HomeMy WebLinkAboutPSD-143-05
Cl~.n
REPORT
PLANNING SERVICES
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
Date: Monday, December 5, 2005
Report #: PSD-143-05
File #: A2005-0042, A2005-0046
A2005-0048, A2005-0049
A2005-0050
By-law #:
C. fJ{) . l/"t:; J- (}co)
,
Subject:
MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
FOR THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 17, 2005
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PSD-143-05 be received; and
2. THAT Council concurs with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on
November 17, 2005 for applications A2005-0042, A2005-0046, A2005-0048, A2005-
0049, and A2005-0050, and that Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario
Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment.
Submitted by: J,j__
a i J. Crome, MCIP, R.P.P.
Director of Planning Services
\
Reviewed by: (. ) ~~~ ~ '
Franklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer
BR*CP*DJC*sh
November 22, 2005
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830
REPORT NO.: PSD-143-05
PAGE 2
1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS
1.1 All applications received by the Municipality for minor variance are scheduled for a
hearing within 30 days of being received by the Secretary-Treasurer. The purpose of
the minor variance application and the Committee's decisions are detailed in
Attachment 1. The decisions of the Committee and staff recommendations are
summarized below.
Application Number Staff Recommendation Decision of Committee
A2005-0042 Deny Denied
A2005-0046 Approve with modifications Approved with modifications
A2005-0048 Approve Approved
A2005-0049 Approve Approved
A2005-0050 Approve Approved
DECISIONS OF COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR
NOVEMBER 17, 2005
2.0 COMMENTS
2.1 A2005-0042 was an application to vary from the definition of accessory use and the
definition of accessory building or structure to permit a 45 square metre non-
commercial, non-agricultural building and the outside storage of a maximum of ten (10)
motor vehicles for a period of not more than three (3) years. The owner's request was
to permit the use and building on a vacant lot adjacent to the owner's residence, and to
consider the use and building accessory to the residence. Staff determined that this
application proposed to permit the establishment of a use that is not exclusively devoted
to a principle use located on the same lot, and would therefore permit the establishment
of a new use which does not conform to the Official Plan or the Zoning By-law. In
addition, the applicant did not demonstrate that the subject lot could not be combined
with the adjacent residential lot, nor was it demonstrated that the uses and structures
requested could not be carried out on the adjacent residential lot. Two neighbouring
property owners spoke in favour of the application, and four provided letters in favour.
Six people spoke in opposition to the application, and two provided verbal objections
through telephone conversations. Committee agreed with Staff's recommendation to
deny the application as it was not minor or desirable in nature, and was not in keeping
with the intent of the Official Plan or the Zoning By-law.
2.2 A2005-0046 was an application to increase the maximum lot coverage for a lot from
45% to 57%, to permit the construction of an accessory building by reducing the
REPORT NO.: PSD-143-05
PAGE 3
required rear and side yard setbacks from 1.2 metres to 0.6 metres, and to permit the
construction of a deck by reducing the required rear yard setback from 6 metres to 5.56
metres, and by reducing the required interior side yard setback from 1.2 metres to 0.66
metres. The applicant constructed the deck with a floor height of approximately 2.3
metres above the grade of the rear yard. Staff supported the reduction of the side and
rear yard for the accessory building, the reduction in the rear yard for the deck, and an
increase in total lot coverage; however, as the deck was constructed at an elevation
above the lot line fence, Staff could not support the further reduction of the interior side
yard. Staff recalculated the total lot coverage excluding the portion of the deck which
encroaches into the interior side yard and determined an increase in lot coverage of
54.5% was appropriate. A neighbouring property owner provided a letter in opposition
to the application, as they felt their privacy in their rear yard was compromised. Staff
recommended approval of the application to increase the lot coverage to 54.5%, to
reduce the side and rear yard setbacks for an accessory building to 0.6 metres, and to
reduce the rear yard setback to 5.56 metres, but did not recommend approval to reduce
the interior side yard setback for the deck. Committee agreed with Staff and approved
the application as recommended.
2.3 Applications A2005-0048, A2005-0049, and A2005-0050 were approved as applied for
in keeping with Staff's recommendation.
2.4 Staff has reviewed the Committee's decisions and is satisfied that the applications that
received approval are in conformity with the Official Plan policies, consistent with the
intent of the Zoning By-law and are minor in nature and desirable. Council's
concurrence with the Committee of Adjustment's decision is required in order to afford
Staff's official status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the event of an appeal of any
decision of the Committee of Adjustment.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Periodic Report for the Committee of Adjustment
Attachment 1
To Report PSD-143-05
CLf!!il1gron
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
AIRD & BERLlS LLP
BERNHART ROTH
FILE NO.:
4648 FICES ROAD, DARLINGTON
PART LOT 354, CONCESSION
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON
A2005-0042
PROPERTY LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
TO VARY FROM THE DEFINITION OF ACCESSORY USE AND ACCESSORY
BUILDING OR STRUCTURE TO PERMIT A BUILDING OF 45 M2 AND THE OUTSIDE
STORAGE OF A MAXIMUM OF 10 MOTOR VEHICLES FOR A PERIOD NOT MORE
THAN THREE (3) YEARS.
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO DENY THE APPLICATION TO VARY THE DEFINITION OF ACCESSORY USE
AND ACCESSORY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE TO PERMIT A NON-COMMERCIAL,
NON-AGRICULTURAL BUILDING OF 45 M2 AND THE OUTSIDE STORAGE OF A
MAXIMUM OF 10 MOTOR VEHICLES FOR A PERIOD OF NOT MORE THAN THREE
(3) YEARS AS IT IS NOT MINOR, NOT DESIRABLE, AND DOES NOT CONFORM
TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW.
DATE OF DECISION: November 17, 2005
LAST DAY OF APPEAL: December 7,2005
~#Jgron
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
KIERNAN VINCENT
KIERNAN VINCENT
PROPERTY LOCATION: 54 TRUDEAU DRIVE, BOWMANVILLE
PART LOT 101, CONCESSION
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF BOWMANVILLE
FILE NO.: A2005-0046
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DECK BY REDUCING THE REQUIRED
INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 1.2 METRES TO 0.66 METRES, BY
REDUCING THE REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 6 METRES TO 5.56
METRES, AND TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESSORY BUILDING BY
REDUCING THE REQUIRED REAR AND SIDE YARD SETBACKS FROM 1.2 METRES
TO 0.6 METRES, AND BY INCREASING THE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE FROM 45% TO
57%.
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE
FROM 45% TO 54.5%, TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED SIDE AND REAR YARD
SETBACK FOR AN ACCESSORY BUILDING TO 0.6 METRES AND TO REDUCE
THE REAR YARD SETBACK FOR A DECK TO 5.56 METRES AS IT IS MINOR AND
DESIRABLE IN NATURE AND CONFORMS TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING
BY-LAW AND TO DENY THE REDUCTION OF THE INTERIOR SIDE YARD
SETBACK AS IT IS NOT MINOR AND NOT DESIRABLE.
DATE OF DECISION:
LAST DAY OF APPEAL:
November 17, 2005
December 7,2005
~n
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
DOUGLAS CRONK
DOUGLAS CRONK
PROPERTY LOCATION: 3618 LAKESHORE ROAD, CLARKE
PART LOT 26BF, CONCESSION
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF CLARKE
FILE NO.: A2005-0048
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ENCLOSED PORCH BY REDUCING
THE PERMITTED REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 3.96 METRES TO 1.2 METRES.
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN
ENCLOSED PORCH BY REDUCING THE REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK
FROM A PERMITTED 3.96 METRES TO 1.2 METRES AS IT IS MINOR AND
DESIRABLE IN NATURE AND CONFORMS TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING
BY-LAW.
DATE OF DECISION: November 17, 2005
LAST DAY OF APPEAL: December 7, 2005
Cl~n
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
PAMELA MCINTOSH
PAMELA MCINTOSH
PROPERTY LOCATION: 138 ELGIN STREET, BOWMANVILLE
PART LOT 122, CONCESSION
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF BOWMANVILLE
FILE NO.: A2005-0049
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING HOME BY REDUCING THE REAR
YARD SETBACK FROM 7.5 METRES TO 6.4 METRES AND TO INCREASE THE TOTAL
LOT COVERAGE FROM 40% TO 46.5%.
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION TO PERMIT THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING
HOME BY REDUCING THE REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK TO 6.4 METRES AND
TO INCREASE THE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE TO 46.5% AS IT IS MINOR AND
DESIRABLE IN NATURE AND CONFORMS TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-
LAW.
DATE OF DECISION: November 17, 2005
LAST DAY OF APPEAL: December 7,2005
Cl~
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
ZYGMUNT PICUR
ZYGMUNT PICUR
FILE NO.:
3411 TOOLEY ROAD, COURTICE
PART LOT 333, CONCESSION
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON
A2005-0050
PROPERTY LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING BY
INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED BUILDING HEIGHT FROM 10.5 METRES
TO 10.9 METRES AND TO PERMIT A SECOND KITCHEN WITHIN A SINGLE
DETACHED DWELLING.
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A HOME
BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT TO 10.9 METRES AND TO PERMIT THE
ADDITION OF A SECOND KITCHEN FOR A SINGLE DWELLING UNIT SUBJECT TO
THE APPLICANT RECEIVING WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE DURHAM
REGIONAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE LAST DAY OF APPEAL IS
RECOMMENDED AS IT IS MINOR AND DESIRABLE IN NATURE AND CONFORMS
TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW
DATE OF DECISION:
LAST DAY OF APPEAL:
November 17, 2005
December 7,2005