Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-6-96 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON REPORT I Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File# ������� Date: February 5, 1996 Res• #Qn—_ By-Law# Report#:-� 6-96 File#: Subject: PROPERTY ASSESSMENT FOR WILMOT VALLEY FARMS LOT 32, CONCESSION 6, ORONO OWNED AND OPERATED BY MR. AND MRS. MURRAY BALL Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report TR-6-96 be received; 2. THAT Council provide direction on either of the following options: (a) approve or (b) reject, the request made to credit or refund taxes; and 3. THAT Mr. and Mrs. Murray Ball be advised of Councils' decision and that Councils' decision is final. BACKGROUND AND COMMENTS: Mrs. Anne Ball has requested that this report be placed on the public agenda and has asked that if the committee can not reimburse the funds, they consider requesting the Assessment Office to reconsider her request for reimbursement because their error is of significant financial value. Mrs. Anne Ball contacted the Tax Office in November of 1995 to make application under j Sections 442 and 443 of the Municipal Act. Sections 442 and 443 of the Municipal Act allow for a cancellation, reduction or refund of taxes where a gross or manifest clerical error has been made. Section 443 only allows an application to be made to a maximum of the two (2) years proceeding the year, in which the application is made. The Regional Assessment Office reviewed the application and recommended a reduction of the total assessment for the years 1993, 1994 and 1995. The total assessment was reduced by 1759 from RP5224 to RP3465. I i i R1AP6FD - 1-1- 7 O 1 I RE 'HIS IS PR­DM RECYCLED PAPER TR-6-96 Page - 2 - The following is a breakdown by year of the total refund issued. Year Assessment Mill Rate Taxes to Be Reduction Refunded 1993 1759 x 688.482 = $1,211.04 1994 1759 x 691.902 = 1,217.06 1995 1759 x 695.795 = 1,223.90 TOTAL REFUND $3,652.00 The Balls', however, feel the issue of the years 1990 through to 1992 still needs to be addressed (see Attachment #1). If an additional write-off for the years 1990 to 1992 were calculated, it would be as follows: Year Assessment Mill Rate Taxes to Be Reduction Refunded 1990 1759 x 605.371 = $1,064.85 1991 1759 x 636.229 = 1,119.13 1992 1759 x 663.543 = 1,167.17 TOTAL REFUND $3,351.15 I I The Municipality has acted appropriately and already given the maximum refund it was obligated to. The Municipality's authority to cancel or grant a refund due to an error is found solely in Section 442 and 443 of the Municipal Act. The only other avenue for a taxpayer is to appeal their assessment. In this case when the property was transferred in 1989, a Notice of Property Valuation would have been sent by the Regional Assessment Office. This notice would have indicated how to launch an appeal if you did not agree with the assessed value. Unfortunately, Mr. and Mrs. Ball did not appeal immediately and the onus is on them to do so. The notice will indicate a deadline in which an appeal is to be made. An appeal cannot be made now against previous years as the Assessment Act does not allow this. 702 TR-6-96 Page - 3 - Conclusions: Council has two (2) options: (a) To Write Off: Based on a previous legal opinion the school boards and region are not obliged to absorb a share of the taxes not specifically authorized in sections 442 and 443. Therefore the Municipality would have to absorb the entire cost of $3,351.15 by way of a Municipal grant charged to general municipal expenses. The net effect being that the other municipal taxpayers would ultimately pay the cost. (b) No Write Off: Advise Mr. and Mrs. Ball that Council is not of the opinion that it is in the best interests of the Municipality to write off taxes. (i) It is not allowed through the appropriate legislation; (ii) In light of recent provincial cut-backs, the Municipality is not in a position to absorb costs by way of a Municipal Grant. (iii) This precedent would present a financial risk to the Municipality as we would be opening the door to future applications. Respectfu submitted, Reviewed by, rie A. Marano, H.BSc.,A.M.C.T., W.H. Stockwell, Treasurer. Chief Administrative Officer. MM/hjl Attachments I i i i i 703 } ATTACHMENT #1 January, Wilmot Valley Farms ►Y, , 1996 Jt`N I �,;.;� Mr. & Mrs. M. Ball 3313 Conc, Rd. 7, R.R. #2 L3E'? ""!.i-!�til` ORONO, Ontario The Honourable "' LOB i MO Y r Hamre t , ►s, Municipality o- arin ton o_r 40 Temperance Street BOW MANVILLE, Ontario L1 C 3A6 Dear Honourable Mayor: RE: PROPERTY ASSESSMENT FOR WILMOT VALLEY LOT 32, CONCESSION 6, ORONO FARMS OWNED AND OPERATED BY MR. & MRS. MURRAY BA LL Upon receiving our assessment late fall of 1995, we called inquire how we are assessed. A few questions were exchanged Plus 1 acre portion was wrongly assessed the your Assessment Office to a residential home from a farm home. This fa originally and found that the house We found out it had been changed in 1990 to Family', February 18, 1880 and has been passed dow through been a working farm for as long as we could Possibly purchased by "The gall Assessment Office Y know• Were tld by th generations. It has (Terri-Lynn Francis) that in 1989 upon transfer of o names the person doing assessments in this area may have driven y Regional were not farming our farm. His assumption was wrong and wnerass into our been overcharged approxtmatel even o and assumed we Y $1,000 to $1,400 per year.b With the fheln/andWe have consideration of Ruth Swan and the current Assessor for this received a rebate of$3,652.00 for 1993 - p sincere the Provincial Legislation (Section 1995 which was allowed by the Municipal Act!n a grievance the.first year, buhad 442 o knowledge are now aware we should have file change made when we took over the farm. d of assessments or that there was a We are still concerned about the overpayment in .1990 to Your consideration of this matter would be 1992 greatly appreciated. Y .urs truly, i Murray and Anne Ball cc: Marie Marano, Treasurer Ruth Swan, Tax Collector All Council Members I • 1 ASSESSMENT OFFfCE INFORMATION W A R D 1 1 - 7 DAVID O'BLENES WARD 1 8-16 GWEN MCDERMOTT WARD 11 STEVE GALLOWAY WARD X TERRY FRANCIS -F' r'� ATE- �/61-f1V MINISTRY OF FINANCE 1 ASSESSMENT REGION #13 OFFICE GALLERIA STE 170, OSHAWA CENTRE Al&L �S f 419 KING ST WEST OSHAWA ON L1J 2K5 432-8444 1-800-268-2224 SC-6880