Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-97-82 i 4 i CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAMPTON, ONTARIO LOB 1 JO TEL. (416)263-2231 REPORT TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 14, 1982 REPORT NO. : PD-97-82 SUBJECT: GROUP HOMES RECOMMENDATION: It is respectfully recommended: 1 . That Report PD-97-82 be received for information. BACKGROUND: In response to the delegation of Bonita Cunningham at the Council Meeting of May 25, 1982, Planning staff have again reviewed the group home issue and feel that it would be helpful at this point to summarize some of the information contained in earlier Reports relative to the question of acceptance and location of group homes. The group home concept, or the concept of community care, has for several years been the subject of studies, debate and concern, in many Ontario municipalities. i Report No. : PD-97-82 . . ./2 Provincial experts suggest that it is financially efficient to house certain special care populations in group homes. They have also concluded that this type of care is far more effective for some types of individuals than is institutional care, as living in the community brings the special needs population one step closer to community independence. This philosophy has been the basis for the Provincial "push" towards the de-institutionalization and community acceptance of group home type care. In order to implement this objective, the Province has asked municipalities to assist them by allowing group homes to establish within the residential communities. The Province has asked that group homes be permitted anywhere that dwellings are permitted. A number of municipalities in Ontario have responded to the Province's request and in some situations have found themselves in a position where, because of their willingness to accomodate the Provincial objective, they now house more group homes than would be considered necessary to serve their population. "High density" placement of group homes i does not serve the residents well , as it does not provide them with the intended "normal community setting" that was part of the concept of group home care. Overcrowding can also disrupt the established community. It is unfortunate that overcrowding situations have occurred and have, in effect, given the group home concept a bad name. It is quite possible that many residents and many municipal councils are reluctant to accept the group home concept because of these isolated situations. Report No. : PD-97-82 . . ./3 The Region of Durham responded to the Provincial request by amending the Regional Plan to have group homes included as a permitted use in most areas where single family dwellings would be permitted. Once this "principle" of establishing group homes had been established in the Regional Plan, the responsibility for dealing with this sometimes controversial land-use moved to the jurisdiction of the local council . Through zoning by-laws passed under the Planning Act, the local council has broad-reaching powers to control the use of land and the erection of buildings and structures. It is i through the Zoning By-law that the Town has the opportunity to respond to Provincial requests, and to implement the policy of the Durham Region Official Plan. The Planning Act does not, however, give the Municipality jurisdiction over the operation of group homes. This responsibility remains with the Province. The Municipality's role, therefore, is one of either permitting or not permitting group homes within the various zoning categories in the Town's Zoning By-laws. Staff feel it is very important not to lose sight of this key role that i the Municipality plays and to bear in mind that the Municipality does not have powers to control the management of homes once they are established in accordance with zoning provisions and, in our situation, once they are registered as group homes with the Group Home Registrar for the Town of Newcastle. Report No. : PD-97-82 . . ./4 The approach taken by Newcastle Council through the recent adoption of several By-laws aimed at recognizing existing group homes, is an attempt to accomodate the Provincial objectives as well as protect the character of residential communities. Most of the existing group homes have operated for some time in the Town and there have, to our knowledge, been few, if any, problems related to these homes. However, the changes incorporated into the Zoning By-laws would require that any new homes be rezoned. As in any rezoning situation, each application would be viewed on its own merits to determine if the use was appropriate in the area. Council would have the opportunity at this stage to consult with Provincial Ministries, local residents and experts in the field of community care. The rezoning process gives Council the opportunity to review each site specific situation and to be in a position to make a responsible decision. The position taken by Newcastle Council may be considered overly restrictive by those strongly in support of Provincial objectives. However, this approach allows Council the opportunity to review each request and to be directly involved in the establishment of any additional homes. Planning staff feel that, through this framework, Council has effectively addressed Mrs. Cunningham's concerns. Group homes may not be established without a detailed review, with each case viewed on its own merits. Local residents will Report No. : PD-97-82 . . ./5 have the opportunity to respond and object to any such application through the normal rezoning procedures. Re s pectf 11 X submitted, T. T. Edwards, M.C.I .P. Director of Planning FA*TTE*mjc June 1 , 192 1 r