HomeMy WebLinkAboutP-157-79a yowwM,
Sol
()F "I"HE't-DAIN CY NEAVC-ASTLE
PLANNINGAND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1). IN. Smi th , M.(-
'. 1. P., D I redar
HAMPT0% ONTAR W L Wo TFL. (416) 2612231
I.IE'PORT 'TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING OF August 23, 1979.
REPORT NO.: P--1` 7-79
SUBJECT: Subdivision Agreement - William and Viola Ashton - Solina
The attached subdivision has been negotiated by Town staff in
accordance with the terms and conditions, recoraniencled by Town Council
*kti, I
and approved by the 1 IiStl.7v of: Housing.
The agreement is based on the Standard Form of Subdivision used
for small subdivisions on private services, and provides for the develop-
ment of the subdivision in two stages. The proposed agreement has been
reviewed by Department Heads and has been revised to incorporate their
concerns.
The only contentious issue in respect of this agreement is the
staging plan proposed by the applicants.
Since the applicants are committed to sell several lots in the
northern half of the subdivision, the first stage proposed for develop-
ment includes lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, as shown on schedule "B" to
the Agreemenh
Ints 1, 9, 10, 11 and 12, as well as the connection of Hillside
Road to the 6Lh Concession would be included in the second stage.
._ 2 ._
Lt is noted that.: Town Council, by resKuti.on in. May of 1978
has . l k) aed Lhe Lot per year growth aLlocat,_o.I as spucif.ied in the
Sol ;. a 'lamlet Development Plan to this Pian o _ Subdivision, Council
a1.;_ o specified that: the subdivision plan should proceed in two regi s—
nrat i n 3 or Phases. Th.i_s ,requi.re ment of Council was subsequently re—
scinded ,at t hu request of the applicant:. It is noted abov<, that the
app i.i ant will be proceeding with the subdivision plan in two phases
desp[ru earlier discussions :in this respect,
ShaEf wish to make the Committee aware that. the Davis subdivision
plan abuts this plan of subdivision and will he dependent on the com—
pletion of this Plan for access. As the yearly growth allocation for Solina
has been allocated to this plan, the Davis plan will not be in a position to
proceed to the building permit stage for some time. ;staff note that the
Ashton :subdivision submission predates the Davis proposal by several years
.and may he considered in that light.
In reviewing the subdivision agreement, staff note that a revision
to clause 2(e) on Schedule G to the agreement (page 27) is required. The
applicant is to submit a revised Schedule: G for inclusion in the agreement:
prior to execution by Councdl.
That tb.e Planning and Development Committee recommend to Town
Council_ that: the subdivision agreement for the. Ashton subdivision plan
be executed by the Town subject to the inclusion of a rev:i_sed. Schedule G.
Respectfully submitted,
J°
NJ -'i' t lb D. N. Smith, M. C.I.P.
Encl. Director of Planning