HomeMy WebLinkAboutWD-41-92 REPORT #3
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF EWCASTL®
REPORT
-
Meeting: COUNCIL Z
File#
Date: APRIL 13, 1992 Res. #
Report#:—WD--4 l---9 2- F I I e #: -RC--31--GZ By-I-aw#
Subject: TOWN OF NEWCASTLE EXPROPRIATION OF LAND FROM
THE BOWMANVILLE ZOO FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF
HIGHWAY 2 AND MEARNS AVENUE, BOWMANVILLE
Recommendations:
The following is respectfully recommended to Council:
1. THAT Report WD-41-92 be received;
2 . THAT in accordance with the conditions set out in the letter,
dated May 14, 1991, from The Honourable Ruth Grier, Minister
of the Environment, the Town agrees to provide a noise fence
to the specifications previously agreed upon by the Director
of Public Works and the owners of the Bowmanville Zoo, at an
estimated cost of $32,000;
3. THAT the proposal for the settlement of compensation for the
land required from the owners of the Bowmanville Zoo on the
east side of Mearns Avenue for the purpose of widening and
reconstructing Mearns Avenue, as outlined in the
correspondence dated September 6, 1991, from Alex Nagy to
Totten Sims Hubicki, be rejected;
4 . THAT the Town of Newcastle continue the process necessary to
acquire the land from the Bowmanville Zoo and settle the
matter of compensation in accordance with the Expropriation
Act; and
/2
REPORT NO. : WD-41-92 PAGE 2
5 . THAT Alex Nagy, President, Bowmanville Zoo, and the Honourable
Ruth Grier, Minister of the Environment, be advised of
Council's decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------
REPORT
1.0 ATTACHMENTS
No. 1: Copy of Report WD-25-91, dated March 4, 1991
No. 2: Copy of correspondence dated May 14, 1991, from The
Honourable Ruth Grier, Minister of the Environment
No. 3: Copy of correspondence dated September 6, 1991, from
Alex Nagy, President, Bowmanville Zoo
2.0 BACKGROUND
2 . 1 Report WD-25-91, dated March 4, 1991, provides the background
for this report. It should be noted that Council did not
approve recommendation number two (2) of the report.
3.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT
3. 1 Expropriation proceedings have been commenced for the
acquisition of land for the widening and improvement of Mearns
Avenue from the Bowmanville Zoo. A Notice of Objection to the
proposed expropriation has been filed on behalf of the
Bowmanville Zoo. It is expected that an inquiry into the
necessity and fairness of the proposed expropriation under the
Expropriations Act will be scheduled to commence in the
relatively near future. If the acquisition of land from the
Bowmanville Zoo is approved under the Expropriations Act, work
on the widening and improvement would be undertaken in 1993 .
3 .2 Approval of the undertaking of the widening and improvement
of a portion of Mearns and King Street East is required under
the Environmental Assessment Act. An application was made for
a class rather than a project specific approval under this Act
. . . /3
REPORT NO. : WD-41-92 PAGE 3
in order to achieve significant savings in time and in costs .
The Bowmanville Zoo requested that the Class Environmental
Assessment be "bumped up" to an undertaking specific
application for approval under the Environmental Assessment
Act. If this had been successful, a very considerable delay
and a significant increase in. the cost of the project would
have resulted. However, the Minister of the Environment, The
Honourable Ruth Grier, in her letter dated May 14, 1991,
(Attachment No. 2) decided not to bump the undertaking up
subject to two (2) conditions set out in her letter. The
first condition requires the Town to agree to provide a noise
fence to the specifications previously agreed upon by the
Director of Public Works and the owners of the Bowmanville Zoo
at an estimated cost of $32,000 . The second condition deals
with the resolution of the question of compensation for the
land proposed to be acquired from the Bowmanville Zoo.
3 . 3 With respect to the issue of the compensation to be paid to
the Town for the land, in accordance with the conditions set
out by the Minister of the Environment in her letter dated May
14, 1991, another appraiser, who was mutually agreeable to the
Town and the owners of the Bowmanville Zoo, was retained by
the Town to provide an appraisal for the land required from
the Bowmanville Zoo for the widening of Mearns Avenue. The
Appraisal Report was provided to the owners of the Bowmanville
Zoo and was discussed with them by Mr. Don Smith, the
Appraiser. As noted in the correspondence dated September 6,
1991, from Alex Nagy to Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, the
owners of the Bowmanville Zoo do not agree with the appraised
value of the land.
I
3.4 In order to satisfy the requirements of the Environmental
Assessment Act and the condition of Minister of the
. . . /4
i
i
I
REPORT NO. : WD-41-92 PAGE 4
Environment's conditions set out in her letter of May 14,
1991, it is desirable that Council now resolve that the Town
agrees to provide a noise fence to the specifications
previously agreed upon by the Director of Public Works and the
Bowmanville Zoo at an estimated cost of $32,000 . The fence
would be constructed in 1993 in conjunction with the proposed
widening and improvement of the Mearns Avenue and King Street
intersection.
Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to Council,
i
Walter A. Evans, P.Eng. Lawrence E. �Kotseff,
Director of Public Works Chief Ac�ml n'istrative Officer
WAE:DH:ph U
April 7, 1992
Attachments
pc: Bowmanville Zoo
340 King Street East
Bowmanville, Ontario
L1C 3K5
Attention: Mr. Alex Nagy
The Honourable Ruth Grier
Minister of the Environment
135 St. Clair Avenue West
Suite 100
Toronto, Ontario
M4V 1P5
I
I
i
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
r.`5�•� � ' ' REPORT
Fi le
Res. #
! - -_F �• By-Law #
SING: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
DATE: MARCH 4, 1991
REPORT #: WD-25-91 FILE #: RC. 31.02
SLBJEC : POSTPONEMENT OF -THE RECONSTRUCTION OF HIGHWAY 2 AND
MEARNS AVENUE AND NEED TO PROCEED WITH EXPROPRIATION OF
LAND FOR ROAD WIDENING, BOWMANVILLE
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report WD-25-91 be received;
2 . THAT the owners of Bowmanville Zoo be advised that conditional on
the owners releasing the Town from any responsibility regarding
their animal collection that may result from the construction and
use of the widenings of Highway #2 and Mearns Avenue in a form
satisfactory to the Town's Solicitor and the owners withdrawing
their objection to the Minister of the Environment regarding the
undertaking of this work, the Town will build a solid wood fence
(at an estimated cost of $32,000) along their frontage on Highway
2 to alleviate their concerns about the effect of the
reconstruction of Highway 2 on the animals in the Bowmanville Zoo
i
subject to the owners advising the Ministry of the Environment
that the Town has satisfactorily dealt with their concerns about
the reconstruction of Highway 2 and Mearns Avenue;
I
3 . THAT appropriate Town officials take the necessary action to
initiate and prosecute expropriation of the necessary land from
the Bowmanville Zoo for the widening of Mearns Avenue;
I
ATTACHMENT N0. 1
2
WD-41-92
REPORT NO: : Wb-X25-91 PAGH 2' '
4 . THAT Mr. .Alex Nagy, President, Bowmanvi-lle Zoo, be advised of
Council 's decision; and
5 . THAT a copy of Report WD-25-91 be forwarded to Mr. Alex Nagy, Ms.
Cathy Cetrulla, Ministry of the Environment and Mr. Doug Goltz,
Ministry of Transportation.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
REPORT
1.0 ATTACHMENTS
No. l: Key Map
No.2 : Environmental Study Report (Under Separate Cover)
No.3 : Correspondence dated June 19 , 1990, from Alex
Nagy, President, Bowmanville Zoo, to the Minister
of the Environment
No.4:. Correspondence dated October 27, 1990, from
Michael Hackenberger, Director, Bowmanville Zoo,
to Walter Evans.
No.5 : Correspondence dated January 21, 1991, from Alex
Nagy, President, Bowmanville Zoo to Walter Evans
2.0 INTRODUCTION
2 . 1 It has been necessary to postpone the reconstruction of Highway 2
and Mearns Avenue from 1991 to 1992 because of unresolved
concerns raised by the owners of the Bowmanville Zoo with the
Minister of the Environment under provisions of the Environmental
Assessment Act.
2 .2 Provision was made in the 1988 Capital Budget and Four Year
Forecast for the design in 1988 and the construction in 1991 of
Highway 2 from Simpson Avenue to the East Soper Creek Bridge and
of Mearns Avenue from Highway 2 to Orchard Park Drive.
2 . 3 Provision was made in the 1990 Capital Budget and Four Year
Forecast for the completion of design and for land purchase. The
construction was forecasted to proceed in 1991.
REPORT NO. : WD-25-91 PAGE 3
3.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT
3. 1 The Environmental Study Report details the process which has been
followed with regard to this project (Attachment No.2 under
separate cover) . The balance of this report will make
recommendations on resolving two outstanding problems:
a) Concerns raised by the owners of the Bowmanville Zoo in a
letter dated June 19, 1990 to the Minister of the
Environment.
b) Purchase of land from the Bowmanville Zoo for road widening
on the 'east side of Mearns Avenue.
3.2 Concerns of the Owners of the Bowmanville Zoo
3 .2 . 1 The only concerns raised by the owners of the Zoo which relate to
this project are those raised on Page 3 (Attachment No.3) under
the heading of "Widening of Highway 211 . In order to resolve
those concerns, meetings were held with the owners of the Zoo on
July 26, August 8, September 20, October 22 , 1990 and January 21,
1991.
3 .2 .2 At the conclusion of the meeting held on October 22, it was
agreed that subject to Council approval, the Town would pay the
cost of constructing a solid board fence along the Bowmanville
Zoo frontage onto Highway 2 . The owners of the Zoo agreed that
if the Town would do this, they would withdraw their objections
to the Minister of the Environment.
I
Mr. Michael Hackenberger confirmed this agreement in his letter
dated October 27 , 1990 (Attachment No.4) .
. . .4
i
I
i
i
REPORT NO. : WD-25-91 PAGE 4
3 .2 . 3 The only other unresolved issue was the purchase of land
from the Bowmanville Zoo for widening on the east side of
Mearns Avenue. At the conclusion of the meeting held on
October 22, it was agreed that the purchase of the widening
would be negotiated by the Town's appraiser and land
purchase agent, Frank Sworik.
3 .2 . 3 On Monday, January 21, 1991, Frank Sworik advised me that he
was advised by the owners of the Bowmanville Zoo that they
had changed their mind and did not want to proceed with the
sale of the land on Mearns Avenue and would not withdraw
their objection to the Minister of the Environment unless
the Town agreed to pay them $100,000 for an easement over
their land over which the west branch of the Soper Creek
flows between Mearns Avenue and Highway 2.
This is an issue which is not related to the reconstruction
of Highway 2 and Mearns Avenue and is between Schickedanz
Brothers Ltd. and the owners of the Bowmanville Zoo.
3 . 2 .4 A meeting was held with the owners of the Bowmanville Zoo at
5: 00 p.m on Monday, January 21, 1991, to .try to resolve the
issues . We were not successful.
At the conclusion of the meeting, Frank Nagy handed me a
letter which states that their concerns raised with the
Minister of the Environment are still unresolved (Attachment
No.5) .
. . . 5
REPORT NO. : WD-25-91 PAGE 5
3 . 2 .5 A municipality cannot proceed with a project until all
concerns raised during the environmental assessment process
have been resolved to the Minister's satisfaction. This
process can take a considerable length of time and for this
reason the project cannot proceed this year.
A submission has been made to the Ministry of the Environment
outlining the issues and asking for a ruling that the Town has
taken all reasonable steps to deal with the issues raised by
the Bowmanville Zoo which are related to this project.
3 . 2 . 6 Four parcels of land are required for road widening for this
project, two on Highway 2 and two on Mearns Avenue. . We have
been successful in obtaining agreements for all but the land
required from the Bowmanville Zoo.
In order to be in a position to proceed with the project in
1992, it is recommended that expropriation proceedings be
initiated to obtain the widening on the east side of Mearns
Avenue.
3 . 2 . 7 The purchase of the other three parcels of land will be dealt
with in separate reports .
3 .2 . 8 The proposed 1991 Capital Budget and Four Year Forecast
reflects the change in timing for this project.
Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to the Committee,
-----------------------
------ -----------------
Walter A. Evans, P.Eng. , Lawrence E Kotseff,
Director of Public Works Chief A istrative Officer
WAE*llv
February 18, 1991
Attachments
. . . 6
REPORT NO. : WD-25-91 PAGE 6
pc: Mr. Alex Nagy, President
Bowmanville Zoo
340 King Street East
Bowmanville, Ontario
L1C 3K5
Ms. Cathy Cetrulla
Ministry of the Environment
Environmental Assessment Branch
250 Davisville Avenue
5th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M4S 1H2
Mr. Doug Goltz
Ministry of Transportation
Regional Municipal Maintenance Section
Central Region
Atrium Tower
1201 Wilson Avenue
Downsview, Ontario
M3M 1J8
i
I
I
I
i
i
i
LEGEND
ROAD WIDENING REQUIRED
w
z
w •
Q
lL f 0 -)
W
_ O
LIMIT OF (L ORCHARD
PROJECT PARK DR.
z
a SAVANNAH LAND
JOHN AND CAROL Uj CORPORATION
SORNBERGER (BOWMANVILLE ZOO)
a 294 KING ST. E 340 KING ST.E.
a
m
J --
a -
EASEMENT
KING STREET EAST /
w
D
w z
w L`'
a Q
�n z
0
0)
a
z SIBJEL INVESTMENTS LTD.
a 229-237 KING ST. E .
LL LIMIT OF
MANUFACTURES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTO. PROJECT
225 KING ST. E
ECT � u�.�• V� 0
S)� lJf'J;'
DRAWN ' J .M
DATE = FEB. 1991
{
J1 ATTACNfIr N
T 110, 1
KEY r WD-25-91
THE ALL NEW
BO'WMANVILLE
zoo
June 19, 1990 .
The Honourable Jim Bradley,
Minister of the Environment ,
135 St . Clair Ave . W. , 5th Floor ,
Toronto , Ont. M4V 1P5
Dear Sirs :
Re : Reconstruction of King Street (Hwy 2 ) Bowmanville
Environmental Study Report
We are writing to you regarding the above project to express
our concerns .
First we would like to start by stating that the reason for
writing at this late is due to the fact that we did not
receive any notices regarding the Study Report. We learned
about this study through a neighbour ,who showed us his notice
just recently . Since then we did meet with the Mayor of the
Town of Newcastle and asked that our concerns be forwarded to
your Ministry .
Attached is a copy of the letter which we sent to the Mayor
following our meeting . We believe that the summary should be
self explanatory to you . it is our opinion that 'the development
in the watershed has not been carried out in accordance with
the Master Drainage Plan as approved with little regard to the:
environment or riprarian rights . .
We ask that our concerns be taken into consideration and would
appreciate a meeting with you to "discuss' them . in further detail .
Yours truly, j
I
BOWMANVILLE ZOO
ATTACHMENT NO . 3
WD-25-01.
Alex Nagy,
President .
AN:hb
Encls .
340 King Street Ea5r Bo„manville Ontario Canada - L IC 3K5
THE ALL NE1t'
D
JUN 13 1990
BOWMANVILLE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
zooMAYO'S OFFICE
June 12 , 1990 .
Town of Newcastle ,
40 Temperance St . ,
Bowmanville, Ont. L1C 3A6
Attention : Mayor - M. Hubbard
Dear Mayor Hubbard:
Thank you very much for meeting with Mr . Winters and myself on
June 8, 1990 to discuss some of the problems which the
Bowmanville Zoo is currently experiencing as a result of develop-
ment of lands surrounding the zoo. The following is a summary
of the concerns raised and our understanding of your undertakings
to deal with same.
Security Fencing
When the Veltri subdivision was constructed the area immediately
to the south of the development and north of the zoo was dedicated
by the developer to the Town . The area is presently used as a
childrens ' playground and park. There is no fence separating the
playground/park from the zoo property and as a result , the
children in the area readily trespass onto zoo property. If the
children cross Soper Creek they can easily come in contact with
zoo animals. Discussions had taken place between Town ' s staff
to erect a fence and although the Town was initially prepared to
do so it now appears that they are not . You indicated that you
had spoken to Mr . Caruana in Community Service and that the j
fence has been provided for in the budget . You have agreed to
follow this up with Town staff and confirm the Town ' s position .
Erosion
Another concern with existing and future development is the
resulting erosion to the banks of the creek which meanders
through our property . The pond which was designed and built at
the south end of the Veltri subdivision does not function as
intended . During heavy rains the pond floods over and runoff
goes directly into the creek increasing flows . In winter the
pond freezes over creating ice jams in the creek causing water
backup .
340 King Street East - 6owmanville - Ontario - Canada - L 1 C 3KS
THE ALL NEW
BOWMANVTLLE _
zoo
2 _
As the ice thaws the water is released with tremendous pressure
and speed causing significant erosion.
We have discussed the pond with Mr. Cannela of the Town as well
as Sernas & Associates who were the designing engineers and it
was their conclusion that the pond does not work as intended .
Corrective measures are required to repair the damage to date
as well as to ' protect for future erosion.
We were pleased that you were familiar with the situation and
agreed that a problem does exist . You have indicated that you
would call for a meeting of all parties involved to discuss a
resolution and would report back to us within a two week period.
Retention Ponds - Schickendanz
A third concern discussed was the development of lands to the
west of our property and the issue of storm water management.
Having read the development agreements and the storm water
management reports prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan and
by Proctor and Redfern we learned that the development of the
lands was not to proceed until satisfactory measures had been
taken to control storm water runoff _ Both engineeting reports
indicated that retention ponds as well as chanelization of the
creek would be required to control storm runoff_ A majority of
the lands in question have already been developed in advance of
the storm controls required _
In order to implement the works recommended easements would be
required through our lands -
Las
year Mr _ Schickendanz entered into negotiations with us to
obtain the easement. It appears that these negotiations were
terminated when the Town entered into an agreement with the
developer, wherein the Town assumed the responsibility of
acquiring the said easements . It is not clear as to why the Town
should have assumed such a liability .
Our main concern over the proposed works is that they should not
negatively impact our property not only in appearance and
maintenance but also for the future development of the corner
at Mearns and Liberty _
You indicated that you would look into this matter as part of
the meeting with the staff and developers within the next two
weeks .
I
THE ALL NEW
BOWMANVILLE _
zoo
3 -
Widening of Highway #2
A fourth point raised and which we feel is of significant
urgency is the widening of Highway #2 . It was by chance Ghat a
neighbour presented us with a notice that he received from the
Town referring to an environmental review prior to construction.
We were never 'in receipt of such a notice .
We . have a concern about the noise and dust that would be created
during construction and the impact on the animals . We have on
the zoo grounds very sensitive species some of which are very
rare and endangered . As a security precaution we feel that it
will be necessary to move these animals to an area beyond the
influence of the construction . At this time we do not have any
information to work with but certainly an impact study would be
required and the responsibility for cost should be established .
We have asked that the Town advise the Ministry of our concerns
and that a meeting be established . We would appreciate receiving
a copy of the correspondence between the Town and the Ministry ,
for our files .
Future of the Zoo
As a final point we discussed the future of the zoo in relation
to the plans of the Town in general . It is our view that the
development to date has been approved without any consideration
for the zoo and its occupants . We are not aware of any notices
sent to us as the owners regarding proposed upstream development ,
even though we formally asked the Town to keep us informed of any
new developments .
At this time we are not in a position to determine the longterm
effect of surrounding developments on the current operations of
the zoo or its future expansion . We are convinced however , that
our potential for future expansion will be constrained by
urbanization . In addition our business depends on breeding of new
animals not only for our own use but for that of other zoos .
The noise , lighting and increased pollution will have a negative
impact in breeding _
I
I-HE ALL NE\\'
BOWMANVILLE
zoo_
- 4 -
As we indicated to you we wish to resolve these issues with the
co-operation of the Town . We feel that the Town has much to gain
or lose as we do. The Bowmanville Zoo is a long established
institution which currently .attracts approximately 150, 000
visitors annually.
This translates to substantial tourist dollars for the Town .
We thank you in advance for your anticipated co-operation and
look forward to hearing from you within two weeks _
Yourst truly ,
BOWMANVILLE ZOO
i
Alex Nagy ,
President _
AN:hb
i
i
I
;Fn x Fa t 8owmmnvi//e Ontario Canada - I.IC 3K5
THE ALL NEW
BOWMANVILLE
Zoo
WA(_
CSC - - ---- -- -October 27 , 1990
Walter Evans
City Hall -.
Bowmanville, Ontario
Dear Mr. Evans,
In regards to' the proposed widening of Highway 2 from Mearns
Avenue, through to the bridge over the eastern branch
of the Soper Creek. The Bowmanville Zoological Park Ltd.
(BZP) , occupies the area north of the proposed construction.
As a tourist attraction and as a centre for the propogation
of endangered species, the BZP has concerns regarding
the impact of widening Highway 2.
As an attraction destination, it is extremely important
for the BZP to maintain the highest standards of aesthetics
for its guests. We have met on several occasions and
Mr. Don Bourne has been very cooperative in creating
a schedule, which should minimize the construction disturbance
on the operation of the zoo.
Of greater concern, is the welfare of the animal collection
which is adjacent to Highway 2 , which will be subjected
to the full impact of the construction process. You have
been supplied with a list of animals which are housed
adjacent to Highway 2 . In particular those species which
are of endangered status were indicated . Many of these
species are very nervous and easily stressed. We are
very concerned that the noise dust and other disturbances
produced by the construction, would have a deleterious
effect upon the collections well-being-
The figure to relocate those sensitive species which
would be most impacted by the construction would be $123 , 000 _
We have approached a number of other zoological facilities ,
capable of holding some of the animals over the construction
period . However , due to the impli-cations of shipping
nervous animals, and the limited resources at other facilities ,
the practicality of this option is not feasible.
ATTACH f 1ENT 110 , 4
WD-25-91
i-.�) Kir�� Slrt< l 1:.��! R�xtini:�nvill� Onlari<) C,?nadd • 1.1('3K5
Page 2.
As an alternative to moving these animals and incurring the
expenses outlined above, BZP suggests the construction
of a barrier across the southern end of the zoo property,
adjacent to Highway 2.
Mr. Al Nagy supplied details to Mr. Don Bourne, of a
proposed: barrier, which we felt- would minimize the
enviromental disturbances created by the construction.
At our last meeting, the cost of such a barrier
was estimated at $32, 000. Should such a barrier
be constructed, the BZP is satisfied that every
reasonable precaution has been made towards the
well-being of the animal collection, and that the
town of Newcastle and MTO are released from any
further responsibility towards the animal collection .
in regards to- the proposed widening of Highway 2.
With thanks for your consideration of this brief,
I remain,
Your obedient servant,
Michael Hackenberger
Director
JANUARY 21 , 1991
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
40 TEMPERANCE ST. ,
3OWMANVILLE, ONTARIO
.—IC 3K5
ATTENTION: WALTER EVANS
]EAR SIRS:
RE: KING STREET RECONSTRUCTION
4ITH RESPECT TO THE AMENDED ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY REPORT PERTAINING
FO THE RECONSTRUCTION OF HIGHWAY ## 2, WE WISH TO ADVISE THAT THE
CONCERNS SUBMITTED REGARDING THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL ARE STILL
JALID AND TO DATE UNRESOLVED.
YOURS TRULY
ALEX NAGY
-;N ^! '(' Ul Note au1 FMe
--
-to
JAN 22 1oo� i : �.f.�r,:•�,r:tv.
-..�..�.�T rti-Y7f1 -
<
i
ATTACHMENT NO . 5
WD-25-01
r�
Minim,, Ministere
of the de
m.
'• f Environment 1'Environnment
Ontario
f the
135 St.Clair Avenue West 135,avenue St.Clairouest
Suite 100 Bureau 100
du Toronto,Ontario Toronto(Ontario)
M4V 1P5 M4V iP5
416/323-4359 416/323-4359
21511
May 14, 1991
Mr. Walter A. Evans, P.Eng.
Director of Public Works
Corporation of the Town of Newcastle
40 Temperance. Street
Bowmanville,- Ontario
L1C 3A6
Dear Mr. Evans:
Thank you for meeting with Mr. Glenn Higgins
of the Environmental Assessment Branch- on April 12,
1991, to discuss the concerns raised by representa-
tives of the Bowmanville Zoo with regards to the
reconstruction of King Street .
Mr. Higgins has provided me with the
resolutions of that meeting. Based on the information
he has provided I have decided not to bump-up this
project to an individual environmental assessment
subject to the following conditions which both the
Town of Newcastle and the Bowmanville Zoo have agreed
upon:
• The Town of Newcastle will agree to provide a
noise fence to the specifications previously
agreed upon by the Town and the Zoo. If such a
fence is not provided, I reserve the right to re-
evaluate my decision not to bump-up the project.
• The Town of Newcastle and representatives of the
Bowmanville Zoo will, through a mutually agreed
upon appraiser, attempt to set a fair and
reasonable price for that portion of land
currently owned by the zoo along Mearns Avenue.
If the price set by the appraiser proves to be
unsatisfactory to one or both parties, the matter
will be settled through the use of the
Expropriations Act .
2 ATTACHMENT N0. 2
WD-41-92
Mr. Walter A. Evans, P.Eng.
Page 2
Let me take this opportunity to thank you
and representatives of the zoo for your cooperation in
this matter.
Yours sincerely,
Ruth Grier
Minister
cc:. Mr. Alex Nagy, President
Bowmanville Zoo
I
I
I
THE ALL NEW
8OWMAN'VILLE
zoo
September 6, 1991 WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Totten Sims Nubicki Associates
1A King St . E. , P.O. $OTC 998
Cobourg, Ontario
K9A 4L1
Attn : Mr . D. R. Bourne
Dear Sirs :
Re: Bowmanyi lle Zoo Pro2perty - Mearns Ave
N ther to our meeting regarding the appraisal report as
prepared by Durham Appraisal ,�ervice5 dcLd ,,mvjng r0viewo6 Ramp
we submit the following comments .
It appears that the more that we attempt to assist you
and the Town in expediting the road wridenings and avoiding
costly studies and reports , the more the 'down attempts to take
advantage . when you and Mr . Evans suggested using Durham
Appraisal Services to agreed on condition that the appraisal
was unbiased and that any input that we may have would be con-
sidered by the appraiser in the oourse" of preparing the report .
This report fails to discuss or tale into account very significant
points which were presented to Mr . Don Smith by rir . John Winters
our accountant . In addition we have serious concerti as to the
Impartiality of the report;.
On page 24 the report states that the land not utilized by
the zoo facilities is suitable only for recreational use or
seasonal agriculture uses . It was explained to Mr . Smith that i
due to the nature of the business which involves the breeding
and display Of animals all of the land owned by the zoo is use-
able space . The .zoo has plans to expand and any Loss of Land
would limit the expansion. The widening of the road would in fact
have a substantial negative impact on any expansion not only due
to the loss Of space but also. for the need of a larger buffer
area . Security would also be required as a result of the
additional traffic .
on page 25 there is refearence to development and pre.-
requigites for subdivision approvai . The developerz wera
responsible for obtaininu easom,_-nts for storm water managemont
Cont . 2 , ATTACHMENT N0. 3
WD-41-92
i
THE ALL NEW
T 0.
BOWMANvxLLE
zoo
2.
prior to development and for which they were paying $70 . 40 per
square meter . Recognizing that development would also require
road widening , why would the developers not also be -responsible
for obtaining the lands for same . Why would the market value
of the lands -required for the road not be at least equal to the
amounts paid by the developers for the easement . In fact part
of the easement for which Mr - Sehickendanz is prepared to pay
$70 , 40 per meter lies across the lands to be expropriated .
On page 25 the author to the .report refers to and relies
on statements given by Mr . Schickendanz with respect to the
history of prior negotiations regarding the acquisition of
easements without any attempt for verification. Had the author
contacted our solicitor Mr , 3olotenko he would have learned
that the Facts were not as presented .
On page 26 it states that Schickendan2 Bros . Limited
applied to the Town of Newcastle , Durham Region , C .L .e.C . A. and
the Ministry of Natural Resources for relief from their
requirement to Obtain an easement over our property. Wq wonder
how this was possible considering protection afforded a property
owner under civil law.
On page 27 the author speaks of highest and best use .
Reference is made to contacts and comments from both C ,L . O ,C .A,
and the Town of Newcastie . We feel that under the circumstancee
it is highly unlikely that these agencies and in particular the
Town would have any positive comments . There are numerous
examples of parking lots being located in low Laying area,7 the
most current example bing the parking lot Sox they future C .O .
Station next to the 5th Wheel Aruck Stop. There are also
nl;merous examples to buildings and additions , C.L.O .C . A.
rOCently built washrooms and a parking lot in the ravine
immediately south of the Old Mill . In fact C.L. O . C .A . le offices
are located in floodplai.n lands . Regardless as mentioned earlier
all of the zoo lands are usablo for agricultural use .
On Na5c 20 Mr . Criii h i.ndi ca %toy that the subjQnr. 1 andq have
remained unci :ltivated and not in productive use . Since the zoo.
was acquired several years ago great strides have been made in
upgrading the facilities and increasing patronagge . Plane for
expansion including parking have been thwarted by the mown .
Mr . Smith ' s conclusion "that the taking of the required portion
of land will havo no eff6ct on the remaining retained portion
of the Subject property" is absolut�aly incorrect and the cost and
income approaches are very appropriate ,
Cont . 3
i
THE ALL NEW
f .
BOWMANVILLE
zoo
3 .
On page 32 the report deals with the 'Direct Sales
Comparison Approach" . All of. the exampics of sales used by the
appraiser as comparisons are totally unrelated to the lands in
question . We wonder why other examples or similar transactions
were not used. One example might be a recent purchase of lands
for road widening at the corner of Liberty St . and Baseline Road .
We also wonder why the market val,ae of an easement through the
property would be greater than a direct ownership of the lands .
On page 47 the report deals with damages attributable to
disturbance . The appraiser estimates the market value to be
$32, 000 which is the value of the fence Along Highway 2 .
We are totally confuse as to how this relates to the value of
lands along Mearns Ave . The fence was something that we agreed
to in a spirit of co-operation in order to avoid costly studies
and time delays for the Town. The cost of the fence is totally
unrelated to damages attributable to disturbance . We believe
that protective barriers would have been a requirement of approval
of the widening of Highway #k2 . In addition to the fencing
certain endangered species would have to be relocated during
construction . The cost of relocation and business losses due
to construction would be far in excess of the $32 , 000 fence .
Page 48 deals with Damages for Injurious Affection . Based
Upon some of the foregoing comments we do not agree with the
author .
We believe that the questions that we have raised are most
appropriate and deserve consideration . As part of the negotiating
process tae ask that the Town provide funding so . th,,At we may
Obtain our own independent opinion as to reasonablenes4 of your
appraisal. report .
At this time we are prepared to offer the following options :
0 -i 0 n 1
We are prepared to exchange our lands for lands owned by the
'own on the south side. of Highway #2 . Theso lands are similar
with respect to zoning and within the flood lines , therefore they
should have similar value .
�n- t--=i Q.Z.
We would be prepared to seI:L Li, , 7,ad aII0,,j nno rf�gillL�C� p1UC
the easement for storm drainage required for the sum of $100, Op0 . uu
This is a most generous offer considering the facts that the Town
already holds a letter of credit in the amount of $100 , 00p . 00 for
the acquisition of the easement and related channelixation plug
honeys Contributed by the developer$ for the road reconstruction ,
Cont . 4
THE ALL NEW
BO WMAN VILLE
zoo-
4 .
The costs of arbitration and expropriation wou3.d most likely
exceed this amount . In both cases we would ask that a security
chain lin}�, fence be installed along the perimeter of our
property after the road widening .
We would appreciate a written reply as to your decision
within 15 days .
Yours truly ,
BOWMANVYbLB X00
Alex Nagy,
President .
AN �hb