HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-15-86 TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
e+w`
�1
REPORT File
Res. #
By-Law #
MEETING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DATE: January 6, 1986
REPORT #: PD-15-86 FILE #: 18T-81008
SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF DRAFT APPROVAL - FILE: 18T-81008
DANARUS MANAGEMENT GROUP
PART LOT 29, CONCESSION 2, NEWCASTLE VILLAGE
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-15-86 be received; and
2. THAT the Region of Durham be advised that the Town of Newcastle has no objection to
the extension of draft approval for Plan of Subdivision 18T-81008 for a one (1)
year period.
BACKGROUND AND COMMENT:
Plan of Subdivision 18T-81008 was draft approved by the Region of Durham on March 29,
1983. Draft approval is scheduled to lapse on March 29, 1986 and the Region has requested
the Town' s comments on the extension of draft approval .
At the time the draft plan of subdivision was circulated for comment, the Regional Works
Department indicated that the most economical method of providing sanitary sewer services
to this proposal , as well as some adjacent vacant lands, would be the construction of a
sanitary sub-trunk sewer through the vacant land to the east. As an alternative,- thirteen
(13) lots could be serviced through the construction of an extension from the existing
. ..2
J.
REPORT NO.: PD-15-86 Page
sanitary sewer on King Street; however, this would not appear to be economically
viable for the development of only thirteen (13) residential lots. Recent
discussions with the Region of Durham Works Staff have indicated that these
comments are still valid.
Staff note that permanent access to the subject subdivision will be provided from
adjacent lands, but that until such time as these lands develop, a temporary access
to King Street will be used. It is important to note that there are no active
subdivision proposals on the adjacent vacant lands, nor have the owners of these
lands expressed any recent interest in proceeding with development. It is Staff's
concern that, should the development of the subject subdivision proceed, this
temporary access could continue as the only access for a significant period of
time.
Staff are concerned that the development of the subject subdivision may be
premature in the context of the development of the entire area north of King Street
and west of Foster Creek. However, inasmuch as draft approval is scheduled to
lapse on March 29, 1986, Staff also feel that the developer should be given an
opportunity to evaluate the alternatives available. It is, therefore, recommended
that the Region of Durham be advised that the Town of Newcastle has no objection to
the extension of draft approval for the Danarus Management plan of subdivision for
a period of one (1) year. At such time as the extension of draft approval is
considered again, Staff will re-evaluate its position should no substantive action
have been taken by the developer towards proceeding with the development.
:Respectf y ted,
T.T. Edwards, M.C.I .P.
Director of Planning
JAS*TTE*jip
December 18, 1985
Applicant: Mr. August Mentantia Agent: Mr. C. Windsor
Danarus Management Limited The Plantario Group
1110 Sheppard Avenue East 4969A Yonge Street
Suite 307 Suite 201
WILLOWDALE, Ontario WILLOWDALE, Ontario
M2K 2W2 M2N 5N6
i
7DODD
December 10, 1985.
i
a.
DURHAM �EC �?Y
Mr. T.T. Edwards, M.C. I.P. ; .
Planning Director Z 1
The Regional Town of Newcastle
Municipality Municipal Office
of Durham Hampton, Ontario LOB 1NO
Planning
Department Dear Sir:
Box 623
1o5 Consumers Dr. Re: Lapsing of Draft Plan Approval
Whitby, Ontario P 9 PP
Canada, I.1N 6A3 Plan of Subdivision 18T- 81008
(416)668.7731 Owner: Danarus Management Group
DR. M. R. MICHAEL, M.C.I.P. Municipality: Town of Newcastle
Commissioner of Planning
Please note that approval issued by the Region with respect to the
above referenced draft plan will lapse on March 29, 1986
pursuant to the Planning Act unless an extension is granted prior
to the lapsing date.
The Region is now considering to grant such an extension. If
there is any reason the extension should not be given, please
advise me immediately. If we do not hear from you within 30 days,
it would be construed that your municipality has no objection to
the extension.
Yours very truly,
a �
Franklin Wu
Senior Planner
:S-PPl/et
i
I
23 2 , rr
10^s 11 12 13
N JB
I 6 141 14 \ 14„ 14 14
i . 4 ye 1 «
(R O A D. a puewlw4 r
16 ts 14 1
�ueec ! on.
1 2 6 ^46 17 m 16 ''y 16 J14 a s
34
13 16 \
..1, n 6
�? 20
BLOCK 2
16.24 24 :
SI
Nab
oz
IN
a
3 .: .. .. . .:.
I :In -w ^
36 58
4 ON �D He7.�� :.
4I
_ _ 3 N4ede f I I 1
>LLOWANCE BETWEEN CONCESSIONS I
HIGHWAY NO, 2 )
1 •
LOT LOT 29 LOT 28
z MR 1 (HNt I
g
N t R1 R11` MI-1
l W I i I
U RI•I
z EP EP
O R1
V � I
SUBJECT SI E7 ) Ri•I
J 0�p KZNG 1
sTG R
t_N R0A0
—I
(H)RI ----- 3 RI C 1— —
HIGHWAY NP 2 1 Cl
R2 R2
I '1 RN
(H)RI
NEWCASTLE VILLAGE �m a®m
I:i