HomeMy WebLinkAboutWD-34-00 Addendum
-
l.;'.rJ"
"
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISlRATION COMMITfEE File # -;0 7
Date: SEPTEMBER 5,2000 Res. #C/1- '3g:a 0
Report No.: ADDENDUM TO REPORT WD-34--00 By-Law #
Subj ect:
BOWMANVILLE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA
REQUEST FOR NEW SIGNAGE
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to
Council the following:
1. TIIA T Addendum to Report WD-34--00 be received;
2. TIIAT Report WD-34-00 be lifted from the table and received;
3. TIIAT the request by the Bowmanville BJ.A. for a promotional sign at the Gamet R Rickard
Recreation Complex be denied;
4.
TIIA T permission be granted for the Bowmanville RIA to supply and install a double sided
promotional community service sign on removable decorative posts, on municipal property at the
Tourism Information Centre, Liberty Street South, Bowmanville, to announce RIA sponsored
community ftmctions and events, provided the signs are only displayed for two weeks prior to each
event; and
)
5. TIIAT the RIA be requested to supply a drawing of the sign and support to the Planning
Department for fmal design and location review.
REPORT
1.0 ATTACHMENTS
No.1: Report WD-34-00
No.2: Memo dated July 6, 2000 from the Director of Public Works to Mayor Diane Hamre and
Members of Council
J 15.5
"~",,,,,,,,,,,.,...,c
~"
ADDENDUM TO REPORT WD-34-00
PAGE 2
'-
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 At a meeting held on July 24, 2000, the Council of the Municipality of Clarington passed the
following resolution:
"THAT Report WD-34-00 be tabled for further information."
3.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT
3.1 The memo, shown as Attachment No.2, was intended only to provide an estimated cost by Public
Works to install such a sign. Staff agrees with the approach taken by the RIA, that the costs of
installing and maintaining the signs should continue to be paid for by the RI.A. from their annual
budgets through a private contractor with no direct involvement by Public Works.
3.2 The RI.A. should provide the Planning Department with a drawing of the proposed temporary sign,
proposed location on the property and its proposed base support for review. The review is required
to ensure the sign and support will be solid and pose no risk of falling. When the temporary signs are
removed the upright posts must be removed as well to reduce clutter and prevent other residents or
businesses from attaching unauthorized signs.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
4.1 That the Bowmanville RIA be granted permission to install the requested sign at the Tourist
Information Centre provided they supply a drawing of the sign and support to the Planning
Department for final review.
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
~J~
Stephen A. Vokes, P. Eng.,
Director of Public Works
d ~-:CtJL
Fiiinklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer
RDB*SA V*ce
29/08/00
1154
~
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting:
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File #
Date: JULY 3, 2000
Res. #
Report No.: WD-34-OQ
By-Law #
Subject:
BOWMANvlLLE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA
REQUEST FOR NEW SIGNAGE
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose ~ll1d Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. TI:IAT Report WD-34-00 be received;
2. TI:IAT the request by the BowmanviUe B.LA. for a promotional sign at the Gamet B.
Rickaro Complex be denied; and
3. TI:IAT permission be granted for the Bowmanville B.LA. to place a promotional sign at the
Tourism Information Centre, Liberty Street South, Bowmanville, for public events. provided
the signs are only display~ for two weeks prior to each event.
REPORT
1.0 ATTACHMENTS
No. I: Correspondence dated March 16,2000 from Bowmanville B.LA.
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 At a meeting held March 27. 2000, the Council of the Municipality 01 Clarington passed the
following resolution:
"'That the correspondence item D-14 be referred to the Chief Administrative
Officer to review with the appropriate staff and prepare a report for
<XIIISideration of the General on"''lse and Administration Committee."
ATTACHMENT NO.: 1
ADDENDUM TO REPORT WD-34-00
11 )J
REPORT NO.: WD-34-00
PAGE 2
Correspondence was forwarded to F. Wu. Chief Administrative Officer and S. Vokes.
Director of Public Works.
3.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT
3.1 The request from Garth Gilpin is to place two additional Bowmanville Business
Improvement Area promotional signs to promote the various festivals held in the downtown
core. The proposed locations are both adjacent to regional roads. Regional Road 14 (Liberty
Street South) at the Tourism Centre and Regional Road 57 at the Garnet B. Rickard
Complex, but placed on Municipality ofClarington property. The proposed signs would be
similar to the existing signs located within the B.LA. area, except the new sign supports
would have signs on both sides to be visible for both northbound and southbound traffic.
3.2 Comments from the Region of Durham included the fact that the signs would not comply
with the Regional sign by-law and any request for the signs to be erected within the regional
road allowance would meet resistance. The Region was also concerned that the B.LA.
promotional signs were well out of the actual B.LA. designated area and may raise concerns
with the Bowmanville Mall and the Bowmanville West Commercial Area.
3.3 The Planning Department advised with respect to the original proposal. that under the
Municipality's Sign By-law 97-157. as amended, businesses are permitted one (l) off-site
directional sign with the maximum size being 1.5 square metres. These signs are only
permitted on lands for industrial, commercial or agricultural use. The lands on which the
Tourism Information Centre is located are zoned "Environmental Protection (EP)". The
Garnet B. Rickard Recreational Complex is zoned "Agricultural (A)". These signs exceed
the maximum allowable sign area and are in one instance proposed on lands not
appropriately zoned. The proposal for the installation of 2 signposts on the Tourist
Information Centre lands, on which promotional signs will be installed 2 weeks prior to any
event would be classified as a "Community Service Sign". A Community Service Sign is
defined as "a temporary sign for the purpose of announcing a communiry function or event
sponsored by a non-profit organization". Section 3.2.1(i) of the Sign By-law exernpts public
uses from the provisions of the By-law. The B.LA is deemed to be a public use, and as
such, the public use provisions of the Rv-law would prevail. They do caution. it is
1 1)0
.
REPORT NO.: WD-34-00
PAGE 3
important that the intent of the Sign By-law be kept intact and that public uses. including the
RIA. provide leadership, setting an example: when it comes to the erection of signs.
3.4 Concerns from the Tourism Information Centre included the fact that they are often
inundated with temporary signs which they must remove. Approval of the request may be
precedent setting for other groups or organizations with similar ideas and that, if approved,
could only be the beginning of future sign requests. The size of the sign is a concern and
will affect the appearance of the property and may receive criticism from other businesses,
which are not being given the same opportunities to promote themselves. If the promotional
signs were installed only 2 weeks prior to each event, it may be less intrusive than a
permanent sign.
3.5 Community Services advised that the Garnet B. Rickard Recreational Complex proposed
sign location would not suit the desired image for the facility. There are also long term
plans for the complex including a digital sign, and Staff wish to maintain a proper image for
the facility.
3.6 Public Works is concerned about the proliferation of signs that detract from regulatory,
directional and warning signs. The B.LA. is presently suggesting double-sided signs, the
same size as the existing signs. Unfortunately, the new signs being proposed will be farther
off the road, and to be visible to motorists would need to be much larger, particularly at the
Rickard Recreational Complex. A concern exists that the requested locations would be
approved and then a subsequent request would come forward to make the signs larger. Staff
are also concerned that future additional requests may come forward for signing at other
municipal properties from either the B.LA. or other groups.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
4.1 The proposed Gamet B. Rickard Recreational Complex sign location is impractical due to
the distance from the travelled portion of the roadway. Staff has concerns regarding the
Tourism Information Centre location, but concerns are lessened if the signs are promoting
the actual event, as a "Public Use Sign", and are only displayed two weeks prior to each
)1
REPORT NO.: WD-34-00
PAGE 4
event. In summary. Staff at Clarington and the Region have difficulty if the SIgn is intended
as a direcuonai or advenising sign to specifically promote the dO\\TItown business area.
Respectfully submitted.
Reviewed by.
~~~
Stephen A. Vokes, P. Eng.,
Director of Public Works
cJ~~~
Franklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer
RDB*SA V*ce
. 1 : ]0 '
8B
:::aa
.m
IOWMANVlLLE
_NUl cvnu:
~~ t)6e{lHt~e(~",
BOWMANVILLE BUSINESS CENTRE
P.O. BOX 3&5
BOWMANVlLLE, ONT.
LtC 3L1
2000 03 16
Mrs. Patti Barrie
Municipal CleI'k
Municipality of Claring
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville. Ontario
'OONAR17 F/1
MUtJrCIPAUTY OF
1~I!'Fi'e
;...~.:.::I_::: v~:~~ I
\~~::~.~ '.~ '.~~~~~~.J _~
L=..."., J
t~~\:'!;::7~:-.~"- '~-1
IT,.iI!A"..... ..".....~.-.:.:
I .... ~ _...,. '..
I ~'Ile
2'.A:l.:.~....:i;,;~
r'~t~;..~~.
MAa Z 3 2G~O
c
Dear ~rs. Barrie
PUBLIC \',"JRKS
DEPT.
Because a great deal of the traffic in our communl y
~oves (only) in a north and south direction along Lib-
erty StI'eet and County Road 57. and. therefore. never
sees our signage which is on King Street East and
West. would you be kind enough to seek permission from
Council. on our behalf. to install two additional
signs with which to advertise our various festivals.
These signs. which would be of the same design and
size as the ones already in existence next to Baker's
Dozen and east of the bridge over Barber's Creek (also
known as Bowmanville Creek). are proposed to be locat-
ed on Municipal property near the Tourist Information
Centre on Liberty Street South. and on County Road 57.
on land occupied by the Garnet B. Rickard Recreation
Complex. The signs would each involve two decorative
posts pOSitioned perpendicular to the roads mentioned
and would contain signage on both sides to accommodate
both north and south bound traffic. The signage would
be changed from time to time. as the events advertised
come and go. The cost of installing and maintaining
these signs would. of course. be paid for out of our ..:!SCTlC,'
Annual Budget. ""
It is our plan to attempt to have one or both of'."t~sl.
signs in place for the Fabulous Fifties Festiv8~R~~
takes p lace in la te June. ,- Clll'IfS ili;
YOurs very truly l.t? /. 1....."':'..6....../
!._~;:. ,~0~
'_' 1 _..-
t
....-...
!
A~/~~
Garth Gilpin
Secretary-Treasurer
and
General ~anager
-,-
O,er. (,0
A'ITACHMENTNO.: 1
REPORT NO.: WD-34-00
J)
,~
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
Memorandum
Mayor Diane Hamre and Members of Council
Stephen A. Vokes, P.Eng., Director of Public Works
July 6, 2000
REPORT WD-34-00 - BOWMANVILLE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
AREA REQUEST FOR NEW SIGNAGE
Further to concerns expressed at the July 3, 2000 G.P. & A. Meeting, Public Works has
investigated the cost of installing removable sign posts at the Tourist Information Centre.
Although it was my suggestion to investigate this alternative, Clarington Public Works
has never installed a removable post on this large a scale before. It may be possible to do
further research and locate what we are looking for in a prefabricated version, but for the
meantime we have estimated the cost for a customized installation to be approximately
5750.00. This cost is for labour and materials and represents the additional cost over and
above the normal cost for the posts and any associated sign.
~z/~
Stephen A. Vokes
Director of Public Works
SA V/wc
pc: F. Wu, Chief Administrative Officer
P. Barrie, Municipal Clerk
F. Horvath, Manager of Operations
ATTACHMENT NO.: 2
b U ADDENDUM TO REPORT WD-34-00