HomeMy WebLinkAboutPSD-092-17Clarington
Planning Services
Report
If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Report To: Planning and Development Committee
Date of Meeting: December 4, 2017
Report Number: PSD -092-17 Resolution: #PD -229-17
File Number: PLN 11.21 By-law Number:
Report Subject: AirBnB and Short Term Rentals
Recommendation:
1. That Report PSD -092-17 be received for information.
Municipality of Clarington
Report PSD -092-17
Report Overview
Page 2
Members of Council have received complaints about short term rentals by companies such
as AirBnB. At the last Planning and Development Committee the Director of Planning was
asked about the action being taken on AirBnB rentals. This report reviews the existing
situation in Clarington, the regulatory regime, the potential issues regarding short term
rentals and the mechanisms to address those issues. From staff's research, primarily only
large cities with housing affordability and shortage of rental housing have found the need for
additional regulatory measures. Several tourist towns have also enacted additional
regulatory measures. At the present time, all of the relevant issues experienced in Clarington
can be addressed through existing regulations.
1. Origin
At the November 13, 2017 Planning Committee meeting, information was requested on
staff's response to complaints on AirBnBs. This report is prepared to respond to this
request.
2. Overview
2.1 Short term rentals like AirBnB are a growing part of the sharing economy like that
includes Uber, car -sharing like Zipcar, Bike share programs like BixiBikes, and goods -
exchange program like Swap. The sharing economy is enabled by evolving technology
and communication platforms and driven by a desire to save money and reduce the
impact on the planet through recycling and sharing goods.
2.2 AirBnB is an internet platform company that connects individuals desiring to rent a
personal dwelling unit with anyone searching for a temporary residence. Rentals are less
than 30 days. Besides AirBnB, there are other platforms like VRBO (Vacation Rental by
Owner), Home Away and Kijiji. The closest type of establishment to that of an AirBnB is
a regular bed and breakfast which offers temporary accommodation with breakfast in an
owner -occupied, private residence with an all-inclusive fee.
2.3 At the present time, AirBnB has 45 listings in Clarington:
x 30 are for private rooms in homes;
x 15 were for dwelling units.
The dwelling units included single detached homes, townhomes and outbuildings,
particularly in rural areas (e.g. pool houses, cabins). There was one listing was for a
basement apartment. There were no accommodations in apartment buildings.
2.4 There is a broad geographic split of the 45 listings:
x 14 in Bowmanville
x 10 in Courtice
Municipality of Clarington
Report PSD -092-17 Page 3
x4 in Newcastle including 3 in the Port of Newcastle
x 2 in Orono
x 2 in Enniskillen
x 3 in Leskard
x 2 near Bowmanville
x 5 in the Ganaraska area
x 2 in Newtonville area
VRBO and Home Away websites had five listings each but they were mostly repetitious
of AirBnB listings.
3. Regulatory Regime
Zoning By -Law
3.1 In general terms, Zoning By-laws 84-63 and 2009-109 do not regulate short term rentals.
Homes or rooms in a residence can be rented out for a short or long term. For reference
purposes, short term rentals will be defined as less than 30 days and longer term rentals
will be one month or greater.
3.2 The only type of rental that is addressed specifically by the Zoning By-laws are bed and
breakfast establishments. In Zoning By-law 84-63 Bed and Breakfast establishments are
defined as:
.......... a dwelling or portion thereof consisting of not more than 3 guests rooms in which
the proprietor resides and which caters to the needs of the traveling public by furnishing
temporary sleeping accommodations and which may or may not provide meals as an
accessory use within the dwelling, but shall not include a boarding or rooming house, a
licensed premise, or an activity otherwise defined herein.
In the Oak Ridges Moraine By-law 2005-109, the definition is similar making reference to
accommodation in the "principal residence of the proprietor".
3.3 It would appear that approximately 90% of the AirBnB listings would likely qualify as a
bed and breakfast under this definition because:
x The entire dwelling or rooms in the dwelling may be rented;
x There is no requirement for meals to be served; and
x It is the proprietor's principal residence but there is no requirement that the proprietor
has to be on site.
In the latter case, it could be the proprietor's principal residence but they could be living
at a cottage or being temporarily living out of town for work or school as an example.
Municipality of Clarington
Report PSD -092-17 Page 4
3.4 AirBnB listings that would not qualify under the Zoning By-laws would be:
x Apartments, with the exception of in-house apartments
x Townhouses
x Dwellings that are not the principal residence of the proprietor
x Rural Estate lots
3.5 Bed and breakfast are permitted in the Agriculture (A), Residential Zones in Hamlets
(RH), Rural Clusters (RC), along the Shoreline (RS), Urban Residential (R1 and R2) and
General Commercial (Cl) under By-law 84-63. In the Oak Ridges Moraine By-law 2005-
109 they are permitted in the Agriculture (A) Rural Settlement 1 (RS1) and in existing
homes in the Environmental Protection (EP) Natural Core (NC) and Natural Linkage (NL)
Zones.
Licencing
3.6 The Municipality of Clarington, like most municipalities, does not license short-term
rentals or bed and breakfast establishments. Similarly, the Municipality does not license
hotels, and longer term rentals of dwellings or parts of dwellings.
The Municipality requires that in-house apartments be registered but like all other
residences does not monitor these dwellings once they have been established.
4. Primary Issues for Municipalities
4.1 Like many aspects of the sharing economy, governments at all levels have struggled to
balance the positive benefits enabled by new technologies with the impacts on residents
and local community.
4.2 For AirBnB and short-term rentals, only large cities (e.g. Toronto, Mississauga,
Vancouver) or tourist communities (Tofino, Whistler, Blue Mountain) have or have under
consideration additional regulatory tools. Attachment 1 is a paper by the Canadian
Centre for Policy Alternatives on "Regulating AirBnB and the Shor-Term Rental Market".
4.3 The primary issues for municipalities are as follows:
a) Impact on Housing Availability and Affordability
A 2017 study by the McGill University School of Urban Planning has found that
approximately 14,000 entire homes in Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal have been
converted for full-time AirBnB usage, out of 81,000 active AirBnB listings across the
three cities. It is noted that this is 14,000 units which could otherwise serve as long-
term units in cities where rental vacancy rates are extremely low.
Housing availability and affordability has been the primary reason for municipalities
introducing additional regulatory measures. Toronto's recent initiative is virtually
entirely focused on increasing the supply of rental housing.
Municipality of Clarington
Report PSD -092-17 Page 5
The new City of Toronto regulations will amend the Zoning By-laws to create a new
category of use for short term rentals, will prohibit the use of an entire dwelling,
including in-house apartments, will license the on-line companies, will require the
homes to be registered with the City for an annual fee, and will amend the property
tax rates.
The situation in the City of Toronto is entirely different than Clarington. There is no
evidence that short-term rentals are having an impact on housing affordability or
availability. The predominant listings in Toronto are for apartments (there are none in
Clarington), and in Toronto, the number of units under short-term rentals is huge
(11,000 in 2016 versus 45 in Clarington in 2017).
b) Nuisance, particularly in areas with a large volume of AirBnBs
Some short term rentals become concentrated in certain areas and gain a reputation
as party houses. Companies like AirBnB prohibit this but in the past they have a
difficult time policing this. Nearby residents generally do not know how to contact the
company or the host to complain.
Municipal Law Enforcement and the Durham Regional Police Service deal with
nuisance complaints throughout the municipality and there are existing regulations
that address property maintenance (Property Standards By-law), Noise (Noise By-
law) and drug use.
c) Loss of taxes
Many municipal jurisdictions across the USA and Canada have hotel taxes. At the
federal and provincial levels of government, there is income taxes and HST. The loss
of revenue from an unregulated accommodation market could have municipal
impacts in a high volume market. It becomes worse as property management
companies start operating short-term rentals.
Clarington and most municipalities outside of Toronto do have the authority for hotel
taxes, and thus is not a relevant factor in Clarington.
d) Uneven Playing Field for Hotel Operators
Hotel operators have a variety of overhead costs that traditional bed and breakfasts
establishments and short-term rental operators do not have to pay including
commercial property taxes, licensing fees, hotel taxes. In some jurisdictions,
particularly tourist areas, this has been seen as an issue of fairness where the
accommodation infrastructure has been built up over many years.
Municipality of Clarington
Resort PSD -092-17
e) Consumer Protection
Paae 6
There is some concern regarding the rights of consumers and homeowners and to a
certain extent safety under the building and fire safety standards of short-term
rentals. Consumer protection is a provincial area of jurisdiction and the province is
partnering with AirBnB to raise awareness on these issues.
Fire and Building Codes are administered by the Municipality. The construction or
modification of dwellings are required to meet the Building Code and Fire Code but
after inspections, there is no ongoing monitoring.
5. AirBnB Complaints
5.1 Municipal staff have received only two complaints about AirBnBs, both about the same
residence in the Port of Newcastle. The issues raised through the complaints were:
xThere is noise and drug use from weekend parties
xHosts refused to provide contact information
xGeneral concern about short term rentals of non -owner -occupied homes
Residents have two avenues to follow with their complaints. They can contact the online
listing platforms to remove the listing or they can contact Municipal Law
Enforcement/Police regarding nuisances.
5.2 For AirBnB, residents can submit complaints directly to AirBnB (See Figure 1) at
httas://www.AirBnB.ca/neiahbors
What happens when you submit an issue?
® � A
Af:r you lilt out the form, y 11 gel q m fumetion Our teem wiM review y , —pim- It sve m.t.h IF"provide the listing's rveb address, —V be
eineit with a taxa number—P.--aF yeur it with--Iw, Air bnb lislin2, —.11send your ehle to Fellow up will lr yuu. It yeu n_i iuM 11.
resvvnses. me.— [ the h-1 whet[ v ;bl, sheet address, .ve rant Follow vy Yl, rete but
nuy still send your mossege tothe hest,
V
Figure 1 — AirBnB Complaints Form
Municipality of Clarington
Report PSD -092-17 Page 7
6. Concurrence
This report has been reviewed by Municipal Law Enforcement and the Clerk who concur
with the recommendations.
7. Conclusion
Short-term rentals such as AirBnB are expanding into Clarington providing an alternative
form of accommodation much like traditional Bed and Breakfasts. There is no reason at
this time for the Municipality to consider additional regulations or add to staff workload to
administer those regulations. Complaints for zoning, noise, parking and other nuisance
issues can be addressed through traditional existing mechanisms.
8. Strategic Plan Application
Not applicable.
Submitted by:
David Crome, MCIP, RPP,
Director of Planning Services
Reviewed by.
Andrew C. Allison, B. Comm, LL.B
CAO
Staff Contact: David Crome, MCIP, RPP, Director of Planning, 905-623-3379 x 2402 or
dcrome@clarington.net
Attachment:
Attachment 1: Paper by Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives on "Regulating AirBnB
and the Short -Term Rental Market".
There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision.
I:\ADepartment\LDO NEW FILING SYSTEM\PLN Planning Files\PLN 11 Housing\PLN 11.21 Short Term Rental s-Airbnb\PSD-092-17_Final. Docx
Attachment 1 to
Report PSD -092-17
Regulating Airbnb
and the Short -Term
Rental Market
An overview of North American regulatory frameworks
Zohra Jamasi
Introduction
As short-term rentals on platforms such as Airbnb and VRBO soar in many cities across
the world, governments find themselves in a unique position of balancing the forces
of innovation with the need to create a regulatory framework.
The City of Toronto has been grappling with a multitude of challenges created
by an uproar of short-term rental listings. The number of Toronto listings on Airb-
nb — one of the many platforms used to offer short-term rentals — jumped by 288
per cent between 2011 and 2016.
Over the last few years, Toronto has been dealing with the aftershock of short-
term rentals, ranging from the disruption of the hotel industry to the tightening of
supply in a hot housing market. A staff report proposes the following new rules to
regulate Toronto's short-term rental market, including:
C C P A
CANADIAN CENTRE
for POLICY ALTERNATIVES
CENTRE CANADIEN
de POLITIQUES ALTERNATIVES
• Restricting short-term rentals to a person's primary residence, which is a
means of cracking down on the 13 per cent of Toronto Airbnb hosts who post
multiple listings;
• Allowing residents to rent out part or all of their home (up to three rooms)
on a short-term basis as long as they are registered with the city, pay a fee,
and provide emergency and safety information to guests;
• Requiring online platform companies to get a city -issued licence number and
to pay a tax on business;
• Requiring online platform companies to remove problem listings and pay a
licensing fee;
• Allowing condo boards to ban short-term rentals in their buildings.
These measures effectively legalize short-term rental commercial activities while
placing restrictions that should help curb the steep rise of quasi -hotel condos and
nuisance short-term rentals in residential neighbourhoods.
Across the many jurisdictions impacted by the wave of short-term rentals, policy
makers have been tasked with addressing five key issues when considering a regu-
latory model. These issues include: commercial host activity, the impact on housing
availability and affordability, tax avoidance, and the impact on economic development.
Several regulatory models have been formulated to provide solutions to these
key challenges. This document summarizes the key elements of proposed or adopted
methods to regulate short-term rentals in some leading North American jurisdictions.
It provides a detailed account of the cities that use these models and the enforcement
mechanisms that have been put in place to hold hosts and platforms accountable.
What is a short-term rental?
The formalization of short-term rentals in a regulatory framework requires clarity on
the definition of a short-term rental. The most widely accepted definition for a short-
term rental is the rental of a dwelling (house, town house, condominium, apartment,
and secondary suites) on a platform for less than 30 days. This definition varies slight-
ly across jurisdictions. For example, Seattle and Denver characterize a short-term
rental as a booked stay of 29 consecutive nights or fewer. Quebec defines a short-
term rental as lasting no more than 31 days.
Some cities have legalized short-term rentals while implementing a set of regu-
lations to manage their impact. Other cities, such as New York, have outright banned
the activity.
Regulating Airbnb and the Short -Term Rental Market
' FIGURE 1 Comparison of regulatory models across North America
Toronto classifies short-term rental activity as "any rental of a residential unit
lasting up to 28 days in a row."'
Key regulatory characteristics in existing models
Among the many regulatory frameworks that have been proposed or are currently
in place, a common set of characteristics have emerged that include a registration
and licence system, a cap on the maximum allowable days in which short-term list-
ings can be made available in a given year, provisions restricting the rental of en-
tire and/or vacant homes, taxation, health and safety standards, and the establish-
ment of zoning bylaws.
Table 1 shows the different mix of characteristics in regulatory models across
North America. These models differ in their composition of these characteristics and
they vary in the extent to which these characteristics are enforced.
Regulating Airbnb and the Short -Term Rental Market 3
Restriction
Entire/vacant
Health &
Licence/
on number
Primary homes
Hotel/
safety/liability
registration
of days
residence restricted
sales tax
insurance
Zoning
Anaheim
9
Chicago
9
9
Denver
9
9
9
Houston
9
Las Vegas
9
Louisville
9
9
9
Miami Beach
9
9
9
New Orleans
9
9
New York
9
9
Philadelphia
9
9
9
Phoenix
9
9
Portland
9
9
9
Quebec
9
9
San Francisco
9
9
9
Seattle
9
9
9
Tofino
9
9
Toronto
9
9
9
9
9
Vancouver
9
9
Whistler
9
Toronto classifies short-term rental activity as "any rental of a residential unit
lasting up to 28 days in a row."'
Key regulatory characteristics in existing models
Among the many regulatory frameworks that have been proposed or are currently
in place, a common set of characteristics have emerged that include a registration
and licence system, a cap on the maximum allowable days in which short-term list-
ings can be made available in a given year, provisions restricting the rental of en-
tire and/or vacant homes, taxation, health and safety standards, and the establish-
ment of zoning bylaws.
Table 1 shows the different mix of characteristics in regulatory models across
North America. These models differ in their composition of these characteristics and
they vary in the extent to which these characteristics are enforced.
Regulating Airbnb and the Short -Term Rental Market 3
City licence and registration
The most common response to short-term rentals in North America has been legal-
ization of the activity combined with a requirement for hosts to register with their
local city office and obtain a business licence. This directive recognizes the com-
mercial nature of short-term rentals and creates a tracking system of host activity.
Jurisdictions have their own set of requirements that qualify hosts for a licence and
almost all require that the licence number be advertised publicly.
In Chicago, hosts must register their short-term listing at no cost, but registra-
tion must be renewed annually. Hosts who have multiple listings must register each
listing separately. Most other jurisdictions have registration fees.
The City and County of Denver operate under a licensing framework, issuing a
short-term rental licence (less than 30 days) for primary residences. A tenant must
have written permission from their landlord to obtain a licence. An applicant must
first set up a tax account (Lodger's Tax ID) for a fee of $50 every two years and then
apply for a short-term rental business licence for an annual fee of $25. All listings on
platforms such as Airbnb must include the business licence number.
In Las Vegas, hosts must register and pay an annual fee of $500 for each rental
unit. Additionally, the host must present a letter from the host's homeowners' asso-
ciation stating permission to operate a short-term rental.
In Louisville, short-term rentals cannot exceed 29 consecutive days. Short-term
rentals must be registered annually with the Revenue Commission and are restrict-
ed to single family homes or duplexes .2
New Orleans and Phoenix allow short-term rentals as long as hosts register for
a rental permit with the city and display it on the platforms through which they ad-
vertise.
Portland was the first city in the United States to legalize short-term rentals in
2014. Both owner and non -owner hosts are required to register with the city's Hous-
ing Safety Office. They adopted an interesting fee structure that disincentives mul-
tiple units and the rental of non -owner units by charging higher registration fees.
For units registered by the owner, a fee of $100 is charged for the first unit and sub-
sequent units are charged a higher rate. A multiple host will have to pay $2,000 for
the fifth unit registered. Units that are registered by non -owners are charged double
the fee of an owner, at $200 for the very first unit and up to $4,000 for the fifth unit.
In San Francisco, a registration system is also in place. Hosts are required to
register with the planning department and remit a fee of $250. However, to regis-
ter a short-term rental, the host must live in the unit at least 275 days of the year. If
they have not yet occupied the unit for a full year, then they must have lived in the
unit 75 per cent of the total days the unit was occupied.
Regulating Airbnb and the Short -Term Rental Market 4
Seattle has legalized short-term rentals for primary and non -primary units and
offers two types of licences for short-term rentals. Primary residence hosts must
sign up for a Short Term Rental Operators License in addition to a business license.
Hosts of a non -primary residence unit must register for a Short Term Rental Oper-
ators License in addition to a business license. Licences for non -primary residence
units are limited to one dwelling unit, in addition to the host's primary residence,
which must be located in the City of Seattle.
Among Canadian jurisdictions, Quebec was the first to regulate short-term rentals.
Quebec law requires short-term rentals of less than 31 days to obtain a licence from
Tourism Quebec. Vancouver has proposed regulations that only allow the issuing of
short-term rental licences for a primary residence — meaning that the host, whether
owner or tenant, must live in the dwelling. This rule targets hosts with multiple in-
vestment properties who operate as commercial hosts and eat into the housing stock.
Toronto has proposed a two-pronged approach to licensing, requiring both com-
panies such as Airbnb and hosts to register and pay an annual fee. Companies are
required to obtain a licence with the city and pay a base fee of $5,000 to $20,000
with a scalable component that charges companies a set dollar amount per night
rented on the platform. In the case of Airbnb, the scalable fee for 2016 would amount
to $988,000 based on a $1 per night rented rate. Hosts of short-term rentals in To-
ronto would be required to pay an annual fee ranging from $40 - $150. Business li-
cence numbers must appear in all short-term listing advertisements. The dual licen-
cing system is geared towards holding both hosts and companies accountable and
to ease the compliance process.
Chicago and Portland are the only other jurisdictions that imposes registration
on operators. The requirement that platforms on which short-term rentals are offered
obtain a business licence also serves to help cities with enforcement and data collec-
tion, which is important in refining regulations as this industry evolves. Other Can-
adian cities (Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Ottawa), where short-term rentals are
soaring are looking towards regulators in Toronto for direction in building a legal
framework — a dual licence and registry system is a move in the right direction.
Primary residence rule
Many short-term rentals operate on online platforms that promote a business model
based on the sharing of your home. Yet many listings on these platforms belong to
hosts that offer multiple listings that are not primary residences. Many tenants also
offer short-term listings illegally, without the consent of their landlords.
Regulating Airbnb and the Short -Term Rental Market
Research conducted by the Centre for Policy Alternatives shows that only 3 per
cent of listings in Toronto belong to the "shared" category, while a small group of
multiple hosts (13 per cent) accounted for 46 per cent of revenue in 2016.
Regulations in Toronto should highlight a primary residence requirement, as it
discourages commercial multiple host operations and puts into place safeguards
for an already heated housing market. The primary residence rule will discourage
hosts from purchasing investment properties to be solely used for short-term rentals.
Vancouver proposed rules making listings that are not a primary residence il-
legal. The rules in Vancouver permit a licence for the dwelling unit that does not
include secondary units, such as basements and laneways, unless secondary units
with tenants have written permission by the landlord to use the dwelling as a short-
term rental. This provision has been estimated to add 1,000 units back to Vancou-
ver's housing stock. These regulations are to be finalized in 2017.
Seattle and Denver are two American jurisdictions that have a primary dwelling
requirement for short-term rental licences. Seattle operates under a dual licensing
system and makes an allowance for permits being issued for one additional dwell-
ing unit, along with the primary dwelling unit of a host. Denver allows tenants that
live in the dwelling to make a listing available after obtaining a licence with proof
of consent from their landlord.
Toronto has followed suit when it comes to the "one host, one home" movement
making the primary residence rule a central part of its proposed regulatory frame-
work. Short-term rentals that occur in non -primary residences will be illegal. The
biggest shortfall in the proposal governing the primary residence rule is that hosts
can register and a licence by simply "self certifying" the use of a primary residence.
Hosts are not required to show proof of primary residence at the time of registration
but may be required to provide this proof in the event they are audited by the city.
This creates a loophole in the system that compromises the objective of the rule by
allowing commercial activity to slip through the cracks. Multiple hosts can simply
obtain licences for several residences under different people "self certifying" that
these are primary residences without providing the necessary proof.
Cap on the number of days per year
Many jurisdictions have implemented a cap on the number of days a year in which
a short-term rental that is deemed legal can be made available. Placing a ceiling on
the maximum number of days for listings is aimed at curbing commercial host activ-
ity that goes beyond local residents sharing their home occasionally.
Regulating Airbnb and the Short -Term Rental Market 6
This type of rule also addresses the impact of hotel -like operations under the
guise of short-term rentals on the housing market. Hosts who cannot make their units
available year-round on short-term rental platforms might be more likely to enter
into long-term rental leases. This helps low vacancy rates in cities such as Toronto
and Vancouver, where housing units are in short supply—driving rental prices up
and creating affordability challenges for local residents.
One example is Philadelphia, where a licence for short-term rentals is required
in excess of 30 days and a cap of 180 days per year is in place. San Francisco has
tighter controls in place, permitting hosts up to a maximum of only 60 days per year.
As Toronto's proposed legislation does not restrict the number of days in which a
host can offer listings. Its restrictions are simply contained to primary residences — up
to three rooms, including legal secondary units.
Entire and vacant homes
When an entire property is listed as a short-term rental, this impacts the housing
market — the protection of which is a primary concern in many jurisdictions.
New York City implemented legislation in 2010 that made the short-term rental
(less than 30 days) of an entire home illegal. For up to 30 days, hosts could offer a
room, a bed, or even a couch for short-term rent, but not an entire home.
In the fall of 2016, this legislation was extended to make the advertisement of
an entire home on a short-term rental platform illegal. As a result, 20,000 listings
on Airbnb were deemed illegal.
Vancouver has also proposed prohibiting listings of vacant homes and even pot-
entially levying a vacant home tax. New Orleans has taken a more lax approach to
managing entire home listings by allowing hosts with a city licence to rent entire
homes for up to 90 days a year.
Proposals for legislation in Toronto will legalize the short-term rental of up to
three rooms in a home and entire homes. Research on Airbnb activity in Toronto for
2016 showed that the majority of listings (64%) on the platform are for entire homes,
apartments, or condos. This category of short-term rentals is most likely to be hav-
ing the greatest negative impact on housing affordability. If the primary residence
component fails to curb commercial host operations, failure to restrict the rental
of entire homes will continue to create challenges for the rental market in Toronto,
where the vacancy rate is extremely low — at 1.3 per cent.
Regulating Airbnb and the Short -Term Rental Market
Lodging, hotel tax, or sales tax
In the absence of regulations, short-term rentals have been operating in a grey area
when it comes to taxation. Although many short-term rentals operate as quasi -ho-
tels, offering multiple listings, hosts pay residential taxes as opposed to business
taxes. In Toronto, commercial property tax rates are 1.8 to 2.6 times higher than
residential property tax rates.' This favourable tax environment provides an unfair
advantage to operators of short-term rentals, while traditional hotels and bed and
breakfasts pay more.
Tax avoidance in the short-term rental industry has real negative economic im-
pacts on the hospitality industry, which is finding it difficult to compete with low-cost,
unregulated short-term rentals. U.S. studies4 show that Airbnb activity in Austin has
negatively impacted hotel revenue by approximately 10 to 13 per cent. A study con-
ducted by the Ted Rogers School of Management at Ryerson University shows Airbnb
revenue as a share of hotel revenue in four large Canadian markets (Metro Vancou-
ver, Calgary, Greater Toronto, and Ottawa) has been steadily increasing — threaten-
ing the revenue of the existing accommodation industry.
Several jurisdictions have responded with tax provisions to level the playing
field. These provisions fall under an umbrella of taxes that range from 1-14 per cent
of the listing price of short-term rentals.
Jurisdictions implementing a hotel occupancy tax in the U.S. include Chicago,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, San Francisco, Seattle, Portland, Houston, Louisiana,
and Louisville. Among Canadian jurisdictions, only Quebec has a hotel tax in effect
and Vancouver has proposed a similar lodging tax.
Jurisdictions imposing taxes on the listing price of short-term rentals that are at
the lower end of the spectrum include: Seattle charges a tax of 1.5 per cent; Chica-
go has a "Hotel Accommodations" tax for 4.5 per cent; Louisiana charges a "Sales
and Use Tax" of 5 per cent; and Houston, Portland, and Pennsylvania levy a 6 per
cent lodging tax.
Jurisdictions where higher tax levies are in effect include: Philadelphia, which
levies an 8.5 per cent hotel tax; Lousiville, which levies a 10 per cent tax; and San
Francisco, where a 14 per cent "Transient Occupancy Tax" is enforced.
Quebec is the only Canadian jurisdiction that has a 3.5 per cent lodging tax, which
is now in effect. However, as in many of the jurisdictions listed above, enforcement
of these new tax rules have been lax, leading to millions of dollars in tax revenue
losses for local governments. These challenges shed light on the need for a tighten-
ing existing rules and more effective enforcement models.
The proposed regulations for Toronto include the city's intention to levy a hotel
and short-term rental tax but do not include specific details on the amount of tax or
Regulating Airbnb and the Short -Term Rental Market 8
the implementation process. Currently, there is no hotel tax in the City of Toronto
but proposals to levy a 4 per cent tax on hotels and up to a 10 per cent tax on short-
term rentals are underway.
Health and safety
Health and safety considerations are an important component of regulating short-
term rentals. Traditional accommodation providers are required by law to ensure
that rental units meet fire codes and have appropriate liability insurance. Most short-
term listings are not legally obliged to follow such health and safety measures — ex-
posing hosts and consumers to risk and potential legal conflicts.
Many jurisdictions have included health and safety standards as part of the eli-
gibility criteria for qualifying short-term rentals for a licence. Safety rules will have
the desired effect of reducing units that are not built for the purpose of being used
like hotel rooms — as long as they are enforced. These measures can mitigate the
negative impact that short-term rentals are having on the accommodation industry
if violations are handled according to due process and result in fines.
In Denver, hosts are required to present guests with a rental package that con-
tains city rules and important safety information about the unit being rented. Hosts
are also expected to obtain general liability insurance to protect against property
damage and bodily injury.
Hosts in Louisville must post an evacuation plan as part of their listing and meet
the city's set smoke detector requirements. In Seattle, a licence application must be
accompanied by a signed declaration that the unit is up to city code and proof that
safety information about the unit is provided to guests.
In New Orleans, when applying for a dwelling licence a host must provide the city
with a floor plan showing locations of smoke detectors in every bedroom, fire extin-
guishers, and exits. Additionally, to qualify for a licence the dwelling must have lia-
bility insurance for $500,000.
In Toronto, the proposed regulations would require registered hosts to abide by
municipal bylaws, be up to par with the Ontario Building and Fire Code, and share
safety information with guests. However, this rule also falls prey to self certification
by hosts, meaning that no proof that health and safety measures are actually being
followed is required when issuing hosts with a licence.
Regulating Airbnb and the Short -Term Rental Market 9
Zoning
The operation of short-term rentals in areas zoned for residential purposes have
created both social and legal problems for many jurisdictions. The character of lo-
cal neighbourhoods is changing in many cities as strangers flow in and out of their
boroughs and party houses pop up creating noise nuisance, property damage, and
safety concerns.
Regulations prohibiting short-term rentals in specific city zones place the onus
on the host to determine whether their listings falls in an illegal zone. As zoning by-
laws are often a complicated web of legal language, many hosts make listings avail-
able that violate these bylaws either because it is too difficult to determine which
zones are legal or because violations are not enforced.
To reduce the impact of short-term rentals on the social fabric of residential areas,
several jurisdictions have made the business activity of short-term rentals illegal
in single-family zoned areas. These jurisdictions include Atlanta, Denver, Oklahoma
City, Miami Beach, Philadelphia, and Tiburon in California.
Toronto is not one of these jurisdictions. The legislative framework put forth in
Toronto proposes an amendment to the city's zoning bylaws to establish a new type
of land use called short-term rental — permissible only in primary residences. This
change will effectively make short-term rentals legal in the following: residential
zone, residential detached zone, residential semi-detached zone, residential town-
house zone, residential multiple dwelling zone, residential apartment zone, resi-
dential apartment commercial zone, commercial residential zone, commercial resi-
dential employment zone.
Enforcement Mechanisms
The most important aspect of any regulatory model is the enforcement mechanisms
that accompany it, which are meant to ensure compliance. Legislation alone cannot
minimize the negative impacts of short-term rentals if commitment to effective en-
forcement is absent. Governments must prioritize both legislation and enforcement,
dedicating adequate resources to ensure that violations of rules are followed with
immediate and set consequences. In order for this to occur, the enforcement pro-
cess must be laid out clearly and cities should plan for expanding the supply of by-
law officers in advance of legislation becoming effective.
Many cities that have implemented regulatory frameworks have also developed
fines for infractions to the rules, but most have been ineffective. What do these fines
look like?
Regulating Airbnb and the Short -Term Rental Market 10
In Chicago, violation of rules governing short-term rental activity can result in
a host being fined $1,500 to $3,000 dollars per offence per day. Instances that in-
volve criminal activity or public nuisance fines are even steeper, starting at a pen-
alty of $2,500 to $5,000 per offence.
Most condominiums in Illinois prohibit short-term rentals as stated in condo-
minium association declarations. If owners or tenants of condominiums are found
to offer units as short-term rentals, they receive a notice requiring them to cease the
listing, they can face fines, they can be taken to court by the condominium associa-
tion, and they can even be evicted.
While a fine system is in place to punish violations, the problem is that the onus
is on the condominium associations to regularly check the various online platforms
for illegal listings. In this case, enforcement has been offloaded to condominium
boards as opposed to government officials.
New York City operates under a hierarchy of fines: a first-time infraction by a host
costs $1,000, with subsequent infractions costing up to $7,500. A similar fine system
has emerged in Miami Beach, where violators are initially fined $1,000 for a first-
time offence, followed by fines of $5,000, $7,500, and $10,000 for subsequent vio-
lations. Since short-term rentals of single-family homes are banned in Miami Beach,
any host offering a single-family home for less than six months and one day can face
a fine of $20,000 for a first-time violation.
In Phoenix, hosts found to operate without registering face a $150 daily fine.
But a bizarre feature of the regulations in Phoenix is that a tax exemption is offered
for hosts with less than three short-term rentals — which, according to many defin-
itions, still classify as "multiple hosts."
Another potentially problematic feature of tax regulations in many cities is that
the collection of tax revenue depends on hosts filing taxes on their short-term rent-
al income. Many short-term rental hosts do not file taxes because they are unaware
of their tax obligations or take comfort in lax enforcement of tax measures, thereby
engaging in tax avoidance.
The shortcoming in such models is that platforms such as Airbnb are not held ac-
countable for tax compliance and are simply asked to provide their hosts with friend-
ly reminders about paying their tax dues.
A more effective compliance model for taxation would make platforms directly
responsible for tax collection and remittance. A prominent example is Philadelphia,
where Airbnb is required by law to collect a sales and hotel tax on behalf of the city.
The platform automatically charges the tax to the guest's final transaction bill. This
kind of model minimizes tax avoidance and encourages accountability.
In Canada, Quebec is leading on the regulation front and has prescribed legal
fines for short-term rental violations. Fines for small-scale hosts range from $2,500
Regulating Airbnb and the Short -Term Rental Market 11
to $25,000 daily. Meanwhile, commercial corporations can face penalties of $5,000
to $50,000 a day. Vancouver is the other Canadian jurisdiction developing of regu-
latory framework. While still in the works, the proposed set of rules in Vancouver
may include suspension of a host's business licence for a term of one year for vio-
lating the proposed primary residence or licensing requirement.
Toronto's proposals to regulate the short-term rental market borrows some of
the key components in other jurisdictions and similarly falls short of a robust en-
forcement and compliance structure. Hosts who illegally offer non -primary residence
units are simply taken off the registry and do not face any monetary fines. There are
also no fines specified to hold companies accountable for allowing illegal postings
on their platform. More generally, most of the rules depend on hosts self certifying
their compliance, which is too lenient a method of regulation.
Conclusion
As the short-term rental industry boom spreads across cities in North America, hosts,
consumers, and communities look to local governments to regulate short-term rent-
als. Several regulatory frameworks have been proposed and many jurisdictions have
enacted rules to help minimize the negative consequences of short-term rentals. This
document identifies some of the key components that have emerged as part of the
mandate to legalize and regulate the short-term rental industry. Integral to the suc-
cess of any regulatory framework is the extent to which compliance to the set rules
are enforced.
Zohra jamasi is an economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives' Ontario
office. She has a PhD in Economics from Ryerson University, where she also teaches
Economics.
The author would like to thank Masi Naserie for his research assistance on this project.
Regulating Airbnb and the Short -Term Rental Market 12
Notes
I Toronto Report EX26.3 http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-104802.pdf
2 Some exceptions apply, please see: https://Iouisvilieky.gov/government/planning-design/short-term-
rental-information
3 http://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/tedrogersschool/htm/documents/ResearchInstitute/CDN Airbnb_
Market_Report.pdf
4 Consigh, Gallagher, Kumar, Mehta, Purnell and Templeton (2012), Jordan (2015) and Zervais et at (2014)
C C P A
CANADIAN CENTRE
for POLICY ALTERNATIVES
CENTRE CANADIEN
de POLITIQUES ALTERNATIVES
www.policyalternatives.ca
PLEASE MAKE A DONATION...
Help us to continue to offer our publications free online.
With yoursupport we can continue to produce high quality research—and
make sure it gets into the hands of citizens, journalists, policy makers and
progressive organizations. Visit www.policyalternatives.ca or call 613-
563-1341 for more information.
The opinions and recommendations in this report, and any errors, are those of the au-
thors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers or funders of this report.
—a,b,