Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-120-91 ti THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE DN: COFA.GPA REPORT Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File# ���� >>� `:n1'C Date: Monday, April 22, 19 91 Res. # By-Law# Report#:PD_-120-91 File#: A911 into A91-013 INCLUSIVE Subject: MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE MEETING OF MAY 9, 1991 FILE: A91/010 to A91-013 INCLUSIVE Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PD-120-91 be received; and 2 . THAT Council concur with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made at its meeting of May 9, 1991; and 3 . THAT Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment in the event of an appeal. 1 The Committee of Adjustment heard applications on May 9, 1991. The Committee dealt with a total of four (4) applications during the meeting. Applications A 91/012 was TABLED by the Committee to the next available meeting date. The balance of the applications were APPROVED. 2 Staff in providing comments to the Committee did not support application A 91/011. The applicant proposes to construct a garage having a floor area of 107 m2 ( 1152 sq. ft. ) . This exceeded the 40% of the total floor area of the dwelling, which equals the allowable floor area of an accessory structure by 37 m2 (396 sq. ft. ) . In commenting to the Committee of Adjustment, Staff recommended the garage be scaled down in size and therefore did not support the application. . . PAPER E'M RI ISIS PRIMED ON RECYCLED PAPER REPORT NO. : PD-120-91 PAGE 2 3 The applicant advised the Committee that the proposed garage is pre-fabricated and therefore difficult to be reduced in size. Two neighbouring residents appeared at the meeting concerned that the garage would become a body shop thus creating a noise problem. 4 The Committee of Adjustment approved the application as applied for. Although Staff did not support application, appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board is not recommended given the Staff time and legal costs involved with a board hearing. 5 Staff have reviewed the balance of the decisions of the Committee and are satisfied that the decisions conform to the general intent of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law and that the variances sought are minor in nature. 6 Council's concurrence with the Committee of Adjustment decisions is required in order to afford Staff's official status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the event of appeal of the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment save and except for A 91/011 . Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation to the Committee Franklin Wu, M.C. I .P. Lawren44istrative. Kotseff Director of Planning Chief n and Development Officer CP*FW*cc *Attach 10 May 1991 �I i I l THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PERIODIC REPORT PAGE: 1 FILE NUMBER: A91/010 ******************** APPLICANT: LAURIE HACHEY AGENT: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LONGSAULT ROAD PART LOT: 5 CONCESSION: 10 TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON PLAN NUMBER: - ZONING: A HEARING DATE: 9-May-91 DECISION: APPROVED APPEAL DATE: 8-Jun-91 MINOR VARIANCE: ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CREATE A LOT HAVING AN AREA OF 9 . 06HA (22 .4 AC) AS OPPOSED TO THE EXISTING 9 .42 HA. REASON FOR DECISION: APPLICATION IN KEEPING WITH INTENT OF D.R.O.P. AND ZONING BY-LAW AND IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA AND IS MINOR IN NATURE, THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PERIODIC REPORT PAGE: 2 FILE NUMBER: A91/011 ******************** APPLICANT: JOHN HALL AGENT: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 2752 MAPLE GROVE RD. PART LOT: 19 CONCESSION: 2 TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON PLAN NUMBER: - - ZONING: A HEARING DATE: 9-May-91 DECISION: APPROVED APPEAL DATE: 8-Jun-91 MINOR VARIANCE: ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 107M2 ( 1152 SQ. FT. ) ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (GARAGE) WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 40% OF THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF THE MAIN BUILDING ( 1890 SQ/FT) . REASON FOR DECISION: THAT THE APPLICATION IS IN KEEPING WITH DURHAM OFFICIAL PLAN AND TOWN ZONING BY-LAW, WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO SURROUNDING LANDS, AND IS CONSIDERED MINOR IN NATURE, THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PERIODIC REPORT PAGE: 3 FILE NUMBER: A91/012 APPLICANT: JOHN MORTON AGENT: PAUL MORTON PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 2228 BASELINE RD. PART LOT: 19 CONCESSION: 1 TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON PLAN NUMBER: - - ZONING: A HEARING DATE: 9-May-91 DECISION: TABLED APPEAL DATE: 8-Jun-91 MINOR VARIANCE: TO ALLOW ACCESSORY STRUCTURES TOTALLING 591 . 3M2 (6365 SQ. FT. ) WHICH EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 40% OF THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF THE MAIN BUILDING (213 . 3M2, 2297 SQ. FT. ) REASON FOR DECISION: THAT THE APPLICATION BE TABLED TO THE NEXT AVAILABLE MEETING, MAY 23, 1990 TO ALLOW PLANNING STAFF TO BE CONSULTED t- 1� 7 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PERIODIC REPORT PAGE: 4 FILE NUMBER: A91/013 ******************** APPLICANT: MICHAEL & JANICE DENGIS AGENT: IRWIN HAMILTON, SOLICITOR PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 3227 GILMOUR ROAD PART LOT: 2 CONCESSION: 3 TOWNSHIP: CLARKE PLAN NUMBER: - - ZONING: A HEARING DATE: 9-May-91 DECISION: APPROVED APPEAL DATE: 8-Jun-91 MINOR VARIANCE: TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CREATE A LOT HAVING AN AREA OF 8 . 678HA (21.4 AC) AS OPPOSED TO THE EXISTING 9 . 95 HA. REASON FOR DECISION: THAT AS THE APPLICATION IS IN KEEPING WITH THE INTENT OF THE DURHAM REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN AND THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE ZONING BY- LAW IS DESIREABLE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA AND IS MINOR IN NATURE, THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED. 1) l D n