance with the exceptions provided under 239(2) of the Municipal
Act, 2001, as appropriate.”
Carried
Recommendation to Council #1
That Report IAS-001-20, Internal Audit Policy, be approved with the
following amendment added to section 6.3 of the Policy:
“in accordance with the exceptions provided under 239(2) of the
Municipal Act, 2001, as appropriate.”
7.2 Report IAS-002-20, Audit Services
Resolution #AAC-003-20
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Mayor Foster
That Report IAS-002-20, Audit Services, be received.
That the proposal received from BDO Canada LLP., with a total bid price of
$343,948.80 (Net HST Rebate) being the most responsive bidder meeting all
terms, conditions and specifications of Request for Proposal RFP2020-13 be
awarded the contract for the provision of Audit Services for a five year term as
required by the Municipality.
That the total funds required in the amount of $343,948.80 (Net HST Rebate), be
drawn on an annual basis over the five-year term from the account:
Description Account Number Amount
Unclassified Admin – Audit and
Accounting Fees 100-21-211-00000-7154 $343,949
Page 189
Audit Committee Minutes – November 16, 2020 Page | 3
That all interested parties listed in Report IAS-002-20 and any delegations be
advised of Council’s decision.
Carried
Recommendation to Council #2
That the proposal received from BDO Canada LLP., with a total bid price
of $343,948.80 (Net HST Rebate) be awarded the contract for the
provision of Audit Services for a five year term as required by the
Municipality.
7.3 Report IAS-003-20, 2020 – 2021 Internal Audit Plan
Resolution #AAC-004-20
Moved by Mayor Foster
Seconded by Councillor Hooper
That Report IAS-003-20, 2021 Internal Audit Plan, be received.
That the 2020-2021 Internal Audit Plan, attached to Report IAS-003-20, as
Attachment 1, be approved.
Carried
Recommendation to Council #3
That the 2020-2021 Internal Audit Plan, attached to Report IAS-003-20, as
Attachment 1, be approved.
8. Other Business
8.1 None
9. Adjournment
Resolution #AAC-005-20
Moved by Councillor Hooper
Seconded by Mayor Foster
That the meeting adjourn at 3:41 PM.
Carried
Page 190
Corporate Policy
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Co-
ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
Policy Number/Name Page 1 of 8
POLICY TYPE: Financial
SUBSECTION:
POLICY TITLE: Internal Audit Policy
POLICY #: G14
POLICY APPROVED BY: Audit and Accountability Committee
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 16, 2020
REVISED:
APPLICABLE TO: All Municipal Operations
1. Purpose
2. Application and Scope
Definition
Internal Audit Functions
Page 191
Corporate Policy
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Co-
ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
Policy Number/Name Page 2 of 8
Types of Services
Evaluating risk exposure relating to the achievement of the Municipality’s
strategic objectives;
Evaluating the reliability and integrity of information systems and environment;
Evaluating the systems established to ensure compliance with those policies,
plans, procedures, laws and regulations, which could have a significant impact
on the organization;
Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency with which resources are employed;
Evaluating operations or programs to ascertain whether results are consistent
with established objectives and goals and whether the operations or programs
are being carried out as planned;
Evaluating governance processes;
Performing consulting and advisory services related to governance, corporate
risk management and control as appropriate for the organization;
Reporting significant risk exposures and control issues, including fraud risks,
governance issues and other matters;
Evaluating the effectiveness of the Municipality’s corporate risk management
processes; and
Evaluating specific operations at the request of the Audit Committee or
management, as appropriate.
Page 192
Corporate Policy
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Co-
ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
Policy Number/Name Page 3 of 8
3. Professionalism and Principles
Independence and Objectivity
Integrity
Confidentiality
Competence
Page 193
Corporate Policy
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Co-
ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
Policy Number/Name Page 4 of 8
Risk Based
Continuous Improvement
Supported by the Audit Committee and Management
4. Reporting Relationship
Audit Committee
Relationship with External Auditor
Page 194
Corporate Policy
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Co-
ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
Policy Number/Name Page 5 of 8
5. Mandatory Requirements
Audit Committee
Audit Plan
Page 195
Corporate Policy
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Co-
ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
Policy Number/Name Page 6 of 8
Access
6. Responsibilities
Audit Committee
Page 196
Corporate Policy
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Co-
ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
Policy Number/Name Page 7 of 8
Chief Administrative Officer, Director of Financial Services and Management
Internal Audit Manager
Page 197
Corporate Policy
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Co-
ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
Policy Number/Name Page 8 of 8
Page 198
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COUNCIL
RESOLUTION #
DATE November 23, 2020
MOVED BY Councillor Joe Neal
SECONDED BY Councillor Janice Jones
1. That, in accordance with subsection 10.12.17 of the Procedural By-Law,
Resolution #C-418-20, regarding Council’s support of the Ministerial
Zoning Order to change the zoning of 2423 Rundle Road Bowmanville,
previously adopted by Council at the Special Council Meeting of October
26, 2020, be amended to delete Paragraph 3, which reads:
“That the Province commit to reviewing the lands south of
Highway 2 between Hwy 418 and Maple Grove Road for inclusion
in the Greenbelt based on their contributions to the systems of
agriculture, natural heritage and water resources”
2. That the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing be advised of:
(i) the foregoing deletion;
(ii) that the letter dated October 27, 2020 which was forwarded to the
Minister regarding Resolution C-418-20 is withdrawn and rescinded;
and
(iii) a replacement letter be sent advising the Minister of Resolution C-
418-20, but not containing the language in the foregoing paragraph
requesting the Province to review the said lands for inclusion in the
Greenbelt.
Page 199
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COUNCIL
RESOLUTION #
DATE November 23, 2020
MOVED BY Councillor Joe Neal
SECONDED BY Councillor Janice Jones
Motion to Amend Something Previously Adopted
Regarding Removing Conditions of Council’s Support of the Ministerial
Zoning Order to Change the Zoning of 2423 Rundle Road, Bowmanville
1. That, in accordance with subsection 10.12.17 of the Procedural By-Law,
Resolution #C-418-20, regarding Council’s support of the Ministerial
Zoning Order to change the zoning of 2423 Rundle Road Bowmanville,
previously adopted by Council at the Special Council Meeting of October
26, 2020, be amended to remove the conditions of support by deleting
Paragraphs 2, and 4, which read:
That the applicant carrying out the necessary studies and
implementing the recommended works from:
• Traffic Study;
• Hydrological/Hydrogeological study;
• Environmental Impact Study;
• Servicing Study; and
• Storm water management plan;
That should the Bowmanville site be redeveloped, the applicant
commit that 25% of the units be developed as affordable housing
units (for low income families).
2. That the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing be advised of:
(i) the foregoing deletion;
(ii) that the letter dated October 27, 2020 which was forwarded to the
Minister regarding Resolution C-418-20 is withdrawn and rescinded;
and
(iii) a replacement letter be sent advising the Minister of Resolution C-
418-20, as amended above.
Page 200
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COUNCIL
RESOLUTION #
DATE November 23, 2020
MOVED BY Councillor Anderson
SECONDED BY Councillor Zwart
1. That, in accordance with subsection 10.12.17 of the Procedural By-Law,
Resolution #GG-325-20 from the General Government Committee
meeting of September 28, 2020, regarding public access to municipal
property east of Mearns Avenue at Longworth Avenue, previously adopted
by Council at the Council Meeting of November 2, 2020, be amended to
replace Paragraph 6, which reads:
“That Staff install signage, similar to the signage in place on the
fence at Mearns/Longworth, indicating the property is Municipal/EP
property and that no trespassing is permitted;”
With the following paragraphs:
“That the gate be removed from the chain link fence installed at the
terminus of Longworth Avenue, east of Crough Street;
That Public Works Staff be directed to install a removable bollard
inside the opening in the chain link fence to deter entry by
motorized vehicles;
That existing signage posted on the chain link fence be removed
and replaced with signage to indicate that motorized vehicles are
prohibited, and users enter at their own risk;”
Page 201
From: Patenaude, Lindsey
To: Patenaude, Lindsey
Subject: FW: Speed Limit in Northglen Community, Bowmanville
Date: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 1:35:43 PM
From: Laurel Kahler <laurel.kahler@hotmail.ca>
Sent: November 4, 2020 12:00 PM
To: ClerksDepartment@clarington.net
Subject: Speed Limit in Northglen Community, Bowmanville
Good morning,
I am writing to request that the speed limit on residential streets in the Northglen
community be reduced from the current 50 km per hour to a more reasonable 35 km per
hour.
Since moving into the community in May of 2019, I have been horrified at the reckless and
dangerous driving in this neighbourhood. In fact beginning in August 2019 I reached out
to the Traffic Officer at DRPS (calls never returned), Slav Spotrykus (calls never returned),
Robert Brazina, Lindsay Parks, Ron Hooper, and finally Ron Albright who recommended
that I send this email.
There was apparently a study done regarding speed on William Fair (the street that I live
on) in February of 2019. This is totally outdated data since the size and occupancy level of
the subdivision has dramatically increased since then. William Fair Drive does not have
any stop signs on it - there is a straight run from Middle Road right through to the highway.
Vehicles are speeding on all streets both day and night. Drivers also do not obey Stop
signs and there have been several serious collisions resulting. In fact, when Ron Albright
came to meet me at my home he witnessed a vehicle drive right through the Stop sign at
Kenneth Cole and William Fair.
I was shocked to hear that the residential speed limit was so high, especially when the limit
on the highway near Longworth is 60. This seems to be very unreasonable, and very
dangerous to the families with small children as well as people walking in the
neighbourhood. I have observed that residential streets in Oshawa are posted at 35, and
also that main streets such as Simcoe and Taunton have speed limits of 50.
EXTERNAL
Page 202
I appreciate you bringing this item to your next Council meeting which I understand is
next week. I would also appreciate an opportunity to appear virtually at the meeting to
answer any questions and provide additional information.
Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing the next steps.
Sincerely,
Laurel Kahler
34 William Fair Drive
905 419 4960
Page 203
Page 1 of 2
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington
By-law 2020-077
Being a by-law to amend the Procedural By-law 2015-029
Whereas the Province of Ontario passed Bill 168, an Act to amend the Municipal Act,
2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, to allow Members of Council and local boards to participate
electronically in meetings;
And whereas the Council of the Municipality of Clarington approved Resolution
#GG-374-20 which outlines new direction surrounding correspondence placed on
Council and Committee agendas;
And whereas, in order to be able to implement these provisions, Council must amend
Procedure By-law 2015-029;
Now therefore be it enacted that By-law 2015-029, Clarington’s Procedural By-law, be
amended as follows:
1. In subsection 7.6.1, add to the end of the first paragraph:
“directly relates to Clarington, and”
2. In subsection 7.6.3, add following the words, “shall identify the author(s)”:
“including their name and address”
3. In subsection 8.1.8.1, add following the words, “which pertain to the mandate of
the GG Committee”:
“and directly relates to Clarington”
4. In subsection 8.1.8.3, add following the words, “shall identify the author(s)”:
“including their name and address”
Page 204
Municipality of Clarington
By-law 2020-077
Page 1 of 2
5. In subsection 8.2.9.1, add following the words, “which pertain to the mandate of
the PD Committee”:
“and directly relates to Clarington”
6. In subsection 8.2.9.3, add following the words, “shall identify the author(s)”:
“including their name and address”
7. That this by-law shall take effect on the date of passing.
Passed in Open Council this 23rd day of November, 2020.
_____________________________________
Adrian Foster, Mayor
_____________________________________
June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk
Page 205
J:\REPORTS TO CLERKS\3 - Agendas\2020-11-23 Council\2020-078\2020-078.docx
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington
By-law 2020-078
Being a By-law to exempt a certain portion of Registered Plan 40M-2627 from
Part Lot Control
Whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it
advisable to exempt from Part Lot Control, for Blocks 56, 57, 58 in Plan 40M-2627,
registered at the Land Titles Division of Whitby (File # ZBA2020-0020);
Now Therefore Be It Resolved That the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of
Clarington enacts as follows:
1. That Subsection 5 of Section 50 of the Planning Act shall not apply to those lands
described in Paragraph 2 within the By-law.
2. That this By-law shall come into effect upon being approved by the Municipality of
Clarington and thereafter Subsection 5 of Section 50 shall cease to apply to Block
56, in Plan 40M-2627, as Parts 1 to 8 on 40R-31084, Block 57, Plan 40M-2627,
as Parts 1 to 6 on 40R-31085, and Block 58, Plan 40M-2627, as Parts 1 to 7 on
40R-31083, respectively.
3. Pursuant to Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, this By-law shall be
in force for a period of two (2) years ending on October November 23, 2022
Passed in Open Council this 23rd day of November, 2020.
_____________________________________
Adrian Foster, Mayor
_____________________________________
June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk
Page 206
J:\REPORTS TO CLERKS\3 - Agendas\2020-11-23 Council\2020-078\2020-078.docx
PART LOT CONTROL EXEMPTION BY-LAW 2020-078
ZBA2020-0020
Unit Type and Number Summary Table
Plan 40M-2627
APPROVED
Result of Part Lot Control
Exemption on Unit Type and
Number
Block Number
Unit Type and Number
Dwelling Units
Block 56 5 Townhouse Units No Change
Block 57 4 Townhouse Units No Change
Block 58 6 Townhouse Units No Change
TOTAL 15 Units No Change
Page 207
767235
46
51
4795846455912532 3187
257525366836 39
43
318025403004
2
6
10
14
18
22
26
30
34
38
42
124128136132140144148152156364
368
363
367
383
387
391
395
6
10
14
18
22
26
30
34
38
42182185
189
193
197
188
192
10
6 7
11
1401441481521561601641681721761801841391431471511551591631671791831871911952042082122162202282322362402442032072112152192272312352392437
11
15
19
23
27
31
35
39
43
3
7
11
15
19
23
27
31
35
39
43
47
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
4852566064727680848896
100
104
108
112
116
120
124
128
132
136133131
129
125
123
121
117115
113
111
107105
103
101
99
97
15
130134 1381421461501541581621661701741781291331371411451491531571611651691731771812319
15
2218141062
115119123127131135 1001041081121162610141822
26
3034 38 4246505458626670747882869094981021061101591519
151923273135394347515559636771757983879195991031071111151191919313947355152327435161
706571
747578798286
90
83
87
9195
102
99103107111 106112116120124128
132
140196192188184180
193189185181177152148144
136
CONCESSION RD 3
DAVID BAKER COURTLUNNEY CRESCENTSCUGOG STREETBILL HUTCHINSON CRESCENTRONALD HOOPER AVENUE
MIDDLE ROADDOUGLAS KEMP CRESCENTRONALD HOOPER AVENUE
THOMAS BIRD STREETµ
Part Lot Control Location Map
ZBA2020-0020
Area Subject To Zoning By-Law97 to 133 Bill Hutchinson Crescent, Bowmanville
ZBA2020-002097 to 133 Bill Hutchinson Crescent
Newcastle401401 40135&115Newtonville RdLiberty StBowmanville Avenue407
Courtice RdRegion
a
l
Rd 2
Regional Rd 235&115L a k e O n t a r i o
King St
Courtice
Bowmanville
Orono
Solina
Newtonville
Enniskillen
Hampton
Burketon
Tyrone Leskard
Mitchell Corners
Kendal
Haydon
MapleGrove
Kirby
Brownsville
Enfield(Bowmanville)
Page 208
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington
By-law 2020-079
Being a By-law to exempt a certain portion of Registered Plan 40M-2612 from
Part Lot Control
Whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it
advisable to exempt from Part Lot Control Block 34, Plan 40M-2612 registered at the
Land Titles Division of Whitby (File # ZBA 2020-010);
Now Therefore Be It Resolved That the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of
Clarington enacts as follows:
1. That Subsection 5 of Section 50 of the Planning Act shall not apply to those lands
described in Paragraph 2 within the By-law.
2. That this By-law shall come into effect upon being approved by the Municipa lity of
Clarington and thereafter Subsection 5 of Section 50 shall cease to apply to Block
34, Plan 40M-2612.
3. Pursuant to Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, this By-law shall be
in force for a period of one (1) year ending on November 23, 2021
Passed in Open Council this 23rd day of November, 2020.
_____________________________________
Adrian Foster, Mayor
_____________________________________
June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk
Page 209
1
2
6 75
2 1
2 6127617
72
76
72
68
6460
56
79
75
71
67
63
59
5551
27353124
342614764211
3272
111520
35
3530
46
43
4531
18 46505147
5395
113414 155425841964
42
2155
23
233038
22
99
3134
10 4991
2653 181915
14101511
19232731
35
39
92
6055525148474339312724231918151411797570 676359304119
284259278139
111
289110
265135 130
266122
258272127
28310025282532 26062575253683
22156836
413839
3828
43
421016
3127
2226803035
308300103
261276288264270260282131
123
291143
285279114118
107
115
126252625682530 25403004
90868278747066625854504642898581777369655551474339353127231915117127
23
19
15
11
7
1130
133134138142146150154158162166170174178182186190194195202206210214218222226230127811121516192023242728313235363940434447485152555659
261014182226303438424650
1
3640
44
56
606468
72
76
80
261014182226303438
42
11151923273135
39
11580848892961001048791959910310711111912331
35
39
43
49
53
57
61
65697377
81
2 6 10 14 18 22 26 30 34 38 46 127131135139143147151155159163167171175179183187376
380
384
392396400
404408
412416
420
424
383
387391395
399403407
411415419423
6101418222630343842
185189193197 192140144148152156160164168172176180184
1391431471511551591631671791831871911952042082122162202282322362402032072112152192272312352392437111519232731353943
3711151923273135394347
4812162024283236
4852566064727680848896100104108112116120124128132136133131129125123121117115113111
1071051031019997
134 1381291331371411451491531571611651691731771811241281361321401561601641681721761801842319 115119123127131135 10010410811211618141059
19 15
22
62
15
1441481521
99103107111115119159151923273135394347515559636771757983879195261014182226303438 424650545862667074788286909498102106110CONCESSION RD 3
BONS AVENUECROCKETT PLACEDARRYL CASWELL WAYHONEYMAN DRIVEB O N S AV E NUE
COURTNEY ST RE E T JOHN TAYLOR DRIVENORTHGLEN BOULEVARDNICKS STREETHOCKLEY AVENUE
WYSE GATEGIMBLETT STREETCOLVILLE AVENUEDAVID BAKER COURTCHILDS COURT SCUGOG STREETTHOMAS BIRD STREETMIDDLE ROADLUNNE
YCRESCENTBILLHUTCHINSONCRESCE NT
µ
Part Lot Control Location Map
ZBA2020-0010
ZBA2020-00101-119 Bavin Street and2-135 Ambereen Place and2-23 Higbee Lane
Newcastle401401 40135&115Newtonville RdLiberty StBowmanville Avenue407
Courtice RdRegion
a
l
Rd 2
Regional Rd 235&115L a k e O n t a r i o
King St
Courtice
Bowmanville
Orono
Solina
Newtonville
Enniskillen
Hampton
Burketon
Tyrone Leskard
Mitchell Corners
Kendal
Haydon
MapleGrove
Kirby
Brownsville
Enfield(Bowmanville)
Area Subject To By-Law1-119 Bavin Street and2-135 Ambereen Place and2-23 Higbee Lane , Bowmanville
Page 210
Presentations
and
Handouts
2020
Momentum
Report
Table of Contents
3. A message from John Henry, Regional Chair and Chief Executive Officer
4. A message from Elaine Baxter-Trahair, Chief Administrative Officer
5. Durham Region Strategic Plan 2020-2024
6. Durham Region COVID-19 Recovery and Action Plan
7. Durham’s Priorities for Federal Investment
8. Durham’s Priorities for Provincial Investment
9. Regional Priorities
10. Citizen Engagement
11.Regional Budget and Financial Information
12. Regional Council Members and Contact Information
22
A message from John Henry, Regional Chair
and Chief Executive Officer
Durham Region: the municipality with
momentum.
During this term of council—which began in
late 2018—Regional Councillors have had to
make decisions. We’ve discussed important
projects, frameworks and options.
Highlighted our ingenuity, industry and
innovation.
Each of these decisions requires us to see the
bigger picture; to make decisions that benefit
our almost 700,000 residents. People who
are living in a region that is more vibrant,
more diverse and growing faster than just
about any place in Ontario.
Guided by the 2020 to 2024 Durham Region
Strategic Plan, we are taking steps to
implement our vision. Focusing on key
priorities such as environmental sustainability,
community vitality, economic prosperity,
social investment, and service excellence. It’s
our roadmap: designed to help us maintain
our unique mix of rural charm and urban
sophistication.
It’s propelled our momentum as a Region and
helped us grow stronger.
Durham is a community built on its diverse
culture, recreational opportunities, and
star attractions. A land of opportunity for
business; whether big or small. A place where
amazing talent nurtures an innovative
ecosystem. Where entrepreneurs, innovators,
investors, researchers and students
collaborate.
It’s a reflection of our reputation: a workforce
built on innovation, creativity, skills
and education.
Durham is also a community known for its
open mindedness; for working together to
ensure others are treated with dignity and
respect. A place where we work together to
ensure no one gets left behind or falls
through the cracks. Where we embrace our
diversity, rich cultural heritage, and strong
creative culture.
Durham Regional Council is working together
to help shape our future.
Let’s continue the momentum: ensuring
Durham Region remains the place to live,
work, play, innovate and invest. Why the
world needs more Durham. Why Durham is—
simply—more.
33
A message from Elaine Baxter-Trahair,
Chief Administrative Officer
Innovation at work. It’s become a mindset for us.
Durham Region provides services to help keep people safe, offers support in times of need,
provides essential services, and works to ensure healthy communities.
We focus on ways to improve and enhance the way we do business. We think big and bold.
We understand the importance of two-way conversation: listening to advice and connecting with
others.
We explore how people and technology can work together to make interactions even better. And
understand why seeing the world through a service excellence lens can transform the way we do
business.
Regional employees deliver programs and services with a people-first state of mind. It’s about
enhancing the customer experience, modernizing operations, and offering enriched interactions to
put the needs of our residents first.
Durham Region has momentum; fuelled by inspiration. We’re a vibrant and diverse community,
with insight, innovation and world-wide traditions on our doorstep.
44
Durham Region Strategic Plan 2020-2024
The future of Durham Region
is bright; supported with a
strong, five-year strategic plan
that identifies key priorities for
Regional Council and outlines
our continued delivery of
award-winning programs and
services.
Work on the new strategic
plan began in March 2019.
It featured an extensive
community engagement
process that included more
than 1,500 individuals who
took part in face-to-face
conversations; a community
survey; and idea sharing
through a new digital
engagement portal called Your
Voice Durham.
As one of the fastest growing
municipalities in North
America, this plan reflects
Durham’s innovative and
resilient economy; featuring
autonomous and electric
vehicles, artificial intelligence
and personalized medicine. It
also underlines the Region’s
commitment to land-use
planning, which creates
healthy and complete,
sustainable communities;
and supports our northern
municipalities.
We are committed to
advancing our five key
priorities: environmental
sustainability, community
vitality, economic prosperity,
social investment and service
excellence.
To ensure our residents are
aware of the ways in which
we are helping to shape this
community, we promise to
report the progress.
55
Durham Region COVID-19 Recovery and Action Plan
In June 2020, Regional
Council approved the Regional
Recovery Framework and
Action Plan. It’s a roadmap
to recovery that considers
supports for vulnerable
residents, local businesses, and
the modernization of Regional
services and programs.
Since the onset of the
COVID-19 pandemic, Durham
Region has continued to
provide essential services,
while ensuring the health
and safety of its community
members. New programs
and services were developed
to meet the emerging and
urgent needs of residents and
businesses.
This flexible and innovative
mindset continues into the
recovery phase; addressing
pandemic-related recovery
efforts and outlining steps to
help build resiliency.
A plan built on four pillars—
social, built, economic and
municipal—complements the
goals established in the new
Durham Region Strategic
Plan.
By addressing recovery in a
holistic way, we can continue
to support economic
recovery and environmental
sustainability to strengthen
community resilience.
66
Durham’s Priorities for Federal Investment
Durham Region has the
potential to become the
next economic engine of
Canada.
That’s why we welcome a
strong partnership with the
Government of Canada; a
collaborative venture that
helps build even stronger
services to help bring our
vision to life.
It’s about achieving the
vision outlined in the Durham
Region Strategic Plan through
the financial support of
our major projects—transit,
road initiatives, public
works projects, broadband,
sustainability, and social
projects. Innovative projects
and improvements that focus
on continued growth and
prosperity. All reasons why
companies will continue to
innovate and invest in Durham.
77
Durham’s Priorities for Provincial Investment
Through the Association
of Municipalities of Ontario
(AMO), Durham Region works
to enhance the quality of life
for our residents.
It’s about making Durham the
best place to live, work and
invest within the next five
years and beyond. To reaffirm
our title as Ontario’s Energy
Capital. To bring additional
jobs and investment to our
community. And to provide
essential Regional services to
benefit the community
at large.
We’re excited about new
infrastructure opportunities
that can help increase
tourism, grow our economy,
and encourage more visits to
our region.
We will drive economic
success by bringing more
businesses closer to where
Ontario’s most skilled workers
live—giving us the resources
we need to future ensure
people can move around
more easily, relax more often,
and further enjoy their region.
A place where new business is
welcomed, and existing
business is supported.
A place where new ideas
are so valuable, we have an
innovative ecosystem to help
propel them forward.
88
Regional Priorities
Momentum is strengthened by strong partnerships; funding initiatives; strengthening our economy; and enhancing
community engagement. We’ve got a lot of work underway to support this region’s bright future.
We aim to capitalize on Durham’s legacy as builders; showcasing our focus on innovation, sustainability and future-
oriented mindset. Where we focus on modern and efficient operations through innovation, collaboration, modernization
and continuous improvement.
A place where strong partnerships drive us to achieve even more. Where insights, innovation and traditions can be
found on our doorstep. A place more vibrant, more diverse, and growing faster than just about any place in Ontario.
Durham Region is about accepting people for who they are—regardless of their belief, culture, identity, language or the
colour of their skin. Where we work to ensure that no one gets left behind.
A community that confirms its reputation as a place where difficult challenges are tackled. That pivots to meet specific
needs. That works to find made-in-Durham solutions in the most difficult of times. That comes together to rebuild
foundations in need of repair.
•Beaverton Supportive Housing Project
•CityStudio Durham
•Durham Region Anti-Racism Framework
•Durham Region Transit Ridership Recovery Framework
•myDurham 311
•Intelligent Communities Plan
•Pre-servicing Employment Lands
•Sustainability Initiatives
99
Citizen Engagement
Your voice. Your ideas. Your
Durham.
Sparking conversation and
encouraging community
participation is the main idea
behind Your Voice Durham.
It’s a community engagement
platform that incorporates
ideas and feedback from
residents and businesses
into projects and initiatives
happening in Durham; offering
a two-way dialogue that allows
residents to be heard.
We welcome input from
residents: stories, experiences,
and thoughts. This is their
home; their community. And
we want to know how we can,
collectively, work together to
make us stronger.
We take these comments
seriously. Because first-hand
feedback can help make us
better.
1010
The Region of Durham’s
Long-Term Financial Planning
Framework places an
integrated and co-ordinated
focus on funding priorities,
accommodating growth, and
investing in infrastructure
and service levels. All while
considering stable taxes and
user rates.
The plan brings together our
financial planning process
and policies; guided by three
core principles of financial
flexibility, sustainability and
affordability.
Each year, the budget process
allows us to deliver essential
services—ensuring programs
and service levels are
maintained, while investments
in capital infrastructure and
strategic investments are
made to help sustain our
region’s high quality of life.
It’s about investing in
programs and services that
are responsive to community
needs. Responding to growth
and affordability pressures;
assisting the vulnerable sector;
innovating and modernizing
operations; investing in
infrastructure renewal; and
responding to ongoing
legislative and regulatory
changes.
It’s about spending tax dollars
wisely.
Regional Budget and Financial Information
1111
Regional Council Members and Contact Information
Durham Regional Council
is made up of 29 elected
members, including the
Regional Chair, mayors from all
eight local-tier municipalities,
and councillors from these
local areas.
Durham Regional Council
members serve a four-year
term.
The Regional Chair is elected
by voters across Durham
Region. The mayors and
Regional Councillors are
elected within a local area
municipality, and serve on
both local and Durham
Regional Council.
1212