HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOD-065-05
Cl@llgton
Report If 5
REPORT
CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Meeting:
COUNCIL
Report #: COD-06S-0S
File #:
Resolution #: (' - f; b ~. 0 _S
By-law #:
Date:
December 12, 2005
Subject:
Pay Equity Plan Review
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended to Council the following:
1. THAT Report COD-065- 05 be received;
2. THAT Council authorize the Chief Administrative Officer to undertake an
independent review of the Municipality's existing Pay Equity Plan (McDowell
Plan) for applicability to today's work environment with a report back to
Council;
3. THAT the funding for the independent review be included in the 2006
Administration Budget,
4. THAT future reviews of Pay Equity questionnaires, except those positions
identified in report COD-54-0S which were referred back for reconsideration
by the Pay Equity Committee, be suspended until the completion of the
independent review and report to Council;
5. THAT CUPE local 74 President, and the Members the Union Pay Equity
Committee be advised of Council's actions respecting the Union Pay Equity
Plan review and the Chief Administrative Officer's intention to advise the
Union of the consultant's recommendations upon completion of the review;
6. THAT the Members of the Non-Affiliated Pay Equity Committee be advised of
Council's actions respecting the Non-Affiliated Pay Equity Plan review, and
the Chief Administrative Officer's intention to review the recommendations of
the review with the Committee upon its completion; and
REPORT NO.: COD-06S-0S
PAGE 2
7. THAT, as the Municipality is the recognized employer for Library Pay Equity
purposes, the Library Board be advised of Council's decision.
Submitted by:
Reviewed bU ~ -------~'Z....
Franklin Wu
Chief Administrative Officer
arie Marano
Director of Corporate Services
MM*ca
BACKGROUND
REPORT NO.: COD-06S-0S
PAGE 3
1. The Pay Equity Legislative review and the Municipal Pay Equity history and
practice were reviewed with Council on November 21, 2005. As part of that
review the CAO identified some questions and suggestions regarding the Pay
Equity practices of the Municipality.
2. The presentation identified that the Pay Equity process and the McDowall, 12-
factor, Job Evaluation Plan has been in place since 1990, when Pay Equity was
achieved. Although the Plan has been tested and has met the standards set out
by the Pay Equity Commission, it has been in place for a significant period of
time and as such a review may be appropriate.
3. The CAO recommended in the presentation to Council, that an independent
review of the Plan for its applicability to today's work environment be completed.
An independent consultant with expertise in Pay Equity would support the
Municipality's continued efforts in maintaining its commitment to Pay Equity
maintenance.
4. It is proposed that an R.F.P. will be developed setting out terms of reference
which will include a review of the present process including the Committee
structure, the degree of compliance with legislative maintenance obligations, and
the applicability of the factors in the Municipal workplace and any other
identifiable gaps or deficiencies. It is also anticipated that the terms of reference
for the review will include a requirement that the consultants meet with both Pay
Equity Committees, the preparation of a report with recommendations on the
practice, process, grid reference to the Plan, and legislative compliance. They
will also be asked to develop criteria to be used in determining appropriate the
time for a job review thereby eliminating reviews which are not warranted.
5. As a result of the significant implications of amending the plans, the Chief
Administrative Officer is recommending that the review be conducted by
independent consultants in a comprehensive manner. If the independent review
recommends that a new plan be developed, or that a substantial revision of the
existing plan would be beneficial to the Pay Equity maintenance process, the
entire review could be lengthy, taking perhaps up to a year to complete. Should
the recommendation include a change to the plan, in compliance with the
legislation, the details would ultimately require negotiation with the Union, and
the posting of the revised plan. Consequently, the Union is advised through the
recommendations in this report, that Council has authorized a review of the plan.
As Council is aware, the non-affiliated plan change would also require posting
and it would result in the re-opening of the 90 day complaint window. Any
change would be required in both plans due to the potential for comparable
references under the proportional value assessment previously applied to the
Corporation and in order to maintain fair and equitable treatment for all female
positions.
REPORT NO.: COD-06S-0S
PAGE 4
6. The budget for this review is recommended for inclusion in the Chief
Administrative Officer's budget for 2006, with a report back to Council on the
results. Should the review result in a major change to the plans, the cost is
estimated to be approximately $35,000.
7. Report COD-54-05, was referred back for review with the Pay Equity Committee.
The employees covered in that report initially submitted a joint questionnaire
which may not have provided the Committee with the opportunity to evaluate
some of the factors pertinent to some positions appropriately. These employees
have been requested to resubmit separate questionnaires, which will be
reviewed by the Committee in 2006. It is recommended that these reviews be
conducted under the present practices which were prevailing at the time of the
original submission.
8. In order not to complicate the Pay Equity process while under review, it
recommended that future requests for reviews be suspended until the completion
of the independent review and report to Council.
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-6506