HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-162-86 TOWN OF NEWCASTLE J Cpl
fifi =1
REPORT File #/}o j
Res. #(-4, ,
/
�. By Law #����
MEETING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DATE: Monday, June 16, 1986
REPORT #: PD-162-86 FILE #: DEV 86-28
SUBJECT: APPLICATION TO REMOVE THE (H) HOLDING SYMBOL FROM THE
"(H)RH - RESIDENTIAL HANILET" ZONE : BEING PART OF LOT
24, CONCESSION 5, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON
THOMAS GASCOIGNE
OUR FILE: DEV 86-28
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-162-86 be received; and
2. THAT the application submitted by Thomas Gascoi gne requesting the removal of the
(H) Holding symbol from a parcel of land in Part of Lot 24, Concession 5, former
* Township of Darlington be approved and that the attached by-law hereto be forwarded
to Council for approval .
BACKGROUND AND COMMENT:
On September 4, 1985 applications LD 316/85 to LD 324/85 (inclusive) , submitted to the
Land Division Committee for consent -to create nine (9) residential lots was circulated to
Staff for consideration and comment. The applications were scheduled for the Land
Division Committee's meeting to be held on September 11, 1985. In consideration of the
applications filed, Staff in responding to the Land Division Committee offered no
objections to the applications subject to the following conditions:
. . .2
REPORT NO.: PD-162-86 Page 2
1. Payment to the Town of Newcastle of the appropriate lot
development charges.
2. Payment to the Town of Newcastle of cash-in-lieu of parkland
pursuant to the provisions of the Planning Act.
3. The Owner applying for and obtaining final and binding approval
for the removal of the (H) Holding symbol pursuant to the
provisions of By-law 84-63.
4. The Owner obtaining final and binding approval of a variance/
rezoning with respect to the provisions of Section 3.19 -
"Minimum Setbacks from zoning By-law 84-63".
5. The Owner providing the Town of Newcastle with a 0.3 Metre j
Reserve for the frontage of the proposed road (LD 322/85 ) and for
the frontage of the retained lands (LD 324/85); fronting the 6th
Concession free and clear of all encumbrances or alternatively, a
clause being placed on title of the retained lands to the effect
that any further development of the lands will only proceed by
Plan of Subdivision.
6. The retained lands pertaining to LD 322/85 are to meld with the
retained lands of LD 323/85 and LD 324/85.
7. The Owner is to obtain the approval of the Ministry of
Environment with respect to the method whereby sanitary sewage
and storm run-off will be dealt with. Additionally the Owner
shall satisfy the Town and the Ministry of Environment that an
adequate supply of potable water exists to serve the proposed
development.
8. The Owner entering into an Agreement with the Town and/or satisfy
i
the Town with respect to road improvements, street lighting and
lot grading and drainage of the subject lands.
Staff would note that the decision of the Committee was that the
applications be approved as applied for subject to various conditions.
Specifically with reference to the Town of Newcastle, Condition No. 2 stated
that the applicant was to satisfy the requirements of the Town of Newcastle
financially and otherwise.
i
. . .3
i
l
r
REPORT NO.: PD-162-86 Page 3
Accordingly, on April 23, 1986 the Planning Department received an
application submitted by Mr. Thomas Gascoigne requesting the removal of the
(11) Holding symbol on a parcel of land located in Part of Lot 24, Concession
5, former Township of Darlington. As noted within Staff Report PD-123-86
acknowledging the application, the removal of the (H) Holding symbol shall
be upon Council being satisfied that the uses to be permitted will be
adequately serviced, the lands to be used have adequate access, prior uses
of the land will not prevent the use of the land for the purposes intended
by the By-law, that the lands and proposed uses will be adequately protected
from any physical or man-made hazard and conditions associated with the
lands and that the agreements in respect of such matters and the associated
financial requirements, where required, have been executed with the Town of
Newcastle and/or the Regional Municipality of Durham.
I
In accordance with departmental procedures the application was circulated to
obtain comments from other departments and agencies as noted in Staff Report
PD-123-86. In consideration of the circulation the following agencies noted
no objections to the application as filed.
1. The Northumberland and Newcastle Board of Education �
2. Ontario Hydro
3. Peterborough-Victoria-Northumberland and Newcastle
Roman Catholic Separate School Board
4. Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority.
I
The Town of Newcastle Community Services Department in responding offered no
objection to the proposal and requested, if applicable, that a cash-in-lieu
payment pertaining to parkland dedication be provided.
C
The Town of Newcastle Works Department in responding offered no objections
to the application noting that the comments as previously submitted with
respect to the Land Division applications would still apply.
Staff would note with respect to the comments of the above-noted departments
that the conditions requested through the Land Division Committee approval
do reflect their concerns.
i
. . .4
REPORT NO.: PD-162-86 Page 4
Staff would note for the Committee' s information that the Region of Durham
Planning Department did provide comments to the Land Division Committee
concerning the applications and accordingly, it is anticipated that the
fulfillment of their conditions would be dealt with through the clearing of
Condition No. 1 as noted within each Land Division Committee decision to the
effect that "the applicant was to satisfy the requirements of the Regional
Municipality of Durham concerning the provision of Regional services,
financial and otherwise."
Staff would note that the conditions of approval save and except the removal j
of the (H) Holding symbol have been satisfied by the applicant. Staff would
note that the applicant has indicated that, at this point in time, Part 3 as
shown on the attached 1OR Plan will meld with the proposed road allowance
and the lands immediately to the rear of the severed parcels. With respect
to the availability of an adequate supply of potable water, Staff would note
that Golder Associates - Consulting Geotechnical and Dining Engineers were
retained by the applicant to investigate the water supply potential of the
subject lands. Based on the available information and their review, it was
recommended that an adequate potable domestic water supply could be obtained
by means of drilled and cased water wells completed in the sand aquifer
located at a depth of between 10 metres and 25 metres below ground surface.
Furthermore it was noted the wells should be sealed to a minimum depth of 6
metres but below ground surface to prevent direct access to the well by
surface run-off. Additionally all wells should be drilled upgradient from j
septic tile fields and a minimum of 15 metres from roadways which might be
heavily salted during the winter months.
In consideration of the above-noted comments, Staff would have no objections
to the removal of the (H) Holding symbol as shown on the attached by-law and
schedule thereto. Staff would note for the Committee' s information that
pursuant to Section 35 of the Planning Act, a by-law amendment to remove a
. . .5
i
REPORT NO.: PD-162-86 Page 5
(H) Holding symbol is not subject to the normal appeal period so afforded a
standard rezoning application and accordingly, is deemed final and binding
as of Council 's approval of same.
Respect f y tted,
i�
T.T. Edwards, M.C.I.P.
Director of Planning
LDT*TTE*jip
*Attach.
June 3, 1986
cc: Mr. Thomas Gascoigne
P.O. Box 565
OSHAWA, Ontario
L1H 7L9
I
i
I
i
i
1
i
i
i
i
i
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
BY-LAW NUMBER 86-
being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning
By-law of the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle.
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle deems
it advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of
the Town of Newcastle.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of
the Town of Newcastle enacts as follows:
1. Schedule "8" to By-law 84-63, as amended, is hereby further
amended by changing the zone designation from "(H)RH" - Residential
Hamlet - Holding" to "Residential Hamlet (RH)" as shown on the
attached Schedule "X" hereto.
2. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of passing
hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act.
BY-LAW read a first time this day of 1986
BY-LAW read a second time this day of 1986
BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of
1986.
MAYOR
CLERK
I
I
This is Schedule "X" to By-law 86-
passed this day of , 1986 A.D.
CONCESSION ROAD 6
N
_ M
r N
.0 N491853'40'��M73 N17021'20"W
z� 5.72 N71053'40"E
GN
Q 0 r�10 67 N 7105340"E
QM
0
N
Q LOT 24
Z CON. 5
O
_j
0 N 3
0 0
h
z r
N
V 0
1 2
96.01
N 71053'40"E
® ZONE CHANGE FROM 11(H)RH1I TO "RH"
0 25 50 100 ISO 250.
Mayor 6030 100
Cork
LOT 26 LOT 25 LOT 24 LOT 23
c EP %
� i
N Al I r'V Z � i EP A-1
w ref 1 w �I
U J HRH 1 U
o �`.as _ z
U III o °
1._!„_;,_�__ _
1 I �
o A� 1EJ Al 0
/ Lj
\ —-- w
U
0
SOUNIA M AREA OF PROPOSED REZONING 0 50 10 50 1®.
® OTHER LAND$OWNED BY APPLICANT 50. 0
I