Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWD-26-95 Addendum WINIS10 BUSMSS THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON XXX R2kk k 2kiykXT XAA!iTA-f-XXX REPORT GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Meeting: JULY 10, 1995 File#e � Date: ADDENDUM NO. 1 Res. # WD-26-95 0.30. 11 Ry-Law#Report#: File #: Subject: REMOVAL OF IGLOOS FROM THE RECYCLING PROGRAM i Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report Addendum No. 1 to WD-26-95 be received; 2 . THAT Report WD-26-95 be lifted from the table and be received; 3 . THAT the seven (7) sets of recycling igloos sponsored by the Municipality be removed; 4 . THAT the Municipality call for tender for the collection and hauling of recyclable materials from properties owned by the Municipality of Clarington; and 5 . THAT the Region of Durham and Harvey Ambrose, President of Ontario Disposal, be advised of Council 's decision. REPORT 1.0 ATTACHMENTS No. 1: WD-26-95 I i 2.0 BACKGROUND 2 . 1 At a regular meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on June 19, 1995, Report WD-26-95 was tabled to request consideration in providing Municipal halls and museums with a recycling program. 1201 PA PEERD EC YiC LE THIS IS PRfIIED ON RECYCLED PAPER REPORT NO. : ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO WD-26-95 PAGE 2 3.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT 3. 1 The following chart illustrates the locations and sponsors of the existing sets of igloos within the Municipality. NO. LOCATION SPONSOR 1 Burketon Municipality of Clarington 2 Enniskillen Fire Hall Municipality of Clarington 3 Public Works Operations Municipality of Clarington Centre in Hampton 4 Public Works Operations Municipality of Clarington Centre in Orono 5 Kendal Municipality of Clarington 6 Newtonville Municipality of Clarington 7 Bowmanville Community Municipality of Clarington Services 8 Garnet B. Rickard Complex St. Mary's Cement 9 Newcastle Fire Hall Laidlaw Waste Systems 10 Wilmot Creek Residential Pineridge Development Homes I 11 Regional Housing on Nelson Region of Durham Street in Bowmanville i i 3 .2 Removal of Igloos Igloos at the Pebblestone Road and Trulls Road location were previously removed due to ongoing abuse. Also, igloos at the Wilmot Creek Residential Homes location and the Regional i Housing location on Nelson Street have already been dealt with j by the Region of Durham. It is the existing seven (7) sets of igloos, sponsored by the Municipality, that require approval i to be removed. I 1202 REPORT NO. : ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO WD-26-95 PAGE 3 The Region of Durham presently has a contract with J. & F. Waste Systems to collect and haul materials received at the existing igloo depots. The Region of Durham funds the collection costs but intends to phase out the igloos due to the recently initiated rural curb-side blue box collection. The Municipality covers the cost of the tipping fees. 3 . 3 Recycling Program for Municipal Properties Council requested that the Public Works Department look into providing a recycling program for all of the halls and museums . Correspondence from Harvey Ambrose, President of Ontario Disposal Limited, suggests that recyclable material would be collected at no charge if the igloos were used. j It is the opinion of the Public Works Department that j utilizing igloos at the halls and museums would result in similar problems occurring as at the present locations ie. illegal dumping, unwanted odours and pets, broken glass and windblown material onto private property. Currently, the recycling program at the Town Hall is being reviewed by the Purchasing Department. It is their intent to include other Municipal buildings. i It is recommended by the Public Works Department that the Public Works Department, along with the Purchasing Department, consider a tender for the collection and hauling of recycling materials from all municipally owned buildings . This collection will include halls and museums which currently do not have a recycling program, or halls and museums which will be without a drop off location once the igloos are removed. The successful contractor will be required to provide the appropriate containers necessary. Each building owned by the Municipality of Clarington would require different quantities of bins and/or containers. 3 .4 Privately-sponsored Igloos The sets of igloos at the Newcastle Fire Hall and the Garnet B. Rickard Complex can be removed once Council approves a 1203 REPORT NO. : ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO WD-26-95 PAGE 4 tender for the collection and hauling of recycling materials from Municipally owned buildings. Since the igloos at the Newcastle Fire Hall and the Garnet B. Rickard Complex are not sponsored by the Municipality, the agreement is between the sponsor and the Region of Durham. 3 .5 Costs It is anticipated the revenue from the materials collected would cover the cost of the program. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS I 4 . 1 Since the implementation of the 3Rs Regulations, all residential properties are now receiving blue box collection. It is the opinion of the Public Works Department that the igloos are a duplication of service, and should be removed. It is recommended that Council give authorization to the Region of Durham to have the recycling igloos sponsored by the Municipality of Clarington removed. 4 .2 It is further recommended that the collection and hauling of recyclable materials at Municipally owned buildings, including halls and museums, be tendered. Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by, 4A Stephen A. Vokes, P.Eng. H.W. Stockwell Director of Public Works Chief Administrative Officer GA*SAV*lw July 4, 1995 Attachment PC Regional Municipality of Durham 105 Consumers Drive Whitby, Ontario L1N 1C4 I Mr. Harvey Ambrose, President Ontario Disposal Limited 800 Colonel Sam Drive Oshawa, Ontario L1H 8A9 1204 CO THE XXXXq� kghVXNRff � W�4WxxINGTON . r. REPORT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File # Date: June 19, 1995 Res. #C�,P1�-�► ��-"�� By-Law# Report#: WD-26- File #: n 3n i i Subject: REMOVAL OF IGLOOS FROM THE RECYCLING PROGRAM Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report WD•-26-95 be received; 2 . THAT the seven (7) sets of recycling igloos be remove at the following locations: Enniskillen Fire Hall, Bowmanville Community Services Depot, Newtonville, Kendal, Trulls and Pebblestone Roads, Public Works Operations Centre at Orono, and Public Works Operations Centre at Hampton; and 3 . THAT the Region of Durham and Harvey Ambrose, President of Ontario Disposal, be advised of Council's decision. REPORT 1.0 ATTACHMENTS No. 1: Correspondence dated March 8, 1995, from Harvey Ambrose No. 2 : Report 94-J-16 of Region of Durham's Joint Meeting of the Finance and Administration and Works Committee , 1 05 " � ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ADDENDUM NO. 1 to WD-26-95 RECYCLEOPAPIE®_CYC PA qIE i111S 6 P{UMED CW REDYCIED PAPEq ' y1 REPORT NO. : WD-26-95 PAGE 2 2.0 BACKGROUND 2 . 1 At a meeting held on March 27 , 1995, Council passed the following Resolution #C-227-95: "THAT the correspondence dated March 8, 1995, from Harvey Ambrose, President, Ontario Disposal, advising that Ontario Disposal is proposing to provide collection of recycling material from igloos for a period of three years at no cost to the municipality, be received; THAT the correspondence be referred to the Director of Public Works for review and preparation of a report to the General Purpose and Administration Committee and referred to the Regional Municipality of Durham FORTHWITH; and THAT Harvey Ambrose be advised of Council's decision. " 2 .2 The Region of Durham instituted an Adopt an Igloo Program in 1991 as a recycling alternative for rural residents who did not receive Blue Box collection service. The Municipality sponsors igloos at the following locations: Enniskillen Fire Hall, Bowmanville Community Services Depot, Newtonville, Kendal, Trulls and Pebblestone Roads, Public Works Operations Centre at Orono, and Public Works Operations Centre at Hampton; 1206_ -rul . REPORT NO. : WD-26-95 PAGE 3 St. Marys Cement, Ridge Pine Development and Laidlaw sponsored igloos at the Garnet B. Rickard Complex. The Region's Adopt An Igloo Program required a one time fee to cover the costs for the maintenance and servicing of the containers. The Municipality pays for the tipping fees for materials collected at the sites. 2.3 Due to the new Provincial 3Rs Regulations, the Region of Durham reached an agreement on January 1, 1995, to expand the curbside Blue Box collection to rural residents who did not receive municipal Blue Box collection. 2 .4 Miller Waste Systems commenced on April 18, 1995, collecting rural curbside Blue Boxes on a bi-weekly basis. Therefore, the Region of Durham is planning to phase out the igloos. 3.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT 3. 1 The Provincial 3Rs Regulations establish requirements in the municipal and-institutional/commercial/industrial (I.C. & I. ) sectors for the recycling of waste. 3.2 According to the 3Rs Regulations, 101-94, the Municipality must provide residents access to recycling services equivalent to garbage disposal services and at at least half the frequency of garbage pick-up. 3.3 Municipal refuse collection only provides collection to apartment buildings with five (5 ) or less dwelling units per building. Any apartment buildings with six (6) or more dwelling units do not currently receive municipal refuse collection. There is no obligation for the municipality to provide recycling collection to these residential buildings. 1207 +0-13, REPORT NO. : WD-26-95 PAGE 4 Under the 3Rs Regulations property owners for these buildings are required to provide recycling programs for their residents. 3.4 Over the years the Municipality and the Region of Durham have received a number of complaints regarding the conditions at the igloo sites. The majority of the complaints were caused by people leaving refuse instead of the specified recycling materials. 3.5 The Region of Durham does not plan to utilize these igloos in the near future, therefore, it is recommended that the municipal sponsored igloos be stored at the Hampton Public Works Operations Centre for possible future use. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS 4. 1 Since the implementation of the 3Rs Regulations, all residential properties are now receiving blue box collection. It is the opinion of the Public Works Department that the igloos are a duplication of service, and should be removed from the locations specified. Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by, Walter A. Evans, P.Eng. W. H. Stockwell Director of Public Works Chief Administrative Officer GA*ph June 12, 1995 Attachments 1208 1-00J4v REPORT NO. : WD-26-95 PAGE 5 The Regional Municipality of Durham Works Department 105 Consumers Drive Whitby, Ontario LIN 1C4 Mr. Harvey Ambrose. President Ontario Disposal 800 Colonel Sam Drive Oshawa, Ontario L1H 8A9 I i 1209 ONTARIO DISPOSAL A Division of Courtice Auto Wreckers Limited 800 Colonel Sam Drive, Oshawa, Ontario L1H 8A9 Phone (905) 725-4784 Fax (905) 725-9722 March 8, 1995 Mayor Diane Hamre and Members of Council Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario LIC 3A6 Dear Mayor Hamre: RE: Phasing Out of Igloo Recycling Depots Your municipality contains nine igloo recycling depots located in rural and other public areas. The Region of Durham is proposing to remove these depots in conjunction with expansion of Blue Box collection to rural areas, scheduled for May, 1995. Ontario Disposal is proposing to provide collection of materials dropped off at these depots for the period of three years at no cost to your municipality. Ontario Disposal has equipment able to service these depots and has commitments from material markets for the three year term. By entering into a no charge service agreement with Ontario Disposal, the Municipality of Clarington will ensure that your depots remain in service and that your residents continue to have the option to recycle using these depots at their convenience. For further information or to arrange for continued service of your igloo recycling depots, please contact me. Sincerely, ONTARIO DISPOSAL A Division of Courtice Auto Wreckers Limited Harvev Ambrose ATTACHMENT N0. 1 President WD-26-95 1210 1-0r Y� October 26, 1994 {w Joint Works and Finance and Administration Committee Meeting t TO: Works Committee Finance and Administration Committee FROM: G. H. Cubitt, Chief Administrative Officer V. A. Silgailis, Commissioner of Works J. L. Gartley, Commissioner of Finance RE: REPORT #94-J-16 - REPORT ON CORRESPONDENCE WRC-21-94 CC#94-431, WRC-23-94, WRC-24-94 CC#94-433;' WRC-25-94; WRC-26-94 CC#94-448, WRC-27-941 WRC-28-94 - THE NEW 3R's REGULATIONS Report on the Annual Review of the Solid Waste Management System and the Applicable 1995 Preliminary Current and Capital Budgets and Related Financing RECOMMENDATIONS: THAT the Works and Finance and Administration Committees recommend to Council that: 1) The proposed Uniform- Regional Solid Waste Management System Rate (Waste System Rate) remain as in 19 9 4 and, 19 9 3 at $7 0 per/ tonne effective January 1, 1995 for all municipal tonnes entering landfill sites, transfer stations, recycling centres or composting facilities. 2) That the following recommendations relating to the mandated Provincial 3R1s Regulations be approved: i) The costs associated with rural blue box collection and municipal multi-unit residential building collection of approximately $1 million annually be funded by the . Region and be included in the calculation of the Regional Uniform Waste System Rate charged to the Area Municipalities. ii) The Area Municipalities continue to administer the daily operations of all blue box recycling programs within their respective municipalities. iii) The Region tender for the collection and processing of blue box materials from large multi-unit residential buildings receiving municipal garbage collection service with an implementation date of May 1, 1995 , iv) The Region_ enter into an agreement with Miller Waste Systems for the curbside collection of blue box materials from small apartment buildings receiving municipal garbage collection service and the delivery of source separated newspapers and cardboard to the Region's Recycling Centre at a cost of $0.77 per stop for the period from April 1, 1995 to January 31, 1997 . 1211 W. Evans THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM JOINT MEETING FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION AND WORKS COMMITTEES WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1994 BEFORE MEETING OF REGIONAL COUNCIL TO BE HELD AT THE REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS BUILDING 605 ROSSLAND ROAD EAST - WHITBY, ONTARIO 9:00 a.m. - ROOM B15 REPORT #94-J-16 Report on Correspondence WRC-21-94 CC#94-431, WRC-23-94, WRC-24-94 CC#94-433, WRC-25-94, WRC-26-94 CC#94-448, WRC-27-94, WRC-28-94 - THE NEW 313's REGULATIONS Report on the Annual Review of the Solid Waste Management System and the Applicable 1995 Preliminary Current and Capital Budgets and Related Financing ATTACHMENT N0. 2 21 � WD-26-95 '� 0_ REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM REPORT 4194-J-16- SUMMARY REPORT ON THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE APPLICABLE 1935 CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING 2 RECOMMF;NDATIONS:/cont'd v) The Region enter into an agreement with Miller Waste Systems for the curbside collection of blue box materials from rural residents . receiving municipal- curbside garbage collection service and the delivery of source separated newspapers and - cardboard to - the . Region's Recycling Centre at a cost of $1.21 per stop for the period from April 1, 1995 to January 31, 1997. vi) The Region enter into an agreement with Miller Waste Systems for the delivery of source separated newspapers and cardboard to the Region's Recycling Centre for the municipalities of Pickering, Ajax, Clarington, Brock, Scugog and Uxbridge at a cost of $0. 06 per stop from April 1, 1995 to January 31, 1997. vii) ' The Area Municipalities reimburse the Region for the cost of blue boxes of approximately $129,100 required for the- expanded service to rural areas and multi-unit dwellings . viii) A copy of this report be forwarded to the area municipalities for information. 3) Staff from the Works and Finance Departments review the recommendations in the Proctor and Redfern Report regarding user pay at transfer stations and landfill sites and review overall financing of these facilities including billing of recyclable material to the area municipalities. 4.) The Ministry of Environment and Energy be requested to: i) Confirm that- all . recyclingprograms, including , the expanded blue box collection program, as required by- the 3R's Regulations, continue to receive operating and capital cost subsidy allocations from the Ministry. Secure funding for Blue Box Recycling beyond the current commitment to March 31, 1996 in order for the Region to defray the large costs involved in operating the current Provincially mandated Blue Box program. Provide additional funding for new initiatives that are required to meet the Provincial goal of 50% waste diversion by the year 2000. I - 1-21 .3 - J�0-8 2 i REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM -� REPORT#94-J-16- SUMMARY REPORT ON THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM � BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING AND THE APPLICABLE 1995 CURRENT AND CAPITAL RECOMMENDATIONS:/cont'd . 5) The Proposed Preliminary 1995 Solid Waste Management Current and Capital Budgets Summary and "the related financing that 70/tonne rate be received as follows: supports the $ 1995 PR]2,181,400 A EXPENDITURES 00Regional Overhead &Facilities Management 50Transfer Stations: - Operations 00-Tipping Fees (Metro)Landfill Operations:(TWO. of Brock, Scott&Perpetual Care) 00Durham Recycling Centre 00Blue Box Collection 00Blue Box Expanded ProgramSub-Total00Waste Reduction Operations (Composting,Promotion) 500,000 Capital Program 10,236,150 Sub-Total Expenditures Metro Landfill Payments (net of transfer station payment) 5,310,000 Payment to Metro to Divert Waste from Brock West 0 Less: Rebates from Metro Toronto 0 Sub-Total Net Metro Landfill Payments 5,310,000 TOTAL GROSS EXPENDITURES 15,546,150 LESS DIRECT RECOVERIES AND REVENUES: 978,000 Material Sales: - Recycling 21,000 -Transfer Sites - Compost . - . - . 13,500 User Revenues (Composters) 120' 000 Subsidies- M.O.E.E. (Recycling Waste Reduction) 1,373,100 Tipping Fees: Regional Landfill/Transfer Sites 317,000 Recycling Centre 141,750 Sub-Total Recoveries and Revenues 2,964,350 TOTAL NET EXPENDITURES 12581,800 FINANCING 2,057,300 Contribution from Solid Waste Reserve 10,524,500 Regional Portion of the Local Tax Levy TOTAL FINANCING 12 581,800 i 1 214 3 i REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM REPORT#94-J-16 - SUMMARY REPORT ON THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE APPLICABLE 1995 CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING 4 REPORT: 1.0 INTRODUCTION • The Annual Review of the Solid Waste Management System is being completed earlier this year in order to analyze the full impact of the requirements of the Ministry of Environment and Energy (MOEE) 3R regulation on the Region's Waste System Rate and the Region's Waste Reserve. • The 3R regulation requires the local municipalities to have curbside blue box collection in rural areas and in multi-unit. dwellings where there is municipal garbage collection with an implementation date of January 1, 1995. • All of the area municipalities have requested that the increased costs of the expanded system be funded from the - Region's portion of the local tax bill rather than from the. local portion (Copies of correspondence are attached. ) • Because of the large costs involved and the potential impact on the Region's Uniform-Solid Waste Management System Rate, an analysis of these costs and the preliminary 1995 Pro Forma Budget estimates are presented in order to determine the full impact on.the Waste System rate and the Waste reserve. • The 1995 Waste Management Current and Capital Budgets will . continue to follow the approved budget timetable. 2.0 HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 1995 PRO FORMA BUDGET ESTIMATES AND FINANCING • The 1995 Waste System Rate Remains at the 1994/1993 Rate of $70/Tonne • A contribution of $2.1 million from the Waste Reserve is required to maintain the $70/tonne Rate • The Average Region-wide Annual Cost/Household Remains at $49 - less than $1 per household per week • The Budgetted Regional Waste Billings to Area Municipalities Remain at approximately 1994 levels - No Major Increases are Expected • Net Expenditures decrease by $1. 8 million primarily due to reduced costs for processing recyclable material and increased revenues. ' l REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM REPORT#94-J-16-SUMMARY REPORT ON THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID.WALTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE APPLICABLE 1995 CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING 5 2.1 1995- Waste System Rate Remains at 1993 Rate of $70/Tonne • The Region has been able to maintain the Waste System Rate at $70/tonne since 1993. •. 'Keeping the rate at $70/tonne-in 1995 results in an estimated operating shortfall of $2,057,300 in the 1995 Pro Forma Waste Budget. A contribution of $2,057,300 from the Solid Waste Reserve/Surplus is therefore required to finance this shortfall (See Attachment #1) . • It is estimated that the cost of recycling and landfill disposal to the average Regional household will remain for a second consecutive year at approximately $49/household which is- lower than - other regional municipalities (Peel . $55/HH, Halton $72/HH) . • Waste Management costs represent about . 10% of the total combined requisition for. the Regional General Levy and Waste Management Costs per household per year. • There are local differences in the per household costs for each Area Municipality as a result of the following factors which can be best explained by the respective Treasurers of these Municipalities: 1) Residential assessment as a percent of total assessment; � : .r. 2) Waste generation per capita; Population/household. growth rates; =• _ _ - 4) Collection practices; and 5)","`Over' and,-Under`"levies from"-previous years, Payments-in- Lieu, Bell Telephone receipts and local waste disposal costs. 2.2 No Major Increases in the 1995 Budgeted Net Regional Waste Billings to Area Municipalities • The 1995 budgetted net Regional waste billings to each Area Municipality are estimated to be very close to 1994 amounts. Any differences in billings for 1995 over 1994 is a direct result of increases/decreases in estimated tonnage for landfill, recycling or yard waste. 16 5 r REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM REPORT#94-J-16 -SUMMARY REPORT ON THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE APPLICABLE 1995 CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RL ATED FINANCING 6 2.3 1995 Preliminary Pro Forma Net Expenditures for Waste ManacTement are Estimated to Decrease by $1.8 Million • The major factors contributing to the decrease in Net Solid Waste Management Expenditures are as . follows: • - A decrease in processing costs at the Recycling Centre of .:.approximately $1.5 million; - A decrease in net landfill and transfer station - tipping fees to Metro Toronto of $512,000; -An increase in the sale of recyclable materials of $165,000; Confirmation of a full year MOEE subsidy for recycling operations resulting in an increase of $664,000 over 1994 2.4 The Projected Balance in the Waste Reserve is Estimated at $15.2 Million by End of 1995 • The unaudited projected balance in the Solid Waste Reserve as of December 31, 1994 is estimated at $17.3 million.. • Year to date estimates indicate that there is a surplus of $900,000 in the 1994 Waste Operations. •. The 19.95 Pro Forma Budget has estimated a draw from the -. Reserve of .$2.1. million, leaving a projected 1995 year end balance of approximately $15.2 million. 2.5 The System Rate Would Rise to $83.68/tonne in 1995 if Waste Reserve Was Not Utilized • Once the Solid Waste Reserve is depleted, the annual operating shortfall will have to be funded by increases to the Waste System Rate, decreases in expenditures or increases in revenue. • If the 1995 Pro Forma Waste Management Budget operating shortfall was fully financed from the Waste System Rate charged to the Area Municipalities, then the system rate would need to rise to $83. 68/tonne from $70/tonne and the cost per household would rise to $60. This more accurately reflects the true cost of Waste Management in the Region. • This is an improvement over the 1994 Budget. In 1994, the estimated rate .to fully finance the waste operations was $91.04/tonne. The 1995 rate of $83 .68 represents a decline of $7 . 76 per tonne. 1217 � 4�' REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM REPORT#f94-J-16- SUMMARY REPORT ON THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SCUD WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE APPLICABLE 19%CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING 7 2.5 The System Rate Would Rise to $83.68/tonne in 1995 if Waste Reserve Was Not Utilized/ cont'd • This analysis highlights the importance of reducing the Region's reliance on the Solid Waste Reserve to finance the waste operations deficit. The Waste Reserve should be used to limit large fluctuations in the Waste System Rate and to finance future capital expenditures. By constraining contributions from the Waste Reserve, sufficient fund balances will be available so that gradual increases in the Regional Waste System Rate can be maintained. 3.0 SIGNIFICANT PROGRAM CHANGES IN THE 1995 PRO FORMA BUDGET 3.1 Durham no Longer Receives a Waste Rebate from Metro Toronto • Effective May 1, 1994, Durham Region no longer receives a residential rebate from Metropolitan Toronto. • On April 19, 1994 Regional Council approved the* recommendation: "that staff from the Works and Finance Departments be authorized to negotiate with Metro Toronto to become 'a "private user" and pay the current $50/tonne tipping fee at Brock West and that negotiations with Metro on a Waste Agreement be suspended until this matter is resolved. " • At the time, Durham was negotiating a Waste Agreement with Metro Toronto to gain access to Metro's transfer stations once. Brock West closes. Durham needs access to Metro's transfer stations to satisfy the MOEE's order for Durham to build a transfer station. • Included in the waste agreement were provisions for costs related to perpetual care, for Metro to divert waste from Brock West and costs associated with the Brock W. effluent. In total the agreement was estimated to cost Durham approximately $86/tonne, $36/tonne or $4 million higher than if Durham paid the $50.00/tonne tipping fee. (Background information is available upon request - Confidential Report #94-J-7) . • Since Metro had just reduced their landfill tipping fee to $50 .00/tonne, it was decided that paying the $50. 00/tonne was more advantageous than entering into the Agreement. • When compared to the 1994 Budget, the net tipping fee to Metro declined to $50/tonne in 1995 from $54/tonne in 1994 . (Note the 1995 figure recognizes that Durham will no longer have to pay the $1.2 million diversion fee to Metro that was budgetted in 1994, and will no longer receive a rebate. ) 1218 7`- 1 U 1 _ REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM REPORT#E94-J-16 - SUMMARY REPORT ON THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE APPLICABLE 19%CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING g 3.2 Costs to Process Recyclable Materials Have Been Reduced by $1.5 Million • Changes made at the Recycling Centre have reduced the gross processing costs .to $1,901,700 in 1995 from $3,434,700 in 1994, a decline of $1,531,000. The gross cost/tonne for processing has declined to $87.33 in 1995 from $163.56 in 1994 (Based on 21,800 tonnes recycled in 1995 and 21,000 tonnes in 1994) . • The changes to the processing operation are as follows: - Plastic pop containers, and metal containers are no longer sorted prior., to shipping. The containers are shipped together directly to market. This has reduced the manpower .. required to manually sort these materials at the Recycling_ Centre. Since May 1, 1994 newspaper and cardboard were sorted during collection rather than at the Recycling Centre for the City of Oshawa (clean sort) . A similar program began in Whitby in October and the program will be extended to the remaining municipalities , in 1995.. Although,. collection ' costs are anticipated to increase for this program, processing costs are expected to decline resulting in an overall net savings to the Region. - The introduction of rural blue box collection has reduced the need for the Region's Igloo Program. The program will be phased out reducing costs in 1995 by $100,000. - Installation of loading docks at the Recycling Centre are expected to reduce costs by $75,000 annually. + 3.3 Blue Box Collection Costs Increase by $962,400 • The total cost of the blue box collection program for 1995 is estimated at $2,968,200, an increase of $962,400 over the 1994 budget of $2,005,800. • The cost for the existing blue box collection is estimated to increase by $175,600 due to the delivery of clean sorted . newspapers and cardboard from Oshawa and Whitby and anticipated growth of 3%•. • The 3R regulations mandated by the Province require the local municipalities to have curbside blue box collection in rural areas where there is garbage 'collection and in multi-unit dwellings. It is estimated to cost $786,800 in 1995 and $1,081,300 on an annual basis including the delivery of clean sorted material. The regulations indicate an implementation date of January 1, 1995. 1219g � Oau4 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM REPORT#94-J-16- SUMMARY REPORT ON THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE APPLICABLE 1995 CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING 9 3.3 Blue Box Collection Costs. Increase by $962,400/cont'd • Although the 3R Regulations require .Area Municipalities to provide these programs . as of January 1, 1995, it will be impossible to properly develop and initiate these new programs on a Region-wide basis before the spring of 1995. = • - The'estimated cost of $786,000 for.the expanded program for the 1995 budget year is comprised of the following components: - $64,900 for clean sort of newspapers and cardboard (full year $86,500) ; - $493,100 for rural collection with clean sort ($657,500 full year) ; $35,300 for small - apartment building with clean sort ($47, 100 full year) ; - $193,500 for large. multi-unit buildings ($290,200) full year. • The expanded blue box collection program will require the purchase of additional blue boxes at an estimated total cost of $129,100. - The Region is recommending that the area municipalities reimburse the Region for these costs. • For more detailed information on the 3R regulation please refer to Attachment.. #2. 3.4 The Total Costs for Blue Box Collection and . Recycling Operations Decline by $568,600 : • In summary, despite. the added blue -box collection costs, the total cost for Recycling Centre Operations and Blue Box Collection is estimated to decrease to $4,871,900 for 1995 from $5,440,500 in 1994. • This represents a gross total cost per tonne of $223.48 in 1995 from $259 .07 in 1994. (Based on 21,800 tonnes in 1995, and 21,000 tonnes in 1994. ) 4.0 REGIONAL TRANSFER STATIONS • The Region has a policy for billing area municipalities for their use of the Regional transfer stations . In 1993, the following policy was adopted: "Those area municipalities be charged the System Rate for the use of Transfer Stations based upon the respective Area Municipality's share of the disposal costs incurred for solid waste transferred from the Transfer Station to the Metro Brock West Landfill Sites (actual tonnage transferred times the system's rate) " 1 �' 1220 • REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM REPORT#E94-J-16- SUMMARY REPORT ON THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE APPLICABLE 1995 CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING 10 4.0 REGIONAL TRANSFER STATIONS/cont'd • The Region bills the area municipality according to their estimated percentage of total landfill tonnes at the transfer -r station times the Regional Uniform System Rate. • In the summer of 1994, two transfer station surveys were conducted. The results were consistent with those of the 1993 survey. . Therefore, for 1995,. an average . of the 1993 and 1994 surveys were used to allocate the tonnage to the area municipalities. Using the average of the two surveys has eliminated the need to adjust the 1994 Waste Billings. • Since a trend - in usage at the transfer stations has been exhibited, a transfer station survey will not be conducted in 1995. The Works Department will review usage at the transfer stations in the future. •.:The Proctor and Redfern Study contained recommendations relating to user charges at transfer stations and landfill sites. Staff of the . Finance and Works Departments will review the recommendations in the Proctor and Redfern Study as well as the financing of these facilities including charging recyclable material to the area municipalities and will report back to the appropriate standing committees on its findings. 5.O THE NEED TO MA?RTAIN AN ADEQUATE WASTE RESERVE BALANCE TO MEET FUTURE COSTS • It is important that thCre is an adequate balance in the Waste �. Reserve available to finance future financial liabilities and to :: cushion the effect of increased costs on the Waste System Rate. t Without the Waste Reserve, these future costs will require large :., increases in the Waste System Rate. • The following is a ' list of initiatives/programs that could impact the Region in the future. - The establishment of the IWA long term landfill site in Durham will impact the Region's planning policies, infrastructure requirements, health issues and municipal finances. These impacts will have financial implications to the Region. - Meeting the Provincial 3R Diversion target by 2000 will result in a substantial increase in the Region's waste management costs . I - If implemented, the Canadian Industry Packaging Stewardship Initiative (CIPSI) will also increase the Region's costs to manage blue box materials. 1221 _ _1-0-16 10 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM REPORT#94-J-16- SUMMARY REPORT ON THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE APPLICABLE 1995 CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING 11 6.0 REQUIRE COMMITTED PROVINCIAL 3R FUNDING TO FINANCE THE BLUE BOX PROGRAM AND FUTURE 3R ACTIVITIES • The Ministry of Environment and Energy recently announced the current level of funding for the Blue Box program would continue until March 31, 1996. • It is imperative that funding for this Provincially mandated Program be secured beyond 1996 . • The Province should also confirm funding for the extra costs related to the expanded blue box collection program into rural areas and apartments. No commitment from the Province has been given to date. In addition, meeting the Provincial 3R's Diversion target of 50% by 2000 will require new programs and initiatives which carry a large price tag. The Region cannot plan future recycling initiatives to meet the mandated 50% diversion target by 2000 without a long term commitment of funding from the Province. 7.0 ASSUMPTIONS IN PREPARING 1995 PRELIMINARY BUDGET AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS • The 1995 Pro Forma Budget estimates were used in the preparation of the 1995 Annual Review of the Solid Waste Management System. As a result, some of the information may- differ from the final 1995 Budget to be approved in April 1995. •: The..Waste System Rate will remain at $70.00/tonne. -Any deviation- from the preliminary estimates -for expenditures and revenues, would have to be .financed by a reduction in expenditures-or from an additional contribution from the Solid Waste Reserve. • The proposed 1995 Pro Forma Regional Solid Waste Management Budget has been prepared on the assumption that the Region will continue to use the Brock West Landfill Site during 1995 and that the tipping fee will remain at $50/tonne in 1995 . 1222 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM REPORT#94-J-16-SUMMARY REPORT ON THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE APPLICABLE 1995 CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING 12 8.0 CONCLUSIONS • The 1995 Waste System Rate will remain at the 1993 rate of $70/tonne. • The average Region-wide cost per household per year for waste management and 3R's will not increase in 1995 over 1994 and remain at approximately $49 in 1995, less than $1 per household per week. • There will be no major increases in the budgetted regional waste billings to the area municipalities. • Net waste management expenditures have declined by $1. 8 million primarily due to changes in the recycling operation. • As has been pointed out in previous years ' reports, the annual Waste Management operation is not self-financing. The. Waste Reserve will be subsidizing the costs of waste management in the order of $2.1 million for 1995. If the current waste management budget was fully financed from the Regional Waste System Rate in 1995, the rate would rise to $83. 68/tonne, and the cost per average region-wide household would rise to $60. • The Waste Management Operation should be made self-sufficient as early as possible. Further, sufficient waste reserve . balances should be maintained in order to stabilize any major annual' increases in the Region's System Rate and the resulting cost increases per average Region-wide household. • In addition, the IWA long term site, meeting the 50% diversion target by 2000 and the CIPSI proposal will result in additional -- costs to the Region. These future costs will need to be financed from the Waste Reserve and by increases in the Region's System rate. G. C t .S.W. Chi f dmi istrative Officer I V. A. Silgailis, P.Eng. JVioner MA Commissioner of Works CFinance H:95Waste\S--- .Rep Encl. 1 2 2 3 12 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM SUMMARY REPORT ON THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE APPLICABLE 1995 CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT 1: Schedule 1.1: Proposed 1995 Pro Forma Solid Waste ManagementExpenditures and Anticipated Revenues and the Calculation of the 1995 Uniform Regional Solid Waste Management System Rate/Tonne Schedule 1.2: Summary 1995 Pro Forma Waste Management Expenditures and Financing Schedule 1.3• 1995 Pro Forma Waste Management Expenditures on a.Cost/Tonne Basis and Related Financing ATTACHMENT 2r Detailed Information on the 3R's Regulations and Correspondence from Area Municipalities Requesting the Region to Finance the Expanded Programs: WRC-21-94 CC#94-431, WRC-23-94, WRC-24-94 CC#94-433, WRC 25-94, WRC-26-94 CC#94-448, WRC-27-94, WRC-28-94 ATTACHMENT 3: Comparison of the 1994-1995 Estimated Regional Waste Billings to the Area Municipalities ATTAC M ENT 4: ..Comparison of Tipping Fees'and Rebate Rates 1994 Budget Estimate and Final 1994 Rate with 1995 Budget Estimates ATTACHMENT 5: 1994 Municipal Solid Waste Collection Services i i 1224_ _ � - _� 13 H:95Waste\Attach.Report ATTACHMENTI Schedule 1.1 REPORT 94J-16 PROPOSED 1995 PRO FORMA SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURES AND ANTICIPATED REVENUES tAND.THE CALCULATION OF THE 1995 UNIFORM REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTgRATE1TO NNE EXPENDITURES 1994 BUDGET PRO FORMA 1995 BUDGET INCIDEC $ $1tonne 1 $ 3/tonne 1 $ttonne% 1 Regional Overhead 790,000 5.41 828,800 5.51 1.8% 2 Facilities Madan: op 186,100 1.28 186,100 1.24 -3.2% 3 Transfer Station: Operations 1,440,800 9.88 1,472,350 9.79 -0.9% 4 Tipping Fees(Metro) 937.500 6.43 672.500 4..47_ go% - 5 Subtotal x$ 6.3 300 11 2.144.850 14.26 6 Landfill Operations 591,600 4.05 594,000 3.95 -25% 7 Recycling Program .. 3,434,700 .-- 23.54 1,903,700 1266 -85.9% 8 Blue Box Collection 2,005,800 13.75 2,183,400 14.51 5.2% 9 Blue Box Collection-expanded program 0 0.00 786,800 5.23 100.0% 10 Waste Reduction Operations(2) 1,128,000 7.73 11 Capital Program 00 2 81 3��� 8.12 .4.8% 409.5 390.000 289 -8.5% 12 Sub-Total 10.924.000 74.88 10.236.150 68.07 -10.0% 13 Outside Disposal-Municipal Metro Landfill Payments (3) 7,500,000 51.41 5,310,000 35.32 -45.6% 14 Payment to Metro to Divert Waste From Brock W(4) 1,200,000 8.22 0 0.00 N/ 0_00 NIA 15 Less:Rebate from Metro Toronto(5) 3( .143.0001 -21.54 0 16 Sub-total Net Metro Landfill Payments "' 5,557,000 38.09 5.310.000 35.32 -7.8'6 17 TOTAL GROSS EXPENDITURES61 .481.000 112.97 15.546.150 103.40 -9.3% 18 Material Sales-Recycling Centre 812,700 5.57 978,000 6.50 14.3% 19 -Transfer sites 25,000 0.17 21,000 0.14 -21.4% 20 -Compost(6) 13,500 0.09 100.0% 21 User Revenues-Composters 75,000 0.51 120,000 0.80 36.3% 22 Subsidies-MOEE m 714,800 4.90 1,373,100 9.13 46.3% 23 Tipping Fees - Regional landfill/transfer sites 346,000 237 317,000 211 -123% 24 -Recycling Centre 0.94 _ 750 25 Sub-Total 90700 0 12 ,350 19.72 28.2% 2.064.200 415 964 26 TOTAL NET EXPENDITURES 14,416,800 98.81 12.581.800 83.68 -18.1% ROM SOLID WASTE RESERVE 27 Contribution from Solid Waste Reserve 3,128,000 21.44 2,057,300 13.68 . -56.7% . 28 MOEE Blue Box Operating Subsidy(8) 1,075,100 7.37 0 0.00 NI UNIFORM REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM RATE/TONNE LEVIED10.213 7pQ Z�Q� 1U•5 Z= O AREA MUNICIPALITIES 1995 BILLABLE TONNES 150 350 (1)The&txri 00iu n relxesents the aiocaticn of the Regional System Rate accordng to e>pertdt re compments. (D.e.it"Uns the canponents that make W the 570Aonte nate Wed to the Area Municipalities.) (2)waste Reduction operator:irtdades yard wsste.backyard cwposting.Promotion.royalty b VNrtby.ICD and other agencies. (3)Municipal Metro Larhdfd Paynhent�Tipping fees hdWs muidpal o nas m Brock w(106.200)0 S50Vb M.3500 tonnes for Brock Twp.not trr�ned This bxrtage docs not go to Brock W. (4)Metro R to Metre m t*v waste Iran Brock Region h 1994 khckadad at2 inion far Metro to dvert 200,000 Imes of said waste from Brock W.This Is no longer re¢ted and is not incfaied In 1995 budget. (5)Mettrn Rebate:8egtmirg May 1,1994.the Reg on of Durham vAl no lager receive a rebate. (6)Revenue firm compost was not shown seperatey in 1994 budget The net eVmlt nes onlywers shown uhdex waste redactor operotians. Subsidy:MOEE bsidy:h 1995 n Aul year subsidy tar rocycfng ope0580ns Is abgetted of$1.06$100.s265,000 is (8)The MOEE subsidy for the fun dy was ed for waste Rehutta4 h 1994 u partd year seltsidy was hctuded h txxfgei year 1994 was eortrrarhed by the Province on Jan 20.1994.The het year subsidy was not rofieefed to tte 1994 wase Btgget (Q04 Rates: Totai nal Bgable TQmes 1995 tonnes Metro WWR rate 1995 fte2w 1994 to Brock w 106200 101.600 550.00 $75.00 Brc+7c Tvq 3,500 3.800 Metro pajRe ate to to Bruck w(a><cfeades Brack Twp) 106.200 100.000 "Transfer staton 11,350 1 z500 Metro Rebate to Durham(5/tonne) Poputation(Excludes WockTwp) $0.00 $19.42 Recycitg 21,800 21.000 WA 441,470 CaTpostirg ZM 7 Uniform Region System ale FW er 570.00 $70.00 Totaf Blabis Torres Recycing Tip tee for Bluets IDatJens(yt«rte) 150.350 145.900 75.00 575.00 increase h Brdable tonnes 3% Landf l Ti Fee for Prfvata Heniens 90.00 00.00 U -ere a in total FilExuhme:PB:e:�preadaasteU5bebget,A70 "43% 1225 r2Q 03:50 PM 14 ATTAC14MENTI ~ REPORT 94,1-16 Schedule 1.2 SUMMARY 1995 PRO FORMA WASTE MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURES AND FINANCING 1995 GROSS USER REV/TIP FEES MOEE 1996 NET EXPENDITURES PRO FORMA BUDGET MATERIAL SAI-Ea SUBSIDY PRO FORMA BUDGET S S S S Regional Ovefiead 828,800 828,800 Facilities Management 186,100 186,100 Transfer Station: Operations 1,472,350 18,000 1,454,350 Tipping Fees(Metro) 672,500 257,000 415,500 Subtotal' 2144,$34 276.000 1.869.850 Landfill Operations 594,000 63,000 531,000 Recycling Centre 1,903,700 1,119,750 1,088,100 (304,150 Blue Box Collection 2,181,400 2,181,400 Blue Boa Collection Expanded Program 786.800 786,800 Waste Reduction Operations 1,220,500 133,500 285,000 802,000 Capes Program 390,000 Q 390.000 Sub-Total 10.235.150 i.Q41.2fr4 1,373.100 7.271.800 Outside Disposal-Metro Landfill Payments 5,310,000 5,310,000 Fee to Metro to Leave Brock W 0 0 Less:Renate from Metro Toronto 0 Q Sub-total Net Metro Landfill Payments Ri.,13 0.000 ¢,$1Q000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 15 546.150 1,391.250 1.$73100 12 581.800 FINANCING contribution from Solid Waste Reserve 2,057,300 Estimated Total Regional Waste System FVenditures 10.524.500 Charged to Area Municipalities at$70/tonne 12.3$1. 4 TOTAL FINANCING Notes: (1)Transferstations:material sales$18,000 and revenue from tipping fees$257,000. (2)Landfill Operations:material sales$3,000 from recycling and$60,000 from tipping fees. (3)Recycling Centre:material sales of$978,000,ICI tipping fees of$7,500,tipping fees from transfer stations of 134,250. (4)Waste Reduction Operations:revenue of$120,000 from sale of backyard composters,$13,5W from sale of compost MOEE subsidy$285,000 for backyard —posters, promotion,compost study,and Goodwill ruawrEPs. e%%Wgiw scat 1e-0c"4 ' I 12265 04:07 PM PB:c:\spread\waste95BUDQUO.WK1 i ATTACHMENT REPORT 94.1.16 Schedule 1.3 19%PRO FORMA WASTE MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURES ON A COST/TONNE BASIS AND RELATED FINANCING TOTAL BILLABLE TONNES 150,350 1995 GROSS USER REV/TIP FEES MOEE 1995 NET EXPEN_ DITURF� PRO FORMA BUDGET MATERL0.L SALES SUBSIDY PRO FORMA BUDGET S/TONNE S/TONNE S/TONNE Regional Overhead 5 51 S/TONNE Facilities Management 1.24 5.51 Transfer Station: Operations 9.79 1.24 Tipping Fees(Metro) A4Z 0.12 9.67 Subtotal 14.27 � 2,M 12.44 Landfill Operations 3.35 0.42 3.53 Recycling Centre 12.66 7.45 7.24 Blue Box Collection 14.51 -2.03 Blue Bax expanded Program 5.24 14.51 Waste Reduction Operations 8.13 0.89 1.90 5-24 Capital Program 2.59 5.34 Sub-Total 68.09 10.69 X14 2.2 4� Outside Disposal-Metro Landfill Payments 35.32 Fee to Metro to Leave Brock W 0.00 35.32 Less:Rebate from Metro Toronto 0.00 444 444 Sub-total Net Metro Landfill Payments X4.32 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 103.4110.59 EMANMQ Contribution from Solid Waste Reserve A13.68Uniform Regional Solid Waste Management System Rate/tonne Levied to Area Mwicipali ies TOTAL FINANCING Notes: (1)Total billable tonnes includes Municipal tO Brock W 101,600;Brock Twp,3,800;transfer stabon 12,500;recycling 21,000;compost 7,000. (2)Expenditures from Schedule 1.2 were divided by the billable tonnage to anive at SRonrne. nLE E:1`8:0pread-00%95bWp»BG6/ 18-Od-84 iJ22 1227 16 04:05 PM F3 c:%sPreadlwaste95R(3r y)+to wKi REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM REPORT#94-J-16-ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE APPLICABLE 1995 PRELIMINARY CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING ATTAC MMT #2 - 3 DETAILED INFORMATION ON THE 3R1s REGULATIONS DESCRIPTION OF NEW RECYCLING PROGRAMS The -following new collection programs must be provided:. . 1) rural blue box collection 2) large multi-unit building collection 3) small apartment building blue box collection The following is a description of each program. 1. RURAL BLUE BOX COLLECTION This program is required if an area municipality provides rural residents with regular curbside garbage collection service. The Region has discussed with the current blue box contractor, Miller Waste Systems, the possibility of providing all rural residents within the Region who receive municipal garbage collection with a blue box collection service starting on April 1, 1995 and ending on January 31, 1997. This end date coincides with the expiry date of the existing collection contract. They are confident they can provide the required service and have indicated they would need four. months advanced notice *in order to be fully prepared for this service. It is recommended that the Region enter into an agreement with the present contractor for the curbside collection of blue box materials from rural residents. Only two Area Municipalities, Pickering and Whitby, currently offer their rural residents curbside blue box collection service. The contractor charges these area municipalities $1. 15 per stop and this extra service has been accommodated by the contractor using his existing fleet of equipment. The costs shown in the table below have been calculated using the estimated number of rural residential stops as provided by the area municipalities times the proposed basic unit cost of $1.15 per stop for blue box collection plus $0.06 per stop for the delivery of source separated newspaper and cardboard as provided by the contractor for 26 weeks (including GST) . I 1025 '-?'I J 14 v REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM REPORT#94-J-16-ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE APPLICABLE 1995 PRELIMINARY CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING ATTA("HMENT #2 - 4 DETAILED INFORMATION ON THE 3R's REGULATIONS Municipality Estimated Cost for Rural Blue Boa Collection No. of Stops Est. Cost Pickering 1,475 49,700 Ajax 350 11,800 Whitby 806 27,100 Oshawa 500 16,800 Clarington 7,500 252,500 Uxbridge 3,000 101,000 Scugog 4,100 138,000 Brock 11800 60,600 Total 19,531 $657,500 It is anticipated that the Region would assume, upon request, the collection costs in the Town of Pickering and in the Town of Whitby when the program commences in April, 1995. The total estimated costs including taxes, for full rural blue box collection service in all municipalities for a one year period- is approximately $657,500. However, it is proposed that this program start on April 1, 1995 and accordingly, the 1995 budget requirement for this program would be $493,100 for the last nine months of the year. 2. LARGE MULTI-UNIT BUILDING COLLECTION This program is required if an area municipality provides residents of a multi-unit building, greater than - six units in size, with municipal garbage collection service. Depending on the number of apartment buildings and townhouse complexes located in a municipality and the level of municipal collection service offered, the financial impact of this new program varies from municipality to municipality. It is proposed this new program will be phased-in during 1995 and it will be offered as a contracted service for the collection, transportation, processing and marketing of recyclables. Regional and Area Municipal staff are currently developing the necessary contract documents, establishing the level of collection service, identifying the building locations to be serviced, and preparing schedules for the education and promotion of this program. 1279 20 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM REPORT#94-J-16-ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ANu THE APPLICABLE 1995 PRELIMINARY CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING , ATTACHMENT 42 - 5 DETAILED INFORMATION ON THE 3R's REGULATIONS It is- anticipated that .a variety of different recycling containers will be used on this contract including: rolling carts, igloos,, bulk containers,-. etc. The type and number of containers to be used at any one site will depend on the building or property space available, the size and layout of:the building, and anticipated level of participation by building residents. Due to space limitations, collection service would be once every week. It is not practical to start this program before May 1, 1995. However, it is reasonable to obtain contract tender prices for this work in the Fall of . 1994 and to award a contract in January 1995. The area municipalities, the successful contractor and the building owners/superintendents will require several months in order to finalize all the necessary arrangements prior to the start of collection service proposed for May 1, 1995. The following table provides the estimated number of dwelling units to be served .as determined . by the . area municipalities and approximate cost estimates for this program. Final costs will not be known until tenders are received: Municipality Estimated Cost for Multi-unit Building Collection No. of Units Estimated Cost :: Pickering 2,057 29,800 Ajax 2,603 30,800 Whitby 3,835 63,800 Oshawa 10,117 156,700 Clarington 0 0 Uxbridge 382 9,100 Scugog 0 0 Brock 0 0 Total 18,994 $290,200 The total estimated cost to offer the required recycling programs in large multi-unit buildings for a one year period, is approximately $290,200. The 'estimated cost for the last eight j months of 1995 would be $193,500. If an owner of a multi-unit residential building provides private garbage collection service, then under the new 3R's Regulations, the owner of the building is required to provide similar recycling services . This report only accommodates those buildings where the municipality provides the garbage collection service. .w� 2 7- 50, 7 'x'0 21 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM REPORT#94-J-16-ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE APPLICABLE 1995 PRELIMINARY CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING ATTACHMENT #2 - 6 DETAILED INFORMATION ON THE 3R's RE TIONS 3 . SMALL APARTMENT BUILDING BLUE BOX COLLECTION This program is an extension-.to the large multi-unit' residential building program, except it accommodates those small apartment buildings with generally less than ten dwelling units. It is proposed that these buildings would receive the regular residential curbside blue box collection rather than a service that provides large sized igloo, cart, or bulk type recycling containers. These smaller buildings have limited space for large sized containers. Contaminates are generally minimized when residents are provided with a blue box and the. contractor is -able to screen all materials at the curb. Collection would be .once every two weeks. The Region approached Miller Waste Systems to- determine if they would provide this service to approximately 2,200 units from April 1, 1995 to January 31,: 1997. The.contractor advised they are able to provide this service at the current residential collection rate of $0. 77 per unit. . The contractor would , deliver all - collected materials to the Region's Recycling Centre and all newspapers and cardboard would be ready for direct baling. The .following table outlines the estimated costs by municipality for 26 weeks (GST included) : Municipality ,. Cost of curbside apartment collections No. of Units: Estimated New Costs Pickering . 0 _ 0 Ajax 0 0 Whitby 405 8,700 Oshawa +1y251 26,800 Clarington 0 0 Uxbridge 79 1,700 Scu og 4,000 Brock 280 6,000 Total 2,200 _$47,200 The total estimated cost for the curbside collection of recyclables from small apartment buildings for a one year period, is approximately $47,200 . Assuming this program is initiated on April 1, 1995, the budget cost for the balance of the year is $35,400 . 23. 1 . 2 ; r REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM REPORT#94-J-16-ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE APPLICABLE 1995 PRELIMINARY CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING A'rmA >,rr #2 - � DETAILED INFORMATION ON THE 3R's REGULATIONS PURCHASE OF NEW BLUE BOXES With;the introduction of-curbside blue box collection in the rural area and in small apartment buildings, the Region will need to purchase additional Blue Boxes. The Region also proposes to supply Blue Boxes to residents of multi-unit buildings receiving municipal garbage collection service. .The total estimated cost to purchase blue boxes is $129,100. DELIVERY OF SEPARATED NEWSPAPERS AND CARDBOARD MATERIALS Effective October 1, 1994, all the newspapers and cardboard collected by the contractor in the City of Oshawa and the Town of Whitby will be delivered source separated to the Region's Recycling Centre ready for direct baling. The new recycling programs for the collection of blue box materials from rural residents and from small apartment buildings will also require the contractor to deliver newspapers .and cardboard to the Region ready for direct baling. After: the new recycling programs are initiated in the Spring of 1995, there will be a number of areas remaining in the Region where newspapers and cardboard will NOT be source separated at the curb prior to delivery to the Region. These areas include Pickering and the urban centres of Ajax, Clarington, Uxbridge and Scugog. The Region approached Miller Waste Systems and requested a cost estimate to provide this particular service in these municipalities . The contractor advised that this service can not be extended to these municipalities at this time because additional collection vehicles are required. However, with the introduction of rural blue box collection using their services, they could accommodate the source separation of newspaper and cardboard in these municipalities at a cost of $0.06 per stop. The estimated additional cost to undertake this program for a one year period is $86,600. However, it is proposed this program start at the same time as the rural blue box and small apartment building collection programs . The -estimated costs for the last nine months of 1995 is $65,000. The acceptance of this program will ensure all newspapers and cardboard materials delivered to the Region's processing facility will be ready for baling and this will allow the Region to further reduce processing costs . 232-142-9-2 4 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM REPORT#94-J-16-ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND THE APPLICABLE 1935 PRELIMINARY CURRENT AND CAPITAL BUDGETS AND RELATED FINANCING ATTAf_B M MT #2 - 8 DETAILED INFORMATION ON THE 3R's REGULATIONS SUMMARY OF COLLECTION AND CAPITAL COSTS The estimated costs for the new required 3R's programs are shown in Table 1. The estimated increase in. collection and capital costs for 1995 over the 1994 Regional Budget allocation is approximately $1,018,200. IGLOO COLLECTION PROGRAM The Region provides a contracted collection service to 148 Igloo . containers located at 49 site locations at an estimated cost in 1994 of $215,000 per year. These igloos will not be required because of the introduction of the new recycling services. It is proposed the Region would phase-out this customized service to the 13 high rise apartment buildings, the 20 rural sites, the 7 commercial malls and the 9 other private locations once the replacement programs are fully operational. Originally, the Igloo recycling containers were sponsored by various organizations for an exclusive three year period, after which the Igloos became the responsibility of the Region. As soon as a number of igloos have been taken out of service, the Region would sell the surplus containers. It is anticipated that Contractors, wishing to provide multi-unit building recycling services, would be very interested in this type of container. It is anticipated that during 1995 there would be a savings of approximately $100,000. 1233 3 3 _ H:95Waste\ATP#2 L ✓ 24 � Blue Box------------------------------------------------------------------_. --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- Recycling ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL COLLECTION AND BLUE BOX COSTS TABLE 1 Program _ - ----------------- --------------"-_�_ Existing Existing Proposed ; Proposed Proposed Proposed Collection Capital cost Total Municipality basic costs clean sort rural costs small bldg units collection large multi-unit , costs for new costs by Region by Region with clean sort with clean sort with clean sort bldg units with taxes blue boxes with taxes --------------------------------------- unit cost per stop 0.71 0.06 1.21 0.77 0.06 Pickering 344,873 0 .49,652 0 29,144 29,742 453,411 6,427 459,838 Ajax 313,408 0 11,782'. 0 26,485 30,820 382,495 8,970 . 391,465 Whitby 345,664 29,211 27,132 8,6760 63,836 474,518 12,801 487,319 Oshawa 667,071 56,372 16,831 26,798 0 156,708 923,781 36,327 960,107 Clarington 198,332 0 252,467 0 16,760 0 467,559 28,088 495,646 Uxbridge 48,373 0 100,987 1,692 4,088 9,112 164,252 ; 12,655 176,907 Scugog 57,578 0 138,015 3,963 4,866 0 204,421 16,047 220,469 CJt . Brock 47,196 0 60,592 5,998 +, 5,201 0 118,987, 7,790. 126,776 ------------------------------------------------ ------------ - ..��__------_---_--__--------- ----�.ww----- TOTALS 2,022,495 85,583 657,456 47,127 86,545 290,218 3,189,424 . 129,,105 3,318,529 - ------------------------------------------------- - ----wr ------____----__-_--_---_---------------_ �_-_� No. of months in 1995 12 12 9 . 9 9 8 1995 budget cost 2,022,495 85,583 493,092 35,346 64,909 193,479 2,894,903 129,105 3,024,007 Notes ** *. • :, * * *_-- """' * --- . " additional 1/3 MOEE funding la anticipated 1995 COLLECTION AND CAPITAL COSTS 3,02A,007 ** regular 1/3 MOEE funding Is expected aamaza:aaa. 1994 REGIONAL BUDGET FOR COLLECTION 2,005,800 ' zzazzzzz:zt INCREASE IN COSTS OVER 1994 BUDGET 1,018,207 � aaszzzzazz n • MUNIC1PALfTY OF . t Harington ' ONTARIO ATTENTION DURHAM September 13 , 1994J , K � L� j?T: 1Jncca..,.. I SEP 1 4 1994 COPIES TO - -� I Mr. C. Lundy, Clerk r.nr t.;a.aim.�Po„ Region of Durham VVG � DEPT. Adminstration Office FiJ 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario L1N 6A3 Dear Mr. Lundy: RE: EXTENSION OF BLUE BOX SERVICE TO THE RURAL AREAS OF CLARINGTON OUR FILE: F11 2679 BL At a meeting held on September 12, 1994 the Council of the Municipality of Clarington passed the following Resolution #GPA-562-94 : "THAT Report WD-46-94 be received; and THAT. Durham Region be requested to pay the cost of the purchase of blue boxes. and . the collection 'cost for the extension of the Blue Box service to the rural areas of Clarington. ". _. Yours .truly, Marie P. Knigh A.M.C.T. , CMM Deputy Clerk MPK/hj CC: V.A. Silgailis, Commissioner of Works Region of Durham 105 Consumers Drive Whitby, Ontario L1N 6A3 W.A. Evans, Director, Public Works 1235 26 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET- BOWMANVILLE -ONTARIO- LIC 3A6 - (905) 623.3379 - FAX 623.4169 wi<•cco...f. 7 TOWN OF AJAX in the Regional Municipality of Durham. 65 Harwood Avenue South Ajax,Ontario, Canada L1S 2H9 Telephone(905)683-4550 September 14, -1994 Mr. V. Silgailis Commissioner of Works Regional Municipality of Durham 105 Consumers Drive P.O. Box 623 Whitby, Ontario LIN 1C4 Dear Sir: Re: 3R's Regulations to Reduce Ontario Waste - Please be advised that Council at their meeting of September 6, 1994 passed the following resolution: "1) That Council endorse the joint venture approach between Area Municipalities within Durham Region and the Region of Durham to implement the requirements of the 3R's Regulations with respect to blue box collection in rural areas and in multi- unit residential facilities. 2) That staff be authorized to 'negotiate through. the joint venture process with Miller Waste Systems Inc. to extend the curbside blue box program to the rural collection routes. 3) That Council endorse staff participation in a joint tendering process with Area Municipalities and the Region of Durham for collection of blue box materials from multi-unit residential facilities. 4) That the Town request that the Region of Durham fund, in full, the extension of blue box collection to the rural areas and the multi-unit residential buildings as required in the 3R's Regulation adopted in the spring of 1994 . " ATTENTION DURHAM REG/ON Note an^F+. Yours truly, G Pr=l`^-it/Tr(� ::SG S•w _. .. .F . SEP I COPIES TO _ � mesr.. •r a F. J. Hull, P. Eng. )•ake Acc,cw a Acnon Director of Engineering & Works DEPT. Fde /Sl 1236 _ 27 -T1.-0_3w y �r^OT?t;al Ct C Township P`f,�r��nt,�*tr"t •�. Sr tk'x !9C EPI 2 15 PH tpq Gxbri,- c;. Ortarto of J L9P !T1 Tckephone. (945) 649-1938 Fax(945)852-9674 September 15, 1994 Mr. C.W. Lundy Clerk Region of Durham ATTENTION DURHAM K REGION 605 Rossland Road East RFC_'FTVFD r�or, Whitby, Ontario SEP 2 ` 1 L1N 6A3 1994 ��:K „:.,,,, P;EH .• ,, �u” u:1e:r a•+o recon BLUE BOX COLLECTION PROGRAM DEPS TOWE TOWNSHIP FILE-- 404A F" Dear Mr. Lundy. Please be advised that the Council of the Township of Uxbridge at its regular meeting held Monday, September 12th, 1994 adopted the attached Resolution No. 64-94 with regard to the recent Provincial legislation to extend the Blue Box Collection Program to all residents served by municipal garbage collection: I am by copy of this letter notifying the area municipal'Ities of our resolution. Yours truly Walter E.4aY for Township Clerk _. 1,r: nas cc: Township of Scugog Township of Brock Town of Pickering Town of Ajaxt o-3 4 Town of Whitby 237 — - 28 . City of Oshawa Municipality Of Clatingtdh The Regional MunicipaRy of Durham RESOLUTION NO. 64-94 MOVED by Councillor Austin, SECONDED by Councillor Bushell ,..."WHEREAS the Provincial Government has mandated that municipalities in Southern Ontario must, by January 1, 1995, extend the Blue Box Collection Program to all residents served by municipal garbage collection; AND WHEREAS the Region of Durham is presently responsible for the Blue Box collection Program for all municipalities in the Region; AND WHEREAS the new Provincial regulation will result in approximately 3,000 more households within the Township of Uxbridge receiving the expanded Blue Box Collection program, primarily in the rural areas; . AND WHEREAS the Region,of Durham is better able to co-ordinate the expanded Blue Box Collection Program, .to obtain better pricing due to . ... economies of scale in the tendering process and to obtain available Provincial grants thereby saving the taxpayers of the Region significant dollars. NOW.THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: -:1. .:_: . THAT.the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Uxbridge . hereby requests the Region of Durham to continue its present policy of being responsible for the Blue Box Collection Program and to co- ordinate and administer the expansion of the present Program as •,� required by Provincial regulation, 2. THAT the cost of the expanded Program be placed on the Regional - portion of the local tax levy, as is the present practice, so that all taxpayers in the Region share equally in the costs; 3. THAT this Resolution be forwarded to the Region of Durham and all area municipalities." CARRIED 29 SOA�l-O F pvIf: ,oma September 23, 1994 The corporation of the Regional Municipality of Durham • Town of Pickering Works Department Box 623 Public Works 105 Consumers Drive Pickering Crvk complex Whitby, Ontario One the Esplanade LIN 6A3 Pickering,Onario Canada (.,v6K7 Attention: Mr.Peter Watson Direct Waste Reduction Manager •Tel (905)420-4630 ' Fax (905)420-4650 Town Dear Peter: Tel. (905)420.2222 (905)683-2760 Fax (905)42"5 15 RE: Province of Ontario 3Rs Regulations Additional Municipal Collectims and Associated Costs Please be advised that the Town of Pickering hereby requests that the Region of Durham arrange for and finance the costs of a Region-wide contract relating to the additional collection of residential recyclable material which is required as a result of the Province of Ontario's 3Rs Regulations.. !,..Further to.the above we suggest.that-each Municipality administer the contract for their respective areas in a manner similar to the current blue box contract. 'If you have' any questions relating to our request, please do not hesitate to, contact me. Yours truly, ATTENTION DURHAM REGION rwo,and FZM Plewa Answ.-.^ Stephen A. Vokes, P. Eng. i $tP 2 1994 No:. ;4L­. :w6 Director of Public Works coPiES TO CSB/cnvir/recycle - rdo cc: Mr. C.M.T. Sheffield,Town Manager Mr. T.J. Quinn, Executive Director of Operations Mr. J. Walls,Treasurer-Collector Mr. S. Brake, Waste Management Co-ordinator J C 9:,r `7 12 3 9 �-�6 30 i )FFICE.OF rHE CITY CLERIC rHE CC?Rf'.(>R:\TIt?v OF T'-,E _ P, OF '�i?:\LV.-\ R. A. HE.xJDERSON, A.,M"C.T.. C.M.C. TELEPHONE 50 CENTRE STREET SOUTH Cit: Oe.k Atlnunwr.uinn t90-Ii 4ile-in.i'J OSHAWA, ONTARIO Licensing (91)5,43()-3()41 L1H 3Z7 BRIAN SUTER, C. I.O., C.,M.C., C-NI. t. Facsimile (905)436-;697 - Deputy Oty.Clerk File A-2300/F-5000T T71 September 22, 1994 -C�/c C. W. Lundy, A.M.C.T. Regional Clerk Regional Municipality of Durham 605 Rossland Road East I• 'i P. 0. Box 623 Whitby, Ontario "• --- — UN 6A3 '— ------ -- - Re: Province of Ontario 3Rs 'Regulations - Additional Municipal Collections and Associated Costs City Council considered the above matter at a meeting held September 19, 1994, and adopted the following recommendation of the Public Works Committee: "(a) That the Region of Durham be requested to arrange for and finance the costs of a Region-wide contract relating to the additional collection of residential recyclable material which is required as a - result of the Province of Ontario's 3Rs Regulations; and further, (b) That the Area Municipalities administer the contracts for their respective Areas in a manner similar to the current blue box contracts." Enclosed is a copy of Department of Public Works Services Report 121-94. If you need further assistance, please contact our Department of Public Works Services at the above address, or by phone at (905) 725-7351. ATTENTION DURHAM REGION N^ro-1 File Brian Sute Deputy City Clerk COPIES TO BCS/cfkV; (1;r:;i,✓ J ar,. c: Department of Public Works SilVI E__ - V\) 1Zc -fib-9 cc 1240 ----_- CONTAINS RECYCL'O MATERIAL 31 Y PW' nx 50 ell REPORT ITEM NO. 121-94 TO: PI:Ii1.1C %VO1{KSCO4%1.NI(;" EI-: CI'T'Y 0 P 0511.\\h•:\ MEE'71vc DATE: Tuesday, 1994 09 13 FROM: C(.)J,1�11551OtiEl{OI' I'hlil.IC W(AtKSS11.RVICES SUBJECT' Province of Ontario 3Rs Regulations - Additional Municipal Collections and Associated Costs RECOMMENDATION 1. (a) That the Region of Durham be requested to arrange for and finance the costs of a Region-wide contract relating to the additional:- collection of residential recyclable material which is required as a result of the Province of Ontario's 3Rs Regulations; and further, (b) That the Area Municipalities administer the contracts for their respective Areas in a manner similar to the current blue box contracts. 2. That a copy of the Commissioner of Public Works Services' report dated 1994 09 13 on Item No. 121-94 be forwarded to the Region of Durham. REPORT At the Public Works Committee meeting of 1.994 07.19, the Commissioner of Public Works Services provided an information report on the Province's new 3Rs Regulations and its impacts on the City of Oshawa. A copy of this report dated 1994 07 19 on Item No. 105-94 is appended as Attachment No. 1. The prime impact of.the the 3Rs Regulations for. the City of Oshawa will be the requirement to institute recycling programs in all multi-residential buildings at those'locations where the City collects refuse. Currently, the City provides bi-weekly blue box collection only to residential buildings with three dwelling units or less. The annual cost for existing blue box service within the City is approximately $675,000, with costs being borne by the Regional Municipality of Durham. This arrangement was established under a Region-wide five-year tender extending from February 1992 to February 1997, with the Contractor entering into separate contract agreements with each of the Area Municipalities. The costs of implementing additional recycling services in the City in accordance with the 3Rs Regulations has been estimated- in the neighbourhood of $200,000. On 1991 10 02, Regional Council adopted the following recommendation: "a) THAT the Region of Durham continue to finance blue box collection subject to further recommendations from the Waste Reduction and Finance and Administration Committees; and b) THAT the matter be reviewed by the end of September, 1992." 7 1241 32b Q r REPORT TO TETE PUBLIC ITEM NO. 121-94 WORKS COMMITTEE (Continued) - 2 - MEETING DATE: 1994 09 13 Subsequently, on 1991 10 30, Regional Council adopted more specific conditions for the financing of the collection of blue boxes as follows: "THAT the area municipalities be advised that in accordance with the October 2, 1991 resolution of Regional Council, the Region will continue to finance blue box collection on the following conditions: a) Frequency of blue box collection must be once every two weeks; b) No expansion of current level of service; c) Material to be collected in the blue box will include newspaper, cans, glass bottles, PET bottles, corrugated cardboard and telephone books. No additional materials are to be added without the approval of the Region; d) Igloo collection costs will be funded by the Region; and e). Should any area municipality wish to provide more frequent collection or expand the level of service, it will be at the expense of the area municipality." In light of the above noted Regional Council resolutions concerning the financing of blue box collection services, the additional costs would be a City responsibility. Staff of.the Area Municipalities have been meeting with Regional staff over the past few months to discuss the impacts of the 3Rs Regulations and to explore a Region-wide tender for additional services similar to the approach that was taken for blue box collection under the current five-year contract. Generally, it is felt that a co-ordinated approach would optimize unit costs on an overall Regional basis, as. costs would be distributed across a larger number of units. .,This would also accommodate. the development of common promotional and educational programs with a sharing of staff resources during the implementation. It should be noted that while the .tender would be Regional, Area Municipalities would continue to manage the day-to-day administration of the collection contract. The financial impact of the Regulations has been a prime concern of all Area Municipalities and the Region of Durham. Current blue box collection costs for the entire Region are approximately $2 million. While the additional financial impact on a Regional basis is substantial, the Department feels that the ongoing costs associated with recycling collection should be assumed by the Region of Durham. With the Region's direct involvement and funding for these programs, there is greater assurance of a Region-wide approach to recycling. Also, the likelihood of Provincial grant funding to the program may be greater. D-M. Ro ertson, P.Eng. Commissioner of Public Works Services MS/gc .F() 1242 33 N. Item 4C. ,. :%,tac^ment No. j REPORT ITEM NO. 105-94 '11(> 1IL li1.IC WORKS CO ;,o Nli'1"1'Lt: CITY OF()S1 l:\W:\ MEETING DATE: Tuesday, 1994 07 19 1'lt(MI: CONIMISS1ON1•:ltOI.' PUIi1.1CW01tKSSEIZVI.CES SUBJECT Province of Ontario 3Rs Regulations RECOMMENDATION That the Commissioner of Public Works Services' report dated 1994 07 19 on Item No. 105-94 be received for information. INTRODUCTION The Public Works Committee, at their meeting of 1994 04 12, was provided with a News Release and package of information that had been received from the Province of Ontario concerning the new 3Rs Regulations. The Committee was advised that as soon as the Department had an opportunity to review the new Regulations and determine the anticipated . impact that the legislation would have on the . City, a report would be prepared for Committee and Council. A copy of the information circulated on 1994 04 12 is appended as Attachment No. 1 to this report. BACKGROUND In 1991, the Provincial Government announced a Waste Reduction Action Plan with the intent of reducing the amount of non-hazardous waste going to landfill by_25 percent by the end of 1992, and at least 50 percent by the year 2000: In support of this plan, a series of Discussion Papers were developed and circulated by the Province to seek public input on the initiatives that were being proposed to achieve the waste reduction targets. "Initiatives Paper No. 1: Regulatory Measures to Achieve Ontario's Waste Reduction Targets" was released in October 1991, and provided first insight on the Regulations. In April 1993, the Ministry of Environment and Energy (MOEE) announced their intention to pass into law the new 3Rs Regulations. At their meeting of 1993 07 26, City Council adopted the following motion: "That the Director of Public Works' report dated 1993 07 20 on Item No. 68-93 be received for information and a copy of the report outlining the City's comments and concerns regarding the implementation of the proposed new 3Rs Regulations be forwarded to the Ministry of Environment and Energy." A copy of the Director of Public Works' report of 1993 07 20 on Item No. 68-93 is appended as Attachment No. 2. 1243 34 f REPORT TO TIIE PUBLIC ITEC! NO. 10544 W01tKS COMMITTEE (Continued) - 2 -. MEETING DATE: 1994 07 19 A general summary of the mandatory programs of the 3Rs Regulations .and the impact they will have on the City is outlined below. MUNICIPAL 3R3 PROGRAMS 1. Residential Recycling Program All local municipalities with a population of more than 5,000 are required to establish and maintain a source separation collection program for any residential property from which the municipality collects refuse. If refuse is collected curbside, then recyclable materials must be collected curbside at a frequency of at least half that of the refuse collection. Where the municipality provides bulk refuse collection on private property, recyclable materials must also be collected. The mandatory list of recyclable material to be collected is as follows: • Newsprint • Food and beverage containers made of: aluminum, glass, steel, and PET. At least two additional materials must be collected from the following supplementary list: • Aluminium foil • Magazines • Boxboard and paperboard • Plastic film • Corrugated cardboard • Paper cups and plates • Fine paper • Rigid plastic containers • Foam plastics • Telephone directories • Polycoat paperboard containers • . Textiles (excluding fibreglass, carpet) In Southern Ontario, this program must be implemented by January 1, 1995. Impact The City of Oshawa currently provides a curbside bi-weekly blue box collection service for residential properties of up to and including three dwelling units. This program covers the City's urban area, the Hamlets of Columbus and Raglan, and the Bickle Subdivision. ' Materials currently collected meet the requirements of the new Regulations as all mandatory items are collected, plus two supplementary items — corrugated cardboard and telephone directories. As noted above, the Regulations require that recycling collections be extended to all residential properties currently receiving City refuse collection service. Recycling collection will, therefore, have to be expanded to the following additional multi- residential areas: 1244 35 REPORT TO TIIL PUBLIC ITE-M NO. 105-94 WORKS COiM.M17'1'LE (Continued) - 3 - MEETING DATE. 1994 07 19 • Curbside blue box coHeetion [or Spa;mnen' buildings of 'up to eigh_ units, the current maximum unit level for City curoside refuse collection. This extended service would affect an estimated additional 2.40 properties or 1,231 dwelling units. * Recyclable collection for apartment buildings greater than eight units receiving.City refuse collection. Most of these units currently receive bulk container refuse collection on private property -through City-administered contracts. Recycling collection service for these units would need to be analyzed and implemented on a per-site basis, with a decision made to service the site by either blue box, 96-gallon roll-out containers (auto-carts) or Igloos, depending on the size of the unit and on-site restrictions. This extended service would affect an estimated 161 properties or 10,188 dwelling units. Any rural areas in the City receiving refuse collection service will also require blue box service. This requirement is currently being met, however, it is an added future implication, should refuse collection be extended to additional rural areas in the City. At this time, it is extremely difficult to determine accurate costs for the aforementioned additional services, however, based on discussions with contractors and other municipalities which have implemented multi-residential recycling, collection costs are estimated to be in the order of $200,000 to $250,000 per year exclusive of disposal costs. However, there should be no significant increase in overall disposal costs incurred by.the City as the Region of Durham currently has a uniform fiat tipping rate of 570/tonne for both refuse and recyclable material. Consequently, recyclable material would be diverted from the waste stream at the same disposal costs. ,., The implementation of these new services will also require the development of ..appropriate educational and promotional programs. It will be necessary to work .directly with building owners, superintendents, and residents at each' building site in order, for recycling programs to be implemented effectively. Typically, educational and.promotional campaigns should be commenced in each building a week or two before service commences. While the 3Rs Regulations places the onus for the education of tenants with the property owners, staff feel the Municipality must play a large role in developing 'and assisting with this part of the process to ensure all residents are receiving a consistent and complete message. 2. Backyard Composting Program All local municipalities with a population of 5,000 or more are required to implement a residential backyard composting program by January 1, 1995. Impact The Region of Durham has implemented a backyard composting program in the Area Municipalities. Within the City of Oshawa, comoosters can be purchased for 515 at the Holland Building Centre. Therefore, there is no new impact with this program. i 1245 -til 4_2 REPORT TO THE PUBLIC 1TE,&1 NO, 105-94 WORKS COMMITTEE (Continued) - 4 - MEETING DATL: 1994 0; 19 3. Leaf and Yard Waste Composting Program All local municipalities .with a population between 5,000 and 50,000 are required to continue with a compost leaf and yard waste program if they had one in place at the time the.Regulations were passed: Any municipality with a population of 50,000 or ; , more must have- a compost leaf and yard waste program. - Such a program must be a reasonably convenient service and can include curbside collection, provision of depots, or a combination of both. A communications program promoting public participation must also be in place. This program must be implemented by January 1, 1995. Impact The City of Oshawa provides a bi-weekly spring and fall collection program for leaf and yard waste.: This program runs for eight weeks in the spring and six weeks in the fail. During periods that the City does not collect, residents can take these materials to the Ritson Road transfer station where a special bin is provided for final destination at the Region's composting site. The Regulations, appear to be fairly flexible in allowing municipalities to determine a "reasonably convenient service" for this program. There is no new impact on the City with this program. IC&I WASTE REDUCTION PROGRAMS 1. IC&I Recycling Programs Major industrial, commercial, and institutional (IC&I) waste generators within Southern Ontario are required to implement source separation programs for specified recyclable material by March 3,. 1995. Included. in this sector are larger shopping complexes, . hospitals, schools, restaurants, office buildings, hotels,- motels, construction projects.' demolition projects, manufacturing sites, and multi-residential buildings of six or more units. The Regulations do not require municipalities to provide recycling collection to the IC&I sector, except for the multi-residential buildings where the municipality collects refuse. This aspect was covered above under Municipal Programs. Impact The Department did have concerns regarding the enforcement of this program, particularly as it relates to applications for new development. MOEE staff, however, have advised that municipalities will not be expected to enforce this program as it will be enforced using existing Provincial staff. There is little doubt that the City will experience increased pressure fbr City service for multi-residential Droperties currently not receiving City collection. The reason that these multi-residential properties presently do not receive City collection, is due to the fact that they are not able to comply with the City's site requirements. The City Hall complex will be required to provide source separation programs to collect corrugated cardboard, fine paper, newsprint, and food and beverage containers made of aluminum, glass, or steel_ The Community Services Department has already implemented such a program. r 12 4 6_w i-t�3 W _ REPORT TO TIIE PUBLIC ITEM NO. 105-94 WORKS COMMITTEE (Continued) - 5 - -MEETING DATE: 1994 07 19 2. Waste Audits and Waste Reduction Work Plans , The major IC&I waste generators noted above are required to undertake a waste audit and prepare a waste reduction work plan by September 3, 1994. Impact The Region of Durham staff have been providing some technical assistance to the IC&I sector in this area. The Community Services Department are actively pursuing a waste audit for the City Hall complex through the establishment of an Interdepartmental 3Rs Committee. 3. Packaging Audits and Packaging Reduction Work Pian Major packaging industries with employee hours of 16,000 or more per month, or importers of $20 million or more per year are required to undertake packaging audits and reduction work plans by September 3, 1994. Impact There are no direct impacts to the City of Oshawa at this time. RECYCLING FACILITIES Through the 3Rs Regulations, it now becomes less onerous to establish a recycling site for source separated* waste. Provided certain locations, design, notification, operating, and reporting requirements are met, a recycling site can be exempt from the Certificate of Approval process. These types of facilities are designated: municipal waste recycling sites, leaf and yard waste composting sites, and municipal waste recycling depots. Impact All recycling facilities are currently provided by the Region of Durham and there is no foreseeable change in this responsibility. SUMMARY The primary impact to the City of Oshawa of the Provincial 3Rs Regulations will result from the requirement to institute recycling programs in all multi-residential buildings where the City collects refuse. Based on very preliminary analysis, this could cost an additional $200,000 to $250,000 per year. Staff from the lakeshore municipalities of Durham Region have been meeting over the last several weeks with the Region of Durham to explore the concept of a Region-wide tender for new services, similar to the approach taken in 1991 with the blue box tender. It is felt that such an approach should result in the most economical overall costs for the Region as collection costs could be distributed across a larger number of units, common promotional and educational programs could be developed, and staff resources could be shared through implementation. 1 ! 7.1.044 . 24 38 i to REPORT TO THE PUBLIC ITEM NO_ 105-94� WORKS COMMITTEE (Continued) -.6 - MEETING DATE: 1994 07 19 However,. it is important to recall the resolution which was passed by Regional Council at their meeting of 1991 10 20. The resolution was as follows: "THAT the area municipalities be advised that in accordance with the October 2, 1991, resolution of Regional Council, the Region will continue to finance blue box collection on the following conditions: a) Frequency of blue box collection must be once every two weeks; b) No expansion of current level of service; c) Material to be collected in the blue box will include newspaper, cans, glass bottles, PET bottles, corrugated cardboard and telephone books. No additional materials are to be added without the approval of the Region; d) Igloo collection costs will be funded by the Region; and e) Should any area municipality wish to provide more frequent collection or expand the level of service, it will be *at the expense of the area municipality." Based on this resolution, Regional staffs current position is that the collection costs associated with the new programs of 3Rs regulations will be an Area Municipality responsibility. Finally, it should be noted that in order to effectively implement the 3Rs Regulation, the City's Refuse Collection By-law requires redrafting.. A review of the existing 1979 By-law, will be initiated over the next few months. D.M. R bertson, P.Eng. Commis oner of Public Works Services MJS:gc 1248 39 a - TOWNSHIP OF SCZICOG MUNICIPAL OFFICES: e a 181 PERRY STREET— P.O. BOX 780 Phone: 905-985-7346 ®,,,,,,� PORT PERRY, ONTARIO L9L lA7 or 905-985-7393 Main Office Fax: 905-985-9914 Clerk's Office Fax: 905-985-1931 EARL S. CUDDIE, A.M.C.T.,C.M.C. Administrator-Clerk October 13, 1994 ATTENTION DURHAM REGION Nine erNl!w — --- PW RFCF.IVFp Lyu�> K•rlr. Mr. C. W. Lundy, Clerk ^A^� Region of Durham0 C j 1 3 1994 COPIES TO 605 Rossland Road TJA'N.1yXayrrr,ft'AtYtYf Box 623 oEPr. WHITBY, Ontario LIN 6A3 Re- ResolLtion Req >t sts of Blue Boa Pick-11p Dear Mr. Lundy, Please find enclosed a copy of Resolution #94-488 enacted by the Council of the Township of Scugog at a recent meeting held September 26, 1994 requesting the Region to assume all costs with respect to Blue Box Pick-up. I believe the resolution is self-explanatory, however, should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to advise. Yours truly, dk Earl S. Cuddie encl. A.M.C.T., C.M.C. W RC Administrator-Clerk 1249 40 Regular Meeting#14 . September 26, 1994 fi 7. OTHER MATTERS (i) Resolution Req-nesting Region to cover costs of Blue Box Pick-Un RESOLTMON NO-- 94-488 Moved by: Councillor Christie ' Seconded by: Councillor Carruthers WHEREAS the Provincial Government has mandated that municipalities in Southern Ontario must, by January 1, 1995, extend the Blue Box Collection Program to all residents served by municipal garbage collection; AND WHEREAS the Region of Durham is presently responsible for the Blue Box collection program for all municipalities in the Region; AND WHEREAS the new Provincial regulation will result in approximately 4,000 more-households within the Township of Scugog receiving the expanded Blue Box Collection program, primarily in the rural areas; - AND WHEREAS the Region of Durham is better able to co- ordinate the expanded Blue Box Collection Program,to obtain better pricing due to economies of scale in the tendering process and to obtain available Provincial grants thereby saving the taxpayers of the Region significant dollars. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS; 1. That Council endorse the joint venture approach between Area Municipalities within Durham Region and the Region of Durham to implement the requirements of the 3R's Regulations with respect to blue box collection . in rural areas and in multi-unit residential facilities. 2. That staff be authorized to negotiate through the joint venture process with Miller Waste Systems Inc.to extend the curbside blue box program to the rural collection routes. 3. That Council endorse staff' participation. in a joint tendering process with Area Municipalities and the Region of Durham for collection of blue box materials from multi-unit residential facilities. 4. That the Township request that the Region of Durham fund, in full, the extension of blue box collection to the rural areas and the multi-unit residential buildings as required in the 3R's Regulation adopted in the spring of 1994. Carried 1 ? 50 41 482 i tU-10-04 UJ•:J= vm tiv!t!'. il uLT :v' J 1 ; i.uv k t •SOetETAS THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BROCK IN THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM October 12 , 1994 Mr. Peter Watson Reginnal Works Department P.O. Box 623 105 Consumers Drive. WHXT$Y, Oat$riv LIN 6A3 Dear Mr. Watson; RE: Blue Box Collection Program Please be advised that the Council of the Corporation of the- Township of Brock aaticlpate4 CxpandLng the municipal garbage collection program within the Corporate limits, Ae a result of recent Provincial legislation, the municipality, as you are aware, will be mandated to expand its Blue Box Collection Program to meet legislation requirements. In light of the above, the Township of Brock has passed a reanittt.ion requesting the Region of Durham to assume the cost of the expanded Blue Box Collection Program to be implemented in the Township of Brock. Yours truly, THE TOWNSHIP OF B ROCK George S. Gra am, , C Clark-Adrai,nia rator APTGtiiTI(�(i OURNAM REGION xar..�vau GSG.cc CC; Mr. C.W. Lundy; Clerk . 7 P*.L• � - -{ - OCT 1 8 199 COPIES TO • I rvl,r''a �^^!)Cfi:.yi'.iM.I r,7K•! � 12 51 w KC > - 9 c 4 2--­10-4-8 i 38 LAIDLAW ST. S.P.O. 80X IA CA NVNINGTON.ONTARIO LAE i EO (7d51d a9.7FRt f7flS1d9R.7774 ATTACHMENT REPORT 94-J-16 COMPARISON OF 1994-1995 NET COST OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT BY AREA MUNICIPALITY Uniform System Rate $70.0 ttonne 1994 ESTIMATED TOTAL WASTE COSTf 1995 ESTIMATED LANDFILL AND TRANSFER COSTS 1995 BLUE BOX AND TOTAL ESTIMATED 1995 1995 WASTE COSTS PER HOUSEHOLD COMPOSTING COSTS WASTE COSTS Total Res.welghted Total Costs 1 1995 Cost Per Household I "onne 1994 Total 1994 HH(b) SINN Resktendal(c) %of total(d) Transfer Total Est Landfill Blue Box .Net Composting Net Taxable Adjusted 1995(h) I Recycling and Inc/(Dec) CostsAd.a Mun.tonnes transfer tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Transfer Cost Tonnes(e) Cost Tonnes Cost Assessment Householdsl Landfill Composting Total Over1994 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (5) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (4)1(8) (7)'$70 - (9)'S70 (11)'$70 (8)+(10)+(12) % (13)'(14) (6)'(14}'(fa) IDop(rx7r(uyu (17)+(16) $ Tomes % Tomes Torsws $ Tomes S Tomes S $ S Municipality Oshawa 1,632,400 48,737 33 29,700 38.66% 5,200 34,900 2,443,000 6,630 464,100 1,942 135,957 3,043,057 67% 1,734,540 50,800 27 7 34 1 Ajax 1,232,868 19,255 64 18,900 0.69% 80 18,960 1,328,600 3,350 234,500 1,507 105,467 1,668,667 78% 1,301,480 20,200 61 13 64 0 Cladngton 991,872 18,633 63 15,100 5.62% 760 15,860 1,110,200 2,420 169,400 124 8,663 1,288,263 82% 1,056,380 20,100 45 7 52 (1 Pickering 1,23:,164 22,123 66 18,500 0.60% 70 18,670 1,299,900 3,980 278,600 2,249 157,451 1,735,951 77% 1,338,680 23,600 43 14 67 1 Whitby 1,131,865 22,739 50 17,500 10.33% 1,390 18,890 1,322,300 3,810 266,700 1,678 117,463 1,706,463 75% 1,279,850 24,400 41 11 52 2 Brock 261,870 4,192 62 3,600 2.63% 350 3,850 269,500 430 30,100 0 0 299,600 88% 263,650 4,300 66 6 61 (1 Scugog 411,075 6,136 67 3,400 22.39% 3,010 6,410 448,700 640 37,800 0 0 486,500 88% 428,120 6,400 62 6 67 0 Uxbridge 240,800 5,124 47 3,100 3.65% 490 3,590 251,300 640 44,800 0 0 296,100 86% 254,650 5,400- 40 7 47 0 TOTAL 7,172,928 146,939 49 109,700 84.37% 11.350 121,050 8,473,600 21,800 1,526,000 7,500 525,000 10,624,600 72% 7,577,640 155,100 39 10 49 0 Out of region 9.22% 1,240 Spoiled Plates rlm BSS) Total 100.00% 13,450 Notes (a)1994-Estimated expenditures,as per the Proposed 1994 Durham Reglon Solid Waste Management Current and Capital Budget,Report 94-J-6. Includes landfill tipping fees,recycling Upping fees and leaf composting adjusted for residential weighted taxable assessment (b)(h)1994 households as per 1994 budget report The 1995 household estimates are preliminary Planning Dept estimates are census-based and represent June of the noted year. (c)Based on 1994 projected actuals,using August 1994 YTD figures. (d)An average of the 1993 percentages approved In Report 93-F-87 and the results from the 1994 transfer station suryeywere used. (e)(f)Total municipal billable tonnes from the Works Dept Allocation by area munk:ipaltty based on 1993 year end percentage distribution from Accounting Services. Blue box tonnes does not Include 100 tonnes from ICI sector. (g)Based on 1993 Final Weighted Taxable Assessment (h)The cost per household may vary by municipality as a result of over and under levies from the previous year,Payments In Lleu,Bell Telephone receipts and local waste disposal costs.The local treasurer can beat explain any differences In the cosVHH. FI•rum•<. •M..H.WSmmun 160dP/ W 6 a CD a 3 M z iV w f'L1 C\vmete\aprend95M8UM2.WK1 04:10 PM • 7 r i ATTACHMENT 4 COMPARISON OF TIPPING FEES AND REBATE RATES 1994 BUDGET ESTIMATE AND FINAL 1994 RATE WITH 1995 BUDGET ESTIMATE 1994 1994 1995 BUDGET EST. FINAL BUDGET EST. $/TONNES $/TONNES Metro Landfill Tipping Fee $75.00 $75.00 Jan.1/94-Apr.30/94 $50.00 $50.00 May 1/94 Rebate Rate from Metro Toronto $19.42 $35.35 Jan.1/94-Apr.30/94 $0.0 $0.0 May 1/94 Landfill Tipping Fee Private Haulers $90.00 $90.00 May 1, 1993 $90.00 Recycling Tipping Fee Private Haulers $75.00 $75.00 May 1, 1993 $75.00 Regional Sofid Waste Management System Rate $70.00 $70.00 $70.00 Notes: (1) The rebate from Metro is based on generation of 1 kg/capita/day. The 1994 budget rebate from Metro was based on an adjusted Metro System$43.77 cost of an$11.81/tonne overpayment by Durham in 1993. (2) Effective May 1, 1994,Durham will no longer receive a rebate from Metro Toronto. H:\95WASTE\ATT4 i —A I I AOMLN I J/ ._ .....-m------------------------r------------------------------------------.._-------___-------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Uurha Waste 1994 MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES 18-Aug-94 Management --------------------------- ----- -----------------------------------•---------------- -------- ----------- Town of Town of Town of City of Municipality of Township of Township of Township of municipality/description Pickering Ajax Whitby Oshawa Clarington Uxbridge Scugog Brock ----------------------------— ------- ---------------------------------------- ---- ----------- 1. Residential garbage or refuse collection -------------------------------------- - _ ----------------------------- - -------- frequencyof service: weekly weekly weekly weekly weekly weekly weekly weekly,' collection agency: private private/munio municipal municipal private private private private area of service: bulli up or urban areas: yes yes yes yes yea yes yes yes rural areae: yes yes yes no yes yes some no email hamlets: yes no yes yes,• Yoe yes some no outlaying subdivisions: yes yes yes Yoe,•• yes yes some some high rise apt.buildings: condos only• yes yes,• some yes no No. no small apt.buildings: condos only• yes yea some yes no some some townhouse complexes: yes yes yes some no no yes some comer plazas: some no yes,•• some yes no yes some commercial malls: some some no no yes no yes no downtown commercial area: no yes yes yeaea y yea yea yea . amount collected: average per stop 3 to 5 bags 3 to b bags 2 to b bags 3 bags 3 to 4 bags -• 2 to 3 bags limit of collection no Ilmn 8 Remo a Rams limit 8 bags b bags 4 bags b bags no limit special services: cleanup weeks: no no no you 1 weak yes,• no yes call-In servk�e: no no yes,••• no no no no no any significant changes clean up week In 1994, started Comments: •1 to 3/week • 2/week by contractor • Columbus&Raglan •curbside call In •,twice/week In by contractor ••In downtown core •• Kedron&Bickle Subd'ns service for white summer In Beaches •••special collection for goods,once every &Beaverton metals,tires and 3 months CTX ( other materials 2. Roeldontlat blue box co9octton —� once every two weeks yes yes yes yes yes — yes yea, Y • es newspapers,glass,cardboard, yes yes yes yes yes yea yea yes phone books,plastic bottles contracted service with Miller Waste yes yes yes yea yes yes yes no,with P.McRae 5 year contract to Feb.1997 yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yea Any significant changes In 1994 -I •service In Port cD-� Perry,Prince Albert, _ &outlaying subd'ns m Z r>Ji 7 ATTACHMENT #5 /contd Town of Town of Town of City of Municipality of Township of Township of Township of Municipallty/descrlpt:on Pickering Ajax Whitby Oshawa Ciarington Uxbridge Scugog Brock. 3. Residents]composting program frequency of service: weekly&monthly. weekly&monthly weekly In spring&fail biweekly in 6 week progam no service no service 3 weeks In fall biweekly In summer spring&fall collection agency: private private municipal municipal private — — private amount to be collected: no limit no limit 8 Items no limit none — — no limit disposal of compostabies: Regional site Regional site Regional site Regional site Regional site — — local nursery areas of service: urban urban all residential urban area all areas — — urban any significant changes In 1994 pilot program In fall reduced collection grass clippings for rural Hamlet frequency In not collected collections summer 4. Industrial,Commercial,Institutional Collection frequency of sevice: no service various twice a week see"" weekly no service no service below crjllscton agency: — prtvate/munic municipal — private — — private amount to be collected: • — no limit no limit — b bags — -- no limit are compostabies collected? — no no — no — — no areas of service — urban limited area W of Hopkins — all areas — — urban In Industrial Park any significant changes — none OCC collection In — none — — no In 1994 downtown core 5. Other comments on other services provided In 1994. no service CBD as �> and limited oommercltal locations notedwhere y C Tl 1-4 cu yd container or 16 bags at curbside can be achleved each week v n S • 3 M z cr7 0 0 <-+