HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-191-86 c�
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
Y d'•�f�. 1 t�
REPORT File # �� " �
Res.
By-Law #
STING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DAIS: Monday, July 21, 1986
REPORT #: PD-191-86 FILE #: 18T-77001
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO DRAFT PLAN APPROVAL
PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 18T-77001
PART LOT 34, CONCESSION 3, FORMER TWP. OF DARLINGTON
SCHLEISS AND HOLLAND
RECOMMENDATIONS:
I"t is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-191-86 be received; and
2. THAT Council adopt the following resolution:
"That the correspondence received from Proctor and Redfern Group on behalf
of Schleiss and Holland, dated June 25, 1986, be received and the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing be advised that the Corporation of the Town of
Newcastle has no objections to the proposed revisions to Lots 77 and 78 as
illustrated on the attached draft IONI Plan to permit the development of single
family homes"; and
3. THAT the Proctor and Redfern Group be so advised.
BACKGROUND AND COMMENTS:
* On July 3, 1986 the Town of Newcastle received a request (see attached) from The Proctor
and Redfern Group on behalf of Schleiss and Holland to permit an amendment to the existing
approved draft plan for their lands located in Part of Lot 34, Concession 3, in the
Courtice Urban Area. The proposed amendment would permit the development of a single
family dwelling on each of Lots 77 and 78 as shown on the attached draft 10M Plan. Within
. . .2
i�
REPORT NO. : PD-191-86 Page 2
the draft approval as issued on January 28, 1981, the respective lots were
approved for semi-detached dwellings. Staff would note for the Committee' s
information that the present zoning of the subject lands, being "Urban
Residential Type One (R1)", does permit single family and semi-detached
dwelling units subject to the specific "R1" zone provisions.
In preparing the "10M-Plan" for Phase III registration, it was noted by the
surveyor that insufficient area would not permit the two (2) semi-detached
lots numbered 228 and 229 on the draft plan of subdivision. The request,
therefore, has been made of the Town to consider a change to these lots to
single family and front each onto Centrefield Drive. The Proctor and
Redfern Group, in submitting the request, considered same appropriate noting
that all other lots fronting onto Centrefield Drive are single family with
15 metre minimum frontages.
Based on the foregoing, Staff would have no objection to the amendment to
the approved draft plan of subdivision as requested to permit the
development of the respective lots for single family homes fronting onto
Centrefield Drive.
Respectf ted,
T.T. Edwards, M.C.I .P.
Director of Planning
LDT*TTE*j ip
*Attach.
July 11, 1986
cc: Mr. Glen Easton
The Proctor and Redfern Group
45 Greenbelt Drive
DON MILLS , Ontario M3C 3K3
SQL-` w O!i I MMd
tee, x
Q
T- ... 3.`•_ as _ \\ _ —
•
i s t? x 7t S 37
¢ $ y z 7 ? S Z Z S x s
9 K 5101 pm u G 3]MYMOT7► avow
The
Proctor & Redfern 45 Green Belt Drive
Group Don Mills,Ontario, Canada M3C 3K3
Telephone(416)445-3600
Consulting Engineers and Planners Telex 06-986173
86 06 25 Project 86714
Town of Newcastle
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario
L1C 3A6
Attention Mr. Terry Edwards
Director of Planning - -
Dear Mr. Edwards
Re: Schliess and Holland Subdivision
187-77001
The Ontario Land Surveyor has now prepared the preliminary
"M-Plan" for the Phase III Registration of the above captioned
plan of subdivision. In calculating the plan the surveyor found
that there was insufficient area to permit the two semi-detached
lots numbered as Lots 228 and 229 on the draft approved plan.
Bearing in mind the R1 zoning already in place on the property,
it would seem that the most appropriate method of resolving this
dilemma would be to change these two lots to single family and
front them onto Centrefield Drive.
We believe this is appropriate since all other lots fronting
onto Centrefield Drive are single family with 15 metres minimum
frontage. Simply changing the two subject lots from semi-
detached to single family would result in singles fronting
Street 'C' across from semi-detached, which is an undesirable
marketing situation.
Condition number 1 of draft approval is quite specific with
respect to the number of lots for single family and semi-detached
purposes. It would therefore appear that an amendment to the
Draft Approval will be necessary to implement this lotting
change. Could you please initiate this process.
. . ./2
Project EO 86714 86 06 26 Page 2
Attached hereto is an extract from the draft approved plan marked in red
to illustrate the requested change. Also, enclosed is a copy of the
preliminary "M-Plan" which, for the Town's information, more accurately
details the proposed change.
We trust that the information presented herein is sufficient and clear.
If you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to contact us.
Yours very truly
Proctor & Redfern Limited
Glen Easton
Senior Planner
GE/vn
Attach.
cc: Paul Featherston - Ministry of Municipal Affairs
Dr. M. Michael - Durham Region
Damian Albanese, P.Eng. - Proctor & Redfern
Walter Schleiss - Owner