HomeMy WebLinkAboutTM-49-80 `IM-49-80
ICJ: Claai_11nan and Members of the Finance and
Achninistration Committee
h'ROM: A. C. Guiler, Town Manager
DATE: September 29th, 1980
SUBJECT: Modi f ieat ions Washrooms, I Itunpton hall
Resotution #F-150-80
it) accordance with rcso l uL i on #F-150-870 as appvoved Ley Counc i I. Resolution
#C-80-924 'Totten, Sims, Ilubicki were .instructed to ctury.out a study for
the proposed washroom improvements for the Hampton Hall to .comply with
Ontario Regulation 972/1975 and the. initial report from Mr. Winclover is
attached as Schedule "A".
In reviewing the drawings attached to Mr. Windover's letter dated July'
22nd, we noted that the existing mechanical room was omitted and we also
requested that he prepare preliminary estiiva.ted costs for alternate sewage
systern "see Schedt i l e "B" letter dated AugUS L LI th, 1980.''
During our cli_seLlssion a further question wa-s raised by the Hall Board as
to if the present facilities would meet today's health standuds. First
of all, this hall was constructed in Lhe late 1950's and the design would
have met the Department of Labour's standards and requirements of the
Comrnulity Centres Act in order to receive provincial grants for the Community
Centre. Secondly, it would also be fair to state that the kitchen facilities,
met health requirements at the time of construction.
The Hall Board is now requesting COUnCi L immediately institute proceedings`
to renovate and for replacement of the existing washrooms serving the
hall to comply with Ontario Regulation 972/1975.
In considering the request for irmiediate action the following points
should be considered:
1. Is Lhei-e a need for an expanded facility in the Hampton area
and should this particular point not be considered in the Recreation
Master Plan Study.
2. That the Hall Board should hold a public meeting to ascertain
if the community of Hampton can support the maintenance costs
of such an expanded facility and repay the capital. construction
costs as we have required other Hall Boards to do.
3. Will we require the use oC the present facilities for expanded
municipal administration until such time as we are prepared to
consolidate our administration into one location.
111449-80
4. If vacated, will the Hall Boaxd be able to maintain and utilize
the upper portion of this building and assume the additional
maintenance, costs. Based on 1_979 costs the additional cost would
be al)proximately $3,093.07.
It is staff's recommendation that the request for the expansion of this
facility not be considered mid the matter referred to the Recreation Master
Plan Study Cbin ttee to be considered as part of their report to Cbuncil..
I
(1