HomeMy WebLinkAboutPSD-015-03
o.!' ,
CJ. 0
L~~
REPORT
PLANNING SERVICES
Meeting:
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
Date:
Monday, February 3,2003
6tl1-{)~3-() 3
Report #: PSD-015-03
File#: -;])J3.(X)
By-law #:
Subject:
MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
FOR THE MEETING OF JANUARY 16, 2003
FILES: A2002/070 AND A2002l071
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1, THAT Report PSD-015-03 be received; and
2, THAT Council concurs with decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on January
16, 2003 for applications A2002/070 and A2002l071 and that Staff be authorized to
appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of
Adjustment.
Submitted by:
Reviewed by: d ~~ Ct ~
nklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer
vid ,Crome, MCIP, R.P,P.
DirectOr of Planning Services
AR*L T*DJC*sh
January 22, 2003
CORPORATION OF THE MUNlcli'ALlTY OF CLARINGTON
40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830
601
'- >
REPORT NO.: PsD-015-03
PAGE 2
1.0 All applications received by the Municipality for minor variance ate scheduled for a
hearing within 30 days of being received by the Secretary-Treasurer. The purpose of
the minor variance applications and the Committee's decisions are detailed in
Attachment No.1. The decisions of the Committee are detailed below.
DECISIONS OF COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR
JANUARY 16, 2003
Application Number
A2002/070
A2002/071
Staff Recommendation
Approve
Approve
Decision of Committee
Approved
Approved
2,0 Both applications (A2002/070 and A2002/071) heard by the Committee of Adjustment
on January 16, 2003 were made by the same applicant to permit the construction of
identical dwellings on separate lots within a plan of Subdivision, which exceeded the
maximum lot coverage of 40%. The applications were awarded conditional approval.
3.0 Staff has reviewed the Committee's decisions and is satisfied that the applications that
received approval are in conformity with the Official Plan policiei'l, C6Mistent with the
intent of the Zoning By-law and are minor in nature and desirable, Council's
concurrence with the Committee of Adjustment decisions is required in order to afford
Staff's official status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the eVent of an appeal of any
decision of the Committee of Adjustment.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Periodic Report of the Committee of Adjustment
602
.
~.
ATTACHMENT 1
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
FILE NO.:
H,L. GAY FAMILY HOMES LIMITED
H.L. GAY FAMILY HOMES LIMITED
229 CORNISH DR." COURTICE
PART LOT 35, CONCESSION 1
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON
A2002/070
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
PROPERTY LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING BY
INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED LOT COVERAGE FROM 40% TO 42%,
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
"THAT the application be APPROVED as applied for subject to the following
conditions: 1) that the increase in coverage be only to allow the covered porch; 2)
that the purchaser be notified of Committee's decision through the agreement of
purchase and sale and 3) that the applicant satisfy the Clarington Engineering
Services Department's grading design criteria."
DATE OF DECISION: January 16, 2003
LAST DAY OF APPEAL: February 5, 2003
603
PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
FILE NO.:
H. L. GAY FAMILY HOMES LIMITED
H, L. GAY FAMILY HOMES LIMITED
221 CORNISH DR." COURTICE
PART LOT 35, CONCESSION 1
FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF DARLINGTON
A2002/071
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
PROPERTY LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING BY
INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED LOT COVERAGE FROM 40% TO 42%,
DECISION OF COMMITTEE:
"THAT the application be APPROVED as applied for subject to the following
conditions: 1) that the increase in coverage be only to allow the covered porch; 2)
that the purchaser be notified of Committee's decision through the agreement of
purchase and sale and 3) that the applicant satisfy the Clarington Engineering
Services Departmenfs grading design criteria." '
DATE OF DECISION: January 16, 2003
LAST DAY OF APPEAL: February 5, 2003
604