HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-153-84 4
CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT T.T.EDWARDS,M.C.I.P.,Director
HAMPTON,ONTARIO LOB 1JO TEL.(416)263-2231
REPORT TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 17, 1984
REPORT NO. : PD-153-84
SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICATIONS FOR MEETING OF AUGUST 8, 1984
RECOMMENDATION:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the
following:
1 . That Report PD-153-84 and the minutes of the
Committee of Adjustment meeting of August 8,
1984 be received for information.
BACKGROUND AND COMMENT:
For the information of the General Purpose and
Administration Committee, staff have prepared the attached
list of applications to the Committee of Adjustment for the
meeting of August 8, 1984. This list includes the file
number, applicant's name, site location , type of variance
requested, staff's comments on the applications, and the
Committee of Adjustment' s decision.
Respe bmitt ,
i. T.T. Edwards, M.C. I.P.
Director of Planning ? "
TTE*j i p
*Attach.
�, cd}
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
August 8, 1984 7:30 p.m.
Court Room # 2, Police Building, Bowmanville
PRESENT:
Acting Chairman Arnold Reicheld
Member Jean Payne
Member H. C. Muir
Current Operations Planner Larry Taylor
Secretary Carrol Clemens
ABSENT:
Chairman T. F. Rehder
Member J. P. Murdoch
Member Wesley J. Yellowlees
APPLICATIONS:
A. 64/84_ -. Estate_ of,Margaret. Thickson,_ Lot_ ] ] ,. Concession_ ] ,_ Bowmanville.
Application was made for relief from zoning by-law requirements in order
to permit the applicant to continue the use of a lot with an existing
single family dwelling having a front yard of 14.33 ft. (4.3 m) , instead
of the required 6 m front yard and a rear yard of 20 ft. (6 m) , instead
of the required 10.5 m (35 ft. ) rear yard.
Mr. MacGregor and Mr. Barber appeared in support of this application.
No other person appeared in support of or in opposition to this
application.
Moved by Mrs. Payne, seconded by Mr. Muir,
"THAT as the requested variance does not appear to offend
the intent of the Official Plan or Zoning By-law and
would permit the continued use of an existing non-
conforming dwelling, the application is considered
minor in nature and permission is GRANTED to continue
the use of a lot with an existing single family dwelling
having a front yard of 14.33 feet (4.3 m) and a rear
yard of 20 feet (6m) . "
"CARRIED"
Committee of Adjustment Meeting, August 8, 1984. . . .
A 65/84 -Colin Peter Thorne, Lot. 28, . Concession. 5, Clarke.
Application was made for relief from zoning by-law requirements in
order to permit the applicant to construct an open porch to the
existing single family dwelling, leaving a front yard of .5 feet
( . 15 m) and a non-conforming set back and maintaining an existing
legal non-conforming 3.6 ft. (1 .09 m) side yard, instead of the
required 20 ft. ( 6 m) front yard and 53 ft. (16.2 m) set back.
Mr. Thorne appeared in support of this application. No other person
appeared in support of or in opposition to this application.
Moved by Mr. Reicheld, seconded by Mrs. Payne,
"THAT as the proposed variance appears to comply with
the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law and
as the proposed proch will be open and cover an existing
cement slab, the variance would not appear to have a
detrimental effect on the surrounding neighbourhood and
therefore permission is GRANTED to ocnstruct a porch
leaving a front yard of .5 feet ( .15m) and a set back
of 8. 1 m and maintaining the existing legal non-conforming
yards to the existing single family dwelling."
"CARRIED"
A 66/84 - Marrion- &. David_ Johnston,_ Lot_ 28,_Concession_ 5,_ Clarke.
Application was made for relief from zoning by-law requirements in
order to permit the applicant to construct a deck at the rear of the
existing single family dwelling, maintaining the existing non-
conforming front yard, side yard and set back.
No person appeared in support of or in opposition to this application.
Moved by Mr. Muir, seconded by Mr. Reicheld,
"THAT as the proposed deck does not offend the intent
of the Official Plan or Zoning By-law and as the deck
is located at the rear of the dwelling and not further
encroaching the non-conforming yards the variance is
considered minor in nature and would not have an adverse
effect on the surrounding area, therefore the application
is GRANTED to construct a deck miantaining the existing
non-conforming front yard, side yard and set back. "
"CARRIED"
Committee of Adjustment Meeting, August 8, 1984. . . . .
A 67/84 - Belton Masonry, Lot 9, . Concession 1 , Bowmanville.
Application was made for relief from zoning by-law requirements in
order to permit the applicant to continue the construction of a
storage shed, leaving a 1 ft. rear yard, instead of the required
25 ft. rear yard and maintaining a 2 ft. side yard to the existing
attached storage shed, instead of the required 25 ft, side yard.
J. Silva appeared in support of this application. No other person
appeared in support of or in opposition to this application.
Moved by Mrs. Payne, seconded by Mr. Reicheld,
"THAT as the proposed variance does not appear to offend
the intent of the Official Plan and would allow the
expansion of an existing industry, permission is GRANTED
to continue the construction of a storage shed and
continue the use of an existing shed leaving a 1 ft.
rear yard and a 2 ft. easterly side yard, on condition that:
1 . The applicant enter into a Site Plan Agreement with the
Town to address such things as, but not limited to:
emergency access and site drainage.
2. The exterior cladding of both the existing and proposed
structures to be of similar treatment (all block / or
all metal cladding.
3. Submission of an engineer' s report certifying that the
existing and proposed structures comply with the Ontario
Building Code; failing compliance, the non-conformity is
to be brought into compliance.
4. Building permits are to be obtained.
5. The proposed and existing storage shed to be removed at
such time as a new principle building is constructed.
"CARRIED"
A- 68/84- :- Ind. -G._Dallas,_ Lot_ 14,_Concession_ 8,_ Dar]i ngton._ -
Application was made for relief from zoning by-law requirements in
order to permit the applicant to use a lot for residential purposes
with 63 feet ( 19.2 m) frontage on an improved road, instead of the
required 80 ft. (24.5 m) frontage.
Mr. Dallas appeared in support of this application. No other person
appeared in support of or in opposition to this application.
Moved by Mr. Muir, seconded by Mrs. Payne,
"THAT as the requested variance does not appear to offend
the intent of the Official Plan or Zoning By-law and does
not appear to have a detrimental effect on the surrounding
area, the application is considered minor in nature and
permission is GRANTED to use this lot for residential
purposes with a frontage of 76 feet, instead of the
required 80 ft. frontage."
"CARRIED"
Committee of Adjustment Meeting, August 8, 1984. . . . . . .
A 69/84 7- Jack Taylor, Lot 29, Concession- 3, --Darlington. .
Application was made for relief from zoning by-law requirements in
order to permit the applicant to construct an attached garage to the
existing single family dwelling, maintaining the existing 31 .42 ft.
(9.5 m) front yard and 41 ft. ( 12.4 ft. ) rear yard, instead of the
required 50 ft. (15 m) front and rear yards.
Mr. Taylor appeared in support of this application. No other person
appeared in support of or in opposition to this application.
Moved by Mr. Reicheld, seconded by Mr. Payne,
"THAT as the proposed attached garage will have a
greater front yard and rear yard than the existing
single family dwelling, and will not have a detrimental
effect on the surrounding properties and would appear
to conform with the intent of the Official Plans and
Zoning By-law, permission is GRANTED to construct an
attached garage to the existing single family dwelling,
maintaining the existing 31 .42 ft. front yard and 41 ft.
rear yard. "
"CARRIED"
A 70/84. -_Albert. L. _ &_ June_ P._Brants,_ Lot_ 22,_ Concession_ l,_Clarke._ _ _
Application was made for relief from zoning by-law requirements in
order to permit the applicant to continue the use of a lot with an
area of 24.43 acres (9.8 ha) , instead of the required 40 acres (16 ha) .
Mr. & Mrs. Brants and Mr. Barber appeared in support of this application.
No other person appeared in support of or in opposition to this
application.
Moved by Mr. Muir, seconded by Mr. Reicheld,
"THAT as the variance would not appear to offend the
intent of the Official Plan and would allow the
continued use of this agricultural lot with an
existing single family dwelling and accessory buildings,
permission is GRANTED to continue the use of a lot with
an area of 24.43 acres (9.8 ha ) . "
' Payne opposed' "CARRIED"
(d)
Committee of Adjustment Meeting, August 8, 1984.
A 71/84T Bowmanville Memorial . Hospital ,_ Lot_ ]O,_ Concession_ ] , . Bowmanville. .
Application was made for relief from zoning by-law requirements in order
to permit the applicant to construct an addition to the existing
institutional building leaving an exterior side yard of 19 feet
(5.79 m) , instead of the required 25 ft. exterior side yard and
maintaining the existing non-conforming yards to the existing building.
No person appeared in support of or in opposition to this application.
Moved by Mrs. Payne, seconded by Mr. Muir,
"THAT as the requested variance would allow the
expansion of an existing institutional building
and would not be detrimental to the surrounding
area or offend the intent of the Official Plan or
Zoning By-law and as the addition will not be en-
croaching further into the exterior yard than the
existing building, the application is considered
minor in nature and permission is GRANTED to construct
the addition leaving an exterior side yard of 19 ft.
(5.79 m) and maintaining the existing legal non-
conforming yards to the existing building. "
"CARRIED"
A 72!84. -. Lloyd_ Edward_ &_Gwenyth_Doreen_Wagg,_ Lot_ 32,_Conc._ 7,_Clarke.
Application was made for relief form zoning by-law requirements in
order to permit the applicant to construct a garage, leaving 65 feet
to the stream, instead of the required 100 ft. from any stream, river
bank or watercourse.
Lloyd Wagg appeared in support of this application. No other person
appeared in support or in opposition to this application.
Moved by Mr. Muir, seconded by Mr. Reicheld,
"THAT as the variance appears to conform with the
intent of the Official Plan and due to the contour
of the land the proposed location appears to be
the most logical location, the application to
construct a garage leaving 65 feet to the stream is
GRANTED, conditional upon approval of the Ganaraska
Region Conservation Authority. "
"CARRIED"
Committee of Adjustment Meeting, August 8, 1984. . . . .
A 73/84 -. Thomas and Mary_ Waid, Lot-7,-Concession-5,- Darlington.
Application was made for relief from zoning by-law requirements in
order to permit the applicant to construct an addition to the existing
single family dwelling leaving a side yard of 10 feet, instead of the
required 6 m (20 ft. ) side yard.
Mr and Mrs. Waid appeared in support of this application. No other
person appeared in support of or in opposition to this application.
Moved by Mrs. Payne, seconded by Mr. Reicheld,
"THAT as the requested variance would not offend the
intent of the Official Plan or Zoning By-law or have
a detrimental effect on the surrounding area and
would permit the applicant to construct an addition
to the existing single family dwelling leaving a side
yard of 10 feet, this application is GRANTED. "
"CARRIED"
A 74/84. -. John_ Leger,_ Lot_ 35,_Conces5ion_ 2,_Darlington, _ _ _
Application was made for relief from zoning by-law requirements in
order to permit the applicant 2to create a lot with a frontage of
30.48 m and an area 2f 1858 m , instead of the required 45.5 m frontage
and area of 3483.8 m and maintaining the existing non-conforming
front yard, side yards and set back.
Mr. Foley appeared in support of this application. Mrs. Pavlovich
appeared with interest in this application. No other person
appeared in support of or in opposition to this application.
Moved by Mr. Muir, seconded by Mrs. Payne,
"THAT as the requested variance would appear to comply
with the policies of the Official Plan and Zoning By-
law and would not appear to have a detrimental effect
on the surrounding neighbourhood, permission is GRANTED
to create 2 a lot with a frontage of 30.48 m and an area
of 1858 m and maintaining the existing non-conforming
front yard, side yard and set back. "
"CARRIED"
... s.eya
Committee of Adjustment Meeting, August 8, 1984. . . . . .
A 75/84 - John- Legere, Lot_35, - Concession- 2,- Darlington.
Application was made for relief from zoning by-law requriements in
order to permit the applicant to create a lot with a frontage of
20.57 m, instead of the required 45.5 m frontage.
Mr. Foley appeared in support of this application. Mrs. Pavolvich
apepared with interest in this application. No other person appeared
in support of or in opposition to this application.
Moved by Mr. Muir, seconded by Mrs. Payne,
"THAT as the requested variance would appear to
comply with the policies of the Official Plans and
Zoning By-law and would not appear to have a
detrimental effect on the surrounding neighnourhood,
permission is GRANTED to create a lot with a frontage
of 20.57 m . "
"CARRIED"
Appeal date for the foregoing applications is September 7, 1984.
Next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment is September 5, 1984.
Inspecting meeting is August 30, 1984 at 7:00 p.m.
Meeting adjourned at 10:25 p.m.
MONITORING OF COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT DECISIONS
August 81 1984.
C. OF A.
FILE NO. APPLICANT LOCATION NATURE OF APPLICATION C. OF A.I
STAFF COMMENTS DECISION
*1
64/84 Margaret Thickson Est. i L. 11, C. 1,
Continuation- Residential I A I
1 I Bowmanville I Front Yard and Rear Yard. I Approval I Granted
I I I I
I A 65/84 1 Colin Peter Thorne I L. 28, C. 5 1 Residential - Construction I I I
I Clarke I Front Yard and Set back. I Approval I Granted
i I I I
I I I
I A 66/84 1 Marrion Johnston I L. 28, C. 5 I
I David Johnston Clarke 1 Residential - addition I Approval
I I rear yard, side yard and set back. I I Granted
A 67/84 1 Belton Masonry I L. 9, C. 1, I 1 I
Industria - Storage building. I Approval, conditional upon i GRANTED
(Durham Building Suppli s Bowmanville side yard, rear yard I
I- --�-- — I Site Plan Approval, similar
I --�--— -- claddin , buildin permits.
A 68/84 W. G. Dallas L 14, C. 8 I Residential-creation I {
I I I Darlington i frontage I Approval
i Granted
A 69/84 Jack Taylor I I {--
I y I L. 29, C. 3 Residential - addition I
I I Darlington I front yard, rear yard I Approval I Granted i
A 70/84 Albert L. Brants I - - - --- F --- ------ ----- --F-- - --{
June P. Brants I L. 22, C. 1, I Rotdiential - continuation i Approval I I
I I Clarke Granted
- -- I - I I
I I I - -A 71/84 Bowmanville Memorial L. 10, C. 1 Institutional - addition Hospital Bowmanville -- Approval side
yar - --- - --- �----- --I
Granted
A 72/84 Lloyd Edward
I Wa W I I I C. I Residential accessory building Doreen agg Clarke Approval
distance - I{
stream I Granted
-}--------- -- - I I
\c\
2.......
2 MONITORING OF COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT DECISIONS
August 8, 1984
C. OF A.
FILE NO. APPLICANT LOCATION
NATURE OF APPLICATION STAFF COMMENTS DE OF A.
DECISION(
I A 73/84 1 Thomas Waid I 5 ( Residential - addition
I I
( Mary Waid i I Approval
Daa rlili ngtgt on ( side yard I i Granted
I I I I
IA 74/84 ( John Legere IL. 35, C.2 I _
( Darlington Ifrontage�and areaation I Approval
I va i Granted
IA 75/84 ( John Le ere I 1
9 IL. 35, C. 2 ( Residential - creation I Granted
I
( Darlington Ifrontage I Approval I Grt I
I I ---I--- I I I
I I I
f f
i I I I I I I
I
I
I - - --- - - --- -
I
I I
I I I
- i I
-
I --- --- --F-- --I
I I j
- {-------------- ----- -
��1