HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-211-88 DN: 211-88
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE 6
t
REPORT File # �� � :�.�
Res.
By-Law #
MEETING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DATE: Monday, October 17, 1988
REPORT #: PD-211-88 FILE #: DEV 88-77
Sl1B,ECT: REZONING APPLICATION - RIDGE PINE PARK INC. (WILMOT CREEK)
PART LOT 3, BROKEN FRONT CONCESSION, FORMER TWP. OF DARLINGTON
OUR FILE: DEV 88-77
I
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-211-88 be received; and
2. THAT the application to amend By-law 84-63 submitted by Ridge Pine Park Inc.
to increase the density from 7 to 7.75 units per hectare in order to permit
the development of Phase VI be referred back to Staff for a subsequent
report pending receipt of information from the applicants and pending
receipt of all the outstanding comments; and
3. THAT the applicants and the residents on the attached list be so advised.
1. BACKGROUND
I
i
i
1.1 On July 20, 1988, the Town of Newcastle Planning Department received an
i
application from Ridge Pine Park Inc. to amend By-law 84-63. The by-law
amendment would seek to increase the density presently recognized under
Section 10.1 of By-law 84-63, being 7 units per hectare to 7.75 units per
hectare thereby implementing Phase VI development of Wilmot Creek, being
Seventy _170) additional residential units.
. . .2
'
� )
REPORT NQ. * PD-211-88 PAGE 2
1.2 Staff would note for the Committee's information that the new proposed
units are very similar to those units already existing in the Bmzh.
2. LOCATION AND SURROUNDING IJ\0D O88Q
2.1 The location of the proposed Phase VI development would be located to
the west of the existing residential oaea being the various stages of
Ridge Pine Park. Staff would note that the other proposal, being DEV
88-72, 0P& 88-50/D considered by Committee through Report PD-203-88 is
located to the north of this subject property. Directly to the south
/
is Lake Ontario and to the north is CN Rail and Highway 0o. 40I.
3. PUBLIC NOTICE
].l Staff would note for the Committee's information that, pursuant to
Council's resolution of July 26, 1982 and the requirements of the
Planning Act, the appropriate aiguage acknowledging the application
was installed on the subject lands.
4. CIRCULATION
/
4.1 In a000cdmuoe with departmental procedures, the application was
circulated to obtain comments from other departments/agencies. In
providing comments, the following offered no objection to the
application as filed:
- Cmcbam Regional Health Services
- ministry of Natural B000uroaa
4.2 The Town of Newcastle Fire Department noted that the applicants moot
comply with the appropriate sections of the Ontario Building Code and
Ontario Fire Code. In addition, the Department recommends that no
Building Permits be issued until road aoneaaea are in place in
accordance with the Ontario Building Code and an adequate water supply
is in place for firefighting pursuant to the Ontario Building Code.
REPORT NO. * PD-211-88 PAGE 3
4.3 The Durham Regional Planning Department noted that the development is
recognized as 1IB6011 in the Durham Regional official Plan, designating
the use of a Mobile Home Pack for adults which shall be allocated a
population figure of I500. According to the Bagimo'o calculations,
the development of Phase VI would not overload to I500 persons within
the Pack.
Regional Staff also note that Section 8.I.2.12 of the Durham Regional
official PImu state that Mobile Home Park developments shall be fully
serviced with water and sewer facilities designed to Regional
/
standards. The Regional Works Department have noted that a surge of
intermittent sewage flow from the Mobile Home Pack in addition to
normal sewage flow from the expanding Village of Newcastle, resulting
in fcegueot overloads in the existing water pollution control
facilities. The Regional Works Staff requests the applicant/developer
to investigate the possibility of additional plant capacity to resolve
intermittent surge of sewage.
Given the above-noted comments Regional Staff are not in a position to
support the development of additional units.
4.4 The Canadian National Railway does not support the introduction of
residential development in the immediate vicinity of the rail
operations. However, the Railway notes that if the development would
proceed, they would require the incorporation of a 30 metre setback in
the rezoning and/or warning clause provision. This would be sought
through the development/subdivision agreement.
4.5 Staff would note for the Committee's information that oonxneuta are
still outstanding from the following departments/agencies:
- Newcastle Public Works Department
- Newcastle Community Services Department
- Central Labe Ontario Conservation Authority
- Ministry of Agriculture and Food
- Ministry of Transportation
- Ministry of Environment
- Ontario Hydro
REPORT NO pn-211-SR PAGE 4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. OFFICIAL PLAN CONFORMITY
5.1 Staff have reviewed the proposed rezoning within the context of
conformity to the Regional official Plan and noted that the subject
property is located within an area designated and identified as 11R60".
Policy of the Durham Plan stipulates a population figure of 1500, the
result of an Ontario Municipal Board decision in 1979.
5.2 This 1500 population figure was subsequently translated into two (2)
implementing documents; the zoning by-law and the site plan agreement.
The end result was that the maximum allowable dwelling units being set
at 768 units, roughly based on two (2) persons per unit.
5.3 Based on the above facts, Staff is of the opinion that the proposed
rezoning application sought by Ridge Pine Park Inc. to increase the
number of dwelling units by 70 units is not in conformity to the
Official Plan. The applicant indicated that the average persons per
unit within Wilmot Creek Park is less than two persons per unit and
therefore, when all 750 units are occupied, there will be less than
1500 total population. The applicant therefore argues that an
Official Plan Amendment application would not be required. In support
of his argument, the applicant quoted existing survey results from
Sandy Cove which shows an average of 1.72 persons per household.
5.4 Staff has advised the applicant that we are not prepared to accept
survey figures from other similar development. We are also of the
opinion that the 1500 population figure is set by the Ontario
Municipal Board and we are not prepared to make flexible
interpretation.
5.5 Based on the aforementioned comments, we maintain that the proposed
rezoning application to increase density is not in conformity with the
Regional official Plan. However, we are prepared to reconsider this
. . .5
rV
REPORT NO. : DD-21I-88 D&QE 5
_______________________________________________________________________________
issue if the applicant can, through an independent survey of the
existing homes within Wilmot Creek, to demonstrate that the existing
figure for persons per unit is less than two persons.
G. STAFF COMMENTS
6.1 As noted in Regional Works comments, the stress on the services is
very obvious at this point. Therefore, the approval if any further
developments proceed in this area, the servicing issue must be
addressed.
6.3 This Report is prepared for the purpose of facilitating a Public
Meeting in accordance with the Planning Act requirement. Once all
outstanding comments and relevant information are received, as well no
the issue of official DIau conformity is resolved, Staff will be in a
position to ceBVct back to Committee with respect to this application.
'Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to t ommittee
T7-------- - ---------------
Franklin Wu, M.C.Z.P. ���reu taeff
Director of Planning & Development Chief & '�cative Officer
CBV*DW*jip
*Attach.
October 5, 1988
~
CC: "� / Mr. Roger Howard CC: Mrs. Marion Lea
Ridge Pine Pack Inc. 2 Loyalist Court
17 Dean Street Group 2' Box 307, B.D. #I
BRUMPTO0, Ontario 0BW{A3TLO' Ontario
LGW 1M7 LOA lBO
w'xYro. Ruth Hinkley, President Prof. James P. Lovekiu
Wilmot Creek Homeowners Association 3 King Street West
Box 42, Group l, R.R. #1 Box 189
NEWCASTLE, Ontario COLB00l0E' Ontario
L0& 18O KOK lGO
Mr. Charles Gage
Box 736, Group 7
NEWCASTLE, Ontario
LOA lB0
BROKEN - FRONT CONC. CONCESSION 1
BENNETT ROAD
(n
0
q cc: I 0
mm CC 11 0
M — — — — — — - — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - z
X 0
m
0
> U)
z 0
> oq 10-Lll:! __7
U) m -4 RICKARD I ROAD BRAGG ROAD cn
r- 0 ..I
m
> >m
U) M
C °o m - - - - - - - - - - - - -
a m
>
C0
m
0
z
AID
_<
00
DARL7CLARKE TOWN INE ROAD REGIONAL ROAD 42
co o 0
Z - - - - - - - - - - - - -
**4 1 m
T LOVEKIN . 0�o D 0
z
U)
Z7- cn
0 om
Z 0
0 X
0
K-R rn .0
CONCESSION 1 CONCESSION 2