HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-139-85 CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT T.T.EDWARDS,M.C.I.P.,Director
HAMPTON,ONTARIO LOB 1JO TEL.(416)263-2231
REPORT TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING OF OCTOBER 7, 1985
REPORT NO. : PD-139-85
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO DRAFT PLAN APPROVAL
PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 18T-77001
PART LOT 34, CONCESSION 3, GEOGRAPHIC TWP. OF
DARLINGTON - (HOLLAND AND SCHLEISS)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1 . That Report PD-139-85 be received; and
2. That the requested amendment to a draft plan
approval in respect of Plan of Subdivision File:
18T-77001 be approved as requested; and
3. That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute
the necessary amendment to the Subdivision Agreement
at such time as said amendment has been finalized to
the satisfaction of the Directors of Planning and
Public Works.
it
I
I
REPORT NO. : PD-139-85 Page 2
BACKGROUND AND COMMENTS:
On September 26, 1985, the Town received a request from Proctor
and Redfern, on behalf of Schleiss and Holland, to permit an
amendment to the existing approved draft plan for their lands
located in Part of Lot 34, Concession 3, in the Courtice Urban
Area. The proposed amendment would remove from Block "A", which
was deferred for future development, approximately 0.73 hectares
of land, and would permit the immediate development of same. The
area in question is designated for residential development by the
Courtice Urban Area Plan and the Courtice West Neighbourhood
Development Plan. The proposed development would comply
therewith. The lands are currently zoned "EP-Environmental
Protection" by By-law 84-63 which reflects the presence of a
minor watercourse and wooded area. This watercourse would be
dealt with through the overall Stormwater Management Concept for
the Plan of Subdivision, with the majority of the existing tree
cover, being scrub cedar, removed to facilitate development.
The request is being made at this time, inasmuch as the developer
has reached a point where further phases become contingient upon
external Regional works not yet in place and this portion of the
Plan represents the last remaining piece of land, within the
proposed subdivision, which can be developed utilizing the
existing municipal service infra-structure.
Staff note that development of the site will require an amendment
to the draft plan approval , rezoning, and an amendment to the
Subdivision Agreement in respect of the adjacent lands to the
south. The consultants for the applicant are aware of these
requirements and will be submitting a rezoning application, and
agreement amendment in the near future.
. . .3
C
REPORT NO. : PD-139-85 Page 3
Based upon the foregoing, Staff would have no objection to an
amendment to the approved draft plan to incorporate the lands
* identified on the attachments hereto.
Respectfully submitted,
dzv
T.T. Edw ds, M.C.I .P.
Direc*,"Of Planning
TTE*j ip
*Attach.
September 23, 1985
cc: Proctor and Redfern
Consulting Engineers and Planners
45 Green Belt Drive
DON MILLS, Ontario
M3C 3K3
ATTENTION: Mr. Easton
I
:,,;fir .•;..•'� -�'�.
4'
;�®ire ��ma ��y ••����� ®�
� ' J..
� si;+:••g.. i,.:.:jyti:•. :�sw+eunis� irr
r,�._. '� gin, �<�� r ►��� �� ��
F��u _�'Si T:'rn��i l:a Si d'=�p"rt�• t•y' -Y' `=•h
' 6 i:vl�:�.{':f'••tsat";�.�i?,'+.cat�c�.v 3�Kd:�.vrt��..
VAN
ME
NMI MIX
NMI
Croy,
lei
r �
7.
IBM
Fri �,�
The Proctor & Redfern Group
Consulting Engineers and Planners
45 Green Belt Drive
Don Mills, Ontario, Canada M3C 3K3
Telephone (416) 445-3600 Telex 06-986173
85 09 25 Project EO 85701-F41
Ministry of Municipal Affairs
777 Bay Street
14th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 2E5
Attention Mr. I Newton
Senior Planner
Dear Mr. Newton
Re: 18T-77001
Town of Newcastle
Region of Durham
Further to our recent discussion we are enclosing herewith twenty (20)
copies of Proctor do Redfern drawing number 74754-9 revised September
24, 1985, which is a revised Draft Plan for the above captioned land.
THE PROPOSAL
We are proposing that part of the existing Block 'A' be changed from a
"Future Development" status to ten (10) single family detached lots and a
street. Specifically we are requesting that approximately 0.73 hectares
be developed for lots 296 to 305 inclusive and Street 'L', and subsequently
rezoned to 'R 1'.
We have outlined in red on the enclosed prints the area subject to our
proposal and would respectfully request that the existing draft approval
be amended to facilitate the development of these lands.
SERVICING CONSIDERATIONS
Our engineers advise that basically the property subject to file number
18T-77001 falls within two servicing systems. Essentially the west half of
the property cannot be serviced until water, storm and sanitary trunks are
extended by the Region. On the other hand the east half of the property
can be serviced via an existing system.
Since there is capacity in the system which serves the east half of the
property, and since the land subject to our proposed draft plan revision
falls within the existing serviceable portion of the property, there would
appear to be no engineering reason why our propsal should not proceed.
Page 2 85 09 25 Project EO 85701-F41
HISTORY
It is our understanding that Block 'A' on this plan was held out of
development because of the Town's uncertainty respecting the location of
the then proposed Adelaide Street extension (possibly through Block 'A').
In addition, the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority had
expressed interest in the woodlot that is partly located at the north-east
corner of the subject property.
CENTRAL LAKE ONTARIO CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
On July 24, 1985 the writer met with Mr. Chris Conti of the Central Lake
Ontario Conservation Authority. The matter of amending the draft plan
approval to include lots 296 to 305 and Street 'L' was discussed vis-a-vis
the Authority's interest in the woodlot.
The Authority agreed that the woodlot in the vicinity of proposed lots 296
to 305 was not of high quality (basically scruffy cedar etc.) and was
similar to that part of the woodlot that would be disturbed by the
development of lots 114 to 131. Accordingly, the Authority felt that its
interest in the hardwood portion of the woodlot (farther north) would not
be compromised by the development of lots 296 to 305.
Mr. Conti questioned whether or not the detention pond on Block 'E' had
sufficient capacity to permit the release of this contemplated area for
development. Our engineers had included a much larger area in their
storm water calculations in designing the detention pond facility.
Accordingly, the development of lots 296 to 305 has already been
considered. The Conservation Authority, the Region and the Town have
now all been advised of these engineering design details.
In order to expedite the processing of this request, we have forwarded six
(6) copies of the plan directly to Mr. Chris Conti at the Conservation
Authority.
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
The Town has indicated that the proposed Adelaide Street extension is no
longer contemplated and has been deleted from the Courtice
Neighbourhood Plan. The Town has also indicated that the proposed lots
296 to 305 and proposed Street 'L' are in conformity with the Courtice
Neighbourhood Plan. As such, and mindful of the Conservation
Authority's comments, the Town's staff are in agreement with this
proposal to amend the draft plan approval. It is anticipated that a staff
report will be considered by the Town's General Purpose and
Administrative Committee on October 7, 1985 and by Council on October
15, 1985. Subsequently we expect that a Council resolution will be
forwarded requesting the Minister to amend the draft plan approval.
Page 3 85 09 25 Project EO 85701-F41
In order to expedite the processing of this request we have forwarded six
(6) copies of the plan directly to Mr. Terry Edwards at the Town of
Newcastle.
REGION OF DURHAM
The Planning Department at the Region has been contacted and alerted to
the fact that the developer is seeking an amendment to the existing draft
approval. The Region has advised that our request will be circulated for
comment to the Regional Planning Department and the Regional Works
Department. A staff report will then be prepared and considered by
Regional Planning Committee and Regional Council.
i
In order to expedite the Regional processing of this request we have
forwarded eight (8) copies of the plan directly to Mr. Franklin Wu at the
Regional Planning Department.
CONCLUSION
We trust that all will be found in order and that we have provided
sufficient information to enable an expeditious processing and approval of
our request.
If, however, any further information is required or if there are any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact us and we will assist
immediately.
Yours very truly
The Proctor ac Redfern Group
Flenaston
Senior Planner
i
GE/am
Encl.
cc: Damian Albanese, P.Eng.- Proctor be Redfern
Walter Schleiss
Terry Edwards, M.C.I.P. Town of Newcastle
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P. - Region of Durham
Chris Conti, B.A., M.E.S.- C.L.O.C.A.
Vic Goad, P.Eng. - Region of Durham
I