HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-91-88 DN: 91-88
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
1
REPORT File #6o, :3
Res. # � { P "
By-Law #
MEETING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DATE: Monday, April 18, 1988
REPORT #: PD-91-88 FILE #: 88-4/N and DEV 88-14
SUBJECT: OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING APPLICATION
TREFLAR MANAGEMENT
PART LOT 12, CONCESSION 2, FORMER TOWN OF BOWMANVILLE
FILES: 88-4/N AND DEV 88-14
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-91-88 be received; and
2. THAT applications to amend the Town of Newcastle Official Plan (Bowmanville
Major Urban Area) and Town of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63,
as amended, submitted by Treflar Management be referred back to Staff for
further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report upon receipt of
all outstanding comments; and
3. THAT a copy of Council's decision be forwarded to the applicant and the
interested parties indicated hereto.
BACKGROUND AND COMMENTS:
On December 3, 1987, the Town of Newcastle received an application for amendment to
the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63, as
amended. This application was submitted by Kevin Tunney (Tunney Planning) on behalf
of Treflar Management. The rezoning is to allow Two Hundred and Eighty-Three (283)
single family dwellings, Ninety-two (92) semi-detached dwellings and part of Two
Hundred and Twenty (220) Apartment units.
. . .2
90
REPORT 00. : PD-9I-88 PAGE 3
_______________________________________________________________________________
on January 21' 1988, the Town of Newcastle was advised by the Region of Durham |
Planning Staff of an application for amendment to the Newcastle Official Plan
(BowmauviIle Major Urban Area) . The official Plan application incorporates
amendments to Neighbourhoods 2&, 2B, 3D and, proposed changes to road patterns;
neighbourhood park and school locations; as well as introducing a high density
symbol and two (2) new local central areas. This application was also
submitted by Mc. Toouey on behalf of the 8ovmnauvilIe North Developers Group. �
�
The rezoning and official plan application was subsequently followed, on
February 9, 1988, by an application for approval of a Plan of Subdivision
(18T-87087) . Said application proposes the creation of the above-mentioned Two
.'
Hundred and Eighty-Three (283) single family dwellings, Ninety-two (92) semi-
detached dwellings, a 1.483 ha (3.66 acre) block for pact of the Two Hundred �
�
and Twenty (220) Apartment Units, a 3.719 ha (6.72 acre) gmzk bIqoh' and a �
2.083 ha (5.15 acre) school block on a total of 32.169 bo (79.5 acre) parcel of �
laud. This combined application (D8V 88-I4 and I8T-87087) is one of tooc (4) �
sets of applications for the North 8nvmauvilIe area, which is also conditional
upon the above-noted official Plan Amendment.
Staff would note for Committee's information that, pursuant to Council's
resolution on July 26, 1982 and the requirements of the Planning Act, the
appropriate aiguage acknowledging the applications was installed on the subject
/
lands and, surrounding property owners were advised of the proposal.
The subject property is presently designated "Residential" in both the Durham
Regional official Plan and the Newcastle official Plan (8o^mauville Major Urban
Area) , and zoned "Agricultural (A)o in the Town of Newcastle Comprehensive
Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended. The laud is presently used agriculturally for
oocu and soybeans.
COMMENTS:
To date comments are still outstanding from four (4) of the circulated agencies
which are: Town of Newcastle Community Services Department, Central Lake
Ontario Conservation Authority, the Ministry of Environment, and the Ministry
of Natural Be000cnea.
REPORT 0O. : PD-91-88 Ig\QE 3
_______________________________________________________________________________
The majority of the commenting agencies have noted no objection to the proposed
development. However, the Town of Newcastle Fire Department has commented that
they note m concern to the proposal as the project results in a population
luoceaoe of approximately Four Hundred and Eighty-five (485) families. This
presents an impact on the Fire Department's level of service considering the
amount of development taking place throughout the municipality.
The Town of Newcastle Public Works Department were not in receipt of Master
Drainage Plan and Conceptual Site Servicing Report at the time of their
comments. They recommended that this development not proceed until such time
as the above-mentioned documents have been received.
Both the Region of Durham Works Department and Planning Department Staff have
commented to the effect that the proposed development is outside of the
Region's Service Area Limit as determined by the Region's Lot Levy Finance
Study. Both Departments acknowledged that the proposal is within the
BovmnaovilIe Urban Area and is designated for full servicing with municipal
water and municipal sewer. However, major capital expenditures are required to
provide adequate services to this area and, due to these major costs, the
Region considers this area premature for development. However, as the
developers requiring servicing, are presently attempting to draft an agreement
amongst themselves to establish relative servicing cost responsibilities, the
/
Region would be willing to negotiate, with the developers" regarding servicing
should an Agreement be acceptable to all parties involved.
In addition, Regional Works have noted the proposed development densities, as
indicated on these draft plans, is acceptable with respect to the Regional
Sewage Plan and receiving downstream sanitary sewer capacity.
Bell Canada has noted they presently have o buried trunk and exchange cable
along Middle Road that extends from Old 8cogog Road north beyond the limits of
the proposed development. Any development will have to take into consideration
|
the safe guarding and maintenance of said cable.
. . .4
i
\
REPORT 0O. : PD-91-88 PAGE 4
_______________________________________________________________________________
Staff note that a letter of objection has been received from u neighbouring
resident. The main ooucecoa of Mc. James Griffin is the increased traffic'
change in aesthetics and quality of life from rural to urban. He is opposed to
the proposed layout of the subdivision and believes area residents should have
more input in the planning process.
Staff further note that the plan proposes to have pact of a 320 unit high
density residential development. Staff's initial concern with the proposed
design is that it does not maintain Newcastle Official Plan policies, in that
no transition zone is provided for between the high density and low density
reoideutialo.
/
Based on the information presented above, observations from commenting
agencies, comments and reports still outstanding, Staff are not presently in a
position to make a recommendation on the subject applications. Staff recommend
that, at such time as all outstanding comments and studies are received, the
above-noted oouoecua addressed, Staff will be in a position to write o report
making a recommendation on said applications.
Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
k2�� .
�_�-~~�_---__-___ ------------
L.D. Taylo\�' awreu tneff
Deputy Director of Planning Chief rative 0ftioer
CP*LDT* 'ig
*Attach.
April Il, 1988
CC: Mr. S. Fenton
Tceflaz Management
194 Merton Street
Suite 200
T0800T0, Ontario
M48 3B7
Mr. Kevin Tuouey
117 King Street
P.O. Box 358
WHITBY, Ontario
Ll0 5S4
SUBJECT SITE
LOT 14 LOT 13 LOT 12
CONCESSION ROAD 3
I
Rl A '
I
Rl-10
R1
(H)R1 sG
Q N
G` O
EP RH �s� z
0
R1 (n
w
-� (H)Rl a W
J U
z
a 5 Rl 0
p f RI
0
W
� � q I
KM
A
e�
CH)R1 R I
RT"
0 50 too 200 30om 4�&
, KEY � MA,P 60M
man � � � �
De V . 88 - 14
SIC c c I
T
J I T IL --L--
L -J
PRoPz;-D LILL I
DRAFT PLAN
T'I-i---1-r-'r- PLAN 871 03:
C,a or si,5D.VGON
! LOIS '-LO1717.CONCESSION 2,
71 2\1 j i i I PANT c,
&15.
HMLL,,STREEI PA OF LOTS 14
LOIN STREET
ALL AZORDINC TO NAMELY PLAN
'A
(by-.H Sholtt)OF PART OF LOT IZ
STREET C STREET
COT CESSON 2.
M
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
0 it I 1 REOONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM au RELEVANT INPORMATION
LAI
Of uj ti
w (A 12 —1—
A R K
(2.719 6.72 A,
%
A
.-NCOM-EROAL-
(1.239,T-3.0-)
S C M 0 0 L-
-
2038 m 5.04
STREET 2M,
APARTMENT COMPLEX-
0 ------ (LABS-N.- 6—) ows
-------—---------ffil .,
A 4:• S-f1'T 2 do N I
7-----
NLLN 9A
V-1
� L�L
V
J'
L
LL_j L -L <
Ire o
TREFLA"ADEWENT
TREFLAR MANAGEMENT
N
CONCESSION ROAD N° 3
OL
C
B ,
i
O V O
}
in
P
P
0
5
900
.:.a'::•}a.;.:::e)•:::5::{'0:.,•.::}::•}{{`^i:{:,,}•.,;v,;r.'j4i{a.:F:$k}?:;%:{t;;Y 2?;
`iiEY•`:if o
::.}}:F;};i:•:F<)%::}t5>�;i;:::::::::::..:'till:::.:..,•
:::::
:a}:.};Y:•
.......... v.o)q;u.:j:F':2k A:k i:•o.;%F%•:a:;n::v}iJ:i:,..JV{::{FFF:k J:t:iS:}:Y:Y:::.:.:tJ}:tY...n::.:va:::k.}}}}:t:>,:;:`:ts{::;:;k:5::::::::f::2:±:n:i$::::::::;'.yF}{'Y:t:%:n:::::..::v
��n:..:n t.ryt;
:..:..':.:..::........v:.}:ax:•}):aa;tYJ:iJ::i:%•:..'i.}s:J}Y}Fk.F•:t::t5{)tFYF}}5::n;f,,'Si$;y::}S.ua:;i .:..: ...
%E•X•;
Y`F5
!rR:F 3
;•4+J}':S'':+ ?:::.YJ:iv'::ri2 ..a.u.:`:u'•Y),;!:N:J:JSa'tn1,{^�i<:F::�i?;:�:��FFfi•,..Y::::n....
't
r{3}>e
.f.
1'i{:22E{%:2F;.4^ :�\}:;{t{{>v:3k;'�;:`v.,>.:'+.2:R:F5}}:'.},:. :'4}::,•:t':
A•.n
L0
aii:ti:4 Jo°T.•.•r
yy
TO
,:.:.•r.. W N
F NEWCASTLE
WCAS
T
LE
!
^z€i
Z
r,'i:rie:)y
>J OFFICIAL
PLAN
H
N
SCHEDULE H
E
7-1
%i4£•
t'C;^
REVISED
I ED
.spa}?•:. vrz>'S�'
C
< :
ME
A
�
5?
( ND
BOWMAWLLE
` :•>:.{"
LAN.••ts}<:.n, :`4}>`5 „t:• ::nt:)>::5.2::.Y.,.},)..a:n. USE STRUCTURE PLAN
`,v;)>�F:}�O i\o:Jn?:?i:."t:')a)/.i�:.)'.:.F}R t`•.}:>•}'.::i.}I,.:.: .( :1i :.:
0
SCHEDULEI )
H
a.k•r,
(f,i 'v'i'::h;';:};.'iaiF}< i::;J?:Ltn>:)•,v,)%:%2�:2Y:.
':OFF::{zF:i;'lr{' �?!f,•'
711s.
F)`Y'
F5%t}
L
C
4r•:
:e
.a.i tJ}Y):y<}:::;::{::5::%i:SF t`: ::...........:::......... ..:...,n..J.:%i:}Y:::r•r..i.�:}:.:::
o}:iae;;)•Y'i{FC;tifik}k;F{>;;...:. 'ktFF.'•}::J;;y.;:5;k>}'.}::.... v:.:r}}}':::ta}i }.. .
.. ^:�)?+',i$;:'i�YiFfi:`iii}is�!:iG{5::;r tY>�':::Sii:i;<k:;.;,::i:;':r>:`•:::k?`::F:a:{?`.':sn
�4
\4nl;ui:}2
i..
:vii:^3:ii::::•%::•Y.:i{':%;:;
SCALE= N.T,S.
DATE : JAN./88
88 0 04-IN