Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEGD-038-04 a. fl ~~ REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 21, 2004 k-s.tf~ C,;1.I-::,:;:2?;;"Oo.l By-law # Report #: EGD-38-04 File #_ Subject: HUNT STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND DUKE STREET IMPROVEMENTS Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD-38-04 be received; 2. THAT the Director of Engineering Services inform Council of the results of the tender evaluation process once complete; and 3. THAT all those who attended the two Public Information Centres and who have contacted the Municipality be informed of this report. Submitted by: ~ u~.\7 viewed by: :- \....A..J t.c Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer A.S. Cannella, C.E.T., Director of Engineering Services CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-4169 761 REPORT NO.: EGD-38-04 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND Hunt Street is classified as a semi-urban residential road in the latest Road Needs Study. While the road has adequate surface width, it has surface and structural deficiencies. In addition, a 103 lot residential subdivision is proposed on the west side of the street north of Nelson Street which will generate increased traffic flow. A report prepared by TSH in January 2003 for the Region of Durham Traffic Engineering Department highlighted some short and long term measures to be implemented to improve traffic flow on the Baseline Road, Liberty Street, Highway 401 access ramp road configuration. In the short term, closure of Duke Street at Baseline Road was recommended. If this recommendation is implemented it will direct additional traffic to Hunt Street and Pine Street, although the anticipated volume will be relatively low (a maximum hour two-way volume of 77 vehicles from a 1999 count). The Needs Study recommends reconstruction of Hunt Street to full urban standard including storm sewer replacement. In conjunction with this work, the Region of Durham plans to upgrade watermain and sanitary sewer facilities in the street. 2.0 APPROACH To assess suitable reconstruction standards and obtain local resident input to the design process, two Public Information Centres were held. The public was notified of the meetings by newspaper advertisement and through the circulation of notices. 762 REPORT NO.: EGD-3S-04 PAGE 3 3.0 INFORMATION CENTRES Two information centres were held: Information Centre No.1, February, 18,2004 At this first meeting the following documentation and plans were presented for discussion: . Existing Road Condition Base Plans; Various typical road sections for alternative urban designs with on-street and off-street parking; Various proposals for the reconfiguration or closure of the Duke StreeUBaseline Road intersection. . . In all, 15 people attended the first meeting and a majority of those in attendance were in favour of reconstruction, There were concerns expressed about sidewalk location, on-street parking and a narrow majority favoured the closure of Duke Street with the provision of a turn around facility. Concern was also expressed regarding the potential increase in traffic on Hunt Street resulting from the closure of Duke Street as well as the impact of the proposed development north of Nelson Street. Based on the comments received, design proposals were prepared for presentation at a follow-up information centre. Information Centre No.2, May 11, 2004 At the second information centre, the following documentation was presented for review: . Design drawings showing a 7.0 m (2 lane) urban cross section with off-street parking on the west side and sidewalk on the east side. . Design for a circular cui de sac turning facility at the south end of Duke Street (Duke Street closed at this location). . A complete inventory and assessment of trees on Hunt Street and side streets within the limits of construction. 763 REPORT NO.: EGD-3S-D4 PAGE 4 . Design drawings detailing new watermain and sanitary sewer construction proposed by the Region of Durham in conjunction with the road works. A Geotechnical Report on soil conditions on Hunt Street at depths that would typically be encountered during construction. . The design proposals were well received. In all, some eight trees are to be removed or relocated. Homeowners who were impacted by tree removal and who were not in attendance at the meeting were contacted afterwards and there were no concerns. There were some adjustments made to the drawings to overcome individual homeowner concerns but the design proposals were largely unchanged. 4.0 Duke Street Closure at Baseline Road The design drawing prepared for tendering purposes included the closure of Duke Street at Baseline Road and the construction of a cul-de-sac. The traffic operational and safety benefits resulting from the closure were considered to outweigh the relatively low increase (a maximum hour two-way volume of 77 vehicles from a 1999 count) that may divert to Hunt Street as a result of the Duke Street closure. Concerns raised by residents with respect to increased traffic flows, the need for additional traffic control measures such as signals at Baseline Road and Hunt Street, turning lane configurations, turning restrictions and speed of traffic, will be monitored after construction and mitigative measures will be put into effect if warranted. 5.0 TENDERING Based on the design as revised and finalized following the second Information Centre, a tender was advertised on Friday, May 21, 2004 with a closing date of Tuesday, June 8, 2004. 764 REPORT NO.: EGD-38-04 PAGE 5 The Contract was set up in phases to allow for deletion of works for budgeting purposes and also to take into account possible delays in the progress of the residential subdivision north of Nelson Street on the west side of Hunt Street. Also, as a result of the ground conditions encountered during the soils investigation and test pits excavated during the tender period, bid prices received are higher than budgeted. The division of the work into phases (some provisional) has resulted in a large variation in pricing from Contractors, making the tender evaluation complicated. The tenders received are now being reviewed with the Region of Durham and other parties and Council will be informed on the outcome of these discussions. 765