HomeMy WebLinkAboutWD-2-93 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
REPORT
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File#
Date: JANUARY 4, 1993 Res. # GPla °'6q3
By-Law#
Report#:__WD_-_2_-_9_3_ File#: _B__a2__1D_03
Subject: ON—STREET PARKING AND BOULEVARD SNOW STORAGE — ELFORD DRIVE
AND POMEROY STREET, EIRAM SUBDIVISION, BOWMANVILLE
PLAN 1OM-840
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1 . THAT Report WD-2-93 be received; and
2 . THAT Rob M. Larocque receive a copy of Report WD-2-93 .
----------------------------------------------------------------
REPORT
1.0 ATTACHMENTS
No. 1: Key Map
No. 2 : Letter from Rob M. Larocque dated June 19, 1992 .
2.0 BACKGROUND
2 . 1 At a regular meeting held on July 13, 1992, Council passed
Resolution #C-476-92 :
"THAT the correspondence date June 19, 1992,
from Rob Larocque, 47 Elford Drive,
Bowmanville, regarding the parking of vehicles
on the front yards and boulevards of
townhouses constructed on Elford Drive and
Pomeroy Drive, be received;
/2
REPORT WD-2-93 PAGE 2
THAT the correspondence be referred to the
Director of Public Works for review and
preparation of a report to be submitted to the
General Purpose and Administration Committee;
and
THAT Rob Larocque be advised of Council's
decision. "
2 .2 The townhouses in question are located in the Eiram
Subdivision, located in Bowmanville, described as Plan 1OM-840
(see Attachment No. 1) .
2 . 3 Mr. Larocque's letter (Attachment No. 2) identifies
"availability of on-street parking" and "boulevard snow
storage" as public safety concerns relating to the
construction of townhouses and driveways on Elford Drive and
Pomeroy Street.
2 .4 At the time of Mr. Larocque's letter, the curbs had not yet
been completed. Subsequent to his letter, the curbs,
sidewalks and boulevards were completed. The completion of
these works has now properly defined each driveway entrance
and results in suitable availability of street parking and
snow storage. Accordingly, Mr. Larocque's concerns have been
addressed.
Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to the Committee,
4- i
Walter A. Evans, P.Eng. , Lawrence E. K t/ eff,
Director of Public Works Chief Adminis�r tive Officer
ASC:hj
December 10, 1992
. . . /3
i
i
REPORT WD-2-93 PAGE 3
Attachments
Pc Rob M. Larocque
47 Elford Drive
Bowmanville, Ontario
L1C 4R4
i
i
i
i
I
i
'I 0�6
i
THIRD CONCESSION
ELFORD DRIVE
CD �
z
zo o � o
0
0 ~ m
ELFORD DR.O
T.H. T.H. p P
TH FREELAND AV
FENWICK
I W
05 CD
FREELAND F-�
J
J
W
Z
0 SUBJECT TOWNHOUSE BLOCKS
° w1
o
S _
{ SUBJECT
i
SITE
> I
� � f
I t
C:\A1TACHS\SIJBD\ELFDRWAY
_ �Sol WN BY: JM DATE: OCT. 1992
C� ATTACHMENT NO. 1
KEY MAP WD-2-93
` COUNCIL DIRECTION
e D-3
June 19, 1992 RPZO%q�q
JUN 19 1992
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
Town of Newcastle TOWN
OFFICE
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario
L1C 3A6
Attention: Mayor and Members of- Town Council
Re: Plan 1OM-840
Eiram Subdivision
i
f
Dear Council Members:
I am forwarding this letter today, in order so my voice is
heard on a matter of great importance to me and my
Community. I am a homeowner of Lot 96 , Plan 1OM-840 , 47
Elford Drive and I wish to bring to the Town Council ' s
attention, a public safety concern in my neighbourhood.
Several townhouses located just north of my residence on
Elford Drive were constructed without garages. Similar
townhouses were also constructed on Pomeroy Drive.
Presently, the Builder of these homes has prepared a portion
of their front yards and boulevards for vehicle parking. The
form to which preparation for asphalt driveways has taken is
a continuous strip of gravel which spans as much as 5
residential unit . This results in a continuous gravel
parking area of in excess of 100 feet. I have enclosed a
sketch which further illustrates this point.
I have had a discussion with a member of your Planning
Staff, Mrs. H. Brooks, with respect to the above driveway
preparation. In our discussion, Mrs. Brooks indicated that
each dwelling unit was constructed such that two ( 2 )
vehicles could be parked on private property regardless if
the dwelling was constructed with or without a garage .
It is my understanding that if a dwelling unit is
constructed with a garage then the garage constitutes one
w ( 1 ) of these two ( 2 ) parking spaces with the other parking
space being located between the garage and the street line .
Continued . . . . . .
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
WD-2-93
r
2 -
With the impending construction season rapidly approaching,
which may see Elford Drive receive completion of its
roadworks, I am formally identifying a concern with respect
to the above situation. If the Builder, Melody Homes, is
allowed to complete the roadworks (depressed curbs and
asphalting boulevards for driveway access ) to match the
present gravel driveways, I can foresee several problems
which may arise from this construction.
The problems I foresee arising from this situation are
related to safety of the local residents in our
neighbourhood.
The continuous asphalt boulevard/driveways, if constructed,
would pose the greatest safety threat during the winter. As
the Municipality provides snow removal services on the
roadway snow storage on the Municipal boulevard would be
lost for over 100 feet.
This safety problem will only worsen as the private land
owner performs snow removal of their driveway and associated
boulevard. Large mounds of snow will result within the'
travelled roadways .
During all weather conditions, the continuous asphalt
boulevard/driveway will pose a safety problem as sight
distance will be reduced substantially. Since, most
households in the affect areas have two ( 2 ) automobiles.
Generally speaking, the continuous asphalt driveway will
have several cars parallel parked within close proximity to
each other. A passing pedestrian may not be noticed by the
vehicle as it is maneuvered - into the roadway.
If am further concerned that this form of boulevard paving
will also limit the availability of on-street parking in the
vicinity of these dwellings.
An alternative form which the driveways can take and will
alleviate most of the above-mentioned concerns, would be to
limit the width of boulevard asphalt placed by the
Developer.
If a 10 foot wide boulevard asphalt strip were placed . in
front of each lot, by the Developer, the remaining boulevard
area can be sodded. A precident would be established which
the Homeowner could follow when planning their driveway.
i
Continued. . . . . .
4� U I
- 3 -
Sufficient setback approximately 37 . 5 feet appears to be
available for these townhouses to support two (2 ) cars
parked, one in front of the other, between the streetline
and the face of the building.
The introduction of sodded boulevards would ensure snow
storage during the winter months and provide separation of
parked vehicles on private lands thus improving sidewalk
(pedestrian) safety. Also, the sodded boulevard would allow
for the planting of street trees.
On-street parking can be improved if the driveways are
j situated in pairs along a common lot line, thus lengthening
the street frontage constructed with full curb, see attached
sketch.
I trust my concern for safety in my neighbourhood are the
same as the Town of Newcastle.
I look forward to hearing from the Town on this matter as
soon as possible, for the construction season is rapidly
approaching .
I
d
Yours truly,
Rob M. Larocq e
t
47 Elford Drive
( 697-1384 - Home )
( 576-8500 - Work)
i Encl. DIST ifBUTIOtf
i;
CLERK ..----------------------------
! c. c. Mr. Frank Wu, Director of Planning ACK. BY----------
--------------
Mr. Walter Evans, Director of Public Works
ORIGINAL T0---------------------- I
COPIES T0:
�.y I
• � i I { � � ( I 3 � 3 i i ,
� I � + +tea � 6 i l I •
.- ! i + Sop . � / ! •�"
Vl� ------7-' CIO
(�R ZA UJLL_ 'D(Zj✓grWY4'
j i ' .._ j I j 5►'�AcJn1��J to �. FiJnz?� FEMP0645
i
of
19� ,10 �, 0- s 1
a11 � ! i ! Fb✓Yjf�vy L�u��d��
! 3
I i
i 1 i i
3
3
• I
3
C)(A 3
-- R�sS�.B�E pos5i6Gr
v Fr-J n1A 7S
-i
b
-� 56D
f
4, ZZ Q-
q
��o
An
t.l n t
1
}
L-Me l wn vim...
pt
f
t
I