HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-25-84 -1 V (�
1 4
CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
HAMPTON,ONTARIO LOB UO T.T.EDWARDS,M.C.I.P.,Director
TEL.(416)263-2231
REPORT TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
MEETING OF JANUARY 16, 1984
REPORT NO. : PD-?5-84
SUBJECT: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT - VANANDEL-GUST
542985 ONTARIO LIMITED
PART LOT 15, CONCESSION 3
FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON
FILE: 18T-82034
RECOMMENDATION:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the
following :
1 • That Report PD-25-84 be received; and
* 2• That the attached By-law authorizing execution
of a Subdivision Agreement between the Town of
Newcastle and 542985 Ontario Limited be
approved; and
3• That Council provide Staff with further
direction with respect to the applicant ' s
requirements for satisfying the Town 's Rural
Fire Protection requirements pursuant to By-law
No. 81-30.
. . .2
REPORT NO. : PD-25-84 Page 2
BACKGROUND:
The above-noted draft plan of subdivision received draft
approval on June 7, 1983 subject to the conditions set out
by the Regional Municipality of Durham on May 12, 1983.
Within said conditions, specifically Condition #13, the
Owner is required prior to final approval of the plans, to
satisfy the requirements, financially and otherwise of the
Town of Newcastle. This shall include among other matters ,
the execution of a Subdivision Agreement between the Owner
and the Town.
The General Purpose and Administration Committee at their
April 18, 1983 meeting, endorsed the recommendations
contained within Report PD-62-83, whereas the Region of
Durham was to be advised that the Town of Newcastle
recommends approval of draft plan 18T-82034 dated September
19, 1982 subject to the conditions contained in Attachment
No. 1 to said report as amended. Subsequently thereto ,
Council at their April 25, 1983 meeting approved the
recommendations in Report PD-62-83 as amended.
Within Attachment No. 1 to Report PO-62-83, Condition No. 2
and No. 17 stated as follows :
"No. 2 That the developer enter into a subdivision
agreement with the Town of Newcastle.
No. 17 That the Owner agrees to satisfy the Town 's
Rural Fire Protection requirements pursuant
to By-law 81-30."
By-law 81 -30 requires the installation of a static
reservoir, minimum capacity of 100,000 litres where a
development of up to seventy-five (75) units is proposed on
septic tanks and private wells , or a municipal water system
. . .3
i
REPORT NO. : PD-25-84 Page 3
supplying domestic flows only. Accordingly, development
through subdivision agreements has proceeded on this basis.
ie. i ) Burketon Hills (18T-75362) - 100,000 litre
reservoir to be constructed.
ii ) Sucee Plan of Subdivision (18T-76063) - 100,000
litre water reservoir provided.
Staff would note for Committee' s information that deviations
from the "Generalized Standards" as contained within By-law
81 -30 may be accepted by the Town of Newcastle through the
execution of development agreements. Such has been the case
in the past where a proposed deviation from the Generalized
Standards, would in the opinion of staff, not be detrimental
to the well being of the Town of Newcastle. An example of
such a deviation to the Generalized Standards would include
the Gearing Farms Limited plan of subdivision - 18T-82030,
where the installation of a new fire hydrant on an existing
watermain was proposed at the corner of Nash and Tooleys
Road. The Fire Department had no objections to this
proposal , as the new fire hydrant would supply water for
rural fire protection transported by Fire Department water
trucks to the proposed subdivision in addition to being a
source of water supply for the buildings within the area of
Tooleys and Nash Road. The Abbott/Marchant plan of
subdivision - 18T-77067 provided for a contribution to the
cost of the construction and installation of a reservoir as
a means of complying with the provisions of By-law 81 -30.
This particular method of compliance in consideration of the
provisions of By-law 81 -30 was deemed appropriate as the
proposed development was located within a defined "Hamlet
area" where the potential number of new lots could be
determined (35) and an equal contribution to the cost of a
. . .4
REPORT NO. : PD-25-84 Page 4
reservoir be calculated.
COMMENTS:
D.G. Biddle and Associates requested in a letter dated
December 5, 1983 on behalf of 542985 Ontario Limited, that
pursuant to Condition No. 17 in the Town's conditions of
draft approval , that rather than constructing a reservoir,
the Town accept the use of existing hydrants in the vicinity
to load the Fire Department 's tanker trucks thereby
providing fire protection. In this instance, the closest
fire hydrant is located on Scugog Road at Mill Lane
approximately 1 ,000 metres south of the proposed
development.
The Fire Department expressed a concern in response to this
request, that although tanker trucks can refill in a quicker
time span, with less man power, from a hydrant than from a
water reservoir, a possibility exists whereby the
availability of the tanker truck from Station #1 due to
another emergency fire location , could be in jeopardy. A
hypothetical example, but could occur. In the interest of
fire safety and protection, the Fire Department recommended
that water supply for fire protection be designed in
accordance with the Town of Newcastle policy in respect of
Fire Protection Standards for estate lot and rural
residential development. Generalized Standards (1 ) would be
acceptable to that department.
A further submission was made on behalf of 542985 Ontario
Limited whereby an alternative was suggested through a
development charge of Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) per
. . .5
II
REPORT NO. : PD-25-84 Page 5
dwelling unit totalling Six Thousand, Six Hundred Dollars
($6,600.00) to be incorporated within the context of the
subdivision agreement - Schedule "D"- Development Charges
for Fire Protection purposes.
While Staff agree in principle with this approach, we are
not in a position to recommend the figure of Three Hundred
Dollars ($300.00) per lot. Recent estimates of the cost of
reservoirs places the figure at around Twenty Thousand
Dollars ($20,000.00) per reservoir. Distributed over a
twenty-two (22) lot subdivision such as this, the cost would
be about Nine Hundred and Nine Dollars ($909.00) per lot.
By relieving the developer of any obligation to build a
reservoir, we also relieve him of certain other costs
related to construction of an access and transfers of
easements. We also relieve the Town of any long term
maintenance responsibilities. For this reason, it was our
suggestion that an amount equal to the cost of the reservoir
be paid to the Town to be held in reserve and applied
against the purchase of capital equipment for fire fighting
such as tank trucks. If however, other development is
approved in this area, it may be possible to reduce the per
lot cost through cost sharing, by paying the developer an
apportioned amount recovered from other developments and
applied against the cost of the reservoir or the financial
contribution.
This is an alternative that staff could support. However,
it requires the subject applicant to front end the total
construction cost or cash contribution and rely upon the
Town 's ability to recover funds from other developers in the
event that further development is approved in the area.
. . .6
i
I
REPORT NO. : PD-25-84 Page 6
Furthermore, no rationale has been submitted for the
suggested development charge. Correspondence with the Fire
Department respecting this particular application also
expresses a concern with the use of reservoirs as a mode of
fire protection for specific areas. They are costly and
have to be maintained by the municipality once installed.
The Fire Department agrees that a more practical solution
may involve the establishing of an additional development
charge whereby monies can be applied to the purchase of Fire
Department tanker trucks. Vehicles of this nature would be
beneficial to the whole of the municipality.
Staff recognizes and concurs with the concerns of the Fire
Department and to that end will be meeting with Fire
Department staff to review and formulate any possible
changes and requirements to By-law 81 -30. However, under
the present provisions of said by-law the subject
applicants are required to provide for fire protection
purposes, the installation of a 1 ,000 litre reservoir unless
an alternate solution is approved through execution of a
development agreement. Inasmuch as staff are unable to
concur with the applicant 's request and the applicant does
not wish to comply with the existing policy, Council
direction will be required in order to finalize this
agreement.
A Respectf s Ub ed,
TO
T.T. Edwards, M.C.I.P.
Director of Planning
LDT*TTE*jip
*Attach.
Applicant : D.G. Biddle & Associates Ltd.
Consulting Engineers
633 King Street East
OSHAWA, Ontario
I I H 1 r
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
BY-LAW NUMBER 84-
being a By-law to authorize the entering into of a Subdivision
Agreement with the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle and 542985
Ontario Limited.
The Council of the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle hereby enacts
as follows:
1 . THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute on
behalf of the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle, and seal with the
Corporation's seal , a Subdivision Agreement between 542985 Ontario
Limited and the said Corporation dated the day of ,
1984, in the form attached hereto as Schedule
2. THAT Schedule "X" attached hereto forms part of this
by-law.
BY-LAW read a first time this day of 1984
BY-LAW read a second time this day of 1984
BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of
1984
G. B. RICKARII MAYOR
D. W. OAKES, CLERK