HomeMy WebLinkAboutEGD-06-02
,
~ ~- ~
Cl!1!il1glOn
REPORT
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Report #:
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
Resolution #:(:jf+~Dlq-D;J.
By-law #: f![)(X) -II
MONDAY, JANUARY 21, 2002 ~1
EGD-06-02 File #: D.02.25.02
Meeting:
Date:
Subject:
TRAFFIC ON BLOOR STREET, COURTICE ROAD TO SOLlNA ROAD,
DARLINGTON
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report EGD-06-02 be received;
2. THAT, based on the recommendations of the Clarington Traffic Management
Advisory Committee, Durham Regional Police and staff, that the request to lower
the speed limit on Bloor Street between Courtice Road (Regional Road 34) and
Solina Road from 80 km/hr to 60 km/hr be denied;
3. THAT the request for a hidden entrance sign east of 1915 Bloor Street be
denied;
4. THAT staff periodically monitor the area for increases in vehicle speeds, volumes
or collisions;
5. THAT Durham Regional Police be requested to consider providing periodic police
enforcement as they feel necessary; and
6. THAT Bill Paterson be advised of Council's decision.
4~. / /
C:~1
Submitted by: / . {~
A.S. Cannella, CET.,
Director of Engineering Services
'"
ReviewedbQ ~ ~~
Franklin Wu
Chief Administrative Officer
RDB*ASC*ce
729
.::....
REPORT NO.: EGD.06-02
PAGE 2
1.0 BACKGROUND
On October 15, 2001, Bill Paterson appeared as a delegation and submitted a
petition from residents of Bloor Street from Courtice Road to Solina Road,
requesting a speed reduction from 80 km/hr to 60 km/hr and that a hidden
entrance driveway sign be installed to wam motorists of unexpected hazards.
This matter was referred to the Director of Engineering Services and to the
Clarington Traffic Management Advisory Committee.
2.0 COMMENTS
2.1 Review by Clarington Traffic Management Advisory Committee
The traffic and speed concern presented by Bill Paterson was first reviewed with
members of the Clarington Traffic Management Advisory Committee at their
meeting of November 15, 2001. At that time, members were encouraged to visit
the Bloor Street location and surrounding areas and bring their comments to the
December meeting. The meeting of December 20, 2001 included representation
from Durham Regional Police, Staff and seven of the eight voting members from
the public. During the initial discussions there were a wide range of comments
but a consensus was reached.
2.2 Speed Zone Legislation
The Highway Traffic Act stipulates that rural areas are 80 km/hr and urban areas
are 50 km/hr. The Act also provides a Municipality with the authority to create
other speed zones such as 70 km/hr or 60 km/hr with the passing of a By-law.
The section of Bloor Street between Courtice Road (Regional Road 34) and
Solina Road is not included in the speed schedules of Clarington Traffic By-law
91-58 because it is considered rural and assumed to be 80 km/hr for enforcement
purposes by Durham Regional Police.
730
--
'-
REPORT NO.: EGD-06-02
PAGE 3
2.3 Traffic Speed Studies
Staff conducted two speed sample studies in the area, which showed the
following average speeds:
Date
Aug 20, 2001
Nov 28, 2001
AveraQe Speed
74.2 km/hr
73.0 km/hr
Vehicle Sample Size
36
52
2.4 Posting of Speed Signs
The Municipality of Clarington, like many other road authorities, does not
generally post its rural or concession roads at 80 km/hr for a number of reasons:
. the speed limit of 80 km/hr is enforceable under the Highway Traffic Act
without signs being posted.
. some motorists feel uncomfortable on rural concession roads and drive at
slower speeds and that by posting a sign stating 80 km/hr, it will only
encourage the slower motorists to speed up to the posted speed limit.
The Highway Traffic Act considers all rural roadways to be 80 km/hr but from an
engineering perspective, the posted speed should be 20 km/hr below the design
speed. The design speeds of many rural and concession roads in Ontario are not
100 km/hr. The design speed can vary widely from road section to road section
based on a number of factors including: traffic volumes, number of property
access points, surface width, surface type, shoulder width, grade changes, sight
distances, weather conditions and other hazards. Drivers are provided positive
guidance with supplementary warning signs such as curves and advisory speed
tabs, but it is the driver's responsibility to operate their vehicle in such a manner
that they have care and control based on their surroundings.
731
'=
REPORT NO.: EGD-06-02
PAGE 4
Although the average speeds were considered reasonable. there appeared to be
a wide variation in speeds. The operating speeds ranged from the low 60's to the
mid 80's with the fastest motorist observed at 104 km/hr. A wide variation of
vehicle speeds on any roadway makes it more difficult for motorists entering
traffic.
Lowering the posted speed to 70 km/hr or 60 km/hr in this rural setting would not
increase safety as the actual operating speeds would not likely be reduced unless
there was frequent enforcement. Enforcement is difficult to obtain with ongoing
complaints from other areas and the existing Durham Regional Police staffing
levels.
There was discussion among committee members about posting 80 km/hr signs
but that would only encourage the slower drivers to increase speed. It was
resolved to leave the area as an unposted 80 km/hr zone as per the Highway
Traffic Act. A speed reduction on Bloor Street could also prompt further speed
reduction requests in other similar rural areas stretching the police resources even
more.
2.5 Posting of Hidden Intersections or Driveway Signs
There was also a concern about a number of dips in the roadway and requests for
hidden driveway signs. Measurements from driveways and intersections along
the roadway showed that the entrance points were not considered hidden at an
operating speed of 80 km/hr. These warning signs should be used sparingly to
ensure effectiveness by installing them only at locations where motorists travelling
at the legal speed limit would encounter very short sight distances and have
insufficient time to stop or avoid a collision.
732
..:
REPORT NO.: EGD-06-02
PAGE 5
2.6 Motor Vehicle Collision History for Bloor Street from Courtice Road to
Solina Road:
Nov 10. 1998
Motorist hit two deer, which ran directly in front of the vehicle causing her to lose
control and drive into the ditch.
None in 1999
October 31, 2000
A mechanical failure disconnected the trailer from a tractor-trailer unit causing it to
lose control then colliding with a hydro pole.
March 11, 2001
Slippery road conditions, vehicle slipped into ditch and turned onto its side.
2.7 Bloor Street Characteristics
The homes on Bloor Street are in a rural setting, outside of the Courtice urban
boundaries, with structures built well back of the travelled portion of the roadway.
Although there are 19 homes spread out along this 1.7km road section, there is
also a large amount of rural farmland or open space between Courtice Road and
Solina Road. This road section is constructed to rural standards with open
ditches and narrow shoulder width. Reconstruction of the roadway to proper
urban standards would not occur until urban development expanded into the area.
Future improvements to increase pavement width and elevation changes to
remove the dips will improve safety, but may also bring about higher vehicle
speed as motorists would perceive the roadway to be safer.
733
'-
REPORT NO.: EGD-06-02
PAGE 6
2.8 Comparison Between Bloor Street and Hancock Road
Hancock Road, just north of Bloor Street, is posted at 60 kmlhr and a comparison
between the two locations was reviewed with the following results:
Item
Contructed As
Regulatory Speed
Road Classification
Road Length
Number of Homes
Bloor Street
rural standards
80 km/hr unposted
Arterial
1.7 km
19
170m
Consecutive Length of Residential
Frontage
Changes to Residential Environment
(Residential to Rural)
9
Hancock Road
rural standards
60 km/hr posted
local
1.6 km
27
770m
o
Hancock Road has a more consistent residential setting than Bloor Street which is
more rural. More homes are placed consecutively on Hancock Road, giving a
more residential setting to support the existing 60km/hr speed zone posting. The
roadside environment on Bloor Street changes nine times between residential and
rural, which does not provide a consistent residential setting.
3.0 CONCLUSION
The physical characteristics of Bloor Street, roadside environment, density of
homes, sight distances, collision history and average operating speeds, combined
with observations of the Clarington Traffic Management Advisory Committee
members, did not indicate that a serious problem existed to justify a speed
reduction at this time.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Key Map
Attachment 2 - Petition Presented to Council on October 15,2001
734
.~
REPORT NO.: EGD-06-02
PAGE 7
Interested parties to be advised of Council's decision:
Mr. B. Paterson
1909 Bloor Street East
Bowmanville, Ontario
L 1 C 8S1
Durham Regional Police
Constable Keith Richards
77 Centre Street North
Oshawa, ON
L 1G 4B7
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1 C 3A6 T (905) 623.3379 F (905) 623-9282
735
~- rr====~ ~ l/
. ------I
l .
JffiEHB
r-
I
J
_/
II
It
1/
"
.,
"
"
"
"
Ii
Ii
II SUBJ
SITE
J
~
=---n--
,
-----, ~ghw.-
'r~~~
f---
~~
"0 I
0::1
""
u
o
u
c.
m
J:
,
,
,
--1
I
I
.----(
i
___J
,
,
-----1
---I
I
'J
I
"0
0::
Q)
u
1::
::l
o
()
I[ J
I ; -'----'
iE
I
BloorSI
~I!
~'I
~Jl
~
'"
.
"
"
o
,
#1682 I #1882
(22) \ (26)
,
_..I~_.__.
II
,
II"
,I I
=l
r:::::'
, !lllg
I I I I I 1___________
---------- I_LLL--.I l::::=:::--~____________
---------- ~
~n---, r-r- "
l.J "
1
I
I
1
LEGEND
#1862 . Municipal house number
II
1--
,
I
1
J
"0
0::
m
.!:
o
rJl
(22) - Distance in metres from house to road allowance
II
Ii
~-
#1776
(18)
L~
LJIT" '177'
(17)
...... -.--
'I _~I-I
#17~ .,788
(20Z~I(.20)
\ L'
, .
4[-----,----r-\-r-i~ 11B53~ 7~".,
\ ! . / \ \ J' ~ (32) X/ _ (23) I I~, '1H5
1787 fld21~'-135 '1849: I \ ) \
")1(14)(9)~28)1I18.i#166Sl'189511!K!1'1SlO9
(13)/ (18) (21) ~_ (23)
-~ / I
ILJ !II_'
1RUtTOl
~~,
;11 ~
"II I!
_...I
BloorSt -
~
'"
I
-.
Jl{
W~e
8
-~ - ~~= _l_J:."","'RJI
~~~~d~:= !ICI~,EY
DRAWN BY: J.RM DATE: .i!\N._2002~j,
I REPORT EGO.....'. ....~I I
ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ~
B..'. ._._
j-
"
I
MAP
Ii
736
...
-'615&26 ~M 4:02:59
To: C1arington Municipal Council.
Due to a lack of any posted 3F1ilID LlliRT in ll~OJ l"'''''~~dt)dl aJ.~ .wQ ~Wie OllIUUlerous
yehicles trayeling at very excessive speeds. we the undersigned residents on BLOOR STREET
between SOLIN A RD. and COURTICE RD. do hereby request that:
:.1.:<;; f'f'\'I1:H.JTIQ
,. c.....
!.:..~.....
,-:.'.".-.,
,; ORfClMt. i" .
A: A Speed Limit of 60 K.P.H. be established and posted .' "'__._.
1 COPIES T0, .-'
r 1-
B: A' HIDDEN ENTRANCES'sign be erected on the Nonh side well East of the driveymy _
at #1915 Bloor SUo be an efIective wamingofthese HAZARDS (refer to Ron Baker'sou-site .~..= 17-
observauons Aug. 2001 ;:.~~... ..': ~L
h7">f.:~'
:.'- #/ _4~
. ----
:JCK. ay ...... ~
-* 141< 1.,<;/
5 () L) /J A- f'.-'!:J /0
NAME
l3v2i) /
p'
PHONE
I 90 J- 436 ->>~
;:7
737
y. '~JI,I
ATTACHMENT NO.: 2
REPORT NO.: EGD'()6'()2