The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPD-92-88 DN: 92-88 TOWN OF NEWCASTLE REPORT File Res. # By-Law # MEETING: General Purpose and Administration Committee DATE: Monday, April 18, 1988 REPORT #: PD-92-88 FILE #: 88-4_.N and DEV 88-15 SU&JECT: OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING APPLICATION OCEANFRONT MANAGEMENT PART LOTS 13/14, CONCESSION 2, FORMER TOWN OF BOWMANVILLE FILES: 88-4/N AND DEV 88-15 RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PD-92-88 be received; and 2. THAT applications to amend the Town of Newcastle Official Plan (Bowmanville Major Urban Area) and Town of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended, submitted by Oceanfront Developments be referred back to Staff for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report upon receipt of all outstanding comments; and 3. THAT a copy of Council's decision be forwarded to the applicant and the interested parties indicated hereto. BACKGROUND AND COMMENTS: On December 3, 1987, the Town of Newcastle received an application for amendment to the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended. This application was submitted by Kevin Tunney (Tunney Planning) on behalf of Oceanfront Developments. The rezoning is to allow One Hundred and Thirteen (113) single family dwellings and a local commercial block. . . .2 REPORT 00. : PD-92-88 -PAGE 2 _______________________________________________________________________________ On January 21, 1988, the Town of Newcastle was advised by the Region of Durham PIoouiug Staff of an application for amendment to the Newcastle Official DImo (Bovmmnvtlle Major Urban Area) . The official Plan application incorporates amendments to Neighbourhoods 2A, 3B, 2D and, proposed changes to road patterns; neighbourhood Dark and oobnol locations; as well as introducing a high density ovmbmI and two (3) new local central areas. This application was also submitted by Mr. Toouey on behalf of the Bnvm\auville North Developers Group. The rezoning and official plan application was subsequently followed, on February 9, 1988, by an application for approval of a Plan of Subdivision (18T-87089) . Said application proposes the creation of the above-mentioned One Hundred and Thirteen (113) single family dwellings and a local commercial block of 2.355 ha (5.57 acres) both totalling 12.67 ha (31.3I acres) . This combined application (DOV 88-I5 and 18T-87089) is one of four (4) sets of applications for the North BowmauviIIe area, which is also conditional opuo the above-noted Official Plan Amendment. Staff would note for Committee's information that, pursuant to Council's resolution on July 26, 1982 and the cagoizemeuta of the Planning Act" the appropriate aiguage acknowledging the applications was installed on the subject lands and, surrounding property owners were advised of the proposal. / The subject property is presently designated "Residential" in both the Durham Regional official Plan and the Newcastle Official Plan (Bovmauville Major Urban &ceu) ' and zoned "Agricultural (&)x in the Town of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended. The laud is presently used agriculturally. COMMENTS: To date comments are still outstanding from four (4) of the circulated agencies which ace: Town of Newcastle Community Services Department, Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, the Ministry of Environment, and the Ministry of Natural Resources. REPORT 0O. : PD-92-88 PAGE 3 _______________________________________________________________________________ The majority of the commenting agencies have noted no objection to the proposed development. However, the Town of Newcastle Fire Department has commented that they note a concern to the proposal as the project results in a population increase of approximately One Hundred and Thirteen (113) families. This presents an impact on the Fire Department's level of service considering the amount of development taking place throughout the municipality. The Town of Newcastle Public Works Department were not in receipt of Master Drainage PImo and Conceptual Site Servicing Report at the time of their comments. They recommended that this development not proceed until such time as the above-mentioned documents have been received. Both the Region of Durham Works Department and Planning Department Staff have commented to the effect that the proposed development is outside of the Region's Service Area Limit as determined by the Region's Lot Levy Finance Study. Both Departments acknowledged that the proposal is within the 8ovnnmuville Urban Area and is designated for full servicing with municipal water and municipal sewer. However, major capital expenditures are required to provide adequate services to this area and, due to these major ooata" the Region considers this area premature for development. However, as the developers requiring servicing, are presently attempting to draft an agreement amongst themselves to establish relative servicing cost responsibilities, the / Region would be willing to negotiate, with the developers, regarding servicing should no Agreement be acceptable to all parties involved. In addition, Regional Works have noted the proposed development densities, as indicated on these draft plans, is acceptable with respect to the Regional Sewage Plan and receiving downstream sanitary sewer capacity. Staff note that a letter of objection has been received from a neighbouring resident. The main concerns of Mc. James Griffin is the increased traffic, change in aesthetics and quality of life from rural to urban. Be is opposed to the proposed layout of the subdivision and believes area residents should have � more input in the planning pcmoeoo. REPORT 00. ; PD-33-88 PAGE 4 _______________________________________________________________________________ Based on the information presented above' observations from commenting agencies, comments and reports still outstanding, Staff are not presently in a position to make a recommendation on the subject applications. Staff recommend that, at such time as all outstanding comments and studies are received, the above-noted oouoecuo addressed, Staff will be in a position to write n report making a recommendation on said applications. Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation to the Committee "- ----- ---- - -__--_-__--__-_-_ � ^ �a�cau 0»taeff Deputy Director of Planning Chief m n otrative officer CP*LDT* 'iD u *Attach. April ll, 1988 CC: Mr. Walter Frank Oceanfront Developments I15 SimnVe Street South O88AWA, Ontario LlB 70l Mc. Kevin Tumuey 117 King Street � P.O. Box 358 WHITBY, Ontario Ll0 5S4 ro) SUBJECT SITE LOT 14 LOT 13 LOT 12 CONCESSION ROAD 3 i i Rl - i Rl-10 A R1 . o (H)R1 Goo � EP Rl-1 s,, w N J , i o i(H)R1 z (� RI � ai � . Z z R, 0 o � " i v W A A KM .,1�LLE 0� H R ( ) 1 RI TM T. i RE F n n 0 50 M zoo mom KEY Dev . $_8 - 15 IO IM De 10 .A VIL L L G S E E Ir L)"'7 L A 8 56 57 22 0,0 21 4 59 PROPOSED cv 20 2 48 c 0 2 DRAFT PLAN Q/ 19 26 47 T R OF SUBDIIASION 16 21 PART OF LOTS 13 & 14 n 4 83- 0 -A A CONCESSION 2 IT 28 .5 F p N A-- I W G\ TOWN OF NEWCASTLE 28 44 LLJ RECtONAL WUNIOPALJTY OF DU'tHA•-- ; 70 9 D \1 is LLJ 30 43 72 73 7 75� 6 77; 73 RELEVANT INFORMATION I 79 LW t 4 31 42 13 32 41 S T 60 R ET 31. 1..is cn 0 12 33 40 05 2 al. it 110 109 106 107 106• 1 g it 34 39 82 ID4 'ott < to 0 —,CD 41 35 377 38 -9h 92 100 lot; i� 84 AD,tD lk—11, �j LLJ 2 2.. A A I \V///// —"' L'j — — — 102 as :00�.s AA L'j 86 low�'A co! 5 4' 3 2 93 $2 299 R 4 6 8 S T R E �v MCC% 0 20tt /Y PROPOSED C r.Cl ON 11111 114 TO OLD 5 CC ROAD COMMERCIAL --j A 2,255 ho D-IRI—UA-WI Z-1-1 aAmyArz T 1 4 --- BLOCK 117 C N C. 2 "TOILII 't' DEVE 'TED J-(�;A'ANES UMITM R A R T' 2 Cr- I 1 0 R 9 7 1 ...6 OCEANFRONT REGIONAL ROAD N_ R7 D -I O 00 -4 D GO M m °z U) "9 o z _ C n N N 3 1 D =mm M m - O O m M < oD m O 00 m�-� n° � m r r- m Z m o m r - D > 1 Z z F r m m