HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-224-90 TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
€ 'NN !
I DN: QUADRA.GPA REPORT F i le
#Res. #
-- ~ '� By-Law #
MEETING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DATE: • Monday, July 9, 1990
REPORT #: PD-224-90 FILE #: 18T-87021
MECT: SUBDIVISION APPLICATION-,IQUADRAGARDENS (REEMARK)
PART LOT 11, CONCESSION 26, FORMER TOWN OF BOWMANVILLE
FILE: 18T-87021 REVISED
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-224-90 be received;
2 . THAT the proposed Plan of Subdivision 18T-87021 REVISED and further
red-line revised and dated October, 1989, as per attachment No. 1
be APPROVED subject to the conditions contained in this Report;
3 . THAT a copy of this Report and Council's decision be forwarded to
the Region of Durham Planning Department; and
5 . THAT the interested parties listed in this report and any
delegation be advised of Council's decision.
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
1. 1 Applicant: Reemark
1.2 Agent: Tunney Planning Inc.
1. 3 Subdivision: 212 units total; 18, 18 metre semi-detached/link
units and 194, and 15 metre single family dwellings
1.4 Area: 17 . 783 Ha (43 .94 acres)
2. BACKGROUND:
2 . 1 In October of 1988, Staff prepared report PD-201-88 for Committee
and Council's consideration. Said report reviewed the merits of
the proposed plan of subdivision, dated June 22, 1988, which
REPORT NO. : PD-224-90 PAGE 2
the proposed plan of subdivision, dated June 22, 1988, which
illustrated 206 single family dwelling lots. Based on the
recommendation of the Report Committee and Council recommended
Approval of the proposed Plan of Subdivision subject to conditions .
2 .2 In November of 1989, the Town was advised by the Region of Durham
that the applicant had submitted a plan seeking a minor revision
to the proposal as previously dealt with by Council. Staff
reviewed these proposed changes and concluded they were minor in
nature and did not change the intent of Council approval of October
1988 . Subsequently favourable comments on the proposed revision
were forwarded to the Region.
2 . 3 The Region issued conditions of Draft Approval for the subject
application as revised in March of 1990 . In April of 1990 Tunney
Planning on behalf of Reemark submitted a request for a further
revision to the Plan as Draft Approved. The amendments have been
proposed as a result of changes in the unit mix in plan 18T-89070
abutting the subject property to the south. The revision would
create nine (9) semi-detached/link lots (18 units) , where
previously there were nine (9) single family dwelling lots (see
attached) .
2 .4 The proposed revisions have been reviewed by Staff in the Public
Works and Planning Departments and do not appear to negatively
impact surrounding applications and services associated there with.
3 . STAFF COZMENTS
3. 1 The proposal has been reviewed by Town Staff in terms of the
applicant's revised submission. The application as submitted to
revise the nine (9 ) single family dwelling lots from singles to
links by incorporating blocks 204, 205 and 206 does not represent
a significant change to the proposal, it maintains a low density
character to the neighbourhood and does not impact the population
target as specified in the Town Official Plan.
. . . 3
REPORT NO. : PD-224-90 PAGE 3
4. RECOMMENDATION
4 . 1 In consideration of the above-noted comments, Staff would have no
objection to the proposed revisions subject to the conditions of
Approval as Attached hereto.
Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
i
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P. Lawrenc Kotseff
DIrector of Planning Chief A nistrative
and Development Office
CP*FW*cc
*Attach
4 July 1990
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
Reemark Group Chris and Louise Barrett
Bryan Bridgeman 342 Liberty Street North
194 Merton Street BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 3K6
Suite 200
TORONTO, Ontario M4H 3B7
Tunney Planning
340 Byron Street South
Suite 200
WHITBY, Ontario L1N 4P8
fort" #r *f"Aarlill
L 0 r 1 0
- - - — — — — — — — — —
E T
GLOOC a ART I IOR-134
v,
Is o
44\ 41 -2 1p 0
20 2m
OLOM 2W PROPOSED
47 'A 45 4_ 3U4 is 200 33 DRAFT PLAN
,'l, .—.j OF SUBDIVISION OF
22 ;STREET "I' PART OF LOT 11
"E CONCESSION 2
50
V TOWN OF NEWCASTLE! 24 13
32 lo7. rl ftrGK*(AL ULV*CVAUIY Or DUPk"
37 = 3e Ld 1-' 137 Raf~-WFORUAMN
— 0
it V.�j
65 63 40
i T1 -i
S R E T
a)
145 1"
is z
73 ; to
103
73
Its 447 Lu
14 L
74 _J
ts
I "T.
143 1
i 76 7
114 142
41 1 )�- - 1.
T
143 123 ck�
it E E
IS2' •
Its-) 43, *q
sz
.121 •
"Its %•
I'll Iq Yl 172 173\1 '75 174 177 1711
Its \114
136 14
Icl
a in 7 r
7 H
iQ
70EE T toc r-,, •m 223
17 101 4 1.
OE" WNIC
W3
a
t
J4&%07 CNTAlo r W_ _0%
II '
osslwt: .Vr,4;c uc,VLOfcN I L I O r a T o a
T'r--� I- QUADRA GARDENS
r J Fill f1*11,11, 'I
L 0 T 1 0
— — — —— — — — — - - - - -
—- — —— — — — — — — — —
T R E E T
E R PAR r 3.RLAN IOR-7J1 n—Mar BLOCK a
'to
.,A,
37
IN 3a
4 4 M 42 0
'.21 5
20 PROPOSED
BLOCK
Jc;
34..te 43
21�
_n- 2 DRAFT PLAN
16 :2
OF SUBDVISION Of
PART 7 LOT I
2STREET
22 2kn I
50 - -1 CONCESS$ON 2
.5 eT—-—
I TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
5, •
3, 24 13 4 n RECIONAL MUNICIPALM OF DUWAM
C,
ROX—T NFOFMADCM
iz
'95
*�rJll•
V)
1\2 27 1- J- -I
S /T R (E E
1 145 ;144
L
21
72 -y-74 too 4 t 147 i ).. .. 6) ---..... . -. ::-_
00. 'A ;
75 4 113 143 4
cl)
1/79 78 77
11 v in It, c• sty-a
2k
114 !41 jz-�j
A.. - -, I
113 41 ilso
\-"s -E E
III! �23 '71
7.
--'TV-A
1. 16 too i L
5
7"* 71
% J37 '.
172 173 174 to. ,77
Im
r
ST� T
look
(10•102. 57 50 43 143
It. 130 3,2 1 156
a- INS 11 '04 Im
am—'t CV--
1,10.T111112 I-
L I
23,
ino,07 C.TAMO w- m-
%
A—-
-j J
'45 0 7 0 6 7.
YOSSILPU: ,sjfv�e"vrjLo�xte�r QUADRA GARDENS
v I
3 v_r\ .�.�{y r r+l� i J, r t_r-�I\— I J-r- _
T58 17 4U—WZ _ _ Z_ -- —
20
.0 b o
N 203
35. - w 6 L � E_J
d 0
/ 0 rN
20 0 '2
`V � Gj 0
x1 �
201 mQ1
35.0 o 00
LL_
N 200
Q 22.4 - -n/_2
R=12 BLOCK 220 S TREE T ��I 0:3 m RESERVE
of R=140
ii o 0
Q -1 o { G2 i
19# 198 1 9 + G
2 G
C' ! n ,
1 � i " _) < p
1
// �0
\ 0 I v0, ?i 2• O �,
^
196 195 I Q \
22 Igic IB•?
R=W -BLOCK 221
O 1� 0.3 m RESERVE
Q
N
40=1 - - - - -
►'So 1 .0 -
1911 1 1 3,,,1
Lid n r0 "
90 189 188 N ry
BLK. BLK. BLK. BLK. BLK. /BLK.
J ' .208 209J 210 211 212 213
5.3 15.0 15.0 - 12 ,4 N 18' 3' 30" W
4'
15.d7 i
°s =30 R. BLOCK
P 214
TREE T
61
w 171
to 18.0 15.5
if
187 186 (. 185 (84 183 182 181
Attachment No. 2
DN: TUNNEY.DRA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
PLAN IDENTIFICATION
1. That this approval applies to draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-87021 prepared by
Tunney Planning dated (revised) October, 1989 (and further revised in red as per
the attached plan) showing 194 lots for single family detached dwellings, 9 lots
for semi-detached or linked dwellings, and various blocks for reserve, road
widening, site triangle etc.
FINAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS
2. That all streets within the Plan of Subdivision shall be dedicated as public
highway and shown as such on the final plan.
3. That all streets shall be named to the satisfaction of the Town of Newcastle and
shown on the final plan.
REQUIREMENTS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
4. That the Owner shall retain a qualified landscape architect to prepare and submit
a Landscaping Plan to the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning
and Development for review and approval. The Landscaping Plan shall reflect the
design criteria of the Town as amended from time to time.
5. That the Owner shall retain a professional engineer to prepare and submit a
Master Drainage and Lot Grading Plan to the Director of Public Works for review
and approval. All plans and drawings must conform to the Town's Design Criteria
as amended from time to time.
6. That the Owner shall retain a qualified consultant to prepare and submit a Tree
Preservation plan to the Director of planning and Development for review and
approval.
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
7. That the Owner shall enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the Town and agree
to abide by all terms and conditions of the Town's standard subdivision
agreement, including, but not limited to, the requirements that follow.
. .. .2
-2-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
8. That all easements, road widening, and reserves as required by the Town shall
be granted to the Town free and clear of all encumbrances.
9. That the Owner shall pay to the Town at the time of execution of the subdivision
agreement, five percent (5%) cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication for residential
development.
10. That the Owner shall pay to the Town, at the time of execution of the Subdivision
Agreement, development charge levy and any other charges in effect at the time
of execution and further agrees to abide by the Town's payment schedule as
amended from time to time.
11. That the Owner shall provide and install sidewalks, street lights, temporary
turning circles etc. as per the Town's standards and criteria.
12. That the Owner shall cause all utilities, including, hydro, telephone, Cable TV,
etc. to be buried underground.
13. That the Owner shall provide the Town, at the time of execution of the
subdivision agreement, Letters of Credit acceptable to the Town's Treasurer, with
respect to Performance Guarantee, Maintenance Guarantee, Occupancy Deposit and
other guarantees or deposit as may be required by the Town.
14. That prior to the issuance of building permits, access routes to the subdivision
must be provided to meet Subsection 3.2.5.2(6) of the Ontario Building Code and,
that all watermains and hydrants are fully serviced and the Owner agrees that
during construction, fire access routes be maintained according to Subsection
2.5.1.2 of the Ontario Fire Code, storage of combustible waste be maintained as
per Subsection 2.4.1.1 and open burning as per Subsection 2.6.3.4 of the Ontario
Fire Code.
15. The Owner agrees that where the well or private water supply of any person is
interfered with as a result of construction or the development of the
subdivision, the Owner shall at his expense, either connect the affected party
to municipal water supply system or provide a new well or private water system
so that water supplied to the affected party shall be of quality and quantity
at least equal to the quality and quantity of water enjoyed by the affected party
prior to the interference.
12 "- 9 . . .3
-3-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT-D)
16. That the applicant shall provide for the construction of a concrete sidewalk on
Liberty Street to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
17. That lot 1, 17 and 18 be exempt from building permit until such time it develops
in conjunction with adjacent lands to the north.
18. That blocks 193, 194 and 195 develop in conjunction with the lands to the south
to form semi-detached/link lots.
19. That lots 135, 156, 172, 187, 190, 191, 196 and 197 be prohibited from accessing
Street "A".
20. That prior to the commencement of on-site preparation, including rough grading,
the applicant shall satisfy Central lake Ontario Conservation Authority
financially and otherwise in terms of erosion, sedimentation control and
stormwater management.
+760