HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-48-82 CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
HAMPTON, ONTARIO L081JO TEL. (416)263-2231
REPORT TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING OF APRIL 5, 1982
REPORT NO. : PD-48-82
SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION APPLICATION - GATEHOUSE HOLDINGS
PART LOT 35, CONCESSION 2, DARLINGTON
f �1� (COURTICE URBAN AREA) 18T-81034
} y� OUR FILE NO. : S-A-1-7-2
RECOMMENDATION:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the
following:
1 . That Report PD-48-82 be received; and
2. The Region of Durham be advised that the Town
of Newcastle has no objection to the approval
of proposed subdivision 18T-81034 as submitted
by Gatehouse Holdings Ltd. , subject to the
* conditions set out in Attachment 1 to this
Report.
i
BACKGROUND:
On September 14, 1981 , the Region of Durham received a
re-submitted application for subdivision from Gatehouse
Holdings Ltd. The proposed plan would create 123 single-
family residential lots and provide for the construction of
126 semi-detached dwellings.
XA Alt
✓!/ SCE
Report No. : PD-48-82 . . ./2
The subject site is within an area designated for
residential development within the Durham Regional Official
Plan and is in conformity with the Courtice Urban Area Plan
and the Courtice South Neighbourhood Plan.
In accordance with Town of Newcastle and Region of Durham
procedures for circulation of subdivision proposals, this
application was circulated to a number of departments and
agencies. The comments received are summarized as follows:
Newcastle Public Works
"l . That the Developer enter into an Agreement with -the
Town and this Department be kept informed of the
status of same at all times.
2. That all Works be designed and constructed in
accordance with the Town of Newcastle's Design
Criteria and Standard Drawings.
3. That any easements which may be required by the Town
be granted free and clear of any encumbrances.
4. That the lands indicated as road widenings be
dedicated to the Town.
5. That the Applicant agrees to enter into a Cost Sharing
Agreement with the Town of Newcastle and the City of
Oshawa."
Newcastle Fire Chief
"Comments:
The proposed subdivision is located approximately 2-1/2
miles from existing fire station #4, Courtice, with a
response time of 6 to 9 minutes.
I
Land use and developments of this nature will require
upgrading fire department personnel and capital expenditures
e.g. apparatus and related equipment to provide proper fire
protection for the Courtice Area.
I
i
J 1,d
Report No. : PD-48-82 . . ./3
Water Supply for Fire Protection:
In accordance with Durham Region design criteria and
standards, for Communal Water Systems to supply both
domestic and fire flow requirements minimum of 500 G.P.M.
and residual pressure of 20 P.S.I . Access for fire
department equipment taking into account:
1 ) connection to public thoroughfares
2) weight of firefighting equipment
3) control of vehicle parking"
Newcastle Community Services
Newcastle Community Services Department had recommended that
Block 190, a 0.5 ha park block, not be accepted and that
cash be taken in lieu. However, Planning staff believe that
because it may be some time before other parkland is
available to residents of this development, it would be
advisable to accept this parkette as part of the 5% parkland
requirement with the balance to be taken as cash in lieu.
This block would represent approximately one-half of the 5%
parkland requirements.
Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority
October 1 , 1981
"With respect to the latest plan, revised to 02 September
1981 and proposing 186 lots, we feel the top of bank
delineation is at slight variance with site conditions at
the rear of lots 30 to 35. An examination of the 26 January
1981 plan to which our March 1981 comments apply indicates
that rear lot proximity to the top of slope was less
pronounced than is the case with the latest revision. The
Authority has no objection to the principle of development
on the lands in question. We must recommend, however, that
draft approval be deferred pending the resolution of the
following points of concern:
1 . Block 189 should be expanded to provide a minimum of 5
metres of table land to the rear of lots 30 to 38.
This would create a buffer area between the Farewell
Creek valley and the lots noted, and would ensure that
foot traffic in this public open space area does not
occur on steep valley slopes. This revision should be
considered a minimum requirement.
2. The stormwater management plan for the site must be in
conformity with the Courtice Storm Water Management
Study adopted as Authority policy 21 October 1980.
Due to the presence of steep, heavily wooded
i
i
i
SCE
Report No. : PD-48-82 . . ./4
topography to the north of the subject lands, the
location of a proposed detention/retention facility in
the valley and the route of the proposed trunk sewer
to the proposed pond should be subject to detailed
investigation. Since these locations and alignments
are often dictated by existing road configurations and
grades, we would prefer not to have the design of the
runoff control plan prejudiced by predetermined road
(and lot) layouts. This point is underscored when it
is noted that development, also likely to drain to a
proposed pond facility in the valley, may possibly
occur to the east of 18T-81034. The least
environmentally disruptive pond location and trunk
sewer route which would serve the relevant tributary
area(s) should first be determined.
3. The development of the subject lands may significantly
alter groundwater recharge and Farewell Creek base
flow functions provided by the site. The Darlington
sandy loam, which is the predominant soil of the site,
permits above average infiltration of rainfall and
snowmelt. Numerous wet areas near the valley floor in
block 189 may represent the surfacing of the local
water table. We are concerned that impervious
surfaces may reduce available recharge and create
moisture conditions unfavourable to the existing mixed
forest in the lower valley area, and interfere with
established base flow augmentation particularly during
the critical low-flow period.
The type and degree of impact on valley lands and the
coldwater streamflow regime of the Farewell Creek which may
result from development should be determined by a detailed
hydrogeological impact statement prior to the granting of
draft approval . The road and lot layout and park/open space
allocations indicated in the draft plan may require
extensive revisions in order to implement the site specific
recommendations in the requested impact statement.
Moreover, the truncated roads on the east side of the draft
plan, if approved as indicated, at this time, may
predetermine development to the east where we have similar
concerns for site hydrology. We do not object generally to
the development of the lands in question, but would request
that the approval of internal design be withheld to permit
greater flexibility in carrying out the environmental
analysis."
I
I
._ �
Report No. : PD-48-82 . . ./5
March 22, 1982
Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority staff have
advised that they have received and reviewed the requested
stormwater management plan and hydrogeological study.
Authority staff have indicated that, in light of these
submissions, they are satisifed with the development pattern
and are prepared to recommend draft approval .
Region of Durham Works Department
"This Department has reviewed the above noted draft plan and
wish to provide our comments as follows:
Sanitary sewer servicing will require the construction of a
sub-trunk sewer from the intersection of Townline Road and
Grandview Drive, northerly, then easterly to the east limit
of the proposed development. Said sub-trunk sewer will be
sized to accommodate lands to the north and east of the
subject lands.
Water supply can be provided by connection to the existing
1200 mm feedermain on Townline Road. A main connection of
600 mm to the Townline feedermain is required to be extended
to the east limits of the proposed plan in order to service
said plan and to provide for an eventual feedermain loop in
the water system for the Courtice area.
With respect to the abutting Regional Road No. 55 (Townline
Road South), the road widening and reserves as shown on this
draft plan are generally acceptable to us. However, we also
wish to request a 6 m x 15 m sight triangle on aloor
Street/Townline Road intersection as marked in red on the
attached plan.
On the basis of the above, we have no objection to further
processing of this draft plan subject to the condition that j
adequate sewer and water capacity is available at the time
of signing of a subdivision agreement."
Ontario Ministry of the Environment
"The Regional Municipality of Durham's Works Department
advises that a sub-trunk sewer is required from the
intersection of Townline Road and Grandview Drive to this
site. There is an existing water main along Townline Road
which can provide adequate water to service the site. No
problems are anticipated therefore in terms of available
servicing facilities.
II,
I�
Report No. : PD-48-82 . . ./6
Our staff have indicated a concern regarding possible
adverse effects on Farewell Creek. However, we are in
receipt of comments from the Central Lake Ontario
Conservation Authority which require the implementation of a
stormwater management plan and preparation of a detailed
hydrogeological impact statement. On the basis of the above
and provided that the recommendations of C OCA are carried
out, we would not object to approval of the application."
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
"The above described plan of subdivision has been reviewed
at this office. Our chief concern is about the hazardlands
associated with the flood plain of the Farewell Creek.
These lands are located in Block 189 on the plan.
Recommendations:
Based on the above we would recommend that this plan be
approved subject to the following conditions:
1 . That the municipality's RA Zoning By-law contain
provisions which would have the effect of prohibiting
all buildings and structures in Block 189, except
those necessary for flood or erosion control .
2. That the owner agree in the Subdivider's agreement, in
wording acceptable to this Ministry:
(a) to comply with the Fill , Construction and
Alteration to Waterways Regulation of the
Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority as
it applies to this site and to comply with any
conditions made on any permit which may be
issued under these regulations.
(b) to neither place nor remove fill of any kind,
whether originating on the site or elsewhere;
nor alter any existing vegetation in Block 189
without written consent of the Central Lake
Ontario Conservation Authority.
(c) to erect a snow fence, or other suitable
barrier along the rear of lots 30 to 38
inclusive to prevent the unauthorized dumping
of fill or alteration of vegetation in Block
189. This barrier shall remain in place until
all grading, construction, and re-sodding on
the site is completed.
i
Report No. : PD-48-82 . . ./7
In order to expedite clearance of these conditions, a copy
of the signed Subdivider's Agreement should be sent to the
District Manager, Ministry of Natural Resources, 322 Kent
Street blest, Lindsay, Ontario, K9V 4T7."
Ministry of Transportation and Communications
"This subdivision does not abut a King's highway and, at the
present time, is not affected by any plans of this
Ministry.
The developer should be made aware all roads must be
constructed to a standard eligible for future subsidy
purposes.
We will not require copies of the final or registered plans
for this file. However, we would like to be advised of the
registration date and number."
Ministry of Agriculture and Food
No objections
Ontario Hydro
No objections
Bell Canada
No objections
Northumberland and Newcastle Board of Education
no objections
COMMENT
As the submitted comments suggest, there are no major
unresolved concerns related to the proposed plan. Planning
staff are therefore prepared to recommend draft approval ,
subject to the conditions set out in Attachment 1 .
Respectfully , su�bmitted,
T. T. Edwards, M.C.I .P.
Director of Planning
FA*TTE*mjc
March 23, 1982
I'
j S cdJ
ATTACHMENT 1 TO STAFF REPORT PD-48-82
TOWNS CONDITIONS OF DRAFT PLAN APPROVAL 18T-81034
1 . That this approval shall apply to a draft plan of
subdivision dated Janaury 26, 1981 , revised on
September 2nd, 1981 as prepared by Donevan &
Fleischmann Co. Ltd. , Ontario Land Surveyors.
2. That the road allowances included in this draft plan
be dedicated as public highways.
3. That the streets in the plan be named to the
satisfaction of the Town of Newcastle.
4. That all one-foot reserves and road widenings shown on
the revised plan be dedicated free and clear of all
encumbrances to the appropriate authority having
jurisdiction over the abutting road.
5. That the developer agrees to enter into a suitable
cost-sharing arrangement for the upgrading of Townline
Road South.
i
6. That the Owner shall enter into a Subdivision
Agreement with the Town of Newcastle, to include, in
addition to the Town's usual requirements, the
following provisions: The Owner agrees to:
a) design and construct all works in accordance
with the Town of Newcastle Design Criteria;
b) satisfy the requirements of the Ministry of
Natural Resources and the Central Lake Ontario
Conservation Authority relative to the
development of the subject lands;
c) to satisfy all other requirements of the Town
of Newcastle, financial or otherwise.
i
7. That the necessary amendment to By-law 2111 , as
amended, of the former Township of Darlington, now in
the Town of Newcastle, be approved and in effect.
8. That the owner agrees in writing to satisfy all
requirements, financial and otherwise, of the Region
of Durham.
i
I
FA*TTE*mjc
March 23, 1982
I
i
KEY MAP
FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON
LOT LOT 1 1 LOT I LOT LOT ( LOT LOT LOT LOT
R 35 34 I ( 32 I 31 30 I 29 u 26 I 27 26 i
I I I I I I p
► i I I I I ?
m
I I
I I I ( I coultTice
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I ► I i I I o
SUBJECT ► I ►
SITE i I J
I ► I I I 49 ► }
IaerroroAL ► I aoao I "A 22
i 1
1 I I I I I I
i I I ► I
I 1 i I YI
( I I
i j i I i t o
j I I 1 I !
pA14WAr
1 i PACIFIC I
f AMAOIAk
0 250 500 100
500 100