Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEGD-39-03 v . ~ C!iJJJlJgfon REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES Date: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE FI~ &Pf\-<+\<f-03 October 6, 2003 Meeting: Report #: EGD-39-03 File#: By-law #: Subject: Parking Lot Rehabilitation and Expansion Clarington Beech Centre - Part "A" & 20 King Street East - Part "B" Waterfront Trail - Part "C" Contract CL2002-25, Municipality of Clarington RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD-39-03 be received; 2. THAT the additional funds of approximately $9,000 for Part C - Waterfront Trail portion of 2002 Capital Parking Lot Rehabilitation and Expansion project be drawn from the Public Works Parks Capital Reserve Fund account number 1110-00157-0000. ~ Submitted by: Anthony Cannella, C.E.T. Director of Engine ring Services o~~~_ Reviewed by: Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer ASC*jb September 30, 2003 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-9282 721 v ... REPORT NO.: EGD-39-o3 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND During the completion of the work required under Contract CL2002-25 a number of unforeseen circumstances arose that lead to additional work being required and additional time spent on design and contract administration. 2.0 PART "A" BEECH CENTRE PARKING LOT - AND PART "B" 20 KING STREET EAST PARKING LOT Part "A" Beech Centre parking lot and Part "B" 20 King Street East parking lot actual expenditures are over the approved contract award; however Part "A" and Part "B" expenditures are within the 2002 Capital Budget amounts. 3.0 PART "C" - WATERFRONT TRAIL (NEWCASTLE) The preparation work for Part "C". Waterfront Trail, excavation and granular base placement, were supposed to have been completed by operations staff prior to the contractor completing the surfacing and restoration for the trail. Unfortunately the Municipal staff's workload did not allow them to complete this work which resulted in it being added to the contract. Due to the limited width and access of the site, unit prices for excavation and Granular "A" were higher than normal. Therefore additional funding of approximately $9,000 is necessary. 4.0 CONCLUSION It is therefore appropriate that $9,000 be drawn from the Public Works Capital Reserve Fund. The Director of Finance has reviewed the funding requirements and concurs with the recommendation. Queries with respect to department needs, specifications, etc., should be directed to the Director of Engineering Services. 722