Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-05-04 Agenda Council Revised Agenda Date:May 4, 2020 Time:7:00 PM Location:Council Chambers, 2nd Floor Municipal Administrative Centre 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario Inquiries & Accommodations: For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for accessibility accommodations for persons attending, please contact: Michelle Chambers, Administrative Assistant to the Clerk, at 905-623-3379, ext. 2101 or by email at mchambers@clarington.net. Alternate Format: If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator, at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Audio/Video Record: The Municipality of Clarington makes an audio and video record of Council meetings. If you make a delegation or presentation at a Council meeting, the Municipality will be recording you and will make the recording public by publishing the recording on the Municipality’s website, www.clarington.net/calendar. Cell Phones: Please ensure all cell phones, mobile and other electronic devices are turned off or placed on non-audible mode during the meeting. Copies of Reports are available at www.clarington.net *Late Item added after the Agenda was published. Pages 1.Call to Order 2.Moment of Reflection 3. Land Acknowledgement Statement 4.Declaration of Interest 5.Announcements 6.Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting(s) 6.1 Council Minutes - Minutes of a regular meeting of Council dated April 14, 2020 5 7.Presentations 7.1 Gioseph Anello, Acting Director Solid Waste Management and Gary Muller, Director of Planning, Region of Durham Region Regarding Report PSD-013-20 - Region of Durham Mixed Waste Pre-Sort and Anaerobic Digestion Organics Processing Facility Site Selection Process Municipal Comments on Evaluation of Short-List of Sites and Identification of Preferred Site 8.Delegations There are no delegations as of the time of publication. 9.Communications – Receive for Information There are no communications to be received for information. 10.Communications – Direction 10.1 Confidential Memo from Faye Langmaid regarding Courtice Waterfront and Energy Park Secondary Plan (Distributed Under Separate Cover) (Motion to refer to the consideration of Item 8 of the Joint Committee Report) May 4, 2020 Council Agenda Page 2 10.2 Confidential Memo from Rob Maciver, Municipal Solicitor regarding Cedar Crest Beach – Beach Erosion/Property Loss (Distributed Under Separate Cover) (Motion to refer to the consideration of Item 7 of the Joint Committees Report) 11.Committee Reports 11.1 Advisory Committee Reports 11.1.1 Minutes of the Clarington Heritage Committee dated April 21, 2020 19 11.1.2 Minutes of the Tourism Advisory Committee dated April 21, 2020 24 11.2 Joint General Government and Planning and Development Committees Report of April 27, 2020 28 12.Staff Reports 12.1 Report FND-010-20 - COVID-19 Cash Flow Analysis 33 13.Business Arising from Procedural Notice of Motion None 14.Unfinished Business 14.1 Report EGD-006-20 Cedar Crest Beach Rd and West Beach Rd Berm Review and Estimates (Tabled from the May 4, 2020 Joint Committees Meeting) Link to Report EGD-006-20 *14.2 Report EGD-007-20 - Temporary Bike Lanes on Prestonvale Road 42 (Referred from the April 27, 2020 Joint Committees Meeting) 15.By-laws None May 4, 2020 Council Agenda Page 3 16.Procedural Notices of Motion None 17.Other Business 18.Confirming By-Law 19.Adjournment May 4, 2020 Council Agenda Page 4 1 If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 Council Minutes Date: Time: Location: April 14, 2020 7:00 PM Council Chambers, 2nd Floor Municipal Administrative Centre 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario Present Were: Mayor A. Foster, Present by Electronic Means: Councillor G. Anderson, Councillor R. Hooper, Councillor J. Jones, Councillor J. Neal, Councillor C. Traill, Councillor M. Zwart Staff Present: A. Greentree, M. Chambers Present by Electronic Means: A. Allison, G. Acorn, R. Albright, S. Brake, F. Langmaid, R. Maciver, M. Marano, T. Pinn, G. Weir _____________________________________________________________________ 1. Call to Order Mayor Foster called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. 2. Moment of Reflection Councillor Zwart led the meeting in a moment of reflection. 3. Land Acknowledgement Statement Councillor Zwart recited the moment of reflection. 4. Declaration of Interest There were no declarations of interest stated at this meeting. 5. Announcements Members of Council announced upcoming community events and matters of community interest. Page 5 April 14, 2020 Council Meeting 2 6. Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting(s) 6.1 Minutes of a regular meeting of Council dated March 23, 2020 Resolution # C-158-20 Moved by Councillor Zwart Seconded by Councillor Hooper That the minutes of the regular meeting of the Council held on March 23, 2020, be approved. Carried 7. Presentations None 8. Delegations None 9. Communications – Receive for Information 9.1 ADR Chambers, Ombudsman Office - 2019 Annual Report 9.2 Peter Maniatakis, ADR Chambers Ombuds Office, Final Report for Complaint against the Municipality of Clarington, MUN-467-0819 9.3 Minister Steve Clark, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, regarding Impending Legislation for the Suspension of Suspended Timelines Associated with Land Use Planning Matters Resolution # C-159-20 Moved by Councillor Anderson Seconded by Councillor Traill That Correspondence Items 9.1 to 9.3 be received for information. Carried 10. Communications – Direction 10.1 Memo from Trevor Pinn, Director of Finance/Treasurer regarding Development Charges Timeline Impact from COVID-19 10.2 Stacey Hawkins, Executive Officer, Durham Region Home Builders' Association, 2020 Clarington Development Charge Bylaw Resolution # C-160-20 Moved by Councillor Hooper Seconded by Councillor Anderson That Correspondence Items 10.1 and 10.2 be referred to the consideration of Unfinished Business Item 14.1. Carried Page 6 April 14, 2020 Council Meeting 3 11. Committee Reports 11.1 Advisory Committee Reports 11.1.2 Minutes of the Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Management Advisory Committee dated March 10, 2020 11.1.3 Minutes of the Tourism Advisory Committee dated March 12, 2020 Resolution # C-161-20 Moved by Councillor Jones Seconded by Councillor Traill That Advisory Committee Report Items 11.1.1 to 11.1.3, be approved with the exception of Item 11.1.1. Carried 11.1.1 Minutes of the Agricultural Advisory Committee dated March 12, 2020 Resolution # C-162-20 Moved by Councillor Hooper Seconded by Councillor Anderson That the minutes of the Agricultural Advisory Committee dated March 12, 2020, be approved. Carried 11.2 Joint General Government and Planning and Development Committees meeting of April 6, 2020 Resolution # C-163-20 Moved by Councillor Hooper Seconded by Councillor Zwart That the recommendations contained in the Joint General Government and Planning and Development Committees Report of April 6, 2020 be approved on consent, with the exception of items 10, 12 and 5. Carried Item 10 - North Scugog Court Reconstruction Resolution # C-164-20 Moved by Councillor Hooper Seconded by Councillor Zwart That Report COD-005-20 be received; That Nick Carchidi Excavating Ltd. with a total bid amount of $886,718.48 (Net HST Rebate) being the lowest compliant bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of tender CL2020-3 be awarded the contract for the North Scugog Court Reconstruction as required by the Engineering Services Department; Page 7 April 14, 2020 Council Meeting 4 That the total funds required for this project in the amount of $1,023,300.00 (Net HST Rebate), which includes the construction cost of $886,718.49 (Net HST Rebate) and other costs including design, material testing, utility daylighting, inspection, contract administration, permit fees and contingencies in the amount of $136,581.51 (Net HST Rebate) is in the approved budget allocation as provided and will be funded from the following accounts: North Scugog Court Reconstruction - Dan Sheehan Lane to Concession Rd 3 (Prior years and 2020) 110-32-330-83358 77401 $679,500 North Scugog Court Reconstruction - Dan Sheehan Lane to Concession Rd 3 Region of Durham Recovery 110-32-330-83358-7402 $343,800 That the contract award be subject to the Region of Durham receiving approval for the funding required to complete their portion of work for this project; and That all interested parties listed in Report COD-005-20 and any delegations be advised of Council’s decision. Yes (4): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, and Councillor Zwart No (3): Councillor Jones, Councillor Neal, and Councillor Traill Carried on a recorded vote (4 to 3) Item 12 - COD-010-20 Courtice Court – Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Construction Resolution # C-165-20 Moved by Councillor Zwart Seconded by Councillor Hooper That Report COD-010-20 be received; That Eagleson Construction Ltd. with a total bid amount of $1,692,074.38 (Blended HST) being the lowest compliant bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of tender CL2019-37 be awarded the contract for the Courtice Court – Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Construction as required by the Engineering Services Department; That the total funds required for this project in the amount of $1,979,817.71 (Blended HST), which includes the construction cost of $1,692,074.38 (Blended HST ) and other costs including design, contract administration, material testing, inspection, and contingencies in the amount of $287,743.33 (Blended HST), is in the approved budget allocation or has been approved by Council and will be funded from the following accounts; Municipal Servicing (2019) (From Participating Owners Recovery) 110-32-330-83212-7403 $903,669 Strategic Capital Reserve Fund (For Non-Participants) 510-00-000-00000-6660 $701,841 Page 8 April 14, 2020 Council Meeting 5 Engineering Services – Pavement Rehabilitation 110-32-330-83212-7401 $374,307 That the contract award is subject to the Municipality of Clarington executing a cost sharing agreement with the participating landowners and receiving the funds required to complete their portion of the work; and That all interested parties listed in Report COD-010-20 and any delegations be advised of Council’s decision. Yes (4): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, and Councillor Zwart No (3): Councillor Jones, Councillor Neal, and Councillor Traill Carried on a Recorded Vote Later in the Meeting, See following Motions (4 to 3) Resolution # C-166-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Hooper That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to allow Members of Council to speak to the foregoing Resolution #C-165-20 for a second time. Carried The foregoing Resolution #C-165-20 was then put to a vote and carried on a recorded vote. Item 5 - Memo from Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning Services, Regarding Interim Control By-law 2018-083 for 94 Elgin Street Resolution # C-167-20 Moved by Councillor Hooper Seconded by Councillor Anderson That the exemption for 94 Elgin Street from Section 1. b. of Interim Control By‑law 2018-083 for regulations for an addition to an existing dwelling, be approved. Carried 12. Staff Reports 12.1 Report FND-008-20 - COVID-19 Financial Support Program Options Resolution # C-168-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Zwart That Report FND-008-20 be received; That Director of Finance continue to work with local area treasurers and the Region of Durham to develop a sustainable consistent approach for support of those impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic; Page 9 April 14, 2020 Council Meeting 6 That the Director of Finance and the Director of Community Services create a new grant program, the “Community COVID Support Grant Program” modelled after the existing Community Grants Program specifically to target relief to businesses and residents effected by COVID-19; That the Community COVID Support Grant Program be funded from the Tax Rate Stabilization Reserve Fund up to $100,000; and That staff report back to Council at the earlier of the first available meeting after the Province’s emergency declaration is lifted or July 6, 2020. Yes (7): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, Councillor Jones, Councillor Neal, Councillor Traill, and Councillor Zwart Carried on a Recorded Vote Later in the Meeting, See following Motions (7 to 0) Resolution # C-169-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Jones That the foregoing Resolution #C-168-20 be amended by adding the following: 6. That Clarington pass a temporary by-law that will cancel, reduce or refund 50% of the Clarington portion of taxes for the period of the declared emergency for residential taxpayers either (i) employed in a business that has been ordered shut down; or (ii) whose business has been ordered shut down; as a result of the Covid emergency, and whose taxes have become unduly burdensome, pursuant to Section 365 of the Municipal Act; and that this be funded from the rate stabilization reserve fund. 7. The aggregate amount under Sub-section (6) shall be capped at $2,000,000, and if the total would exceed that amount, the reduction for each residential taxpayer shall be reduced such that it will equal (i) $2,000,000, divided by (ii) the total number of accepted applications. Yes (7): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, Councillor Jones, Councillor Neal, Councillor Traill, and Councillor Zwart Carried as Amended on a Recorded Vote Later in the Meeting, See following Motions (7 to 0) Page 10 April 14, 2020 Council Meeting 7 Recess Resolution # C-170-20 Moved by Councillor Anderson Seconded by Councillor Hooper That the Council recess for five minutes. Carried The meeting reconvened at 7:43 PM with Mayor Foster in the Chair. Resolution # C-171-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Jones That the foregoing Resolution #C-169-20 be amended as follows: That in paragraph one: "That the word "pass" be replaced with the words “endorse in principle””; That the following be added to the end: "8. That the details of the program be the subject of a staff report to be presented at the June 1, 2020 General Government Committee meeting." Carried The foregoing Resolution #C-169-20 was then put to a vote and carried as amended on a recorded vote. Resolution # C-172-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Hooper That the foregoing Resolution #C-168-20 be amended by deleting paragraph five; and That the resolution paragraphs be renumbered accordingly. Carried The foregoing Resolution #C-168-20 was then put to a vote and carried as amended on a recorded vote. Page 11 April 14, 2020 Council Meeting 8 12.2 Report CAO-012-20 - COVID-19 Business Continuity Planning, CAO-012-20 Resolution # C-173-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Anderson That Report CAO-012-20 be received for information. Carried Later in the Meeting, see following motion Closed Session Resolution # C-174-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Hooper That, in accordance with Section 239 (2) of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, the meeting be closed for the purpose of discussing a matter that deals with personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees and with labour relations or employee negotiations. Carried Rise and Report The meeting resumed in open session at 8:48 PM. Mayor Foster advised that one item was discussed in “closed” session in accordance with Section 239(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001 and no resolutions were passed. The foregoing Resolution #C-173-20 was then put to a vote and carried. 13. Business Arising from Procedural Notice of Motion 13.1 Reconsideration of Contracting Out of Marriage Ceremonies Resolution # C-175-20 Moved by Councillor Hooper Seconded by Councillor Anderson That the following recommendation regarding the contracting out of marriage ceremonies approved at the March 2, 2020 Council meeting be reconsidered: "That marriage ceremony services be contracted out." Yes (3): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, and Councillor Hooper No (4): Councillor Jones, Councillor Neal, Councillor Traill, and Councillor Zwart Motion Lost on a recorded vote (3 to 4) later in the meeting Page 12 April 14, 2020 Council Meeting 9 Recess Resolution # C-176-60 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Jones That the Council recess for five minutes to enable Staff to ensure all Members of Committee are connected remotely to the meeting. Carried The meeting reconvened at 9:04 PM with Mayor Foster in the Chair. The foregoing Resolution #C-175-20 was then put to a recorded vote and lost. 13.2 Reconsideration of Resolution #C-441-19 pertaining to Report CAO-010-19, Cedar Crest Beach Update Suspend the Rules Resolution # C-177-20 Moved by Councillor Traill Seconded by Councillor Anderson That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to allow the reconsideration of Resolution #C-441-19 which was tabled indefinitely. Carried Resolution # C-178-20 Moved by Councillor Anderson Seconded by Councillor Zwart That resolution #C-441-19, regarding Report CAO-010-19, Cedar Crest Beach Update, approved at the December 9, 2019 Council meeting be reconsidered at this time. Yes (5): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, Councillor Traill, and Councillor Zwart No (2): Councillor Jones, and Councillor Neal Carried (5 to 2) Resolution # C-179-20 Moved by Councillor Anderson Seconded by Councillor Zwart That Report CAO-010-19, Cedar Crest Beach Update be tabled indefinitely. Yes (2): Councillor Jones, and Councillor Neal No (5): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, Councillor Traill, and Councillor Zwart Motion Lost (2 to 5) Page 13 April 14, 2020 Council Meeting 10 Resolution # C-180-20 Moved by Councillor Traill Seconded by Councillor Anderson That Report CAO-010-19 be received; That up to $30,000 be allocated from the Tax Rate Stabilization Reserve Fund for the completion of a Cedar Crest Beach Erosion/Property Loss Study, and the consulting assignment be sole sourced to Zuzek Inc.; That Staff report back to Council with the results of the study, once completed; That Clarington adopt CLOCA “Port Darlington Shoreline Hazard Study” Staff Report #5630-19 Recommendation #5 to raise the road elevation of Cedar Crest Beach Road via the deployment of gravel by Operations; That Clarington construct a berm/berms on the marsh side of Cedar Crest Beach Rd. and West beach Rd. (southerly section) with 50% of the funds drawn from the “Clarington Station A Reserve Fund” and requesting that St. Marys pay the other 50% of the cost; That if St. Marys refuses to contribute 50% of the cost, Clarington pay the entire cost of the berms; That in satisfying paragraph five above, Clarington work with CLOCA Staff to ensure proper analysis and technical information is completed and all the requirement of Ontario Regulation 42/06 are met and that this matter be expedited; and That all interested parties listed for Report CAO-010-19, including all landowners in the Port Darlington (west shore) reach and any delegations, be advised of Council’s decision. Motion Divided and Referred, see following motions Resolution # C-181-20 Moved by Councillor Traill Seconded by Councillor Anderson That paragraphs 2 and 3 of the foregoing Resolution #C-180-20, be divided. Carried Page 14 April 14, 2020 Council Meeting 11 Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the foregoing Resolution #C-180-20 Resolution # C-182-20 Moved by Councillor Traill Seconded by Councillor Anderson That paragraphs 2 and 3 of the foregoing Resolution #C-180-20, be referred to Staff to Report back to the April 27, 2020, Joint General Government and Planning and Development Committee meeting as to whether Zuzek Inc. or Baird is the most appropriate option to undertake the Cedar Crest Beach Erosion / Property Loss study. Yes (5): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, Councillor Traill, and Councillor Zwart No (2): Councillor Jones, and Councillor Neal Carried on a recorded vote (5 to 2) The balance of Resolution #C-180-20 was then considered by Council and referred through the following Resolution, Resolution # C-183-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Jones That the balance of Resolution #C-180-20 be referred back to Staff for a report detailing a cost estimate for the proposed work. Yes (4): Councillor Hooper, Councillor Jones, Councillor Neal, and Councillor Zwart No (3): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, and Councillor Traill Carried on a recorded vote, Later in the Meeting, see following motions (4 to 3) Resolution # C-184-20 Moved by Councillor Traill Seconded by Councillor Anderson That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to allow Members of Committee to speak to the foregoing Resolution #C-183-20 for a second time. Carried The foregoing Resolution #C-183-20 was then put to a vote and carried on a recorded vote. Recess Resolution # C-185-20 Moved by Councillor Traill Seconded by Councillor Hooper That the Council recess for 10 minutes. Carried Page 15 April 14, 2020 Council Meeting 12 The meeting reconvened at 10:12 PM with Mayor Foster in the Chair. 14. Unfinished Business 14.1 Report FND-006-20 - 2020 Development Charge Study Update and Presentation (Referred from the April 6, 2020 Joint Committees Meeting) Resolution # C-186-20 Moved by Councillor Hooper Seconded by Councillor Traill That Report FND-006-20 and the associated presentation from Watson and Associates Economists Ltd. be received; That staff continue consultation with the development community prior to finalizing the Development Charge Background Study and By-law; That staff be instructed to release the proposed Development Charge Background Study and By-law at a date to be determined by the Director of Finance which provides Council, members of the public and the development community opportunity to review and provide feedback for the 2020 Development Charge Background Study and By-law; and That, in accordance with the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Support and Protection Act, 2020, which received royal assent on April 14, 2020, the Municipality’s existing Development Charges By-law (By-law 2015-035) shall remain in force until such date as specified in the Act, and therefore, staff be directed to schedule the statutory public meeting for a date after the lifting of the emergency declared under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act on March 17, 2020 with such meeting being advertised publicly. Carried 14.2 Resolution #JC-038-20 - Staffing and COVID-19 (Referred from the April 6, 2020 Joint Committees Meeting) Resolution #JC-038-20 - Staffing and COVID-19 was withdrawn by the mover. 15. By-laws 15.1 2020-025 - Being a By-law to amend Interim Control By-law 2018-083 15.2 2020-026 - Being a By-law to amend By-law 2014-059 entitled “a By-law to Regulate Traffic and Parking on Highways, Private Property and Municipal Property” Page 16 April 14, 2020 Council Meeting 13 15.3 2020-027 - Being a By-law to Adopt the Estimates of all Sums Required During the Year, to Strike Rates and Levy Taxes for municipal purposes for the year 2020 and to provide for the collection thereof Resolution # C-187-20 Moved by Councillor Hooper Seconded by Councillor Anderson That leave be granted to introduce By-laws 2020-025 to 2020-027; and That the said by-laws be approved. Carried 16. Procedural Notices of Motion None 17. Other Business 17.1 Motion to Cancel the April 20, 2020 General Government Committee Meeting Suspend the Rules Resolution # C-188-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Anderson That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to add an additional item to the Agenda regarding the cancellation of the April 20, 2020, General Government Committee meeting. Carried Resolution # C-189-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Hooper The April 20, 2020, General Government meeting be cancelled, and a Joint General Government and Planning and Development Committee meeting take place on April 27, 2020 at 7:00 PM. Carried 18. Confirming By-Law Resolution # C-190-20 Moved by Councillor Hooper Seconded by Councillor Anderson That leave be granted to introduce By-law 2020-028, being a by-law to confirm the proceedings of the Council of the Municipality of Clarington at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of April, 2020; and Page 17 April 14, 2020 Council Meeting 14 That the said by-law be approved. Carried 19. Adjournment Resolution # C-191-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Hooper That the meeting adjourn at 10:30 PM. Carried Mayor Municipal Clerk Page 18 Clarington Heritage Committee Minutes April 21, 2020 - 1 - If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 Minutes of the Clarington Heritage Committee held via Teleconference on April 21, 2020, at 7:00 PM. Members Present via Teleconference were: Peter Vogel, Victor Suppan, Katharine Warren, Ron Sproule, Noel Gamble, Marina Ross (Museum), David Reesor, Steve Conway, Jason Moore (ACO), Councillor Ron Hooper Regrets: Myno Van Dyke (NVDHS) Staff Present: Faye Langmaid, Sarah Allin, Planning Services Guests (Teleconference): Paula LaRocque, Tribute Communities (until 7:20pm) 1 Declaration of Pecuniary Interest There were no disclosures of interest stated at this meeting. 2 Adoption of Agenda 20.10 “Approved by Consensus” That the Agenda be adopted be adopted, as amended, with the addition of item “Goodyear Lands Update” under New Business. 3 Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting 20.11 “Approved by Consensus” That the minutes of the February 18, 2020 Clarington Heritage Committee meeting be adopted. 4 Delegations/Presentations None 5 Business Arising 5.1 1593 Bloor Street Members of the Committee noted appreciation for the opportunity extended by Tribute Communities to allow the sub-committee to attend a site visit to evaluate the property. The Municipal Inventory and Register sub-committee presented its evaluation to members of the Committee, recommending no objection to demolition. Members of the committee discussed opportunities for commemoration of the property and its historical inhabitants Page 19 Clarington Heritage Committee Minutes April 21, 2020 - 2 - 20.12 Moved by V. Suppan, seconded by N. Gamble That the Heritage Committee (i) appreciates Tribute Communities extending the opportunity for the Committee to conduct a site visit and evaluation of the property, (ii) accepts the recommendations of the Heritage Impact Assessment, prepared by SRN Architects Inc., dated November 2019, and does not object to the demolition of the dwelling at 1593 Bloor Street, Courtice, and (iii) opportunities to commemorate the property be considered. “Carried” 5.2 879 Regional Road 17 Committee members considered the Documentation of 879 Regional Road 17 submitted by Brookfield Homes to document the farmhouse prior to demolition. J. Haslett of Brookfield Homes has submitted correspondence to Council in support of including the street name “Howard Allin” in the Brookfield development. The Region of Durham has accepted the name for consideration by Council. There will be a memo before Council at its meeting on April 27, 2020 to consider the proposed street name. 5.3 Fletcher Tree Planning Services staff provided an update on the status of the Notice of Intent to Designate the Fletcher Tree, which was issued February 26, 2020. Ontario Regulation 73/20 under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act has the effect of suspending the objection period under the Ontario Heritage Act. Therefore, the Notice is held in abeyance until such time as the emergency legislation has been lifted. Staff will continue to monitor the situation as it pertains to this matter. 5.4 Delpark Homes Application At its February meeting, the Committee discussed Delpark Homes applications (COPA2018-0004; SC2018-0005 ZBA2018-0026) as they related to the adjacent designated heritage property located at 1467 Prestonvale Road. Planning Services staff advised Council had approved applications on March 2nd. Regulations passed under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act affecting Planning Act matters require that the notices of decision be re-issued in accordance with O. Reg. 189/20. Planning Services staff also condition of draft approval of the subdivision was incorporated requiring the architectural style and finishes of the townhouses (Block 68) take into consideration the designated heritage home directly across the street at 1467 Prestonvale Road. 5.5 27/29 Church Street and 24 Lovers Lane Page 20 Clarington Heritage Committee Minutes April 21, 2020 - 3 - Committee members requested confirmation that the properties known as 27 and 29 Church Street, and 24 Lovers Lane were identified on the Cultural Heritage Resources List. Planning Services staff confirmed this is the case. 5.6 Cultural Heritage Resources Property Inquiries Planning staff asked the Committee to consider evaluating 96 Ontario Street, Bowmanville in response to inquiries received on this property. 5.7 2020 Ontario Heritage Conference The 2020 Ontario Heritage Conference has been moved from May 28-30 to October 22-24 due to the situation surrounding COVID-19. 6 Correspondence and Council Referrals: None. 7 Reports from other Committees 7.1 Architectural Conservancy of Ontario (ACO), Clarington Branch: - Doors Open 2020 has been cancelled due to COVID. The Courtice area will be showcased at Doors Open 2021. 7.2 Newcastle Village District Historical Society (NVDHS) – No Report. 7.3 Museum – Museum buildings were closed to the public as of March 14. Staff has since been placed on Emergency Declaration Leave as a result of the COVID-19 situation. The Canada Day celebrations typically held at the Museum, and those organized by Community Services have been cancelled. Alternative arrangements are being explored. It was noted that Maple Fest has also been cancelled. 7.4 Wilmot Creek Heritage Park – Nothing new to report. 8 Project Reports 8.1 The sub-committee evaluated four (4) properties for potential inclusion on the Municipal Register, and recommended as follows: 38 Centre Street, Bowmanville: Group 1 Evaluation; the property be added to the Municipal Register; significant to the cultural heritage of the community; 42 Centre Street, Bowmanville: Group 2 Evaluation; the property be added to the Municipal Register; significant to the fabric of the adjoining heritage district; 50 Centre Street, Bowmanville: Group 1 Evaluation; the property be added to the Municipal Register with further consideration for designation; significant heritage value to the community and to the fabric of the adjoining heritage district; and Page 21 Clarington Heritage Committee Minutes April 21, 2020 - 4 - 54 Centre Street, Bowmanville: Group 2 Evaluation; the property be added to the Municipal Register; significant to the cultural heritage value of the community as one of the first constructed in the Registry as a property of significant heritage value to the community, as it is one of the first in this time period (1930s) and is significant to the fabric of the adjoining heritage district. 20.13 Moved by V. Suppan, seconded by D. Reesor That the Heritage Committee recommends to Council that the properties at 38 Centre Street, 42 Centre Street, 50 Centre Street, and 54 Centre Street in Bowmanville be added to the Municipal Register. “Carried” 8.2 Outreach/Education Committee: No report. 9 New Business 9.1 Goodyear Lands Update: Municipal staff is continuing to work with the owners of the former Goodyear site to complete the background studies needed to evaluate this property. This work is being coordinated as part of the ongoing work for Bowmanville East Secondary Plan. Part of the background work is to evaluate the heritage merit of the buildings and site. This work remains ongoing. 9.2 Heritage Plaques: Heritage plaques for newly designated Central Public School and Haydon Community Hall properties are ready. Timing of installation is currently being coordinated. Committee members inquired as to whether a plaque dedication ceremony could be planned/coordinated by the Education and Outreach sub-committee for Central Public School, as it may be an opportunity to speak to local youth about cultural history. The sub-committee will explore this opportunity once schools have reopened. 9.3 Former Bowmanville Post Office (41 Temperance Street): The Committee has evaluated this property and recommended it be designated under the Ontario Heritage Act. The building is currently under Federal ownership and therefore, designation under a provincial act would not be recognized. The property is also currently for sale. Municipal staff has provided the relevant cultural heritage background information to the selling agent. 9.4 May Heritage Committee Meeting: The May Committee meeting conflicts with a Planning & Development Committee meeting scheduled for the same date and time. 20.14 Moved by K. Warren, seconded by S. Conway That the Heritage Committee Meeting scheduled May 19, 2020 at 7:00p.m. be moved to May 26, 2020 at 7:00p.m. Page 22 Clarington Heritage Committee Minutes April 21, 2020 - 5 - “Carried” 9.5 Future Heritage Committee Meetings & Video Conferencing: Planning Services staff inquired as to the familiarity and technological/broadband capabilities of Committee members to consider the use of a video conferencing platform for the May and future Committee meetings. There was consensus among Committee members to conduct the May meeting using Microsoft Teams. F. Langmaid thanked the Committee for its willingness to adapt and embrace new meeting formats during this time when in-person meetings are not possible. 10 Adjournment D. Reesor moved Adjournment, S. Conway seconded, 8:00 pm. Next Meeting: May 26, 2020, 7:00 p.m. via Video/Teleconference Page 23 CLARINGTON TOURISM ADVISORY COMMITTEE Minutes of Meeting April 21, 2020, 9 a.m. Teleconference Members Present: Petra Schwirtz, Chair Christine McSorley Ann Harley Evan King Kim Neziroski Laura Holmes Councillor Ron Hooper Bonnie Wrightman, CBOT Regrets: Brandon Pickard, Durham Tourism Amy Verwey Fred Archibald Staff: Ashlee Kielbiski, Tourism Programmer Basia Radomski, Communications and Tourism Manager Jess MacGregor, Tourism Clerk 1. Call to Order o Meeting was called to order – 9:01 a.m. 2. Adoption of Agenda Moved by, Ron Hooper, seconded by, Ann Harley: That the agenda for April 21, 2020, be adopted. Carried 3. Approval of March 12, 2019, Meeting Minutes Moved by, Ann Harley, seconded by, Evan King: That the meeting minutes of March 12, 2020, be approved. Carried 4. Presentations o None Page 24 5. New Business Update from Clarington Tourism Current status: o Checking in on tourism stakeholders and assisting them with the new challenges of this current landscape. Learning/researching new tools to help guide stakeholders as they pivot their business models. Examples include learning about online shopping platforms, how to create videos for social media, advising on virtual events and the possibility of using Facebook Live to stream events. o Using social media to share information about what businesses are open, takeout and delivery food options, store hours for seniors and vulnerable people. We are also sharing light-hearted content, beautiful pictures, and sharing the Municipal #SpreadLove campaign. Post Covid-19: Our plan for when the economy re-opens has two priorities as set out below. We are operating with the knowledge that there’s a great deal of uncertainty and questions regarding timelines, when everything will reopen, what time of year, what businesses are open, and how we can promote our community safely. o Priority #1. Focus 100% on our local community. Get residents out of their homes and into our community, supporting local businesses and contributing to our local economy. Our focus for the near future will be striving to have residents act as Clarington ambassadors. o Priority #2. Assisting businesses with their individual needs. Working with partners, CBOT, Durham Tourism, Central Counties Tourism and Community Services to provide resources and necessary support. o The planned 2020 Summer Event Guide will not be produced. Marketing and advertising materials, when used, will be simple and community- specific. Ideas include a community scavenger hunt, Clarington passport and bucket list as potential ideas to encourage residents back into the community. The timing of these campaigns will depend on when distancing measures are relaxed. o Clarington Canada Day celebration has been cancelled. Community Development and Tourism are brainstorming ideas on how to celebrate Clarington in a new way. This will include content from the #SpreadLove campaign. Page 25 Plans from the Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism, and Culture for the recovery, rebuilding and re-emergence post Covid-19 include: o $20 million in funding to Celebrate Ontario. Apply as of April 20 on the Ministry website. o $7 million in funding to the Ontario Music Fund through Ontario Creates. This opens May for 2021 funding. Three categories: music creation, live music, industry initiatives. Musictogether.ca has launched to promote and support Ontario musicians and artists. o $67 million in Ontario Trillium grants. o The Ministry is working with RTOs and Destination Ontario on recovery plans. These plans will consider cultural and social impact as well as economic growth. Plans for three months, 18 months, three years and five years are in the works. There will be sector-specific strategies and metrics in place. o Destination Ontario is working on an advertising campaign to say ‘Welcome Back to Ontario’ when it is safe to do so. o All new information will be shared in the Clarington Tourism stakeholder newsletter as it is made available. Update from Clarington Board of Trade o The current situation has created a new opportunity for businesses to shift their business model, for example, offering curbside pick-up. This new way of doing business will continue after Covid-19. o CBOT has checked in with over 300 businesses. Many have adapted to new delivery models but are seeing decreased revenue. o Concerns from the business community about how long this will last. CBOT is researching what the transition to recovery may look like. o CBOT has held Town Hall with Mayor Foster, Town Hall meeting with Regional Chair John Henry, has hosted a ‘Work from Home’ webinar, and is planning a social media webinar. o Money is earmarked for a support local campaign including print and radio ads. o Working on a webpage devoted to emergency services in the community. Ron Hooper shared information from OBIAA calls that discuss best practices and what communities around Ontario are doing to pivot their business models . He shares this information with CBOT and the other Clarington BIAs so all can benefit. Newcastle BIA could potentially put together a Canada Day event with short notice if the emergency orders and social distancing rules are lessened. Page 26 Newcastle usually runs an Easter Scavenger hunt around Newcastle. It is a great event that introduces locals to available businesses. The idea of a scavenger hunt could be scaled to a larger community and benefit local businesses. Question was asked about funding available to the Municipality at this time. Funding to Municipalities has not been announced, the focus is on stakeholders and business owners. The Municipality continues to work with our partners, Durham Region and Central Counties and will share when new funding is available. Question was asked about how the community will re-open safely post Covid-19. The Municipality takes advice from Durham Region health department and Dr. Kyle. Its up to the Province to clearly communicate how the economy will re-open and how to do so safely, when the time comes. ‘Downtowns of Durham’ project lead by Durham Tourism involves 8 Durham BIAs to promote shopping local. Launch of website and dedicated marketing campaign on Monday, April 27. Website will promote businesses that are operating in any capacity at this time to provide a single source of local services information. This includes BIA businesses only. 6. Other Business o None 7. Date of next meeting: o Date to be determined and emailed to committee members. Possible date of May 15, 2020. 8. Motion to adjourn Moved by, Ann Harley, seconded by, Christine McSorely, Carried. The meeting concluded at 9:54 a.m. Attached are speaking notes from Brandon Pickard, Manager of Durham Tourism, as he was unable to make the conference call. Page 27 Joint Committee Report to Council If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Council Report Number: JCR-003-20 Date of Meeting: May 4, 2020 Report Subject: Joint General Government and Planning and Development Committees meeting of April 27, 2020 Recommendations: 1. Receive for Information (a) 10.3 Minutes of the Bowmanville Business Improvement Area dated March 10, 2020 (b) 10.4 Jeff Lees, Chair, Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority, Regarding Ban of the 2020 Fishing Season (c) 10.6 Memo from Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning Services, Regarding Provincial Policy Statement Update Memo (d) 10.5 Memo from Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning Services, Regarding Recommendation Report - Proposed Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning to Implement the Bowmanville Neighbourhood Character Study (e) 10.1 John Mascarin, Aird & Berlis LLP, Regarding Closed Meeting Advice (f) 11.9 Rob Burton, Mayor, Town of Oakville, Regarding Support for the Food Service Industry (g) FND-009-20 Annual Commodity Hedging - 2019 Page 28 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report JCR-003-20 2. Stewart Strathearn, Mayor and Amanpreet Singh Sidhu, CAO, Town of Midland, Regarding Direct Payment for Federal Funds to Municipalities to Waive Property Taxes for the Year 2020 - Financial Help to Alleviate the Suffering from COVID-19 Pandemic That the following proposal from Town of Midland, regarding Direct Payment for Federal Funds to Municipalities to Waive Property Taxes for the Year 2020 - Financial Help to Alleviate the Suffering from COVID-19 Pandemic, be endorsed by the Municipality of Clarington: 1. Residential Properties (primary residence only) a. Waive 100% of the 2020 property taxes for all residential properties currently assessed at or below $ 500,000.00 by each governing provincial property assessment body; b. Waive 50% of the 2020 property taxes for all residential properties currently assessed below $ 1,000,000.00; and c. Waive 25% of the 2020 property taxes for all residential properties currently assessed above $1,000,000,00. 2. Industrial, Commercial and Farm Properties a. Waive 100% of the 2020 property taxes for all; industrial, commercial and farm properties currently assessed at under $10,000,000.00; b. Waive 50% of the property taxes for the year 2020 for all industrial, commercial and farm properties currently assessed between $10,000,000.00 and $ 50,000,000.00; and c. Waive 25% of the property taxes for the year 2020 for all industrial, commercial and farm properties assessed above $50,000,000.00. 3. Federal Transfer Payment to Canadian Municipalities a. In lieu of the annual municipal property taxes, the Federal Government transfers funds to municipalities across Canada, as a one-time grant. Page 29 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report JCR-003-20 3. Memo from Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning Services, Regarding Recommend Approval of "Howard Allin" to be used as a Street Name That Council endorse the name "Howard Allin" to be used as a street name in a plan of subdivision in the North Village Neighbourhood, Newcastle. 4. Kevin Narraway, Manager of Legislative Services/Deputy Clerk, Town of Whitby, Regarding Provincial Electric Vehicle Rebate Program That the following resolution from Town of Whitby, regarding Provincial Electric Vehicle Rebate Program, be endorsed by the Municipality of Clarington: That the Council of the Town of Whitby requests that the Provincial Government re-establish an electric vehicle rebate program to encourage consumers to purchase zero emissions vehicles; and That a copy of this resolution be sent to the Minister of Transportation, the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, the Minister of Finance, the local MPPs, the local MPs, and Durham Region municipalities. 5. Melanie Hakl, Administrative Clerk 2, Legislative Services, Town of Gravenhurst, Regarding Support for Adding Community Gardens, Garden Centres and Nurseries to the Essential Services List during the COVID-19 Pandemic Whereas the Municipality of Clarington fully understands, upon the direction of the Provincial Government, that only businesses and services deemed to be essential are to remain open during the COVID-19 Pandemic; Whereas our Not for Profit Community Partners rely on Community Gardens for the ability to grow vegetables that assist in meeting the food related needs as well as providing physical and mental health benefits for our most vulnerable citizens; Whereas physical distancing measures would still be needed for those working in Community Garden Centres and Nurseries; and Whereas Garden Centres and Nurseries could be required to provide curb-side car drop off service to reduce the risk; Now Therefore Be it Resolved: That the Municipality of Clarington Council requests that the Province of Ontario add Garden Centres and Nurseries as essential services; and Page 30 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report JCR-003-20 That this resolution be circulated to Premier Ford, Durham Region MPs and MPPs, Region of Durham and all Durham Region Municipalities requesting their support. 6. COD-014-20 RFP2020-2 Ward Boundary Review That Report COD-014-20 be received; That the proposal received from Watson & Associates Economists Ltd, being the most responsive bidder meeting all terms and conditions and specifications of RFP2020-2 and subject to a satisfactory reference check, be awarded the contract for the provision of consulting services to complete the Ward Boundary Review; That the total funds required for this project in the amount of $66,074.80 (Net HST Rebate) which includes the over budget amount of $1,074.80 be funded from within approved budget allocations as provided from the following accounts: That all interested parties listed in Report COD-014-20 and any delegations be advised of Council’s decision. Description Account Number Amount Elections Professional Fees 100-19-193-10190-7161 $65,000 Admin Professional Fees 100-19-130-00000-7161 $1,074 7. PSD-012-20 Cedar Crest Beach Update – Beach Erosion/Property Loss Study That Report PSD-012-20 be received; That in accordance with the Purchasing By-law the lower of the bids from the qualified consultants will be awarded the consulting contract, to the maximum of the $30,000 budget for the completion of the Cedar Crest Beach Erosion/Property Loss Study; That Staff report back to Council with the results of the study, once completed; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD-012-20, including all landowners in the Port Darlington (west shore) reach and any delegations, be advised of Council’s decision. Page 31 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report JCR-003-20 8. PSD-013-20 Region of Durham Mixed Waste Pre-Sort and Anaerobic Digestion Organics Processing Facility – Site Selection Process Municipal Comments on Evaluation of Short-List of Sites and Identification of Preferred Site That Report PSD-013-20 be received; and That Clarington declare itself to be an unwilling host community to anaerobic digestion and waste pre-sort facility as recommended in the preliminary siting report; That Report PSD-013-20 be adopted as the Municipality of Clarington's comments on the Mixed Waste Transfer/Pre-Sort and Anaerobic Digestion Organics Processing Facility Siting Report (GHD, March 6, 2020); That the Region of Durham be requested to address the comments in Report PSD-013-20; That the Region of Durham be requested to collaborate with the Municipality by committing and contributing to the economic development objectives of the Courtice Waterfront and Energy Park area; That staff be requested to provide a confidential memo regarding development options being explored for the waterfront park at the May 4, 2020 Council meeting; That a copy of Report PSD-013-20 and Council's decision be sent to the Region of Durham, the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks, and the other Durham Region area municipalities; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD-013-20 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page 32 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Council Date of Meeting: May 4, 2020 Report Number: FND-010-20 Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Director of Finance/Treasurer Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO By-law Number: File Number: Resolution#: Report Subject: COVID-19 Cash Flow Analysis Recommendation: 1. That Report FND-010-20 be received for information. Page 33 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report FND-010-20 1. Background Budgeting vs Financial Reporting 1.1 Under the Municipal Act, 2001 the Municipality of Clarington is required to follow Public Sector Accounting Board (PSAB) standards for financial reporting. These standards are an accrual-based accounting framework which focuses reporting on when revenues are earned and expenses are incurred rather than the timing of cash receipts or payments. Under this method assets such as roads and buildings are capitalized and expensed over the period of their useful life. 1.2 Also, under the Municipal Act, 2001 the Municipality of Clarington is required to, and does, budget using a modified cash-flow approach. The Municipality is required to have a balanced budget annually and is not allowed to use debt financing for operating expenses. Any deficit needs to be recovered in the following year through taxes, this could be funded from reserves and reserve funds, if available. 1.3 With the impact of COVID-19, there may be a greater discrepancy between the Municipality’s revenues and expenses for financial reporting and its cash flows. The primary reason for this would be that taxes are earned during the year for accounting purposes, however the timing of the receipt of those taxes may be longer than typically expected. 1.4 The survival of an organization rests with cash flow. Successful businesses and organizations have had positive financial results and still struggled because of cash flow issues. Staff have started on a cash flow analysis and continue to modify based on changing circumstances, in order to ensure that the Municipality has sufficient cash resources to meet its obligations. Report Overview The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the ability of the Municipality to provide all of the services as approved in the 2020 Budget. This report focuses on the cash flow impacts of the pandemic on the Municipality, recognizing that the timing of when cash would be received by the Municipality is likely deferred from typical years. The cash flow analysis is not reflective of financial statement reporting but is a management tool to inform decisions on timing and capacity to complete tasks as originally planned. The largest assumption in the cash flow analysis is the timing and collectabili ty of taxes, we have assumed a longer time to collect and a higher uncollected amount in 2020. Overall, the Municipality has the financial resources to continue to operate to December 2020 based on the assumptions as outlined in this report. Page 34 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report FND-010-20 COVID-19 Pandemic 1.5 On March 13, 2020, the Municipality of Clarington cancelled all programs and activities, including March Break Camps, drop-in programs and facility rentals. Recreation facilities were also closed. 1.6 On March 16, 2020, the Municipality of Clarington closed to the public all remaining facilities. While closed, staff have continued to provide services through these offices. 2. Cash Flow Assumptions Property Tax 2.1 Cash receipt modelling was projected assuming Pre-Authorized Payment (PAP) receipts monthly for $4.4 million in April to June with an increase to $4.5 million from June onwards. Tax receipts on installment dates were forecasted assuming 25% was received in the month prior to due date and the remaining 75% in the month of the due date. This is an estimate based on the fact that there is a portion of the tax base which will pay early. 2.2 As a result of tax relief approved by Council on March 23, 2020 as outlined in report FND-007-2020 several changes to these assumptions were made: a. The April payment was moved to June with 25% paying in May and 75% paying in June; b. The regular June payment was moved to July with 25% paying in June and 75% paying in July; and c. Interest for May and June was adjusted from $208,700 to $0. 2.3 As a result of announcements from the Province of Ontario, it was assumed that the remittances for school boards where moved 90 days later in the year. The December 2020 remittance would be the equivalent of two payments (September and December). 2.4 At this point there has been no assumed change in the remittances to the Region of Durham. There is an agreement that the April payment could be the equivalent of the portion of taxes collected with the remaining portion due July 8, 2020. For cash flow purposes, we assumed the Region’s taxes would be remitted on time. 2.5 As a result of anticipated financial impact to taxpayers the following assumptions were also made to the tax collection cash flow analysis: a. Taxes collected on time would be 60%; b. Taxes collected one month late would be 10%; Page 35 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report FND-010-20 c. Taxes collected two months late would be 10%; d. Taxes collected three months late would be 5%; e. Taxes collected four months late would be 5% (except the September paymen t which would be collected in December not January 2021); f. Taxes not collected in 2020 would be 10% (this is double the normal uncollected rate); g. Supplemental taxes would not be collected in 2020, this is a conservative assumption; and h. PAP for May to August would be lower by $100,000 with it being caught up in September to December for no net impact by the end of the year . 2.6 As a result of direction provided on April 14, 2020, through resolution C-168-20, an assumption is made that any tax relief would not result in a cash outlay as it would be applied directly to the taxpayer’s account. 2.7 The Municipality averages taxes receivable of 5% of the annual tax levy. The above assumption would double that mark. There has also been an assumption that taxes outstanding from 2019 or earlier would not be collected at this point, this is a conservative assumption. 2.8 The Municipality’s April 23, 2020 instalment date resulted in approximately 83.6% of the interim taxes being collected based on the interim tax levy. This compares to 2019 when 88.5% were collected. The 4.9% change supports the assumption made in paragraph 2.5(f). Investment Income 2.9 The Municipality has investments maturing during the year. It is currently assumed that these investments, totalling $3.2 million in the general fund and $14.2 million in the reserve funds would be reinvested. 2.10 It is assumed that the dividends from Elexicon Energy Inc of $1,045,000 will not be received in the calendar year but will be deferred to 2021. It is assumed that the final dividend for 2019 will also be deferred to 2021. This is consistent with statements made by other hydro companies regarding dividend payments to municipalities and is conservative. 2.11 It is assumed, based on interest rates decreasing and the use of cash by the Municipality, that investment revenue would be approximately $935,000 lower than what was budgeted from April to December (approximately 50% decrease). Page 36 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report FND-010-20 Community Services 2.12 At the time of writing of this report, the spring programming has been cancelled and plans are underway to have the summer program take place. 2.13 User fees and revenues for Community Services have been reduced in April to June to reflect the estimated $1.1 million loss in revenues in programming, facility rentals and drop-ins. 2.14 The lost revenue is offset by savings in part-time wages and salaries of $480,400 in April and May. At this point, no adjustments have been made to June onwards to regular part-time staff. 2.15 The cash flow analysis assumes that there would be no Community Services revenue for the months of July and August. As such, part-time staff would be assumed to return in September. Operations 2.16 Operations is currently responsible for the booking of fields. The current closure of fields is to May 31, 2020. Revenue for April and May has been eliminated. 2.17 To be consistent with an ultra-conservative approach, it has been assumed that the monthly revenue in July and August for field bookings would also be $0. At th is time, this decision has not been made; it is simply looking at worst case cash flow scenarios. Capital Projects 2.18 At this point, there have been no adjustments to capital projects. Staff are reviewing the timing of projects to determine if they can be completed in 2020. Some projects have a very specific window in which work can be completed if we miss this window the work cannot be completed. At this time, we are still within that timeframe, unless identified below. 2.19 Between previously approved budgets being completed and the approved 2020 budget there is approximately $22.0 million in capital projects resulting in payments between May and December 2020. 2.20 Community Services has identified $500,000 in capital work for the Courtice Community Complex which is unable to be completed in 2020 and is therefore going to be deferred to 2021. This has been adjusted in the cash flow analysis. 2.21 We have assumed that both the debenture for South Bowmanville Recreation Centre and the costs budgeted this year are completed in 2020; however, we are still waiting on determination of grant approval. If the project does not receive grant approval, then Page 37 Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report FND-010-20 both the expense and the debenture would not occur (this has no net impact on the cash flow analysis). 2.22 Given that most capital projects are completed between late May and November, at this point we are anticipating that projects will go ahead. This is a conservative approach to cash flow analysis and supports both service delivery and economic stimulus priorities . General 2.23 The Municipality has placed a hiring freeze on staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. This has resulted, as outlined section 2.12 of report CAO-012-20, in 26 positions remaining vacant. An adjustment to the wage costs of approximately $200,000 per month has been made to reflect these cash savings. These have been assumed to be in place until the end of August. 2.24 Revenue from Development Charges has not been included in this analysis as historic practice has been that any receipts immediately go into reserve funds for use in future years. This is also conservative in that there is an implied assumption that there are no development charges received this year. 3. Cash Flow Impacts 3.1 The Municipality had approximately $41.8 million in the general bank account and $22.1 million in reserve fund bank accounts at the end of March 2020 for a total of $63.9. The analysis would expect the end of year an ending balance of $52.8 million, this does not take into account any DC receipts during the year as mentioned in paragraph 2.24. 3.2 With the assumed changes in cash flow, the cash balance at the end of the year would be lower by $7.7million. This is mainly a reflection of the assumed deferral of collection of 10% of the tax levy, this is an impact of $5.6million. It is anticipated that these funds would be collected in 2021 to 2023. Based on the analysis, the ending cash balance would approximate $44.0 million. At the end of the year a rebalancing of the general bank account and the reserve bank accounts would occur to reflect the activity during the year. 3.3 At this point, it is my opinion that the Municipality is in a strong position to continue operations to provide services to the residents of the Municipality and continue the capital investment as planned and approved by Council as part of the 2020 and previous budgets. 3.4 There remains the flexibility to adapt to meet the fiscal constraints that the Municipality may face. Page 38 Municipality of Clarington Page 7 Report FND-010-20 4. Concurrence Not Applicable. 5. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that this report be received. Staff Contact: Trevor Pinn, Director of Finance/Treasurer, 905-623-3379 ext 2602 or tpinn@clarington.net Attachments: Attachment 1 – Cash Flow Analysis Interested Parties: There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision. Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Council Date of Meeting: May 4, 2020 Report Number: EGD-007-20 Submitted By: Ron Albright, Acting Director of Engineering Services Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO Resolution#: File Number: By-law Number: Report Subject: Temporary Bike Lanes – Prestonvale Road, Courtice Recommendations: 1. That Report EGD-007-20 be received for information; 2. That, should Council wish to move forward with temporary bike lanes, the staff recommended route be used; and 3. That all interested parties listed in Report EGD-007-20 and any delegations be advised of Council’s decision. Page 42 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report EGD-007-20 1. Background 1.1 The Engineering Services Department has reviewed the request from Council to provide temporary bike lanes on Prestonvale Road from Highway 2 to Bloor Street. This request is unique in nature as this situation is not specifically addressed in any of the guidance materials for Ontario roads. As such, staff have used the guiding principle of public safety in preparation of this report as well as Ontario guidance related to cycling facilities and travelled road lanes. 1.2 The following is a summary of the existing geometric conditions of Prestonvale Road:  Hwy. 2 to Robert Adams (160m) o 50 m of urban shoulders from Robert Adams north, terminated because of turning lane development. Traffic lane widths are 3.25 to 3.50 m beyond 1.50 m urban shoulder. Total road width of 10.0 m to 10.5 m Report Overview In response to Council’s request to implement temporary bike lanes on Prestonvale Road from Highway 2 to Bloor Street, staff have reviewed the Council recommended route as well as an alternate route, communicated with other Municipalities that have installed temporary bike lanes, and provided cost estimates. Page 43 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report EGD-007-20  Robert Adams to Claret (400m) o 1.5 m urban shoulders and 3.5 m traffic lanes. Total road width of 10.0 m  Claret to Glenabbey (645m) o 1.5 m urban shoulders and 3.5 m traffic lanes. Total road width of 10.0 m Page 44 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report EGD-007-20  Glenabbey to Meadowglade (260m) o Offset centreline with 3.5 m wide northbound lane and 3.5 m to 5.0 m wide southbound lane. Total road width of 7.0 m to 8.5 m  Meadowglade to Bloor (380m) o 3.5m traffic lanes but transitions at south end to include left turn lane at signalized intersection. Total road width of 7.0 m for majority and transitions to 12.0 m at signalized intersection. Page 45 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report EGD-007-20 1.3 Based on the Ontario Traffic Manual’s Book 18 – Cycling Facilities, the minimum width for a bike lane should be no less than 1.5 m, and based on the traffic volumes on Prestonvale Road, the traffic lane widths should be no less than 3.5 m. Therefore, the road width that can accommodate both through traffic and bike lanes should be a minimum of 10.0 m. Below is a figure from OTM Book 18 showing these requirements. Based on these criteria, the only portion of Prestonvale Road that should be considered for temporary bike lanes is from Robert Adams to Glenabbey. Council’s request cannot be safely accommodated outside of these limits. Page 46 Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report EGD-007-20 2. Alternative Temporary Bike Lane Route 2.1 With the understanding that Council’s intent was to provide an additional temporary access to recreational facilities, and specifically the Waterfront Trail, staff reviewed other options to achieve the requested goal. In reviewing the local road network, and knowing that the desired local destination as per the Councillor’s request is Prestonvale Road south of Bloor Street, staff have identified the following alternative route that meets the minimum required road width for Council’s consideration:  Use existing urban shoulder from Robert Adams to Glenabbey with the provision of “Temporary Bike Lane” signage. Because the lanes are already painted, it is not recommended that construction barrel delineation be used (red line on below map)  Use construction barrel delineation and “Temporary Bike Lane” signage for the following areas (green line on below map): o Glenabbey from Prestonvale to Robert Adams Page 47 Municipality of Clarington Page 7 Report EGD-007-20 o Robert Adams from Glenabbey to Meadowglade o Meadowglade from Robert Adams to Bloor (offset centreline additional centre barrels required – 25+/-) Page 48 Municipality of Clarington Page 8 Report EGD-007-20 o Roswell from Bloor to Southfield  Southfield from Roswell to Prestonvale  Prestonvale (Bloor to south entrance of SCA) has formal bike lanes  Prestonvale south of SCA entrance the formal bike lanes terminate and the road changes to a 2-lane rural road with narrow shoulders (no opportunity to extend temporary bike lanes) under current conditions Page 49 Municipality of Clarington Page 9 Report EGD-007-20 2.2 As an alternate to Prestonvale Rd, Council could consider continuing the temporary bike lane on Robert Adams from Glenabbey to Prestonvale (yellow line on map). This route would require the use of barrels and temporary signage as well. 2.3 When developing the route, staff found one section that would not be wide enough for a temporary bike lane; this was on Medowglade at the intersection of Bloor and is due to the turning lanes for this signalized intersection. Considering the lower than normal traffic numbers, the Region of Durham may consider a temporary removal of the left turn lanes on Meadowglade at Bloor to accommodate the bike lanes. Clarington staff can liaise with the Region of Durham on this issue, should that be Council’s direction. Page 50 Municipality of Clarington Page 10 Report EGD-007-20 Page 51 Municipality of Clarington Page 11 Report EGD-007-20 3. Temporary Bike Lanes in Other Communities 3.1 As suggested at Council, staff reviewed the temporary bike lanes implemented in Brampton. Our bike lanes would be similar in concept, however the circumstances in Brampton were slightly different in that they closed the outside lanes of a 4 -lane roadway, which was only possible due to the reduction in traffic volumes during this COVID-19 situation. Below are several photos showing the temporary bike lanes created by Brampton. Page 52 Municipality of Clarington Page 12 Report EGD-007-20 3.2 Further research by staff found that Mississauga also created similar temporary bike lanes on King Street in Cooksville. Mississauga’s temporary condition was done on a wider road that could accommodate the recommended lane widths for both traffic and cyclists. Mississauga is also planning to open an additional temporary facility similar to Brampton’s where they will be closing the outside lane of a 4 -lane road to accommodate the bike lanes. When staff asked if Mississauga changed their traffic by-laws, they confirmed they did not. While this would be required to enforce no parking in the temporary bike lane, Mississauga staff noted that due to by-law staff’s focus on assisting with the enforcement efforts associated with COVID-19, they would not have the resources to also enforce these added temporary areas. Instead, they are relying on the temporary signage and the expectation that area residents will understand they cannot park in these temporary bike lanes. Below are some photos of Mississauga’s temporary bike lanes. Page 53 Municipality of Clarington Page 13 Report EGD-007-20 3.3 As seen in the photos, both Brampton and Mississauga create the temporary bike lanes with extensive use of construction barrels. Both municipalities have also used this solution in areas with a limited number of homes fronting the roads, which would not be the case in Courtice. 3.4 While it can be appreciated that during this trying time we are attempting to assist our residents in safely exercising outdoors, it should be noted that both Mississauga and Brampton are much different communities than Clarington. Both have much higher population densities and fewer naturalized recreational areas within their municipal boundaries. For these reasons, these communities are seeing significant pressure on their trail and park systems from their residents during this time. Clarington’s population is much less dense, and we enjoy access to many naturalized recreational areas. While our trail systems are seeing an increase in use, we have observed that residents are generally able to keep a safe distance from others when using our trails. 4. Materials and Estimated Costs 4.1 As noted above, where there are white edge lines to define the temporary bike lanes the use of barrels to further delineate the lanes is not recommended. In the examples shown in the photos, it appears that the barrels are spaced between 5m and 10m. Because of the higher frequency of driveways and with the goal of reducing costs, we have estimated costs based on spacing of between 10m and 20m. The number of barrels required for the temporary bike lanes, considering the 1.65 km length of the alternative route on both sides of the road, would be roughly 275. This would exceed the number of barrels Clarington has available so the barrels would need to be rented or purchased. The cost Page 54 Municipality of Clarington Page 14 Report EGD-007-20 for the rental of 275 barrels is estimated at $6,700 per month. The purchase price would be roughly $9,600. 4.2 Although staff are not recommending the use of barrels on Prestonvale Road, should Council decide to do so, roughly 160 barrels would be required at an estimate cost of $4,000 per month whereas the purchase price would be roughly $5,600. If the Robert Adams option is used instead of Prestonvale, roughly 200 barrels would be required at an estimated cost of $4,800 per month ($800 more per month than if barrels where used on Prestonvale) whereas the purchase price would be roughly $7,000. 4.3 Additionally, temporary bike lane signs would be required and should be posted at the minimum spacing of every 200 m and should be present at the temporary bike lane ends on both sides of an intersection. Based on these criteria, roughly 50 temporary signs would be required. Due to the temporary nature of these signs, staff recommend using coreplast signs (corrugated structural plastic) which have a significantly lower cost than metal signs and can be manufactured much faster. The estimated cost for the temporary signage is a one-time charge of $550. 4.4 Based on staff’s experience in implementing various traffic initiatives, a concern Council should consider is the local residents’ receptiveness to having these barrels in front of their homes and the entire stretch of road they live on for the next 1 to 2 months, or possibly longer. In addition to the staff time that would be required to install the temporary bike lanes, they would also be required to patrol the route 2 to 3 times a day as a minimum to ensure that the barrels are in place and not causing any issues. The cost of staff time required to complete this request has not been included in the estimate. 5. Concurrence Not Applicable. 6. Conclusion It is estimated that the implementation of the temporary bike lane proposal, excluding staff time, would cost $6,700 to $10,700 per month for barrel rental plus a one-time cost of $550 for the temporary signage. Should Council wish to proceed with purchasing the barrels for this Council initiative, the cost would be between $9,600 and $15,200. Staff Contact: Ron Albright, Acting Director, Engineering Servicing, 905-623-3379 x2302 or RAlbright@clarington.net. Attachments: Not Applicable Interested Parties: There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision. Page 55 Presentations and Handouts Service Excellence for our Communities Developing Durham’s Energy and Sustainability Campus Presentation to Council Municipality of Clarington May 4, 2020 1 Service Excellence for our Communities Presentation Outline Opening Remarks What is Mixed Waste, Presort and Anaerobic Digestion? Drivers for Managing Organic Waste The Siting Study Process Development Principles Project Commitments Next Steps 2 Service Excellence for our Communities What is Mixed Waste, Presort and Anaerobic Digestion? 3 Service Excellence for our Communities Drivers for Managing Organic Waste Region Drivers •Growth and Diversion •Durham-York Energy Centre capacity •Regulatory •Address Climate Change/reduce GHG emissions Market Drivers •Landfill capacity •Green bin processing capacity •Renewable Natural Gas 4 Service Excellence for our Communities The Siting Study Process -Where Are We? 1.Determined search area / minimum site requirements 2.Identified candidate sites based on minimum site requirements 3.Developed evaluation criteria for candidate long list of sites 4.Applied evaluation criteria to determine a short-list of sites 5.Stakeholder Consultation 6.Comparative evaluation to establish advantages / disadvantages between sites 7.Identified preferred site 8.Recommendation to Regional Council for Approval of Site Service Excellence for our Communities Proposed Site Location 6 Service Excellence for our Communities Facility Development Principles •An integrated and complementary approach: •Focus on the south site •Ensure compatibility •Provide a distinct sustainability focus •Ensure design excellence •Enable the development of a gateway •Commit to continuous engagement 7 Service Excellence for our Communities 8 Focus on the South Site DYEC Courtice WPCP OPG •Focus on the south site: •4.96 hectares (12.25 acres) •Next to DYEC •+/-400 m from Highway 401 •Between Energy Drive and Haul Road •North of CN Rail line •Avoids natural heritage systems •Leaves the “Gateway” site available for future development Service Excellence for our Communities Ensure Compatibility •Commit to zero odour emissions •Fully enclosed facility •Negative pressure and biofilters •No combustion •Control noise by managing truck routing and facility operations subject to MOE requirements •Control ambient light through zero cut-off lighting •Implement dust suppression practices during construction 9 Service Excellence for our Communities Provide a Distinct Sustainability Focus •Address Climate Change •Provide natural gas recovery systems •Be “District Energy Ready” •Implement energy efficient construction practices •Provide stormwater reduction measures through Low Impact Development techniques such as permeable pavement, vegetated swales, etc. •Address urban heat island effects through roof treatments and on-site plantings 10 Service Excellence for our Communities Ensure Design Excellence •Commit to the site plan process and the Municipality’s Streetscape and Sustainable Development Design Guidelines •Complement the character of existing public buildings •Positive and interesting street presence •High quality materials •Architectural variety and articulation •Landscape design •Consideration of the design from all sides •Minimize truck access visibility and servicing to the rear 11 Service Excellence for our Communities Enable the Development of a “Gateway” •Explore uses that benefit OPG and other business in the energy park •South site does not preclude employment intensive uses on the north site: •Region will work with Clarington to establish Prestige Employment uses; •High quality architecture and design; •Leverage visibility from highway 401. 12 Service Excellence for our Communities Commitment to Continuous Engagement •Development of the north parcel will not be precluded •Site planning process •Achievement of the vision •AD process –regular engagement that updates everyone on the status of the project •Use of the by-products for agricultural community 13 Service Excellence for our Communities Questions 14