HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-23-01
. .'
, ~
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARlNGTON
REPORT
Meeting:
General Purpose and Administration Committee
File #: F4/
Res.#: (;jJlf- 317-6/
Date:
June 18, 200 I
Report #:
TR-23-01 File #:
By-Law #:
Subject:
DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BY
GREATER TORONTO SERVICE BOARD (GTSB)
FOR GO TRANSIT
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report TR-23-01 be received;
2. THAT Municipality of Clarington endorse the Region of Durham as the
appropriate level of government to collect development charges for growth
related capital costs required for GO Transit only; and
3. THAT the GTSB, the Durham Region Area Municipalities, the Region of
Durham and Mr. John O'Toole, MPP, be advised of Council's decision,
FORTHWITH.
Background:
1.0 The GTSB committee member municipalities passed a resolution (Attachment #1)
requesting that legislation be put in place or amended to permit the GTSB to levy
development charges to assist in funding growth related capital costs for Go Transit.
2.0 The Region of Durham along with the other GTA Regions have been working on a
background study, as required by the legislation. The Region of Durham's Report
200 I-F -37, outlining the proposed timetable for the implementation of a Go Transit
Development Charge is provided for committee's information, as Attachment #2.
3.0 The GTSB does not have the legislative ability to levy charges, and any change to
permit that would require legislative amendment. Since the ability currently resides
with the Regional level, and in consideration ofthe degree of completion of their
work, it is not deemed advisable to support the GTSB request at this time. In addition,
the ability to levy charges contradicts the expressed mandate of the GTSB and would
901
Report TR-23-01
DEVELOPMENT CHARGES GTSB FOR GO TRANSIT
Page 2
effectively be the first step in establishing a bona-fide level of government, which is
again contrary to expressed direction and mandate of the GTSB.
4.0 The Region of Durham's proposal will have the effect of an "area specific" charge
which will help to protect the Regional municipalities from subsidizing the total
capital infrastructure across the entire GT A area.
5.0 It is recommended therefore that the municipality endorse the Region of Durham, as
the appropriate authority to levy and collect Go Transit Development Charges.
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
c~~~~ ~C>--J1:c
arie Marano, HBSc., AMCT, CMO.,
Treasurer.
Franklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer.
MM/hjl
Attachment
902
Attachment # 1
DEVELOPMENT CHARGE{ - ~O TRAN~
"- /
McCallion___
3. WHEREAS, under existing legislation GO Transit does not have
the power to directly impose development charges for the
growth-related portion of its 10 year Capital Plan;
AND WHEREAS the responsibility for collecting GO Transit
development charges by default rests with GTA/Hami/ton
municipalities;
AND WHEREAS, the existing process for imposing GO Transit
development charges is fragmented and difficult to administer;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOL VED THA T the appropriate legislation
be amended to permit the GTSB to directly impose development
charges for the growth-related capital costs required for GO
Transit.
Miller
Not Voted On.
Refer this motion regarding development charges to the constituent
municipalities and regional governments for a response by June
2001.
Carried. No Recorded Vote.
903
MAY 18 2001 10:37 FR REG OF DUR-FINANCE 905 571 7460 TO CLARINGTON
P.02/11
ATTACHMENT 112
REVISED
, -
,~
The Regional Municipality of Durham
Report to: Finance & Administration Committee
From: R.J. Clapp, Commissioner of Finance
Report No.: 2001-F-37
Date: May 16, 2001
SUBJECT:
PROPOSED TIMETABLE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A GO TRANSIT
DEVELOPMENT CHARGE (cc #270.1999, #308.2000)
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT the Finance and Administration Committee recommend to Regional Council that:
r-'-,
1) The proposed timetable for the implementation of a Region-specific GO Transit
Development Charge as indicated in this report be approved to allow the expeditious
implementation of a GO Transit Development Charge;
2) Further, this report be forwarded to the Greater Toronto Services Board as the
response by the Region of Durham to the GTSB resolution requesting changes to
Provincial legislation to allow the GTSB to directly impose development charges for
GO Transit; and,
3) A copy of this report be forwarded to GO Transit, the Durham Chapter of the Urban
Development Institute, the Greater Oshawa Home Builders Association, the Durham
Chambers of Commerce, Boards of Trade, the Greater Toronto Services Board, the
Regions of Peel, Halton and York and the Cities of Toronto and Hamilton, the Area
Municipalities within Durham Region, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing
and the Durham MPP's.
REPORT:
1.0 INTRODUCTION
· The purpose of this report is to provide the Finance and Administration
Committee and Regional Council with an update on the status of ongoing
work by staff regarding the introduction and implementation of a Regio,\al
Development Charge to assist in the financing of the growth related cap,tal
costs for the GO Transit System. Thus, this report addresses two outstanding
items of Council Correspondence #270-1999 and #308-2000 (attached).
,...--.-
. This report also provides an updated timetable for the recommendation of a
GO Transit Development Charge for the Region of Durham.
· In addition, this report offers some comments on the recent resolution
forwarded by the GTSB regarding a potential amendment to the Development
Charges Act, 1997 and the GTSB Act to permit the GTSB to directly impose
development charges for GO Transit.
'9-04 fJ8
MRY 18 2001 10:38 FR REG OF DUR-FINRNCE 905 571 7460 TO CLRRINGTON
P.03/11
,,--.
Report No.: 2001-F-37
2.0 BACKGROUND
Page No.: 2
. In 1998, responsibility for funding the GO Transit System was transferred by
the Province to the GTA Regions of Peel, York, Halton, Hamilton-Wentworth
(now the City of Hamilton), Durham and the City of Toronto as part of the
Provincial Local Services Realignment.
. The GTA Regions, City of Hamilton and the City of Toronto became
responsible for sharing the operating costs of the GO Transit System and its
future capital needs. As part of the services realignment, the Province
provided approximately $106 million of MCORF Transportation Funding
Capital to assist in financing capital replacements and equipment purchases.
. In the past 18 months, Finance staff of the GT A Regions and the Cities of
Toronto and Hamilton, in conjunction with GO Transit staff, have been
working cooperatively to develop the capital forecasts for the long term State
of Good Repair and immediate service improvements_ As well, the plan
includes capital for the expansion of the system to meet the projected growth
over the next 10 years_
.r--
. In 2000, staff of the GTA Regions and the Cities of Toronto and Hamilton
reached a tentative agreement on a 10 Year Growth Related Capital Forecast
for the GO Transit System which totals approximately $1_0 Billion_
. Further, an agreement was also reached on a formula to share the capital
costs amongst the funding partners based on an in-depth analysis of the
benefits derived by each Region/City from common system capital projects
(e.g, upgrade and expansion of Union Station) as well as projects benefitting
specific Regions (e,g. station expansions/new stations/service
improvements).
· In June 2000, the 10-Year Growth Related Capital Plan and the cost sharing
,arrangement was adopted by the GO Transit Board and the Greater Toronto
Services Board subject to the contribution of two-thirds funding from the
Federal and Provincial governments.
· The GTSB, as part of the Transportation Strategy adopted June 30, 2000
suggested that "the necessary background studies to support regional
development charge by-laws for GO Transit growth related improvements be
completed as expeditiously as possible" (cc #308-2000 attached)_
.,r--"
9 0 5 9!1
MRY 18 2001 10:38 FR REG OF DUR-FINRNCE 905 571 7450 TO CLRRINGTON
P.04/11
r-'
Report No.: 2001-F-37
3.0 THE GO TRANSIT DC BACKGROUND STUDY
Page No.: 3
· The development of a 10 year $1 billion Growth Related Capital Plan for GO
Transit allowed the GTA Regions/Cities to proceed with the preparation of a
GTA-wide background study for the introduction and implementation of
Development Charges as a means of providing a portion of the one- third
municipal share of the capital program and thus reducing the tax supported
financial requirements.
· The Regions/Cities retained C.N. Watson and Associates and Aird and Berlis
to prepare a GTA-wide Development Charge Background Study that would
address common issues as well as specific concerns to each Region/City.
Regional Council approved funding for Durham's share of the costs of
preparing the Background Study in September, 2000 (Report #2000-F-48).
. This Background Study is near completion and will form the basis for the
individual Background Studies which are likely to be tabled for review in each
Region/City in June and July subject to the respective Council timetables.
Each Region/City will be responsible for determining matters specific to their
Region/City such as the quantum, collection policies, timing, consultation
process etc.
r"',
4.0 REVISED TIMETABLE FOR DURHAM REGION
· A revised timetable for the introduction and implementation of a GO Transit
Development Charge for Durham Region is proposed with the following target
dates:
· Tabling of Background Report
. Consultation Process
. Public Meeting of Council
. Final Bylaw
Late June
July - Early September
Late September
October
· Staff of the Regions/Cities will be meeting with representatives of the Ontario
Chapter of the Urban Development Institute and the Ontario Homebuilders as
an initial step in the consultation process. Also, each Region/City will
undertake further separate consultations as required in accordance with their
local needs and the Development Charaes Act. 1998.
. The proposed timetable would allow the Region of Durham to commence
collecting a development charge for GO Transit purposes by
November/December 2001.
,r--
· The Presidents of the Durham Chapter of UDI and the DRHBA & GTHBA
have been notified of this report and the proposed timetable.
906 100
MAY 18 2001 10:38 FR REG OF DUR-FINANCE 905 571 7450 TO CLARINGTON
P.05/11
r---
Report No.: 2001-F-37
5.0 GTSB RESOL.UTION
Page No.: 4
. On April 20, 2001, the following resolution was referred by the GTSB to
member municipalities requesting that Provincial legislation be enacted to
permit the GTSB to impose a uniform GO Transit development charge across
the Regions/City:
"WHEREAS under existing legislation, GO Transit does not have
the power to directly impose development charges for the growth-
related portion of its 10 year Capital Plan;
AND WHEREAS the responsibility for collecting GO Transit
development charges by default rests with GTAlHW municipalities;
AND WHEREAS, the existing process for imposing GO Transit
development charges is fragmented and difficult to administer;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the appropriate legislation
be amended to permit the GTSB to directly impose development
charges for the growth-related capital costs required for GO
Transit."
,,...--.,
· Regional staff have reviewed commentary requested of the consultants, C.N.
Watson & Associates and Aird and Berlis regarding the financial and legal
implications of proceeding with a uniform GTSB GO Transit development
charge. The key points of this commentary include:
· Currently, the GTSB does not have the statutory powers to impose a
development charge and the delay involved in amending legislation would
result in forgone revenues and require a new Background Study. This
process could extend the commencement of collecting GO Transit
development charge by one to two years.
· An average uniform GTSB development charge would likely reduce the
DC rate for Durham and Halton to the "average" with a commensurate
increase in the property tax contribution thereby requiring an "over-
contribution" from Durham taxpayers. This reflects Durham's'high growth
share of GO Transit future capital costs.
~.
· For those Regions which currently charge a non-residential development
charge well below the full amount (i.e. Durham, Halton, Hamilton and
York), the mandatory imposition of a non-residential DC would serve to
disrupt the balance that has been struck between economic development
incentives and capital funding needs. Essentially, individual Regions
would lose the power to structure their development charge practices and
policies in a way that best suits their development needs.
907 101
MAY 18 2001 10:39 FR REG OF DUR-FINANCE 905 571 7450 TO CLARINGTON
P.05/11
Report No.: 2001-F-37
Page No.: 5
r--
. The current practices provide the necessary flexibility in local
Development Charge policy development.
· Staff of the Regions/Cities collectively have spent a considerable amount
of time and effort to arrive at this stage of the process. These efforts seek
to secure development charge funding to help finance the growth related
capital costs of the GO Transit System. The proposal by the
Regions/Cities to introduce GO Transit Development Charges
demonstrates the commitment by municipalities to provide sufficient
financing to proceed with expansion ofthe GO Transit System.
. Any delay in the introduction of a GO Transit development charge will
result in the loss of non- recoverable revenues of up to $16 million per
year across the GTA Regions/Cities.
. Also, at the present time, the GTSB does not have staff who are sufficiently
experienced in financial capital planning and development charge policy to
proceed with the background analysis, implementation and operational stages
which would be required for a GTA wide GO Transit Development Charge.
,----
· Such an amendment would provide the GTSB with the new ability to directly
tax for the GO Transit system.
· It is the consensus of staff from the Regions/City of the six municipalities that
a uniform GO Transit Development Charge imposed by the GTSB would be
counterproductive and would result in costly delays pending changes to
Provincial Legislation.
· Further, it is agreed that each of the six municipalities should proceed
forthwith under current legislation to adopt individual bylaws that take into
consideration local conditions and Council approved development charge
policies. This would allow the Regions/City to commence collecting GO
Transit development charges without delay,
· Therefore, it is recommended that a copy of this report be forwarded to the
GTSB as the response by Durham Region.
6.0 NEXT STEPS
· As authorized in the previous Report #2000-F-48, staff will proceed with
finalizing the Background Study and draft by-law for tabling by Regional
,--- Council in June, The Background Study will provide detailed information
regarding all aspects of the proposed GO Transit development charge.
908 102
.. ..,
MAY 18 2001 10:39 FR REG OF DUR-FINANCE
905 571 7460 TO CLARINGTON
P.07/11
Report No.: 2001-F-37
Page No.: 6
.~
. The Councils ofthe other GTA Regions/City are also considering similar
recommendations from their respective staffs in late May. These
recommendations address the issue oftimetables and the need to proceed
with the introduction of individual DC Background studies at each of the six
Regions/Cities.
. The Commissioners of Works and Planning and the Regional Solicitor concur
with the recommendations of this report.
R.J. Clapp. CA
Commissioner of Finance
Recommended for Presentation to Committee:
r---,
G.H. Cubitt, M.S.W.
Chief Administrative Officer
Attach.
MGlreporllGO DC
.'--.....
909
103
. MRY 18 2001 10:39 FR REG OF DUR-FINRNCE
~
905 571 7450 TO CLRRINGTON P.08/11
ATTACHMENT
Office of the Chair
CCD270
~
25 years of workina for you
~
_e:rl"'-~l:o:_
-
April 9, 1999
I"" ,.... . ~ .
. -'.'
,.j'--.../-,
Resolution No. 1999-458
Roger Anderson
Regional Chair
Regional Municipality of Durham.
605 Rossland Rd. E.
P.O. Box 623
Whitby, Ontario
LlN 6A3
APR19'.9S.;M 9:
7f!~.
Dear Mr. R:ri<<lers :
r---
Subject:
Funding for GO Transit Capital Cosrs
The follOwing request was made by members of the Region of Peel's General Committee during
budget deliberations on March 11, 1999, and approved by Regional Council on March 25, 1999:
Whereas it is imperative that development charges finance the growth related
capital cosrs of GO Transit so that the financing burden is not placed on the
homeowners;
Therefore be it resolved, that the Region of Peel request each GO Transit funding
Region and the City of Toronto to identify their growth related GO Transit needs
over me next 10 year period in order to incorporate me capital fO~!oi:'ib~13%&?f~MENT
respective GO Transit 1999 development charges by-law.
Original
To, ,~ ~
c.,py 1./
To:
-
,..---..,
The Regional Municipality of Peel
~~DJL.)
10 Peel Centre Dr" Brampton, Ont. L6T 489
;"c.c:.J ;tle
T.... Appr. Adoon
-- .. w .._ . _ ~..:=..::..__. __,
"
(90S) 791-7800 Fax (90S) 791-2567
'-104
910
-TOS- -c
, ...
, '
MAY 18 2001 10:39 FR REG OF DUR FINANCE 905 571 7460 TO CLARINGTON
P. 09/11
270
".....---,.
ATTACHMENT
On behalf of Regional Council, I request that you give consideration to the above
recol1ljllendation. I look: forward to your early reply. Please quote the Region's resolution
number in your reply.
Sincerely,
~
Enlll Kelb
Regional Chair and
Chief Executive Officer
BN;sg
cc:
J. Penoachetti, Treasurer and Commissioner of Finance
P. Allen, Commissioner of Planning
Patticia Madill, Regional Clerk, Regional Municipality of Durham
Joan Eaglesham, Regional Clerk. Regional Municipality of Halton
Joseph Schatz, Regional/City Clerk. Regional Municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth
Dennis Hearse, Regional Clerk:, Regional Municipality of York
Novina Wong. City Clerk, City of Toronto
,~
.r----
911
105
MAY 18 2001 10:39 FR REG OF DUR-FINANCE
GTSB
905571 7460 TO CLARINGTON P.10/11
ATTACHMENT
I Origiftlll
IT",
llt.:('~-.~ ~.J~:::' .-:--
I~.. .. .~'_'_~ -
CC #308
~.
Greater Toronto Services Board
July 18,2000
p(rJ}II~1
Copy I
TQ' K..J. c"1Cti" =-- I
,
A. L .Ge..CCD'\ r
; c;.., 1-\. C-l>. b~
r ..~
-::-,..'.~
(, e.G, )
;:jl~
.
l=i
( t
Dear Municipal Clerk;
;:";"lIr,c. ~()r. A~T/cn
At its meeting held onJune 30,2000, the Greater Toronto Services Board
adopted the attached Clause 1 of Transportation Committee Report No. 10, entitled
"Comments on Removing Roadblocks - The Draft Strategic Transportation Plan for
the Greater Toronto Area and Hamilton-Wentworth" and by so doing, adopted:
. (a) a strategy as a foundation to maintaining and improving the economic health and
competitiveness of the Greater Toronto Area and Hamilton-Wentworth and the
quality ofEfe of the area's residents; and
r--,
(b)
actions for implementing the Strategic Transportation Plan.
The following recommendations, in particular, are being drawn to your
attention:
GTSB member municipalities are requested to protect the GTA transit corridors]
identified in the Strategic Transportation Plan and ensure supportive land use policies
for these corridors through their official plans as they are reviewed. ,
fic.ri'
GO Transit, GTSB member municipalities and their transit operating agencies
are requested to participate in a co-operative process to develop a GT A-wide transit co-
ordination protocol to provide a common basis for approaching inter-regional transit
co-ordination issues.
The provincial government has been requested, in consultation with the Greater
Toronto Services Board and GTSB member municipalities, to identifY and implement,
including enfixcement, a network of high occupancy vehicle lanes on 400-series
highways in the Greater Toronto Area and Hamilton-Wentworth.
laws
The necessary background studies to support regional development charge by- l
for GO Transit growth related improvements are to be completed as expeditious]~
.
1000 Murray Ross Parkway Toronto, Ontario M3J 2P3
Tel; 416-338-2989 Fax: 416-338-2994 Toll Free: 1-877-335-3319
~{'
r
r--
~
9 1 2 i fO 6 /
r /~~4 f!1
,~. .
~ -3;,
MAY 18 2001 10:40 FR REG OF DUR-FINANCE 905 571 7460 TO CLARINGTON
~,
GTSB
ATTACHMENT
-2-
P.l1/11
CC #308
as possible, and the appropriate by-laws presented for approval no later than October
2000.
A copy of Clause 1 ofTransporution Committee Report No. 10 is being
forwarded to you for your attention and any action you deem appropriate.
cc. Chairman Alan Tonks
Chair Bill Fisch, Chair, Transportation Committee
Attachment.
,.---.,
,~
107
913
** TOTAL PAGE.l1 **