Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/19/2005 ClY!i!}gtOn GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2005 9:30 A.M. TIME: PLACE: COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. ROLL CALL 2. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 3. MINUTES (a) Minutes of a Regular Meeting of September 6, 2005 301 4. PRESENTATIONS (a) Diane MacKenzie, Executive Director, Epilepsy Durham Region - Recognition Plaque for support of their Annual Golf Tournament 5. DELEGATIONS No items to be considered under this section of the agenda. 6. PUBLIC MEETINGS (a) Application to Amend the Clarington Official Plan and the Zoning By-law 501 Applicant: 1559300 Ontario Limited Report: PSD-111-DS (b) Application to Amend the Clarington Official Plan and Zoning By-law 503 Applicant: Ridge Pine Park Inc. Report: PSD-112-05 (c) Application for Draft Plan of Subdivision Approval 505 Applicant: Sabina Investments Inc. & Ankara Realty Limited Report: PSD-113-05 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905) 623-3379 G.P. & A. Agenda .2. September 19, 2005 7. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) PSD-111-05 - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law 601 Amendment to Permit the Expansion of a. Mineral Aggregate Operations Applicant: 1559300 Ontario Limited (Ron Robinson LId) (b) PSD-112-05 - Applications to Amend the Clarington Official Plan 613 and Zoning By-law to Permit the Westerly Expansion of Wilmot Creek Community with Approximately 67 Additional Low Density Dwelling Units Applicant: Ridge Pine Park Inc. (c) PSD-113-05 - Proposed Plan of Subdivision 620 Owner: Sabina Investment Inc. and Ankara Realty Limited (The Remington Group) (d) PSD-114-05 - Application for Removal of Part Lot Control 628 Applicant: 1189286 Ontario Inc. (e) PSD-115-05 - Confidential Report - Property Matter (Under Separate Cover) 8. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT No Reports 9. OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT No Reports 10. EMERGENCY AND FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT No Reports 11. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) CSD-012-05 - Grant Eligibility - University of Ontario Institute of 1001 Technology - Solar Vehicle Team 12. CLERK'S DEPARTMENT (a) CLD-027-05 - Pet Plan Insurance Shelter Partnership Program 1101 G.P. & A. Agenda .3- September 19, 2005 13. CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) COD-042-05 - Request for Proposal RFP2005-7- Supply of Concession Items 1201 (b) COD-047-05 - Confidential Legal Matter (Under Separate Cover) (c) COD-048-05 - Tender No. CL2005-34 1205 One Four Wheel Drive Tractor and Mowers (d) COD-049-05 - Request for Proposal RFP2005-111 - Newcastle 1208 Recreation Facility Architectural Services (e) COD-050-05 - CL2005-31, Two (2) 43,000 GVW Single Axle Cab & 1211 Chassis c/w Dump Body and Plow Equipment 14. FINANCE DEPARTMENT (a) FND-013-05 - Cash Activity - Second Quarter of 2005 1301 15. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER'S DEPARTMENT No Reports 16. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (a) Addendum to EGD-028-05 - Parking, Nash Road, Courtice, Proposed Amendments to By-law 91-58 1501 17. OTHER BUSINESS (a) Courtice South District Girl Guides - Permission to have a Fireworks Display 18. ADJOURNMENT Public Meeting Report # PSD-111-0S 1559300 Ontario Limited C1m:mgron CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION BY: 1559300 ONTARIO LIMITED AN APPLICATION TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL PLAN AND THE ZONING BY-LAW TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarlngton will consider proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments, under Section 22 and 34 of the Planning Act, 1990, as amended. APPLICATION DETAILS The proposed amendments submitted by 1559300 Ontario Limited would allow a mineral aggregate operation (a pit) as an expansion of the existing Kovacs Pit. The subject property is located in Part of Lots 1 & 2, Concession 9, Darlington Township (3086 Regional Road #20) as shown on reverse. Planning File Nos.: COPA 2005-004 & ZBA 2005-012 PUBLIC MEETING The Municipality of Clarington will hold a public meeting to provide interested parties the opportunity to make comments, identify issues and provide additional information relative to the proposed development. The pubiic meeting will be held on: DATE: TIME: PLACE: Monday, September 19, 2005 9:30 a.m. Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, Municipal Administrative Centre, 40 Temperance St., Bowmanville, Ontario ANY PERSON may attend the pubiic meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the proposal. The start time listed above reflects the time at which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences. If you cannot attend the Public Meeting on this applicatiorr you can make a deputation to Councii at their meeting on Monday September 26, 2005, commencing at 7:00 p.m. Should you wish to appear before Council, you must register with the Cierks Department by the Wednesday noon, September 21, 2005, to have your name appear in the Agenda. COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? If you wish to make a written submission or if you wish to be notified of subsequent meetings or the approval of the Official Plan and/or Zoning By-law Amendments, you must submit a written request to the Clerk's Department, 2"" Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L 1 C 3A6. Additional information relating to the proposal is available for Inspection between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at the Planning Services Department, 3"' Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L 1C 3A6, or by calling Heather Brooks at (905) 623-3379 extension 331 or bye-mail athbrooks@ciarington.net APPEAL If a person or public body that files a notice of appeal of a decision for the proposed Official Plan and/or Zoning By- law Amendments to the Ontario Municipal Board does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or does not make written submissions before the proposed Official Plan and/or Zoning By-law Amendments are approved, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal. Dated at the Municipality of Clarington this 20th day of June, 2005. I 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario L 1C 3AG David Crome, M.C.l.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning Services Municipality of Clarington ~ ~ '=' => '" ~ '" z '3 ZBA 2005-012 Zoning By-law Amendment COPA 2005-004 Clarington Official Plan Amendment '" <3 '" Owner: 15593(10 Ontario Limited J ~!~mgron CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION BY: RIDGE PINE PARK INC. Public Meeting Report # PSD-112-05 Ridge Pine Park Inc. AN APPLICATION TO AMEND THE CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington will consider a proposed Official Plan Amendment and a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment under Sections 17 and 34 respectively, of the Planning Act, 1990, as amended. APPLICATION DETAILS The proposed Official Plan Amendment submitted by Ridge Pine Park Inc. would permit the re-designation of Waterfront Greenway to Urban Residential within Special Policy Area B in order to permit the western expansion of Wilmot Creek Community with approximately 67 additional low density dwelling units. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment submitted by Ridge Pine Park Inc. would permit the re-zoning of "Agricultural (A) Zone" lands to an appropriate urban residential zone in order to permit the western expansion of Wilmot Creek Community with approximately 67 additional low density dwelling units. The subject property is located in Part Lot 4, Concession Broken Front, Former Township of Darlington, at the south end and east side of Bennett Road as shown on reverse. Planning File Nos.: COPA 2005-007 and ZBA 2005-030 PUBLIC MEETING The Municipality of Clarington will hold a public meeting to provide interested parties the opportunity to make comments, identify issues and provide additional Information relative to the proposed development. The public meeting will be held on: DATE: TIME: PLACE: Monday, September 19, 2005 9:30 a.m. Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, Municipal Administrative Centre, 40 Temperance St., Bowmanville, Ontario ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting andlor make written or verbal representation either in support of Dr in opposition to the proposal. The start time listed above reflects the time at which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences. If you cannot attend the Public Meeting on this application you can make a deputation to Council at their meeting on Monday, September 26, 2005, commencing at 7:00 p.m. Should you wish to appear before Council, you must register with the Clerks Department by tihe Wednesday noon, September 21 , 2005 to have your name appear in the Agenda. COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? If you wish to make a written submission or if you wish to be notified of subsequent meetings or the adoption of the proposed Official Plan Amendment and approval of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment you must submit a written request to the Clerk's Department, 2nd Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L 1 C 3A6. An Officiai Plan Amendment adopted by the Municipality of Ciarington is forwarded to the Region of Durham for approval, unless it is determined during the review process that the Amendment is exempt from Regional approval. For an exempt Amendment, the decision to adopt by Ciarington Council becomes final, subject to any appeal during the statutory appeal period. Additional information reiating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at the Planning Services Department, 3'd Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L 1C 3A6, or by calling Bob Russell at (905) 623- 3379 extension 341 or bye-mail atbrussell@municipalily.c1arington.on.ca APPEAL If a person or public body that files a notice of appeal of a decision for the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to the Ontario Municipal Board does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or does not make written submissions before the proposed Official Plan Amendment is adopted or the Zoning By-iaw Amendment is approved, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal. Dat;ld'at the Municipality of Clarington this 15th day of Juiy, 2005. e___:?/ ~- ,". /J/',(.//' '--),--:7 ,I L/ / ,{'/'i'_ .."":/ /I-,,:,_--&,/ JDa}'id Crome, ~:C.I.P., R.P.p:J Qifector of Planning Services Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario L 1C 3A6 Subject Site PAAT~ ~ 4QR-1900c4 Cl <( o a:: Rf'.\\..\N~~ ~ ",.. '....::::..:.~..... :nON.AL ~. ........"...."......"..... Iliirt=ile,.';;;""'''''''''''''''"'', l fRi\Wiltli.JtiillifilfjfwJllll!l.I!!iiiiJiflillf ~~:~m~:~m::~~:::jJ.:t~m:~~~*~t0~!~tfi~~~~tl~:~f.if~ .:.:.:.:.:~.:.:.:.:;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:."::.::::~*.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:~.:.:.:-:.:.:.:':':':':':':':':':';':':':':':';':':':':':':'. ~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~::;~::~~~~~~~~~~~~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1~~~~~~~1~~~~~~~~~~~~t. ~!~~~~~~!~~~~!~II~!!!~I~!~l~~~ll~!!!l~l~it~~~!!II~f.J;~1~IIlIl~!1!~IIIIII~~~~I~l~\~tktt:::~:~20~ I ~ ! imii~1r8jliflilllllj~)I\illi!*!j!illllllf.iillirim[lf&f.il :::~::::~:::::~~:~::::::~::::::~::::~:~::::::::~:::::::::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::~::.:.:.::::::~~~f:~::~;:::::::5:::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::5::::::::;:;:::;::::: }JM;f1!I\Ili!Itlfl!mllm!lili!I~!%t;II@;li\lllftiifi!lmif@lil.: .:".:.:.";;;:;.:.:,,.:.;,,:.;:.:.;:.;.,,:;.:.:.:;.:.:.:.:....:.:.:......:";Ilm!glmliwiJjIliiiiiiiii: lellli :::..;:~~f:~:~:z:;,;,:~~:;,:::~~:;,:;~:;,::::;,:~~::~:~;2:::~:i. ;~l~~l~~l~~~~l~~~~l~~~l~l!~ll~!!f~l~~~!l~!!~ll~i. .................:..::..:.:.:."::.:.:.:.::~:::::~::::~:::::::::::::::::~" ~ w z z w cc PAATI,Pl.IoN4\IH5ll27 '-i., .... LAKE ONTARIO Newcastle Key Map COPA 2005-007 Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA 2005-030 Zoning By-law Amendment "'.' '0.\Gy;.",~ )~ QNN- f/J'.\I..'tI~'( ~ , ~ J II [Z2l Lands Subject to Application k::~:::~:f:il Other Lands Owned By Applicant Owner: Ridge Pine Park LAKE ONTARIO C;!~mgron CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Public Report Sabina Ankara Meeting II PSD-113-05 Investments Inc & Realty Limited DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION BY: Sabina Investments Inc. & Ankara Realty Limited AN APPLICATION FOR DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPROVAL TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipaiity of Clarington will consider a proposed draft plan of subdivision, under Section 50 of the Planning Act, 1990, as amended. APPLICATION DETAILS The proposed subdivision submitted by Sabina Investments Inc. & Ankara Realty Limited would permit the development of 100 townhouse units and facilitate the extension of Church Street between Galbraith Court and SI. George Street. The subject property is iocated in Part Lot 10, Concession 1, former Town of Bowmanville, north of King Street East between Gaibraith Court and SI. George Street, as shown on reverse. Planning File No.: S-C-2005-0001 PUBLIC MEETING The Municipality of Clarington will hold a public meeting to provide interested parties the opportunity to make comments, identify issues and provide additional information relative to the proposed development. The public meeting will be held on: DATE: TIME: PLACE: Monday, September 19, 2005 9:30 a.m, Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, Municipal Administrative Centre, 40 Temperance St., Bowmanville, Ontario ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting andlor make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the proposal. The start time listed above reflects the time at which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences. If you cannot attend the Public Meeting on this application you can make a deputation to Council at their meeting on Monday September 26, 2005, commencing at 7:00 p.m. Should you wish to appear before Council, you must register with the Clerks Department by the Wednesday noon, September 21 't, 2005 to have your name appear in the Agenda. COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? If you wish to make a written submission or if you wish to be notified of subsequent meetings or the approvai of the Draft Plan of Subdivision, you must submit a written request to the Clerk's Department, 2nd Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L 1 C 3A6. Additional information relating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at the Planning Services Department, 3" Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L 1 C 3A6, or by calling Susan Ashton at (905) 623-3379 extension 218 or bye-mail atsashton@c1arinqton.nel. APPEAL If a person or public body that files a notice of appeal of a decision for the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision to the Ontario Municipal Board does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or does not make written submissions before the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision is approved, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal. Dated at the Municipality of Clarington this Iz..~day of Aut,it> , 2005. 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario L 1C 3AG D id' me, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning Services Municipality of Clarington EXISTiNG '_I ELEMENTARY I SCHOOL ,~ \ (3 -.J " eo.D f-: ~ 1- ~ ~~ -- ;r:~V) g ..LQ-- ] ~ I-~-' ,. -Z I,,~ - UJ " " " \- i , , ! ,--,- / ' ; ~ . .~ ~ . ci .~ ; I , L_~ , . h t;j ~ ~ t5 Cl:: o Lu " C' ~ ..;:; >.1:'-1 ~~ t~ -. 0 ~. o . < INST. No N25757 '-- I KING STREET INST. \ No 11913_ ~I Possible I . futuro Road -___L.__ \ '''''';00 cAST c---- , , ~ t f-,: l0 Bowmanville Key Map S-C-2005-0001 Plan of Subdivision lZ2I Subject lands l:::::::'-'-:::~:::I Other lands Owned By Applicant STREET fAST ~[bJ I Owner: Sabina Investments Inc. and Ankara Realty Umited Clocmgron REPORT PLANNING SERVICES PUBLIC MEETING Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday, September 19, 2005 Report #: PSD-111-05 File #'5: COPA 2005-004 & ZBA 2005-012 By-law #: Subject: OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONING BY.LAW AMENDMENT TO PERMIT THE EXPANSION OF A MINERAL AGGREATE OPERATION APPLICANT: 1559300 ONTARIO LIMITED (RON ROBINSON LTD.) RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-111-05 be received; 2. THAT the applications to amend the Clarington Official Plan (COPA 2005-004) and the Municipality's Zoning By-law (ZBA 2005-012) submitted by 1559300 Ontario Limited (Ron Robinson Ltd.) be referred back to staff for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report; and 3. THAT Durham Region Planning Department, all interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: D id Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning Services Reviewed by: O~--->~ Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer HB/CPIDJC/lb/lw September 14, 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOW MANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD.111.05 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Owner/Applicant: 1559300 Ontario Limited (Ron Robinson Ltd.) 1.2 Clarington Official Plan Amendment: To change the designation of the lands from "Oak Ridges Moraine" to permit the expansion of mineral aggregate operation. 1.3 Zoning By-law Amendment: To change the current zoning on the lands from "Agricultural (A)" to an appropriate zone to permit the expansion of a mineral aggregate operation. 1.4 Site Area: 62.1 ha 2.0 LOCATION 2.1 The subject property is located at 3086 Regional Road 20 just west of Darlington Manvers Townline Road and north of Regional Road 20 being Part Lots 1 and 2, Concession 9 in the former Township of Darlington (see Attachment 1). 3.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING LAND USES 3.1 Most of the subject lands are being used for agricultural purposes. At the north east corner of the property is a 7.5 ha woodland. A Hydro One transmission corridor easement is located across the northem portion of the site. A single dwelling and a couple of out buildings exist on the subject property, fronting onto Regional Road 20. Adjacent to the residential dwelling located on the property, and surrounded by the subject lands, are two residences on properties of approximately 1 acre in size. 3.2 To the west of the subject lands is the existing aggregate licence area (20.38 ha). The proposed expansion will include the existing licensed area. 3.3 Surroundinq Uses North Woodlands and Hydro One transmission corridor easement. South Regional Road 20, mineral aggregate site, agricultural land and rural residences. East Darlington Manvers Townline Road, mineral aggregate licensed site (presently forested and undisturbed), rural residence and woodlands West Existing aggregate extraction area (Kovac's Pit), Murphy Road, and agriculture. 4.0 APPLICATION BACKGROUND AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 4.1 On April 28, 2005 applications were received for an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-law Amendment to change the land use to permit the expansion of the existing aggregate extraction area. An application was submitted on April 29, 2005 to amend the Durham Region Official Plan (ROPA 2005-006). REPORT NO.: PSD-111-05 PAGE 3 4.2 The application proposes to expand the existing licensed mineral aggregate operation easterly onto the adjoining 62 ha of land. It is intended that the existing residence will remain within the licensed area, providing employee housing or a future office for the extraction operation. Although the woodland and hydro corridor within the north east portion of the site are included within the licensed boundary, this area has been left out of the proposed extraction limits. 4.3 The depth of the extraction operation will be approximately 35 to 40 metres below existing grade and 2 m above groundwater table. Taking into account the setbacks, the woodlot and a 30 metre buffer around the woodlot, the total area to be extracted, including the area presently licensed will be 60.83 ha. Extraction will proceed from west to east with progressive rehabilitation following extraction of each phase. 4.4 The operation will involve excavation, screening, crushing and blending of materials. There is no washing of aggregate proposed. Importing of limestone products for resale or for blending with on-site materials is also proposed. The importation and resale of limestone will be dependent upon on-site extraction. In other words, if no extraction occurs, then limestone cannot be imported to the site. 4.5 The following studies have been submitted in support of the applications: . Level I and II Natural Environment Reports, Oak Ridges Moraine Conformity Report and Natural Heritage Study prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd, dated April 20 2005 . Technical Background Report prepared by Skelton Brumwell and Associates, dated April 7, 2005 . Traffic Impact Study prepared by Skelton Brumwell and Associates, dated April 1 , 2005 . Background Hydrogeologic Assessment prepared by Ian D. Wilson Associates, dated January 18, 2005 . Sound Impact Analysis prepared by Valcoustics Canada Ltd, dated April 6, 2005 5.0 PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT 5.1 The PPS states that as much of the mineral aggregate resources as is realistically possible shall be made available as close to markets as possible and that extraction shall minimize social and environmental impacts. Progressive and final rehabilitation is required and the interim nature of extraction shall be recognized. Final rehabilitation shall be compatible with surrounding land uses and approved land uses designations. Within prime agricultural areas, extraction is permitted as an interim land use provided that substantially the same amount of area and same average soil quality is restored through rehabilitation for agricultural use. 5.2 The PPS prohibits aggregate extraction within significant habitat of endangered species and threatened species, significant wetlands and fish habitat. Extraction cannot occur within significant woodlands, significant valleylands, significant wildlife habitat and significant areas of natural and scientific interest if extraction would cause negative impacts on the feature or ecological functions. Lastly, extraction cannot occur on lands REPORT NO.: PSD-111-05 PAGE 4 adjacent to any of the features identified above if the extraction would have a negative impact on the feature or its ecological function. 5.3 The PPS requires that the long-term availability and use of land, resources and infrastructure be optimized, hence supporting future economic prosperity. 5.4 Planning authorities are to protect, improve and restore the quality and quantity of water by, among other things, implementing restrictions on development in order to protect, vulnerable surface and ground water resources. Also, linkages and related functions among surface and groundwater features and natural heritage features shall be maintained. 6.0 OAK RIDGES MORAINE CONSERVATION PLAN 6.1 Within the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (ORMCP), the subject lands are designated "Countryside Area". Lands to the east, west and south of the site are also designated "Countryside Area". The lands to the north are designated "Natural Core Area". The policies of the ORMCP take precedence over any conflicting policies of the PPS. The ORMCP permits mineral aggregate operations within lands designated "Countryside Area" provided that: . the quantity and quality of groundwater and surface water will be maintained . as much of the site as possible will be rehabilitated; . key natural heritage features on the site and adjacent lands are maintained, improved or restored; and . areas of natural and scientific interest (earth science) are protected. 6.2 The ORMCP further require the health, diversity, size and connectivity of any key natural heritage feature (that is not a young plantation or early successional habitat) either on the site or adjacent to the site, shall be maintained, or where possible, improved or restored. 6.3 Clarington has undertaken the necessary conformity amendments to the COP and Zoning By-law, incorporating the provisions of the ORMCP. These documents have been passed by Council and are currently before the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing for approval. 7.0 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES 7.1 Durham Region Official Plan The lands are designated "Major Open Space - Oak Ridges Moraine (Countryside)" in the Durham Region Official Plan. An amendment is required for any expansion of an existing aggregate operation onto lands not identified as a Resource Extraction Area. Application for amendment shall be accompanied by technical studies to assess potential impacts on water resources and natural heritage. Studies shall also be submitted to address impacts of noise, dust and truck traffic haul routes. The Region is undergoing the peer review process of these studies. REPORT NO.: PSD.111.05 PAGE 5 7.2 Clarington Official Plan The lands are designated "Oak Ridges Moraine" and uses permitted include conservation, reforestation, agriculture and passive recreational uses. Aggregate extraction is not a permitted use although the Plan provides for site specific amendments in the consideration of aggregate pits. In June 2004, Council adopted Amendment No. 33, being the ORMCP conformity amendment. Once approved by the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the designation of these lands will be "General Agricultural Area" and "Environmental Protection", The Environmental Protection designation recognizes the woodlot in the northeast portion of the land holdings as it is significant. The subject lands are within an area having the highest aquifer vulnerability rating and are in a primary area of potential aggregate resource. Amendment to the Official Plan is required to permit the proposed use. The proposed amendment is contained in Attachment 2 to this report. Aggregate extraction shall occur in an orderly and efficient manner with a minimum of environmental, social and financial impacts. The wise use of aggregate resources shall be balanced with the Municipality's responsibility to protect the ecological integrity of the natural heritage system, rural landscapes and the quality of life of Clarington residents. For instance, expansion of an aggregate extraction area shall not be permitted within a significant woodland or within a settlement area. The Official Plan recommends that an area-wide rehabilitation plan be prepared in consultation with the Region of Durham, the Province and the aggregate industry. The purpose of the plan is to identify long term rehabilitation of the landscape ensuring appropriate landforms are created and the ecological integrity of the ORM is maintained. Sections 15.3.6 and 15.3.9 of the Official Plan requires that an Aggregate Extraction Area study be submitted. This study shall address existing land uses and features, provide a description of the operation including an extraction plan, and identify and assess all impacts of the proposed development. In accordance with Section 15.3.8, the Municipality can conduct a peer review of the Aggregate Extraction Area Study at the expense of the applicant. 8.0 ZONING BY.LAW 8.1 The lands are zoned "Agriculture (A)" which does not permit aggregate extraction. In June 2005, Council adopted Zoning By-law 2005-109, rezoning lands within the ORM. This by-law is before the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing for approval. Once approved the lands will be zoned "Prime Agricultural", "Environmental Protection" and "Prime Agricultural subject to Environmental Holding Symbol". The latter zones are established to ensure that appropriate studies are undertaken to determine setbacks from natural features. Rezoning is required to permit the proposed use. REPORT NO.: PSD.111-OS PAGE 6 9.0 PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSIONS 9.1 Public Notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject site and the public notice signs were erected on the three road frontages. In addition, notice of the public meeting was posted on the Municipality's web site. 9.2 As of the date of writing this report, Staff have received a number of comments from the public. The following summarizes the questions and concerns raised in these letters: . This is an increase of almost 400% from what is currently permitted today. . Proximity of pit to residential properties, impact on rural residential quality of life, and negative impact on property values. . Impact of dust and dirt on enjoyment of residential properties. . Loss of continued use of land for agricultural purposes, is farmland considered a natural heritage feature? . Impact on animals and birds, specifically the red-shouldered hawk, and impact on wildlife linkages . Impact of air quality from diesel equipment . Inconsistencies in the content of hydrogeologic report. . Concern about the recommendations and conclusion of the noise report. . Will Clarington conduct independent reports on the technical issues? . Noise and vibration from existing local aggregate operations is currently disruptive. Noise and vibration generated from this proposal will add to existing levels. . Will calcium chloride used to control dust, impact groundwater quality? . Who will monitor contaminants including oil and gas from mechanical equipment and fertilizers used during rehabilitation? . Safety of children walking on Murphy Road to meet the school bus at the corner of Regional Road 20 and Murphy Road. . How will the current entrance handle an increase in traffic? . Entrance should be relocated to Regional Road 20. . Just east of the intersection of Murphy Road and Regional Road 20 is a crest that obscures visibility of on-coming traffic. Also, this intersection is used as a location for school bus drop off and pick up and the mail boxes are also found at this intersection. . Additional traffic will further degrade condition of Murphy Road and other roads. . Does expansion onto lands not licensed for aggregate extraction qualify as a new licence? . Confusion exists about who owns the lands and whether someone who does not own the land can apply to change the land use? . The ORM CP requires a 1.25 km corridor to be maintained in linkage areas. Will there be a 1.25km corridor? . Will progressive rehabilitation occur in conformity with the ORMCP and Aggregate Resources Act? . Applicant should pay 50% of the cost of upgrading Regional Road 20 which was paid for by the aggregate operator to the south as this operation will also benefit from these lane improvements. REPORT NO.: PSD.111.05 PAGE 7 10.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 10.1 Comments have only been received from Clarington Engineering Services. Their comments are summarized as follows: . The main entrance should be relocated to Regional Road 20. . Continued use of any entrances onto Murphy Road will be subject to the approval of the Director of Engineering. . The applicant will be responsible for 100% of the cost of any improvements, modifications or changes to Murphy Road that are deemed necessary to facilitate the proposed expansion. . A drainage plan detailing that existing drainage patterns will not be altered or adversely affected is required. . A performance guarantee estimate is required for any external works deemed necessary by the Director of Engineering Services, including entrance construction and modification. . A road damage deposit in the amount of $1000.00 will be required. . Cash-in-lieu of parkland is required at a rate of 2% of the value of the property. . Additional comments may be applicable subject to the review of all technical studies and reports. 10.2 All other agency comments remain outstanding awaiting the review of the technical reports. 11.0 STAFF COMMENTS 11.1 These applications for Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment are to permit the expansion of the existing mineral aggregate operation onto the adjacent 62 ha of land. The existing licensed area is on 20 ha with an annual maximum extraction limit of 350,000 tonnes. In addition to expanding the licensed area, the applicant is also proposing to increase the allowable annual tonnage to 1 million tonnes. The applicant has submitted an application to amend the Durham Region Official Plan (ROPA 2005-006) and the Region is undergoing the peer review process. 11.2 The applicant is proposing to have the existing pit's main entrance on Murphy Road utilized for all future phases of extraction. This would require additional ongoing maintenance of the road by the Municipality and is a source of concern for some residents. Final location of the main entrance has yet to be resolved. 11.3 All comments submitted, including those from the public have been forwarded to the applicant for review and consideration. 11.4 There are a number of issues that need to be addressed including: . Assessing the impact of this development on natural heritage features, including groundwater and reviewing proposed mitigation measures if necessary; . Assessing the impact of this development on surrounding land uses and reviewing proposed mitigation measures if necessary; . Main entrance location and assessment of the impact of traffic on existing roads; REPORT NO.: PSD-111-05 PAGE 8 . Completion of peer review of technical studies. 11.5 Staff have not completed a review of the studies submitted in support of this application Staff comments will be reviewed together with the comments received from the public and the peer consultant prior to additional consideration of these applications. 11.6 The proposed licenced area includes the woodlot and the portion of the Hydro One easement to the north, although it is not in the "area to be extracted". The woodlot would be better protected if excluded from the licenced area. 12.0 CONCLUSIONS 12.1 The purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements for the Public Meeting under the Planning Act, and taking into consideration the outstanding comments, staff respectfully request that this report be referred back to staff for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map Attachment 2 - Proposed Official Plan Amendment Attachment 3 - ORM Designations and Context Attachment 4 - Operation Plan List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Doug and Tammy Beatty Greg White Paul Reid Skelton Brumwell and Associates Inc. Elizabeth Frick Ron Robinson Anna Bragg Clayton Taylor Kate Sperry Janet Ralston Keystone Sand and Gravel Attachment #1 To Report#PSD 111-05 , " 1 I I' I~ I II I :! , I' --1 . , 1 ~ J \ o << o oo Darlington Key Map 1 I \ ~ ,'" Z <<0 ,,<< 10 ZOO Ow tiz ZOi OiZ !l''' oC' ~ ROPA 2005-006 Durham Region Official Plan Amendment ZBA 2005-012 Zoning By-law Amendment COPA 2005-004 Clarington Official Plan Amendment (Zj Existing Licenced Area E2ZI Proposed Expansion Lands ':; " << '" " z '3 " Owner: 1559300 Ontario Limited Attachment #2 To Report #PSD-III-05 . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o t. ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ !;; E ~ ~ ~ . e ! . ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ! i ~ N ~ . 6 o i HAYDON i!' 00<,", "''''''0 -.1.J ,=( _._.-tl..=.MlC'l!I1."">OIo::rt' , . : ~~~ I I =.n.n.'fW. MEA \-~-;~%H GREEN SP.a l:~:~-:.I ~l1JRIL AREA ~ URBA.'i RESlDENr~ 1'-:i}~1 ~GREENW~y ~1;i~* ~ NV. L_-1 COlI~ RESICENTlAL f - -: ~M~ .; ~AA't SC1tOO_ D H.WlE1' RESlOOfT1loL e C"'J,!MuNfIY F'AAK ~ ~~.:~ SCHCOl. @ ~ CLUSTER e I-W,lLET?,I.RI( ....-....- SPEWi.. POUC'f MEA .------, t,T,lJT)' 1:-::';1 ~~~cin.:~ * T<;URiSM NeD::: SECT1O."t 14-.6 @ GOlF """'" KOVACS PIT EXPANSION TECHNICAL BACKGROUND REPORT FIGURE 6 OFFICIAL PLAN N.T.S. PIN 1872 APR 2005 t!J I ~~ ~r.l::"~~1 CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS uaru.r-'AlROOO.5UTE 107 ~.ON\OIIlIl LW";' ltlO'tlCllE (7m) 721-1141 rJtl.(705)711-OJ.J1 LEGEND ___lJR!AHSOl.JMtJJn' SOURCE: MUNICIPAliTY OF CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN, MAP A1 LANDUSE. '1 ~' i t I! " r :1 I 'I ! Attachment # 3 To Report # PSD-1IJ- , i~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ 10 ,N 1~ o ~ o 11 .'.g' oc ~ ~..:. j~ ~ oc ~ I! '~ m " o " ~ o ~ ~ o . oc ~ ~ 6 o ~ SOURCE: OAK RIDGES MORAINE CONSERVATION PLAN, INFORMATION ON THIS PLAN " BY THE MNR, MMAH AND 2DD2DMTI SPATIAL INC, AIR PHOTO BY ;; NORTHWAY PHOTOMAP, flOWN NOVEMBER 7, 200'2, . '; KOVACS PIT EXPANSION TECHNICAL BACKGROUND REPORT FIGURE 5 PHYSICAL CONTEXT N.T.S. PIN 1872 APR 2005 t!] I ~k~~~~ ~~!~I~~~, ') 1 1 1 CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLP,NNERS Jl BtU. r,tltlolllOAD. :sum: u,l1 BUtR€, ora.olllO loU:lG1 m.tl'HC>>€ (105).7Zli-ll41 FAX. (705) 12e-03Jl ~ ~ a I \)," I I , I I ~I ~! -, , ct> c0 ~. , , '----." I , :i c0 c0 "... ",. ct> c0 r1 Attachment #4 To Report #PSD 111-05 LEGEND __._...C.."'._ --- ....''''.''"'''''''''' --- -....-.-..-- _0_'_ _._n"""<-...._ =-""'" -, === ....-- = <<--.....,,-""'-' i ..._~ CI ...~""" r;:;> ..........-.'''''..- c:::> ........"..- - ........ . I~"-'- _'._ -,,,",,,,,",,,,,.....,...,Dn) C2J _-..aT .."..,",, ~ -,............ d) _c_/>tUl<<< '" "'-- ~..._IlI......-....._r: ~--'-.....'I r/'f:A:f+, _.-......_ ., =."'~J",J"i::'- 1Il'~::':":,,mot;.... ~-<' ---- "'---, " . __....1......: ,,..... >--_~ 1-----1 ..... ~-~ "''';''''''01__'"'' .-....M...~_ -,..,-."'.... -="~""'''':!'1.'''''':' ~ KOVACS PIT EXPANSION t.lUNICIPALlTT Of' CLAAINC10N -~~~= OftR.6.TlOHAL PLA" -.m ..,.0"-1872 """"- ...o41872~ tE Skeltoo Brumwdl Cl~mglOn REPORT PLANNING SERVICES PUBLIC MEETING Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, September 19, 2005 Report #: PSD-112-05 File #'5: ZBA 2005-030 & COPA 2005-007 By-law #: Subject: APPLICATIONS TO AMEND THE CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW TO PERMIT THE WESTERLY EXPANSION OF WILMOT CREEK COMMUNITY WITH APPROXIMATELY 67 ADDITIONAL LOW DENSITY DWELLING UNITS APPLICANT: RIDGE PINE PARK INC. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-112-05 be received; 2. THAT the application to amend the Clarington Official Plan and the application to amend the Zoning By-law be referred back to staff for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report following the receipt of the outstanding agency comments; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: D vi . Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning Services Reviewed by: () ~~ ~ Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer BR/CP/DJC/lb September 12, 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-112-05 PAGE 2 1.0 1.1 APPLICATION DETAILS Owner: Ridge Pine Park Inc. 1.2 Applicant: (same as owner) 1.3 Clarington Official Plan Amendment: To provide for the westward expansion of the Urban Residential designation subject to Special Policy Area B (Wilmot Creek Lifestyle Community) be redesignating lands currently designated Waterfront Greenway. 1.4 Rezoning: Appropriate to permit proposed uses 1.5 Area: Area to be developed: 6.483 hectares (16.02 acres) 1.6 Location: The area to be developed is at the western limits of Wilmot Creek Community in Part of Lot 4, Broken Front Concession, former Township of Darlington. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On June 24,2005, the Planning Services Department received from Ridge Pine Park Inc. an application to amend the Clarington Official Plan and an application to rezone the area for expansion of the "gated" residential community. The official plan amendment application was submitted to provide for the westward expansion of the Urban Residential designation within Special Policy Area B on lands currently designated Waterfront Greenway. The rezoning was submitted to permit approximately 67 dwellings, all low density, and related private streets in the 6.483 hectares (16.02 acres) area to be developed. It is proposed that the balance of the site of 7.287 hectares (18.01 acres) be acquired for municipal park purposes. 3.0 LAND CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES 3.1 The area to be developed is currently vacant. 3.2 The surrounding land uses are as follows: North: C.N. Railway South: one dwelling on a rural residential lot and Lake Ontario East: West End of Wilmot Creek Community West: the above referenced lot and Bennett Road 4.0 PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSIONS 4.1 Public notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject property and two public notice signs were installed, one approximately midway on the Bennett Road frontage and one at the west end of the cul-de-sac terminating Hinkley Trail. Public Notice was also posted on the Notice Board at the Wilmot Creek Community Centre (the Wheelhouse). REPORT NO.: PSD-112-05 PAGE 3 The previous proposed expansion of Wilmot Creek Community, to the north, applied for at an earlier date, generated several interested parties who were also mailed public notice for the subject Official Plan Amendment and rezoning. The applicant indicated they would hold a community information meeting for the residents of Wilmot Creek Community at the Wheelhouse and that they have already presented the proposal to the Wilmot Creek Homeowners Association. 4.2 As of the writing of this report, the Planning Services Department has received two telephone inquiries and one e-mail inquiry with respect to the applications. One telephone inquiry was from a neighbour from outside Wilmot Creek Community. Two of the inquiries were with respect to status and timing of the application. The third inquiry from a Clarington resident asked how the western expansion related to previous expansion applications. Staff clarified that previous expansion applications were to not only expand Wilmot Creek but to expand the urban area as well, whereas the western expansion proposal was within the Bowmanville Urban Area. 5.0 OFFICIAL PLAN CONFORMITY 5.1 Within the Durham Regional Official Plan, the subject property is designated as Living Area and the application conforms. 5.2 Within the Clarington Official Plan, the subject property is designated as Waterfront Greenway within an urban area. The predominant use of land is for recreation, tourism uses, conservation and agricultural uses. The application does not conform, hence this application. The lands east of the subject property are Urban Residential within Special Policy Area B. The Special Policy Area recognizes the private leasehold community catering to seniors or retired residents. It is the policy of the Municipality to provide public access to the waterfront, protect natural and cultural heritage resources and ensure land use compatibility. 6.0 ZONING BY -LAW COMPLIANCE 6.1 The subject property is zoned "Agricultural (A)". The proposal for approximately 67 dwellings does not conform, hence, this rezoning application. 7.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 7.1 The rezoning application was circulated to various agencies and other departments by the Planning Services Department. Rogers Cable and Clarington Emergency and Fire Services had no objections. Other comments received to date are as follows. 7.2 The Ministry of Transportation had no objections in principle, and advised they are reviewing the Traffic Impact Study submitted in support of the application. 7.3 Bell Canada and Enbridge Gas have no objection to the application subject to conditions of approval. REPORT NO.: PSD-112-05 PAGE 4 7.4 Clarington Engineering Services advised they have concems regarding the proposal. The existing municipal roadways are rural and not urban and the absence of storm sewers combined with no upgrading plans in the foreseeable future led the Department to request that no approval be provided at this time. 7.5 C.N. Rail requested two policies regarding noise, vibration, setbacks, berms and fencing be included in the official plan amendment. They also requested a 30 metre setback be specified in the zoning by-law amendment. C.N. Rail also had three technical comments on the noise feasibility study. 7.6 Comments remain outstanding from: Hydro One Networks Inc., Central Lake Ontario Conservation, Regional Planning and Works Departments. 8.0 STAFF COMMENTS 8.1 In 2002, the applicant submitted an application to amend the Durham Regional Official Plan to expand the boundaries of the retirement community and the Bowmanville Urban Area to include the lands between the railway corridor, Highway 35/115, Highway 401 and Bennett Road. The area subject of the 2002 application was referred to as Phases 7 & 8 of the retirement community. The 2002 application is being considered by the Region as part of the Region of Durham Official Plan Review. 8.2 The current application if approved would also allow an expansion of the retirement community, however the expansion area is within the Bowmanville Urban Area boundary. The applicant advised that although they do own the land between Bennett Road and the west limits of the application. they do not plan to expand the residential community any further west than the limits of the lands subject of this application. 9.0 CONCLUSIONS 9.1 As the purpose of this report is to give the status of the application for the public meeting, and identify comments and issues received to date, it is appropriate to have the application referred back to staff for further processing. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Site Location Key Map and Property Plan Attachment 2 - Proposed Clarington Official Plan Amendment List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Mr. Ufton Clarington Industrial Services Inc. Linda Gasser Paul Mack, Mack and Kisbee Bruce Hadji Jim Reninger Roger Howard Dave Diamond Sernas Associates Ernest Burnie Reid and Deborah Allin Victor Suppan, LACAC Bernie Hirseland Attachment #1 To Report # PSD-112-05 -'"' o I , i RP-\\..\l'JP-'{...~ .....,. - - NP-iIONP-\.. -......, I CANADIAN - I I 01 J <( ~ ,I \ ~.I LU Z Z LU a:l - .- ::=~ ;:\ ~~ " i~ I'll HW _IHH I J1 -'f'!""'"'......r.' LAKE ONTARIO Newcastle Key Map ~ 401 ~LMOT ~ ~ ~" ~~~ 0 11 ~;~/'" l II N/>l.~l>N"'''' COPA 2005-007 Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA 2005-030 Zoning By-law Amendment o "' o '" s z z w '" ~ Lands Subject to Application I I~ Owner: Ridge Pine Park UJ<E ONTARIO Our Project No. 02140 Purpose: Basis: Location: Actual Amendment: Implementation: Interpretation: Attachment #2 To Report #PSD-112-05 APPLICANT'S PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN The Amendment implements the following land use changes: . The Urban Residential area and Special Policy Area B coinciding with the Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community is expanded onto lands to the west thereof and south of the CNR in order to permit the expansion of the Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community onto Phase 9. The Amendment is based on an application submitted by Ridge Pine Park Inc., the owners of Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community. The Amendment applies to approximately 6 hectares (15 acres) in the east half of Part of Lot 4, Broken Front Concession, Former Township of Darlington, generally south of the CNR and west of the existing Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community. The lands are part of a total 14 hectare (35 acre) parcel to be purchased by Ridge Pine Park Inc. and intended to form Phase 9 of its Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community in the Municipality of Clarington. The balance of the parcel in the west half of Lot 4 to Bennett Road is to remain Waterfront Greenway and offered for sale to the Municipality of Clarington to remain in open space use in perpetuity. The Clarington Official Plan is hereby amended as follows: (i) By amending Map A 1 (Darlington) Land Use by: . adjusting the limit of Special Policy Area B . redesignating lands south of the CNR and in the east half of Lot 4, BFC, to Urban Residential as shown on Exhibit "A" The provisions set forth in the Clarington Official Plan, as amended, regarding the implementation of the Plan, shall apply in regard to this Amendment. The provisions set forth in the Clarington Official Plan, as amended, regarding the interpretation of the Plan, shall apply in regard to this Amendment. LOT 5 LOT 4 LOT 3 Attachment #2 To Report #PSD-112-05 LOT 2 o <( o '" HIGHWAY o '" <( '" o 401 '" SPECIAL ~ !hI ~.,............ l'i IRevise Boundary Of l ~pecial Policy Area "~ ~ Redesignate To ~n Residential LAKE ONTARIO Applicant's Proposed Amendment To The Clarington Official Plan z o en en w <.) z o <.) I- Z o 0:: u.. z w ~ o 0:: co Cl!![il1glOn REPORT PLANNING SERVICES PUBLIC MEETING Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, September 19, 2005 Report #: PSD-113-05 File #: S-C-2005-001 By-law #: Subject: PROPOSED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION OWNER: SABINA INVESTMENTS INC. AND ANKARA REAL TV LIMITED (THE REMINGTON GROUP) RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-113-05 be received; 2. THAT the application for proposed Plan of Subdivision S-C-2005-001 submitted on behalf of Sabina Investments Inc. and Ankara Realty Limited be referred back to staff for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report; and, 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: David Direc Reviewed by: ()~~~ Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer ome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. [ f Planning Services SNCP/DJC/lb/df September 14, 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-113-05 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant: Sabina Investments Inc. and Ankara Realty Limited (The Remington Group) 1.2 Owner: Sabina Investments Inc. and Ankara Realty Limited (The Remington Group) 1.3 Plan of Subdivision: 100 residential unit plan of subdivision consisting of 35 on-street townhouse units and 65 block townhouse units. 1.4 Site Area: 3.25 ha 2.0 LOCATION 2.1 The subject lands are located at 2 Church Street, Bowmanville, north of the Bowmanville Professional Building and other various commercial businesses fronting on King Street East (Attachment 1). The property is contained within Part Lot 10, Concession 1, in the former Town of Bowmanville. 3.0 BACKGROUND 3.1 On June 20, 2005, Sernas Associates on behalf of Sabina Investments Inc. and Ankara Realty Limited, submitted an application to the Municipality of Clarington for the development of 100 medium density residential units. A Functional Servicing Report and Storm Water Management Report accompanied the application. 4.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES 4.1 The subject property is vacant and currently has frontage along Galbraith Court. 4.2 Surrounding Uses: North: South: Lands associated with Vincent Massey Public School and the Bowmanville High School Bowmanville Professional Building, various commercial businesses, all fronting on King Street East. Medium density residential (townhouses) Kingscourt Road townhouses and Vincent Massey Public School East: West: REPORT NO.: PSD.113.05 PAGE 3 5.0 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES 5.1 The lands are designated Living Area in the Durham Region Official Plan. Lands designated Living Area permit the development of residential units, incorporating the widest possible variety of housing types, sizes and tenure. 5.2 The lands are within the Bowmanville East Main Central Area Secondary Plan of Clarington Official Plan. The East Business District Land Use Schedule of the Secondary Plan designates the lands both High Density and Medium Density Residential. In addition the land use schedule identifies Church Street being extended from St. George Street to Galbraith Court and Simpson Avenue being extended northerly from King Street East to the Church Street extension. 5.3 The medium density policies allow for development with a net density of up to 60 units per net residential hectare with predominant housing form to include townhouses and low-rise apartments. The High Density designation applies to the lands generally north of the Church street extension. This designation allows a density range of 40 to 100 units per net hectare. Predominant housing forms shall include townhouses, stacked townhouses and apartments up to 6 storeys. Parking for all residential units shall generally be located to the rear of the dwelling and may be accessed from a rear lane. 6.0 ZONING BY-LAW 6.1 The subject lands are currently zoned "(Holding) Urban Residential Type Three ((H)R3)". The proposed on-street and block townhouse units are permitted in the R3 zone. 7.0 PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSION 7.1 Public notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject site and a public meeting notice signs were installed on the property at the Church Street and Galbraith Court frontages. 7.2 To date, six (6) inquiries have been received following the sign being posted and notice mailed out. The inquiries were regarding the following: . that the existing traffic levels on Church Street, especially at the Church and Liberty Streets intersection, will be adversely impacted by the proposed 100 additional units; . The increased traffic on Galbraith Court will negatively affect the existing residents; . The noise levels will increase from the increase of traffic on Galbraith Court; . The intersection of Galbraith Court and King Street East appears to have a high incidence of traffic accidents. The increase in traffic will make this intersection more dangerous; . There will be an over abundance of medium density housing being built in the immediate area; REPORT NO.: PSD.113-05 PAGE 4 . There will be an over abundance of medium density housing being built in the immediate area; . There were concerns with respect to possible assisted housing for the townhouse block; . There is no inclusion of any parkland associated with the new development; and . Galbraith Court is not currently constructed at a wide enough width to handle the increase in through traffic volume. 8.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 8.1 At the writing of this report, comments have been received from Central Lake Ontario Conservation, Clarington Engineering Services, Clarington Emergency Services, Rogers, Enbridge and the PVNC District Separate School Board. 8.2 Central Lake Ontario Conservation has several issues with the Storm Water Report and requires a revised report. These comments have been forwarded to the applicant for review. 8.3 Clarington Engineering Services requires that the proposed development have two access points. At this time the applicant has only proposed an access to Galbraith Court and is proposing turning circles at Church Street and Simpson Avenue as they do not own the land required to complete these connections. Until such time as these properties are acquired for road development, draft approval is not be recommended by Clarington Engineering. 8.4 Clarington Emergency Services, Rogers, Enbridge and the Separate School Board had no objection to the application, but Rogers, Enbridge and the Separate School Board requested several conditions be included in the draft approval conditions at such time as they are prepared. 8.5 Comments are outstanding from: . Veridian Connections, . Regional Works, . Regional Planning, . Canada Post Corporation, . Bell Canada, . Durham Police Services, . CMHC, . Conseil scolaire de district catholique Centre Sud, . Conseil scolaire de District du Centre-Sud Ouest, and . Kawartha Pine Ridge Public School Board. 9.0 STAFF COMMENTS 9.1 The application is for an infill development of 100 townhouse units surrounded by existing institutional uses (Bowmanville High School and Vincent Massey Public School), existing residential uses (Kingscourt Road and Galbraith Court) and existing REPORT NO.: PSD.113.05 PAGE 5 commercial uses on King Street East. The lands shown as "Other Land Owned By Applicant" are part of a recent site plan approval for a significant expansion to the Bowmanville Professional Building. The owners of the Professional Building have entered into an agreement with respect to the acquisition of these lands for additional required parking. 9.2 The proposal provides an alignment for part of both the Church Street extension to Galbraith Court and the Simpson Avenue extension north of King Street East. However, based on land ownership, the applicant is proposing one access initially, to Galbraith Court, and two temporary turning circles at Church Street and St. George Street, and at the southern end of Simpson Avenue, prior to reaching King Street East. As noted in the agency comments section, the Municipality does not support the approval of this application with only one access point. 9.3 The subject lands have historically had approval for medium density development based on a private road network and one access to King Street East. Approvals for townhouse development of these lands dates back to 1975. Development of these lands was recently considered by the Municipality as part of the King Street East Corridor Study (2003), which recommended the Church Street and Simpson Avenue extensions and designated the lands for medium and high density development. 9.4 The proposed block townhouses, located on the northern portion of the site, will require site plan approval prior to development. The site plan will examine in detail access to the block, parking, building layout, building design, landscaping, private and common amenity areas, lighting, waste disposal etc. The applicant has illustrated 61 townhouse units at this time, but the layout of the private roads and lotting pattern on the block will not be part of the subdivision draft approval. 9.5 The Ciarington Official Plan contains policies to guide development of medium and high density residential areas. Issues that need to be addressed further with respect to the policies are as follows: . That townhouses sited on blocks shall generally not exceed 50 units. The applicant has requested 65 block townhouse units on their application form. Through their review of this plan of subdivision application staff will review this proposal and determine if the 65 proposed block townhouse units meets the general intent of the Official Plan. . The impact of traffic on local streets is minimized. Staff is of the opinion that this development should not go forward until such time as there is a second access to minimize the impact of all the traffic being required to use Galbraith Court for access. . Amenity areas are required to be provided. There are no amenity areas indicated on the drawings submitted. Both an indoor and an outdoor amenity area should be provided for the 65 unit block townhouse development. . Street townhouses shall not be sited on opposite sides of the street unless adequate on-street parking can be provided to the satisfaction of the Municipality. An on-street parking plan has not been submitted in support of this application. Planning staff believe that rear alleys may assist in achieving a more desirable environment. REPORT NO.: PSD.113.05 PAGE 6 . The site shall be suitable in terms of size and shape to accommodate the proposed density and building forms. The site is an irregular shape due to existing development abutting the property. Staff has concerns that the layout of freehold townhouse units proposed by the applicant will constrain the development of the block townhouses. . In addition, the relationship between the proposed residential; development and the existing surrounding uses will be carefully reviewed with respect to traffic, noise access and urban design issues. 10.0 CONCLUSIONS 10.1 In consideration of the issues raised and the agency comments not received at the writing of this report, and that the purpose of this meeting is to fulfill the Planning Act requirements for a Public Meeting, it is recommended that the application be referred back to staff for further processing. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map Attachment 2 - Proposed Plan of Subdivision Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision: Sernas Associates Sabina Investments Inc. and Ankara Realty Limited Kim Macdonald Sheila Roman Kim Broome Dillon Sawyer Glenn Martin Donna Collins EXISTING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL " Attachment #1 To Report #PSD 113-05 <:( I Cj -J <C f:: I :z: Lu CJ Vi Lu I ct l') :z: I f:: (J) >< Lu \ . "-- ~ --------- ci ---------- CHURCH " .. T"",p.Tymlng ~1rd. aooclo: ~" (l)./Il...-o.CJIl<.) f-- i;j go ~ (J) Lu l') ct 0 Lu l') c-: U) KING , ,. z "'~ ,,:,..1 ~~ t~ ;;~ ", ~, ::e: " INST. No N25757 S TR E E T INST.I No 119~3 I ~Pos5ible ____ . f~ture Road I \ '''m.;oo EAST Bowmanville Key Map '~~~~7 0 I:, ~ / :: Subject ""\ ). I' Site ,^~ "". ' / ....... J ! / ...... ~jL][_~~_ __JL \ .~.~~ l..~ I~ Il [ -- S-C-2005-0001 Plan of Subdivision IZ2J Subject Lands [:::::::::::::::::::1 Other Lands Owned By Applicant Owner: Sabina Investments Inc. and Ankara Realty Limited " , j , , COO , " , -, I I I I L-, z 11 , y " . 0 > Temp,T1minglCircl8 Block BLOCH 11 (O,Cl-ne-Lo.roae.) ~ 0 " , I- tJ ~ (f) I.,J () 0:: 0 J I.,J () ~ (f) 20;.16B N 70- 34-' 00" = OCl = = ClO = = = ClO = = = il ~EOJUIot-liiENSlTY REsloanAlP=l BLOCKJ __ (1.61ahO - 3.98 Q~.) = " 00 ~ ~ I~ tIi 2 ~ -'e-'d E :::l g o -.r'" ,..: B B B 8 B 28.l!....- ~ n- [ E B ~ il ! <:> Q ~ , / N74-"26"30"E 75'1 Fut.Devel. BLOCK 10 (O.~ha - 0.04 ac,) Z , ~~ ~'" ",0, '"~ "'~ ;:;~ G I:t~. :i c: ~I t t.: t.i ~ ~ Attachment #2 To Report #PSD 113-05 Cl 20,0 z --J ~ () -J <:( i=::: Z !.ir CJ Vi I.,J 0:: , 29,2 \ ~I I I \ "" N () Z i=::: (f) >< cd ~ << W ~ ---- , ~t __-.Iz 5 ~~ ~. ~ ~\j\\'l: 00. '~ot ",0, ,0, ;; E n 0; ---- -~ o , [==-- INST. No N25757 ! I INST.I No I I . I 119~1 '---- I I Possible Future Road Extension I I LJ N74'26'.3S"E STREET FAST KING Proposed Plan of Subdivision CllJl-!lJgton REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, September 19, 2005 Report #: PSD-114-05 File #: ZBA 2005-035 By-law #: Subject: APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF PART LOT CONTROL APPLICANT: 1189286 ONTARIO INC. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-114-05 be received; 2. THAT the request for removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Lots 58, 59, 61, 63, and 73 to 81 inclusive on Plan 40M-2178 be APPROVED and that the attached Part Lot Control By-law be pass~ pursuant to Section 50 (7.1) of the Planning Act; 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision; and 4. THAT a copy of this report be forwarded to the Region of Durham Planning Department. Submitted by: D v' . Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning Services Re';eWedby.Q~ Q anklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer TW/CPIDJC/df 31August 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1 C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-114-05 PAGE 2 1.0 1.1 APPLICATION DETAILS Owner: 1189286 Ontario Ltd. 1.2 Location: Lot 34, Concession 1, former Township of Darlington, 40M-2178 (Attachment 1) 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On July 22,2005, Staff received a request from 1189286 Ontario Ltd. for the removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Lots 58, 59, 61,63, and 73 to 81 inclusive on Plan 40M- 2178. 2.2 Draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-95023 received approval for one hundred and fourteen (114) semi-detached dwelling units. Registration of plan of Subdivision 40M-2178, which is Phase 1 of the Draft Approved plan, included fifteen (15) semi-detached link lots for thirty (30) dwellings in November, 2003. The removal of Part Lot would facilitate the construction of twenty-six (26) of those approved dwelling units. Part Lot Control has previously been lifted for the remaining four (4) semi-detached units. 3.0 COMMENTS 3.1 Staff has no objection to the approval of a By-law exempting the subject lands from Part Lot Control. Attached is a By-law (Attachment 2) to exempt the subject lands from Section 50 (5) of the Planning Act. 3.2 Attachment 3 is a Summary Table provided in accordance with the Region of Durham's requirements under the delegation of Part Lot Control. It details lots affected by the Part Lot Control By-law and the unit type and number of the Part Lot Control By-law. 3.3 The Finance Department has indicated that the tax payments are up to date for the subject properties. 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 In accordance with Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, the By-law may provide a specified timeframe during which the By-law shall be in force. As a result, it is not necessary for Staff to prepare a second By-law to restore Part Lot Control on the subject lands. The Planning Act leaves it to the Municipality to determine an appropriate timeframe during which the By-law shall apply. Staff recommends that the By-law be in force for a three (3) year period following Council approval, ending September 26, 2008. REPORT NO.: PSD-114-05 PAGE 3 Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map Attachment 2 - By-law for Removal of Part Lot Control Attachment 3 - Unit Type and Number Summary Table List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Gary Breda Attachment #1 To Report #PSD-114-05 ~ "" <D ~ o ~ N ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f- '" ~ ~C"...IC"...IC"...IC"...IC"...IC"...IC"...lU~UNNNNc:.n _ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Vol N - 0 w ~ ~ ~ AJ 116 o (J) ~ 115 r r 114 In: ;;0)> GJ:I! OG") 1""'1)> =ir;:! , '" .... 117 / " MONTAGUE AVENUE 113 c:, r o o ^ " / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c:.n N U ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ 0 I ~RjEl (J1 <.11 c.n (J'I ..po. 01 en ........ 112 111 110 en o ~ ~*g~gm~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ 109 %~~~~%%%~ ~ ~~~~~~~}~~~~ 108 ow ;;0)> GJ:I! OG") 1""'1)> =ir;:! I I CD r o o ^ " AYLESWORTH A VENU E o AJ <: 1""'1 0> 0> 0> .... '" '" 107 106 105 - ~ ~~':f~~~~fg~~~g; N ...... N i ~ ~ C'l 104 " SOUTHFIELO AVH L- BLOCK 1163 r--... I " / - ~ ~ to to to 0 0 a a -....J co to 0 --" N tN T --" ...... ...... - ...... ~ g t 6; ~ P' Courtice Key Map j ! ZBA2005-035 Lots Affected By Part Lot Control Lots 58, 59, 61, 63, and 73-81 40M-2178 Owner: 1189286 Ontario Inc. Attachment #2 To Report #PSD-114-0S CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NUMBER 2005-_ being a By-law to exempt a certain portion of Registered Plan 40M-2178 from Part Lot Control WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to exempt from Part Lot Control, Lots 58, 59, 61,63, and 73 to 81 inclusive on Pian 40M-2178, registered at the Land Title Division of Whitby; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as foilows: 1. That Subsection 5 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, this By-law shall not apply to those lands described in Paragraph 2 within the By-law. 2. That this By-law shall come into effect upon being approved by the Municipality of Clarington and thereafter Subsection 5 of Section 50 shall cease to apply to the following lands: a) Lots 58, 59, 61,63, and 73 to 81 inclusive of Plan 40M-2178 3. Pursuant to Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, this By-iaw shall be in force for a period of three (3) years ending on September 26, 2008. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2005 BY -LAW read a third time and finally passed this dayof 2005 John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk Attachment #3 To Report #PSD-114-05 PART-LOT CONTROL EXEMPTION BY-LAW Registered Plan #: 40M-2178 By-law: . "R~RQVI;D'. ;'GL~i>iZllitrs~t*:~";}!:#;' '@;.;i:&~':;i:',;'" .~'l9C~8Affe.cte Lot 58 Lot 59 Lot 61 Lot 63 Lot 73 Lot 74 Lot 75 Lot 76 Lot 77 Lot 78 Lot 79 Lot 80 Lot 81 TOTAL Semi-detached - 2 Semi-detached - 2 Semi-detached - 2 Semi-detached - 2 Semi-detached - 2 Semi-detached - 2 Semi-detached - 2 Semi-detached - 2 Semi-detached - 2 Semi-detached - 2 Semi-detached - 2 Semi-detached - 2 Semi-detached - 2 Units - 28 No increase in units No increase in units No increase in units No increase in units No increase in units No increase in units No increase in units No increase in units No increase in units No increase in units No increase in units No increase in units No increase in units No increase in units ~{(J!illglOn REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee Date: September 19, 2005 Resolution #: Report #: CSD.12-05 File#: By-law #: Subject: Grant Eligibility - University of Ontario Institute of Technology - Solar Vehicle Team Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CSD-12-05 be received, and; 2. THAT Council consider the request for funding from the University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Solar Vehicle Team, under the Municipal Grant Program. Submitted by: J s ph P. Caruana irector of Community Services Reviewed byd~~, Franklin Wu Chief Administrative Officer JPC/BT/SC/ta CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET. BOWMANVILlE, ONTARIO l1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-5506 REPORT NO.: CSD-12-05 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 At the September 6, 2005 meeting of General Purpose and Administration Committee, Samveg Saxena, President and Founder of the UOIT Solar Team, made a presentation requesting financial support for their project to design a Solar Car for international competition. 2.0 COMMENTS 2.1 The Solar Team is a volunteer based student club of the UOIT and Durham College. The program is not considered to be an administrative or academic function of UOIT or Durham College. 2.2 The purpose of the program is to educate students in the area of renewable energy and sustainability development. Students will be responsible for the design, construction and operation of the sola'r vehicle. Students from Clarington attending UOIT and Durham College are involved in the project as a learning opportunity. 2.3 This program was developed with the support of the Durham Board of Education and will be expanded to include the Kawartha Pine Ridge Board of Education. Sponsors of the program will benefit from international exposure. As well, the vehicle will be made available for special events to promote both the program and the sponsors. 2.4 A grant has recently been awarded by the City of Oshawa ($5,000.00). The Region of Durham - Economic Development Department will also incorporate the Solar Car Team into the Region's promotional program up to a value of $5,000.00. 3.0 FINANCIAL 3.1 Based on the above comments, the UOIT Solar Car Project meets the grant program criteria under the Civic Category; and, is eligible for consideration of a grant by Council. 3.2 The total funds allocated to the Municipal Grant Program in 2005 Operating Budget is $80,000.00. At the Council meeting of February 7, 2005 Council approved the 2005 Municipal Grant Report and allocated $58,050.00 in funding to support various initiatives presented by local community groups. A further amount of $13,500.00 was subsequently been awarded to various community requests leaving a balance of $8,450.00 in the 2005 Grant Account. List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Samveg Saxena - President and Founder of the UOIT Solar Car Team CJiJ!.Y!gtoo REPORT CLERK'S DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: September 19, 2005 Report #: CLD-027-05 File#: By-law #: Subject: Pet Plan Insurance Shelter Partnership Program RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CLD-027-05 be received; and 2. THAT staff be authorized to enrol in the Pet Plan Insurance Shelter Partnership Program. Submitted by: Reviewed by: Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer ~ Q~~ PLB*CAG* CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1 C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-6506 REPORT NO.: CLD-027-05 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT Pet Plan Insurance is an international pet health insurance provider. The Pet Plan Insurance Company offers a partnership program with pet shelters. The program provides new pet owners six weeks of free pet health insurance for select accidents and select illness. Our Animal Services Officers would be required to provide the new pet owners with the Pet Plan Insurance brochure and voucher, advise them of the opportunity to enrol in a pet insurance plan, and recommend that they contact the service providers within 24 hours of adoption to activate the free six week insurance plan voucher. If the new pet owner chooses to activate their insurance voucher the Municipality of Clarington would receive $.50. If the new pet owner chooses to enrol beyond the six weeks, the Municipality of Clarington receives $20.00. Municipalities currently enrolled in the Pet Plan Insurance Shelter Partnership Program include: Vancouver Animal Control, Mississauga Animal Services and the Delta Humane Society. Staff contacted the Mississauga Animal Services and confirmed that they have been enrolled in the Program for approximately three months. They report that their staff do not "sell", but rather they simply advise the new pet owners of their opportunity for the no obligation coverage and encourage the owner to activate their voucher. Details about coverage are not discussed with the pet owner. To date, the Mississauga Animal Services has received approximately $60.00 from Pet Plan Insurance. Currently we provide new pet owners brochures for two pet insurance companies (including Pet Plan Insurance) as part of our adoption information package. These brochures are distributed as a courtesy to the insurance companies and certainly as a benefit to our new pet owners to assist them in making informed decisions concerning pet health care. It is recommended that the Municipality of Clarington enrol in the Pet Plan Insurance Shelter Partnership Program for the following reasons: it would not impact our staff workload, there is no cost to the Municipality, it provides an opportunity for minimal revenue, and it provides our new pet owners with an option for six weeks of complementary insurance coverage. Attachment #1 Pet Plan Insurance Brochure ~~~mgron REPORT CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: September 19, 2005 Report #: COD-042-05 File#_ By-law # Subject: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP2005.7 - SUPPLY OF CONCESSION ITEMS Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report COD-042-05 be received; 2. THAT Kwik Snacks, Toronto, Ontario be awarded Part A; Part C; Part E; Part F and Part G for the Supply of Concession Items for a one year term for an approximate annual value of $121,871.97; 3. THAT Humpty Dumpty, Brampton, Ontario be awarded Part B of the contract to supply and deiiver Snacks to the Concession Stands for a one year term for an approximate annual value of $6,112.35; 4. THAT Madison Food and Beverage Company, Orillia, Ontario be awarded Part D of the contract to supply and deliver Hot Beverages to the Concession Stands for a one year term for an approximate annual value of $22,018.1 0; 5. That the contracts be award for a second and third term pending satisfactory pricing and delivery; 6. THAT the funds required be drawn from the respective Community Services operating budgets. Reviewed bYO~---~ Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer Submitted by: MMILABlsm oe Carauna Director of Community Services COD-042-05 Page 2 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT A request for proposal was publicly advertised and issued with bid documents being issued to twenty-five firms. Attached is "Schedule A" summarizing the bids which were received by the Municipality. Representation from the Community Services Department and Purchasing reviewed and scored each proposal. Upon completion of the document review by the selection committee the following companies ar b . d f e elnQ recommende or the concession contract. Section ComDany Estimated Cost Part A - Confectionarv Kwik Snacks, Toronto, ON $7,621.07 Part B - Snack Items Humptv Dumptv, Brampton, ON $6,112.35 Part C - Perishables Kwik Snacks, Toronto, ON $62,728.47 Part D - Hot Beverages Madison Food And Beverage $22,018.10 Company, Orillia, ON Part E - Baked Goods Kwik Snacks, Toronto, ON $12,941.46 Part F - Dairv Products Kwik Snacks, Toronto, ON $18,349.25 Part G - Paper Products Kwik Snacks, Toronto, ON $20,231.72 The request for proposal allowed the bidders the opportunity to include operating equipment such as microwaves, coffee makers, hot chocolate machines, nacho and popcorn equipment. As part of the contract conditions, the unit prices submitted are estimates only based on previous usage in 2004, and subsequently there is no penalty assessed should these usage figures not be met. Included as part of Madison County's bid submission is the supply and installation of the necessary coffee and hot chocolate equipment. The servicing and maintenance of all equipment will remain the responsibility of the successful bidder. The term of the contract will commence on November 14, 2005 and to expire on November 13, 2006, with the option to extend for two additional one year terms pending satisfactory service and pricing. The unit prices quoted will remain firm for ninety days. Any price increases will not exceed the annual consumer price index, and any price decreases would be passed on to the Municipaiity. The Municipaiity reserves the right to review such increases, continue or cancel the contract. Further, this contract could be cancelled should the successful bidder not provide a good standard of service and quaiity products. The required funds will be drawn from the Community Services respective years operating budget. Queries with respect to the department needs, specifications, etc. can be directed to the Director of Community Services. COD-042-05 Page 3 The subject firms with the exception of Madison Food and Beverage Company have been suppliers for concession items in the past years and have provided satisfactory service to the Municipality of Clarington. Madison Food and Beverage Company references were satisfactory. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOW MANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-4169 1/1 E CIl = c o 1/1 1/1 CIl ..... ~~ ....1lI... ~E8 -6~'O CIl en >- ~ - to) "C c.. en in g. en .... I It) Q Q N D.. LL. D:: g fa "0 "0 0) 0) 0) Vl._ "": "0 "0 - - '> '> >-:::J ~ 0).0 :2 :2 "0 "0 "0 0) :2 e e E";:: <(]i III III C1i C1i C1i co III a.. a.. 0 0 CO - - 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z w Z Z Z Vl c.2J :::J.- "0 "0 OC: ID 0) 0) c: 0) N "0 "0 0) en (Y) '> '> "00) "0 "0 :2 00 :2 :2 "0 e e 0 O:m C1i C1i III r-: III III C1i a.. a.. (90 N - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z w Z Z Z Z Z '" "0 "0 ~~ 0 0) 0) 0 ~ LO "0 -0 "": cO 0 "': '> '> ,- :::J e e "00 "0 ~ :2 ~ :2 "0 0) ~O C1i ~ III 0_ III C1i N a.. a.. 0 N 00_ - - 0 .,f 0 N 0 0 0) 0 0 Z w Z w Z Z w Z Z ~ "0 "0 0) 0) f~ ID "0 "0 C"1 "> '> "0 N :2 "0 -0 :2 "0 e e :::J:::J C1i ~ III C1i C1i III C1i a.. a.. J:O ~ - - 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z w Z Z Z Z Z Z Z N I'- ~ CO LO N ~ 0 '<t N "": "! I'- -,,-" 00 00 cO Lei ~ 0) ~ ._ 0 3: CIl 0) 0) N (Y) '<t '<t (Y) ::.::C: ID (Y) I'- LO 0) (Y)_ "!. .,f 00 en N N N 00 0 :!< :!< '<t ID CO N ~ ~ N 0 0 W W W W W W W ID ID 0) 0) ~ c. 0) (Y) CO ~ ::l ID "": 00 0) , ~ ~ :2 -0 '<t :2 0) c: :::J "!. (Y) III C1i I'- III 1'-- en N 0 (Y) N ID CO 0 0 ~ 0 N :!< :!< Z Z Z 0 0 W W W W (Y) (Y) "0.9- ... 0) Vl c: .~ N N '" CIl ~UJ 0 0 ID !!! ..,f 0 "! 0 ~od :2 :2 ID CO -0 :2 N .5 c:"o III III o_ lD C1i III 00 ~ ~8 00 co_ CO #. :!< 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 N 'C: '5 0 u. z z w w Z Z w (Y) (Y) E ..... :::J ..... <( III 0 0 UJ U. CD E CIl CIl t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: 'x ~ ~ CIl CIl CIl CIl CIl CIl CIl CIl ~ E a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. :E N (Y) ~ U ~ CIl ~ ~ c ~ OJ .c: g :: ';; {1 '.+:l :E '" '" ~ Ii: ~ '" o(!.g ~ {/:l :g .s >>.0 e..... ] Eo-< ~..;... o':w C,) eld .g0~S' Z ~ ~ 8 . OJ := S ~ .t::I 8 a) >. 0 rfJ {/:l'~ <= .S ~"O .. ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ .g O::8ou"O!:: '5 oU a8.g '" c 'I:'~ z.S" :u o..!:: u _ co OJ "0 U """ I;J'J ~ ==,.d~t} ~ 0.. ~ - =' eu~~s-g.'!i o "" "0 ... u g,!::o!::o 5l~.g o ~ - 0 ~ >>>>.0 "'... !::o '8 <= ,~ '8 ~ o OIl - "0"0"0 !::1Il '" .- .- .- .- = III III .0 .~ t:: 0 U 0 tl ~~ :g t::t::l;ic>>:; ~~~~~g "0"0"030"0 !:: !:: !:: 0 u'~ ~~~ "tj "'-'t 1-1 I-t >. =0 '" 1U1U1U.... ... -g -g -g S':a ~ ~~~~~~ .....;Nff"i~.,.;\Ci Cl{Jl#]gton REPORT CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: September 19, 2005 Report #: COD-048-05 File#_ By-law # Subject: TENDER NO. CL2005-34 ONE FOUR WHEEL DRIVE TRACTOR AND MOWERS Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report COD-048-05 be received; 2. THAT Evergreen Farm and Garden, Orono, with a total bid amount $90,180.00 plus GST being the lowest responsible bid received meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender #CL2005-34, be awarded the contract for the supply and delivery of one only four wheel drive tractor and mowers as required by the Operations Department, and 3. THAT the required funds be drawn from Budget Account #110-36-388-83642-7401. S",m..d b,,~a*) . arie Marano, H.B.Sc., C.M.O. Director of Corporate Services the 2005 Operations Department Capital i:)(' t!' IJ ~ r- Reviewed b . ::, U..J k Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer MM/NT/LAB/jb REPORT: COD-048-05 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT Tenders were publicly advertised and invited for the suppiy and delivery of one only four wheel drive tractor and mowers as required by the Operations Department. A total of nine documents were issued and tenders were received and tabulated as per Schedule "A" attached. Upon review and analysis of the bids by Operations Department and Purchasing, it is mutually agreed that Evergreen Farm and Garden Ltd., Orono, be recommended for the supply and delivery of one John Deere tractor and mowers. The funds required to complete the purchase of this unit are provided in the Operations Department Capital Account # 110-36-388-83642-7401 in the amount of $105,000.00. The Director of Finance has reviewed the funding requirements and concurs with the recommendation. Queries with respect to the departmental needs, specifications, etc. should be directed to the Director of Operations. The subject firm has previously provided satisfactory service for the Municipality of Clarington. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOW MANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-4169 ClfJlpn Municipality of Clarington SCHEDULE "A" BID SUMMARY TENDER NO. CL2005-34 ONE FOUR WHEEL DRIVE TRACTOR AND MOWERS Evergreen Farm & Garden Ltd. Orono, Ontario $90,180.00 Greendale Farm & Garden ltd. Omemee, Ontario $96,473.16 Hutchinson Farm Supply Stouffville . GST EXTRA $97,632.00 Cl~il1gron REPORT CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: September 19, 2005 Report #: COD-049-05 File#_ By-law # Subject: Request for Proposal RFP2005-11 - Newcastle Recreation Facility Architectural Services Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administrative Committee recommend to Council the followin9: 1. THAT Report COD-049-05 be received; 2. THAT the proposal received from Shore Tilbe Irwin, Toronto, Ontario being the most responsive bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Request for Proposal RFP2005-11 be awarded the contract for the provision of the Architectural Services for the Newcastle Recreation Facility at an estimated cost of $790,000.00 plus GST; and 3. THAT the Treasurer be authorized at the time of awarding the tender for construction of the project, to make application to the Region of Durham for debenturing the necessary fund for the total requirements for this project. Submitted by: ~~ Marie Marano, H.B.Sc., C.M.O. Ire tor of Corporate Services Reviewed b~ .,-- ~ Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer oseph Caruana, Director of Community Services "' ~ ' ,. ~..jt t ~Ta~ B.B. , . :, Director of Finance MM\NT\JClLABlsm\km COD-049-05 Page 2 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT As per Resolution GPA-302-05 as the result of Report CSD-010-05, Purchasing proceeded with a Request for Proposal for professional services for the Newcastle Recreation Facility. As per the Resolution, Council authorized pricing be received for the architectural services for Newcastle Recreation Facility to include a leisure pool, auditorium, meeting rooms along with an administrative area. A request for proposal was publicly advertised and issued with bid documents being issued to eighteen firms. The following is a tabulation of bids submitted: Architects Bid Amount (not includina GSTI Lett Architects lnc + Salter Pilon Architects inc., $660,500 Peterborouah, ON + Barrie, ON Garwood-Jones & Hanham Architects, Hamilton, ON $735,000 Rounthwaite, dick & Hadley Architects, Toronto, ON $774,000 Thomas Brown Architect, Toronto, ON $780,000 Shore Tilbe Irwin & Partners, Toronto, ON $790,000 Maclennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects, Toronto, ON $800,000 Diamond and Schmitt Architects, Toronto, ON $803,500 Barry-Bryan Associates, Whitby, ON $834,000 Cannon Design, Toronto, ON $838,750 Carruthers Shaw and Partners Ltd., Architects, Toronto, ON $857,000 Architects Tillmann Ruth Mocellin, London, ON $865,000 Quadrangle Architects Limited, Toronto, ON $900,000 Montgomery Sisam , Toronto, ON $975,000 Parkin Architects Ltd, Mills & Associates Ltd., $983,716.92 Toronto, ON & Oshawa, ON Representatives from the Community Services Department and Purchasing reviewed and scored each proposal based on the following criteria: >- Previous Experience >- Experience of Key Personnel >- Price >- Working knowledge in Clarington and Durham Region >- Ability to Complete the Project on Schedule >- Completeness of Proposal >- Creativity COD-049-05 Page 3 As per the request for proposal document, the consultant selection would be made on the basis of the written proposal, a potential interview and reference checks. Upon completion of the document review by the selection committee, five firms, Cannon Design, Shore Tilbe Irwin & Partners, Barry-Bryan Associates, Carruthers Shaw and Partners Limited along with Macleannan Jaunkalns Miller architects were selected for an interview. On completion of the interviews and presentations by the firms the scores were compiled and the two firms who scored the highest were selected for reference checks. Staff was impressed with the coverage of the proposed services, proponents' experience and enthusiasm for the project. Team members were in attendance at the interview and their roles were discussed. Reference checks for the Shore Tilbe Irwin were excellent. As indicated in Report CDS-10-05, this project has been identified in the Municipality's Development Charges Study with 90% of the project to be funded from Development Charges. The project will be debentured with recovery of the appropriate share from development charges over the debenture repayment period. A more detailed financing section will be included in the report for awarding the construction tender. The Director of Finance has reviewed the funding requirements and concurs with the recommendation. Queries with respect to the department needs, specifications, etc. can be directed to the Director of Community Services. It is therefore recommended that the proposal received from Shore Tilbe Irwin, Toronto, Ontario to provide the Architectural Services for the Newcastle Recreation Facility, be accepted. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-4169 Clwil1gton REPORT CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: September 19, 2005 Resolution #: Report #: COD-050-05 File#: By-law #: Subject: CL2005-31, Two (2) 43,000 GVW Single Axle Cab & Chassis clw Dump Body and Plow Equipment Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report COD-050-05 be received; 2. THAT Donway Ford Sales Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, with a total bid in the amount of $343,887.12 (plus GST), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender CL2005-31, be awarded the contract to supply Two (2) 43,000 GWV Single Axle Cab & Chassis complete with Dump Body and Plow Equipment, as required by the Municipality of Clarington, Operations Department; and 3. THAT the funds required in the amount of $343,887.12 (plus GST) be drawn from the Operations 2005 Capital Budget Account #110-36-388-83642-7401. Submitted by: ~ Marie Marano, H.B.Sc., C.M.O. Director f rporate Services Reviewed bY~---! ~ Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer MM\LA8\J8\lm REPORT NO.: COD-050-05 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT Tender CL2005-31 for Two (2) 43,000 GVW Single Axle Cab & Chassis complete with Dump Body and Plow Equipment was advertised and issued with bids being received as per Schedule "A" attached. On review it was noted that all bids submitted contained deficiencies. While evaluating the bids and preparing the recommendation, it was noted that the two low bids were not compliant with the specification for transmission and also had minor deficiencies. The third lowest bid also had deficiencies in engine size and a high cab step which is a safety issue. The recommended bidder Donway Ford Sales Ltd, meets all specifications. After further review and analysis of the tender by Operations and Purchasing, it was mutually agreed that Donway Ford Sales Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, be recommended for the contract to supply and deliver Two (2) 43,000 GVW Single Axle Cab & Chassis compiete with Dump Body and Plow Equipment, as required by the Operations Department. The required funds for this acquisition total $343,887.12 (plus GST), and fall within the total budget allocation of $380,000.00. The Director of Finance has reviewed the funding requirements and concurs with the recommendations. Queries with respect to department needs, specifications, etc., should be referred to the Director of Operations. The subject firm has previously provided satisfactory service for the Municipality of Clarington. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-4169 ATTACHMENT # f TO REPORT # {lb()-O:;C>f6 Cl!J!_n Municipality of Clarington SCHEDULE "A" BID SUMMARY TENDER CL2005-31 TWO (2) 43,000 GVW SINGLE AXLE CAB & CHASSIS COMPLETE WITH DUMP BODY AND SPREADER Winslow Gerolomy Motors Peterborough, ON $317,636.64 Non-Com liant Winslow Gerolomy Motors Peterborough, ON $333,268.56 Non-Com liant Complete Western Star & Sterling Truck Barrie, ON $343,612.80 Minor Deficiencies Donway Ford Sales Ltd. Toronto, ON . GST EXTRA $343,887.12 CI~mgron REPORT FINANCE DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2005 Resolution #: Report #: FND-013-05 File#: By-law #: Subject: CASH ACTIVITY - SECOND QUARTER OF 2005 Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report FND-013-05 be received; 2. THAT in accordance with provision of Chapter 25, Section 286 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, the Treasurer reports the cash position of the Municipality of Clarington for the second quarter of the year 2005, as shown on the attached schedule; and 3. THAT Part "A" of the expenditures for the second quarter of the year be confirmed. Reviewed iJ Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer. NT/ANhjl REPORT NO.: FND-013-05 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT: The attached schedules indicate the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington's cash transactions for the second quarter of 2005, the cash investment position, the taxes receivable position and the comparative information for the month ending June 30, 2005. Statistical information, transit revenue and expenditure schedule is for the second quarter of 2005. Attachments: Attachment A - Analysis of Revenue and Expenditures - Second Quarter of 2005 Attachment B - Continuity of Taxes Receivable - As at June 2005 Attachment C - Statistical Information - As at June 2005 _ Transit Revenue and Expenditure - As at June 2005 Attachment D - Investments Outstanding - As at June 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOW MANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1 C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-4169 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON Analysis of Revenue and Expenditures for the Second Quarter of the Year 2005 PART "A" Second Quarter Second Quarter 2005 2004 REVENUE RECEIVED FOR GENERAL OPERATING AND RESERVE FUND PURPOSES: GENERAlfTAX PAYMENTS RECEIVED 42.475,563 36.436,235 LINEAR PROPERTIES 0 177,911 DURHAM REGION - PROVINCIAL OFFENCES ACT 160,708 192,206 CANADIAN WASTE - RENT AND ROYALTIES 12,783 13,969 PROVINCE - GAS TAX 90,999 0 ONTARIO MUNICIPAL PARTNERSHIP FUND (CRF) 87,000 58,000 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES-MUNICIPAL 1,739,594 3,817,584 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES-REGION 2,369,210 4,900,094 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES-SCHOOL BOARD 257,835 544,227 INTEREST 828 385 682814 48 022 077 46 823 040 USE OF FUNDS: PAYROLL 5,041,826 4,653,669 REGION LEVY 10,691,571 11,085,122 SCHOOL BOARD LEVIES 6,924,290 6,561,507 GENERAL-INCLUDING CAPITAL EXP," 11740608 10880049 34 398,295 33180347 NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) 13623782 13642693 BANK NET CASH BANK BANK BALANCE PROVIDED BALANCE BALANC~ FINANCIAL POSITION: MAR. 31 2005 {fUSED JUN,302005 JUN, 30 2004 GENERAL FUND 6,552,942 15,023,130 21,570,072 22,790,203 RESERVE FUND 273,045 360,437 633.482 4,196,022 MUNICIPAL BOND INVESTMENTS 2,603,854 26,802 2,630,656 2,522,406 HOST COMMUNITY FUND IN TRUST 10,000,000 0 10,000,000 10,000,000 INVESTMENTS (GENERAL + RESERVE FUNDS) 52142287 /1 786587 50 355' 700 51 693809 TOTALS 71 572128 13623782 85195910 91 208500 BANK BALANCES AS AT: APR, 30 2005 APR, 30 2004 MAY 31 2005 MAY 31 2004 GENERAL FUND 16,239,638 25,398,179 8,634,206 13,387,749 RESERVE FUND 525,849 2,138,787 535,518 3,117,998 MUNICIPAL BOND INVESTMENTS 2612602 2504173 2 621 728 2513451 NOTE A: Difference in comparison between years due 10 timing difference in receipt of funds. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ClARINGTON PART "B" ~ontinuity of Taxes Receivable for the Second Quarter of the Year 2005 March 31, 2005 JUNE JUNE BEGINNING BALANCE INTEREST TAXES PAYMENTS 2005 2004 RECEIVABLE ADDED BILLED BALANCE IADJUST:" PREPAID TAXES CURRENT YEAR TAXES (2,B10,14B) 45,254,771 42,444,623 (34,699,870) 7,744,753 8,524,275 PENALTY AND INTEREST 20 085 t 14 018 134,103 ' (61597 72506 70 536 FIRST PRIOR YEAR TAXES 2,955,852 0 2,955,852 (685,898) 2,269,954 2,291,954 PENAL TV AND INTEREST 1952t3 99518 294731 ;110712 184019 216735 SECOND PRIOR YEAR TAXES 1,232,842 0 1,232,842 (263,475) 969,367 965,366 PENALTY AND INTEREST 165625 41141 206 766 ' (67,B94 136 872 168819 h-HIRD & PRIOR YEARS TAXES 1,309,743 0 1,309,743 (203,590) 1,106,153 1,073,270 PENALTY AND INTEREST 600 901 43 455 644 356 ' (62 554 581 802 604 466 TOTAL 3670113 298132 45 254 771 49223016 (36 155 589 13067427 13915421 ... Includes refunds, write-offs, 496's, etc. NOTE 1: 2005 AND 2004 Interim Installment months: February and April 2005 AND 2004 Final Installment months: June and September NOTE 2: Current year taxes open in a negative position because they represent prepaid taxes for the April installment. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON PART "C" STATISTICAL INFORMATION for the Second Quarter of the Year 2005 Year to Date Tax Certificates 274 455 Number of Properties eligible for Tax Registration (see Note 1) 29 H see Note 2 Accounts Payable Cheques Issued #0069514 to #0071660 1,647 3,463 Transit Total Adult Ridership 10,333 20,567 Transit Total Student Ridership 28,182 55,116 Transit Total Sr.lChild Ridership 2,764 5,265 Transit Total Ridership Across Region (Durham "D' 268 456 Transit Total Transfers 1,820 3,944 Number of Births Registered 4 9 Number of Deaths/Stillbirths Registered 151 312 Note 1: Only includes those properties whose arrears are greater than $20,000. Please note that the threshold has changed from $10,000 to $20,000. Note 2: Number of eligible properties for tax registration not applicable for year-to-date comparison. TRANSIT REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE for the Second Quarter of the Year 2005 Year to Date REVENUE TRANSIT REVENUE 58,100 116,952 EXPENSES MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING 5,893 22,540 TRANSIT CONTRACT 206,544 377 ,352 OPERATING (LOSS)/GAIN (154,337) (282,939) CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON INVESTMENTS OUTSTANDING AS AT JUNE 30, 2005 PART "0" I \ FINANCIAL INVESTMENT INTEREST # OF DAYS MATURITY MATURITY INSTITUTION COST RATE O/S VALUE DATE GENERAL FUND TOTAL GENERAL FUND 0.00 RESERVE FUND RBC . 806,000.00 3.70% 1,827 806,000.00 Jul. 09/08 RBC 1,425,999.88 5.11% 1913 1,851,467.00 June 01/06 RBC 1,683,100.32 5.15% 2019 2,221,035.00 Sept.15/06 RBC 1,855,574.20 5.15% 1913 2,414,000.00 June 01/06 RBC . 4,180,00000 3.75% 365 4,180,000.00 June 30/05 RBC 495,186.85 4.00% 1171 561,500.00 Jun. 06/06 RBC 1,379,343.53 4.65% 2085 1,787,409.00 Dec. 01/08 RBC 739,938.86 3.55% 1704 869,800.00 Oct. 05/09 RBC . 1,450,000.00 4.10% 366 1,450,000.00 Dec. 01/05 RBC 1,566,467.00 5.45% 1826 2,042,463.00 Jan.29/06 RBC 500,000.00 3.25% 1827 595,239.37 June 21/08 RBC 481,878.00 4.45% 1827 599,072.41 Mar. 04/08 RBC 868,578.00 4.10% 1098 979,853.00 Apr. 03/06 RBC . 970,000.00 3.20% 372 970,000.00 Mar. 19/06 RBC 500,000.00 6.25% 1095 578,782.97 June 21/04 RBC . 1,815,962.00 5.00% 1825 1,815,962.00 Feb. 07/07 RBC . 1,482,702.57 5.50% 1825 1,487,000.00 Feb. 13/06 RBC . 1,480,000.00 4.20% 366 1,480,000.00 Feb. 10/06 RBC 208,000.00 4.35% 1830 257,351.00 May 12/08 RBC . 2,465,000.00 4.05% 365 2,465,000.00 Jul. 23/05 RBC . 550,000.00 4.00% 730 550,000.00 Oct. 14/06 RBC 1,143,285.67 3.80% 1547 1,338,742.00 Dec. 15/08 RBC 733,772.63 3.85% 1980 900,445.00 Jun. 02/10 RBC 499,999.38 4.00% 1182 567,343.00 Jul. 26/06 RBC . 2,061,000.00 4.00% 365 2,061,000.00 Dec. 03/05 RBC 1,000,000.00 4.15% 1096 1,129,738.22 Apr. 10/06 RBC 1,500,000.00 5.50% 1694 1,500,000.00 Dec. 20/07 RBC' 906,000.00 4.10% 730 906,000.00 Sep. 29/06 RBC 372,440.00 4.40% 1826 461,912.00 May 28/09 RBC 1,520,617.00 5.35% 1826 1,973,297.00 Mar.15/07 RBC 1,000,000.00 4.45% 1827 1,243,203.49 Aug. 09/07 HSBC 1,579,021.90 2.45% 365 1,617,707.94 Oct. 25/05 TD 4,978,200.00 2.54% 63 5,000,000.00 Jul. 14/05 TD 1,686,298.00 2.58% 115 1,700,000.00 Aug. 29/05 BMO 4,471,335.00 2.57% 91 4,500,000.00 Aug. 05/05 TOTAL RESERVE FUND 50,355,700.79 ITOTAL INVESTMENTS 50,355,700.79 I . Investment interest paid on a monthly/semi-annual/annual basis Unfinished Business REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday September 19, 2005 Report #: Addendum to EGD.28-05 Flle#: By-law #: Subject: PARKING, NASH ROAD, COURTICE - PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO BY- LAW 91-58 RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Addendum to EGD-28-05 be received; 2. THAT parking be prohibited on the south side of Nash Road from Townline Road North to Centerfield Drive, Courtice; 3. THAT parking be prohibited on the North side of Nash Road from Trulls Road to Fourth Avenue, Courtice; 4. . THAT Council approve the by-law attached to Addendum to EGD-28-05; and iK% 6~~. Submitted by: A.S. Cannella, C.E.T. Reviewed by: FranklinWu, Director of Engineering Services Chief Administrative Officer ASC/RDB/jo September 12, 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-9282 REPORT NO.: Addendum to EGD.2S.CJS PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND Report EGD-28-05 was presented to GPA on September 6, 2005 suggesting a number of proposed amendments to the Traffic By-Iawrelated to parking. Several ofthe locations outlined were approved and forwarded to Council however, two locations on Nash Road (items 4 and 5 of Report EGD-28-05), were referred back to staff for further clarification. 2,0 COMMENT 2.1 Nash Road, Townllne Road N to Centerfield Drive, Courtlce (Attachment No.1) During 2003 the Courtice Ratepayers Association advised the Mayor's Office of a number of intersections and areas where they felt there were safety concerns. One of the locations was the area on Nash Rd., between Townline Rd N. and Centerfield Dr. near S.T.worden Public School. Staff reviewed the area and implemented a number of immediate changes to improve safety. A yellow off-set centreline was painted towards the south side of Nash Rd., between Townline Rd. N and Centerfield Dr., during the fall of 2003 to: . Narrow the east bound lane to encourage slower operating speeds entering Clarington and approaching the school zone. . To discourage parking on the south side while encouraging parking on the north side. . To reduce traffic congestion and confusion in front of the school in a high volume area. . To supplement the existing "No Stopping" signs near the S.T. Worden Public School . To tie in with the pavement markings at the signalized intersection of Nash Rd. at Townline Rd N. The off-set yellow line has worked well, as it alerts motorists wishing to park on the south side to the fact that they would be blocking traffic if they stopped. It also appears that the off-set yellow line does encourage motorists to park in other available locations. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-9282 REPORT NO.: Addendum to EGD.28-05 PAGE 3 The purpose of report EGD-28-05 is to update the Traffic By-law to reaffirm the existing parking plan. This plan has been in place for two years and it appears to have been working well. Compliance with the pavement markings has been excellent but to improve upon what is already in place we do see a potential opportunity. The section of Nash Rd., west of Varcoe Rd may benefit from the posting of additional "No Parking" signs to assist By-law Enforcement, if enforcement is required. It should be noted however, that on-street parking demand is low in the area west ofVarcoe Rd., due to the long residential driveways and availability of parking on the north side. 2.2 Nash Road, Trulls Road and Fourth Avenue, Courtlce (Attachment No.2) Nash Road between Trulls Road and Fourth Avenue, Courtice requires additional "No Parking" regulations on the north side to improve safety in front of the Courtice North Public School, the new plaza and the intersection of Richfield Square where parked vehicles could obstruct sightlines. There are already a number of "No Stopping" and "No Parking" signs which have been posted for a number of years near the school, however some additional signage will need to be installed near Richfield Square and the new plaza which is presently under construction. The update to the Traffic By-law and the posting of additional signs will improve safety. Residents appear generally satisfied with the existing parking restrictions and are in favour of further restrictions to improve safety fronting the school, the plaza and the intersection at Richfield Square. Parking is available for parents on the other section of Nash Road, while the Plaza will have its own internal parking lot. REPORT NO.: Addendum to EGD.28.Q5 PAGE 4 3.0 CONCLUSION The proposed amendments to the Traffic By-law 91-58 have actually been in place for some time and appear to have been endorsed by the community as effective. The purpose of this report is simply to formally adopt those amendments to the Traffic By.law which have been shown over time to improve safety in the area. It is our recommendation that the attached By-law amendment be reviewed and approved by Council to update the Traffic By-law 91-58. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key map Nash Rd, Townline Rd N to Centerfield Drive Attachment 2 - Key map Nash Rd, Trulls Rd to Fourth Ave. Attachment 3 - Proposed By-law amendment to By-law 91-58 Attachment 4 - Report EGD-28-05 ! ! ! I~L ,"'" "J. rOo ,;, ! I i , ~~i I,,(t,\ , I" , u w 32 05 ! I~ I~' !' : I ! ;' I"~ J ~r:J\"""""r:",,~7 ~"~'! // \ \\: I , Pt:l aU!lUMOl 'I , 7 : I"m'" O'l O'l,~ : I,~~ ,S ,S r'" ~ g:'<>N~~ }I !~" Cl. U5 "C 0 0 ,J' lii Z Z l ~ I ~ ;-1= /7 L ml"ill ! ( i //1 "' o o N , '" ~9 >- ClO_" ~ N . E E 10 f we Z 0 - Cl ' 2"w....~ U) z ~ Qj 0 w ~ rn .... ::E ~ o ::! ::I: ~ ,:J(.)g -!c<C~ wZI-, ;>..wl-J, OJ 0 <( ~ ceo ~ <C '" . ~ '! . il' zei C~ I , : : i : : ; p~ aoq..mo:) : I i II'i 1: ...: II, : I i i : : I I I / : : ..~ : : I . J ..i J Lynwood Av , I , i :. I i~~- I I I I i ! Jane Av \ 'i I' ," 7,! : : :~"j Ij ~ L:~ ~ ...... ~ L., i'i ..............~ r' L......... I:'" L '" cr 3 :~ c ID o . i . ~.....~ L. .~: : IT ,~ I j i~~ .Jr. <::::11:: ""'".~ ^V 4JJno.::l I 1 Ti, LI I' i &~__ ,; i ~ ~.~ ',m ::; ~~: p Iu idduck St,j' <i' ' 13 L,.. : nTl ~ ~L../::. I 1 ID ::=f: II 11J1 ..J ;l~~{] TIll!]] i i!ii ;7- 1" (i '--_ ,i 'f1' ~ ~ F3 E:l'Sm I f,<[;~':i' i In l J i,.::.. J { \ ~ i5 Z O...J uo Wo II)J: wu UII) Ii: :J o U .- J:...J 1-0 g50 zJ: wU ulI) -u 1-- o::...J :JlJJ 0:J uD.. .8 - cOO all!) E~ -00) c ~ ;;1' iL ~ ~ ~ <( >" ...... ~ co z -0 U al.- (/)~ o <ll 0.'- 01- '- a. E':g o N - It) ~ Cj> ~ ~ N i ~ cO l c.C>Z' ~~~t 21-W~ ~:!:!~ ::J ::I: ~ .J 00 g uj z ~! >.wt-"1 moet; c C G 3 1"< o '. ~. .; ~i ..-. :13 ..J I I I : .~. I ~~~ ,. ~.. i I Ol Ol c .f:: :g ~ ro 0 a. 1i5 "C 0 0 c z z CIl j I ~ I I J iflL' _; "('i . ! i ": (',1 i 1 riT ~'T .. : "' i :::::I~ .ai ~] ATTACHMENT NO.: 3 REPORT NO.: Addendum to EGD-28-05 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW 2005- Being a By-law to amend By-iaw 91-58, as amended, being a By-law to Regulate Traffic on Highways, Municipal and Private Property in the Municipality of Clarington. WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems is desirable to amend By-law 91-58; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington hereby enacts as follows: 1) Schedule II "NO PARKING" of By-law 91-58 is amended by: Adding the following reference: Column 1 Column 2 Hiahwav Side Nash Rd. South (Courtice) Nash Rd. North (Courtice) Column 3 Between Column 4 Prohibited Times or Davs Townline Rd. N. & Centerfield Dr. anytime Trulls Rd. & Fourth Ave. anytime 2) This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the date approved by Council and when signs to the effect are erected. BY-LAW read a first and second time this 26th day of September, 2005. BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this 26'h day of September, 2005. John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk ATTACHMENT NO.: 4 REPORT NO.: Addendum to EGD-28-05 REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday September 6, 2005 Report #: EGD-28-05 Flle#: By-law #: Subject: PARKING VARIOUS LOCATIONS - PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO BY-LAW 91-58 RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: ~ 1. THAT Report EGD-28-05 be received; 2. THAT the General Parking and Stopping Regulation section of Traffic By-law 91-58 be amended to provide the Director of Engineering Services greater latitude in authorizing the posting of stopping/parking prohibitions if required near: -schools, parks and playgrounds -crosswalks -private roadways or driveways serviced by large vehicles -intersections 3. THAT parking be prohibited on various sections of Sandringham Drive, Courtice from Durham Hwy 2 to Trulls Road in accordance with details contained in this report; 4. THAT parking be prohibited on the south side of Nash Road from Townline Road North to Centerfeild Drive, Courtice; 5. THAT parking be prohibited on the north side of Nash Road from Trulls Road to Fourth Avenue, Courtice; ~ CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARlNGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-9282 REPORT NO.: EGD-28..o5 PAGE 2 6. THAT parking be prohibited on the West side of Fourth Avenue from Nash Road to Westmore Street, Courtice 7. THAT parking be prohibited on the north side of Meadowglade Road from Prestonvale Road to Robert Adams Drive. Courtice; 8. THAT parking be prohibited on the west side of Robert Adams Drive from Meadowglade Road to Glenabbey Drive. Courtlce; 9. THAT parking be prohibited on the east side of Robert Adams Drive from White Cliffe Drive to Renwick Road, Courtice; 10. THAT parking be prohibited on the west side of George Reynolds Drive from Devondale Street to Dunkin Avenue, Courtice; 11. THAT parking be prohibited on sections of Prestonvale Road between Glennabbey Drive and Bloor Street and adjacent to the South Courtice Arena; 12. THAT parking be prohibited on the west side of West Side Drive from Baseline Road to Botrell Street, Bowmanville; 13. THAT parking be prohibited on both sides of St. George Street. between Queen Street and Church Street, Bowmanvllle 14. THAT Council approve the by-law attached to Report EGD-28 -05; and 15. THAT the Interested parties listed within this report be provided with a copy of this report and Council's decision. ~iL Submittad by: Anthony Cannella, C.E.T. Reviewed by: n Wu, Director of Engineering Services ~ Chief Administrative Officer ASC/RDB/jo August 18, 2005 REPORT NO.: EGD.2S.05 PAGE 3 1.0 BACKGROUND A number of requests for parking revisions, require amendments to Traffic By-law 91-58. Those requests from the public and staff are listed below for Councils consideration. 2.0 COMMENT 2.1 Parking Parking regulations and the posting of prohibition signs can reduce motor vehicle collisions by improving sight lines and traffic flow. Although general restrictions, such as the "Three hour parking limit", can reduce many parking problems, staff often receive requests for more permanent prohibitions and signage in higher complaint areas. 2.2 General Parking and Stopping Regulations of By-law 91.58 The Director of Engineering Services has authority under section 3 of Traffic By-law 91- 58 to authorize the placement of temporary "No Parking and No Stopping" signs to address traffic and safety concerns as well as authorize other official signs as required to give effect to provisions of the by-law. The general parking and stopping regulations enables prohibition signs to be installed quickly to address localized safety concerns with out the necessity of listing these small areas in the parking/stopping schedules. In some cases signs are installed on a larger scale, temporary basis, and if successful, are later listed within a by-Jaw amendment to bring the by-law schedules up to date. These general regulations are especially important near schools where signs can be installed or removed to reflect ever changing parking issues. There are a number of existing "general provisions limiting the extent of prohibitions which could be modified to provide greater flexibility and improve safety at some locations. The proposed changes include: a) Changing wording from "adjacent" to a school, park or playground, to include, "or within 150 m". This change is important because some school parking issues can flow 50m to 150m beyond the boundary of the actual property. b) Changing wording from "10m" of a crosswalk to "30m" of a crosswalk. This would permit an extension of the no stopping area in some sensitive school crossing REPORT NO.: EGD-28-05 PAGE 4 areas if the standard 10m distance is deemed not to be sufficient due to sight line or other issues c) Introducing the ability to install prohibitions near private roadways or driveways where larger vehicles require access. Prohibition signs could be posted when the standard regulation, such as within 1 m of a driveway does not permit space for larger vehicles to manoeuvre due to parked vehicles beside or across from a driveway. d) Prohibiting where necessary parking within "30m" of two Clarington roadways rather than "10m". Presently the 30m distance only pertains to intersections of Clarington roadways at Regional roadways. All of the above prohibitions, would require the posting of signs at any locations where they would be implemented to ensure that motorists are aware of the restrictions. 2.3 Sandringham Drive, Courtice On January 17, 2005 Alana Saunlier appeared as a delegation with a petition dated Jan 6, 2005 requesting parking exemptions and limiting parking to one side of the street. Engineering responded with a letter dated February 4, 2005 to Alana Saunlier advising why we could not provide her with parking exemptions and that the request for parking prohibitions on one side of the street to improve traffic flow would be considered. Staff, have now completed the review and support the public request to prohibit parking on one side. The Courtice key map shows the parking plan which shifts the parking to different sides based on parking opportunities and, sight lines. The section of Sandringham Drive, between Glenabbey Drive and Claret Road is a high complaint area and should be posted as "No Parking" on "both" sides rather than one, due to the curve and intersection spacing to improve safety. If approved by Council, signs will need to be installed by the Operations Department. 2.4 Nash Road, Townline Road N to Centerfield Drive, Courtice Schedule II "No Parking" of By-law 91-58 should be updated to confirm the No Parking requirement on the south side of Nash Road, between Townline Road N and Centerfield Drive. Off-set pavement marking was applied during the fall of 2004 at the request of residents to improve traffic flow on this busy section of Nash Road and reinforce the No REPORT NO.: EGD-28-05 PAGE 5 Stopping/No Parking signage near St. Worden Public School. Some signs are in place now however additional signage will need to be installed by the Operations Department. 2.5 Nash Road, Trulls Road and Fourth Avenue, Courtice Nash Road between Trulls Road and Fourth Avenue, Courtice requires additional "No Parking" regulations on the north side to improve safety in front of Courtice North Public School and the intersections with Trulls Rd and Richfield Squire. Some additional signage will need to be installed by Operations. 2.6 Fourth Avenue, Nash Road to Westmore Street, Courtice Two residents of Fourth Avenue requested that parking be limited to one side to prevent the problem of parents parking on both sides of the street and preventing reasonable access to residents and emergency services. This road was reconstructed during 2004 with a new pavement width of 8M with curb and gutter. Staff agree that prohibiting parking on the west side would improve access for residents and still provide ample parking on the east side for short term parking. Operations would need to install signage in this area. 2.7 Meadowglade Road, Prestonvale Road to Robert Adams Drive, Courtice This road section is near Dr. G.J. MacGillivray P.S. where congestion occurs during school periods. This congestion combined with intersection spacing, a school crossing guard and fire hydrants offers very little parking on the north side. Prohibiting parking on the north side would improve safety while leaving sufficient parking on the south side beyond the school property. Some signage is in place near the school however additional signage would need to be installed by Operations. 2.8 Robert Adams Drive, Meadowglade Road to Glenabbey Drive This road section is also near Dr. G.J. MacGillivray P.S. where congestion occurs and the school has expressed concerns about the movement of school buses, parents and pending residential home construction activities. Prohibiting parking on the west side between Medowglad Road and Glenabbey Drivewould improve safety while leaving REPORT NO.: EGD-28-05 PAGE 6 sufficient parking on the east side. If approved, Operations would need to install signage. 2.9 Robert Adams Drive, Courtice At the request of residents, Robert Adams Drive was posted as no parking on the east side between White Cliffe Drive and Renwick Road to improve safety on this sharp bend. The results have been considered successful and the parking prohibition should now be listed in the schedules to by-law 91-58. 2.10 George Reynolds Drive, Courtice At the request of residents, George Reynolds Drive was posted as "No Parking" on the west side between Devondale Street and Dunkin Avenue to improve safety near the park during 2004. The results have been considered successful and the parking prohibition should now be listed in the schedules to by-law 91- 58. 2.11 Prestonvale Road, Glenabbey Drive to Bloor St and adjacent to the South Courtic Arena, Courtice A concern was raised from a resident, Syd Wordon, regarding patrons from the south Courtice Arena parking on Prestonvale Road creating safety problems on the curve. To immediately address the concern, the Director of Engineering Services authorized the installation of "No Parking" signs from 330m south of Bloor St to 660m south of Bloor Street during 2005 to improve safety in this area. The section of Prestonvale Road between Meadowglade Road and Bloor Street was constructed at a width of 7m. Although no complaints have been received, "No Parking" signs should be installed on both sides of the roadway prior to additional development to ensure the safe movement of traffic. The section of Prestonvale Road between Glenabbey Drive and Meadowglade Road was constructed with a parking lane on a portion of the west side but parking will need to be prohibited from the east side before additional development occurs. Operations would need to install signage in these areas. REPORT NO.: EGD-28'()5 PAGE 7 2.12 W..t SId. Drive. Ba.ellne Road to Bottrell Street. Bowmanvllfe This area Includes Dr. Ross Tilley Public School. Prohibiting parking on the west side would leave ample parking on the east side which Is green space south of the school. Although some slgnage is in piace near the school. additional slgnage would need to be Installed by Operations. 2.13 St. George Street, Queen Street to Church Street, Bowmanvll/e A number of complaints were received from Mr. Rowden and his nelghbours in this area regarding vehicles parking on both sides of the roadway Impeding vehicular traffic and blocklng larger vehicles. Due to the urgency of this request signs were Installed at the direction of the Director of Engineering Services to permit the safe movement of traffic during 2005. The traffic by-iaw should now be amended to prohibit parking from both sides of St. George Street from Queen Street to Church Street to update the schedules. 3.0 CONCLUSION The attached by-law amendment should be reviewed and approved by Council to address a number of parking concems within the municipality. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map Courtlce Area proposed changes Attachment 2- Key Map Bowmanvllle Area proposed changes Attachment 3 - Proposed by-law amendment to by-law 91-58 Interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Ms. Alana Saunlier "' 0 ~\1 III 0 C c i N 0 0 0 ri Ilo W ~ '., N I~ (,) ;g 1;;1/) ,... '" 0 .c ~q 0 - - ..,'" Ie ..i~ ~~ ~ C III 0- <CO z 0::: .. " " N " g>,g Ol ~~ $ , I- ::J c . l' "0 ir ..J;! ~ DC) Z :5.. 0 ~ ! W en '" i W::E ~I;: (,) c 0- .J ~ I u,j I-J: ~:;c .. ~J >, a:: () ~~ 0.. <Xl 0 <( c Q. 1L1 IM,"u!~J 1"- '\ \\ ~ LynwoodAv -ff JaneAv i ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ --.; g ~ '" ~ " ."'. " ", ".'. " ..'.. ~ E I. !? II it Mapl!.J~Or TrullsRd ~ W I- o a:: !;;( I ~ '8 iii ..._u_n_n_n_.. ". ...._u_.._.._.._..__ _.. ..._.._n_.._'. .. n_. ~ ~ ~ " '.. 0'",,,,, 1.!'1iI '4;OA ~oi1~ -'I>- "'>1' Farmington Dr ii LI {j . ri ~ 2 ~ i TrullsRd LJ .0 ,,,'"""-1. ~ a~PIOfJ Firw d <<i KlnlyrnSl g ~ Ct ~ 0 ~ 0\0,>'01 8 Ci'~.,; ;;.-"1J: - MUlier) ~~ ( :21 ~~c; ~'- -!lJrl !;. ", a all. lJe 0 " -....a UMelllJ'"\ U ~ F\. - 1!'- (j' I! III ~.:\"_::;-;~ oJ: r i\ JO<llepu..l -- fr~r p~e~O \ \ P:tl IIje^U019aJd - ........... ~ I "'~oodfl GaUl ~anwlc\( Rd L.,.,,,d II'" _.._..1 .._..~.. ..1l. .~~_ c magB n ~~, TooievRd JJSfMJ:J~ ::J'11.; Ctlnlerfl6ldDr I Homefiel Sq f [J 4 ( "n;hfieldDr/ 1 VarcoElRd " ~ ~ .. .5 ushlordSt ~ Poolton Cr '-' ] ~ n 1 Sb ""Rd J >> " g ~ t7J <P i/I ~ " ~C1 ::,~ '0 ;. DartingtOll BlVd FOl<HuntTr .. (j' ~I fl " lJollJllflJo It ~ ~ co to 7/'/ ~ AburnLn ~ ~ <( BfunlSfield Sl t!. --.......--- J ~ l 13 n" 0, PlI'I a1eCr 1l i ~ l! '=1 ._.._"-..-.._.._.I'IAII. "'""""e..fl<l.. .. .. . p~ eU'IUMoJ.Ii;QM ---, i' KEtshaw ~trlla SL Bratlshaw51 Mann 51 if> 111- ~ .~ , . . ~ ~ iJ l o '" "c~ \ HlghSt \!lginSt ~\ Pros c~ if> l' MundayCI i c u 0 ~ i I -- :;: I-- if> .~ 8 o o U Cen 51 t:- ... l BeachAv (Il . I~ 3 ~'! 0/ .p ~.5' <'{, if> ) B t ~ 13 e 5 ~ o ~ 11 a " ~i 1i u I~ p^ lJOlflUIJ'81 I L ~ '0 ''''''''d) . GalbrailhCt f 0/ ~ ~ I~. .~ is> ~ Ob(,., ,,<::: ...~ cl ..., . ~ E ~ ~ .~ ~ W :f! '" c: ...J 0 0 ...J '" :e .. .0 '" :> g :E "..J 0 <~ Z " III a: ",:J ,<. < Cl.g rn "'~ c: :. :! ..J~ :g 3: '" '" " a. 0 ~ I en c. i:! ~ " . C ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ n- ~S=OA' H ~ P^18 Nl91A p-'liIlp.l( i:! > < Iii - Flett ~ ~ I . ~ ~~~ g Iii -t ~ it . <r ~ ~ "- .II '1 r j '" , '" S,<- ~ c is j "," ... ~ '\ / ~ if> , if> . ?J\\O <:1'.,. 0 - ~ " ~ - A '" \, o(\o,)~\5 ~ . "- ~ ~ '" iii FremkSI r " .U" Iii o IN ;< /II SIJaqu , I~ 0/ '& dl i> II ''''. "~,. l>~\~ ~ ~ \' Simpson Av I 1 7 " 8 N ri N U) U') 't:"l ~9 <C CXl c:i Q.i ()I Z 1; C I- o Cl Z ..j W ~ UJ I- ::r: ",0:: U ~ Ii ~ ~uJl- 00::< I / I Il' I ~ , '" IS e~na/ ~ / / \ ~- ~- I ~ ~ - Waverly ~\ \ \ ? - ~ is . ~ E . u ~ ~ E 8 :9 G""!:'~' of A2"eo~G' 1:)8100 Y t (fJ .( StnKe Av ..:l ~~ rc#'}L HI~ller 51 - ~ t LltlleAv Wa.. rlyRd 'Vi:! """" i~.J ~ "J" · $ ~ I,"~SI . ~ ~ <r ..---15 Bo,"", ,II. D.11 Fryer U ~~S\ r1~- . E ~ LflndervUleL weJslde r MartinRd we. l\li~Cl <r JJ l' ! .. ~ m ~~ ~ \ ! II- ----") '& ~ ?o ~ ~ ~ ATTACHMENT # 3 :ro 1'~?~qT # cr, fTi.:2f.<r)- THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY.LAW 2005- Being a By-law to amend By-law 91-58, as amended, being a By-law to Regulate Traffic on Highways, Municipal and Private Property in the Municipality of Clarington. WHEREAS the Councii of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems is desirable to amend By-law 91-58; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington hereby enacts as follows: 1) General Parking and Stopping Regulations Section 4 is amended by: A) Oeieting the following reference(s): (8) Where officiai signs to that effect are displayed, no person shall on any highway stop any vehicle: (B) any time or between the hours and on the days set out on the officiai signs on one or both sides of a highway or portion of a highway which is immediately adjacent to a school; (9) Where official signs to that effect are displayed no person shall park any vehicle: (A) within 30 m of a King's Highway or Regional Road on an intersecting highway under the jurisdiction of the Municipality of Clarington; (E) anytime on one or both sides of a highway or portion of a highway which is immediately adjacent to a park or pia yg rou nd; B) Adding the foliowing reference(s): (8) Where official signs to that effect are displayed, no person shall on any highway stop any vehicle: (B) any time or between the hours and on the days set out on the official signs on one or both sides of a highway or portion of a highway which is adjacent to, or within 150 m of school, park or playground property; (0) any time or between the hours and on the days set out on the official signs on one or both sides of a highway or portion of a highway which is within 30 m of any crosswalk; (E) any time or between the hours and on the days set out on the official signs on one or both sides of a highway or portion of a highway which would obstruct or restrict large commercial or recreational vehicles in the use of a private roadway or driveway; (g) Where official signs to the effect are displayed no person shall park any vehicle: (A) within 30 m of a King's Highway, Region of Durham Road, or Municipality of Claringlon Road on an intersecting highway under the jurisdiction of the Municipality of Clarington; (E) any Ume or between the hours and on the days set out on the official signs on one or both sides of a highway or portion of a highway which is adjacent to, or within 150 m of school, park or playground property; 2) Schedule "NO PARKING' of By-law 91-58 is amended by: Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Prohibited Hiohwav Side Between Times or Davs Sandringham Dr. South Trulls Rd. & Stuart Rd. anytime (Courtice) Sand ring ham Dr. North Stuart Rd. & Grandville Dr. anytime (Cou rtice) Sandringham Dr. South Grandville Dr. & Yorkville Dr. anytime (Courtice) Sandringham Dr. North Yorkville Dr. & Glenabbey Dr. anytime (Courtice) Sandringham Dr. Both Glenabbey Dr. and Claret Rd. anytime (Courtice) Sandringham Dr. East Claret Rd. & Durham Hwy 2 anytime (Cou rtice) Nash Rd. South Townline Rd. N. & Centerfield Dr. anytime (Courtice) Nash Rd. North Trulls Rd. & Fourth Ave. anytime (Courtice) Fourth Ave. West Nash Rd. & Westmore SI. anytime (Courtice ) Meadowglade Rd. North Prestonvale Rd. & Robert Adams Dr. anytime (Courtice) Prestonvale Rd. Both 330 m south of Bloor SI. & (Courtice) 660 m south of Bloor SI. anytime Prestonvale Rd. Both Bloor SI. & Meadowglade Rd. anytime (Courtice) Prestonvale Rd. East Glenabbey Dr. & Meadowglade Rd. anytime (Courtice) Preslonvale Rd. West Glanabbey Dr. & 60 m south (Courtica) of Glenabbey Dr. anytime Robert Adams Dr. West Meadowglada Rd. & Glenabbey Dr. anytime (Courtice) Robert Adams Dr. East White Cliffe Dr. & Renwick Rd. anytime (Courtice) Georga Reynolds Dr. West Devondale St. & Dunkin Ave. anytime (Courtice) West Side Dr. West Baseline Rd. & Bottrell St. anytime (Bowmanville) St. George St. Both Queen St. & Church St. anytime (Bowmanville) 3) This By-law shall come into force and take effect on tha date approved by Council and when signs to the effect ara erected. BY-LAW read a first and second time this 12th day of September, 2005. BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this 12'" day of September, 2005. John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk 3200 Hancock Rd. Courtice, ON LIE 2M 1 September 6, 2005 To Mayor and Clarington Council Request to Enact Site Alteration By-Law and the Improvement to Burning By-Law. I was unsuccessful in my request of Top Soil Protection By-Law during the OP review in 1994, 5 and 6. During the same request to Council in 2000, Mayor Mutton advised me that our Planning Department was working on similar by-law, Site Alteration By-Law. Upon its completion, it was presented to the Agriculture Advisory Committee and it died there. It wasn't well understood by our fanners at that time. This by-law could protect them, not hurt or restrict them. In 2000 I had supplied our Planning Department with various Management Practices and By-Laws that were successfully used in other municipalities. Even our Regional Health Department was recommending to our Municipality that it would be wise to have such a by-law. I haven't heard anything since then from Planning Department regarding this by- law. We all need clean air, good water quality and plenty of it and clean soil to survive physically and economically. This summer, we have experienced water shortages, drought and smog. What are we doing about it? Climate change is a real thing; we have to relate our activities to poor conditions we have experienced during this summer. We could all help by restricting our undesirable activities such as affecting the drainage of residents living at the same road or community, stripping off our only supplier of oxygen and cooling -forested areas -, or filling in wetlands that can improve our common water supply. Changing natural drainage into man-made ditches of standing water can threaten not only the health of surrounding community, but also the health of the landowner himself. These are the habitats attracting mosquitoes spreading the West Nile virus. Barrel or any other burning is threatening large area with even poorer air conditions. People should be responsible for their own actions and should be more conscious of how their activity causes other people to suffer, not to mention their own or their family's well being. Our Municipality could not do a thing to protect its citizens against irresponsibility of some landowners and their actions because we don't have Site Alteration By-Law or stricter Burning By-Law to protect the health of all residents. I was told by our Works Department, Engineering section that the drainage of a site is a private matter. In reality, is it really? I was also told by our Fire Department that the farmer is allowed to barrel-bum. When urban citizens see the fanner doing this, they do not understand this exception and they too continue to bum. Burning went on almost daily this summer. Could the farmers be given an opportunity to call Regional Works to pick up what they have to dispose of, free of charge, instead of getting rid of unwanted stuff by open-air burning? They could serve as an example to the community. These activities are affecting us in winter and summer; there is no difference. Adopting Site Alteration By-Law and improvement to the Burning By-Law should not be viewed as a restriction or burden to the individual, but as an improvement of living conditions for the whole community. Polluted air, water or soil doesn't stay in one location, it impacts everyone. Private business, including agriculture, aggregate and Works Departments should be treated the same way. Their activities affect not only themselves, but the rest of us too. Activities such as filling, grading, excavation, removal of forested areas and topsoil, placing or dumping of fill or paper sludge, drainage works and burning should be regulated to help ease climate change effects. These activities alter ecosystem processes and lead to contamination or pollution of land, water and air. Top Soil By-Law could give our Municipality a better enforcement capability and more timely control over matters involving construction, development practices; it could help to regulate stockpiling and rehabilitation of the land. The adoption of this by-law is often recommended when there is a history of land clearing (like in Courtice North) without adequate sediment control measures. The by-law approach is often considered preferable to reliance on sedimentation and erosion control plans because it applies to all lands and therefore can address the problem of site clearing prior to development application being made. Therefore, I am respectfully requesting this Council to enact Top Soil or at least Site Alteration By-Law and to improve the existing Burning By-Law to protect our health. Libby Racansky cc: CLOCA Planning Department Clarington Works Department Clarington Agricultural Advisory Committee Presentation to General Purpose and Administration Committee Tuesday September 6, 2005-09-02 RE: COPA 2005-003 and ZBA 2005-027: Clarington Compost Facility Presentation By Catherine Dowling, Gartner Lee Limited, On Behalf of Miller Paving Limited Miller Paving has reviewed Report PSD-099-05 submitted by Planning Services and would like to thank Heather Brooks for providing a balanced summary of the proposal and the remaining issues for consideration. Through this presentation Miller Paving is pleased to have an opportunity to reemphasize the key features of the proposed Compost Facility. Miller staff and their consultants are also in attendance to answer any questions the Committee may have at this time. The general Site Characteristics as described in the staff report are correct and reflect the detailed planning that has gone into this proposal. This proposal will provide needed waste diversion infrastructure capacity, consistent with Provincial, Regional and local objectives. The site design and planned operations incorporates several features to ensure protection the natural environment and minimize potential impact on neighbouring properties and uses, including: · The 7.5 ha woodlot at the north end has been completely preserved with a fenced buffer area of 5m to ensure no disruption. · Protection of a very large Sugar Maple adjacent to the east property boundary. (0 l-prts 23022-I-mis(; 1]1)('6!]:') Page J · The stormwater control system has the design capacity to contain surface runoff from the compost area to the 100-yr storm, protecting Tooley Creek. · No impact to groundwater is predicted, given existing soil and groundwater flow conditions and the planned paving of the compost area. However, a groundwater monitoring program would be in place to detect any change at the property boundary. · Sound operational practices and the reasonable separation distance from adjacent uses will minimize odour impacts. · Miller has extensive experience with material composting and a solid record of good performance at all of its facilities, including its Richmond Hill facility that has operated for over 15 years. Outstanding I As the Planning Services report notes, there are a number of issues that will require further discussion as this proposal is considered. I would like to briefly address some of the issues this evening. Property Integration Miller Paving owns two land parcels totalling 31 ha. This OPAlrezoning only concerns the north property where the compost facility will be located. Development of the two sites are related however as, a) stormwater management planning has considered the needs of both properties and; b) access to the north property is proposed through the south property. Eventually when both sites are developed there will be seamless integration of the properties. Initially the compost facility can proceed independently. Supporting Documentation Miller Paving provided Clarington with all the noted background and impact studies on August 25. All of the studies conclude that the facility would have minimal impacts on the environment and neighbours, with the recommended measures in place. All of the recommendations have been accepted by Miller and incorporated into the proposal. ([) I -prcs2J 922- f-misc 00l'bl~'5 ) Page ;; In addition the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment is now complete and provided to Clarington today. This report demonstrates that there are no existing environmental issues with the site. Official Plan Policies As a point of clarification, it is our understanding that the "Environmental Protection" designation applicable to these lands does not identify significant woodlands as indicated in the staff report. Based on the Environmental Impact Statement work and recommendation however, Miller provides complete protection for the on site woodlot. Public Comments Miller has received copies of correspondence submitted by two parties with an interest in a single property located in the industrial area south of Baseline Road. Miller met with Fred Biesenthal and spoke on the phone with Ibi Igracki to discuss the issues. Furthermore, Miller has placed a copy of all the applications and background technical reports on file at the Pickering Waste Management site office for interested parties to review and discuss with Miller staff. Clarington Engineering Services Comments Hancock Road ReQuirements Engineering Services indicates that a section of Hancock Rd from Baseline Road to north of the urban boundary is required, with a dead-end turn around circle. Miller disagrees with this recommendation and looks forward to further dialogue on this issue. There are several reasons why this approach is not appropriate for this site development: · In our view construction of the proposed section of Hancock Road only to the site entrance with a setback entry gate would be a safer and more appropriate alternative. The setback would allow for 3 point turn for vehicles if required. . The recommended longer stretch of road serves no purpose and could indicate a destination beyond the site entrance; this would be a source of confusion for drivers approaching the compost facility. . The recommended longer stretch of upgraded road, beyond the facility entrance, would be isolated from any industrial activity and create an opportunity for dumping of waste and use of the turn around area for illegal or (0 l-prcs'2J92:- f-mise 09(,6051 Page 3 inappropriate activity. Miller already spends considerable effort removing illegally dumped waste. · In the longer term, industrial development on the south portion of the Miller property would create a business environment and reduce the isolation of this road section. · Development south of the site, or possibly to the east would support further construction of Hancock Road, it is not economically justified at this time. Grade Seoaration Design and construction of a future grade separation on Baseline Road is a broad road improvement beyond the control and requirements of this project. It is an issue that needs to be discussed with the MTO in connection with the plans for the 407 link. The traffic analysis confirms that the proposed realignment of Hancock Road is an appropriate solution for this development. This improvement does not preclude further work on Baseline Road in the future but would accommodate the immediate needs for this project. Parkland Dedication In addressing the recognized requirement for parkland dedication and/or cash -in-lieu payment, consideration should be given to the retention of valleylands and the onsite woodlot. Staff Comments The summary description accurately reflects the proposed development. A point of clarification is required regarding the use of compost that does not meet Category A use criteria. Miller's experience with composting 100s of thousands of tonnes of similar material in Ontario has never resulted in compost product that was less than Grade A quality. In the event that this does occur in Clarington, the material need not be retained on site or disposed of. This material is still valuable and can be used for approved and appropriate applications. We acknowledge and agree with the staff comment that no "Prestige Employment" lands are in proximity to the site. No significant impact on businesses, business operations or employees is anticipated based on the technical impact studies for noise, air quality and groundwater. Clarington's economic development objectives associated with potential future development of the 407 link in proximity to the site are not at risk as a result of this proposal. Miller is a progressive company that will respond to land development and market opportunities should (IJI-prcs 2Y)2~-f-mi5C 0(1),-,(i:') Page :./. they occur in the future. If this area evolves beyond predominantly agricultural use, Miller would take advantage of the higher and better use opportunities that may be available. The compost facility would not preclude any future uses of these lands in the longer term, including urban expansion scenarios, possibly 15-20 years from now. BalancinQ Need with Other Considerations Organic material diversion is a service that residents and businesses want and expect in their community. The quality products are of value and in demand. Miller agrees that the need for a new composting facility must be balanced with consideration of facility operating costs, requirements for an ecologically sound site and compatibility with surrounding land uses. The proposed development site has a number of advantages: · Proximity to the urban generators of organic material help to keep operating costs down, by minimizing transportation distances. · The operation will complement the Pickering Organics processing facility by providing an appropriate site for final curing and blending. · Separation from adjacent residential or industrial uses is achieved by this site location, the natural valleyland and retention of the woodlot area. · Design and operational features of the proposal will protect the natural environment. · Miller has a solid reputation built through experience. With over 15 yrs of experience at the Bloomington Road site and ongoing operation of the Nova Scotia facility, there is a solid record of good management practice to draw on to address any operational issues that may emerge. · Technical impact analysis demonstrates that there will be minimal impact on surrounding land uses. Miller has applied for appropriate OPAs and land use rezoning, recognizing that this facility represents a change from traditional agricultural use in the area. Miller has also applied for the appropriate Certificate of Approval and will comply with any conditions that approval involves. While some have argued that composting is an agricultural use and therefore not subject to the review process and controls that are applicable through municipal and environmental planning processes, Miller has taken the opposite position. Miller is requesting that this facility be recognized as a reasonable use for these lands within an agricultural designation. All applicable environmental protection measures will be applied and the site will operate within the terms of an Environmental Protection Act certificate of approval. (01-pres2_1,C)22-f-misc Page 5