HomeMy WebLinkAboutWD-25-95 4
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
XXX 2MMiffiRkXTykI XX
REPORT
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File
Date: JUNE 5, 1995 Res. # 6� -_ =
Ry-Law#
Report#:_Wp.�.25-,--9- ._ File#: _.0 0.8-.- 0 01
Subject: YELLOW CENTRELINE, ENFIELD ROAD BETWEEN
CONCESSION ROADS 8 AND 9, ENFIELD
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report WD-25-95 be received;
2 . THAT the request to paint a yellow centreline on Enfield Road
between Concession Roads 8 and 9 be DENIED; and
3. THAT a copy of Report WD-25-95 be forwarded to Patricia
McLellan and that she be advised of Council's decision.
REPORT
1.0 ATTACHMENTS
No. 1: Key Map
No. 2 : Correspondence dated March 1, 1995, from Patricia
McLellan
No. 3: Copy of Report WD-63-91 dated July 8, 1991
2.0 BACKGROUND
2 . 1 At a regular meeting held on March 13, 1995, Council passed
Resolution #C-182-95 as follows:
"THAT the correspondence dated March 1, 1995
1001
`CYC"P4PER 'RECYICLE
14145 6 PNtlIED Ott RECYCLED PAPER
REPORT NO. : WD-25-95 PAGE 2
from Patricia McLellan regarding a yellow
centreline on Enfield Road, be received;
THAT the correspondence be referred to the
Director of Public Works for review and
preparation of a report to be submitted to the
General Purpose and Administration Committee;
and
THAT Patricia McLellan be advised of Council's
decision. "
3.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT
3. 1 The letter dated March 1, 1995 (Attachment No. 2 ) requests the
yellow centreline to prevent accidents in bad weather with the
offer to pay for the paint if the Municipality pays for the
machinery and labour.
3.2 Extensive Review Done in 1991
An extensive review was done in 1991 regarding the feasibility
of painting centrelines on Concession Roads (Report WD-63-91,
Attachment No. 3) . Council approved the recommendations in
the report:
i
112 . THAT only concession roads which meet the
warrants listed in the Manual of Uniform
Traffic Control Devices be considered for
centreline painting; and
i
3. THAT provision be made in the 1992
Budget, for Council's consideration, for
centreline and edge line painting all
roads which meet the warrants. "
I
1002
REPORT NO. : WD-25-95 PAGE 3
3. 3 Some Facts
3.3. 1 The estimated cost to centreline paint a kilometre of
road in the first year is $535 and in the second year is
$377 . The cost in the first year is higher than in the
second year because the road has to be "pre-marked" in
the first year, but not in the following years.
3.3.2 The estimated annual cost to centreline paint Enfield
Road, from Concession Road 8 to Concession Road 9, in the
first year is $1, 120 and in the second year is $800 .
3 .3.3 The estimated annual cost to centreline paint all of the
Concession Roads in Clarington is $309, 000.
3.3.4 The estimated annual cost to centreline paint all of the
roads in Clarington (75 km) which meet the warrants from
the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices is $28,262.
3.3.5 The 1995 budget for centreline painting is $20,000. This
i
provides sufficient funds to centreline paint 53 kms of
the 75 kms of roads which meet the warrants from the
Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
3 .4 Enfield Road Characteristics
Enfield Road north of Taunton Road is Regional Road 34 . This
Regional section is straight, 7 metres wide with a two (2)
metre shoulder on each side. It is smooth asphalt with a
painted centreline. When a motorist travels north of
Concession Road 8 (Regional Road 3) the Clarington section has
no centreline, is straight, rough primed surface, narrower
pavement width of 6.5 metres and narrow shoulders of 0.5
metres.
I
1003
i
REPORT NO. : WD-25-95 PAGE 4
There have been no reported accidents on Clarington's road
section over the past three (3) years. The fact that the
painted line stops at Concession Road 8 should indicate to
motorists that the road has changed and they should adjust
their speed to compensate for the different road
characteristics. Motorists on Enfield Road may experience
difficult conditions in bad weather, but so do drivers on all
concession roads. It should also be noted that often during
bad weather, pavement markings are obscured and ineffective.
3.5 Offer to Share Costs
The offer of the petitioners, none of which even live on this
road section, to pay for the paint is impractical. The paint
is only a small portion of the expenditure and once applied by
the Municipality would become an annual expenditure to
taxpayers.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
4 . 1 From the above, it is concluded that there are several roads
in Clarington which meet the warrants for centreline painting
which are not being done because of lack of funds which have
a higher priority than Enfield Road between Concession Roads
8 and 9 .
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
i G
Walter Evans, P.Eng. W. H. Stockwell
Director of Public Works Chief Administrative Officer
RDB*ph
May 25, 1995
Attachments
I
i
10'04
REPORT NO. : WD-25-95 PAGE 5
Patricia McLellan
1733 Concession Road 9
R.R. #2
Blackstock, Ontario
LOB 1B0
I
I
i
1005
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I o I
I
I I I I CONC SSION ROAD 9
N
NFIE I_I � o
I I I I ( Utl A4KE C EN ERLINL
o ICL Rl�GI ONI D I 1V
E AS�ILL6
l a I I I I I I I I
W R GION NL R D
J
V)
QI I I I I I I I t o I I
U
o I I ( ( MjkRKED IC NTERL E I W 0Lr
RE G1 NA RA[� I I mit
s I II II I
J
�.N ESSIOJ RO 7
Q n
ch o
z I I I I I I LLI S
o
w �
z w I MIL ROAD
J 0
Q I
< X
J0 IS I
d' j
0 C NCESSI N RO D 6
Is INA
W
A N ol TCkLL� I I z
11
� J
3 0
(n REGIO AL RIJD 4
I
i
C:\ATTACHS\DARL\ENRDPVMT.DWG
DRAWN BY: JM DATE: MAY 1995
ATTACHMENT N0, 1
WD-25-95
1006
its G 2 zo r�i1 '95 1d �6 I 6o
fill All
q
mk
y
DIS
TRIBUTION
# CLERK # 1
ACK. PY.......
D�-RUNAL TD:
COPIES TO:
YJ
• ����'.�t L
alt ":t't �.r7- --:
! f
ATTEI\ITiOr � "`--r'. hlliJ(d...iPR.;_i ! w— — .
j- -
f'OPIES To
ATTACHMENT N0. 2
WD-25-95
1007
I
I
�)t
1
i
TO;
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario
LIC 3A6
We the undersigned, wish to present to the Municipality of
Claringtvr� our need for a yellow line to be painted on the Enfield
Road between concession 8 and concession 9.
On the abovementivned road, during
line and bad weather, we have no guiding
this has caused quite a few accidents.
the majority of us have telephoned the Municipality to requestindividuthat
strip of road, only to be told
Provide funds for t
a yellow line be painted on this
that there are not sufficient funds for this. We request that ifv.1
the he paint, will the Municipality please provide
he and labour to effe
accident. ct same, before there is a fatal
/ NAME ADDRESS
, _. SIGNAL URE
�/G yJ:� d o g
f/1�vl�Za aS S^��C ✓ ,
Lr-7- U
n /
7 y 2 3
Y
s C
// /
' I
- 1008
TO.
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario
L1C 3A6
We the undersigned, wish to present to the Municipality of
•Clarington our need for a yellow line to be painted on the Enfield
Road between concession 8 and concession 9.
On the abovementioned road, during bad weather, we have no guiding
line and this has caused quite a few accidents. As individuals,
the majority of us have telephoned the Municipality to request that
a yellow line be painted on this strip of road, only to be told
that there are not sufficient fdnds for this. We request thatifAe
provide funds for the paint, will the Municipality please provide
the machinery and labour to effect same, before there is a fatal
accident.
NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE
2 </+c/>'yTC,G
�feu
/1.
1009
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
"!� •
•t . REPORT
�; File #
•� •�^���.
Res. #
_ - —- By-Law #
,fTING: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
)ATE: JULY 8, 1991
REPORT #: WD-63-91 FILE #: D.00.00. 17
U&ECT: FEASIBILITY AND COST OF PAINTING CENTERLINES ON
CONCESSION ROADS
:.ECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report WD-63-91 be received;
2 . THAT only concession roads which meet the warrants listed in the
Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices be considered for
centerline painting; and
3. THAT provision be made in the 1992 Budget, for Council's
consideration, for centerline and edge line painting all roads
which meet the warrants.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
REPORT
1.0 ATTACHMENTS
No. l: Line Marking Schedules - Total Warranted Locations
i
• i
i
ATTACHMENT N0. 3
WD-25-95
1
i
1010
REPORT NO. : WD-63-91 PAGE 2
2.0 BACKGROUND
2 . 1 At a meeting held on July 16, 1990, Council passed Resolution
#GPA-551-90:
"That staff investigate the feasibility and cost factor
of painting centerlines on the Town's Concession
Roads . "
3.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT
3. 1 A survey was conducted of other municipalities in the Region
regarding line painting Concession Roads.
CITY OF O5HAWA•
The City of Oshawa follow guidelines listed in the Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices . Centerline paint exists on 3.6
km (2 .2 miles) of the 70.3 km (43 . 7 miles) of paved rural roads.
PICKERING AND AJAX:
Pickering and Ajax do not provide centerline painting on rural
roads .
TOWN OF WHITBY•
The Town of Whitby provides centerline painting on 19 km (11.8
miles) of rural roads which are considered main collector rural
roads with heavy traffic volumes.
3 .2 Pavement markings have definite functions to perform in a proper
scheme of traffic control. Pavement markings warn of any unusual
or hazardous condition and serve to organize and control
motorists through a hazardous or congested zone. They are used
to supplement the regulations or warnings of other devices such
as traffic signs or signals.
In some cases, such as turning lanes, they may serve by
themselves to convey warnings in an effective manner.
I
i
. . .3
1 09 0 ,
1011
REPORT NO. : WD-63-91 PAGE 3
3. 3 Pavement markings have definite limitations . They may be
entirely obliterated by snow or sand, they are not clearly
visible when wet, they have limited durability on surfaces
exposed to heavy traffic and require repainting more than once
per year. In spite of the limitations they have the advantage
under favourable conditions of conveying warning or information
to the motorist without diverting his attention from the roadway.
3.4 Pavement markings have no legal authority and are only a guide to
supplement other regulatory warnings or devices . A driver on a
rural road cannot be charged for straddling a centerline. If the
motorist interferes with other traffic the driver could then be
charged with failing to share the road. This charge could be
laid with or without the centerline being present.
3.5 The Ministry of Transportation of Ontario publishes the Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The manual lists warrants and
guidelines for direction dividing lines on rural roads as
follows:
C 2 . 02 . 01 (A) Two Lane Rural Highways Dividing Lines:
( 1) Throughout their length where the pavement is 6 m (19.7
ft) or over in width and they carry two way peak hour
volumes of 200 vehicles or more;
(2) Throughout their length where the pavement is 5 .5 m
(18. 0 ft) to 6 m ( 19.7 ft) in width and they carry two
way peak hour volumes of 100 vehicles or more;
(3) Throughout their length where the pavement is 5 m ( 16.4
feet) to 5.5 m (18.0 feet) in width and they carry two
way peak hour volumes of 50 vehicles or more;
i
(4) In sections where the accident record indicates a need
for defining the division of the roadway between
traffic travelling in opposite directions;
. . .4
I
^ .. 1 012 �:
REPORT NO. : WD-63-91 PAGE 4
(5) In areas where the roadway is likely to be obscured
frequently by atmospheric conditions .
3 . 6 In addition to the yellow centerline, the Manual also lists
guidelines for white edge lines on ,rural roads .
C 2 . 05 Pavement Edge Lines•
Line markings to delineate the pavement edge or in instances
where the shoulder is paved, to separate the shoulder from
the travelled lane shall be used on sections of highways.
(A) Where the shoulder is paved;
(B) In advance of and over all bridges;
(C) 150 m (492 feet) in advance of, and around all curves
having an advisory speed less than the posted speed
limit;
(D) On merging or diverging lanes;
(E) On pavement width transitions;
(F) Where obstructions on the shoulder are within 60 cm (2
feet) of the pavement edge or edge of the travelled
lane and thus may constitute a hazard to the motorist;
(G) Where there are peculiar physical conditions or
frequent occurrences of fog.
3.7 There are disadvantages to line painting rural roads which do not
meet the warrants. If limited funds are spent on unwarranted
locations the hazardous locations may not receive the required
markings. If an entire road is centerlined painted it detracts
from the more serious hazards of curves or bridges . Line
Painting unwarranted locations puts an unnecessary financial
burden on the tax payer.
1013
REPORT NO. : WD-63-91 PAGE 5
3 .8 The Public Works Department operates its own paint spraying
equipment which is used for the following line painting:
pedestrian crosswalks
school bus loading zones
disabled person symbols
stop bars
direction arrows
hatch marks
parking stalls
parking lots
3 .9 All centerline painting on Town streets is contracted to the
Region of Durham who have the equipment for this type of work.
During 1990 the Region painted 5.3 km of white edge lines and 31
km of centerline at a total cost of $15,400. The Region has
provided an estimated 1991 cost to pre-mark and paint center
lines of $588 per km ($946 per mile) for the first year. The
second year pre-marking would not be required and the price would
be $450 per km ($724 per mile) . Ordinarily all lines are painted
once .per year and should be done in the spring.
3. 10 The cost to paint all centerlines and edge markings which meet
the warrants would be $58,000 in the first year, and based on
1991 prices, would be $55,000 in the second year.
3.11 The cost to paint centerlines on all concession roads would be
$236,000 in the first year and $189,000 in the second year.
3.12 The 1991 approved Budget provided for $27,000 for centerline and
edge painting.
. . .6
0 9 `� C
1014
REPORT NO. : WD-63-91 PAGE 6
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
4 . 1 Based on the above, it is concluded that centerline and edge
line painting should be provided only at warranted
locations .
Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to the Committee,
AChief
,
------------------
--------------------
Walter A. Evans, P.Eng. , Kotseff,
Director of Public Works inistrative Officer
RB*WAE*llv
June 28, 1991
Attachment
i
I
I
Page 1 of 3
WARRANTED LOCATIONS FOR CENTRELINE AND EDGE LINE PAINTING
FOR DIVISION #1, DARLINGTON
STREET NAME FROM TO LENGTH REMARKS
METRES
------- — ----- -------
DARLINGTON PARR ROAD COURTICE RD WESTERLY 620 CENTRE CURVE
DARLINGTON PARR ROAD COURTICE RD WESTERLY 1240 EDGE CURVE
SOUTH SERVICE ROAD REGION RD 34 WAVERLY 6000 TRAFFIC VOLUME
BASELINE ROAD REGION RD #57 REGION RD 34 6000 TRAFFIC VOLUME
* PRESTONVALE ROAD PRESTONVALE RD BASELINE RD 300 CENTRE CURVE
* PRESTONVALE ROAD PRESTONVALE RD SOUTH OF BLOOR 365 CENTRE CURVE
i
* MAPLE GROVE ROAD HWY # 2 SOUTHERLY 200 CENTRE CURVE
.,� NASH ROAD NASH RD EAST OF GREEN RD 410 CENTRE CURVE
NASH ROAD NASH RD EAST OF GREEN RD 820 EDGE CURVE
O� NASH ROAD NASH RD WEST OF REGIONAL RD # 57 740 CENTRE CURVE
GREEN ROAD GREEN RD SOUTH OF REGIONAL RD # 4 410 CENTRE CURVE
GREEN ROAD GREEN RD SOUTH OF REGIONAL ,RD # 4 450 CENTRE CURVE
* CONCESSION ROAD 6 OLD SCUGOG RD HOLT RD 845 HILL/BRIDGE
* CONCESSION ROAD 6 CONC RD 6 WEST OF OLD SCUGOG 640 BRIDGE
t= --I
I s
m
0
H
Page 2 of 3
STREET NAME FROM TO LENGTH REMARKS
* CONCESSION ROAD 6 CONC RD 6 WEST OF SOLINA RD 320 BRIDGE
* CONCESSION ROAD 6 CONC RD 6 WEST OF SOLINA RD 640 BRIDGE
* CONCESSION ROAD 7 OLD SCUGOG RD HOLT RD 810 BRIDGE/HILL
* CONCESSION ROAD 7 CONC RD 7 WEST OF SCUGOG ST 650 BRIDGE
CONCESSION ROAD 7 OSHAWA TOWNLINE EASTERLY 900 CURVE/HILL
* LANGMAID ROAD REGION RD #3 SOUTHERLY 500 CENTRE CURVE
* LANGMAID ROAD REGION RD #3 SOUTHERLY 1000 EDGE CURVE
* LANGMAID ROAD LANGMAID RD SOUTH OF REGION RD #3 400 JOG
CONCESSION ROAD 9 CONC RD 9 EAST OF ENFEILD RD 930 CENTRE CURVE
Q CONCESSION ROAD 9 CURVE # 2 EAST OF ENFEILD 320 CENTRE CURVE
CONCESSION ROAD 9 CURVES 3 & 4 EAST OF ENFEILD 650 CENTRE CURVE
CONCESSION ROAD 9 CURVE #5 EAST OF ENFEILD 320 CENTRE CURVE
CONCESSION ROAD 9 CURVE #6 EAST OF ENFEILD 380 CENTRE CURVE
OLD SCUGOG ROAD SOUTH CONC RD 9 NORTH OF CONC RD 9 530 CURVE/INTERSECTI
* OLD SCUGOG ROAD SOUTH CONC RD 9 NORTH OF CONC RD 9 1060 EDGE CURVE
OLD SCUGOG ROAD REGION RD #3 NORTHERLY 180 CENTRE CURVE
CONCESSION ROAD 10 CONC RD 10 WEST OF ENFEILD RD 1100 CENTRE CURVES
* CONCESSION ROAD 10 CONC RD 10 WEST OF ENFEILD RD 2200 EDGE CURVES
* CONCESSION ROAD 10 CONC RD 10 EAST OF GRASSHOPPER PARK RD 400 CENTRE CURVE
Page 3 of 3
STREET NAME FROM TO LENGTH
REMARKS
* CONCESSION ROAD 10 CONC RD 10 EAST OF GRASSHOPPER PARR RD 800 EDGE CURVE
* MIDDLE ROAD MIDDLE RD SOUTH OF CONC RD 4 300
CENTRE CURVE/INT
* MIDDLE ROAD MIDDLE RD SOUTH OF C`ONC RD 3 300
CENTRE CURVE/INT
* MEARNS AVENUE MEARNS AVE NORTH OF CONC RD 4 340
CENTRE CURVE
* MEARNS AVENUE MEARNS AVE NORTH OF CONC RD 4 680
* BETHESDA ROAD CONC RD 4 NORTHERLY 470
CENTRE CURVE
* BETHESDA ROAD BETHESDA RD NORTH OF CONC RD 4 810 EDGE CURVE
BETHESDA ROADBETHESDA RD NORTH OF CONC RD 4
380 CENTRE CURVE
BETHESDA ROAD BETHESDA RD NORTH OF CONC RD 4 760
EDGE CURVE
CON,C. RD, 4/ LAMBS RD. WESTERLY SOUTHERLY 350
co CENTRE CURVE
CONC. RD. 4/ LAMBS RD. WESTERLY SOUTHERLY
700 EDGE CURVE
DIVISION #1 DARLINGTON SUMMARY
TOTAL LANE LINE PAINT 0 M
TOTAL EDGE LINE PAINT 12740 M
TOTAL CENTER LINE PAINT 25850 M
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ 18,392
* WARRANTED LOCATIONS WHICH HAVE NOT RECEIVED PAVEMENT MARKINGS
WARRANTED LOCATIONS FOR CENTRELINE AND EDGE LINE PAINTING Page 1 of 3
FOR DIVISION #2, BOWMANVILLE
STREET NAME FROM TO LENGTH REEKS
METRES
LAKE ROAD REGION RD # 14 PORT DARLINGTON ROAD 425 CENTRE CURVE
LAKE ROAD REGION RD # 14 PORT DARLINGTON ROAD 850 CENTRE CURVE
PORT DARLINGTON ROAD LAKE RD SOUTHERLY 120 CENTRE CURVE
* WEST BEACH ROAD WEST BEACH RD WEST OF PORT DARLINGTON RD 615 CENTRE CURVES
* WEST BEACH ROAD WEST BEACH RD WEST OF PORT DARLINGTON RD 1230 EDGE CURVES
BASELINE ROAD MARTIN RD WESTERLY 300 RESURFACED
BASELINE ROAD REGION # 57 RAINES ST 2490 TRAFFIC VOLUME.
L� * BASELINE ROAD HUNT ST WESTERLY 570 BRIDGE
* BASELINE ROAD REGION RD # 14 WESTERLY 600 BRIDGE
SIMPSON AVENUE BASELINE RD NORTHERLY 500 CENTRE CURVES
SIMPSON AVENUE BASELINE RD NORTHERLY 1000 EDGE CURVES
SIMPSON AVENUE KING ST SOUTHERLY 150 TRAFFIC VOLUME
SIMPSON AVENUE KING ST SOUTHERLY 150 TRAFFIC VOLUME
MARTIN ROAD BASELINE NORTHERLY 60 TRAFFIC VOLUME
Page 2 of 3
STREET NAME FROM TO LENGTH REMARKS
MARTIN ROAD PENFOUND DRIVE REGIONAL ROAD # 57 . 320 HILL/ CENTRE
WAVERLY ROAD REGION ROAD # 57 ROENICK DRIVE 1180 TRAFFIC VOLUME
ROENICK DRIVE WAVERLY ROAD KING ST 340 CENTRE CURVE
ROENICK DRIVE WAVERLY ROAD KING STREET 680 EDGE CURVE
* QUEEN STREET KING STREET TEMPERANCE' STREET 230 CENTRE CURVE
QUEEN STREET BROWN STREET ST.GEORGE STREET 365 TRAFFIC VOLUME
ST.GEORGE STREET KING STREET QUEEN STREET 125 TRAFFIC VOLUME
FRANK STREET KING STREET SOUTHERLY 250 TRAFFIC VOLUME
TEMPERANCE STREET QUEEN STREET CHURCH STREET 250 TRAFFIC VOLUME
DIVISION STREET QUEEN STREET CHURCH STREET 250 TRAFFIC VOLUME
N BROWN STREET KING STREET QUEEN STREET 125 TRAFFIC VOLUME
O
* ONTARIO STREET KING STREET REGION ROAD # 14 1000 TRAFFIC VOLUME
SCUGOG STREET KING STREET REGION ROAD # 57 2900 TRAFFIC VOLUME
SCUGOG STREET KING STREET NORTHERLY 80 TURNLANE
SCUGOG STREET CHURCH STREET NORTHERLY 80 TURNLANE
CHURCH�STREET DIVISION STREET GEORGE STREET 150 PREMARK
CHURCH STREET TEMPERANCE STREET DIVISION STREET 250 LANES
CHURCH STREET SCUGOG STREET REGION ROAD 14 980 TRAFFIC VOLUME
ELGIN STREET FIRST STREET HORSEY STREET 315 BRIDGE/WIDTH
Page 3 of 3
STREET NAME FROM TO LENGTH REMARKS
ELGIN STREET FIRST STREET CONCESSION STREET 320 BRIDGE
DIVISION #2, BOWMANVILLE SUMMARY
TOTAL LANE LINE PAINT 560 M
TOTAL EDGE LINE PAINT 5500 M
TOTAL CENTRE LINE PAINT 13190 M
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS $9,331
* WARRANTED LOCATIONS WHICH HAVE NOT RECEIVED PAVEMENT MARKINGS
'7
J
J...1
t
WARRANTED LOCATIdNS FOR CENTRELINE AND EDGE LINE PAINTING Page 1 of 4
FOR DIVISION #3, CLARKE
STREET NAME FROM TO LENGTH REMARKS
METRES
SUNSET BLVD RUDELL ROAD EASTERLY 370 CENTRE CURVE/IN"
SUNSET BLVD CHURCH STREET WESTERLY 200 CENTRE CURVE
MILL STREET TORONTO STREET SOUTHERLY 730 CENTRE CURVE
MILL STREET TORONTO STREET SOUTHERLY 920 EDGE CURVE
LAKESHORE ROAD PARR STREET EASTERLY 890 CENTRE CURVE
* LAKESHORE ROAD PARK STREET EASTERLY 1780 EDGE CURVES
LAKESHORE ROAD RILEY ROAD EASTERLY 455 CENTRE CURVE
0
* LAKESHORE ROAD RILEY ROAD EASTERLY 910 EDGE CURVES
C=D
_
LAKESHORE ROAD MORGANS ROAD EASTERLY 400 CENTRE CURVES
* LAKESHORE ROAD JAYNES ROAD EASTERLY 345 CENTRE CURVES
* LAKESHORE ROAD TRAIN TRACKS SOUTHERLY 395 CENTRE CURVE
* LAKESHORE ROAD NEWTONVILLE ROAD WESTERLY 350 CENTRE CURVE
* LAKESHORE ROAD NEWTONVILLE ROAD WESTERLY 700 EDGE CURVE
Page 2 of 4
STREET NAME FROM TO LENGTH REMARKS
* LAKESHORE ROAD LANCASTER ROAD EASTERLY 520 CENTRE CURVE
* LAKESHORE ROAD PORT GRANDBY EAST/WEST OF BRIDGE 640 BRIDGE
* LAKESHORE ROAD NICHOLS ROAD EASTERLY 665 CENTRE CURVE
* LAKESHORE ROAD NICHOLS ROAD EASTERLY 1330 EDGE CURVE
* NEWTONVILLE ROAD CONCESSION RD 1 NORTH/SOUTH 340 CENTRE CURVE
CONCESSION ROAD 3 REGION ROAD #42 EASTERLY 825 CENTRE CURVE
CONCESSION ROAD 3 POLLARD ROAD EASTERLY/WESTERLY 320 BRIDGE
* CONCESSION ROAD 3 POLLARD ROAD EASTERLY/WESTERLY 640 BRIDGE
* CONCESSION RD 5 OCHONSKI ROAD WESTERLY 300 BRIDGE
* CONCESSION ROAD 5 OCHONSKI ROAD WESTERLY 600 BRIDGE
* CONCESSION ROAD 5 OCKONSKI ROAD EASTERLY 470 CENTRE CURVE
r.
* CONCESSION ROAD 5 OCHONSKI ROAD EASTERLY 940 EDGE CURVES
f� STATION STREET REGION ROAD #17 WESTERLY 570 ENBANKMENT
Csi C_rJ
* MORGANS ROAD CONCESSION ROAD 4 SOUTHERLY 540 BRIDGE.
* MORGANS ROAD CONCESSION ROAD 4 SOUTHERLY 1080 BRIDGE
* STAPLETON ROAD CONCESSION ROAD 4 SOUTHERLY 300 BRIDGE
* STAPLETON ROAD CONCESSION RD 4 SOUTHERLY 600 BRIDGE
* STAPLETON ROAD CONCESSION ROAD 3 SOUTH/NORTH 370 CENTRE CURVE
* STAPLETON ROAD CONCESSION ROAD 3 SOUTH/NORTH 740 BRIDGE
Page 3 of 4
STREET NAME FROM TO LENGTH REMARKS
* REID ROAD CONCESSION RD 4 SOUTHERLY 300 BRIDGE
* REID ROAD CONCESSION RD 4 SOUTHERLY 600 BRIDGE
* REID ROAD CONCESSION RD 4 SOUTHERLY 300 BRIDGE
* REID ROAD CONCESSION RD 4 SOUTHERLY 600 BRIDGE
* REID ROAD CONCESSION RD 4 NORTHERLY 300 BRIDGE
* REID ROAD CONCESSION RD 4 NORTHERLY 600 BRIDGE
* CONCESSION ROAD 4 REGION ROAD 18 WESTERLY 350 BRIDGE
* CONCESSION ROAD 4 REGION ROAD 18 WESTERLY 700 BRIDGE
* STEWART ROAD CONCESSION RD 3 NORTHERLY 180 BRIDGE
---� * STEWART ROAD CONCESSION RD 3 NORTHERLY 360 BRIDGE
* ELLIOT ROAD CONCESSION RD 3 NORTHERLY
300 BRIDGE
* ELLIOT ROAD CONCESSION RD 3 NORTHERLY 600
�'= * CONCESSION ROAD 5 JEWEL ROAD PATTERSON ROAD 770 CENTRE CURVE
* CONCESSION ROAD 5 WALSH ROAD EASTERLY 330 CENTRE CURVE
* CONCESSION ROAD 6 JEWEL ROAD HILLEN ROAD 3625 FOG AREA
* CONCESSION ROAD 6 GILMORE ROAD EAST SIDE OF CURVE 350 CENTRE CURVE
* CONCESSION ROAD 6 GILMORE ROAD EAST SIDE OF CURVE 700 EDGE CURVES
* THERTELL ROAD COLDSPRINGS ROAD WESTERLY 560 . CENTRE CURVES
* THERTELL ROAD COLDSPRINGS ROAD WESTERLY 1120 EDGE CURVES
Page 4 of 4
STREET NAME FROM TO LENGTH RENiA1tKS
* DELL ROAD THERTELL ROAD SOUTHERLY 400 CENTER CURVES
* DELL ROAD THERTELL ROAD SOUTHERLY 800 EDGE CURVES
* CONCESSION ROAD 8 WHITE ROAD EASTERLY 400 CENTRE CURVES
* CONCESSION ROAD 8 WHITE ROAD EASTERLY 800 EDGE CURVES
* BEST ROAD REGION RD 4 NORTHERLY 250 CENTRE CURVES
* BEST ROAD CONCESSION RD 7 NORTH/SOUTH 510 CENTRE CURVE
* CONCESSION ROAD 7 LESKARD ROAD WESTERLY 435 BRIDGE
* CONCESSION ROAD 7 LESKARD ROAD WESTERLY 620 BRIDGE
'v7
CONCESSION ROAD 8 TOWNLINE ROAD EASTERLY 825 CENTRE CURVE
* CONCESSION ROAD 8 TOWNLINE ROAD EASTERLY 1700 EDGE CURVES
* CONCESSION ROAD 8 LESKARD ROAD WESTERLY 300 BRIDGE
CJ1
* CONCESSION ROAD 8 LESKARD ROAD, WESTERLY 400 BRIDGE
* LESKARD ROAD SKELDING ROAD SOUTH/EAST 320 CENTRE CURVE
DIVISION # 3 CLARKE SUMMARY
TOTAL LANE LINE PAINT 0 M
TOTALEDGE LINE PAINT 21050 M
TOTAL CENTRE LINE PAINT 19590 M
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $20,398
* WARRANTED LOCATIONS WHICH HAVE NOT RECEIVED PAVEMENT MARKINGS
SUMMARY
LINE MARRING SCHEDULES
TOTAL WARRANTED LOCATIONS TO BE CONTRACTED OUT
Division #1 (Former Darlington) $18,392
Division #2 (Former Bowmanville) 9,331
Division #3 (Former Clarke) 20,398
SUBTOTAL $48,121
PAINTING APPLIED BY TOWN STAFF 10,000
TOTAL 58,121
ROUNDED 58 000
i
1026