Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutADMIN-3-95 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE REPORT Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File# A 15• U Y Date: February 20 1995 Res. Ry-Law# Report#:--mADM :N_3_ [9l9#: Subject: Organizational Review: Community Services Department Recommendations: it is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1 . THAT Report Admin. 3 - 95 be received; 2. THAT the Chief Administrative Officer, along with the appropriate Staff, be authorized to conduct a review of the organizational structure of the Community Services Department and the existing and future service requirements currently supported by the Department; and 3. THAT the Chief Administrative Officer report back with recommendations on the above. BACKGROUND: 1 . The Municipality of Clarington, with its rapid growth and development, will be required over the next few years to service the municipality in areas that are increasingly placing new demands on the organization. 1 .2 The Community Services Department has not undergone a review of this extent since the mid 19801s. Consequently, it is recognized that the timing is appropriate for the Chief Administrative Officer and appropriate Staff to enter into this organizational review. 2.0 It is anticipated that there will be minimal costs involved in conducting the review in that it will primarily be conducted in-house and only drawing on external expertise if the situation warrants at any given point during the exercise. 2. 1 It is anticipated that evaluation will take place in two phases, the first of which will be an internal review, commencing with interviews of different positions within the °aCPE" A111 E iH 15 IS­tliEDIX PEGy-PAIfn existing complement, and concluding with a second phase which will extend to consultation with some key user groups and possibly other municipal structures of similar size and demand. 2.2 Any proposed future costs attached to recommendations resulting from the organizational review could be accommodated through future budgetary considerations. It is therefore premature to project related costs at this time. 3.0 The time frame for conducting the organizational review and making any recommendations back to Council in the form of a report is anticipated to be the fall of 1995. Respectfully submitted, W. H. Stoc ell, Chief Administrative Officer MM/WHS/nof i I