Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-38-84 4 CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT T.T.EDWARDS,M.C.I.P.,Director HAMPTON,ONTARIO LOB 1JO TEL.(416)263.2231 REPORT TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 6, 1984 REPORT NO. : PD-38-84 SUBJECT: APPLICATION TO AMEND DURHAM REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN - PORT DARLINGTON MARINA HOTEL LIMITED PART LOT 9, BROKEN FRONT CONCESSION GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON FILE: 83-33/D RECOMMENDATION: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following : 1 . That Report PD-38-84 be received; and 2. That the Region of Durham be advised that the Town of Newcastle has no objection to Official Plan Amendment Application 83-33/D, submitted by Port Darlington Marina Hotel Limited, to permit the construction of 25 residential condominium units in Part Lot 9, Broken Front Concession , geographic Township of Darlington ; and 3. That a copy of Staff Report PD-38-84 and Council 's decision be forwarded to the Region of Durham and the applicant. i REPORT NO: PD-38-84 Page 2 BACKGROUND: On October 11 , 1983, the Region of Durham advised the Town of Newcastle that it had received an application submitted by Port Darlington Marina Hotel to amend a 0.53 hectare (1 .31 acre) parcel of land in Part Lot 9, B.F. Concession , geographic Township of Darlington , from "Major Open Space - lands affected by Section 12.3.3" to an appropriate designation to permit the year-round occupancy of 25 residential condominium units. The site is also the subject of an application for approval of a plan of condominium (18CDM-83-002) and a rezoning application (File: DEV 83-38) ; both applications are currently being reviewed by Town Staff. In addition, the applicant applied to the Regional Land Division Committee (File No. : 220/83) for approval to separate the land subject to the Official Plan Amendment application from the existing Marina/Hotel facility. In their comments to the Land Division Committee, Town Staff recommended approval , conditional upon the granting of a minor variance and the applicant amending the development agreement currently covering the Marina and Hotel development. Staff note that this agreement was entered into on June 3, 1981 by By-law 81 -69. The Land Division Committee considered the application on July 11 , 1983 and, approved the application with one of the conditions of approval being that the applicant satisfy the requirements of the Town of Newcastle , financial and otherwise. In accordance with departmental procedure, the application was circulated to various agencies and departments for comment. As well , the Region of Durham provided the Town . . .3 REPORT NO: PD-38-84 Page 3 with copies of comments received through their circulation of the application. The following is a summary of the comments received : Town of Newcastle Public Works Department The Public Works Department noted that the change in usage of the subject property from primarily a seasonal marine traffic oriented operation to a year-round vehicular traffic operation , will increase the need to reconstruct Simpson Avenue. The department 's comments related specifically to the improvement of Simpson Avenue and would therefore be more appropriately addressed at the time the rezoning application is considered. Town of Newcastle Building Department "No Comment ." Town of Newcastle Community Services Department "We would recommend that the Town receive 5% cash-in-lieu of parkland. " Town of Newcastle Fire Department The Fire Department 's comments related to aspects of the proposed development which would be more appropriately addressed at the time the rezoning aplication is applied for. . . .4 REPORT NO: PD-38-84 Page 4 Region of Durham - Works Department "Full municipal services are available to the site. The subject owner has already obtained all necessary approvals from the Region for the related site sevicing plans and has also made agreements with the Regional Works Department for installation of water service and sanitary sewer connections for this project. The Regional Works Department has no objection to the subject proposal . However, we request that approval be made subject to the applicant and the Regional Municipality of Durham entering into an agreement to ensure: 1 . That the applicant satisfy all statutory requirements , finanacial and otherwise, of the Regional Municipality of Durham. In this regard, the applicant will be responsible for the payment of service charges and/or development charge levies in accordance with Regional policies. 2. That the condominium authority agree to maintain unobstructed access to existing water meters for servicing by Regional personnel . 3. That any metering changes proposed by the condominium authority be approved by the Region and all costs involved in the re-arrangement shall be at the condominium authority's expense. 4. That all outstanding local improvement charges for sanitary sewers and water mains assessed against these properties be commuted prior to the sale of the units." Ministry of Natural Resources "As the location of this Ministry' s primary fishery concerns . . .5 REPORT NO: PD-38-84 Page 5 is on the west side of the Port Darlington marsh, this proposal will not have a significant impact on our programme concerns . Subsequently, we have no objection to this amendment." Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority "The site of the proposed Official Plan amendment has been reviewed in conjunction with draft plan of condominium 18CDM 83-002. We understand that the purpose of the amendment is to permit the permanent private occupation of units built or being built on the previous understanding that these rental accommodations were a part of a marine operation and therefore seasonal in nature. In April 1981 and May 1983 this authority granted approval to the owner of the land subject to the Official Plan amendment to place fill and to construct "marine accommodation units. ..". Although the buildings are to be constructed on dredged fill material , the area around the permiter of the units and the lower portions of the units themselves will be flood-susceptible under regional storm conditions. The regional flood elevation is 78.6 metres. All portions of the "proposed asphalt driveway" and Simpson Avenue are below the flood level , as are portions of the lower level in the proposed units. For example , the walls on the west side of units 17 and 18 would be prone to about 1 .9 metres or 6.2 feet of flooding, according to the draft plan of condominium. There is no question that the above conditions when combined with potential ice damage entail a degree a risk to life . . .6 REPORT NO: PD-38-84 Page 6 and property. Note that road vehicle access to/from the site is unavailable during a regional storm, and that floating automobiles and water pressure could undermine the stability of the accommodation units. The perceived level of risk for marine accommodation of structures on the site has been deemed satisfactory. Implicit in this determination is the understanding that uses associated with a marina operation may entail a flood-related risk since such uses are, by necessity, water-based. Also, the risks are somewhat minimized in that: 1. the operation would be seasonal in nature, that is , tied to the operation of the marina ; 2. access to the units could be controlled by the proprietor as could emergency evacuation procedures ; 3. the hardship and much of the damage associated with the ownership of flood-prone property would be borne by the developer and not individual unit owners ; and 4. should the marina operation cease to exist at some point, no isolated flood-prone dwellings would remain since the units would be part of the marina. The approval of the proposed Official Plan amendment and condominium plan would negate those safeguards described above. It is important to emphasize that the proposed units and the driveway/access route cannot practically be protected against the regional storm. i . . .7 I Page 7 REPORT NO: PD-38-84 oing, we are unable to provide positive Based on the foreg comment on the proposed Official Plan amendment." Region of Durham Health Unit n to this proposal as it is provided We have no objectio with municipal services. proposed swimming pool and However, plans of the p ro p the Ministry of recreational complex must be approved by Health." Northumberland and Newcastle Board of Education purposes would not be required within the "A site for school p ur p boundaries of the proposed p lan." COMMENT: the Public As noted earlier, the concerns identified by artment regarding improvement to Simp son Avenue , Works Dep arding fire protection , would be and the Fire Department reg and development more appropriately addressed at the relani amendment agreement stage, should the Official application be approved* respect to the proposed The most serious conce eX r e expressed by the Central Lake Ontario development are those p The Authority states that previous Conservation Authority. that the units approvals were granted on the understanding eration of the would be rental accommodation tied natu he oAs well , the marina, and therefore seasonal in . ..8 1 page / I REPORT N0: PO-36-64 I i --� and Simpson Authority noted that p I ortions of the driveway I ell as portions of the lower level Level , Avenue, as w Regional Storm I proposed units, are below the Reg access and that if the units were rental abeodCOntrolled by the but procedures could emergency evacuation proprietor of the marina. approve as "seasonal in CLOCA refers to the units already pp that t presently zoned as he site is nature" . Staff n ote w to By-la 1567. That by-law limits the Special Condition 14 ancy, and not year-round to seasonal occup that occupancy would being would type of unit ccup The intent permanent residences.Nothing within the by- law however, be transient. ccu occupancy during the winter season and the prevent rental or ° p designed as housekeeping presently approved units were amendment effect of the proposed Official Plan The units- change in the manner in which the is therefore, to p ear-round ermit a rather units will be owned and to facilitate year-round , than transient occupancy. located outside of the Bowmanville Urban •s The subject area i en Space - Lands Affected By designated Major Op Tonal Official Plan Area and is fans Section 1?.3.3" . This sectionhalltprepare and adopt p Tonal Council s states that Reg development for these areas which include appropriate Until such plans have policies and land use designations. ared, only recreational uses will bedawl dwellings to been prep of existing seasonal the conversion is in �-Iowever, be allowed if such conversion dwellings may laws and permanent and zoning by with respective building Section the appropriate Health authorities. dwellings may approved by roue o 1 2.3.3 further states n nt dwellings provided that a communal ter be converted to perm lies with standards for piped water system which comp available. system to serve p ermanent dwellings is . ..9 i xo- Page 9 REPORT NO: Pf)-3R-B4 has not been prepared for �I Staff note that a development section 12.3.3. staff 12.3.3. However, as required by y ment has a feel the pr lready the area develop inciple of residential through the previous approval of the rental been established t permits conversion of section 1 2•3.3 p provided units. As well , dwellings to permanent dwellings, existing seasonal respective zoning comply with the by an that such dwelling s are supplied provided that they by-laws and further p Staff note that the appropriate water supply system. application to rezone the subjec applicant has submitted an pp and that the proposed parcel to permit the development , al water and sewers. development will be ser municip conversion of the presently a pp roved In these resp ects , th rivately owned condominiums would rental accommodation to p the intent of the T)urham ear, to seriously offend position not app We are not however, in a ro osal would comply with Regional Official Plan. to comment on whether or not the p p the Durham Regional Official Plan that Section 2.?_.5 of We can only suggest t to condominium conversions• their conversion to condom- et completed, the units are not y supply of act the existing inium would not adversely imp since these units were rental accommodation, p articularly,specialized market related to originally intended to meet a arine development. the existing harbour and m Based on the above, Staff have no objection to the proposed of the yenta on om Official Plan amendment or the conversion niums. This comment is based accommodation units to c of the site for residential solely on the fact that the use I f however , this were an previously granted. purposes was considered, we would be inclined application not previously denial until a waterfront plan had been to recommend , , ,lO i page 10 REPORT N0: PO-39-84 concurrence , I completed for this area. Subject to Council 's � comp ion of ourham be advised that it is recommended that the Re objection to Official Plan the Town of Newcastle has no amendment application 83-33/0• Respect s fitted, r�J 1� T. T. Edwards, M.C.I.p• director of Planning JAS*TTE*jip January 17 , 1984 ton Marina Hotel Limited Appl i cant: port R.o �1 i ng LIC 30 R BOWMANVILLE, Ontario Mr. Irwin Hamilton Agent: Hamilton & Bellefontaine Barristers & Solt p O. Box 357 43 Ontario St Ontario• L1C 2S4 Bowmanville, KEY MAP r BOWMANVILLE b L 6T I 15T I t I LOT 8 T LO 10 o m I lu i -j Of I i i I I O I I o �. QQ sb~A�VILL E _Z O I 2 IHWY. N° I 0 w w I O I I � I o I BASE LINE RD. I � _I, N IHWY. No 401 cn i I 'to I L I IZ I I - � SUBJECT SITE L A KE ONTAR/O 0 250 500 IOOOm 500