HomeMy WebLinkAboutWD-77-81 TOWN OF NEWCASTLE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Director's Report to Public Works Committee of June 9, 1981.
Item: WD-77-81.
Date: May 26, 1981.
Subject: Resolution 11 C-611-81.
Recommendation:
THAT this Report be received for information.
l�
Report:
Rezotuti.on # C-611-81:
"THAT aU outstanding Ae�sotutions and coA mpondence
netating to the conside&ati.on o4 AeconstAucti.on o4
the Newcastle V.i tage "cone" cftea (,sidewatk�s, ztottm
/seweU, cuAb,s and gutteu and pavement AauA4ac i,ng)
be deatt with by the D,i.AectoA o4 Public WoAh and
that a tcepo&t and Aecommendati.on be made to the
Pubt i.c GVwth Committee 4oA consideAatc:on".
The foregoing was pursuant to the approval of Public Works Comm-
ittee Resolution # W-126-81, which stated:
"THAT the Aecommendat%on in Report WD-72-81 be endoAz ed
and, upon the Aeappnata.l o4 the Connecting Link in
the Vittage o� Novcastle meeting the tequ ihements o4
the M.ini�stAy o4 TAans poAtat on 9 Communication's in being
necognized as 'de4 icient' , the Town Request Mini stAy
appno vat 4oA a Connecting Link ConstAuction PAo j ec t".
At the time of writing, Staff are not aware of any "outstanding
resolutions and correspondence" relative to the subject matter, and
this report, therefore, will document the background details of
same, and the involvement of this Department to date. (All file
data, to which reference is made, is attached) .
In 1978 the Village of Newcastle Connecting Link was discussed with
the Ministry of Transportations & Communications at the request of
the Newcastle & District Chamber of Commerce; upon appraisal of the
area, the Ministry advised that it did not meet the criteria for the
classification of "deficient", and this was recorded in the 1978
Needs Study Update.
�t
In 1979, the Connecting Link was again appraised, and again did
not receive the "deficient" status required by the Ministry for
the approval of a construction project. Report No. 131, dated March
19, 1979, noted the following:
"The lack of, or deficiency in, curbs and sidewalks, does
not constitute the total criteria in determining any overall
deficiency. Sidewalks in the Village of Newcastle have been
replaced with concrete in certain areas where elevations
cannot change if and when future reconstruction of the
street does occur. Where elevations could foreseeably change,
sidewalks have been resurfaced with asphalt. Curbs are, of
course, part of the street, as are gutters, and can only
be replaced and/or established during reconstruction of
the entire street".
At that time, in 1979, the notation was made that the Connecting
Link portion of Highway 2 in the Village of Newcastle (i.e. from
North Street/Baldwin Street easterly to a point 625 feet east of
Beaver Street) would be monitored as an ongoing item during future
Needs Study Updates.
In May, 1980, Mr. R.E. Dawson, then District Municipal Engineer for
the Ministry of Transportation & Communications, made an on-site
inspection of the subject area, and, once again, advised that it
did not meet the required criteria for reconstruction. In October,
1980, Council (Resolution # C-80-1286) referred the matter to the
Public Works Committee "for further consideration", at which time
Report # WD-151-80 was prepared, received and referred to "next
year's Committee". On file is a letter, dated December 8, 1980,
from Mr. H. Orlando (Regional Municipal Engineer, M.T.C) to Mr.
Sam Cureatz, M.P.P. , further clarifies the Ministry's position
with regard to Connecting Link construction.
In February, 1981, the Newcastle Chamber of Commerce made the
request that the situation be investigated, and Report # WD-37-81
detailed the updated findings. Resolution # W-67-81 stated:
"THAT the Aecommendati.on in Report WD-37-81 be endowed
and a 4uAtheA Aepmt be pAmented to the Pubti.c Works
Committee upon the compteti.on o4 the 1981 &e-appAa zat
o4 King Sweet in the ViUage o4 Newc"tte, which Witt
be undektaken as paAt o4 the ongoing Needs Study Update".
On May 4, 1981, by Resolution # C-571-81, Council requested a
further report on the status of the mentioned Needs Study Update,
and this was the subject of Report WD-72-81 to the last Meeting
of the Public Works Committee on May 12, 1981, resulting in Res-
olution # W-126-81; which was quoted earlier in this report.
C3\
I'trlil is il"(?rkN t f
It. , rilrtar,n 111 l.,fi j1
1hc nti ;trit4t 1„rf '171.\"I'
(I)nnoct,ing 1-i 11;, Mid U1 (mn UK2 rf_uppi ,ttti;rl uC lhc� C�.,nrt��cC.inl Link in t.h��
l'iii ;e of V111091 uS \t1nn4t1e 1" vLlnr; th�� rcrltu.rcrrt,rrt; of tlr
lv,tit�'a1�>i.7�> 11ir7i,try of "1'r•;ur>;lv)rLathm ;urcl Cl. rtra>,i.i� rrtl.un , .in Ix inr,
r �'ty riir. ti 101 ' ckMC nt ' tK "ltx�n MA IM*
N(inir;trj
;yirrvval .fur a C1.mnr��tln� link Cc �;ttrrc.ti.c�n I't��jcrt
',C'�1fi11II;I)'
Resolut_ian �C�G1Gaf31
Moved by Councillor i ay l or•, seconded byCounc i l l or 'Woodyu r•d
Reconstruction JHAT item 8 of the foregoing report be approved.
Connecting Link
Village of Newcastle?
"CARRIED"
- ;;- Rf'sol ution 1;`C-611 -�1
Moved by Councillor Namre , seconded by Councillor 'Woodyard
IHAI all outstanding resolutions and correspondence relating
to the consideration of reconstruction of the Newcastle
Village "core" area (sidewalks , storm
gutters and paverroxnt resurfacing ewers , curbs and
Director of public "Works and that aerepor•t and l�recor, gendation
be made to the public Works Committee for consideration ,
i
"C.;i�R1EU'
t
r
'
.
' \ !�C YV}��lC RuKKS \/CYAkIMCN�
Director's Kryorc to Public Works Committee of May 12 . 1981 .
Item: V 72-8l.
Date: May 8. 1981 .
Subject : Resolution # C-571-81. Needs Study.
Recommendation .
]]LA?, upon the rcupyc*1aal of the Connecting Link in the Village
of Newcastle meeting the requirements of the Ministry of Trans-
portation & Communications in being recognized as "deficient''
�
the Town request Ministry approval for m Connecting Link
Construction Pro]ucL ,
KenorL:
On Friday, April ], 1981 , u reappraisal by Staff of the Town
and the Ministry was unJcrcukco un6 , as a result, M.T.C. will
be uJviac6 of o Jculougc deficiency, and be requested to rec-
ognize same.
From the poLo, Of view of structural adequacy the section 1s
not JeLiciou , however, it is quite evident that a drainage
deficiency "x(ota onJ, if this is reco&nizeJ 6y the Ministry,
the Io^m may then request approval and funding for Connecting
' Link construction.
The construction project would consist of storm aewero , curb
and gutters , pavement resurfacing, but sidewalks would not be
eligible or included for subsidy; the only time the latter
become mu6vidizakle items' 10 when reconstruction alters the
elevations nnJ/nz widths' of the street.
`
�
_ ' |
/
�
Coun61 Minutes
May 4 1981
KcsuluLlun #0.566.81
%yed by Councillor Taylor , seconded by Councillor Woodyard
NAT the third and final reading of the following BY-Laws
ho approved:
N1 _49 , 81 -5U, VI -5l , 81 -52 , 91 -53 , 81 -54 , 81 -55 ,
41 -56 , 81 -57 , HI -58 , and 81 -60.
"CARRIED"
bliqlRtion #C-569-81
'Wooed by Councillor Taylor , seconded by Councillor Woodyard
By-Law THAT the second reading of BY-Law 91 -59 be approved,
81-59
"CARRIED"
V�I 3 t_U_L-LO �7(
Moved by Councillor Taylor, 5'econded by Councillor Woodyard
I the t h i r d .and f i n a l reading of By-Law 8 1 -5 9 be approved.
"CARRIED"
00WA. NAVAT
it evdi by Councillor Hamre , seconded by Councillor Hubbard
KAI the Director of Pub] ic Works report on the status of
thr provincial "needs study" being considered for that
portion of Highway ;2 , located in the downtown core of
"t as" Vi 1 We , to be submitted to the Public Works
ComiLtee within four. (4 ) weeks of the date Of this meeting.
"CARRIED"
ed by Councillor Hamre , seconded by Councillor Taylor
0. S. U.M.
VAI the Mayor , ih LonjuncLion With those Councillors that
Wended , prepare a report to be presented LO Council on
rly 19 1981 , on the recently attended convention of the
OrydnizaLion of .Snail Urban Municipalities ,
"CARRIED,,
'
?UNN OF NEWCASTLE YU8LlC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Uizecioc/ y Kc\,ori Co Public Works Committee of Nucc)` 17, 1981.
Item: WD-27-8I .
Date: March 4 ` I981.
Subject: V1Llo&c of Newcastle Connecting Link (Highway 2)
King Street, from Baldwin Street , easterly to
625 ft. east of Beaver Street. `
'
Recommendation:
THAT o further report be presented to the Public Works Committee
, upon the cwoy|edvn of the 1981 re-appraisal of King Street in the
Village of Newcastle, which will be undertaken as part of the on-
going Needs Study UpJate,
Report:
During the 1980 Needs Study Update, the Connecting Link (King
Street) in the Village of Newcastle was re-appraised and, at the
time it was found that this section of Highway 2 could not be
classified as 'deficient' as it did not meet the requirements of
the Ministry of TzaompncLutiou criteria for such categorization.
Ile xu}`]c,c matter was before this Committee in October of 1980
at which time Resolution 0 W-289-80 was passed, receiving Report
# W)/-151-80 and referring same to the 1981 Committee.
�
l[, as a zcsolc of the 1981 rc-uppculxul of Municipal 8oudu. it
10 found that the Connecting Link 1u deficient, in accordance with
Ministry criteria , then the relevant section would be recorded in
the 'now' Ncn(p [nvcnc"ry, at which time the Town may wish to seek
Ministry approval for o construction project which would be eligible
for subsidy.
In vie* of the foregoing, the earliest possible time at which con-
struction could be effected would be July-August , 1982.
JD:nh |
!
i
�
COMMUNICATIONS D 11
recti n
Newcastle. District hammer o commerce
Box 243
Newcastle,oritarlo LOA )HO
File # 8165
February 16, 1981
r
Corporation of the `.A:rats of Newcastle
Ityapton, Ontario
LOB IJO
Attention: J. McIllp
Dear Sir:
Be: Village of Newcastle - Main Strut
At the meting of the Neda stle ChWI-x r of Ccmmerce on February
9, 1981 a great deal of dlicussion centered around the state of the main
street in the Village. Mr. Barr indicated that a number of years ago a
representative from the Ministry of Transportation and Communication attendea
the village to assess the main street. Little or no results flowed from that
attendance. As such, the Chamber is hereby requesting that the Town arrange
for a reattendance Ham the Town to reassess the possibility of modifying the
tr><tin street and sidewalks.
The next m=eting of the Chamber is scheduled for Monday, March
9, 1981. If possible, I would appreciate hearing from you with respect to
the above, prior to that date..
Tian]] irxJ you for your anticpat.ed cooperation herein.
Yours - ------
i
J.`7aavid . n off;%
JLt1:BC Secretary
y,I 4W o .1
i
0 ario
-
Ministry of
Transportation and Central Region
COMMUniCatioII,,,,, 5000 Yonge Street
Willowdale, Ontario
Telephone: 2?,11-7531. M2N 6 E 9
1.980 12 08
Mr. Sam Cureatz, M. P. P.
Legislative Assembly
Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario
Dear Mr. Giii-eatz:
I am writing tt-) confirm our recent discussion on King's
Highway Connecting Links .
The Minister, tinder Section 19 of the Public Transportation
and Highway Improvement Act, may have certain local roads
designated as J<iII9.'s Highway Connecting Links . As noted
tinder sub-section 9 of section 19, a road so designated
remains under the jurisdiction and control of the municipality.
Responsibility for such road, therefore remains with the
municipality and is not transferred to the Grown.
Where a Connecting link is measured as deficient and Council
wishes to undertake some improvement, the municipality
should advise our District Engineer. In fact, late each year
municipalities are contacted so that all planned connecting
link WO"k is k1lowl, for preparation of our Ministry program.
Because of budgetary controls, all necessary improvements
planned by municipalities cannot be accepted for the year
Proposed. The more critical needs would have a high priority
on the program, and sorlie projects are deferred to a later
year.
Yours truly,
fl . Orlando
Regional Municipal Engineer
Central Region
TOWN OF' NK'WV)'HJ, PUBLIC U)J*, , J)j,j)Aj ,jMIINr
Director',,, RUI)O17L to Public Works (,on-miLtee of October 28, 1980.
ITDI: WD-151-80.
DATE October 21, 1980.
SUBJECT: Resolution # C-80-1286,
King Street, Village Of Newcastle,
BACKGROUND:
At the October 6, 1980, Meeting Of Council, Resolution # C-80-1286
referred the st6ject matter to tiie Public Works Coamittee for
further consideration.
King Street in the Village of Newcastle, from Baldwin Street/
North Street to 625 feet east of Beaver Street, is a Connecting
Link under the jurisdiction of the Town of Newcastle.
REPORT:
During re-appraisals earlier this year, King Street was inspected
and it was decided that, from an engineering standpoint, it is
not deficient-.. the re-appraisals were carried out in consultation
with Staff from the Ministry of 'I'ransportation & Canamications and,
more recently, Ole Ministry has again reviewed the Connecting Link
and endorsed the original assessment that the section was not
deficient.
CONCI.AJS ION:
In accordance with the subject Resolution ff C-80-1286 the Public
Works Comiiine(-, may wish to further consider the matter of the
King Street (Highway 2) COI-Inecting Link in the Village of Newcastle.
JD:vh
Taffi OF NIMCASTLE
1b: J. Wnlxui), Director of Riblic JVorks
n'om: J. M. Mellroy, A.M.C.T., Town Clerk
Date: October 9 1980
On October 6 1980 at Council meeting, Councillor Barr made a
motion that the M.T.C. inspector be invited to come to the
Village of Newcastle on October 17 1980 at 1:30 p.m, to review
'the main street with the possibility of having it declared
constructurally deficient.
The motion was lost but a subsequent motion that the matter be
referred to the PLiblic IV61:,Irs Committee for further consideration
was carried. (#C-80-1286) .
. I LVR REc WED
ECE
OCT 9 1980
TOWN OF NEWC,V'TLE
COP' `RATION OF THE TOWN OF NEW 'S`T`LE
OFFICF OF 111E TOWN CLERK �
,,`•_.. 0,� ;.; ;", - d) I EMPERANCE_ STREE r TELEPHONE 6231379
BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO
LIC3A6
April 11, 1979
Mr. Sam L. Cur.eatz, M. P.P.
Durham Last,
Room 443,
Legislative Building,
Queen' s Park ,
Toronto, Ontario.
M7A lA2
Dear Sir:-
Further to our letter of March 15, 1979, regarding
former Village of Newcastle Main Street, the matter
was considered at the meeting; of the Public Works
Committee held on April 3, and the resolution contained
in Report No. 131, was endorsed by Council on April 9, 1979.
A Copy of the report is attached.
A copy of your l.et:ter and the report is being sent to the
Newcastle Public Utilities Commission.
i
Yours very truly,
Joseph M. MW y, A.M.C.T.
Town Clerk
i
Y
�f
attach.
C.C . Newcastle P. U. C.
Councillor K. Barr and Wm, Clarke
oil
Director of Public Works 1979
m
F�
^
,s
i
TOWN OF
YQ��r J 1P A RTM E Xr
Director' s Report to Public Works Committee.
Item: COVI-cspondence from Sam L. Cureatz , M.P, p,
Date: March 19, 1979,
Subject : Connecting Link (Highway No. 2J
VILLAGE OF NEWCASTLE.
The attached correspondence was received from Sam L. CUreaLZ,
M-P- P- expressing concerns rQgarding the upgrading of Highway
2, Village of Newcastle.
Re port,:
During 1978, than Public Works Committee met with representatives
of the Newcastle & District Chamber of Commerce, in the Village
of Newcastle. At that time the Chamber representatives expressed
concerns to the effect that Highway No. 2. , through the Village
was deficient , and this included the curbs and sidewalks also.
The Connect Lug; Link includes that portion of Highway No. 2. from
North Street and/or Baldwin Street ) easterly to a point 625 feet
east of Beaver Street .
During the 1)t-epa rlIt ion of our Needs Study In 1975 the Connecting
Link was not classified as deficient ; it was again apprniRed in
1970, during the Needs Study Update and then, too, was not con-
sidered to be deficient.
It should he mated that the lack of , or deficiency In, curbs and
sidewalks, does not Constitute thp total criteria in determining
any overall deficiency. Sidewalks In the Village of Newcamtle
have been rep)aced with concrete in uertaL" areas where elevations
cannot change if and when future reconstruction of the street does
occur. Where elevations could
foreseeably change, sidewalks have
been resurfaced with asphalt , C"rhs are, of course, part of the
street, as a • gutters, and can only be replaced and/or established
during reconwitiction of the entire street .
2 . . .
-3
March 19, 1979.
RIgort, continued. . .
Mr. Cureatz m"kes reference to the lack of street lighting on
the main street. This matter Is the responsibility of the local
Public Utilities Commission and, presumably, this Committee will
present a recommendation for additional lighting facilities of
for the updating of the present system.
On July 14 , 1978, an on •site meeting was held with the Canadian
Transport Commission regarding the grade separation on Mill
Street. The atrnched Report # 67, and Resolution # W-267-78
gives all relevnnt details of the meeting.
Recommendat Lou:
1. THAT' the Connecting Link within the Village of
Newcastle be reappraised during the major updating
of tho Needs Study which will take place in April
or May, 1980.
2. THAT the lack of lighting facilities, as expressed
by Mr. Cureatz, be referred to the Village of
Newcnstle Public Ut'l-itics CO"unission.
3. THAT the attached Rqport # 67 , together with
Resolution # W-267-78, be endorsed by this Committee
until such time as definite development is indicated
by way of Agreements.
REPORTP67
To: Chnirman & Mvmbers of the Public Workm
-4 From: 1 . 101dulm, Director of Public Works.
Subject: Mill SLUVeL Village of NewcastLe,
Resulting from the appearance before the Public Works Committee of Mr.
C. Evert, on April 13, 1978, Resolution # W-140-18 was recommended to
Council as follows:-
"THAT we recommend that application is made
to the Canadian Transport Committee for the
reconstruction of the grade separation on
Mill Street . "
Council, on April 24 , 1978, amended the foregoing as follows :-
"THAT documentation be commenced bei ore app-
licat-Joll is made to the Canadian Transport
Committee, for the reconstruction of the
grade separation on Mill Street",
On May 11, 1978, the Public Works Committee approved a r-ecommenda t foil
contained in Report 0 44 which stated : "That a joint site meeting with the
Involved parties be arranged in order to determine If reconstruction is
warranted" (see attached) , Council adopted the latter at the Meeting of
M ny 24 , 1978.
As a result Of the above, Staff met with a representative of the, Canadian
Transport Cormnission on July 14, 1978, to review the matter, The commission
States that, for them to recommend 1 ,Qnstruction to the Urban Transport-
ation Committee, they would require an application from the Municipality .
However, proposed development would not be sufficient evidence to warrant
reconstruction.
Current traffic counts, accident reports and , most importantly, as signed
development agreement , would support an application for reconstruction;
also school bus
traffic and pedestrian traffic can be a factor,
With the exception tint a signed devOlOPmeni: agreement, the abovenoted could
be documented now. Kom our discussions with the Canadian Transport Comm-
Issi-On, it is highly unlikely that they would support an application for
reconstruction until development Occurs or a development agreement has been
signed for this immediate 31-va ; the"v eventualities would cause to traffic
increase.
lk
teoG 67
Mi I 1 .9 t r e e", 1_14 ew c a.'s I 1 L.
Lt: should -also bu no! rd that , in prvparing the Five Year Forecast for
Grade Separations (Yebruary, 1978) this project was forecast for 1982
at an estimated cost of $1 ,416,000. 00, of which the Municipal portion
in likely to he a minimum of six and a halt per cent .
In conclusion I would recommend that , upon develoVment in the area ,
further consideration be given to the reconstruction of the subject
bridge. I am of the opinion that , at that time, the Canadian Transport
Commission would be supportive of such a proposal by the Town.
VMS.,
Public Works ConniLlci'
COUNCIL Resolution U W-267- 18 .
Mill Street - sh)ved by Councillor Dykstra, :seconded by Counctlloi
Village of Cray:
Newcastle:
Grade THAT this Cowmitmv approves the recommendation
Separation : al the Director of Pohlic Works , an stated In
Report 0 67 , An followm : " that , upon dvvulnpmvnL
in the nren , further consideration he given to the
reconstruct ion of the subject bridge . . . . . And at
that time the Canadian Tr:insporL Commission would he
supportive of nuch a proposal by the Town" ; and
further that a copy of the mentioned Report 0 67 be
4enL to to Director of Planning for his information ,
"CARR 1 ED"
40 1 (.fs',r'f. i:ANC[ 41 2(_f ( TE 6.kif NON j-3JI9
�� IiU`Vl�\latJVIC •. 1', ONI AR IC?
t.IC JA6
IRS, n % March 151h, 1979
,
b�
Mr. 1— Coreatr,
Queen 's Park
Room 4 1 3
Legislat i , u iiuildi-nl
Toronto , Ontario
MIA 1A2
Lear Mr , cnroat .. .
1hAlik you for your letter dated March 7th, 1979 regarding
farmer Vi I : Age of 11ewc:ast le main street ,
Yator ! otter has been referred to the Director of Public.
Works for u report and recommendation to the Public Works
Committee .
We .steal l ;advise you of action taken A due course.
Your, very truly,
j0 cl,h M Mc11roy, A.M.C .T.
wn Clerk
J MM: 7 t `/
c .c . fl or of i'ubI ic. fiorYs w
i
i I
s Pmk ORKe: t'or)%Iimvocy Office-
= fi
V4
jShH"! 8WWWV R /
'JUMIA FWK I 1C AAI
!A IAA
16) 065 4 106 n Honw Addi(!Nt
MW
Swn L . CUM= MKI Nlw-w�lh- l )11, 11,)
I.0A 1110
Mnrch7 , 1979
Clerk I Town of Nawcastle Council.
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ont .
LIC 3A6
Dear Sirs :
Representatives of the Ch"Inber (,c Collullerce and
concerned businessmen in the Village of Newcastle approached
me and our local and regional councillors for Ward 3 to express
concern about the lack Of aesthetic development in the Main
Street of the Village. They felt there should be co-ordination
between all levnis of government and various Boards to help the
Village to bw :It t. 1 to nest Only prospective purchasers
but to the residents of the village.
Upon jnvomtiqation it would appear that the Ministry
of TransporLaLiwn L Cu""unjuations and the Town should b(_p
approached about the possiblo upgrading of Hwy 2 , huoping in
mind that specilic kerbing and Eidewolks within the Village
are a municipal YesponsibiliLy .
There ha% w also been yuustionb about the lack of liyhLin,j
facilities on rLe Main Street , and I hope your Works Department
might investigatc this matter,
I have approached and ' will again approach the Ministry
of Transponation h COMMuni rat. ions for the upgrading of jj,.-� , I
east of Newcastle and for pressing a new CN overpass at Mill St,
under the UTAP program.
I will Kc working with our local and region councillors
of Ward 3 , hut in the meantime , I trust that throvill a concerted
effort a long VOM Plan might he devised to enhanQ the VillaqQ .
Yours
cup
M E M 0 N D U M
To: HAyor 0.0; Rickard and
Member$ A Council-
Mr. A. Guiler, Tovn Manager.
From: J. Dunlvurt, Director of Public Works,
Subject: Village of Newcastle.
Resolution # W-148-78.
Date: May 4, 1978,
The above Resolution # W-148-78 stated:-
THAT the Director of Public Works arrange a Meeting,
in the Village of Neurastle, with the Newcantle Chamber
of Coiiroerce, in order to discuss the concerns expressed
by Mr. Barr in his letter, and that Mr. Barr be so ad-
vised of the Meeting.
Accordingly, Mr. R. Willsher of the Chamber. of Commerce
has advised that the Meeting Is schedule for TUESQY�
Hay 23, 1978, at 7:00y the Newcastle IQ, Hall. !?
A copy of Mr. Barr's original letter to Council is att-
ached for your information.
E 13 1978
,�
TOWN 0, NEWCASTLE
Al L . _u. _ . .,r:.
„ . in, o JI Nq gavtlrTi, _M
Saar
I am writin. tD y 3u as an INdivi u l a r l n u t member if any _ . .
iaation.
ivc cor.sileration tDT r:iv ply: -
1. 2urin; toe litter moptI. �r tti... t;
.O;.'an ti li nr i n Advi
4010 010 wai a r�. _•Pt!..r, Vat fort' ly tY p ,:r' t-r i, v ,,
to the P'lwct tYat th,r� wcul i c 1 nnw 112
Villa, if `eyva2 L]. , r,,i,..� was r
l
�. .t., in ?ez• that .,, ,.j .art. y/,
to I nn thn A,-oi in II
... ., c1strilt, 11,n }7 t.,., .7 0M/. "in HUMP" 1:V +I r
,? Pt.i' i. r !, ir. nr?< r t ± . r) 1 of thi. ._
y bu dune, Ewp,vor, A _.. .:ortain 1 17 r._ `, ! A;, K t r i. .. ±t.`r:-i � !�
Q you ten tlenrL .
2, ie main i tr/,r t, i., t z < r't r .1. L ,
1 T r t..
is is nyl ira Ip __ .. .iti.;... 1112 . 1 "t. } A L. 1° a
l �r'7V(�' to fj rot_nl
starlar ,, , thin .'..._'l,. l_ 10, '_ . ? �n ' W4 �
la.rkit _ >� w� t i z il+ '.'..Ie 1.
:�:; ';? L40
low
W situation In lj Or? )Y.An, -W yt Ar, A -r"+i7d ts it Worr
are possitly thrae -iY"rQnj toil-: 4volv, in k 7 ,1
W, artmunt A Trar .rf I TOMMUnIcatKnn , jouncil aY
ReClan of Durhar Ouval . 1 wauld , uZC-yt that nc firpt itpp -ould p- 1)
have a ractinj L"Y- in N. wnastl- Villa sit, m_nwrp f tin ativ.-
mentioned Lovurnin. LAW and myr-Ir W a r3np of the Village buyiner,;
peoi;le. 'Frie y,r KHry ; urpose woul 1 W W 21= the n%tt, r "in Ap npnt"
and brinE forth inf,rratlon and suj:entlons to arrint, in havin� t1,i:5
matter brou§t t) fr:;1 L Wn There ire Indicitlinn of further comrprnlal
developm, nt on th, nark AN of Kin; AWnt an! thil soul! hive i bpirlw
on both 1 , an jr-s- Ow .
I await yjur ua:ly OvIaL in thrYU nAttfr_
Rank you.
With n. Tarr, Citkan.
cc: - Mr. A junhLn, Director, hublic Wirko %,1 _Twwn 0" Newcant1r ,
N r. 3 h0 w 1 c V, n n 1 r I D a r L;• n t, 1 o n n Y ';p w can t I a.
41
�
�����0���0 ' 8 ���� ��� �� � �����1� �� ����������
~��� ���� `�,�°° �� ����� �����"* �* .����������4K� \�
��k*���� A�����8°��0�������
����� ��� ��������o«��»v�
J. DUNHAA8/ Director
Hmrnntun, Ontario
LO8lJO
416: 2612231
Mr. K. N1llxhrr,
President,
Newcastle Chamber of Commerce,
P.O. Box 243`
NEWCASTLE.
UuLorio, '
LOA lR0
^ April 25. 1978.
Dear Sir:
I attach hereto copy of letter to Council from Mr. Keith Barr.
On March 27th, 1978, Council referred the matter of the 0o1n
Street, Newcastle, to the Public Works Committee, and the aub-
ject was discussed at the meeting of the latter on April 13,
1978.
Resulting from the foregoing actions, the Public Works Committee
yuuyeJ Resolution # W-148-78, as follows:-
"'[U&7 the Director of Public Works
arrange a Meeting, in the Village
of Newcastle, with the Newcastle
�
Chamber of Cnmmercc, in order to
�
discuss the concerns expressed by
Mr. Barr in his letter, and that
Mr. Barr be so xJv1ur'| of the Meeting".
i would be glad if you would arrange for the item to be placed on
the AgaoJu, and advise m, of the duLe of your next Meeting. It also
would be greatly appreciated if you would notify my office well in
advance of time in order that I may endeavour to arrange for the
ottcnJour, of Momkccu o[ Council ,
I look forward to hearing from you In the very near future.
Yours truly,
J- DUN>b\M.
Director.
cc : Mc. A, Gui ),c.
Mr. J.M. H,lIroy.
./D:vh
'^^r
/