Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-124-91 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE DN,:BFI .GPA REPORT PUBLIC MEETING Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File# L, 0 ij Date: Monday, June 3, 1991 Res. # By-Law# Report#: PD-124-91 File#: DEV 90-096 Subject: REZONING APPLICATION - BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES (BFI) PART LOT 26, B.F.C. , FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON FILE: DEV 90-096 (CROSS-REFERENCE: OPA 90-103/D) Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1 . THAT Report PD-124-91 be received; 2 . THAT Rezoning Application DEV 90-096 submitted by Browning-Ferris Industries to permit the construction of a Medical Waste Storage and Incineration Facility in Part Lot 26, B.F.C. , former Township of Darlington, be referred back to Staff for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report; 3 . THAT the Region of Durham be requested to retain a technical consultant to review the Environmental Assessment documents, and that Town Staff be permitted to participate in discussions with such consultant and be provided with copies of reports prepared by the consultant; 4 . THAT the applicant, the Region of Durham Planning Department, the Ministry of the Environment, the interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. 1. APPLICATION DETAILS 1. 1 owner and Applicant: Mr. Hubert Bourque of Browning- Ferris Industries (BFI) 1.2 Agent: Mr. John Manuel of M.M. Dillon Limited 1 . 3 Official Plan Amendment: From 'Industrial' To 'Waste Management Site' 1 .4 Rezoning: From 'General Industrial (M2) 1 To an appropriate zone category to permit the construction and operation of a Medical Waste Storage [-' ] A and Incineration Facility I I I OLEO a ER IIItS I$PRiili£D Q'!RECYCLED PAPS Ii REPORT NO. : PD- 124 91 PAGE 2 1 .5 Area: 2 . 74 ha (6 . 775 acres) total site area, of which 0 . 8 ha (2 acres) is to be used for the proposed facility 2 . LOCATION 2 . 1 Legal Description: Part Lot 26, Broken Front Concession, former Township of Darlington 2 .2 Relative Location: South of Baseline Road and north of Highway 401, east side of McKnight Road in the Courtice Industrial Park (Attachment No. 1) 3 . EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES 3 . 1 Existing Uses : BFI truck maintenance garage and office (Attachment No. 2) 3 . 2 Surrounding Uses: North and East - vacant Industrial land and C.P. Rail line South - Highway 401 and vacant Industrial land owned by BFI West - vacant Industrial land and Crothers Caterpillar 4 . BACKGROUND 4 . 1. The subject Rezoning Application was received by the Planning Department on December 7, 1990 . At that time, the applicant also requested Site Plan Approval for the proposed development. However, Staff verbally advised BFI that the plans submitted were not sufficiently detailed to process a Site Plan application. BFI subsequently indicated that they would submit a separate application for Site Plan Approval at a future date. 4 .2 The Region of Durham advised the Town of the receipt of the related application to amend the Durham Regional Official Plan on December 21, 1991. The application seeks to designate a 'Waste Disposal Site' on the subject lands . REPORT NO. : PD- 124-91 PAGE 3 5 . ENVIRONMENTAL APPROVALS 5 . 1 Environmental Assessment Act 5 . 1. 1 The Environmental Assessment Act (EAA) is administered by the Ministry of the Environment. The Act sets out an environmental planning review process which requires a proponent to define the alternatives to a proposed undertaking, with a progressive narrowing down of the alternatives based on the study of the environment and the environmental impacts of the various alternatives . The Ministry also strongly urges a proponent to initiate consultation with relevant agencies, affected parties and the public in the early stages of the Environmental Assessment process . 5 . 1.2 The EAA applies to all public undertakings by the Government of Ontario and its agencies, including municipalities . Private sector undertakings are subject to the Act only if they are designated as such by regulation. On October 13, 1989, the BFI proposal was designated by the Minister of the Environment as an undertaking to which the Act applies . 5 . 1 . 3 BFI initiated its pre-submission public consultation with the Town of Newcastle in December 1988, through meetings with members of Council and Staff . A Public Information Centre was held by BFI on January 26, 1989 at the Baseline Community Centre in Bowmanville. BFI also met with the Port Granby- Newcastle Environment Committee on January 18, 1989 . A number of public submissions were received by BFI, the Town, the Region and the Ministry of the Environment as a result of this consultation process . 5 . 1 .4 The Draft Environmental Assessment documents were submitted to the Ministry of the Environment in March 1989, and the Town and the Region of Durham in April 1989 . Staff advised both BFI and the Ministry of the Environment that the documents would be reviewed in conjunction with the applications for Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning, when submitted. REPORT NO. : PD-124-91 PAGE 4 5 . 1.5 The Final Environmental Assessment documents were submitted to the Ministry of the Environment in December 1990. The documents were also submitted to the Town and the Region as supporting documentation for the Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning applications . The Environmental Assessment includes a description of the purpose, rationale and need for the undertaking, alternatives to the undertaking, and a description of the site selection process . An assessment of the impacts on the environment as a result of developing the proposed facility at the subject site is also provided. This assessment includes an analysis of air quality impacts, transportation impacts, occupational health and safety impacts, impacts on the natural environment, land use impacts, economic impacts, and impacts on the social environment, in particular the community/ cultural effects, and visual and noise impacts . 5 . 1. 6 The Environmental Assessment documents are currently being reviewed by the Ministry of the Environment to determine whether the proponent has addressed all of the requirements of the EAA, and to identify any technical deficiencies with the documents . Once the Ministry releases its final comments, a minimum 30 day period for public input is initiated. 5 .2 Environmental Protection Act 5 .2 . 1 The Environmental Protection Act (EPA) is also administered by the Ministry of the Environment. Its sets out the prohibitions related to the deposit, emission or discharge of contaminants into the natural environment. It also establishes the powers and procedures to be used by the Ministry in the regulation and control of contaminant discharges, including the requirement for a Certificate of Approval for a proposed undertaking. Part V of the Act sets out the specific interpretations, prohibitions and requirements related to waste management. �`) 17 REPORT NO. : PD-124 -91 PAGE 5 5. 2 .2 The EPA applies to any existing or potential sources of contaminants in the private or public sector. In most cases, the requirements of the EAA would have to be met before the requirements of the EPA would be applied. 5. 2 . 3 To date, BFI has not applied for the approval of the proposed undertaking under the EPA. 6 . DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 6 . 1 The following description of the medical waste storage and incineration facility was drawn from the technical documents submitted by BFI. In this regard, the information presented does not reflect any comments resulting from the review of the documents by the Ministry of the Environment or other agencies, including the Town of Newcastle. 6 .2 Types of Wastes To Be Received 6 . 2 . 1 The term "medical waste" as defined by BFI, includes 'hazardous pathological waste' pursuant to the provisions of the Environmental Protection Act and Ontario Regulation 309 . BFI anticipates that the waste composition, by weight, treated at the proposed incinerator would be 15 percent red bag (human and infectious animal anatomical) waste, and 85% yellow bag (non-anatomical, infectious) waste. 6 .2 .2 BFI has indicated that it would not accept human cadavers and fetuses . It would also not accept hazardous industrial waste, PCB waste, or waste which is ignitable, radioactive, corrosive, or severely toxic above the quantities prescribed by regulation. 6 . 3 Collection and Transportation of the Waste 6 . 3 . 1 BFI plans to collect medical waste from health care facilities (eg. hospitals, research and diagnostic laboratories, extended care institutions, pharmaceutical dispensaries and manufacturers) , veterinary clinics (including university and government laboratories) , and funeral homes . �� ! REPORT NO. • PD- 124-91 PAGE 6 6 . 3 .2 BFI would collect and transport medical wastes to the proposed incinerator in accordance with their current Provisional Certificate of Approval for medical waste collection and transportation. The waste, which would be sealed in secure containers at the source, would be screened by BFI personnel at the source with a geiger counter to ensure that no radioactive waste is accepted. The waste would then be transported to the incinerator in approved refrigerated vehicles . 6 .4 Storage and Incineration of the Waste 6 .4 . 1 The proposed storage and incineration building is proposed to have a floor area of approximately 1300 sq.m. ( 14,000 sq. ft. ) , with the main stack being 28 m (90 ft. ) above grade level (Attachment No. 3) . Waste would be received five days of the week, at an average rate of 31 tonnes per day. A maximum average of 25 trucks per day are expected at the facility. Only waste to be incinerated at the facility would be stored. 6 .4 . 2 Once delivered to the facility, the integrity of each box would be visually checked. Leaking boxes would be placed in containers which would be sealed. Waste from non-BFI trucks would be checked with a geiger counter for radioactivity. The waste, once accepted, would be held in a refrigerated storage area, from where it would be fed by conveyor to the incinerator on a first-in/first-out basis . 6 .4 . 3 The incinerator itself would operate continuously and would, on average treat 22 tonnes of waste per day ( 154 tonnes per week) . The two stage incineration process would use two separate chambers to complete the combustion process . In the primary chamber, in which a temperature of 760 degrees C. ( 1400 degrees F. ) would be maintained, the waste would be dried, the volatile components evaporated and the fixed carbon burned. The resulting ash, termed 'bottom ash, , would be moved to an enclosed water quench system, from where it would be removed on a continuous basis to the ash transport containers. 19 REPORT NO. : PD-124 -91 PAGE 7 6 .4 .4 The partially burned gases from the primary chamber would pass to a secondary chamber, where they would be held for approximately 2 seconds at a temperature of 1,050 degrees C. ( 1920 degrees F. ) . The incineration process would stabilize the waste and reduce the total volume by up to 95 percent. 6 .5 Pollution Control 6 .5. 1 After the combustion process in the secondary chamber is completed, the gas stream would be cleansed prior to release to the atmosphere. The injection of hydrated lime and activated carbon into the gas stream would neutralize the acid gases . The cooling of the gas stream would result in the condensation of most of the heavy metals (zinc, lead, cadmium, chromium) . The mercury vapour would bind to powdered activated carbon injected into the gas stream. The fabric filter would then collect the solid acid products and the heavy metals, along with any other particulate matter. The emission control system would also remove most of the organic emissions, such as dioxins and furans . 6 .5 .2 The fabric filter would be cleaned periodically, with the ash being conveyed to a fly ash handling system which would be totally sealed to control fugitive dust. The fly ash material would be mixed with stabilizing agent and water and discharged into the ash transport containers . 6 .5. 3 Approximately 1 . 9 tonnes of each of the bottom ash and the fly ash would be generated each day. The bottom ash and the fly ash would be handled separately and transported in separate containers . Both types of ash would initially be treated as 'leachate toxic ' material and disposed of at an approved, secure waste disposal facility pending the results of leachate tests . Regular testing of the ash would be carried out during the first year of operation to assess the long term ash disposal requirements . REPORT NO. : PD-124 -91 PAGE 8 6 .5 .4 Municipal water and sewer services are not currently available to the subject site. BFI estimates that water usage from the on-site well would be approximately 30 litres ( 6 . 6 gallons) per minute. There would be no discharge of process wastewater from the plant. Process wastewater, including that from the washing of the delivery trucks, would be drained to holding tanks . The water would be disinfected and sprayed into the system evaporative cooler. Solids from the tanks would be periodically removed from the holding tanks, boxed and fed into the incinerator. Sanitary sewage from the office and employee areas would be treated in a septic tank/tile bed system on-site. 7 . OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES 7 . 1 Existing Durham Regional Official Plan 7 . 1. 1 The subject site is designated 'Industrial' by the existing Durham Regional Official Plan. Uses such as manufacturing, warehousing, assembly, processing, and the storage of goods and materials are to be the predominant use of lands so designated. The Plan also states that industrial uses which are declared to be noxious from the nature of the operation or the materials used within, are not permitted. 7 . 1. 2 The Plan indicates that Industrial Areas are to be fully serviced by municipal water and sewage systems . However, industries of a dry nature may locate in Industrial areas not served by municipal sewer and water, provided that an engineering report is prepared which indicates an adequate supply of potable water is available, the method to be used for adequate temporary fire protection, and soil conditions suitable for a private waste disposal system. 7 . 1. 3 The Region of Durham Planning Department advised the applicant that the proposed development is considered a 'Waste Disposal Site' within the provisions of the Regional Official Plan. REPORT NO. : PD-124-91 PAGE 9 Waste disposal sites are to be used for the receiving, disposing, reclaiming and/or recycling of waste, and/or landfill. The Plan requires new waste disposal sites to be designated through Official Plan Amendment. Each application for a waste disposal site is to be treated on its own merits as to its compatibility with the surrounding land uses and its impacts on the environment. As well, no waste site shall commence operation unless it has been approved by the Ministry of the Environment. 7 .2 Recommended Changes to the Durham Regional Official Plan 7 .2 . 1 On May 7, 1991, Regional Planning Committee considered Commissioner's Report 91-P-70 which outlines the Recommended Changes to the Durham Regional Official Plan. The Recommended Changes Report designates the subject site as 'Employment Area' . The uses proposed for Employment Areas are similar to those permitted within the 'Industrial' designation in the existing Official Plan. 7 .2 . 2 The Recommended Changes Report also indicates the subject site as being within the expanded boundaries of the Courtice Urban Area. It is intended that sufficient municipal water and sanitary sewage facilities be provided to urban areas within the financial capability of the Region. However, limited development on private services is permitted within Urban Areas prior to the availability of municipal services, subject to a number of conditions, one of which being that the proposed use does not require excessive water and appropriate provisions have been included in the zoning by-law to that effect. 7 .2 . 3 The BFI undertaking would also be considered a 'Waste Disposal Site' under the provisions of the Recommended Changes Report. The establishment of a new waste disposal site shall require an amendment to the Plan. In the consideration of such REPORT NO. : PD-124-91 PAGE 10 applications, Regional Council is to consider the following matters: the principle of reduction, re-use and recycling of waste alternative solutions for waste disposal the impact of the proposal on the environment, the health of surrounding residents, the transportation system and existing and future surrounding land uses financial implications to the Region. any other matters deemed appropriate by Regional Council or the respective area municipal Council . 7 .2 .4 The Recommended Changes Report also states that, prior to considering an amendment application in respect of a waste disposal site, Regional Council shall select and retain a qualified consultant to review technical reports submitted at the expense of the applicant. 8 . ZONING 8 . 1 The subject lands are zoned 'General Industrial (M2) ' by Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63 . The construction and operation of a medical waste storage and incineration facility would not be permitted under the provisions of this zone. Given the unique nature of the proposed development, a site specific zoning would be required. 9 . PUBLIC NOTICE 9 . 1 In accordance with the requirements of the Planning Act and Council policy, notice of the Public Meeting was advertised in local newspapers on Wednesday, May 1, 1991. As well, a Public Notice sign was posted on the subject property. Public Notice was also mailed to all those persons who have made submissions to the Town in respect of the proposed medical waste incinerator, including all those persons who made submissions prior to receipt of the Rezoning application. REPORT NO. : PD- 124-91 PAGE 11 10 PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS 10 . 1 The Town has received a number of letters from the public since BFI first announced its plans in December 1988, to construct a medical waste incinerator on the site on McKnight Road. Many of these submissions objected to the proposal, while others outlined concerns which should be addressed in the review of the proposed development. 10.2 The following is a summary of the concerns identified by the various submissions: 10 .2 . 1 Environmental Concerns toxic emissions from the burning of plastics effectiveness of a dry scrubber system in reducing air pollution the need for such a high stack if the incinerator produces no emissions possibility of airborne pollutants being blown into Lake Ontario, potentially contaminating future water supplies the cumulative impact of the incinerator and the future Highway 401/Highway 407 link interchange on air quality in the area the concentration of half of the province's medical waste incineration in one facility will create an environmental risk and impact on both air and water quality facilities generating medical waste should take steps to reduce and reuse waste the volume of waste incinerated at the facility will increase over time the proximity of the proposed facility to the Darlington Generating Station and the resulting cumulative impact on the environment ash produced at the facility may be disposed of in a landfill in the Town whether the proposed facility would incorporate the 'best available technology' as BFI claims 1 c.. REPORT NO. : PD- 124-91 PAGE 12 the disposal of medical waste should be undertaken by the public sector and not the private sector 10 .2 .2 Economic Concerns negative impact on residential and commercial property values clean industries will be discouraged from locating in the Courtice Industrial Park, forcing Newcastle to accept less desirable industries the cumulative impact on the community's image due to the presence of this and other waste disposal sites, such as the tritium removal facility at the Darlington Generating Station, the existing landfill operated by Laidlaw, Laidlaw's major expansion proposal, the radioactive waste site at Port Granby, and the possible location of a landfill site for Durham-only waste 10 .2 . 3 Transportation Concerns disruptive effect of truck traffic on area residents potential exposure to infectious material if trucks hauling medical waste are involved in traffic accidents 10.2 .4 Land Use Concerns the application should not be dealt with pending a decision on the proposed changes to the Durham Regional Official Plan related to the boundaries and population distribution of the Courtice Urban Area the facility should be located closer to Metropolitan Toronto which has the greatest concentration of medical waste generators the adequacy of the site selection process undertaken by BFI 11. AGENCY COMMENTS 11. 1 The subject Rezoning Application was circulated by Staff to various agencies for comment. The Town has also received P_.t REPORT NO. : PD-124 -91 PAGE 13 copies of agency comments through the circulation of the related Official Plan Amendment application by the Region of Durham Planning Department. 11.2 The following agencies have indicated no objection to the proposed development: Ministry of Agriculture and Food Newcastle Hydro-Electric Commission 11. 3 The Town of Newcastle Community Services Department indicated no objection to the proposal, subject to the 2% parkland dedication being accepted as cash-in-lieu, with the funds being credited to the Parks Reserve account. 11.4 The Town of Newcastle Public Works Department indicated no objection to the proposed development, subject to the applicant assuming the full costs of any necessary work on McKnight Road resulting from the development. Such works include the reconstruction of the road to the Town Industrial Standard, the provision of illumination and the construction of an entrance to the site. 11.5 The Ministry of Natural Resources noted that the site is located in the Tooley Creek watershed. Development activities such as grading and construction could result in water quality degradation. The Ministry requested the preparation of an erosion, sedimentation and stormwater control plan as a condition of Site Plan Approval. 11 . 6 C.P. Rail indicated the applicant must construct and maintain a 1. 83 m (6 ft. ) high chain link fence along the common property line with the Railway. Alterations to the existing drainage pattern which may affect Railway property, and any proposed utilities over or under Railway property to serve the development, must be approved by the company. C ? J r.. REPORT NO. : PD- 124-91 PAGE 14 11. 7 The Region of Durham Department of Health Services requested the preparation of a lot servicing plan indicating the proposed location of all structures, drilled wells and subsurface sewage disposal system envelopes, including a 100% replacement area for the systems. The Department also requested information regarding daily sewage flow rates . 11. 8 The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority noted a potential exists for backwater flooding of the site under major storm conditions due to the restricted conveyance capacity of the culverts under the berm along the south limits of the site. The Authority has requested the applicant to determine the potential for flooding on the site up to and including the Regional Storm, and to demonstrate that the proposed grades on the site can provide a flood-protected development area without increasing flood risks to adjacent properties . 11. 9 The Town of Newcastle Fire Department noted that the site falls within the response area of Station # 4 on Trull's Road. The approximate response time would be 7-8 minutes for full time personnel and 10-12 minutes for part time personnel. The Department indicated a concern with personnel possibly being exposed to hazardous emissions, including biological or medical waste, in the event of an emergency in the storage area and damage to the storage containers . A concern was also noted with the use of private water on the site and that, in the event of a major fire, water supply could be a problem. The Department recommended that extensive fire protection systems be installed, especially within the storage area, although it was further noted that this may not be possible on a private water supply. 11. 10 The Ministry of Transportation has indicated that one of proposed alternative routes for the Oshawa/Newcastle freeway Link between Highway 401 and the future Highway 407 directly REPORT NO. : PD-124 -91 PAGE 15 impacts the subject site. The Ministry requested that consideration of this application be deferred pending the establishment of a technically preferred route for the link, which is expected by the fall of 1991. 11 . 11 Comments remain outstanding from the following agencies: Region of Durham Works Department Ministry of the Environment Ontario Hydro 12 . STAFF COMMENTS 12 . 1 Through the initial review of the Environmental Assessment documents submitted by BFI, as well as the comments submitted by agencies and the public, Staff have identified a number of issues which must be addressed by the Town in considering the proposal to establish a medical waste storage and incinerator in the Courtice Industrial Park. 12 .2 Of significant concern is the impact of the emissions from the incinerator on air quality, during both regular operations and upset events at the facility. In this regard, the incineration and pollution control technology proposed by BFI must be reviewed to establish its effectiveness in reducing toxic emissions . As well, the cumulative impact on air quality resulting from the proximity of the facility to the future Highway 401/407 link interchange and the Darlington Generating Station must also be determined. 12 . 3 The potential for the proposed incinerator to have a negative effect on the attractiveness to investors and the marketability of the Courtice Industrial Park as well as the effect on property values, should be assessed, especially i given the facility's visibility from Highway 401. The cumulative negative effect on the Town's image of various waste disposal facilities currently in operation or being proposed should also be considered. j i REPORT NO. : PD-124-91 PAGE 16 12 .4 Staff have significant concerns regarding the potential for area residents and employees in the Courtice Industrial Park to be exposed to infectious wastes as a result of accidents. In this regard, the proximity of the site entrance to the at- grade rail crossing on Baseline Road, is noted. Also of concern is the availability of adequate water for fire- fighting purposes and the potential for flooding on the site. 12 .5 Since BFI initiated its site selection process in 1987, the future land use scenario for the area has changed as the result of Recommended Changes to the Durham Regional Official Plan. The Recommended Changes Report indicates the subject site as being within the expanded boundaries of the Courtice Urban Area, with full municipal sewer and water services possibly being available at some time in the future. As well, new residential, commercial and industrial development not provided for in the existing Regional Official Plan would be permitted in the vicinity of the proposed incinerator. 12 . 6 Staff reference the policy in the Recommended Changes to the Durham Regional Official Plan which indicates that, prior to considering an amendment application in respect of a waste disposal site, Regional Council shall select and retain, at the expense of the applicant, a qualified consultant to review the technical reports submitted. Regional Planning Staff have tentatively indicated that they are interest in retaining a technical consultant, at the applicant's expense, to review portions of the Environmental Assessment document. 13. CONCLUSIONS 13. 1 This report has been prepared to facilitate the Public Meeting required pursuant to the Planning Act. A number of issues related to the proposal require further review by Staff. As well, not all agency comments have been reviewed, in particular the comments of the Ministry of the Environment regarding the Environmental Assessment documents submitted by BFI . REPORT NO. : PD-124 -91 PAGE 17 Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation to the Committee o 4 &T Franklin Wu, M.C. I .P. Lawrence Kotseff Director of Planning Chief A i istrative and Development Officer JAS*DC*FW*df *Attach 7 May 1991 Attachments # 1 Key Map # 2 Site Plan # 3 Facility Elevation Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision: Mr. Hubert Bourque Vice-President, Environmental Affairs Browning-Ferris Industries 185 The West Mall Suite 1110 Etobicoke, Ontario M9C 5L5 Mr. John Manuel, P.Eng. M.M. Dillon Limited 47 Sheppard Avenue East Box 1850, Station A Willowdale, Ontario M2N 6H5 Mr. John Bullen Environmental Assessment Branch Ministry of the Environment 250 Davisville Avenue 5th Floor Toronto, Ontario M4S 1H2 G 4 ) tn REPORT NO. : PD- 124-91 PAGE 18 Mrs . Sandy McDowall 10 George Reynolds Drive Courtice, Ontario LIE 1Z7 Mrs. Pam Callus Courtice and Area Community Association Box 253 Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3L1 Ms . Wendy Boothman No Ganaraska Dump Committee R.R. # 1 Kendal, Ontario LOA 1E0 Mr. Tom Moyer 15 Walbridge Court Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 4B7 Mrs . Ruth Weidner 100 Varcoe Road North Courtice, Ontario LIE 1A2 Mrs . Helen MacDonald R.R. # 1 Newtonville, Ontario LOA 1J0 Mr. John Veldhuis Port Granby-Newcastle Environment Committee R.R. # 1 Newtonville, Ontario LOA IJO Mr. Harvey Thompson R.R. # 1 Newtonville, Ontario LOA 1J0 Mr. & Mrs . Brooks Pearce R.R. # 2 Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3K3 Ms . Kay Moore 9 Church Street Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 1S2 REPORT NO. : PD- 124-91 PAGE 19 Nancy & John Line 49 White Cliffe Drive Courtice, Ontario LlE 1T2 Susan & Dean Spence 3339 Courtice Road Courtice, Ontario LlE 2L7 Mrs . Wesley Down R.R. # 4 Oshawa, Ontario L1H 7K6 Lloyd & Eileen Down 1687 Baseline Road Courtice, Ontario LlE 2S6 Attachment # 1 ® SUBJECT SITE LOT 27 LOT 26 LOT 25 II of � I Q CU of z o Z OU z � l � BASEL/NE ROAD COURTICE CT.. � Z HIGHWAY 4O, C� i a Q Z z LL i o Q z ° o W I o Y c; Q I I � AP ,°°m° 1°° 2°° 300 400 m KEY M Dev. 90-096 V, 7 \ Existing Shop CA -Existing Office 9q ` Proposed Incinerate 25 50 100 150' l 11-:­- > ONTARIO HYDRO EASEMENT �- . - cD MASTER PLAN BFI MEDICAL WASTE TREATMENT FACILITY N i 1�1 11 � �.,, ' I IN 1 114 I Iiilllllllll 111111! I!!i` III!�tll ll! I'f1 'f'' .,- �• ��III��Ir I � � f I,11 ( lllf,lillllll(I lfl� � ,; �_,..,�'�-�' . �: � ��, I( r � 1 111 Ll WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION 1 f -.u��iu II1lililihlili�1 11111111111111111111.1��� I� 1 11 Fl-. LI "'�"",'"""'I'°� "'I!Il�lt�ll�llilll�ll►!! rh SOUTH ELEVATION A 3 ©!LL0n1 PROPOSED BFI MEDICAL WASTE FACILITY, NEWCASTLE ARTISTS RENDERING OF CONCEPTUAL DESIGN W