Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/20/2005 Clarkigion Leading the Way GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE DATE: June 20, 2005 TIME: 9:30 A.M. PLACE: COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. ROLL CALL 2. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 3. MINUTES (a) Minutes of a Regular Meeting of June 6, 2005 301 (b) Minutes of a Special Meeting of June 13, 2005 312 4. PRESENTATIONS (a) Craig Binning, Hemson Consulting regarding Development Charges Study Report FND-007-05 (b) Todd Brown, Monteith Brown Planning Consultants regarding the Newcastle Recreation Facility Needs Assessment Report CSD-010-05 (c) Faye Langmaid, Manager, Special Projects regarding Bowmanville Community Improvement Plan Report PSD-079-05 5. DELEGATIONS (a) Bill Cawker, Baywood Homes, regarding Report PSD-092-05 (b) Ron Hooper, Member, Community Focus Group regarding Bowmanville Community Improvement Plan regarding Report PSD-079-05 (c) Dave Turkovich regarding Report PSD-091-05 Surplus Property on Bradshaw (d) Ray Bester, Orono Athletic Association regarding Report CSD-010-05 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905) 623-3379 G.P. & A. Agenda - 2 - June 20, 2005 6. PUBLIC MEETINGS (a) Bowmanville Community Improvement Plan 501 Report: PSD-079-05 (c) Application for Draft Plan of Subdivision Approval and to Amend 502 the Zoning By-law Applicant: Home-Land Development Group Ltd. Report: PSD-080-05 (c) Application to Amend the Zoning By-law 84-63 504 Applicant: Moolco Investments Incorporated Report: PSD-081-05 (d) Proposed Development Charges By-law 506 Report: FND-007-05 7. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) PSD-079-05 — Bowmanville Community Improvement Plan 601 (b) PSD-080-05 — Revisions to Proposed Plan of Subdivision and 604 Related Rezoning to Permit 48 Residential Units Applicant: Home-Land Development Group Ltd. (c) PSD-081-05 — Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment to Permit a 609 Self Serve Car Wash with a Dog Wash Applicant: Moolco Investments Incorporated (d) PSD-082-05 — Application for Removal of Part Lot Control 614 Applicant: Frank Canonaco (e) PSD-083-05 — Application For Removal of Part Lot Control 621 Applicant: Syvan Development Limited (f) PSD-084-05 — Application for Removal of Holding 625 Applicant: Prestonvale Road Land Corp. (g) PSD-085-05 — Proposed Plan of Subdivision to Permit 388 631 Residential Units, in the City of Oshawa Applicant: Glaspell do Glenosha Farms (h) PSD-086-05 — Sign By-law Amendment Application 636 Applicant: Fairhaven Investments Inc. G.P. & A. Agenda - 3 - June 20, 2005 (i) PSD-087-05 — EA Notice of Study Completion 642 Additional Water Supply Capacity to Service the Newcastle Urban Area (j) PSD-088-05 — Application for Removal of Part Lot Control 645 Applicant: Orchard Park Estates (Bowmanville) Inc. (k) PSD-089-05 — Application for Removal of Part Lot Control 650 Applicant: Vermont Village Homes (I) PSD-090-05 — Application for Removal of Part Lot Control 655 Applicant: 1189286 Ontario Inc. (Gary Breda) (m) PSD-091-05 — Declaration and Sale of Surplus Property 660 (n) PSD-092-05 — Plan of Subdivision, Rezoning and Official Plan Amendment to Permit 327 Residential Units Owner: 1477677 Ontario Limited (Baywood Homes) (to be distributed under separate cover) (o) PSD-093-05 — Draft Plan of Condominium Application 667 Applicant: Port of Newcastle East Lands Ltd. (p) PSD-074-05 — Site Plan Control By-Law 672 (q) PSD-094-05 — Amendment to By-law 2003-185 Application Fees Planning and Development Applications (to be distributed under separate cover) 8. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) EGD-017-05 — Establishing a Revised Building Permit Policy for the 701 Municipality of Clarington (b) EGD-018-05 — Venton Court Subdivision, Tyrone, Plan 40M-2009, 707 'Certificate of Acceptance' and 'Assumption By-law', Final Works Including Road and Other Related Works (c) EGD-019-05 — Confidential — Property Matter (d) EGD-020-05 — Monthly Report on Building Permit Activity for 712 May, 2005 (e) EGD-021-05 — Accessible Parking — Proposed Amendments to 717 By-law 91-58 (f) EGD-022-05 — Confidential — Property Matter G.P. & A. Agenda - 4 - June 20, 2005 9, OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT (a) OPD-007-05 — Clarington Pitch-In Canada Events 801 (b) OPD-012-05 — CNE Garden Show 807 10. EMERGENCY AND FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) ESD-009-05 — Monthly Response Report— May 2005 901 11. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) CSD-010-05 — Newcastle Recreation Facility Needs Assessment 1001 (b) CSD-011-05 — Proposed Admission Standards for Public Swimming 1005 Pools 12. CLERK'S DEPARTMENT No Reports 13. CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) COD-031-05 — Confidential - Personnel Matter (b) COD-032-05 — CL2005-12 Scugog Street Reconstruction, 1201 Bowmanville (c) COD-033-05 — Confidential - Personnel Matter (d) COD-034-05 — CL2005-22 Asphalt Resurfacing, Various Streets 1208 (e) COD-035-05 — CL2005-15 Sidewalk Construction, Various 1225 1216 Locations (f) COD-036-05 — CL2005-10, Soper Creek Recreational Trail, 1225 Bowmanville and Lion's Trail Newcastle Paving (g) COD-037-05 — Tender CL2005-19, Driveway Paving 1232 14. FINANCE DEPARTMENT (a) FND-007-05 — Development Charges Study and By-law 2005 1301 (b) FND-008-05 — Annual Statement for the Development Charges 1330 Reserve Funds for the Year ended December 31, 2004 G.P. & A. Agenda - 5 - June 20, 2005 15. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER'S DEPARTMENT No Reports 16. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (a) COD-028-05 — CL2005-18 Newcastle Memorial Arena Canteen 1501 Renovations (b) Addendum to PSD-032-05 — Orono Community Improvement Program 1511 Approval 17. OTHER BUSINESS 18. ADJOURNMENT ,, # General Purpose and Administration Committee ' tf it{ Minutes June 6, 2005 %how Minutes of a meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on Monday, June 6, 2005 at 9:30 a.m., in the Council Chambers. ROLL CALL Present Were: Mayor J. Mutton Councillor A. Foster Councillor D. MacArthur Councillor P. Pingle Councillor G. Robinson Councillor J. Schell Councillor C. Trim Also Present: Chief Administrative Officer, F. Wu Senior Planner, Community Planning, H. Brooks Director of Engineering Services, T. Cannella Director of Community Services, J. Caruana Director of Planning Services, D. Crome Director of Operations, F. Horvath Director of Corporate Services, M. Marano Manager, Community Planning and Design, C. Pellarin Director of Finance/Treasurer, N. Taylor Director of Emergency Services, G. Weir Manager, Park Development, P. Windolf (attended until 10:00 a.m.) Deputy Clerk, A. Greentree Clerk II, C. Doiron Mayor Mutton chaired this portion of the meeting. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST Councillor Schell indicated that he would be disclosing a pecuniary interest with respect to Report PSD-071-05. Councillor Pingle indicated that she would be disclosing a pecuniary interest with respect to Report PSD-072-05. MINUTES Resolution #GPA-247-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT the minutes of the regular meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on May 24, 2005, be approved. Sir CARRIED - 1 - General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 6, 2005 PRESENTATIONS Todd Brown, Monteith/Brown Planning Consultants gave a power point presentation regarding the Outdoor Recreation Facilities Study. The intent of the study is to ensure that the needs for recreation and leisure facilities are evaluated by analyzing the past, present and projected demographic profile of the community. The Study identified outdoor recreation facility needs within the Municipality of Clarington for the next fifteen years. The Study will determine the most appropriate and fiscally-achievable provision strategies, complete with priorities and timing, to meet the needs of sports facility improvements or construction. Mr. Brown reviewed the facility inventory and the identified needs. He presented the twenty-two recommendations detailed in the Study. Resolution #GPA-248-05 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT Maxine Hoos be added to the list of delegations. CARRIED DELEGATIONS W'' Mr. Dave Muiria, on behalf of his wife Lucielle, and himself, stated regarding Report PSD-068-05 Oak Ridges Moraine Zoning By-law, that they had nothing to add at that time and did not address Committee. Trudy Paterson, Senior Planner, Skelton Brumwell & Associates Inc. spoke in regards to Report PSD-068-05 Oak Ridges Moraine Zoning By-law. Ms. Paterson was representing her client Sarah Lowe, Dufferin Aggregates. She has concerns regarding the process of the By- law and that the proposed zoning by-law had not been made available for public review and believes that a Public Meeting is required. Ms. Paterson discussed the comments and recommendations detailed in her letter of June 3, 2005, which was previously circulated to Members of Council. Mr. Greg White, regarding Report PSD-068-05 Oak Ridges Moraine Zoning By-law, stated he had nothing further to add and did not address Committee. Mr. Ron Robinson, regarding Report PSD-068-05 Oak Ridges Moraine Zoning By-law stated he had nothing further to add and did not address Committee. Maxine Hoos spoke in opposition to Report PSD-070-05. Ms. Hoos mentioned that she had no concerns with the Kylemore Homes Development. However, she is concerned that they are now applying for additional homes before they even start construction. She would like to see low density housing as she feels that there is enough high density areas in Clarington. - 2 - General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 6, 2005 She feels that this causes concerns with the amount of parking available to the residents. Ms. Hoos asked the Committee if it would be at all possible to have visitor parking lots in local neighbourhoods. She also added that there is a buffer to be placed between the sewage plant and the neighbourhood and questioned how and why it is set to 150m. Ms. Hoos sought further details respecting the construction of an 18 hole mini putt anticipated in the area. PUBLIC MEETING There were no items to be considered under this section. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Councillor Schell stated a pecuniary interest respecting to Report PSD-071-05, vacated his chair and refrained from discussion and voting on this matter. Councillor Schell indicated that his wife is employed by Dan Holkema. ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A COMMERCIAL BUILDING APPLICANT: 1638338 ONTARIO INC. (DAN HOLKEMA) Resolution #GPA-249-05 ‘■ Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THAT Report PSD-071-05 be received; THAT the rezoning application submitted by 1638338 Ontario Inc., be approved; THAT the amending By-law attached to Report PSD-071-05 be forwarded to Council for approval; THAT a copy of Report PSD-071-05 and the attached amending By-law be forwarded to the Durham Region Planning Department; and, THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-071-05 and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED Resolution #GPA-250-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Pingle THAT Committee recess for 10 minutes. CARRIED - 3 - General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 6, 2005 The meeting reconvened at 10:40 a.m. Councillor Schell chaired this portion of the meeting. OAK RIDGES MORAINE ZONING BY-LAW Resolution #GPA-251-05 Moved by Councillor MacArthur seconded by Councillor Pingle THAT the rules of procedure be waived to allow anyone present to speak in opposition to or support of Report PSD-068-05. CARRIED No one spoke in opposition to or in support of Report PSD-068-05. Carlo Pellarin, Manager, Community Planning and Design gave a power point presentation to the Committee Members regarding Report PSD-068-05, highlighting the key elements of the Oak Ridges Moraine Zoning By-law. Resolution #GPA-252-05 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Pingle THAT Report PSD-068-05 be received; THAT the Zoning By-laws implementing the policies of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan and Amendment No. 33 to the Clarington Official Plan as contained in Attachment No. 1 to Report PSD-068-05 be approved; THAT upon approval of the Zoning By-laws by the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, a by- law be forwarded to Council to change the Municipal Fee Schedule by adding a new fee for Removal of the Environmental Holding Symbol consistent with fees for minor variance applications; THAT the Zoning By-laws contained in Attachment No. 1 to this Report be forwarded to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing for approval in accordance with the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act; THAT the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Region of Durham Planning Department, Central Lake Ontario Conservation, Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority, Otonabee Region Conservation Authority, Kawartha Region Conservation Authority, City of Oshawa, Town of Port Hope, City of Kawartha Lakes, Township of Scugog and Cavan Township be forwarded a copy of Report PSD-068-05 and Council's decision; and -4 - General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 6, 2005 THAT all interested parities listed in Report PSD-068-05 and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE MEETING OF MAY 19, 2005 Resolution #GPA-253-05 Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Report PSD-069-05 be received; THAT Council concurs with the decision of the Committee of Adjustment made on May 19, 2005 for applications A2005/018, A2005/019 and A2005/020; and THAT Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment. CARRIED AMENDMENT TO DRAFT APPROVED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 18T-96013 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT ZBA2004-048 TO PERMIT THE DEVELOPMENT OF 245 RESIDENITAL UNITS APPLICANT: KYLEMORE HOMES Resolution #GPA-254-05 Moved by Mayor Mutton, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THAT Report PSD-070-05 be received; THAT the amendment to Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision 18T-96013, submitted by Kylemore Homes be approved subject to the conditions contained in Attachment 3 to Report PSD-070-05; THAT the rezoning application submitted by Kylemore Homes be approved and that the proposed Zoning By-law contained in Attachment 4 to Report PSD-070-05 be passed; THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized by By-law, to execute a Subdivision Agreement between the Owner and the Municipality of Clarington at such time as the agreement has been finalized to the satisfaction of the Directors of Engineering and Planning Services; THAT a copy of Report PSD-070-05 and Council's decision be forwarded to the Region of Durham Planning Department; and - 5 - General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 6, 2005 THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-070-05 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED Councillor Pingle stated a pecuniary interest respecting to Report PSD-072-05, vacated her seat and refrained from discussion and voting on this matter. Councillor Pingle's son is a landowner in the subject area. APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF HOLDING SYMBOL APPLICANT: ANDREW MEIMA Resolution #GPA-255-05 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THAT Report PSD-072-05 be received; THAT the application submitted by Andrew Meima on behalf of Keith Allin of 917859 Ontario Limited, to remove the Holding (H) symbol be approved and that the attached By-law to Report PSD-072-05 to remove the Holding (H) symbol be passed and a copy forwarded to the Regional Municipality of Durham; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD-072-05 and any delegations be advised of Council's `Ils' decision. CARRIED CANADIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMISSION DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE G — 320 —ASSESSING THE LONG TERM SAFETY OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT Resolution #GPA-256-05 Moved by Mayor Mutton, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT Report PSD-073-05 be received; THAT Report PSD-073-05 be approved as the comments of the Municipality of Clarington on Draft Regulatory Guide G-320, Assessing the Long Term Safety of Radioactive Waste Management; and THAT a copy of Council's decision and Report PSD-073-05 be forwarded to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Office, the Nuclear Waste Management Organization, and the South East Clarington Rate Payers Association FORTHWITH. CARRIED - 6 - General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 6, 2005 MUNICIPALITY OF PORT HOPE OFFICIAL PLAN Resolution #GPA-257-05 Moved by Councillor Pingle, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Report PSD-076-05 be received; THAT Report PSD-076-05 be submitted as the Municipality of Clarington's comments on the Municipality of Port Hope Draft Official Plan dated April 12, 2005; and THAT a copy of Report PSD-076-05 be forwarded to the Municipality of Port Hope. CARRIED Councillor MacArthur chaired this portion of the meeting. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT OUTDOOR RECREATION FACILITIES STUDY Resolution #GPA-258-05 °\r Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report EGD-016-05 be received; THAT The Outdoor Recreation Facilities Study be approved as a guide for the future provision of outdoor recreation facilities; and THAT Council express its intent to fund these projects, to the extent allowable, from current and future development charges. CARRIED Councillor Trim chaired this portion of the meeting. - 7 - General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 6, 2005 OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT SENIOR CITIZENS AND PHYSICALLY DISABLED SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY WINDROW SNOW CLEARING PROGRAM Resolution #GPA-259-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THAT Report OPD-008-05 be received for information. CARRIED 2004—2005 WINTER REPORT Resolution #GPA-260-05 Moved by Councillor MacArthur, seconded by Councillor Foster THAT Report OPD-009-05 be received; THAT the Municipal Salt Management Plan be approved as attached to Report OPD-009-05; and %s' THAT Environment Canada be advised of Council's direction. CARRIED EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT There were no reports considered under this section of the agenda. Councillor Robinson chaired this portion of the meeting. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENTARY FEES AND RATES REPORT Resolution #GPA-261-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT Report CSD-009-05 be received; and `. - 8 - General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 6, 2005 THAT the Supplementary Fees and Rates Report CSD-009-05, as outlined in Attachment #1 to Report CSD-009-05, be approved. CARRIED Councillor Foster chaired this portion of the meeting. CLERK'S DEPARTMENT PRIVATE PARKING ENFORCEMENT Resolution #GPA-262-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THAT Report CLD-025-05 be received; THAT the by-laws attached to Report CLD-025-05 to appoint parking enforcement officers for private property be forwarded to Council for approval; and THAT Shelly Wensink, Barry Hails, Valiant Property Management and P.R.O. Security Investigation Agency Inc. be advised of Council's actions. *r CARRIED Mayor Mutton chaired this portion of the meeting. CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT CL2005-13 STATION STREET RECONSTUCTION, ORONO Resolution #GPA-263-05 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT Report COD-029-05 be received; THAT Miwel Construction Limited, Stouffville, Ontario with a total bid in the amount of $638,216.09 (Plus G.S.T.), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions, and specifications of Tender CL2005-13, be awarded the contract for the Station Street Reconstruction, Orono, as required by the Engineering Department; - 9 - General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 6, 2005 THAT the total funds required in the amount of$570,000.00 ($638,216.09 tender plus contingencies, consulting, soils and utilities, less Region of Durham Works) be drawn from Engineering 2005 Capital Projects #5800-8310-05106 ($520,000.00) and #5800-8310-05118 ($50,000.00); THAT the attached By-law to Report COD-029-05, marked Schedule "A" authorizing the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the necessary agreement, be approved FORTHWITH. CARRIED REALLOCATION OF 2004 CAPITAL BUDGET FUNDS Resolution #GPA-264-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor MacArthur THAT Report COD-030-05 be received; THAT the remaining funds, in the amount of$9,800.00 from the 2004 Capital Budget, Account# 110- 16-130-81608-7401 be used for the purpose of ergonomic design/furniture for the Communication and Marketing Division's office space. CARRIED FINANCE DEPARTMENT There were no items considered under this section of the agenda. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER'S DEPARTMENT There were no items considered under this section of the agenda. UNFINISHED BUSINESS There were no items considered under this section of the agenda. OTHER BUSINESS There were no items considered under this section of the agenda. - 10 - General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 6, 2005 ADJOURNMENT Resolution #GPA-265-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT the meeting adjourn at 11:32 CARRIED MA OR DE UTY LERK 4010, - 11 - General Purpose and Administration Committee ? 1.110011 Minutes June 13, 2005 Minutes of a special meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on Monday, June 13, 2005 at 9:30 a.m., in the Council Chambers. ROLL CALL Present Were: Mayor J. Mutton Councillor A. Foster Councillor D. MacArthur Councillor P. Pingle Councillor G. Robinson Councillor J. Schell Councillor C. Trim Also Present: Chief Administrative Officer, F. Wu Director of Engineering Services, T. Cannella Director of Planning Services, D. Crome Director of Operations, F. Horvath Director of Corporate Services, M. Marano Director of Finance/Treasurer, N. Taylor Director of Emergency Services, G. Weir Administrative Assistant to the Clerk, H. Keyzers Municipal Clerk, P. Barrie Mayor Mutton chaired this portion of the meeting. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST There were no disclosures of pecuniary interest stated at this meeting. PRESENTATIONS Bob Lehman, Meridian Planning Consultants, Doug Annand, urbanMetrics Inc., Will McCrae, Totten Sims Hubicki and David Crome, Director of Planning Services, provided Council with a combined powerpoint presentation highlighting the following: Bob Lehman, Meridian Planning Consultants — Commercial Policy Review • Purpose of the Study • Planning Process • Urban Conclusions • Main Conclusions • OPA 43 — Official Plan • Secondary Plan Review • Urban Design Review— Findings - 1 - General Purpose and Administration Committee till i l ; 0 Minutes ,eow""`"°"°` June 13, 2005 • Public Consultation Workshop • Recommended Option — Demonstration Plan • Main Conclusions Doug Annand, urbanMetrics Inc. — Market Analysis • Background Report • Background Report Conclusions • Retail Market Impact Analysis — December 2004 • Retail Market Impact Analysis Conclusions • Addendum Market Analysis — May 2005 • Addendum Market Analysis Conclusions Will McCrae, Totten Sims Hubicki —Transportation • Main Conclusions David Crome, Director of Planning Services • OPA 44 — Bowmanville West Main Central Area Secondary Plan Review Resolution #GPA-266-05 Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Trim THAT Committee recess for 10 minutes. "CARRIED" The meeting reconvened at 11:00 a.m. Councillor Schell chaired this portion of the meeting. PUBLIC MEETINGS (a) Subject: Commercial Policy Review Amendment No. 42 to the Clarington Official Plan Applicant: Municipality of Clarington Report: PSD-077-05 - 2 - General Purpose and Administration Committee o Minutes June 13, 2005 (b) Subject: Bowmanville West Main Central Area Secondary Plan Review Amendment 44 to the Clarington Official Plan and Related Applications by Halloway Holdings Limited and West Diamonds Property Inc./Players Business Park Limited Applicant: Municipality of Clarington Report: PSD-078-05 Stan Stein, Osier Hoskin & Harcourt, appeared before Committee representing Zellers Inc. He suggested that the program for commercial development is extremely aggressive for a community of this size. Mr. Stein reminded Council that in 1995 the Ontario Municipal Board made a decision approving a junior department store, and as a result Zellers have made significant investments in this community. He notes that the Market Analysis provided by urbanMetrics Inc. is overly aggressive and the results will do serious harm to the existing commercial facilities. The municipality's consultants' report is unrealistic, i.e. inflow dollars overall sales is currently being stated at 30% which is double the realistic 15%. Mr. Stein questioned the conclusions of the Market Analysis. He asked what will happen to the downtown merchants if their sales drop. How many downtown merchants can handle a 43% drop in sales? He advises Council not to rush their decision and that there needs to be a more selective approach, better urban design and a more orderly approach to see that the new facilities are introduced as population rises. Mr. Stein recommends to Council that Reports PSD-077-05 and PSD-078-05 be referred back to staff to develop an alternative solution. Ron Hooper, Chairman, Board of Management, Bowmanville Business Improvement Association, thanked David Crome and Carlo Pellarin of the Planning Services Department for meeting with him to discuss the Marketing Impact Study written by urbanMetrics. He noted that the 1 million sq ft proposal is staggering and totally incomprehensible. Mr. Hooper stated that building a Wal-Mart and a new Loblaws by 2006/2007 would be devastating to existing businesses and that anyone wishing to attend one of these stores only needs to travel to Taunton and Harmony Roads in Oshawa. He stated that the surveys taken by the consultants have no foundation or fact on how people are spending their money. Mr. Hooper is requesting Council to stage the phasing in of these stores to the growth of the population. Bob Hann, Valiant Property Management, reminded Committee that from 1989 - 1992 people were being laid off and that people should be thankful that this municipality is growing. Mr. Hann acknowledged that there has been some urban design concerns along with traffic issues but they are attempting to meet all of the Planning Services Department's needs and if Home Depot is approved the traffic concerns will be eliminated. He also advised that Home Depot is satisfied with the existing site and will not look anywhere else in Clarington. If smaller stores are approved to be built on this site, they will compete with the downtown merchants' sales. Mr. Hann stated that if the development is allow to proceed, Council will be giving the residents what they want, jobs will be created, tax money will be brought in, levies and building permit fees will grow, travel time and energy costs will be lowered. - 3 - Cialins°tOn General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes t.oe:»x En. S June 13, 2005 Brent Clarkson, MHBC Planning, appeared before Committee representing Home Depot of Canada. He advised Committee that Home Depot, if approved, will serve the residents of Clarington better and the money residents spend will not have to go to Whitby or Oshawa. Home Depot has investigated many areas in Bowmanville but this proposed site best suits their needs. He notes that staff are not in support of this location because they state that Home Depot is an industrial use. Mr. Clarkson states that Home Depot will benefit downtown Bowmanville by resembling the downtown appearance and complementing the merchants instead of mimicking their stores. He also notes that staff recommendations are not what the Bowmanville BIA want to see or what constituents want to see. Home Depot understands the important of urban design and are prepared to develop a one-of-a-kind site for Bowmanville and abandon corporate image to address wishes. He notes that Home Depot staff wages are above minimum wage and above Ministry averages. They employ skilled trade's people and each store manager is given a budget for local charity efforts. Mr. Clarkson requested Council's support for the Halloway Holdings Application and Amendment Nos. 43 and 44 to the Clarington Official Plan. Roslyn Houser, Goodmans LLP, appeared before Council on behalf of West Diamond Properties. She commended Clarington's staff and consultant reports and noted that this process has taken over a year. She noted that residents need appropriate levels of service and that the existing facilities are not meeting their needs. The results of the consumers surveys are very dramatic and note that only 17% of department store money is being captured. Ms. Houser advises that if her client's application is approved the spin off effect of money spent will go back into the downtown core. Her client is in support of the recommendations contained in the Planning Services Department reports. She advised that a detailed letter was circulated to Committee prior to the meeting outlining the following concerns: • Phasing in of the Wal-Mart and Loblaws; • Floor space permissions in OPA No. 44; • Certain urban design and transportation policies; • Broader range of housing types; and • Special Policy Area H are outdated. Ms. Houser is requesting that Reports PSD-077-05 and PSD-078-05 be referred back to staff for two weeks. Mark Frayne, Counsel and Vice-President, Holburn Biomedical Corporation, advised Committee that he submitted a letter dated June 10, 2005, to staff highlighting the following concerns: • Does the proposed permitted use designation address market demands; and • Does the proposed permitted use designation achieve planned function and design objectives? Mr. Frayne is requesting Committee to delete the last sentence contained in Section 11.5.2 of Amendment No. 43. - 4 - General Purpose and Administration Committee C111111 01011 Minutes trndal vI* Noe June 13, 2005 Daniel Weinryb, Krauss, Weinryb, appeared before Committee on behalf of his clients pertaining to the Torgan Site. Mr. Weinryb advises that he is not in support or opposition to the Planning Department reports and that he is present today to update Committee on the status of his client's site. He notes that his client is proceeding with their plans and that the site is appropriate for a Home Improvement Centre (RONA). PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT PSD-077-05 - COMMERCIAL POLICY REVIEW AMENDMENT NO. 43 TO THE CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN AND REPORT PSD-078-05 — BOWMANVILLE WEST MAIN CENTRAL AREA SECONDARY PLAN REVIEW, AMENDMENT 44 TO THE CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN AND RELATED APPLICATIONS BY HALLOWAY HOLDINGS LIMITED AND WEST DIAMONDS PROPERTIES INC./PLAYERS BUSINESS PARK LIMITED Resolution #GPA-267-05 Moved by Mayor Mutton, seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Report PSD-077-05 and Report PSD-078-05 be referred back to staff. CARRIED ADJOURNMENT Resolution #GPA-268-05 Moved by Councillor Robinson, seconded by Councillor Schell THAT the meeting adjourn at 12:01 p.m. CARRIED QA2 4,7N MAYOR <6UNICIPAL CLERK - 5 - Public Meeting CORPORATION OF THE Report # PSD-079-05 Q M. �� MUNICIPALITY OF PUBLIC ME Proposed Community Im ■■'aan■■ NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Community Improvement Plan Leading the Way Li% 'PROPOSED BOWMANVILLE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington will consider a proposed Community Improvement Plan, under Section 28 of the Planning Act, 1990, as amended. The proposed Community Improvement Plan for Bowmanville identifies a number of actions to be undertaken by the Municipality and the community. Among other things, it will enable the Municipality to offer incentives to merchants and property owners to revitalize heritage buildings and provide for intensification of uses. This Community Improvement Plan applies to the area shown in the map below. I K�0 C1711 -� �c�: .iIJJ g l�a I�al maZE _ Y� !II - i 1 Y` _ .1i ! p '16i"wpm a 41 u l. s• 'a' A' dim"'X11 Bn'lili C t l ' �: tW6471#14-:4*-('" is 6^_-' i -. 1 4 �.,► y¢ a 'fy� xc �/,ys,/� xx rrt r \r1),- t`ai °! 141 ) l x. 's�, p- f � t' �(r�Iy -n' I p'�+ t, ! f . K MI 3_11J r� ` I a ' � fN r 1 a .. 1 t * 3 . nr. .ml Bowmanvllle CommunttyImprovement Plan. Planning File Nos.: PLN 37.2 PUBLIC MEETING The Municipality of Clarington will hold a public meeting to provide interested parties the opportunity to make comments, identify issues and provide additional information relative to the proposed community improvement plan. The public meeting will be held on: DATE: Monday,June 20, 2005 TIME: 9:30 a.m. PLACE: Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, Municipal Administrative Centre, 40 Temperance St., Bowmanville,Ontario ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the proposal. The start time listed above reflects the time at which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences. If you cannot attend the Public Meeting on this application you can make a deputation to Council at their meeting on Monday June 27th, 2005, commencing at 7:00 p.m. Should you wish to appear before Council, you must register with the Clerks Department by the Wednesday noon, June 22nd, 2005 to have your name appear in the Agenda. COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? If you wish to make a written submission or if you wish to be notified of subsequent meetings or the adoption of the proposed Bowmanville Community Improvement Plan, you must submit a written request to the Clerk's Department, 2nd Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6. A Community Improvement Plan adopted by the Municipality of Clarington is forwarded to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing for approval. Additional information relating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at the Planning Services Department, 3`d Floor,40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6, or by calling Faye Langmaid at(905)623-3379 extension 216 or by e-mail at flangmaid @municipality.clarington.on.ca APPEAL If a person or public body that files a notice of appeal of a decision for the proposed Bowmanville Community Improvement Plan to the Ontario Municipal Board does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or does not make written submissions before the proposed Community Improvement Plan is adopted, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal. Date e Municipality of Clarington this 25th day of May, 2005. �" � David Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. 40 Temperance Street Director of Planning Services Bowmanville,Ontario Municipality of Clarington L1C 3A6 Public Meeting (LJ /�� !r!= Report $ PSD-080-05 �/Sr■] CORPORATION OF THE Home-Land Development MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON Group p Ltd. Leading the Way NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING I DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION BY: HOME-LAND DEVELOPMENT GROUP LTD. AN APPLICATION FOR DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPROVAL AND TO AMEND THE ZONING BY-LAW TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington will consider a proposed draft plan of subdivision and a proposed zoning by-law amendment, under Sections 51 and 34 respectively, of the Planning Act, 1990, as amended. APPLICATION DETAILS The proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and related Zoning By-law Amendment submitted by Home-Land Development Group Ltd.would permit the development of a 48 unit residential Plan of Subdivision consisting of 35 detached dwelling units and 13 townhouse units and related local roads, all located in Part Lot 10, Concession 2, former Town of Bowmanville as shown on the reverse. Planning File Nos.: 18T-92004 AND ZBA 2005-010 PUBLIC MEETING The Municipality of Clarington will hold a public meeting to provide interested parties the opportunity to make comments, identify issues and provide additional information relative to the proposed development. The public meeting will be held on: DATE: Monday,June 20,2005 TIME: 9:30 a.m. PLACE: Council Chambers,2nd Floor, Municipal Administrative Centre, 40 Temperance St., Bowmanville, Ontario ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the proposal. The start time listed above reflects the time at which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences. If you cannot attend the Public Meeting on this application you can make a deputation to Council at their meeting on Monday, June 27, 2005, commencing at 7:00 p.m. Should you wish to appear before Council, you must register with the Clerks Department by the Wednesday noon, June 22, 2005 to have your name appear in the Agenda. COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? If you wish to make a written submission or if you wish to be notified of subsequent meetings or the approval of the Draft Plan of Subdivision and/or the Zoning By-law Amendment, you must submit a written request to the Clerk's Department, 2nd Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6. Additional information relating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at the Planning Services Department, 3`d Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6, or by calling Bob Russell at(905) 623-3379 extension 341 or by e-mail at brussell(a�municipality.clarington.on.ca. APPEAL If a person or public body that files a notice of appeal of a decision for the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and/or the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment to the Ontario Municipal Board does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or does not make written submissions before the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and/or proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is approved, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal. Date the Municipality of Clarington this 6th day of May 2005. / •a - Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. 40 Temperance Street Director of Planning Services Bowmanville, Ontario Municipality of Clarington LIC 3A6 1 I 2 I 3.______....„...-k-- SCOTTSDALE DRIVE 33 32 31 30 29 28 ---SB AIM 94 93 92 -04• - I.t3 —57 PART 1, _ PLAN5- 48' N se' E IP1 61- 40R-13953 a g_'% N 10-03'39v 32 33 34 j 2.94 N]l-04'WE BLOCK 40�� b2-- PART 2, PLAN 40R-13953 9 22 Mil - REDFERN f 0 - CRESCENT — 63-- _ \ t CRESCENT `< 4f/ p i 19 NA i 314 $ ,4 wPART 3, PLAN 408-13953 -_ a f 9 4E ! b F cc fll x To-33 18 W — sr— CoBLOCK 41 a Z IT 3 C L F i 4 1 S co a A W :m W R 1 a y' 16 5 B � 3 3 r J 6y� m = 20 a ce ! 15 Y WNNN 1 r 3-- --� i I -0'u, �-- "'� N 69- PlE jn� 6 y� re A I Z — H� !4"D• N Eh tb 4v $ 13 8 a 5 X 1404 9 9 PART 4, PLAN 40R-13953 OIL { n 1 la 9 ! A ■ it 10 4 3 ai -- 69--- N 71-OP 0•E 29h1 PART 1, PLAN 1OR-244 1 ' a wn107 46 — BLOCX 44 lB)- 4T wk. C z 50 --"1- ---�pCg kC S U ., i" 5 36 N \'\ Bowmanville Key Map 1 ..11} y" � M I l lip i ZBA 2005-010 IAEADONYIEW S1 SCOTD3DALE DRIVE .E Zoning By-law Amendment 41�=g infirm anuatt 111111- 1-- s =�o��� C`%=r< 18T-92004 =MI iii ■�� Subdivision Plan dal_ : , SUN1CREST BOULEVARD■�1111111111115= nir, ■ Subject �11111111111Pr a — i11 4 Lands ,`� VAN5fONE COURT �' ..� 111�� Illlll/� ���,� Applicant: Home-Land Development /_= i1UNSTlR11: a s+ Pp P itita �1111111.a— �Q Group Ltd. Public Meeting Report # PSD-081-05 Moolco Investments Clan �,�,�{-Jyj CORPORATION OF THE Incorporated ■,afl■ ;!/�(�■jij MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON Leading the Way NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING IDEVELOPMENT APPLICATION BY: Moolco Investments Incorporated AN APPLICATION TO AMEND THE ZONING BY-LAW 84-63 TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington will consider a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, under Section 34 of the Planning Act, 1990, as amended. APPLICATION DETAILS The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment submitted by Moolco Investments Incorporated would permit the development of a four (4) bay self-serve car wash, a dog wash facility and a building with a ground floor retail unit to include a second floor residential unit. The subject property is located within Part Lot 27, Concession 2, former Village of Newcastle, at 254 King Avenue East as shown on the reverse. Planning File Nos.: ZBA 2005-014 and SPA 2005-021 PUBLIC MEETING The Municipality of Clarington will hold a public meeting to provide interested parties the opportunity to make comments, identify issues and provide additional information relative to the proposed development. The public meeting will be held on: DATE: Monday,June 20, 2005 TIME: 9:30 a.m. PLACE: Council Chambers,2nd Floor,Municipal Administrative Centre, 40 Temperance St.,Bowmanville,Ontario ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the proposal. The start time listed above reflects the time at which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences. If you cannot attend the Public Meeting on this application you can make a deputation to Council at their meeting on Monday June 27, 2005, commencing at 7:00 p.m. Should you wish to appear before Council, you must register with the Clerks Department by the Wednesday noon, June 22, 2005 to have your name appear in the Agenda. COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? If you wish to make a written submission or if you wish to be notified of subsequent meetings or the adoption of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, you must submit a written request to the Clerk's Department, 2"d Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville,Ontario L1C 3A6. Additional information relating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at the Planning Services Department, 3`d Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6, or by calling Tracey Will at(905)623-3379 extension 326 or by e-mail at twill @clarington.net. APPEAL If a person or public body that files a notice of appeal of a decision for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment to the Ontario Municipal Board does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or does not make written submissions before the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is approved, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal. Date• e Municipality of Clarington this 17th day of May,2005 Arip 1 Day Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. 40 Temperance Street Director of Planning Services Bowmanville,Ontario Municipality of Clarington L1C 3A6 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL IGGs df7ba I —.... ..._.sou.__.___:_:...—QS . tI ;=, iC ' . a ,'R .. �_' - WASH EouwNEx'r •EERVIrE AREA B BUIL4ING 1 A 1 c d' 1�4p a .y �` I i yy���••ss''1yy1 008 ..���$bl - I I s„„aNw�1�jF)l.. s N WEN I. I 1 (3�I l � cam., p i I r I DOGWASN FACILITY ,- oIGlrW our** R. /EXIST. 1 EXISTING G CARETAKER - w 14 ! G4 ...pap..._._... ..4E..$ Id I 1 K. YORxbld P X44- s 1, `Pa e • I Mda 1� 1 g� iDn CAR STACKING ej F +r-- .�. AB , pa „, „, w 6, E 0x1 rza 1�� y .1 - s T" O CO MERCIA FOR b --I Je .4 4/v COMMERCIAL USE (/f•�'11 a - e_ 1 J� RENSE ENCIDSURC. - t 47 "--'� A Q 1 I1 4.111 t S �t ExISTINc 1 4 O`V IN 144 :KwaOtI h.nab N RESIDENCE 1 We NM NRWNNa en MN, AA . ry. - II'266 I \PV NOW tan W. r3 malNl Nr1N4 • L P4 [pMit� h PENT*oubiimw F r y (V EoRaO W prime GlNlep NaRGI • �.. .1 BaE ;g}RD fl T sq . �• �4 Ar. �_ 1�r r _ e BUILDING B a vU -i E f• ?igi • p lit Hoer • commercial A, — ,i R 2nd floor• miOecei R RETAIL I . UNIT t,N• w lyr"II E �b ��� �° E°u,,tt - �� Iris 14E - s Nom 1 - - 6 !� -m - _ _ G+a ea. M..- ti V KING'S HIGHWAY Ne 2 KING AVENUE EAST -I Newcastle Key Map G9 ZBA2005-014 vs Subject ►a. aim n.... nn..0 EN mo` N Lands 6V1111 Er!! =num Zoning By-law Amendment 31111 1 �r�� ��i �idllll AVENUE EAST SPA 2005-021 �•` KING •VENUE GS! LIJ= I ml. i R ���1111111111111111 1 ‘11110111111 Site Plan Application e1 111 � a _Ma INN : Ilifi - 1 elm erne I S ` _ ..a..3.— IICOY ' ,` „•- L� m = E fl m— eeazkno1 •i= II�IIIILN maws. s emort� no 110111lin ME Owner: Moolco Investments Incorporated ire ∎Holm iimem aiml art t Public Meeting CORPORATION OF THE �l >jj� /�y1 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON Report # FND-007-05 . `i.`�(ton Municipality of Clarington jj NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Leading the Way PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BY-LAW TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington will consider a development charges background study and by-law, under Section 12 of the Development Charges Act, 1997, as amended. The proposed Development Charges By-law sets out the maximum fees that the Municipality of Clarington can apply to new development based on the development types, forecasted capital budget and established levels of service. The background study for the by-law presents the results of the review which determines growth-related net capital costs which are attributable to development that is forecast in Clarington. PUBLIC MEETING The Municipality of Clarington will hold a public meeting to provide interested parties the opportunity to make comments, identify issues and provide additional information relative to the proposed development charges by-law. The public meeting will be held on: DATE: Monday, June 20, 2005 TIME: 9:30 a.m. PLACE: Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, Municipal Administrative Centre, 40 Temperance St., Bowmanville, Ontario ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the proposal. The start time listed above reflects the time at which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences. If you cannot attend the Public Meeting on this application you can make a deputation to Council at their meeting on Monday June 27th, 2005, commencing at 7:00 p.m. Should you wish to appear before Council, you must register with the Municipal Clerk's Department by Wednesday noon, June 22nd, 2005 to have your name appear in the Agenda. COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? If you wish to make a written submission or if you wish to be notified of the adoption of the proposed Development Charges By-law, you must submit a written request to the Municipal Clerk's Department, 2nd Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6. Additional information relating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at the Municipal Clerk's Department, 2nd Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6, or by calling Nancy Taylor at(905)623-3379 extension 259 or by e-mail at ntaylor @clarington.net APPEAL If a person or public body that files a notice of appeal of a decision for the proposed Development Charges By-law to the Ontario Municipal Board does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or does not make written submissions before the proposed Development Charges By-law is adopted, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal. Dated at the Municipality of Clarington this 25th day of May 2005. Patti Barrie, A.M.C.T. 40 Temperance Street Municipal Clerk Bowmanville,Ontario Municipality of Clarington L1C 3A6 LeUaiingwn REPORT Leading the Way PLANNING SERVICES PUBLIC MEETING Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report #: PSD-079-05 File #: PLN 37.2 By-law #: Subject: BOWMANVILLE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT report PSD-079-05 be received for information; 2. THAT the proposed Bowmanville Community Improvement Plan as shown in attachment 1 be referred back to Staff for further review and consideration of comments received at the Public Meeting; and 3. THAT any interested party or delegation be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: /Lei Reviewed byOA-4"1-12S David'ACrome, MCIP, R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer FL/DJC/df/Iw June 7, 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 • REPORT NO.: PSD-079-05 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 On December 15th, 2003 Council approved the preparation of a Community Improvement Plan (CIP) for Bowmanville and a study area Bylaw 2003-186 as amended. The terms of reference for the study called for a community focus group, which was formed in February of 2004 and has guided the study since that time. 1.2 Prior to the undertaking of a Community Improvement Plan discussions were held with various stakeholder groups to determine whether the residents and community were receptive to having such a study prepared, the result was very positive. The community has been kept informed of the study progress; 7000 newsletters were distributed within and adjacent to the study area in early April 2005. There have been reports in the media and a public open house was held on April 11th, 2005. Comments received during the progress of the CIP support the recommendations put forward. 1.3 This Community Improvement Plan will allow the Municipality to provide incentives to business owners and property owners in the Bowmanville East Main Central Area (Bowmanville East Town Centre). It also includes recommendations for works by the Municipality. 1.4 The Business Development Manager of the Clarington Board of Trade has been intimately involved in the preparation of this Community Improvement Plan and will continue to be involved in the implementation. 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2.1 The Bowmanville Community Improvement Plan consists of grant programs for building permit fees, site plan control application fees, heritage building fagade improvements, and building code improvements. It also includes recommendations regarding expansion and development of a more formal civic square, capital funding for improvements located on municipal lands (such as streetscape works), facilitation of co- ordinated public and private parking initiatives, development of guidelines for infill, intensification and related parking requirements and ongoing liaison with the Bowmanville BBC and others. 2.2 Part of the implementation of the Community Improvement Plan is the ongoing co- ordination between the various community organizations, the Municipality of Clarington, the Board of Trade and Tourism Clarington. Cross-marketing amongst these groups and other initiatives is vital to the ongoing success of the CIP. 3.0 PUBLIC MEETING 3.1 In accordance with the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, appropriate notice of the Public Meeting was given through advertisements placed in the June 1st, 8th and 15th, 2005 edition of the Canadian Statesman. A copy of the final draft of the Community • REPORT NO.: PSD-079-05 PAGE 3 Improvement Plan were circulated to the commenting agencies and Ministry of Municipal Affairs at the end of May. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS 4.1 The Bowmanville Community Improvement Plan identified a series of recommendations for implementation by the Municipality in partnership with stakeholder groups. In addition, a number of actions, including further guideline development, streetscape improvements and other capital projects are to be undertaken by the Municipality. The CIP will enable the Municipality to offer incentives for specific types of improvements within the area. 4.2 The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, requires that a Public Meeting be scheduled to consider a Community Improvement Plan. The purpose of this report is to facilitate the public consideration of the proposed Bowmanville Community Improvement Plan. Attachments: Attachment 1 — Bowmanville Community Improvement Plan (distributed under separate cover) Interested parties to be notified of Council's decision Members of the Bowmanville Community Focus Group Garth Gilpin, BIA Larry Dekkma aar_i1144011 Leading the Way REPORT PLANNING SERVICES PUBLIC MEETING Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report #: PSD-080-05 File #: 18T-92004 & ZBA 2005-010 By-law #: Subject: REVISIONS TO PROPOSED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND RELATED REZONING TO PERMIT 48 RESIDENTIAL UNITS APPLICANT: HOME-LAND DEVELOPMENT GROUP LTD. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-080-05 be received; 2. THAT the revisions to Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-92004 and the application to amend the Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended, submitted by Home-Land Development Group Ltd. on behalf of Randy & Linda Norrish, Leonard & Margaret Goodmurphy, David & Joanne Payne and Merlynn & Helen Shantz be referred back to staff for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report following receipt and resolution of the outstanding agency comments; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: lie II ' Reviewed by: D. i.4VCrome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer BR`CP`DJC*Iw June 13, 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-080-05 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Owner: Randy & Linda Norrish, Leonard & Margaret Goodmurphy, David & Joanne Payne and Merlynn & Helen Shantz 1.2 Applicant/Agent: Home-Land Development Group Ltd. 1.3 Plan of Subdivision: Revision to previously submitted Plan of Subdivision (18T-92004) to permit the development of a 48 unit residential Plan of Subdivision consisting of 35 single detached dwellings (12 x 9.6 metre frontage, 9 x 10 metre frontage and 8 x 10.6 metre frontage dwellings); and 13 townhouse dwellings. 1 .4 Rezoning: From: "Agricultural (A)" to appropriate zones to implement the proposed development 1.5 Area: 2.17 hectares (5.36 acres) 1.6 Location: The area subject to the proposal is located east of Liberty Street (Regional Road 14) in the rear yards of 221, 223, 227 & 239 Liberty Street North, Bowmanville and north of the St. Lawrence & Hudson Railway, Lot 10, Concession 2, former Town of Bowmanville 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On April 21, 2005, the Planning Services Department received a revised Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision (revised 18T-92004) and a new Rezoning Application (ZBA 2005- 010). 2.2 Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-92004 was originally submitted to Durham Region on January 24, 1992. The original rezoning application was submitted to the former Town of Newcastle on January 22, 1992. Insufficient progress was made on the application due to a lack of consensus among the various owners and the Municipality closed the rezoning file on November 29, 2000. The Region of Durham, being the approval authority at the time for subdivision approval did not close the subdivision file. 2.3 Documentation submitted in support of the subdivision proposal included a Geotechnical Investigation, a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, and an On- street Parking Plan. 3.0 LAND CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES 3.1 The site is flat, currently vacant and has no significant environmental features 3.2 The surrounding land uses are as follows: North — Low Density Urban Residential Uses South — Low Density Urban Residential Uses REPORT NO.: PSD-080-05 PAGE 3 East — Medium Density Urban Residential Uses West — Low Density Urban Residential Uses and beyond, Liberty Street North 4.0 PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSIONS 4.1 Public notice was given by mail to each landowner within the 120 metres of the subject property and public notice signs were installed at the following locations: • At the south end of terminus of Redfern Crescent • At the terminus of Forrester Drive • At the northeast end terminus of Redfern Crescent 4.2 As a result of the public notification process, to date, the Planning Services Department has received one e-mail inquiry, from a resident of Redfern Crescent. She stated any development would generate "heavy traffic" and impact her children. Staff advised the subdivision had been planned for a long time, was an example of infill and would be adding an additional 48 units in total. 5.0 OFFICIAL PLAN CONFORMITY 5.1 The Durham Regional Official Plan designates the subject properties as Living Area. Both subdivision and rezoning applications conform. 5.2 The properties are designated "Urban Residential" in the Clarington Official Plan with a Medium Density Residential symbol. Both subdivision and rezoning applications conform. 6.0 ZONING BY-LAW COMPLIANCE 6.1 Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63 of the former Town of Newcastle zones the subject properties "Agricultural (A)". A rezoning of the site is required to implement the Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision. 7.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 7.1 The subdivision and rezoning applications were circulated to various agencies and other departments by the Planning Services Department. The majority of circulated agencies' comments remain outstanding at this time. Comments received to date are as follows. 7.2 The Clarington Building Division, Clarington Emergency & Fire Services and the French Separate School Board all had no concerns. 7.3 The Separate School Board requested adequate sidewalks. 7.4 The Engineering Services Department provided detailed comments to be addressed prior REPORT NO.: PSD-080-05 PAGE 4 to further consideration of the plan. Prior to further review of the application the applicant must submit a plan indicating the proposed entrance and driveway location for all corner lots to demonstrate zoning conformity and any future dwellings constructed on corner lots within the subject draft plan must have entrances, driveways and garages that are compatible with the required plan. The applicant's engineer is required to prepare a Preliminary Lot Grading and Drainage Plan that details the configuration of the on-site storm sewer system (minor system) and the conveyance of the overland flow (major system) from this subdivision to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services prior to approval of this draft plan. 8.0 STAFF COMMENTS 8.1 A Grading and Drainage Plan was not submitted with the application. The applicant has been requested a copy be submitted for review by Engineering. 8.2 The townhouse units are proposed to have 6.7 m frontages. Although this is greater than the 6.0 m frontage townhouses on Swindells directly abutting to the east, they are contrary to Council direction requiring townhouse units to have a 7.0 m frontage. Lot 35 having a 12.9 m frontage for a single detached unit appears to be out of context relative to the abutting blocks of townhouse units. This lot should be incorporated into the townhouse blocks. This additional frontage could also facilitate all townhouse lots having a minimum frontage of 7.0 m. 8.3 Although the applicant has proposed 15.0 metre singles backing onto the existing lots on Liberty Street the balance of the singles are all small lots (12 x 9.6 metre frontage, 9 x 10 metre frontage, 8 x 10.6 metre frontage and 1 x 11.6 metre frontage) which are 30 of the 35 singles. The small lot singles do not fit into standard zone categories and are not consistent with lots elsewhere in the neighbourhood. Staff will further review these lot sizes with the applicant. 9.0 CONCLUSION 9.1 As the purpose of this report is to give the status of the application for the public meeting, it is appropriate to have the application referred back to staff for further processing. Attachments Attachment 1 — Site Location Key Map and Plan of Subdivision List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Eric Vahamaki Bill Creamer Nancy Gummow a ATTACHMENT 1 to Report PSD-080-05 L 2 13y- SCOTTSDALE DRIVE an33 32 31 30 29 20 Y 2LK 3LN ii. .. '—]] 4 P0L 0 A N 1 395 3 " N . e 19 5;'14 VIV 31 32 33 34 BLOCK 40 6e— PMT 2,PLAN 00R-(3933 11111 N- RE➢PERX �� CRESCENT T Ti I CRESCENT T �� a dal - a 35 = s 1y Z re � � 3 — .. WPMT 3,PLAN RR-t3933 2 ' Et !g A -_ F W f xTo-or OBE R w al CD- � Dir{1 e S l- 3 S Q y re } zl A Y y a 1 ct 13 de CO CO W8 - 3 16 9 3 N 13 N. -b. -- 6b"— J it le 6 3 _ _-�� W co 20 a 0 a z . , ,. ', 3 14 . T 1 O Ir 3 �� 6t— Q B� �R'Y 3 l]x LL 13 .. /'n —� X N N'INY g PMT 4,PLAN 40R-13933 1ItNdd99 S 9 ' Pr t €R Y1 �_- X n-9Y a 66 ♦S m -� 3 11 10 I 1 3 1- __ 69"-- PMT I. PLAN IDR-e{N —I�. 109 NT 7 BLDL% ®wiRrvo M— ir ._______ 16- --2?—_ 9 36 53 ,4\\4 Bowmanville Key Map ZBA 2005-010 —I z 3�mD DRNE . Zoning By-law Amendment -1I■g OM= .ttw- l■��� 11111 �p�� pp =r 18T-92004 is m�}C ;1 —�=law ._lip Subdivision Plan ∎!� e� • 'a 3UNIC-,S BOULEVARD ' , ■/III1111111IICl_5 •�1t s� �t . � A Lands HhlIlIlIlIP e =_a' 4 �r.. 11111 aura =_ j e•-• 0IIII���.= ums - : Applicant: Home-Land Development iss c7 fSill11111111:m- Group Ltd. qg,jton REPORT Way PLANNING SERVICES PUBLIC MEETING Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report #: PSD-081-05 File #: ZBA2005-014 & SPA 2005-021 By-law #: Subject: PROPOSED ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT TO PERMIT A SELF SERVE CAR WASH WITH A DOG WASH APPLICANT: MOOLCO INVESTMENTS INCORPORATED RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1 . THAT Report PSD-081-05 be received; 2. THAT the application submitted by Moolco Investments Incorporated be referred back to Staff for further processing and the preparation of a further report following the receipt of all outstanding agency comments; and, 3. THAT the interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: Sri/ / Reviewed by: t Da .�"►' . Crome, MCIP, R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer TW*CP*DJC*Iw June13, 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1 C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-081-05 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1 .1 Applicant: Moolco Investments Incorporated 1.2 Rezoning: from "General Commercial (C1) Zone" to an appropriate zone to permit the development of a self-serve car wash, a dog wash facility and a mixed-use building with a ground floor commercial unit and a second floor residential unit. 1 .3 Location: 254 King Avenue East, Newcastle, located on the north side of King Avenue, between Beaver and Arthur Streets. 1 .4 Site Area: 0.133 hectares 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On May 6, 2005, Moolco Investments Incorporated submitted a rezoning and site plan application for 254 King Avenue East, Newcastle, in order to permit a four (4) bay self- serve car wash, a dog wash facility and a mixed-use building with a ground floor commercial unit and a second floor residential unit. 3.0 SITE CHARACHERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES 3.1 A single detached dwelling is located on the subject property. 3.2 The surrounding land uses area as follows: North - Residential South - Commercial and Residential East - Residential West - Commercial 4.0 PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSION 4.1 Public notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject property and a public meeting notice was installed on the property. 4.2 As of the writing of this report, no inquiries were received from the public. 5.0 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES 5.1 The subject lands are in the Main Central Area and designated "Strip Commercial" within the Newcastle Village Main Central Area Secondary Plan. This REPORT NO.: PSD-081-05 PAGE 3 designation permits retail, personal service and office uses as well as automobile service stations. 5.2 This development is also subject to the following urban design principles contained in the Official Plan: • the provision of direct pedestrian street access to some stores in each development; • land use compatibility between commercial and residential buildings shall be achieved through appropriate building siting, design and landscape treatment; • high quality landscape treatment shall be provided; • building form and siting shall minimize the impacts of noise, wind and shadows and shall enhance views of landmark buildings, parks and open space; • refuse collection areas will be internal to buildings; • loading areas and refuse collection areas shall be unobtrusive and screened where necessary and shall generally be located at the side or rear of the building; • common vehicular access and internal circulation including service lanes connecting abutting properties should be provided where possible. 6.0 ZONING BY-LAW 6.1 The property is in a "General Commercial (C1) Zone" which does not permit the self- serve car wash and dog wash facility. Retail commercial, and residential dwelling units as part of a building containing a non-residential user are permitted. In order to permit the proposed development a rezoning application was submitted for consideration. 7.0 PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT 7.1 The proposed amendment to Zoning By-law 84-63 is consistent with the Employment Area policies of the Provincial Policy Statement issued on March 1, 2005. However, a noise study is required to demonstrate that the proposed land use does not cause environmental or public health and safety concerns with regards to the noise pollution. 8.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 8.1 Comments are outstanding from the majority departments and agencies circulated. 8.2 Clarington Emergency Services offered no concerns or objections to this proposal. 8.3 The Clarington Building Services Division provided no objection to the rezoning but provided the following comments with respect to the site plan application. These have been detailed under separate cover to the applicant, and are summarized as follows: REPORT NO.: PSD-081-05 PAGE 4 • A Barrier-free path of travel will be required to the main entrances of the building; • The applicant must submit an approved application for the sewer/water service from the Region of Durham; • The Owner must pay development charges prior to the issuance of the building permit. 9.0 STAFF COMMENTS 9.1 In order to support the rezoning application, the applicant is required to submit a Noise Study demonstrating that proposed use will not have negative impacts on the adjacent residential properties. The applicant has indicated that a Noise Study is being prepared in support of this application. 9.2 The application as submitted does not conform to the design principles contained in the Official Plan. Staff will examine the proposed building placement and design, parking and stacking areas, as well as landscaping in detail through the review of the site plan application to ensure compliance with urban design principles contained in the Official Plan. 10.0 CONCLUSIONS 10.1 The purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements of the Public Meeting under the Planning Act. After hearing the comments received, it is respectfully recommended that this report be referred back to Staff for further procession and the preparation of a subsequent report. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Yusuf Moolla Ray Abbott was I ATTACHMENT 1 to Report PSI)—U8'.—D5 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL - I I I eRZEar: I. _ - x , �u --I--• Wash Equipment and Santa Area # BUI ZING I A I 1 e r--� > Dog A.77A ICJ 1 A I I ir442j1 wPS+pi�- b Wash [[ff�\,\ fet� _ra_ roami - ° r>1 I $ r-� i1 L--- E W EARNING DESIGNATED FOR , :1 aa1Ma1N Wm �. IE%ISf. I I VGINSIIOP DDSmVI FACILITY 4 • liaRa4El 1••CARETAKER g 'I_' ' _YT 6 JM. _ _J9L. H I IL v` �� 1 • S W STACNMS GDR WiMASN A. 2 s�SA W n E &l�'i/Y W EARNING 1Je'IR3mMNED EGI COMMERCIAL LE I A AAA i N f RESIDENCE I 4� Y RESIDENCE 14'"' W.Nx?Zit 1/Yii �MRM MRMM .av N--- llrrmf sM Y, VO BUILDING B E :. 1 9 Ist tbr • Commercial 4V W'2ntar• m resteenes 1 e 4" �N� ohm NT'14 _ KINGS HIGHWAY N2 2 KING AVENUE EAST Newcastle Key Map ZBA 2005-014 �'J �� REINIX OR subject j : 1ag1111111111 11111111111 ,� Lands .��1mg miI,1111t ∎nnnl: Zoning By-law Amendment . . ■ clwIFNCER Cr. mD sNR* 1 -1111111 11 subject Ilia Liaiit AvDiimilll SPA 2005-021 mail . Wim...1m Site Plan Application I LJ 11111111111111111 _e IltIII SUMER tlr b IN JOSE COI I C— I U€ ■���1 E 1 I -� —� _ 111: �__ _: I. �� �_ I.M..SIRE VYNR MM1F �(TTf-[ga� -- _ C?lYlle[". Moolco Investments Incorporated 113 mu � I win I S! 5EI11N111111 111111111 !111111 _Al Garth gion Leading the REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report #: PSD-082-05 File #: ZBA 2005-016 By-law #: Subject: APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF PART LOT CONTROL APPLICANT: FRANK CANONACO RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-082-05 be received; 2. THAT the request for removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Lots 1-28 inclusive, lots 53-63 inclusive, and lots 68-93 inclusive on Registered Plan 40M-2225, be APPROVED and that the attached Part Lot Control By-law be passed pursuant to Section 50 (7.1) of the Planning Act; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report, any delegations and the Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: Aiiu Reviewed by:� Da idQCrome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer BH/CP/DJC/sh May 26, 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-082-05 Page 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1 .1 Applicant/Agent: Frank Canonaco 1.2 Location: Part Lot 13, Concession 2, former Town of Bowmanville 40M-2225 (see attachment 1) 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On May 13, 2005, Staff received a request from Frank Canonaco for the removal of Part Lot Control with respect lots 1-28 inclusive, lots 53-63 inclusive, and lots 68-93 inclusive on Registered Plan 40M-2225. 2.2 Draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-87086 received approval for 31 single detached dwellings, and 130 semi-detached dwelling units. Registration of Plan of Subdivision 40M-2225 was completed on December 2"d, 2004. The removal of Part Lot Control would facilitate the construction of the approved dwelling units 3.0 COMMENTS 3.1 Staff has no objection to the approval of a By-law exempting the subject lands from Part Lot Control. Attached is a By-law (Attachment 2) to exempt the subject lands from Section 50 (5) of the Planning Act. 3.2 Attachment 3 is a Summary Table provided in accordance with the Region of Durham's requirements under the delegation of Part Lot Control. It details lots affected by the Part Lot Control By-law and the unit type and number of the Part Lot Control By-law. 3.3 The Finance Department advises that the taxes have been paid in full. 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 In accordance with Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, the By-law may provide a specified timeframe during which the By-law shall be in force. As a result, it is not necessary for Staff to prepare a second By-law to restore Part Lot Control on the subject lands. The Planning Act leaves it to the Municipality to determine an appropriate timeframe during which the By-law shall apply. Staff recommends that the By-law be in force for a three (3) year period following Council approval, ending June 20, 2008. REPORT NO.: PSD-082-05 Page 3 Attachments: Attachment 1: Site Location Key Map and Lands Affected by Part Lot Control Removal Attachment 2: By-law for Removal of Part Lot Control Attachment 3: Unit Type and Number Summary Table List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Frank Canonaco ATTACHMENT 1 to Report PSD-082-05 WUiv 18 R BO : ) ss.76 j• CONCESSION ROAD 3 , .„„, ��. i.- rs 'r .,,, 1.n. n E 1 ts a J-.-.:II f 9 B S uuaa. n .. R1, �� 0 rill assant. ii nal 1 i it 1111 n i cc e I HOCIBEY 1 MOUE 8 pe w Ba „ pit Q ' c B b Lii it - R 9 OILOS COURT • ® 1 : 4'.% in 0CC 1 -,. "ii� o �% 8 • dal .�sg I. i . MIME F N II" �_c O. g 92 Al It i. » lj. BONS AVENUE 1 s. IY \ .s 6m, . $ ..�, � -9CU +G ST. ,LUCK iii un. 65 9 G 9 61 Q Yn 1 ..�. .�"�I' 8 T B2 S2 Vt. e g It' i aox n5 . \ w co I ZBA 2005-016 40M-2225 Lots Affected By Part Lot Control Lots 1-28, 53-63, and 68-93 Incl. Owner: Orchard Park Estates ATTACHMENT 2 to Report PSD-082-05 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO. 2005- being a By-law to exempt certain portions of Registered Plan 702 WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to exempt from Part Lot Control, Lots 1-28 inclusive,lots 53-63 inclusive, and lots 68-93 inclusive on Registered Plan 40M-2225, registered at the Land Titles Division of Whitby; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. That Subsection 5 of Section 50 of the Planning Act shall not apply to those lands described in paragraph 2 within the By-law. 2. That this By-law shall come into effect upon being approved by the Municipality of Clarington and thereafter Subsection 5 of Section 50 shall cease to apply to the following lands: a) Lots 1-28 inclusive, lots 53-63 inclusive, lots 68-93 inclusive on Registered Plan 40M-2225 3. Pursuant to Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, this By-law shall be in force for a period of two(3)years ending on June 20th,2008. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2005 John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk ATTACHMENT 3 to Report PSD-082-05 PART LOT CONTROL EXEMPTION BY-LAW Unit Type and Number Summary Table Registered Plan #: 40M-2225 By-law: Result of Part Lot Control Exemption on Unit Type & Number Lots Affected Unit Type & Number Lot 1 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 2 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 3 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 4 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 5 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 6 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 7 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 8 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 9 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 10 Semi-detached —2 No increase in units Lot 11 Semi-detached —2 No increase in units Lot 12 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 13 Semi-detached —2 No increase in units Lot 14 Semi-detached —2 No increase in units Lot 15 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 16 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 17 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 18 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 19 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 20 Semi-detached —2 No increase in units Lot 21 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 22 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 23 Semi-detached —2 No increase in units Lot 24 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 25 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 26 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 27 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 28 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 53 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 54 Semi-detached —2 No increase in units Lot 55 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 56 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 57 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 58 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 59 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 60 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 61 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 62 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 63 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 68 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 69 Semi-detached —2 No increase in units Lot 70 Semi-detached —2 No increase in units Lot 71 Semi-detached —2 No increase in units Lot 72 Semi-detached —2 No increase in units Lot 73 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 74 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 75 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 76 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 77 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 78 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 79 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 80 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 81 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 82 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 83 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 84 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 85 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 86 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 87 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 88 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 89 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 90 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 91 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 92 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units Lot 93 Semi-detached — 2 No increase in units TOTAL Units — 130 No increase in units Clarrngton REPORT Leading the Way PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report #: PSD-083-05 File #: ZBA 2005-025 By-law #: Subject: APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF PART LOT CONTROL APPLICANT: SWAN DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-083-05 be received; 2. THAT the request for removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Block 15, on Registered Plan 10M-831, be APPROVED and that the attached Part Lot Control By-law be passed pursuant to Section 50 (7.1) of the Planning Act; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report, any delegations and the Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: "'LI 1 Reviewed by: Davi: rome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer BH/CP/DJC/lw June 9, 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-083-05 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant/Agent: Syvan Developments Limited 1.2 Location: Part Lot 8, Broken Front Concession, former Town of Bowmanville - Block 15, 10M-831 (Attachment 1) 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On June 1, 2005, Staff received a request from Syvan Developments Limited for the removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Block 15 on Registered Plan 10M-831. 2.2 Registration of Plan of Subdivision 10M-831 was completed on November 17th, 1989, and received approval for 18 industrial blocks. The removal of Part Lot Control would facilitate the division of an industrial block into two parcels. 3.0 COMMENTS 3.1 Staff has no objection to the approval of a By-law exempting the subject lands from Part Lot Control. Attached is a By-law (Attachment 2)to exempt the subject lands from Section 50 (5) of the Planning Act. 3.2 Removal of part lot control would permit the creation of two separate land parcels. The parcel to the north will be .92 ha, and the southern parcel will be 1.43 ha. The lot frontage of both properties is 40 metres. 3.3 The Finance Department advises that the taxes have been paid in full. 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 In accordance with Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, the By-law may provide a specified timeframe during which the By-law shall be in force. As a result, it is not necessary for Staff to prepare a second By-law to restore Part Lot Control on the subject lands. The Planning Act leaves it to the Municipality to determine an appropriate timeframe during which the By-law shall apply. Staff recommends that the By-law be in force for a two (2) year period following Council approval, ending June 20, 2007. Attachments: Attachment 1: Site Location Key Map and Lands Affected by Part Lot Control Removal Attachment 2: By-law for Removal of Part Lot Control List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Theresa Vanhaverbeke ATTACHMENT 1 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO. 2005- to Report PSD-083-05 being a By-law to exempt certain portions of Registered Plan 10M-831, from Part Lot Control WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to exempt from Part Lot Control, Block 15, on Registered Plan 10M-831, registered at the former Registry Office for the Land Titles Division of Newcastle; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. That Subsection 5 of Section 50 of the Planning Act shall not apply to those lands described in paragraph 2 within the By-law. 2. That this By-law shall come into effect upon being approved by the Municipality of Clarington and thereafter Subsection 5 of Section 50 shall cease to apply to the following lands: a) Block 15, on Registered Plan 10M-831 3. Pursuant to Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act,this By-law shall be in force for a period of two(2)years ending on June 20,2007. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2005 John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk ATTACHMENT 2 to Report Y$D-083-05 �� l 6;;1- . © \ 0 to I�^� l l ..re- ip \ ir, /300( .. V;;k I-. ) \1,1 / �ni Vl 'y - 8 0 2 < 0. 73 11 3 3-- �I 20 L. 3 21 —s A0 6 '� 3key lJ%� j / w I °' t�o,. ! 6 • t 1 318 L Pi r' th / , 30 '11 h- 14 31 ____-- c, i 1 Ir. ;' , , 80.8 ., f9•/a - o; •713S'5I'I0 t caved; 188• S q \q I I L �, '�— f�iOn'3 104 ,/ `'' ;� 1 - I 3 a• 51 41 , 1� ��_ �' BLOCK 15 \ :o ^ 1 ,-� s r,, tii 0 10M-831 n •• - N` \ 1_\SI 53 \ ' 4:1 if P. c‘\n.\ 4 ..,X -- \ \ \ 11 '3 n:1 / v 7ovao f.lSs./6 %r 13 f721 - -- Pali/ ile? ;,% ;%4r: ,%7 59 19 _ _ Nati:ill W2.65 'sse•we,%r `--r CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY Bowmanville Key Map ZBA 2005-025 Mitlatat_ 1H �• 1 m most N Q — Lands Affected By Part Lot Control ``��wq o �� Block 15, 10M-831 4 I�Subject,�..� Lands ,'.R `'I,, Owner: Syvan Developments Limited `, Clarthgton REPORT Leading the Way PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report #: PSD-084-05 File #: ZBA 2005-023 By-law #: Subject: APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF HOLDING APPLICANT: PRESTONVALE ROAD LAND CORP. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-084-05 be received; 2. THAT the application submitted by Prestonvale Road Land Corp. to remove the Holding (H) symbol be APPROVED and that the attached by-law to remove the Holding (H) symbol be passed and a copy forwarded to the Regional Municipality of Durham; and, 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: J�}J//ti l Reviewed by "a Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer TW/CP/DJC/df 8 June 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-0B4-05 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant: D.G. Biddle & Associates Limited 1 .2 Owner: Prestonvale Road Land Corp. 1.3 Rezoning: Removal of"Holding (H)" symbol from "Holding-Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)" to "Residential Type One (R1)" 1.4 Location: Part Lot 33, Concession 2, Former Township of Darlington (Attachment 1). 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On May 20, 2005, Staff received a request from D.G. Biddle & Associates Limited, on behalf of Prestonvale Road Land Corp. for the removal of the "Holding (H)" symbol from the subject lands. 2.2 Consent applications to sever eight (8) residential lots, with lot areas between 555 m2 and 626 m2 and lot frontages ranging from 16.70 metres to 17.2 metres were approved by the Region of Durham Land Division Committee on January 18, 2005. 2.3 In order to fulfil the conditions of approval for the Consent applications, the applicant has submitted a rezoning application to remove the "Holding (H)". 3.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 3.1 The Clarington Engineering Services Department, Region of Durham Works Department and the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority offered no objection or concerns to this proposal. 4.0 COMMENTS 4.1 The "Holding (H)" symbol affects Parts 1-8 inclusive, on 40R-23561 . A land division agreement is being finalized dealing with conditions of approval including financial guarantees to ensure completion of severed lots. 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 In consideration of the comments noted above, approval of the removal of the "Holding (H)" symbol as shown on the attached by-law and schedule (Attachment 2) is recommended. REPORT NO.: PSD-084-05 PAGE 3 Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map for Removal of Holding Application Attachment 2 - By-law for Removal of Holding (H) List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Hannu Halminen D.G. Biddle & Associates Limited ATTACHMENT 1 to Report PSD-084-05 - S I 3O . I „fr 4 .„. , , ,... , 4, , 7.7. o,�u PART 3 � � I �.. J ;. : :;` :: : PART 7 .... ':is G.:• PART II M1.fjj •: :......... �• ... ' i JJ O: _ _ y __ :..E A 91- v a v ■. u —1± { c. . t v .. - .. iI Courtice Key Map ZBA2��5-023 a...._-v zi \\I�. �i U�,744 �,A r4Ø1zXk-:='• ino ,o Zo ning By-law Amendment ales -=. 4 -111% �� It��Ie_, kf 1 r4flr ip101�LE- r4'niV 10 p4i��!.�` in. NI �� :�1II! ! y u ii ,- = Lands Subject to Removal of Holding Nam al �lit, Subject a ��� = o_I Ili p /hIn1f Other Lands Owned By Applicant Lands .� :: CCt ■ 1111111111 N. = --rw= 1. .„ ��f/1111111 ma t 1111111111x'4 <,-.ai '.O �= ...e• minion* dim 1111 ' Owner: Prestonvale Road Holdings Corp. Amu OIIIIIlkuil� 11111111-1111111111, 111 /:= -� ATTACHMENT 2 to Report PSD-084-05 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO. 2005- being a by-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle to implement ZBA 2005-023; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. Schedule "4"to By-law 84-63, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Holding-Urban Residential Type One((H)R1)" to "Residential Type One (R1)". 2. Schedule "A"attached hereto shall form part of this By-law. 3. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Sections 34 and 36 of the Planning Act. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2005 John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2005- 5 passed this day of 92005 A.D. _;:ii-,,, z:,-,11;rs.•. i i i r tor r :,; ? ■ V lt::::::::-::-::::-:%::::‘,,Y.C.-ff ';2: , r WS Zoning Change From 1. . : : ?44::::".': 2 " , "(H)R1" To "R1" , I ; 1 Zoning To Remain "(H)R1" - ■ - zo'.:!::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.x..:.::::.:::z:z.:::m 12 4retdi.::::::::t:::::::t::::::::::-:-::-:.;:::::25::.?::: Pt tit.1 , ,. .:.::::::::::::::::,:::::::::::::::::::::„:„::::: :c' 4, -a 77 1 E ' • A :::.:::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::;::: ::..:if:: i • . , •„: ::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::.:::::::::::.:::::::::::::.::::::::::::.::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::-:1::::::::: 1 , .„ = •..----::, .z.:::::::::::-:::: -.....---,:.:....y.:.:.::-:-:?,:,:-:.:.:.:-.-:).,.,..!.,..„. , ______:, ,„ Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk John Mutton, Mayor I/ 1 / -7,b,v2:-: y , §' F1 s fl-iLl Ins, 1 1 '— / A / // - ./ %. e la-et ; „_,, ; i , / moo,— 1 1 ;boo/ / / i , Lv i ... i ,, 2 FOUND j \ ' I CR 1 4 i tam in F 1 ,/1,74,i_ 1 . ial 113 1 1 i ,i_u_ klr c, GLENA,LI , CIRE5 1 I 1 1 OK E ROAD PNn --"C"---\ "eov THORNBURY , N 1 grigirc,,-; I , ---1--W-ii' GiEA1ABBEY DRiv5 a 1 . Subject j \ : 1111111111111111 H \ r_ Lands // ( ' A sm e.t \ \ IN°Mailligral \ 7-,k GLEN EAGLES DRIVE ] ....CM l ‘ I TN` Courtice c.- U&ington Leading the Way REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report#: PSD-085-05 File #: 5-0-2004-03 By-law#: Subject: PROPOSED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION TO PERMIT 388 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, IN THE CITY OF OSHAWA APPLICANT: GLASPELL C/O GLENOSHA FARMS RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-085-05 be received; 2. THAT the City of Oshawa be advised that the Municipality of Clarington has no objections to the approval of the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision (S-O-2004-03) provided that: a) THAT the City of Oshawa confirm in writing prior to issuing Draft Approval that the City and the applicant will assume and accept 100% of the costs of street illumination and/or sidewalk improvements that are deemed necessary on Townline Road North as a result of this development including all future maintenance. b) THAT the conditions contained in Attachment 2 are incorporated in any Draft Approval. 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision; and 4. THAT a copy of this report be forwarded to the City of Oshawa Development Services Department and the Region of Durham Planning Department. Submitted by: Reviewed by: 6:5 A D d N rome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer BR/CP/DJC/Iw June 9, 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-085-05 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Owner: Stuart Glaspell C/O Glenosha Farms 1.2 Applicant/Agent: Brookfield Homes (Ontario) Limited 1.3 Plan of Subdivision: To permit the development of a plan of subdivision with unit types as follows: 12.2m (40') Detached 35 11.0m (36') Detached 150 9.2m (30') Detached 139 6.0m (20') On Street Townhouses 64 Total 388 In addition, the development includes a public elementary school, a separate elementary school, a park, a storm water management pond, landscape buffers along Townline Road North, residential reserves (partial lots), roads and road widenings. The total site area is 27.95 hectares (69.06 acres). 2.0 LOCATION 2.1 The subject lands are located within Part Lot 1, Concession 3, City of Oshawa, Parts 1 and 2, Plan 40R-15946. Specifically, the lands are on the west side of Townline Road North, a short distance south of Taunton Road and north of the future extension of Beatrice Street East. 3.0 BACKGROUND 3.1 The area subject to the Draft Plan of Subdivision is located within the Part II Plan for the Pinecrest Planning Area. The lands are designated residential. 3.2 On September 3, 2004, the Municipality of Clarington was circulated by the City of Oshawa to provide comments on the above draft plan of subdivision. This plan of subdivision provided for a range of lot and unit types, and gave flexibility for the lands to be subdivided in various ways through Part Lot Control. Comments were provided to the City of Oshawa through Report PSD-137-04. 3.3 On May 9, 2005, the Municipality of Clarington was circulated a revised plan of subdivision by the City of Oshawa to provide comments. The revised plan provided for an even greater variety of lot and unit types although the unit numbers were fixed and no longer a range. The total number of units was reduced and the number of elementary schools was increased from one to two. This report offers comments on the revised plan. REPORT NO.: PSD-085-05 PAGE 3 4.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 4.1 The application was circulated to the Municipality of Clarington Engineering Services Department for review. The following comments have been received. • The City of Oshawa is to required to confirm in writing that it and the applicant will assume and accept 100% of the costs of street illumination and/or sidewalk improvements that are deemed necessary on Townline Road North as a result of this development including all future maintenance; and • All storm drainage flows, both minor and major, must be self contained within the City of Oshawa and the road allowance for Townline Road North. The developer's engineer must demonstrate this to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering for the Municipality of Clarington prior to final approval. 5.0 STAFF COMMENTS 5.1 The development was previously approved and the revisions are considered minor as they affect the Municipality of Clarington. All existing development on the Clarington side of Townline Road North is based on private well and septic services. The applicant will be required to prepare a hydrogeological report to assess any potential of development on neighbouring wells so that preconstruction information is available for subsequent monitoring. 6.0 CONCLUSION 6.1 In consideration of the comments provided within this report, it is recommended that the Municipality would have no objection to the approval of the revised Draft Plan of Subdivision, provided the City of Oshawa confirms its responsibility for improvements on Townline Road North as a result of the development on Townline Road North subject to the Condition of Draft Approval contained in Attachment 2. Attachments Attachment 1: Site Location Key Map and Draft Plan of Subdivision Attachment 2: Conditions of Draft Approval List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: City of Oshawa Regional Municipality of Durham Mr. & Mrs. L. Heard ATTACHMENT1 to Report PSD-085-05 KEY r• I 1 1 �1 � J �;c©� rri. �: 1 N 7110 47 f.--1-1�j BlLCK33J q.{J Ie PUBLIC .- .� �� �EMMY .w E.i.BI£ NIXY ""1:1114110,� �� Brteci9 , UNIT COUNT me.W�a., m. 00� e , .. �;"ri3►Zr�i� Q��llllll r On NO mi By _ ����� 1,181 I & x 59 ror om 84 0 LEGEOt o o .��� _ % a®I r it._w. _.m..m O 0 ▪ ° ° wits_...._.�na 0 0▪ *°v �- 47 ® I n . E o a 1111111111 .,_ ._. 11f1It.s"":.1 i*t*Is1111 , _. lama ii :: 110 0000o000G11ri���� ©s�S:::: �_ --41-- I Two.�. 3 BLCCKJW ig- 1��� n BEN SPACE - I-Lr1 S-0- 004-030'hiss t.na REVISED DRAFT PWICI PROPOSED SUBDIVISION 0 PMT W LOT I,CON.3 0 PMTS 16],PLAN 4OR-155946 CITYONALMWA BEATRICE STREET EAST REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY W DURHAM x re.mc ms xn-mx m.N DESIGN PLAN SERVICES INC. — in Town Planning Consultants Evm..mw 11 n lel -K.nralu nr iJra4a1 2... Ufl City of Oshawa JI _=w II IS▪ L ®® S-O-2004-03 Subdivision (Oshawa) R/iM N. I� °~�` I ^` cm Monet 1 '. 4 ' _ Owner: Stuart Glaspell j ATTACHMENT 2 to Report PSD-085-05 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON June 20, 2005 Stuart Glaspell (Glenosha Farms) and Brookfield Homes (Ontario) Limited 5-0-2004-03 1. The Owner shall retain a qualified Professional Engineer to prepare and submit a Hydrogeologist Report to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services for the Municipality of Clarington demonstrating that the proposed development will not adversely impact the existing wells in the surrounding area. 2. The Owner must demonstrate prior to final approval, to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services, that all storm drainage flows, both minor and major, are self-contained within the City of Oshawa and the road allowance for Regional Road 55 (Townline Road North). 3. The Owner and the City of Oshawa must confirm in writing that they will assume and accept 100% of the costs of street illumination and/or sidewalk improvements that are deemed necessary on Townline Road North as a result of this development including all future maintenance. ClagtRy REPORT Leading the Way PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report #: PSD-086-05 File #: SBA 2005-001 By-law #: Subject: SIGN BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION APPLICANT: FAIRHAVEN INVESTMENTS INC. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-086-05 be received; and 2. THAT the sign by-law amendment application submitted by Fairhaven Investments Inc. on behalf of Laberimi Holdings Inc. to permit two wall signs with a total sign area of 8.36 square metres, be APPROVED for a maximum of 1 year to June 27, 2006; 3. THAT the attached by-law be APPROVED by Council; and 4. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. aier Submitted by: a A2L7 Reviewed byd D. i.N'. Crome, MCIP, R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer BMR*CP*FL*df 13 June 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-086-05 PAGE 2 1.0 LEGISLATION 1.1 Section 99 of the Municipal Act allows Council to authorize amendments to the Sign By- law, if in the opinion of Council, the general intent and purpose of the by-law is maintained 2.0 BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED AMENDMENT 2.1 On May 25, 2005 Peter Pitino of Fairhaven Investments Inc. on behalf of Laberimi Holdings Inc, submitted a sign by-law amendment application to permit the construction of two wall signs totalling 8.36 square meters in area. 2.2 The subject lands area located at 161 King Street East in Bowmanville (see attachment 1). The property, owned by Laberimi Holdings Inc, is a mixed use structure with commercial on the first floor, and a residential dwelling on the second floor. The applicant is using the first floor commercial area as a sales office for a new residential development in the area of Hunt Street and Victoria Street in Bowmanville. 2.3 The sign by-law currently permits a single ground or pylon sign 7.5 square metres in size, and a single wall or window sign with a total area of 3.75 square metres, or 10% of the wall area. A wall area of 55.74 square metres was calculated based on the first floor wall area, as the upper floor is a separate unit. The total wall area would permit the construction of a 5.57 square metre sign. 2.4 A sign permit for a 2.9 square metre sign was issued on May 10, 2005. At that time, the applicant proposed additional signage, and was informed of the process for attaining approval of the additional signage. This application is a result of those discussions. 2.5 The applicant's request is to allow for two wall signs totalling 15% of the 55.75 square metre wall. The requested 8.36 square metre signage would be a 50% increase in permitted sign area. The total sign area would include the existing 2.9 square metre sign, as well as a proposed second 5.46 square metre sign which is to occupy the area of the ground floor window. 3.0 STAFF COMMENTS 3.1 Although the existing development was approved prior to the implementation of a sign by-law, a major goal of Sign By-law 97-157 is to limit excessive commercial signage along roadways in Clarington. The by-law permits one ground or pylon sign, and one wall or window sign. 3.2 The site is located in an older area of Bowmanville with prominent street related commercial development. As a result, the site is not conducive to the placement of a ground or pylon sign. 3.3 Staff does not wish to establish a precedent for the introduction of large single business signage in the Bowmanville East Main Central Area, however, given the temporary REPORT NO.: PSD-086-05 PAGE 3 nature of the new home sales office use, and the applicants concurrence to not erect a ground or pylon sign on the site or other wall or window signs, staff is willing to support the sign by-law amendment to permit a second wall sign and to increase the maximum allowable sign area from 5.57 square metres to 8.36 square metres, for a period of one year only. The applicant will determine at that time if a further extension is required and needs to be applied for. 4.0 CONCLUSION 4.1 Staff respectfully recommend that this application be APPROVED for a second wall sign, and signage area totalling 8.36 square metres for a period of three years, provided the applicant enter into an agreement with the Municipality that no ground pylon sign will be constructed while this approval is in place. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map Attachment 2 - Proposed Wall Sign Attachment 3 - Proposed Sign By-law Amendment List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Lawrence Avery Peter Pitino ATTACHMENT 1 r rtoP r P H 6—OS / \ ' �O 4, _ I— C4 CO N re 1 410PA-) 2 cy) i 0) w 5 „� 14 w IN I- �� /i'4 10 `� 9 Co Ili ST1* (o Lu — 26 ��k �ST °� m 2� ��� per CO A÷ fsr)im CO ta co 2 — _ I j 0 c C V, d Lu to& cc <0 N c\ _ co bye �� QUEEN STREET 32 S t' t bcb n N N , ce w N m ?):\ �° a 42 0 C35 /-n, 55 i 46 161 King Street East, Bowmanville Bowmanville Location Map SBA 2005-001 - ATTACHMENT2 _ to Report PSD-086-05 4 9 ' 2 . 71 . 1 _ Tu R iw v cs .w",x "'e k� 1.. 2"i °1. 2 1 1 4 f 4. V Y l p k 'oas . � ( a _ 1 a � x4'�'�;a-_;p �.. i`^rC+' .. ...- rxx4 2 y— e, ♦ 1,.,a r..;a fr'a° 7 i v 'v :ta ±,s_ t ,.t't W tt, v�I= : 'a l a y7$ v r sa 37: K s �,r .,' .r-- 4 i•4,K .f3.4�,S^S ;IIi1I ry I ^. r d y t AKna+i+ a6/RS ;1 t1 I. : . ' ''Y ';''..'rRB.!t1 tsk� „ -lseq'i. ..=,,,''''.. °.■nrhIW r`'Y "rv. •i "'. A 41j1:4 A� flw -1'411;1-C t L [ P 14 a t S'a I t p O w N V l L L S ib).r r 1 p ; : '. r v+R .st P.�:4Sv cv n 9nr' r r �' r � � � a b ill.-3 c c + n� ` .. s?",:-.; ,� f„ 3 Yi the -4,,,, 3 {p�*t i a I k r� .''a r i � i� I� pp�� Is ,� �r "� �1 C � • ,r;;-*A*' $'4 1 r°r ti r(la"j^i 4 Yl'",t y {ijigebt „.41„,..,-.*e L ? F ki14 t n s ,iiv :• ^ . :'w °' g 4 ' a. 'I i to F.: t 4.' k y a'0w �' .:-. � nx it t t r� v:,.ii r i 9 nA$ I 5 I ar*=a 5 - { r , ' 8 ; q � 116'0 r . Fm r i tih f Y7PFdVz L Z _, " >L r is d 5 f + 4 p ' R s '" i . . .. .. t t T 1i ” iw x ya i f "1,-i-�,1, 4 is ?.a.F s ', rc. 49.£y v A.; taa r 2' y"� a P f — . 'S . r&c'x♦+;_x '41 ?c i,r ry °r o t° riml,p ,�.� = a # yY � ' a ,F 7+' p t ...4 \m "` "Ikiii4tw " r ,f aitlrW i b 4 '1, .;*k sir�*S IT 4 a f 4 q fi ^ i SYs t 4 . ¢ 3 4 Y 4mY4 .`: �A � t ATTACHMENT 3 to Report PSD-086-05 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO, 2005- being a by-law to amend Sign By-law 97-157, as amended of the Municipality of Clarington WHEREAS Chapter 25, Subsection 99 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, as amended, provides for the amendment of By-laws regulation or prohibiting the erection of signs and provides for the charging of fees for inspection and/or issuing of permits and for the pulling down or removal of contravening signs; WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-law 97-157 as amended, of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enact as follows: 1. Section 4.4—EXCEPTIONS is hereby amended as follows: "4.4.7 Notwithstanding Section 4.3 Table B and Table C, one additional identification sign may be permitted on the north building face of 161 King Street East, in Bowmanville for Fairhaven Investments Inc. referred to as "NorthStar Homes". The total maximum sign area for wall signs shall not exceed 8.36 m2. This signage shall be permitted for a period of one year, and shall expire on June 27, 2006" 2. That this By-law shall come into effect upon being approved by the Municipality of Clarington. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2005 John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk tlarrngton REPORT Leading the Way PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report #: PSD-087-05 File #: PLN 18.1.8 By-law #: Subject: EA NOTICE OF STUDY COMPLETION ADDITIONAL WATER SUPPLY CAPACITY TO SERVICE THE NEWCASTLE URBAN AREA RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-087-05 be received for information; 2. THAT Council endorse the preferred solution, for additional water supply capacity to service the Newcastle Urban Area; 3. THAT the Regional Works Department be requested to provide at an early stage of design development a site plan of high quality architectural and landscape design, including an alignment for the waterfront regeneration trail to the satisfaction of the Directors of Planning Services and Engineering Services; and 4. THAT a copy of this report be forwarded to the Regional Works Department. Submitted by: Ja/4, / Reviewed by:0/' e-- s . •J. Crome, MCIP, R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer FL/DJC/df/lw 8 June 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-087-05 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1 .1 In January 2003 the Region of Durham informed Clarington that they would be undertaking a Class Environmental Assessment for the provision of additional water supply capacity for the Newcastle Urban Area, which includes provisions for future servicing of the Orono Urban Area and meets the long term water supply needs for the hamlet of Newtonville. 1.2 The existing water supply plant (WSP) in Newcastle at 5 Lakebreeze on Lake Ontario has capacity available for the urban area of Newcastle to satisfy the projected growth until 2010 to 2013. 1 .3 The water supply system will subsidize capacity for limited growth in Newtonville in keeping with its' status as a hamlet and designation in the Regional and local Official Plans. 1 .4 Orono is within the recently designated greenbelt and is not identified as an urban growth area in the Official plan. Regional Council, and the Ministry of the Environment felt it was prudent to investigate future provisions to provide lake-based servicing should the need arise to provide proper servicing for public health reasons. Any consideration of the servicing of the Orono Urban Area is beyond the 2021 planning period. 2.0 PREFERRED SOLUTION 2.1 Staff have been involved in the ongoing work by the consultant and Region that recommends the expansion of the existing Newcastle WSP on the existing site to meet the water capacity needs. 2.2 While we agree with the preferred solution the expansion will have to be co-ordinated with the Waterfront Trail Master Plan as well as the Port of Newcastle development. As such, we are requesting that Regional Works provide a site plan of high quality architectural and landscape design including an alignment for the waterfront trail to the satisfaction of the Directors of Planning Services and Engineering Services at an early stage of the design development. 3.0 CONCLUSIONS 3.1 The preferred solution would ensure adequate water supply and capacity for the projected growth in Newcastle, the future expansion includes provisions for future servicing of the Orono Urban Area beyond 2021, and meets the long term water supply needs for the hamlet of Newtonville; as such Council should endorse the preferred solution. 3.2 The staff of Clarington Planning Services and Engineering Services will continue to work with Regional Staff and consultants to ensure that as the design develops for the REPORT NO.: PSD-087-05 PAGE 3 expansion it will accommodate the waterfront trail and recreational facilities for the Port of Newcastle. Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision: Regional Works Uarrngton REPORT Leading the Way PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report #: PSD-088-05 File #: ZBA 2005-018 By-law #: Subject: APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF PART LOT CONTROL APPLICANT: ORCHARD PARK ESTATES (BOWMANVILLE) INC. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT report PSD-088-05 be received; 2. THAT the request for Removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Block 95 on Plan 40M-2066 be APPROVED and that the attached Part Lot Control By-law be passed pursuant to Section 50 (7.1) of the Planning Act; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations and the Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: A Ia./ /A Reviewed by. Da 41, rome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer BR/CP/DJC/df 14 June 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-088-05 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant: Orchard Park Estates (Bowmanville) Inc. 1.2 Location: Part Lot 10, Concession 2, former Town of Bowmanville (Attachment 1) 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On May 13, 2005, Staff received a request from Orchard Park Estates (Bowmanville) Inc. for the removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Block 95 on Plan 40M-2066 (Attachment 1). The applicant proposes to divide Block 95 as shown on Attachment 1 in order to meld the westerly portion with Lot 35 and to meld the easterly portion with Block 94. The easterly portion of Block 95 and Block 94 would eventually be melded with other lands to the south to create full development lots. 2.2 Registration of plan of subdivision 40M-2066 was completed October 21, 1994. 3.0 COMMENTS 3.1 Staff has no objection to the approval of a By-law exempting the subject lands from Part Lot Control. Attached is a By-law (Attachment 2)to exempt the subject lands from Section 50 (5) of the Planning Act. Removal of part lot control allows for the division of Block 95 to be melded with Lot 35 to the west and Block 94 to the east. 3.2 Staff recommends that the by-law be in force for a two (2) year period following Council approval, ending June 27, 2007. 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 It is recommended that Council approve this application and adopt the attached Part Lot Control By-law for Block 95 on Plan 40M-2066. Attachments Attachment 1: Site Location Key Map and Lands Affected by Part Lot Control Removal Attachment 2: By-law for Removal of Part Lot Control Attachment 3: Unit Type and Number Summary Table List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Susan Zucchero ATTACHMENT 1 to geport D�083-05 5 o co N PIN 26619 — 0102 N C "' O 7,-) in o Exp .,. Du � 03 BLOCK 96 — a N L z � z Z 'E) AREA = 0.008 ha. oo 0 6 a.m. N7448 00 E Z �1a 1 6.- F— T • 9 \ A 13.968 12,057 12'320 O o 0 8=90.000 �o• Z SCOTTSDALE LOT �Rpie °°. W °° Pxa PART 1 w rnN N 78°54' a 40"E PIN R=110.000 1��53 I, o� ,,moo 25.479 11 3g4 (n — o Oc7`� 0 all - 1 • "' - 11.384 11.384 Z N Z o !wit O Ac o '� j'\'\ ' O^'Y ^-) O 3 5 Q, ",.� 14 p = 0.327 3.136 - j y + i - 13.093 z 13.03 ` 13 'i06 1511 m 6.180 31.497 N71 `04'2Q % (P&MEAS) PART 1 , N710320 W (P2) PLAN 40R-13953 PIN 26619 — 0104 BL ] CK 95 B AR2A 0.021 ha. A PART 2, PLAN 40R-13953 4 BLOCK 94 BLOC \--- AREA = 0.020 ha. AREA = Bowmanville Key Map Subject �O pm � � H • Lands J :%/allllllllllllllllll■ 1 ,. ZBA 2005-018 Jr1�e�1�■rN■. �1Noi!!!11111 IIIIIIIIINI Lands Affected By Part Lot Control i _�� 4111x illai -....411111 i ■ �► n �� • inn: �►s��°:=g=1111: J�t Sitar ��m1. suuica eoo _ - ablig111NIN NIE..n::.,� _ IlllllllSTONE llll�r. =:�0, muffin 111111 Nate, hi Owner: Orchard Park Estates mumb_ 111111 �� - ant► ATTACHMENT 2 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON to Report PSD-088-05 BY-LAW NO. 2005- being a By-law to exempt a certain portion of Registered Plan 40M-2066 from Part Lot Control WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to exempt from Part Lot Control, Block 95 on Plan 40M-2066, registered at the Land Titles Division of Whitby; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. That Subsection 5 of Section 50 of the Planning Act shall not apply to those lands described in paragraph 2 within the By-law; 2. That this By-law shall come into effect upon being approved by the Municipality of Clarington and thereafter Subsection 5 of Section 50 shall cease to apply to the following lands; a) Block 95 on Plan 40M-2066. 3. Pursuant to Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, this By-law shall be in force for a period of two (2)years ending on June 27,2007. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2005 John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk ATTACHMENT 3 to Report PSD-088-05 TABLE 4 PART-LOT CONTROL EXEMPTION BY-LAW Unit Type and Number Summary Table Registered Plan #: 40M-2066 By-law: APPROVED Result of Part-Lot Control Lots/Blocks Affected Unit Type & Number Exemption on Unit Type & Number Block 95 Portion of Portion of two single detached Single Detached — 1 (A decrease of 1 unit) Clarke Way Leading the Way REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report #: PSD-089-05 File #: ZBA 2005-017 By-law #: Subject: APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF PART LOT CONTROL APPLICANT: VERMONT VILLAGE HOMES RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-089-05 be received; 2. THAT the request for Removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Blocks 137 and 138 on Plan 40M-2096; and Blocks 101 and 102 on Plan 40M-2172 be APPROVED and that the attached Part Lot Control By-law be passed pursuant to Section 50 (7.1) of the Planning Act; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations and the Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: St / Reviewed by: Ci `—�— . „.. Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, �irec .r of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer BR/CP/DJC/df 14 June 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-089-05 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant: Vermont Village Homes 1.2 Location: Part Lot 9, Concession 2, former Town of Bowmanville (Attachment 1) 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On May 13, 2005, Staff received a request from Vermont Village Homes for the removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Blocks 137 and 138 on Plan 40M-2096 and Blocks 101 and 102 on Plan 40M-2172 (Attachment 1). The four blocks were to be melded into two lots, one for a single detached dwelling and one for two semi-detached dwellings. Removal of part lot control as proposed allows the adjusting of lot lines on abutting blocks of lands in adjoining registered plans of subdivision to create two single detached lots. 2.2 Registration of Plans of Subdivision 40M-2096 and 40M-2172 were completed July 16, 2002 and October 31, 2003, respectively. 3.0 COMMENTS 3.1 Staff has no objection to the approval of a By-law exempting the subject lands from Part Lot Control. Attached is a By-law (Attachment 2)to exempt the subject lands from Section 50 (5)of the Planning Act. 3.2 In accordance with the procedures established in the delegation of Part Lot Control By- laws, Planning Staff will forward to the Regional Planning Department the "Unit Type and Number Summary Table" (Attachment 3)along with a copy of the Part Lot Control By-law. 3.3 Staff recommends that the by-law be in force for a two (2) year period following Council approval, ending June 27, 2007. 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 It is recommended that Council approve this application and adopt the attached Part Lot Control By-law for Blocks 137 and 138 on Plan 40M-2096; and Blocks 101 and 102 on Plan 40M-2172. Attachments Attachment 1: Site Location Key Map and Lands Affected by Part Lot Control Removal Attachment 2: By-law for Removal of Part Lot Control Attachment 3: Unit Type and Number Summary Table List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Brian Settes ATTACHMENT 1 to Report PSD-089-05 th A Cii F I b b �'— b I— .o PA!PAF O 1 0 I Oti 1 o ON Oti PAR Jz —1 J2 __J G. 0 I i BOARD FENCE DN LIME S.E.AN N70' IS' s 00'E IP11 LOT 1 IJOBI N70' -. I 41' 1,1081 -0 IB 30'E(MEASI .P.40M' I /}/ ' PLAN ;' Cl) tt• i CO M t � ��° N s �-, «l Mo QQ a0° °° PART 5 o I U b pQ 6�• 4 P AREA .0.072 no. b QQb s Ili m.el. ; Q�ti A"c�' BLOCK INo266/9.0785� a— — � � N. .143 I BLOCK K SEE DETAIL "L ii" PM zesls.D7ea�� E PART 4 BEARIN01 •Y IREGERENCE'— �� AREA .0.001 Aa. 4S' 00'E IP11 t IJ081 /NTO'D• IS \� 41' 30/ �_�/�� .e 7,129 .. 31,633 4.020 SiB Z' —0.12740— 4' � ` 39.19(PIP i� WOB) — 0.12620 ADB N6i'26'20'E (x1EA51 ,( 0 4� (WIT1 x67'2660 E IPII 4: r 49 23 / Me60.10664 \3/4ea,4 �;� wit) Bpw 2 6I 6 4 G°�3/ b C' � ,:„ ooa fpm ti N88.06B���E l///Pll 4�\y� 7."(` —'�0.��iP� 6 'OOOf j N/ / EP so. _go., PIN 26910550 cl/;q�/ f,'�P .�t, ��i ��"7 ' . sE ZC 226g6E ACP-- PART 3 P,�o {b�,¢b sU0 as N P\"69.IDOE 0 r— — — Aaan •0.001 no I C* 5$ I1ai PFPS 2 PIN 26 8>s — O 4 1 = w 1 ° � IT1 WIJDB)L CO I PLAN Bowmanville Key Map �IIIIIIII/% ZBA 2005-017 Lands t 11111111111= 111 ow_ Lands Affected By Part Lot Control ==llMW --o-i =w STEPHENS MO= Wren Al ‘ -m-`ilI,=a00� 1 �N, , _■ 1111101 1111111111111 EN IIra ,- - Owner: Vermont Village Homes SSCOOTTS�DALEE ('J DDRIV�E'"�� m II IY— I — ATTACHMENT 2 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON to Report PSD-089-05 BY-LAW NO.2005- being a By-law to exempt a certain portion of Registered Plan 40M-2096 and a certain portion of Registered Plan 40M-2172 from Part Lot Control WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to exempt from Part Lot Control, Blocks 137 and 138 on Plan 40M-2096, and Blocks 101 and 102 on Plan 40M-2172, registered at the Land Titles Division of Whitby; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. That Subsection 5 of Section 50 of the Planning Act shall not apply to those lands described in paragraph 2 within the By-law; 2. That this By-law shall come into effect upon being approved by the Municipality of Clarington and thereafter Subsection 5 of Section 50 shall cease to apply to the following lands; a) Blocks 137 and 138 on Plan 40M-2096;and b) Blocks 101 and 102 on Plan 40M-2172. 3. Pursuant to Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, this By-law shall be in force for a period of two(2)years ending on June 27,2007. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2005 John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk ATTACHMENT 3 TABLE 4 to Report PSD-089-05 PART-LOT CONTROL EXEMPTION BY-LAW Unit Type and Number Summary Table Registered Plan # 40M-2096 By-law APPROVED Result of Part-Lot Control Exemption on Unity Type & Number Lots/Block Affected Unit Type & Number Block 137 Single Detached — 1 No increase Block 138 Semi/Links — 2 A decrease of 1 unit TOTAL Units — 3 A decrease of 1 unit TABLE 4 PART-LOT CONTROL EXEMPTION BY-LAW Unit Type and Number Summary Table Registered Plan # 40M-2172 By-law APPROVED Result of Part-Lot Control Exemption on Unity Type & Number Lots/Block Affected Unit Type & Number Block 101 Semi/Links — 2 A decrease of 1 unit Block 102 Single Detached — 1 No increase TOTAL Units — 3 A decrease of 1 unit tlarington Leading the Way REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report #: PSD-090-05 File #: ZBA 2005-026 By-law #: Subject: APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF PART LOT CONTROL APPLICANT: 1189286 ONTARIO INC. (GARY BREDA) RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-090-05 be received; 2. THAT the request for removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Lots 60 and 62 on 40M- 2178 be APPROVED and that the attached Part Lot Control By-law be passed pursuant to Section 50 (7.1) of the Planning Act; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report, any delegations and the Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department be advised of Council's decision. /'n '_ -124" Submitted by: _ //.J�/ / Reviewed by�.� D. %I.W Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer SA/CP/DJC/lw June 9, 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-090-05 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant/Agent: 1189286 Ontario Inc. (Gary Breda) 1.2 Location: 88, 92, 104, and 108 Aylesworth Road in Courtice 1.3 Part Lot Control Removal: Lots 60 and 62, 40M-2178 (Attachment 1) 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On June 8, 2005, Staff received a request from the owners of the above-noted properties for the removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Lots 60 and 62, 40M-2178. 2.2 Registration of the Plan of Subdivision 40M-2178 was completed on November 28, 2003. 3.0 COMMENTS 3.1 The Planning Act gives authority to a Municipality to remove Part Lot Control in a plan of subdivision to permit a person to convey a part of any lot or block of land. 3.2 Staff has no objection to the approval of a By-law exempting the subject lands from Part Lot Control. Attached is a By-law (Attachment 2)to exempt the subject lands from Section 50(5) of the Planning Act. 3.3 In accordance with the procedures established in the delegation of Part Lot Control By- laws, Planning Staff will forward to the Regional Planning Department the "Unit Type and Number Summary Table" (Attachment 3) along with a copy of the Part Lot Control By-law. 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 It is recommended that Council approve this application and adopt the attached Part Lot Control By-law for Lots 60 and 62 on Plan 40M-2178. 4.2 Staff recommends that the By-law be in force for a two (2) year period, following Council approval, ending June 27, 2007. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map Attachment 2 - By-law for Removal of Part Lot Control Attachment 3 - Unit Type and Number Summary Table List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Gary Breda c/o 1189286 Ontario Inc. ATTACHMENT 1 to Report Pa-90-05 1 9 LOT 49 I LOT 50 LOT 51 1 LOT 52 I LOT 53 - T 4 AN 1692050' .•I'J 259+9-355— °N 269'9-1955 P'J ;69E. 5655 I F/N . c651 P - 3-�'F 53 e I N )I' iB J9I. IB 10- E: - __ ___ [JDBI 18000 IJDBI _ _9000 u091 I 18000 — IDB1 N8, CORNED/ � i'. 01r r —. _..— —_ , ' _ _. ��%/, // LOT 61 t' G 40m 2178 �� , PIN 26939-ODDS /11 -. : I LO c3 00 "7 /fro' / /1 / .0 Ln _ ,.11 /0 r " , . 41, 40, 1 --' j 0, - " , re) 0• i-/ I--- F ,/ �o ' a ` ° , V °�< : 40,o I o/ / `/ „ mom . ,I / om = '''''H AI V O-A. / l !II B: V 4 I1JD91 I N ]V 18000 - X5 00"O — 9 000 39 0 I=E%FBE M10E SELF tliS 1 I I I AYLESWORTH AVENUE u /' ii ii 11 'II I Courtice Key Map I ZBA2005-026 Lots Affected By Part Lot Control i'rrluina= = Subject Lots 60 and 62, 40M-2178 .. E`:_°=irium momrion - Lands_ Now Parts 1 to 4, 40R-23472 N If miuminmim!:;Er a -Inilllliiltl i` aMmaal nn I II sammummanum _nnmm11W" '°IMI= - 1111"111 1 MEW= Owner: 1189286 Ontario Inc. :1111'14_ =. ATTACHMENT 2 to Report PSD-090-05 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO. 2005- being a By-law to exempt certain portions of Registered Plan 10M-2178, from Part Lot Control WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to exempt from Part Lot Control, Lots 60 and 62 of 40M-2178, parts 1, 2, 3, and 4 of 40R-23472, registered at the Land Titles Division of Whitby; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. That Subsection 5 of Section 50 of the Planning Act shall not apply to those lands described in paragraph 2 within the By-law. 2. That this By-law shall come into effect upon being approved by the Municipality of Clarington and thereafter Subsection 5 of Section 50 shall cease to apply to the following lands: a) Lots 60 and 62 of 40M-2178. 3. Pursuant to Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act,this By-law shall be in force fora period of two(2)years ending on June 27,2007. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2005 John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk ATTACHMENT 3 PART LOT CONTROL EXEMPTION BY-LAW UNIT TYPE AND NUMBER SUMMARY TABLE to Report PSD-090-05 Registered Plan 40M-2178 File: ZBA 2005-026 Lots/Blocks Affected Unit Type & Number Results Lot 60, 40M-2178 Semi-detached dwelling, No Change Pts 3 & 4, 40R-23472 2 units Lot 62, 40M-2178 Semi-detached dwellings, No Change Pts 1 & 2, 40R-23472 2 units TOTAL 4 UNITS No Change Clarrngton Leading the Way REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report#: PSD-091-05 File #: RE 16.15 and RE 6.14.9.1 By-law #: Subject: DECLARATION AND SALE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-091-05 be received; 2. THAT Council declare, by By-law, the property identified as Part 3 on Plan 40R-19115, Part Lots 23 and 24, Plan H-50077, Bradshaw Street, Part Lot 9, Concession 2, former Town of Bowmanville, as shown on Attachment 1, as surplus and offered for sale; and 3. THAT Council declare, by By-law, the property identified as Part 4 on Plan 40R-22242, Darlington Boulevard, Part Lot 35, Concession 2, former Township of Darlington, as shown on Attachment 2, as surplus and offered for sale. -, /�i Submitted by: Reviewed by: D-vid !!Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer IL/FL/DJC/df 14 June 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-091-05 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 By-law 95-022, being a by-law to establish procedures governing the sale of real property, states that from time to time the Director of Planning Services may: • identify real property that should be declared surplus; • report to Council recommending that Council declare the particular real property to be surplus property and set out the reason why it should be declared to be surplus property; and • advise that at least one appraisal of the fair market value of the real property should be obtained before Council decides to sell or exchange or transfer the real property, unless an appraisal is not required under the Municipal Act. Bradshaw Street Surplus Property The property identified on Attachment 1 is a 3.92 metre wide strip of land adjacent to 62 Bradshaw Street in Bowmanville. The parcel was owned by Schickedanz Bros. Limited and was donated to the Municipality in 2004 in exchange for a receipt for tax purposes. The donation was accepted through Council's approval of Planning Services Report PSD- 107-04. Immediately north of the site is an unopened road allowance known as Winnstanley Street. The western portion of the road allowance was closed and conveyed to Schickedanz. Bros. Limited through By-law 89-67 so that they could complete the subdivision development of 10M-829 on the east side of Mann Street. The eastern portion of the road allowance remained in Municipal ownership. In order for the Municipality to accept a donation of a gift of land in exchange for a charitable receipt the value placed on the land must be justified by a property appraisal unless an appraisal is not required under the Municipal Act. This property is 3.92 metres wide by 50.9 metres deep. As indicated through Report PSD-111-04, the estimated value of this site was $5,985. The value of this property as a small strip is limited as it can only be developed in conjunction with the unopened road allowance to the north. The Engineering Services Department have indicated that they intend to close the Winnstanley Street road allowance through Report EGD-019-05. They have requested that the strip of land acquired from Schickedanz Bros. Limited be declared surplus so that it can be purchased in conjunction with the road allowance. If the strip is added to the road allowance it would result in a lot with a frontage of 16.11 metres. Municipal services are already in place along Bradshaw Street to accommodate the strip and the road allowance to develop in sequence. A property appraisal will be required to determine the fair market value of both pieces as one parcel of land. Darlington Boulevard Surplus Property This parcel is on the west side of Darlington Boulevard and is identified as Part 4 on Plan 40R-22242 (Attachment 2). Planning Services Report PSD-087-03 was presented to Council on June 23,2003, and at that time Council approved the acquisition of Parts 2, 3, and 4 on Plan 40R-22242 from The Waltzing Weasel. The owners retained Part 1 for an extension of their parking lot area. Part 2 is to become part of a future motor vehicle REPORT NO.: PSD-091-05 PAGE 3 laneway from Darlington Boulevard westward to Townline Road. Part 3 is now a pedestrian walkway connection from Darlington Boulevard to Foxhunt Trail. As indicated in PSD-087-03, the owners were not willing to provide just the lands required for the trail and walkway so it was necessary to acquire Part 4 as well. There was no legal impediment to acquiring more land than required for public purposes and there is no legal impediment to declaring Part 4 as surplus and offering it for sale at this time. An appraisal report was completed to determine the value of the lands purchased from The Waltzing Weasel. The lot is designated Urban Residential and zoned Urban Residential Type One (R1). It has 15.3 metres of frontage and a lot area of 826 square metres. Currently there is no municipal sewer system along Darlington Boulevard. The properties on this street have municipal water and are serviced with private septic systems. The lot is of sufficient size that it likely can support a residential use with a private septic until full municipal services are provided. This will be confirmed with the Health Department. Part 4 on 40R-22242 was appraised in 2002 as part of the Municipality's negotiations with the former owner. On November 28, 2002, its estimated fair market value was $45,000. Residential land values have increased since the date the appraisal was completed so it will be necessary to have the appraisal report updated to determine the value of the property today. The lot can be offered for sale for its 2005 land value upon completion of the appraisal update. It can be sold at a latter date when municipal services are available. 2.0 CONCLUSION 2.1 Part 3 on Plan 40R-19115 was acquired in exchange for a receipt for tax purposes. The acceptance of the land was based on its potential to be sold as surplus property to the future owner of the Winnstanley Street road allowance. When the road allowance is closed an offer to purchase can be submitted for the strip of land and the road allowance as a residential parcel. Part 4 on Plan 40R-22242 was purchased in order to acquire Parts 2 and 3 on 40R- 22242 to facilitate the construction of the Foxhunt Trail walkway and the motor vehicle laneway access from Darlington Boulevard to Townline Road. It is a residential lot and has no public purpose. The proceeds from sale of this property can be utilized to acquire other lands that have been identified for public use. It is recommended that both parcels of land be declared surplus and offered for sale at the appropriate time. Attachments: Attachment 1 — Surplus Property By-law for Part 3, 40R-19115 Attachment 2 — Surplus Property By-law for Part 4, 40R-22242 ATTACHMENT 1 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NUMBER 2005- being a by-law to declare the lands more particularly described as Part 3 on Plan 40R- 19115, Part Lots 23 and 24, Plan H-50077, Part Lot 9, Concession 2,former Town of Bowmanville, to be surplus THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The lands more particularly described as Part 3 on Plan 40R-19115, Part Lots 23 and 24, Plan H-50077, Part Lot 9, Concession 2, former Town of Bowmanville, as identified on Schedule 1. are hereby declared surplus; 2. Schedule 1 attached hereto forms part of this By-law. BY-LAW read a first time this 27" day of June 2005 BY-LAW read a second time this 27th day of June 2005 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this 27th day of June 2005 John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk SCHEDULE 1 • N�E\ ARD APPLE BLOSSOM BC' U n rn N N fTl 91 BO 1011 8179 80 82 a) rn al o o 88 85 87 78 Ii N . •' 77 86 rn i— 83 7775 7B 119 76 (n ® g4 73 81 73 71 72 74 1 15 �2 82 eo 77 7 if ir 71 69 111 6967 68 70 107 70 tal6 Z 736 6563 LA 64 66 103 68 7 ��7L 94 W 62 99 64 OOH 0 r 9 6159 60 93 62 63 ^ co 5 7 5755 (n 56 58 60 59 UD 58 N I cD o 52 54 87 56 = 55 M M �t o N c0 r ° 48 5 52 C N d m — ROAD 4 46 7 50 Y EDGERTON N 40 42 46 r r� LC) N 01 r) (f) ‘1•7 irro) 6 38 62 6� 44 47I 58 43 42 3533 32 4 54 7 41 N o 3129 50 53 40 39 N rD o i_(,(2 CO 49 38 15 27 3 25 46 45 36 FLAXMAN Z 41 34 / 33 °' r� 11 23 21 Q 20 22 30 = 37 3230 31 r n C 7 1917 1 6 18 V) 33 2826 27 29 3 15 12 14 26 25 2422 23 25 STREET 13/ 8 10 22 m 21 2018 19 21 16 17 1614 CHANCE CRT. ism 6 15 1210 �9 11 C 11 86 5 7 � d- ,:t- in 4 2 1 3 CONCESSION STREET EA HI -n (.) < m < m < mamamQmq to Qma__ Lands to be Declared Surplus IRE 16.15 r A Winnstanley Street Road Allowance ATTACHMENT 2 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NUMBER 2005- being a by-law to declare the lands more particularly described as Part 4 on Plan 40R-22242, Part Lot 35, Concession 2,former Township of Darlington,to be surplus THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The lands more particularly described as Part 4 on Plan 40R-22242, Part Lot 35, Concession 2. former Township of Darlington, as identified on Schedule 1, are hereby declared surplus; 2. Schedule 1 attached hereto forms part of this by-law. BY-LAW read a first time this 27'" day of June 2005 BY-LAW read a second time this 27th day of June 2005 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this 271" day of June 2005 John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk SCHEDULE 1 • 2 ,:: I [s) m.er(Ps) 1414 `)$:)b ( ExE (P--;680-16;l -1 ,..) ` "12 u• 4E"""A. SRO _ 44-E •21.2.,0 _ ..-1— ii--2716 h (0 I 016 61 " I c) sa n o .; i:; ..) t.. n aAS m I •i � I l:i In m'ar 5 h— I .�7 Im reO J,E YO .� re eN �, id .(pin I'— CO rJ•PART 59B _ _ n 3 I E Na."3720 ` ) E 4.38 I4 03i _ i" N CiV p:;2 r PART 4 6 , Q io; ;LS° n a. r. ..: . Ewn f ) N O ••. v d wAe nix" _ r)' -• 11 N7236'20`E 52.98 I n •, CO E f• i f 0.1)Ens. Cl DIY sv. F r • 'SI .2 8 ma Or - Y]E.O.]5 - isv} Z Pl. Dm .• g _ PART 1 a g s U' EAST r.ca Y N E 3 Z CIAMPI If et ErrNS_p 8'18p NaO.020E r N7374'20'E 24.08 Ce r EAST O-l A 2J.22 i0 n m 18 fl _ N. 'PAR (nJ k Sr rA¢GO le d CI --__ : . T 5 18°40.0j) " Neote.20-E ease PART 2 8 (ro5) �--� 1' z° _`CI N7374'20`E I 2474 4->/43�oet_2�rP! aft i`0� 641 �'qRT 3 M �i /VD / PART Sky. \ . n ��LAN nD__9 a3 _ OaO N \`\�� Ss 0 ski xrnEAsi f f.. . 1 . 44fi--2-V— --I F42.52'04vF(4444s \� \�\� I F.C.P. m• ) ;r —__ )4 ) L ],C'\(.E' SEE DETAIL J ('.7.N. 7(358;,.�00)P `CF (riiq l i` 4`.' \\ Lands to be Declared Surplus RE 6.14.9.1 Qaringion REPORT Leading the Way PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report#: PSD-092-05 File #: 18T-90036, By-law#: ZBA 2004-042 & COPA 2004-008 Subject: PLAN OF SUBDIVISION, REZONING AND OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO PERMIT 327 RESIDENTIAL UNITS OWNER: 1477677 ONTARIO LIMITED (BAYWOOD HOMES) RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-092-05 be received; 2. THAT Amendment No. 45 to the Clarington Official Plan as submitted by 1477677 Ontario Limited (Baywood Homes — Napa Valley Phase IV) to delete the Neighbourhood Commercial Symbol within the area of Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision as contained in Attachment 3 be ADOPTED; 3. THAT the application for Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-90036, as amended and submitted by 1477677 Ontario Limited (Baywood Homes — Napa Valley Phase IV) be APPROVED and that the Director of Planning Services be authorized to issue Draft Approval, subject to the conditions as contained in Attachment 4; 4. THAT the application to amend Zoning By-law 84-63, be APPROVED and that the amending by-law, as per Attachment 5 be forwarded to Council for approval; 5. THAT a by-law to remove the "Holding (H)" symbol be forwarded to Council at such time that the applicant has entered into a subdivision agreement; 6. THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized by By-law, to execute a Subdivision Agreement between the Owner and the Municipality of Clarington and at such time as the agreement has been finalized to the satisfaction of the Directors of Engineering Services and Planning Services; 7. THAT staff be authorized to settle the terms of a purchase agreement to purchase 2 semi- detached lots from 1477677 Ontario Limited; REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 PAGE 2 8. THAT a copy of this report and Council's decision be forwarded to the Region of Durham Planning Department; and 9. THAT the Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department, all interested parties and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: / l Reviewed byj A r ( C W Da id Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer BR/CP/DJC/df/lw 17 June 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 PAGE 3 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Owner: 1477677 Ontario Limited (Baywood Homes) 1.2 Applicant/Agent: 1477677 Ontario Limited (Baywood Homes) 1.3 Clarington Official Plan Amendment: To delete a Neighbourhood Commercial Symbol within the area of the Proposed Plan of Subdivision 1.4 Plan of Subdivision: Revision to previously submitted Plan of Subdivision (18T- 90036) to permit the development of a 327 unit residential Plan of Subdivision consisting of 97 detached dwellings, 182 semi-detached dwellings and 48 townhouse dwellings 1.5 Rezoning: From: "Agricultural (A)", "Holding - Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)", "Holding — Urban Residential Type Two ((H)R2)", "Holding — Urban Residential Type Three ((H)R3)" and "Holding — Neighbourhood Commercial ((H)C2)" to appropriate zones to implement the proposed development 1.6 Area: 19.46 hectares (48.09 acres) property 1.7 Location: The area subject to the proposal is generally located on the east side of Liberty Street North and north of Scottsdale Drive, Lot 10, Concession 2, Former Town of Bowmanville 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 Plan of Subdivision 18T-90036 was originally submitted to the Region of Durham in 1990. The Plan of Subdivision included 18.08 hectares (44.68 acres) and proposed 297 residential units. The Neighbourhood Commercial symbol was added by Amendment to the Town of Newcastle Official Plan in 1994. 2.2 In March 1994, Council recommended partial Draft Approval of the Plan of Subdivision, for only those lots fronting onto Swindells Street, provided that prior to final approval for registration of the Plan, lands owned by David Puk and Connie Puk of Brooking Transport were secured for the extension of Longworth Avenue east of Liberty Street. The Region of Durham Planning Department, the approval authority at that time, did not draft approve the Plan of Subdivision but the file was not closed. 2.3 On October 6, 2004, the Planning Services Department received a revised Proposed Plan of Subdivision (Revised 18T-90036) and a new Rezoning (ZBA 2004-042) application. On November 24, 2004, the Planning Services Department received an application to amend REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 PAGE 4 the Clarington Official Plan. The Official Plan Amendment requests the removal of the Neighbourhood Commercial symbol in favour of 12.0m single detached units. 2.4 Prior to the time of the resubmission of this proposed draft Plan of Subdivision in late 2004, and the related public meeting on January 10, 2005, the applicant acquired the Brooking Transport lands. This permitted connection of Longworth Avenue with Liberty Street North. However, the width of Longworth Avenue on the east side of this intersection and other intersection geometrics were not ideal. Since then, in early May 2005, a purchase agreement has been made for the Buma lands at 277 Liberty Street North. This has facilitated a better intersection layout. The Buma lands were not included in the plan shown at the public meeting, but at 1.435m2 (0.3546 acres) they represent less than 1% of the total area of the subdivision site of 19.46 hectares (48.09 acres) and does not represent significant change to the subdivision. These additional lands facilitate the construction of the Longworth Avenue and Liberty Street intersection in its ultimate location, however, no new residential lots will be created. Only two partial lots, that is, blocks for future residential lots, will be created. For development of these partial lots to occur a further planning process will have to be undertaken. Therefore, staff has determined this minor boundary adjustment does not necessitate a further public meeting. 2.5 A public meeting for the proposed official plan amendment, plan of subdivision and rezoning was held on January 10, 2005. Four neighbours spoke at the meeting. Three of the neighbours objected to Phase 4 when they felt neighbouring Baywood subdivisions had not been completed. One neighbour objected to the anticipated impact the new development would have on his property. This neighbour has since entered into an agreement to sell his property to Baywood Homes. 3.0 LAND CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES 3.1 The site is generally flat, currently vacant and has no significant environmental features. 3.2 The surrounding land uses are as follows: North: Vacant Land, Longworth Park and beyond, Low and Medium Density Urban Residential Uses South: Low Density Urban Residential Uses East: Low Density Urban Residential Uses and Harold Longworth Public Elementary School West: Low Density Urban Residential Uses and beyond, Liberty Street North 4.0 OFFICIAL PLAN CONFORMITY 4.1 The Durham Regional Official Plan designates the subject property as Living Area. All three applications conform. 4.2 The Clarington Official Plan designates the subject property as Urban Residential with a Medium Density Residential symbol, a Neighbourhood Commercial symbol, and a Neighbourhood Park symbol. A Type C Arterial Road (Longworth Avenue) runs east-west REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 PAGE 5 through the middle of the subdivision. The Clarington Official Plan Amendment, if approved, will delete the Neighbourhood Commercial Area symbol. 4.3 The site is within the Fenwick Neighbourhood which has a population allocation of 5500 and a housing target of 1950 units, 1325 low density, 525 medium density and 100 intensification units. Other than the Neighbourhood Commercial Area symbol, the applications conform to the Official Plan policies. 5.0 ZONING BY-LAW COMPLIANCE 5.1 Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63 of the former Town of Newcastle zones the subject property in part "Agricultural (A)", "Urban Residential Type One (R1)", "Holding-Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)", "Holding-Urban Residential Type Two ((H)R2)", "Holding- Urban Residential Type Three ((H)R3)", and "Holding-Neighbourhood Commercial ((H)C2)". A zoning by-law amendment is required to implement the proposed draft Plan of Subdivision. Most of the zones are appropriate for the subdivision generally but are not consistent with the boundaries proposed on the May 2005 version of the subdivision proposal. 6.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 6.1 The applications were circulated to various agencies and other departments. The following summarizes comments and requested conditions of draft approval received. 6.2 Clarington Emergency and Fire Services had no fire safety concerns. 6.3 The Separate School Board requested adequate provision of sidewalks throughout the subdivision. 6.4 Bell Canada, Rogers Cable and Enbridge have no objections but Bell has two conditions of draft plan approval incorporated in Attachment 4. 6.5 Veridian Connections provided detailed comments. Electric service is available on the road allowances touching the property and servicing will be from the east side of Liberty Street. An underground expansion of the Corporation's plant is required on the road allowance. The existing Corporation's plant on Liberty Street may have to be replaced/relocated at the Applicant's cost to accommodate the proposed new road location. A Construction Agreement must be signed with the Corporation in order to obtain servicing for this site and legal costs will be charged to the Applicant. Veridian has no objections to the proposed development. 6.6 Central Lake Ontario Conservation has no objections to COPA 2004-008 or ZBA 2004- 042. With regard to proposed plan of subdivision 18T-90036, Authority staff has previously expressed no concerns regarding the draft approval of 18T-90036, as at that time REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 PAGE 6 stormwater management issues issues had been addressed through overall stormwater management reports for the overall area. The proponent should demonstrate that the proposed plan of subdivision will be developed in conformity with this overall scheme and this can be ensured through appropriate conditions of draft approval. 6.7 The Regional Planning Department commented the Municipality should examine whether the amendment to delete this "Neighbourhood Commercial" symbol would alter the daily commercial needs of area residents who may walk or cycle as an alternate form of transportation. The Region's Community Strategic Plan supports healthy neighbourhoods through safe and convenient movement of pedestrians. Traffic noise is an issue that will need to be addressed when evaluating the subdivision proposal. Water supply and sanitary sewer service is available. This application is considered to have no significant regional or provincial concerns and is exempt from Regional approval. The Department also commented the revised draft plan proposing 277 single detached dwellings and 22 street townhouse dwellings, blocks to be developed in conjunction with adjacent lands, a park block, a walkway, roadways and road widenings, would appear to conform to the Durham Regional Official Plan. Regarding the Region's delegated review responsibilities for provincial interests: • two separate Environmental Site Assessments (a Phase 1 and a Phases 1 & 2) have been submitted for different portions of the property. The Assessments indicate that a portion of the property once was used as a transport business but the site does not appear to be significantly impacted by any contaminants. No environmental remediation or additional subsurface investigation is required at this time; • issues concerning storm water management are to be addressed to the satisfaction of the conservation authority; • a Noise Impact Study has been submitted by Sernas Associates. The Noise Impact Study examines the proposed sound levels for Liberty Street and proposed Longworth Avenue. The Study needs to be amended to reflect the revised plan; and • there are no other provincial interests or delegated review responsibilities applicable to this application. Regarding municipal services: • municipal water is available from the existing 300mm watermain on Liberty Street at Longworth Avenue and the existing 300mm watermain on Longworth Avenue, east of the subject lands; • the subject lands are tributary to the existing 250mm diameter sanitary sewer located on Swindells Street at Scottsdale Drive, which is to the south; • an external drainage area north of the subject lands is to be incorporated into the design of the sewage system for the subject lands. Regarding transportation: • a road widening will be required along Liberty Street, a Type `B' Arterial Road in the Regional Official Plan; • sight triangles at the intersection of Liberty Street and Longworth Avenue will be required to match those existing at the west side of the Liberty/Longworth intersection; and, REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 PAGE 7 • all design and construction details, including the ultimate alignment of Liberty Street and Longworth Avenue, are to be included with the first submission engineering drawings. Based on the foregoing, the Region has no objection to draft approval of this plan. Eleven conditions of draft approval are to be satisfied prior to clearance by the Region for plan registration. 6.9 The Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board noted students generated by this subdivision will attend Harold Longworth Public School and requested the internal streets of the subdivision be provided with sidewalks. The Board noted there was no park block east of the subdivision's east boundary. This block, shown on earlier versions of the plan, has since been deleted. The Board concluded it had no objections to the application. 6.10 The Engineering Services Department has reviewed the proposed plan of subdivision. The Engineering Services Department has requested an additional 2 lots at the intersection of Longworth Avenue and Swindells Streets be added to the park block to increase the street frontage and visibility of Longworth Park. This matter is reviewed further in Section 7.3 of this report. Twenty two (22) conditions of draft approval have been provided (see Attachment 4). 7.0 STAFF COMMENTS 7.1 Neighbourhood Commercial Symbol The Commercial Policy Review has considered the existing commercial hierarchy and made recommendations that Neighbourhood Commercial Areas and Local Central Areas be combined into one designation. Deletion of this designation is in keeping with the recommendations of the study. The daily commercial needs of the subdivision's residents who choose to cycle or walk to reach such businesses will be addressed by the Local Central Area designation at the northwest corner of the Liberty/Longworth intersection. Walkways (see Section 7.4) will support such transportation choices. 7.2 Variety of Housing The plan of subdivision has been changed considerably from that which was submitted in Fall 2004. Previously, the subdivision had little housing variation: 277 detached dwellings with 12 and 10.5 metre frontages and 22 townhouse dwellings with 7 metre frontages. Currently, the subdivision has 98 detached dwellings but with 19 having 15.0 metre+ frontages and 79 having 12.0 metre+ frontages. The 15.0 metre+ lots are strategically placed to share rear lot lines with the wider, older residential lots fronting on Liberty Street. The 10.5 metre detached lots have been removed and replaced with 9.0 metre semi/link lots. The number of townhouses has been more than doubled from 22 to 48. As a whole, the Fenwick Neighbourhood requires 525 medium density (typically townhouse) units. Review of the neighbourhood's housing targets including medium density units, existing and proposed, and the increase in the number of units in this subdivision reveal the REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 PAGE 8 application is in conformity and there is no longer any shortfall in medium density units in the Fenwick Neighbourhood. 7.3 Longworth Park The 1.94 hectare park block to be dedicated by the applicant is a southerly extension of the existing Longworth Park. This is an overdedication of the requirements of the Planning Act and was previously required in the earlier consideration of the draft plan by the Municipality. The park block and the existing portion of the park, due to the combined size, satisfies Clarington Official Plan area requirements. The applicant has basically met the frontage requirements for his park block but since the existing park in the Melody Homes development to the north has practically no frontage, there is a frontage deficiency in the park as a whole. The Clarington Official Plan requires that approximately 25% of the perimeter of a park have frontage of a street. Only 12% of the park perimeter has frontage (Attachment 2). In order to address this deficiency and to improve the visual prominence and pedestrian access to the park from the corner of Longworth and Swindells, Engineering and Planning staff recommend the purchase of additional parkland north from the corner. Engineering and Planning staff propose to increase the park's frontage through the acquisition of the 2 semi/link dwelling lots west of the park block and fronting on Swindells Street. Baywood Homes has agreed to the conditions of approval that provide for the acquisition of Lots 181 and 182 (Attachment 2). I have had preliminary discussions with the developer with respect to this acquisition and can brief Committee in camera on the anticipated cost. 7.4 Walkways The Clarington Official Plan requires subdivisions to be oriented toward a grid road network to enhance connectivity. Previous approvals have made a full grid road system difficult. To this end, walkways are proposed to link the west end of Street "E" with the north side of Longworth Avenue, and the northwest end of Street "C"with the south side of Longworth Avenue. Convenient access to the Longworth/Liberty intersection is important given that it will have a commercial plaza, transit stops, and be on the way to St. Elizabeth Separate Elementary School on Longworth Avenue west of Liberty Street. Street connections in this location were not considered desirable due to intersection spacing requirements from Liberty/Longworth intersection. 7.5 Longworth Avenue Approval of this plan of subdivision is desirable since it contains the "missing link" in Longworth Avenue, a Type 'C' Arterial Road that will provide an alternative east—west link to King Street from Mearns Avenue to Regional Road 57. 7.6 Entrance Feature The lot at the northeast corner of the Liberty/Longworth intersection Block 198, as redline revised, will be dedicated to the Municipality at no cost for use as a landscaped entrance feature to the subdivision and the neighbourhood. A condition of draft approval has been included to this effect. REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 PAGE 9 7.7 Tax Status The Finance Department advises that the taxes for the whole subject property have been paid in full. 8.0 CONCLUSION 8.1 The applications have been reviewed in consideration of the comments received from area residents, the circulated agencies, the Clarington Official Plan and Zoning By-law 84-63. The owner has agreed to the conditions of draft approval as contained in Attachment 4. In consideration of the comments contained in this report, staff respectfully recommends the adoption of the official plan amendment as contained in Attachment 3, the proposed plan of subdivision, as contained in Attachment 1, be APPROVED subject to the conditions of draft approval as contained in Attachment 4, and that the rezonings as contained in Attachment 5 be APPROVED. Attachments: Attachment 1: Site Location Key Map and Plan of Subdivision Attachment 2: Plan of Subdivision Park Block Attachment 3: Proposed Amendment No. 45 to the Clarington Official Plan Attachment 4: Conditions of Draft Approval Attachment 5: Zoning By-law Amendment List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Effie Vedouras Jennifer& Don Buma Bryce Jordan Robert W. Cawker Craig Scott Paul Berube Dale and Sue Veinot Andrew Kozak REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 INTERESTED PARTIES LIST Name GomPaSy Agdra tt v nc Pest Effie Vedouras 6 Brooking Street Bowmanville, ON L1C 5J5 Jennifer & Don Buma 277 Liberty Street North Bowmanville, ON L1C 3YC Bryce Jordan G.M. Sernas & Unit 41, 110 Scotia Court Whitby, ON L1 N 8Y7 Associates Robert W. Cawker Baywood Homes 1140 Sheppard Avenue W., Toronto; ON M3K 2A2 Unit#12 Craig Scott 311 Liberty Street North Bowmanville, ON L1C 3Y6 Paul Berube 43 Scottsdale Drive Bowmanville, ON L1C 5G4 Dale and Sue Veinot 44 Scottsdale Drive Bowmanville, ON L1C 5G4 Andrew Kozak 86 Concession Street West Bowmanville, ON L1C 1Y9 ATTACHMENT 1 FUTURE _ .�����w NICK I~II �v 1 Pe DENSITY `Ol `�R� an IinB i Z 1B 3s 36 BLCCK 19] � PARK 1.9450 — I I I ® It 199wA sTREET "E- a ® e UTURE 11u1= JAflI0©0S 115113 I YYLF CIAL I > M30NMD1 ' 1mmmomomommmomv ® AVENUE ---A�_ r — - LONGWOR'R'i]6n WAU<WAY $1I1©000�� mmmm�IDTYFL a." �, �` !�!,I.mmmmm lE9 fi] p N10N DENSITY NA" �- 9MT a_ � STREET / W I n � r.�. 163 1 128 129 y V A 16Y WALKWAY IBI W a 103&001(30.1 t04 W 137 160 • 4..2b' WOENNE ° f. • t.r,.L I 71 103 59000 60 BLOCK 196 W 131 l 7 7.an SIN 6-7.05 SM 0.1958. 0.5660. 135 159 W' is m, 105 y u: ill<• + ' + la0 13s +m 7 ° J6 7] U 106]B 96 10] +O 6-IX}(191 `1•/ 134 157 a i.an Sd DLIXi(196 134 _I 0.IN8. 6-LCm S]X La 0.1360. —� N IQ 97 O 51 0.0•. JB W 96 IN ~ = IJS 1W. 1 W ao W i Iz3 .y 95 tog a Iy Iss I e1 h BLOCK 192 7-7. 194 136 !l H. co a,NU. 9.ITw. Im 0 I 154 83 93 137 120 1 I5] —I 63 9R 111 1]B I El i 91 BLOC%193 . $TI 153 112 O.ITtO. 143 141 140 139 / I 90 I / 151 Iiiiuuint: 0 t ■ u:nt 1 Bowmanville Key Map ZBA 2004-042 AVENUE r z•+ - COURT �1T�'{�".-�JI N ' Zoning By-law Amendment 1-J URTH ii�'—'—�.I U PN9,. ELDAD P°� 18T-90036 Ns cM m EB `"°` Subdivision WI g CRESCENT Ro J ""L"� COPA 2004-008 WI NEADOwVIE1Y VD. v; 910 Clarington Official Plan Amendment tl ti U° .�8,`9"}Rt 2 'i 040.40 rUNICNL r = 7' 'c. N t • Owner: Dwight Chizen (Power of Attorney), NE CRT BL,,. ! ® 6 SUNSE t CAMPLING Margaret Constance Puk and the �Y,° IRE D 97, —.- Estate of Robert Allen Brooking ATTACHMENT 2 p 36 38 N * 10 g 40 ' 0 FREELAND \ 0 42 �0 C. -I/ ruNo � ' '1U k�N NI~ �O ®®� \ \ J 65 J L ONGWORTH �� o-) 69 ww PARK(Existing) ® MAXWELL C' 307 supnen -j • EIS M_ '- - HAROLD LONGWORTH U EN. = e Was PUBLIC SCHOOL �' 111110 A . II n I I gilillinnilliall t24 LONGWORTH A all 2 *a .4-4 an na nr" I 6 MI I NI Li j 277 I 11 �mom IS Cn 273 ELDAD DRI S� i 32 33 271 -_. 36 37 MEE 40 41 ■N��t�■ pwp 269 ■ ' I 44 w 49 ISM J 18 -9 • • I _ 52 � 53 ' 267� 56 cn STEPHENS 64 0 N N N N N z SOD SOD Xr 261 68 2 73^ 11 1/41=- 259 76 O 77 C) 80 CC 81 257 255 I 84 CO 85 `b 92 89 id 2s o 251 1 96 s 22 100 101 18 71 lei 249 104 108 105 09 247 ( . / 71 116 113 117 10 II 24514 12024 121125 7`. .c I Hill ii 11 I 1 1 ii I 1 1 ' 128 N ' 1 WA Park Block as set out in 18T-96003 ' Existing Portion of Longworth Park ATTACHMENT 3 AMENDMENT NO. 45 TO THE CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN PURPOSE: To amend the Official Plan of the Municipality of Clarington to permit the deletion of the Neighbourhood Commercial symbol within the area of Plan of Subdivision 18T-90036. The symbol location is in Part Lot 10, Concession 2, former Town of Bowmanville. BASIS: The Amendment is based on an application submitted by 1477677 Ontario Limited (Baywood Homes) to delete the above Neighbourhood Commercial symbol. The approval of this application is based on the findings of the Commercial Policy Review which are to guide associated amendments to the Clarington Official Plan. Council is satisfied that the deletion of the Neighbourhood Commercial symbol is consistent with the recommendation of the commercial hierarchy for the Municipality as described in the Commercial Policy Review and as to be articulated in the Clarington Official Plan through amendments to it. ACTUAL AMENDMENT: The Clarington Official Plan is hereby amended as follows: 1. By amending Map A3 — Land Use — Bowmanville Urban Area as shown on Exhibit "A". IMPLEMENTATION: The provisions set forth in the Clarington Official Plan, as amended, regarding the implementation of the Plan, shall apply in regard to this amendment. INTERPRETATION: The provisions set forth in the Clarington Official Plan, as amended, regarding the interpretation of the Plan, shall apply in regard to this amendment. EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT No. 45 TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN, MAP A3, LAND USE, BOWMANVILLE URBAN AREA / U • CONCESSION ROAD 3 • © • NP NP I Delete "Neighbourhood Commercial" Symbol w w m w w J � z w NP v) NP cc Q w ONCESSION STREET ( ATTACHMENT4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Revised Plan of Subdivision 18T-90036 Lot 10, Concession 2, Former Town of Bowmanville 1. The Owner shall have the final plan prepared on the basis of the approved draft plan of subdivision 18T-90036, prepared by Sernas Associates, identified as Project Number 04333, dated and revised May 2005, as revised in red [and dated June 10, 2005], which illustrates 97 lots for single detached dwellings, 91 lots for 182 semi-detached/link dwellings, 7 blocks for 48 townhouse dwellings, blocks to be developed in conjunction with adjacent lands, a park block, a block to be dedicated as an entrance feature, three walkways, roadways, road widenings and sight triangles. 2. The applicant must enter into a subdivision agreement with the Municipality which includes all requirements of the Engineering Services Department regarding the engineering and construction of all internal and external works and services related to this proposal, and agree to abide by all terms and conditions of the Municipality's standard subdivision agreement, including, but not limited to, the requirements that follow. 3. The Owner shall dedicate the road allowances included in this draft plan as public highways on the final plan. 4. The Owner shall name road allowances included in this draft plan to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Durham and the Municipality of Clarington. 5. The Owner shall convey to the Regional Municipality of Durham sufficient road widenings across the entire frontage of the draft plan abutting Liberty Street in order to establish a minimum of 15 metres from the centerline of Liberty Street to the subject property line. 6. The Owner shall convey sight triangles at the northeast and southeast corners of Liberty Street and Longworth Avenue, as widened, to the Region of Durham. 7. The Owner shall submit plans showing any proposed phasing to the Region and the Municipality of Clarington for review and approval, if this subdivision is to be developed by more than one registration. 8. The Owner shall grant to the Region, any easements required to provide Regional services for this development and these easements shall be in locations and of such widths as determined by the Region. 9. The Owner is required to submit a signed Record of Site Condition (RSC) to the Regional Municipality of Durham, the Municipality of Clarington and the Ministry of Environment (MOE). This RSC must be to the satisfaction of the Region, including an Acknowledgement of Receipt of the RSC by the MOE. 10. The Owner shall agree in the Municipality of Clarington Subdivision Agreement to implement the recommendation of the report, entitled "Noise Control Study", prepared by Sernas Associates dated October 2004, as revised, which specifies noise attenuation measures for the development. The measures shall be included in the subdivision agreement and must also contain a full and complete reference to the noise report (i.e. author, title, date and any revisions/addenda) and shall include any required warning clauses identified in the study. The Owner shall provide the Region with a copy of the subdivision agreement containing such provisions prior to final approval of the plan. 11. The Owner shall provide for the extension of such sanitary sewer and water supply facilities which are external to, as well as within, the limits of this plan that are required to service this plan. In addition, the Owner shall provide for the extension of sanitary sewer and water supply facilities within the limits of the plan which are required to service other developments external to this subdivision. Such sanitary sewer and water supply facilities are to be designed and constructed according to the standards and requirements of the Regional Municipality of Durham. All arrangements, financial and otherwise, for said extensions are to be made to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Durham, and are to be completed prior to final approval of this plan. 12. Prior to entering into a subdivision agreement, the Regional Municipality of Durham shall be satisfied that adequate water pollution control plant and water supply plant capacities are available to the proposed subdivision. 13. The Owner shall satisfy all requirements, financial and otherwise, of the Regional Municipality of Durham. This shall include, among other matters, the execution of a subdivision agreement between the Owner and the Region concerning the provision and installation of sanitary sewers, water supply, roads and other regional services. 14. The Owner must revise draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-90036, prepared by Sernas Associates, identified as Project Number 04333, dated and revised May 2005, to incorporate the red-line revisions to said plan, and such revisions are dated June 10, 2005. These revisions to the draft plan must be done prior to the Notice of Decision of Draft Approval being mailed. 15. The Owner shall dedicate Blocks 199, 200, 201 and 202 on the red-line revised draft plan to the Municipality of Clarington as public walkways on the final plan. 16. The Owner shall convey Block 197 to the Municipality of Clarington for park or other public recreational purposes and further agrees to provide for a 1.8 metre high chain link fence at the east limits of the site in accordance with the Park Site Master Plan at no cost to the Municipality. No building permit, above and beyond fifty one percent (51%) of the entire subdivision, will be issued by the Municipality until the Longworth Avenue frontage and services abutting the park are completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services. The lands will be conveyed in a form satisfactory to the Director of Engineering Services and may include the requirement for a Soils Report indicating that no foreign material is present. The park shall be graded to ensure proper drainage and compatibility with abutting lands and roads. No less than 200 mm of topsoil shall be provided on the site. Seeding/sodding to stabilize the site shall be determined by the Director of Engineering Services. The block shall not be used for the temporary storage of any materials nor shall any material be imported to or exported from the block without the approval of the Director. 17. The Owner shall enter into a purchase and sale agreement or an option to purchase agreement, as determined by the Municipality, for the sale of Lots 181 and 182 to the Municipality, such agreement containing terms and conditions satisfactory to the Director of Planning Services. 18. The Owner shall convey Block 198, the block on the northeast corner of the Liberty Street North and Longworth Avenue intersection to the Municipality of Clarington and shall landscape the block in accordance with the approved landscape plan. The eastern portion of the block will be added to the lot to the east which will in turn be divided into two north-south oriented lots. 19. Lot 53 shall be retained as a future development block to be developed in conjunction with the lands to the south. 20. That the developer is required, as a condition of the development agreement, to make the front end payments to the Municipality for the amount stated in the following front end agreements: 1. Schickedanz Upper and Lower Front End Agreement 2. Mann Street Storm Sewer Front End Agreement 3. Orchard Park Subdivision 21. That the storm drainage works necessary for this plan of subdivision are constructed in accordance with the West Branch of Soper Creek Master Drainage Study, dated May, 1991, prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan and as finally approved by the Director of Engineering Services. 22. That prior to the detailed engineering submission, the applicant's engineer prepares a Stormwater Management Implementation Report that details all storm quantity and quality control facilities, erosion protection measures, conveyance of storm drainage, both major and minor systems from this site. In addition, the report should specify the location of the storm connection to which existing storm sewer system the applicant proposes to connect. This report shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Engineering Services. 23. All streets shall be constructed in accordance with Municipality of Clarington standards. 24. The applicant will be responsible for 100% of the cost, financial and otherwise, associated with the connection of proposed internal roadways and related facilities to existing roadways located in adjacent residential subdivisions. The cost shall include any works located on extemal lands that are deemed necessary by the Director of Engineering Services. 25. The Owner shall grant such easements as may be required for utilities, drainage and servicing purposes to the appropriate authorities. 26. That all land dedications, easements, sight triangles and reserves as required by the Municipality for this development must be granted to the Municipality free and clear of all encumbrances and in a form satisfactory to the Municipality's Solicitor. 27. All works and services must be designed and constructed in accordance with the Municipality of Clarington Design Criteria and Standard Drawings, provisions of the Municipality Development By- law and all applicable legislation and to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services. 28. That prior to the issuance of building permits, access routes to the subdivision must be provided to meet Subsection 3.2.5.2(6) of the Ontario Building Code and, that all watermains and hydrants are fully serviced and the Owner agrees that during construction, fire access routes be maintained according to Subsection 2.5.1.2 of the Ontario Fire Code, storage of combustible waste be maintained as per Subsection 2.4.1.1 and open burning as per Subsection 2.6.3.4 of the Ontario Fire Code. 29. All utilities such as hydro, telephone and cable television within the streets of this development must be installed underground for both primary and secondary services. 30. The north side and west side of Street C must be fully serviced with water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, hydro, telephone and cable television for any future lots that may front onto Street C. 31. Prior to the issuance of any building permits within the proposed subdivision, the applicant must provide for the removal of any existing temporary turning circles located in adjacent developments. The applicant must reconstruct the road to an urban standard, including asphalt paving, curb and gutter, boulevard sod, sidewalks, street lighting and street trees. 32. All lots located on street eyebrows must be revised to have a minimum frontage of 15.0 metres. All blocks located on eyebrows that are designated as future lots must accommodate 15.0 metre frontages. Alternatively, the applicant will be required to submit house siting plans for each eyebrow lot which demonstrate that the reduced frontages will still allow sufficient room to accommodate storm sewer easements, street furniture, driveway entrances and snow storage. 33. Actual construction of Street C will not be permitted until the owner has acquired all of the lands necessary to facilitate the construction of Street C. The final approved Master Grading Plan for the subdivision must demonstrate that Street C can be constructed without retaining walls and without adversely affecting adjacent property to the north. The final master drainage scheme will be subject to the approval of the Director of Engineering Services at the engineering approval stage of the development process. 34. Every effort must be made to reduce the number of rear yard catchbasins being proposed at the south limit of the subdivision. The final drainage scheme will be subject to the approval of the Director of Engineering Services at the engineering approval stage of the development process. 35. Additional grading works may be required to facilitate proper grading of Lots 87, 119 and 143. The owner shall be responsible for 100% of the cost of works deemed necessary by the Director of Engineering Services to facilitate proper grading of these lots. 36. The owner shall be 100% responsible for the costs, financial and otherwise, associated with the removal of any existing fence, structures or other items that encroach onto the subject lands. 37. That the Owner shall retain a qualified Engineer to prepare and submit a Hydrogeologist Report to the Director of Planning Services to demonstrate that the proposed development will not adversely impact the existing wells in the surrounding areas. 38. That the Applicant meet all the requirements of the Engineering Services Department, financial or otherwise. 39. The Owner shall, if necessary, apply to the Municipality of Clarington and obtain area municipal approval of the zoning for the land uses shown on the approved draft plan in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. 40. That the Owner shall adhere to architectural control requirements of the Municipality. 41. That the Owner shall retain a qualified landscape architect to prepare and submit a Landscaping Plan to the Director of Engineering Services and the Director of Planning Services for review and approval. The Landscaping Plan shall reflect the design criteria of the Municipality as amended from time to time. 42. The Owner shall submit a detailed tree preservation plan to the satisfaction of the Municipality of Clarington. No trees shall be removed until such time as this program has been approved except as authorized by the Municipality. 43. That the Owner shall provide the Municipality, at the time of execution of the subdivision agreement unconditional and irrevocable, Letters of Credit acceptable to the Municipality's Treasurer, with respect to Performance Guarantee, Maintenance Guarantee, Occupancy Deposit and other guarantees or deposit as may be required by the Municipality. 44. That the Owner shall pay to the Municipality, the development charge in accordance to the Development Charge by-law as amended from time to time, as well as payment of a portion of front end charges pursuant to the Development Charge Act if any are required to be paid by the Owner. 45. The Owner shall meet all the requirements of the Municipality of Clarington, financial or otherwise. 46. Prior to any on-site grading or construction or final approval of the plan, the Owner shall submit to, and obtain approval from, the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority for reports describing the following: a) the intended means of conveying stormwater flow from the site, including use of stormwater techniques which are appropriate and in accordance with provincial guidelines; b) the anticipated impact of the development on water quality, as it relates to fish and wildlife habitat, once adequate protective measures have been undertaken; and c) the means whereby erosion and sedimentation and their effects will be minimized on the site during and after construction, in accordance with provincial guidelines. The report must outline all actions to be taken to prevent an increase in the concentration of solids in any water body as a result of on-site, or other related works, to comply with the Canada Fisheries Act. 47. The Owner shall satisfy all financial requirements of the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority. This shall include Application Processing Fees and Technical Review Fees owing as per the approved Authority Fee Schedule. 48. The subdivision agreement between the Owner and the Municipality of Clarington shall contain, among other matters, the following provisions: a) the Owner agrees to carry out the works referred to in Condition 46 to the satisfaction of the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority; b) the Owner agrees to maintain all stormwater management and erosion and sedimentation control structures operating and in good repair during the construction period, in a manner satisfactory to the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority; c) The Owner agrees to advise the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority 48 hours prior to the commencement of grading or the initiation of any on-site works. In order to expedite clearance of Condition 48, a copy of the fully executed subdivision agreement should be submitted to the Authority. 49. The Owner must place in all agreements of purchase and sale for lots completely or partially within 300 metres of the St. Lawrence & Hudson Railway right-of-way, warning prospective purchasers or tenants of the existence of the Railway's operating right-of-way; the possibility of alterations including the possibility that the Railway may expand its operations, which expansion may affect the living environment of the residents notwithstanding the inclusion of noise and vibration attenuating measures in the design of the subdivision and individual units, and that the Railway will not be responsible for complaints or claims arising from the use of its facilities and/or operations. 50. The Owner shall agree in the Agreement, in words satisfactory to Bell Canada, to grant to Bell Canada any easements that may be required for telecommunication services. Easements may be required subject to final servicing decisions. In the event of any conflict with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements, the Owner/Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of such facilities or easements. 51. The Owner shall be required to enter into an agreement (Letter of Understanding) with Bell Canada complying with any underground servicing conditions imposed by the Municipality. 52. Prior to final approval of this plan for registration, the Director of Planning Services for the Municipality of Clarington shall be advised in writing by: a) The Regional Municipality of Durham, how 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 Conditions have been satisfied; b) The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, how Conditions 46, 47 and 48 have been satisfied; and c) Bell Canada, how Conditions 50 and 51 have been satisfied. NOTES TO DRAFT APPROVAL 1. If final approval is not given to this plan within three years of the draft approval date, and no extensions have been granted, draft approval shall lapse and the file shall be CLOSED. Extensions may be granted provided valid reason is given and is submitted to the Director of Planning Services for the Municipality of Clarington well in advance of the lapsing date. 2. As the Owner of the proposed subdivision, it is your responsibility to satisfy all conditions of draft approval in an expeditious manner. The conditions of draft approval will be reviewed periodically and may be amended at any time prior to final approval. The Planning Act provides that draft approval, may be withdrawn at any time prior to final approval. 3. All plans of subdivision must be registered in the Land Titles system within the Regional Municipality of Durham. 4. Where agencies' requirements are required to be included in the local municipal subdivision agreement, a copy of the agreement should be sent to the agencies in order to facilitate their clearance of conditions for final approval of this plan. The addresses and telephone numbers of these agencies are: a) Durham Region Planning Department P.O. Box 623 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, ON L1N 6A3 b) Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority 100 Whiting Avenue Oshawa, ON L1H 3T3 c) Bell Canada Right of Way 100 Borough Drive, Floor 3 Scarborough, ON M1 P 4W2 ATTACHMENT 5 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NUMBER 2005- being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63,the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington for ZBA 2004-042; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. Schedule "3" to By-law 84-63, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: 2. "Agricultural (A)Zone"to"Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R1-43)"; "Agricultural (A)Zone"to"Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-15)"; "Holding-Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)" to "Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R1-43)"; "Urban Residential Type One (R1)"to"Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-15)"; "Holding-Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)" to "Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-15)"; "Holding-Urban Residential Type Two ((H)R2)" to "Holding-Urban Residential Exception (R2-15)"; "Holding-Urban Residential Type Two ((H)R2)" to "Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R1-43)"; "Holding-Neighbourhood Commercial ((H)C2)" to "Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-15)"; "Holding-Urban Residential Type Three ((H)R3)" to "Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R1-43)"; "Holding-Urban Residential Type Three ((H)R3)" to "Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R3-20)"; and "Holding-Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)" to "Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R3-20)". 3. Schedule"A"attached hereto shall form part of this By-law. 4. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Sections 34 of the Planning Act. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2005 John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Clerk This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2005- , passed this day of , 2005 A.D. c i If \\ i � i I :°::gym ._...ill pll rai dlllr ' to i 401 ,: [ _1 7 ' I a t, 3:°LN 'x STREET •E. '.tn , r 41 � o�os..a� e� .11 �.�w / /,„„-Jt.,44,49,0„, iI r—{7 "I i �*� * * '(�e•' r - a SLOLN]°5 � � � ��=�';Tick * * , - , AVENUE [ °"M ". ,!.. i Oil!*' *ys s ON TN roan * * �- T '? lksv[ � #,`.�k �', ..414 �f Y *Ft, 444414 >/4 cx ' �-' vam"tr :�.�.'��� \ ►44.4•A•-• - /� I I . ` P44444414M��4��4. SIT I •.I' PACLN . , ' W g m l � ` - , � I I 4„._._- miiiil e : �4i - �� __� mJ m d •414�4� �i N , •4.4.141' " -,� " ;;1.7.;;:- ';"b- J i 4 4 4 4 —^ W : AL,/ riii ►//44'40 t - ° w 1- 1 _ i a ®/�II4•4tO� 1 a°rrx I ti +.:'i:' = 1441 tJ �/-mom_ �_ I f —IIC�/_ I� ����/,,,,,,////// 4•x.4■ //� - �r! to IL� p_-r� y ;g. //��i4O1444 to ,7�, JlaiiU�i�i .��.�. :114 i rom—f 1 `iA --- ' ;i.-• 114/t S-_ - 1_ J I ''� � h.14/ r T - T- *Y� a ::iiiiillL . w I ...••...lip��ivaT in- 1 ! . r ��/� 4 _i i _ __ wotiWSS . i i/. . .', Zoning To Remain "R1" Eiali Zoning Change From "R1"To"(1-1)R2-15" mo Zoning Change From "(H)R1"To"(H)R1-43" sM. Zoning Change From "(H)R1"To"(H)R2-15" \\ Zoning Change From "(H)R2"To"(H)R1-43" f55 Zoning Change From "(H)C2"To"(H)R2-15" CC!: Zoning Change From"(H)R3"To"(H)R1-43"=ti Zoning Change From"A"To"(H)R2-15" re Zoning Change From "A"To"(H)R1-43" 555 Zoning Change From "(H)R3"To"(H)R3-20" iiiill! Zoning Change From"(H)R2"To"(H)R2-15"Ma Zoning Change From"(H)R1"To"(H)R3-20" 4 BOWMANVILLE Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk John Mutton, Mayor Clarington REPORT Leading the Way PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report #: PSD-093-05 File #: C-C 2003-002 By-law #: Subject: DRAFT PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION APPLICANT: PORT OF NEWCASTLE EAST LANDS LTD. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1 . THAT Report PSD-093-05 be received; 2. THAT the Draft Plan of Condominium application, submitted by Port of Newcastle East Lands Ltd. be APPROVED and that the Director of Planning Services be authorized to issue Draft Approval, subject to the conditions as contained in Attachment 3; 3. THAT a copy of Report PSD-093-05 be forwarded to the Durham Region Planning Department; and, 4. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. 1 l)cetwc_2 (k.szt,, Submitted by: �J Reviewed b c saviff. Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer CS/CP/DJC/df 15 June 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-093-05 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant: Port of Newcastle East Lands Limited 1.2 Draft Plan of Condominium Application: To permit condominium tenure of one low-rise building containing 18 residential units. 1.3 Site Area: 0.37 hectares 2.0 LOCATION 2.1 The subject lands are located at 350 Lakebreeze Drive in Newcastle Village (Attachment 1). The property is contained within Part Lot 29, Broken Front Concession in the former Township of Clarke. 3.0 BACKGROUND 3.1 In November 2004, the applicant received site plan approval for three low-rise residential buildings, each containing 18 units for a total of 54 units. The owner submitted an application for condominium approval to the Municipality of Clarington to permit condominium tenure of one residential building. Construction of the one building commenced in November, 2004. 4.0 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES 4.1 The lands are designated "Living Area" within the Durham Region Official Plan. The goal of the Living Area designation is to provide a full range of housing. 4.2 Within Clarington Official Plan, the subject lands are designated Urban Residential with a Medium Density Symbol. Medium Density development shall proceed at 31-60 units per net hectare. The application for condominium is for only one of three buildings and conforms to the policies. 5. ZONING BY-LAW CONFORMITY 5.1 The subject lands are currently within the "Urban Residential Exception (R4-15) Zone" The R4-15 zone permits the proposed development and conforms to the zoning provisions. 6.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 6.1 There were no objections from the circulation of this application. REPORT NO.: PSD-093-05 PAGE 3 6.2 The Durham Region Planning Department had no objection but included in their comments conditions for the Condominium Conditions of Draft Approval. 7.0 STAFF COMMENTS 7.1 A site plan agreement with the Municipality of Clarington detailing the location of buildings and landscaping features is presently registered on title. The site plan agreement also covers financial matters, including development charges and performance guarantees for landscaping and engineering works. The appropriate Letters of Credit were obtained from the Owner for these performance guarantees. This property is also within a registered plan of subdivision and the appropriate parkland dedication was made through the plan of subdivision. Staff has no objections to the approval of the application for Plan of Condominium. 7.2 Building permits have been issued for one of three buildings, representing 54 units, and construction has begun. Staff is not aware of when the other two buildings will be built. 7.3 The Owner is aware that the Municipality shall require a site plan amendment to implement the conditions of draft approval contained in Attachment 2 of this report. 8.0 CONCLUSIONS 8.1 Based on comments contained in this report it is respectfully recommended that revisions to the subdivision be APPROVED, subject to the attached conditions of draft approval contained in Attachment 2. Attachment 1 — Condominium Plan Attachment 2 — Conditions of Draft Approval Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision: Port of Newcastle East Lands Limited ATTACHMENT to Report PSD-093-05 LAKEBREEZE DRIVE 11 BEOCKIW Pr-in I 9 i I I 17 I � � 2 iI/Ii I Ifll®I ml i a Ala i ml I ••a g z ,*, R Im 1 CL -sp III a i . trunis __ ___ ___ ____ ___ _ _ _ TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD TO MARINA SIIIMMINIM 3 Newcastle Key Map ell ��.... an r m-, C-C-2003-002 Tel p Clarington Condominium Plan III.,fv'� I Ell Owner: Port of Newcastle East 1 MI Developments Inc. Subject • r Site e ATTACHMENT 2 to Report PSD-093-05 CONDITIONS OF DRAFT APPROVAL Part Lot 29, Broken Front Concession Former Township of Clarke File No. C-C-2003-002 1. The Owner shall have the final plan prepared on the basis of approved draft plan of condominium C-C-2003-002 prepared by J.D. Barnes Limited identified as job number 02-25-260-00, dated September 14, 2002, which illustrates 18 units in one (1) low-rise buildings, parking facilities, open space and indoor amenity area. 2. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall submit a signed Record of Site Condition (RSC) to the Regional Municipality of Durham, the Municipality of Clarington and the Ministry of the Environment (MOE). This must be to the satisfaction of the Region, including an Acknowledgement of Receipt of the RSC by the MOE. 3. The Owner shall satisfy all requirements, financial and otherwise, of the Municipality of Clarington. This shall include, among other matters, the execution of an Site Plan Agreement between the Owner and the Municipality of Clarington concerning such matters as follows: compliance with the Municipality's approved site plan in terms of refuse collection, snow storage and driveway entrance maintenance. 4. Prior to final approval of this plan of condominium for registration, the Director of the Planning Services for the Municipality of Clarington shall be advised in writing by: a) Durham Region Planning Department, how Conditions 1-2 were satisfied; NOTES TO DRAFT APPROVAL 1. As the Owner of the proposed condominium, it is your responsibility to satisfy all of the conditions of draft approval in an expeditious manner. The conditions to draft approval will be reviewed periodically and may be amended at any time prior to final approval. The Planning Act provides that draft approval may be withdrawn at any time prior to final approval. 2. All plans of condominium must be registered in the Land Titles system within the Regional Municipality of Durham. 3. If final approval is not given to this plan within three years of the draft approval date, and no extensions have been granted, draft approval shall lapse and the file shall be CLOSED. Extensions may be granted provided valid reason is given and is submitted to the Director of Planning Services for the Municipality of Clarington well in advance of the lapsing date. Uarington Leading the Way REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report #: PSD-074-05 File #: PLN 8.8 By-law #: Subject: SITE PLAN CONTROL BY-LAW RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-074-05 be received; 2. THAT the Revised Site Plan Control By-law contained in Attachment 1 be forwarded to Council for approval; 3. THAT the Minister of Municipal Affairs be requested to modify Amendment No. 33 of the Clarington Official Plan, the Oak Ridges Moraine Conformity amendment, to make revisions to Section 23.8, Site Plan Control as contained in Attachment 2; 4. THAT a copy of Report PSD-074-05 and the attached By-law be forwarded to the Durham Region Works Department, Central Lake Ontario Conservation, Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority, Kawartha Conservation Authority and the Otonabee Region Conservation Authority; and, 5. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of Council's deci . Reviewed by:U Submitted by: / i'�". Cro me, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Direc or of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer SA/CP/DJC/sh/df/lw 15 June 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-074-05 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 With the introduction of the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (ORMCP), the Municipality of Clarington has been required to implement amendments to both the Clarington Official Plan and the Municipality's Zoning By-law to conform with the ORMCP requirements. 1.2 To implement the ORMCP and Amendment No. 33 to the Clarington Official Plan, an environmental impact study (EIS) must be prepared for development occurring within the 120 metre limit of a natural or hydrologic feature. The Zoning By-law approved by Council on June 6, 2005 zones lands within the first 30 metres of a natural heritage feature and/or hydrologically sensitive feature "Environmental Protection (EP)". The remaining 90 metre area of influence is subject to an Environmental Holding (H) Symbol. To develop land within the Environmental Holding (H) symbol an EIS is required. To implement the findings of an EIS, the Municipality will require the owner to enter into a site plan agreement with the Municipality. The purpose of this report is to recommend the actions required by the Municipality to implement a more encompassing site plan control by-law on the Oak Ridges Moraine. 1.3 Section 41(2) of the Planning Act states that where in an official plan an area is described as a site plan control area the Council of the local municipality may designate the whole or part of such area as a site plan control area. The Municipality of Clarington has previously enacted By-law 90-130 to establish the entire Municipality as a site plan control area and to delegate Council's site plan approval powers to the Director of Planning Services and the Director of Engineering Services. 2.0 SITE PLAN CONTROL ON THE OAK RIDGES MORAINE 2.1 To implement the Zoning By-law for the Oak Ridges Moraine, Staff are proposing that for all vacant lots in the Environmental Protection Exception (EP-1) Zone, Natural Core Exception (NC-1) Zone and/or any area depicted by the Environmental Holding Symbol, a site plan agreement shall be required for the implementation of all recommendations of an Environmental Impact Study that is required prior to any development or redevelopment of a property occurs. 2.2 A site plan agreement contains drawings and provisions that in the case of the Oak Ridges Moraine may include items such as the following: • The location of buildings or structures relative to natural features; • Specifications for the type and number of vegetative plantings required and their location on a lot; • Illumination specifications and/or restrictions; and • Grading. REPORT NO.: PSD-074-05 PAGE 3 2.3 Changes are required to the current site plan control by-law to implement this requirement. It is recommended that the current site plan control by-law be repealed in its entirety and replaced with a new by-law. The existing site plan control by-law is from 1990; as such, it contains wording reflective of the previous Town of Newcastle Official Plan, and the Planning Act, S.O. 1983. The site plan control by-law attached to this report (Attachment 1) implements both the ORMCP and OPA No. 33, incorporates current references to the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, and accurately reflects the wording of the site plan policies contained in the Clarington Official Plan. 2.4 To provide for this additional level of site plan control, it is also necessary to amend the Clarington Official Plan dealing with site plan approval. It is recommended that this be done by modifying Clarington Official Plan Amendment No. 33 which is currently before the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing for approval as the Municipality's conformity amendment. The modification addresses the use of a site plan control when approving the development within or on land adjacent (120 metres) to a natural heritage or hydrologic feature. 2.5 There is no requirement for public notice for the passing of a site plan control by-law contained in the Planning Act. Thus, the by-law attached to this report may be approved directly by Council. 3.0 RECOMMENDATION 3.1 Based on the comments contained in this report, it is respectfully recommended that this report and the attached site plan control by-law be passed and that the Minister of Municipal Affairs modify Official Plan Amendment No. 33 as contained in Attachment 2. Glossary: EIS Environmental Impact Study ORMCP Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan OPA Official Plan Amendment Attachments: Attachment 1 - Site Plan Control By-law Attachment 2 - Modification to Amendment No. 33 ATTACHMENT 1 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NUMBER 2005- being a By-law to repeal By-law 90-130, and replace it with a By-law to designate the Municipality of Clarington as a site plan control area, to define classes of development that may be undertaken without the approval of certain plans and drawings, and to delegate the approval authority to the Director of Planning Services and the Director of Engineering Services WHEREAS, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to repeal By-law 90-130, of the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle and re-enact a by-law with respect to site plan control in the Municipality of Clarington; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. By-law 90-130 is hereby repealed. 2. All lands located within the corporate limits of the Municipality of Clarington are hereby designated as a site plan control area pursuant to Section 41(2)of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, as amended. 3. The following are hereby defined as classes of development that may be undertaken without the approval of plans and drawings otherwise required under Section 41(4)and (5)of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, as amended; a) any building or structure owned or operated by the Municipality, the Region of Durham, a Conservation Authority,the Government of Ontario or Canada; b) any structure erected for the purpose of flood or erosion control; c) any agricultural building or structure; d) any temporary structure as defined by the Ontario Building Code; e) a residential building containing less that three (3)dwelling units; 1) alterations to buildings or structures which do not alter the nature of the existing use; g) aggregate extraction activities which do not include permanent buildings or structures; and h) any expansion or enlargement of a building or structure that is less than 20 square metres or less than 10% of the total floor area of the building, whichever is less. 4. Notwithstanding Subsection 3 above, in the Oak Ridges Moraine Area the approval of plans and drawings is required under Section 41(4) and (5) of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, as amended, for the following: a) any agricultural building or structure and any residential building or accessory structure in any "Environmental Protection (EP) Zone", the "Natural Linkage Exception (NL-1) Zone" and any area subject to the Environmental Holding Symbol in the Municipality's Zoning By-law with the exception that a one time expansion of any building and structure existing as of November 15, 2001 shall not require such approval and, provided: i) the expansion does not exceed 50% of the gross floor area of the existing building or structure; H) in the case of a principal building, it does not exceed 50 m2;and Hi) in the case of an any one or all accessory buildings and structures it does not exceed 20 m2 in total. 5. For the purpose of this By-law, Oak Ridges Moraine Area shall mean the portion of the Municipality of Clarington within the Oak Ridges Moraine Boundary established by Ontario Regulation 01/02 or its successor. 6. Pursuant to Section 41(13)(b) of the Act, the powers and authority of the Council of the Municipality of Clarington under Section 41 of the Act, except the authority to define any class or classes of development as mentioned in Section 41(13)(a) are hereby delegated to the Director of Planning Services and the Director of Engineering Services of the Municipality of Clarington. 7. The Mayor and Clerk of the Municipality of Clarington are hereby authorized to execute any agreement with the Municipality dealing with ensuring the provision of any or all of the facilities, works or matters referred to in Section 41(7)(a) and the maintenance thereof referred to in Section 41(7)(b), or with the provision and approval of the plans and drawings pursuant to Section 41(4) of the Planning Act, as may be required to be made by the owner of the land with the Municipality as a condition of the approval of the plans and drawings referred to in Section 41(4) of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, as amended. 8. This By-law shall come into full force and effect on the date of the passing hereof. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2005 John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Clerk ATTACHMENT 2 PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT 33 Add the following to the end of Section 23.8.1 Notwithstanding the above, agricultural buildings or structures and residential buildings containing less than 3 dwelling units may be subject to site plan control for the purposes of implementing requirements from an environmental impact study, a natural heritage evaluation or a hydrological evaluation. Qariwon Leading the PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report #: PSD-095-05 File #: ZBA 2005-028 By-law #: Subject: APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF PART LOT CONTROL APPLICANT: SCOTT PUSHMAN RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-095-05 be received; 2. THAT the request for removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Block 143 on Registered Plan 10M-829, be APPROVED and that the attached Part Lot Control By-law be passed pursuant to Section 50 (7.1) of the Planning Act; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report, any delegations and the Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department be advised of Council's decision. �I Submitted by: a//4 1 Reviewed byr-) D 'vid 'Cro e, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer BH/CP/DJC/df/lw 17 June 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-095-05 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant/Agent: Scott Pushman 1.2 Location: Part Lot 10, Concession 2, former Town of Bowmanville 10M-829 (see attachment 1) 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On June 16, 2005, Staff received a request from Scott Pushman for the removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Block 143 on Registered Plan 10M-829. 2.2 Draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-87033 received approval for 75 single detached dwellings, and 252 semi-detached dwelling units. Registration of Plan of Subdivision 10-829 was completed on October 16th, 1989. The removal of Part Lot Control would facilitate the construction two linked dwelling units. 2.3 Block 143 was originally designed as a street linking Farncomb Crescent to Tilly Road. With the subsequent draft approval of 40M-2138 for Tilley Road in February 2003 this block was revised to permit 2 linked dwellings. In February 2005, building permits were approved for 81 and 83 Famcombe Crescent. 3.0 COMMENTS 3.1 Staff has no objection to the approval of a By-law exempting the subject lands from Part Lot Control. Attached is a By-law (Attachment 2) to exempt the subject lands from Section 50 (5) of the Planning Act. 3.2 Attachment 3 is a Summary Table provided in accordance with the Region of Durham's requirements under the delegation of Part Lot Control. It details lots affected by the Part Lot Control By-law and the unit type and number of the Part Lot Control By-law. 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 In accordance with Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, the By-law may provide a specified timeframe during which the By-law shall be in force. As a result, it is not necessary for Staff to prepare a second By-law to restore Part Lot Control on the subject lands. The Planning Act leaves it to the Municipality to determine an appropriate timeframe during which the By-law shall apply. Staff recommends that the By-law be in force for a three (1) year period following Council approval, ending June 27, 2006. REPORT NO.: PSD-095-05 PAGE 3 Attachments: Attachment 1: Site Location Key Map and Lands Affected by Part Lot Control Removal Attachment 2: By-law for Removal of Part Lot Control Attachment 3: Unit Type and Number Summary Table List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Scott Pushman REPORT NO.: PSD-095-05 yyii{i INTERESTED PARTIES LIST Scott Pushman Diamond Fischman & Box 26008 RPO King St., E Oshawa, ON L1 H 8R4 Pushman ATTACHMENT 1 • r • 18 .300 r(//2>,/c, ' , 24 .000 00 0o P 0 106 o M .., ( 0 In rn co of)B Z ` /' z Z / r 18 .300 e , e • e • 24 .000 1 3 Al a N 71 °01 '00a E SIB c C FARNCOMB CRESCENT C Bowmanville Key Map II I I I I I I l Subject ,-.� 1 r°° in na_ ; � �t 11111Mnnnm ZBA 2005-028 ■ 711..-°2:$ . .m �-....noon...... ,rte I !I I 1101 •1111 Lands Affected By Part Lot Control awn nlllpelV�1 X1111. -III'iin !� 'enema gm &Ana iime Block 143, 10M-829 mnnNun.�aMtm .E.in11BIIle mmu■ -_-_ -- i - Ea C=gip? ninni�a �—F�= nonmllll °`� lmulo<� � �_ . �� _nngl IIIIIIII. __�-_ .- -- -__ am' 1 =EP miffs E to °°�° - - Owners: Tatra Valley Homes Inc. ■�� as.. ass in =_ °°T ■11g mimnm nn�EAST mi Eilmo ATTACHMENT 2 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NUMBER 2005- being a By-law to exempt certain portions of Registered Plan 10M-829 WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to exempt from Part Lot Control Block 143 on Registered Plan 10M-829, registered at the Land Registry Office for the Land Titles Division of Newcastle; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. That Subsection 5 of Section 50 of the Planning Act shall not apply to those lands described in paragraph 2 within the By-law. 2. That this By-law shall come into effect upon being approved by the Municipality of Clarington and thereafter Subsection 5 of Section 50 shall cease to apply to the following lands: a) Block 143 on Registered Plan 10M-829 3. Pursuant to Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, this By-law shall be in force for a period of one (1)year ending on June 27th,2006. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2005 John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk ATTACHMENT 3 PART LOT CONTROL EXEMPTION BY-LAW Unit Type and Number Summary Table Registered Plan #: 10M-829 By-law: Result of Part Lot Control Exemption on Unit Type & Number Lots Affected Unit Type & Number Block 143 Semi-detached — 2 TOTAL Units — 2 Increase of two units argon REPORT Leading the way ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 20, 2005 Resolution #: Report #: EGD-17-05 File #: By-law #: Subject: ESTABLISHING A REVISED BUILDING PERMIT POLICY FOR THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD-17-05 be received; 2. THAT conditional full and/or part building permits be permitted at the discretion of the Chief Building Official for commercial/industrial projects or for multi-family residential projects only, whereby the applicant has clearly demonstrated that unreasonable delays in construction would occur and is willing to enter into the appropriate agreement with the Municipality of Clarington to assume all risks arising from the issuance of a conditional permit. Respectfully by, 49014VA'2 Submitted by: A.S. Cannella Reviewed by: Franklin Wu Director of Engineering Services Chief Administrative Officer ASCIb June 8, 2005 Report #EGD-17-05 Page 2 ESTABLISHING A REVISED BUILDING PERMIT POLICY FOR THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 1.0 PURPOSE OF REPORT The Building Department regularly looks for opportunities to streamline the building permit application process to ensure that building permits are issued in as timely a manner as is reasonably possible. The question as to whether it would improve processes if we regularly issued conditional building permits for residential structures has come up from time-to-time and is one that warrants further consideration. After a comprehensive review we are now in a position to present our recommendations within this report. 2.0 BACKGROUND A building permit is a document which shows that formal permission has been given by the Municipality for construction or demolition to begin. To qualify for a building permit the applicant must first obtain approval of plans to show that the project complies with the Ontario Building Code, local zoning by-laws, and other applicable laws and regulations. Building permits are documents which show that a very clear process has been followed to protect the interests of the homeowner/developer as well as the community at large. Permits, which are regulated by the Ontario Building Code, help ensure that the structure is safe, legal and sound. The majority of permits that we issue are full, unconditional permits which means that before construction is allowed to begin all legal requirements mandated by the Ontario Building Code, the Municipal Building By-law and the subdivision agreement must be met. Once everything is in place we have a legal obligation to issue the permit forthwith. Occasionally the Municipality can, at the discretion of the Chief Building Official, issue what is known as a"conditional permit". There are two types of conditional permits; a conditional full permit is one that is issued for the entire structure, a conditional part permit is issued for a very specific stage construction only, such as the foundation. In both cases, whether part or full, the term "conditional"means that the applicant must agree in writing that certain specific conditions will be met as agreed upon within the time frame stated in writing before the permit will be issued. The reason we enter into Report #EGD-17-05 Page 3 ESTABLISHING A REVISED BUILDING PERMIT POLICY FOR THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON agreements with the developer before issuing a conditional permit is because we need to ensure that the applicant has agreed to assume all risks in commencing construction before the conditions of the building permit have been met. For example the applicant must agree to remove the building at his/her own expense and restore the site in the manner specified in the agreement if approvals are not obtained or plans filed in the time set out in the agreement. Clearly, enforcing such agreements could become a complicated and costly legal matter and it is for this reason that we do not enter into them lightly. At present we restrict the issuance of conditional permits, both part and full, to larger industrial, commercial, institutional and multi-family projects only, which have construction schedules that are one or more years in length. When a large, multi-phase project is being constructed there are advantages, seasonal, financial and otherwise, to the conditional permit process. Typically the foundation stage of larger projects may take several months or more to complete and where it can be proven that "unreasonable delays in construction would occur if a conditional part permit is not granted", and where risk has been accounted for through the appropriate agreements, conditional permits will be granted to facilitate construction. 3.0 COMMENTS 3.1 Conditional Full or Part Permits as a Time Saving Measure The Building Department, as mentioned, regularly looks at opportunities to streamline the building permit process to achieve efficiencies where it is appropriate to do so. Recently we have looked at whether we might also achieve efficiencies if conditional permits were issued for residential dwellings as well as for larger projects. Our findings suggest that if any time was saved, and this would seem unlikely, the risk and expense is, in most cases,unjustified. Report #EGD-17-05 Page 4 ESTABLISHING A REVISED BUILDING PERMIT POLICY FOR THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON Issuing conditional full or part permits for large projects has clearly been shown to achieve efficiencies worthy of the time, expense and risk involved. For example, a conditional part permit issued for the foundation stage of a large project "buys"the applicant several months time during which he can go through the steps required to gain additional approvals for later stages of construction. In the case of a single- family residential dwelling the foundation stage of construction rarely lasts more than one week, insufficient time to contribute to "unreasonable delays in construction". Furthermore, if conditional part permits were issued for single-family residential dwellings the builder would have to stop construction after the foundation was completed and wait for the full permit to be approved. Given the expense of having trades on site waiting to proceed,we are concerned that instead of waiting, the builder may feel pressure to proceed without approvals. Such a process would require constant policing, and perhaps additional staff, to ensure that builders do not construct beyond the scope of their permit. We are also concerned that delays would result in open foundations which may put the Municipality and the public at risk 3.2 Existing Concerns As explained, conditional full and part permits create substantially more work for our Plans Examiners and Administrative staff and it is for this reason that conditional full permits cost $500.00 more and conditional part permits cost $150 more than a regular permit. In addition to higher costs, and of much more concern, is the inherent risk involved in permitting construction before all legislated requirements have been met. In controlled circumstances, such as is the case with a large commercial or industrial project, the costs and the risks may be justified. In the case of single-family residential dwellings the same can not be said. Report#EGD-17-05 Page 5 ESTABLISHING A REVISED BUILDING PERMIT POLICY FOR THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 3.3 Conditional Building Permit Policies of Other Municipalities Other municipalities issue conditional permits only for large projects and seldom issue them for single family dwellings. The Chief Building Official will, under special conditions as allowed in the Ontario Building Code, issue conditional permits for single family dwellings only occasionally and under very unique circumstances. 4.0 CONCLUSION Our recommendation is that the Municipality of Clarington continue to issue conditional full permits or conditional part permits, at the discretion of the Chief Building Official, for larger industrial, commercial, institutional and multi-family projects only. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Building permit process flow chart ATTACHMENT# I TO REPORT# TO, Municipality of Clarington Building Permit Application Process Builder submits plans and completes an application form • The plans are reviewed by the Building Department for compliance with the Ontario Building Code. • Engineering reviews the grading plan. • Planning reviews zoning& architectural approval process 1 Planning reviews application to ensure that all conditions in subdivisions are met and completed. • The Building Department reviews the project to ensure that all applicable laws have been met and that all of the above has been completed and approved. Attachment No. 1 EGD-17-05 Uarington REPORT Leading the Way ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday June 20, 2005 Resolution #: Report#: EGD-18-05 File #: D.07.08.001 By-law#: Subject: VENTON COURT SUBDIVISION, TYRONE, PLAN 40M-2009, 'CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE' AND 'ASSUMPTION BY-LAW', FINAL WORKS INCLUDING ROADS AND OTHER RELATED WORKS Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD-18-05 be received; 2. THAT the Director of Engineering Services be authorized to issue a 'Certificate of Acceptance' for the Final Works, which include final stage roads and other related Works, constructed within Plan 40M-2009; and 3. THAT Council approve the by-law attached to Report EGD-18-05, assuming certain streets within Plan 40M-2009 as public highway. Submitted by: /PAS is_. Reviewed by. A.S. Cannella, C.E.T. Franklin Wu Director of Engineering Services Chief Administrative Officer ASC/NAC/jo June 8, 2005 REPORT NO.: EGD-18-05 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington entered into a Subdivision Agreement, registered August 25, 2000, with 1378115 Ontario Limited to develop lands by plan of subdivision, located in Tyrone and described as Plan 40M-2009 (Attachment 1). The agreement required the developer to construct all roadworks, including hot-mix paving, sodded drainage ditches and streetlights, hereinafter referred to as the 'Works'. 1.2 The Subdivision Agreement provides for the separation of the Works into five (5) stages: a) Initial Works; b) Street Lighting System; c) Final Works; d) Stormwater Management System; and e) Park Works 1.3 The Initial Works and Street Lighting System were issued 'Certificates of Completion' and subsequent 'Certificates of Acceptance' by the Director of Engineering Services, as per the maintenance requirements set out in the Subdivision Agreement. 1.4 There are no Stormwater Management System or Park Works associated with this project. 1.5 The Final Works were issued a 'Certificate of Completion' dated May 15, 2004. This initiated a one (1) year maintenance period, which expired on May 15, 2005. The Works have been re-inspected and all deficiencies have now been rectified to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services. REPORT NO.: EGD-18-05 PAGE 3 1.6 It is now appropriate to issue a 'Certificate of Acceptance' for the Final Works. The Subdivision Agreement requires Council approval prior to the issuance of the 'Certificate of Acceptance' for the Final Works. 1.7 Further to the issuance of a 'Certificate of Acceptance', a by-law is required to permit the Municipality to assume certain streets within Plan 40M-2009, as public highways (Attachment 2). Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map Attachment 2 - Proposed By-law 4 j. ::::::: ii:::i:::i::'i : : i:::::.... �;:::: :: : : 1 ...1:::::::i.....;.;..:.:;.:;;E::::,::::::;.:.:::::::::::::::::!:....:.:::::::::::.:.:::::::.......:•.......:•:.:..,...... . • • .. .............::::::: ....................................... ... ::::,...............: Z y 1 d a J .. Court ::::::: :y::::. ..'::::::2:::::::i:'. : ::::i:::::: ' :: :: —_– -ii.j..1.!....111:.....!:::!:::::]...... ::::;.•::::::.:::::;.:4.E.1::::::."•:::%.::i.:.:::•:::::::::.:;.:.:::!:....:.;•;; ;....•.;;:::.....,...........;.......!....:........:.:.............................:).........:*......:................... 1 VENTON COURT J I SUBDIVISION II PLAN 40M-2009 . l Concession Road 7 SUB.kCT SITE N i W, ,e Concession Rd 7 S O TYR NE b o co DRAWN BY:E.L. I DATE:June 8,2005 1 I co REPORT EGD-18-05 i U 1 KEY MAP i ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ATTACHMENT NO.: 2 REPORT NO.: EGD-18-05 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW 2005- Being a By-law to assume certain streets within the Municipality of Clarington as public highways in the Municipality of Clarington. NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington hereby enacts as follows: 1. THAT the Street and Block shown on Plan 40M-2009, and listed below in this section, being in the Municipality of Clarington, in the Regional Municipality of Durham, are hereby accepted by the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington as public highway, and assumed by the said Corporation for public use; Venton Court Block 29 BY-LAW read a first and second time this 27"'day of June 2005. BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this 27th day of June 2005. John Mutton, Mayor Path L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk aarifigtoil REPORT Leading the Way ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Resolution #: Report#: EGD-20-05 File #: By-law#: Subject: MONTHLY REPORT ON BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY FOR MAY, 2005. Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD-20-05 be received for information. / Submitted by: itsaiii Reviewed by: A. S. Cannella, C.E.T. Franklin Wu Director of Engineering Services Chief Administrative Officer ASC*RP*bb June 10, 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-1824 REPORT NO.: EGD-20-05 PAGE 2 1. BACKGROUND: 1.1 With respect to the Building Permit Activity for the month of May 2005, Staff wish to highlight the following statistics for the information of Committee and Council. MONTH OF MAY YEAR TO YEAR TO % CHANGE 2005 DATE 2005 DATE 2004 YT 05U4 D 05-04 Permits Issued 131 458 642 -28.7% VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION Residential $12,279,252 $55,346,153 $82,436,107 32.9% Industrial $10,000 $21,600 $20,000 8.0% Government $57,500 $202,500 $20,000 912.5% Commercial $659,209 $3,603,338 $5,088,714 -29.2% Institutional $3,500 $3,500 $19,609,800 -100.0% Agricultural $6,500 $420,348 $327,674 28.3% OPG $0 $0 $80,000 N/A Miscellaneous $15,243 $79,093 $24,800 218.9% TOTAL $13,031,204 $59,676,532 $107,607,095 -44.5% The following is a historical comparison of the building permits issued for the month of"MAY" and "YEAR TO DATE" for a three year period. Historical Data for Month of"May" Historical Data"YEAR TO DATE" $120,000,000 $25,000,000 $100,000,000 - -- --- -_... __-_. _---- --- --_._. __. -- $20,000,000 $80,000,000 _.. -- -- - - --- -- $15,000,000 - . ..--- - -. __ $60,000,000 - -_ -. -- --.. -. $10,000,000 -- <^ -- -- -- -- $40,000,000 --- , - e $5,000,000 - _. $20,000,000 a $0 2005 2004 2003 $0 2005 _ 2004 2003 1 . ®value $13031,204 '$21,837,232 $10,436,826 El value $59,676,532 .$107,607,095 $56364,780 I REPORT NO.: EGD-20-05 PAGE 3 The following is a comparison of the types of dwelling units issued for the month of "MAY" and "YEAR TO DATE". Dwelling Unit Type"MAY 2005" Dwelling Unit Type "YEAR TO DATE 6 2005" 7 Apartment Apartment 28 0 13 6�D - Single 2/0 Townhouse • • Detached 13 ss I 19% ° Townhouse 38/° ° 'm 4% i itDetached 47% I Single Detached 28 III Single Detached 145 D Semi-Detached 26 0 Semi-Detached 146 D Townhouse 13 D Townhouse 13 D Apartment 6 D Apartment 7 1.2 With respect to building permit activities (over$250,000) and large residential building permit activities, the details are provided as follows: APPLICANT CONSTR TYPE LOCATION VALUE Paul Watson I Bunkhouse — Farm Help 2216 Solina Road $359,650 Gerr Holdings Ltd. Retail Building 221 King Street $560,000 Attachment#1 — Monthly Building Permit Activity Report/Historical Comparison of Building Permit Municipality of Clarington ATTACHMENT# I TO Building Services - Monthly Activity Report REPORT// 6 , isS May 2005 BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY ^^^^^^ ' 2005 2004 Type of Construction May Year to Date May Year to Date Residential: Single Detached 28 145 64 228 Semi-Detached 26 146 47 189 Townhouse 13 13 18 72 Apartment 3 3 0 0 Other Construction 39 86 31 99 Sub Total 109 393 160 588 Industrial: New Building 0 0 0 0 Addition/Alteration 1 3 0 2 Sub Total 1 3 0 2 Government: New Building 1 4 0 0 Addition/Alteration 0 0 0 1 Sub Total 1 4 0 1 Commercial: New Building 1 3 0 6 Addition/Alteration 6 15 2 15 Sub Total 7 18 2 21 Institutional: New Building 0 0 0 2 Addition/Alteration 1 1 0 3 Sub Total 1 1 0 5 Agricultural: New Building 0 5 2 7 Addition/Alteration 1 1 0 2 Sub Total 1 6 2 9 OPG: New Building 0 0 0 0 Addition/Alteration 0 0 0 1 Sub Total 0 0 0 1 HVAC, Plumbing & Miscellaneous: 6 21 2 10 Demolition: 5 12 1 5 TOTALS 131 458 167 642 ri 2005 2004 May Year to Date May Year to Date Residential: $12,279,252 $55,346,153 $21,167,494 $82,436,107 Industrial: $10,000 $21,600 $0 $20,000 Government: $57,500 $202,500 $0 $20,000 Commercial: $659,209 $3,603,338 $559,000 $5,088,714 Institutional: $3,500 $3,500 $0 $19,609,800 Agricultural: $6,500 $420,348 $104,238 $327,674 Ontario Power Generation: $0 $0 $0 $80,000 Miscellaneous: $15,243 $79,093 $6,500 $24,800 TOTALS $13,031,204 $59,676,532 $21,837,232 $107,607,095 May 2005 PERMIT REV UES , 2005 2004 May Year to Date May Year to Date PERMIT FEES $87,355 $377,421 $145,821 $742,446 -INSP CTION�SERVICE 2005 2004 May Year to Date May Year to Date Building Inspections 789 3645 809 2810 Plumbing Inspections 530 2706 534 1904 TOTALS 1319 6280 1343 4714 -;NUUMBER OF NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS 2005 2004 May Year to Date May Year to Date Single Detached 28 145 64 228 Semi-Detached 26 146 47 189 Townhouse 13 13 18 72 Apartments 6 7 0 0 TOTALS 73 311 129 489 YEAR 2005 AREA (to 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 month) Bowmanville 113 587 468 345 312 188 184 313 423 217 229 Courtice 101 173 180 133 129 231 296 254 295 331 170 Newcastle 78 191 123 131 76 110 78 4 5 3 Wilmot Creek 7 25 29 38 24 19 21 33 21 16 16 Orono 1 2 1 1 1 Darlington 8 15 13 17 47 102 31 14 20 17 21 Clarke 1 10 16 15 9 17 17 12 20 10 7 Burketon 1 1 1 1 1 2 Enfield 3 Enniskillen 1 1 2 5 7 6 3 7 3 Hampton 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 Haydon 1 1 2 Kendal 1 3 2 1 Kirby 1 Leskard 1 1 Maple Grove 1 Mitchells Corners 1 Newtonville 1 5 3 3 3 1 2 2 Solina 3 3 1 1 Tyrone 3 9 3 TOTALS 311 1015 843 701 609 679 640 636 801 601 447 c/ yn REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday June 20, 2005 Resolution #: Report#: EGD-21-05 File #: By-law#: Subject: ACCESSIBLE PARKING - PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO BY-LAW 91-58 Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD-21-05 be received; 2. THAT the request for an "on-street" accessible parking space at 100 King St E, Bowmanville, fronting the MTO licensing office be approved; 3. THAT the "off-street" accessible parking supply be increased in the municipal parking lots per standards proposed through the draft Zoning By-law as recommended by the Clarington Planning Department and details listed in this report; 4. THAT the two narrow "on-street" accessible parking spaces on Temperance St South of Church Street be relocated to Church St with the parking spaces fronting the Municipal Administrative Centre being converted to metered parking; 5. THAT reception staff at the Municipal Administrative Centre provide the notice attached to report EGD-21-05, to courier and delivery drivers requiring them to use the Church Street loading zone and advising them of the new accessible parking spaces during an introductory period; 6. THAT signs and pavement markings be applied to all new accessible parking locations; CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-9282 Report#EGD-21-05 Page 2 7. THAT all on-street accessible parking spaces be included in the Operations Department sidewalk snow clearing contract for removal of windrows along the length of the parking stall for full access to the sidewalk; 8. THAT Council approve the by-law attached to Report EGD-21-05; and 9. THAT the interested parties listed within this report be provided with a copy of this report and Council's decision. Respectfully by, Agf,j,j2jt 07, Submitted by: A.S. Cannella Reviewed by: Franklin Wu Director of Engineering Services Chief Administrative Officer ASC/RDB/jo June 14, 2005 Report#EGD-21-05 Page 3 1.0 BACKGROUND A request for an "on-street" accessible parking space from the Driver and Vehicle Licence Office on King St. E Bowmanville and a number of other proposed "off- street" accessible parking revisions, require amendments to the traffic by-law 91- 58. Accessible parking spaces must be designated in traffic by-law 91-58 to allow enforcement officers to apply the "accessible parking" fine ($300.00 set fine or $200.00 early payment) compared to the nominal "parking in a prohibited area" fine ($23.00 set fine or $15.00 early payment). Some of the municipal parking lots do not contain the recommended number of accessible parking spaces based on the standards proposed through the draft Zoning By-law as recommended by the Clarington Planning Department for new parking lots. 2.0 COMMENT 2.1 On-street accessible parking request, Vehicle Licence Office In the interest of public safety, it is usually considered safer to have designated accessible parking spaces located in parking lots rather than on public roadways. A standard parking lot parking stall is 2.75m wide but a designated accessible parking space must be wider to provide easier access. A width of 4.5 m wide, if one space, or 3.4m wide if two or more accessible spaces are abutting each other is recommended in the draft zoning by-law. The MTO property only has seven (7) standard parking spaces at a width of 2.7m each. The creation of a single accessible space in the private lot would result in the loss of two regular parking spaces due to the width required and only serve people using the MTO office. At this point, the municipality would not force an existing business such as the Licensing office to comply with the new standards being proposed. Report#EGD-21-05 Page 4 The on-street public parking space located on the north side of King St E just east of George St could serve as an on-street accessible space because there is no municipal parking lot in this immediate area. The 13 M pavement width of King Street will allow a good measure of safety for persons with a disability to use this location safely and a parking stall of 3.5m could be provided. The municipality provides businesses west of Division Street with off-street accessible parking in the municipal lots but has not provided a space east of Division to accommodate the increasing parking demands in this area. Staff, have noted that by creating a accessible space at this location it will also improve existing sight lines from George Street during periods when the space is empty. Staff supports this request to provide an on-street accessible space for the businesses east of Division St. 2.2 Municipal Parking Lots and facilities The standards proposed through the draft Zoning By-law as recommended by the Clarington Planning Department, attachment no. 2, requires that any new development applications provide accessible parking as follows: Private parking spaces Accessible spaces required 1 to 25 1 26 to 50 2 51 to 75 3 76 to 100 4 The number of accessible spaces could be higher if the facility would be expected to draw a large percentage of its customers from a population of people with a disability. An accessible space width of 4.5m is shown; however, some recent developments have been approved by the planning department with a width of 4.1m and are considered accessible. Report#EGD-21-05 Page 5 The South Courtice Recreational Complex needs to be included in the by-law schedules to reflect the eight (8) posted accessible parking spaces currently provided. The 20 King Street lot Bowmanville, needs to be included in the by-law schedules to reflect the two accessible parking spaces currently provided which provide quick access to King St in the downtown core. The 15 Silver Street lot, Bowmanville, has 31 parking spaces with one existing accessible space. A resident with a disability expressed concerns about the tight 3m width and requested a wider stall and or more spaces. Guidelines suggest a parking lot with over 25 spaces requires 2 accessible parking spaces. Staff, are recommending that two accessible spots at 4.1 m each be created in the south west corner of the lot which is closer to King Street and the removal of the existing accessible space in the north west corner of the lot. The new municipal parking lot at 25 Silver Street, Bowmanville, located at the North east corner of Church Street and Silver Street to be constructed will require 2 accessible parking spaces based on its size. The 30 Division St lot, Bowmanville, has approximately 84 parking spaces with 2 accessible spaces centrally located near the public access walkway. Staff, are recommending the creation of 2 more spaces to comply with guidelines, to be located near the south east corner of the lot. Division St. Three standard spaces will need to be removed to provide the two accessible spaces of 4.1m wide. The 132 Church St lot, Bowmanville, has approx 28 spaces on the e/s and 36 spaces on the w/s. Staff are recommending the creation of 2 accessible parking spaces in the south west corner of the lot on the west side of the building. This could benefit any persons with a disability using the public lot, plus a direct benefit to the courts, youth centre, youth workshop group and John Howard Society, all which operate out of the leased municipal property. Three standard spaces will Report#EGD-21-05 Page 6 need to be removed to provide the two accessible spaces. This parking lot also has spaces dedicated for the tenants and Trinity United Church. Newcastle Memorial Arena, Facilities Manager, Scott Greenfield has requested that two accessible spaces be included in our by-law schedules during this revision which will enable By-law to charge the higher fines. The hall board will ensure that proper signing and pavement markings are in place before enforcement can begin. 2.3 On-street Accessible Safety Staff are recommending that: • Off-street accessible parking be the preferred safest option • When required, on-street designated accessible spaces not be permitted unless a minimum parking stall width of 3.4m can be accommodated with a minimum of 3m width for the travel lane. Smaller widths would only be considered if AADT volumes were less than 500. Existing On-street Accessible Parking widths are as follows: • 3.5m accessible on Church St with 3.6m travel lane • 3.4m accessible on Prince St with 3.0m travel lane • 3.4m accessible on Temperance St. south of King with 3.0m travel lane • 2.0m accessible on Church Lane east of Newtonville Road, although narrow has very low AADT volumes of only 170 • 2.1m accessible on Temperance St south of Church with 3.Om travel lane existing is too narrow for busy road with MDT volume of 2370 2.5m is the Provincial guideline for any standard on-street parking space but unfortunately they do not provide any guideline for on-street accessible parking. Based on the above, Staff are recommending that the two existing accessible parking spaces located on the west side of Temperance St. in front of the Municipal office be removed for the following reasons: Report #EGD-21-05 Page 7 • existing and newly created accessible parking spaces will reduce the demand at this location • on-street accessible spaces should only be endorsed by Council if safety is provided with a minimum of 3.4m for parking and 3.0m for the travel lane. • Temperance St. is too narrow for designated accessible parking with a pavement width of 10.2m with parking on both sides. The narrow parking stalls of 2.1 m and travel lanes of 3.0m force drivers with disabilities to open doors and exit into traffic with little or no safe refuge area. • Spaces are abused on a regular basis by motorists accessing the post office • Spaces are abused by delivery vehicles failing to use the 3.5m wide loading zone provided on Church St. The old accessible spaces on the west side of Temperance Street would be converted to metered parking for use by the general public. 2.4 Clarington Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting of March 3, 2005. Staff attended the March meeting to discuss the proposed accessible parking changes and obtain feed back from the members. The committee agreed with Engineering Services that the existing accessible spaces on Temperance Street were too narrow to safely accommodate the needs of persons with disabilities. Engineering Services originally suggested that the two narrow on-street spaces be removed and not replaced, feeling that the new Off-street parking locations would fulfil the parking demands. The committee felt the demand still existed for access to the Municipal Administrative Building ramp and fast access to the post office and requested that the two on-street spaces on Temperance Street be relocated to Church Street just west of Temperance to provide a safe parking width of 3.5m. Engineering staff included the requested changes in the report and proposed by-law for Councils consideration. Report#EGD-21-05 Page 8 2.5 Delivery Vehicles in Accessible Parking Spaces On a number of occasions staff, have observed delivery vehicles parked in the accessible parking spaces on Temperance Street or parked on Church Street blocking vision of the stop sign rather than using the loading zone provided on Church Street. Engineering staff suggest that reception staff at the Municipal Administrative Centre provide the notice attached to this report to courier and delivery drivers as they are having delivery slips signed. The notice will remind the delivery drivers to use the Church Street loading zone and advising them of the new accessible parking spaces during an introductory period. If compliance does not occur, municipal by-law officers will be requested to provide enforcement or make direct contact with the delivery firms. 2.6 Snow Removal at all On-street Accessible Parking Spaces Staff are concerned that persons with disabilities may not be able to reach the accessible spaces safely if the snow windrows prevent opening of the passenger side doors or access to the sidewalk. When windrows flow onto the curb line of the parking stall, it narrows its width, forcing the motorist to park closer to the travel lanes thereby reducing safety. Staff are proposing that the Operations Department include all on-street accessible parking spaces in its sidewalk snow clearing contract for the removal of windrows similar to the existing Senior driveway windrow snow removal program to ensure accessibility year round. Accessible spaces in parking lots may also need occasional snow removal to ensure that the spaces are not reduced in size. 3.0 Conclusion The municipality should provide the number of Accessible Parking Spaces in Municipal parking lots as per the standards proposed through the draft zoning by-law. The guidelines should be followed unless it can be demonstrated why accessible parking is not required for a specific area. The proposals in this report were circulated to the Planning Department and to the Clarington Accessibility Advisory Committee for general comments prior to final preparation. Report#EGD-21-05 Page 9 Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map Downtown Bowmanville Municipal Parking lots Attachment 2 - Correspondence dated May 3, 2004 MTO Vehicle Licence Office Attachment 3 - Accessible parking standards proposed through the draft zoning by-law as recommended by the Clarington Planning Department Attachment 4 - Notice to couriers and delivery drivers Attachment 5 - Proposed by-law to amend by-law 91-58 Interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Andrew Kozac, Chair Clarington Traffic Management Advisory Committee David Kelly, Chair Clarington Accessibility Advisory Committee Fred Horvath Operations Len Creamer By-law Enforcement Jennifer Cooke Communications ,4 r.,...•7.:. t 11 14 1:11*1 4 I la 141 PlI4CHZ 44a 1 W4?)011 0/2 0 I , 4 4, ) "lib .117,j 61e . 1/41 _ 0.0 C.j1/41 .co Of tie N. ... . * 40,.... 1 BOWMANVILLE lt 4 illib .44,74 , *6. e i 4 LEGEND N PP+ XRemoval of narrow disabled paddng locations E s 6,. Disabled(unchanged) *66 Proposed new disabled locations Municipal parking lots DRAWN BY:E.L. I DATE:June 14,2005 ' REPORT EGD-21-05 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ATTACHMENT NO.: 2 REPORT NO.: EGD-21-05 Laberimi Enterprises Inc Driver & Vehicle Licence Office# 386 100 King St. E. Bowmanville, ON LIC INS (905) 6 -DIDA RECEIVED Fax (9'1. a May 3, 2004 MAY - 5 2004 Municipality of Clarington MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 Tea p r nrl Street, MAYOR'S OFFICE Bowmanville,ON LIC 3A6 Attention: Town Council Re:Designated disabled parking space We recently called the by-law office inquiring about the procedure to convert a parking space on King Street into a disabled parking spot and were advised by Len Cramer that a request would have to be made by letter and forwarded to council. Laberimi Enterprises Inc.is the private Driver&Vehicle issuer for the Ministry of Transportation in Bowmanville. We re-located to our new office at 100 King Street East in March 2002. In September 2003,the Ministry privatized the Driver Examination offices. As a result of this change,all senior drivers must now renew their licences at a private issuing office. Many of these drivers use the disabled parking permits. The Ministry is asking us to provide a disabled parking space in close proximity to the front door to assist the senior drivers as well as any other members of the public in possession of disabled parking permits. Therefore we are requesting that a parking space on King Street be designated as a disabled parking spot. The first available parking space on the north side of King Street,east of George Street would be the preferable location,as this would allow the easiest access into our office. The curb in this spot is already cut making it a safe location for departure from the passenger side of the vehicle. Thanking you for your attention to this matter. Berta.Avery President ACK. kv / Laberimi Enterprises Inc. .;,'a:77ef+r"^"l.. m"7""11 / - C / y D 4 dill / ATTACHMENT NO.:3 Section 6 REPORT NO.: EGD-21-05 Off-Street Parking and Loading 6.2.5 TABLE 6-3 REGULATIONS- NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES FOR TIIE PIIYSIC ILLY DISABLED Legend 00 Notation Number of Parking Spaces Required By Table 6-2 Parkins Spaces for Physically Disabled(q 1 to 25 1 26to50 2 — 51to75 3 — 76 to 100 4 101 to 150 5 151 to 200 6 201 to 300 7 301 to 400 g 401 to 500 9 501 to 1000 2%of total Greater than 1000 21 spaces plus 1 space for every additional 100 spaces or part thereof over 1000 Notations for Table 6-3 (I) Nursing homes,retirement homes,hospitals,medical clinics and medical offices shall provide twice the number of parking spaces for the physically disabled as required by Table 6-3. 63 Parking Area Location and Design Standards 6.3.1 For the purposes of this By-law: a) Aisle shall mean that part of sparking area used for the manoeuvring or circulation of motor vehicles. An aisle shall have a minimum width of 4.5 metres for one-way traffic or 6 metres for two-way traffic; b) Commercial Parking Area shall mean a parking area where short term parking of motor vehicles is provided for a fee,and may include a kiosk for the parking attendant; c) Driveway shall mean that portion of a lot designed to provide motor vehicle access from the lot to the travelled portion of the street,private road or lane; d) Enclosed Parking Area shall mean a parking area located within a building or structure, including multi-storey structures such as aboveground or underground garages; e) Parking Area shall mean an area within a building or structure or an area of land not located on a street,private road, or lane which is used for the parking of more than one motor vehicle with or without a fee being charged, but shall not include any area where motor vehicles are kept or stored for sale or repair. Clarington Zoning By-law (Draft) Page 6-5 I Section 6 Off-Street Parking and Loading rm 6.1.2 pa TABLE 6-1 REGULATIONS-PARKING SPACE DEVIENSIONS . , ,_ r.... Legend Parkin Space rm. # Not applicable Other (#) Notation �� Width(I) Length Regulations Angle(2) 2.75 m (3) 5.7 m measured on the ram angle Parallel 2.75 m (3) 7 m # 5.7 m; or Perpendicular 2.75 m (3) 5.4 m in front of Width of landscaped area or landscaped area or walkway- 2.4 m I— walkway Tandem 2.75 m (3) 5.7 m $ Physically 1 space-4.5 m Disabled 2 or more abutting spaces 5.7 m # 3.4 m each Garage 2.75 m 5.7 in Area - 18.6 m2 Notations for Table 6-1 (1) Where a parking space abuts a wall along its length, the minimum required width of the parking space shall be increased by 0.25 m. In the case of a 2 car garage, the minimum width of only 1 parking space must be increased. (2) Angle of parking space -45 degrees (3) Width of 2 outdoor perpendicular parking spaces for a single detached, semi-detached or duplex dwelling-4.6 m. This provision does not apply to semi-detached dwellings in the R3A Zone. 6.1.3 A required parking space shall only be used for the parking of operative, currently licensed motor vehicles unless otherwise specified in this By-law. 6.1.4 One commercial motor vehicle not exceeding four tonnes registered gross weight at capacity may use a required parking space within any Residential Zone. 6.1.5 The parking spaces in the R1, R2, and R3A zones required for residential uses and for a home .occupation may be provided in tandem. 6.2 Parking Space Requirements 6.2.1 Parking spaces shall be provided on the same lot as the building, structure or use requiring the parking and shall be calculated in accordance with the requirements specified in Section 6.2.3 and 6.2.4. The number of required parking spaces shall be rounded up to the next whole number. 6.2.2 Where the required parking spaces cannot be provided on the same lot as the use requiring the parking, the required parking spaces may be located on another lot, subject to the following: as Clarington Zoning By-law (Draft) Page 6-2 !T Z \ TEMPERANCE ST. (.7) dw dV dW o �IIIaIIId N o rqb. O W IeR ■ 0 �` . C W a y 0 I— z W N CC H a > eo C O Z J H • pt IZ m < < m W CC 0 z �w \*. v J * D Z U mo U 1 O Z O Y o z Z 1 ■ Z Y Y < N Y K IL < W IL 0 0 0 J L 0 W w CO Z W > J < (C-) W H 2 M V) C L U W W U) < 0 m.J W - 3 C I— < c LJ O W W Z Z ea Y (n N < i U CC a v s= z m ICU D = J N a Y IZ a ji U OO M 0 m U ) O W Y C 0 Ir U - N > O O x W D W > p_ Z JJ } Z0Z i > U ' J Z O 0 a W 5ZZ m 0 < 0 < 0 0 in w - 2 < _ u)< a Ir H IL ill 0_ W 2 U) U 0 U) CC 0 WO » J In JU) U < Z '1111 _ OJ 2ZV) U Z« OD (7 SILVER ST. ATTACHMENT NO.: 5 REPORT NO.: EGD-21-05 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW 2005- Being a By-law to amend By-law 91-58, as amended, being a By-law to Regulate Traffic on Highways, Municipal and Private Property in the Municipality of Clarington. WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it desirable to amend By-law 91-58; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1) Schedule XXIX "ON-STREET PARKING FOR DISABLED PERSONS" of By-law 91-58 is amended by deleting the schedule in its entirety and substituting thereto a revised Schedule XXIX "ON-STREET PARKING FOR DISABLED PERSONS" as follows: SCHEDULE XXIX ON-STREET PARKING FOR DISABLED PERSONS COLUMN I COLUMN 2 COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4 Highway Side Between Times or Days Church Lane South 85 m and 98 m East of Durham Anytime (Newtonville) Region Road 18(Newtonville Road) Church Street South 28 m and 44 m West of Anytime (Bowmanville) Temperance Street Church Street South 7 m and 21 m West of Anytime (Bowmanville) Temperance Street King Street East North 10 m and 17m East of George Street Anytime (Bowmanville) Prince Street North 105 m and 120 m east of Durham Anytime (Bowmanville) Regional Road 14 (Liberty Street South) Temperance Street East 56 m and 63 m north of Queen Street Anytime (Bowmanville) -2- 2) Schedule XXX "OFF-STREET PARKING FOR DISABLED PERSONS" of By-law 91-58 is amended by deleting the schedule in its entirety and substituting thereto a revised Schedule XXX "OFF-STREET PARKING FOR DISABLED PERSONS" as follows : SCHEDULE XXX OFF-STREET PARKING FOR DISABLED PERSONS COLUMN I COLUMN 2 Location Number of Stalls Municipality of Clarington- 4 Courtice Community Complex 2950 Region Road 34/Courtice Road (Courtice) Municipality of Clarington- South Courtice Community Complex 1595 Prestonvale Rd (Courtice) Municipality of Clarington- 2 Church St Parking Lot 132 Church Street (Bowmanville) Municipality of Clarington- 2 Darlington Sports Complex (Hampton) Municipality of Clarington- 4 Division Street Parking Lot 30 Division Street (Bowmanville) Municipality of Clarington- 2 Fitness Centre Parking Lot 49 Region Road 14/Liberty Street North (Bowmanville) Municipality of Clarington- 9 G.Rickard Recreation Complex 2440 Durham Hwy 2 (Bowmanville) Municipality of Clarington 2 King Street Parking Lot 20 King Street East (Bowmanville) Municipality of Clarington- 2 Mill Street Parking Lot 49 Region Road 17/Mill Street North (Newcastle) Municipality of Clarington- 2 Newcastle Memorial Arena 103 Caroline Street West (Newcastle) Municipality of Clarington- 2 Silver Street Parking Lot 15 Silver Street (Bowmanville) -3- Municipality of Clarington- 2 Silver Street Parking Lot 25 Silver Street (Bowmanville) Clarington Mall 14 2379 Durham Hwy 2 (Bowmanville) Clarington Mall 1 2387 Durham Hwy 2 (Bowmanville) Clarington Mall 2 90 Clarington Boulevard (Bowmanville) 3) This By-law shall come into force on the date that it is approved and when signs to the effect are erected. BY-LAW mad a first and second time this 27th day of June, 2005. BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this 27th day of June, 2005. John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk clarhigton Leading the Way REPORT OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 20, 2005 Report #: OPD-007-05 File #: By-Law #: Subject: CLARINGTON PITCH-IN CANADA EVENTS Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report OPD-007-05 be received for information. Submitted by: Reviewed by: Fr ath Franklin Wu, B.A., D.M.R., R.R.F.A. Chief Administrative Officer Director of Operations FH1sa REPORT NO. OPD-007-05 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND: The Clarington Pitch-In Canada Events from April 18th to 23rd were a big success with over 2,000 participants, 27 locations were cleaned up and approximately 4 tonnes of garbage collected from our boulevards, parks, trails and open space areas. The Municipality of Clarington participants and locations in the 2005 campaign are listed below: Tuesday April 19 Location Contact Courtice Millennium Park & Courtice Maryann Leung Community Complex (2) Ontario Power Generation Friday April 22 Location Contact/Organization Waverley Public School, Optimist Cheryl Brown, Principal Park and walkway from Spry south to Waverley Public School Baseline Rd. along Hwy 57 (2) Longworth Public School and Vicki Puterbough Longworth Park (2) Longworth Public School Bowmanville High School (1) Karen Boyd Bowmanville High School Central Public School and Area Blvds. Leisa Rook (2) Central Public School Rotary Park (1) Bowmanville Senior Public School Lynda Simpson, Principal Burke Court & Saunders Walkway (1) Doug Hartford Saturday April 23 Group Contact Hampton Community Hall and Area Grace Morris Blvds. (2) Hampton Citizens Assoc. Mill Street South at Hwy 401 Fred Horvath, Clarington Staff and Interchange (1) Neighbours Murray Devitt, Clarington Staff and Debra Devitt Concession Rd. 4 between Hwy 115 & Jackie Moore Golf Course Rd and Moffat Rd. (2) Pebblestone Rd. from Courtice Rd. Bradford Soles east(1) Bowmanville Valley(1) Susan Larsh, Valleys 2000. Andrew Piggott—Clarington Staff Pat Churchill, Tim Horton's REPORT NO. OPD-007-05 PAGE 3 Group Contact Samuel Wilmot Creek Trail (1) Phil Broome, Clarington Staff Cory&Devon Broome Newcastle Lions Trail (1) Charlie Trim— Leos Sidney B. Rutherford Trail (1) Charlie Trim-Masons Trull's Rd from Pebblestone Road Steve Grigg, Clarington Staff south(1) Kathy&Nicole Grigg Soper Creek Park and Open Space (2) Larry Postill, Clarington Staff Recycle Drop Off Area at Miaial Kaye Rand, Clarington Staff Services Susan Mends, Clarington Staff BIN FOR GARBAGE FROM Region of Durham Works Dept Staff OTHER LOCATIONS AVAILABLE Mike Solsky, Habitat for Humanity FOR STAFF & HABITAT (provided by Canadian Waste) 401 interchange at Newtonville Rd. Gord Robinson and area residents (1) Reg Rd. 42 to Links Greenhouse (1) Magda Zoelman Pebblestone from Townline west to Dean Worden bridge -Also helped Sat at Trull's south to Fire Hall (1) Total—27 locations FIRST RECYCLING DROP OFF AREA: On Saturday April 23rd, Clarington held our first special drop off area. Residents could bring their Household Hazardous Waste, usable construction materials for Habitat Canada and used cellular phones. A table of materials collected is found below. SUMMARY OF MATERIALS COLLECTED AND PROCESSED MATERIAL AMOUNT WEIGHT or VOLUME Propane Tanks 26 x 20 lb. 520 lbs (236 kg) Propane Tanks 15 x 1 lb. 15 lbs (7 kg) Lead Acid Batteries 80 1088 kg Fire Extinguishers 3 N/A Motor Oil 19 Drums @ 108 L each 2052 Litres Antifreeze 6 Drums @ 108 L each 648 Litres Aerosols 1 Drum 80 Litres Et Pesticides 1 Drum 80 Litres • REPORT NO. OPD-007-05 PAGE 4 Oxidizers 1 Drum 80 Litres Corrosive (Base) 1 Drum 80 Litres Solvents/Fuels 3 Drums = 1 Bulk Drum 205 Litres Household Batteries 1 Drum 320 kg Miscellaneous Organic 6 Drums 480 Litres Paint(39 Drums of mixed oil base and latex processed) 3120 Litres Estimated #of Residents=250 Total Solid HHW by Weight= 1616 kg Total Liquid HHW by Volume= 6860 Litres *Data Compiled by Region of Durham Solid Waste Staff The Salvation Army was offered the opportunity to have a clothing drop off area but declined due to their existing inventory. ROADSIDE LITTERING As anyone can appreciate, our major areas of littering are Provincial highway interchanges, Canada Post super boxes and bus shelters. There are eight interchanges along Highway 401 and eight interchanges along Highway 35/115. MTO contracts out their maintenance of the roadways and interchanges and cleans these areas once a year. It should be noted that the level of service for their cleanup / pickup is restricted to anything bigger than two feet long. The majority of litter is coffee cups, fast food garbage and glass bottles at this location which are not part of their annual clean up protocol. Without our community volunteers doing their part at pitch-in week, these areas will continue to remain in an unacceptable condition. The Region of Durham Works Committee is taking a co-ordinating role with all area municipalities across the Region to recommend and implement a co- ordinated approach to littering. Meetings have been set up with Durham Region Transit, Municipal By-law Departments, Canada Post, Ministry of Transportation, • REPORT NO. OPD-007-05 PAGE 5 ROADSIDE LITTERING cont'd: School Boards and the fast food outlet chains (McDonalds; Tim Horton's) to discuss our concerns and to collectively implement initiatives for the 2006 campaign. COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT: The Municipality of Clarington is quite active in developing and implementing community improvement programs that encourages our residents to take pride in the community. In 2005 The Operations Department will maintain over 25 horticultural beds throughout the Municipality, with 7 beds containing annual flowers with over 1500 plants being utilized. It is the intent of this years display that the beds will produce an oasis of colour. All other beds will receive a thorough cleanup and mulching to assist with lowering maintenance time, and some shrub beds that are beyond salvaging will be removed. Operations staff is also responsible for 300 garbage receptacles in 60 parks and green spaces, across the Municipality. BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA'S: Meetings were held with the BIA'S representatives in Bowmanville, Newcastle and Orono. We reviewed our past practices and levels of service and discussed how we can work together to keep our community clean. All of the BIA's expressed appreciation for the work done in the past, and look forward to working together to reduce litter and keeping our streets cleaned. The garbage receptacles in the BIA's are emptied twice weekly, and the municipalities new self propelled portable vacuum is sent through each BIA weekly to ensure cleanliness. • REPORT NO. OPD-007-05 PAGE 6 LIONS TRAIL IN NEWCASTLE: Staff have identified and started working on developing this as a multi-use trail and stream rehabilitation project. This year talks are ongoing with Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) to develop and implement a plan to stabilize areas of the bank and increase flow to prevent silting areas. Paving of the gravel walkway between Hwy 2 and Edward Street will be done as part of the 2005 Capital Budget program. CONCLUSION Staff will continue to work with the Area Municipalities and the Region to develop a coordinated campaign against littering beginning in 2006. People are more likely to litter in an area that has already been spoiled by litter than in a litter free zone. Business, Community organizations, schools, neighbourhoods and residents are needed to volunteer to work together and keep Clarington clean. Clarington will continue to provide safety equipment, garbage bags, garbage pickup and training for all of our volunteers. The "Pitch In Week" is an excellent Community based program that encourages Community involvement and promotes volunteerism and instills Clarington pride. We will hope that our campaign will urge everyone especially motorists to think before you throw. Our efforts will make a difference. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)263-2292 F(905)263-4433 Cladiigt oil Leading the Way y REPORT OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 20, 2005 Report#: OPD-012-05 File #: By-Law #: Subject: CNE GARDEN SHOW Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report OPD-012-05 be received; and 2. THAT the Municipality participates in the CNE 2005 garden show. Submitted by: /Sad 4-!/eI%oy4jReviewed — —"- W Fred Horvath Franklin Wu, B.A., R.D.M.R., R.R.F.A. Chief Administrative Officer Director of Operations FH1KRIkm REPORT NO. OPD-012-05 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND: Each year during the Canadian National Exhibition, municipalities from across the province are invited to participate in the Annual Garden Show held in Heritage Court at the Ricoh Coliseum. The participating municipalities are provided with 750 sq ft. of garden space and are asked to build something that fits the selected theme. Last year the Municipality of Clarington participated in the program and received recognition for their entry of "Ring Around the Rosie". This year's theme is "Pick a Feature From Your Community". The Canadian National Exhibition reimburses the Municipality $3,200 to offset any costs in preparing the festive garden. The only other cost to the Municipality is labour and equipment which can be funded under the existing current budget. If Council is in agreement, staff will continue to work on developing the theme and will confirm its participation for 2005. Attachments: Attachment #1 — letter from Canadian National Exhibition, May 11 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)263-2292 F(905)263-4433 ATTACHMENT NO.: 1 REPORT NO.: OPD-012-05 CET'S GO TO THE LX August 19 to September 5, 2005 www.TheEx.com RECEIVED May 5, 2005 MAY 1 1 2005 Bob Genesko OPERATIONS DEPT. Parks Supervisor Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, ON L 1 C 3A6 Dear Mr. Genesko: The Canadian National Exhibition is fast approaching. We are pleased to confirm your feature garden location as#1 (see attached floorplan). This year's CNE will run from August 19th to September 5th, 2005. The theme this year is "Pick a Feature of your Community". Our building superintendent will contact you prior to the CNE to determine your sand requirements. The sand will be in your location upon your arrival. You may begin moving in your garden on August 11th, 2005. Installation can continue each day (including the weekend) until August 17th at midnight. The gardens will be judged on August 18th, and awards will be presented at the preview party in the evening of August 18th. We will contact you for your invitation list prior to the CNE. Should you have any additional questions, please contact me at (416) 263-3835. Yours truly, CrTh Paula Ellis Garden Show Co-ordinator CANADIAN NATIONAL EXHIBITION PRESS BUILDING • EXHIBITION PLACE •TORONTO •ONTARIO •M6K 3C3 •TEL 416 263 3800 • FAX 416 263 3838 I 1 Ill in III Jit! 1118-tare.14 111 5 m ini -L mcl ® ® � V � Cml a] r ii N'eii ,um n QJ ulEll 1 !III a � o W s. 7 is H tlt W s. 0 • a C7 1 as€: Q C-0 4) 1 -' - 9 € H 1 1 • •I s w f Y:I �' T` 0 1 :' r.�� _ 44,, ....., .,, ,.: _, C ... ... i 1 TA 1 " f ,�„ vii S tai L.) _,,_ _. _, .,, Qariugton Leading the Way REPORT EMERGENCY AND FIRE SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: JUNE 20, 2005 Report#: ESD-009-05 File # 10.12.6 By-law# Subject: MONTHLY RESPONSE REPORT - MAY 2005 Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report ESD-009-05 be received for information. Submitted by: AI 01A _ Reviewed by: don eir, AMCT, CMM111 Franklin Wu. Director Emergency& Fire Services Chief Administrative Officer GW*sr CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-6506 • REPORT NO: ESD-009-05 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 Our report covers the month May, 2005. It is our intent to provide Committee with information relevant to this department, in a timely manner. 2. REPORT 2.1 The department responded to 265 calls during this period and recorded total fire loss at $33,300. A breakdown of calls responded to follows in the table attached. • CLARINGTON EMERGENCY & FIRE SERVICES ACTIVITY REPORT Period: May 1, 2005 00:00:00hrs to May 31, 2005 23:59:59hrs CALL TYPES -VOLUME BY STATION STATION 1 STATION 2 STATION 3 STATION 4 STATION 5 TOTALS CALL TYPE Bowmanville Newcastle Orono Courtice Enniskillen PROPERTY FIRE CALLS 5 3 0 12 1 21 (includes structure, chimney, vehicle, miscellaneous e.g. Furniture, clothing, etc.) I 3 UNAUTHORIZED BURNING I 6 I 5 I 4 4 22 (burning complaints) FALSE FIRE CALLS I 15 I 1 I 0 I 8 I 2 I 26 (includes alarm activations-accidental//malicious, human-perceived, emergencies, check calls e.g. investigate an odor) PUBLIC HAZARD CALLS 17 1 1 9 0 28 (includes propane/natural gas leaks,fuel/chemical spills, powerlines down/arcing, C.O. leaks etc.) RESCUE CALLS I 10 I 4 I 7 I 6 I 0 1 27 (includes vehicle extrications/accidents, commercial/industrial accidents, home/residential accidents,water/ice rescues) MEDICAL ASSIST CALLS 47 8 5 26 3 89 (includes assistance to ambulance personnel with respiratory and resuscitation emergencies MISCELLANEOUS CALLS 33 4 2 13 I 0 52 (incidents not found, assistance not req'd by other agencies, call cancelled on route, etc.) TOTALS 133 26 19 78 9 265 DOLLAR LOSS #of Fire Calls 5 3 0 12 1 21 Dollar Loss$ $15,100 $1,500 $0 $15,700 $1,000 $33,300 VOLUNTEER STANDBY RESPONSES #of Standbys -Calls 10 0 0 5 0 15 #of Standbys - 0 0 Training 0 0 0 0 2005 MONTHLY CALL VOLUME BY STATION Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May. Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. STATION 1 153 118 109 148 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 661 STATION 2 38 36 34 40 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 STATION 3 28 23 16 21 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 STATION 4 95 69 90 73 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 405 STATION 5 16 8 4 15 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1398 TOTALS 330 254 253 297 265 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1398 2004 MONTHLY CALL VOLUME BY STATION Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May. Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. STATION 1 114 111 103 105 98 131 105 105 101 111 117 151 1352 STATION 2 35 29 27 32 24 20 40 31 34 31 19 40 362 STATION 3 18 17 12 13 14 9 10 25 13 11 18 29 189 STATION 4 74 57 70 69 57 81 73 73 65 61 68 76 824 STATION 5 7 4 7 9 9 11 19 16 11 10 5 18 126 TOTALS [ 248 1 218 1 219 1 228 I 202 I 252 1 247 1 250 1 224 1 224 I 227 1 314 2853 Qarhiglon REPORT Leading the Way COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee Date: June 20, 2005 Resolution #: Report #: CSD-10-05 File#: By-law#: Subject: Newcastle Recreation Facility Needs Assessment Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CSD-10-05 be received; 2. THAT the Needs Assessment Study for the Newcastle Recreation Facility be endorsed in principle; 3. THAT Council approve the Phase I components for the Newcastle Recreational Facility as recommended in the Needs Assessment Study; 4. THAT staff be authorized to proceed with the RFP for professional services for Phase I of the Newcastle Recreation Facility; 5. THAT the disposition of the Newcastle Memorial Arena be referred to staff for review and report back to Council at an appropriate time; 6. THAT the Newcastle Arena Board be dissolved, at such time that the new Recreational Facility is opened for use; and, 7. THAT the Newcastle Arena Management Board be advised. ---te Submitted by: � Reviewed b� os=•h P. Caruana Franklin Wu Di -ctor of Communit Servi es Chief Administrative Officer Reviewed by: 44, . L�IF icy ay •r, B.B. , C.• Director of Finance JPC/ta CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-5506 REPORT NO.: CSD-10-05 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 On March 7, 2005 the General Purpose and Administration Committee approved report COD-015-05 recommending Monteith Brown Planning Consultants to conduct a recreation facility needs assessment for Newcastle Village (attachment #1 under separate cover). 1.2 The purpose of the assessment was to develop a comprehensive list of indoor facility components that should be considered in providing a major recreation facility within the eastern area of the municipality. 1.3 The consultants were also required to identify capital and operation cost scenarios for the various facility components identified and further evaluate the potential impact of the new facility on existing recreation facilities. 2.0 REPORT STRUCTURE 2.1 The consultant has now completed their assessment and have provided their final report for Council's recommendation. Specifically the report is structured as follows: • Community Profile — an overview of population projections and a discussion of potential influences of the growing and aging populations on the provision of indoor recreation services. • Market Research - the identification of key factors that are known to influence participation and their implications with respect to the further provision of new indoor recreation facilities. • Facility Inventory— an inventory and description of indoor recreation facilities in the area. • Public and User Group Input— a summary of public input reviewed through the stakeholder/user group surveys, interviews, and public meetings. • Needs assessment — an analysis of the need for new indoor recreation facilities within the municipality and more specifically Newcastle Village and surrounding area. • Business Case — an analysis of the operating and capital costs related to the provision of the recommended components. • Implementation Strategy — an assessment of partnership potential as well as a process by which the study's recommendations could be carried out. 3.0 CONSULTANTS RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 Based on the results of information gathered the consultants are recommending a variety of facility components to be considered in a phased timeframe. 3.2 Phase I recommendation is a facility anchored by a new twin pad arena, complimented by a gymnasium and program/meeting rooms. REPORT NO.: CSD-10-05 PAGE 3 3.3 Phase II would see the addition of a leisure aquatic facility, to be added at such time that the municipality's population reaches 105,000 (approximately 2016) and the municipality's existing facilities reach maximum capacity. 4.0 PHASE I 4.1 Should Council approve the recommendation to endorse the Phase I facility components, preliminary project funding requirements are estimated at $16,800,000 as follows: Phase I Project Cost Construction $13,650,000 Consulting 1,100,000 Contingency 1,400,000 Furnishing/Equipment 550,000 Disbursements 100.000 $16,800,000 4.2 It is anticipated that a report recommending an architect would be presented to Council for consideration in September/October 2005. The facility would be designed over the winter anticipating a construction start in late spring 2006 and completion of the facility in time for a 2007 fall opening. 5.0 PROJECT FINANCING 5.1 As the project has been identified in the Municipality's Development Charges Study, ninety percent (90%) of the project will be funded from development charges. The Director of Finance has indicated that the method of financing will be to debenture the capital cost, and to recover the appropriate funds through the Development Charges process. A more detailed report will be submitted to Council at such time that the Municipality is prepared to award the construction tender. 6.0 NEWCASTLE ARENA MANAGEMENT BOARD AND ARENA 6.1 The consultants report is recommending the existing Newcastle Memorial Arena continue to operate under the Board until such time that the new facility is fully operational (fall 2007). At that time the consultant is recommending to dissolve the Newcastle Arena Management Board. 6.2 Further it is recommended that staff evaluate the future of the existing Newcastle Memorial Arena building and site to determine if alternative use or sale of the site/building is feasible. REPORT NO.: CSD-10-05 PAGE 4 7.0 COMMENTS 7.1 Staff would like to acknowledge the participation of our numerous stakeholders, user groups and the community in general for their insight and opinions regarding the facility needs assessment process. 7.2 Subsequent to Council's deliberation of this report, staff and the consulting team will conduct a final open house to explain the results of the study and Council's direction to all interested parties. Attachment#1 under separate cover— Newcastle Recreation Facility Needs Assessment - Final Report June 13, 2005 Interested parties to be advised: Gord Lee, Chairman Newcastle Arena Management Board Uarington REPORT Leading the Way COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee Date: June 20, 2005 Resolution #: Report #: CSD-11-05 File #: By-law #: Subject: Proposed Admission Standards for Public Swimming Pools Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CSD-11-05 be received for information. Submitted by: a - ' Reviewed by:("L2J2SLII- Iseph P. Caruana Franklin Wu Director of Community Services Chief Administrative Officer JPC/BT/EM CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-5506 REPORT NO.: CSD-11-05 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 The operation of all public pools is regulated by the Health Protection and Promotion Act (Regulation 565) and is administered locally by the Region of Durham Health Department as mandated by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. 1.2 Pool incidents involving a major injury or a drowning are thoroughly investigated by the various Health Departments and/or Ministry and the results are circulated to all pool operators in an effort to create awareness to avoid similar situations from occurring locally. 1.3 Following a fatal drowning that occurred in another municipality, the Coroner conducted an inquest into the drowning. As a result of the inquest findings, the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care has requested the Region of Durham Health Department circulate a notice to area municipalities (Attachment #1) and the Coroner's Recommendations (Attachment #2) to all local pool operators, including our Municipality. 1.4 Primarily, the Coroner's inquest recommends that all children under the age of ten (10) must be accompanied by an attendant who will directly supervise and be responsible for the child while in the pool. In this particular case, the drowning occurred when a group of young children were unsupervised by their attendants in a supervised facility. The Coroner's investigation found that if the attendants had stayed and supervised the young children, the drowning might not have occurred. 1.5 In a response to this event the Coroner's office, along with numerous stakeholders, developed recommended Admission Standards to prevent such tragedies in the future. The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care strongly support these recommendations for the purposes of preventing injuries and fatalities. 1.6 The Admission Standards state that: • Children under 10 years of age who are non-swimmers must be accompanied by a parent or guardian who is at least 12 years of age and responsible for their direct supervision. The ratio is to be 4:1 (4 bathers to one parent or guardian). If lifejackets are worn by all non-swimmers in their charge, the ratio may be increased to 8:1. • Children under 10 years who are swimmers (able to demonstrate comfort in the water and pass the facility swim test) may be admitted to the swimming pool unaccompanied. REPORT NO.: CSD-11-05 PAGE 3 • Children under 6 years of age must be accompanied by a parent or guardian at a maximum ratio of 2:1. • Guardians or group leaders are responsible for the children in their care while in the facility and must directly supervise the children at all times. • Guardians or group leaders should be at least 12 years of age. 1.7 The Region of Durham, Health Department recently circulated a notice to all owners/operators and lifeguards of public pools advising us of these Admission Standards with the recommendation that all pool operators, including the Municipality, consider the standards as a tool to assist us in preventing accidents or drownings in our pools. 2.0 COMMENTS 2.1 There are several ways these new Admission Standards will impact our operations: • Currently, our minimum age requirement to be unaccompanied in the pool is 6 years of age, regardless of comfort level in the water or a stipulation that a swim test is passed. The minimum age will now move to 10 years of age and this will impact the children and parents/guardians that use our facilities for recreational swims. • Our summer camp program includes an aquatics component. Our ratios for camp staff with respect to our campers who are under 6 years of age would be impacted. Our current ratio. is 3:1 and the recommended ratio is 2:1, which may have budget implications if additional staff are required. • Under the new Admission Standards, age is not the only criteria for determining if a child may be left unaccompanied. Swimming ability is also taken into consideration. An efficient swim testing method will need to be established at our facilities to comply with the Admission Standards. Frequently, our pools operate at capacity and staff will need to devise a process to assess swimmers in an efficient and timely manner. • In order to comply with the recommendations, staff will need to develop a proof-of-age process for caregivers (12 years of age and over). It should also be noted that staff have concerns regarding the ability of 12 year olds to be responsible for siblings in a pool environment. REPORT NO.: CSD-11-05 PAGE 4 2.2 It should be noted that at this point, these are only recommendations and not regulations under the Health Protection and Promotion Act. As implementation of the recommendations is voluntary, a start date has not been established by either the Ministry or the Health Department. These recommendations have been brought to the attention of the pool operators in an effort to be proactive in educating the public in these recommendations. Staff is anticipating a change to the Health Regulations for Public Pools in the near future to include these Admission Standards as part of the Health Protection and Promotion Act. 2.3 Currently, the aquatics departments of neighbouring municipalities are reviewing the information and staff anticipate a program to incorporate the Admission Standards will be in place as coordinated through the Durham Region Aquatics Committee, in the fall of 2005. The Municipality of Clarington has representation on this committee. 2.4 In the interim, the Community Services Department will commence a program of staff training regarding the recommendations and provide information to our residents regarding the future implementation of the Admissions Standards recommendations. Attachments: Attachment#1 — Notice — Region of Durham, Health Department Attachment#2 — Coroner's Recommendations Attachment #1 to Report C5D-11-05 • NOTICE To all Owners/Operators and Lifeguards of Public Pools DURHAM REGION A drowning occurred when a group of young children were unsupervised by their attendants in a supervised public pool facility. A coroner's investigation into the matter noted that if the attendants had stayed and supervised the young children, The Regional the drowning may not have occurred. In response to this event, the Coroner's Municipality Office, along with numerous stakeholders, developed Admission Standards to of Durham prevent such tragedies in the future. Health Department HEAD OFFICE Attached is a fact sheet on the Admission Standards. SUITE 210 1615 DUNDAS ST. E. WHITBY ON L1N 2L1 • Please consider these standards as a tool to assist you,the pool owner, CANADA operator or lifeguard in preventing accidents or drownings in your pool. 905-723-8521 Tor:905-686-2740 1-800-841-2729 • We recommend posting of these requirements or advising the users of your Fax:905-723-6026 pool through written handouts. Information of this nature is very valuable in www.region.durham.on.ca preventing a mishap in your pool. • An cre Health Agency Public Haahh • Please consider the intent of these recommendations. Parental supervision is li of vital assistance to the lifeguard staff in ensuring safety within a pool • enclosure. • Owners and operators of class B Public Pools that do not require lifeguards should consider advising their users to limit the number of young or non- swimmers that a parent or his or her agent takes into the pool enclosure. Use these Admission Standards as an example. If you have any questions or concerns please contact the Durham Region Help Line at(905) 723-8521, Ext. 2188. We are thankful you care. Mike Pittman, B.Sc., C.P.H.I.(C) Senior Public Health Inspector Environmental Health Division Prepared for the Protection of Ontario Residents by: Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Public Heath Division, Infectious Diseases Branch "Servlae Excellence for our Communities" 100%Post Consumer Attachment #2 to Report C5D-11-05 s D\IIbSION STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC POOLS Coroner's Recommendation • Admission Standard_ =c= Public Pools were developed by the Office of the Chief Coroner to assist lifeguards and assistant lifeguards in maintaining adequate surveillance over the whereabouts and the activities of young bathers while they are inside the pool enclosure. The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care strongly supports these recommendations for the purposes of preventing injuries and fatalities. • Children under the age of 10 years who are non-swimmers must be accompanied by a parent or guardian who is at least 12 years of age and responsible for their direct supervision. The ratio of non-swimmers to parent or guardian may be a maximum of 4 bathers to one parent or guardian (4:1). The ratio of non-swimmers to parent or guardian may be increased to a maximum of 8 bathers to one parent or guardian (8:1) if lifejackets are warn by all non- swimmers in their charge • Children under the age of 10 who are swimmers (able to demonstrate comfort in the water and pass the facility swim test) maybe admitted to the swimming pool unaccompanied. • Children under the age of 6 years may not oe admitted to the swimming pool unless they are accompanied by a parent or guardian who is responsible for their direct supervision,with a maximum of two children for each parent or guardian. • Guardians or group leaders are responsible for the children in their care while in the facility and must directly supervise the children at all tunes. • Guardians or group leaders should be at least 12 years of age. • Ratios of instructorsilifeguards to bathers must also be maintained as per Regulation 565. Class B Public Pools that do not require lifeguards still require bathers under twelve years of age to be accompanied by a parent or his or her agent who is not less than sixteen years of age. Clarhigion Leading the Way REPORT CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 20, 2005 Report#: COD-032-05 File # By-law# Subject: CL2005-12 Scugog Street Reconstruction, Bowmanville Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report COD-032-05 be received; 2. THAT Ron Robinson Limited, Bowmanville, Ontario with a total bid in the amount of $1,974,620.61 (Plus G.S.T.), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions, and specifications of Tender CL2005-12, be awarded the contract for the Scugog Street Reconstruction, Bowmanville, as required by the Engineering Department; 3. THAT the funds required in the amount of $1,030,000.00 ($1,974,620.61 tender plus contingencies, consulting, soils and utilities, less Region of Durham Works. less Developers' works) be drawn from Engineering 2005 Capital Project#5800-8310-05110; 4. THAT funds in the amount of $357,000.00 be paid for by funds from the Developer, Middle Road Developments Inc., which have been confirmed; 5. THAT funds in the amount of $314,100.00 be paid for by funds from the Developer, Maplewoods Development Corporation, which have been confirmed; and 6. THAT the attached By-law marked Schedule "A" authorizing the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the necessary agreement be approved FORTHWITH. Submitted by: Reviewed by O '"V w rie ano, H.B.Sc., C.M.O. Franklin Wu, Direct.- of Corpor e -rvices Chief Administrative Officer //.fL,Ail L, /.� Nancy T- lor, : :.A., C.A., LeyDire or f finance A.S. Cannella, C.E.T. Director of Engineering Services MM/LAB/Id REPORT NO.: COD-032-05 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT Council at the meeting of February 28, 2005, authorized staff to proceed with the advertising and issue of this tender in advance of the 2005 Capital Budget Approval. Tender specifications were provided by Totten Sims Hubicki Associates for the Scugog Street Reconstruction, Bowmanville, as required by the Engineering Department. Tenders were advertised in local papers, as well as electronically. Subsequently, tenders were received and tabulated as per Schedule "B" attached. The total project cost, including Project Administration, and costing allocation is as detailed in the letter from Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, marked Schedule "C" and will be provided from the 2005 Capital Project#5800-8310-05110 for Scugog Street Reconstruction. The total bid price includes works for the Regional Municipality of Durham for which they will be invoiced accordingly. Additional works for Middle Road Developments in the amount of $357,000.00 and Maplewoods Development Corporation in the amount of $314,100.00 are included for which funds have been confirmed. In order to expedite the scheduling of the work a forthwith approval is requested. The low bidder has previously performed satisfactory work for the Municipality of Clarington. The Director of Finance has reviewed the funding requirements and concurs with the recommendation. Queries with respect to department needs, specifications, etc., should be referred to the Director of Engineering. After further review and analysis of the bids by the Engineering Department, Totten Sims Hubicki Associates and Purchasing, it was mutually agreed that the low bidder, Ron Robinson Limited, Bowmanville, Ontario, be recommended for the contract for the Scugog Street Reconstruction, Bowmanville. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-4169 Schedule "A" THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW 2005- Being a By-law to authorize a contract between the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and Ron Robinson Limited, Bowmanville, Ontario, to enter into agreement for the Scugog Street Reconstruction, Bowmanville. THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and seal with the Corporation Seal, a contract between, Ron Robinson Limited, Bowmanville, Ontario, and said Corporation; and 2. THAT the contract attached hereto as Schedule "A"form part of this By-law. By-law read a first and second time this day of , 2005. By-law read a third time and finally passed this day of , 2005. John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk Clara n Leading the Way Municipality of Clarington SCHEDULE "B" BID SUMMARY Tender CL2005-12, Scugog Street Reconstruction, Bowmanville Ron Robinson Limited $1,974,620.61 Bowmanville, ON Corner Group Limited $2,023,201.10 Concord, ON Miwel Construction Limited $2,030,863.20 Stouffville, ON Switz-Con Construction Services $2,202,026.00 Cobourg, ON Dagmar Construction Inc. $2,591,813.38 Markham, ON Elirpa Construction & Materials Ltd. $2,691,721.39 Pickering, ON B.N. Fenton Construction Ltd. NO BID Courtice, ON JUN-09-05 THU 01 :53 PM TSH COBOURG FAX NO, P, 01 Mil i :111 Totten Sims Hubioki Associates engineers 513 Division Street, architects Cobourg, Ontario, Canada K9A 506 planners (905)372-2121 Fax: (905) 3723621 E-mail:cobourg@tsh.ca www,tsh,oa June 9, 2005 SCHEDULE "C" Ms. Lou Ann Rirkctt, CPP,AMCT Purchasing Manager FAX AND M' Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington 905-623-3330 40 Temperance Street I3OWMANViI,LE, Ontario. LW 3M Dear Ms. Birkett: Re: Scugog Street Reconstruction, Contract No. CL2005-12,Municipality of Clarington Tender for the above project were opened at the Municipal Offices on Wednesday,May 11, 2005 at 2:00:00 p.m. A list of the bids received is provided in the table below. All numbers are exclusive of GST. BIDDER TOTAL BID AMOUNT Ron Robinson Limited, 13owmanville Excludin. GST $1,974,620.61 Group limited, Concord , 00.11 Miwel Construction Limited, Stouffville $2,002323,2201.10 Switz-Con Construction Services, Cobourg $2,030,$63.20 Dagmar Construction inc, Markham $2,202,813.00 Elirpa Construction&Materials Ltd., Pickering $2'591'813.38 $2,191,721.39 The low bidder's tender has been reviewed and is in order. Ron Robinson Limited has completed numerous projects for the Municipality of Clarington in recent years including Concession Street and Centre Street Reconstruction and Various Storm Sewers 2004. These contracts were completed in a satisfactory manner. They have also carried out projects for other municipalities in the area including the Region of Durham. All contacts contacted, have assessed Ron Robinson Limited's performance to be satisfactory and therefore we recommend the award of this contract to the low bidder. Deposit cheques or bid bonds shall be retained for the low and second low bids until the Contract has been executed. Enclosed is a cost apportionment estimating project costs based on the low bid received by Ron Robinson Limited. The Clarington share of the project is on budget and the Engineering Services Department will ensure that securities are in place from both Mapleweods Development Corp. and Middle Road JUN-09-05 THU 01 :54 PM TSH COBOURG FAX N0, P. 02 Ms. I.vu Ann LIirkttt,CPI',AMCT Juno 9,2005 2 Developments Inc. for their shares of the work prior to June 20, 2005. Should you require any further information,please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, • William McCrac, P.t?ng. Senior Project Engineer WMc/ym PQV rmCni n,y!nRS(.mic Encl. pc: Mr. A. S. Cannella, C,E.T.,Director, Engineering Services, Municipality of Clarington Mr. Norm Clark, C.E.T., Manager of Construction, Municipality of Clarington Ms.Jenny Bilenduke, Municipality of Clarington U" JUN-09-05 THU 01 :54 PM TSH COBOURG FAX NO. P. 03 e §' n < c O c O a C 0 P c 0 a NO o A {) D A A i C T 5 J. m 3 N 4 a A M p A a N O O '` Ip N _' ,� cm O x A m 9 ? m A "' o dt 2g el g 2' u `2 5 a m r- w c <. m A o v v 0 re e Ao ro a a i• 7 a n O m c = O w m m m 7 00 n 5.L� 9 W n f d m 2 3 co,co a rn ° 9, < 0 o 5 a a d A w D 04 ry m ry Li D m' o < �° x g A A 3 a; a 5 `� A o ° = co tB 8 ii P Dn _ `2 N m C7 E rN w P NNi IV C 8 7 Cp 9. - 41 p� „ 0 n , p O Z. N D N m a N■w° y N� p b ° 0 'o Q. qq m c Y 5 rae g = m m a o to = �' ei .7n ° m 7 w v 3 a < ?� .0,. 7, O 0 C N w a Ft l0 n Ra y Po = o (5 8 5 o N 0 m fD Pi re Re tn y Cq 7 N 0 O 6 I- 7 a N N N N N -3 A N N J OA A V W (n 6 CO 0 o O O W -. N QO A 0 V N O O o O CD co O O O W O V 0 0 O o 0 c m O 4 01 V 0 N N N co o C O O 0 m co O A rJ ha O O co O 0 O o 0 W 0 y O 0 -' O A a (OJ 3 m y O A = O C 0 b IA 6q pp co b _Ni ,V O) O o W w 4 V F9 w 7 IF En o $ 0 0. 'co 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m ,q° °o ° o° o SO V o r°p w m `� f!!y U O O O p V) O O n N m O W co W 7 C '.S O O O 0 0 o O O Le W CO co w 0 0 O CO sin N 1" w m 3 Ny CO U V `��4 N Cif N N3 0 W ? o d 3• fN.f w a c) b) W O) W rp A m w o No q ' A 0 cal O O W V 0 O P N - O 7 m 0D aft o w o° a CO rn H a O I fir re O3 'c o In N{p)i - -s (0 o r° w 8 A A fn _t0 W N N 9 N L Q T 03 N O m .Vi 0 0 0 [��IppppV f f -CO • �+ i O 0 0 N W 0 A) 0 v •A P 4 AI 0 0 V w ^' W 3 N (VII N 0 V N S N V Fp y N d , m o O O [n pAp N N N o 4 }� co a p 0) a O m tOtpp V 0 Oa 3 .7 0 O 0 W.+ 0 oo co N W Pi N •-.. M N cn N a /f N a V H 0 ih A CM m U N) N 01 a �j C W C WW N m a m 4 co O Co O V N O - N a f�fn 245 = p O O O LO V O V o a i.) - m Fa) n - G -0 w m m V A 0 a ID m o a s N U) m T m j. ? v. D a f] K 4 n O a = d p3) 8 N N C Z z %" m m N a Iny ? a pA a a 0. . tom R m N D N m ((0p y N c a N Kan (:) O. a q a 5 N A phi' A — o O 3 W N) h) = a a m D DJ 0 EL 3 m 0 2 m a sr d 3 H o CD A7 R » P 5' N O F m n) N Z on 2 5 v m A N 5 N •C N a o ti p O) O) 0 •' y m H . NCO 0 -1 D NN•O X U) N 0 P. Clarington Leading the Way REPORT CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 20, 2005 Report#: COD-034-05 File # By-law # Subject: CL2005-22 Asphalt Resurfacing, Various Streets Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report COD-034-05 be received; 2. THAT Harnden & King Construction Inc., Ajax, Ontario with a total bid in the amount of $511,774.50 (Plus G.S.T.), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions, and specifications of Tender CL2005-22, be awarded the contract for the Asphalt Resurfacing, Various Locations, as required by the Engineering Department; 3. THAT the total funds required in the amount of $664,000.00 plus $50,000.00 committed to CL2005-13 Station Street Side Street Rehabilitation ($511 ,774.50 tender plus contingencies, consulting and soils) and $28,000.00 for the upgrade of the Pavement Management System be drawn from Engineering 2005 Capital Project #5800-8310-05118; 4. THAT the remaining funds in the amount of $58,000.00 be re-allocated as an addition to the pavement rehabilitation project tender CL2005-22 , in the amount of $43,000.00 and to the undertaking of the preliminary engineering for the finalizing of the 2006 Pavement Rehabilitation Program in the amount of $15,000.00; and REPORT NO.: COD-034-05 PAGE 2 5. THAT the attached By-law marked Schedule "A" authorizing the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the necessary agreement be approved. 7 ; Submitted by: !� �— Reviewed b DA4-124'9--e- 314.- - Marie Marano, H.B.Sc., C.M.O. Franklin Wu, Director,of Corporate Services Chief Administrative Officer Nancy Taylor, B.B. ., C.A., Director of Financenofrotzheec__ m A.S. Cannella, C.E.T. Director of Engineering Services MM/LAB/Id REPORT NO.: COD-034-05 PAGE 3 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT Tender specifications were provided by Totten Sims Hubicki Associates for the Asphalt Resurfacing, Various Streets, as required by the Engineering Department. Tenders were advertised in local papers, as well as electronically. Subsequently, tenders were received and tabulated as per Schedule "B" attached. The total project cost, including Project Administration, and costing allocation is detailed in the letter from Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, marked Schedule "C" and will be provided from the 2005 Capital Project#5800-8310-05118 for Asphalt Resurfacing, Various Streets. This project also provided for a major update of the pavement Management System in the amount of $28,000.00 which included database and software upgrades. These system improvements facilitated the preparation of the non-growth components of our Development Charge Projects and the determination of this year's rehabilitation projects and as well it will be used to develop the pavement rehabilitation program on an annual basis. It is recommended that the remaining funds for this project, in the amount of $58,000.00 be re- allocated as an addition to the pavement rehabilitation project tender CL2005-22, in the amount of$43,000.00 and to the undertaking of the preliminary engineering for the finalizing of the 2006 Pavement Rehabilitation Program in the amount of $15,000.00. The low bidder has previously performed satisfactory work for the Municipality of Clarington. The Director of Finance has reviewed the funding requirements and concurs with the recommendation. Queries with respect to department needs, specifications, etc., should be referred to the Director of Engineering. After further review and analysis of the bids by the Engineering Department, Totten Sims Hubicki Associates and Purchasing, it was mutually agreed that the low bidder, Harnden & King Construction Inc., Ajax, Ontario, be recommended for the contract for the Asphalt Resurfacing, Various Streets. Schedule "A" THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW 2005- Being a By-law to authorize a contract between the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and Harnden & King Construction Inc., Ajax, Ontario, to enter into agreement for the Asphalt Resurfacing, Various Streets THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and seal with the Corporation Seal, a contract between, Harnden & King Construction Inc., Ajax, Ontario, and said Corporation; and 2. THAT the contract attached hereto as Schedule "A" form part of this By-law. By-law read a first and second time this day of , 2005. By-law read a third time and finally passed this day of , 2005. John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk claringoil Leading the Way Municipality of Clarington SCHEDULE "B" BID SUMMARY Tender CL2005-22, Asphalt Resurfacing, Various Streets Harnden & King Construction $511,774.50 A'ax, ON Miller Paving $559,286.60 Whitb , ON JUN-15-05 WED 10: 14 AM TSH COBOURG FAX NO. P. 01 Totten Sims eet i Associates Street Division Street ■ Cobourg, Ontario, Canada K9A 5G6 engineers (905) 372-2121 Fax: (905)372-3621 architects E-mail: ralbrioht( tsh.ca www.tsh.ca planners June 13,2005 Ms. Lou Ann Birkett, err,AMCT FAX: 905-6235- DULE "C" Purchasing Manager Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street, BOWMANVII.LE,Ontario L1C 3A6 Dear Ms.Dirkett: Re: Contract No. CL2005-22,Asphalt Resurfacing, Various Streets Municipality of Clarington Tenders for the above project were opened at the Municipal Offices on Wednesday,June 8,2005, at 2:00:00 p.m. local time. The bids received, exclusive of CST,are summarized as follows: , BIDDER TOTAL BID AMOUNT ■ Miller Paving Limited $559,286.60 Whitby,ON I larnden&King Construction Inc. $511,774.50 Aioix. QN The low bidder's submitted tender has been reviewed and is in order. Hamden&King Construction Inc. has completed similar projects for the Municipality of Clarington and Region of Durham over the past three years, including last year's resurfacing Contract CL2004-22, Last year,the works administered by our office were completed with an acceptable level of quality and workmanship. 'this year's tender consist of three(3)sites, as summarized on the attached Cost Apportionment The apportionment also details the estimated project costs based on the low bid submitted by Hamden&King Construction Inc. The total project costs related to this tender are$664,000.00 and the total amount allocated under Project ID 5800-8320-05118 in the 2005 Capital Budget is$800,000.00 less $50,000 previously committed to the Station Street side street pavement rehabilitation under contract CL200S-13 and 528,0000 for the update of the Pavement Management System. In addition another estimated$15,000 will be required to undertake pre-engineering work to develop the 2006 Asphalt Rehabilitation program, leaving a surplus of$43,000.00. It should be noted that the update of the Pavement Management System facilitated the determination of this year's pavement rehabilitation projects and will be used to develop the JUN-15-05 WED 10: 14 AM TSH COBOURG FAX NO. P. 02 Ms. Lou Ann I3irken, CPP, AMCT June 13. 2005 2 pavement rehabilitation program on an annual basis. Based on the past experience of the low bidder and available budget, it is recommended that Contract CL2005-22 be awarded to I larnden &King Construction Inc. for the total amount of$511,774.50(excl. of awl)and it is further recommended that the surplus $43,000 be used to add another project to this year's program under Contract CL2005-22. Fender deposits may be returned to all contractors except the low and second low bidders. Should you require any additional information, please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, Ron Albright,P.Eng, Project Engineer RA/ym P/29193/Col resp/20996 due Encl. cc: Mr. A. S. Cannella, Director, Engineering Services Mr. F. Horvath, Director of Operations Mr, N. Clark, Manager of Construction Mrs. K. Rand,Confidential Secretary to the Director of Operations(+end.) Ms.J. O'Donnell, Clerk H(+encl.) RI "0 ^ w b CO —I A 5 a Cl n w o N 03+ O. c G m m == 1 1-. p-4 v0i o ° n 7 N N N N? m » O O O c 10 @ D .NO a. = 42 D 4, a. o m z z 2: 2 v ts ko r i w C) n O m o a 0 n t7 Ci b7 `y ::• O r a 3 7 O O ' m w 7 �• Z w O 7 F m w 3 9 a ? !" o r n wm C] e a m a a a 3' o N a I4- O N N clumm Sba -2 . a s a 0 N a " a x ti y 0 e ° to C q a 0 d 3. y O i7 O Q 0 Da 00h : 0' N N O 01 e O ' 0 'a9 a.ii,Er• : 00'1 0 0 O. n c C) m E. w a R B O a a co a 2 co r. O A d YI y C w co to w R N cal N = a N i o `A T n 3 O• o y 0 w �°-n =• a FJE rn obi N W ° :i a 0 a b w '• y ± 0 - 7 T�rp.c',' d 3 a x o a o a co D ot zzi s 10 c a o o a .'O .* CCJ N p 8 2• y ? co y •' N co O W N H o A G. 2 K ti ? D . ° o �. a 3 & g t0 E. y ao n o ri 'u 3 g' R C) P1 r a o `. < O o N y C) c a N 7 N, O 44 44 Cl) 44 69 00 49 Vi in 44 in L> 4A M a N oo as a t..tLA C W NA N 0 - A r to ...3 U OO 0 a Sr' - W W A T O O O p O p U J 1:4 0 W p N cm 0 0 C0 b 9 LA -4 0, C,S O S O S p 0:, S N 1�o O o p ' 59 44 49 H 49 49 0 • 44 (4 44 44 iA IA th xl O r (Q a1) .y oa pca� N1� o Ot C W LJI ONo O S .p. A -a b N N to Q Qp p a a is to o `. 3 Sp O O O W J 0 — U -. 7 W ..' S O p H A N 0' O�. _ N 7. w 0 8 6 0 co� o N O O o o C = . Co cn n 1 M m o cn a C �Pt K co N '' N N • co o . W N 80 'd 'ON Hdd 08110800 HS! WV 91 :01 43M 90-91-Nnr Clarington Leading the Way REPORT CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 20, 2005 Report#: COD-035-05 File# By-law# Subject: CL2005-15 Sidewalk Construction, Various Locations Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report COD-035-05 be received; 2. THAT Trisan Construction, Schomberg, Ontario with a total revised bid in the amount of $366,644.82 (Plus G.S.T.), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions, and specifications of Tender CL2005-15, be awarded the contract for the Sidewalk Construction, Various Locations, as required by the Engineering Department; 3. THAT Part C - Enniskillen Sidewalks in the amount of $27,681.27 be removed from Project#5800-8320-05102; 4. THAT Part F - south side of Highway 2 from Trulls Road to Courtice Road in the amount of$98,384.97 be removed from Project#5800-8320-05101; 5. THAT the total funds required in the amount of $512,133.76 ($492,711.06 tender less $27,681.27 for Enniskillen sidewalks, less $98,384.97 for south side of Highway 2 plus contingencies, consulting and utilities) be drawn from Engineering 2005 Capital Projects #5800-8320-05102 ($196,072.73) and #5800-8320-05101 ($308,615.03) and the Roads Contribution Reserve Fund. REPORT NO.: COD-035-05 PAGE 2 6. THAT the attached By-law marked Schedule "A" authorizing the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the necessary agreement be approved. Submitted by: b Marano, H.B.Sc., C.M.O. Franklin Wu, Directo of Corporate Serviicc--; Chief Administrative Officer /a_ ancy Tay •r, B.B. ! C.A., Director of Finance A.S. Cannella, C.E.T. Director of Engineering Services MM/LAB/Id REPORT NO.: COD-035-05 PAGE 3 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT Tender specifications were provided by Totten Sims Hubicki Associates for the Sidewalk Construction, Various Locations, as required by the Engineering Department. Tenders were advertised in local papers, as well as electronically. Subsequently, tenders were received and tabulated as per Schedule "B" attached. Estimated project costs are as shown on the attached cost apportionment provided by Totten Sims Hubicki marked Schedule "C". Based on the total project cost of $223,754.00 for the sidewalk replacement work and the 2005 Capital Budget amount of $200,000.00 for Project #5800-8320-05102, this portion of the contract is $23,754.00 over budget. In order to meet the allocated budget for this work, it is recommended that Part C — Enniskillen Sidewalks, be removed from the contract resulting in a $3,927.27 surplus for the replacement portion of the contract. The apportionment also shows the total project cost for Part F — Highway 2 Sidewalks, Courtice is $407,000.00 is $97,000.00 over the 2005 Capital Budget amount of $310,000.00 allocated to Project #5800-8320-05101. In order to meet the available budget it is recommended that the portion of the works on the south side of Highway 2 from Trulls Road to Courtice Road be removed from the contract which amounts to $98,384.97 resulting in a $1,384.97 surplus for the portion of the sidewalk. The three low bidders are in concurrence with this revision to the contract. The total project cost, including Project Administration, and costing allocation is as detailed in the cost apportionment from Totten Sims Hubicki Associates and will be provided from the 2005 Capital Project #5800-8320-05102 for Sidewalk Replacement, Various Locations ($196,072.73) and from the Highway 2, Courtice Sidewalk Construction Project #5800-8320-05101 ($308,615.03). For the sidewalk associated with development of Courtice Corners (south-east corner of Highway 2 and Courtice Road), funds in the amount of $7,446.00 are recommended to be financed from the Roads Contributions Reserve Fund. These funds have already been received from the developer. For ease of processing this will be incorporated into Project#5800- 8320-05102. REPORT NO.: COD-035-05 PAGE 4 The low bidder has previously performed satisfactory work for the Municipality of Clarington. The Director of Finance has reviewed the funding requirements and concurs with the recommendation. Queries with respect to department needs, specifications, etc., should be referred to the Director of Engineering. After further review and analysis of the bids by the Engineering Department, Totten Sims Hubicki Associates and Purchasing, it was mutually agreed that the low bidder, Trisan Construction, Schomberg, Ontario, be recommended for the contract for the Sidewalk Construction, Various Locations. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-4169 Schedule "A" THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW 2005- Being a By-law to authorize a contract between the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and Trisan Construction, Schomberg, Ontario, to enter into agreement for the Sidewalk Construction, Various Locations. THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and seal with the Corporation Seal, a contract between, Trisan Construction, Schomberg, Ontario, and said Corporation; and 2. THAT the contract attached hereto as Schedule "A"form part of this By-law. By-law read a first and second time this day of , 2005. By-law read a third time and finally passed this day of , 2005. John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk C1arigon Leading the Way Municipality of Clarington SCHEDULE "B" • BID SUMMARY Tender CL2005-15, Sidewalk Construction, Various Locations Trisan Construction $492,711.06 Schomber., ON Brennan Paving $493,099.46 Markham, ON Miwel Construction $537,703.16 Stouffville, ON Aloia Bros. Concrete Contractors Limited $575,503.61 Toronto, ON Ferma Road Construction $616,679.70 Mississau•a, ON Elirpa Construction $667,423.97 Pickerin., ON Totten Sims Hubicki Associates • engineers 513 Division Street, Cobourg,Ontario, Canada K9A 5G6 architects (905) 372-2121 Fax: (905)372-3621 planners E-mail: cobourg@tsh.ca www.tsh.ca June 10, 2005 SCHEDULE "C" Ms. Lou Ann Birkett, CPP,AMCT Purchasing Manager Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street BOWMANVILLE, Ontario. L1C 3A6 Dear Ms. Birkett: Re: Highway#2 Sidewalks,Centerfield Dr. to Trulls Rd. —N. Side,Trulls Rd. to Courtice Rd. — S. Side, Courtice 2005 Sidewalk Rehabilitation—Various Locations Contract CL2005-15, Municipality of Clarington Tenders for the above project were opened at the Municipal Offices on Thursday June 2, 2005 at 2:00 p.m. A list of the bids received is provided in the table below. All numbers are exclusive of GST. BIDDER TOTAL BID AMOUNT I Trisan Construction, Schomberg, ON $492,711.06* Brennan Paving &Construction,Markham, ON $493,099.46* Miwel Construction Ltd., Stouffville, ON $537,703.16* Aloia Bros. Concrete Contractors, Toronto, ON $575,503.61* Ferma Road Construction Ltd., Mississauga, ON $616,679.70 ELIRPA Construction, Pickering, ON $667,423.97* * Amended total—extension error. The low bidder's tender has been checked and is in order. Trisan Construction has previously undertaken projects for the Municipality of Clarington,most recently Contract CL2004-30 which was also sidewalk construction at various locations. The work was performed to an acceptable standard although restoration work was slow at times resulting in complaints from residents. This contract allows for 50% payment of sidewalk upon placing, and the remainder upon completion of restoration works which should ensure a timely restoration of disturbed areas. All restoration issues from CL2004-30 were eventually addressed to our office's satisfaction. Estimated project costs based on Trisan's low bid are as shown on the attached Cost Apportionment. Based on the total project cost of$223,754.00 for the sidewalk replacement work and the 2005 Capital Budget amount of$200,000 for Project ID 5800-8320-05102, this portion of the contract is $23,754.00 over budget. In order to meet the allocated budget for this work it is recommended that Part C— Enniskillen Sidewalks be removed from the contract resulting in a $3,927.27 surplus for the replacement portion of the contract. • Ms. Lou Ann Birkett June 10,2005 2 The apportionment also shows the total project cost for Part F —Hwy 2 Sidewalks, Courtice, is $407,000.00 which is $97,000 over the 2005 Capital Budget amount of$310,000 allocated to Project ID 5800-8320-05101. In order to meet the available budget it is recommended that the portion of the works on the south side of Hwy. 2 from Trulls Road to Courtice Road be removed from the contract which amounts to $98,384.97 resulting in a $1,384.97 surplus for this portion of the sidewalk. The costs for the sidewalk required for the Courtice Corners development on the southeast corner of Courtice Road and Highway 2 match the allocated funds of$7,446 from Account # 514-X-X-X-6760. Based on both of the above noted deletions from the replacement and new sidewalk portions of the contract and the past performance of the contractor it is recommended that the tender in the amount of $366,644.82 (exclusive of G.S.T.) be awarded to Trisan Construction of Schomberg, Ontario Please proceed with the award of this Contract which is scheduled for completion by Friday, September 2, 2005. Should you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact the undersigned. Best regards, Ron Albright, P.Eng. Project Engineer RA/ym M294691Correso✓mnder Results.doc pc: A.S. Cannella, Director of Engineering Services Leslie Benson, Manager, Transportation and Design Jennifer Welsh, Clerk II Norm Clark, C.E.T., Manager of Construction Fred Horvath, Director of Operations Kaye Rand, Operations, Accounting Clerk II LO n - • o a of N 0) N O a N co 3 c 0 dC _1 v co G o • 0) N 0 0 cti C) 0 a m W D. 0 a N E m N E a) E E - N w '0 0 H o w wa W CL e 0 2 o N N N 0 0 00 0 O 0 0 0 O N n O O 0 O H N m N ( LL) O) CO n O 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 al C U 9 O_ O_ o r 6 N N O CO Oni = a 0 ei M CO N a !A CO Y U o A o 0 N N Zto 4 �, H9 H9 h z 0 v, to O co 2 o 0 °o co o °o ° It C co- ° mot o to to t6 co j 0oEEdo v 3 n d to o. O c U `4 n n n I- C Q o U L. 9 9 x je z W 3 p O N 4• C U 1 9 r c — N 0 co r CO •3 U = fA !A N cZ _O C c m N- o N- n o N 0 00 0 CO Q F t0 E C N r CO N N- n aD co O M aOa o O o W Q U U N R b N Da 0)) O N O 0 CO') N O C, • O f0 o n M 0) M )0 N' n 0 O 0 9 r N r n 0) tD t0 tq co.. M O t+) Z J �' 0 O t0 N N M n v N N N N o O (n K J eND N N to 0 '� I— D Y 7 G N E' G < O 3 0 a CO '7 m > y 49 69 !A 69 to CS 1A f9 t9 N H 40 r n O n N t0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 to 0 W n M N n n N O 0) O O CO O O X ce ai a .- O N fV — a) O O (a G t(4 4 t- n co 0) O 10 r V 0 0 Cr) 0 in `C r N CO tO n 01 1: A to o fD N n N E J — n 0) n n O) O N M W a 0) CO 6 C Q co N N M r M N N 'Cr N N o le I-- o W a a G 0 �/� 0 VI U C N . . . . . H 14 69 t9 69 N 4, a co n co G I- W 'o U H 0 '0 a. NN ° E en 0 N U E J Y 0 N C 0 o a N O = r 0 a - W -I a to J J N N N tC U CID O - O Q W Y a a a, a a m 8 N m CO 0 o d U W W O a W W C N U j ~ J 'C 0 -I o rn �+ °— w E 2 co v Q w o w vi 0 o f 0 a LL o - y O 01 U` c � Q U _J J O a m` uw in w N el to �, 0 2 H Y a w a E v E 01 c a .. 01' i �, E o 'o N O Y c 0 c to tc m $ C 'o " d C d 0 0 2 W 7 U o Z ~ U N o v H O m x a` O U Y I U W Y CO 2 ' O 0 N - N N 'O < y w C7 Q m c Q m U G IL rd. YO— p`, Ol A u A m m o V; e t t t t t t C b r 'w a = = C E 'O a U O 0 !o N t0 t0 CO t0 CO O CD N N ca = 0 N 7 co O 0 U a 0. a a 0. a W I- 0 Wt. 0 O W m W Q Clarington Leading the Way REPORT CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 20, 2005 Report #: COD-036-05 File # By-law# Subject: CL2005-10, Soper Creek Recreational Trail, Bowmanville and Lion's Trail Newcastle Paving Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report COD-036-05 be received; 2. THAT Royalcrest Paving & Contracting Ltd., Markham, Ontario with a total bid in the amount of $176,299.70 (Plus G.S.T.), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions, and specifications of Tender CL2005-10, be awarded the contract for the Soper Creek Recreational Trail, Bowmanville and Lion's Trail, Newcastle Paving as required by the Engineering Department; 3. THAT funds required in the amount of $217,000.00 ($176,299.70 tender plus contingencies, consulting and soils) be drawn from Engineering 2005 Capital Projects #5800-8610-05107 ($200,000.00) and #6000-8620-05600 ($17,000.00); 4. THAT the additional funds required in the amount of $7,500.00 required for the Lion's Trail Paving Project #6000-8620-05600 be drawn from Account #100-36-381-10250- 7163 Pavement Resurfacing; 5. THAT the attached By-law marked Schedule "A" authorizing the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the necessary agreement be approved. Submitted by: �G� �' Reviewed by: 6 4'""cf2._--_t, arie Marano, H.B.Sc., C.M.O. Franklin Wu, Din .r of Corporat>..ervic=- Chief Administrative Officer // Api l/✓ /% ancy ay .r, e.B.A./. Director nance Director,. _/ A. . Cannella, C.E.T. Director of Engineering Services MM/LAB/Id REPORT NO.: COD-036-05 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT Tender specifications were provided by Totten Sims Hubicki Associates for the Soper Creek Recreational Trail, Bowmanville and Lion's Trail Newcastle Paving, as required by the Engineering Department. Tenders were advertised in local papers, as well as electronically. Subsequently, tenders were received and tabulated as per Schedule "B" attached. The total project cost, including Project Administration, and costing allocation is as detailed in the letter from Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, marked Schedule "C" and will be provided from the 2005 Capital Project #5800-8610-05107 for Soper Creek Recreational Trail ($200,000.00) and from Lion's Trail Paving Project #6000-8620-05600 ($17,000.00). As the total costs related to the Lion's Trail Paving exceed the budget allocation of $17,000.00, it is recommended the additional funds required in the amount of $7,500.00 be drawn from Account #100-36-381- 10250-7163 — Pavement Resurfacing. The low bidder has previously performed satisfactory work for the MBTW Group, Toronto and Marshall Macklin Monaghan, Thornhill. The Director of Finance has reviewed the funding requirements and concurs with the recommendation. Queries with respect to department needs, specifications, etc., should be referred to the Director of Engineering. After further review and analysis of the bids by the Engineering Department, Totten Sims Hubicki Associates and Purchasing, it was mutually agreed that the low bidder, Royalcrest Paving & Contracting Ltd., Markham, Ontario, be recommended for the contract for the Soper Creek Recreational Trail, Bowmanville and Lion's Trail Newcastle Paving. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1 C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-4169 Schedule "A" THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW 2005- Being a By-law to authorize a contract between the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and Royalcrest Paving & Contracting Ltd., Markham, Ontario, to enter into agreement for the Soper Creek Recreational Trail, Bowmanville and Lion's Trail, Newcastle Paving. THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and seal with the Corporation Seal, a contract between, Royalcrest Paving & Contracting Ltd., Markham, Ontario, and said Corporation; and 2. THAT the contract attached hereto as Schedule "A"form part of this By-law. By-law read a first and second time this day of , 2005. By-law read a third time and finally passed this day of , 2005. John Mutton, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk Clam n Leading the Way Municipality of Clarington SCHEDULE "B" BID SUMMARY Tender CL2005-10, Soper Creek Recreational Trail, Bowmanville and Lion's Trail, Newcastle Paving Royalcrest Paving & Contracting Ltd. $176,299.70 Markham, ON Ashland Paving Ltd. $191,181.00 Concord, ON Lafarge Paving & Construction Ltd. $198,720.42** Oshawa, ON Peninsula Construction Inc. $199,920.33` Fonthill, ON Ron Robinson Limited $242,249.90 Bowmanville, ON Elirpa Construction $248,519.92 Pickering, ON *error in calculation ** error in extension JUN-14-05 TUE 04: 19 PM TSH COBOURG FAX NO, P. 01/03 Totten Sims Hubicki Associates ■ 513 Division Street, engineers Cobourg,Ontario,Canada K9A 5G6 architects (905)372-2121 Fax: (905) 372-3621 I planners E-mail:cobourgetsh.ca www,tsh.ca June 14, 2005 SCHEDULE "C" Ms. Lou Ann Birkctt,CYP, AMCC FAX. 903-623-3330 Purchasing Manager Corporation of the Municipality of Claringlon 40 Temperance Street, BOWMANVILLE, Ontario 1,1C 3A6 Dear Ms. Dirkett: 1ta• Contract No, C1-100g 10 gaper Crank 12arrontinnal Tl-all.ROwmanviile and Lion's Trail Paving,Newcastle,Municipality of Clarington Tenders fur as; abuvc pcojcct ward opcnod at the Municipal Oakes nn Friday, .tune 10. 2005. at 2:00:00 p.m. local time. The bids received,exclusive of GST, are summarized as follows: BIDDER TOTAL BID AMOUNT Royalcrest Paving &Contracting Ltd. $176,299.70 Markham ON Ashland Paving Ltd- 5191,181.00 Concord, ON _ Lafarge Paving& Construction Ltd. $198,720.42 Oshawa, ON Peninsula Construction Inc. $199,920.33 Fonthill, ON Ron Robinson Limited $242,249.90 Bowmanville, ON Elirpa Construction $248,519.92 Pickering. ON 11w low bidder's tender has been reviewed and is in order. References provided by the Contractor, which include The MBTW Group (Toronto) and Marshall Macklin Monaghan(Thornhill), have been contacted and comments received are very favourable. Contracts completed satisfactorily range from $300,000.00 to $425,000.00, which are in excess of the value of this Contract, The total costs associated with this project are summarized on the attached cost apportionment. As detailed on the cost apportionment Part A — Soper Creek Recreational Trail, is on budget based on the $200,000.00 funding allocated under Project ID 5800-8610-05107 in the 2005 Capital Budget. The JUN-14-05 TUE 04: 19 PM TSH COBOURG FAX Na P, 02/03 Ms. Lou Ann Birkett, CPP, AMCT Tune 14, 2005 2 total costs related to Part B - Lion's Trail Paving, are $7,500.00 over the $17,000.00 allocated budget under Project ID 6000-8620-0560. In order to provide the necessary funding to complete this portion of the contract it is recommended that $7,500.00 be drawn from Account#100-36-381-10250-7163 - Pavement Resurfacing to cover the deficit. Based on past performance and budget availability, we recommend that Royalerest Paving & Contracting Ltd. be awarded Contract CL2005-10 in the total amount of$176,299.70 (excluding GST). Should you require any additional information,please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, I Ron Albright, P Ting. Project Engineer RA/ym rn eanrc„�.rn o 1001 d„e Encl. cc: Mr. A. S. Cannella,Director,Engineering Services Mr. F. Horvath, Director of Operations Mr. P. Windolf,Manager of Park Development Mr. 13. Gcnosko, Supervisor Mrs. K. Rand,Confidential Secretary to the Director of Operations(+ encl.) Ms. L O'Donnell, Clerk II (+encl.) UM • & I C -I n 0 0 0) C t1 � 0 n 2 £ 2 f _ _ , d ] 2 Al & . / k J s 9 7 2 § (/JIP/ j ( ` 0 k k x E [} § _ _ $ z , w . § 2 § ; { \ -. ) L ( � \ ! } { $ 3 ' J ¢ g § n 1- III 0 { Al/ ( i § 0 ! a / ( § a c }0.{ — » \ y § — , } » n 0) IT 0 8 \ 0 \ / 3 , G co\ - Al o 9. / A —Co / - j f ( \ / a ® — — 4 _ I _ , \ a a § 2 Na / j k § . . § } . m $ § ; ) ( ) i / \ B § ¥ & _ / 44 to _ _ (A Xi 3 cn CD %o ; o § (7 § ,\ § § ) \ LA ■§ $ j/ -4 \ CA a\ B co, E 9 _ CA _ _ 44 ® f ) � E • _ § e 0 -• g co ) \ \ ■ ) & » } 0 / 2 & B k B § ( k G » m o P. ( $ \ ® g ; ( : §) reg 'd DN XVA en� o0Eells Q J;G3In 24l-t Clarington Leading the Way REPORT CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 20, 2005 Report #: COD-037-05 File # By-law # Subject: Tender CL2005-19, Driveway Paving Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report COD-037-05 be received; 2. THAT Melrose Paving Company Ltd., Etobicoke, Ontario, with a total bid amount of $59,150.00, being the lowest responsible bidder 'meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender CL2005-19, be awarded the contract for Driveway Paving; and 3. THAT the funds expended be provided from the 2005 Operations Budget. Submitted by: at Reviewed by:0 Marie Marano, H.B.Sc., C.M.O. Franklin Wu, Director of Corporate Services Chief Administrative Officer 7 id /1/ a cy a or, .B,". . , Director o Finance F ath, RDMR, RRFA, cto f Operations MM/LAB/Id REPORT NO.: COD-037-05 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT Tenders were publicly advertised and called for Driveway Paving, as required by the Operations Department. Subsequently, tenders were received and tabulated as follows: i�p , fir„` ..•`^� j a .. - - Ilr i�1 ill ,xaixF ,. 5+ tt �� �;;��,�Ili��l������il,lh,�.� ��s• �� .�w.t49 , '"�. Melrose Paving Co. Ltd. Toronto, ON $59,150.00 Trison Contracting Inc. Port Per , ON $67,600.00 Royalcrest Paving Markham, ON $84,240.00 United Paving Oshawa, ON $139,100.00 The Operations Department requires approximately 2,600 square metres of driveway paving. For the information of Council, the unit prices per square metre represent an approximate 0.09% increase over those bid, for 2004. After further review and analysis of the tender by Operations and Purchasing, it was mutually agreed that Melrose Paving Company Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, be recommended for the contract for Driveway Paving, as required by the Operations Department. The total funds required for Tender CL2005-19 Driveway Paving, are included in various accounts within the 2005 Operations Budget. The Director of Finance has reviewed the funding requirements and concurs with the recommendation. Queries with respect to department needs, specifications, etc., should be referred to the Director of Operations. The recommended bidder was awarded this contract in 2004 and provided satisfactory service. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-4169 Clarhigron e Wa REPORT Leading the Way FINANCE DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: MONDAY, JUNE 20, 2005 Resolution #: Report #: FND-007-05 File #: By-law #: Subject: DEVELOPMENT CHARGES STUDY AND BY-LAW 2005 Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT the Development Charges Background Study, May 2005, prepared by Hemson Consulting Ltd. Be approved; 2. THAT the Development Charges quantum for both Residential and Non- Residential charges be approved as follows, effective July 1, 2005, subject to annual indexing: Residential Single and Semi $8,377 Townhouse and Row $7,346 Large Apartment $5,671 Small Apartment $3,609 Non-Residential Commercial and Institutional $34.94 (per square metre) Industrial $19.24 3. THAT Council in approving the Background Study, expresses its intent to ensure that the increase in the need for services attributable to the anticipated development will be met and that any future excess capacity identified in the Study will be paid for by development charges or other similar charges; 4. THAT Council has reviewed the changes made to the draft By-Law and after having considered the changes, Council determined that there is not a need for an additional public meeting; FND-007-05 Page 2 5. THAT the annual report to Council on the Development Charges Reserve Fund activity includes a status report on the building permit activity and charges collected in relationship to the projected activity; 6. THAT for completed applications as determined by the Chief Building Official received on or before June 30, 2005, where the development charges will be paid by June 30, 2005, that the applicable development charges be calculated based on By-Law 2000-108; 7. THAT correspondence received from Ridge Pine Park Inc. (Attachment "A") be received and that Wilmot Creek homes remain under the single family dwelling category; 8. THAT By-Law 2005-108 (Attachment "B"), inclusive of any amendments made by Council at the meeting of June 20, 2005, be recommended to Council for approval to rescind and replace By-Law 2000-108; and 9. THAT the Region of Durham and recorded interested parties be provided a copy of this report and be notified of Council's decision. , Submitted by: e %✓� .4 Reviewed b . J ancy Tay or, =.B. 1fC.A., Franklin Wu, Director of Finance. Chief Administrative Officer. NT/hjl FND-007-05 Page 3 BACKGROUND AND INFORMATION: 1.0 The 2000 Development Charges 1.1 On July 10, 2000, Council adopted the existing development charges with the approval of report TR-36-00, plus addendum, and the accompanying By-Law 2000-108. This By-Law, by statute expires after five years or July 31, 2005. Consequently, Council authorized staff to undertake a new background study as required under the Development Charges Act. 1.2 The legislation only allows calculation of a charge based on the historical average service level of the past 10 years. The legislation does not permit the use of development charges to increase the service levels in any category. If the allowable permitted calculated charge under the legislation is not used, the shortfall is transferred to the tax base and the historic average is eroded, such that in future development charges less can be recoverable. 2.0 The 2005 Development Charges Study 2.1 Staff from all Departments and the Library worked diligently, as a Steering Committee with Craig Binning of Hemson Consulting Ltd., to bring forward the background study May 2005. The result of the analysis was to produce a revised development charge that reflects the services required to support the projected new development over the next 10 years to 2014. 2.2 The background study introduction provides an overview of the areas of focus in this report. The areas of particular emphasis were the growth forecast, the identified capital projects, the proposed new policies and the inclusion of local service definitions. 3.0 Non-Residential Charge 3.1 In reviewing the non-residential development charges within the lakeshore area municipalities of Durham Region, all lower tier municipalities have a commercial and industrial development charge. The Region of Durham is currently the only municipality without an industrial development charge. 3.2 The cities of Pickering and Oshawa both have a standard charge for all non- residential. Ajax and Whitby have separated industrial at a different rate than the other non-residential components. This is the approach recommended in Clarington also. 3.3 The residential charge being recommended is a very modest increase of 4% over the current charge which would have indexed at approximately this amount on July 1, 2005. FND-007-05 Page 4 3.4 The industrial charge is very consistent with prior years. The other non- residential charge is experiencing a significant increase. This is comparable to other lakeshore municipalities in the Region of Durham and similar sized municipalities in the GTA. 3.5 In all categories, the maximum permissible under the Development Charges Act is being levied. 4.0 Tax Impact 4.1 The existing taxpayer picks up any shortfall for the cost of growth related services which is not collected through the development charge. Page 18 of the background study identifies the impact on the tax base. 5.0 Meeting with Developers 5.1 Staff and the Municipality's consultant met with the development community on May 27th to provide an overview of the background study, the methodology applied in the development charge calculation and to provide an opportunity for questions to be answered. The meeting was set up over and above the requirements of the Development Charges Act and in addition to the scheduled public meeting for June 20, 2005. 6.0 Exemptions 6.1 There are some exemptions to the Development Charge By-Law. These are detailed in Section 18 to 23 of the Development Charge By-Law. Included in the proposed exemptions are: intensifications and redevelopment, agricultural development, certain public buildings, heritage homes requiring relocation, medical professional offices, contaminated sites, historic downtown redevelopments, research laboratory exemptions and green industrial building credits. These are broad ranging exemptions intended to promote and support specific identifiable objectives. 7.0 Future Potential Exemptions 7.1 It is possible that during the public review process the Municipality will be requested to include additional exemptions. Specifically we are anticipating requests from the Physician Recruitment Committee and Bowmanville Community Improvement Plan focus group. In the proposed by-law, exemptions pertaining to the areas of interest of these groups have been incorporated. 7.2 As the Development Charges by-law is reviewed at least every 5 years, exemptions and incentives not producing the results anticipated can be enhanced, modified or eliminated. If an exemption is producing unintended results, amendments can be made during the life of the Bylaw. FND-007-05 Page 5 7.3 Consideration has been given to providing incentives for infill and intensification. However, this could have a negative impact on the retention of older buildings within the revitalization area. Additional restrictions in the form of policy adjustments and guidelines need to accompany any exemptions. Since a study regarding infill and intensification is recommended as part of both the Bowmanville CIP and Bowmanville East Town Centre Secondary Plan update, the terms of reference for this study should examine how development charge reductions or exemptions can be implemented to achieve the desired goals. This can lay the groundwork for future development charges. 7.4 The King Street East Corridor Study provided urban design guidelines for the infill of the street facade along King Street from Liberty to Mearns and suggested that development charges could be an implementing tool. Unfortunately due to the number of municipal roadwork projects for this area, if the development charges were reduced the capital expenditures would have to be drawn from non-development charge financing and a different funding source identified. This would create an undue burden on the taxpayer. 7.5 Development Charge exemptions are imperfect tools to achieve some desired goals. While development charge exemptions are a type of incentive that the municipality can provide they are not the only incentive. In some cases the provision of a grant along with the attendant rules that the Municipality can impose are more successful tools for accomplishing specific goals. 7.6 An exemption has been included in the DC Bylaw to provide an incentive for the development of office space, examination rooms, etc. for new practitioners. This exemption is provided to the developer of the facility at the time of construction. However, there is no guarantee that the occupant will be a new doctor to the area. 8.0 Communication from Ridge Pine Park Inc. 8.1 Subsequent to the meeting with the development community, correspondence was received from Ridge Pine Park Inc. (Attachment "A"). They are requesting consideration of placement in a large apartment category rather than a single family dwelling. The structures constructed in the Wilmot Creek neighborhood clearly fall under the definition of single detached dwelling. Also, due to the fact that other homes scattered throughout the Municipality may have individual lower persons per unit and would therefore be treated differently, it is recommended that no change be made as a result of the request from Ridge Pine Park Inc. Clarington's residential development charge policy is municipal wide, not area specific. FND-007-05 Page 6 9.0 Exemption Where Permits Applied For 9.1 The effective date of change in the quantum is recommended as July 1, 2005. It is recommended that building permit applications that are in on or before June 30 and are complete will not be subject to the new By-Law. The increase in the charge is imposed at the time of issue of the building permit and so a specific resolution has been added to this report. Attachments: Attachment "A"— correspondence from Wilmot Creek Attachment "B" — Proposed By-Law 2005-108 Interested Parties: Wilmot Creek 1 Wheelhouse Drive, Unit 1 Newcastle, Ontario L1 B 1B9 Region of Durham Finance Department 60 Bond Street Oshawa, Ontario L1 H 8B6 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-4169 flUdAAa1 H r t A WILMOT to Report FND-001 CREEK ON THE LAKE 2 June 2005 Via Fax & Mail: 905-623-4169 Total# of Pages: ( 2 ) Ms. Nancy Taylor Director of Finance/Treasurer THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6 Re: Development Charges By-Law Dear Nancy: First, we would like to thank you for holding the meeting for the development industry on May 27, 2005. It was very informative and helpful in understanding the process the municipality goes through in determining the amount the Development Charge needs to be. Second,we want to make it clear to you that we will not appeal your Development Charge By-law as proposed. We do, however, remain very concerned with the fact that future Wilmot Creek purchasers of new homes will be paying a Development Charge as if they had 3.25 persons in their home. Wilmot Creek has a demographic characteristic of 1.7 persons per home. It is not fair that they, in effect, will be asked to subsidize the balance of the new homeowners in the Municipality of Clarington. In the pursuit of fairness, we would suggest and appreciate if council or staff would "recommend that Wilmot Creek homes be treated as large apartments with a population of 2.2 persons per home. " 1 Wheelhouse Drive, Unit 1, Newcastle, Ontario L1B 1B9 Toronto Direct (416) 369-0000 Administration (905) 697-5805 Sales (905) 697-5806 Fax (905) 697-2501 www.anewbeginning.ca Ms. Nancy Taylor 2 June 2005 Page 2 Wilmot Creek economically plays a relatively significant and positive role in the Municipality of Clarington. We believe that the benefits from tax dollars paid, through to support of local businesses, churches and hospitals indicate that Wilmot Creek homeowners, and we as a company, are not looking to avoid doing our fair share for the Municipality of Clarington. Wilmot Creek has been in existence for 21 years and the issue of population or per capita per home is not a question any longer. It is not fair to burden these homes with the obligation to pay almost double that which they rightly owe. We sincerely ask you and council to reconsider this matter and to treat the development charge within Wilmot Creek as that of a"large apartment". If you wish to discuss this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us at 905-796-3630 or e-mail to dave @ricedevelopment.ca Yours truly, RIDGE PINE PARK INC. David W. Rice DWR:fc F:\W1LMOP.4u,Clhring un05 wpd cc: Mayor John Mutton Attachment"B" to Report END-007-05 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON PROPOSED BY-LAW NO.2005-108 To impose development charges against land in the Municipality of Clarington pursuant to the Development Charges Act, 1997(the"Act") WHEREAS subsection 2(1)of the Act provides that the Council of a municipality may by by-law impose development charges against land to pay for increased capital costs required because of increased needs for services arising from the development of the area to which the by-law applies; AND WHEREAS Council has before it a report entitled"Development Charges Background Study,The Municipality of Clarington,May 2005"(the"Study"); AND WHEREAS Council gave notice to the public of a public meeting and held a public meeting pursuant to section 12 of the Act on June 20,2005,prior to which the Study and a proposed development charges by-law were made available to the public,and Council heard comments and representations from all persons who applied to be heard(the"Public Meeting")and considered Report END-007-05 dated June 20,2005(the"Staff Report"); AND WHEREAS staff of the Municipality considered the public comments and representations made at the Public Meeting and provided Addendum to Report END-007-05 dated June 27,2005 to the meeting of the Council held on June 27,2005; AND WHEREAS at its meeting on June 27, 2005, by Resolution No. C-XXX Council approved the recommendations contained in Report END-007-05 as amended by Addendum to Report END-007-05; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: Definitions 1. (1) In this By-law the term: "accessory"where used to describe a building means that the building is naturally and normally incidental, subordinate in purpose or floor area or both, and is exclusively devoted to a principal use or building located on the same lot. "Act" means the Development Charges Act, 1997, S.O. 1997, c.27, as it may be amended from time to time; "agricultural"means a bona fide fanning operation, including farm buildings and buildings accessory thereto, sod farms,the breeding and/or the boarding of horses, greenhouses,and residential buildings which are used exclusively to provide living accommodation for employees of the operator of the land devoted to the practice of farming and which residential buildings are occupied for fewer than eight (8) consecutive months during each calendar year; "air-supported structure"means an air supported structure as defined in the Building Code Act; "apartment"means a dwelling unit contained in an apartment dwelling; "apartment dwelling" means a residential building, or the residential portion of a mixed-use building containing 4 or more dwelling units which have a common entrance from the street level,common halls,stairs,elevators and/or yards,and which is not a dwelling unit or dwelling units contained in a single-detached dwelling, a semi-detached dwelling,a townhouse(rowhouse)dwelling,or a multiple dwelling; "approval authority"means the Region's Commissioner of Planning,the Region's Land Division Committee or the Ontario Municipal Board having jurisdiction to approve a plan of subdivision under section 51 of the Planning Act,to grant a consent under section 53 of the Planning Act,or to approve a description under section 50 of the Condominium Act,whichever Act is applicable in the circumstances; "board of education"means a board as defined in Subsection 1(1)of the Education Act 1997,s.o.1997,c.27,as amended; "building"means a building or structure occupying an area greater than 10 square metres consisting of a wall, roof, and floor or any of them or a structural system serving the function thereof,and includes an air-supported structure and an exterior storage tank; "Building Code Act"means the Building Code Act, 1992,S.O. 1992,chapter 23,as amended and all Regulations thereto including the Ontario Building Code, 1997,as amended,and as they may be amended or replaced from time to time; "demolish"means to do anything in the removal of a building or a part thereof and the term"demolition"has a corresponding meaning; "development"includes redevelopment; "development charge"means a development charge imposed by this By-law; "dwelling unit"means one or more habitable rooms designed or intended to be used together as a single and separate housekeeping unit by one person or by more than one person,containing its own kitchen and sanitary facilities,with a private entrance from outside the unit itself; "existing industrial building"means a building used for or in connection with, (a) manufacturing,producing,processing,storing or distributing something, (b) research or development in connection with manufacturing, producing or processing something, (c) retail sales by a manufacturer, producer or processor of something they manufactured,produced or processed,if the retail sales are at the site where the manufacturing,production or processing takes place, (d) office or administrative purposes,if they are, (i) carried out with respect to manufacturing,producing,processing,storage or distributing of something,and (ii)in or attached to the building or structure used for that manufacturing, producing,processing,storage or distribution; "farm building"means a farm building as defined in the Building Code Act; "floor"includes a paved,concrete,wooden,gravel,or dirt floor; Page 2 • "grade" means the average level of the proposed finished surface of the ground immediately abutting each building or mixed-use building at all exterior walls of the building or mixed-used building in question; "gross floor area" means the total floor area, measured between the outside of exterior walls or between the outside of exterior walls and the centre line of party walls dividing the building from another building,of all floors above the average level of finished ground adjoining the building at its exterior walls. "industrial"means a)manufacturing,assembling,processing, fabricating,refining, b) research and development, storage of materials and products, truck terminals, warehousing,and buildings and structures or portions thereof which are designed, used or intended to be used for a purpose, but the term does not include (1) retail service sales or rental areas, storage or warehousing areas or uses used,designed or intended to be used in connection with retail sales,service or rental areas,and(2)office areas or uses whether or not they are accessory to any of the foregoing areas or uses,or to any other non-residential areas or uses; "land for parks",for the purposes of paragraph 3 of subsection 2(4)of the Act, (a) includes land for woodlots and land that is acquired because it is environmentally sensitive,and (b) does not include land for an enclosed structure used throughout the year for public recreation and land that is necessary for the structure to be used for that purpose,including parking and access to the structure; "land"includes buildings and structures; "large apartment"means an apartment containing 69.675 square metres of residential floor area or more; "local board"means a public utility commission,transportation commission,public library board,board of park management,local board of health,police services board, planning board,or any other board,commission,committee,body or local authority established or exercising any power or authority under any general or special Act with respect to any of the affairs or purposes of the Municipality or the Region; "lot"means a parcel of land within a registered plan of subdivision or any land that may be legally conveyed under the exemption provided in clauses 50(3)(b) or 50(5)(a)of the Planning Act; "mezzanine"means a mezzanine as defined in the Building Code Act; "mixed-use building"means a building used,designed,or intended to be used either for use for a combination of non-residential and residential areas and uses,or for a combination of different classes or types of non-residential areas and uses; "mobile home" means a dwelling unit which is designed and constructed to be transported on its own chassis and is placed on a foundation; "multiple dwelling" means a residential building or the residential portion of a mixed-use building which contains one or more dwelling units; "Municipality"means The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington; Page 3 "non-residential" means buildings or portions of mixed-use buildings containing floors or portions of floors contained therein which are used,designed or intended to be used for a purpose which is not a residential purpose; "owner" means the owner of land or a person who has made application for an approval for the development of land against which a development charge is imposed; "protracted"means in relation to a temporary building or structure the persistence of its construction,erection,placement on land,or an alteration to or an addition to a building for a continuous period exceeding twelve months from the date on which the construction, erection or placement of the temporary building or structure was completed; "Region"means The Regional Municipality of Durham; "residential" means buildings or portions of mixed-use buildings and floors or portions of floors contained therein which are used,designed,or intended to be used as living accommodation for one or more individuals provided in a dwelling unit(s); "residential floor area"means the floor area of an apartment measured either between the exterior faces of the exterior walls of the apartment,or between the exterior faces of one or more of the exterior walls of the apartment and one or more of the centre line(s)of the wall(s)separating the apartment in question from an abutting apartment and the exterior face(s)of the wall(s)separating the apartment in question from an adjacent corridor,elevator,lobby,or stair,whether or not any such walls contain one or more entrances to the apartment,provided that where the apartment dwelling in which the apartment is located is attached to another building by a party or common wall the centre line of such wall shall be deemed to bean exterior face of an exterior wall of the apartment dwelling in question; "semi-detached dwelling"means a residential building divided vertically so as to contain only two separate dwelling units each of which has an independent entrance directly from outside of the building,is located on separate lots,at least 50 per cent of the above-grade area of a main wall on one side of each dwelling unit is attached to or is the same as a main wall on one side of the other dwelling unit,building is not attached to any other building or structure except its own garage or shed and the building has open space on all sides of it; "service"means a service designated as such by subsection 6(2)of this By-law; "single-detached dwelling"means a residential building containing only one dwelling unit which is not attached to any other building or structure except its own garage or shed,has open space on all sides,and has no dwelling units either above it or below it,and the term "single-detached dwelling"includes a mobile home; "small apartment"means an apartment containing less than 69.675 square metres of residential floor area; "temporary building"means a building constructed or erected or placed on land for a continuous period not exceeding twelve months, or an addition or alteration to a building or structure that has the effect of increasing the total floor area thereof for a continuous period not exceeding twelve months; "total floor area",in the case of buildings other than mixed-use buildings,means the sum total of the total areas of the non-residential floors contained in the building that are not exempt from development charges imposed by this By-law, whether at, above,or below grade,measured between the exterior faces of the exterior walls of the building. In the case of mixed-use buildings that contain a combination of Page 4 residential, and/or non-residential areas or uses that are not exempt from development charges imposed by this By-law,"total floor area"means the sum total of each of the total areas of the non-residential floors, or the sum total of the non-residential portions of the floors contained in the mixed-use building that are not exempt from development charges imposed by this By-law,whether at, above or below grade,and(1)where the total area of the floor is comprised of non-residential areas or uses that are not exempt from development charges,total floor area shall be measured between the exterior faces of the exterior walls of the mixed-use building, and(2)where one or more portions of a floor of the mixed-use building comprise non-residential areas or uses that are not exempt from development charges and another portion(s)of the same floor that either is a residential area or use,or is a non-residential area or use which is not exempt from development charges imposed by this By-law,total floor area shall be measured either between the exterior face(s) of the exterior wall(s)and/or between the centre lines of interior walls which separate the non-residential area(s)and use(s)from one or more residential area(s)and use(s) or non-residential areas or uses that are so exempt on the same floor. In the case of mixed-use buildings that contain(a)a combination of residential areas or uses,and non-residential areas or uses some only of which are exempt from development charges imposed by this By-law,or(b)only a combination of classes or types of non- - residential areas or uses,some only of which are exempt from development charges imposed by this By-law,"total floor area"means the sum total of each of the total areas of the portions of the non-residential floors that are not exempt from development charges imposed by this By-law,contained in the mixed-use building whether at,above or below grade, and(1)where the total area of the floor is non- residential which is not exempt from development charges imposed by this By-law, total floor area shall be measured between the exterior faces of the exterior walls of the mixed-use building,and(2)where the total area of one or more portion(s)of a floor(s)of the mixed-use building is a non-residential area(s)or uses(s)which is not exempt from development charges imposed by this By-law and the same floor also contains another portion(s)of a floor(s)which is exempt from development charges imposed by this By-law, total floor area shall be measured between the exterior face(s)of the exterior wall(s)and/or the centre line(s)of interior walls which separate the non-residential area(s)and use(s)on the floor that are exempt from development charges from those on the same floor that are not exempt from development charges imposed by this By-law. In all cases in which the building or mixed-use building is attached to another building or mixed-use building,the centre line of the party or common wall shall be deemed to be an exterior wall of each building or mixed-use building as the case may be. Where a building does not have any walls,"total floor area"means the sum total of the area of land below the roof of the building and the total areas of the floors in the building. Except as otherwise provided in this definition,in all cases,"total floor area" (a) includes the floor area of a mezzanine, an air-supported structure, interior corridors, lobbies and common areas,and the space occupied by interior wall partitions,and (b) excludes any areas of the building or mixed-use building used for elevators, enclosed garbage storage areas,loading facilities,mechanical equipment related to the operation or the maintenance of the building or mixed-use building, parking of motor vehicles and stairwells, and any separately enclosed garbage storage area, "townhouse(row house)dwelling"means a group of three or more attached dwelling units which are attached side by side and do not have any other dwelling unit either above or below any of them; "Zoning By-law"means the Municipality's By-law No.84-63 and By-law No.2005- 109,as amended,as may be further amended or replaced from time to time. Page 5 (2) In this By-law,unless the context otherwise requires,the singular includes the plural and the plural includes the singular. Rules 2. (1) The rules developed under paragraph 9 of subsection 50)of the Act for determining if a development charge is payable in any particular case and for determining the amount of the development charges that are payable are set forth in sections 8 to 16, inclusive,and section 22 of this By-law. (2) The exemptions provided for are the exemptions set forth in sections 18 to 21, inclusive of this By-law;the indexing of charges shall be in accordance with section 15 of this By-law; (3) The rules for determining if a development charge credit is available shall be in accordance with the rules set forth in section 22 of this By-law; (4) The rules for determining refunds shall be in accordance with the rules set forth in Section 23 of this By-law. Lands Affected by By-law 3. This By-law applies to all lands within the geographic area of the Municipality. Designated Services 4. It is hereby declared by Council that the development of land for residential buildings, non-residential buildings and mixed-use buildings in the Municipality will increase the need for services. 5. The development charges imposed by section 7 of this By-law shall apply without regard to the services which in fact are required or are used by or in respect of a particular development of land. 6. (1) Except where otherwise provided,development charges are imposed against land by this By-law to pay for increased capital costs required because of increased needs for services arising from the development of land within the Municipality. (2) The following are designated services for the purpose of this By-law: (a) General Government; (b) Library Services; (c) Emergency Services; (d) Indoor Recreation; (e) Park Development and Related Facilities; (f) Operations(Buildings,Equipment and Fleet); (g) Parking; (h) Transit; (i) Roads and Related;and (j) Storm Water Drainage and Control Services. Page 6 (3) The allocations of the residential development charges and the non-residential development charges imposed by this By-law,to the designated services referred to in subsection 6(2)are set out in Schedules"3"and"4",respectively,hereto. Imposition of Development Charges 7. Except as otherwise provided in this By-law,development charges are imposed against land if the development of the land requires any one or more of the following actions or decisions: (1) the passing of a zoning by-law or of an amendment thereto under section 34 of the Planning Act; (2) the approval of a minor variance under section 45 of the Planning Act; (3) a conveyance of land to which a by-law passed under subsection 50(7) of the Planning Act applies; (4) the approval of a plan of subdivision under section 51 of the Planning Act; (5) a consent under section 53 of the Planning Act; (6) the approval of a description under section 50 of the Condominium Act;or (7) the issuing of a permit under the Building Code Act, 1992 in relation to a building. 8. Not more than one development charge for each of the services set out in subsection 6(2)is imposed by this By-law upon the development of land whether or not two or more of the actions or decisions referred to in section 7 are required before the land in question can be developed. 9. Notwithstanding section 8 of this By-law,if two or more of the actions or decisions referred to in section 7 occur at different times,additional development charges shall be imposed in respect of any increase in or additional development permitted by that action or decision or by those actions or decisions. 10. Where the development of land requires an action or decision referred to in section 7 of this By-law to be taken or made after the issuance of a building permit and no development charges have been paid,then development charges shall be paid prior to the action or the decision referred to in section 7 being taken or being made. 11. If the development of land is such that it does not require that a building permit be issued before the development is commenced,but the development does require one or more of the other actions or decisions referred to in section 7 be taken or made before the development is commenced,development charges shall be payable in respect of any increase in or additional development permitted by such action or decision prior to the action or decision required for the increased or additional development in question being taken or being made. 12. (1) Nothing in this By-law shall prevent the Municipality or an approval authority from requiring,as a condition of an agreement under sections 51 or 53 of the Planning Act, that the owner of land,at his or her own expense,install such local services related to a plan of subdivision or within the area to which the plan relates, as the approval authority may require,or that the owner pay for local connections to storm drainage facilities installed at the owner's expense,or administrative,processing,or inspection fees. (2) Without derogating from subsection 12(1),nothing in this By-law shall prevent the Municipality or an approval authority from requiring as a condition of any approval given under the Planning Act that the owner,at the owner's expense, shall install such services as may be determined by the Municipality or the approval authority in accordance with the applicable law. Page 7 Basis of Calculation of Development Charges 13. Subject to section 16 the development charges imposed by this By-law shall be calculated as follows: (1) in the cases of residential buildings, and the residential portions of mixed-use buildings,on the basis of the number and type of dwelling units contained in them; (2) in the cases of non-residential buildings and the non-residential portion of mixed-use buildings,on the basis of the total floor area contained in the non-residential building or in the non-residential portion of the mixed-use building proposed to be developed for non-residential purposes, excluding industrial purposes, or proposed to be developed for industrial purposes,as the case may be. Amount of Development Charges 14. (1) The amount of the development charges payable in respect of the development of apartment dwellings,multiple dwellings,single-detached dwellings,semi-detached dwellings,and townhouse(rowhouse)dwellings,and in respect of the development of the residential areas of mixed-use buildings shall be as set out and shall be determined in accordance with subsection 16(1)of this By-law and Schedule"1" hereto. (2) The amount of the development charges payable in respect of development of non-residential buildings,and in respect of the development of the non-residential components of mixed-use buildings,shall be as set out and shall be determined in accordance with subsection 16(2)of this By-law and Schedule"2"hereto. Indexing of Development Charges 15. The development charges set out in Schedules"1"and"2"hereto shall be adjusted without amendment to this By-law annually on January 1st in each year,commencing on January 1st, 2006, in accordance with the Statistics Canada Quarterly, Construction Price Statistics (catalogue number 62-007)based on the 12 month period most recently available. Timing of Calculation and Payment 16. (1) The residential development charges set out in Schedule"1"hereto are payable in full from the date of passage of this by-law. (2) The non-residential development charges set out in Schedule"2"are payable in full from the date of passage of this by-law. (3) Subject to subsections 16(1)and 16(2),and except as provided in section 22 of this By-law,development charges shall be calculated as of,and shall be payable on the date the first building permit is issued for the development of the land against which the development charges imposed by this By-law apply. Payment by Money 17. Payment of development charges shall be by cash or by certified cheque. Rules with Respect to Exemptions for Existing Residential 18. This By-law does not apply to impose development charges if the only effect of any action or decision referred to in section 7 is: (1) an interior alteration to an existing residential building or structure which does not change or intensify the use of the land; Page 8 (2) the enlargement of an existing residential dwelling unit; (3) the creation of one or two additional residential dwelling units in an existing single detached dwelling where the total gross floor area of the additional unit(s)does not exceed the gross floor area of the existing dwelling unit; (4) the creation of one additional dwelling unit in a semi-detached dwelling or row dwelling where the total gross floor area of the additional unit does not exceed the gross floor area of the existing dwelling unit;or (5) the creation of one additional dwelling unit in any other existing residential building provided the gross floor area of the additional unit does not exceed the smallest existing dwelling unit already in the building. Rule With Respect to the Exemption of Agricultural Development 19. Agricultural development of land is exempt from development charges imposed by this By-law. Rules With Respect to the Exemption of Certain Public and Other Buildings 20. Buildings within any of the following categories of areas or uses are hereby exempted from development charges imposed by this By-law: (1) buildings used, designed or intended for use as hospitals governed by the Public Hospitals Act,R.S.O. 1990,c.P.40,as amended or replaced from time to time; (2) buildings owned by and used,designed or intended for use for the purposes of the Municipality,the Region,or their local boards; (3) buildings used,designed or intended for use as a place of worship; (4) buildings owned by a board of education and used,designed or intended for use for school purposes including the administration or the servicing of schools; (5) buildings owned by and used, designed or intended for use for the purposes of a college of applied arts and technology established pursuant to the Ministry of Colleges and Universities Act,R.S.O. 1990,c.M.19,as amended or replaced from time to time; (6) buildings owned by and used,designed and intended for use for the purposes of a university established by an Act of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario; (7) buildings or parts thereof located either in the Clarington Science Park or the Clarington Energy Park as shown on the plans contained in Schedule`6'hereto,that are used, designed or intended to be used for the purpose of research facilities, laboratories,offices,amenity areas and service areas for staff who conduct research, with evidence provided to the satisfaction of the Director of Finance/Treasurer; (8) buildings owned by a corporation or organization registered as a charity for the purposes of the Income Tax Act R.S.C. 1985,Chapter 1 (5th Supp.)as it may be amended or replaced from time to time,and used,designed,or intended for use for any residential or for any non-residential purpose of the not-for-profit corporation or organization in question; (9) the gross floor area of the conversion where, as a result of development of land located in a `revitalization area' as shown on the map contained in Schedule `5' hereto,a building is converted in whole or in part to a different use;and Page 9 (10) professional offices and ancillary facilities designed to be occupied primarily by medical practitioners licensed by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. Rules with Respect to the Exemption of Temporary Buildings 21. (1) Temporary buildings are exempt from the development charges imposed by this By-law. (2) In the event that a temporary building becomes protracted,it shall be deemed not to be,or ever to have been a temporary building,and the development charges required to be paid by this By-law shall become payable on the date on which the temporary building becomes protracted. (3) Prior to an action or decision referred to in section 7 of this By-law being taken or being made in respect of the development of a temporary building,the Municipality, pursuant to section 27 of the Act,may require an owner to enter into an agreement which may include the provision of security for the owner's obligation under the agreement and which agreement shall provide for all or part of the development charges to be paid after the date on which they would otherwise be payable under subsections 16(1)or 16(2)of this By-law,whichever is applicable. The terms of such agreement shall prevail over the provisions of subsections 16(1), 16(2)and 16(3)of this By-law. Rules with Respect to Credits 22. (1) Where,as a result of the redevelopment of land,a building or existing structure is to be converted to another use,in whole or in part,or converted from one principal use to another principal use on the same land or such building or structure is destroyed in whole or in part by fire,explosion or Act of God and is demolished and reconstructed for the same purpose for which it was put before it was destroyed,the development charges otherwise payable with respect to such redevelopment or reconstruction shall be reduced by the following amounts: (a) in the case of a residential building or the residential portion of a mixed-use building or structure, an amount calculated by multiplying the applicable development charges under the Schedule 1 of this By-law by the number, according to type of dwelling units that have been demolished or convened to another principal use or demolished and reconstructed as the case may be; and (b) in the case of a non-residential building or the non-residential portion of a mixed-use building or structure, an amount calculated by multiplying the applicable development charges under Schedule 2 of this By-law by the non-residential gross floor area that has been demolished or converted to another principal use or demolished and reconstructed as the case may be. (2) A credit in respect of an event referred to in subsection 220) shall not be given unless within five years from the date on which the event occurred,a building permit has been issued. (3) The amount of any credit under subsection 220)shall not exceed in total the amount of the development charges otherwise payable with respect to the redevelopment of the land or reconstruction of the building or structure as the case may be. (4) Notwithstanding subsection 22(1)no credit will be provided when: (a) the demolished building or structure or part thereof would have been exempt under this by-law; Page 10 (b) where the building or structure or part thereof would have been exempt under this By-law prior to the conversion,redevelopment or reconstruction as the case may be; (c) where a development or redevelopment which is exempt in whole or in part or eligible for any other relief under this By-law. (5) Where a development charge is payable for a development or re-development of lands,with the exception of development or redevelopment of lands for the purpose of a gasoline service station,which requires the clean up of lands under the Ontario Ministry of the Environment's`Guideline for Use at Contaminated Sites in Ontario" as amended or replaced from time to time, an amount will be credited against the development charge otherwise payable equal to the amount of the actual costs of assessment and clean up of the property, approved by the Municipality, but the credited amount shall not exceed the total development charge payable hereunder. Rules Respecting Refunds 23. (1) An amount equal to the development charge that has been paid by the owner of a building that has been relocated to another property and designated with that property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under the Ontario Heritage Act shall be paid to the owner after application is made to the Director of Finance/Treasurer for a refund and upon presentation of proof to the satisfaction of the Director that the building has been so designated. (2) An amount equal to the applicable development charge paid at the time the building permit was issued for a dwelling unit provided that the existing dwelling unit is demolished within 6 months or such longer period as may be permitted by Council following the date of issuance of the building permit for the new dwelling unit. (3) An amount equal to the applicable development charge paid at the time the building permit was issued if the building permit was cancelled prior to the commencement of the construction of the building or structure in question. (4) An amount equal to fifty percent of the applicable development charge paid at the time the building permit was issued for industrial development in the Municipality which is certified and registered with the Green Building Council of Canada as meeting the LEED Canada-NC 1.0 Rating System(or its successor). Interest 24. The Municipality shall pay interest on a refund under subsections 18(2), 18(3)and 25(2)of the Act at a rate equal to the Bank of Canada rate on the date this By-law comes into force updated on the first business day of every January,April,July and October until the date of the repeal or the expiry of this By-law. Front-Ending Agreements 25. The Municipality may enter into front-ending agreements under section 44 of the Act. Schedule 26. Schedule 1 — Residential Development Charges and Schedule 2 - Non-Residential Development Charges are attached to and form part of this By-law. Date By-law Effective 27. This By-law comes into force and is effective on July 1,2005. Page 11 Date By-law Expires 28. This By-law expires five years after the day on which it comes into force. Repeal of By-law No.2000-108 29. By-law No.2000-108,is repealed effective July 1,2005. Headings for Reference Only 30. The headings inserted in this By-law are for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of this By-law. Severability 31. If, for any reason, any provision, section, subsection or paragraph of this By-law is held invalid,it is hereby declared to be the intention of Council that all the remainder of this By-law shall continue in full force and effect until repealed,reenacted or amended,in whole or in part or dealt with in any other way. THIS BY-LAW READ A FIRST,SECOND,AND THIRD TIME,AND PASSED IN OPEN COUNCIL THIS 27th DAY OF JUNE,2005. John Mutton,Mayor Patti L.Barrie,Clerk Page 12 SCHEDULE"1" RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CHARGES SCHEDULE"1"TO BY-LAW NO.2005-108 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CHARGES PER UNIT Single and Semi-Detached $8,377 Townhouse, Multiple& Row $7,346 Units Apartments Large $5,671 Small $3,609 Page 13 SCHEDULE"2" NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CHARGES SCHEDULE"1"TO BY-LAW NO.2005-108 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CHARGES PER SQUARE METRE OF GROSS FLOOR AREA Non-Residential $34.94 (excluding Industrial) Industrial $19.24 Page 14 SCHEDULE"3" THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO.2005-108 ALLOCATION OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CHARGES %Allocation General Government 3.61% Library Services 5.40% Fire Protection Services 5.04% Indoor Recreation 30.15% Park Development and Related Facilities 11.79% Operations(Buildings, Equipment&Fleet) 5.97% Parking 0.31% Transit 0.23% Roads&Related 37.50% Total Development Charge 100% Page 15 • SCHEDULE"4" THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NO.2005-108 ALLOCATION OF NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CHARGES %Allocation Non-Residential (excluding Industrial Industrial) General Government 3.52% 6.39% Library Services N/A N/A Fire Protection Services 4.95% 8.99% Indoor Recreation N/A N/A Park Development and Related Facilities N/A N/A Operations(Buildings,Equipment&Fleet) 5.87% 10.66% Parking 0.31% 0.57% Transit 0.23% 0.42% Roads&Related 85.12% 72.97% Total Development Charge 100% 100% H;1 ar_adman 0004developmentehargesreviewlrlaring ton 2005 de bylaw draft)).doe Page 16 Schedule "5A" to Development Charges By-law 2005-108 �w■ a iii■' ■ MA GE OGW • GEORGE ST E GEORGE ST E nil ~ llllllllll'_ J WILMOT STREET ■ II j= _ __ .� j/ %ice iii:!:%: Iii � /�%%i%��%%j „„ " iii////%///�//�///G�.�.: ""11"'�� %'%%% '%ice'iii i MEW ■ lilt iii; IME __ MIS% = = EMILY ST W w EMILY ST E = iti MI� ■ III,* ���: ; ■ ilir _dik _dik g i ii.0111 O . CAROLINE ST W CAROLINE ST E -MI Ell% O .• elms m ■ — — ___ ' CRESCENT _ B �-....1 �/11111� __■U 111 Illlllllll_ s �� WARD STREET W FOSTER CREEK CT EDWARD W EDWARD S � 111 II- els III, 111111111 ■■- , J llllllllllllllll' NM Win N II, JAMES S JAMES ST E MI III i 1711K E 1111101 ap • _ sal iiiiiiiuuta ■_■ . W ROBERT ST W 1■1■■1111k _ _. ROBERInTST E Revitalization Area Newcastle Village Schedule "5B" to Development Charges By-law 2005-108 11 *104 ' fLIh ,______ I 4 ,8 CENTREVIEW STREET —%--%�- oo&& %i ra �� . .— PARK STREET _..,:s.1111_ r% � .u j - i iii - s : -� r = U T / -1, \INCE T W 111. 4b.. -<--._ BOWEN STREET ,)F4> I I I 11111 Revitalization Area - Orono Schedule "5C" to Development Charges By-law 2005-108 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ----117„, ,i, .>• - pp ci sip, ,, 41,..... iii ' "111111101 —u • ■ iimm 116 CONCESSION STR ■ I� -- �� I, ill. ■. ■11P1I11 a a.._-"eioirre-7. °1---/#.1:--1 a,::1-"---e , 7, 44_a pm obw Ara i/�- �/ % 11m TREET i' ii 1�1llll1lllll Or 1st° / -/ �/i 14000.5 I VA�� / i�� �Ittt ��tam ; /'I— ,,��a ■ a-- --a !!yyam�.. //!i// i�/j/�//Vii/ a 6. mime, a_�//11111111 • /% >./ ----;-:4- �/,;; , //i;, i • 111 • �� ,. ' y; !�/5�/ ! ';4&i-=-,�i = LAWRENCE CRCS /ii//// 1111 MINN `,� ���'�:/ "' i a°. al rt. 5. 11 I. IIII.1 w ' Sil,.Wt.. Az 0 .** , in • ..,._, • .. . #... . ,_ • _ : ,„.. .6. As Al"r G� . Revitalization Area - Bowmanville Schedule "6A" to Development Charges By-law 2005-108 Ir HNWAn" er �/r NKi11WAY„„ !„aece, N W � S Ciarington Energy Business Park Schedule "6B" to Development Charges By-law 2005-108 4141! - s - „ p rr>a I r///// arelat rs> -5r • U ra,rao 4 H/GHWAY40/ w N � � E Clarington Science and Technology Park Qaringion Leading the Way REPORT FINANCE DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: MONDAY, JUNE 20, 2005 Resolution #: Report#: FND-008-05 File #: By-law #: Subject: ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT CHARGES RESERVE FUNDS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended the General Purpose and Administrative Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report FND-008-05 be received for information; and 2. THAT a copy of this report be sent to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing. Submitted by: A 1 a Reviewed byeiRaL ---( --'t Nancy M. T.ylor, B.:.A., C.A. Franklin Wu Director of Finance Chief Administrative Officer NMT/hjl REPORT NO.: FND-008-05 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND 1.0 In accordance with Bill 98, an Act to promote job creation and increased municipal accountability while providing for the recovery of development costs related to new growth, Schedule "A" attached shows the activity in the Development Charges Reserve Funds for the year ended December 31, 2004. 2.0 For the year ended December 31, 2004, a total of 1015 residential building permits were issued. Approximately 826 units were anticipated for 2004 in the development charge study review and update. Also, a total of 20 capital projects have been financed by the Development Charges Reserve funds. Attachments: Schedule "A" - Development Charges Study Review and Update Schedule "B" — Committed Amounts from Prior Years' Budgets/Council Approvals Schedule "C" — Capital Expenditures Interested Parties: Municipal Finance Branch Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing 777 Bay Street, 13th floor Toronto, Ontario M5G 2E5 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-4169 0 Q W 1� T O m O N N N N W 0 J N co r ' ' ' 0 N ° ' 0 0 (0 0 J i Q 0' M N N Y)O N (D iD 6 7 H co N O O co 0 r N r 0 ° co co r 0 V V 0) W (0 N W 0 0 N n M r V ("1 N U �. co N H 0 C " ' . CL a) QW W W y 0 J O 1 g 0 QQm 0Qz N U Z O N N cr') ' ' (0 ei (0 6 on en ' < 0 00_ Q W t[i H Ni r r u) r Ln co I- on O m N r 0) N (O 0 ° 'co cc;Oct re m CO o m K CO RI on a Z to en m (OD ' 0 on cn . ' M °w (01 (°O W N M coj N N (O V Go- v I- co V ter" O, N N O 0K r. 74a mW a ° 0 m N on on ra-I W N r 0) ' ' 00) 0 CO N co > F IO n N Y) r (0 W J o W r 0 co W a r 0 ° v N 0 m K Q Q LL a ° z 8 m m O ID O N �j N 0 0 c6 f r N LC) CO CO Y) u') 2 W W , n r r r O < F- LI 0 Q H N F- m N M N in Y) N V EL 00 N O CO Z )O CO N (`N') ' ' M r CO , V r t0 ° W 0 K (r+). am (° v a;om n 0 (O M LL LL Q Ol of > 0. _. z w Z W ° °W 0 N CD 0 8 r r' Y ° O v N N N O O Z 0 Q OC OJ r 00 D) W (D E W K ¢ m 0) r r m ° o 0 U QQ J m N N LL0W _p c O f Y F m N M 00 r r O C L ry y r W O ¢Q Z co O N ' m N r N .0 Qa N K2 ° � ° r m (�i K E a W Wz c �, 8' O = K > m f O0 LL 00 r 0_ 0 n o I c K N • N S C Cl) co O M c 0 >- 0 To 0 0 L.0 O 0 C LL -0 O z O N O 0 N N 0 E 'O G '-. N LL L U) N O] o 6 M O J C ly C yU E _ E'L LL 7 O 7 O O 3 t0 N CU . a O o LL j O LL r`- LL L L o U U P N 6 i t C N j W U CO y n aa)) m w L N 0 m a w i 0 a w d E N E e K 0 U CC U w m E m > c n c n 0 o c o E E O EO c cc m ¢ 'm y °m o 0 o N m °) c ,G t Q «° ¢ CO °y Q 5 - i E Ni DN:DCRF 2004 Prepared By: RB/June 10, 2005 SCHEDULE B Revised: RB/June 13, 2005 to Report FND-008-05 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON DEVELOPMENT CHARGES RESERVE FUND STATEMENT FOR THE 2004 YEAR COMMITTED AMOUNTS FROM PRIOR YEARS'BUDGETS/COUNCIL APPROVALS YEAR PROJECT I DESCRIPTION AMOUNT COMMITTED RESERVE FUND: GENERAL GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 2004 Council Planning Study-industrial lands 62,406 2004 Council Planning Study-growth study 14,780 2004 Council Development charges study 56,585 Total 133,771 RESERVE FUND: FIRE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 2003 Capital Courtice Fire Station 174,334 Total 174,334 RESERVE FUND: PARK DEVELOPMENT&FACILITY DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 2003 Capital Budget Bowmanville Waterfront Redevelopment Feasibility Study 72,397 2003 Capital Budget South Courtice Community Park-Soccer Field 1 77,542 2004 Capital Parkland Development Implementation Plan 39,075 2004 Capital Park Development-Pearce Farm Park 527,474 Total 716,488 RESERVE FUND: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 2004 Capital Transfer station dome rehabilitation 72,990 2004 Capital New equipment 176,270 Total 249,260 RESERVE FUND: ROADS AND RELATED DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 2002 to 2004 Capital Road reconstruction 1,016,197 2003 Capital Traffic signals 176,815 2003 Capital Sidewalks 59,168 2004 Capital Street lights 77,337 2004 Council Traffic monitoring study 3,007 2004 Capital Courtice transportation study 44,175 2004 Capital Environmental study-south of Hwy 2 25,110 Total 1,401,809 TOTAL COMMITTED TO DEVELOPMENT CHARGES RESERVE FUNDS 2,675,662 DN:DCRF 2004 Prepared By: RB/June 10,2005 Revised: RB/June 13,2005 SCHEDULE C MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON to Report FND-008-OS DEVELOPMENT CHARGES RESERVE FUND STATEMENT P FOR THE 2004 YEAR D/C R/F NON D/C R/F CAPITAL EXPENDITURES AMOUNT FINANCING FINANCING DESCRIPTION FIRE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT CHARGE Courtice Fire Station 1,200,655 167,325 D/C-Fire Dept 691,634 Municipal Capital Works R/F 334,096 Impact/Escrow R/F 7,600 Region contribution PARK DEVELOPMENT&FACILITY DEVELOPMENT CHARGE Parkland Development Implementation Plan 5,605 5,100 D/C-Park Dev.&Facilities R/F 504 Tax Levy Park Development-Pearce Farm Park 22,048 19,096 D/C-Park Dev.&Facilities R/F 2,952 Developer contribution South Courtice Community Park-Soccer Field 1 29,487 25,539 D/C-Park Dev.&Facilities R/F 3,948 Tax Levy Bowmanville Valley Trail 99,395 2,029 D/C-Park Dev.&Facilities R/F 97,366 Public Works&Parks Capital R/F Bowmanville Waterfront Redevelopment 15,829 14,404 D/C-Park Dev.&Facilities R/F 1,425 Tax Levy Guildwood Park 22,890 19,825 D/C-Park Dev.&Facilities R/F 3,065 Public Works&Parks Capital R/F PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT CHARGE Purchase New Equipment Hampton 160,054 120,329 0/C-Public Works Department R/F 39,712 Tax Levy 13 Municipal Capital Works R/F Page 1 of 2 DN.DCRF 2004 Prepared By: RB/June 10,2005 Revised: RB/June 13,2005 SCHEDULE C MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON DEVELOPMENT CHARGES RESERVE FUND STATEMENT FOR THE 2004 YEAR D/C R/F NON D/C R/F CAPITAL EXPENDITURES AMOUNT FINANCING FINANCING DESCRIPTION ROADS AND RELATED DEVELOPMENT CHARGE Prestonvale Road,Courtice-Street Lighting 36,177 26,307 D/C-Roads and Related R/F 9,869 Tax Levy Longworth Avenue,Courtice-Street Lighting 5,566 4,703 D/C-Roads and Related R/F 863 Tax Levy Longworth Avenue,Bowmanville-Bridge 3,402,935 2,592,222 D/C-Roads and Related R/F 374,216 Municipal Capital Works 101,281 Roads Contribution R/F 335,216 Developer contribution Roenigk Drive,Bowmanville-Traffic Signals 206,330 187,761 D/C-Roads and Related R/F 18,570 Tax Levy Mearns Avenue,Bowmanville-Surface Asphalt 7,665 6,348 D/C-Roads and Related R/F 1,317 Tax Levy Concession/Elgin Streets,Bowmanville-Surface Asphalt 8,158 2,598 D/C-Roads and Related R/F 5,560 Tax Levy Hunt Street,Bowmanville-Reconstruction 67,642 23,675 D/C-Roads and Related R/F 43,967 Tax Levy Prestonvale Road,Courtice-Reconstruction(2004) 118,333 92,809 D/C-Roads and Related R/F 25,524 Tax Levy Prestonvale Road,Courtice-Reconstruction(2002) 25,174 19,744 DIC-Roads and Related R/F 3,356 Working Funds Reserve 2,074 General Capital Reserve Foxhunt Walkway,Courtice 5,200 4,732 DIC-Roads and Related R/F 468 Tax Levy Enniskillen Sidewalk construction 244,169 150,195 D/C-Roads and Related R/F 93,974 Tax Levy Green Road Railway,Bowmanville 508 462 D/C-Roads and Related R/F 46 Developer contribution TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 5,683,818 3,485,204 2,198,615 SUMMARY OF FINANCING: 167,325 D/C-Fire Dept 85,993 D/C-Park Dev.&Facilities R/F 120,329 D/C-Public Works Department R/F 3,111,556 D/C-Roads and Related R/F 1,065,863 Municipal Capital Works R/F 334,096 Impact/Escrow R/F 100,431 Public Works&Parks Capital R/F 101,281 Roads Contribution R/F 245,701 Tax Levy 3,356 Working Funds Reserve 2,074 General Capital Reserve 7,600 Region contribution 338,214 Developer contribution TOTALFINANCING 3,485,204 2,198,615 Page 2 of 2 Carib� UNFINISHED BUSINESS Leading the Way REPORT CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: May 24, 2005 tra:# � ��Report #: COD-028-05 File # Subject: CL2005-18 Newcastle Memorial Arena Canteen Renovations Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report COD-028-05 be received; 2. THAT Kraco Carpentry Services, Bowmanville, Ontario with a total bid in the amount of $54,000.00 (Plus G.S.T.), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions, and specifications of Tender CL2005-18, be awarded the contract for the Newcastle Memorial Arena Canteen Renovations as required by the Community Services Department; 3. THAT the funds required in the amount of $40,100.00 be drawn from Newcastle Arena Expansion Account #110-42-421-84200-7401 and financed from the Impact/Escrow reserve fund approved by Council in Report CDS-05-01; and 4. That the remaining amount of $17,783.00 (including GST) pertaining to the additional transformer and related costs be drawn from Operations department's 2004 Capital — Newcastle Arena Account #110-36-370-83652-7401; and 5. THAT the attached By-law marked Schedule "A" authorizing the Mayor and the Clerk to execute the nece ry agreement be approved FORTHWITH. �,�/� Submitted by: �i� G�✓0 Reviewed by: a "_�"`''�"r-6„. ne Marano, H.B.Sc., C.M.O. Franklin Wu, Director of Corporate Services Chief Administrative Officer /L. At: ' as Taylor, B.B.A., C.A., Directo of Finance f At , J.0t Caruana, Fred ath i 'ctor of Community Services Director o'l Operations MM/LAB/sm REPORT NO.: COD-028-05 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND AND COMMENT Tender specifications were provided by Totten Sims Hubicki Associates for the Newcastle Memorial Arena Canteen Renovations, as required by the Community Services Department. Tenders were advertised in local papers, as well as electronically. Subsequently, tenders were received and tabulated as per Schedule "B" attached. In November 2001, Council approved in report CSD-05-01 (Schedule "C"), a $300,000 interest free loan to the Newcastle Arena Board for the expansion project with the financing from the Impact/Escrow reserve fund. In the 2004 Capital budget under the Operations department, $25,000 was allocated for an additional transformer to handle the increase in energy load at the Newcastle Arena and approximately $23,000 is available for this project. The total project cost will be provided as follows: - the amount of $40,100.00 to be drawn from Newcastle Arena Expansion Account #110-42-421-84200-7401 and financed from the Impact/Escrow reserve fund approved by Council in Report CDS-05-01; and - That the remaining amount of $17,783.00 (including GST) pertaining to the additional transformer and related costs be drawn from Operations department's 2004 Capital — Newcastle Arena Account#110-36-370-83652-7401. The low bidder has previously performed satisfactory work for the Municipality of Clarington. The Director of Finance has reviewed the funding requirements and concurs with the recommendation. Queries with respect to department needs, specifications, etc., should be referred to the Director of Community Services. After further review and analysis of the bids by the Community Services Department, Totten Sims Hubicki Associates and Purchasing, it was mutually agreed that the low bidder, Kraco Carpentry Services, Bowmanville, Ontario, be recommended for the contract for the Newcastle Arena Canteen Renovations. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-4169 SCHEDULE "A" THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW 2005- Being a By-law to authorize a contract between the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and Kraco Carpentry Services, Bowmanville, Ontario, to enter into agreement for the Newcastle Memorial Arena Canteen Renovations. THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and seal with the Corporation Seal, a contract between, Kraco Carpentry Services, Bowmanville, Ontario, and said Corporation;and 2. THAT the contract attached hereto as Schedule"A"form part of this By-law. By-law mad a first and second time this day of , 2005. By-law read a third time and finally passed this day of ,2005. John Mutton, Mayor C.Anne Greentree, Deputy Clerk Clam n Leading the Way Y Municipality of Clarington SCHEDULE "B" BID SUMMARY Tender CL2005-18, Newcastle Memorial Arena Canteen Renovations . auc PI it Kraco Carpentry Services Ltd. $54,000.00 Bowmanville, ON Taxis Contracting Ltd. $54,160.55 Newcastle, ON A-Con Construction Ltd. $62,500.00 Woodbridge, ON Snyder Construction $66,230.00 Ashburn, ON Gay Company Ltd. $69,000.00 Courtice, ON SCHEDULE °C" • • aanngtoil Leading the Way REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee Date: November 05, 2001 Resolution #: Report #: CSD-05-01 File #: By-law #: Subject: Newcastle Memorial Memorial Arena Renovations Recommendations: 1. THAT Report CSD-05-01 be received; 2. THAT Council endorse the Newcastle Memorial Arena Renovation Project; and 3. THAT Council approve an interest free loan, to an upset limit of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000.00) to be drawn as required by the Municipality of Clarington; 4. THAT a letter of intent for repayment of the loan in seven annual instalments of forty-two thousand, eight hundred and fifty seven dollars and 14 cents ($42,857.14) each with the first payment due December 31, 2002 and subsequent payments due on December 31, 2003; December 31, 2004; December 31, 2005; December 31, 2006; December 31, 2007 and the final payment of Forty two thousand eight hundred and fifty-seven dollars and sixteen cents ($42,857.16) due on December 31, 2008 be received; 5. THAT the required funds be drawn from the Ipnpact/Escrow Reserve Fund Account #1110-196-X; and 6. THAT the total project be administered by the Municipality of Clarington in conjunction with the Newcastle Memorial Arena Management Board; 7. THAT thy Newcastle Memorial Arena Management Board by advised of action taken. n Submitted by: -- Reviewed bys ✓.t , • C1J Joseph P. Caruana Franklin Wu Director of Comm • • ervices Chief Administrative Officer F lath Director of Operations JPC 805 DEPORT No. CSD-05-01 Page 2 S 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 At the request of the Newcastle Memorial Arena Management Board (The Board) staff 5 have been meeting and assisting the Board in its desire to upgrade the Newcastle Memorial Arena. 1.2 Essentially the Board is requesting some consideration of renovations (Attachment #1) that would incorporate 2 additional dressing rooms, relocation of the Concession area (to become more accessible), additional storage and finally a larger lobby and entrance. 1.3 The Board also requested consideration of a new roof (over the lobby and entrance 10 area), refrigeration plant upgrades to improve efficiency of the plant and if possible a wider corridor leading to the dressing rooms. 1.4 Through discussion with the Board Members the roof and plant upgrades were deemed to be the responsibility of.the Municipality through the Building Maintenance Program and will be addressed at the appropriate time through the Municipal Capital Budget deliberations. 1.5 The request for widening the corridor was considered by staff as non-essential and would significally inflate the project's estimated costs. 1.6 Subsequentially the Board has agreed to staffs proposed building program as outlined in section 1.2 of this report. 2.0 FINANCING 2.1 Staff requested financial data outlining the method of raising funds for repayment of the loan. Essentially the Board is proposing to raise it's user fees to cover the repayment schedule. 2.2 The financial plan was reviewed by the Director of Finance and it appears that the loan payment schedule is attainable with the proposed increase in user fees. 2.3 Subsequentially a recommendation to provide an intent for loan to an upset limit of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) is forwarded with terms established over seven (7) years to be repaid in seven installments with the first payment due December 31, 2002 and that funds are to be drawn from the Impact/Escrow Revenue Fund Account #1110-196-X. 2.4 Attachment #2 to this report is provided as confirmation of the Board's agreement with __ the terms of the loan. • 806 1 1 REPORT No. CSD-05-01 Page 3 3.0 COMMENT 3.1 With the approval of Council, staff will immediately initiate the project with an anticipated completion date of August/September 2002. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO Li C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-6506 807 rr I v nCruR I $ L L)-Ub-01 (PAGE 1) p( I40 VI. to OCT 1 5 2001 0FCLApINGTON Newcastle Memorial Arena MUNICIPALnv 103 Caroline Street Coalman' Services , ,t. Newcastle. Ontario LIB 1H1 October 8. 2_001 Municipality of Clarington I 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville. Ontario LIC 3A6 Attention Mr. Joseph Caruana Director, Community Services. Dear Mr. Caruana: I Just a short note to thank you, Mr Acorn, and Mr. Horvath for your attendance at our board meeting of October 2, 2001. We certainly appreciate your input and assistance you extended to our members regarding both projects. our renovation desires and your ice allocation program. Regarding the latter. our board members now have a better understanding of the thoughts and procedures and look forward to further communication I and the final draft and report. Regarding our renovations should they be approved. I am taking this opportunity to re- cap our priority list to make sure everything was covered during our discussions. Obviously depending on budget approval. this is what we would like to tackle. A) Bringing the snack bar to the main floor is crucial to increasing revenue and making -� the arena more user friendly. B) Lobby and entrance way need to be addressed to improve traffic flow and alleviate congestion. From incoming and outgoing hockey players with bags, sticks and various paraphernalia cluttering up our thoroughfare while they wait for the dressing rooms to be I vacated. C) A new roof over the lobby and entrance will bring assistance to the Municipality's budget plans to replace the entire roof as our contribution would cover some of this cost. D) Increase dressing room space and improve shower facilities, which are currently inadequate for the arena. 8u8 A l I AGMmtN I #1 TO REPORT # CSD-05-01 (PAGE 2) E) Attention to a more energy efficient plant operation with the addition of a second hum icon, or any suggestions Mr. Horvath may have to improve our plant efficiency. F) Improved storage facilities that can be tied into these renovations will be another improvement that will come about from these changes. Joe: this just about covers all our requirements, in closing I would just like to mention that we have an excellent arena board membership in place. For a group of volunteers, they are committed and dedicated to the arena community. In the past l8 months we have brought increased revenue to the arena with rink board advertising, which was never in place prior to the year 2000. We have purchased and installed a new scoreboard fully financed by a corporate donation and last but not least we are presently undergoing renovations to both washrooms with a $20,000.00 expenditure. We all look forward to favourable approval of. if not all of our wish list, a Rroportion of these projects to improve Newcastle Arena for the Municipality and its users. Thanks! Again lend/ 404.— Yours truly, R.G. (Gord) Lee, Chairman. J 809 ATTACHMENT #2 TO REPORT #CSD-05-01 _ _ a � ; . sa Newcastle Memorial Arena Management Board cT ^s caw luNICiF:J h 1-.1IRGTON �....,, TMENT' Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street. Bowmanville. Ontario Attention Mr. Caruana Director, Community Services. ■ Re: Renovation Project at Newcastle Arena a Dear Mr. Caruana: Please be advised that the Newcastle Memorial Arena Management Board unanimously passed a motion at our October 23rd., 2001 meeting to proceed with our renovation loan application, as outlined by this writer. The amount and terms of the loan are in agreement with our recent meetings and telephone discussions. Amount of loan: - $300,000.00 PI Terms- Interest Free for a period of 7 years 6 payments of$42.857.14 S 7d'. and final payment of $42,857.16 Payments to commence on December 31 2002. with final payment Due on the 30. day of December 2008. Thanks again, for your help with this project and looking forward to the next step in our application. Yours truly, Y R.G. (Gord) Lee. Chairman. 810 1 UNFINISHED BUSINESS C!?)ring /on REPORT the way PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Addendum to Report #: PSD-032-05 File #: PLN 37.1 By-law #: Subject: ORONO COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPROVAL RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that Council approve the following: 1. THAT Addendum to Report PSD-032-05 be received; 2. THAT Council delegate the authority to accept the Minister's modifications to the Orono Community Improvement Plan, which Council approved by By-Law 2005- 009 to the Director of Planning Services and Director of Finance, providing that the modifications are minor in nature and do not alter the intent of the community improvement program; and 3. THAT all interested parties advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: 4 J!lt / Reviewed Crome, M.C.I.P.,R.P.P. Franklin Wu Director, Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer FL*DC*df 15 June 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 ADDENDUM TO REPORT NO.: PSD-032-05 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 On September 15th, 2003 Council approved the preparation of a Community Improvement Plan (CIP) for Orono and a study area Bylaw 2003-124. 1.2 Staff have developed and written, with the assistance of the community focus group and public a Community Improvement Plan and program for the project area. 1.3 Council held a statutory public meeting on February 7th, 2005 to review the Community Improvement Plan and hear any public delegations, none appeared. 1.4 On March 21St Council adopted both the Bylaw 2005-038 which designates the community improvement project area and Bylaw 2005-039 which adopted the Section 5 and Figure 1 of the Orono Community Improvement Plan Document as the community improvement plan. 1 .5 The Community Improvement Plan was submitted to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing for approval pursuant to Section 28(4) of the Planning Act. The Minister's approval is required to allow the Municipality to make grants or loans to the registered owners, assessed owners, and tenants of land and buildings within a community improvement project area to pay for the cost, in whole or part, of rehabilitating lands and buildings in conformity with the community improvement plan within the community improvement project area. 1.6 The Orono Community Improvement Plan consists of grant programs for signage and façade improvement, property acquisition for municipal parking, capital funding for improvements located on municipal lands (such as streetscape works), ongoing liaison with the Orono BIA, Orono Crown Lands Trust, Orono Town Hall Board and others. 2.0 COMMENTS 2.1 The Ministry staff have had an opportunity to review the Community Improvement Plan and provide comments. In discussion with the Ministry staff, there are minor modifications that would clarify the intent of the Community Improvement Plan they wish to see added to the document. The overall intent of the Community Improvement Plan is not affected nor is the project area and grant program. The additional comments can be added by a Minister's modification prior to his approval of the document. 2.2 We anticipate that the Minister's modification will be arriving during the summer recess period. So as not to delay provision of grants to the property owners and merchants of Orono, we are recommending that Council delegate the authority to accept the Minister's modification to the Directors of Planning Services and Finance, providing that the modifications are minor in nature and do not alter the intent of the community improvement program. ADDENDUM TO REPORT NO.: PSD-032-05 PAGE 3 2.3 At this point in time, we do not have the comments of the Ministry in hand to provide to Council. However, we have been informed by Ministry staff that they will be providing comments to us during the week of June 20th. As soon as we have the comments we will provide them via e-mail to Council (attachment 1). 2.4 The Community Improvement Plan was also circulated to a number of other agencies, some of whom we had not heard from when Council approved the document. Since that time we have received comments from other agencies, there are no objections or revisions that need to be adopted from those agencies. 3.0 CONCLUSION 3.1 To provide for the distribution of grants to property owners and tenants in keeping with the grant program outlined in the Orono Community Improvement Plan it is respectfully recommended that Council delegate the authority to accept the Minister's modifications to the Directors of Planning Services and Finance. Attachments: Attachment 1 — Comments from the Ministry (to be distributed by e-mail when received) Interested parties to be notified of Council's decision Members of the Orono Community Focus Group Orono BIA Orono Crown Lands Trust Linda Gasser Valerie Cranmer & Associates Olivia Susai, Planning Co-ordinator, ORC Trudy Couvier Clarington Leading the Way MEMO • TO: Mayor Mutton & Members of Council FROM: C. Anne Greentree, Deputy Clerk DATE: June 20, 2005 RE: General Purpose and Administration Meeting, June 20, 2005 - Update Please be advised of the following amendments to the June 20, 2005 General Purpose and Administration meeting: (a) Reports PSD-092-05 and PSD-095-05 be added to the agenda (b) Report PSD-094-05 has been pulled from the agenda (c) It has been recommended that the order of the agenda be altered as per attached. ►yam . Anne -entr'e, BA, M.C.T. Deputy Clerk CAG*cd cc: F. Wu, Chief Administrative Officer Department Heads CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON I MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE RESOLUTION # DATE JUNE 20, 2005 MOVED BY SECONDED BY THAT the order of the agenda be altered to allow for the Development Charges Public Meeting and Report FND-007-05 to be considered immediately following the presentation of Craig Binning, Hemson Consulting. 1 set 1. 1 ( P. hIMI "i June 20, 2005 Good Morning Mayor Mutton and Members of Council Thank you for allowing me an opportunity to speak this morning. I am here this morning as the Chair of the Physician Recruitment Committee. I would like to thank both council and staff for your support in our efforts to attain new family physicians to Clarington I have had an opportunity to read through the proposed bylaw change document on the agenda for this morning. The recommendation made in item 20.10 is enthusiastically supported by our committee, as this is great news for our committee and the community. Turn Key office facilities are in the top three priorities for prospective doctors, and this proposed bylaw change will encourage the development of such space. We are fortunate to be working with progressive partners in Clarington and look forward to working with Council & Staff on additional incentives for attracting new doctors to our great Municipality. Sheila Hall Physician Recruitment Committee Chair Q/aD 32 '65, Municipality of Clarington 208 Approved Capital Projects Project ID : 15800-8310-05110 Project Name: IScugog Street-Road Reconstruction Department: 151300 Engineering Services I Service I Program : 18310 Eng-Roads&Structures I Year of Initiation : 2005 Flexible: Yes e uw 4. �. .. . '".n � .., g kj _2� dIA'7 + r . s a x6J%t : a ! .:�ei A . 4 :g- , =rx ' Health or Safety Issue? N/A Legislative Requirement N/A Equipment Maintenance/Replacement N/A Growth Related Need? N/A Service Enhancement/Efficiency Improvemr N/A Risk Management .,,._ N/A External Request . . _. . N/A Project Tied to Mother Jurisdiction N/A J:VennyB%ScugogSt jpg it E a SI 8 d a� 4, i �"\1\\\\\ 1111111* 0\\\ of 0 t4 IIIIIIIIIII//e ,\\\\\\$\" „ t e U. 111111111► �\\\\\�\\\\\\\ - `,\gyp ' 1 • 1i��-- -`������`r• --1:%m'o_I1! ..III BOWMANVILLE`' ® inn i •1='_ 1111111111111111: — ��nnummul :imwunuwnol .—i01=1= — PIu III- !\t1l11111111111 C -3 1- 05 Municipality of Clarington 208 Approved Capital Projects Project ID : 5800-8310-05110 Project Name : IScugog Street-Road Reconstruction Department: I5800 Engineering Services Service!Program : 18310 Eng-Roads 8 Structures Year of Initiation : 2005 Flexible: Yes "ay;'ax,`: ..t'4,=ail-. sral ',; - F1RtlJE�`.',P-..o RI '+S,,t WAWA',°i ti :C4id,-3,;?. '.'� Health or Safety Issue? -N/A Legislative Requirement N/A Equipment Maintenance!Replacement N/A Growth Related Need? N/A Service Enhancement/Efficiency Improvemr N/A Risk Management N/A External Request N/A Project Tied to.Another Jurisdiction N/A J:JennyB%ScugogStjpg . pl N # 8 a tb le 75 6 14 4,0 `., a° I'a 14.44..4E'II^a q jy P ova lP �� III' uun►; vvvow�Olt;! = o�x"pie• N ___ a il 0 or MI • Sot id TIE IL!i!21!ii!IIii!ii!i OWMANVILLE , I1j' _It. —�_ -tam— .101/111111111111 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON New Recreation Facility in the Newcastle Village Study COUNCIL PRESENTATION June 2005 414 Monteith.Brown planning consultants Municipality of Clanngton New Recreation Facility in the Newcastle Village Study Purpose of the Study • Identify potential indoor facility components for a new recreation facility in Newcastle Village. • Identify capital and operating cost scenarios of the various facility components identified. • Identify the potential impact of a new recreation facility on existing recreation facilities. yh{i�i.G Council Presentation-June 2005 sesoeu••Mewe Municipality of Ciedngton New Recreation Facility in the Newcastle Village Study Community Demographics Clarington's Overall Growth Expectations • Clarington's current population is estimated at 80,000 people. • Population projections indicate growth to 116,700 by the year 2021 representing an overall growth of 36,700 people (a 46% increase in Clarington's population). • At present, 32% of Clarington's population is under the age of 20 years old. 1 Council Presentation.June 2005 M•m.un•u•.n Municipality of Clarington New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Community Demographics Where and When Will Growth Occur? Forecasted Ground-Related Unit Growth 3000 irifn 2500 �.k1 - _ its•. r k i l.. Y 2000 3 1500 t z 1000 r -- 500 ■ . 0 L, - ..i :._.. ■�: 2005-09 2010-14 2015-19 Year m Newcastle ■Bowmanaile ■Counice ❑Real 444 Council Presentation-June 2005 0e°•°.•c,°W° Municipality of Cladngton New Recreation Facility in the Newcastle Village Study Community Demographics Newcastle Village Area? • The 2004 population is estimated at 7,850 people and is expected to grow to over 20,000 people by the year 2031. • Continued growth is Newcastle Projected Pcpulatln anticipated with the most Pero �, y .d 5, ),G-�`. significant increases "BOD .. ;. expected after 2015. 1 t5om „z!7 °-�. �.. • ,dtlro �� Has an older age profile 540 compared to the s,oao P 2031 2004 2009 2014 2010 2031 municipal totals but new Year growth will begin to reflect change. 441K Council Presentation•June 2005 MO°1°"sVaiOW° Municipality of Cladnglon New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Consultation Process Who Have We Engaged In the Process? The consultation process for this Study has involved key players in the process, including: • Workshop with Key Municipal Staff • Workshop with Stakeholders/ User Groups • Survey of Stakeholders/User Groups • Council Interviews • Public Meeting with the Community AA Council Presentation-June 200e na"r•ra•are'^ Municipality of Cladngton New Recreation Facility in the Newcastle Village Study Trends Research Multi-Purpose Recreation Facilities • combining a range of facility components to promote a "one stop" shopping approach. Provincially I Clarington Newcastle Yes Yes No Council Presentation-June 2006 M.m."n•ere... Municipality of Clarington New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Trends Research Twin Pad Arenas • increases opportunities for tournaments and improves operational efficiencies. Provincially [ Clarington j Newcastle Yes Yes No Council Presentation-June 2005 Municipality of Clarington New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Trends Research Leisure Pool Concept • combining leisure opportunities with traditional lane swim areas. Provincially Clarington I Newcastle Yes -----t -..-Yes-. ._ No - -_ Council Presentation-June 2005 r°"�"in•e"... Municipality of Cladngton New Recreation Facility in the Newcastle Village Study Trends Research Gymnasiums • providing flexible space for programming - school facilities have generally become less accessible and affordable Provincially Clanngton Newcastle Limited Limited No Council Presentation-June 2005 •en•un••rs.n Municipality of Cladngton New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Facility Inventory Arena/Ice Pads (7) • South Courtice Arena- 2 pads (1 Olympic) • Garnet B. Rickard Recreation Complex- 2 pads • Darlington Sports Complex- 1 pad • Orono Arena- Board operated- 1 pad • Newcastle Arena- Board Operated - 1 pad �hG�FG Council Presentation-June 2005 MOe1Ope 01/owe Municipality of Cladngton New Recreation Facility in the Newcastle Village Study Consultation Arena/ Ice Pad Needs-What We Heard? • Population increases coupled with a desire for expanded program offerings require additional ice to be provided. • Several groups wish to expand programming and/or utilize additional ice time to meet current needs. A number of groups also noted that they have waiting lists due to a lack of ice time. • The quality of the ice facility in Newcastle was viewed as a negative aspect and not comparable to the level of service in other parts of Clarington. AA Council Presentation•June 1000 ro•••e.m Municipality of Cladngton New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Newcastle Facility Issues Newcastle Memorial Arena • this is a rather old facility - lacking modern amenities. • it does not provide a comparable level of service as in other parts of Clarington with respect to quality or amenities. • The site is small - resulting in parking limitations and is located in a residential area which is not ideal for a major community facility. AA 444 Council Presentation•June 2005 mem.ne•e.... Municipality of CIaiington New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Needs Assessment Demand for Ice Pads • existing ice pads are at or reaching capacity - there is a need for an additional ice pad. • many groups are unable to offer a full complement of ice programs due to lack of suitable ice time; some of these groups have waiting lists while others are unable to expand programming to meet public demands. • population growth municipal-wide will generate demand for additional ice-allocation of ice will need to be a focus. '✓ l"v • Council P, sentadon-Juna 2005 "°"'•""•°'°. Municipality of Ciadngton New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Facility Inventory Indoor Pool/Aquatics (2) • Courtice Community Complex- 25 metre, 6 lane leisure pool with slide, tot pool and whirl pool • Clarington (Bowmanville) Fitness Centre-25 metre, 6 lane traditional pool with whirl pool Council Presentation-June 2005 wm•u"•a°.." Municipality of Clarington New Recreation Facility in the Newcastle Village Study Consultation Indoor Pool /Aquatics-What We Heard? • The facility in Courtice has set a standard for the quality of facility to be provided. • The Clarington (Bowmanville) Fitness Centre is not a modern facility, is a traditional lane pool and lacking desirable leisure features which has resulted in decreased usage levels. • The indoor pools in Courtice and Bowmanville have capacity to accommodate additional demand. �G Council Presentation Juno 1006 n`•"'•'t•••'°"n Municipality of Clarington New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Needs Assessment Demand for Indoor Pool • Courtice pool utilization has some capacity to accommodate additional demand. • Fitness Centre pool (Bowmanville) has existing capacity to accommodate increased usage. • Program shifting could be undertaken to provide relief to the Courtice facility and improve utilization of the Fitness Centre. 4 4�G Council Presentation-June 2005 wmum.e....n• Municipality of Claringlon New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Facility Inventory Municipal Gymnasium (1 - limited) • South Courtice Arena- not a full-sized M+41,,G Council Presentation•June 2005 rss,s•n• rs.•• Municipality of Cluington New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Consultation Gymnasium -What We Heard? • There is a desire to see a municipal gymnasium suitable for a wide range of programming, including seniors, children, youth and adults. • Existing school facilities in the Newcastle area do not provide opportunity to offer new programs. • There is a desire to provide more leisure opportunities for youth - programming ranging from drop-in activities to basketball. Council Presentation.June 2005 m•.,•sn•erown Municipality of Cladngton New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Consultation Gymnasium-What We Heard? • There is a desire for a quality facility for dry land training. • Lack of a quality facility in Newcastle is impacting people's participation in programs. • Opportunities for summer camps would be greatly enhanced if a multi-purpose recreation facility with gymnasium were provided. 4 4 6 Council Presentation•June 2005 Mam•Ma•s.•wn Municipality of Cladngton New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Needs Assessment Demand for Gymnasium Space • Only one municipal gym (in Courtice) and this is an under-sized facility. • Increasing demand for gym-space with a current lack of programmable space in Newcastle for all age groups. • Opportunities for more youth-oriented activities could be achieved with a gymnasium. 4 4 e, Council Presentation-June 2005 M•meun•a.•..n Municipality of Clarington New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Facility Inventory Community Meeting / Program Space • Meeting rooms, banquet facilities and program space is available at a number of facilities including: • Newcastle Community Hall - meeting space 4415& Council Presentation-June 2005 Mnnbe••VOrn Municipality of Clarington New Recreation Facility in the Newcutle Village Study Consultation Program / Meeting Rooms-What We Heard? • Rooms for programming and meetings are viewed as important components of a community centre. • The Clarington Older Adult Association would like to provide programs in the Newcastle area to accommodate demand and the increasing size of the senior's population. M4 Council Presentation-June 2005 Municipality of Cladngton New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Newcastle Facility Issues Newcastle Community Hall • well located in the heart of Newcastle Village with character and historic value-provides a unique venue for large gatherings. • it does not provide a comparable level of service as in other parts of Clarington with respect to quality or amenities with respect to meeting rooms. • accessibility is a challenge-interior and exterior stairs& door openings, while parking is at a premium particularly during larger events requiring on-street parking. 41 Council Presentation-June 2005 m'm•ne • Municipality of Clarington New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Needs Assessment Demand for Community Meeting I Program Space • There is a lack of suitable, flexible, programmable space in the Newcastle area to accommodate programs whether run by the municipality or by community organizations. • Many organizations requested space for recreation, social, arts and cultural programs for all ages and for dry land training. • For a multi-purpose community centre to function properly, meeting space is a key component. A Council Presentation•June 2005 �'m•m•e.•.,� Municipality of Clanngton New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Facility inventory Fitness Facilities (1) • Courtice Community Complex- fitness training centre-fitness floor, aerobics studio, etc. Council Presentation•June 2005 Mate10•ennn Municipality of Clanngton New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Consultation Fitness Facility -What We Heard? • The fitness centre at the Courtice Community Complex is not at capacity. Council Presentation-June 2005 •.mmm•a,o..• Municipality of Clarington New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Needs Assessment Demand for Fitness Centre • Currently one municipal fitness centre (in Courtice) which has capacity to accommodate additional demand. • There are a number of private fitness clubs in Clarington-with a women club being in Newcastle. • Population does not warrant a full service fitness centre in Newcastle. AA M+G�rG MentenIn9rown Council Pruantatlon•Jun*ZDDa Municipality of Clanngton New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Key Recommendations Facility Needs and Priorities • Phase One: twin pad arena with gymnasium and flexible meeting room space along with complementary amenities (e.g. change rooms, concession, washrooms) • Phase Two: leisure concept pool with associated amenities (e.g. family change rooms) Menln lt •arnwn Council Presentation•JUne 1003 Municipality of Ciadneton New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Key Recommendations Rationale-Arena • There is a current demand for additional ice time in Clarington. • A number of groups are requesting additional time for current and expanded programming. • Additional ice would provide needed time for tournaments and special events. M4 Council Presents don•June Seca Mnneue•a'•"" Municipality of Clarington New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Key Recommendations Rationale-Arena • The existing arena serving the area (Newcastle Memorial Arena) is old, lacks modern amenities, and is operationally not as efficient as a twin pad facility. • A modern twin pad arena would provide the Newcastle area with a level of ice service and amenity comparable to other arena facilities in Clarington Council Presentation S June Seas M....nn•a....� Municipality of Cladngton New Recreation Facility in the Newcastle Village Study Key Recommendations Rationale-Gymnasium & Meeting Rooms • There is a current lack of programmable space for all age groups and these facilities are complementary to arenas and pools. • Both municipal staff and community interest groups indicated a desire to provide additional programming in Newcastle. • Existing facilities are either generally booked or do not provide the modern amenities that attract participants in leisure/recreation programs which has resulted in program offerings being poorly attended or cancelled. o4fo Council Presentation•June 7006 M'nl•n. a•..n Municipality of Cladngton New Recreation Facility in the Newcastle Village Study Key Recommendations Rationale- Indoor Pool • There is a desire locally for an indoor pool facility. • The local population has not reached a threshold that supports the provision of an indoor pool facility and would have a detremental impact upon the two existing indoor pool operations. • The population of Newcastle is not projected for substantial growth until after 2014. A 4/41•G McM.11I•6/O�'n Council Presentation-Juno 2006 Municipality of Cladngton New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Key Recommendations Rationale- Indoor Pool • The existing two pool facilities in Clarington have capacity to accommodate additional usage and could accommodate program shifting that could open up additional opportunities. • The existing outdoor pool in Newcastle provides only limited swimming opportunities -for only a couple months each year and does require some level of capital improvement to the associated support building (change rooms). Council Presentation•June 2006 nw^,.ox Municipality of Clarington New Recreation Facility In the Newcastle Village Study Summary of Estimated Costs Arena + Gymnasium & Meeting Rooms • Capital $15.7 to $16.1 million • Operating $30,000 (annual profit-year 1) Indoor Pool • Capital $8.7 to $9.3 million • Operating $566,000 (annual deficit-year 1) Council Presentation-June 2005 re^'°^^•••°w^ m o c Dom 3 a 0 ° c cn a) oz O G7 rn Z ` co Om > o z = cr" r m co vim -' o cn E Inn 3� N c z 0 o o -I -n "' = r �- n xl a rnz (no 0 z • • • • • • • • • • • -I 3 a 94 3 a a a e4 r3". .10 m to O m uS Di n N < -1 Cn co 3 O. 77 C •p r �D 0 (p C� N c c V) O rO.r n a. 0, O Qom m e m o y. O aD T y m �• < OO. O CD (A CD ty y 'O R. Z " 13 3 Q ('� �; CD N y 3 r N m ca 0 �p O cn N rt •v C 0. ',G N • • • 0 * a CD a o 3 o v I _ C C CD -, 0 '< C O O O a O si.0.0 3 3 s c). .4, m 3 3 rn 3 o a CD 3 CA a = = z 12 a •� rn a N. s v ai y o al av c� rn 1 ca 2 m • m m rm Z 0 `D —• • 3 N y 0 3 ea r C. -1 . 3 C . 3 m m z Z aai y . s 0 els =. ?. 0 Z 0 O. s+ w 3 CO v n CD 3 m er - < CD W y a rr • • 0 * !u as 5 el ? o > _ Pia c0 � cc d CD m mow c cc, 0 a o . S --I CD tD cn a" =• Z n m to 0 a Co 0 go 6. Z _I 70 = 0 o co O 3 y - 0 '10 Z < 2 U CD CD y m XI CO Z y r. O CD CD 3: C d 0 CD 0 7 m -. z y v � CD =_ 0 4. o 3 • • . • no Is) = o ° o 0 o 1W o � -. >I ` a o -1 a 71 m C7 n a c Q f'. 0 o _ G7 � c IT ;re p aCD � C cD p ,p CD y 3 < sCD s0, m - o wel m1 Cn r s 3 y - ? C o CO 0 = nm Cm rn cD n � �. � cr n n -< su 0 U o. co o- C Z • � `� Na `� z m z c< <°° n , n m Its p su r sa .41 Frit 0 =• 'a, 0 lir a,-' r 0) = o Imp A) a e �. E - a o Z 'C ca n• rn CD -I y U, • • CO • Cl) rn 'a lu 0. C o 3 7 0 73 o < 72 r g e 0 0 0 at d 73 n to rn 0 W CD '< . 7 3 < Z m 0 0 0•3 re sZ y. � 0 CA en co y 0 _ "~ -• a _Z 3 y CD CD 0 Q° n� (n 73 C 0 e • • rn Z XI O. rn 0 = R- a - %y o to G) O • 3 CD M rr rn • Cl) -° O ` o m al o c p = a to co nil of d _ _ c f y F C o• cn E 5 t a 3 a C a 5, 0 -1 0 0 CL ,• CO CD — .0 = m w RI O O cD N m Cn CD 3 Q � O A — • o 3 0, n -t 3 3 O C 0 0. 3 3, a Z o• a m ..L w mil 3 _ 3 co 3. < - o y `° • o rn N Z of • a.O O 0 3_ al rn 3 3 n = a 0 CD CD 3 3 0 N CD co � 0 7. CD r+ CD CD Q in ca CD a) co 0 CD 3 0. a) N 00 (IA M. 0) co a co • • • m • •■ C7 Cn 0O n (D C;' x 0 00- 0 p FE ca n' 1— 0 0 3 c- 3. sx cDa cD _. _. _. -ti — < XI U. — 0 l3 03 = v, W 0 (D 'a (D c (D 0) (D �/+ rn n' o. .0.-CD- (Q - CO Q (D O C Z (D CO 0 0 s;. � .,, n' � 111 < -P• 11) (Dy (D N. 3 CD N + � Cr N N rn Ou) a c •• - -t w O r Z � � ' o o, o m co 3x ,� 0 a C Q c en a �,. c m re o -'' a.- 3 cD et W a 0 morn a) m. Co -1 a p co 0. VJ Q 0 ? (D (D cr$< O --I n' ri - m o < 3 -I (D n MO ) c cm C0) k 7a. � � \ a0. � n 3 m a ( a m - 3 E_. r ® / Cn � k m \ Few ( E . m C z 3 § # _ _ & 73 0 Cn fin '4:, k2t § § 88 S ■ J m ƒ 0 2 (� f 22 (\ ƒ k\2 1- < $ @ /� vvo ffE§ ( E |_2 , §$ g$ fl f$ � -0 Z - rn Vil ID g „ „ 2 § cc § 22 ' ; , % & � 5 Z 0 § § 12ig -2 12.) 5 \ § 2g ! ■ § ■ d ® .. . - 7 { 1 0 r ! 0 CO B § a ■ g }$ k % k fsm I a ■r =! e # ( ■ § n I v v © .08v .g8�k v Eg 0 g ■ /v 0 - ] ■ EE 3 3 0 0 a 0 0 0 v m mE -1 = E� g e 3 g aQ� C o 7 ' �I 7 • • 0 C a a 9 gi w h 5 m o C 0 � 3 m 0 w o m _ m vM 3 o m m c 3038 ' T 3 -. 0� i .. N d 0 8a 11 0 P 73 3 c m CDv CI rn (O N D - V N V N "'. N 7 1AV (N) A 7%) D 7 CD ,3w W 0 O N Oo N 0 fQ Y/ N A / _ 0 n T Vail o O N n V 0-03 ba tg Co y W my COV p O O 8 O W N O O O C E 0 3 0 a A �p CO (op: A V N + p0p�1� m A V -11 p co -. A W co CD O Os Cl a N CO CD A A n -( n o z- g n- g co P O (71As O w Co SODS N (Q co to V CO O O p 0 O CD y" N A Co N CO O S O CO O 000 0 C71 N 0 V in 3 O K O a 1.2 a -till (� { D f+ CO N .d.. a A W N 01. 0 O N O 0 D -4 O CO N CO CO -a V A 8 8 + 8 p 8 8 8 2 m la `2 8 A C z >> m 0 > A N D m N D 0 0 can A nn z do; (Z] gu C m m N !CN N 4Ci {7 N ( C N d ij g � o gg A sg to 3 0 3 3 3 3 CA CA 3 3 01 71 a 3 ? 33 33 33 D $ r 3 O O v D3l3 119 S1' DD a Ng D D D D D D .m "I 0 m - mm *m B D 0 L N a 2 D •a. D ;6-i ;e ;hi M^N Cl H M^y M^ 2 y (t�� t py to m b " N Sw • • xi b a 0 b om YA Q 0 MI M A a 0 0 0 o rn � 0 0 0 in z I G —� §I m $ op 0 0 I 111 rn 3 m b m o Cl) ., 6' 4' f o w 2 o 0 N = I� r o b m H 52. en Cf p air to a Bill W Ks rn _IMO CO '91 o 2 34 e y x�g II 7111 MIMI C in�p (q yp��ggnz i r 0) N pA W S 1 ° y -I ftil a a 1p o f{SS_ 1 40 4 J N T MI S 8 S S x p 6) 8 ♦A V+ to (N N N H r NNl� n•A O N N V S 8 m V 10 S 4f loll 0 0) N o o m o 5 g I N 4 S S X p -� to o Hl o t p�+p a p8 W S b b o m N O O OCC V O' N 8 8 8 8 m m Z c c _ c c m c c $ c c z cc me ii my ik P kk 9l 61 -a G m� A -c-C c'� c"c z m Et WF m WW i S$ 88 88 10 i ma 0 I it a • 5 3 � 3 33 a � O Hm me E_ 0 o it 0 o co o s 3 ilij im ?? ? ? ?? a M M M M_f H N M M _ « CD w 8 o.g ae {(��f .«.. a O V T 8 to E r y q :t.' QyS CI G' rn N O O O N 3 a 1 rn n C C b O Z � I Z � 2 ft"Ill o o � 1 rn 3 N m o o II �s v 0 o o P E -',[25_ n Z 6 b o N I r y E .9 N O l ta in n IJ K V V an N 'i rn V p6 sap 7Iii mil y oz a CV 69 fla - lo w o A t t o MI X a a //� „, E �. V, IR N H V 8 m S '-' 0i N P to V N O m fn" 1 a rn a n m co 4Oi O pi A O Co ae ; aE ecn ae f N w e i p N« O O N O p N O� Op 1 (T O i OV V O fn V O Y Z co co c -I VA G) el- .0 c� a o' a at C 70 " y r O R. r W 0 0 a y - Q s y cce y 2 c co g � � 9 2 fl s ccm 0 X Om� CDCOa. v 0 FA c 'ac a GP M m m . = a y Z 3 C m C� o N z r ma rnn < r -a a a o aw Co m O aO � O W N o a co o CD w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. W g $ o eo I I " 6 �v w n 2 7 pp 3m ! >O l'' cif �l Y ill e S •' 33 i_ 1 y 6 y S fn 3 3 $at IA. g A gai as C aFt A e 1$ Y. 1 I s I E O 5 $ ! ill 70 2 Si S3 pp �1 2 1 f M mril N M M O N V E Ira —II O m k 88 m r 8 88 8 $§8 Z 8 88 m 2 A 0 m a e ""a ! v � m : z n c � S � i rn n r m p a - V O V • $ tf rH�UQU o a bt a 9S Ciii rem • Ai rn N8 eyaa T1 gog - I < 0 X K A [ ' YY olt�n W O V 8• a M m e p n $ ! . + m A m O N CA 2e 41 a ;e K 2 E O I N; S W M + -+ Y la Q V N y�A S HN.+ N CD O W A NaN P VfVO e O N 8 t m 88 Z 73 -073 13 tH —I 00 � cr — " Nr ' EO c W 0 - N O al N . 3 G N N ca > mq N cD C M 3. Q° 70 = 2 ? � N 0 O rn� D) CD r o o. a c y 'n r• C� 0 c rT1 C: C) G� 0 3 0 N m � N 1. z N Xi mD vr CA CO 73 73 o co 5 0 o N 0 y 171 b 0 b b (/) r 0 O 0000 0 0 I ul _ -I - _ c c c 0 9 z z C c z qo z f m Q 3 m co $ 'm° m N W 0 r C 9 sp F R 6 -1 m p m n p p p r 0 z = Fo n a v m m 1 0 0 N z tomn { 1 t 0 m m F z 0 s n iv -13 A m m z m c = czi m mC MI I X a m 0 m A m m > O Q m m z m v z 43 t H m c z 73 111110 a 4' m * 0 0 3. rn 0 cn rn . v 3. & X v ° � rn ass, sWrs411 ta 0)N rn I m cn < MI 0' C v m nil r N a 9 7 0 o f (yq is 0pp a �W 0 O W J CO W A 2 V O iW0 m a 07 MMMI .11 VV N 0) CO N Myj F <NT V N a a N O N, 0 CO 01 CO N rn g '— z . gr C � m :4 " 43 fp M rT gm CO N OI N 01 CD CO a W A V 3 C y s b K Al ri m aaa N N aW a m —Ds O + V V A 01 W 8 ccc m cc T a N 8 N ~' 3 N m _ N H N m a p pp� 69 N a a a O § W W IJ -• N O Ol Ol U CO 0) N CO O] Ca CO Ut 0 DD 0) D) 0) N CO - - ; m > 0 Z Z m -4 C C o m C p zip z m z mm> m m N z0 p v p F g 0 d m m 1 m Z m y y 0 '0 A IX m z o 77m m m 5 s m ° ; O n ZZ N Z 01] Z y > O 0) m A X M m n O M 111 m n C w m 0 O '0 m X m i rn CO A rn 0 y vF w zv 0 m c z < M (q a � 3 rn 3 N PI 911 -I O O N O O pO ; a - •cn ti C C A ONl 1O O V S S N S rn r 0 O U) 2 1g vE fp m (0 CI II 0 o oNo po po -' po ; rn rn A a a O W in " N O S W S Z z C d o. o _ _ _ r co co W 01 a a a a a a - a ; 0 J Q CI 0 0 01 a O -1 0 0 01 0 O C to 3 am If f m a w *j -s a a a a a a a a a ; " 0 a- 10 AA A 531 O O N pO pO -S 0O f • k a a O W 03 - 01 O S :-.1 8 n n E. F DF c a s �. F. a m m » m 8 1 CA H ' rn 77 I d o W ♦∎ i U E m A V+ , 0 Z T 0 § m _ it 3 X O 0 0 Z " t m 0 -CO Cl) A � rn v c . z 90 40 a � �a5 m N rn 01 X w a o (.11 N 0 O f V CO W 0/ W miml a 7 — m 2 Z a 5 w � A O co 0 0 0 --1 Z rna 2 " 0. o , g z 2 o 103 = a g I 3 co ff_ S ° a i g g m pa o 0 3. o S 3 I; Er 1 Q st I (q 69 CO V 4 $ N (q �q {q -`p1 r XI i m1 1 m-CO 69 CO (t0q N .(0��0 0p0 OWOG tND (O.�f V I I G N V V M O Oo N N co W I U)- }4 W 41 3 O � N el J O 8 m c I iS Z @ z — o ' e 69 in EA H N N 49 « T m 8 i EE 8 lE E E E § E R. 2r $ o N c W H i. O. O. --. 69 EA 6' co � � rn d o *A4A § A � � -co 6- di g Er 1p So f0 t0 f0 r1 4�pl (JI m Z fl r N A N 0 N O) co W mil N N m r .. tO F gon 3 * Si amy g z e la lmi!, . U n7 = X P CD c. ^ y 0 C o co a Il y17 O m ' 'L CO C CD CD C E m n m Q a m S m o m to ; C m � a O m O. 5 H CD C) = . . . m m A c 0 Pi m m 3 g to co N ca av a m � ° 9 � m o 74 P 1 , W c Ii ta'S m m !PA t g Si w m n n m 1 o m `c to m - MU n m a p m ' a ffim $I m m a gccq 3 m ; E E E E m a 0 3 co N m Z N N t0 � C Cl) C 0 • ° 5m o at m Z _ a ill m d a . ��qq WW ai �� �q 3 q a y N O A A A NN ,C Oo V 01 I I to in 2 0,a N tl' to. N N A O V o i 11 m $ o m 0 Q m 4, -I A o C ca 0. m a 0 l ro O� E. 4' y g & 8 m al a r I Z 3 3 w fn �o w N S, to sg m is �'o • a to 0o w {p ■(q w m m 03 co N Ol m a Cj ' N� to co V D ' D to a m o Co A � m m 8 co Co rn m n m 0. s gm o o a mom s m ttqq yy fl ID 3 9 n xmm N VW X N X CD m W j m v o mm ttt��� 4l y ? V N O V V AN W CD y Mm m 0. rn m n N to a ° z m m 3 m so W o 49 69 � 4 CO 19 <o CO I a P m W V a, N -a A _, ci Co p g m N m co 8W m r v n wo 5 -• ago `° x' 00 0 _. o c xi < 0 y N to m a > > r ° 0 c1 c c Z Q N = N -1 0 O 0 3 = a 3 N m' S 7 (D ,N r (Q Z C1 co) (n a' y I _• 3 O _• C N �• C Cl) N Cn • - - 0 O- — • co ri (D C =. (C -p, N O o E D) (fl 0 71 D m (D (D a) N c. 3 N OH • • • • • • • • my m e m o o o _... O< o— `D < = = = C 13 r a < <° -, c� o mi CD �o � 5 `< , n • = n- - a) " CD o to -. ' -' ' ' o rr - cn , m �' re -o++ Q - O • C CA a •-t= a oc° g 4.713 .51. 3 � m m y 0 121 ° - C) 6 CO n o •D " ' el = o Z p 2 O r , z CD - a -•• O A) O co N N Cn 7• = Q Q rn cm rn O N NmD n N a 0 CD S• O A) Z N c� • • • • -I Cn N 03 o 0 0 el. °oD rn �, c cn ,r r co 00 a o, Q = m y 'Q C = r a. = tr a) t C) _ E '5 m v■ . c c C. et • z < 3 = c so W SR y. t_ cp C O = I. y = 0 E cp 90 N 0) P wv N -s O O V (IO� O N _■ W c1arinton Leading the Way MEMO TO: Mayor and Members of Council Department Heads FROM: David J. Crome, Director of Planning Services DATE: 17 June 2005 RE: UNDER SEPARATE COVER REPORTS PSD-092-05 AND PSD-095-05 Please find attached Reports PSD-092-05 and PSD-095-05 which have been delivered under separate cover for the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting held on June 20, 2005. CD 114/ id Crome 4, . /df i CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 ‘ . Clarhigton Leading the Way REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report#: PSD-092-05 File #: 18T-90036, By-law#: ZBA 2004-042 & COPA 2004-008 Subject: PLAN OF. SUBDIVISION, REZONING AND OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO PERMIT 327 RESIDENTIAL UNITS OWNER: 1477677 ONTARIO LIMITED (BAYWOOD HOMES) RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-092-05 be received; 2. THAT Amendment No. 45 to the Clarington Official Plan as submitted by 1477677 Ontario Limited (Baywood Homes — Napa Valley Phase IV) to delete the Neighbourhood Commercial Symbol within the area of Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision as contained in Attachment 3 be ADOPTED; 3. THAT the application for Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-90036, as amended and submitted by 1477677 Ontario Limited (Baywood Homes — Napa Valley Phase IV) be APPROVED and that the Director of Planning Services be authorized to issue Draft Approval, subject to the conditions as contained in Attachment 4; 4. THAT the application to amend Zoning By-law 84-63, be APPROVED and that the amending by-law, as per Attachment 5 be forwarded to Council for approval; 5. THAT a by-law to remove the "Holding (H)" symbol be forwarded to Council at such time that the applicant has entered into a subdivision agreement; 6. THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized by By-law, to execute a Subdivision Agreement between the Owner and the Municipality of Clarington and at such time as the agreement has been finalized to the satisfaction of the Directors of Engineering Services and Planning Services; T!—lAtT +o f kr1 . .,e"!, ;-7-Ci ti -rLtlr!.. If-r' fc-r- : vrc h ,`(' por F r tE t C1 ?E i"thp,..s., 2 s f14-- detached lots from 1477677 Ontario Limited; REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 PAGE 2 8. THAT a copy of this report and Council's decision be forwarded to the Region of Durham Planning Department; and 9. THAT the Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department, all interested parties and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by:b Reviewed d by. Da id Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer BR/CP/DJC/df/lw 17 June 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ,^r `i f 9 r f T,Rf I 11 '3 A T c�. O REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 PAGE 3 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Owner: 1477677 Ontario Limited (Baywood Homes) 1.2 Applicant/Agent: 1477677 Ontario Limited (Baywood Homes) 1.3 Clarington Official Plan Amendment: To delete a Neighbourhood Commercial Symbol within the area of the Proposed Plan of Subdivision 1 .4 Plan of Subdivision: Revision to previously submitted Plan of Subdivision (18T- 90036) to permit the development of a 327 unit residential Plan of Subdivision consisting of 97 detached dwellings, 182 semi-detached dwellings and 48 townhouse dwellings 1.5 Rezoning: From: "Agricultural (A)", "Holding - Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)", "Holding — Urban Residential Type Two ((H)R2)", "Holding — Urban Residential Type Three ((H)R3)" and "Holding — Neighbourhood Commercial ((H)C2)" to appropriate zones to implement the proposed development 1.6 Area: 19.46 hectares (48.09 acres) property 1.7 Location: The area subject to the proposal is generally located on the east side of Liberty Street North and north of Scottsdale Drive, Lot 10, Concession 2, Former Town of Bowmanville 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 Plan of Subdivision 18T-90036 was originally submitted to the Region of Durham in 1990. The Plan of Subdivision included 18.08 hectares (44.68 acres) and proposed 297 residential units. The Neighbourhood Commercial symbol was added by Amendment to the Town of Newcastle Official Plan in 1994. 2.2 In March 1994, Council recommended partial Draft Approval of the Plan of Subdivision, for only those lots fronting onto Swindells Street, provided that prior to final approval for registration of the Plan, lands owned by David Puk and Connie Puk of Brooking Transport were secured for the extension of Longworth Avenue east of Liberty Street. The Region of Durham Planning Department, the approval authority at that time, did not draft approve the Plan of Subdivision but the file was not closed. 2.3 On October 6, 2004, the Planning Services Department received a revised Proposed Plan of Subdivision (Revised 18T-90036) and a new Rezoning (ZBA 2004-042) application. On REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 PAGE 4 the Clarington Official Plan. The Official Plan Amendment requests the removal of the Neighbourhood Commercial symbol in favour of 12.0m single detached units. 2.4 Prior to the time of the resubmission of this proposed draft Plan of Subdivision in late 2004, and the related public meeting on January 10, 2005, the applicant acquired the Brooking Transport lands. This permitted connection of Longworth Avenue with Liberty Street North. However, the width of Longworth Avenue on the east side of this intersection and other intersection geometrics were not ideal. Since then, in early May 2005, a purchase agreement has been made for the Buma lands at 277 Liberty Street North. This has facilitated a better intersection layout. The Buma lands were not included in the plan shown at the public meeting, but at 1.435m2 (0.3546 acres) they represent less than 1% of the total area of the subdivision site of 19.46 hectares (48.09 acres) and does not represent significant change to the subdivision. These additional lands facilitate the construction of the Longworth Avenue and Liberty Street intersection in its ultimate location, however, no new residential lots will be created. Only two partial lots, that is, blocks for future residential lots, will be created. For development of these partial lots to occur a further planning process will have to be undertaken. Therefore, staff has determined this minor boundary adjustment does not necessitate a further public meeting. 2.5 A public meeting for the proposed official plan amendment, plan of subdivision and rezoning was held on January 10, 2005. Four neighbours spoke at the meeting. Three of the neighbours objected to Phase 4 when they felt neighbouring Baywood subdivisions had not been completed. One neighbour objected to the anticipated impact the new development would have on his property. This neighbour has since entered into an agreement to sell his property to Baywood Homes. 3.0 LAND CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES 3.1 The site is generally flat, currently vacant and has no significant environmental features. 3.2 The surrounding land uses are as follows: North: Vacant Land, Longworth Park and beyond, Low and Medium Density Urban Residential Uses South: Low Density Urban Residential Uses East: Low Density Urban Residential Uses and Harold Longworth Public Elementary School West: Low Density Urban Residential Uses and beyond, Liberty Street North 4.0 OFFICIAL PLAN CONFORMITY 4.1 The Durham Regional Official Plan designates the subject property as Living Area. All three applications conform. 4.2 The Clarington Official Plan designates the subject property as Urban Residential with a Mediulrn Density Residential symbol, a Neighbourhood Commercial symbol, and a Neighbournood Hark symbol. H i ype AiLel Ruda kLungvwuriir ;�ve�� �j rues tart �4t REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 PAGE 5 through the middle of the subdivision. The Clarington Official Plan Amendment, if approved, will delete the Neighbourhood Commercial Area symbol. 4.3 The site is within the Fenwick Neighbourhood which has a population allocation of 5500 and a housing target of 1950 units, 1325 low density, 525 medium density and 100 intensification units. Other than the Neighbourhood Commercial Area symbol, the applications conform to the Official Plan policies. 5.0 ZONING BY-LAW COMPLIANCE 5.1 Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63 of the former Town of Newcastle zones the subject property in part "Agricultural (A)", "Urban Residential Type One (R1)", "Holding-Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)", "Holding-Urban Residential Type Two ((H)R2)", "Holding- Urban Residential Type Three ((H)R3)", and "Holding-Neighbourhood Commercial ((H)C2)". A zoning by-law amendment is required to implement the proposed draft Plan of Subdivision. Most of the zones are appropriate for the subdivision generally but are not consistent with the boundaries proposed on the May 2005 version of the subdivision proposal. 6.0 AGENCY COMMENTS 6.1 The applications were circulated to various agencies and other departments. The following summarizes comments and requested conditions of draft approval received. 6.2 Clarington Emergency and Fire Services had no fire safety concerns. 6.3 The Separate School Board requested adequate provision of sidewalks throughout the subdivision. 6.4 Bell Canada, Rogers Cable and Enbridge have no objections but Bell has two conditions of draft plan approval incorporated in Attachment 4. 6.5 Veridian Connections provided detailed comments. Electric service is available on the road allowances touching the property and servicing will be from the east side of Liberty Street. An underground expansion of the Corporation's plant is required on the road allowance. The existing Corporation's plant on Liberty Street may have to be replaced/relocated at the Applicant's cost to accommodate the proposed new road location. A Construction Agreement must be signed with the Corporation in order to obtain servicing for this site and legal costs will be charged to the Applicant. Veridian has no objections to the proposed development. 6.6 Central Lake Ontario Conservation has no objections to COPA 2004-008 or ZBA 2004- " iku'ncc‘rtyc h?-^. expressed no concerns regarding the draft approval of 18T-90036, as at that time REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 PAGE 6 stormwater management issues issues had been addressed through overall stormwater management reports for the overall area. The proponent should demonstrate that the proposed plan of subdivision will be developed in conformity with this overall scheme and this can be ensured through appropriate conditions of draft approval. 6.7 The Regional Planning Department commented the Municipality should examine whether the amendment to delete this "Neighbourhood Commercial" symbol would alter the daily commercial needs of area residents who may walk or cycle as an alternate form of transportation. The Region's Community Strategic Plan supports healthy neighbourhoods through safe and convenient movement of pedestrians. Traffic noise is an issue that will need to be addressed when evaluating the subdivision proposal. Water supply and sanitary sewer service is available. This application is considered to have no significant regional or provincial concerns and is exempt from Regional approval. The Department also commented the revised draft plan proposing 277 single detached dwellings and 22 street townhouse dwellings, blocks to be developed in conjunction with adjacent lands, a park block, a walkway, roadways and road widenings, would appear to conform to the Durham Regional Official Plan. Regarding the Region's delegated review responsibilities for provincial interests: • two separate Environmental Site Assessments (a Phase 1 and a Phases 1 & 2) have been submitted for different portions of the property. The Assessments indicate that a portion of the property once was used as a transport business but the site does not appear to be significantly impacted by any contaminants. No environmental remediation or additional subsurface investigation is required at this time; • issues concerning storm water management are to be addressed to the satisfaction of the conservation authority; • a Noise Impact Study has been submitted by Sernas Associates. The Noise Impact Study examines the proposed sound levels for Liberty Street and proposed Longworth Avenue. The Study needs to be amended to reflect the revised plan; and • there are no other provincial interests or delegated review responsibilities applicable to this application. Regarding municipal services: • municipal water is available from the existing 300mm watermain on Liberty Street at Longworth Avenue and the existing 300mm watermain on Longworth Avenue, east of the subject lands; • the subject lands are tributary to the existing 250mm diameter sanitary sewer located on Swindells Street at Scottsdale Drive, which is to the south; • an external drainage area north of the subject lands is to be incorporated into the design of the sewage system for the subject lands. Regarding transportation: • a road widening will be required along Liberty Street, a Type 'B' Arterial Road in the Regional Official Plan; • sight triangles at the intersection of Liberty Street and Longworth Avenue will be required to match those existing at the west side of the Liberty/Longworth intersection; and, REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 PAGE 7 • all design and construction details, including the ultimate alignment of Liberty Street and Longworth Avenue, are to be included with the first submission engineering drawings. Based on the foregoing, the Region has no objection to draft approval of this plan. Eleven conditions of draft approval are to be satisfied prior to clearance by the Region for plan registration. 6.9 The Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board noted students generated by this subdivision will attend Harold Longworth Public School and requested the internal streets of the subdivision be provided with sidewalks. The Board noted there was no park block east of the subdivision's east boundary. This block, shown on earlier versions of the plan, has since been deleted. The Board concluded it had no objections to the application. 6.10 The Engineering Services Department has reviewed the proposed plan of subdivision. The Engineering Services Department has requested an additional 2 lots at the intersection of Longworth Avenue and Swindells Streets be added to the park block to increase the street frontage and visibility of Longworth Park. This matter is reviewed further in Section 7.3 of this report. Twenty two (22) conditions of draft approval have been provided (see Attachment 4). 7.0 STAFF COMMENTS 7.1 Neighbourhood Commercial Symbol The Commercial Policy Review has considered the existing commercial hierarchy and made recommendations that Neighbourhood Commercial Areas and Local Central Areas be combined into one designation. Deletion of this designation is in keeping with the recommendations of the study. The daily commercial needs of the subdivision's residents who choose to cycle or walk to reach such businesses will be addressed by the Local Central Area designation at the northwest corner of the Liberty/Longworth intersection. Walkways (see Section 7.4) will support such transportation choices. 7.2 Variety of Housing The plan of subdivision has been changed considerably from that which was submitted in Fall 2004. Previously, the subdivision had little housing variation: 277 detached dwellings with 12 and 10.5 metre frontages and 22 townhouse dwellings with 7 metre frontages. 10.5 metre 11 1 �UI,V and townhouse 1 Iv JV \A VVI�I II,J with 7 metre 11 VI l l,. J. Currently, the subdivision has 98 detached dwellings but with 19 having 15.0 metre+ frontages and 79 having 12.0 metre+ frontages. The 15.0 metre+ lots are strategically placed to share rear lot lines with the wider, older residential lots fronting on Liberty Street. The 10.5 metre detached lots have been removed and replaced with 9.0 metre semi/link lots. The number of townhouses has been more than doubled from 22 to 48. As a whole, the Fenwick Neighbourhood requires 525 medium density (typically townhouse) units. • I " r. _ ...._ �� � - and proposed, and the increase in the number of units in this subdivision reveal the • REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 PAGE 8 application is in conformity and there is no longer any shortfall in medium density units in the Fenwick Neighbourhood. 7.3 Longworth Park The 1.94 hectare park block to be dedicated by the applicant is a southerly extension of the existing Longworth Park. This is an overdedication of the requirements of the Planning Act and was previously required in the earlier consideration of the draft plan by the Municipality. The park block and the existing portion of the park, due to the combined size, satisfies Clarington Official Plan area requirements. The applicant has basically met the frontage requirements for his park block but since the existing park in the Melody Homes development to the north has practically no frontage, there is a frontage deficiency in the park as a whole. The Clarington Official Plan requires that approximately 25% of the perimeter of a park have frontage of a street. Only 12% of the park perimeter has frontage (Attachment 2). In order to address this deficiency and to improve the visual prominence and pedestrian access to the park from the corner of Longworth and Swindells, Engineering and Planning staff recommend the purchase of additional parkland north from the corner. Engineering and Planning staff propose to increase the park's frontage through the acquisition of the 2 semi/link dwelling lots west of the park block and fronting on Swindells Street. Baywood Homes has agreed to the conditions of approval that provide for the acquisition of Lots 181 and 182 (Attachment 2). I have had preliminary discussions with the developer with respect to this acquisition and can brief Committee in camera on the anticipated cost. 7.4 Walkways The Clarington Official Plan requires subdivisions to be oriented toward a grid road network to enhance connectivity. Previous approvals have made a full grid road system difficult. To this end, walkways are proposed to link the west end of Street "E" with the north side of Longworth Avenue, and the northwest end of Street "C" with the south side of Longworth Avenue. Convenient access to the Longworth/Liberty intersection is important given that it will have a commercial plaza, transit stops, and be on the way to St. Elizabeth Separate Elementary School on Longworth Avenue west of Liberty Street. Street connections in this location were not considered desirable due to intersection spacing requirements from Liberty/Longworth intersection. 7.5 Longworth Avenue Approval of this plan of subdivision is desirable since it contains the "missing link" in Longworth Avenue, a Type 'C' Arterial Road that will provide an alternative east—west link to King Street from Mearns Avenue to Regional Road 57. 7.6 Entrance Feature The lot at the northeast corner of the Liberty/Longworth intersection Block 198, as redline ,iy; . Li kf�, i -;6 a �w, �i o° p�c e n a, 3. Ear c,t..°a cd 't frPpr P�v�1`V�i IJ, Y4�1� �./�i l.�LlA YIrC.i C�v l.Y L. Li�t„. �Y ii.GY���6l.E,a�l�� �..�. a.�e ..[..._w . ....� ..5 ..... ...... ...�� feature to the subdivision and the neighbourhood. A condition of draft approval has been included to this effect. REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 PAGE 9 7.7 Tax Status The Finance Department advises that the taxes for the whole subject property have been paid in full. 8.0 CONCLUSION 8.1 The applications have been reviewed in consideration of the comments received from area residents, the circulated agencies, the Clarington Official Plan and Zoning By-law 84-63. The owner has agreed to the conditions of draft approval as contained in Attachment 4. In consideration of the comments contained in this report, staff respectfully recommends the adoption of the official plan amendment as contained in Attachment 3, the proposed plan of subdivision, as contained in Attachment 1, be APPROVED subject to the conditions of draft approval as contained in Attachment 4, and that the rezonings as contained in Attachment 5 be APPROVED. Attachments: Attachment 1: Site Location Key Map and Plan of Subdivision Attachment 2: Plan of Subdivision Park Block Attachment 3: Proposed Amendment No. 45 to the Clarington Official Plan Attachment 4: Conditions of Draft Approval Attachment 5: Zoning By-law Amendment List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Effie Vedouras Jennifer& Don Buma Bryce Jordan Robert W. Cawker Craig Scott Paul Berube Dale and Sue Veinot Andrew Kozak REPORT NO.: PSD-092-05 INTERESTED PARTIES LIST Name Company Address City Province Postal Code Effie Vedouras 6 Brooking Street Bowmanville, ON L1C 5J5 Jennifer & Don Buma _ 277 Liberty Street North Bowmanville, ON L1C 3YC Bryce Jordan G.M. Sernas & Unit 41, 110 Scotia Court Whitby, ON L1N 8Y7 Associates Robert W. Cawker Baywood Homes 1140 Sheppard Avenue W., Toronto, ON M3K 2A2 Unit#12 Craig Scott 311 Liberty Street North Bowmanville, ON L1C 3Y6 Paul Berube 43 Scottsdale Drive Bowmanville, ON L1C 5G4 Dale and Sue Veinot 44 Scottsdale Drive Bowmanville, ON L1C 5G4 Andrew Kozak 86 Concession Street West Bowmanville, ON L1C 1Y9 ATTACHMENT 1 ' a FUTURE E HIGH �� hir DENSITY 0 2 18 Ill= v Z 4 �1 ® Io 25 MB 011 BLOCK 197 9 ®� N r PARK (n 1.94ho E" II S P. BOCK 199 WAY STREET U1 U TUBE 0.02ha. -4 El YYERC/AL �1 t� 4/11111111111P_I BLOCK 204 ' -0.03ha.DENINC �, m .aa..«Ata-1 �98K � mommmom AVENUE LONGwoRTH N 18T-82037 BLOCK zoo 3.0m WALKWAY •� Is • FUTURE a.aa -. .1 HICN T' BIa_ a1I■ 11111111111 N PART DENSITY BLOCK LO.�.t6ha. EE „A„ o...• CC S'M T J 1 EV 201 BLOpC 208 128 29 O WALKWAY 161 2 130 2 kA BLOCK 203 p 103 1'' 425m VADENINC I 8 104 k 127 160 0. t. 8661tt 11'.4A 74 102 BLOCK 190 BLOCK 196 ''+4 131 II 7-7.0m sm 8-7.0m SRL I « 101 105 0.1940. 0.1956. 126 P. 59 Inili 75 > V J 132 I — (.3 100 125 8: 76 77 106 2m 1„ MS �' 99 '^ 133`I U' I24 2 id 78 98 107 8 6-77..0�m BSTN BLOCK 195 134 157 I BS« 202 0.12ha. 6-7.0m STN 0.12ha. 0.0 ha.ALK 79 ~ 96 108 I 123 156 N 1W 96 135 80 W MR ft 95 109 < CO 122 /y _ 1 I 81 r~•. I., BLOCK 192 BLOCK 194 `�/ 136 I•v 1� V, 94 V) o.14haa.. S 0.17Aa s 121 en 154 110 82 93 ` 137 120 1 um 83 92 111 138 153 91 BLOCK 193 84 7-7.0m STN 142 141 140 152 112 0.17h4 1 90 139 IMMI ill t I 01111111111111111 ®®®®® Bowmanville Key Map ZBA 2004-042 - COURT 0............, °' r� JAVENUE r Z ," o Zoning By-law Amendment N4,. I ORTH A L�'° JO,NOPAN °-•V I ELDADI DRIVE 12` g..a( ! -30®36 �-ON RO rW w .TEPHEN` 2 E .Subdivision V m c J = J RAILWAY ES. z CRESCENT I o O �50NU+ COPA 2004-006 S CP MEADOWVIEW - D. z 5G0�`?GE�Dw Pc^00 pt, Clarington Official Plan Amendment L-1 .OFFS 1n w w c�i° p ^���,tJ > SPRUCE OD o oz S MADDEN` 1^, UN 1 VANSTONE CRT BLVD. �y� m��a ,nU Owner: Dwight Chizen (Power of Attorney),INI T. v. .ir—� o .#A5" �!�—.. r I Ilarc:1 rct' Cc stciricc 70°(7.n " ho: Li Fr) STREET I r4�\� L1.4CONpvIRELAND ST LI1 1 Estate of Robert Allen Brooking f ATTACHMENT 2 111 -(2 III liesnitvr . 3386 E 39ir LI 40 N y ,0 FREELAND (S- aim c,-(• 9 0 LV5%•*44 Cnili 4l U) LLI LONGWORTH PARK(Existing) N lelgt06 63 5 - 69 0 MAXWELL CI z cn 330171 1,111111WAR .11' ralla 10 _ 291 kb am 287 197 is HAROLD LONGWORTH — ma 10 I I . PUBLIC SCHOOL — 285:11111 228853, 0 SIIIIIIII in re) _ 111111111111 " C6 LONGWORTH A\ 7,17 1-4 In rr, rq_ di 1111111111 126 7 .• roro - rororo w 277 IIII I IX 1--- , - 1111 11111 III' I Cn 273 11111111 11 ELDAD DRIV 271 1111r-- 32 '33 o to tloon 1- 36 37 40 F- 41 N.co I, 11.1 co 269 . 44 LLI 45 -:-J 18 -96 031 267 56 (f) ST PHENS 64 L--) C•1 CNI N Cs1 Cs4 261 68 259 ,v 0 77 o 257 8° cc 81 ,i 38 1 255 I 84 CO 85 88 89 JO 3? 1 I 1 I___ \ vz 93 7 251 t:0 J ( , 96 97 100 101 < 21 4 111 i 249 104 105 247 PAP 2451/2 II 117186 120 124 1121317 PIINIIC ci) 125 •-,A a 128 c4 "20 1 7 7 nPr1/4, FtfrN-lic q'q eM. elvt, !r, 1,3T-96001 N Existing Portion of Longworth Park 1 ATTACHMENT 3 AMENDMENT NO. 45 TO THE CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN PURPOSE: To amend the Official Plan of the Municipality of Clarington to permit the deletion of the Neighbourhood Commercial symbol within the area of Plan of Subdivision 18T-90036. The symbol location is in Part Lot 10, Concession 2, former Town of Bowmanville. BASIS: The Amendment is based on an application submitted by 1477677 Ontario Limited (Baywood Homes) to delete the above Neighbourhood Commercial symbol. The approval of this application is based on the findings of the Commercial Policy Review which are to guide associated amendments to the Clarington Official Plan. Council is satisfied that the deletion of the Neighbourhood Commercial symbol is consistent with the recommendation of the commercial hierarchy for the Municipality as described in the Commercial Policy Review and as to be articulated in the Clarington Official Plan through amendments to it. ACTUAL AMENDMENT: The Clarington Official Plan is hereby amended as follows: 1. By amending Map A3 — Land Use — Bowmanville Urban Area as shown on Exhibit "A". IMPLEMENTATION: The provisions set forth in the Clarington Official Plan, as amended, regarding the implementation of the Plan, shall apply in regard to this amendment. INTERPRETATION: The provisions set forth in the Clarington Official Plan, as amended, regarding the interpretation of the Plan, shall apply in regard to this amendment. EXHIBIT "A" • AMENDMENT No. 45 TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN, MAP A3, LAND USE, BOWMANVILLE URBAN AREA vyji CONCESSION ROAD 3 ID NP • NP A Delete "Neighbourhood Commercial Symbol F— w w cn ID w m_ w J � NP U NP\ W ONCESSION STREET • ATTACHMENT 4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Revised Plan of Subdivision 18T-90036 Lot 10, Concession 2, Former Town of Bowmanville 1. The Owner shall have the final plan prepared on the basis of the approved draft plan of subdivision 18T-90036, prepared by Sernas Associates, identified as Project Number 04333, dated and revised May 2005, as revised in red [and dated June 10, 2005], which illustrates 97 lots for single detached dwellings, 91 lots for 182 semi-detached/link dwellings, 7 blocks for 48 townhouse dwellings, blocks to be developed in conjunction with adjacent lands, a park block, a block to be dedicated as an entrance feature, three walkways, roadways, road widenings and sight triangles. 2. The applicant must enter into a subdivision agreement with the Municipality which includes all requirements of the Engineering Services Department regarding the engineering and construction of all internal and external works and services related to this proposal,and agree to abide by all terms and conditions of the Municipality's standard subdivision agreement, including, but not limited to, the requirements that follow. 3. The Owner shall dedicate the road allowances included in this draft plan as public highways on the final plan. 4. The Owner shall name road allowances included in this draft plan to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Durham and the Municipality of Clarington. 5. The Owner shall convey to the Regional Municipality of Durham sufficient road widenings across the entire frontage of the draft plan abutting Liberty Street in order to establish a minimum of 15 metres from the centerline of Liberty Street to the subject property line. 6. The Owner shall convey sight triangles at the northeast and southeast corners of Liberty Street and Longworth Avenue, as widened, to the Region of Durham. 7. The Owner shall submit plans showing any proposed phasing to the Region and the Municipality of Clarington for review and approval, if this subdivision is to be developed by more than one registration. 8. The Owner shall grant to the Region, any easements required to provide Regional services for this development and these easements shall be in locations and of such widths as determined by the Region. 9. The Owner is required to submit a signed Record of Site Condition (RSC) to the Regional Municipality of Durham, the Municipality of Clarington and the Ministry of Environment (MOE). This RSC must be to the satisfaction of the Region, including an Acknowledgement of Receipt of the RSC by the MOE. 10. The Owner shall agree in the Municipality of Clarington Subdivision Agreement to implement the recommendation of the report, entitled "Noise Control Study", prepared by Sernas Associates dated October 2004, as revised, which specifies noise attenuation measures for the development. The measures shall be included in the subdivision agreement and must also { report (i.e. author, tithe, date and any revisions/addenda) and shall include any required warning clauses identified in the study. The Owner shall provide the Region with a copy of the subdivision agreement containing such provisions prior to final approval of the plan. 11. The Owner shall provide for the extension of such sanitary sewer and water supply facilities which are external to, as well as within, the limits of this plan that are required to service this plan. In addition, the Owner shall provide for the extension of sanitary sewer and water supply facilities within the limits of the plan which are required to service other developments external to this subdivision. Such sanitary sewer and water supply facilities are to be designed and constructed according to the standards and requirements of the Regional Municipality of Durham. All arrangements, financial and otherwise, for said extensions are to be made to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Durham, and are to be completed prior to final approval of this plan. 12. Prior to entering into a subdivision agreement, the Regional Municipality of Durham shall be satisfied that adequate water pollution control plant and water supply plant capacities are available to the proposed subdivision. 13. The Owner shall satisfy all requirements, financial and otherwise, of the Regional Municipality of Durham. This shall include, among other matters, the execution of a subdivision agreement between the Owner and the Region concerning the provision and installation of sanitary sewers, water supply, roads and other regional services. 14. The Owner must revise draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-90036, prepared by Sernas Associates, identified as Project Number 04333, dated and revised May 2005, to incorporate the red-line revisions to said plan, and such revisions are dated June 10, 2005. These revisions to the draft plan must be done prior to the Notice of Decision of Draft Approval being mailed. 15. The Owner shall dedicate Blocks 199, 200, 201 and 202 on the red-line revised draft plan to the Municipality of Clarington as public walkways on the final plan. 16. The Owner shall convey Block 197 to the Municipality of Clarington for park or other public recreational purposes and further agrees to provide for a 1.8 metre high chain link fence at the east limits of the site in accordance with the Park Site Master Plan at no cost to the Municipality. No building permit, above and beyond fifty one percent (51%) of the entire subdivision, will be issued by the Municipality until the Longworth Avenue frontage and services abutting the park are completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services. The lands will be conveyed in a form satisfactory to the Director of Engineering Services and may include the requirement for a Soils Report indicating that no foreign material is present. The park shall be graded to ensure proper drainage and compatibility with abutting lands and roads. No less than 200 mm of topsoil shall be provided on the site. Seeding/sodding to stabilize the site shall be determined by the Director of Engineering Services. The block shall not be used for the temporary storage of any materials nor shall any material be imported to or exported from the block without the approval of the Director. 17. The Owner shall enter into a purchase and sale agreement or an option to purchase agreement, as determined by the Municipality, for the sale of Lots 181 and 182 to the Municipality, such agreement containing terms and conditions satisfactory to the Director of Planning Services. 18. The Owner shall convey Block 198, the block on the northeast corner of the Liberty Street North and Longworth Avenue intersection to the Municipality of Clarington and shall landscape the block in accordance with the approved landscape plan. The eastern portion of the block will be added to Li lU YUL tU 11 it CaSI Vvi iiVi :aU v .,4.'6�; �.,i .:C. 19. Lot 53 shall be retained as a future development block to be developed in conjunction with the lands to the south. 20. That the developer is required, as a condition of the development agreement, to make the front end payments to the Municipality for the amount stated in the following front end agreements: 1. Schickedanz Upper and Lower Front End Agreement 2. Mann Street Storm Sewer Front End Agreement 3. Orchard Park Subdivision 21. That the storm drainage works necessary for this plan of subdivision are constructed in accordance with the West Branch of Soper Creek Master Drainage Study, dated May, 1991, prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan and as finally approved by the Director of Engineering Services. 22. That prior to the detailed engineering submission, the applicant's engineer prepares a Stormwater Management Implementation Report that details all storm quantity and quality control facilities, erosion protection measures, conveyance of storm drainage, both major and minor systems from this site. In addition, the report should specify the location of the storm connection to which existing storm sewer system the applicant proposes to connect. This report shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Engineering Services. 23. All streets shall be constructed in accordance with Municipality of Clarington standards. 24. The applicant will be responsible for 100% of the cost, financial and otherwise, associated with the connection of proposed internal roadways and related facilities to existing roadways located in adjacent residential subdivisions. The cost shall include any works located on external lands that are deemed necessary by the Director of Engineering Services. 25. The Owner shall grant such easements as may be required for utilities, drainage and servicing purposes to the appropriate authorities. 26. That all land dedications, easements, sight triangles and reserves as required by the Municipality for this development must be granted to the Municipality free and clear of all encumbrances and in a form satisfactory to the Municipality's Solicitor. 27. All works and services must be designed and constructed in accordance with the Municipality of Clarington Design Criteria and Standard Drawings, provisions of the Municipality Development By- law and all applicable legislation and to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services. 28. That prior to the issuance of building permits, access routes to the subdivision must be provided to meet Subsection 3.2.5.2(6) of the Ontario Building Code and, that all watermains and hydrants are fully serviced and the Owner agrees that during construction, fire access routes be maintained according to Subsection 2.5.1.2 of the Ontario Fire Code, storage of combustible waste be maintained as per Subsection 2.4.1.1 and open burning as per Subsection 2.6.3.4 of the Ontario Fire Code. 29. All utilities such as hydro, telephone and cable television within the streets of this development must be installed underground for both primary and secondary services. 30. The north side and west side of Street C must be fully serviced with water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, hydro, telephone and cable television for any future lots that may front onto Street C. .5 1. Prior to me issuance or any building permits Vvliiii i die pi upu6uu aUUt3IVi6i01 1, I i iuS provide for the removal of any existing temporary turning circles located in adjacent • • developments. The applicant must reconstruct the road to an urban standard, including asphalt paving, curb and gutter, boulevard sod, sidewalks, street lighting and street trees. 32. All lots located on street eyebrows must be revised to have a minimum frontage of 15.0 metres. All blocks located on eyebrows that are designated as future lots must accommodate 15.0 metre frontages. Alternatively, the applicant will be required to submit house siting plans for each eyebrow lot which demonstrate that the reduced frontages will still allow sufficient room to accommodate storm sewer easements, street furniture, driveway entrances and snow storage. 33. Actual construction of Street C will not be permitted until the owner has acquired all of the lands necessary to facilitate the construction of Street C. The final approved Master Grading Plan for the subdivision must demonstrate that Street C can be constructed without retaining walls and without adversely affecting adjacent property to the north. The final master drainage scheme will be subject to the approval of the Director of Engineering Services at the engineering approval stage of the development process. 34. Every effort must be made to reduce the number of rear yard catchbasins being proposed at the south limit of the subdivision. The final drainage scheme will be subject to the approval of the Director of Engineering Services at the engineering approval stage of the development process. 35. Additional grading works may be required to facilitate proper grading of Lots 87, 119 and 143. The owner shall be responsible for 100% of the cost of works deemed necessary by the Director of Engineering Services to facilitate proper grading of these lots. 36. The owner shall be 100% responsible for the costs, financial and otherwise, associated with the removal of any existing fence, structures or other items that encroach onto the subject lands. 37. That the Owner shall retain a qualified Engineer to prepare and submit a Hydrogeologist Report to the Director of Planning Services to demonstrate that the proposed development will not adversely impact the existing wells in the surrounding areas. 38. That the Applicant meet all the requirements of the Engineering Services Department, financial or otherwise. 39. The Owner shall, if necessary, apply to the Municipality of Clarington and obtain area municipal approval of the zoning for the land uses shown on the approved draft plan in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. 40. That the Owner shall adhere to architectural control requirements of the Municipality. 41. That the Owner shall retain a qualified landscape architect to prepare and submit a Landscaping Plan to the Director of Engineering Services and the Director of Planning Services for review and approval. The Landscaping .Plan shall reflect the design criteria of the Municipality as amended from time to time. 42. The Owner shall submit a detailed tree preservation plan to the satisfaction of the Municipality of Clarington. No trees shall be removed until such time as this program has been approved except as authorized by the Municipality. 43. That the Owner shall provide the Municipality, at the time of execution of the subdivision agreement unconditional and irrevocable, Letters of Credit acceptable to the Municipality's •,e_. . i { n, fc F`: E^I ^_. c_'f.`,7rcrtce, Mairttcii c� Guarantee, Occupancy Deposit and other guarantees or deposit as may be required by the Municipality. • 44. That the Owner shall pay to the Municipality, the development charge in accordance to the Development Charge by-law as amended from time to time, as well as payment of a portion of front end charges pursuant to the Development Charge Act if any are required to be paid by the Owner. 45. The Owner shall meet all the requirements of the Municipality of Clarington, financial or otherwise. 46. Prior to any on-site grading or construction or final approval of the plan, the Owner shall submit to, and obtain approval from, the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority for reports describing the following: a) the intended means of conveying stormwater flow from the site, including use of stormwater techniques which are appropriate and in accordance with provincial guidelines; b) the anticipated impact of the development on water quality, as it relates to fish and wildlife habitat, once adequate protective measures have been undertaken;and c) the means whereby erosion and sedimentation and their effects will be minimized on the site during and after construction, in accordance with provincial guidelines. The report must outline all actions to be taken to prevent an increase in the concentration of solids in any water body as a result of on-site, or other related works, to comply with the Canada Fisheries Act. • 47. The Owner shall satisfy all financial requirements of the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority. This shall include Application Processing Fees and Technical Review Fees owing as per the approved Authority Fee Schedule. 48. The subdivision agreement between the Owner and the Municipality of Clarington shall contain, among other matters, the following provisions: a) the Owner agrees to carry out the works referred to in Condition 46 to the satisfaction of the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority; b) the Owner agrees to maintain all stormwater management and erosion and sedimentation control structures operating and in good repair during the construction period, in a manner satisfactory to the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority; c) The Owner agrees to advise the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority 48 hours prior to the commencement of grading or the initiation of any on-site works. In order to expedite clearance of Condition 48, a copy of the fully executed subdivision agreement should be submitted to the Authority. 49. The Owner must place in all agreements of purchase and sale for lots completely or partially within 300 metres of the St. Lawrence & Hudson Railway right-of-way, warning prospective purchasers or tenants of the existence of the Railway's operating right-of-way; the possibility of alterations including the possibility that the Railway may expand its operations, which expansion may affect the living environment of the residents notwithstanding the inclusion of noise and vibration attenuating measures in the design of the subdivision and individual units, and that the Railway will not be responsible for complaints or claims arising from the use of its facilities and/or operations. 50. The Owner shall agree in the Agreement, in words satisfactory to Bell Canada, to grant to Bell Canada any easements that may be required for telecommunication services. Easements may be required subject to final servicing decisions. In the event of any conflict with existing Bell ("\<' <-n'rl., ��.l n.�nr �I�^--�! I-tn r'^.r�t�.. �' rn. TIC !c'!cO :t!cn if such facilities or easements. 51. The Owner shall be required to enter into an agreement (Letter of Understanding) with Bell Canada complying with any underground servicing conditions imposed by the Municipality. 52. Prior to final approval of this plan for registration, the Director of Planning Services for the Municipality of Clarington shall be advised in writing by: a) The Regional Municipality of Durham, how 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 Conditions have been satisfied; b) The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, how Conditions 46, 47 and 48 have been satisfied; and c) Bell Canada, how Conditions 50 and 51 have been satisfied. NOTES TO DRAFT APPROVAL 1. If final approval is not given to this plan within three years of the draft approval date, and no extensions have been granted, draft approval shall lapse and the file shall be CLOSED. Extensions may be granted provided valid reason is given and is submitted to the Director of Planning Services for the Municipality of Clarington well in advance of the lapsing date. 2. As the Owner of the proposed subdivision, it is your responsibility to satisfy all conditions of draft approval in an expeditious manner. The conditions of draft approval will be reviewed periodically and may be amended at any time prior to final approval. The Planning Act provides that draft approval, may be withdrawn at any time prior to final approval. 3. All plans of subdivision must be registered in the Land Titles system within the Regional Municipality of Durham. 4. Where agencies' requirements are required to be included in the local municipal subdivision agreement, a copy of the agreement should be sent to the agencies in order to facilitate their clearance of conditions for final approval of this plan. The addresses and telephone numbers of these agencies are: a) Durham Region Planning Department P.O. Box 623 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, ON L1 N 6A3 b) Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority 100 Whiting Avenue Oshawa, ON L 1 H 3 T 3 c) Bell Canada Right of Way 100 Borough Drive, Floor 3 Scarborough, ON M1P 4W2 • ATTACHMENT 5 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NUMBER 2005- being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63,the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington for ZBA 2004-042; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. Schedule "3" to By-law 84-63, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: 2. "Agricultural(A)Zone"to"Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R1-43)"; "Agricultural(A)Zone"to"Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-15)"; "Holding-Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)" to "Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R1-43)"; "Urban Residential Type One(R1)"to"Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-15)"; "Holding-Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)" to "Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-15)"; "Holding-Urban Residential Type Two ((H)R2)" to "Holding-Urban Residential Exception (R2-15)"; "Holding-Urban Residential Type Two ((H)R2)" to "Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R1-43)"; "Holding-Neighbourhood Commercial ((H)C2)" to "Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-15)"; "Holding-Urban Residential Type Three ((H)R3)" to "Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R1-43)"; "Holding-Urban Residential Type Three ((H)R3)" to "Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R3-20)"; and "Holding-Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)" to "Holding-Urban Residential Exception ((H)R3-20)". 3. Schedule"A"attached hereto shall form part of this By-law. 4. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Sections 34 of the Planning Act. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2005 John Mutton,Mayor Patti L. Barrie,Clerk This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2005- , passed this day of , 2005 A.D. r E - tlar liiiPAKN `-0i1..g='hUllw o �_ . .1iiiMiar A tf) rrAr T I I O I j J air."4ri=.: 12.",0 BLOCK 198 , , � 7.Om WALKWAY S'•�EEr ;.N ' I . '-, 1 e, ,.. :•:-.7.-Tifivia- • vorA In .004 - ! • _ 002h. r ,4,- ,..,/ 1 rfor v r A rn -.el., 10FA •A _ rn orA . add n,,m.�. �y I�.Iie.v � 4 BLOCK 207 �l I �l :. :•/�=�I i�i , 5.13 WIDENING 04:.#4; ; f 1 1 yy GG]h.. O �- ►1! �, ,�i� �` AVENUE ° — �_�.._4, L. GWURTM rt 32037 I °•" V ON r f r y�[ l�. __ `` POS9BLE � �� ►. .■�... CH l' • . • O•us PARTL.TS ,I■iiimiii \ \\ \ ,��/'�� ,,♦/ ,�' S I T Y I 0.16ha. iggi✓11..n . \ \` ...,�♦�•�� .. 0 q a �I I BLOCK .0 lii duun� g "••� - °pAN p , Ill.l'_ PART DLO? _l m G GA. RY_ iiiiL� iiL�\ ► e TREEr m r 414,1 _ S �, •BLOCK w°oLNINC '" , iln,P ;„m -------- •+l-..i- .:i o W°r ❖�.4 .,s l.r.r.Ai I� 8 ,�, m :••• 1p- rep el• ik• L ' pz --- ,...... - 0 '4'. ' - - or - r :iii._. ��~ ` 0 ' ♦�•+•• / ISPIA •r A Q¢•6LBCti9r r.• •' BLOCK 199 / ::g —T2N� W , ... 3 0 wALKwAV M Alll r ——— :0;'r 'i4-. HC� it= = , W _ _ ,-.::%f-- -we- W -1 �—_ `A In iLlihsr .,P 2, TT- `i� r ;��,�:.• ,4 _ —_1 I E— i __'__ ,.,yea •: w,„, .�,. ..t. i J 1 - I '� 2 •giii111L, ",. 's• .A _Appal .e�.� 4LL- ►* v � NV�-- * ml°TI � Zoning To Remain "R1" I . Zoning Change From"R1"To"(H)R2-15" 'V/2 Zoning Change From "(H)R1"To"(H)R1-43" MIA Zoning Change From"(H)R1"To"(H)R2-15" \\ Zoning Change From"(H)R2"To"(H)R1-43" 55 A Zoning Change From"(H)C2"To"(H)R2-15" !iSN Zoning Change From "(H)R3"To"(H)R1-43"Iiii-IA Zoning Change From"A"To"(H)R2-15" Zoning Change From"A"To"(H)R1-43" I--1 Zoning Change From "(H)R3"To"(H)R3-20" iii'711n Zoning Change From "(H)R2"To"(H)R2-15"`•':L. Zoning Change From "(H)R1"To"(H)R3-20" 4 i 4 BOWMANVILLE John Mutton, Mayor Y Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk c1arinton REPORT Leading the Way PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, June 20, 2005 Report#: PSD-095-05 File #: ZBA 2005-028 By-law #: Subject: APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF PART LOT CONTROL APPLICANT: SCOTT PUSHMAN RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-095-05 be received; 2. THAT the request for removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Block 143 on Registered Plan 10M-829, be APPROVED and that the attached Part Lot Control By-law be passed pursuant to Section 50 (7.1) of the Planning Act; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report, any delegations and the Regional Municipality of Durham Planning Department be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: i. Reviewed by: Franklin Wu, D 'vid �. Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Chief Administrative Officer Director of Planning Services BH/CP/DJC/df/lw 17 June 2005 Pv 1 rkpr'p6a%!I PTV PF r`1 lal?W('=T(?N 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F(905)623-0830 REPORT NO.: PSD-095-05 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant/Agent: Scott Pushman 1.2 Location: Part Lot 10, Concession 2, former Town of Bowmanville 10M-829 (see attachment 1) 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On June 16, 2005, Staff received a request from Scott Pushman for the removal of Part Lot Control with respect to Block 143 on Registered Plan 10M-829. 2.2 Draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-87033 received approval for 75 single detached dwellings, and 252 semi-detached dwelling units. Registration of Plan of Subdivision 10-829 was completed on October 16th, 1989. The removal of Part Lot Control would facilitate the construction two linked dwelling units. 2.3 Block 143 was originally designed as a street linking Farncomb Crescent to Tilly Road. With the subsequent draft approval of 40M-2138 for Tilley Road in February 2003 this block was revised to permit 2 linked dwellings. In February 2005, building permits were approved for 81 and 83 Farncombe Crescent. 3.0 COMMENTS 3.1 Staff has no objection to the approval of a By-law exempting the subject lands from Part Lot Control. Attached is a By-law (Attachment 2)to exempt the subject lands from Section 50 (5) of the Planning Act. 3.2 Attachment 3 is a Summary Table provided in accordance with the Region of Durham's requirements under the delegation of Part Lot Control. It details lots affected by the Part Lot Control By-law and the unit type and number of the Part Lot Control By-law. 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 In accordance with Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, the By-law may provide a specified timeframe during which the By-law shall be in force. As a result, it is not necessary for Staff to prepare a second By-law to restore Part Lot Control on the subject lands. The Planning Act leaves it to the Pviunicipality to determine an appropriate timeframe during which the By-law shall apply. Staff recommends that the By-law be in force for a three (1) year period following Council approval, ending June 27, 2006. REPORT NO.: PSD-095-05 PAGE 3 Attachments: Attachment 1: Site Location Key Map and Lands Affected by Part Lot Control Removal Attachment 2: By-law for Removal of Part Lot Control Attachment 3: Unit Type and Number Summary Table List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Scott Pushman REPORT NO.: PSD-095-05 INTERESTED PARTIES LIST Name Company ', Address City.Province Postal ; Code Scott Pushman Diamond Fischman & Box 26008 RPO King St., E Oshawa, ON L1 H 8R4 Pushman ATTACHMENT 1 , a 18 .300 / rife �' 24 .000 0 0 `� �� A „� o 0 0 O _ 0 ► .0 rn I a am a 105 ar , r p to tD e �� .+t; M o co C.0 O ea 20 ? z ` Ages. / $ z(/ ' K z / 40” 24 .000 1 . 18 .300 r ft . . , ■ � .� N 71 °01 '00" E SIB C FARNCOMB CRESCENT c Bowmanville Key Map II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Subject CD • ,. REUND SIRES ZBA 2005-02 111e mini, N1� A03to 111111111111 l Lands ViAl 1 E Bill illllll ipp Part m■ '�.ur ��_���.._.. ,t ssDM Raw. Lands Affected By ��E L ���Contra! 11 ��� � Sil E111 �DI_Ii0la10� VA " , W We lib/ 410E10 _V T'E Block 143, 10M-829 ���rnse�= ign .�G4:1R rial=1111: EORRAINE CRT. -� Aimmm •-=:5 fn1 iii C ...monk bbill --W�_$�iiiir l��" =Y_iiii11�1 ill ==m= 11 CRES--=mail'== EUYMAN yF MINIZE um�4111111a Fes?.1D WU 22-7■ m�1" "I���I= �/r� -� NERRIMAN STREET Owners: Tatra Valley Homes Inc. --rte r I ♦ NfE CPT, 1 1 I H N I " \ I O I'( i I I I IIIEWI ►�I��III i I 1 I THEE? WET CONCESSION STREET CAST CONCESSION STREET FASL I I I 1 I \ / ■ I I 1 1<I 1 1 I I 1 1 HI IHli11IVICr*I c CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY-LAW NUMBER 2005- being a By-law to exempt certain portions of Registered Plan 10M-829 WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to exempt from Part Lot Control Block 143 on Registered Plan 10M-829, registered at the Land Registry Office for the Land Titles Division of Newcastle; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. That Subsection 5 of Section 50 of the Planning Act shall not apply to those lands described in paragraph 2 within the By-law. 2. That this By-law shall come into effect upon being approved by the Municipality of Clarington and thereafter Subsection 5 of Section 50 shall cease to apply to the following lands: a) Block 143 on Registered Plan 10M-829 3. Pursuant to Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act,this By-law shall be in force for a period of one (1)year ending on June 27th,2006. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2005 BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2005 John Mutton,Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk ATTACHMENT 3 PART LOT CONTROL EXEMPTION BY-LAW Unit Type and Number Summary Table Registered Plan #: 10M-829 By-law: Result of Part Lot Control Exemption on Unit Type & Number Lots Affected Unit Type & Number Block 143 Semi-detached — 2 TOTAL Units —2 Increase of two units •.r "::-.."-.. 4,,,,:-. +.�' t�4a* �s4 �c r �t. 'j r.�, Y A k• fx ' y .S a. ....e , .{.y +"y.i.±Y ,i<•'..art':• • 1•-•F ]'jYnf: • .. k»' ::.. t -k wh. ,* n :•Z :. LG y. ^•i♦ M: . • .'t. • ,.may-... �K°.:.� • 'tea.. • ,. a Y = Z • itIr4 .,. „Vin. yy9 x • ;. • A:: • • a ' #11 ` , FY. • • j ar i Y}O t - fsA '%l y, � � r � $ . P A At C p . rj,. . L fir r .•. 3 4.'4.1,-..4-I hi 3 vt^F h�' W "'`"„'�'.;.� t:- yi a 'Yi, .)Yi ytl 4;b �� �• .) r )" yT ' '•rW�• ••:.M Faro .• i S�Yl ta -t +, :'.,I.::` +Ca 'f . r„Cr 1: .701.4:1:!:t.2- 'S '. j�a, X ..7.02;„;;:%•;.:!!..:.4. r 4f -' .,.�y��" y )). • { 4r{b cianiigton the Wa Leading rh �ading t tY Munici P ali of Clarington New Recreation Facility in Newcastle Village Study I ' FINAL REPORT June 2005 1 1 1 ' Prepared by Monteith•Brown planning consultants MALLENNAN JAl1NKALNS MILLE0. • ARLNITECTS I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose& Background . . . . . . . . 1 I 1.2 Scope of the Study 1 1.3 Report Organization 2 SECTION TWO: COMMUNITY PROFILE 3 I 2.1 Socio-Demographic Profile . 3 2.2 Projected Population Figures-Newcastle Village 3 2.3 Age Composition-Future Populations . . . . 6 I 2.4 Household Income . 8 2.5 Education 8 SECTION THREE: MARKET RESEARCH 9 I 3.1 Overview 9 3.2 Trends in Participation 9 3.3 Facility-Specific Trends 11 3.4 Facility Design &Construction Trends . . 14 ISECTION FOUR: FACILITY INVENTORY 17 4.1 Arena Facilities 17 4.2 Swimming Pools/Aquatics 18 I 4.3 Fitness Centres 19 4.4 Gymnasium 20 4.5 Community Meeting/Program Space 20 I SECTION FIVE: PUBLIC AND USER GROUP INPUT 22 5.1 Stakeholder Workshops 22 5.2 User Group Questionnaire 23 I 5.3 Public Meeting 31 SECTION SIX: NEEDS ASSESSMENT 32 6.1 Arena 32 I 6.2 Indoor Swimming/Aquatics 35 6.3 Fitness Centres 38 6.4 Gymnasia 40 6.5 Community Meeting &Programmable Space 41 I 6.6 Seniors Facilities 42 6.7 Other Facility Considerations 42 6.8 Synthesis of Needs Projections 43 I SECTION SEVEN: BUSINESS CASE 44 7.1 Introduction 44 7.2 Facility and Service Segmentation ..44 I SECTION EIGHT: CAPITAL COSTS&CONCEPT 52 8.1 General Notes on the Design 52 8.2 Capital Cost Estimates 54 I 8.3 Conceptual Design 56 SECTION NINE: RECOMMENDATIONS 57 9.1 Summary of Analysis 57 I9.2 Summary of Recommendations . 60 I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkains Miller Architects I I I Section 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE & BACKGROUND IThe Municipality of Clarington is a fast growing community located to the east of Toronto along the shores of Lake Ontario. Clarington is comprised of both urban and rural landscapes with a I number of significant settlement areas, including Bowmanville, Courtice and Newcastle (which are all primary focuses for existing and future population growth) and Orono. The influx of population, which is largely comprised of families and young adults, continues to I place significant demands on the provision of indoor recreation facilities. In order to accommodate this demand, the Municipality has been actively developing new indoor recreation facilities. To date, the focus of new facility development has been in Courtice (due to the high I growth rate and lack of existing facilities) and more recently in Bowmanville (with the development of a new indoor soccer complex designed to support an expansion when facility demand warrants). These new facilities, in combination with existing indoor recreation facilities I in Clarington, have managed to keep pace with growth pressures. However, aging facility infrastructure and continued population growth (including that anticipated in the Newcastle area) are driving the need to provide additional indoor recreation facilities to serve both the current and long-term demands. IIn order to respond to facility needs, Clarington has embarked on a Study focused on the Newcastle Village area to identify: I • potential indoor recreation facility components for a new recreation facility in Newcastle Village; I • capital and operating cost scenarios of the identified facility components; and • the potential impact of the new recreation facility on existing recreation facilities. I1.2 SCOPE OF THE STUDY The scope of this Study includes a review of the Municipality's existing inventory of facilities, as I well as those operated by independent boards and other providers. The service area to be considered for the new recreation facility includes the Village of Newcastle and surrounding area. The Municipality has identified a site and secured the required lands for the development I of a recreation complex in Newcastle. Site investigations and the development of locational criteria are, therefore, not part of this Study. I The Study not only recommends indoor facility components for the new recreation complex, but also provides a strategy for design and construction, an assessment of community priorities, partnership opportunities, capital and operating cost estimates for the facility components, and future expansion considerations. Associated outdoor recreation components are not within the Iscope of this Study. I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 1 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I 1 SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION Consultation with the public and stakeholders is a key element of the Study and includes: ' • stakeholder/user group input to identify issues/concerns; • input from key providers of indoor recreation facilities regarding usage levels, long-term availability, partnership opportunities and other topics; and 1 • public meetings to gather input and feedback from the general public. In order to thoroughly quantify indoor facility demand, timing and costs, the consulting team of 1 Monteith Brown Planning Consultants, The JF Group, and MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects were retained to assist in the preparation of this Study. 1.3 REPORT ORGANIZATION The Municipality of Clarington's New Recreation Facility in Newcastle Village Study is organized as follows: Section 2 Community Profile - an overview of population projections and a discussion of the potential influences of the growing and aging population on the provision of indoor recreation facilities. 1 Section 3 Market Research - the identification of key factors known to influence participation in indoor activities and their implications with respect to the future provision of new indoor recreation facilities within the Municipality. Trends in the design and construction of recreation complexes are also provided. iSection 4 Facility Inventory - an inventory and description of indoor recreation facilities in the area. 1 Section 5 Public and User Group Input - a summary of public input received through the stakeholder/user group surveys, interviews, and public meetings. Section 6 Needs Assessment - an analysis of the need for new indoor recreation facilities (and complementary uses) within the Municipality and more specifically the Newcastle Village area, using a variety of assessment methodologies. 1 Section 7 Business Case - an analysis of the operating costs related to the provision of needed indoor facilities. 1 S ection 8 Capital Costs &Concept-an analysis of the capital costs related to the provision of needed indoor facilities, as well as a conceptual drawing. Section 9 Recommendations - a summary of the facility component evaluation and the Study's recommendations. 1 1 Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 2 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants.The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects 1 1 ' Section 2: COMMUNITY PROFILE 2.1 SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 1 Analyzing the past, present and projected demographic profile of a community leads to an understanding of the forces that shape a community and assist in making informed decisions pertinent to indoor recreation and leisure facilities. The Village of Newcastle is a dynamic and growing community that is expected to experience tremendous increases in its population base in the long-term which will undoubtedly influence the demands, provision and delivery of leisure services. Located in the Municipality of Clarington, Newcastle is currently the smallest of the three major urban centres with a 2004 population of 7,846 residents. According to Development Charges 1 figures, the Municipality's 2004 population data indicates that approximately: • 10% of residents live in Newcastle; • 2% of residents live in Orono; and • 39% reside in Bowmanville; • of Clarington's population lives in • 29% are in Courtice. rural areas. ' These urban areas, along with Clarington's rural communities, will experience varying levels of growth and changes to their age structures. Age composition has a significant impact on the demand for recreation and leisure services; for example, younger age groups tend to participate in more 'active' forms of recreation such as hockey and swimming lessons, while older ages generally favour more 'passive' leisure activities. Population data and projections for Clarington and each of the settlement areas have been developed by Hemson Consulting as part of the Municipality's on-going efforts to prepare a new development charges by-law. This data, combined with data from the Statistics Canada Census and the Region of Durham have been utilized for this section. 2.2 PROJECTED POPULATION FIGURES— NEWCASTLE VILLAGE According to the Development Charge Study projections, it is anticipated that Newcastle's current populartion of approximately 7,846 residents will grow modestly until some time after 2009 after which it is expected to almost triple by the year 2031. Table 2-1 and Figure 2-1 illustrate the populations for the different communities in Clarington and their projected growth. I 1 Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 3 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JP Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I SECTION TWO: COMMUNITY PROFILE Table 2-1: Anticipated Growth Rates for the Municipality of Clarington I % of Total Municpal 2001* 2031 % Growth Growth" Newcastle 6,701 21,090 214.7% 18.6% Bowmanville 27,460 64, 658 135.5% 48.2% I Courtice 21,549 36,561 69.7% 19.5% Orono 1,816 1,677 -7.7% -0.18% Rural 15,804 21,618 36.8% 8.5% I Total 73,330 150,545** 105.3% 100% *2001 data adjusted to include Census undercount **2031 total population includes 4,943(6%)residents living elsewhere due to a projected housing shortfall arising from the existing and/or assumed land use structure I Figure 2-1: Projected Population for the Village of Newcastle Newcastle Projected Population I 22,500 T . 20,000 H K. e= e•u 17,500 15,000 tr '1 I 1 a 12,500 1p� o a 10,000 a 1 ..4> ,6 4' S° 7,$00 „„ 1X , I 5,000 .":k ' 2001 2004 2009 2014 2019 2031 I Year Source: Municipality of Clarington ' Newcastle's current demographic profile characterizes an aging population, described later in Section 2.3, which is consistent with national trends. Combined with in-migration resulting from the projected growth in the housing stock, Newcastle is expected to experience a tremendous I increase in its population from the families and young adults relocating there once housing demand has been saturated in Bowmanville and Courtice. I The number of forecasted new units provide insight as to where and when the future growth will occur and thus, decisions made regarding recreation and leisure facilities should take into account the future spatial distribution. Newcastle currently is not experiencing the growth as I seen in other areas, however, by 2016 it will have more new developments than each of the other districts. Most of the new development is projected to be provided in the form of single detached units, most likely targeted to young and mature families with multiple household members. I I I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 4 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JE Group&MacLennan Jounkains Miller Architects SECTION TWO: COMMUNITY PROFILE Figure 2-2: Forecasted Ground-Related Unit Growth ' Forecasted Ground-Related Unit Growth 3000 „1^ nG 2500 r"".r� g @@@� w..e ` �^ � °�� -z.> tit��� -� sera* i��• w2000 E., `i �SxL ILA j R �? .. ',9 t ' �`v'k�Sr- } . 1500 r " d 1000 •f 500 2005-09 2010-14 2015-19 Year El Newcastle ®Bowmanville •Courtice ❑Rural Source: Municipality of Clarington,2004 ' The majority of Newcastle's population growth is forecasted to locate in the Foster neighbourhood and the North Village, with significant increases in Port Newcastle and Wilmot as well. The populations of the Graham and North Main Central communities are expected to remain fairly steady. The following subsections outline the changing demographics of the Village of Newcastle as compared to the Municipality. 2.2.1 Newcastle The population of Newcastle is roughly one-third of that of Courtice, but its age composition is similar with a large number of residents aged in their late 30s and under 15 years. The proportion of those over 60 years of age, in comparison to other cohorts, is higher than both Bowmanville and Courtice. As described in the previous paragraphs, Newcastle is projected to experience a major increase ' in its residential housing base. While the intial demand for housing will be absorbed by the large urban centres of Bowmanville and Courtice, demand will shift to Newcastle as its development potential is realized. The Municipality forecasts that Newcastle will almost triple its 2001 population of 6,701 to 17,352 by 2019. 2.2.2 Bowmanville Bowmanville appears to contain a high proportion of young and mature families, with a large number of people aged in their early 40s along with a high percentage of those aged under 20 years. Bowmanville is forecasted to absorb a significant portion of the Municipality's population 1 growth in the next fifteen years. ' Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility in Newcastle Village Study PAGE 5 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants.The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects 1 I II SECTION TWO: COMMUNITY PROFILE ' 2.2.3 Courtice I Similar to Bowmanville, although the largest group of people are aged in their late 30s, Courtice ' I is another example of a community with a relatively young age in Clarington. It is in a young family stage as quite a number of youth are under 15 years of age. Courtice is also expected to absorb a signficant portion of the Municipality's population growth over the next ten years. 1 2.2.4 Orono With a population of just over 1,600 residents, Orono has a high proportion of 10-14 year olds in I addition to the significant proportion of the population aged in their late 30s and early 40s. Orono's population is expected to decrease by almost 8% by 2031. I2.2.5 Rural Areas The trend in rural areas is typical of provincial trends given that the population is significantly older than in the urban areas. In this particular case, there is comparatively quite a high I proportion of university/college aged residents. The rural population is expected to grow by almost 20%from 2001 to 2019. 1 2.3 AGE COMPOSITION-FUTURE PROJECTIONS I The group of individuals aged between 35 and 54 constitute a large portion of the 'Baby Boom' generation who are in the 'greying' phase of their life cycle. While traditional senior citizens were more likely to participate in highly passive leisure opportunites, the baby boom cohort is more likely to maintain more active recreational habits longer into their senior years. This group of I individuals also has a higher income and savings than the traditional seniors, thus increasing their ability to participate in a wider range of leisure opportunities. I At present, the communities within the Municipality that have older ages in relation to other areas include Newcastle, Orono and the rural areas, while Courtice and Bowmanville have a higher proportion of those aged under 35 years including youth. IAs a result of the relatively high proportion of baby boomers, the most significant change in age composition will be the growing numbers of residents aged over 55 years. The absolute number of residents aged 35-54 will continue to grow as well, primarily through in-migration. The I number of adults aged 20-34 also rises significantly as the Municipality moves into the future. The implications of all groups increasing in absolute population means that recreational opportunities for all age groups need to be considered in the planning of future leisure services. IFuture recreation planning should encompass a broad spectrum of opportunities to meet the needs of this growing population. Even though the absolute number of residents continues to I rise, their respective growth rates indicate the trend in which they are growing in relation to each other. By 2021, it is expected that seniors will constitute the largest proportion of the population at over 27%, while children and teens account for almost the same percentage. I I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility in Newcastle Village Study PAGE 6 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants.The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I I SECTION TWO: COMMUNITY PROFILE I Figure 2-3 and Table 2-2 illustrate the existing and future age composition of the Muncipality. IFigure 2-3: Age Distribution by Community I Age Distribution by District,2001 0 I 4 o i�' ,fir 1�• .kY`z '2::::::::�=xw 97.7 -fir 3e 0 35.0% s, n I Ep,,,,,ir��E s r o o a }� � <'"s� n .. ss cv 30.0/0 I [ ` 1 +5:`s t F 1 E Lil m 25'0% u, t c 20.0% r , .-3.- ,---,- u I S 10.0% nh 1 F % I ' ,- ' ' r 5.0% J n L �, E u 1` 0.0% &�i E Newcastle Bowmanville Courtice Orono Rural I District •0-9 •10-19 ❑20-34 ❑35-54 •55+ ISource: Statistics Canada I Table 2-2: Forecasted Age Structure for the Municipality of Clarington 2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 0-9 16.4% 14.5% 14.1% 14.4% 14.8% 10-19 15.4% 15.7% 14.3% 12.6% 12.1% 20-34 17.8% 18.1% 19.7% 20.7% 20.2% 35-54 33.0% 31.9% 29.6% 27.2% 25.6% ' 55+ 17.4% 19.8% 22.3% 25.0% 27.3% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Source: MBPC(2005), based on Census 2001 data&Region of Durham Official Plan Review IIn absolute terms, the number of children and teens in the Municipality is expected to increase by about 50% to 33,000 in 2021. Conversely, those aged above 55 years are projected to nearly I triple, by 178%, during the same time period. These projections are based on Region-wide percentages (adjusted for current age breakdowns in Clarington) contained in the Region of Durham Official Plan Review: Population, Employment and Urban Land Discussion Paper, Fall 2003. IIn the context of Newcastle, these projections are fairly consistent for its population base due to the similar proportions as compared to other areas. As Newcastle already has a large number of I residents aged over 55 years, it i th is anticipated that over time even more people of this age category will reside there. After 2015, the number of middle aged adults will also rise signifcantly due to the forecasted housing boom. Therefore, the provision of leisure services should I continue to be targeted to the seniors population as well as families and youth as they begin to migrate to the community within the next ten years. I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 7 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects SECTION TWO: COMMUNITY PROFILE 2.4 HOUSEHOLD INCOME ' Studies have identified income as a significant barrier to recreational opportunities and their resulting participation. This consideration is highly important when planning for communities due ' to the diversity in earnings that exists. An important indication of income trends is the growing disparity between the country's wealthy and lower-income citizens. ' The 2001 Census identified that wealth and income tend to increase with age and the highest net worth is associated with the 55-64 year old age group. As noted in previous sections, the Municipality of Clarington currently has a high proportion of residents aged between 35-54. With a median annual income of$30,084 per person in Clarington (compared to $24,816 in Ontario), 1 individual incomes are likely to rise in the future as the 35-54 year old cohort moves into the next age bracket. Clarington's unemployment rate of 4.9% is below the Provinicial rate of 6.1% which implies that Clarington is in a generally advantageous position, as compared to others in the province, when securing income. ' 2.5 EDUCATION Level of schooling is another indicator of leisure participation - the more educated a community is, generally the more physically active it is. A review of the 2001 Census data suggests that Clarington has a lower percentage of university educated residents compared to the provincial averages, but has a higher proportion of citizens with a college or technical school education. This implies that local participation rates may be lower than in other communities, however, when combined with the higher average income finding (see section 2.4), these factors likely mitigate each other. I I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 8 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group &MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I I ' Section 3: MARKET RESEARCH 3.1 OVERVIEW IThis section summarizes several trends that are associated with indoor recreational facilities based upon local, provincial and national research. Identifying and understanding these trends can help the Municipality manage and plan for its future indoor recreation needs. 3.2 TRENDS IN PARTICIPATION III3.2.1 Organized Sports ' Studies have shown that participation in many organized sports has suffered a significant decline. One reason for this decline has been a pronounced "lack of free time," which is a key requirement for organized sports. Commuter populations are often associated with this trend I (which is certainly prevalent in Clarington). Facilities such as pools and gyms can offer activities that cater not only to organized sports, but also to unscheduled recreation and are, therefore, not as susceptible to this trend. The trend away from structured/organized activities and toward more self-directed, self-scheduled, unorganized, unstructured, and spontaneous leisure I activities applies to people of all ages. 3.2.2 Youth Recreation/Leisure Trends IYouth share the same attitudes and are often looking for the same type of recreation as many adults. When planning a recreational facility some of the considerations to take into account I are: • User Conflict- Youth, particular older youth, do not like to share facilities with other age groups. Offering "Youth Only Time" could help increase participation numbers. I • Cost - Cost is a bigger concern to youth than it is to the general public, making it a significant barrier to achieving their recreation needs. Offering reduced rates could help to ease their financial burden. • Drop-in Programs- Lack of time is another major challenge for youth. Opportunities for Iself-scheduled recreation ("what they want when they want it") help in this regard. 3.2.3 Older Adults Recreation/Leisure Trends ICanada's population is getting older due to the aging baby boom generation and declining birth rates. Swimming, walking, or exercise classes can easily be tailored to one's preferred degree I of activity and, therefore, tend to be the most favourable for older age groups to engage in. Furthermore, today's older adults and seniors are generally more active than previous generations, a factor which will cause programming and facility design to change over time. In particular, it is expected that: II • there will be a shift toward less physically rigorous activities as well as personal skill development (this trend is already quite evident in many communities across the Province); III II Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 9 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects 1 I SECTION THREE: MARKET RESEARCH • there will be a shift away from participation in traditional recreation activities towards I activities that are more informal, casual and self-scheduled; in this regard, it is expected that older adults will prefer a drop-in approach to recreation activities; • older adults will have higher expectations in terms of quality services and facilities; I • there will be a desire for more arts and cultural activities to serve this age group; • opportunities for life long learning will be a consistent demand (e.g., as a means of I developing new skills and gaining knowledge to cope with life transitions); and • there will be a greater emphasis on "active living"; fitness is not considered as much a leisure pursuit as it is a necessity; the Active Living Coalition for Older Adults has this to say I about active living tends affecting seniors: "The movement towards an active living approach is extremely significant for older Canadians. Since structured physical activity is no longer seen as the sole means of I gaining benefits, a myriad of activities-such as walking or"wheeling" gardening, home exercise, swimming, dancing, and even domestic chores of a physical nature- are now considered valuable and essential." 1 3.2.4 Popularity of Indoor Recreational Activities I Over the coming years, Newcastle is expected to experience population growth. Identifying the needs and wants of a population will help to determine what activities should be offered. According to the 1998/99 National Population Health Survey, the popular physical activities for youth aged 12 to 19 (Canada-wide), are as follows: IWalking for exercise 60% Volleyball 21% Swimming 46% Bowling 17% I Jogging, running 42% Exercise classes 16% Basketball 38% Skating 13% Social Dancing 38% Ice hockey 11% I Weight training 24% With Canada's population getting older and fewer young people to fill the gap, it is imperative to also look at the older population. According to the 1998/99 National Population Health Survey, Ithe popular physical activities for adults over 20 (Canada-wide), are as follows: Walking for exercise 69% Bowling 7% I Swimming 26% Skating 5% Social Dancing 23% Basketball 5% Jogging, running 13% Volleyball 4% I Weight training 12% Ice hockey 4% Exercise classes 7% I I I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 10 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants.The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkains Miller Architects I SECTION THREE: MARKET RESEARCH 1 3.2.5 Physical Activity Initiatives ' In 2003, only 50% of Canadians age 12 and over were considered to be "active or moderately active in leisure-time physical activity", meaning that 50% are insufficiently active for optimal health benefits. Although activity levels generally decline with age, physical inactivity is very II ' much a problem among children and youth. Both the Canadian and Provincial governments have shown a great interest in improving the health of individuals through participation in all forms of physical activity. For instance, the Province of Ontario has launched a new program I called "Active 2010" that aims to increase physical activity for everyone, with a particular focus on 10 to 14 year-olds. The government is investing $5 million per year in Active 2010 to improve awareness of the benefits of physical activity and to motivate people to get active. I Providing a community with the needed facilities, which can operate year round, can assist in achieving these goals. 1 3.3 FACILITY-SPECIFIC TRENDS 3.3.1 Multi-Purpose Facilities IIn a broad sense, the leading facility trend has been away from smaller, single-purpose facilities and toward larger, high quality multi-purpose facilities. Long gone are the days of separate I facilities for different recreational activities. Due to economies of scale, it is more cost effective to consolidate a whole range of activities into one large facility, allowing maintenance, staffing, and capital costs to be reduced. Cross-programming demands, family recreation outings, and I rising expectations for quality service and value for money are also responsible for the trend towards high quality multi-purpose facilities. Studies have shown that consumers will travel farther to access higher quality facilities. Municipalities are also having to adjust to longer hours of operation as"lack of time"to address the "lack of time" issue. IFurthermore, the significant aging of the population and the emergence of new activities has led to a greater emphasis on flexible space in terms of facility design. Multi-purpose rooms, I gymnasia with retractable walls, swimming pools with floors that can be raised and lowered are just a few examples of design elements that provide greater flexibility in facility programming. I 3.3.2 Arenas One of the most significant arena facility trends is the development of twin and four-plex facilities. The advantages of combining many ice pads into one facility include lower operational I costs and greater potential for large tournaments. The rise in female participation in arenas has also led to the need for facility upgrades in the way of washroom and change facilities. In general, ice pad sizes are also becoming larger to accommodate a wider range of activities; I rinks being built today are usually of a traditional standard (185'-200' by 85') or Olympic standard (200' by 100'). Another major trend is the involvement of private enterprises in the development and operation of arena facilities; partnerships, however, have their risks and I rewards and are not a panacea. The use of arenas during the non-ice season is also growing. Sports such as indoor soccer, ball hockey, inline skating, lacrosse, and summer camps, all give the chance to increase arena I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 11 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I SECTION THREE: MARKET RESEARCH I use year-round, as does summertime ice for teaching schools and growing sports such as 3-on- 3 hockey. I Over the past few years, participation in girls' hockey and ringette has grown in many communities. This trend could result in increased interest for women's hockey in the future as Ithe girls playing today age. The aging trend - combined with the fad that many older adults are fitter than previous I generations - suggests that adult hockey will become a more significant component of future arena demand. Studies and municipal benchmarking surveys indicate that participation rates in minor hockey are relatively stable in most areas of the Province. Minor girls and boys hockey registration in Clarington has increased by approximately 34% over the past two years. There is, however, greater demand for hockey schools and additional practice times, which has led to increased Idemand for ice. Nation and Province-wide, data continues to show declining participation in figure skating. This I can be partly attributed to the growth of girls'/women's hockey as well as the "time crunch" as figure skating is both a time consuming and often costly sport. Lack of coaches for figure skating can also be an issue. Due partially to rapid population growth, figure skating registrations in Clarington have increased by approximately 13% over the past two years. I3.3.3 Fitness I Fitness and wellness centres can offer the health-related benefits of sport exercise without the rigid time commitments. These centres often offer a wider range of modern equipment and classes than municipalities could provide, and the growing competition keeps membership costs I reasonable. In response, many municipalities are developing multi-purpose rooms and studios with wood sprung floors that allow for expanded fitness programming that promotes physical activity, wellness, and active living. 1 3.3.4 Gymnasia Gymnasia space is becoming more desirable among youth and young adults. Some of the I more popular sports being played are basketball, volleyball and badminton. Most schools can offer these types of activities in their own gymnasia. However, limited access and rising costs have made schools an unstable resource (costs for renting facilities increased by 138% I between 1998 and 2003 in Ontario). In response to this issue, the Provincial of Ontario recently launched a program that provides school boards with additional funds to cover the incremental costs of community use of their facilities. This government program is intended to make I community access to schools after-hours and on weekends more affordable to local citizens. 3.3.5 Indoor Pools I Swimming has consistently been identified as a favoured recreation activity for people of all ages, ranking in the top 5 activities for adults according to the Canadian Institute for Fitness and Lifestyle Activity Monitor Series (2000) and as the number one activity for children, ages 5 to 17. ISwim Canada promotes swimming as a "cradle to the grave" sport and the trend data suggests Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 12 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I I SECTION THREE: MARKET RESEARCH Ithat Canadians of all ages are using aquatic facilities for a range of activities. Swimming participation declines with age, however, there is no age group that does not swim. Recreational I swimming (non-structured, drop-in swimming) is the fastest growing segment of indoor pool usage. I With the aging of the population has come an increased demand for therapeutic pools and programs aimed at rehabilitation. As health professionals are predicting joint replacement to be a "growth industry" in the future, this is a component of pool usage that will likely continue to ' grow. Exercise programs such as aqua fitness and water aerobics are also an increasingly significant component of aquatic participation. Beginning in the late 1980s, municipalities began to develop the leisure pool, featuring zero I depth access, waterslides, water toys and usually higher water temperatures. The chief attribute of the leisure pool is the ability to accommodate a larger number of bathers than the traditional rectangular pool. The leisure pool suits recreational swimming (particularly amongst I children), learn to swim programs, and aquatic therapy. Pool design continues to evolve. The newest template is the multi-purpose pool, which can accommodate the traditional programs associated with a conventional competitive pool (e.g., lessons, laps, deep-water aqua fitness, I competitive swimming, etc.) with the entertainment/fun elements of a leisure pool. The most successful indoor aquatic centres include a variety of features that are designed to accommodate all ages and abilities, with an increasing emphasis on the needs of the aging population. IWith the advent of the leisure pool has come a new class of aquatic user- those who come for entertainment, not lessons or programs. Slides, wave pools and a wide range of water toys I including basketball hoops, balls, water sprayers, and climbing walls can now be found in aquatic facilities. Although indoor pool use traditionally peaks during the winter months (particularly post-December), the emergence of the leisure pool concept has helped to increase Ithe usage of aquatic facilities year-round. Indoor pools are one of the more costly facilities to build and operate. They also require a substantially large population to support their operations as most people will only use the pool 'I- I 5 times a year. The leisure pool, however, has a bigger capture market than the traditional rectangular fitness pool and, when combined with other types of recreation facilities (e.g., gymnasium, fitness centre, library, etc.) usage is increased. I3.3.6 Indoor Soccer ' Outdoor soccer has experienced a growth in its participation rates since the mid-1990s. According to the Ontario Soccer Association this also holds true for indoor soccer. Although there was a drop in registration numbers this year 65,718 from last year 68,480 Province-wide, I this is the first drop in two decades of increased enrolment. In fact from 1997 there has been close to a 52% increase in player enrolment, with both the youth and adult participation doubling. Throughout the Greater Toronto Area, indoor soccer facilities are being provided by the municipal, private and not-for-profit sectors, often in partnership with each other. New I artificial fields are so lifelike that the players notice little difference between the field turf and natural grass. Clarington, with its new indoor soccer facility in Bowmanville can be viewed as "leading the way" on this trend. I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 13 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects SECTION THREE: MARKET RESEARCH 3.3.7 Older Adult &Senior Facilities The multi-purpose facility trend is also affecting the provision and design of facilities for older adults and seniors. As the younger, fitter, older adult and senior ("aging boomer") is a significant cohort, the traditional stand-alone seniors centre does not meet all of the programming needs of these age groups. Multi-purpose community centres will, therefore, be in greater demand and with more flexible schedules, older adults and seniors will be able to better utilize "non-prime" daytime hours (when facilities are often under-utilized). While we envision the I ' "active" senior, there will also be a need to address the increasing number of "special needs" senior citizens - a factor that should be taken into consideration in facility design. ' 3.3.8 Youth Centres Traditional municipal and community programming for teenagers/youth is often geared toward ' athletics. While these are important opportunities to offer, research shows that - more often than not-young people just want a safe place to "hang out"with their peers. Facilities that act as "community resource centres" for youth, combining drop-in centres with a variety of affordable youth-directed activities and effective access to supports and resources have proven ' to be the most successful. The operation and funding of youth centres varies widely throughout Ontario. Some facilities ' are staffed by municipalities (regional or lower tier), while others are more community-driven and funded through senior government grants. Funding is always an issue, however, integrating properly designed teen/youth space (some dedicated, some shared) into municipal ' multi-purpose community centres provides stability to the operating environment and improves cross-programming opportunities. ' 3.4 FACILITY DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION TRENDS There are no revolutionary trends in the design and construction of community recreation facilities,just a gradual evolution toward the establishment of an appropriate quality level for this emerging building type-quality programs, design, and construction. ' The multi-use facility that offers program and facilities targeting several recreation activities, often in addition to compatible cultural and educational functions, has become the norm. There are many jurisdictional and operational problems to be resolved; however, the benefit of these multiple-stakeholder facilities has been recognized and more are being built. Many Canadian ' communities are combining ice related facilities with aquatics and fitness as a basic mix, to be combined with broad based cultural components like multi-purpose meeting rooms, senior and youth centres, libraries, arts and dance studios, and schools. 3.4.1 Construction In municipal recreation buildings there has been a pronounced evolution from prefabricated metal structures to the unique design "stick-built" construction, predominantly of masonry and steel. This change has coincided with the recognition of the importance of these facilities to community wellness, and the increased demand by society for better facilities and programs. ' While the prefab metal building is still the economic choice of many smaller communities, Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility in Newcastle Village Study PAGE 14 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The.1 Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I SECTION THREE: MARKET RESEARCH . Iespecially for arenas, the larger towns and cities have moved away from this building I technology because of its industrial appearance and difficulty to modify or expand. Employing mainly steel in their construction, these buildings are no longer considered an effective way to enclose aquatics facilities. ' Because of high humidity levels, negative pressure HVAC systems, and high ambient indoor temperatures, pool buildings most often use combinations of wood, masonry, glass and aluminum in their construction. Where steel is used it is either galvanized or coated with robust, I expensive coatings to prevent rusting. While humidity is also a concern in arenas, the combination of a good quality coating and adequate (desiccant) dehumidification will permit the extensive use of economical steel in arenas. The quality of construction of pool and arena I buildings has also improved with a greater knowledge about and use of high performance vapour/air barriers and insulations. Not only does the proper installation and maintenance of these building components increase the effective life of modern facilities, but it also enhances their enjoyment while saving expensive energy. I 3.4.2 Energy Conservation ' The current escalation in energy costs is expected to continue. As high users of energy, recreation buildings were one of the first building types targeted for conservation. Now such features or equipment as building energy management systems, lighting controls I (dimming/motion sensors), heat pump dehumidification (in pools), low-e products (glass, ceilings, coatings), high efficiency motors/pumps/boilers; heat loops/heat recovery systems (desuperheaters, Eco-Chill, Ice-Cube) comprise a menu to meet the needs of an energy conserving diet. Many of the above would be used in the best modern facilities to realize I increasing cost benefits. LEED (leadership in energy and environmental design) is a designation that signifies a I community commitment to environmental stewardship in its buildings. Because of the Canadian climate, most of the energy criteria for LEED are easily and often achieved in recreation facilities, especially if a CBIP grant is a goal. Many of the other environmental impact criteria are I relatively easy to achieve at the lowest LEED category, while the highest levels involve changes in use that will evolve over time, and are not generally appropriate for public recreation buildings at this time. Ideally, Clarington should establish LEED certification for all its new construction, including the proposed centre for Newcastle. I 3.4.3 Pool Systems Options I Like the recreation complex itself, the aquatics centre has become multi-functional, appealing to a wide cross-section of the community with programs and facilities to accommodate fitness instruction, competition, leisure, and therapy. This flexibility frequently involves multiple pool I tanks of differing temperatures and water depths. Diverse equipment like slides, lifts, whirlpool jets, water toys, sprays, and umbrellas are common, while concrete and ceramic tile continue to be the standard construction materials for municipal facilities. I A new pool construction method (10 years in North America) has found increasing use. The Myrtha pool, from Italy, is a PVC coated stainless steel, prefabricated tank system. It promises reductions in operating and maintenance costs due to never having to dump the water for the ' annual tile maintenance, a practice standard to the concrete and tile pool. Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility in Newcastle Village Study PAGE 15 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects SECTION THREE: MARKET RESEARCH New methods of introducing ultra violet (UV) light and ozone into the water are being tested in some pools. We look forward to their trouble-free use as the spectre of chlorine resistant organisms (e.g., crypto-sporidian) is a concern to all pool operators. While chlorine is still ' required by the Building Code, bulk liquid is still the preferred product even though gas chlorine is less expensive. Most municipalities use sand filtration rather than DE, sacrificing water clarity and sparkle for ease of operation. Both existing municipal pools have maintained DE for the benefit of water clarity. ' 3.4.4 Refrigeration Systems Design of ice slabs has changed little over the years since the introduction of plastic piping and rigid insulation. The refrigeration system, however, is evolving with better (more costly) coolants and equipment. If money is available, the so-called "plate and frame" heat exchange system is ' replacing the "shell and tube", while brine refrigerants have been replaced by glycol systems. The Municipality's newer facilities have incorporated both of these modern design initiatives. 3.4.5 Building Delivery Systems ' In some areas, the delivery of public buildings through the traditional design-bid-build method has reached a crisis. Design professionals and purchasing departments cannot produce "ironclad" contract documents that prevent contractors, driven to low-ball pricing in an over- competitive marketplace, from exceeding the most carefully crafted construction budgets. ' Depending on such variables as building complexity, quality of documentation, and contractor reputation, the design-build method can provide an acceptable alternative, especially when cost and/or schedule are the overriding owner concerns. Unfortunately, this method should not be used if both quality and low cost are the primary criteria. I ' Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 16 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The-IF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I I Section 4: FACILITY INVENTORY IThis section discusses the supply/inventory of indoor recreation facilities in the Municipality of I Clarington. Although the focus of this Study is on the Newcastle Village area, it is important to recognize that new facility development plays a role that affects the entire community. This section provides an examination of the current conditions as well as the strengths and ' constraints of existing recreation facilities in the Municipality. Additionally, the impact that new indoor recreation facility might have on existing facilities has also been examined - new facilities can provide complementary services or directly compete against existing facility opportunities. ' 4.1 ARENA FACILITIES I There are a total of seven (7) ice pads in five (5) arenas in the Municipality of Clarington, which roughly translates into one ice sheet for every 11,500 residents. There is currently one ice pad in the Village of Newcastle located at Newcastle Memorial Arena (see Table 4-1). I Table 4-1: Arena Facilities in the Municipality of Clarington Arena Ice Pads Newcastle Memorial 1 I Orono Arena 1 Darlington Sports Complex 1 G.B. Rickard Recreation Complex 2 I South Courtice Arena 2 Total Ice Pads 7 I Newcastle Memorial Arena-This board-run arena is an older facility that is in relatively poor condition and does not provide a similar level of service with respect to quality or amenities as compared to other ice facilities in the Municipality. The site is small which results in parking limitations; additionally, as the arena is located in a residential area, it is not typically ideal for a I major community facility. Additionally, the arena only has four dressing rooms and none are specifically for women; the girls currently use the boardroom to change, however, that will soon be converted into a concessions area, which will force girls to use the washrooms to change. IOrono Arena - This arena is also operated by an independent Board. The facility is located within the fairgrounds in Orono and offers a single pad ice surface combined with community I hall/meeting space. A building condition audit was not available for this facility, but from a visual inspection, the arena appears to be in fairly good condition. Darlington Sports Complex - The Darlington Sports Complex is located adjacent to the I settlement of Hampton and contains a single ice pad with spectator seating for 800 people. There are four dressing rooms, a referee's room, refrigeration and resurfacer equipment rooms and service rooms. The lobby contains office space, ticket booth, canteen and kitchen area. IA building assessment conducted in 2003 found the Complex to be in fair condition, with some deficiencies that can be attributed to the age of the facility. In particular, there are some ' drainage issues, minor roof leaks and certain components of the refrigeration system will need to be replaced. The existing building has no insulation which minimizes the use of the rink to Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility in Newcastle Village Study PAGE 17 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I I SECTION FOUR: FACILITY INVENTORY AND UTILZATION Ilate fall, winter and early spring. A 2004 accessibility audit and feasibility study found that the I Complex is only wheelchair accessible to the main entrance and ice pad viewing area at the southeast corner of the rink. There is no wheelchair access to the First Aid room, concession areas, dressing rooms and basement areas (including washrooms). A common issue found through the stakeholder consultation was that the showers in the dressing rooms are not ' adequate. Garnet B. Rickard Recreation Complex - The G.B. Rickard Complex is located in I Bowmanville. The Rickard Complex is currently in good condition. As outlined by a 2003 building condition assessment conducted for the Municipality, the primary upgrades that were identified were repairs to doors, leaking roof and certain minor components of the ice pad I operation that will soon reach their life expectancy. The Rickard Complex offers a heated viewing area, concessions, and a pro-shop. A large banquet hall is also located within the complex. ' South Courtice Arena-This arena, constructed in 2003, offers one NHL size ice pad and one Olympic size ice pad in addition to a mini gymnasium, community meeting rooms and program rooms. It also has a concession area, a pro-shop, a heated viewing area and is fully accessible. 1 The facility is designed to be twinned to a 4-pad facility when demand warrants. I4.2 SWIMMING POOLS 1 AQUATICS There are currently two (2) indoor aquatic facilities in the Municipality of Clarington translating into a provision ratio of one indoor aquatic facility per 40,000 residents. There are also two (2) ' outdoor pools in the Municipality. (See Table 4-2) Table 4-2: Municipal Pool Facilities in the Municipality of Clarington I Year Constructed Indoor Pools Courtice Community Complex 1997 I Clarington Fitness Centre 1980 Outdoor Pools Newcastle Lions Pool 1980 (approx.) IOrono Park Pool 1975 (approx.) Clarington (Bowmanville) Fitness Centre (indoor) - Contains a 25m, six-lane indoor pool and also has a whirlpool and sauna. The 2003 building condition assessment found the Fitness I Centre to be in fair to good condition and the suggested pool specific-upgrades include modernizing the pool finish to reflect current trends and aesthetics. Also, some lighting systems in the pool area are approaching their life expectancy and there is a lack of family change room I facilities. It is noted that the Fitness Centre pool experienced a significant decrease in usage once the Courtice Community Complex was opened. A review of the pool schedule indicates that there are many unallocated prime time hours, suggesting that this pool is currently ' operating under capacity. Courtice Community Complex (indoor) - Offers a 25m, six-lane indoor pool, an 800 square foot tot pool, splash area and also has a whirlpool and sauna. According to the 2003 building I condition assessment, the Courtice Community Centre and its indoor pool were found to be in I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility in Newcastle Village Study PAGE 18 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants. The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I SECTION FOUR: FACILITY INVENTORY AND UTILZATION . ' good condition. Mechanical and internal components related to the pool system were generally ' ' in good condition, with the pool itself showing no cracking or leaking. It should be noted that there is mold/mildew formation on the exterior stucco which may be a result of poor detailing and vapour transmission for the pool environment. The pool in the Courtice Community Complex is heavily utilized and has become a popular venue for swimming since its ' construction. Newcastle Lions Pool(outdoor) -The Lions Pool is an outdoor venue with a main pool and a ' wading pool. It was found to be in fair to poor condition as noted in the 2003 building conditions assessment. The pool facility change house has aged and experienced considerable deterioration (the Study recommends it to be replaced as opposed to undertaking significant I repairs). The pools and their respective finishes are in fair to good condition and should remain relatively trouble free for several years. However, caution must be paid because the main liner may be concealing unknown problems and the pool water piping system is at high risk of damage due to the existing site conditions. This pool is not handicap accessible and would be ' costly to retrofit the facility to allow access to the pool, washroom facilities and the general interior. Overall, if the facility is to serve the community for many more years a significant investment would likely be needed to upgrade this facility, especially with regards to the change Ihouse and its electrical components and interior space. Orono Park Pool (outdoor) - The building conditions assessment in 2003 found the outdoor I Orono Park Pool to be in fair condition and that the pool structure should function cost- effectively for the near future. Access to the change rooms and washrooms is poor since they are located across a major entrance driveway. Additionally, the pool apron slabs have experienced significant cracking and movements and can be considered a health risk due to the ' possibility of tripping and it was also noted that the general electrical system required minor repairs. The flow characteristics and skimmers should be investigated and upgraded along with the replacement of the piping network to the pool. This pool does not appear to be handicap Iaccessible. I4.3 FITNESS CENTRES There is one (1) municipal fitness centre in Clarington located in the Courtice Community Complex. The Fitness Training Facility is 15,000 sq. ft and offers top of the line cardiovascular, I strength training and free-weight equipment along with a 1,600 square foot aerobic room. The fitness centre in the Courtice Community Complex is operating at approximately 50% capacity (as estimated by staff and consultants). The facility has 169 members from Ward 4, of which I115 are from Newcastle and another 42 are from Orono. There are two international squash courts located in the Clarington (Bowmanville) Fitness I Centre, although this facility does not have a weight/aerobics room and, as such, it not considered a "fitness centre"for the purposes of this study. There are a number of private fitness clubs operating in Clarington with the majority being I located in Bowmanville, including GoodLife, Curves, Bottom Line and Lifestyles Health & Fitness. Curves is a women's only club and also has a location in both Courtice and Newcastle. I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 19 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants.The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects SECTION FOUR: FACILITY INVENTORY AND UTILZATION 4.4 GYMNASIA There is one (1) municipal gymnasium located in the Municipality at the Courtice Community Centre. This gymnasium is undersized (is only about one-quarter of the size of most gyms). ' Although programmed for a number of activities, its limited size has impacted the range of activities and the potential opportunities of this gymnasium space. 4.5 COMMUNITY MEETING / PROGRAM SPACE There are meeting rooms, banquet facilities and program space available at a number of ' facilities in the Municipality. As noted in the Public Consultation section of this report, meeting spaces that can accommodate a variety of uses are viewed as important components of a community centre. (a) For a major "community centre" to truly be a focal point in the community it needs to contain multi-use community space that is capable of being programmed for a wide range of recreation activities, serving the full age and ability spectrum of residents within ' a specified radius or area of accessibility. Due to their ability to serve multiple user groups, recreation/community centres are prominent and essential facilities that provide focal points for both recreation and social interaction. Most community centres are ' staffed full-time and are characterized as facilities that contain multiple indoor recreational spaces, such as an indoor pool, fitness centre, gymnasium or ice pads. ' Courtice Community Complex - In addition to the pool and fitness facilities, the Courtice Community Complex also has a 3,000 sq. ft. banquet hall that holds 200 guests and is also dividable into two meeting rooms for smaller events. The complex also contains a library. ' Garnet B. Rickard Recreation Complex- There are banquet and meeting facilities in this 6,000 sq. ft. hall that can hold 350 guests and is also dividable into four sections. (b) Smaller in scale, there are a number of minor community centres that provide a more ' limited range of recreational facilities, most often with meeting or multi-purpose rooms and storage space. They are not staffed full-time and some have functions similar to that of a fieidhouse. ' Clarington Beech Centre - The Clarington Beech Centre is operated by an independent board. One stakeholder group mentioned that the Beech Centre was used for their 'wellness' activities. The Beech Centre is also home of the Bowmanville Tennis ' Club. Orono Arena Community Centre- provides space for 280 guests with kitchen and bar ' services, and is wheelchair accessible. South Courtice Arena - This facility contains five meeting and program rooms that are expandable and dividable to fit various sized groups and is fully accessible with an ' elevator. ' Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 20 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I SECTION FOUR: FACILITY INVENTORY AND UTILZATION ' (c) There are a number of community halls located in the eastern portion of the Municipality. These facilities are similar to the minor community centres, however, each hall generally contains a large room capable of accommodating banquets, weddings and other community events and functions. There is a wide range in the size, quality and amenities I within each hall. Each local community hall is owned by the Municipality and run by volunteer boards of management. I Brownsdale Community Hall - Located to the east of Newcastle, Brownsdale Community Hall has a capacity of 120 people and serves the surrounding area. It is primarily used for events such as hosting banquets, functions for the neighbouring golf I course and wedding parties. The hall only has one agency that regularly operates out of it, although they have turned down requests for regular aerobics and wellness activities because the equipment would cause problems and user conflicts. I Kendal Hall-The capacity of the hall is unknown, but it offers kitchen services and is wheelchair accessible. I Newtonville Hall-This hall is located in Newtonville and appears to be well utilized with functions taking place nightly. The hall offers a range of opportunities including exercise, ratepayers meetings, parties and euchre tournaments. It is being renovated in June I 2005 and it is anticipated that the kitchen facilities will be upgraded as they are not being currently used. Newcastle Village Community Ha!! - Located in the heart of Newcastle, this is an I older, historic facility. The hall, although offering a unique interior environment, does not provide a comparable level of service as in other parts of Clarington with respect to quality of amenities. The main hall holds 265 people and although it is classified as I wheelchair accessible, accessibility remains a challenge, especially on interior and exterior stairs and door openings. Parking is at a premium particularly during larger events requiring on-street parking. The facility also houses two lower level meeting Irooms (accessible via a staircase only) and both share a kitchen facility. A number of groups utilize the Community Hall including the Newcastle YMCA Ontario Early Years Centre which offers community space and daily programming to parents and I young children in a dedicated space as well as the main hall. The Newcastle facility is a permanent satellite centre for the Bowmanville Early Years Centre and any demand that the Newcastle branch cannot meet is sent to Bowmanville or `Outreach centres'. The Ifacility once housed the Newcastle Branch Library in the front portion of the building. Orono Town Hall - The Orono Town Hall is capable of holding 150 guests and has I kitchen services, however, it is not wheelchair accessible. There is also a stage inside the facility. I I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 21 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I Section 5: PUBLIC AND USER GROUP INPUT To collect information, identify issues, and discuss future needs and directions, a multi-stage ' public consultation program was undertaken. Consultation techniques included a workshop and survey with local stakeholder groups, as well as a public meeting. The details of the consultation program are presented in this section, which is concluded with a summary. ' 5.1 STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOPS As part of the consultation process for this Study, a Stakeholder Workshop was held. All major user groups of municipally owned and/or maintained indoor recreation facilities were invited to attend this session in addition to being provided with a stakeholder survey for the collection of ' group specific user information. A number of groups attended the session, although not all invited groups chose to attend. ' Ensuring that key stakeholder groups have direct and meaningful involvement is critical to the success of examining the need for a new indoor recreation facility in Clarington. This workshop provided an opportunity for all groups in attendance to examine the results of the Stakeholder ' Surveys received to date and provided the Consultant and the Municipality with a key source of information regarding the current and future needs and use of indoor facilities in Clarington. The workshop provided opportunity to share ideas, to understand the competing demands for facilities and to provide a listing of desired indoor recreation facilities for the Newcastle Village ' area. Initially, groups were asked to introduce themselves, describe their organization and provide a brief overview of their indoor recreation facility needs. The following is a summary of the discussion by topic area. Ice Pad/Arena - As many of the groups in attendance were ice-oriented user groups, a significant amount of discussion centred on the need for an additional arena facility. Although many of the groups indicated that they were pleased with the facility development initiatives that the Municipality had already undertaken, there was a demand for more ice time - this was particularly heard from figure skating clubs. There was some concern raised about the implications of new arena development on the future of the existing Newcastle Memorial Arena, ' but also a caution not to over-supply ice pads as this could negatively impact the feasibility of maintaining the operations of the Orono Arena. ' Pool/Aquatics - Only one group attending was a pool user group, however, there was some discussion on the needs for an additional facility. Some concern was raised that the design should consider the needs of the more competitive user groups (including pool depth, lane sizes, etc.). Many non-pool user groups noted that the Courtice Community Complex was a desirable model for any new pool facility in Clarington. Multi-Purpose/Gymnasium - Many groups indicated a desire for more "dry land training"facilities such as multi-purpose and gymnasium space. Two seniors organizations also attended with one group indicating a desire to increase opportunities for seniors in Newcastle (and in Clarington in general). Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 22 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects SECTION FIVE: PUBLIC AND USER GROUP INPUT Other Amenities - Groups generally thought that community centres should offer a range of ' amenities and facilities, including meeting rooms, concession, seating, parking and storage areas. ' Overall, groups suggested that a new facility in Newcastle should provide opportunities for children and youth to give them something to do (rock-climbing was one suggestion). With such a facility, there was a sense that improved summer camps and more programming for all ages could be achieved. I 5.2 USER GROUP QUESTIONNAIRE In April of 2005, a survey was prepared in consultation with Municipal staff to collect background information, statistical data and opinions from indoor facility users groups throughout the Municipality of Clarington. The Consultant has worked to obtain the input from the outstanding groups in order to ensure that the opinions and data of all indoor facility user groups were considered, however, many groups have yet to complete the survey (as at the time of finalizing this document). ' Consultation with key stakeholder/user groups was undertaken in order to obtain an understanding of current and future indoor facility requirements, issues needing to be addressed and preferred future provision strategies. In total, 31 groups were sent a questionnaire survey; summaries of the completed group questionnaires are provided below and grouped according to recreational activity. ' 5.2.1 Skating Bowmanville Figure Skating Club The Figure Skating Club was established in 1952 and incorporated in 1985. Its membership has increased over the past three years and serves children as young as 4 years of age. The majority of the members are from Bowmanville and Courtice and there are 10 members from Newcastle. I 2002 2003 2004 Total Participants 296 322 378 ' The Club offers group programs, daytime programs and private lessons and their season runs from September to May. They foresee an expansion in their programming, especially if there was more ice on the east side of the Municipality as it would allow them to expand on the learn to skate programs. Currently the Club uses Rickard Arena's Pad B and Courtice Arena's Pad B. Their most ' pressing concern is the need for more ice time. The Club requires additional facilities and their 'dream' would be to have a rink designated just for figure skating with its own Music Room, club Offices and "off-ice" room on site, within the Municipality. They feel this additional facility is needed because there is not enough ice time or rooms within the existing facilities for ice groups to expand in pace with a growing community. Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 23 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkains Miller Architects I SECTION FIVE: PUBLIC AND USER GROUP INPUT I I The Club indicates that it would be willing to consider partnerships with other agencies, especially the Newcastle Figure Skating Club so that only one skating club would be booking ice instead of competing with each other. It has been indicated that they are cancelling programs I and turning members of the community away because they cannot get ice time. Clarington Speed Skating Club I The Clarington Speed Skating Club was established in 1997 and has seen its membership increase over the past three years. The Club primarily caters to 7-20 year olds, however, it has members as young as 3 years and as old as 60 years. I2002 2003 2004 Total Participants 85 98 100 Aged 7-20 50 70 60 I The Club offers three levels of programming: Introductory, Recreational and Competitive skating. The group plans to expand their programming, services or membership but states that I they need more ice time. Currently they use the South Courtice Arena's Pad B and do not report any problems or deficiencies with the ice surface. The group identifies its most pressing concern as the lack of ice time and they need more qualified coaches. The Club would like to see a I second location for more skaters as the club and sport grows. These facilities are needed to accommodate the growth in the sport. Newcastle Skating Club I Established in the 1950s, the Newcastle Skating Club indicates that the majority of its members are between 3 and 12 years of age although its primary age group is between 3 and 18. It offers Ilearn to skate programs, power skating, and adult skating to name a few. 2002 2003 2004 ITotal Participants 100 91 125 The Club plans to expand in the future by increasing its senior StarSkate members as well as I power classes (this will be the second year for power) and general membership due to increased population. The Club does not have a waiting list but explains that it could run a synchro team with 16-20 members, however ice may not be available and other skaters have ice time conflicts. IThe Club currently uses Newcastle Memorial Arena but it does not provide them with enough ice time or desirable time slots. The most pressing needs for the group is to have affordable ice I and sufficient ice to run a skating club. For this reason, the Club feels as though it needs additional facilities if they are to grow to full potential (`off ice' training facility at the arena, as well as a facility that could accommodate a skating competition was also noted). If they were Igiven more information, they would consider a partnership with other agencies. I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 24 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I I SECTION FIVE: PUBLIC AND USER GROUP INPUT I Orono Figure Skating Club IThe Orono Figure Skating Club was established in 1948 and has seen a decline in its membership over the past year. They serve ages 3 and up, offering learn to skate programs up to advanced level skating. ' 2002 2003 2004 Total Participants 160 161 120 IThe Club plans to expand by promoting programming to help increase its membership. They currently use the Orono Arena and identify their most pressing concern as a lack of volunteers. I Orono Skating Club has indicated that they are not willing to consider partnerships with other groups. They do not require any new facilities although they state that there is a need for a pool, community centre and a library. I5.2.2 Hockey IBowmanville Legion Oldtimers Hockey This group has 24 members, aged between 40 and 60 years, who play pickup hockey at I Darlington Arena in Hampton. They do not have any plans to expand the scope of their programming and only have one major concern - they feel that there should be six dressing rooms at the arena because they do not have enough time to shower before the next team I needs to get in the change room. They do not require a new facility to meet their needs. Bowmanville Men's Town League Hockey I This group was established in the 1940s and has had sixty (60) registrants in each of the past three years. They have players from all over Clarington starting at age 18 and an average age of 30. They play one night a week at the Rickard Complex and South Courtice Arena, and they I do not report any deficiencies at these facilities. They feel that their membership may expand depending on the number of new participants, which relates to their most pressing concern of needing more players. They do not expect to need any additional facilities. IBowmanville Non-Contact Hockey This league has eight teams with 120 participants, which is down from five years ago when they I had twelve teams and about 180 participants. They are an oldtimers league serving those aged above 35 years and use the Rickard Complex. The representative has indicated that they are one of only two adult leagues left. The reason for the decline in registration is that the four I teams were dissolved because of a lack of ice time. Consequently, this lack of ice time is the group's most pressing concern and they do not anticipate on expanding. A major cause of unavailable ice slots relates to increased demands from figure skating, which ' also renders the ice surface unfavourable for hockey through damage. The representative suggested that figure skating be given a dedicated ice pad. The representative did feel as though a new hockey pad in Newcastle would be well utilized as the pad at Newcastle Memorial Iis quite old. Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Faclllly In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 25 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I I SECTION FIVE: PUBLIC AND USER GROUP INPUT I IBrooking Transport Old Truckers Established in 1975, the hockey team has had 16 players for the past three years with an average age of 48. The team does not anticipate on expanding in the future. They currently use I Darlington Arena and the only deficiency they list is with regards to showers. The team's most pressing concern is to make sure there is ice time for both recreational leagues as well as adult leagues. They do not feel as though they need additional facilities to meet their needs. • Clarington Girls Hockey Association I The CGHA has seen growth in the range of 15% to 24% in the last three years. They forecast that their growth rate will decline as membership increases and will become more consistent with the population growth rate in Clarington. I Historical Registration Forecasted Registration 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Registrants _ 314 360 445 534 614 676 I % Growth - 15% 24% 20% 15% 10% They feel that there is a much greater potential for growth in girls' hockey as it increases in I popularity. They see the greatest growth potential for the Tyke division and state that they need to market to the schools as this age group can make the greatest difference to sustaining growth in membership. IClarington Minor Hockey Association 'Toros' The CMHA has been incorporated since 1979 and primarily serves those aged between 8 and 17 years of age. Their membership has increased significantly over the past three years along with their associated volunteers. The group plans to expand to 27 teams for the 2005-06 hockey season for a total of 480 players and to 32 teams with 544 players by 2006-07. IHistorical Registration Forecasted Registration 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 I Total Participants 306 395 450 480 544 Total Volunteers 100 125 150 150 190 I The group currently has 75-100 players (in the AE division) on the waiting list as their growth plan has been delayed a year due to ice restrictions. The CMHA currently uses the G.B. Rickard and Darlington Arena ice pads; the group indicated that the Darlington Arena has inadequate shower facilities and they would prefer to have a larger office for their administration. The I group's most pressing concern is ice availability that restricts them from providing a higher level of rep hockey to the number of players on the waiting list. They feel as though they need additional ice pads to provide hockey programs to the growing communities within Clarington. I As the CMHA is registered with the OMHA as 'AAA' zone, they are the only centre that players from surrounding areas of Orono and Newcastle can tryout for and play AAA hockey. With the Zone situation, their'AA', 'A' and 'AE' programs have grown. I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 26 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkains Miller Architects I I SECTION FIVE: PUBLIC AND USER GROUP INPUT I . As a volunteer non-profit organization, they cannot be involved in partnerships. They would I consider partnering for long-term facility rental and ice contracts to continue to provide rep level hockey for the Municipality of Clarington. The Toros have enjoyed an excellent working relationship with Clarington Community Services and together have provided successful programs and tournaments, resulting in a tremendous influx of visitor spending. They mention I that since moving to the Rickard Complex, they have had 5 OMHA championships representing the community at the highest level. I Ice is a requirement that the CMHA must have in order to provide the proper development. They have purchased approximately $400,000 of ice from the Municipality and the shortage of ice has forced them to purchase ice from surrounding communities such as Port Hope, Manvers and ' Bewdley at a premium cost to their members. They feel that they should never be in a position that their money is being spent outside of Clarington to be used for practice and development. Clarington Recreational Hockey League I The league, which primarily serves 5 to 17 year olds, has experienced an increase in membership over the past three years of about two hundred players per year. 1 2002 2003 2004 Total Participants 1300 1500 1680 IThe league plans to expand as population growth will increase the numbers of their members using indoor ice surfaces. The league uses arenas in Orono, Newcastle, Bowmanville and I Courtice. Their most pressing concern is available ice time at reasonable times. The league requires additional facilities in the form of a hockey arena and a training area because Clarington is growing every year and needs available reasonable ice time. The league states that the Municipality of Clarington was very quick to react to the hockey community by bringing I the new ice facility in Courtice. The growth in the area allowed the organization to grow so their hockey programs could accommodate the needs of its members. IGerrits Orchard Oldtimers Hockey This group was established in 1980 and for the past three years have had 16 participants aged I between 35 and 60 years. They serve Orono, Newcastle, Bowmanville, Oshawa, Kendal and Tyrone. They do not anticipate on expanding, although there are 6-8 people on the waiting list but the team roster is filled and there are very few openings each season. The team uses Orono Arena and does not list any problems or deficiencies with it. The most pressing concern for I them is that they see other teams losing ice-time or being moved to undesirable times which may cause teams to fold or disband. This team notes that their ice-time has been untouched/unchanged for several years. The team does not require any additional facilities but I hopes to continue their hockey at reasonable time slots while recognizing the importance of giving children/youth the opportunities and activities that they deserve. Newcastle Minor Hockey Association I The Newcastle Minor Hockey Association serves the Newcastle area and draws players from Newtonville, Orono and Bowmanville as well. Registration has remained stable over the past I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 27 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I I SECTION FIVE: PUBLIC AND USER GROUP INPUT I few years. Their primary facility is Newcastle Memorial Arena (which is its home rink), but they I play some away games at the South Courtice Arena. 2003 2004 Total Participants 247 247 The Association plans to expand in the coming years to accommodate the anticipated population growth in Newcastle and the fact that many players who register after ice time has I been requested in May do not get in. The club has about 7 tyke division players on the waiting list plus a few others spread throughout the other divisions. The most pressing need for them is the availability of ice time as it is hard to accommodate all the players. Additionally, there has I been talk about joining the Newcastle and Clarington leagues and splitting the ages into a couple of divisions. This has implications because even though the number of players could stay the same, the number of teams may increase and this would further reduce the number of available ice slots. IAnother key issue for them is the number of dressing rooms as Newcastle Arena currently has only four dressing rooms but none are for girls, who use the boardroom. However, the I boardroom is being converted to a snack bar and the girls will have to change in the washrooms. The Association has stated that it needs an additional rink in order to meet ice time requirements. The Association stated that it would also be nice to have an office with a central phone line as they currently operate out of their homes. Orono Amateur Athletic Association I Established in 1945, this group offers hockey, figure skating and soccer. Their registration numbers for the past three years have not varied significantly and they serve ages 5-20. I 2004 Total Participants 330 I The hockey program has 6 house league teams under CRHL and 11 teams in the instructional program. Figure Skating is offered through the Orono Figure Skating Club. They use Orono Arena and Community Centre and they operate this arena through an appointed arena board. I The most pressing concern is the potential negative impact of new ice surfaces in Newcastle (without the population to support it). The group mentions that they would entertain discussions on partnership issues. IUltra Old Boys Hockey Team Established in 1989 and serving those aged 50-74, the team has grown by two players per year I over the last three years. They play 1.5 hours, three times per week. The group indicates that they are happy and have no pressing concerns. I 2002 2003 2004 Total Participants 32 36 38 I I MunicipalHy of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 28 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I I SECTION FIVE: PUBLIC AND USER GROUP INPUT I 5.2.3 Swimming IDurham Synchro Swim Club This Club has 150 members in 2005, up from 120 members the year before. The primary age I group they serve is between 6 and 30, but they offer swimming up to a Master's level (there are 9 members on the team that is going to the world championships). About half are aged between 6-12, and another 25% aged between 12-17 and 25% again 18-30. IThe group plans to expand their programming to compete in all tiers. They currently use 7 different pools including the University of Toronto, MacMaster University and Trenton. The I group's most pressing need is for a pool that they can use as their home, which would preferably be a deepwater pool with diving towers and that is Olympic calibre. The Club states that they are always looking at corporate sponsorships as partnering opportunities and they are I ' affiliated with Synchro Canada and Synchro Ontario. 5.2.4 Community Groups IClarington Older Adult Association I The group was established in 1998 and has grown to over 600 members in the past year. The primary age group it serves is from 55 to 90 years. They offer exercise (yoga, stretch and tone, etc.), health and educational services and meals through a weekly lunch. I 2002 2003 2004 Total Participants 500 575 625 I The group would like to expand and offer programs in other locations of the Municipality. They currentlyt use the Clarington Beech Centre, which runs out of space on occasion for the group. Their most pressing concern is if they will have adequate space available for the older adults of I Clarington in a location outside of Bowmanville. The group needs additional facilities for meeting and programs along with activity space. The group states that considering present membership growth and the number of new seniors that will be looking for programs and services in the next I five years, it is important to start planning now. Newcastle Seniors Club I The Club currently has 90 members, however, that is down from 120 members from five years ago. The Club is targeted to 'older seniors' such as those 70 years and older, who prefer passive types of activities. The Club has a bowling league and euchre which is played in the I Town Hall. The primary concern of the group is how to sustain itself in the future in the face of declining membership. The group does not feel as though any new facilities are required to meet their present demands, however, they state that if the 'new seniors' who are involved in ' more active types of activities join, they may need new facilities. I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 29 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I 1 SECTION FIVE: PUBLIC AND USER GROUP INPUT Theatre Dance Academy ' The Academy has locations in Bowmanville and Courtice. There are 100 students in Bowmanville (however, there used to be 300 students) and over 100 students in Courtice. The ' primary age group served is from 4-18 years. The Academy owns the building in Bowmanville and leases space at the Courtice Community Complex from the Municipality. Their primary issue with the facility that they lease is it is too ' expensive. They state that their main concern is that the industry is very competitive and there is not a large population to support them, and therefore the high lease payments force them to charge higher prices than their clients can sometimes afford. The representative felt that they do not need any additional facilities and that a facility in Newcastle is not needed for them because the community does not have a large enough population for them to serve at present. YMCA Northumberland The number of participants coming to the YMCA has skyrocketed over the past year in Northumberland. The numbers are based on member participation at centres, childcare ' registrations and visits to the Ontario Early Years Centres (OEYC). They serve people aged up to 90 years. ' 2002 2003 2004 Total Participants 5,500 8,500 15,000 ' The Northumberland YMCA offers a wide range of programming including: • recreational swimming and lessons geared from 3 months to lifeguard training; • recreational physical and creative programs that focus on the physical and mental development of youth aged 6-12 years; • competitive programs such as karate and cheerleading; • dance for ages 3-12 including ballet, tap,jazz and hip hop; • birthday parties; • adult enrichment programs including yoga, Building Healthier Bones, Cardiac Maintenance program and Spanish lessons; • recreational basketball, soccer, volleyball, running groups, adult fitness classes, ' recreational and instructional squash and personal conditioning (for those age 14 and over); • youth leadership programs for those 11-17 years; and ' • volunteer development program offering adult opportunities to deliver programs or participate to develop policies. 1 The main YMCA fitness facility is located in Cobourg and there is a satellite centre in Brighton. The OEYC has locations in Cobourg, Port Hope, Hastings, Campbellford, Brighton and mobile outreach programs. These deliver programming for children aged 0-6 years with parental participation and focus on mental and physical development. There are YMCA-licensed children's care locations in Cobourg (3), Port Hope and Grafton that accommodate children 2- 12yrs for full day care and before and after school licensed care. ' The YMCA's vision would be to continue to expand program delivery throughout Northumberland County, whether it would be through the creation of partnerships, expansion of ' Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 30 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkains Miller Architects I I SECTION FIVE: PUBLIC AND USER GROUP INPUT existing facilities and/or responding to community needs for specific programs. Their Cobourg I building has a pool, fitness centre, squash courts, changing facilities and program rooms but they report that there are aging areas of the facility and space constraints that limit the delivery of specific programs. The Brighton facility has a fitness area and change rooms, along with program rooms and they report that this is a newly renovated facility but the anticipated growth I in membership would require additional space. The OEY and Childcare Centres are adequate for their current needs. I The most pressing concern facing this YMCA is upgrades and addition of space to the `flagship' Cobourg Centre. The need for additional facilities would be determined through the strategic plan that is currently being reviewed by the Board of Directors. As many partnerships currently I exist within their operation, the YMCA is willing to consider additional partnership opportunities throughout its service area. Efforts were made to contact the Oshawa YMCA as well, but phone calls were not returned. 5.3 PUBLIC MEETING IA public meeting was held in May to present the results of the preliminary needs assessment and to solicit additional comments relating to indoor recreation facility needs in the Newcastle I area. The input received through this meeting has been integrated into the analysis throughout this report. ' 5.4 SUMMARY The public consultation yielded many valuable insights and provided a great deal of information I regarding local preferences and needs, behaviours and utilization of indoor recreation facilities in Clarington. A common issue that arose from ice users was that there was a shortage of quality ice-time and changing facilities, especially in the older arenas. Hockey remains a popular I sport in the area while skating groups, except in Orono, are also seeing increases in their registration (most likely due to an increase in available ice through the construction of the South Courtice Arena and a continued influx of young families). The lone swimming group that I responded indicated that they were in dire need of a 'home' pool to minimize their travelling to multiple facilities in search of available pool time for competitive level swimmers. However, most groups were generally pleased with the pool facility in Courtice and viewed it as a model for the development of future pool facilities in Clarington. I I I I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 31 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants.The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I I I Section 6: NEEDS ASSESSMENT I This section discusses the need for indoor recreation facilities in the Municipality of Clarington I and, more specifically as part of a new recreation facility in the Village of Newcastle. With its increasing population, Newcastle will not only have to provide recreational opportunities to its existing residents but accommodate the demands of a growing Municipality as well. In this regard, it is important to re-visit the growth projections anticipated for both Clarington as a whole Iand Newcastle. Table 6-1: Clarington and Newcastle Pro'ected Population, 2001-2031 I 2001 2004 2009 2014 2019 2031 Newcastle 6,701 7,846 8,413 11,175 17,352 21,090 Clarington 73,330 79,586 90,391 102,986 117,637 150,545 IPopulation forecasts play an important role in assessing the need for additional facilities when combined with other socio-economic variables, trends and participation rates in individual recreation and leisure activities. 6.1 ARENAS I6.1.1 Arena Utilization & Demand I There are seven ice pads in Clarington with two being operated by independent Boards and the remaining five being operated by the Municipality. Based on a review of ice schedules, all ice pads are well-utilized. ' In assessing ice utilization, one approach is to look specifically at prime time hours. Under normal circumstances, prime time hours are generally considered to be 5pm to 10pm on weekdays and from 7am to 10pm on weekends resulting in a total of 55 prime time hours per I ice pad. In reviewing the ice schedule for the five municipally-operated ice pads, the prime time hour utilization (based non 55 hours per week) is 98% leaving only limited opportunities primarily at early or later time slots. IIn some communities, extended prime time hours are considered as demand for, and utilization of, earlier and later prime time hours can exist. In Clarington, many figure skating organizations I have been able to utilize the 4prn time-slot weekdays, while hockey organizations appear to utilize the 10pm to 11pm time slot. Including these additional hours, up to 12 additional prime time hours per ice pad per week could be offered (for a total of 67 prime hours per ice pad). A review of the municipal and board-run arena ice schedules reveals that at least 96% of the 67 I prime time hours per week per pad are utilized (see Table 6-2). Based on this assessment, there are approximately 18.5 prime time hours available in the entire arena system in Clarington each week. With a current population of 80,000 people, and the estimated 96% prime time I utilization, a modest growth in the population of less than 3% (equating to a growth of approximately 2,400 people per year) would likely result in full utilization of the available prime time ice by 2006. However, there may be greater pressures placed on the municipal ice pads during this time frame due to a number of factors, including unmet demand by a number of user Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 32 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I I SECTION SIX: NEEDS ASSESSMENT Igroups and latent demand in the community. As such, for ice facilities in Clarington, the I facilities have effectively reached (or are quickly reaching) capacity. Table 6-2: Utilization of Existing Ice Pads (based on 67 prime time hours per week) Facility Number of Total Prime Prime Hours Prime Hours Estimated ' Provider Ice Pads Hours/wk Used/wk Available/wk Utilization Municipality 5 335 319 16 95% I Boards 2 134 131.5 2.5 99% Totals 7 469 450.5 18.5 96% I Another way to identify demand is to examine participation levels. With 4,736 participants, hockey is the most popular structured indoor activity in Clarington. Figure skating is also a popular activity with over 720 skaters registered in figure skating and speed skating in the I Municipality. Table 6-3 outlines the current registrants for the Municipality's hockey and skating user groups. I Table 6-3: Participation Figures for Municipal Arena Users Hockey Age Group 3-9 10-19 2034 35-54 Total Bowmanville Eagles Junior A Club - 17 4 - 21 I Bowmanville Kinks - _ _ 20 20 Bowmanville Legion Oldtimers 24 24 Bowmanville Men's Town Hockey* - 2 29 29 60 I Bowmanville Non-Contact Hockey _ 120 120 Brooking Transport Old Truckers 16 16 Clarington Girls Hockey Association 44 401 445 Clarington Minor Hockey Assoc.* 90 360 - - 450 I Clarington Recreational Hockey 870 810 _ 1680 Gerrits Orchard Oldtimer Hockey 16 16 Newcastle Men's League* - - 45 45 90 I Newcastle Minor Hockey Assoc. 76 171 - - 247 Newcastle Oldtimers Hockey League 60 60 Oldtimers Hockey Club 20 20 Orono Amateur Athletic 105 205 20 - 330 I Solly's Enterprise Hockey Team - - 10 11 21 Town Sports Oldtimers 18 18 Ultra Old Boys Hockey Club - - - 38 38 I Additional leagues, casual rentals(pick- 40 510 510 1,060 up groups), schools, etc. (estimated)* - Total Hockey 1,185 2,006 618 927 4,736 *Age specific breakdowns not provided so distribution assumed I I I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 33 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I SECTION SIX: NEEDS ASSESSMENT I Skating Age Group 3-9 10-19 20-34 35-54 Total Bowmanville Figure Skating Club 237 135 6 378 Clarington Speed Skating Club' 30 30 25 15 100 I Newcastle Figure Skating Club 78 47 - - 125 Orono Figure Skating Club' 40 40 40 120 Total Skating 385 252 71 15 723 I 'Age specific breakdowns not provided so distribution assumed There are a total of 5,459 current ice users in the Municipality of Clarington. I Table 6-4 illustrates the current and projected demand for ice pads in Clarington based on a "participant-standards approach". Extensive research on arena-utilization by the Consultant has found that approximately 750 participants per ice pad achieves a high utilization level while I providing opportunity for public skating and tournament/special event play, particularly in communities that exhibit good uptake of"shoulder hours" (e.g., 4-5pm and 10-11pm weekdays), such as Clarington. For Clarington, the current participant level at 5,459 achieves a provision level of one ice pad for every 780 participants, indicating that the arenas are operating near 111 capacity at the present time. The projections are based upon a participant standard, as it is more reflective of community- I specific needs compared to the traditional population-based standard. It shows that there is a current deficit of 0.3 ice pads in the Municipality which will likely increase in the future as population growth occurs. ITable 6-4: Demand for Ice Pads in Clarington Total Participants 5,459 I Provision Standard 1:750 Required Ice Pads 7.3 Existing Ice Pads 7.0 Deficit (0.3) I 6.1.2 Potential Arena Provision Strategies IWith the exception of South Courtice Arena, most of the arenas in the Municipality are at least 15 years old and as a result, are generally less efficient to operate and program compared to I newer, more modern rinks. Additionally, older rinks with single ice pads do not offer the same level of amenity or economy of scale that multi-pad and multi-purpose facilities provide. In addition to a lack of modern amenities at the older venues such as the Newcastle and Orono Arenas, the age of the buildings and their components require on-going capital funds into I safety-related upgrades. For the Darlington Sports Centre, previous building condition assessments and the accessibility audit have identified significant upgrades that will be required in the future. The potential of twinning the facility to provide a total of two ice pads was also Iassessed. With existing ice pads operating at or near capacity in Clarington and expectations that an ice I time shortfall will grow as the population increases, the Municipality's provision strategy for additional ice will not only need to respond to demands but also to increasing cost- Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 34 ' FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkains Miller Architects 1 SECTION SIX: NEEDS ASSESSMENT • effectiveness. Given these issues, enhancing financial performance and co-locating recreation ' facilities are important elements of a strategy. Overall, there are three single pad ice facilities that should be given consideration in developing a strategy for future arena/ice pad provision in Clarington: Newcastle, Orono and Darlington. ' The Courtice and Rickard facilities, being twin pad arenas can be viewed somewhat as models to be achieved. The focus of this Study being on the Newcastle Village area dictates that the future of the Newcastle Memorial Arena be tied to the ultimate ice provision strategy. Although both the Orono and Darlington facilities are older, they do serve a key function at present. Their long- , term future may be best re-evaluated at a future date when other arena delivery additional/alterations are required (e.g., if/when additional ice is considered in Courtice and/or Bowmanville). ' The Newcastle Arena is of older condition, lacks modern amenities, and is not operationally integrated with the municipal ice system resulting in inefficiencies and potentially lower utilization rates. Population projections for Newcastle Village forecast a nearly tripling of its ' population by 2021. Although demand specifically-generated from the Newcastle Village area is not expected to generate significant increases in ice demand until around 2010 or later, overall population increases in Clarington as a whole will continue to drive ice pad demand across the ' entire system. This demand can be allocated system-wide to maximize utilization by taking pressure off existing facilities such as those in Courtice and Bowmanville that are essentially at (or near) capacity, while giving time for locally-generated demand in Newcastle to grow in coming years. Strategies: ✓ Work with the Arena Board in Newcastle to develop a plan for the closure of the Newcastle Memorial Arena and for the dissolution of the Board. ✓ Evaluate the future of the existing Newcastle Memorial Arena building and site to determine if alternative use or sale of the site/building is preferred. ✓ Develop a new twin pad arena in Newcastle as part of a multi-purpose complex (which results in the provision of one additional ice pad in the Clarington arena system). ✓ Monitor and maximize ice usage and allocation to ensure scheduling and utilization 1 efficiencies. ✓ In order to meet existing and projected ice demand, the older Darlington Sports Centre will continue to be required. 6.2 INDOOR SWIMMING /AQUATICS 1 6.2.1 Aquatics Utilization & Demand Other than walking, swimming continues to be identified as the most popular endeavour of all ages across Canada. Population and participation trends, however, suggest that there will be no significant natural growth in recreational swimming, children's swim lessons and related activities over the next twenty years. However, with a young population, Clarington will deviate 1 ' Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 35 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects 1 I SECTION SIX: NEEDS ASSESSMENT ' from this trend due to the continued influx of new residents to the area, including in Newcastle I which is expected to see an increase in the number of families in coming years. At present, Clarington is served with two indoor pools (in Courtice and Bowmanville) and two outdoor pools (in Orono and Newcastle). I The indoor pool at the Clarington Fitness Centre is twenty-five years old while the Courtice Community Complex was constructed only eight years ago. Both are in fair to good condition Iand have the ability to operate cost-effectively into the future. The two outdoor facilities at Newcastle Lions Pool and Orono Park Pool are respectively twenty- ' five and thirty years old. The Orono outdoor pool is still in fair condition and has useful life remaining for the near future while the Lions Pool is rated to be in fair to poor condition. The majority of the problems for the Newcastle pool facility are associated with its building structure and not the pool itself. If the proposed repairs are undertaken, there is opportunity to I accommodate additional demand for summer-time swimming. With a supply of two indoor pools, the Municipality currently has a provision level of one pool for every 40,000 residents. Provision levels vary from municipality to municipality in Ontario. For smaller communities a provision level may be in the range of one indoor pool for every 25,000 residents. However, for larger, growing communities like Clarington, provision levels tend to be I closer to one indoor pool for every 30,000 to 40,000. Larger, more urban communities may have provision levels as low as one indoor pool for every 60,000 population. Clarington's current provision level of one pool for every 40,000 appears to have achieved a I polar result with one pool being at capacity and the other being under-utilized. Significant pressures are being experienced at the Courtice Community Complex pool as this facility is viewed as the premier venue for residents with its desirable leisure concept. This facility has I also had great success in swimming programs (e.g., lessons) and its highly accessible location draws from the entire municipality. I On the other hand, the pool at the Fitness Centre in Bowmanville with its more traditional and outdated look has suffered usage declines leaving some capacity for additional usage. Although these two facilities share a similar market, their individual success and draw/appeal is much different from one another. Opportunities to modernize the Fitness Centre could be considered and this, in turn, could result in increased utilization. In addition, different programming at each facility could be delivered to take pressure off the Courtice facility while increasing use of the Fitness Centre. Overall, a provision level of one indoor pool for every 35,000 population is recommended in Clarington. This provision standard recognizes the demand for swimming in Clarington, the I need to consider facility distribution (in that Clarington is not only physically large but also has a number of existing settlement areas expected to grow) and the current utilization/capacity of existing facilities. Based upon the projected demand illustrated in Table 6-5, there appears to be sufficient pool capacity for recreational swimming at the existing indoor pool facilities in the near 1 to medium term. A target of 2016 should be considered for the provision of a third indoor pool facility (ideally located as an expansion to a Newcastle Multi-Purpose Recreation Complex) when the projected population reaches a sufficient threshold to support this direction. Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation FacIllty In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 36 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I SECTION SIX: NEEDS ASSESSMENT I The current capacity of pool space (largely at the Fitness Centre) is sufficient to accommodate I population growth in the near to medium term. Unless the utilization of the Clarington Fitness Centre increases substantially in the coming years, the decision to build a new pool facility should be met with a high degree of caution. In the meantime, seasonal summer demands could continue to be met by maintaining the existing outdoor pools (and splash pads) until they Iare unsuitable for use. Table 6-5: Projected Demand for Indoor Pools I INDOOR POOLS PROJECTED DEMAND 2004 2006 2011 2016 2021 Total Population* 79,586 83,908 95,429 108,846 124,098 , I Provision Standard Indoor Pools Required 2.3 1 indoor pool per 35,000 population 2.4 2.7 3.1 3.5 Existing Indoor Pools 2 2 2 2 2 I Deficit 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.5 •Population projections adjusted to Census years based upon Municipality of Clanngton D.C.projections and Region of Durham Official Plan Review(Population, Employment and Urban Land Discussion Paper) 6.2.2 Potential Indoor Pool Provision Strategies I The consultation program for this Study found differing views on the preferred strategy for indoor pool provision in Clarington. There were those that supported the near-term provision of a third facility (to be located in Newcastle), while others supported the provision of the third I facility in the medium-term as significant population increases occur in Newcastle. A summary of the pros and cons for alternative pool provisions strategies is presented below: Table 6-6: Pros and Cons of Alternative Pool Provision Strategies INear-Term Provision ,Medium-Term Provision • Provides opportunity for the Fitness Centre • Allows for the programming at the Fitness I to become a focus for"competitive" programming and user groups. Centre to be adjusted to balance programming/utilization between the • Immediately provides a second leisure Courtice facility and the Fitness Centre, I concept pool which would take pressure off thereby maximizing usage of existing the Courtice facility and could market to facilities. the eastern portion of the Municipality, • Delays the provision of a third indoor pool while Courtice could market to the western in Newcastle until the population threshold I portion. in Newcastle increases to a point where • Could facilitate the removal or sale of the the pool is supported by the Newcastle Fitness Centre pool from the inventory Village area population and does not rely I allowing for the long term provision of a new pool in Bowmanville. on populations from other parts of the Municipality (e.g., Bowmanville). • Could allow for the Lions Pool (outdorr) to • Does not respond to the desire to provide I be removed from the inventory. The pool a comparable indoor pool facility in the buildings are in need of repairs and the eastern portion of Clarington as Courtice. pool does not offer a modern aquatic • Decreases the financial risk involved in experience. opening a pool before sufficient population I is in place to support it. Municipality of Clarington—New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 37 I FINAL REPORT—June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects 1 SECTION SIX: NEEDS ASSESSMENT Strategies: ✓ Monitor participation levels in indoor aquatic activities to determine local trends and attitudes toward recreational swimming in Clarington/Newcastle. ' ✓ Consider upgrading the existing indoor pool and services at the Clarington Fitness Centre in order to accommodate future demands. ✓ Consider the provision of a third indoor pool in Newcastle (designed as a leisure pool similar to the Courtice facility) around the year 2016. ✓ Until such time as a new indoor pool is provided in Newcastle, there will be a need to rely on the Lions Outdoor Pool which will necessitate capital improvements to the existing facility including the associated building. 6.3 FITNESS CENTRES The Municipality provides a fitness centre and programs at the Courtice Community Complex, ' as well as a programming site in Bowmanville. In addition, there are five private fitness facilities in the Municipality, three of which are women's only clubs. Curves Fitness Club is the only private club in Newcastle (they have a location in Bowmanville and Courtice as well), while the ' rest of the clubs (GoodLife Fitness Club, Lifestyles Health & Fitness and Bottom Line) are located in Bowmanville. ' Provision standards are generally not applied to fitness centres, rather they are best provided only if a gap in service exists that cannot be adequately filled by an alternate provider and if the opportunity presents itself. For example, fitness centres are excellent traffic generators within multi-purpose facilities as shown in the Courtice Community Complex and should be maintained ' in instances where they are supportive of the Municipality's mandate and other facilities within a complex. The capacity of a fitness/wellness centre is usually determined by its ability to accommodate traffic rather than simply a member count. To establish the facility's traffic capacity, the number of participants who can be simultaneously yet comfortably served must be determined. This is a ' function of the available number of participant spaces including aerobic equipment, strength training stations, general activity areas such as the track, stretching locations, court spaces, etc. Based upon industry data, the average length of a fitness centre visit (use time) is approximately 70 minutes. Dividing the use time by the total number of prime-time hours, establishes the number of workout or use cycles (i.e., the number of times the centre can move its participant capacity through the facility). For example, a facility with a prime-time window of ' Monday through Friday 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on weekends would offer 39 prime-time hours per week, which in turn produces 34 workout or use cycles per week. ' Taking the example further, if the Centre provides 124 participant spaces, the facility would be able to accommodate 124 individuals during each workout cycle. Therefore, the facility can handle 4,216 prime-time workouts per week. 1 ' Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 38 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkains Miller Architects I SECTION SIX: NEEDS ASSESSMENT I Normally, 75% to 80% of a fitness centre's traffic is concentrated in prime time- 20% to 25% of I fitness visits will occur in off hours (early-mornings or midday). If it is assumed that the facility experiences 25% of its total weekly traffic during non-prime time, the facility would be capable of accommodating an additional 1,392 member visits per week for total of 5,608 weekly uses. I Industry data suggests that members frequent their fitness facility an average of 1.75 times per week. Based upon this visit per week pattern, the example facility (which is very similar to the Courtice Community Complex facility) would have a capacity of 3,205 members. The following 1 table illustrates the application of the capacity formula. Table 6-7: Estimated Capacity for a Fitness Centre I Variable Value Total prime time hours per week 39 I Total prime-time minutes per week 2,340 Average length of fitness visit in minutes (workout length) 70 Weekly prime-time use cycles-PT min. per week+workout length 34 ' Number of individual workout stations 124 Weekly prime-time use capacity-workout stations X use cycles 4,216 Weekly non prime-time use- 25% = PT use X .33 1,392 Total use capacity- prime + non prime-time use capacity 5,608 I Average number of member uses per week (use frequency) 1.75 Member capacity-total use capacity use frequency 3,205 I Member capacity would rise or fall as participation patterns change. For example, if members of the sample facility began to use the centre more frequently than 1.75 times per week, the facility's capacity to accommodate members would decline - a use frequency of two visits per I week would lower the member capacity to 2,804 or a reduction of 400 members. On the other hand, if members use the facility during non prime-time hours more frequently than industry averages, member capacity would escalate proportionate to the increase in off-hour use - if I 30% of centre's traffic occurred during non prime-time, the facility's capacity would climb by 237 members. The preceding calculations presume that drop-in participants would not inhibit member capacity. I Consequently, it is assumed that policies would be established to limit pay-as-you-go use of the facility to maximize the number of members the centre could comfortably accommodate. I For the Fitness Centre at the Courtice Community Complex, a similar exercise was undertaken and resulted in a determination that the existing facility has capacity to accommodate additional users. Therefore, as Clarington's population continues to grow, it is expected that this facility will I be able to accommodate additional demands. In reviewing the Courtice facility membership records, there are currently 169 members from Ward 4, many of which are from Newcastle and Orono. Although this suggests a demand 1 Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility in Newcastle Village Study PAGE 39 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I 1 SECTION SIX: NEEDS ASSESSMENT ' originating from the Study Area, it is not sufficient to justify the development of a new fitness ' centre (particularly with the existing Courtice facility having capacity for additional users). With an increasing population and changing demographic structure expected in the Newcastle Village area, demand for fitness facilities can be expected to increase in-line with national wellness trends that view fitness as a growth area. At present, however, the current population level in the Newcastle Village area is not sufficient to support a new fitness centre. ' As the population in Clarington continues to grow, an increase in membership/usage of the existing Courtice Fitness Centre is anticipated. However, given the facility's current level of usage and the relatively limited number of users from Ward 4, it is recommended that consideration of a fitness component for the Newcastle facility be re-evaluated at the time that a second phase expansion is contemplated (2016). ' Notwithstanding the "fitness centre" component, during the consultation process, a number of residents requested consideration of a walking track to facilitate indoor walking especially during winter months. Without developing a "fitness centre", we would not recommend providing a track, however, there is strong merit in designing the new Recreation Complex such that ' hallways/corridors are linked in a manner that facilitates a walking course/experience. - Strategies: ✓ Consideration of a fitness component for the Newcastle facility should be re-evaluated at the time that a second phase expansion is contemplated (2016) as current demand does not justify provision of such a facility. ✓ When considering a second phase fitness component, the municipality should consider private sector partnership opportunities. ✓ Design the Newcastle Recreation Complex in a manner that facilitates a linked hallway/corridor system that is conducive for those interested in indoor walking for leisure. ' 6.4 GYMNASIA Today, indoor gymnasia are desired facilities due to their ability to accommodate a wide variety of activities ranging from active team sports to banquets to day camps. The public consultation confirmed this demand within Clarington. In particular, youth basketball, volleyball and ' badminton, as well as many adult team sports have grown in popularity in recent years and this was also communicated in Clarington with desire for additional leisure opportunities for youth, ranging from drop-in activities to basketball. Rock climbing is a new and emerging activity that is ' gaining popularity and could offer a non-traditional leisure opportunity for the Newcastle area. Gymnasia can also serve as banquet halls due to their size, provided that kitchen facilities are available. Many of the sports organizations also indicated a need for quality "dry land training" facilities that could further the potential of their activity. Traditionally, there has been a heavy reliance by both the municipality and community groups on school gyms, however, funding formulas have caused a reduction in public access or have ' resulted in pricing and operating decisions that have become cost prohibitive for community ' Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 40 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects SECTION SIX: NEEDS ASSESSMENT organizations (although recent Provincial initiatives have been put in place to reduce costs). It 1 was stated that existing school facilities in Newcastle do not provide the opportunity to offer new programs. With multi-purpose gym space being a facility capable of serving the needs of youth and other segments of the population, some emphasis should be placed on gymnasium provision and on assisting groups in accessing existing and future gymnasium facilities. Of critical importance was the view that there was a lack of gymnasium facilities in Newcastle, which is viewed as impacting people's participation and interest in program offerings. Recent ' municipal initiatives to provide more programming in the Newcastle Village area have been challenged by the lack of available space and competition for existing spaces. Opportunities for summer camps would be greatly enhanced if a multi-purpose recreation facility with gymnasium ' were provided. To date, the only municipal gymnasium is provided at the South Courtice Arena and it is an under-sized facility. The demand for such a facility, the lack of existing space and the potential to increase activity levels support the provision of a gymnasium as part of a new multi-purpose recreation facility. Strategy: ' ✓ Construct a full size gymnasium as part of a multi-purpose facility to address existing and future demand (4,000-5,000 sq. ft.). The design of the gymnasium space should encompass a broad range of recreational opportunities which could include a rock climbing wall. 6.5 COMMUNITY MEETING & PROGRAMMING SPACE Large, high quality multi-purpose and multi-generational facilities are generally preferred over ' stand alone or neighbourhood facilities. This type of facility allows for a broad range of programming (structured and unstructured activities) for all ages (preschool to seniors), as well as cross-programming opportunities, which partially address the "shortage of time issue". Multi- purpose facilities also allow for a number of service agencies to be co-located, thereby creating "one-stop shopping" opportunities. Community recreation complexes create greater financial economies of scale and allow for a higher level of customer service. ' There are currently about 20 community meeting spaces (of which 17 are independently run) in the Municipality of Clarington, reflecting the spatial distribution of people. The dispersed nature of the community does not lend itself well to the application of provision standards for community meeting space, rather the development of new facilities should be done according to community demand and if gaps are identified in the service provision. ' The impact that a new facility would have on existing community halls is difficult to predict as the types of services offered will vary considerably. There are many social factors an individual evaluates in deciding what community hall to use, such as its proximity to home and who the ' other users are. The halls in the Newcastle area would most likely be affected, but consultation with facility operators indicates that a new facility would be good for the Village so long as it is kept affordable. The most likely affected facility would be the Newcastle Community Hall, however, this historic venue offers a unique atmosphere for patrons - particularly for wedding ' receptions, dances, etc. It can be expected, however, that meeting room space at a new facility ' Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 41 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects SECTION SIX: NEEDS ASSESSMENT would impact the Hall - most particularly the lower level rooms which are only accessible by stair and which have no natural light as well as being of only fair condition. A new recreation facility in Newcastle should be multi-purpose and should provide meeting ' rooms capable of accommodating a range of activities and capacities. Activities identified during the consultation process included: arts and crafts, youth-drop-in activities, seniors interests (e.g., carpet bowling, cards). Overall, what is needed is "programmable space" for both community organizations and the municipality. Strategies: ' ✓ Develop flexible and programmable meeting room space as part of a new multi-purpose community facility. V Discuss shared-used opportunities with potential partners to increase non-prime daytime hour usage of new meeting/program space. ' 6.6 SENIORS FACILITIES The needs of seniors are an important consideration given the aging population trend prevalent on a local, provincial and national level. Newcastle's population is currently older than those in Bowmanville and Courtice and demands for seniors and older adult programs exist. For the Newcastle Village area, the existing Senior's Club is limited in size and scope (focused ' on older seniors) and is likely more concerned about maintaining membership than expanding programming. However, the Clarington Older Adult Association has indicated interest in providing programming geared to these age groups in Newcastle. Currently, a lack of available ' facilities is the main constraint. There is a need in the community to provide activities for the 'new seniors' who are involved in more active types of activities - facilities that offer a broader range of services are required for such offerings. Strategy: ✓ Although a dedicated seniors' facility is not recommended, it will be important to ensure ' that flexible and programmable meeting room space that can accommodate activities for older adults and seniors is part of a new multi-purpose community facility. 6.7 OTHER FACILITY CONSIDERATIONS t During the consultation process, there were a range of recreation/leisure facilities and amenities suggested for a new Newcastle recreation complex. Although some of these have been discussed above (e.g., rock climbing wall, walking track), we want to comment on a couple of ' other suggestions: • Curling Facility - There were a few comments received that curling was not currently offered in Clarington. Some referenced a club (the Bowmanville Golf Club) that once ' provided curling but has since closed the curling component of their operation. Overall, ' Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility in Newcastle Village Study PAGE 42 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects 1 SECTION SIX: NEEDS ASSESSMENT the demand identified during the consultation process was quite limited and did not ' provide a sufficient level of need to justify provision of curling. However, as this Study is recommending the closure of the Newcastle Memorial Arena for the purposes of ice skating (e.g., hockey, figure skating, etc.), there is merit in considering alternative uses ' of this facility. Such consideration should ideally involve soliciting interest in a group to enter into a partnership to offer curling. Should sufficient interest not be obtained, then such alternative use should be dismissed. • Indoor Soccer- There were very few comments received about the potential of utilizing the Newcastle Memorial Arena for indoor soccer. With the development of the new indoor soccer facility in Bowmanville, the initial demand for indoor soccer space appears ' to be satisfied. However, as with curling, further investigation by the municipality to seek partnership interest could be considered. ' Strategy: ✓ Prior to closing the Newcastle Memorial Arena facility, the municipality should undertake a preliminary search for partnership interest in offering/providing curling, indoor soccer or other alternative use of the facility. t6.8 SYNTHESIS OF NEEDS PROJECTIONS The majority of existing quality indoor facilities are located in the major population centres of ' Bowmanville and Courtice. There is a shortage of high quality venues in the eastern portion of the Municipality. Newcastle is forecasted to show significant population growth within the next decade. Thus, Newcastle is the ideal community to build a multi-purpose community recreation ' facility to accommodate future indoor leisure needs. Newcastle and the surrounding area appear to be able to support one additional ice pad ' provided that a municipally-wide allocation strategy is employed. Given that people are willing to travel for ice and that Newcastle arena is in older condition, replacing it with a new twin pad facility is recommended. The analysis also revealed that a gymnasium and flexible/programmable meeting space are also needed. tAn indoor pool is not recommended in the initial phase of development but should be "planned" as an addition in a second phase. The pool facility appears supportable in the 2016 time frame. A fitness centre is not recommended in Newcastle as the population is currently too small to adequately support such a facility and given that there is capacity at the Courtice facility for ' additional memberships/users. The fitness center could, however, be considered in the second building phase if a suitable partnership with a third-party provider is established or if the municipality feels that there is adequate demand at that time. ' MunIcipally of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 43 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects II ' Section 7: BUSINESS CASE 7.1 INTRODUCTION The components contemplated for development in the new facility for Newcastle include a twin pad arena, a gymnasium with associated program and meeting rooms and an indoor swimming ' pool (as a second phase). The business plan element of this study examines the operating implications of the contemplated facilities and provides an indication of the operating cost and revenue of each component. To prepare the business plan, the consultants performed the following activities: • Reviews relevant trends and operating considerations pertinent to the study. ' • Reviews the Municipality's arena, pool and community centre operating profile and financial information. • Reviews management and operating approaches employed in other jurisdictions. ' The business plan presents the financial implications of the contemplated facility components on a stand-alone basis in order to provide senior municipal officials with appropriate information ' upon which to base development decisions. Where necessary and appropriate, the plan also includes commentary regarding the impact of the contemplated facilities on the existing Municipal endeavours. The management and operating parameters of each business unit are ' fully described to give Municipal officials adequate background about the factors that will influence the financial and operating performance of the facilities to facilitate a thoughtful decision regarding potential development. ' Of note, there were two individuals that were identified during the Study as having possible partnership interest in a Newcastle facility. One interest was related to renting of space (possibly 1,000 square feet) with potential access to gym, pool or other spaces (no formal commitments ' were made by this individual at this time). A second individual indicated an initial interest in a fitness centre (of approximately 5,000 sq. ft.), however, it would appear that upon that individual's own market research, this interest is no longer being pursued. Within the municipality, there is also potential that the Fire Station as well as the Newcastle Branch Library could have interest in located at the site identified for the Newcastle Recreation Complex. Clarington Public Library is currently undertaking a Study to determine library space needs and to evaluate potential sites. 7.2 FACILITY AND SERVICE SEGMENTATION The facility represents the potential of three independent business units that could be developed t on an individual basis, simultaneously or utilizing a phased approach. Each unit would have specific and identifiable target audiences and would employ staff with skills and training unique to the particular service environment. The operating and financial information is presented as though each unit was to be developed individually. The three units are: ' Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 44 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants, The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects 1 SECTION SEVEN: BUSINESS CASE • Arena: revenue and costs associated with programs, rentals and services available from ' the twin pad ice facility. • Aquatic Centre: revenue and costs associated with water based activities and dry land training or other pool programs. ' • Gymnasium and Meeting Rooms: revenue and costs associated with operating a gymnasium and meeting rooms that would be rented to community organizations as well as department programs delivered in these spaces. 7.2.1 Management and Administration ' The development of one or more of the contemplated business units would trigger the necessity for the addition of a new Facility Supervisor. The facility administration budget would absorb the ' costs associated with this new position ($70,000 plus benefits). Therefore, the financial projections for each business unit are not affected by this cost burden. A new facility would also necessitate the addition of a Clerk to handle the administration functions inherent with the business units - a single Clerk would be sufficient to service one or more of the units depending upon development decisions. The Clerk's compensation ($40,000 plus benefits) would be carried by the facility's budget, therefore the financial projections for ' each business unit includes an appropriate entry. It is noteworthy that if two of the business units were to be developed simultaneously, the combined projections would be overstated by approximately $40,000 - equivalent to the Clerk's salary that is included in the projections for ' each unit. 7.2.2 Arena Business Unit Clarington's existing supply of ice is used to capacity. The needs analysis of this study suggests that there is a certain degree of pent-up demand from users in the community as a ' result of lack of additional available ice time. It would seem that this demand would persist over time as the municipal population increases and the demand from traditional user groups - minor hockey, girls' hockey and adults-remains strong. ' The development of an arena with multiple ice surfaces would result in economy of scale cost efficiencies. Typically, a twin pad arena's payroll and utility costs can be proportionately reduced by between 30% and 50% (on a per pad basis) compared to single pad facilities. These savings are connected to the integration of service functions and the cross-utilization of staff. The number of ice surfaces in a facility and its configuration can significantly influence the relative amount of cost savings associated with these economies of scale. For example, an arena with three pads is not able to maintain as low a payroll to revenue ratio as a twin or quad ' facility. This is because a single crew of operators is not capable of simultaneously maintaining three surfaces, which escalates staff costs compared to the revenue stream generated by the third surface. Therefore, it is more economical to configure multiple pad arenas with even numbers of ice surfaces. Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 45 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I SECTION SEVEN: BUSINESS CASE I Additionally, multiple pad facilities are often able to attract more special events or tournaments, ' which can augment revenue streams. Quad facilities are generally the most desirable for large tournaments, however, twin pad arenas are quite capable of hosting smaller events. To establish the context for the financial projections, the consultants prepared a number of Iplanning principles: • The facility would be a twin pad configuration. ' • Given the likely absence of potential partners with interest in developing and managing a new arena, the Municipality would control all aspects of the facility's operation and would choose an operating approach consistent with municipal philosophies. I I • The new arena would respond to the facility and program needs of Clarington user groups and the facility's use profile (i.e., the proportion of time used by various youth and adult groups) would mirror the manner in which the South Courtice Arena is used and I programmed. • The staffing model of the new arena would be generally consistent with personnel deployment methods utilized at the South Courtice Arena. I • The Municipality would operate the concession and pro shop. • User fees and other rates in the new facility would remain consistent with the schedule Ifor rates and fees. Based upon information provided by staff, the consultants have developed a number of I parameters that will be important determinants of the operating and financial success of the new ice facility. The twin pad arena will offer a total of 125 hours of prime-time ice available to both minor and I adult groups at their respective prime-time rates. Further, Department programs will consume eight hours of prime-time ice. It is anticipated that all prime-time will be used to capacity. As is currently the case in the South Courtice facility, youth groups and adults will occupy a modest 1 number of non prime-time hours - estimated at a total of 16 hours per week. The following assumptions have been employed in the financial projections for a new twin pad I arena: • Prime-time ice would be allocated to both youth (77%) and adults (20%). • The facility would offer eight hours of weekly Department programs made up of public skating, learn to skate, etc. • All allocated prime-time and 16 hours non prime-time would be used on a weekly basis. I • The ice season would be 32 weeks in length. • Ice rental rates (and exclusive of GST) would be as follows: youth prime time - $139; adult prime-time- $161; youth non prime-time - $99; adult non prime-time- $131. I • Labour costs would parallel the South Courtice facility, which includes arena operators, maintenance personnel, staff for concessions and the pro shop, plus the addition of a ' Clerk to handle administrative functions. I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 46 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I SECTION SEVEN: BUSINESS CASE I • Utility, supply, repair and maintenance costs would remain consistent with the I Municipality's current experiences. • Ice rates would conform to the existing policy to the end of 2007 and would rise 2% per annum thereafter. I • Cost items would escalate 2% per year as a result of inflation. The following table provides the first and fifth year financial projection of the new twin pad arena Ibased upon the preceding assumptions: Table 7-1: Estimated Operating Revenue& Expenses for New Twin Pad Arena I Year 1 Year 5 Revenue I Ice Rental $582,896 $650,631 Public Skating $20,480 $22,160 Programs $20,000 $21,649 Other Uses $110,000 $119,068 IMiscellaneous (canteen, vending, pro shop) $219,000 $237,053 Total Revenue $952,376 $1,050,568 IExpenses Labour $473,593 $512,632 I Utilities $274,560 $297,193 Operations $96,900 $104,888 Concession and Pro shop supplies $97,000 $104,999 I Total Expenses $942,053 $1,019,708 Net Revenue $10,323 $30,857 I Given Newcastle's population as well as the prevalence of large arena venues in neighbouring jurisdictions, it is not expected that the new twin pad would be capable of attracting tournaments or special events that would substantially add to facility revenue. ' 7.2.3 Aquatic Centre Business Unit I It is anticipated that a new aquatic venue would be developed and operated in accordance with standards currently in force at the Courtice Community Complex. The operations would balance hours offered for lessons with opportunities for recreational swimming, special events I and rentals. Where possible, the pool would be programmed to accommodate a number of simultaneous uses thereby increasing bather loads and revenues. I Convenience is the leading factor dictating facility choices for recreation, leisure and wellness consumers. Industry research suggests that the primary market area (or trade area) of a leisure facility is within a geographical radius represented by an eight-minute travel time from the ' centre. The secondary market is within a 12-minute travel radius. In suburban locations, travel I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Faculty In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 47 FINAL REPORT—.June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I1 I SECTION SEVEN: BUSINESS CASE Itime is normally measured from the facility to an individual's residence. Urban facilities include Itravel times from both residential and workplace locations in market area calculations. For the purposes of projecting pool use, it is assumed that the primary market for the new swimming pool would be residents from Newcastle - a total of 7,000 individuals. Bowmanville I would represent the secondary market with a total of 27,460 residents. It is assumed that residents of Courtice would not use the new venue as the Courtice Community Complex is expected to adequately meet their needs. However, individuals residing in the primary and I secondary markets of the new facility, who are currently using the Courtice Community Complex pool, would undoubtedly migrate to the Newcastle facility because of improved convenience. I Children and youth are the primary users of swimming pools. This age cohort participates in instructional programs and usually surpasses adult participation rates for recreation swims. Industry studies frequently indicate that youth engage in swimming activities three to five times more often per year than adults. In Clarington, the children and youth age cohort (0 to 14 years) Irepresents 25% of the residential population of both the primary and secondary markets. The per-capita bather rate of a community is represented by the total number of bather visits per I year compared to population. Although the construction of a new pool in Newcastle could possibly increase the propensity for recreational swimming by local residents, the small number of people living in the vicinity of the venue would significantly impact the total number of pool I visits per year arising from within the primary market. Those in the secondary market may also be inhibited by travel time, which could negatively influence the number of swim visits from this group of potential pool patrons. I It is anticipated that residents would be able to use the new pool either on a drop-in (individual fee) or a pool membership basis. Frequent users will likely opt for membership while casual users would elect the pay-as-you-go option. While tracking the number of pool visits by I individuals with pool memberships would be difficult, this group of users would represent a major proportion of annual bather traffic to the facility. I For the purposes of projecting recreational swim attendance, the following assumptions have been employed for pay-as-you-go bathers: Table 7-2: Assumptions for Pay-as-you-go Bathers I Primary Secondary Market Market I Total Population 7,000 27,460 Children and Youth Population 25% 25% Adult Bather Rate (per Capita) 0.5 0.25 ' Youth Bather Rate (per Capita) 7.0 0.5 Based upon the preceding assumptions, the new pool would accommodate a total of 22,144 I annual pay-as-you-go bathers for recreational swimming. It is reasonable to assume that this number could double when taking into account users who would patronize the facility on a membership basis. This represents an annual bather ratio of 1.3 visits per capita of individuals Iresiding in the primary and secondary markets. This is a very low ratio. Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 4B I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I I SECTION SEVEN: BUSINESS CASE ' As mentioned, some of the bathers that will frequent the new facility are current users of the Courtice Community Complex pool. Consequently, the development of the new aquatic centre would have a detrimental impact upon pool traffic and the resultant revenue stream at the ' Municipality's existing facility. However, it is impossible to accurately predict the degree to which bather activities and revenues would be negatively affected. The development a new pool would trigger the necessity for the addition of the Aquatic ' Coordinator/Supervisor. The aquatic administration budget would absorb the costs associated with this new position ($60,000 plus benefits). Therefore, the financial projections for aquatic business unit are not affected by this cost burden. ' The following business assumptions have been employed to project the financial performance of the new aquatic centre: ' • Approximately 18% of the children and youth population residing in the primary market would participate in instructional programming (1,551 individuals). • Children and youth in instructional programs would register (on average) for 2.5 ' instructional sessions per year. • Lesson fees would average $60 per session per registrant. ' • Recreational swim fees would average $2.75 per visit. • The pool would be the responsibility of an Aquatic Coordinator/Supervisor who would work with a staff complement of guards, instructors, cashiers, receptionists (largely part- ' time personnel) and a Clerk to handle the administrative functions. • Part-time labour costs are based upon the appropriate guard coverage during hours of recreational swims and the number instructors necessary to conduct the lesson programs. • Utility costs and other operating costs are based upon the Courtice Community Complex pool operation. The following table illustrates the compensation rates or payroll costs anticipated for the staffing portion of the pools operating cost. ' Table 7-3: Proposed Indoor Pool Staffing Position Status Compensation ' Clerk Guards Full-time $40,000 Part-time $85,000 Instructors Part-time $95,000 ' Cashier-receptionists Part-time $80,000 Maintenance Full & $207,000 Part-time Benefits @ 18% $91,260 Total $598,260 The following table provides the first and fifth year financial projection of the new pool based ' upon the preceding assumptions. Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 49 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I SECTION SEVEN: BUSINESS CASE ITable 7-4: Estimated Operating Revenue & Expenses for New Indoor Aquatic Centre I Year 1 Year 5 Revenue Recreational Swims $60,895 $65,915 I Lessons $232,605 $251,779 Rentals $50,000 $54,122 Memberships $40,000 $43,297 IMiscellaneous $65,000 $70,358 Total Revenue $383,500 $415,113 ' Expenses Labour $598,260 $647,576 Utilities $225,000 $243,547 I Supplies $25,000 $27,061 Maintenance $50,000 $54,122 Miscellaneous $51,500 $55,745 ITotal Expenses $949,760 $1,028,051 Net Cost $566,260 $612,938 I7.2.4 Gymnasium and Meeting Room Business Unit ' In response to emerging leisure participation trends, many municipalities are adding gymnasia to multi-purpose recreation facilities. Gyms provide versatile space that increases the potential use by various types of patrons. For example, a typical municipally operated gym could I accommodate basketball, volleyball, soccer, badminton, martial arts, rhythmic gymnastics, ball hockey, dance classes, aerobics, yoga, as well as a wide array of games and spontaneous activities attractive to both youth and adult groups. Gymnasia can be programmed by the Idepartment or rented to user groups on a per hour basis. The contemplated gymnasium facility would be of standard size and capable of meeting the I program requirements outlined above. Based upon discussions with staff, it is anticipated that Department programming would occupy approximately 80% of the available gym time. The balance of the time would be rented to community groups such as minor basketball, volleyball I and soccer groups that would organize leagues, skill development camps, etc. Multi-purpose centres also offer meeting rooms that are available for rent by community groups, private enterprise and public agencies. These rooms may also be used from time to time for IDepartment programming. The meeting rooms in the Newcastle facility would offer a flexible environment (a room divider) I and be appropriate for meetings, special events, social gathering, etc. It is anticipated that the rooms would be largely used by local organizations and consequently the financial projections have considered the municipal meeting room rental rate for community groups. I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 50 � I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants, The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I SECTION SEVEN: BUSINESS CASE 1 It is very unlikely that the gymnasium and meeting rooms would be developed on a stand-alone I basis. Therefore, this business unit would only come to fruition in conjunction with either the arena or aquatic centre, the financial projections for which include the Clerk. The gym and meeting room projections assume administrative support would already be on site and therefore I the payroll cost adjustment is avoided. The following business assumptions have been employed to project the financial performance of the gymnasium and meeting rooms: I • The gymnasium would offer approximately 50 prime-time hours per week over a 40- week operating season. 1 • Department programs would occupy 80% of the 2,000 annual available prime-time hours with sport organizations and community groups renting the remaining time. • Non prime-time would be used for Department programming, however no rentals are I anticipated during these less desirable time periods. • Department programs would be organized on a positive cost recovery basis with a standard profit threshold of$10 per hour. I • Gym rental fees will begin at $30 per hour and be increased by 2% per annum. • Meeting rooms would be rented 40% of the available time at a rate beginning at $27 per 1 hour, which would be increased by 2% per annum. • Operating costs including utilities and light cleaning is projected at $4.50 per square foot for both the gymnasium and meeting rooms. I The following table provides the first and fifth year financial projection of the gymnasium and meeting rooms based upon the preceding assumptions. ITable 7-5: Estimated Operating Revenue & Expenses for Gymnasium & Meeting Rooms Year 1 Year 5 IRevenue Gym Rent $12,000 $12,989 Programs (net) $16,000 $17,319 IRooms $17,280 $18,704 Total Revenue $45,280 $49,013 IExpenses Operations $24,750 $26,790 I Total Expenses $24,750 $26,790 Net Revenue $20,530 $22,222 1 I I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 51 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects PAGE I I ' Section 8: CAPITAL COSTS & CONCEPT i ' 8.1 GENERAL NOTES ON THE DESIGN The evolution of the modern community recreation centre has defined a set of general characteristics that are found in most well designed facilities. For this report, we have produced I a generic design that relates the various components to one another and to the site. Some of the general characteristics we feel are important to the Newcastle site are as follows: • Single point control of access to the facility from a location central and visible to the I public areas announces the importance of personal and building security while avoiding the additional operating costs of multiple checkpoints. I • In arenas, separation of the public / spectator areas from the players is standard practice; while the isolation of the services functions from both public groups is a safety goal. I • Initial impressions last. An easily located inviting public entrance that introduces patrons to the facility activities through immediate transparency and a clear organization of space is a highly effective marketing device. I • Views into major activity spaces from the public areas contribute to a sense of security through ease of wayfinding and "eyes on the street", while encouraging participation in facility programs. I Space size requirements are based on ratios developed by the consultants and are generally accepted industry standards. The following subsections describe our understanding of the spatial program leading to the concept design diagram and preliminary cost estimates. ill 8.1.1 Site Development IFor this study, we have only considered the site development immediately adjacent the building and the minimal parking requirements associated with the building program. Parking counts are I based on approximately one space for every 3 persons of occupancy for Phase 1 and 1:4 for Phase 2, resulting in 191 spaces for the 200 seat arenas and an additional 67 spaces for the 400 seat option. The pool component would require only 55 spaces, as most users are children and competition use is not projected. We have not determined the impact of the proposed I outdoor facilities on these parking requirements. We would advise an overall parking strategy for the site be determined prior to development of the first phase of the facility. In addition, an overall master plan of the site (building, parking, outdoor amenities) should be accepted before ' the building design is begun. 8.1.2 Twin Pad Arena IThe proposed arena will be similar to the South Courtice Arena, with 12 change rooms between the two similar sized pads, except the refrigeration and other services would all be located Iopposite the public side to achieve separation between the public, players, and services I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 52 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkains Miller Architects SECTION EIGHT: CAPITAL COSTS &CONCEPT functions. We would not recommend seating above the change rooms for the 200 seat scenario. ' This location might be viable in the 400 seat scenario if the meeting rooms were also located there. However, that option presents other limitations on the use of the arenas and the meeting rooms. Our preferred location for small capacity seating is on the opposite side of the ice from the team rooms with separate access to a public concourse. Consistent with our philosophy of visibility and transparency, we would locate public viewing from the heated concourse to permit all facility users to enjoy the on-ice activities, enlivening the ' public areas and encouraging greater participation in facility programs. ' 8.1.3 Gymnasium The gymnasium is conceived as a sports hall first, with supplementary use for other public ' functions. For that reason, it is also has a common glazed wall with the main public concourse. Its size is derived from the standard basketball court (approximately 50' x 90') with run-out space on all sides. No seating has been included outside this court. Change rooms would be male and female, sized about the same as a high school gym. It is not anticipated that the gym ' will be used for large fitness classes as the change rooms may be inadequate. Ideally, the second phase pool change facilities should be located such that gym users could access these change rooms, as well as the pool, without having to re-enter the public area. 8.1.4 Program / Meeting Rooms ' By creating two sub-dividable spaces of 500 and 1500 square feet, the multi-purpose rooms are sized to accommodate a variety of occupancies from 15 to 100 persons. We are not of the opinion that the best location for these rooms is overlooking another public event space like the arena or pool as it tends to put them on an upper level and can complicate access. Secondarily, this location may not be appropriate for events not related to the space being overviewed. ' 8.1.5 Common Areas ' The common areas are sized to accommodate both phases of the project, which implies the second phase must be substantially outlined with the design of the first phase. The connection point of Phase 2, at the administration and public concourse / lobby, is an important functional consideration to be carefully determined in the design of Phase 1. 8.1.6 Aquatic Centre ' A bather load of about 230 was used to fix the water and deck areas of the aquatic centre, as well as the change rooms. The water area, at 3850 square foot, is slightly larger than an equivalent six lane 25 metre pool. The deck is about twice that size to accommodate a large parents' viewing area, a water slide, and poolside seating for bathers. Consistent with current thinking, the change rooms would accommodate the traditional male and female rooms and a large family change room. Staff change is also provided in separate rooms near the guards / first aid station. ' Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 53 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects SECTION EIGHT: CAPITAL COSTS &CONCEPT 8.2 CAPITAL COST ESTIMATES ' Construction costs are based on early 2005 unit cost rates for comparable facilities in the Greater Toronto Area. The building quality for purposes of design and cost estimating is not very different from newer facilities in Clarington and adjacent municipalities. Greater emphasis has been placed on elements to improve life cycle costs, including material durability, energy conservation, and systems performance. We have also assumed that environmental / sub-surface conditions are not problematic; that standard foundations can be used and that site servicing is readily available from the street. Site development costs are always "guestimates"varying widely from project to project. Costs for furnishings and equipment have not been included because of the wide variation in standards and procurement. We occasionally use a figure of 5% of the construction cost, but only if a number is required. ' Phase 1 and Phase 2 are assumed to be separate projects, even though the costs are current. A saving could be realized if the project were not phased. Cost will increase over time, although they are not always related to the standard escalation like the CPI or the rate of inflation. Spikes I can occur due to local market conditions or intemational shortages, like the recent rise in steel prices. It would be prudent to relate these cost increases to the project schedule when establishing the final project budget. Tables 8-1 and 8-2 illustrate the capital cost estimates for the two phases. 1 Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility in Newcastle Village Study PAGE 54 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkains Miller Architects 1 SECTION EIGHT: CAPITAL COSTS &CONCEPT 1 Table 8-1 -Capital Cost Estimates: New Recreation Facility in Newcastle Village (PHASE 1) I :,, r#re s s R •• 1. ;�o, f t� c grl 1,,, PHASE ONE ' 1 Twin Pad Arena 8% 10% Arenas(100/100 seating) 48,400 10% 53,240 I Team rooms(12) Storage 6,000 20% 7,200 600 30% 780 Music, referees,first aid 700 30% 910 Ice resurfaces,workshop 900 30% 1,170 ' Refrigeration 900 30% 1,170 Maintenance office 200 30% 260 Totals 57,700 64,730 $8,414,900 $673,192 $841,490 $9,929,582 I Extra 200 seats 1,200 20% 1,440 $180,000 $14,400 $18,000 $212,400 2 Gymnasium 8% 10% Sports hall 6,000 20% 7,200 I Change rooms, storage 1,200 25% 1,500 Storage 400 25% 500 Totals 7,600 9,200 $1,610,000 $128,800 $161,000 $1,899,800 ' 3 Program/Meeting Rooms 8% 10% Three/four rooms 2,025 25% 2,531 Storage 400 25% 500 ' Kitchenette 300 25% 375 Totals 2,725 3,406 $579,063 $46,325 $57,906 $683,294 4 Common Areas 8% 10% I Lobby/viewing 6,500 10% 7,150 Public washrooms 800 25% 1,000 Snack bar/pro shop 400 25% 500 I Administration, reception 3,000 10,700 25% 3,750 Totals 12,400 $1,984,000 $158,720 $198,400 $2,341,120 5 Site Development 8% 10% I Parking, landscape, services 191 parking (200 seating) $732,000 $58,560 $73,200 $863,760 Parking, landscape, services 258 parking (400 seating) $865,000 $69,200 $86,500 $1,020,700 6 Phase 1 Totals: I Complex(200 seating) Complex(400 seating) 78,725 89,736 $13,319,963 $1,065,597 $1,331,996 $15,717,556 79,925 91,176 $13,632,963 $1,090,637 $1,363,296 $16,086,896 I I I I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 55 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects PAGE I SECTION EIGHT: CAPITAL COSTS &CONCEPT I Table 8-2 - Ca•ital Cost Estimates: New Recreation Facilit in Newcastle Villa•e PHASE 2 I iF}I -".. 4 -.� fk#a e • . .p . I .,. d. . � ,.0 lR,l 4, �, 5 PHASE TWO ' 7 Aquatic Centre 10% 10% Swimming pools,deck, slide 11,500 20% 13,800 I Change rooms 3,000 30% 3,900 Guards, F.A., storage, sauna 1,200 30% 1,560 Filtration 1,100 30% 1,430 1 I Building services 2,200 19,000 30% 2,860 Totals 23,550 $6,947,250 $694,725 $694,725 $8,336,700 Extra for Therapy pool 1,300 30% 1,690 $507,000 $50,700 $50,700 $608,400 I 8 Site Development 8% 10% Parking, landscape, services 55 parking spaces $340,000 $27,200 $34,000 $401,200 9 Phase 2 Totals: Without Therapy Pool 19,000 23,550 $7,287,250 $721,925 $728,725 $8,737,900 With Therapy Pool 20,300 25,240 $7,794,250 $772,625 $779,425 $9,346,300 I8.3 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN II In order to provide a visual understanding of the proposed recreation facility, a concept drawing was undertaken. This drawing is intended to illustrate the major facility components and to identify possible relationships between these space. The concept is provided on the following page. I I I I I I I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 56 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants, The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I 1 V __ S 4 I - I 11.41 I I.M° -MI h ''' KM 7 A I I I."I i Imo �I s1r 1 T T ■itn�# T r ' a kW � lLr � III o � II Oa! 1 iliratill 1 1 . 0 0 ers..... 0 0 raer_1� S , o 1 O 1 Oi* . — ' - -11111r- 0 I I 0 A Entrance .1 —–3. I - _ I Entrance I 8 I Ii. io ;: aa- � �� ; . 41 is ■ 7: II iI in If 1 I Iii 1 t.. m _ FP 12 III 1 ICE PAD 1 2 ICE PAD 2 I 3 REFRIGERATION 4 ICE RE-SURFACER 5 VIEWING GALLERY I 6 PUBLIC LOBBY 7 MEETING ROOMS 8 GYMNASIUM 9 GYM CHANGE ROOMS • New Recreation Facility - Newcastle Village I 10 SWIMMING POOL HALL 11 POOL CHANGE ROOMS June 2005 12 FILTRATION BSERVICE MACLENNAN JAUNKALNS MILLER ARCHITECTS 19 Duncan Street Suite 202,Toronto,ON,M51-I 3H1 tel: 416-593-6798 tax: 418.593-0212 e-mail: mail(t$mjmarchitects.com ------ ; °�, \ \ R 1 ' � ! a"ms & > e.C- ��\, k %/ /\` `\\r_ \ 'tom. J \ ! :Atti 1 \ `/jP \\ .lUn` i r / {.yea Y Al* \ � 9 r ' - .. ` , - A \*- r if.-----.a 1 4Y \ 1 1 ENTRANCE - NTRANCE -------� I2 PARKING -90 SPACES NN, 3 PARKING - 150 SPACES , ' 4 DROP OFF `" ' 5 SERVICE a New Recreation Facility Study Newc�s# Viflage «a! June 2005 ' ,\ 4 M N 9AJJNKALNS MILLER ARCM:TEETS 19 Gunnar 6lraeI Slu4§-202 Nona.ON! M611 3hi \ \ •4, a�yt 'es I' lei 416593-67% fax' 410',&P2_}2-e=In I mai 43rr marherr to Cam I I1 Section 9: RECOMMENDATIONS I9.1 SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS ' In evaluating the need for various facilities for the Newcastle Village area, extensive research was undertaken, including an assessment of existing facilities in Clarington and their respective capacities and utilization, an analysis of population projections, trends research, and extensive I community consultation. Based on this research, a number of recommendations were developed which have been integrated throughout this report. I In addition to the needs assessment, a priority was established and recommended based on the research. Included in this analysis was the business case for each facility (estimated operating costs and expenditures). A summary of anticipated capital costs was also prepared. I The following table is intended to provide a brief highlight of some of the key considerations associated with evaluating the need and priority for each facility component assessed during this Study: ITable 9-1: Summary of Facility Component Evaluation for a New Recreation Facility in Newcastle I Gymnasium and Factors Twin Pad Arena Program/Meeting Aquatics Centre Rooms I NEED: There is a current There is a current • lack of rammable • There is a desire• demand for prog locally for an indoor Factors additional ice time in space for all age pool facility. supporting the Clarington as groups. I provisions of the existing ice is at or • The local population facility component close to capacity. •• Both municipal staff has not reached a and community threshold that • A number of groups interest groups supports the provision ' are requesting indicated a desire to of an indoor pool additional time for provide additional facility. current and programming in I expanded Newcastle. • The population of •programming. Newcastle is not Existing facilities are projected for • Additional ice would either generally substantial growth I provide needed time booked or do not until after 2010 to for tournaments and provide the modern 2014. special events. amenities that attract participants in leisure • The two existing I • The existing arena serving the area /recreation programs indoor pool facilities which has resulted in in Clarington have (Newcastle Memorial program offerings capacity to Arena) is old, lacks being poorly attended accommodate I modern amenities, or cancelled. additional usage and and is operationally could accommodate not as efficient as a • These types of program shifting that I twin pad facility. spaces are viewed as could create complementary to additional Municipality of Clarnglon-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 57 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&Maclennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I I ' SECTION NINE: RECOMMENDATIONS • IGymnasium and Factors Twin Pad Arena Program/Meeting Aquatics Centre I Rooms A modern twin pad arena and/or indoor opportunities. • arena would provide Pool facilities. ' the Newcastle area The existing outdoor with a level of ice pool in Newcastle service and amenity provides only limited comparable to other swimming ' P opportunities for only arena facilities in a couple months each Clarington. opportunities but does require some level of capital I improvement to the associated support building(change 1 ii ' ' rooms). EFFECTS: • When the new arena • There would likely be • An indoor pool would complex is some impact on the provide a level of I • Factors that am not quantitative developed,there will Newcastle Community Hall- service that is not be increased currently available in but could opportunity to particularly the lower the Newcastle area. influence the provide system-wide level meeting rooms I provision of the ice allocation and which are not modern • If a new indoor pool is facility component programming. facilities. provided in Clarington,the I • There would not be a existing two pools need for the (most particularly the Newcastle Arena Fitness Centre in Board. Bowmanville can I expect to see decreased usage (transferred usage to new facility). I • An increase in operating deficits would likely occur at I the existing indoor pools due to decreased user Inumbers. TRENDS: • Improving • Demand for drop-in • Viewed as a"cradle operational opportunities to graves activity that I • Factors efficiencies by developing twin(or particularly for youth/ all age groups associated with teens such as participate. trends that more) ice pads. basketball, influence facility skateboarding, • Primary user group I provision and • Stable participation hanging out, etc. (especially for activity in hockey but with swimming lessons) participation Clarington's youthful • Demand for space to are children which is I age profile demand accommodate a wide a significant is expected to range of activities for component of Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 58 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I SECTION NINE: RECOMMENDATIONS IGymnasium and Factors Twin Pad Arena Program/Meeting Aquatics Centre I Rooms continue to be high. all age groups(e.g., Clarington's community group population. I • Growth in adult(and meetings, arts and women's) hockey is cultural programs, • Has therapeutic anticipated. summer camps, etc.). benefits. I • Decreasing participation in figure skating although locally Clarington I continues to experience growing demand. I OPERATIONS: • A new twin pad A gymnasium and An aquatics centre• arena would likely meeting room spaces would operate at a • Factors operate at an initial would operate on a substantial annual I associated with surplus in the order surplus basis in the deficit in the order of the business case of$10,000 based on order of$20,000 $566,000 based on the various annually based on assumptions assumptions the assumptions contained in this I contained in this report. contained in this report. Contributing report. to this is a lack of market population and capacity at I existing indoor pools in Clarington. I • Note: indoor pools do tend to operate on a deficit basis. I CAPITAL COSTS: • For arena, gymnasium and meeting rooms: indoor pool: $15,717,566(200 seat arena)to$16,086,896 $8,737,900 (without• • Factors (400 seat arena). therapy pool)to associated with $9,346,300(with ' the estimated therapy pool). construction costs I I I I Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 59 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects I SECTION NINE: RECOMMENDATIONS II Table 9-2: Recommended Priority of Facility Component Development for a New I Recreation Facility in Newcastle RECOMMENDED Gymnasium and PRIORITY Twin Pad Arena Program/Meeting Aquatics Centre Rooms ' • Recommended Priority#1 Priority#2 Priority#3 priority for facility development in • Recommended as a • Recommended to be • Recommended as a ' Newcastle Phase One part of Phase One of Phase Two component that a new recreation component should be a facility in Newcastle. (estimated for 2016) cornerstone of the but population growth ' development of a Should the should be monitored• new recreation Municipality decide to to determine if this facility in Newcastle. proceed with an time frame shifts. indoor pool instead of I the twin pad arena, these facilities should form part of that I complex with the pool. I9.2 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS The following is a summary of key recommendations contained in this Study with respect to I indoor facility provision. Reference to each section should be made to understand the rationale/support for each recommendations. IOverall Facility Development ✓ Develop a new indoor recreation complex in the Newcastle Village area as a two-phase I projects as follows: Phase One - twin pad arena, gymnasium and program/meeting rooms plus complementary facilities such as washrooms, change rooms, concession, office and storage space. IPhase Two - indoor pool / aquatic facility (further assessment at the time of construction for this second phase could be given to a fitness centre, however, at this time, based on Iavailable data, there is insufficient need for a second full-service municipal fitness centre). Arena/Ice Pad I ✓ Work with the Arena Board in Newcastle to develop a plan for the closure of the Newcastle Memorial Arena and for the dissolution of the Board. ✓ Evaluate the future of the existing Newcastle Memorial Arena building and site to determine I if alternative use or sale of the site/building is preferred. ✓ Develop a new twin pad arena in Newcastle as part of a multi-purpose complex (which results in the provision of one additional ice pad in the Clarington arena system). I ✓ Monitor and maximize ice usage and allocation to ensure scheduling and utilization efficiencies. Municipality of Clarington-New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 60 I FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkolns Miller Architects SECTION NINE: RECOMMENDATIONS ' ✓ In order to meet existing and projected ice demand, the Darlington Sports Centre will ' continue to be required. Indoor Pool/Aquatics ' ✓ Monitor participation levels in indoor aquatic activities to determine local trends and attitudes toward recreational swimming in Clarington/Newcastle. ✓ Consider upgrading the existing indoor pool and services at the Clarington Fitness Centre in ' order to accommodate future demands. ✓ Consider the provision of a third indoor pool in Newcastle (designed as a leisure pool similar to the Courtice facility) around the year 2016. ' ✓ Until such time as a new indoor pool is provided in Newcastle, there will be a need to rely on the Lions Outdoor Pool which will necessitate capital improvements to the existing facility including the associated building. ' Fitness Centre ✓ Consideration of a fitness component for the Newcastle facility should be re-evaluated at the ' time that a second phase expansion is contemplated (2016) as current demand does not justify provision of such a facility. ✓ When considering a second phase fitness component, the municipality should consider private sector partnership opportunities. ✓ Design the Newcastle Recreation Complex in a manner that facilitates a linked hallway/corridor system that is conducive for those interested in indoor walking for leisure. ' Gymnasium ✓ Construct a full size gymnasium as part of a multi-purpose facility to address existing and ' future demand (4,000-5,000 sq. ft.). The design of the gymnasium space should encompass a broad range of recreational opportunities which could include a rock climbing wall. ' Program /Meeting Rooms ✓ Develop flexible and programmable meeting room space as part of a new multi-purpose community facility. ' ✓ Discuss shared-used opportunities with potential partners to increase non-prime daytime hour usage of new meeting/program space. ' Seniors Facility ✓ Although a dedicated seniors' facility is not recommended, it will be important to ensure that t flexible and programmable meeting room space that can accommodate activities for older adults and seniors is part of a new multi-purpose community facility. Other Facilities ✓ Prior to closing the Newcastle Memorial Arena facility, the municipality should undertake a preliminary search for partnership interest in offering/providing curling, indoor soccer or other alternative use of the facility. ' Municipality of Clarington—New Recreation Facility In Newcastle Village Study PAGE 61 FINAL REPORT-June 2005 Prepared by Monteith Brown Planning Consultants,The JF Group&MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects