HomeMy WebLinkAboutFND-014-02
,~::'~W',\"",.,...,
, /,,'
"__\,~ 'i
--';,:
" --J~
~;/ii'
AE' 'PORT
"- -'
":;: ,,' ">",", : ":<:,.. '. ,i.::;: ,',,:: ::
.. '':~ ; ~ t~, ", ..~ ";':. , . ','!'
I .' , - .
, . ~"., , ,,; .: -- -, ,-;--", :" - :" -,;::-'
FINMCE.DiPAR.......T
~
Date:
.. . ' .
GENERAL PURPOSEANOAWlItilltSTRATION ~
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 23,.. Re.I~ ttlbffh ~0:J..
Meeting:
R.po,U': Fti~1~,.o2
Ffte #;,
'l
By..... ,:
.,
$l(bject: MUNJOtPAL~_rlB"ES ~ *2002
, ,~
',. ~!: L L.~
Reoommendatkms:
It is respeGlfUlly ~ the GeneraJ ~i'.and AdmiQi~'\!tlYeCommitlee '
recommend toCouooit the fOllowing: ' ' '
c." .
1. THAT ReportFND-014.Q2 berecetl.l!Id_infomlation.
,j...:,,~',~;t.~~ t~' .. ,
. ," , " ",', ,
__.., ~II .'_by.cJ~-"~
. ~ M. ; . B.BA, C.A.<',' FranklinW.u..
Dlfector Of Finance " . ChiefAdmmist~Offreer
~~
NMTlhjl
:~~
J'tJ!'
:~',:!'20i"
'~ ',,--,;""\
':k\;~~~i,::" ,c
'>;'-
"
./
REPORT NO.: FND..o14-02
PAGE 2
BACKGROUND
1.0 On December 10, 2001, the ProvinCEl~nced the formal requirements for
Year 2 (2001) of the Municipal P~Measures Program (MPMP).
1.1 The requirttd measures have been fifedWiththe Ministry Of Municipal Affairs and
Housing and are included as Sc~\.lIe ".A".
1.2 Theprpvindehas mandated thaUn.~$Ures be published. for taxpayers'by
SePtember 30; 2002. The informatiorl~ be posted on the Municipality's
website.
1.3 The provincial objectives Of the MPMP!i~ to enhance accountability to
taxpayers, increase taxpayer awa~.~ !>hare best practices between
municipalities. New measures were '~for.2001. As well as some measures
from last year have been refined. .
FUTURE ,MEASURES
2.0 Indirect costs are those that are 1l9l~!>arily directly incllJded in the costs of
theqepartment providing direct se~itothe public, such as Human
Resources, Information Technology; 815. well as corporateco!>ts such as Council,
CAO. Clerks, et(:. To ensure that ~ costs lilre comparable betw$ell
municipalitie$.a common methodol_fOrtheallocationOfthese costs is
necessary.
2.1 . A modeHorallocating indirect costs '.~'~ .approved. Its. use was optional for
2001 buliS required for 2002. CI~has adopted the model for 2001 and
this is reflected in our measures as~d. We will further enhance;thiSln
futureyelilFS.
CONCLUSION
3.0 It is recommended that the Munlcipal.~ce Measures Program results for
2002 be received for information. . . .
Schedule "A" ....Performance Measures,
c~1!tPNOF THE; MUNJqlPALJTY OF Cl.ARJHGTON
40 TEMPERANCEsmEET. BOWMANVII.L1S,ootNtlO L 1 C3A6 T (900)623-~7!l F (900)$23-0608
.
1308
,
.
Schedule "A"
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
DESCRIPTION OF MEASURE 2001 2000
Portion of operating costs spent on general 9.47% 10.66%
government administration
Operating costs for fire services per $1000 of $0.90 $1.02
assessment
Operating costs for paved roads per lane $509.15 N/A
kilometre
Operating costs for unpaved roads per lane $1,585.24 N/A
kilometre
Operating costs for winter control per lane $736.54 $612.83
kilometre
Operating costs for solid waste collection per $13.68 $12.10
tonne
Percentage of paved lane kIn rated as good to 81.66% N/A
very good
Percentage of winter event responses that meet 100% 92.59%
or exceeded maintenance standards
Garbage collection complaints per 1000 0.46 N/A
households
Percentage of new development units within 98.22% N/A
settlement areas
Designated agricultural land in Official Plan 100% 100%
preserved
* N/ A means not applicable, as these measures were not required for 2000
1309