HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-8-88 DN: 8-88
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
REPORT File #
Res. #
By-Law #
MEETING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DATE: Monday, January 4, 1988
REPORT #: PD-8-88 FILE #: 18T-76011
SDJECT: PROPOSED REVISIONS AND EXTENSION TO DRAFT PLAN APPROVAL
PENWEST DEVELOPMENTS
PART LOT 9, CONCESSION 1, BOWMANVILLE
FILE: 18T-76011
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-8-88 be received; and
2. THAT the Minister of Municipal Affairs be advised that the Town of
Newcastle has no objections to the proposed redline revisions, prepared by
Conroy Dowson Planning Consultants Limited, Project No. 75-17-5 and dated
September 28, 1987 as further revised by Staff and attached hereto; and
3. THAT the conditions of draft approval be amended to include a provision
that the Owner covenants and agrees to provide a cash contribution
equivalent to Fifty Percent (500) the cost of extending Street "G"
immediately abutting Lots 189 and 204 as shown on the revised draft plan;
and
4. THAT the Minister of Municipal Affairs be advised that the Town of
Newcastle would have no objections to the extension of draft approval of
Plan of Subdivision 18T-76011 for a further one (1) year period to
January 23, 1989.
. . .2
REPORT NO. : PD-8-88 PAGE 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BACKGROUND AND COMMENT:
It is noted for the Committee's information that Council, at a meeting held on
January 23, 1984, endorsed the following resolution:
"It is respectfully recommended to Council that:
1. THAT Staff Report PD-39-84 be received; and
2. THAT the attached by-law be approved; and
3. THAT Staff not clear conditions of draft approval in respect of
Plan 18T-76011 until such time as the detailed location of
Street 'IF" and boundary descriptions have been resolved to
Council's satisfaction."
Staff would note that the above by-law in question was the zoning amendment in
conjunction with draft plan of subdivision 18T-76011. As Committee may recall,
the neighbours to the west of the proposed development, Mrs. VanderVeer and Mr.
Mutton both expressed their objections to the north/south road (Street 'IF,') to
Concession Street. Mrs. VanderVeer's preferred solution, at that time, was the
removal of the proposed future road entirely from her lands or to, at least,
provide that it be located half on her lands and half on the developers.
Alternatively, she would not object to the acquisition of these lands by the
developer, thus eliminating the problem.
As noted in Staff Report PD-39-84, Staff are sympathetic to the concerns
identified by Mr. Mutton and Mrs. VanderVeer and would suggest that, while
certain commitments have previously been made through draft plan approval and
these commitments reflect a draft pattern which respects the development
potential of all the lands within the neighbourhood without regard for land
ownership, there is room for negotiation on this point. However, the
underlying assumption must be that vacant and developable lands be developed in
accordance with the optimal subdivision design. It is noted for the
Committee's information that the revised plan submitted on behalf of Penwest
Development Inc. proposed, in addition to the proposed relotting and
relocation of a walkway, a revision to Streets 'IF" and 11GII. Staff would note
that, although the location of Street 'IF" has not been changed insofar as it is
proposed to develop as originally located, the northerly portion of same to
Concession Street has been eliminated. This deletion would appear to satisfy
Mrs. VanderVeer's concerns yet provide for the potential development of her
lands
3
}/
/
REPORT NO. : PD-8-88 PAGE 3
_______________________________________________________________________________
fronting Street "Q^ if and when Street nQn is constructed immediately abutting
Lots 189 and 204.
In consideration of the proposed location, Staff as noted within the
recommendations of this Report have requested that a condition of approval
include the Owners providing m cash contribution equivalent to Fifty Percent
(50%) , the cost of extending Street »Gx adjacent to Lots 304 and 189. It is
Staff's opinion that this location of Street xQ^ would permit the developable
lands to be developed in accordance with the optimal subdivision design
thereby providing adequate depth for lots proposed on Mrs. VaudecVeer'o and Mr.
'
Mutton's properties having frontage onto Street oGn east of the "Environmental
Protection (EP)II zone. The proposed aboziug of the coat of extending Street
'/Gn would be consistent with similar applications and practices within the Town
where joint ownership has been involved.
Staff umoId also note for the Committee's information that the walkway shown as
Block xCx is proposed to be relocated between Lots 81 and 82 would then
directly abut Soper Creek Drive on the east aide of Meacu'n Avenue and provide
a ueoeaaecy mcoeaa to the west and the pock site. We would also recommend
relocation of proposed walkway Block nDn, to the east of Imta 177 and 188 to
provide a better aooeoa to the intersection and future tcouolt atwDa and avoid
�
conflicts with the existing residential lot. Thus Block »8`` is enlarged and
Block "Do relocated with Block v\7o being reduced in size accordingly.
Staff would note that copies of this Report have been provided to Mc. Mutton
and Mrs. VaudecVeec. It is noted for the Committee's consideration that,
should support of the proposed revisions not be acceptable at this point in
time' Staff would respectfully request that consideration be given to a �
resolution whereby extension to draft approval of the presently approved plan, |
thereby extending said approval to January 23, I989 be considered. '
�
|
^ . .4
�
�
B8P0BT N0. : PD-8-88 PAGE 4
/
___________________________________________________________________________
Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
CAT
--- --�7----------- -C�- - --------------
T.T. Bdv��zdov1�^�.I.�. �owce oef�
/ nirantoc of Planning Chief Ad 'u st�ative Officer
` -
Q}T*TT8* 'ip
*Attach.
December 18, 1987
CC: Conroy Iowoou
Planning Consultants Inc.
203 Rushton Road
TORONTO, Ontario
M6G 3J2
Mc. Robert Mutton
45 Concession Street East
80WM&KVILLE, Ontario
LIC lY2
Mrs. K. VandecVeec
53 Concession Street East
B0WMA0VILLE, Ontario
LlC lY2
�
/
|
�~ |
'
Iss 186 181 we 109. 190
1 163 102 101 180:179
Ire
199- 97 96 195 194'193 11,2 191
202 2203 20 20-6.
0 '199:200 201
SURVEYORS
144 152 207 200--
145- 146, 140 149 150 151
LOCK
09 08 87 86
1 106 IOT 108 109' 44 43
1 05
2 43 46 81
112 m no
115' 114 113
c.
OLK
WALKWAY
142 211 To
135 136 13T 13 1 9 140: 76
41 18
134 133 132 131 1 0 129" 74
39 F-
uj
It
27 120
- NOTE: THIS PLAN WAS
36 53 69 ORIGINALLY DRAFT
4 35 34 APPROVED
MINISTER ON JonvoryZ9,
5 1981, ond INCLUDES
5 54— 575 67
6 11 56 .6 REVISIONS TO Junelt,1984
32 ST 65
31 0 64
KOCK ST.
59* 63
60 62
28 61
23 22 21
PART OF LOT 9. CONCESSION I
.1 r, tFORMERLY TOWN OF BOWMA"VILLEI
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
AS APPROVED OY COUNCIL
18T7601 1
'
I1.-f 1 It
OLK.'G' 8LK.'H'
2
S 5
Be.T E
GLOaV
BLOCK 18 7 188 OPILkWAV
EILOCK-V
182 181 178 177
/•i BL K,L
REST
XEY PLAN
TEMP 189:19 9 9 193 r94 19_5 196: 1175
T RNI _ _ •174
ci C 198 197-- 173 _OLX.T AUTHORIZATION
7172 ILOC9,0, ... .. .
ILOC.X.�Q lG#
BLOCKV 63 164 165 166 167 168 16 170
w
162 161 160 159 158 157 156
U)
TSURVEYORS CERTIFICATE
STREET 'F' = U.,
4 140 146 147: J 4 8 149 150 151 1 153 154 155,
J.
98 —gr'90. 89 so 87 as 05
84
J
I AND USE
I,IX,x S R E T 'E' 03
44 45 82
10 105 106 107 108 109: in
101 102
43 46
42 47 C: BLOCK
14 113 112 Ill RO C
117 w t 208 207 WALKWAY
lie PEAC TREE : 142 206 78
119 141 205 77
135,1 36 137 138 1 9 140^
41 48 76 bi
120
73
121 40 49
134:133 132 131 1 129 3', 74 AOnITIONAL INFORMATION
0: 122 - ?
�O LLJ f 73,
BLK.V
;? CRESCENT 0- ST., '19' LL1 72
J: i
ui
X bi
1 ZG 2 28:
124 5 ' 7-1 1 7 It
2 x t 37 .52
36. 53 69. NOT THIS PLAN WAS
11 ORIGINALLY DRAFT
4 35 54 Go APPROVED BY THE
MINISTER ON Jonvory 29,
5 c p !,,34—--I�i : 67 1981, and INCLUDES
1 ALL MINISTER APPROVED
33 as 66.. REVISIONS TO Junell,1904.
ROYAL PINES 7 32 57 65
COURT---,, 31 58-, 64
' A RED-LINE REVISION
JeLOCKV
30
----LL— 6 -SEPTEMBEB--28- 1987
59' 3
8 A 29
4. 61 62
t
26
—40 DIIAPT PtAn of
24
44 22 21 sumvision aT-76011-R
PART OF LOT 9, CONCESSION I
�1`1 N,III I
(FORMERLY TOWN OF BOWMANVILLE)
6/,' TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
RFGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM
17 18 19,
9 20 BLK.'X'
V Is
OLOCX
• AS APPROVED BY COUNCIL
• OCTOBER 9,1979
OWSON PLANNING
CONSULTANTS INCORPORATE.
7
�t �,
s
{ f' � � .,
5
d'
iJ t .. s i p
t�
it` ..
S", .
/�
�4 f
Gam_'
(ro ' � () `�'.
CARR & COLEMAN
BARRISTERS & SOLICITORS
ROGER N, CARR, 4.c. 50 WALTON STREET
BRUCE H. COLEMAN, B.E.s., LL.B. PORT HOPE, ONTARIO
L1A 1N1
(416) 88 5.814 6
December 29 , 1987
Corporation of the Town of Newcastle
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville , Ontario
L1 C 3 A 6 `tt _nu
I CLUB K DEPARTMENT
Dear Sirs : �� � `�
6
Re: Planning and Development Report -8-88
To General Purpose and Administration Committee
Meeting - January 4, 1988
Draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-76011
We have been retained by the agent for Mrs. VanderVeer, the
adjoining property owner on the west side of the above noted plan of
subdivision.
At no time has there been any communication initiated by the
developer with respect to the use of Mrs. VanderVeer ' s lands for road
allowance purposes as shown by the dotted line on the original draft
plan and as further shown on the red line revision. The red line
revision requires the use of a portion of Mrs . VanderVeer ' s lands
at some unspecified date, and until the matter has been properly
negotiated and resolved with Mrs . VanderVeer it would be premature
of the municipality to approve of the red line September revision ,
From a planning perspective , we submit that the use of turning
circles at the end of G Street as a temporary measure is also un-
acceptable , because it would create an undesirable road pattern
which, if proceeded with, would never be subsequently rectified.
Subject to further instructions, we would be prepared to
support recommendations numbers 1 and 4 of the above noted report ,
with perhaps the proviso that no further extension on January 23 ,
1989 , will be given .
Would you kindly provide us with a copy of the recommend-
ations made by the General Purpose and Administration Committee,
when those recommendations will be forwarded to Council , and in due
course copies of any resolutions of Council dealing with this matter .
Yours very truly,
CARR �FOLEMAN
:dog
dr N. Carr. C'
R N C:r y
C.C. Mrs . K. VanderVeer '`