The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01/24/2005 . > l;ffJliJJgton '- GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE DATE: JANUARY 24,2005 9:30 A.M, TIME: PLACE: COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1, ROLL CALL 2, DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 3, MINUTES (a) Minutes of a Regular Meeting of January 10, 2005 301 4, PRESENTATIONS "" (a) Gene Cartier, Durham Region Works Department, regarding the Adelaide Avenue Extension (b) Martin Scott, McCormick Rankin Corporation, regarding the Adelaide East Avenue Extension (c) Jim Kinsella, Schooley Mitchell, regarding Telecommunications Study 5, DELEGATIONS (a) Tom Barrie, Chair, Agricultural Advisory Committee, Update (b) Bruce Taylor, regarding United Way (c) Glen Genge, D,G, Biddle & Associates, regarding Report PSD-017-05 (d) Bill Cawker, Baywood Homes, regarding Addendum Report PSD-006-05 (e) Kevin Tunney, Tunney Planning Inc., regarding Report PSD-014-05 '- CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ClARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905) 623-3379 G.P. & A. Agenda - 2 - January 24, 2005 '- (f) Robert Hann, Valiant Property Management, regarding Halloway Holdings Limited and Towchester Developments Limited, North Bowmanville Appeals (g) Peter and Marianne Zakarow, regarding Halloway Holdings Limited and Towchester Developments Limited, North Bowmanville Appeals (h) D, Mackenzie, regarding Halloway Holdings Limited and Towchester Developments Limited, North Bowmanville Appeals (i) Randy and Kelly Burns, regarding Halloway Holdings Limited and Towchester Developments Limited, North Bowmanville Appeals 6. PUBLIC MEETING (a) Application to Amend Zoning By-law 84-63 Applicant: Martin Road Holdings Report: PSD-009-05 '- (b) Proposed Zoning Amendment Bulk Fuel Storage Applicant: Municipality of Clarington Report: PSD-010-05 7. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) PSD-009-05 - Rezoning Application for a Fuel Bar, Convenience Store and Car Wash Applicant: Martin Road Holdings Limited (The Kaillin Group) (b) PSD-010-05- Bulk Storage Tanks in General Industrial (M2) Zones (c) PSD-011-05- Hydro Corridor Lands Declaration of Potential Secondary Future Use (d) PSD-012-05 - Application for Removal of Part Lot Control Applicant: The Kaitlin Group LId, (e) PSD-013-05- Annual Report on Site Plan Activities for 2004 '- 501 503 601 606 611 621 627 G.P. & A. Agenda - 3 - January 24, 2005 '- (f) PSD-014-05 - Amendment to Draft Approved Plan of 636 Subdivision 18T-87021 Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA 2004/045 to Permit the Development of 267 Residential Units Applicant: Liberty Street Developments Inc, (g) PSD-015-05 - Monitoring of the Decisions of the Committee of 662 Adjustment for the Meeting of January 13, 2005 (h) PSD-016-05 - Proposed Street Name Changes for Northwest 669 Bowmanville Status Report (i) PSD-017-05- Rezoning Application to Permit a Light Industrial 673 Use Applicant: 1524103 Ontario LId. (Holburn) Ul PSD-018-05 - Potential Settlement with Halloway and Towchester for their North Bowmanville OPA and Zoning Appeals (to be distributed under separate cover) '- 8, ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) EGD-01-05 - Monthly Report on Building Permit Activity for 701 December, 2004 9, OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT No reports 10, EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT No reports 11, COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) CSD-O 1-05 - Municipality of Clarington Participation in the 1001 Summer Jobs Service Program (b) CSD-02-05 - Newcastle Village Recreation Facility 1004 Needs Assessment 12, CLERK'S DEPARTMENT '- (a) CLD-03-05 - Animal Services Quarterly Report - 1101 October - December, 2004 . --- G.P. & A. Agenda - 4- January 24, 2005 13, CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) COD-003-05 - Tender CL2004-39 Grass Culling and Trimming 1201 (b) COD-004-05- Telecommunications Consultant 1204 14. FINANCE DEPARTMENT No reports 15. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER'S DEPARTMENT No reports 16, UNFINISHED BUSINESS (a) Addendum to Report PSD-006-05 - Application By Baywood Homes to Amend 1501 a Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision To Delete a Service Land for 10 Residential "'- Units Abutting Townline Road South in the City of Oshawa (b) Addendum to Report PSD-160-04- Further Comments on the Provincial Draft 1524 Greenbelt Plan 17. OTHER BUSINESS 18. ADJOURNMENT "'- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Cf!!wgton General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes January 10, 2005 Minutes of a meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on Monday, January 10, 2005 at 9:30 a.m., in the Council Chambers. ROLL CALL Present Were: Absent Were: Also Present: Mayor J. Mutton Councillor A. Foster Councillor D. MacArthur Councillor G. Robinson Councillor J. Schell Councillor C. Trim Councillor P. Pingle (vacation) Chief Administrative Officer, F. Wu Director of Engineering Services, T. Cannella (until 12:05 pm) Director of Community Services, J. Caruana (until 12:05 pm) Director of Planning Services, D. Crome Director of Operations, F. Horvath (until 12:05 pm) Senior Planner, R. Holy (until 1 0:30 am) Director of Corporate Services, M. Marano (until 12:05 pm) Senior Planner, C. Pellarin (until 10:35 am) Planner, B. Russell (until 10:35 am) Director of FinancefTreasurer, N. Taylor (until 12:05 pm) Director of Emergency Services, G. Weir Planner, T. Will (until 10:30 am) Municipal Clerk, P. L. Barrie Deputy Clerk, A. Greentree Clerk II, C. Doiron (until 12:05 pm) Mayor Mutton chaired this portion of the meeting. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST There were no disclosures of pecuniary interest stated for this meeting. MINUTES Resolution #GPA-001-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THA Tthe minutes of the regular meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on December 6, 2004, be approved. CARRIED -1 - 301 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes January 10, 2005 Resolution #GPA-002-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Lee Foster be added to the agenda as a delegate; and THAT the presentation by The Region of Durham respecting the Adelaide Ave. extension be moved to the January 24, 2005 meeting. CARRIED Patti Barrie, Municipal Clerk, introduced Anne Greentree, Deputy Clerk. Mayor Mutton advised that the employees of the Municipality of Clarington raised approximately $3,500 for the Tsunami relief, and that the Municipality will match this amount for a total of approximately $7,000. PRESENTATIONS (a) Glenn Case, Port Granby Project Director, presented an update on the Port Granby Project and provided Committee Members with a handout supporting the presentation. He discussed the following issues: Environmental Assessment, cleanup criteria, design and licensing, and the public consultation process of the project. A Public Meeting is scheduled for January 18, 2005 at the Newtonville Hall. Mr. Case committed to compiling a list of Provincial and Federal Agencies who will be reviewing the Draft EA Study Report. This list will be available to the public at the January 18th meeting. (b) Bob Lehman, Meridian Planning Consultants and Dougf-nnand gave a presentation on the Commercial Policy Review to Report PSD-008-05. Mr. Lehman gave a brief review of the market impact analysis, urban design analysis and transportation analysis. A copy of the presentation was provided to the Members. DELEGATIONS (a) Bill Cawker, Baywood Homes requested that Report PSD-006-05 be tabled to allow time for a joint meeting, including representatives of the City of Oshawa, Region of Durham and the MuniCipality of Clarington, to provide clarification of the application. (b) Lee Foster and Terry Shirk, Courtice Secondary School students, advised Council of their School Fund Raiser for C.OP.E. for Mental Health. The fundraiser includes a dinner and a silent auction, and all proceeds will be donated to ClariHgton Community Care. The students extended an invitation to all Members of Council to attend this event. .2. _ 302 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes January 10, 2005 Resolution #GPA-003-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THAT Committee recess for 10 minutes. CARRIED The meeting reconvened at 10:45 a.m. Councillor Schell chaired this portion of the meeting. PUBLIC MEETING (a) Subject: Application to Amend Zoning By-law 84-63 Rezoning application to permit commercial uses with reduced setback, parking,and loading standards Peter Sainovski PSD-001-05 Applicant: Report: Richard Holy, Senior Planner, Community Planning, gave a verbal report pertaining to Report PSD-001-05. Dan Norton spoke in opposition to this application. He is concerned that the proposed new building will be too close to the property lines. Mr. Norton has no objections as long as the application meets the current zoning by-law requirements. Barry Jones commended the applicant on fixing up the two other buildings. However, he is in opposition to this application. Mr. Jones is concerned that the new building will not conform with the zoning by-law. He feels there is already sufficient vacant commercial space in Newcastle. He also has concerns with the potential of increased traffic volume. Patricia Norton spoke in opposition to this application. Ms. Norton has concerns regarding the parking lot, and she stated there are already parking issues with people parking on both sides of Baldwin Street. She is also concerned with noise, traffic, and the negative impact on the neighbourhood. Additionally, she is concerned that the new building will overshadow her gardens. Kaye Quinney spoke in opposition to this application. Ms. Quinney is concerned about the insufficient parking and the potential uses of the building. She would like to see a fence and vegetation to buffer the property. Ms. Quinney would not object to the property being turned into a parking lot, but does object to the proposed building. No one spoke in support of this application. - 3.... 303 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes January 10, 2005 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Martin Topolie spoke on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Topolie advised that the Planning Department would like to have larger parking spots, however he feels that this will down size the landscaping strip along Baldwin 8t. He also feels that the building will serve a buffer between the residential area and the downtown core. Parking problems will be rectified by building the new parking lot. The intended use of the new building is mercantile, although a tenant has not been established. Applicant: Report: Amendment to draft approved plan of subdivision 18T.96013 Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA2004/048 to permit the development of 245 residential units Kylemore Homes PSD-002-05 (b) Subject: Tracy Will, Planner, gave a verbal report pertaining to Report PSD-002-05. Maxine Hoos spoke in opposition to this application. She advised the Committee Members that when she purchased her home she was informed by the developer that a golf course would be erected in the said application area. She also stated that there is a foul smell that comes from the water treatment plant and/or swamp. No one spoke in support of this application. Kelvin Whalen spoke on behalf of the applicant. Due to difficulties they haVe encountered in pursuing the land to the north of the subject lands, the golf course will not be proceeding. Mr. Whalen offered to answer any questions the Committee may have. Applicant: Report: Official Plan Amendment, revisions to proposed plan of subdivision and related rezoning to pennit 299 residential units 1477677 Ontario Limited (Baywood Homes) PSD-003-05 (c) Subject: Bob Russell, Planner, gave a verbal report pertaining to Report PSD-003-05. Paul Berube spoke in opposition to this application. His concerns relate to the dirt, noise level and traffic that is generated from the construction vehicles that travel Scottsdale Drive. Mr. Berube questioned the developer's obligation to finish phase one of the subdivision before starting another phase:: . Sue Veinot spoke in opposition to this application. She is concerned that phase one has not been finished and would like to know when it might be completed. Ms. Veinot is also concerned about the amount of traffic on Scottsdale Drive. Dale Veinot spoke in opposition to this application. He would like to know if the developer is required to finish phase one before starting a new phase. Mr. Veinot is concerned about dust caused by construction. -4... 304 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes January 10, 2005 Don Buma spoke in opposition to this application. He would like to know how the new development will affect his property. No one spoke in support of this application. Bryce Jordan spoke on behalf of the applicant. He commented on the issues raised by staff. Mr. Jordan advised that Longworth Ave. will be extended, and construction access will be along the new portion of Longworth Ave. Phase one is substantially completed. Mr. Vedouras has agreed to release the $500.00 damage deposit to the residents, and residents are to contact Baywood Homes concerriing their deposit. (d) Subject: Applicant: Report: Rezoning to permit a temporary sales trailer Northglen Land Corp. PSD-004.{)5 David Crome, Director of Planning Services, gave a verbal Report pertaining to PSD-004-05. No one spoke in opposition to or in support of this application. Bryce Jordan spoke on behalf of applicant and stated they support the staff recommendations. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REZONING AflPLlCATION TO PERMIT COMMERCIAL USES WITH REDUCED SETBACK, PARKING, AND LOADING STANDARDS APPLICATION: PETER SAINOVSKJ Resolution #GPA-004-05 Moved by Mayor Mutton, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report PSD-001-05 be received; THAT the application submitted by Martin Topolie on behalf of Peter Sainovski be referred back to Staff for further processing and the preparation of a further report following the receipt of all outstanding agency comments; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-001-05 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED -5. 305 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes January 10, 2005 AMENDMENT TO DRAFT APPROVED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 18T-96013 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT ZBA2004/048 TO PERMIT THE DEVELOPMENT OF 245 RESIDENTIAL UNITS APPLICANT: KYLE MORE HOMES Resolution #GPA-005-05 Moved by Councillor MacArthur, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Report PSD-002-05 be received; THAT the applicant be advised that the Municipality requires all new lots in former Block 163 be standard depth (minimum 33 metres); THAT the applications to amend Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision 18T -96013 and Zoning By- law 84-63, submitted by Kylemore Homes to permit the development of 245 residential units be referred back for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-002-05 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT, REVISIONS TO PROPOSED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND RELATED REZONING TO PERMIT 299 RESIDENTIAL UNITS APPLICANT: 1477677 ONTARIO LIMITED (BAYWOOD HOMES) Resolution #GPA-006-05 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT Report PSD-003-05 be received; THAT the application to amend the Clarington Official Plan, revisions to Proposed Plan of Subdivision 18T-90036 and the application to amend Zoning By-law 84-63, submitted by 1477677 Ontario Limited (Baywood Homes) Dwight Chizen in Trust, Margaret Constance Puk and the Estate of Robert Allen Brooking be referred back to staff for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report following the receipt of the outstanding agency comments; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-003-05 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED -6- 306 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes January 10, 2005 REZONING TO PERMIT A TEMPORARY SALES TRAILER APPLICANT: NORTHGLEN LAND CORP. Resolution #GPA-007-05 Moved by Councillor MacArthur, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Report PSD-004-05 be received; THAT the application to amend Zoning By-law 84-63, submitted by Sernas Associates on behalf of Northglen Land Corp. be approved and that the by-law contained in Attachment #2 to Report PSD-004-05 be forwarded to Council for adoption; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-004-05 and any delegations. be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 25, 2004 Resolution #GPA-008-05 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THAT Report PSD-005-05 be received; and THAT Council concurs with the decision of the Committee of Adjustment made on November 25, 2004 for applications A2004/029, A2004/057 and A2004/058; and that Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment. CARRIED APPLICATION BY BAYWOOD HOMES TO AMEND A DRAFT APPROVED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION TO DELETE A SERVICE LANE FOR 10 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ABUTTING TOWNLlNE ROAD SOUTH IN THE CITY OF OSHAWA Resolution #GPA-009-05 Moved by Mayor Mutton, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report PSD-006-05 be tabled. CARRIED -7- - 307 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes January 10, 2005 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION - COMMENTS ON SECOND DISCUSSION DOCUMENT Resolution #GPA-010-05 Moved by Mayor Mutton, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Report PSD-007-05 be received; THAT Staff Report PSD-007 -05 be adopted as the Municipality of Clarington's comments on the Nuclear Waste Management Organization's Second Discussion Document, Understanding the Choices; and THAT a copy of Report PSD-007 -05 and Council's resolution be forwarded to the Nuclear Waste Management Organization, the Region of Durham, and the member municipalities of the Canadian Association of Nuclear Host Communities, FORTHWITH. CARRIED DRAFT FINAL REPORT. RECOMMENDED POLICY CHANGES: CLARINGTON_COMMERCIAL POLICY REVIEW Resolution #GPA-011-05 Moved by Mayor Mutton, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Report PSD-008-05 and the draft final report on Recommended Policy Changes: Clarington Commercial Policy Review be Policy Review received; THAT the Report be circulated to the Region of Durham and the Commercial Policy Review Stakeholders Group for comment; THAT the Report be made available for public comment for a 30 day period; and THAT the interested parties listed in Report PSD-008-05 be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT There were no reports considered under this section of the agenda. .8- - 308 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes January 10, 2005 OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT There were no reports considered under this section of the agenda. Mayor Mutton chaired this portion of the meeting. EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT MONTHLY RESPONSE REPORT - NOVEMBER, 2004 Resolution #GPA-012-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report ESD-001-05 is received for information. CARRIED COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT There were no items considered under this section of the agenda. Councillor Foster chaired this portion of the meeting. ,........ CLERK'S DEPARTMENT QUARTERLY PARKING REPORT Resolution #GPA-013-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report CLD-001-05 be received; and THAT a copy of Report CLD-01-05 be forwarded to the Bowmanville Business Centre for their information. CARRIED Mayor Mutton chaired this portion of the meeting. -9- - 309 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes January 10, 2005 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT RFP2004-12, AUDIT SERVICES Resolution #GPA-014-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report COD-001-05 be received; THAT Deloitte & Touche, Toronto, Ontario with a total bid in the amount of $56,925.00 (including disbursements, plus GST), being the most responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Request for Proposal RFP2004-12, be awarded the contract for Audit Services for a 5 year term to expire January 31, 2010, as required by the Finance Department; THAT the funds be drawn from the respective year's current account for audit services; and THAT the attached by-law marked Schedule "B" to Report COD-001-05, authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to execute the necessary agreement, be approved. CARRIED FINANCE DEPARTMENT TYRONE COMMUNITY CENTRE -INTEREST FREE LOAN REQUEST Resolution #GPA-015-04 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THAT Report FND-001-05 be received; THAT the request from the Tyrone Community Centre for an interest free loan of $2,000 to be repaid by December 31, 2005 be approved; and THAT the funds be drawn from 2004 unallocated grant account #100-42-472-20999-7600. CARRIED CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER'S DEPARTMENT There were no items considered under this section of the agenda. ...;".. -10- 310 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes January 10, 2005 UNFINISHED BUSINESS DURHAM REGION PUBLIC ALERTING SYSTEM - PERMANENT EASEMENT Resolution #GPA-016-05 Moved by Councillor Schell seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Addendum to Report EGD-37-03 be received; THAT Report EGD-37-03 be lifted from the table; THAT Report EGD-37-03 be received; THAT the Offer to Purchase an Easement (Attachment 4) of Report EGD-37 -03 granting a permanent easement, described as Part 1 on Plan 40R-21972. to the Regional Municipality of Durham be approved; THAT the Mayorand Clerk be authorized to execute a by-law to'authorize an agreement between the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and the Regional Municipality of Durham to offer to grant an easement to the Regional Municipality of Durham; and THAT the Durham Emergency Measures Office be advised of Council's decision, CARRIED OTHER BUSINESS DELEGATION FROM LEE FOSTER AND TERRY SHIRK Resolution #GPA-017-05 Moved by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THAT the presentation of Lee Foster and Terry Shirk be received with thanks; and THAT the request for donation be forwarded to Marketing and Communications. CARRIED -11 - - 311 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes January 10, 2005 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REQUEST TO WAIVE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FEES Resolution #GPA-018-05 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THAT the request to waive the planning fees for an application to the Committee of Adjustment by Tamara Boucher and Daniel Moore to permit a swimming pool in the defined "front yard" of Guildwood Drive be denied. TABLED lATER IN THE MEETING (SEE FOllOWING MOTION) Resolution #GPA-019-05 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THAT the foregoing Resolution #GPA-018-05 be tabled. CARRIED lEGAL MATTER - "CLOSED" MEETING Resolution #GPA~020-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT the meeting be..closed" for consideration of a Verbal Report of the Solicitor concerning a legal Matter. . CARRIED RATIFICATION OF ACTIONS TAKEN AT THE "CLOSED" MEETING Resolution #GPA-021-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT the actio[,1S taken at the "closed" meeting be ratified. CARRIED -12.- 312 I I I I I I I, I I I I I I I I I I I I ,,'..c General Purpose and Administration Committee ADJOURNMENT Resolution #GPA-022-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT the meeting adjourn at 12:40 p.m. CARRIED Minutes January 10, 2005 MAYOR DEPUTY CLERK -13 - 313 ~ Public Meeting Report # PSD-009-05 Martin Road Holdings . Ltd. TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington will consider a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, under Section 34 of the Planning Act, 1990, as amended. APPLICATION DETAILS The proposed Zoning by law amendment submitted by Martin Road Holdings would change the zone category of a 0.78 ha parcel of land located on the north-west corner of Aspen Spring Drive and Martin Road, as shown on reverse, from 'Holding-Urban Residential Type One ((H) R1)" to perm~ a development of a service station w~ a convenience store, drive-through eating establishment and a car Wash. Planning File Nos.: ZBA 2004-050 PUBLIC MEETING The Municipality of Clarington will hold a public meeting to provide interested parties the opportunity to make comments, identify issues and provide additional infomnation relative to the proposed development. The public . meeting will be held on: DATE: TIME: PLACE: Monday, January 24, 2005 9:30 a.m. Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, Municipal Administrativ.e Centre, 40 Temperance st., Bowmanville,.Qntario ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in oppos~ion to the proposal. The start time listed above reflects the time at which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences. If you cannot attend the Public Meeting on this application you can make a deputatfon to Council at their meeting on Monday, January 31, 2005, commencing at 7:00 p.m. Should you wish to appear before Council, you must register with the Clerks Department by the Wednesday noon, January 26, 2005 to have your name appear in the Agenda. COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? If you wish to make a written submission or if you wish to be notified of subsequent meetings or the adoption of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, you must subm~ a written request to the Clerk's Department. 200 Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L 1 C 3A6. Additional infomnalion relating to the proposal is available fdt inspection between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at the Planning Services Department, 3nl Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L 1C 3A6, or by calling Janaka Wijesundara at (905) 623-3379 extension 421 or bye-mail atiwiiesundaratlIlmuniciDalitv.clarinaton.on.ca . APPEAL If a person or public body that files a notice of appeal of a decision for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment to the Ontario Municipal Board does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or does not make written submissions before the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is approved, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of . the appeal. Dated at the Municipality of Clarington this 21st day of December, 2004. Davi Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning Services Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville. Ontario L1C 3A6 ! 501 Lot 15 , Concession 1 " << ... ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I 1 . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,... II) c c( o D:: :i c( :c D:: ~ C - C c( o D:: Z ~ c( :i '" I.o.J . ~ z. ~ ::::J Cii z '0 . J l- ll) o a.. 1 ,,-.) ":.~:\"r ., ~..Jl.:t,;... ,_ J~:JO . - ., , . I I -::~ ASPEN SPRINGS DRIVE Bowmanville Key Map ::::::::--.J ~ J I. _ SlREEl wEST OUiD"JlIIII ttlGtMA'l'1 II f\~ Subject L -=- U Site ~. I rJ~ ~ I 11lEWIN '[I~~ ~1....li ~ Sl'"",,;s 0 . il .' Ell ~ 0<<'- i ;nnQ ~(~J,,,,,,\ .DClIlEEH~I~11 ~~ ZBA 2004-050 Zoning By-law Amendment Owner: Martin Road Holdings Ltd. . . ; !YO 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Clarin~1lJ1 l_eadmgtheWay~~.. .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Dated at the Municipality of Clarington this 161h day of December, 2004. rsa id Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. . Director of Planning Services Municipality of Clarinllton Public Meeting Report # PSD-OIO-OS Municipality of Clarington CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON NOTiCE OF FUBUC MEETING a~ ROPOSED ZONING AMENDMENT - BULK FUEL STORAGE TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corpomtion of the Municipality of Clarington will consider a proposed Zoning. By-law Amendment, under Section 34 of the Planning Act, 1990, as amended. PROPOSED ZONING DETAILS The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would eliminate bulk fuel storage tanks and related uses as a permitted use in the Geneml Industrial (M2) Zone and all relevant M2 Exception Zones where bulk fuel storage is permitted. Should the zoning amendment receive approval, bulk fuel storage would only be permitted in future by site specifIC zoning amendment. Planning File Nos.: ZBA2004-056 PUBLIC MEETING The Municipality of Clarington will hold a public meeting to provide interested parties the opportunity to make comments, identify issues and provide additional Information relative to the proposed development. The public meeting will be held on: DATE: TIME: PLACE: Monl:iay, January 24, 2005 9:30 a.m. Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, Municipal Administrative Centre, 40 Temperance St., Bowmanvllle, Ontario />.Ny PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the proposal. The start time listed above reflects the time at which the General Purpose and Adminisltatiori Committee Meeting commences. If you cannot attend the Public Meeting on this application you can make a deputation to Council at their meeting on Monday January 31,2005, commencing at 7:00 p.m. Should you wish to appear before eooncil, you must register with the Clerks D!lpartment by the Wednesday noon, January 26, 2005 to have your name appear in the Agenda. . COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? If you wish to make a written submission or if you wish to be notified of subsequent meetings or the adoption of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, you must submit a written request to the Clerk's Departmen~ 2'" Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L 1 C 3A6. Additional information relating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at the Planning Services Department, 3'" Floor, 40 Temperan~ Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L 1C 3A6, aby calling Susan Ashton a1(905) 623-3379 extension 218 or by e-mail atsashton@municipality.claringt6n.on.ca APPEAL If a person or public body that files a notice of appeal of a decision for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment to the Ontario Municipal Board does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or does not make written submissions before the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is approved, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal. 40 Temperance Street Bowmanvllle, Ontario L1C3A6 I . ;)03 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CIW:il1glOn REPORT PLANNING SERVICES PUBLIC MEETING Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE . Date: . . Monday, January 24,2005 Report #: PSD-009-05 File #: ZBA 2004-050 By-Iaw#: Subject: REZONING APPLICATION FOR A FUEL BAR, CONVENIENCE STORE AND CAR WASH . APPLlCANT~ MARTIN ROAD HOLDINGS LIMITED (THEKAITLlN .GROUP) . . . RECOMMENDATIONS: . , It is. respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: ' , ' 1. THAT Report PSD-009-05 be received; 2. THAT the applicatiol1for Zonil1gBy~law Amendment (ZBA 2004-006). submitted by Mr. Kelvin Whalen on behalf of Martin Road Holdings Limited to change zone category of a 0..78 ha parcel of land to penmit a convenience store, fuel bar and a car wash be referred back to staff; 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advi$ed of CounCil's decision. . . ~. r). La- J.2J!. r-.( { ~ Reviewed by:'- ;- -"-. ."'-----' >'-..! LL Franklin Wu Chief Administrative Officer JWIDJC/lb 19 January 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPAUTY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F{905)623-083Q .. 601 REPORT NO.: PSD-009-05 PAGE 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1. Applicant: Martin Road Holdings Limited 1.2 Agent: Kelvin Whalen 1.3 Zoning by-law Amendment To change the zone category from "Holding-Urban Residential Type One ((H) R1)" to an appropriate zone to permit the development of a convenience store, fuel bar and a car wash 1.4 Site Area: 0.78 hectares 2.0 LOCATION , 2.1 . The land subject to the amendment is located on the northwest comer of Aspen Springs Drive and Martin Road/Durham Road 57, in Bowmanville, being Part Lots of 15, Concession 1 in the former Township of Darlington. (see Attachment 1 ). 3.0 BACKGROUND 3.1 On October 29, 2004 Staff received applications to amend the zone category of the above land to develop a convenience store. with a drive-through restaurant 300 m2 (3200 sq ft), a car wash and a fuel bar. After, the public notice for this application was circulated and prior to the meeting the application was revised to delete the drive-through restaurant component. The application is now for a convenience store up to 100 m2 (1076 sq ft), a fuel bar and car wash facility. 3.2 This Zoning amendment requests the rezoning of the land from "Holding-Urban Residential Type. One. ((H) R1)" to an appropriate zone to implement the proposed development. . 4.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING LAND USES 4.1 The subject site is currently vacant 4.2 Surrounding Uses North - South - East - West - Vacant lands for a future GO station and tlTe St. Lawrence and Hudson Railway Aspen Springs' Drive and residential development Martin RoadlDurham Road 57 and residential development Future GO train station parking lot 602 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PSD-009-05 5.0 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES PAGE 3 5.1 In the Durham Region Official Plan the lands are designated Living Area. In addition to residential uses, limited commercial development is permitted in this designation, in accordance with the local Official Plan. 5.2 The Clarington Official Plan designates the subject lands as Urban Residential, within the Westvale Neighbourhood of the Bowmanville Urban Area. Within the Urban Residential designation limited commercial uses may be permitted which by the nature of their activity, scale and design are supportive of, compatible with and serve the residential uses. The "corner store" or neighbourhood oriented small scale commercial uses are intended to provide items or services of daily necessity for the residents of the surrounding neighbourhoods. In addition Section 10.10 of the Official Plan outlines the requirements for development of service stations. Service stations may generally be established in any urban land use designation. 5.3 The applicant is requesting permission to develop a convenience store as part of a car wash and a fuel bar on a 0.78 ha site at the corner of Durham Road 57 & Aspen Springs Drive. 6.0 ZONING BY-LAW 6.1 Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63 as amended, zones the lands as "Holding- Urban Residential Type One ((H) R1)". A zoning by-law amendment will be required in order to proceed with thisdevelopment. 7.0 PUBLIC MEETING 7.1 Public notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject site anc;l two public meeting notice signs were installed on the property. 7.2 From the notice provided the Municipality has received a letter from a resident on Martin Road, objecting to this development. The following summarizes the concerns raised: . The proposed location is in a residential community . There are three drive-through facilities at Waveriy and Baseline already, plus two others on Highway No.2 near Clarington Blvd; . Two gas stations with car wash facilities are also located at Baseline and Waveriy, as well as the PetroCan at Boswell and Highway No.2, . There are existing convenience. stores at the Clarington Centre as well as along Highway No.2 in downtown Bowmanville, 603 REPORT NO.: PSO-O09-OS PAGE 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . The proposed development will create additional traffic, . noise, environment pollution, blazing night lights, garbage and further congestion on Martin Road 8.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 8.1 The Clarington Engineering Services Department, Emergency and Fire Services and CLOC noted that they have no objections to this zoning change. Further detailed comments will be provided through the site plan approval process. 8.2 The Region of Durham Planning Department provided comments with respect to confonnity to the Durham Region. Official Plan, Regional services, transportation, access, Provincial Policies and delegated Provincial review responsibilities. The Durham Planning Department noted that the proposed uses are pennitted subject to the inclusion of appropriate provisions and designations in the area municipal plan. 8.3 Comments have not been received from the Durham Region Works Department, or St. Lawrence and Hudson Railway 9.0 STAFF COMMENTS 9.1 Attachment 1 shows the proposed development as applied for including a convenience store, a drive-through restaurant and gas bar with a car wash. In order to facilitate the proposed development, an amendment to the current zoning designation is required. 9.2 The applicant has revised the application to ensure the commercial component is no greater than 100 m2 in keeping with the Official Plan policies. A revised sketch has not been submitted at this time. The applicant has also agreed to eliminate the drive-through restaurant. 9.3 The issues raised by the public comments as well as from outstanding agencies that will be reviewed and considered in future reports. 10.0 CONCLUSIONS 10.1 The purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements of the Public Meeting under the Planning Act. Taking into consideration all of the comments received, it is respectfully recommended that this application be referred back to Staff for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report. List of Interested Parties to be advised of Council's decision Evelyn Fraser Kelvin Whalen 60. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '" 1 Lot 15 Concession 1 i I I 1 l!.. I I .., I \oj '"1 1 :z . I ::; a; I 1 :z I '0 ' I 1 I .1 I I I 1 ,... 1 It) I Q I I <C 1 I ~ I. 1 I ::E I I <C I :z:: l- I <I'l' I l:II: 0 I ::::J 0- I I Q -...~ I - I I ~ - ! I I ~ I I I Z I - , ! ~ I I I II I <C ::E ASPEN SPRINGS DRIVE J ZBA 2004-050 Zoning By-law Amendment Owner: Martin Road Holdings Ltd. - 605 REPORT PLANNING SERVICES PUBLIC MEETING Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, January 24,2005 Report #: PSD-010-04 File #: ZBA 2004-056 By-law #: Subject: BULK STORAGE TANKS IN GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (M2) ZONES RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-D1O-D5 be received: 2. THAT the rezoning proposal be referred back to Staff for further processing and preparation of a subsequent report; and, 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: Oa 'd . Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning Services ')" Reviewed bY:{)~ . ~ Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer SAlCP/OJC/df January 19, 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 ~ 606 REPORT NO.: PSD-010-05 1.0 BACKGROUND PAGE 2 2..0 EXISTING BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITIES AND ZONING REQUIREMENTS IN CLARINGTON 2.1 Currently the Clarington Zoning By-law identities bulk storage tanks to. be a permitted industrial use in the "General Industrial (M2) Zone". A number of exception zones that include bulk storage tanks as a permitted used include the "General Industrial Exception (M2-6)". "General Industrial Exception (M2-11)", "General Industrial Exception (M2-12)", "General Industrial Exception (M2-13)", "General Industrial Exception (M2-14)". and "General Industrial Exception (M2-15)" Zones. With the exception of the M2-6 Zone, none of the exception zone contains bulk (fuel) storage tank uses. 2.2 Staff have identified five bulk fuel storage facilities and one vacant parcel with zoning of bulk fuel storage in Clarington. The existing facilities and their zoning are identified as follows: . Location 4333 H' hwa 2, Newtonville 350 Lake Road, Bowmanville 10 Sturrock Avenue, Bowmanville 40 Port Darlin on Road, Bowmanville 119 C' as Road, Courtice 26 Church Lane. Newtonville 607 Zonin A-56 M1-7 M2-6 M2 M2 C3-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PSO.010-05 PAGE 3 3.0 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES 3.1 The Durham Region Official Plan is very general and permits a variety of uses in the Employment Area including "storage of goods and materials' and "warehousing". The Municipality of Cia ring ton is permitted to be more restrictive than the Regional Plan. 3.2 The Clarington Official Plan states that in the "General Industrial" designation the predominant use of lands shall be for, among other uses, ..."storage operations". While other forms of storage operations will continue to be permitted, once the proposed amendment is approved, new bulk (fuel) storage establishments will require rezoning to be permitted in the General Industrial zone. 4.0 PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSION 4.1 Public notice was given in the C/arington This Week on December 22, 2004, on the Municipal website, and on the information screens in the main lobby of the Municipal Administrative Centre, running from December 16, 2004 to January 25,2005. 4.2 Two inquiries were received following the newspaper advertisement, but each inquiry was from persons calling on behalf of their cOmpanies who have a bulk (fuel) storage tank use related to their permitted use. Neither operate solely a bulk (fuel) storage tank business on their sites. 4.3 This zoning by-law amendment was not circulated to any agencies for comment as the by-law is becoming more restrictive than permissive. 5.0 IMPACT ON EXISTING BULK STORAGE ESTABLISHMENTS 5.1 The impact of deleting bulk (fuel) storage tanks is reviewed under four categories: . . Sites rendered legal non-conforming; . Sites retaining special exception zoning; . Sites needing additional zoning measures; and . Sites for new facilities requiring rezoning 608 REPORT NO.: PSO-G10-GS PAGE 4 5.2 Sites Rendered Legal Non-conforming . Existing bulk (fuel) storage establishments in the M2 Zone become legal non- conforming uses by this zoning by-law amendment. They have an established right under the existing zoning by-law and may continue operations as they exist today. The Caledon Propane and Cigas Propane operations would be affected. The Caledon Propane facility would retain a legal non-conforming status because of its involuntary discontinuation of its operations. Any proposed expansion to a legally existing bulk fuel storage facility would require a Committee of Adjustment approval and an approved site plan or site plan amendment. 5.3 Sites Retaining Special Exception Zoning . The Imperial. Oil site at 350 Lake Road, the Cooper Fuels site at 4333 Highway 2 and the former Skelding Fuels site at 26 Church Lane would retain their existing zone permissions and could therefore expand in compliance with the zone provisions. Both the Imperial Oil and Cooper Fuels sites have. site specific zoning and approved site plans and would require amendment to site plan approval for any expansion. 5.4 Sites Requiring Additional Zoning Measures The Imperial Oil Limited lands zoned M2-6 at 10 Sturrock Avenue (a 0.49 ac site) have a site specific zoning that was carried forward from the original Bowmanville Zoning By- law, By-law 1587. The only permitted use is a bulk fuel storage tank and related uses. This use was relocated to 350 Lake Road, where they established an underground bulk fuel storage facility by rezoning (1991) and site plan approval (1994). All remaining buildings at 10 Sturrock Avenue were demolished in 1997. It is proposed to rezone these lands to address the intent of Council's resolution. The new zone proposed for 10 Sturrock Avenue must be in conformity with the Clarington Official Plan, which designates the property Special Policy Area E, with an underlying Low Density Urban Residential designation. The objective of this designation is to recognize existing industrial uses and to provide altemative redevelopment land use, in keeping with surrounding residential use. Staff propose to introduce a new zone, and zone this property "Future Development (FOr. The "FD zone" would permit the following uses: . existing uses; and . conservation To rezone to permit other uses, the proponent would have to satisfy the Municipality that soil conditions, and ground and surface water conditions on the site are suitable for the proposed use. Given the brownfield nature of the site and its proximity to both residential and heavy industrial uses, this is the best zone category until a detailed redevelopment proposal is prepared and considered by Council. 5.5 Sites for New Facilities The elimination of the bulk (fuel) storage tank and related uses from the list of permitted uses in the M2 zone would require that any proposed new facility- apply for rezoning on a site specifiC basis. This would include a full review of the spatial separation requirements from sensitive uses and help to ensure that only the most appropriate I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -- John Ferguson I v Henk Mulders ." Caledon Propane '~ Mr. Andy Fielder ,. . '-' Port Darlington Community Association' . '-. Mr. Ronald F. Worboy -~ Imperial Oil Limited I_ "Cigas Propane .." Dragica Alilovic '-. Rosekris Properties Inc. .- .~ Harrison Fuels '." William Skelding I I I I I I I . REPORT NO.: PSD-010-05 PAGE 5 . locations can be considered for a potentially hazardous use. All new facilities would also be subject to the site plan approval process. . Given what we have leamed from the Caledon Propane Fire, this is the most appropriate framework to adopt until such time as the matter can be reviewed in more detail in the context of a Zoning By-law update. 6.0 RECOMMENDATION 6.1 As the purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements for a Public Meeting under the Planning Act, it is respectfully requested that this report be referred back to Staff for further consideration and the preparation of a subsequent report. Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision: 610 I I I I _I I I I I I 2. I I I I I I I I I CIYli!Jgton REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, January 24, 2005 Report #: PSD-011-05 File #: PLN 26.13 By-law #: Subject: HYDRO CORRIDOR LANDS DECLARATION OF POTENTIAL SECONDARY FUTURE USE RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-011-05 be received; THAT the charts in Attachment 3 be approved as Clarington's submission of potential secondary future public interests and uses for the hydro corridor lands under the Provinci!!1 Secondary Land Use Program, 3. THAT a copy of PSD-011-05 be forwarded to the Regional Municipality of Durham to facilitate a joint municipal submission to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing; 4. THAT Council acknowledge that Clarington's resolution(s), and its submission contained in the joint submission, will be a public document and will remain on file with the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing; and 5. THAT all interested parties be notified of Committee's decision. Submitted by: Reviewed by: o~.--=- 0- \k, Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer v . Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning Services . FUDJC/df 13 January 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 611 REPORT NO.: PSD-011-05 PAGE 2 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to declare future municipal interests. for public secondary uses on Provincially owned hydro corridor lands, under the Provincial Secondary Land Use Program, and obtain endorsement of these secondary uses for submission to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing vis-a-vis the Regional Municipality of Durham. The corridor lands that Hydro One has turned over to Ontario Realty Corporation in Clarington are noted in Attachment 1; the remainder of the corridors are easements over private property. 2.0 BACKGROUND The following provides a general overview of the Provincial Secondary Use Program (PSLUP) and Public Use Principles (PUPs) for municipalities, based on the literature circulated on the program to date. Bill 58 - The Reliable Energy and Consumer Protection Act, 2002 received Royal Assent in June 2002. It allowed for the ownership of approximately 50,000 acres of hydro transmission corridor lands to be transferred from Hydro One to the Province of Ontario. This transfer became effective on December 31, 2002, enabling the Province to protect contiguous corridor land as well as identify and dedicate the lands for other compatible future uses. In October 2002, Cabinet approved the Provincial Secondary Land Use Program (PSLUP). The purpose of the PSLUP is to establish a hierarchy of public use principles for the consideration of secondary uses on hydro corridor lands, and to guide the review of new secondary use applications on these lands. As an agent of the province, the Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) notified municipalities on the PSLUP in Spring 2003. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is currently leading this provincial planning exercise to identify potential secondary uses in accordance with the public use principles. Municipalities have an opportunity to identify their public interests in t!'1e corridor lands to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing by June 1, 2005. This is referred to as the two-year municipal planning period. The PSLUP applies only to those lands previously owned by Hydro One and used for the transmission of electricity. This program does not apply to other provincially owned lands, surplus corridor lands or private lands over which Hydro One has an easement to run transmission lines (see Attachment 1). 3.0 PUBLIC USE PRINCIPLES FOR HYDRO CORRIDOR LANDS The following is the hierarchy of public use principles (PUPs) for the management of hydro corridor lands under the PSLUP: . New public uses requiring contiguous integrity of the corridor (e.g. linear uses) have priority over other uses. Land uses requiring corridor integrity might include I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PSD-011.05 PAGE 3 the following examples of linear uses: roadways, bus ways, light rail, recreational trails and pipelines as well as other utilities. . New public linear uses that serve provincial or inter-regional purposes (e.g. transportation) have priority over local uses. . New non-linear public infrastructure uses have priority over private uses. Some examples of a non-linear use are: road crossings, commuter parking lots, parks and playing fields. . Multiple uses will be promoted whenever possible, especially the coexistence of surface and sub-surface uses, including storm water pipelines. . Interim uses (e.g. soccer fields or parking lots) will be allowed on contiguous corridors that may be required for future uses. . The public use principles (PUPs) state that electrical transmission has primacy of use, and linear public uses serving provincial and inter-regional purposes have priority over local uses. Any pUblic uses, including local public uses, have. priority over private uses. The PUPs not only guide the review and approval of applications for secondary land uses of the corridor lands, but also guide the long-range provincial secondary use planning exercise. The project's recommendations will be compatible with other provincial initiatives and policies such as the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, the Niagara Escarpment Plan, and the Provincial Policy Statement. A recommended plan will be produced that will identify appropriate provincial and inter-regional secondary uses compatible with transmission uses. The plan will guide the provincial management of provincially owned . hydro corridors - a significant public land asset. ORC administers the application process for secondary uses on the hydro corridors. Applications are screened by ORC, and then circulated to municipalities and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. The Ministry's regional Municipal Services Offices review and consolidate inter-ministerial comments on interim use applications and retum the packages to ORC for final decision-making. 4.0 EXISTING PUBLIC SECONDARY USES Attachment 2 (table and map) provides the locations of existing licenses and easements on hydro corridor lands held by Clarington. Currently the lands that Clarington licenses are for the Waterfront Trail are through the Samuel Wilmot Nature Area and the Westside/Bowmanville Marsh Complex. 5.0 PROPOSED PUBLIC SECONDARY USES The Municipality has an interest in ensuring that the requirements for access for the waterfront trail and other used that cross corridor lands are considered. Clarington has determined its future public interests in the hydro corridor lands, in collaboration with the ~ 613 REPORT NO.: PSD-011-05 PAGE 4 Durham Hydro Corridors Working Group. The Durham Working Group collaborated in the identification of future public interests for these lands, ensuring the public interests submitted by each local municipality are compatible with the interests submitted by the Region and Conservation Authorities. Attachment 3 (table and map) references particular lot numbers and summarizes the proposed secondary use for the hydro corridor lands. In general, our potential future uses either relate to the waterfront trail or are for future municipal works (such as roadways or storm water). 6.0 CONCLUSIONS Indicating future potential uses is not a commitment by the Municipality that we will only pursue this option. Any future licenses or crossing (e.g. road right of ways) will have to . be negotiated when they are required. In the case of road rights-of-way most likely acquisition would be the preference of the Municipality rather than easement or license. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Map of Transmission Corridors in Clarington Attachment 2 - Matrix of Existing Uses on Hydro Corridors Attachment 3 - Matrix of Potential Future Secondary Uses on Hydro Corridors 614 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -..-.. c o ~ :!: &--.._- l:.-'~ ....'~ c-.I :! :;;: .. "2 c w "2 .. "" .. \ ~ , , / ~.I'-=--'> .. c ~ l- I " ",-:,:" ATTACHMENT NO.1 --------..---------------.. ... .Q ~ 52 I" r---'! Lns-----! .5 o Ul K O'lfO~ 1'lfNOIEl3H " .r" ca ." C ~ ~ o II: ;j Z o a w II: o ~ z ~ ~ :! "> c o j .,1 ZI / 8~ OVOH 1VNOIEl3l:l o c e o 'L. ',...-r'J L~ cntml ,yNOIOilH \--_. S f--' o.c EV'~'-'- .. :!: .. ~ ., c ~ o o 'i .c u :!::, -1 -'-~ r- i 't, ~_-1 :! os: i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1Il~,__ il, SUISE A'lfMH()IH / . " ;' --...".---' ~ "> c .. E ~ o III > I e , Cl 1---IZ~-..:--' J .. " ::E ,J. , ., u :e " o o --or- ci ~ .,,0 .,(J E.2:' :;]- I-lE "'c:: -go CO.C ...J.!!! ., <= <=0 00 0- ~ ~ ~~ IO C I 0 - C) C .- ... C'lS '" - - <= 0 ., E C ., '" - III W ~ "0 <= III 0 ~ " 0 "0 .- "C ... ~ ... 0 0 (J e 0 "0' ... 0 I ... " ~ ::I: I en en en en I ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ z I w ::E en en en :I: ~ I!! en .~ ~ 0 ~ 11l 11l 11l C'I .... 11l 0) I ~ C'I .... C'I !;( ~ N N cO .... .... "<t UI "0 CO I c 0 ca 0 .... N N 0 0 ...I 0 N N N .. Ili .... Ili ~ 0 ~ .... z I "0 .... .r: 11l ";: ';: ::J e .. a. I: 11l 0 < 11l :::i: 0 ~ I e "0 B ~ 8 :J: 11l 11l 11l ~ a. a. a. 11l I en en en a. C en 0 I: I: I: I: Gl< Gl< Gl< Gl< J! l!!o. l!!o. l!!o. I!!o. . c Clw Clw Clw Clw CD E - I: I: "0 I: g . 0 CD NGl ":Gl I: E! c> ~- g>> UI 11llJ.. .1: I ca C')~ C')~ NI:I::e "0 I: c:e w 15.!2 a. CS..!! a. 'or"'"Q).2cua. 1:E!011l l1llJ..'- a. ...JO:c ...JO:c .,", ::l O:c eno- "0 . .... en ...... en ::e8icn NI:~""'tii c ....Gll: ....Gll: ....Gl Gli I ca I:ESo SE~ enCllI:E~ !!lesE o 0 - .0 UI o,Et- o,Et- .3~O,Et- .3Cl10,E~ CD UI en C f! f! I CD f! >..~ 11l 11l U ~ 11l ~ .a11l :::; Gl "O:::i: >. It) 0 It) Gi..; I N N N ::Len c = - UI I: ';( Gl Gl Gl Gl en en en E I w I: I: I: Gl 8 8 8 en 11l .... ::J ::J ::J w CD - - - I :a I: I: I: 1:_ E! ~ ~ ,2 Gl ca 'E f!1: I- s= s= s= Gl I: ~~ 11le! 11l11l > 11l ~~ ,_.c: I ~t- 00 Gl Gl 11l 11l I!! I!! Qj':; CD 0> )( I < < X "01: Gl "01: C6-m G5-(I) ,_ 11l _ ._ 11l Gl ::JO.~ :::JOL;. !!l ~.c: a. ~i~'iS. EE,a EE,a en f!E l1l'- 11l 11l~ 11l Gl 1110 Gl .B asls I en~z en z ~ClI:::i:O ~ :::i:o . 616 I , ~ i~' ~ iQ .---------------- --'<:;.--- --- CD ''''......~ CD "" -~-~--;.:-n---1i--------~-------' N I, ....' N N,- : . '; N ~ -i -;---'" Q) -;---------=-:.-:, i ___n~-: -~n-----n-~-:J:_\~-------:;- "' i ~N- i ~,g-_____~~-,.l, -.:~~f; _'_'-'--_ N' ... ~.. ~ ........., 0) ---J = ':'" /.~ ~> ~ 0 Z' "I,. , \ . . , . ---------- on N ':,.r- ~ on N ----------------- ,..--.------ ( '" N N ~ " .., g ----~~--~------~ '",- _ ': _ \ ~ ! M __________5~'-~~~---j-----~------ ~ ! ~ ~ : ~ , --- .2_ ~II! ~.,j-e 'e~!a .!;si~ ~.!!lI) ~ '" '" '" '" ~ ~<'i "" l" -----------~--~---------_._--------~-------~---------------- ... '" <'i on '" , :,: r on '" ,~ """. "'~ ~. -~_......( ------------------------ ~ ~ N . N I '" . l iij" , ______-.;__n . --1 - . on J CD ( . ----------- " '" '" ____~n ... i'''''' oni .~ -----------, \ CD J ,CD J -.). ;-- --.:-----!,,---------; ; ( ~,. ._....... r- --A-- ------- GI == "S: . .2 li ~ "e:GI i i ~Gloe c:~CDo ~.,j~U 'e l:ll e: .c: GI e: .. r! -;;:-@ca it.!!-=t ~.!! I --::::7\ " \ . .~ ". .".' , , , , ' -----------~------"--i-i-:~ '~\ ------------------- -=--;-~------------- / l S! >: 0 .. i 1:. : ..... ---:/~----r---------::--~------E; \______::_____________ _n__ ~ U m ----------- ~ ~ '" ~ .. ~ --- ----------- , , , --...I. ,. I Q .~" I m I __________::____-,.t:=L--~----.::---------------L---- IT, I l'l .' : l'l ' , ' ------------ L.______+___:---+----~~-m-l ,I ~ , --- :-------------+---.:..-----1 ~ : ~ .:, ____...____________________..._____: J ,. .n I ~ . rO I I I II) I " c I ftS ..J .... 0 I " .- ... ... 0 I 0 0 ... I " ~ :J:' c I 0 .!J I c CD E I CD U) ftS W I " C ftS I II) CD II) c I CD. u .- e. ..J I 18 C) c :.~ - ....: - I II) "0:: .- ~.2 >C 01 - W ..JJ!l Ole: I cO 00 e-= Ic3 I I I I I I I I CO) I- Z w ::i :J: ~ I- .~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ul "C C III ..J ... o "C .~ ... o o ~ "C ::E: c o Ul CD Ul ::) III "C C o U CD U) ~ :::::I .. :::::I LL "C CD Ul o ~ 11. N CD :Q III I- c .2 OJ c .C III (3 -CD C:c: CD"- C:Ell. "'CDCD -CDCI a....."C ]j ~a: ~g ..,..c:-I: . c= tU "'~ll. f! t II) ;( CD Z II) o - '" , -- .:!:..$ - ~ "l!! Q) I-E ::!; Z .; " lIS Q. (/) c: 8.(/) 00 "CN-c: . c: c: c: .... 0 ",.., 2 0 c: (I') .- CD cu..'- 0 - U)...lI:: m=_ ~.,;$~~c:CDCI C")o.!2U)~o.5: J!a"Cc(J_Qc~ oeO _o~Oa:J ...JmO'l"""...JaJUC CD Ii .0 >- c: "C.cCD - "5:2~~~ o Q)._._ m O..c: 0:: II. 0. .. .. " 01 Cl. (/) c: .. Q. o "CI c: 01 .!! e l- Ii ... ~ 01 ll. C( ~- o c: CD .. '" E c: CD 8 '" _lIS -IW ... $->- ~c:"" OCDC: -E'" OGlE E:!:; E =GlO 3:0::0 ~ 'l: CD_ 'lij"l!! 3:1- '" '" 1:'~ came =co "CI=CDc:"'~ l!! ECDQ." "3'OCD~3iU5 crt l!!.l!: c:.., .sOlClCD.i!c: ..... o.ca.c...c; ca .., c:_ .. c: r, CI Gl CD a;c:..E ~~~J 1; c: c:: .. ti 'O~ ~j 3:.., -.. . lii.~!; :6ii illS.2 -~ ~f! ~ - ....!J!"iiCD.e ~(/)'62~0 $= OI~O >l'.eti-l~ ( (/) 8.(/) 00 -.!! - 00 c: =...J.r;-2 c EO'O~u-.9 CD c~"C i~ OJ.2"iiC::..,"- CD 1:: .. ca 0 "t: ~ &.:: ~ as 8 l! t II) N - c:: 31 CD c:: i !l! .., '" .!icCU -I"W ~ 'CtDQ.. fii= E Q)~o I~~ 3:c8~ ~..,!;- ...c::.2CD "'t:mcac .;==mfij > l!!.ie..c: >1-00 618 c:: .. ~1Il ~ll 8;f i e", t) ~~ is. 2 -g, ..c: '015 ~~ ::!; z s .. Q. (/) c:: 8.(/) 00 "gc:: cu~ .9 "Ite CD 'l"""m_c J!J .!; 'E 0..... t::: CQ ...J..-u..c 'E .. e CD '" .. .w (/) Cl z .'" c::~ ~~ e c:: " eia5 u-o.9 tD6 ! ~"C CD ~"~"CI'lij! 3:ofii3:1- Gl '" '" a- c::" 'gE ~~ CI .5; ]i .l:l 15= EJg ~"g -lIS CIa :5.5; "-I: "lC.. WQ. ~ z ~ Q. (/) c:: 8.(/) 00 '0 -I1ii c:: E'O... 0 Q) 6 e. ,C --a1c.- Kla":20a w a...-L1.. ~ ~- Oc:: CDGl ",e c:: CD ~Kl -IW .!! ~ c:: .. ~; m~ g.., CI -eC::c:: Q)G_ 'lij=~ > I!! lIS >1-0. I ~ '" I III lll_ e"", .~ i Ole ~~ eGlE'" .!!! E c.i .!!!en Il.Gl.2 I ~.c c: (D~~~ e.!!! := C) CD lllll. l/) <.., 0. ~ ~ I 01 01 ~ ~ 0 0 I N - ,}, ,}, -g I Ii. e '0 -.- 001 ~~ :50. I :2"8 ?;:o:: ?;:,g ~ ~ I z z I ai ~ I " 01 0. 0. l/) l/) e e 8. en 8.l/) I 00 00 e e Gl ~ ."" e e I e 0 e .9 m - m Cl Cl oi c: .~ "_ e ...... ~.- _0"C _ 0"C o ~ 01 O~OI I ...Ju-O ...JU-O ~ ~ Z z I - I 0) e '" Gl 01 E .<::. ~ Gl '" ::> 01 ll. W I e"8 e"8"" .90 .90~ g'-e g'-e " I .- ::> .- ::> "Co "COCl 01..0 01..0 e 0.<::. CJ::1i t:.S!l .. t: .~.>< 00) .! o 0) Gl. Il.Z Il.Z. I ~ '" ~ E .., 0 :i2c: CD . !u'O a -0 0 c:"_ E'= I a: ::I ~ (Q Gl"'..,OIls - -150 - oeeti~ 619 ID ~()a: (,) Il.WOl . , , , ....1.,.. I ._-----~--~.._~-~_.~----_::--------------_: ---- o 1, : 0 N' , N l::i -----;:;---------1 I . '. N t If l --- .-------------+---+-----, ~ I ct I I I I ' . --+--------------------~----- , on , I I 1Il I I I !:l I ::l <=\ I on : ., , -----------,---~---------- , , - , I ----------- ., .. I on ----------- , , , I , I - - N - ----------- I I , _____1_______ ------ i I ----------- , , , , I -I , ,. , I 1Il on N lEI lEI ~ !;; !:l ., ., ~ c: U 151! E. ;~ I on c: -r- ~ .! ,CD ;;t ---t._____~____ _____~ I Q II: : t:: . il co - on , / e. 'Co al() E~ ~1 <nil: 'Co c_ ~.!i alC cO 00 e-: ~3 6201 U) "0 c. co ..J ~ o "0 .- ~ ~ o (.) e "0 ~ ::I: c o en Go) U) ::) ~ co "0 C o u Go) en f ::s - ::s u. "0 Go) U) o c. o ~ a.. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ClYLiggron REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, January 24, 2005 Report #: PSD-012-05 File #: ZBA 2004-058 By-law #: Subject: APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF PART LOT CONTROL APPLICANT: THE KAITLIN GROUP LTD. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended thatthe General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: . 1. THAT Report PSD-012-05 be received; 2. THAT the request for Removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Lots 1 to 12 inclusive, Lots 15 to 20 inclusive, Lots 34 to 39 inclusive, and Blocks 40 to 47 inclusive on Plan 40M-2214 be APPROVED and that the attached Part Lot Control By-law be passed pursuant to Section 50 (7.1) of the Planning Act; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations and the Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department be advised of Council's decision. ~-~,~ Da i . Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning Services Reviewed by: 2),-< ""- - P Q _ .--G_SC... , Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative OffICer BRlCS/DJC/df 17 January 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPA.UTY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-<l830 621 REPORT NO.: PSD-012-oS PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant: The Kaitlin Group Ltd. 1.2 Location: Part Lot 16, Concession 1, former Town of Bowmanville (Attachment 1) 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On December 9, 2004, Staff received a request from The Kaitlin Group Limited for the Removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Lots 1 to 12 inclusive. Lots 15 to 20 inclusive, Lots 34 to 39 inclusive, and Blocks 40 to 47 inclusive on Plan 40M-2214 (Attachment 1). . 2.2 The south portion of draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-96014 that is subject to this . application received draft approval for: fifteen (15) detached, 50 semi-detachedllink (25 lots), and forty-five (45) street townhouse (8 blocks) dwelling units. Registration of Plan of Subdivision 40M-2214 was completed August 18, 2004. 3.0 COMMENTS 3.1 Staff has no objection to the approval of a By-law exempting the subject lands from Part Lot Control. Attached is a By-law (Attachment 2) to exempt the subject lands from Section 50 (5) of the Planning Act. 3.2 In accordance with the procedures established in the delegation of Part Lot Control By- laws, Planning Staff will forward to the Regional Planning Department the .Unit Type and Number Summary Table" (Attachment 3) along with a copy of the Part Lot Control By-law. . 3.3 Staff recommends that the By-law be in force for a two (2) year period following Council approval, ending January 31, 2007. 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 It is recommended that Council approve this application and adopt the attached Part Lot Control By-law for Lots 1 to 12 inclusive, Lots 15 to 20 inclusive, Lots 34 to 39 inclusive, and Blocks 40 to 47 inclusive on Plan 40M-2214. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Site Location Key Map and Lands Affected by Part Lot Control Removal Attachment 2 - By-law for Removal of Part Lot Control Attachment 3 - Unit Type and Number Summary Table I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PSO-G12-GS PAGE 3 List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Kelvin Whalen 623 :."Nt.::: ::.."'::. Ji ................- ....~"'.. ....... ........ ...w. ..... :~,; ........... i! ATTACHMENT 1 .. 1~':66 7 - :: ;:; ~ 0 ... N _ IIOT1IlElI. SII!T _~ _SII!T e-lIQIU2l I- ~ :~~: c ':.W::. ~:::=i:::~ .:.:~..:.:. ~~::i~::: ~':':_':" -:-:.:w:.:: & . <= t::~~ i:i:ii:i ';:iit:ii .....:1)... *:.~; .....'1'.... ........ ........ ........ ....... ...-... ....-.. ........ ....... ........ ........ ........ ....... IIOTRIl. SII!T & . tI M III II III III IS III . !It tI 1:1 Ii ................. ..................................................... ....................................................... ................ ................. ................ ..........-........ ................ .................. ................ ................... ............... ................. ................ .................................... ii~lli itilf:f~~I;Jl~ ~;I: c ~ Z W w 0:: (l) DCIIDS_ ................................. .............. ................. .................. ............... ..................................... ............... '1IIIIi.t!II~li'j I~i:ii~ 8 .......................................,.......................::. iii ...."."...,........"... I ~~~~:::~:~:::::::::~:~ :~:::~:~::::::::::::::::~;::: I :::g::::.::.:.:g::::5:: \ 'f.illl[P!!f.~I~~f! I :.::::.:: '*'::i~'::~~:ii~; ;;:ii~::~:I:ii; ,.,;.:.,,:";.;:,...;. ~:::::~:~::::~::::::::~ ::~:~:::::~:~:~:~~: ~~~:::i.':~~~::::: ..~ ..,.,;;;:,.,;::;.., . J ~ ............... ~$.{~j~~~~ ............... .............. ................ --.., --. . I . 6 :: IE I;: I~!il UlT78 :-: i l:: _~f-J lOT 75 UlT 1 UlT . UlT 7 UlTI UlTI - I UlT 10 I -ra -1l,2'iIUO I LOT 11 I UlT 12 UlT 13 LOT 14 lOT 1S LOT 16 LOT 17 LOT 18 BASELINE ROAD 6~ 6 6 ...-.... ... lit!..... 01 "\ <0,. 'l:f l<Jr.. LOT 74 LOT 73 LOT 15 UlT 72 lOT .. UlT71 LOT 70 lOT 87 LOT 69 lOT &a ~ IlXUIER LNt: UlT27 LOT 21 UlT2i UlT 25 LOT 29 LOT 24 LOT JO UlT2J LOT 31 ~ LOT 22 , " lJ lOT 21 UlTJ2 - ZBA 2004-058 lands Affected By Part lot Control Lots 1 to 12, 15 to 20, 34 to 39 and Blocks 40 to 47, 4OM.2214 Owner: Aspen Springs West Ltd. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . I I .. I I I I I I . . . I I I I I CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY -LAW NUMBER 2005- being a By-law to exempt a certain portion of Registered Plan 40M-2214 from Part Lot Control WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to exempt from Part Lot Control, Lots 1 to 12 inclusive, Lots 15 to 20 inclusive, Lots 34 to 39 inclusive, and Blocks 40 to 47 inclusive, on Plan 40M-2214, registered at the Land Titles DMsion of Whitby; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Council 01 the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. That Subsection 5 of Section 50 of the Planning Act shall not apply to those lands described in paragraph 2 within the By-law. 2. That this By-law shall come effect upon being approved by the Municipality of Clarington and theraafter Subsection 5 of Section 50 shall cease to apply to the following lands; a) Lots 1 to 12 inclusive, Lots 15 to 20 inclusive, Lots 34 to 39 inclusive, and Blocks 40 to 47 inclusive on Plan 40M-2214. 3. Pursuant to Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, this By-law shall be in force for a period of two (2) years ending on January 31, 2007. <<' day of 2005 BY-LAW read a first time this BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2005 day of 2005 BY -LAW read a third time and finally passed this John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk .~ 625 ATTACHMEINT 2 ATTACHMENT 3 T.&RLE4 PART.LOT CONTROL EXEMPTION BY-LAW Unit Typl! and Number Summary Table Registered Plan # : 4OM-2214 By-law: _ APPROVED ' Result of Part-Lot Control Exemption on Unit Type & Number . Unit TvnA & Number Lots/Blocks Affected Loll SemUUnks - 2 An increase of 1 unit Lol2 SemUUnks - 2' An increase of 1 unit Lol3 . . SemUUnks - 2 An increase of 1 unit . Lol4 SemUUnks - 2 An increase of 1 unit Lot 5 . SemUUnks - 2 An increase of 1 unit Lol6 . SemUUnks - 2 An increase of 1 unit Lol7 SemiILlnks - 2 An increase of 1 unit Lot 8 SemUUnks - 2 An increase of 1 unit Lot 9 SemUUnks - 2 An increase of 1 unil Loll0 SemUUnks - 2 An Increase of 1 unit Lolll SemUUnks - 2 An increase of 1 unit Lol12 SemUUnks - 2 An increase of 1 unit Lol15 SemUUnks - 2 An increase of 1 unit Lot 16 SemiILlnks - 2 An increase of 1 unit SemilLinks - 2 . Lol17 An increase of 1 unil Lol18 SemVLlnks - 2 An increase of 1 unit Lol19 SemUUnks - 2 An increase of 1 unil Lot 20 SemUUnks - 2 An increase of 1 unit Lol34 SeinllUnks - 2 An increase of 1 unil Lol35 SemilLinks - 2 An increase of 1 unit Lot 36 SemilLlnks - 2 An increase of 1 unit Lot 37 SemilLinks - 2 An increase of 1 unit Lot 38 SemVLlnks - 2 An increase of 1 unit Lot 39 SemVLinks - 2 An increase of 1 unit Block 40 Townhouse - 6 An increase of 5 units Block 41 Townhouse-6 An increase of 5 units Block 42 Townhouse-6 An increase of 5 units Block 43 Townhouse-6 An increase of 5 units Block 44 Townhouse - 5 An increase of 4 units Block 45 Townhouse - 5 An increase of 4 units Block 46 Townhouse - 6 An increase of 5 units Block 47 Townhouse - 5 An increase of 4 units . TOTAL Units. 93 An Increase of 61 units . I 626 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CI~gton REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, January 24, 2005 Report #: PSD-013-05 File #: PLN 7.12 By-law #: Subject: ANNUAL REPORT ON SITE PLAN ACTIVITIES FOR 2004 RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-013-05 be received for information. ~ (\cay-L ;\ Reviewed by:. ) - -r.Ji.. .~ _11 t. rome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu r, Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer BMR*CS*DC*df 19 January 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3AG T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 627 REPORT NO.: PSD-013-05 1.0 BACKGROUND PAGE 2 1.1 The purpose of this report is to provide an annual update on information regarding site plan applications that have been submitted for approval. 1.2 The Site Plan Control By-law requires that plans and drawings for any building or structure be approved by the Municipality prior to issuance of a building permit . except for those exceptions stated in By-law 90-130. By-law 00.130 delegates the approval authority of site plan applications to both the Director of Planning Services and the Director of Engineering Services. 1.3 Except for additions or minor expansions, a site plan agreement is generally required for a proposed development to ensure a comprehensive design review of the location of all buildings and structures, landscaping, access permits, parking areas, signage and grading etc., by all regulatory authorities. In addition, it is through the site plan approval process that the Municipality collects its cash- in-lieu of parkland dedications, road widenings, performance guarantees, etc. Each. agreement is registered on title and is enforceable against present and Mureowners. . 2.0 SITE PLAN ACTIVITY 2.1 Attachment 1 to this report outlines all site plan applications during the period of January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2004. The summary table includes the following information: site plan application file number, the mature of the application, location, and current status. Attachment 2 outlines all site plan applications approved during the same time period. Approval may be conditional on agreements being signed by the applicant, executed by the Mayor and Municipal Clerk and then registered against title. Until registration occurs, a building P7rmit is not usually available. 2.2 Site Plan activity through 2004 was as follows: ~ Applications Received ~ Applications Approved ~ Applications Withdrawn ~ Applications Appealed .to OMB ~ Applications Denied by the OMB ~ Application Files Remaining Open at end of 2004 47 44 1 o 1 114 . 628 I I I . -. . I I I I . I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PSO.Q13.Q5 PAGE 3 Chart 1 SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS 70 60 50 40 30 . 20 10 o 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 .Series1 . 28 . 41 40 55 34 48 52 61 47 2.3 A breakdown of site plan applications submitted in 2004 by land use type is shown in the pie chart below (Chart 2). Chart 2 2004 SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS BY TYPE .3% RECREA110NAL .9% I'lSmuTIONAL 05% UTLI1Y 1!!116% RESIDEN11AL .44% COMMERCIAL .23% NDUSlRlAL Utility, among other matters, includes all projects related to Darlington Nuclear Generating Station and telecommunication towers. . 629 REPORT NO.: PSD-013.()S PAGE 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.4 Site plans approved in 2004 by type are shown in Chart 3. These figures also include site plans received in years previous to 2004. Chart 3 APPROVED SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS BY TYPE, 2004 .2% KfCREA TIONAL . 5% INSTTTU'OONAL [] 10% lJTLrrES 1iil15% RESo:NTIAL . 55% OOtvt..t:Ra6.L . 13% INJtJS1RIAL 2.5 There are 114 files open at year end 2004. Some have been recently received and are in circulation for comments from other departments and external agencies. Others have been open for longer periods. These tend to be more complex applications, often requiring more time for reSOlving issues, possibly requiring rezoning. Site plan files awaiting information are monitored regularly by the assigned planner and a letter is sent informing the applicant of the status of the file. In 2004, overall development activity has led to delays in processing some of the. applications. 2.6 One application for site plan approval submitted by the TDL Group Limited for the property at the northwest comer of King Street East and Galbraith Court was subject of an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing. The hearing took place over a 3 week period in December 2003, plus some additional days in January 2004. The Board's decision provided conditional approval subject to the removal of the Holding (H) symbol from the zoning for the property. The Board provided until August 2004 for the conditions to be satisfied for the removal of the Holding (H). These conditions were not satisfied and therefore the appeal of the site plan application was dismissed, resulting in the denial of the application. 2.7 An application by Susan McDonald for a commercial dog kennel was also processed in 2004. The application received in March 2004 was submitted with 2003 fee. In April after a request by the applicant to waive the balance of the fee, Council passed a resolution "directing that all appropriate Site Plan fees be submitted to the municipality prior to any licenses being issued." An uncertified . 630 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PSO-o13-oS PAGE S cheque was tendered by the applicant for the fees on May 25 and conditional site plan approval was issued the same day. In August, planning staff were advised that the cheque was returned due to insufficient funds with the result that the fees were not paid in full. As a result the applicant was advised that since the application fee had not been paid in full. the conditional site plan approval was withdrawn. 3.0 CONCLUSION 3.1 This report is intended to be update of the site plan activity for 2004. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Site Plan Applications (January 1, 2004 to Oecember31, 2004) Attachment 2 -Approved Site Plans (January 1, 2004 to December 31,2004) 631 ~ o o C\I Z o w > W t> W 0::: en z o ~ t> ....J a.. a.. <( z :5 a.. w I- en ) B B .) J ) ) J B B ) J , ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .E ... .E ... ... ... .E ) I ) t ~ ) c ) .8 ~ ) I ~ ) ) t I I I I t i ~ c I I I .a t XIS' <> <> <> i <> i <> <> <> .I .11 .11 .II Q. ~ ~ .I t& ~ t& t& t& ~ l!: ~ ~ ~ .I ... ... ... ... < ... ... ... ... ... < < ... 1 I f i f J I 8" i . I t I I i" I !? I i i f i ! 1! .sa Ii I .. f I ... "5 I ! I I il } I i I I f i f I 1! i i 1-0 ~ i t .. I 'I I II I i "5 ~ i f 1 I I I " t ~ 1! i ~ f i I i i .. E .. ~ ~. I ~ I f .sa i f i I ~ f J iJ~ "5 I I il I i 'I I I I I I I ~o j i j j .., I i t J ~ I! j ~ I I :! :!l :g .. ~ ... 1 I j l- i .. N .. lI: N ill !;:: Jl ~ I! , ~ ~ w ~ I ~ i ~ ~ w I ~ . i i I ~ ~ g ~ I i ~ '?~ ~ I ~ ~ s; s; i w ~ ~ ~ ~o I ~ I I 1.1 I ! ~ I z Ii: i z I iJ :::l :::l ~ :::l ~ ~ 0: 0: ~ 8 ~ g 1!i 1!i z <.> ID ID ID <> z d ~ . 1!i ~ ~ w ~ 0 l!l 0 lli I ~ ~ ;;:; ~ ~ ffi ~ '" ~ ~ '" ~ u; ~ Ii; .... ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ :::l '" iti z z w :I: " i'i! ~ '" ~ i'i! !ll 0 ~ ~ Sl ~ z g <> I :s 0: w :s ;;:; <'i l!! <> ~ i'i! :> I ~ i :=; I!: c <> I ~ 1!i <> gj ::I - ;;:; ~ iij '" ~ ffi i l!; z ~ il l!; ~ :I: ~ ... t:; ~ Q ~ 0 w ~ c ~ ~ ~ i'i! ~ 0: I ~ 0: 0: ~ ... i ~ w ~ 5 <S w i ~ g g ~ 0: i ~ ci w liE :> z z ~ '" z ~ ti ~ i 0 w l!; ~ l!; g j z :> .... 2f z I Ii: ii: !i lQ 0: ill ~ ; .... :E ~ C3 w ~ II C3 ~ w !ii ~ ill ~ '" c ~ .~ ~ <.> Z '" z al z w ~ ~ iij ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Iii c ~ ~ ii! l!! 0: ~ '" .... i'i! ... 2 :I: := c > 0: Ii; 0: C C C c I!: Ii; 0: 0 51 Ii; 51 c l5 51 51 l!i c c lil ::c i 0: ID C C 0: 0: 0: 0: C <n 0: 0: 0: W <n :,!! <> w '" ~ s: ~ III III ~ z Iii 0: N ~ :l if: w w w i !Ii w w ll! Iii i 1.1 I ~ '" ~ 0: Z ~ ~ ~ ~ <n ~ z ID ::I 0: 0: '" :I: :;j Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w w ~ 0: ~ w :l ~ ~ I z w ~ '" ~ ~ <> ii! ~ 13 z ~ :s ID :s ~ O'i z ii: III :s liE '" :E :::l :E <> '" .... Z 0: - 1D ... ~ t! l(! 1Il ~ '" N - ::!: l:i ! ~ ~ l3 . '<'IS' :,!! i ;:!: ::;J ., ::: 1ij ~ N i i ~ ~ i ! i i ~ ~ I i i i ~ I I I ~ ~ i i I ~ I ~ I i;j i;j ;;; i;j " " ;; ;; iii iii ;::: !11 ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I i I I I I I I III I ! I ~ ~ 2f ~ ~ ~ 2f 2f ... '" '" '" '" <n '" '" '" '" '" en I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ - it U E " ~ . .. I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I II1I III 11111 JI~iill~ 1I11111 .. f t ~ . i i s 01 ~ ~-Ji tl,I,i!I!!.llli)l! 16~~ III J2111'l5$~J Ii 111111111111111i ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~illlili~~I~~II~ (,)cmmzm~~~Qm(.)ozm(,) . ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ . C) In CI) (.) ~ =JW Z C (I) z 3 i ~~ ffi~t;; 5 ~[;!! ~~ &tfI~c~;f3 .C::t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ m l~i~!f~~~I~~~i~~ w 3: ~ g;; > <:s ~z :E ~ !M iff ~ -l cl ~ !5 :S:::(!)omOS 0e:W~(f.)~t-a:x ~ lI! >- ~ ;!; 1= Iil ~ W lI!'Z; W !:; < 3: (!) ~ c C15 Z m a::: ~ fE 4i+~:r: g;! t; Cl C C ~ > >- >- >- c c ~ ~ >- > >- c << ~ << ~ << (f.) (I) (I) a: a::: 0 .~ (,) < u << w ~ ~ ~ c;!;~ en t- 0::: If w Irw ;~!i; ~ 8en~~!.! ~~ !!l~ffi~~;~ig~fu~~!j!~B ~ _ m t- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t- < % 0 ~ c 0 N!!l!:j ::l!!1!:j!!! -S-/il ~ ~ N M _ ~ ~ N 2 ~ ..... CD N co 1I1II11111111111 .......... ..... ..- S!~~;;;Pl"'i'ii!!IS~fJ~-"'~ ~~~iilit~~i~illi 633 C'l t- Z W ~ :I: o ~ < . ~ ili . 0: :r . III t5 < '" ~ ::> w ~ is :r ~ ~ '" w (!) s- o: !i 3! ~ ~ I ~ I is ~ ~ I ::> 0: ~ ~ ~ t.) il ill !:\! ~ j!: '" w = l::l i!i '" ! ! ;~ 0: il ~ 3! z g; !:\! ::> t.) ~ ~ en "" 1= t -' ~ :: ~ !i is g ~ ~ "' 1;] i s ~ ~ ~ 111 c ~ ::> i ~ :r ~ ~ ~ I!' ~ I '" ~ ~ !i 0: ~ W ~ ~ "" l( c c ~ ::; c w = ;;r:; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ .. . (!) i ll! c::l ~ = z 0; !;j :E ~ ~ ~ '" ~ !:\! ~ " ~ !;; ~ ::> ~ -' i i c 2i .... !:\! 0: ~ w ; ~ 0: -' < '" 1.S ~ '" t.) li! i w i ... ~<5< 8 0;; :5 ::> -' i:i i:i "- ... l!; ~ -' :!!; w '" i ;! l!; i:i t5 ~ -' 0: ~ 15 ~ 9 S 3! i 3! !Ii! !.l ~ ~ l!; ~ ~ > t; i l;! "" '" ~ t.) ~ ".so ill -' ~ I !Ii! ~ ~ ~ t; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t5 III ~ ~ i .... ~O -' w i -' !!i! w !;j ~ ~ 0: ~ i ~ c '" ~ E ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ !:; lil z ~ ~ w t5 w frl i: ll! 52 <li ~ ~ ~ ll! " 0: 0: 0: 0: U> lil t.) < '" I. I ~ !Ii! ~ ~ I I ~ g I ~ I ~ '?/t.: ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~O !Ii! li! ! t.) ~ ! t.) ! !Ii! ~ i ! 0: :!i I ~ Ii: ~ z " ~ ~ 0: ~ W t.) i!'i :5 ~ g g g d t.) z z t.) '" '" '" t.) t.) z g ~ ~ w s I ~ (!) ~ 0 ~ ~ U> ~ ~ "' ~ ~ III i lh w t5 ~ ~ is ~ ~ 0: [ Z ~ en U> Iii ~ d Iii I :r z 12 ~ II> ~ I t5 ~ :E 0: ~ S ~ S ~ -' '" S S w ~ !:\! i z E ~ 0 u> III w w !!! ~ i "- !Ii! li1 ~ '" ~ "'" ~ . 8 is w "" ~ 3! ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ 9 c '" ~ d i I lZ ~ ! - < ~ 0: 0: 0;; ~ 0: I ! >- ~ ~ '" w ~ !:i z I c !Ii! . t !:i , ~ !a z z '" w ~ ~ ~ . ~ j:! ~ >- z ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ 0: ~ ~ ~ ::> 0: ~ ij !il Q ~ z il z ~ ~ ~ i ~ ifi < :r f!! Q ~ Ii: ~ II> S ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ c w ~ z ll! w ~ w ~ "- i i ~ 0: ~ ::> w j!: IE ~ !l: il5 0: C .... '" Ii: ~ 0: ~ '" 5 0: .... ::J C i c t; t; t; i:i :5 c c t; t; i i:i c c ~ :51 lil lli! li! c c t li! 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: ~ Z ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ; w ~ 1ii S ~ ii~ 1ii ~ N .... III w ~ I .... i I I 0: '" 13 I ?:c ::Ii ?:c I w >- iti '" '" ~ i ~ ~ z -' ~ ~ ~ u> ~ ~ <~ oS> :r !i '" ~ !Ii! i t.) ~ ~ ~ ~ u> z t5 ::> !2 ~ ~ :r 52 52 .... t.) :5 t.) :E :!i :E I!' :r ~ l!a !il - ~ ~ III ~ - N i\"l - 8l ~ ~ '" "' ~ ~ - ~ Ii! iil ;:; ... '" iii .... .... -;:I; _ - t::i l;l .... ., N :!: ~ ~ i ~ 8l I ~ i ~ I I i I ~ I ~ I @ ~ ~ ~ ~ i I I ~ I ~ ;;; ... Iii Sl l::: a; Iii ;;; iij a ~ :: ~ ~ l;; 1 ;: - I I .... ~ ~ N .... ~ I I I I i I I III I I I I I I I I I 9 ~ I ~ ! ! ~ ! ~ if if w g; ~ ~ ~&;5; ~ c c '" '" '" '" u> u> u> '" '" '" '" u> '" v o o C'Il Z o w > o c::: a.. a.. <( (f) Z ~ a.. w ~ (f) ~ 634 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " z 9 5 ~ a III ~ 5 a ffi t.> I- g;; (.) -I C) ~ ~ (!) w z ~ ~~;2 . ~",~~g2;~", ~~~t=~i!!~~ ffl~~g~~~!!iffig ~ z ~ 0 ~ ~ . ~ ~ 0 ~;;:w~~8~t.>t=!!l ~~I~~~~I~~g l!'~fil~;!:~;:~fil~1!' ~ ~ ~ ffi ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi ~ D::: M < a:: a:: I.L ...I a:: ~ a:: u . ~w~~~ "~~i5 ~Fn~~~~~~I~~ ~cinz~IIDI~--~ -- lil~g~~ID~d w '" i2 g ~ ffi !z ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 5 d e ~ I- !z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t.> ~ < ~ ~ ~ Iii ~ i!i " - ~ ~ ~ z ~ 8 ffl ~ !i ~ ~~ ~ ~ c x - z w ~ ...I 0 ~ w u '" ~ ~ !i (ij ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ t.> 0 ~ w ~ !111~~~III~i~~ ililS -'8~i\1!i;~ iliili~:z :E I- E; ~ >-.~ =>> >- .~ ~ ~o Xo 0 !!l ~2j~wwZi!ig;~"lID"'''' c< .c do ~:> ::i: ~ ~ ~ ~ IE ~ ~ ~ c z w g ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o z ~ ~ iii z M ii: l: !\! ~ l: llJ ~[dw~:I:~(!)ii'i ili<!l:s:lll::i:::!~~ZQ., m QlJ 3:::I: m 52 ~ In S!: m ~ en :J ~~ ~wN !:l w >- '" :<: t: m ~ ~ ~ ::l ::i :5 is an ~ ~ ~ ~ g !oj a.. '" c 0 I- .... - ~ .... iiil~ii~~I~jii ",!'l ""il'l i>l;::......:il__ ~il<....~I<..II~il ~~ ~ <~Ilf~ llJ llJ llJ llJ llJ llJ llJ v, (J> w ... <> II a.. a.. (J> (J> I~ ~ ~ (J> (J> 635 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Cl!1!ilJglOn REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: . Monday, January 24, 2005 Report #: PSD-014-05 File #: ZBA 2004/045 and 18T-87021 By-law #: Subject: AMENDMENT TO DRAFT APPROVED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 1ST -87021 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT ZBA2004/045 TO PERMIT THE DEVELOPMENT OF 267 RESIDENTIAL UNITS APPLICANT: LIBERTY STREET DEVELOPMENTS INC. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT ReportPSD-014-05 be received; 2. THAT the amendment to Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision 18T-87021 submitted by Liberty Street Developments Inc. be APPROVED subject to the conditions contained in Attachment 3; 3. THAT the application for Zoning By-law Amendment (ZBA2004/045) be APPROVED, as contained in Attachment 5; 4. THAT the Region of Durham Planning Department be forwarded a copy of this report and Council's decision; and 5. THAT the applicant, agent, and all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Reviewed by: ZJv--U2- r-[.R Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer TW/CS/DJC/sh January 19, 2005 . CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1 C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 636 REPORT NO.: PSD-014-05 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant: Liberty Street Developments Inc. 1.2 Agent: Tunney Planning Inc. 1.3 Amendment to Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision: From: 138 lots with 15.0 metre frontages for 138 single detached dwellings, 56 lots with 18.0 metre frontages for 112 semi-detached dwellings with a total of 256 units. . To: 78 lots with 9 metre frontages, 98 lots with 12.0 metre frontages and 85 lots with 15.0 metre frontages all for single detached dwellings with a total of 267 units. 1.4 Amendment to the Zoning By-law: From: "Holding - Urban Residential Type One ((H(R1) Zone" to appropriate zones to permit the development of single detached dwellings on lots with 15, 12 and 9 metres frontages with reduced exterior side and front yard setbacks and increased lot coverages. To: Permit the proposed amendment to the Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision. 1.5 Site Area: 17.782 hectares (43.94 acres) 2.0 LOCATION 2.1 ThesubjecUands .arelocated west of Liberty Street; south of Concession Road 3, being Part ottot 11,C0\1cession 2in the former Town of Bowmanville. 3.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING LAND USES 3.1 The lands subject to the amendments are currently occupied by a residential sales office for the proposed development. The remaining lands are currently vacant. 3.2 Surrounding Uses North - Concession Road. 3 and north of it, v~cant lands, a church and two . .. res'iaeritial dwellings: . . _ _ South - Residential dwellings and vacant lands with a Draft Approved Plan of - 'Subdivision (18T-89070) for 88 units for semi-detachedllink dwellings and ;tOwnhouses. - - . _ . _ East - One single detached dwelling on the west side of Liberty Street and a residential subdivision on the east side of Liberty Street consisting -of townhouses, semi-detached and single detached dwellings. - ~~., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '. I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PSD-014-05 PAGE 3 West- A single detached dwelling and vacant lands with two Draft Plans of Subdivisions. Plan 18T-89044 has been draft approved for 70 units for single-detached, semi-detachedllink and townhouse dwellings. Plan 18T- 87087 has been approved for 294 single detached, semi-detached/link and townhouse dwellings. 4.0 BACKGROUND 4.1 The Region of Durham issued Draft Approval for Plan of Subdivision 18T-87021 in March 1990. It was subsequently amended in March 1991 and again in March 2001. The latest amendment was Draft Approved for 138 lots for single detached dwellings, 56 lots for semi-detached dwellings, a block for six (6) townhouse units and a block for commercial development. The six (6) townhouse units are intended to be developed with a medium density townhouse block within Draft Approved Plan 18T-89070 consisting of 42 units. The commercial block is intended to be developed with the property located on the south-west corner of Liberty Street and Concession Road 3. 4.2 On October 5, 2004 Staff received an application to amend Zoning By-law 84~3. The application to amend Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision 18T-87021 was received on November 3, 2004. The applicant wishes to amend the lots in the Draft Approved Plan which were originally approved as lots for 138 single detached dwellings and 56 lots for semillink residential units. The proposed change results in an overall increase in lots from 194 to 261 and units from 256 to 267. 4.3 The following chart illustrates the differences between the Draft Approved Plan of March 1990, revised in March 1991, and March 2001 and the current proposal. . TABLE 1 15 m Sin les 203 194 138 85 12 m Sin les N/A N/A N/A 98 9 m Semi/Link N/A 18 112 N1A 9 m Sin les N/A N/A N/A 78 Townhouses N/A 6 6 6 Total 203 218 256 267 Net Residential Densi 11.4 12.3 14.3 15 5.0 OFFICIAL PLAN CONFORMITY 5.1 Durham Reaion Officia/Plan The lands are designated as Living Area within the Durham Regional Official Plan. The predominant use of the lands within the Living Area designations shall be for housing purposes. The proposed uses conform to the plan. . 638 REPORT NO.: PSO-G14-GS PAGE 4 5.2 Clarinaton Official Plan In the Clarington Official Plan, the subject lands are designated as Urban Residential. There is a Neighbourhood Commercial Symbol at the north east comer of the subject lands. The lands are within the Knox Neighbourhood, which has a population allocation of 5400 and a housing unit target of 1900. The proposed uses conform to the plan. 6.0 ZONING BY-LAW 6.1 Within Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended, the lands are zoned "(Holding) Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1) Zone". A zoning by-law amendment will . be required in order to implement the proposed amendment to draft approval. 7.0 PUBLIC MEETING AND SUBMISSIONS 7.1 Two area residents spoke in opposition to the proposal at the statutory Public Meeting held on December 6, 2004. Their concerns are summarized below: · D. Louise Barret, who lives at 342 Liberty Street North was concerned with the change to the lotting fabric and location of Jennings Place in the vicinity of her septic bed. It should be noted that Jennings Place will be constructed in a temporary location until the septic bed is no longer in use. The blocks surrounding Mrs. Barret's property will also be frozen until Jennings Place is constructed in. its permanent location. · Mr. Frank Harris identified concerns with the lack of sidewalks along Liberty Street North and Concession Road 3. He was also concerned with increased traffic volumes on Concession Road 3. . The applicant is proposing to include sidewalks in this development. Both Liberty Street and Concession Road 3 are Type B Arterial Roads and are intended to move significant volumes of traffic. 7.2 Staff have received three calls from residents who reside in the vicinity of the subject site. Mr. Lucchi, who resides on the north side of Concession Road 3, west of Liberty Street, . inquired about the location of Lowrie Street and whether it would affect to his driveway on Concession Road 3. Lowrie Street enters Concession Road 3 to the west of Mr. Lucchi's property. Two phone calls of a general nature were also received. 8.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 8.1 In accordance with departmental procedures, the applications were circulated to obtain comments from other departments and agencies: . Il:-l~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PSD-014-05 PAGE 5 8.2 The Clarington Emergency and Fire Services Division, Clarington Operations, Canada Post and Rogers Cable have no objections to the proposal. 8.3 The Peterborough Victoria Northumberland and Clarington Catholic District School Board requests that adequate provision be made for sidewalks in this development. The Board has no other comments or concerns at this time. 8.4 The Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board indicated that they have no concerns at this time and advised that the proposed development will yield approximately 90 students to Harold Longworth Public School which is currently over capacity with four (4) portables on site. The Board also indicated that they require sidewalks on interior streets. 8.5 Enbridge, Bell Canada and Veridian Connections offered no objections to the proposal. Each agency provided standard conditions to be included in the Conditions of Draft Approval. 8.6 The Region of Durham Planning Department has no objection to the revised draft plan. The conditions of draft approval provided on March 26, 1990, as amended on March 15, 2001 are still applicable. Condition 1, 4, 6 and 7 of the amended conditions of draft approval will need to be changed to correspond with the revised plan. These conditions will need to be complied with prior to clearance by the Region for registration of this plan. 8.7 The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority has no objections to the applications and indicated that the previously requested conditions of draft approval are still applicable to the current proposed plan of subdivision. 8.8 The Clarington. Engineering Services Division attended staff/developer progress meetings and were provided with information, drawings and sketches addressing our various concerns. To summarize, the following issues have been satisfactorily addressed. . The developer has demonstrated that houses with 4.6 metre driveways and single car garages can be sited on the "eyebrow" lots on Allworth Crescent. The ultimate siting will be reviewed in detail at the Engineering submission stage. . Kinked driveways are not permitted: however, 4.6 metre wide driveways can be constructed on the "30 foot" lots if the zoning triangle were reduced to 6.75 metre X 6.75 metre. . It must be clearly stated (where appropriate) that all services located on the temporary portion of Jennings Place must be moved and relocated at the applicant's cost prior to the development of lots 273 through 277 inclusive. 640 REPORT NO.: PSD-014-05 PAGE 6 9.0 STAFF COMMENTS 9.1 9.0 and 12.0 Metres Sinale Detached Dwellinas The applicant wishes to amend the existing Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision to permit the development of only single detached dwellings. The applicant has requested lots with a minimum of 9.0 metres frontages for single detached dwellings on an interior lot and 12.0 metres on a corner lot rather than an 18 metres semi-detached or link lot. The 9.0 metres single detached dwellings will have a similar housing form to the previously approved 18.0 metre semi-detached link lots with the exception of the link which is typically accomplished by using a bar to link two units below grade. The minimum lot area would be slightly decreased for each dwelling unit and the separation distance between dwellings would remain the same (eg. an interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 metres on the other). Staff support the proposal to create a new 9 metre single lot category only in a situation where semi-detachedllink lots have been previously approved. For any new development, the minimum frontage on a small' lot single dwelling should be 10 metres. The Applicant also proposes to replace some of the 18.0 metres semi-detached links and some of the 15.0 metres single detached lots with 12.0 metres single detached lots. This provides a good variety of housing types. For the 12.0 metres single detached lot category, a corner lot frontage of 13.8 metres was requested. Typically 15.0 metres would be required to provide for the wider exterior side yard. Staff support the reduction in corner lot frontages in tandem with the other recommendations regarding exterior side yard requirements addressed below. 9.2 Front and Exterior Side Yard Setbacks 9.2.1 Front Yard Setbacks The applicant has requested reduced front yard setbacks to encourage the construction of porches and balconies and to bring the homes closer to the street. This will provide an attractive residential environment and encourage social interaction. The reduced setbacks have been requested for all lots and are outlined in the table below. Front 4.5 metres Staff are in agreement with the requested front yard setbacks. Similar' setbacks to a dwelling have been permitted in recent subdivisions, including the subdivision directly to c: ".. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PSD-014-05 PAGE 7 the south of the proposed development. Porches are already permitted to encroach 1.5 metres into the permitted front, side, and rear yards, providing a front yard setback of 3.0 metres to the property line. The General Provisions contained in the Zoning By-law permits a 1.5 metre encroachment for steps in the front yard. This would permit steps associated with a porch to be setback 1.5 metres from the property line. 9.2.2 Exterior Side Yard Setbacks Similar to the requested front yard setbacks, the applicant has requested reduced exterior side yard setbacks for the purpose of providing an attractive streetscape. While staff support a considerable reduction of the current standard for an exterior side yard, the Applicant's request is too extreme. The current, requested and recommended setbacks are outlined in the table below. TABLE 3 PROPOSED AND RECOMMENDED MINIMUM EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACKS Current Pro osed Recommended 4.5 metres 1.2 metres 2.0 metres 6.0 metres 3.0 metres 4.0 metres 6.0 metres 6.0 metres 6.0 metres Lands to the south and east have been developed with the standard exterior side yard requirements of 6 metres to any portion of a dwelling and a 1.5 metre encroachment for an unenclosed porch. The requested exterior side yard setbacks are out of context to what is currently permitted in surrounding developments. Reductions have been permitted in other developments in Bowmanville, however, they have not been reduced below 4.5 metres to a dwelling. The setback to a porch, when factoring in the permitted 1.5 metre encroachment would allow for a 3.0 metre setback. Staff visited developments with setbacks similar to what the applicant has requested in Ajax, Oshawa, and the Port of Newcastle. Staff observed that the homes on corner lots were substantially larger than the ones on interior lots. The exterior side yard setbacks recommended by Staff will encourage the development of homes on corner lots that are. similar in scale to those on the interior lots. Attachment 6 contains two pictures of a home in Oshawa with similar setbacks to what is proposed by the applicant. Sitings, provided by the applicant are provided in Attachment 7 as a comparison. As seen in the photographs, the.exteriorside yard of this home is quite narrow with minimal space for landscaping. The stairs from the porch extend right down to the sidewalk. The planting beds in front of the porch meet the sidewalk. This causes concern with the ability of a homeowner to be able to maintain large trees in this yard which may be desired by some residents for the proviSion of shade, privacy and an attractive yard. 642 REPORT NO.: PSO-o14-oS PAGE 8 Grading issues must also be considered. In certain situations there may be grade differentials that do not allow for a natural grade to the street, necessitating small retaining walls. Staff are supportive of reduced setbacks from the current standard to provide a compact pedestrian-oriented environment with attractive porch features. However, if the home is located too close to the street, the residents will not feel comfortable using the porch. The requested exterior side yard setbacks may be more appropriate in a denser urbanized area but is not appropriate for this neighbourhood. Staff recommend that the exterior side yard setback to a dwelling be 4.0 metres and 2.0 metres to an unenclosed porch/balcony. The setback to the dwelling will closer reflect the 4.5 metre front yard setback, and the 4.5 metres exterior side yard setbacks in other areas of Bowmanville. This will provide a consistent streetscape along both the front and exterior side yards while providing adequate areas for the provision of landscaping and separation between pedestrians and the homeowner. 9.3 Increased Lot Coveraae An increase in lot coverage from 40 to 45 percent was also requested for the 9 metres minimum lot frontage. Along with the reduced front and exterior side yard setbacks for all lots in the plan, this will provide the applicant with the ability to intensify the development by permitting a larger bUilding footprint on all lots. The applicant has requested an exemption in lot coverage for unenclosed porches and balconies. It is proposed that on an interior lot, a porch up to a maximum of 12 square metres in area be permitted. For an exterior lot, porches with a maximum area of 20 square metres is proposed. The table below represents the increase in lot coverage for the 9.0, 12.0 and 15.0 metres lots using the minimum lot area requirements and the requested maximum area for porches and balconies. TABLE 3 PERCENTAGE INCREASE IN LOT COVERAGE 15.0 metres 12.0 metres 9.0 metres 2.61% 3.24% 4.44% 3.64% 5.41% 7.41% Staff agree with the requested exemption for porches from lot coverage. Through Architectural Control review, porches are encouraged specifically on exterior lots. By allowing this exemption further support of the Architectural Control Guidelines is provided. R4~ I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PSD-014-05 PAGE 9 9.4 Siaht Trianale Through the detailed review of this proposal it was determined that by reducing the frontages and interior side yard setbacks, a 4.6 metre wide driveway would likely encroach within the required 7.5 metre site triangle. Discussions with the applicant revealed that the lots could develop without the driveway encroaching into the site triangle if it was reduced to 6.75 metres. Engineering Staff were consulted and are in agreement with the recommended site triangle. ' 9.5 Drivewavs on Evebrow lots Engineering Services was concerned that the eyebrow lots on Allworth Crescent did not have adequate frontages to accommodate a double wide driveway and area for snow storage. The applicant provided sitings that demonstrated a 4.6 metre wide driveway can be accommodated. At the request of Engineering Services, Staff recommends these lots be zoned to limit the width of the driveway to a maximum of 4.6 metres. The applicant should also be aware that Engineering Services objects to kinked driveways, therefore the lots should not be developed with garages that exceed the width of the driveway. 9.6 Themed Streetscaoe Features The proponent is marketing this project with a traditional Ontario town theme. To this end, a variety of streetscape elements have been proposed including an entry feature at Bons Avenue and Liberty Street and Concession Road 3 and Lowrie Street. The entry features are intended to provide a sense of place and a gateway for the proposed development. Streetscape features will also be incorporated into the development which includes fencing, landscaping and heritage street lighting. 644 REPORT NO.: PSD-014-05 PAGE 10 amendment application will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for a single detached dwelling. 9.8 Road Infrastructure The road infrastructure maintains a similar pattern to what had been previously Draft Approved (See Attachments 2 and 3). Modifications to the road network are discussed below. Jennings Place Due to the location of an easement for a private septic system servicing the property located at 342 Liberty Street North, the applicant will not be able to . construct a portion of Jennings Place until such time as the homeowner agrees to connect to municipal water and sanitary sewer services, which will be made available by the developer. As an interim solution, the applicant is proposing to construct a temporary road. All temporary services must be removed and relocated, and Jennings Place is to be constructed to it's permanent location prior to the development of Blocks 273 through 277 inclusive. Lowrie Street The applicant proposes to relocate the road from Concession Road 3, identified as Lowrie Street east of the location that was previously Draft Approved. The street was relocated to avoid conflict with the future Collector Road designated for lands to the west of this development and identified in the Official Plan. On the previously approved Draft Approved Plan, Lowrie Street was to connect with Argent Street to the. south. Engineering Staff expressed concern that this would become a thoroughfare, acting as a Collector Road, rather than a Local Road. As a result the mid-section of the proposed street has been replaced bya walkway. This satisfies Engineering Services comments, while maintaining a grid system for pedestrian use. Special attention will have to be given to the dwellings that abut the walkway in regards to placement and design. Brough Courl A cul-de-sac was originally located to the north of the existing single detached dwelling fronting onto Liberty Street. The cul-de-sac has been moved to the west end of the development and is identified as Brough Court. Section 9.5.5 and .19.7.2 of the Official Plan contain principles for residential neighbourhoods to develop with a grid street system. Section 19.7.2 also indicates that cul-de-sacs are generally not permitted. The purpose of these principles is to encourage multiple routes and connections for pedestrian and vehicular use. This proposal does contain a cul-de-sac, as did the previous Draft Approved Plan. However, it should be noted that the plan does maintain a grid system with opportunities to connect to the neighbourhoods to the west and south. The walkway connecting Lowrie ~Ar:; I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PSD-014-05 PAGE 11 Street to Argent Street maintains the pedestrian grid system, meeting with the intent of the Official Plan. 10.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 10.1 Prior to scheduling a recommendation report to Committee and Council on a draft plan of subdivision application a list of the proposed conditions of draft approval are submitted to the applicant for their review and concurrence with the same. . The purpose of this exercise is to determine if there are any conditions of draft approval that the applicant does not agree with and that they be identified for further discussion purposes. The applicant concurs wi~h the Conditions of Draft Approval. 10.2 In consideration of the comments received from circulated agencies and review of the proposal, staff recommend: · Approval of the amendment to Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision 18T-87021, on Attachment 3, subject to the conditions contained in Attachment 4; and · Rezoning the subject lands within the plan of subdivision, Attachment 5. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map Amendment to Draft Approved Plan Attachment2 - Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision 18T-87021, March 2001 Attachment 3 - Plan of Subdivision 18T-87021 as redlined Attachment 4 - Conditions of Draft Approval Attachment 5 - Zoning By-law Amendment Attachment 6- Photographs of a similar development in Oshawa . Attachment 7 - Proposed corner lot sitings List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Lisa D'Angelo Steve Lucchi Nancy Barnes Kevin Tunney D. Louise Barrett Frank Harris 646 . ATTACHMENT 1 CONCESSION ROAD 3 l I ~ :: ~"--~ : :.. .: 11: ." .11 .. e:r _- ~ I f lrI' e ." ... .. .. I t_ ~r &1118 Y : : 'j : ~ ::,:: ::':: .: ((G3~ .. e J l:r !:t f E I e: II I I I I: I Ii 'I '" I' I;: WI.: t: :.: I :: : I I I!I : ..1 Ol't': -I ~ II: 18 I II I 1 _ ..!, l:::i' ;: J Jo I II: II: I II i = ~I Ii J. I' . I I- . I ,I. " I. . 1 I. -!...: I ~~I'; I I I I . -----, eBI,U1EY-SlRE9- --zIIINGS' 1 ::I-~ ;-,;;;;;..:..... ~....... .. .. ,I ..,.......... _ ' 1If 7 f.+t: I I is = ;: a i ~i.. , ~ .. <: ~ <= " i i ~ - . . I. t" I . "011......:: · i .. e .. Q ii .. i i I I : I I I .~ r;:- :~' Ii I .-. ~Y ""..................... .... ... ... .. .. ... ... f:~~~! ~if~ ~ - _ --:"'::':' ~ - -- ~. -- -::::: -:-~",.--:::_:..~.. MEllii5iii!:ti:ciii..ii 11;- . .- ---~-- -is- ..' ..ill!i..!........,..._. . ~liIT~ .. .. .. ... .. .. ... .. ... .. ... ... ... .. .. .... ... .... .. .. ..... ... ... .. -I-I... ~---IiiiiS,.oot-----eo;;,~---~ .n. I - - I I '" .. I' I I.. ... I :::::.. _ ~I_ '76, ... 125 ~1211 m~ ~ac t..~." _ '" I.. I ,_ .. ~~ ". ~ ~~ .. I I (!) '" ~.. '" 1:230 Ule :a.~ 347: I ", IlI3 Z22 :U Ute tlQ 14: 1711 .... lib ! UI US! c..... _ :: I ~ : a ---t - ~-~ -..-I - , : i - :: 3 . -.- \,1-- !--.-I I ~: :::"T. --..- 1.1 ~ I f ,. ~'-r-=~':' l "It I :~'. am __ IIJ .".::.! ----,. ~ ,,+ . e---:-\ . . . ~l --- .. I f- a l)':" ~ 0 u - - u U . :\.. ~---t- _ '7 t 'I I i Iii i i . i . i N,ll ~ .... is I" ~---:-.. ~ I ~ r.:- ~ 'I' I., j 1. I 11 LOft7 ~s ~~~iisls~siSS!.... fI II t:"7 T ~ ~ r :::; ;; ;;; ~ ... :~ LOT 11 ~ ~ ~ l s . ." ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :; ! ; ~ G 2 1';\;,8 p.-- . Bowmanville Key Map JnnJLJ :I: I- 0:: 0 Z ~~ I- , W ~~ w 0:: l- t/) ~ 0:: w m - -I J ZBA 2004-045 Zoning By-law Amendment Redline Revision to Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision 1ST -87021 Owner: Liberty Street Developments Inc. 647 I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . . . - l! II. I.. .' . ~Sl. I !t;~9N15 . I':'!b~il ~~bil:= \ ..... ~ I'~ I' 1111111"')' , I IJIlI!ll/ I . I "'1""'" . ."li I I 1111 0' I r. I '1'1 III ~I! Pl'ijjjj ,. i If Ililli!II'" .... R li jl I I! !!l L._.J !-.-.-1 r'-'l '1....-.-1 I I -,.-.- I I I .1 ! I I I I I I I I I I "I \ '. '- L.L.L.Li..J..j.~._i_L.L..L!i...Li~ I rr.r.rT.,....,.--r-r.r.r.J1r.I"T..,..."( ! i i ,! i i ~ ! ! ! i ! Ii j i '\ \. r I I 4..-1,--- \ \ \-J.- ........':'-;f ._.~ I ~ , I ._.~ I- ._.J I- ._.~ ~ ._.J l- I ' ._._~L ,...~i~iL . i~i .:il:. o .':"-:J !~! r ! liliI' . .~ I -. ~ - ;"-', I - '-'-1,' ~:j L ~.__i _C . > . . . . 648 z ~I i i i I; ~ .. ...."'~ o NO," It .. !! II II!!! ti !1h .... ;! i~ i llIini i' .. ....... ~ i N B; a ~ I 'Ill' Ill" ~ 11111 ;i: a:~ 0 "ill!s~ I...... I, III!!::; 1;~I~I:~I'II~~~ l!i1i,'iii1m ~a:_~....h~; .~~ I I ilU I .... .... II I'!i l'!~i Ii, 1\ -II' I - j' I .II! -l::! II : ~I II Il,J llll'l I . ~ ~!I . I f ..i r II U ~I 'J~ " . ~i il!! I \ ~!i.1 _! ,I'l . a: "~I! 1l1!1' ;~ (; :lll. I I,'" ~ ~ : ~ - - - - - -- - ,m''''' "'" "'~s,,,. ZS!\.I'l'Ml"j I II .,., 8 ""'^' """"" ~~~. OL~ a .1. I II 1-;;0,_ i 0 ~ I~ ~ ~ I ~ 11 · -k I ~ ~-m I- $ .. \ ~Y;" I .,~ 1\ !, --,,-;0;- I \9 9 ~. -i ~ J 9 9 g lot. ~ ~ I~ 9 9 \, ~ 1< : I\}\- ~I}~I~ ~ -->-~-'li! !!I!,Ii~d! J"''',g\\\~\ I 1\ 'f ..I;ol+. ->--- ..\_"nn_IJ,"~':~% '6 \.\!\.. :\ :( ,f" -'J ... <..~ >,,~ I I ") i I --... / I ,.., L> -.( ~ , I .1. ~-; · ~ ~ t I 'I 1+ c" \\. "" ..: ;.:' ~-j (\ I I., i · _ . !; ': -~-- j ... .., ,~. ___-4 I II, ,/~,~ ~"ll L' ~ · ., --- 'I '.. :: ::: --- 0 \ " : _1_ _'1 i \---7'" ::: "'. ,., ___J t:: .-1 _"'_ ~-I _ "".. _: :.. "', :: ___'1 r: '~I \ ,,,,," . .uo.o<oI" ..~ GR: ...IL~,:Il!-J~ I. \~~....::..... - 7"" "':I ( tR an: I ~: "- :I ./ --, "" . ~8 ___. Iii'''' ..., ,- .., ~ .... ---J s c:: !:aM 1M; aiR ca; r;--;& _ ..ltl I '" 1~11-1t\l-II--"~:1i I ... .. . ,- ... / ' .., .~. --1 r-- I" _ :;;: _ IIK:Ii _ ta: ,,:Ii _ ="' ..: _ :l.L1 ....--:...1 ~ I ~ ,,, L-...... :::: ;- ,.,. - J-.; l! Kt"...... ;.,"....; ; Ci.\ ~'~ L I! ;~. \ I _.j., ,......~ I i"- il "I' "'\):- -I-.. - -Itlool- - --+------f.o----'-If. 1'" 11(--' ~illJ-j)':'! Ilkilh.~HItl.J!Hilnl~!!H,E it i 'II; 17 l;:::1- I to-. F "- ; ',' L", L, 1, BI~_" :ra1'i.1~1-f I 11\!,"r,,!~ill!"!' !i1.j:.a-I!_!~~ !:;;,~ \it I ~~II~:" .........t-" ......I.. no ..1..."'-111.\.-1.......; .~_/"~, \--L-J :<11 T -- ~ '(::1""'- I r-'l... _............ "I... i 1/ .f Y il i r,--:,...;;r- - - - P" - PI ~ - - - - - - - - -' '~ · --\ [ ~II ~', 01 f'. k I r::3! ! i ! ! i ! f E! i"-' J I ~ . r-J.r.' __ / ;k --I . ',~}J, /' I I~ .. . ;/(; -;;. ."" 0 ~ 1-9 - ! \! ! il ! " . . ,I. ~. , I I ;. lir::~,~.. __;.;:............._...I"l~~.[)l!' iI!~/l I I .~ ~'"If, i -":.4..",",," I / '~awnlO ._/ -,- - - no n""f... -' - ~;s ._T /' /1"".. / i . I' {. 10. ~ .-"":[:1 ;. '- ., I I " ..., ',I ' z . I"> - I... . ," -:7 '- ' l r !;!I 1/:: }: - , · PH :: ll..J.Y,7; ~ -:/.~..."~ -/ /~ I Nl li11 " ,1- ;. :; 1 .; ;. .~ - ; 0" - -i '1 ::! I g I ~I::a- ; .~, i'~' .. ~ , . I ~ ~ . .! -,' I IL 01 ( .. · [l.:.A.; ,. .,!. L; · .' / ( ~1\1 .\ ;(: ",; ---,;' ~' 1/.,..['-.,,; ra ,.... ~ : ; .""" '.1 \ .,::l......;. 'I I ~.\ .; g ,: -...... "." " ~ \ . "'~' :.. ~.I,TK . I -~ . "1 ; -.! j -"1 . );... ; ~">: ... j ~.:,.. ", M I 'i\ -\. · ; - i-'l 0/1 ,..'. ':'---' .." I aii ')""\i\ ~. · ~ ... ; ~ I-"" 1 / /~';. 1-'" "f . , ' ' / r _~\ ~~, i 1ft ?""mlbO 1k2.J C ~~,,--- - -(/ - - - - - ~ ~ ~. ~ ."' -~./IJ~.7 ,;::7 ' ! '-r. _ ': , RdQ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CONDITIONS OF DRAFT APPROVAL Revised Draft Plan of Subdivision 18T 87021 Part Lot 11, Concession 2, Former Town of Bowmanville Dated: January 24, 2005 ATTACHMENT 4 1. The revised Conditions of Draft Approval for Plan of Subdivision 18T 870211a5t approved March 15,2001 being numbers 1 to 29, be deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following conditions. 2. The Owner shall have the final plan prepared on the basis of approved draft Plan of Subdivision 18T 93008 prepared by Tunney Planning Inc. identified as job number TUN 507-1, dated November 2004, which illustrates 261 single detached dwellings, 16 part Blocks for 21 single detached homes, Block 278 for a commercial block, Block 279 for a medium density Block, and various roads, site triangles and reserves. 3. The Owner shall dedicate the road allowances included in this draft plan as public highways on the final plan. 4. The Owner shall name road allowances included in this draft plan to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Durham and the Municipality of Clarington. 5. The 5.18 metres road widening on Concession Road 3, identified as Block 288 shall be de"dicated to the Municipality of Clarington as a public highway. 6. The 0.3 metre reserves shown as Blocks 284, 285, 286, and 287 shall be conveyed to the Municipality of Clarington free and clear of all encumbrances, with the final registration of this plan. 7. The 0.3 metre reserves shown as Blocks 281, 282 and 283 shall be conveyed to the. Region of Durham free and clear of all encumbrances, with the final registration of this plan. 8. The 14 metre x 6 metre site triangles included in Block 289 at the intersection of Bans Avenue and Liberty Street be conveyed to the Region of Durham free and clear of all encumbrances, with the final registration of this plan. 9. The 14 metre x 7metre site triangles included in Block 288 at the intersection of Lowrie Street and Concession Road 3 be conveyed to the Municipality of Clarington free and clear of all encumbrances with the final registration of this plan. . 650 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Block 280, being the 3.0 metre walkway be dedicated to the Municipality of Clarington free and dear of all encumbrances, with the final registration of this plan. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The Owner agrees to develop Blocks 262 to 278 (inclusive) in conjunction with adjacent lands and further agrees to maintain these Blocks until developed. Block 279 in Plan of Subdivision' 18T-87021 and Block 19 in Plan of Subdivision 18T-87021 shall be melded and developed as onesiteplan. The location of all road allowances must be compatible with the location of the road allowances in all adjacent draft plans of subdivision. The Owner agrees to construct a temporary portion of Jennings Place on Blocks 273 through 277 future lots inclusive. The final design of this temporary portion must' be to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services. All services located on the temporary portion must be removed and relocated at the Owners ,cost prior to the development of Lots 273 through 277 inclusive. The Owner agrees to submit a supplementary noise control report to review and update the abatement measures recommended in the acoustic report dated September 8th, 1989, prepared by G.M. Semas and Associates Limited. The revised noise report must reflect the design/lotting changes approved in the revised plan dated November, 2004. The Owner shall implement the noise control measures recommended in the original and supplementary reports of the Region of Durham and the Municipality of Clarington. The above-noted recommendations should also include the following requirements: i) The Owner agrees to insert the following clause in the purchase and sale agreement for Lots 258 to 261: 'Purchasers are advised that, due to increasing road traffic, noise levels may be of concern and occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants." 16. The Owner agrees to insert, in following clause in the purchase and sale agreement for Lots 47 and 48 and Lot 261 and the future home on Block 268: 'Purchasers are advised that decorative landscape features such liS fencing (wood, stone or metal), signage or plantings provided em their property at the site triangle delineate the property boundary and provide a buffer from the intersection. It is the owner's responsibility to maintain the said decorative landscape feature." 651 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 17. The Owner shall satisfy the temporary circle requirements of the Municipality of Clarington. Temporary turning circles are required at the terminus of Bons Avenue, Allison Street, Argent Street and Courtney Street. All Lots fronting temporary turning circles will remain frozen until such time as the road allowances are extended and constructed with the finished urban roadway including Regional services, asphalt paving, curb and gutter, boulevard sodding, sidewalk, street trees and street lighting for the entire frontage width abutting the ''frozen lots or Block". 18. Prior to issuance of building permits the Owner shall remove any temporary tuming circles location immediately adjacent to this subdivision which are in existence at the time of construction to the satisfaction of the Municipality of Clarington. The Owner shall reconstruct any "external connections' to an urban standard, including asphalt paving, curb, gutter, boulevard sodding, sidewalks, street lighting, street trees in accordance with the standards and requirements of the Municipality of Clarington. . 19. The Owner shall enter into a Development Agreement with the Municipality of C/arington regarding the reimbursement of front-ending agreements entered into between the Municipality and: 1. Schickendanz Brothers Limited (Stormwater Management Works): 2. The Owner of Plan 10M 829 (Stormwater Sewer Oversizing): and 3. The Owner of Plan 40M 1852 (Stormwater Sewer Oversizing). This Development Agreement will contain appropriate clauses regarding the timing and amount of the required front-end payments. Payments shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of the Development Charges legislation, to the satisfaction of the Municipality of C/arington. 20. The Owner agrees to insert a disclosure in all purchase and sale agreements advising home buyers of the municipal parking regulations, to the satisfaction of the Municipality of Clarington. 21. That the Owner shall establish a geodetic benchmark in the vicinity of the intersection of Liberty Street and Concession Road 3, which will serve as a vertical control for the neighbourhood. The Owner shall be responsible for 100% of the cost of establishing this benchmark. 22. The lands within the Plan of Subdivision shall be appropriately zoned in accordance with the Municipality of Clarington zoning by-law to implement the proposed development. 652 23. The Owner shall retain a qualified consultant to prepare and submit a detailed Tree Preservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Municipality of Clarington. 653 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 24. The Owner shall grant such easements as may be required for utilities, drainage and servicing purposes to the appropriate authorities. 25. The Owner shall submit plans showing the proposed phasing to the Region and Municipality for review and approval if this subdivision is to be developed by more than one registration. 26. The Owner shall pay to the Municipality, the development charge in accordance to the Development Charge By-law, as amended from time to time, as well as payment of a portion of front end charges pursuant to the Development Charges Act is any are required to be paid by the Owner. 27. The Owner shall provide and install sidewalks, streetlights, temporary turning circles, signage etc. as per the Municipality's standards and criteria. 28. The Owner shall assume all the costs for provision, installation and location of community mailboxes to service this development, in manner satisfactory to the Director of Engineering Services. 29. The applicant must enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the Municipality of Clarington and agree to abide by all terms and conditions of the Municipality's standard subdivision agreement, including, but not limited to requirements that follow. 30. The Owner shall provide the Municipality, at the time of execution of the subdivision agreement, an unconditional and irrevocable Letter of Credit acceptable to the Municipality's Treasurer, with respect to Performance Guarantee, Maintenance. Guanantee, Occupancy Deposit and other guarantees or deposit as may be required by the Municipality. 31. The Owner agrees that prior to issuance of building permits, access routes to the subdivision must be provided to meet Subsection 3.2.5.2(6) of the Ontario Building Code and, that all watermains and hydrants are fully serviced and the Owner agrees that during construction, fire access routes be maintained according to Subsection 2.5.1.2 of the Ontario Fire Code, storage of combustible waste be maintained as per Subsection 2.4.1.1 and open buming as per Subsection 2.6.3.4 of the Ontario Fire Code. 32. No building permit shall be issued for the construction of any building on any residential Block on said plan, until the exterior architectural design of each building and the location of the building on the lot has been approved by the Municipality of Clarington. 33. The Owner shall be 100% responsible for the cost of any architectural design guidelines specific to this development, as well as 100% of the costs for the 'Control Architect" to review and approve all proposed - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I models and building permits, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services. 34. No residential units shall be offered for sale.to the public on said plan until such time as the exterior architectural design of each building has been approved by the Director of Planning Services. 35. The Owner shall pay the appropriate cash-in-lieu of park lands dedication in to the Municipality of Clarington in accordance with the Planning Act. 36. The Owner agrees to not place fill, grade, construct any buildings or structure without prior written approval begin given by the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority. 37. The Owner shall provide for the extension of such sanitary sewer and water supply facilities which are external to, as well as within, the limits of this plan that are required to service this plan. In addition, the Owner shall provide for the extension of sanitary sewer and water supply facilities within the limits of the plan, which are required to service other developments external to this subdivision. Such sanitary sewers and water supply facilities are to be designed and constructed according to the standards and requirements of the Regional Municipality of Durham. All arrangements are to be made. to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Durham, and are to be completed prior to final approval of . this plan. 38. Prior to entering into a subdivision agreement, the Regional Municipality of Durham shall be satisfied that adequate water pollution control plant and water supply capacities are available to the proposed subdivision. 39. The Owner shall satisfy all requirements financial and otherwise, of the Regional Municipality of Durham. This shall include, among other matters, the execution of a subdivision agreement between the Owner and Region concerning the provision and installation of sanitary sewers, water supply, roads and other regional services. . 40. That the Owner supply on disk, in a CAD format acceptable to the Municipality, a copy of the proposed Plan of Subdivision as Draft Approved and a copy of the Final M Plan. 41. The subdivision agreement between the Owner and the Municipality of Clarington shall contain, among other matters, the following provisions; a) The. Owner agrees to include provisions whereby all offers to purchase and sale shall include information that satisfies Subsection 59(4) of the Development Charges Act, 1997. 42. Prior to final approval of this plan for registration, the Director of Planning Services for the Municipality of Clarington shall be advised in writing by: 654 655 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I a. The Regional Planning Department, how Conditions 2,4, 7, 8, 25, 37 and 39 have been satisfied b) Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, how Condition 36, has been satisfied. NOTES TO DRAFT APPROVAL 1. If final approval is not given to this plan within three years of the draft approval date, and no extensions have been granted, draft approval shall lapse and the file shall be CLOSED. Extensions may be granted provided valid reason is given and is submitted to the Director of Planning Services for the Municipality of Clarington well in advance of the lapsing date. 2. As the Owner of the proposed subdivision, it is your responsibility to satisfy all conditions of draft approval in an expeditious manner. The conditions of draft approval will be reviewed periodically and may be amended at any time prior to final approval. The Planning Act provides that draft approval, may be withdrawn at any time prior to final approval. 3. All plans of subdivision must be registered in the Land Titles system within the Regional Municipality of Durham. 4. Where agencies' requirements are required to be included in the local municipal subdivision agreement, a copy of the agreement should be sent to the agencies in order to facilitate their clearance of conditions for final approval of this plan. The addresses and telephone numbers of these agencies are: a) Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, 100 Whiting Avenue, Oshawa, Ontario L 1 H 3T 3 (905) 579-0411 b) Region of Durham Planning Department, 1615 Dundas Street East, Forth Floor, Whitby Ontario L 1 N 6A3 (905) 728-7731. I' I I I. I I I I I I I: I I I I I 1 I I ATTACHMENT 5 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-lAW NO.2OO5- . , 'beings by~law to amend By.Iaw 84-63. the ComprehensiileZonIng ~y-lawfor the , . Corporation of the Municipalily of Claringlon WHEREAS the CouncH of the Corporation of the Municipality of.CIarington deems II advisable to amend By-law 84-63. as amended of the fornier Town of Newcastle to imptement ~ing amendment apprlC8tion ZBA2004-045; ; ,\ NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOlVED THAT the Cooricl of the Corporation of the , Municipality of ClarinQlon enacts as folows: 1. Sedion 12.4 'SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS -URBAN RESIDENTIAL TYPE ONE (Rl) ZONE" is hereby' amended by adding thereto the following ~ Special exileption 12.4.59 as follows: ,', ' , "SECTION 12.4.59 URBAN RESIOENTIAL EXCEPTION (R1-59) ZONE" NoIwiIhst8nding Sections 3.22. 12.2 d)i)ii) and 1)1). the Ianda zoned Rl-59 on those Schedules to thIa By-law IhaI be subject to. the folloWing regulations: 8) Yard Requirements (mn.r..m) . i) 'front yard ,3.0 metres to an u~ porchlbalCony 4.5 metres to dweIing 6.0 metres to privl!te ,g8l1lg8 or carport ii) exterior side yard 2.0 metres 10 an unenclosed porchIbaIc:ony 4.0 metres to dwelling 6.0 metres 10 private garage or carport iii) sight triangle 6.75 metres Lot Coverage (maximum) 49 percent Notwithstanding the above lot coverage provision, a ooveredand unenclosed porchIbaIc:ony heving no' habitable space IIbo\I8 It shaH be permitted subject to the following: i) in the case of an interior'lot. anunencJosed porch/balcony up to a m;lximum area of 12.0 square melres shall be pennittad provided It , is located In .the fronl yard of Ihe lot and shall not be calculated as lot eoverage;., . ' H) in the case of a comer 101, an unenclosed pOrchIbalcony up. to 'a maximum area of 20 square metres sh!lU be .......lIltad provided It Is located In tha front and/or exterior side yard of the 101 and shall not be calculated as 101 coverage. c) Height of floor deck of unfinclosed porch to finished grade (rnaxi!nu",) , .... b) ~~ 1.Om 2. 8ection 13.4 "SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS - URBAN RESIDENTIAL TYPE TWO (R2) ZONE" is hereby amended by adding thereto the following new Special Exceptions 13.4.35. 13.4:36 and13.4.37 as follows: "SECTION 13.4.35 URBAN RESIDENTIAL EXCEPTION (R2-35)ZONe" , Notwithstanding Sections 3,22. 13.2 bJ I); c) i, ii) and e). the lands zoned f'a-35 on those Schedules to ,this By-law shall be subject, to the following regulations: a) lot Frontage (minimum) 'j) corner 101 13.8 metres 656 Notwithstanding the above lot coverage provision, a covered and unenclosed porchlbalcony having nO habitable space above it shall be permitted subject to the following: i) In the case of an interior lot, an unenclosed porch/balcony up to a maximum area of 12.0 square metres shall be pennitted provided it is Iocaled in the front yard of the lot: II) in the case of a comer Iol, an unenclosed porchIbalcony up to a maximum area of 20 square metres shall be permitted provided it is Iocaled In the front and/or exterior side yard of the lot Height of floor deck of unelldosed porch to finished grade (maximum) 1.0m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I b) Yard Requirements (minimum) i) front yard 3.0 metres to an unenclosed porchIbalcony 4.5 metres to dwelling 6.0 metres to private garage or carport ii) exterior side yard 2.0 metres to an unenclosed porchIbalcony 4.0 metres to dwelling 6.0 metres to private garage or carport iii) sightlriangle 6.75 metres c) Lot Coverage (maximum) 40 percent d) "SECTION 13.4.36 URBAN RESIDENTIAL EXCEPTION (R2-36) ZONE" Notwithstanding Sections 3.22, 13.2 a), b) i), ii), c) i), ii), Iii) and e), the lands zoned R3-36 on those Schedules to this By-law shall be subject to the following regulations: a) Lot Area (minimum) 270 square metres b) Lot Frontage (minimum) i) Interior lot 9 metres ii) comer lot 12 metres c) Yard Requirements (minimum) . i) front yard ' 3.0 metres to an unenclosed porchlbalcony 4.5 metres to dwelling 6.0 rIlelres to private garage or carport II) exterior side yard 2.0 metres to an unenclosed porchIbalcony 4.0 metres to dwelling 6.0 metres to private garage or carport iii) interiOr side yard 1.2 metres on one side end 0.6 metres on the other side of the dwelling unit Iv) sight triangle 6.75 metres d) Lot Coverage (maximum) 45 percent Notwithstanding the above lot, coverage pl'OVlSlOn, a covered and unenclosed porchlbalcony having no habitable space above It shilll be permitted subjeclto the following: i) In the case of an, interior Iol, an unenclosed porchlbalcony up to a maximum area of 12.0 square metres shall be permitted provided il is located in the front yard of the 101 and shall not be calculated as lot coverage; II) In the case of ,a comer lot, an unenclosed porchlbalcony up to a maximum area of 20 square metres shall be permitted provided it is 657 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I located in the front and/or exterior side yard of the lot and shall not be calculated as lot coverage. Height of floor deck of unenclosed porch to finished grade (maximum) 1.0m e) "SECTION 13.4.37 URBAN RESIDENTIAL EXCEPTION (R2-37) ZONE" . Notwithstanding Sections 3.22, 13.2 a, b) i),ii), c) i), ii), iii) and e), the lands zoned R3-37 on those Scheduies to this By-!aw shall be subject to the following regulations: a) Lot Araa (minimum) 270 square metres b) Lot Frontage (minimum) i) ii) interior lot comer lot 9 metres 12 metres i) front yard (minimum) 3.0 metres to an unenclosed porch 4.5 metres to a dwelling 6 metres to a private garage or carport c) Yard Requirements iii) interior side yard 2.0 metres to an unenclosed porch 4 metres to a dwelling 6 metres to a private garage or carport 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 metres on the other side of the dwelling unU ii) exterior side yard IV) sight triangle 6.75 metres d) e) Driveway width (maximum) Lot Coverage (maximum) 4.6 metres 45 percent Notwithstanding the above lot coverage provision, a covered and unel)closed porchIbalcony having no habitable space above it shall be permitted subject to the following: i) in the case of an interior lot, an unenclosed porch/balcony up to a maximum are of 12.0 square metres hall be permitted provided U is located in the front yard of the lot; ii) in the case of a comer lot, an unenclosed porch/balcony up to a maximum area of 20 square metres shall be permitted provided it is located in the front and/or exterior side yard of the lot. Height of floor deck of unenclosed porch to finished grade (maximum) . f) 1.0m BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2005 John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 658 This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2005- passed this day of . 2005 A.D. . CONCESSION ROAD 3 ~ i ; i 1 i ~ i J - ; i \\iiili .....liI'=: .. \ ~ Zoning Change From "(H)R1" To "R1-59" ~*;j Zoning Change From "(H)R1" To nR2-35" ~ Zoning Change From "(H)R1" To "R2-36" _ Zoning Change From '(H)R1n To "R2-37" John Mutton. Ugyor Petti L Barrie.' Municipal Clerk , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 651 :I: Ii: o z Iii w a: I- Ul ~ W CD ::; I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ 660 ATTACHMENT 6 " I- w Z u => ~ 0::: 0- W CJ) Z Cl z 0::: Z 0 z t) w .., b 1.0 30Vld SDNINN3r 133~lS ^3Nl~nOO ~ ;: (:(oO'iT ~~ ,~~~::'OC"_-~': ":...., ".',' ~:Qll ;"7<:"" '-~~~ :.>,~ .' ~ :-::: . =... l::l!!iI;~ ili S , 3nN3A\I SN08 CCi ATTACHMENT 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I- lu z => w a::: ~ CJ) w w Z i2 a::: ~ 0 ...J t) b "<t lu w a: li; ..... z w Cl ~ I- Z :J 0::: w Z 0::: o t) b (<) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I'''. CI~mglOn REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday January 24, 2004 Report #: PSD-015-05 File #: A2002/053, A2003/024, A2005/001 and A2005/002 By-law #: Subject: MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE MEETING OF JANUARY 13, 2005 RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-015-05 be received; and 2. THAT Council concurs with the decision of the Committee of Adjustment made on January 1.3, 2005 for applications A2002l053, A2003/024, A2005/001 and A2005/002; and that Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of theGommittee of Adjustment. Submitted by: . '\ ~O <e~-~ . Reviewed by: U . Franklin. Wu, Chief Administrative Officer av . Creme, MCIP, R.P.P. Director of Planning Services January 17, 2005 TW*CS*DJC*sh CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L tf; 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 662 , , " . REPORT NO.: PSD-015-05 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 All applications received by the Municipality for minor variance are scheduled for a hearing within 30 days of being received by the Secretary-Treasurer. The purpose of the minor variance application and the Committee's decisions are detailed in Attachment 1. The decisions of the Committee are detailed below. DECISIONS OF COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR JANUARY 13, 2005 Application Number Staff Recommendation Decision of Committee A2002/053 Dismiss without prejudice Dismissed without prejudice . A2003/024 Dismiss without prejudice Dismissed without prejudice . A2005/001 Table Tabled A2005/002 Approve with modifications Approved with modifications 2.0 COMMENTS 2.1 Applications A2002/053 and A2003/024 were previously tabled to provide the applicants with the opportunity to submit a site plan amendment application in support of the requested variances. In both cases, the applicants had not proceeded with the applications, therefore it was recommended to dismiss the applications without prejudice. The Committee concurred with Staff's recommendation. 2.2 A2005/001 was an application to retluce the minimum lotfrontage of a proposed lot from 15 metres to 13.83 metres. Engineering Services objected to the proposal due to the curvature of the street and the possibility that the lot would not properly accommodate the creation of a driveway while providing adequate storage area for snow from the driveway, street and adjacent walkway. Staff recommended that the application be tabled for a three (3) month period to provide the applicant with the opportunity to address Engineering concerns. The applicant argued that there was adequate space for both the driveway and snow storage and requested the Committee to deal with the application at the meeting. The Committee decided to table the application for one (1) month. 2.3 Application A2005/002 was submitted to recognize an above ground pool with an attached deck located 0.31 metres to the rear property line. The deck consisted of two levels; the lower level being 1.04 metres to the property line, and the upper level being 0.31 metres to the property line. The pool was 1.11 metres to the property line. Staff was of the opinion that the upper level deck could be easily relocated to comply with the 1.2 metre setback and recommended approval of the 1.04 and 1.11 metre reductions for the lower deck and pool. The Committee concurred with Staff's recommendation. . 663 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PSO.Q15-05 PAGE 3 2.4 Staff has reviewed the Committee's decisions and is satisfied that the applications that received approval are in conformity with the Official Plan policies, consistent with the intent of the Zoning By-law and are minor in nature and desirable. Council's concurrence with the Committee of Adjustment decisions is required in order to afford Staff's official status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the event of an appeal of any decision of the Committee of Adjustment. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Periodic Report for the Committee of Adjustment 664 ATTACHMEffT I Clarinot'W Loadillg the W.., e UI.i . 665 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: OWNER: PROPERTY LOCATION: FILE NO.: CALEDON PROPANE 1494263 Ontario Ltd. 40 PORT DARLINGTON RD.,. BOWMANVILLE PART LOT 10, CONCESSION BF FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF BOWMANVILLE A2002l053 PURPOSE: TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 7.5 METRES TO 3.05 M FOR SHED #1, TO 3.4 M FOR SHED #2, AND TO 4.3 M FOR SHED #3 . DECISION OF COMMITTEE: DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE DATE OF DECISION: January 13, 2005 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: February 2,2005 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I a.. u ~~ PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FILE NO.: 3416674 CANADA INC. 3416674 CANADA INC. 422 LAKE RD." BOWMANVILLE PART LOT 8, CONCESSION BF FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON A2003/024 APPLICANT: OWNER: PROPERTY LOCATION: PURPOSE: TO PERMIT THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 101.38 SQ.M MEZZANINE LEVEL STORAGE AREA WITHIN AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BY REDUCING THE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES TO 90 FROM THE REQUIRED 96. DECISION OF COMMITTEE: DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE DATE OF DECISION: January 13, 2005 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: February 2, 2005 666 C~-ilJgfDn PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: OWNER: PROPERTY LOCATION: L YSYK, GEORGE L YSYK, GEORGE 36 QUINN DR." BOWMANVILLE PART LOT 13, CONCESSION 1 FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF BOWMANVILLE A2005/001 FILE NO.: PURPOSE: TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE FOR A SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING FROM 15 METRES TO 13.83 DECISION OF COMMITTEE: THAT THE APPLICATION BE TABLED UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT ON FEBRUARY 3, 2005 DATE OF DECISION: January 13, 2005 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: February 2,2005 QQ.., I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT ,.~" "~ APPLICANT: :iA OWNER:'1!,c eFt-'N PROPERTY LOCATION: FILE NO.: i ,.,_,10.", ';;f(4~:- '_'._'""'V ARMSTRONG HARRISON ASSOCIATES PILON, ANDRE 105 CLAYTON CR.,. BOWMANVILLE PART LOT 11, CONCESSION 2 FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF BOWMANVILLE A2005l002 DECISION OF E MINIMUM REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK FOR AN CTURE FROM 1.2 METERS TO 0.31 METER TO RECOGNIZE AN D DECK. PURPOSE: TO REDUCE ," ACCESSORY EXISTING P "~ TO APPROVE THE REDUCTION OF THE REAR YARD SETBACK FOR THE EXISTING LOWER DECK PROM 1.2 M TO 1.04 M, AND TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FOR?~E EXISTING POOL AND ASSOCIATED SUPPORT POSTS FROM 1.2 M TO 1.11ffAND THAT THE UPPER DECK BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED WITHIN 90 DAY:~AS THE APPLICATION IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE OFFIGlAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW AND IS DEEMED TO BE MINOR AND DESIRABL~.U .-,1- ?:-,- ,,''%:;:+..< ~i1'-- DATE OF DECI~lpN: January 13, 2005 .!Z-!":'(' LAST DAY OF ~PEAL: February 2, 2005 ;;;}!Z;,-'" fji;i> :'J..' ~".;- ":t: '>",:>. j" u. ,',_. ".:'C~~: .'." ,~.:~- ,-;ljr fC'- -~ -:~;:;.. \ii5;--: lI~~::;: .j!!? ~~. . 668 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Cl!!filJgron REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, January 24, 2005 Report #: PSD-016-05 File #: PLN 25.1.45 By-law #: Subject: PROPOSED STREETNAME CHANGES FOR NORTHWEST BOWMANVlLLE STATUS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-016-05 be received; 2. THAT Staff be authorized to take appropriate actions under Section 47 of the Municipal Act, to advertise and hold a Public Meeting for the proposed street name changes that were chosen by representatives of affected properties who attended the Public Information Session; and 3. THAT the Region of Durham Planning Department be forwarded a copy of this report and advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: A. . 17 Q ,- & ({., Reviewed bY~ ~ _..J / ~ Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer avO . Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning Services BRlDJC/lb January 18, 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 669 REPORT NO.: PSD-016-OS PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 The lands between Middle Road and Scugog Street will be developing over the next few years. In December 2004 draft approved plan of subdivision 18T -87086 was registered as Plan 40M-2225. Draft approved plan of subdivision 18T -87085 is proceeding quickly toward registration. With the construction of these subdivisions, the new road networ1<: intersects with Scugog Street in several locations. Consequently, Scugog Street is divided into several distinct segments that are not continuous (Attachment 1). The discontinuity will generate some confusion with the street names and numbering. On October 25, 2004 Council authorized Staff to consult with residents with respect to changing the street name for segments of Scugog Street. 1.2 The purpose of this report is to infonn Council of the results of the Public Infonnation Session that was held on the evening of November 30, 2004 at the Gamet B. Rickard Recreation Complex. This report also seeks authorization to advertise the proposed street name changes and hold the subsequent public meeting. 2.0 PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSION 2.1 Staff organized and attended a public infonnation. session at the Gamet B. Rickard Recreation Complex in an effort to obtain input from the various property owners with respect to the above-mentioned need to change street names. Notices were sent by first class mail to all landowners on Scugog Street north of the intersection with Middle Road. At the session a few people were in favour of the street name changes. A few people were strongly opposed but, the large majority although opposed at the start of the meeting, came to understand the need for the changes and reluctantly agreed to wor1<: with staff on the selection of the new names. 2.2 Residents were given the opportunity to propose a new street name or select a street name from an approved list of war dead, war veteran and historical street names. Most residents wanted to retain some reference to 'Scugog" in the new street name. Thus North Scugog Court and West Scugog Lane were slillected. . West SCUqoa Lane This proposed name, used on Scugog Street from Middle Road to Bons Avenue, with a new street extension going directly north to Concession Road 3 (Attachment 1) currently has 11 households. Four (4) households were at the session. . North SCUqOq Court This proposed name, used on Scugog Street from Bons Avenue to a future cul-de- sac immediately south of Concession Road 3 (Attachment 1) will be used by 12 current households. Six (6) households were atthe session and representatives of Knox Christian School were in attendance. 670 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PSD-016-05 PAGE 3 The Durham Region Planning Department has approved the two names selected, for use by Clarington. 3.0 OTHER STREET SEGMENTS 3.1 Middle Road . It is proposed that Middle Road from its current southem terminus at Scugog Street, north to. Concession Road 3 (Attachment 1) be renamed Scugog Street. The intersection at a concession road is a more appropriate location for the transition of street names. The only municipal street address for this road segment is St. Stephens Secondary School. The separate school board, has verbally indicated that they accept the Municipality's right to re- name a street but ask that the timing be suitable for St. Stephen's Secondary School. 3.2 Jackman Road The opening of the Longworth Bridge and its westerly connection to Regional Road 57 in December. 2004 necessitate the renaming of the portion of Jackman Road between Longworth Bridge and Regional Road 57 (Attachment 1) at this time, to Longworth Avenue and therefore, it has been induded with the Scugog Street renamings. There are no municipal street addresses on this segment of Jackman Road. 4.0 NEXT STEPS 4.1 The Municipal Act requires that a Public Notice be given prior to holding a public meeting on a street name change. It is proposed that a public meeting be held on February 21, 2005. . 4.2 It will be important to consider the timing of the street name changes in order to give people time to give notice of their change of address. It is recommended that the name changes for Scugog Street and Middle Road be effective September 1, 2005. This timing works well for the three schools affected by the street name change since it occurs at the start of a new school year. There are no households impacted by the renaming of jackman Road, thus it would be renamed effective March 1, 2005. . 5.0 CONCLUSIONS 5.1 It is recommended that staff be authorized to advertise a Public Meeting for the street names changes identified in Sections 2 and 3 of this report. Attachments Attachment 1: Site Location Key Map for Proposed Street Name Changes 671 "I I ""'"Me n I I ... It) o ~ ~ J: It: ::) o ~ j ~ R<"" " '" '" , ~= ~ rfj) ~- - L~ ~.~~/(: .11 I T II ~:/ij - ~ \' '--J . ~ ~~A)~. y =II\~~I ,~:II:R lill : ~ KNOX .~~~ 'r~' ~ 111 Af: ipIf-~- fr/Jl!!ky Q~ == ~ ~~~~~ \: = I I f /'1 : · - - '"' ,\ lfE '1~1M- .: c~v, - ,\--... "'" ~ -.u ~~ ~ -4 ~~~~- I "I:~ ~^~S}~{\ ~ = --U~ \/ r ~ : a /\ : en DUR~M . CHRISTIAN . SECONDARY . SCHOOL . '" : .- ~ : ~d\ . . . . ST. STEPHENS :: IT HIGH SCHo/JL W . .,- . .'-r . :..l ~l . . . . . \\ . l- . W . W . It: it ~~~~:~ ~G~ · ~o ~: ::) p.,,€.~\l : ~ . L~= . - . r-. . ~ ~ I ... It) o ~ It: ~ J: It: ::) o \ ('l~ ~'b -~ ~ II ~I --/ ~ .............~ \ " \~ ~ ''--... ~c Id ~ ~ LONGWORTH ~ ~"'~~'< ~~:: ~ . ~""'"'' :\:,~,:\:\:"...." -.... ,...."......;'-' ....,......., AVENLE "~~ ~ \ ProDosed Street Names ~ 672 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Cl~mgron REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, January 24, 2005 Report#: PSD-017-05 File #: ZBA 2004-025 By-law #: Subject: REZONING APPLICATION TO PERMIT A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE APPLICANT: 1524103 ONTARIO LTD. (HOLBURN) RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT report PSO-017-05 be received; 2. THAT the rezoning application submitted by 1524103 Ontario Ltd. to permit the establishment of a light industrial development be APPROVED for the balance of the lands and that the attached zoning by-law amendment be adopted by Council; 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised .of Council's decision. Submitted by: o~~ Reviewed by: . '. Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer i ;.t. Crome, MCIP, R.P.P. tor of Planning Services CP/DJC/df 20 January 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPAlITY OF CLARINGTON . 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, aoWMANVILlE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 673 REPORT NO.: PSD..Q17..QS PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 Proponents: 1.2 Owner: 1.3 Rezoning Application: 1.4 Location: 1524103 Ontario Ltd. (Holbum Group) 1524103 Ontario Ltd. (Holbum Group) To permit the development of a light industrial use. Part Lot 5, Concession 1, former Town of Bowmanville, west of Bennett Road and south of Highway NO.2. Approximately 8 ha (20 acres) 1.5 Area: 2.0 LOCATION 2.1 The sUbject lands encompass the north portion of applicant's lands fronting on the south side of Highway No.2, west of Bennett Road. The southern portion of the applicant's lands were originally rezoned in June of this year. 3.0 . BACKGROUND 3.1 On May 21, 2004 the application for rezoning was received by the Planning Services Department The proposal was to rezone the subject lands to permit a research and . development facility on the 19.8 ha site. A statutory pUblic meeting for this application was held June 21, 2004. A zoning by-law amendment was approved for part of the . lands at the following Council meeting. The amendment allowed the following list of uses: . a business or professional office provided such use is accessory and incidental to a permitted use otherwise specified herein; . a dry light industrial use; . research and development; and . a researclflaboratory 3.2 On November 8, 2004, Council approved a by-law removal of holding by-law for part of the lands originally rezoned in June which front on Bennett Road. This enabled the commencement of construction of the first building proposed by the Holbum Group in late November, 2004. 3.3 The report at this time is dealing with the balance of the lands not zoned in June of this year, which are still zoned Agriculture. 4.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES 4.1 The site is currently vegetated along the Highway No.2 frontage and has a dwelling fronting on Highway No.2. The site is generally flat sloping slightly to the south and west. The lands have been tiled. ...... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PSO-o17-o5 PAGE 3 4.2 Surrounding Uses: East - North - West - South - agricultural lands residences fronting on the south side of Highway No.2 agricultural lands ,agricultural lands with no buildings, and Highway 401 5.0 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES 5.1 The lands are designated "Employment Area" in the Durham Official Plan. A variety of industrial uses are permitted in this designation. 5.2 The Clarington Official Plan designates the majority of the lands "General Industrial Area", with the lands in the vicinity of Highway No. 2 being designated "Prestige Employment Area". The predominant uses permitted in the Prestige Employment Area designation includes professional, corporate and office buildings, data processing centres, research and development facilities and light industrial uses within wholly enclosed buildings. The General Industrial Area designation is the most permissive industrial designation. The predominant uses include; manufacturing, assembling processing fabricating, refining, warehousing,' storage and repair' and servicing operations. The application conforms. . 6.0 ZONING BY-LAW 6.1 The northem portion of the property is currently zoned Agricultural (A), hence the need for the rezoning. 7.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 7.1 The application for all 19.8 ha of land was originally circulated to a number of agencies for comment. The following is a summary of the agency comments received. . 7.2 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority staff has reviewed the subject application and advise they have no objections in principle to the development. They require a stormwater management plan demonstrating conformity with the Bennett Creek Stormwater Drainage Study (Dillon, 1986 and 1992) prior to the development proceeding. Zoning approval subject to (H) holding symbol is supported. They recommended removal of the holding symbol be withheld until the detailed information has been provided to the Authority's satisfaction. 7.3 Regional Planning Department has provided a co-ordinated response on behalf of Regional Works, Health and Planning. They advise that the lands are designated - 675 REPORT NO.: PSD-017-05 PAGE 4 Regional Planning staff further advised that the potential for environmental site contamination should be addressed through the processing of this application. 7.4 The Clarington Engineering Services Department has no objection in principle to the rezoning application. Preliminary comments were provided with respect to requirements to be considered as part of a future site plan application. The comments advise of transportation requirements as identified in the Clarington Official Plan that must be complied with. Grading and drainage requirements were specified, as well as other engineering design standards and financial requirements to be satisfied. 7.5 Neither the Emergency Services nor the Building Division provided and concem with the rezoning application. They both advised that on-site water will be required for fire protection. . 8.0 COMMENTS 8.1 The HoIbum Group is currently constructing their Phase 1 building. This building has a floor area of almost 3400 m2 (36,700 tr) and will be privately serviCed. However, full services will need to be extended to the property for any further development and to eventually service the building under construction. Holburn's plans for the lands include the construction of two additional buildings for use by the Holbum Group by 2010. In addition, Holbum wants to attract similar companies with an emphasis on medical research and biotechnology. A concept plan for the Holbum Science Park has been prepared (Attachment 2). 8.2 The Municipality is undertaking an Employment Area Study for the lands in east Bowmanville. The purpose of this study is to examine the potential for an expanded science and technology park beyond the 50 acre Holburn parcel, develop an overall master plan and consider any necessary changes to the Clarington Official Plan and Zoning By-law. R7R I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PSO.o17.oS PAGE 5 8.3 The rezoning of the balance of the Holbum lands at this time allows the site to be marketed for the research and development uses. The Bowmanville East Employment Area Study may identify additional uses or specific uses for certain locations in the Bowmanville East area but this will not be compromised by the current rezoning. 8.4 . Three additional uses, in keeping with the primary research and development use are proposed. These include: a conference centre; a training facility, and; a day nursery. In addition, the attached amendment proposes amend the 'M2-17' zone provisions by deleting the term "a dry light industrial use" and replacing with the term "an assembly, manufacturing, or processing plant within a wholly enclosed building or structure". This allows more flexibility for future uses of the site at such time municipal services are extended to the property.. With the Holding symbol in place all servicing issues will be addressed prior to removal of the holding symbol. 8.5 With the completion of the concept plan for the development of the Holbum site, staff is satisfied that the balance of the Holbum lands can be rezoned. This will allow continued development of the Holbum Science Park, subject to site plan approval and removal of the Holding symbol. Based on the list of permitted uses and the zoning performance standards, a high quality research campus can be created. 9.0 CONCLUSIONS 9.1 In consideration of the positive comments received from the circulated agencies and staff comments provided, it is recommended that the rezoning application be approved subject to a holding (H) provision. The holding provision would be removed at such time the detailed development plans and supporting studies have been submitted and the applicant is able to address the provisions of the Official Plan with respect to removal of the Holding symbol. Attachments: Attachment No. 1 - Key Map Attachment NO.2 - Concept Plan Attachment No.3 - Zoning By-law Interested parts to be notified of Council's decision: Victor Rudick Peter Newell Royal Trust Tower 1524103 Ontario Ltd. Ronald & Beatrice Whyte Don Rickard .. Peter Walker Glenn Genge Elizabeth Camenzuli Eugene Douglas Dupuis Terry Price 677 nl ATTACHMENT 1 I I I I I KING STREET EAST ( THE KING'S HIGH....AY /., , \ 1\ '\ '" '" ... '-' z [:J '-' '" .... [:J ...J NO.2) u ..~ ::: ~Q f~ , . -- .................... ........... ......................,........ :::..::::::: .:::::....:............::....:....::::..::::: ::::::::::: .::..:::::..::........:....:......:..::::::: ::....::....:::A.:::::::::::::::::..:::..:::::::: fit .:.:.:~.:.:.:.:.:.:.:!,"".:.:.:.:.:.:.:~.:.:.:~.::.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: I') .:::..::::::1.:..::::::..::....:::..:::..:..::::: .. I ........... ............................ jo-l!i ..:....::::::... :....:........:....:..:..::......:..::::..: ~ a .......... ............................ 4,.:iI; :.:~.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: :t:.:.:.:.:.:.:~.:.::~.:.::.:.:.:.:~.:.:.:.:.:.:. t. = ~:::::::::::::::::: .==:::::::::::::$::::::::::$::::::~:::::::::::::::::: ~ a ~ 1a6 .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.&*:.:-:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: ..................:::::::::::::::......:. ................................................................................... ...................................................................~............. .............................................. ...................... ............ ................................................................... ............. .:..::::::::..::....:......::..........:..............:....::::::: :::::::::::........:......:....:../11....::..:....::. ............................................. .......................-,:,.......i.. ............................................ ................................... . ............................................. .............-........-1,....... . .........................................................-........., -.... . .......................-................... ......................:e ...... . ................................................................... ~... . .::....:::........:............:....:................:......:............:.... :::....:::....:..::::::::...... .::: .. ................................~............ ........................\\:. .... . ......................~............................................~~......... .:::::::::..:..::...::..::::...::..:::s:..:::::::::::::::::::::"::.~;;;':::::::ail.:::::.. .:::....:::..........................:1:1:.............::..:..:::::..:::....::..:..:..::.. ::::::.~E .:....::::. ...:..:..:::::::....::..::..::::..:::....E.......:....:......:::..:..:::::..::...W::..:....... ....:....:::....:. ...:........:..............:............:...:........~...........:::::..:::.......~.......:::;;..::..:....:. ..:..:::............. z [:J ril .", z "" ... '" .... [:J ...J I '" II ... "" '-' lli! "" z ... [:J .... '-' c:;; "' ..... [:J ...J '" > !~ R~,.. "'-2 ~:M ..~<'l ~~e - - J , . '" t N I . '" C> d z ...i Q. cl - '" ... !I~ ~ '" i '" .... ! .... .... .~ ... .. PRIlPDSED 3.0.. \,ID RlIAD \JIDENlNG (0.02 ....l BASELINE ROAD (UNOPENED ROAD AlLO....ANCE BET~EEN B.r AND CONCESSION 1) I B " I;; '" "' z ~ ZBA 2004-025 Zoning By-law Amendment t:::::~:::::::::I Lands Subject To Rezoning Subject Site Applicant: 1524103 Ontario Ltd. ( Holbum Group) . 1:7R I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ATTACHMENT 2 HOLBURN Concept Drawing t First Building I ~;/ '\. " I ,.~ I I Legend ....., , . Gateway "-* . 679 By-Law read a second time this day of 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ATTACHMENT 3 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON . BY-LAW NUMBER 2005- being a By-Law to amend By-Law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-Law for the Colporation of the Municipality of Claringlon. WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems tt advisable to amend By-Law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle in accordance with application ZBA 2004-025 to pennit a light industrial use on the subject lands; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporali?n of the Municipaltty of C1arington enacts as follows: 1. Section "23.3.11 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL EXCEPTION (M1-11) ZONE" is hereby amended as follows: i) by deleting "b) a dry light industrial use" and replacing with" b) an assembly, manufacturing, or processing plant within a wholly enclosed building or structure" in Section (2) i) b). il) by deleting the word "and" after the words "research and development use;" in Section (2) i) c). iii) by edding "e) a conference centre; f) a training facility, and g) a day nursery". In Section 2 I). 2. Schedule "1" to By-law 84-63, as amended is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Agricultural (A) zone to "Holding - General Industrial Exception ({H)M2-17) Zone" as shown on the attached Schedule "A" hereto. 3. This By-Law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to. the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990. By-Law read a first time this day of 2004 By-Law read a third time and finally passed this day of 2004 John Mutton, Mayor . 680 Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2004- , passed this day of . 2004 A"D" HIGHWAY 2 ..................................... :::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::;,:::::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::;,::::::;,;,:~:;,::::::::::;,::;,::::;,;,::::;,::::::;,::::::;,:::~~:::::::::o ........................................................................ ~ II: E z Z ILl III Unopened Rood Allowance Between Broken Front And Concession 1 John Uutton, Mayor IIllI Zoning To Remain "M2-17" ~ Zoning To Remain "(H)M2-17" . t::::::::::::::;,:::1 Zoning Change From "A" To "(H)M2-17" Patti L Barrie. "Municipal Clerk LOT 8 LOT 7 LOT 6 LOT 5 ~ - -- ~ 0: HIGIiw..V 2 Ul CD ~ ElASEUNE ROAD EAST ~ ~ 681 Bowmanvllle I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CI![-!lJglOn. REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, January 24, 2005 . Report#: EGD-01-05 File#: Resolution #: By-law #: Subject: MONTHLY REPORT ON BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY FOR DECEMBER, 2004. Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD-01-05 be received for information. Submitted by: A S. Cannella, C.ET. Director of Engineering Services ASC*RP*bb January 6, 2005 _ . Reviewed bY:O ~'.::.. Cc~ Franklin Wu Chief Administrative OffICer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ClARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-9282 701 REPORT NO.: EGD-01-05 PAGE 2 1. BACKGROUND: 1.1 With respect to the Building Permit Activity for the month of December 2004, Staff wish to highlight the following statistics for the information of Committee and Council. MONTH OF % DECEMBER YEAR TO YEAR TO CHANGE DATE 2004 DATE 2003 OF VALUE . 2004 YTO 04-03 . Permits Issued 68 1430 1114 28.4% VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION Residential $5,374,685 $167,313,538 $127,316,034 31.4% Industrial $260,000 $6,717,367 $3,159,296 112.6% Government $0 $4,029,000 $158,500 2442.0% Commercial $131,000 $11,993,397 $2,050,904 484.8% Institutional $0 $20,387,505 $10,642,864 91.6% Agricultural $1,048,599 $3,066,358 $1 ,233,460 148.6% Ontario Power Generation $0 $80,000 $27,5~1,647 -99.7% Miscellaneous $2,400 $261,164 $256,950 1.6% TOTAL $6,816,684 $213,848,329 $172,409,655 24.0% The following is a historical comparison of the building permits issued for the month of "DECEMBER" and "YEAR TO DATE" for a three year period. $8.000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 II value Historical Data for Month of "December" Historical Data "YEAR TO DATE" $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 $0 2004 2003 IIvalue $213,848,329 $172,409,655 2002 $120,784,848 -.J 702 I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: EGD-01-05 PAGE 3 The following is a comparison of the types of dwelling units issued for the month of "DECEMBER" and "YEAR TO DATE". Dwelling Unit Type "DECEMBER 2004" 3 Single Detached 6% o Apartment 0% 410 Sem~ Detached 40% 45 Tov.nhouse 90% . Single Detached 3 ISl Semi-Detached 2 I] Townhouse 45 m Apartment 0 Dwelling Unit Type ''YEAR TO DATE 2004" 411 Single Detached 41% II Single Detached 411 ~ Semi-Detached 410 DTownhouse 157 mAparbnent 37 1.2 With respect to building permit activities (over $250,000) and large residential building permit activities, the details are provided as follows: APPLICANT CONSTR TYPE I Poultry Barn John Osborne Attachment #1 - Monthly Building Permit Activity Report Attachment #2 - Historical Comparison of Building Permit 703 LOCATION VALUE 3897 Cone. Rd 4, Clarke $1,017,099 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Municipality of Clarington Building Services - Monthly Activity Report December 2004 2004 2003 Type of Constroction December Year to Date December Year to Date Residential: Single Detached 3 4\1 14 388 Semi-Detached 2 410 2 260 Townhouse 45 157 0 10 Apartment 0 5 2 10 Other Construction 8 259 5 235 Sub Total 58 1242 23 903 Industrial: New Building 0 9 0 6 Addition! Alteration 3 11 1 6 Su b Total 3 20. 1 12 Government: New Building 0 3 0 2 Addition! Alteration 0 2 1 3 Sub Total 0 5 1 5 Commercial: New Building 0 18 0 5 Addition!Alteration 2 37 3 40 Sub Total 2 55 3 45 Institutional: . New Building 0 4 0 3 Addition! Alteration 0 \1 0 8 Sub Total 0 15 0 11 Agricultural: New Building 1 27 1 21 Addition/Alteration 1 3 0 3 Sub Total 2 30 1 24 Ontario Power Gen.: New Building 0 0 0 6 Addition! Alteration 0 1 0 5 So b Total 0 1 0 11 HV AC, Plum bing & Miscellaneous: I 37 2 73 Demolition: 2 25 1 30 TOTALS 68 1430 32 1114 2004 2003 December Year to Date December Year to Date Residential: $5,374,685 $167,313,538 $5,388,123 $127,316,034 Industrial: $260,000 $6,717,367 $8,000 $3,159,296 Government: $0 $4,029,000 $95,000 $158,500 Commercial: $131,000 $11,993,397 $60,000 $2,050,904 Institutional: $0 $20,387,505 0 $10,642,864 Agricultural: $1,048,599 $3,066,358 $102,465 $1,233,460 Ontario Power Generation: $0 $80,000 0 $27,591,647 Miscellaneous: $2,400 $261,164 $5,000 $256.950 TOTALS $6,816,684 $213,848,329 $5,658,588 $172,409,655 704 .. I I . I I . . I . . . . . . I . I ~,I . Decem ber 2004 PERMIT FEES 2004 December Year to Date $49,044 $1,438,534 2003 December Year to Date $38,855 $1,139,119 Building Inspections Plumbing Inspections 2004 December Year to Date 896 7433 680 5564 1576 12997 2003 December Year to Date 501 5924 289 4630 790 10,554 TOTALS Single Detached Semi-Detached Townhouse Apa rtments 2004 December Year to Date 3 411 2 410 45 157 o 37 50 1015 December 14 2 o 37 53 2003 Year to Date 388 260 10 185 843 TOTALS YEAR: 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 AREA (10 month) Bowmanville 587 468 345 312 188 184 313 423 217 229 406 Court ice 173 180 133 129 231 296 254 295 331 170 388 Newcastle 191 123 131 76 110 78 4 5 3 4 Wilmot Creek 25 29 38 24 19 21 33 21 16 16 10 Orono 2 1 1 1 2 Darlington 15 13 17 47 102 31 14 20 17 21 11 Clarke 10 16 15 9 17 17 12 20 10 7 8 B urketon 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 Enfield 3 Enniskillen 1 2 5 7 6 3 7 3 1 Hampton 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 Haydon 1 1 2 Kendal 1 3 2 1 Kirby . 1 Leskard 1 1 Maple Grove 1 1 Mitchells Comers 1 Newtonville 5 3 3 3 1 . 2 2 Solina 3 3 1 1 1 Tyrone 3 9 3 TOTALS 1015 843 701 609 679 640 636 801 601 447 834 705 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '. ClfJ!ilJgton REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: January 24, 2005 Resolution #: Report #: CSD-D1-D5 File#: By-law #: Subject: Municipality of Clarington participation inthe Summer Jobs Service Program Recommendations: .,.'. It is respectfully-recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT ReportCSD-01-05 be received for information. Reviewed bQ~ ~---Cv\7t..c Franklin W.U . Chief Administrative Officer Submitted by: J h. Caruana . ector of Community Services JPC/BT/jm CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOW MANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1 C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-5506 . - . 1001 REPORT NO.: CSD..()1..()5 PAGE 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " ;. ;'" 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 Summer Jobs Service is a student job subsidy program created by the Province of Ontario and is facilitated in Durham Region through the John Howard Society. 1.2 The Summer Jobs Service program provides a $2.00 per hour wage subsidy to employers who employ students for the summer. The program also posts jobs, which are subsidized by the program, in the Summer Jobs Service job bank for student access. 1.3 The Summer Jobs Service program offers free training to students in areas such as jOb search and self-marketing skills. This program is designed to help eligible youth (see section 2) prepare for employment, gain employment experience and stay in school. ' 1.4 This is the third year that the CommunitY SerVices Department has initiated the program on behalf of the Municipality. 4.0 . Comments 4.1 Through staff initiatives to pursue this program, the Municipality submitted requests for 117 student positions, however received approval for 42, students in the Summer Jobs Service program. The total subs~y received by the Municipality of Clarington from the Summer Jobs Service program was $26,450.00. This is a decrease from 2003 as the number of employers participating in the program has increased. It Sf:1ould be noted that eligibility does not guarantee the employer will receive $2.00 per hour per student as the total funds are distributed by formula to the participating employers. 1002 . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , " REPORT NO.: CSO.01-05 . PAGE 3 4.2 Departments do not budget for this revenue as the program is not guaranteed from year to year. The funds are recognized in a miscellaneous revenue account specific to each department. . 4.3 The program has again been approved for 2005 and the Community Services Department wilt be submitting applications on behalf of the municipality at the appropriate time. 1003 II II.' II II I I. II II 11 II III II II II II. II II I I I '. ".... Cl9!llJgton REPORT . . . COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMi:NT Meeting:' General Purpose and Administration Committee '. Date: January 24, 200S Resolution I: Report #: CSD-D2-DS. . . File #: By-Jaw I: Subject: Newcastle Village Recreation Facility Needs Assessment Recommendations: It is respectfully.recommended that the Ge~eral Purpose and AdministratiOn Committee recommend to Council the following FORTHWiTH.... . 1. . THAT Report CSD-02-05 be reviewed;. . . . 2. . THAT staff be authorized to Issue a requeSt for proposal for consulting serviceS' to conduct a facility needs assessment for a Recreation .Complex located in . Newcastle Village. . Reviewed bb. Franklin Wu Chief Administrative Officer Submitted by: eph P. Caruana Director of Conimunity Services JPCIta .. 1004 r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: CSD-02-05 . PAGE 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 During a recent work session, Council provided direction for staff to prepare a terms of reference (attachment #1) for consulting services to. provide a facility needs assessment towards the development afa new recreation facility lacated in the Village of Newcastle. 1.2 The needs assessment will identify potential companents for the new facility. Once identified the consultants are to prepare preliminary capital construction estimates and operating expenses of the recommended companents. Once established the consultants will further identify and provide comment on the potential impact of a new facility on existing facilities. I 1.3 In determining the requested information the consultant will be required to conduct a review of existing facilities identifying any deficiencies and provide an inventory of recreatianal oppartunities currently available to our residents. 1.4 Existing and emerging trends related to the provision of recreational facilities and. programs. will be.. identified by developing a socia-demographic profile of the community. This will be particularly helpful in identifying implications or impacts on current and future demands for indoor recreation services. 1.5 Finally, the consultants will also. explore the opportunities for public and non-proflt agency partnerships that will improve the provision. of recreatian facilities and. services in order to maximize limited municipal resources. 2.0 COMMUNITY CONSULTATION 2.1 As is aur standard practice the consultant will be required to conduct a comprehensive community consultation process. 2.2 Through this process aur various communities stakeholders (general public, user. groups, school boards, boards of management etc.) will be pravided with an appartunity to voice their apinions regarding community needs and suggested facility components. 3.0 COMMENT 3.1 The study is estimated to take approximately (4) four months to complete, praducing a final report for presentation to. Council in June or early Juiy of 2005. CORPORATION o.F THE MUNICIPALITY o.F CLARINGTo.N 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE. ONTARIO. L1C3A6T.{905)623-3379 F (905)623-5506 . . . " 1fJ05 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT CSD-02-0S. ATTACHMENT #1 TERMS OF REFERENCE 1.0 Purpose The Municipality of Clarington is seeking proposals from qualifiecfconsultants to provide professional services in preparing a study for a new recreation facility in Newcastle Village. The purpose of the project is to; a) identify potential indoor facility components for the new recreation facility in Newcastle Village; and b) identify capital and operating cost scenarios of the various facility components identified; and c) identify the potential impact of the new recreation facility on existing recreation facilities. The Study's conclusions will be based upon a series of inputs including expressed community need, current and projected usage demands, and consultation with key stakeholders and municipal staff. 2.0 Background Clarington is located in the Region of Durham on the shores of Lake Ontario. The Municipality contains a dynamic mix of urban and rural communities and offers its. residents and businesses a vibrant and prosperous. lifestyle. Clarington's main settlement areas include Bowmanville, Courtice, Newcastle, and Orono. . With an estimated population of over 80,000, Clarington is the fastest growing municipality east of Toronto (over 4% per year). The Province of Ontario has plans to extend Highway 407 to Clarington, which may help to sustain high rates of population growth into the future. The projected population for 2016 is over 104,000 people. Clarington has a relatively youthful age profile and is expected to remain this way into the future as more families and young adults are attracted to the Municipality's many job opportunities and high quality of life. The Newcastte Village urban area is located north of Lake Ontario, bounded by the Wilmot Creek Valley and Highway 35/115 to the west; Concession #3 to the north; and Arthur Street, The Canadian Pacific Railway and the Graham Creek Valley to the east. Newcastle Village and surrounding area currently has an estimated population approaching 15,000. The ten year projection for the catchment area provides for a population of 20,000. The urban area provides for a mix of residential, commercial, institutional and industrial uses, as well as an identtfication of natural heritage features. General demographic information may be obtained from the Municipality's website at www.municipality.clarington.on.ca under the 'Business' link. . 1006 REPORT CSD-02-0S. ATTACHMENT #1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TERMS OF REFERENCE continued Clarington offers exceptional recreational and leisure opportunities for all ages and abilities through the many programs and facilities provided by the Municipality. Our recreation services and facilities are integral to the high quality of life in the Municipality.. The Community Services Department is responsible for the planning, design, construction and operation of indoor recreation facilities. The Municipality has identified a site, and secured the required lands, for the development of a recreation complex in Newcastle Village. The Municipality also owns 'and operates various indoor recreation facilities, as listed below: 1. Garnet B. Rickard Recreation Complex 2. South Courtice Arena 3. Darlington Sports Centre 4. Courtice Community Complex 5. Clarington Fitness Centre 6. Bowmanville Indoor Soccer/Lacrosse Bowl 7. Newcastle Uons Outdoor Pool 8. Orono Pari< Outdoor Pool Clarington's rapid growth has created the need to continue to provide indoor recreation facilities. Other factors affecting the provision and delivery of indoor sports facilities in Clarington include: . escalating service expectations and budget pressures - there is a need to gain a true understanding of both our own and the community's priorities; we also need strategies to prioritize competing services within budget limitations and to prioritize public requests; . emerging trends and issues in the sport and recreation sector - there is a need to conduct community consultation to identify the current leisure needs and preferences of local residents; and . a willingness to engage public and non-profit agencies in partnership agreements to improve the provision of recreation facilities and services in order to maximize limited municipal resources. 3.0 Project Scope & Requirements It is the purpose of this Study to develop a comprehensive list of indoor recreation facility components that will provide the Municipality a clear strategy for the design and construction of a new recreation facility in Newcastle Village. The Study will identify which components are to be considered in the initial stage of construction as well as which components should be considered in any future expansion plans for this indoor facility. . 1007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT CSD-02-0S - A TIACHMENT #1 TERMS OF REFERENCE continued Consideration should be given to how this facility will not only service the needs of residents of Newcastle Village, but also to those who reside in the surrounding areas of the Municipality. The Study will review the existing inventory of municipally-owned and operated recreation facilities as well .as those operated by independent boards and other providers of recreation facilities. Specifically, the Study will consider the impact a new recreation facility will have on. the Newcastle Arena. Orono Arena, Newcastle Community Hall and any other surrounding facilities. This purpose will be achieved through the completion of the following objectives: a} Review and summarize the inventory of indoor recreation facilities in the Municipality of Clarington, including all facilities that are available for public use. The Municipality will provide an up-ta-date inventory of municipally operated recreation facilities. b} Identify existing local, regional, provincial and national trends and emerging trends relating to indoor recreational participation and facility design. Trends in local usage patterns should be documented and assessed in terms of how this is likely to impact future demand and provision. . c} Develop a socio-demographic profile of the community and identify its implications on the current and future demand for indoor recreation services. d} Undertake a process to obtain input from community stakeholders, Municipal staff and officials, the general public, and non-municipal indoor recreation facility providers (see Section 4.0 of the Terms of Reference for more information on the consultation program). The successful consultant will be expected to review and incorporate into the study relevant background information provided by various municipal departments. Key information sources for this project (to be provided by the Municipality) include, but are not limited to: . Population forecasts (Development Charges Study - ongoing) . Stakeholder contact information .. Recreation facilities inventory data and mapping . 2001 Census data . Digital aerial photography . Clarington Official Plan NOTE: Referenced information will only be provided to the successful consultant. 191)8 REPORT CSD-OMS. ATTACHMENT#! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II TERMS OF REFERENCE continued 4;0 Community Consultation Consultation with stakeholders and the public at large is a key element in this Study. It is expected that the consultant will solici~ input from the community in terms of current issues and needs, trends, future needs, partnership arrangements, and potential strategies. The consultant will also receive feedback on the interim and draft reports from the community. In their proposal, the consultant is asked to. propose the most appropriate, effective, and efficient approach for soliciting public and stakeholder input in keeping with the goals and objectives of this Study. The community consultation process should aim to create buy-in without raising unrealistic expectations. At a minimum, it is expected that the consultant will: a) contact organized users of indoor recreation facilities through interviews, surveys, and/or focus groups to identify/discuss issues and concerns; b) contact key providers of indoor recreation facilities (e.g., school boards, boards of management, etc.) to discuss usage levels, long-term availability, partnership opportunities, etc.; c) undertake a minimum of one public meeting/open house to solicit the input of the community, with additional meetings as required. In addition to the aforementioned requirements, the consultant in their proposal submission may consider other consultation techniques that would benefit the . Study. The Municipality will be responsible for advertising and providing space for the public meetings, as well as providing stakeholder contact information. The consultant will be responsible for the preparation of presentation materials, facilitating the public sessions, and providing summaries of the sessions. The consultant will also be required to organize, attend and facilitate meetings with the department staff, as required, in order to gather input and feedback. Additional meetings and/or discussions may be required with Municipal staff to gather information or discuss iS5ueslideas. One meeting will also be required with the General Purpose & Administration Committee or Council to present the final report. 5.0 Deliverables The consultant will prepare a draft report outlining the complete study findings. Four (4) copies of the draft report will be SUbmitted to the Municipality. 1009 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6.0 7.0 REPORT CSD-02-0S. ATTACHMENT #1 TERMS OF REFERENCE continued Once final consultations are complete, the consultant will provide 15 (fifteen) copies of the final repor! in a 'user-friendly' design. The final report (and any interim reports) shall be provided in a printed version suitable for reproduction in either black and white or colour (if applicable). It is expected that the final report will be ready for presentation to the General Purpose and Administration Committee and/or Council in mid June 2005. The consultant will be in attendance at these meetings to make a presentation of the Study. Project Administration The Municipality's Project Manager for this Study is Mr. George Acom, Facilities Mimager in the Community Services Department who will be the primary contact for the Consultant throughout the project and will be reSponsible for administration of the contract. . Key Municipal staff will be available to provide input and feedback to .!be consultant throughout the process. Meetings with applicable staff will be scheduled as required. Timing As indicated in Section 5.0 of this Terms of Reference, the project is expected to be finalized and presented in mid June 2005. ~ 1010 I :~ I Meeting: I Date: I Subject: I I RECOMMENDATIONS: I I I I I I Submitted by: I I PLB*CAG*cd I I I I Report #: REPORT GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE January 24, 2005 CLD-03-05 File#: By-law #: ANIMAL SERVICES QUARTERLY REPORT;" OCTOBER - DECEMBER, 2004 It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. 2. THAT Report CLD-03-Q5 be received; and THAT a copy of Report CLD-03-Q5 be forwarded to the Animal Alliance of Canada and the Animal Advisory Committee. O~~~~ . Reviewed by: Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOW MANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1 C 3AB T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-6506 1101 REPORT NO.: CLD..()3..()S PAGE 2 of2 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT Commencing with the statistical information for 2004, Animal Services activities will be reported to Council on a quarterly basis. The attached table summarizes the activities and revenues pertaining to Animal Services for the months October to December, 2004. Please note that the Year-to-date totals for the dogs which have been "brought in" to the shelter and for the dogs retrieved by owners are down as compared to the 2003 totals. Staff attributes this reduction primarily to improved responsible pet ownership. Attachment #1 Animal Services Monthly Report Interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Ms. Liz White Animal Alliance of Canada Animal Advisory Committee 1102 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I CLERK'S DEPARTMENT ANIMAL SERVICES DIVISION ANIMAL SERVICES MONTHLY REPORT October, November, December 2004 ATTACHMENT NO.1 TO REPORT NO. CLD-03-05 ACTIVITIES . December Yr. to Date 04 Yr. to date 03 ICKED UP - WILDLIFE 1 113 123 DOGS CATS DOGS CATS DOGS CATS ICKED UP 11 14 175 175 225 197 EUGHT IN 6 43 126 330 163 328 RIEVED BY OWNERS 8 1 181 26 249 16 iOLD TO RESIDENTS 6 45 99 351 117 371 OLD TO RESEARCH 0 0 0 0 0 0 tHANISED 2 2 8 45 4 66 . 9 EAD ON ARRIVAL 1 13 83 18 72 . fUARANTINE 1 1 4 11 3 13 IlRITTEN WARNINGS . 10 260 285 4 13 63 .OA TICKETS _ONVICTIONS 2 12 36 ALL-OUTS AFTER HOURS 1 35 33 [ER TIME HOURS 110 108 8 B. REVENUES IGS & CATS RELEASED 40.00 0 625.00 270.00 705.00 605.00 LICENSES 330.00 100.00 52730.00 14046.00 51078.00 14070.00 1-0 TO RESEARCH 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ TO RESIDENTS 300.00 2025.00 5700.00 14895.00 7740.00 15570.00 S & CATS REDEEMED 339.00 0 8026.00 293.00 9864.00 262.00 ,.SUB TOTAL 1009.00 2125.00 67081.00 29504.00 69387.00 30507.00 REVENUE 18.00 3152.00 249.00 96834.00 558.00 100452.00 IUTHANISED Jan. 1 dog injured 1 dog behaviour problems 1 sick cat 1 feral cat I 1103 Ms. Liz White Animal Alliance of Canada 221 Broadview Avenue Suite 101 Toronto, ON M4M 2G3 Animal Advisory Committee I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ Interested parties to be advised of Council's decision regarding Report CLD-03-05: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . REPORT. .eoRPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT 'Meetlng: GENERAL PURP~ANOAOMlf'STRATJON COMMITTEE Date: . . January 24. 2005 Report t: CC)D.003.05 RIa' " .,. By-'. Subject: TENDER CL2004 38, GRASS CUTTING AND fIT mJlll'. ~tIone: 1t.1s reepeclfl.tlly *lOfl1"erlded that theG...."IIllU l!rJlldMl.llilislratlon aQUA J ilIIJWCOI'!lIl\8lllf. CoundIthe~.o: . . . '0 THAT Report COl)<<)3.45 be ~.t.ad; . ' . , . . ," .. . 2; THAT Tom'. LIl..~IgMA.,_..~t..Olltll"~_ .~iIW.bilI_"'or' 't80:*.C14 <l*'GS1'}.. tlIlngthe ",rxi. . !iIllebidder n .." .... .....:~... .,. cll'~ or T..- Cl20CM .. _.1)&. ~. i11 the line (3) ,... --..a _ ... CUllIng Ind lllllilllilg_SeclIIllw 1. I Ind 3...... .~~..0Il. [on -llIO$j:Wl.tlilliltlnd . 0 3. ..,..T...leqIIftd__be __--_,JIIih..:tJe )'I8I'...QlInII1t.....~ far_ ~ '.' ..../....... ...... .' ~ . , ,. . SubmIlIed by. . .~ ,< ..._~.- DIl.aororCcxpoi_~;."... .... ~_. orOperations . .. ~t.."."./~. ~i .......d .0 . ~::"".' .. . . ChIIf~IliI.".()lJicer MMIlABIeo · 11t.l REPORT NO.: C~3oOI .8AcKGRouND ANDiXi..." " "....'2< ...",.,",<'k,'.:::"O;,;';.>-... ..: ...., .,'..,:....,..,.:.. r' _F?'~""- -,....-.. -, .. .....', :) ~)~~:f,' . ~ 'i, - .. ',- .-',. ",..,',- -. ,:> '.. :'.:';..':-:.'.'~ ,..';.".'.....' '" ...... ",' '-':.,:- :',-'-,' .'- T.... _'publicly .a..du' .....ClIIIIId rar .'11.' (I) ~_ ~ r .,.11I T.ill Ol.l~ __ by"'OpeIIIIIonI DIpeltll_ ..' 1. . .. .". Sublequlnlly. tIndelI....Il~:ntMd ........~..~ ".In.. Tam"la l8mel.,rlQ U8lllll_ & o.lgn $11I,051- .", 0rDlI0 Suflup COI/1011111Oil 0nIIIID. ..73t~. ..,~ _025..,..,. . Error .>,/,;",'. '<:';""_0"-:""',.> , .' . -~.,. "-,' '-,:~;/" .. . __ ..,' " .. ',_ ,_ ...... .'.. ".-".... ,'.0 ", ,_ .. '0> ,_ ',' ,', ,-:_),:,-: ,.: ',,' ,.,0'.. ", ",-: . ......... II*..:aIo.II rMI'~d .._~ .. .. ~.GIfer' pIllling IIl0! ...... ~ .,..-....... ':".. "',:-<'-~;":-',:{',,::-':,._'_.,: .. _-,,-'>"::-'\f::"~:-''''':'<,- .....(3}...... ....~ -:.~~ '.l4..~"__"'_~,J. [(~,'''JIJII'I .. '11.,.",:.,.. TheklWbirfllllJlli;~rL..f",~~(,.qf.ltjl ilC.&~ 1Jl:1&.1....~l;i 1IIIlof -"':" ", -,' - - , - .',' ,"-';;-', ,'-' .:" _ ---~- '-:-- -",-,.~:: '.",f,,-::;'.!jf7"i,"\ '110,134.14 _taxae far..........~ .'\IIInl....,.....* "-11. bellii...-.IIT rlT.-lM- 1IId. flIreach 1ellIIcn. ......... WlIUIII bit ..~ LIllfu4Iiil....~. t ~~'.' '(" 'ftIiIP &ow llII:",~ .......... UMlIgn flIr8ecllrJn2. ........Jid__of.1i4..U~#sIaiIt.. . _ ....m..dlII~ _1n...Jl104....... _COlt ~._.....ftlIt;ih~i....'QfliillY "* 11I11 .. ~11111111n ......i,. SIIIf... COI T'l'l~ lheoplOhof ,................UULJ..~I2II1.~.~~.......Gf GIIPIIIIIlmllllrnlntlhllllnot......:L:....11. fir rT ~.IlII....A.........I..L.tJU IlllJ " . ..-.. ...' .. -. '. ;.' '..,,' -.. ' .. ."..'-.,:-:'~: ',,': ':"-';"-"".'" ..bien b_ iN d under ..' ..... '#}~~: .. ,.--""',,'::,, TllIIl'. LandIcIpIng ha pre4irlully pMonAld Ill/ i JtoIty flIr the ~,.of~.I(~!1I!! 'II _.. p.sdlllg ttne (3) yearGr811 CuIIng 8Ild TIIrnmlnf Q)..... '. c . '<~;%;~,~: . . .'..'.......-. M1rbther nMIw and ln8IyIIIof...tlldabr..... :1:, d'3s1 iII,j..en4\hePw~'lyl*M.r 9"'.111 ,.",..,I..Kled .. \he .....Ihlll for PM111, ~ lIlCt-,a be.. rJld.. TClm'a.Lal rtWTlfV~ IH ..11 _. 0eIIgn. 0IhaWa. OntarIo. .' . - ;~ '.;- , '" '1!Ot :','i'{' '-~ ;;,./:f' .. .,;'Y::- ".'>:P; <,,;,f',_<- .-,/.,,--.- ,I~ I I I I I I I. 'J ''-'''- " I I I I I I I. I I l, ,-'~ ^-y I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: COD-003.o& PAGE 3 The DirecIPr of Finance has reviewed the fundIlIo ~ end COI1ClII$.wIlh 1IIe reoOllll1llllld8llon. Queries wIlh respect to department.needs, 'PI.'. ..... elc., IhouId .......NC1 to theOir8cll3r of Operations. , cortPOftA1:IOHOF THE MUNICIPA.UTY OF CLARlNGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVlu.I;otn'AAIO l1C. 3A6 T{90S)623-3379 F (905)623-3330 . ..U03 . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUJlject: REPO:RT CQRPQRATe SERVlCEaDePARTMENT Meeting:. G NEfW. PURPOSE Ne..'"USTRATlON COMMllt~ Date: , Report #: C I ,1 FIe' ey.w. NICATIONS....sUI..TANT Recom_ndations: Itla respectfully r_llIhe.lded that the . ~ to CouftcII the following: 1. THAT The preaentation from 2. THAT Report CO[)..()()4005 be ref"'" .to.$lafJ for a fII1her reported . recommendations to be bRXlQht back.. for approval; .. .~ and Adt<........ OJ .~iIhe .' .' . .. . -~-~~ ...... . . H.a.sc. c . ... " . '0" Director of Corpolat6 .~ MM\LAB\eo .. t.. \' , 6"~..LL~ by. .... ""- Franlllln Wu, Chl8fAdn'M.... OffIcer '_'cy REPORT NO.: C()().OQ4.Of ,AGE 2 d,: ",..<;,,'. BACKGROUND ANDOOtIMI!NT . . .. . . .. . . . . . In December, 200a~~h-d ~_"'ofa T818CtJl1111l1ri'~JD~nI~_tD . IIIBS8 ourcwrent l81.a~ r . r ),18.... ttJ...... ....~ for the ..........,....: See R~C0D-047~.....IlCIt.~ "A", . . . . . . . -. .. . ..... ... .' TheNport_ been corrpil1l d..fa b8ln9"a;...jb-t...~ S*Q..'t~nlil.to CouncIl for lnJoIl.18tIon ai1d dIl~ It fa reapecfuIy reqtlsstect.._.-pon be.ltfllt'Jd....... for.....\IiIo<....... NCOmrrl8IIMOilS. . '"'''~~ '. \ "" . . . ... .. . CQRPORA_()F.,.IMRC1P...._'Ol.c.RItI~tot.. ..'CO~ESTRCET;.towMANVIL1$.ONf..tt03A&f~F~....... . · .120'5 I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. - ;:" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Sclilldul, ..... ".-' COD-004-GS CORPOftATES , Meetint: Date: "~. Reportt: COO.047-04 AND' RIQllF$TFOR SUPPLY AND INST RecommeIldatIoas Subject " Isl~ ~ 1hIIt' tIW 1'8COIlIQlen(I.~ tIW fallowing: 1. THAT RIpcit COI).()47.04be 2. THAT HIli_lion ~'Ii ......of $119,481.42 ( G.S:f.). . ellllm1l. cOlldllDolUnd,tI t1W< lJ)..lfortIWSUppIy r n h._ 3. ,THATtlWfunda "-13814 7401. bepoal(4edhm the Submllted by: MM/lABnd' " , .Reo-NI'A'?Jrif...c;1f ,~ PwJIl* - Admlr.'-, Comml~ II &_ ,'Ontlwfo.,.... .. _, tlId the llM1l!It fIIIlCll........ - vG forPt....~7.....~(ltl Equ/plMIIl;'" ' I' I RiIYiewed Ftwd1 Wu., CIIIef Admlnl8 'eoR~_{Q.MllNJOIPAIJTY of." I1C3A6T ~ 1206 40 REPORT MO.: COD-e41.. 88a2 . BACKGROUND ANOCOIIJ 111I11' .(':'.:'.:'('~:_-.,.-.-- .' >{,- -f>~:; ;',""'~;"~.-.>,' ';~'''' i. ;',," J '''''.;,,,," -- >''',';'--' o ,~<~:}~~,;_: Underthe ~-Q"*/IflIII" BulfnlU PIJeR": BuelAm Goat 14 "To 8(j~.."_h'IIemat 8IId ..,..con........ol m.."COqlol*........ aUfgned lie T_ofr- 1 J ~.. etfIIclIIvene88Gf 00A1t>._ 111~.... . . SW have been iIwIl(~d ,.0'" ......flJJWlf~~..8IId......I~~ . pnIpOe....'f,1Ie propJ .ttfwortt ...... but II '*finlItId to"S"SIng "q.jr~J Ia&~ tlliltlnololWwIlhfukp~1n onIII'to ....1II8ldmumS}*'JllIll__J .. 1.llft,., '. ..YIce.ldt..4I11ng -._ II) 111_.........~ how lie 4ele~~II..l'" .~..~. . apIJ..b.d. .......1IN8dand_.b6...d,........1I ... tDreduC8Cl1* .1.1 li~L~I...._ I .. .. .... _',.. .' .. ..... '_', '>"_",""'" .. '."" '. _,_,.. ',.>,_ .:... ...."', _,:, :'_':':::'" '_ ','.,'_, ,_.,......" ...; ",C, (!...-eat of~ MdfonrUalng it 1.,. ~~J.~ l~ 11J.....l..litllgytor......"'n..__ . . .. ,', ....' .. " _ .. .... .. ,_ .. .. _...... ", ,'-::, '::,' ,c: _._ _-,- '-':-"__.. _:-.'.. '. _:' ;':_._-.'::-_~~:: ,-,':" Cf.I8t WOUld beapproilftl 1nl $t5.0G0.ooWlll rur,Ing..:/~ In lie 2003 ~ .1l1:'II~" ~~ '.;.i.'..... 'C ct,;- ... 0It. plOO886 for"." wauId!ncMllt",,~ihedno_'" Jm~'trJrI.Jl!lllf'" . .. .,.ctUafIIcIaIa"8It....b',...,~ ". now. and"''''!! Q:.... ... - :Ii ".nges .., face. .....;.,. -""' lh~uIdCOUi1CllendotW..... n,pad.... tIneI.. .~"~'~.8ftdrirlcll. "'l!ilwll. . tie'~~'~~"'''....'._....., ~ i mlful bfdder. lbe '*'anlI;'....d coeawilll8 aWt....ol..ty$t5;(lOGJ)O...('.~A. n ...... various CoIpcM* ......eon....~.. ~."~lll~j;i'.lJJt... . .... . ',-' ,', __'n"____"'_' ,,' iSTEMPetWdSTREET.-~=:~ . -"'4'7 . ',' ,>/1~; I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l' t... . ....- .. . .:ti I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . Unfinished Business Cl~mgton REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, January 24, 2005 Report #: Addendum to PSD-006-05 File #: 18T-95009 By-law #: Subject: APPLICATION BY BAYWOOD HOMES TO AMEND A DRAFT APPROVED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION TO DELETE A SERVICE LAND FOR 10 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ABUTTING TOWNLlNE ROAD SOUTH IN THE CITY OF OSHAWA RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-006-05 be lifted from the table; 2. THAT Report PSD-006-05 and Addendum to Report PSD-006-05 be received; 3. THAT the City of Oshawa be advised that the Municipality of Clarington does not support the application by Baywood Homes to remove the service land in draft approved plan of subdivision 18T-95009; and 4. THAT a copy of this report be forwarded to the City of Oshawa Development Services Department and the Region of Durham Planning Department. Reviewed by: J~~~ Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer Submitted by: Davi . Crome, MCIP, R.P.P. Director of Planning Services BR*DJC*lw January 17, 2005 CORPORATION OFTHE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 - - 150'1 REPORT ADDENDUM to PSD-006-05 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 Report PSD-006-05 was tabled at General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting of January 10, 2005, at the request of the applicant, Mr. Bill Cawker of Baywood Homes. The applicant noted that he wanted the opportunity for Clarington Staff to meet with the City of Oshawa and Durham Region Staff to see if any agreement could be reached regarding the proposal to delete the condition requiring a service lane for 5 semi/link lots (10 dwellings) abutting Townline Road South on its west side. 2.0 DISCUSSION 2.1 Staff met on the morning of January 14, 2005, with representatives of the City of Oshawa, the Region of Durham and the applicant to discuss the matter. Bill Cawker of Baywood Homes stated the five (5) lots will be impractical and unmarketable with the usual property taxes and a service lane to maintain and administer. Regional Works and Clarington Staff stated that Townline Road will eventually become a Type B Arterial linking Freeways 401 and 407 and the road's southern alignment in front of these five lots had yet to be designed thereby precluding approval for six (6) additional driveways beyond the north and south two-way traffic entrances for the service lane itself. Mr. Cawker noted that the design work was beyond the horizon of anyone's budget and therefore, the absence of a design should not sterilize these five lots. Regional Works Staff noted that redevelopment of a residential lot is much less frequent than that of a commercial lot, on average perhaps as little as once in 100 years and therefore, design options had to be preserved. No agreement was reached to satisfy the applicant's concerns. 3.0 CONCLUSION 3.1 Clarington Staff heard no reason why the recommendation of PSD-006-05 should be altered. In consideration of the comments contained in this report, Staff respectfully confirms the recommendations made in PSD-006-05. Attachments: Attachment 1 - PSD-006-05 List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: City of Oshawa, Department of Development Services Regional Municipality of Durham, Planning Department Robert W. (Bill) Cawker, Project Manager . . 1502 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ATTACHMENT 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CI~mglOn REPORT . . PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, January 10,2005 Report #: PSD-006-05 File #:1ST-95009 By-law #: . Subject: APPLICATION BY BAYWOOD HOMES TO AMEND A DRAFT APPROVED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION TO DELETE A SERVICE LANE FOR 10 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ABUTTING TOWNLlNE ROAD SOUTH IN THE CITY OFOSHAWA RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recOmmended. that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recoll1mend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-006-05 be received; . 2. THAT the. City of Oshawabe advised that the Municipality of Clarington does not . support the application by Baywood. Homes to remove the service lane in draft approved plan of subdivision 1ST-95009: and 3. THAT a copy of this report be forwarded to the City of Oshawa Development Services Department and the Region of Durham Planning Department. . Submitted by' ~ . David J. Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning Services Reviewed b0 Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer BRlCS/DJCllb December 23, 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET. BOWMANVILLE. ONTARIO L 1C.3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 ... 15 03 .... . REPORT NO.: PSD-006-05 . PAGE 2 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 APPLICATION DETAILS Owner: Applicant/Agent: Plan of Subdivision: Baywood Homes Baywood Homes Amendment to Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision to delete a service lane for 10 semi/link residential units, to be replaced by 10 driveways directly off Townline Road South. 4.53 hectares (11.19 acres) for the entire draft approved plan of subdivision. . 1.4 Area: The area subject to the proposal is located west of Townline Road South, south of Southgate Drive, north of the Sl Lawrence & Hudson Railway in Lot 1, Broken Front Concession, City of Oshawa. 1.5 Location: 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On November 26, 2004, the Municipality of Clarington was circulated by the City of .Oshawa to provide comments On the above proposed amendment to draft plan of subdivision. The proposed amendment would delete Condition 2 from the Conditions of Draft Approval. The plan had been draft approved September 30, 1996. 2.2 The applicant claims the proposed amendment is needed since the marketabilityof the five semi-detached lots (10 units) is open to question considering the affected properties will be subject to full property taxes and the maintenance costs of the service lane at the same time. 2.3 The applicant then stated that since the City of Oshawa has jurisdiction over the west side of Townline Road South and the authority to grant draft plan approval, it should delete Condition 2.The applicant requested that Oshawa's related requirements of site plan approval and removal of a holding symbol also be eliminated. 3.0 OFFICIAL PLAN 3.1 Townline Road is designated as a Type B arterial road in the Clarington Official Plan. It is planned that Townline will cross the Farewell Creek, connecting Townline Road North and South and will eventually connect to Highway 401 With an interchange in the vicinity of Prestonvale Road. Type B arterials are designed to move. significant volumes of traffic at moderate speeds. Access is generally to be limited to a minimum of 80 metres apart in Urban Areas. The applicantion does not conform. . 1504 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PSD-006-05 PAGE 3 4.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 4.1 The Engineering Services Department stated Townline Road South is designated in the Official Plan, both Durham and Clarington, as a future Type B Arterial Road, and as such, feel that this decision is better made by the Region. 4.2 The Emergency and Fire Services Department stated it had no fire safety concems. 5.0 STAfF COMMENTS 5.1 The introduction of the service lane concept was resolved as a means of dealing with access issues when Townline Road was reclassified from Type C arterial 10 a Type B arterial (see paragraph 2.2 (vi) and 2.3 of Report PD-112-96 (Attachment 2). To reverse this position would be contrary to the policies of the Durham Region Official Plan and the Clarington Official Plan. Accordingly, staff do not recommend support for the applicants proposal. 6.0 . CONCLUSION 6.1 That the City of Oshawa be advised that Clarington does not support the proposed amendment to draft approval for draft plan of subdivision 18T-95009 as submitted by Baywood Homes. . Attachments: . Attachment 1 - Key Map and Plan of Proposed Accesses Attachment 2 - Report PD-112-96 List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: City of OshC)wa, Department of Development Services Regional Municipality of Durham, Planning Department . Robert W. (Bill) Cawker, Project Manager . 1505 ATTACHMENT 1 o ~ ~ () o ....J CD I I I I I i, ; I : f ; I' I : . ! o i I , , II I ! i I , I \: .J "I ~ I ~1'1 i! I , ,I i i :c I 1 !~I '::::> '01 '! I en : I !~ : Iii I a::: I ! I 11.&.1 I Iz ~i III~ II .:11 ~ , " 101 ~I !! II I j :lli :~ ! I : I I ,./ ,./ .JZ)/ / ..... ./ 5 18T -95009 Oshawa Subdivision File o <l , ~ ~ ';g ~ Owner: Baywood Homes :.' 15 0 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ATTAGHMI::I'lI ~ ON: 1sT9SlOll.GPIHE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPAUTY OF CLARINGTON REPORT I Meeting: I Date: Report #: I Subject: I General Purpose and Administration Committee Tuesday, July 2, 1996 Rle# Res. # PD-112-96 18T -95009 By-law # Rle#: PROPOSED DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: C & K MORTGAGE SERVICES PART LOT 1, BROKEN FRONT CONCESSION CITY OF OSHAWA FILE: 18T.95009 I Recommendations: I I I I I I I I I I I I It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: . 1. THAT Report PD-112-96 be received; . 2. THAT the Region of Durham Planning Department and the City of Oshawa be advised that the Municipality of Clarington withdraws its objection to the draft plan of subdivision 18T-95009 submitted by C & K Mortgage Services; and 3. THAT a copy of Report PD-112-96 be forwarded to the City of Oshawa Planning Department, the Region of Durham Planning Department and the applicant. 1. BACKGROUND: 1.1 The applicant's lands are located at the southem terminus of Townline Road In Part of Lot 1, Broken Front Concession in the City of Oshawa (see Attachment #1 to Report PD-30-96). The draft plan of subdivision proposes 42 townhouse units and 38 semi-detached units, including 10 semi-detached units with direct access to Townline Road South. ...2 .1507 REPORT NO.: PD-112-96 PAGE 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 .2 On March 11, 1996, Council adopted the recommendations of Report PD-30-96 and forwarded an objection to the above-referenced plan of subdivision in the City of Oshawa (see Attachment #1). The Municipality's objection was based primarily on concems that the plan of subdivision would not conform to the standards for a Type 'B' arterial road and that the Boundary Road Agreement with the City of Oshawa needed to be updated to ensure that the City would assume all costs of road reconstruction and future maintenance. These matters also related to the Ontario Municipal Board hearing on the lands in South-West Courtice, to which the City of Oshawa is a party objecting to the proposed reclassification of Townline Road. 1.3 Through the Official Plan Review, the Municipality determined the need to amend the classification of Townline Road (south of Bloor Street) from a Type 'C' to a Type 'B' arterial. On January 23, 1996, the consultant for C & K Mortgage Services registered an objection to the proposed reclassification of T ownline Road as a Type 'B' arterial (see Attachment #2). Notwithstanding this objection, Council adopted the new Official Plan on January 29, 1996. Council also authorized the Municipality's application to amend the Durham Region Official Plan with respect to the classification of Townline Road (ROPA 96-002). 1.4 The Region will make a decision on the Municipality's official plan amendment application concurrent with its approval of the Clarington Official Plan. This is scheduled for September 1996. 2. PROPOSED RESOLUTION OF CONCERNS: 2.1 In an effort to resolve the Municipality's concerns, Regional staff convened several meetings and held discussions with various parties. As an a1temative to awaiting a decision on the Municipality's Regional Plan amendment application or the Ontario Municipal Board hearing on South-West Courtice, staff provided a number of conditions which served as the basis for negotiations. ...3 ,,- 1508 I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PO-112-96 PAGE 3 2.2 These conditions have been resolved satisfactorily to staff as follows: i} Staff Report PD-30-96 requested that the Stormwater Management Implementation Report be forwarded to staff for review and approval. The City has agreed to undertake this. ii) Staff Report PD-30-96 noted concerns which may arise from potential purchasers who would object to the development of lands for industrial purposes in Clarington. Accordingly, staff requested that a clause be included in the purchase and sale agreement to disclose future land uses in Clarington. The City of Oshawa concurred. Iii} Staff Report PD-30-96 indicated that the Municipality would not participate in the reconstruction of Townline Road to serve this plan of subdivision. A condition has been written to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department with respect to the road standard for the reconstruction but.the . subject of cost-sharing will be formally incorporated into a revised Boundary Road Agreement A letter dated June 21, 1996 from John Simmonds, Director of Engineering for the City of Oshawa outlines the understanding regarding cost sharing of future improvements (see . Attachment #3). Since the future alignment of Townline Road has not been determined, it is not known how much of the reconstructed road will be incorporated into the arterial road system. However, only if and when the Municipality receives a benefit from this portion of the road would the Municipality be obligated to share in the costs of this road reconstrUction work, iv) Staff requested that a 5 metre road widening be imposed on the plan of subdivision to allow for the future widening to a Type 'B' arterial road . standard. Staff subsequently agreed to a 3 metre road widening in light ...4 . ---1509 ...5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT NO.: PO-112-96 PAGE 4 of the lack of a defined alignment for the future diversion of Townline Road into the Employment Area and the proponents' proposal for a service lane easement (see Section 2.3 below). v) Staff requested that the proponent withdraw its objection to the Clarington Official Plan and the Municipality's application ROPA 96-002 to amend the . Regional Official Plan regarding the classification of Townline Road. Ms. D'Alessandro on behalf of the proponent has conditionally withdrawn her objection provided the Municipality withdraws its objection to the plan of . subdivision (see Attachment #4). vi) Staff requested that the City of Oshawa staff indicate their willingness to recommend that the City of Oshawa withdraw their objection to the Type 'B' designation for Townline Road. Staft subsequently withdrew this request in light of the provision of. the front service lane/easement Nevertheless, a letter received from the City of Oshawa Public Works . Department on June 24,. 1996, indicated that based on technical information provided by the Municipality, "the proposal to reclassify Townline Road as a Type 'B' arterial is reasonable, justifiable and can be supported by this Department". This position is subject to Oshawa Council's confirmation. 2.3 During the discussions, the applicant proposed a service lane/easement with two. access points at Lots 5 and 9. The service lane would limit the number of accesses to Townline Road to a total of three (3) thereby meeting the Regional Official Plan spacing requirement of 80 metres. This proposal i~ acceptable to staff. The City C?f Oshawa passed a resolution on June 17, 1996 indicatiflQ its support. 1510 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' REPORT NO.: PD-112-96 PAGE 5 3. CONCLUSION: In light of the above, the plan of subdivision complies with the spacing criteria of the Regional Official Plan for Type 'B' arterial roads and therefore would not be prejudicial in the event that the City of Oshawa continues to object to the designation in the Clarington Official Plan. The costs of upgrading the road to a collectorroad standard would reside with the City of Oshawa In the event that the road provided some benefit to Clarington residents or businesses at a future point in time, the boundary road agreement, to be negotiated in the near future, would. contain provisions regarding the Municipality's responsibilities for cost sharing. Accordingly, it is recommended that the Municipality withdraw its objection to the draft plan of subdivision. Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by, o V"tJ..- 0 Q--:.,~-~c.... Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P., Director of Planning and Development ~~~ W. H. Stockwell Chief Administrative Officer DC*FW*jip 25 June 1996 Attachment #2 Planning Department Report PD-30-96 Letter of Objection from AVD Planning & Development Consulting Attachment #1 Attachment #3 Letter from City of Oshawa on Approval Condition Objection Withdrawal Letter. from AVD . Planning & Development Consulting Attachment #4 . 1511 HUClcnmenl 'il"1 DN:C&KMORT.GP~HE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON REPORT 1eeting: late: General Purpose and Administration Committee Monday. March 4,1996 File # Res. # \eport #: .ubJect: PD-30-96 File #: 18T-95009 By-law # PROPOSED DRAFT PUN OF SUBDIVISION c. & K. MORTGAGE SERVICES PART LOT 1, BROKEN FRONT CONCESSION, CllY OF OSHAWA FILE: 18T-95009 Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PD-30-96 be received; 2. THAT the City of Oshawa and the Region of Durham be advised that the Municipality of Clarington objects to the approval of the application for Draft - Pian of Subdivision 18T -95009 submitted by C & K Mortgage Services Inc.; 3. THAT a copy of this report be forwarded to the City of Oshawa and Region of Durham Planning Departments; and. 4. THAT the interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. 1. APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant: 1.2 Agent: C & K Mortgage Services Inc. AVO Planning & Development Consulting Umited To permit the development of 38 semi- - detached units, 42 townhouse units, a 'parkette, and a stormwater management facility: 4.53 h-ettares (11.19 acres) . . 1.3 Draft Plan of Subdivisi9n: 1.4 Site Area: . -1512 . I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I: 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I.' I I I REPORT NO.: PD-3D-96 PAGE 2 .2. LOCATION 2.1 The subject lands are located within the southern portion of Oshawa The property consists of Part Lot 1, Broken Front Concession in the City of Oshawa The property consists of a 4.53 ha (11.19 ac) parcel on the west side of Townline Road. 3. BACKGROUND 3.1 On March 24, 1995, the Municipality was requested to provide comments on this Draft Plan of Subdivision application. Staff have delayed responding on this application until such time as the designation of Townline Road was confirmed through the consideration of the Clarington Official Plan. 3.2 The property represents a small, triangular residential site bordered by Townline Road to the east, C.P. Railway tracks and .Highway 40.1 to the west, and existing residential development to the north. The proposal would extend Southport Drive through the property from Southgate Drive at the north to Townline Road.. The townhouse units are proposed on the west side of South port Drive while the semi-detached units front onto the eastem side of South port Drive and Townline Road. A parkette is located at the northern end of the proposal while a stonnwater management facility is located at the southern tip of the property. 3.3 The property was subjectto a previous appliCation for a non-profit, co- operative housing development consisting of 49 apartment units In a 3-4 storey building and 115 townhouse units. Although the City of Oshawa Pianning . . Department recommended approval, both the City of Oshawa and Durham Regional Councils denied the proposal and the application was referred to the Ontario Municipal Board. The appeal was dismissed on the basis.that the site was too remote from services such as transit, schools, parks, retail areas, and medical/dental clinics for an assisted housing project. The Board also felt.that the high noise levels from the nearby tWo railway tracks and Highway 401 ~ 15-13 REPORT NO.: PD-3D-96 PAGE 3 would be more suitable to a development in which the buyer was aware of the situation through waming clauses. As a result, a revised application has been submitted. 4. AGENCY COMMENTS 4.1 The application was circulated to the Public Works Department for review. The . following comments have been received for consideration: . The Neighbourhood Plan for Southwest Courtice indicates that We&. Townline Road is being considered as a future Type B arterial road. The draft plan of subdivision proposes lots fronting onto Townline Road which would not be permitted under a Type B designation. The status of Townline Road should be finalized and the plan revised to eliminate access onto Townline Road. . A stormwater management report must be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and comment prior to draft approval The report must address the manner in which drainage from the site will be handled, the stormwater management works required to service the development, and ensure that no municipal orprlvate lands are affected. . Development of this plan of subdivision will necessitate the reconstruction of Townline Road from Southgate Drive to the southerly limit of the development, including the installation of sidewalk and street lighting. As the reconstruction works are not required by the Municipality, ~!3 City of Oshawa should assume and accept all costs for the reconstruction and future maintenance of To'wnline Road. The .Boundary Road agreemeht.between the City and the Municipality should be amended to reflect these provisions. .' .- 1514 I I I I I I I I I I I I I .' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,.. I I " REPORT NO.: PD-30-96 PAGE 4 Until these issues have been addressed, the Public Works Department considers the proposal to be premature. 5. STAFF COMMENTS 5.1 The Durham Region Official Plan designates Townline Road south of Bloor' Street as a Type C l:irterial. Direct access is permitted on Type C arterial roads. The draft plan of subdivision proposes 10 lots that would access directly onto Townline Road South. 5.2 The Clarington Official Plan, as adopted by Council on January 29, 1996, designates Townline Road south of Bloor Street as a Type B arterial. In . addition, the Municipality has requested that the Region amend its Official Plan accordingly. Regional policies do not permit lots with frontage on and direct access to a Type B arterial road. The draft plan of subdivision does not conform with the Clarington Official Plan and the Municipality's application to amend the Durham Region Official Plan. 5.3 It is noted that the issue of the designation of Townline Road is a matter which will be considered by the Ontario Municipal Board at the hearing related to , various applications in southwest Courtice. The Municipality has requested the Region to refer a portion of the Clarington Official Plan to be consolidated with that hearing, including the designation of Townline Road. Until this matter is resolved, the draft plan of subdMsion should not be approved or should be redesigned to eliminate lots with direct frontage on Townlirie Road. 5.4 The Boundary Road agreement between the City of Oshawa and the .' : . Municipality of Clarington should be updated to reflect changing circumstances in both Municipalities. At a recent meeting with respect to the southwest Courtice OMB hearing, Public Works officials from both municipalities agrOOd , . to initiate discussions on this matter. Until there is an agreement with respect . 1515 . . RT NO.: PD-3Q-96 PAGE 5 I I I I I I I I I . I . . '. I I I I I to the road widening, reconstruction, and future maintenance, the approval of this draft plan of subdivision is premature. ) It is noted that a portion of the proposed plan of subdivision is adjacent to Prestige Employment lands in the Municipality of Clarington. It is important that potential buyers be aware of the land use designations in Clarington to avoid future misunderstandings or potential objections to industrial development in Clarington. Accordingly, it is recommended that at such time that draft approval may be considered, a condition of approval would require the subdivision agreement to contain a. clause requiring the vendor to post a plan showing future land uses in the Municipality of Clarington. CONCLUSIONS ,.1 Based on the discussion in this report, it is apparent that the application is premature until various issues have been resolved and that the draft plan of subdivision is redesigned. It is recommended that the Municipality register an OBJECTION to this proposal with the City of Oshawa and the Durham Region Planning Departments. ~espectfully submitted, Reviewed by, d r t>-- C-Q. -=- ~~ Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning and. Development ~-I1f!1:r7~> W.H. Stockwell . Chief Administrative Officer RH*FW*df Attachment #1 - Key Map At "lment #2 - Draft Plan of Subdivision r-ebruary 1996 . 1516 I. ATTACHMENT. #1 LOT 35 LOT 34 LOT 33 LOT 32 ~ ] .~ J GRANDVlEW ~ o I . DRIVE II> ~ I STREET i BLOOR ~ ~ \3 \ I 1 I I I I:. I I . rEJ SUBJECT SITE 1 BASEUNE ROAD HIGHwAY ~I C'l Z o Ui ffl u z o u KEY MAP FOR 18T -95009 . . -1-517 .... .... ATTACHMENT #2 " . . . 1 I -<' ~\\ \ \ , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ /\ \\ \\~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \' \ \ \ \ ~, \ \ \ 'r- \ \ \ \ Gl. \\\\'" \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \0\ i;; \ \ \ Q \ \\ ~\ ~ AIfEA ~)\~ '(~\ "Y,t. 'M \~ \~ ' .... \ <.'. -(\ \,..\ \ \ 1:, \\\ \ \ . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ \ '" \'\\~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \.\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\1 \ \ \ \1 \ \~ '>'? 1 -15.18 "" , PROPOSED lNlO USES DESCOIP1IOH$ ..................- LOTSU"" fIESlDOf1UL1L01t1 ...-s L01S' 'ftII.. UIItS .. \ '. \ ... ", ~~..\ . "\ \:;:,.,. ~, \~\,...~~1t1f .... \:("'Br~"""" \...~.:~"'8.. '- ~. .... ~~-- \ .,>,. \ ..~. , , ~ ~ '- ,. PM1' toll - a.oac ft ~ MJICIC; U (SDI) . tWJCWA.T _ -.ocz ....... NIt .. UICA PNaC: _.~ Sf noRlII"'U~-U" "...... ROAD __ - -.ooc .. -- -') ..... . . . us ID.XlnlI ItCIIEJNt - aoc:x 10 TOTALS ....... .... .... o.n .... Cu.-I) ....... . MOlt: D.OIbtIIlfU,IS pMTOIf"'''' NIU. ftIIIl SOll"S. MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS : ..... ntOKTMt ~ _........ LOT 1M}. I 1Is...~ 'LOnrI fkDHTACt (SlM's) - ...... UlT N<<A. I 5~ .Uft~-1OTA.ntOIIt'l<<-JOIAClrR 1~ ...-s _ 1DVL ntOIIt'lIGt. .)1,"'" ., , ~ AOOmONAL INFORMATION : AS REGUIREO PURSUANt 10 SECnoH 51 or THE Pl.ANMNG ACT: 8) S1NE1'S IKALL I( NMo ~ CIOIfSUl1'A'nClM .nM 1t€ ............... qMSl101l(s:omK~1SDf1lIlCHCll.DItCSor UHOt'IO.ClPO)lN<<IlN llCS'<lClHln. Q (lUMO usa or A.lOllMlI west 1t(1IDEN1\AL H) PItCII"OSOl WAtUl SUPf'\.'Il: .......... t!A1(JIMM(S. I) ~ UHDT LlWI I() fUU. "'CIl"AL IlD'MCO '10 II: IIS'MUD ~ SN<<tIAY NG rtoNI. sooa. ""0 1lO#DS _1M QAI:S .... ....... L)~"'1A~.Ml1IIIC1l'oCCO\IUWf1'S I I I I I I '.. I '. .:' -.j '. ::~ I ,..~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -" . ~.' ,., Ji:.~:f1J . '" f ~., 'f..' Attachment +2 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING LTD. J4H 26 II 2& AM '9& January 23, 1996 VIA TELECOPIER & MAiL Ms. Patti L. Barrie, A.M.C.T. Clerk Municipality of. Clarington 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville., Ontario. LlC 3A6 Dear Ms. Barrie: RE: Clarinl!ton Official Plan A VD Planning & Development Consulting Ltd. represents C & K Mortgage Services Ine. and Aldana ' Properties Inc., owners of property on the west side of Townline Road, in the City of Oshawa (see attached locational plan). . In March, 1995, we submitted on behalf of our ~lients a proposed draft plan of subdivision (18T-95009) which conforms with both the City of Oshawa OfficW Plan and the Regionof Durham Official Plan. Your proposed new official plan and the proposed South-west Courtice Neighbourhbod Plan propose that Townline Road be re-classified from a Type C to a Type B road. This proposal does not conform to the Region of Durham Official Plan nor the City of Oshawa Official Plan.. Until such a time that the appropriate studies have been completed to justify such a redesignation, showing it in your official plan is premature. In addition to the foregoing, any such reclassification seriously affects the viability of my client's development plans. As such, please accept this letter as our objection to the proposed reclassification of Townline Road to Type' B. We respectfully request that Council not approve the reclassification of Townline Road to Type B. . . 1...2 3800 STEELES AVE. WEST.. SUITE 20m. WOOOBRIOGE. ONTARIO L4L 469. TEL.: (905) 850.2040. FAX: (905)850-2041 ~ . 1519 -2- We trust the foregoing to be satisfactory at this time however, should you require additional information or clarification on any of the above-noted information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours very truly, A VD PLANNING & DEVEWPMENT CONSULTING LTD. ~"J)~dJ) Anna V. D' Alessandro Principal attach. cc. C & K Mortgage Services Inc. Aldana Properties Inc, City of Oshawa Region of Durham ""-:;:~-:l-l .. ....::...~:..~t~:~0t'""I I . ......... ~ : . .,., . ......_---:--- , ";;;:~<Ci;=~~ ....-..---.-. . .._--~~~-~~ ".. .... . - : .---....;-.---.-- \ . -- ---:..- ;.:~.._. :'-__0': ." o ;;zS;.\1) .. ".' ~1,520 3800 STEELES AVE. W.. SUITE 202W, WOODBRIOGE, ONT. L4L 4G9.TEL.: 19051850-2040, FAX: 19051 850.2041 ., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r .run~4 '-96" 09: fSAM' i5I.am Pi...mifNG'DEP1!IPM . ' PUBLIO WORKS DEPT.~ . 8"':2/212:# 2 Attachment -#3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .~ 80shawa '. ~ 50 Ce~tre Street South . Oshawaf Ontario, Ll H 3Z7 _ Tel (90S) 725.7351 ~~..fax '(905) 436-5694 ".~ Department c.f .. Mite Works Servlc:u Amund Myldebon. B.A.Sc.,. P.Eng. Cbmmlssloner . '.., .~.JL- QUNf;:J-~ 1 .. ""'NtI ';-.nr\ ~. ,~ Mr. T. CanneQlll, Manager ,of Engineering Municipality of C1arlngtOn 40 TemperanCe Street eowmanvllle, Ontario LtC 3A6 r~ -' REGIONAL cRAfT PLAN CONDITION-TOWNUNE ROAD SUBDIVISION 1BT-SSOQ9 (AVO SUBCMSION AGREEMENTJ. OUR PILE: S0288.1. AND D41oo-940t8' ' 'This is funher ~ our recent telephone conversation of June 21. 1 eee regarding f1naUzin,r the Regional clause regarding draft plan approval for the abuve subcliviSion.. , It waa &greed that the hlst two sentences of thll1 clause, starting at "no costs.... would be delated. The aannce of the clllUDII rllmains. In that the City win reconstruct Townlll18 Road to tha sti/llfard referenced In the 1079 Boundary Road Agreement. Our neX!: step, as both Boundary Road Agreements have C1lCPlrecf. is to enter into a new onll which Will address Townllna Road ftom Its southerly Umit to Its.northerly limit.. A3 diac:ussed. shoold any sectlon of TownUne Road. lnduding .thi8 one. not ba u.ad by C1.rington. then the co~ of recon5t~ the (gad .would ramaln with the CitY of OShawB. and thete would be no reImbursement from the Municlpality of CIarIngton. . This sltuetion could happen. for InstanOll if. the south end of Townl'm= Road blJG8llle a d~d end and WIS no longer f9(julred lIS part of the arterial syltllm shown on the Regional Offlclel Plan. iInd thlll'e was consequently no link to any develclpment on C1aringtOn'. side. I trust that thIs laner provides you with euffioient oornfOl1: end thai we WIll be ubls to enter Into negotiations to conclude a new boundlllY road agreement that will foHow the gel1lU1ll principles of the previous Boundllry Roed Agreements. To thIS end, we could get togeth=r after my holidays in the f"I1at 1"<<0 weeks of July end atart the proca8d1ngll. Should you have any questlons. please feel free to giva me a call at 725.'351 lIXtlIIlSlo!1'21lO. ... t:; e::.. $<=- J. ~ p,mmandll. P. Eng- Director .af EngIn8f:fing .,.. COpy: A. DeFarla-Raglon of Durham (fax 436-6612> T. Hodgins P.Ralph A~ Myldllboat ~'. Nf.,8Dn&-1 @ , . ~ 1'5'2 t .., ........ ...... --. .---....-.-..-.- os7i2ilia n1.l:S-~ :rUB 650 2041 1l!I00~ .:a-- ....._. ~UN 121995 , ?$/Ii:J.. , .--".-'- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Attachment #4 AVID . . .... . ",of' . PLANNING & DEVElOPMENT CONSUITlNG UtI;' . . ; ~ June 12. 1996 l. , ~l\~~.......; . ~~'!'_-_.. .!Sf.lilIlu.:\\'V\,.... . --.--- J~~!:!.~~~_ 'I"';t.t,""'~ -' .. ~.!:...~t.~_. vtA TELECOEIER & MAIL I\.IN --:-[ O~HH~', . . ," ~.t;:;~"l Ms. Amn DeFaJ:ia. Canent ()pP.l"01t1OIlS :Bl:anch , Durbam J~on. PlmDiDg Depan:ment HilS Duiu:las St. E.. 4th Floor. , Lang ,Tower, West B,n,.n~g P.O. Bo~, 623 ' , Whitby, Ontuio LlN 6A3 I' . , ._, ",lt~~t:$Y!\ ..g.'" ~. '";.....--~....~~. ....-.. Dear ~ 'DeFarla: ", '. . , BE: Applic:atidn foiP.mft: Plan of;Subdivisi.ciD: C &:K Mo~~ Services InC. (..4.M~.." ~"........-;ies' Inc.) ,___, PanofLot1,BmkcnPront~ol1. ': . I .. . City 'of' Oshawa. l1"giQft of '!)Ilm""" , ;. I Pil.A.N~:' 1~-9S009 and 51649 .., . ..".,:; Ii.. ":' '; Fu.rI:hex t9 OtlI' telephone (OUvem1;7:on tIJis is to confum that my e1iep.\S' lnicrbt ~d ol:d=On to thcrecla.s.sific:atiOll ofTownline ~ to a. Type "1\" arterl.a1 road applies OnlY, irisqfSras it ,~ i;tjl lands ,........wr ill the City of Osha.wa aiid wbkh lands baw fron12ge 6n T~~ . "'-d ..': -, " : ; ": ': ~.. .... . .' . . .'!. This is also to serve as co~ tba1 we wiihdra.w our objection to the T;....,l"~.;fi,.;,,ti~n. bf' Townline :Road from B. Type .C" to I. Type "B-" artI:da1 ~ subject to ~ )r~clpaliQr ~f Claringtall.'Wfthdmwmg i1s objection to my client's draft plan of sub~ . . . ., . . . ..-".. . ; Pinally" tltis is also to confirm that my clients have agreed to n:sb:ict diiect;;ceess onto Townline :Road"to two (2) J.ot'o'l~nll.S. in compliance with.the proposed ~ B ~ l1OaCi. The 'gener.111ocarlon of these ll('i-"'.;'K'S, wiII pe at Lots 5 and 9, and a seMceI~ easemel;lt will 00 crested across the fIont of the 1"""'''';~;~ tats to f2I"lHf.'f>; inU""-~ and: eg$Ss 1iX ~ , pwperlies. ' It shm:dd be t'tntlprdnOd b.owever~ that ~e agreed to resf:rii1iojIll aJ.'e l:lIIC$ , ' ~i'n COl1lntional1l.pon the MmddIJ3lli:J of ~cton; ~drawfng its ~bj~~ to m;y , .....--t'9 ~--'''''' p'-":" 'of _....r.~^R . ': ,.. ...... , I . -,. '.. , .,.. ......_.~ Ul:aLt. ma' ~..~....' ". ... I . '. . . ! , . ,/__.2 . ,- , : 3800 srm.ES twe. WESt. sunUO'ZN. WOODBRIIlGE. ON'l1\RlO L4!. 4G9. 'TE..: 19l15) 850-2040; filJC (905) 850-2041 1522 .. - . " TJUI'4 12 '96 02: 47PM DURHAM PLANNING DEPTZJ96 11m" 14:22:&2, ,ICl7.2/9Cl~ ..~.):S4 e416. &60 2041 -. " ..... I' I I .1. :1. . I ..1. .I:. . . I. I. I -1- d '1 1 I... P :;;!/'~.".I. .." li1Jooa '.. .'. .... '.' - ~2'- ,~VD ~LA:NNiNG '!"l;)E~1'MENT '. 1_ . '. . 'CONSDLTINGLm..:.' ..... .. .....;.[Tl-1k........'/n'...... ..... r~W~-' 1 .' A:~:m(;V:.P~~.....~~ . ". .... . . .' ..Pi::ipcipaI.. ... ..:: .. .. .. . '. . ~ . '. . .... . , I, .' I 'trtJSt ,h~ foreg~ ~ l1e ~i:i'~IY lio~;';t ~olild you .~eQ.~" a.ddiD.6~ iiIform~nnri' or ("J=ifi~i9n.:please.!io not .~tali:.to ~ ~ .' .' . . ..... , ~: :' :' .... .: . . . . - . " .... .... .,'- . YoUrs "'el)"'~Y;. . .. .. . . ...... . " . , ce- :c&:k~es., -.~ -- . ~'. Aida'n8. ~Ltd.".."_ < ~.~~~~~p~~.p1.~n~g . .. 0.. :. . -. . ".", '. '. .' . " ..' .' . : " . -0. '. .' "'-" " " . .. .'~" '. .' '-' .... -' .-..-. N' . . . .. ...... .- .., . .. . ,"' '.- ~ .' " , . , .~ . -... .... . ~.. '. '. .' ...... .. . ...- . . .' ..;.... . ,... .. ". ..~ .' ." . . 1 . ,. . uoo s:ta'La; AVE. W.; GUlTIl 2<!~W.. \,/O.ODBllIDGEl ONT, 1.4l.,.-G', TaL.: 19051 Bs0..2D40, FAX. iaOSI _41 ....~... - ". . .' .: ...~, -)'52g ~.. ... , . . .. -. 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Unfinished Business Cl~ilJgron REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: Date: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Monday, January 24, 2005 Addendum to Report#: PSD-160-04 File#: PLN 1.1.9 By-law #: Subject: FURTHER COMMENTS ON THE PROVINCIAL DRAFT GREENBELT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Addendum to Report PSD-160-04 be received; 2. THAT in addition to the submission made by the Municipality of Clarington in PSD-160-04, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing be requested to exclude from the Greenbelt those lands associated with the rural residential cluster of Bond Head as shown on Attachment 1 to Addendum to Report PSD- 160-04. 3. THAT a copy of Addendum to Report PSD-160-04 be forwarded to John Gerretsen, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Municipal Affairs and Housing Greenbelt Group and the Region of Durham Planning Department. 4. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: '~ Reviewed bye} !Jk.A2Q ~~ Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer Da d . Creme, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning Services HBfCPfDJCfdf 19 January 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET. BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 1524 ADDENDUM TO REPORT NO.: PSD.160.04 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND On December 6, 2004, Council of the Municipality of Clarington approved Staff Report PSD-160-04 as the Municipality's comments on the Province's draft Greenbelt Plan. Since that time, staff have been continuing to review the implications of the Greenbelt and the Greenbelt boundary. This report is an Addendum to Report PSD-160-04 with respect to the rural residential cluster of Bond Head and its proposed exclusion from the Greenbelt. 2.0 COMMENTS The cluster of Bond Head is located adjacent to the Newcastle Urban Area and has been identified as "Protected Countryside" within the Province's draft Greenbelt Plan. The Clarington Official Plan designates Bond Head "Rural Residential Cluster" having a maximum of 50 residential lots. In accordance with the Official Plan, all residential lots in Bond Head must be connected to municipal water and new lots must be in the form of infilling. Much of the lands within Bond Head are currently zoned Rural Cluster. Other lands remain zoned Agriculture; although the small parcels intermingled with residential lots have a marginal use for any agricultural purpose. Municipal water has been extended to Bond Head. If the lands in Bond Head remain in the Protected Countryside designation of the Greenbelt Plan, there will be no opportunity to consider infilling and other minor growth potential in Bond Head. Given the prime waterfront location and the municipal investment in park facilities on the waterfront, freezing the cluster in its current state would prevent the Municipality, in perpetuity, from considering the potential of this area as an executive housing enclave. 3.0 CONCLUSION The Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing should be requested to remove Bond Head cluster from within the limits of the draft Greenbelt Plan as shown on Attachment 1 to this report. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Lands to be Excluded from the Greenbelt Plan 1525 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . '. I . . . I I . . . . . . . . I . ADDENDUM TO REPORT NO.: PSD-160-04 PAGE 3 List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: '~ John Gerretsen, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing "'" Victor Doyle. '" Farncomb Le Gresley "" Linda Gasser ~ Libby Racansky , 1526 . . .. .. .... .......... . :: <Pr.otect~a:t;oUritrYslde:Ai~a:> ::: .... ....... ... ......... ":"';iil!i!::'I:!'!!!!"!i:!!illmll!liii;':IIIIIII',,II':!!!!:!!!!.'IIIII!'I'II'I . ", ,". . ,'. . .'. . . . . . . .................. . . ATTACHMENT NO 1 I .:: :!! i:!! :!miiYi:i:!:i:iii:i:!:ji:ii::Wi!i!ii ::!\i~~:: :i -- !: :):U : :!..:......Wm:!~!i!imi!00~imim::::ii::: i :i:i:im::: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WHnn~ ~ ~ ~:~ ~ :;:;:;:::::: :::: ..... ,"... . . . '. . 1IIIIillllll:!:1 nmnm ~ ~ Uj 1 :;:::;:;:;: ::::: :;:::;:;:;: ::::: 11111I11111 ilill ~nnnn~ ~ ~ n~ ~ ~1f11I~1~~ I 1 j~j 1 .......... . . .', . :::;:;:;:;: :::;: ~nnnn~ ~ ~ ~H I il!I::IIII!III!! : ';:; :::::: '.:::: :::: lands to be Excluded from Greenbelt Plan · - ;) 27 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HAN DOUTS/CIRCLUA TIONS FOR GPA '. . . . . . I I I I I I I I . I I I I ClfJ!:inglOn MEMO TO: Mayor Mutton and Members of Council FROM: Anne Greentree, Deputy Clerk DATE: January 24,2005 RE: General Purpose and Administrative Committee Agenda January 24, 2005 Please be advised that the following agenda item has been removed from the agenda of the General Purpose and Administrative meeting to be held on January 24, 2005: 5. DELEGATIONS Remove from the list of delegations: (f) Robert Hann, Valiant Property Management regarding Halloway Holdings . Limited and Towchester Developments Limited, North Bowmanville Appeals (g) Peter and Marianne Zakarow, regarding Halloway Holdings Limited and Towchester Developments Limited, North Bowmanville Appeals (h) D. Mackenzie, regarding Halloway Holdings Limited and Towchester Developments Limited, North Bowmanville Appeals (i) Randy and Kelly Burns, regarding Halloway Holdings Limited and Towchester Developments Limited, North Bowmanville Appeals 7. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT U) PSD-018-05 - Potential Settlement with Halloway and Towchester for their North Bowmanville OPA and Zoning Appeals CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET. BOW MANVILLE. ONTARIO L 1 C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-6506 '. . I I . I I I I I I I . I I I I I I 13. CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT (b) COD-004-05 - Telecommunications Consultant / 7 ./~ .' /tl~.. f. .. ~. . ;//( . /1 / ./, '. ~ / C. Anne Greentre , SA: A.M.C.T. Deputy Clerk CAG cc: Frank Wu, Chief Administrative Officer Department Heads I : CLgtDn I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MEMO CLERK'S DEPARTMENT To: Mayor Mutton & Members of Council From: C. Anne Greentree, Deputy Clerk Date: January 21, 2005 Subject: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE AGENDA JANUARY 24, 2005 Enclosed please find the following revisions and material to be considered at the January 24, 2005 General Purpose and Administrative Committee Meeting: 4. PRESENTATIONS Remove from the list of Presentations: (c) Jim Kinsella, Schooley Mitchell, regarding Telecommunications Study. 5. DELEGATIONS Remove from the list of Delegations: (d) Bill Cawker, Baywood Homes, regarding Addendum Report PSD-006-05: 7. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (h) Replacement of Report PSD-017-04 (Attachment 3) 'Page -680-' of the Agenda. 13. CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT (b) Replacement of Report COD-004-05 (Schedule A) 'Pages -1206 & 1207-' of the Agend -;7 C. c.c. - Frank Wu, Chief Administrative Officer Department Heads CAG*ct CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-6506 ATTACHMENT 3 I I I I I THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NUMBER 2005- being a By-Law to amend By-Law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-Law for the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-Law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle in accordance with application ZBA 2004-025 to perm~ a light industrial use on the subject lands; I I I I I NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. Section "24.3.17 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL EXCEPTION (M2-17) ZONE" is hereby amended as follows: i) by deleting "b) a dry light industrial use" and replacing with" b) an assembly, manufacturing, or processing plant within a wholly enclosed building or structure" in Section (2) i) b). ii) by deleting the word "and" after the words "research and development use;" in Section (2) i) c). iii) by adding at the end of Section (2) i) "e) a conference centre; f) a training facility; and g) a day nursery". I I I I I I I I I 2. Schedule "1" to By-law 84-63, as amended is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Agricultural (A) zone to "Holding - General industrial Exception ((H)M2-17) Zone" as shown on the attached Schedule "A" hereto. 3. This By-Law shall come. into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990. By"Law read a first time this day of 2005 By-Law read a second time this day of 2005 By-Law read a third time and finally passed this day of 2005 John Mutton, Mayor 680 Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk ... ..-J .1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I . ScbM9le A ! ..lellOlit ~,., i , I i ! REPORT ."~~4;.;;.' , , --';.,,-.:;~=' " ::/c'f:'i.-';: ':~i'i"'i:-.,~ I, ',.-:..-,.-.,,'>'-......-.,..... ,'C'.:- ...'...... .,,' '''-__-...''.... ....,___, ';-'__"':"_' I GEN&RAlPURPOSEAt&t~AA"~. I Decembel...2003..n:,~.f\f. ,.,..~-%1.r I = =Q1~~~~;' ! ,", ,-'<",':':-',""":,-"::.-,,,.",,. '. .'. .' - ,.-.... - I Ii ,;.... X:UJ>!.,' , ,(,'.,,, I :;;'=~~~_J~~J~~!(~J:p , . . ,,' . '. " --.-...,', :.', '.,.', "J" ,. "'\:'-,":! THATReportC00447.()3be~.nTIJ ""'0' I .'" . .... ..',,: :,.... .-'::'_..:.-A-::''- ..... ;>.':.-': .c'" i ..:.: .-.' .-~, . ":-'::-' ',-/'.>,..;.,,;.:' .', ' 2. THAT staff.. autI'IoIta..d to .f.... ...."~~I ._d. 'lfllIIIlv'\"1fr,'f,: IJ ~ II rr r Iltl_ an~.amountof$t5.a.nrlf:'" .' T '. I -,' '. - '.' ;;",-,,/:<-' I ' , ~~8elY~~~'."~r n."~8d by.\. )h.:~ IZ.f2. - ~ ~; . franldrr-t Wu. !' ChWAdl.[ JilUIlI.re 0+- i I ! i Meetlnt: Date: "r' 1. 3. THATIt1e~'-dsbe ~..~-0242. MMILAINan ,;'>---,."..-:;" ... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I AGRICULTURAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE CLARINGTON Accomplishments 2004 Presentations bY: . Durham Farm Fresh, John Redman . Economic Development, Marlene Werry . . Tax Collector, Maureen Wiles-Frost . MPAC, Mike Porporo, Dennis Laburn, Greg Martin . MPP John O'Toole . Chief Administrative Officer, Franklin Wu on Committee Roles . DLSC, Jonathon Staples - CLOCA grants . Durham Works, Rich Tindall, Biosolids . Mark Peacock, , Watershed Plan and Source Protection _'''-.., · Heather Brooks - draft agricultutal zoning <,/ I J Resolutions for: 1 .~", '<. / '," I l,",~q- ''\, - 1 / '\ I j' mpensation ji '\ t ended changes to S~, ..' to p..r. Qtect farmers from unwarranted CQmplaints :atio change to 15% fr {,' .% il \ I 1 ~:~t~~~:~+~~~ ~~fWtlJ~;~e~~~n1ar1~~onsi'bmty.;jt;;';;;;;~tion \ N A. d Farm~arkl;l~ '. ,3.) \ I ." - June 1~003 , . --"~ i I I i I 'J"",o=_mm"""Iion' \ ~.'~ "\ \ f~1 'i "s.i "",1~~"-",,'-----'" i"'.," "'H"~+"t~t~12\ '. I \\'1\ l . I I k . S1Jr,--Hreesoverha'nQin-~ l,-:,:, "_"A___~_'~~~:;"_::;';~<::;~,:,::,:,:;~;;;~~~::;~~~c- ~-~ . Change of CommjlleIHIB~"''' .~.::,:;;~:~:;:::~;::::=:::c,;;;;::::.:,""",,'" . Adoption of logo~~''$i~ . Direct marketing discussions (on.going) . Draft Agricultural Zoning - on.going . . . . . . . . Events: . . Other: Recoanitlon in 2004 . Sikma's and DeVries I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADELAIDE AVENUE EXTENSION Class Environmental Assessment Region of Durham Presentation to Clarington General Purpose and Administration Committee January 24, 2005 Introduction . Purpose of the Presentation . Overview of the Study . Identification of the Technically Preferred Alternative . Next Steps 1 I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Study Area Background . Identified in Region Official Plan and Transportation Master Plan . Identified in Clarington Official Plan . Study initiated in June 2004 . First Public Information Centre held in October 2004 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Alternative Solutions . Do Nothing . Widen Existing Roads . Adelaide Avenue Extension . Recommended Adelaide Ave. Extension because: . supports proposed growth . Provides balance in east-west road network . Establishes urban boundary . Addresses future travel demand in Courtice Preliminary Alignment Alternatives 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Refinement of Alternatives . Develop 3 alternatives that are representative of 'north', 'central' and 'south' . Sensitivity to constraints . Watercourses . Woodlots . Wetlands . Residential properties Alternatives for Analysis 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Analysis and Evaluation . Analysis based on environmental effects + Socio-economic Environment + Natural Environment + Agriculture + Transportation + Cost . Each grouping has factors and indicators to measure effects Evaluation . Carried out by Project Team + Region, Clarington, CLOCA and consultant . Comparison of environmental effects . Determine 'best' for each indicator and relative comparison of the other alternatives 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,. I . I I Evaluation Summary . Alternative H considered better than or equal other alternatives for all groupings except Natural Environment . Difference mainly at crossing of Farewell Creek . Shift to south of Alternative H crossing would reduce potential effects . Alternative H (with shift) identified as Technically Preferred Alternative Technically Preferred Alternative 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Technically Preferred Alternative . 5 homes would be displaced, property required from 6 others . Crossing of Harmony Creek and Farewell Creek . Avoids high quality sections of Farewell Creek . Avoids forest block between Old Varcoe Road and Tooley Road . Provides transportation service to at least 2021 Timing for Implementation . Transportation Master Plan shows Adelaide Avenue Extension 2008-2012 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Next Steps . Public Information Centre on January 27, 2005 + 5:00 pm to 8:00 pm + Courtice Community Complex . Prepare draft ESR . Complete Spring survey (frogs and fish) . File ESR 8