HomeMy WebLinkAboutTM-23-80 TAK23-80
TO: Chairua.n and M(vibers of the Finance and Administration
01111)i 1,kv
FROM: A. C. Guiler, Town Mannger
K. DeGroot, Treasurer
"A
DATI : June 18th, 1980 (;
SU13.TLC1': Resolution F--130-80 �
Resr olution F-130-80 requests a report regarding the 1979 deficit. To
relate to this effectively some thought must be given to the type of
operation and the outside activities which influence the municipality
butcannot be controlled by it. Tie municipal operation is canposed
of a number of independent units. That is, we have a number of
extxnditure units which do not react to the same stimulae and have
practically no relationship with the revenue which supports these
activities, which is dramatically opposed -to the private sector where
various parts of an operation are closely alligned and move together
in concert in their reaction to various types of stiirntlae. I point out
this canpari_son only to emphasis the lack of relationship between the
❑o veinent of revenues and exj)endi.tures.
We operate in a situation where the major portion of our revenues
are static, that is, they do not change regardless of what happens,
they are taxes and government grants. However, a large portion of
expenditures are dynamic in nature and respond to various stimulae.
For example, fires must be put out, holes in roads fixed and grass in
parrs cut, etc. These VAMP work constantly in different ways
which is one of the reasons that in the past there have been overall
surpluses when individual areas have been over budgeted. In 1979
these stlmMe have largely worked in the same way effecting a sizeable
deficit which was compounded by the error in estimating the 1978
year end position for 1979 budget purposes. This particular error
was brought to Council's attention when the 1978 Financial Statements
were presented to Council's attention in 1979 by the auditors,
Deloitte, Haskins and Sells, on September 4th, 1980 and were received
for information by Resolution A-327-79 on Sep-t:c-nber 4th, 1979.-
In describing the stimulae that affects the municipal operation, I
note that they are mainly generated outside the organization, and on
some we have no influence, but must react accordingly, these typically
are the changes in interest rates and the court of revision action on
reducing taxes. Other activities such as the deterioration of a .
section of road, sane influence can be had as to the timing of repair,
but one must respond to the problem.
_2_
having described the activities that affect budget performance one
can see that some ai-o conti,ol.lable and that others are not. Nineteen
Seventy--Nine was a particularLy volatile year as it relates to
interesl. WAnn. The si tuM(mi is now rettnrning to nx)re reasonable
levels but even the Country's Lop economists are at; odds as to which
direction that interest rates should move, and we mast resign ourselves
Lo being spectators. It should also be noted that the majority of
bugetary interest expenses reflect in higher earnings for the various
reserve funds as the part: of borrowings is from these reserve funds.
The high level of assessment losses experienced at the assessment review
court in 1979 was both unexpected and unpredictable, but because of the
Unique circumstances which caused it we do not expect a. recurrence
of this situation.
The short fall in the dog ILcenee revenue was created by unique
ci_reunsLances and the department involved has embarked on a new
collection procedure in 1980 which it is hoped will prevent this
short .Fall. The area of livestock damage is a largely uncontrollable
i teal and is _unposed on the municipality by the province. I would
note that the 1980 claims already exceed the 1979 level and in fact,
exceed the 1980 budget allocation.
In the area of road maintenance and park maintenance, which I
believe are affected somewhat by climatic conditions, in order
to ensure that expenditures remain within budget the departments
cannot freely respond to such conditions but mast consider the re-
allocation of priorities and if necessary reduce the planned program
in another area to accommodate the new priority. Timing would affect
this since late in the year it may be impractical to switch resources
from one activity to another.
The cost of consultants and legal counsel in the area of planning is
related to the level and type of representation required with respect
to O.M.B. hearings. In these cases council must evaluate the future
benefit to be derived from the current expenditures to defend these
actions at the O.M.B. A factor to be considered in relating to budgetary
control is information and knowledge, in this respect I believe the
financial reports being received by the various departments are the
best information relating to budgets that they have received in the
history of the Town of Newcastle, but they are not perfect. They are
the best; possible, given the resources available for that area and
the operating methods of the municipality. A totally centralized
purchasing system would allow the develolxment of an encumbrance
accounting system, however, I do not feel that the benefits outweigh
the expenditures required.
Reflecting on the previous financial statements I find that in the past
there, have been si ea.ble vari-ances from the budget which have all been
favourable,but nonetheless a.re variances from the planned program and
this constant favourable variance may have caused all of us to relalti
our concern with the budgetary control,
_3-
In conclusion, I would note that the 1979 operation deficit is
$347,852.00 compounded by the unrecognized 1978 deficit of
$96, 150.00. The A Niched anal ys i s ;shows the areas o C over-
exlx mdi.tu_l'e wh i ch account I'or this di r Cerence.
V � 1979 1979 S ITLUS
BUDCE'T WIM (DEFICIT)
Taxation 10,024,174 10,207,603 1S3,429
Unconditional Grants 434,360 454,283 19,923
Revenue (Specific Functions) 1,220,700 1,2367226 15,526
Gather Revenue 670,026 671,200 1,174
12,349,260 12,569,312
EVIENDITURES
General Government 660,080 782,721 (122,641)
Protection to Persons & Property 455,611 468,180 ( 12,569)
Transportation Services 2,603,745 2,859;884 (256,139)
Environmental Services 337,725 303,017 34,708
Health Services 16,924 14,376 2,548
Social & Family Services 19Dc 17,958 1,024
Recreation & Cultural Services 659,767 6867992 ( 27,225)
Planning and Development 290,350 389,811 ( 99,461)
Levies 7,441,834 7,394,225 47,609
12,485,036 12,917,164
3477852 1979 Deficit
96.150 1978 Deficit
444,002 carried forward
Analysis 1978 Estimates & Actual
Budgets Estimates Actual Difference
General Government 579 880 579 044 60 000 ( 29 , 956 )
Protection to Persons & Property 457, 180 465 160 478; 790 ( 13 , 630 >
Transportation Services 2 , 399 , 180 2 , 212 , 198 2 , 343 , 689 ( 131 , 491 )
Environmental Services 196, 974 213 , 556 214, 670 ( 1 , 314 )
Health Services 14 ; 495 13 , 244 13 244 -
Social & Family Services 15, 000 17, 149 17 , 149 -
Recreation €. Cultural Services 633 , 150 628 , 243 627 , 360 883
Planning & Developement 228 ,730 156, 218 156 , 218 -
41524, 583 4, 284 , 812 4'_ , 510 , 120 (225, 308 )
Levies 6 , 729, 888 6, 818, 018 6 , 818 ,018 -
11 , 254 ,477 11 , 102 , 830 11 , 328 , 138 -
Revenues 11 , 254, 477 11, 255, 057 11, 255, 057 -
- 152 , 227 ( 73 , 081 ) (225 , 308 )
1979 DEFICIT A�?4LVSIS
ACTUAL BLDGET
GENERAL GOt`ER.IQ= $736,422 '$620,450
Contribution f ran Reserves 11,571 30,000
724,551 590,480
Difference 134,071
Interest Costs 106,693 Over Budget
_I NALY S= AS FOLLOWS
Changes in Interest Rates fran 917c to 1711c during year $ 25,000
Creation of Courtice O.H.A.P. Reserve 22,000
Reduction in Taxes collected 10,000
(Due to Econaric Conditions)
Financing Charges Due to Deficit 30,000
Carrying Charges Capital 30,000
(Arenas over Anticipated Amount)
$117,000
TABS S17RI=i OFF 30,950 50,950 20,000
Due to unanticipated large number of successful
appeals after implementation of section 86 re-assessment,
especially as related to vacant residential land.
1979 DEFICIT ANALYSIS
Actual Budget
PROTECTION TO PERSONS & PROPERTY. $468,180 $468,511
REtiT-7L ES
Building Permits 54,4 4-6 55,000
Plumbing Permits 3,887 7,000
Dog Licences 29,859 40,000
Fines 8, 183 9,000
96,375 111,000
371,805 357,511
Differences 14,294
This difference can be attributed to large livestock damage claims
especially mink claims.
Claims Total 11,093
Budget 3,000
$ 8,093
Dog Licences were $10,141
Below budget largely due to not being able to implement past collection
procedures due to the individual involved being incapacitated and
no adequate replacement being found.
1
t
i
i
1979 DEFICIT '\?ALYSIS
Actual Budget
PUBLIC WORKS
7202- Administration $144,906 8138,100
7203- Overhead 245,384 212,015
a -
7204- Construction Bridgers & Culverts
-028 Lots 30 & 31, Cone. 2 12,021 3,750
-036 Various Locations 70.D/19 50,000
-044 Lot 30, Cone. 4 6,121 5,000 _
1
-049 Lot 31,Conc. 4 & 5 119,587 120,000
-058 202
' -072
2,114
-115 Lot 29, Cone. 3 4,808
-185 Lot 18, Cone. 5 5,000
Sub-Total Construction Bridges & Culverts $214,902 $183,750
7205- Construction Roads & Streets
-007 King & Simpson Traffic Signals 2,355 25,000
-008 hots 30 & 31, Cone 1 Railway Signals 4-90
-010 Hot Mix Re-surfacing 118,329
-014 Waverly Road (2,407)
-026 Mearns Ave. R.R. Crossing 5,644 8,000
-056 Lots 30 & 31, Cone. 2 7,583 8,000
-084 Lot 33, Cone. 3 99,643 125,000
-085 Lots 30 & 31, Cone. 3 4,780 22,000
-088 Lots 30 & 31, Cone. 5,000
-127 Lots 21 & 24, Cone. 6 99,447 70,000
-226 Solina Road 5,383 16,000
-285 Lots 29-32, Cone. 3 45,129 68,000
Page 2
1979 DEFICIT ANALYSIS
PUBLIC VURKS Actual Budget
7205- Construction Roads & Streets
-290 Lots 21 & 22, Cone. 2 9,374 5.000
-331 440
-388 Lots 32 & 33, Cone. 8 6,125 32,000
-561 Baseline 7,358 5,000
-596 King Street 92,751 100,000
-630 Concession Street, Liberty-Mearns 7,952
-663 Mearns Ave. 40,652 30,000
Sub-Total Construction Roads & Streets $551,048 5519,000
7206- Maintenance Bridges & Culverts
-332 Bridge & Culvert Mtnce. 31,239 17,000
-353 Entrance Culverts 5,287
$ 36,526 S 17,000
7207- Roadside Maintenance 95,000
-312 Brushing 38,518
-313 Ditching 69,468
-325 Weed Cutting 15,256
-341 Catch Basin Maintenance 24,866
-343 Storm Sewer Maintenance 15,243
-345 Sidewalk Maintenance 27,273
$190,624 S 95,000
7208- Hardtop Maintenance 191,000
-319 PavEment Patching 105,450
-350 Pavanent Working 5,869
-351 Surface Treatment 96,799
$208,118 $191,000
Page 3
1979 DEFICIT ANALYSIS
Actual Budget
PUBLIC WORKS
7209- Loose Top Mai_nrenance S600,000
-314 Dust Control 323,949
-316 Gravel Patching 64,555
-317 Gravel Resurfacing 263,793
-351 Maintenance 3,739
-352 Dragging 70,28
726,323 600,000
7210- Winter Control 360,000
-326 Sncrx; Plming 108,893
-327 Sanding & Salting 152,124
-328 Snav, Removal 14,076
-329 Snow Fence 18,4E
-346 Spring & Fall Clean up 19,802
313,307 360,000
7211- Safety Devices 51,000
-318 Guide Rails 5,668
-321 Signs New & Repair 24,807 _
-330 Traffic Signals 347
-340 Railway Crossing 15 ,523
46,345 51,800
Page 4
I
1979 DEFICIT ANALYSIS
YUBLIC WORKS Actual Budget
7212- Miscellaneous 1 80,000
-320 Patrol & Radio Rental 13,729
-353 Boundary Roads (2,250)
-500 Bldg. Maintenance 29.84-0
-501 Fencing 3,461
-502 Walkway Mtnce. 243
-503 Blvd. Dance. 329
-900 DTisc• 15,952
7213 Connecting Link 6,508
67,812 80,000
Total Expenditure 2,745,295 2,446,865
Revenues
6300- Road Improvanent Grants 1,142,000 1,142,000
-207 Entrance Culverts 7,570 1,000
6400-
-033 Mearns Ave. 40,652 30,000
-034 Solina Road 13,917 16,000
-030 Debenture 37,668 36,215
1,241,807 1,225,215
1,503,488 1,221,650
1979 DEFICIT ANALYSIS
Actual Budget
Recreational & Cultural Services Expenditures $733,716 5678,842
Revenues
Recreation Grant 9,000 9,000
Reserve - Park Equipment 46,621 33,000
Reserve - Library Books 25,000 -
80,000 42,000
Difference 16,253
$653,095 5636,842
This difference is attributed to greater manpower and
material requirements in Parks Maintenance.
Planning Expenditures 53881394 S300,000
Revenues
Business Improvement Areas 24,999 -
Rezoning Applications 8,555 6,000
Carymittee of Adjustment 3,520 5,000
Subdivision Control 1,500 8,000
Sale of Publications 4,498 2,000
Service Charges 1,968 6,000
Reserve - Courtice Costs 49,793 75,000
Recoveries frcn Developers 62,648 -
40,316 50,000
197,797 152,000
Difference 42,497
$190,597 S148,000
Related to the costs incurred for consultants and
and solicitors in relation to Ontario Municipal Board Hearings.