HomeMy WebLinkAboutWD-34-00
~
UNFIIIISBED BUSII!IESS
~ \~ -j.-
~-
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting:
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File # --l D25'" . G C'
Date:
JULY 3, 2000
Res. # c:.-.q3("-o~
Report No.: WD-34-00
By-Law #
Subject:
BOWMANVILLE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA
REQUEST FOR NEW SIGNAGE
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report WD-34-00 be received;
2. THAT the request by the Bowmanville RlA. for a promotional sign at the Garnet R
Rickard Complex be denied; and
3. THAT permission be granted for the Bowmanville B.lA. to place a promotional sign at the
Tourism Information Centre, Liberty Street South, Bowmanville, for public events, provided
the signs are only displayed for two weeks prior to each event.
REPORT
1.0 ATTACHMENTS
No.1: Correspondence dated March 16, 2000 from Bowmanville B.LA.
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 At a meeting held March 27, 2000, the Council of the Municipality ofClarington passed the
following resolution:
''That the correspondence item D-14 be referred to the Chief Administrative
Officer to review with the appropriate staff and prepare a report for
consideration of the General Purpose and Administration Committee."
119903
~
~
REPORT NO.: WD-34-00
PAGE 2
Correspondence was forwarded to F. Wu, Chief Administrative Officer and S. Vokes,
Director of Public Works.
3.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT
3.1 The request from Garth Gilpin is to place two additional Bowmanville Business
Improvement Area promotional signs to promote the various festivals held in the downtown
core. The proposed locations are both adj acent to regional roads, Regional Road 14 (Liberty
Street South) at the Tourism Centre and Regional Road 57 at the Garnet B. Rickard
Complex, but placed on Municipality of Clarington property. The proposed signs would be
similar to the existing signs located within the RI.A. area, except the new sign supports
would have signs on both sides to be visible for both northbound and southbound traffic.
3.2 Comments from the Region of Durham included the fact that the signs would not comply
with the Regional sign by-law and any request for the signs to be erected within the regional
road allowance would meet resistance. The Region was also concerned that the RI.A.
promotional signs were well out of the actual B.I.A. designated area and may raise concerns
with the Bowmanville Mall and the Bowmanville West Commercial Area
3.3 The Planning Department advised with respect to the original proposal, that under the
Municipality's Sign By-law 97-157, as amended, businesses are permitted one (1) off-site
directional sign with the maximum size being 1.5 square metres. These signs are only
permitted on lands for industrial, commercial or agricultural use. The lands on which the
Tourism Information Centre is located are zoned "Environmental Protection (EP)". The
Garnet R Rickard Recreational Complex is zoned "Agricultural (A)". These signs exceed
the maximum allowable sign area and are in one instance proposed on lands not
appropriately zoned. The proposal for the installation of 2 signposts on the Tourist
Information Centre lands, on which promotional signs will be installed 2 weeks prior to any
event would be classified as a "Community Service Sign". A Community Service Sign is
defined as "a temporary sign for the purpose of announcing a community function or event
sponsored by a non-profit organization". Section 3.2.1(i) of the Sign By-law exempts public
uses from the provisions of the By-law. The B.I.A is deemed to be a public use, and as
such, the public use provisions of the By-law would prevail. They do caution, it is
119904
...
.
REPORT NO.: WD-34-00
PAGE 3
important that the intent of the Sign By-law be kept intact and that public uses, including the
RIA, provide leadership, setting an example when it comes to the erection of signs.
3.4 Concerns from the Tourism Information Centre included the fact that they are often
inundated with temporary signs which they must remove. Approval of the request may be
precedent setting for other groups or organizations with similar ideas and that, if approved,
could only be the beginning of future sign requests. The size of the sign is a concern and
will affect the appearance of the property and may receive criticism from other businesses,
which are not being given the same opportunities to promote themselves. If the promotional
signs were installed only 2 weeks prior to each event, it may be less intrusive than a
permanent sign.
3.5 Community Services advised that the Garnet R Rickard Recreational Complex proposed
sign location would not suit the desired image for the facility. There are also long term
plans for the complex including a digital sign, and Staff wish to maintain a proper image for
the facility.
3.6 Public Works is concerned about the proliferation of signs that detract from regulatory,
directional and warning signs. The RI.A. is presently suggesting double-sided signs, the
same size as the existing signs. Unfortunately, the new signs being proposed will be farther
off the road, and to be visible to motorists would need to be much larger, particularly at the
Rickard Recreational Complex. A concern exists that the requested locations would be
approved and then a subsequent request would come forward to make the signs larger. Staff
are also concerned that future additional requests may come forward for signing at other
municipal properties from either the RI.A. or other groups.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
4.1 The proposed Garnet B. Rickard Recreational Complex sign location is impractical due to
the distance from the travelled portion of the roadway. Staff has concerns regarding the
Tourism Information Centre location, but concerns are lessened if the signs are promoting
the actual event, as a "Public Use Sign", and are only displayed two weeks prior to each
119905
...
,
.'
REPORT NO.: WD-34-00
PAGE 4
event. In summary, Staff at Clarington and the Region have difficulty if the sign is intended
as a directional or advertising sign to specifically promote the downtown business area.
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
~~
Stephen A. Vokes, P. Eng.,
Director of Public Works
O~~
Franklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer
RDB*SA V*ce
119906
8B
Q D D
O!I
BOWMANVlLLE
\.!8INFSS CENTRE
~tdtMie 'Z)~W"'
BOWMANVILLE BUSINESS CENTRE
2000 03 16
'ArrENTiON
Mrs. Patti Barrie
Municipal Clerk
Municipality of Claringt .p...._.___~
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario C" '.," . I
Dear Mrs. Barrie
P.O. BOX 365
BOWMANVILLE, ONT.
L1C 3L1
'OOHAR17 F'11
MUN1CiPALiTY Of
C. _A::\.t~ri :-CN
'., ',- ". ".." I I
I'~' ...' ~.' l'\lIl
ii;;,~-.~-,~;--t-i
.~~1~j~
~'11e !
PtC~;,,~~'
MA~ 2 3 2D~O
PUBUG W'ORKS
DEPl
Because a great deal of the traffic in our commun ty
moves (only) in a north and south direction along Lib-
erty Street and County Road 57, and, therefore, never
sees our signage which is on King Street East and
West, would you be kind enough to seek permission from
Council, on our behalf, to install two additional
signs with which to advertise our various festivals.
These signs, which would be of the same design and
size as the ones already in existence next to Baker's
Dozen and east of the bridge over Barber's Creek (also
known as Bowmanville Creek), are proposed to be locat-
ed on Municipal property near the Tourist Information
Centre on Liberty Street South, and on County Road 57,
on land occupied by the Garnet B. Rickard Recreation
Complex. The signs would each involve two decorative
posts positioned perpendicular to the roads mentioned
and would contain signage on both sides to accommodate
both north and south bound traffic. The signage would
be changed from time to time, as the events advertised
come and go. The cost of installing and maintaining
these signs would, of course. be paid for out of our ..~!al.:nCr,'.
Animal Budget.
~~
.-..""-_..,......
It is our plan to attempt to have one or both of','tI9~se'-'
signs in place for the Fabulous Fifties Festiva~R~~_
takes place in late June. [~S TIC
Yours very truly
1_
r-.'
-1~j*~
Garth Gilpin
Secretary-Treasurer
and
General Manager
11 9 ~ u I
~.
.-.-...,...............
,
. .................
,
", '---1--
01'6.60
ATTACHMENT NO., 1
REPORT NO.: WD.34-60