HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-237-90 Addendum UNFINISHED BUSINESS
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
&h,4 c 3 u
REPORT File #t,-
N: ASHDALE.GPA
Res. #
By-Law #
METING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DATE: Monday, November 5, 1990
ADDENDUM
REPORT #: PD-237-90 FILE #: DEV 90-058 (X-REF 18T-88024 REVISED)
S(J&JECT: REZONING AND REVISED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
ASHDALE CAPITAL CORPORATION LTD.
PART LOT 9, CONCESSION 2, TOWN OF BOWMANVILLE
FILE: DEV 90-058 ( X-REF 18T-88024 REVISED)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Addendum Report PD-237-90 be received;
2 . THAT Report PD-237-90 be lifted from the table and be received for
information; and
3 . THAT the Zoning By-law Amendment Application be closed as per the
request of the applicant.
1. BACKGROUND
1 . 1 On July 23, 1990 Committee received PD-237-90. Staff recommended
DENIAL of the proposed rezoning and revised Proposed Plan of
Subdivision ( 18T-88024) for an additional 29 dwelling units.
Committee in its consideration of the matter, TABLED the
application for three months, "to allow the owners of the property
in the subject area to jointly prepare and submit a Neighbourhood
Development Plan to the Town of Newcastle for consideration" .
1.2 On October 23, 1990, Staff received a letter from . the applicant
advising that they now wish to formally withdraw the rezoning
application and revised Proposed Plan of Subdivision, (Attachment
No. 1) and will proceed with the Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision
as previously approved.
ADDENDUM REPORT NO. : PD-237-90 PAGE 2
2 . CONCLUSION
2 . 1 in consideration of the applicants request, Staff recommend Council
close the Zoning By-law Amendment application by resolution.
Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
Franklin Wu, M.C. I.P. Lawrence/ $. Kotseff
Director of Planning Chief A inistrative
and Development Officer
CP*FW *cc
*Attach
29 October 1990
ATTACHMENT No. 1
October 23 , 1990,",\ 3
UELZVERED VTA FAX
The Corporation of the ¢��
Newcastle �d .
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Ontario.
L1C 3A6
Attentions Mr. L. Taylor
Dear Mr. Tay14r. :
Re: Rezgni.ng. Application Draft Approved
Plan of Subdivision 18T-88024
Town of Newcastle - Ashdale Capital Corporation
Ltd. Your, file No. DEV90-058
Further to my earlier telephone conversation with Mr. Pellarin of
your office, as instructed by and on behalf of Ashdale Capital
Corporation Ltd. , we are writing to formally withdraw our Application
for Rezoning to implement proposed amendments to above Draft Plan
of Subdivision.
While it remains the position of Ashdale Capital Corporation Ltd. ,
that the Neighbourhood ID Development Plan prepared by Tunney Planning
Inc. is fully supportive -of the above application; upon careful review
of the current position of the Town of Newcastle planning staff,
Ashdale has determined that it would be more prudent to proceed with
registration of the above Draft Approved Plan.
Yours very truly,
ASEDALE CAPITAL CORPORATION LTD,
Pert � • /'i I
Allan N. Windrem
Vice-President, Development.
CC: Mr. J. Cornacchia,
Ashdale Capital Corporation Ltd.
Cc: Mayor M. Hubbard
cc: Councillor D. Hamre
cc: Mr. C. Pellarin,
Town of Newcastle planning Department
cc: Mr. K. Tunney
Tunney Planning Inc.
i
cc: Mr. V. valela 5
BayPark Homes
V,
° `" � TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
REPORT File # �� '�
DN: DEV90058.GPA Res. #
By-Law #
MEETING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DATE: Monday, July 23, 1990
REPORT #: PD-237-90 FILE #: DEV 90-058 (X-REF 18T-88024 Revised)
SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICATION - ASHDALE CAPITAL CORPORATION LTD.
PART LOT 9, CONCESSION 2, FORMER TOWN OF BOWMANVILLE
FILE: DEV 90-058 (X-REF 18T-88024 Revised)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-237-90 be received;
2 . THAT application to amend the Town of Newcastle Comprehensive
Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended, submitted by Tunney Planning Inc.
on behalf of Ashdale Capital Corporation Ltd. be DENIED;
3 . THAT the Region of Durham Planning Department be advised that the
Town of Newcastle can not support the Red-Line Revision proposed,
dated June 1990; and
4 . THAT the interested parties listed in this report and any
delegation be advised of Council's decision.
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
1. 1 Applicant: Ashdale Capital Corporation Ltd.
1.2 Agent: Tunney Planning Inc.
1.3 Rezoning Application: from "Urban Residential Type One - Holding
( (H)Rl) " to "Urban Residential Type Three
Holding (H)R3) .
1.4 Subdivision: proposing to develop 47 street townhouse units a
block containing"46 townhouse units . - . . .2
REPORT NO. : PD-237-90 PAGE 2
1.5 Land Area: 1.57 Ha (3. 879 Acres)
2. LOCATION
2 . 1 The subject property is located in Part Lot 9, Conc . 2, former Town
of Bowmanville. The lands are north of Concession Street, west of
Mearns Avenue, south of the Canadian Pacific Railway line and east
of Bradshaw Street.
3 . BACKGROUND
3 . 1 An application was received by the Town of Newcastle Planning and
Development Department on June 25, 1990, proposing to rezone a
portion of lands within a previously Draft Approved Plan of
Subdivision from " ( (H)Rl) " to " ( (H)R3) " . The proposed amendment
would permit the development of 47 street townhouses and 46 block
townhouse dwelling units . The previous zoning allowed 23 semi-
detached/link lots (46 dwelling units) and 18 street townhouse
units. The proposed revision would result in 29 additional
dwelling units, a 45% increase from the original approved proposal.
3 .2 The applicant has also made a submission to the Region of Durham
Planning Department for a proposed revision to the Draft Approved
Plan of Subdivision ( 18T-88024) . The revision is in keeping with
the rezoning application submitted to the Town. Town Planning
Staff have circulated the applications concurrently in order to
expedite the process .
4 EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES
4 . 1 The subject lands are currently vacant of any structures.
Surrounding land uses include:
South: limited existing residential fronting on Concession
Street.
East: vacant land subject to application for commercial
development, Mearns Avenue, and additional vacant lands
subject to site plan approval and Draft Plan Approval.
North: vacant lands comprising Draft Approved Plan of
Subdivision 18T-89013 .
. . . . 3
REPORT NO. : PD-237-90 PAGE 3
West: limited existing residential fronting on Bradshaw Street
and Mann Street as well as registered and developing
Plans of Subdivision 1OM-829 and 1OM-830.
5 PUBLIC MEETING AND RESPONSE
5 . 1 Pursuant to Council's resolution of July 26, 1982 and the
requirements of the Planning Act, the appropriate signage
acknowledging the application was installed on the subject lands.
In addition the appropriate notice was mailed to each landowner
within the prescribed distance.
As of the writing of this report, no written submissions have been
received, although counter enquiries have been received.
6 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES
6 . 1 Within the Durham Regional Official Plan the subject property is
designated "Residential" . The residential policies encourage
development with a variety of housing mix and type. The
application does not appear to comply due to lack of single and
semi-detached/link dwelling units.
6 .2 Within the Town of Newcastle Official Plan, Bowmanville Major Urban
Area, the subject lands are within neighbourhood 111D" and
designated "Low Density Residential" . The neighbourhood has a
population target of 5000 people and also contains a medium density
symbol. The low density provision permits a maximum density of 30
units per net residential hectare. The medium density provision
allows a density range of 30 to 55 units per net residential
hectare. In addition to complying with the density provisions as
outlined above, the application must comply with the population
target.
6 . 3 The lands subject to rezoning and the lands previously zoned 11R3"
total approximately 2 .281 Ha. The density, therefore of the 93
proposed townhouse units would be 40. 77 units/Ha. Staff have also
undertaken detail population calculations of the neighbourhood
. . .4
REPORT NO. : PD-237-90 PAGE 4
population target relative to subdivision applications within the
neighbourhood which have been approved or proposed. It would
appear that an additional 100 persons could be accommodated within
neighbourhood ' 1D' . The 29 additional units proposed in the
revised subdivision plan would consume the residential population
allocation.
6 .4 Within neighbourhood 111D" there remains several parcels of vacant
developable lands . In consideration of the remaining vacant land
and the balance of population available, Staff is of the opinion
that this revised plan should not be approved until such time a
Development Plan is prepared to ensure density and all population
allocation are accounted for fairly and equitably for all land
owners within Neighbourhood "1D"
6 .5 Section 7 .2 . 1.2 iii of the Newcastle Official Plan states that
Neighbourhood Development Plans may be prepared for Residential
Neighbourhoods prior to approval of plan of subdivision. Such
Neighbourhood Plans may be developed to identify specific policies
related to the development of the neighbourhood; such as the
location and residential density of specific land blocks; and
density ranges for specific land blocks . Until such a development
plan is prepared, any increase in density may prejudice the
development potential of other vacant land within the
neighbourhood.
7 AGENCY COMMENTS
7 . 1 The subject application was circulated to a number of agencies and
departments for comment. Todate no comments have been received
from any of the agencies /departments circulated either by the
Region or internally.
8 STAFF COMMENTS
8. 1 A similar request for increase in density has just been submitted
by the owner of Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision 18T-89013, which
REPORT NO. : PD-237-90 PAGE 5
abuts the subject lands to the north. The proposed revision seeks
an additional 30 units to the previously draft approved plan by
converting single family dwelling units to semi-detached/link
units . Staff will be reporting on this application in the near
future. It is becoming obvious that there will be increasing
pressure put on the municipality to entertain revision to approved
subdivision for higher density. The cumulative effect of this
current application and others will erode the density guidelines
set out in the Official Plan.
8 .2 In consideration of the foregoing comments, and inasmuch as Council
only recently granted approval to the plan of subdivision, Staff
cannot recommend any further change that would increase the density
of this subdivision.
Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
Franklin Wu, M.C. I .P. L rence E Kotseff
DIrector of Planning Chief A istrative
and Development Officer
CP*FW*cc
*Attach
17 July 1990
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
Tunney Planning Inc . Ashdale Capital Corporation Ltd.
340 Byron Street South c/o Michael Stuart Group
Suite 200 85 West Beaver Creek Road
WHITBY, Ontario LIN 4P8 Unit 2
RICHMOND HILL, Ont. L4B 1K4
TOTAL LAND HOLDINGS
LANDS SUBJECT TO REZONING
LOT 10 LOT 9 LOT 8 IN
1 � A
jW I
�{ N
Z
0
1 � �
i
A � Z w
1 Q 1
_
N
� O
R1 L A i R1-8
1 -STREET _ _ • ____ _._
CONCESSION ST. E.
TRUDEAU DRIVE I ' ` I r�
W
1 MARCHWOOD CR. R v
1 a H � 0
W, TRUDEAU DR i p
�+ W ' f� {�I
c~n R1 1 l�tJ
W o
_ m � R1 �
i FP
0 50 loo 200 300,n
KEY MAP � �
Dev. 9.0-058 18Tmm88024
-� �T
N U E 0.3m RESERVE �
BLOCK 67 �
VE 163.126 N 33.268
1 _ `
N 5 20.0 5 —Zi
37.3 — —s �L—H 8
`o°— PROPOSED .. -. .-.".►
. . . . . .
` BL000 ``y Z BLOC6 I
MEARN'S AVE.
' �6 . " ao REALIGNMEN "'\\
i
— # — — „. 9
3" �. �' a� � 34.2 l_
10R— 280 I
,BLOCK"'6i��� ���°�8 PART 2
. . . . . . . . . . .
Z
35.5 9 I
p _
35.1 BLOCK BLOCK 6
66 4'49,30 E N 16' 29'
° fp 18.4 N 16• .10' 00" 58.30
BICh� � 118.4
B _,
oant -77 9 4
s
W Y
'.
— — — — n m �
�Vpd 93
yet " �� ��QLOCKf •56
L ,3MED: IUM 1D SITY
" _ o � BLO K 64 co
3 � '9 : 92
(1.127 h — 278 ac.) Hy
3 — " xi1 r • , m, n U
o „ 74�1
3 2
- - ' W
�. j . . . . . . :' . . . . . . . .. . . . O 9
12.0 14.3 o ` 1 3. ,,, I
•1' o
R 40 Q�h 5 w
5 T _R E T A 04
/ \i V O.3m RESERVE
r `1 L� N BLOCK 98
E
163.126 33.268 '
5 20.0 5 - Ll
37.3 773*- ..- Colo. 8
39 .0 qt PROPOSED 1 ,�. . . . . . . . . . .
I
_N h MEARN'S _
I REAUGNMEN --''�� w
7 9
u r fl5a
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
101?—#80
QD PART 2 96 93
CIO �r _
==� it ° �¢'�� �� � � z � 7>
9 I
X35.3 ct •35.0
M ° BLOCK
BLOCK 9
N 74��30 E N 16' 2fl' �..
N 16' .10' 00' W 58.30
s 13 ao O.3m RESERVE r` 1.Z 41.9 �i w �
« 40.1 c0
Q BLOCK 95 •11 � W o « '
- — -- 15 = --- u 0 10 w x
°
««° o o. . . . .9 o c
:�5.0 16 to �� so E J
Lo
41.6 17 8 49.4 m
to to
18 7 '
o 5 19 ,;' . . . . .6 . . . . . . . . . . I
O 4 C:,
•
1 , 20 ; 58.4 0
_ o 01 ,
_ 41.7 �.-
0
Ile. ° Olt 0
M I o� }°
' 9
44 43 42 4 "° ?�
, ) .. . . . .20.0. : g.
12.0 . . �' 18.0 1 00.2 2 .2 1 0
20 . "" �.p I
14.3 \ �/ohs 5 a
R
10
L O T 8
C O N C E S S I O N 2
YOM�IIOIII Ol0(rt 1 I
• �—li `• �I [ 100• '•
——————--———— M E A f? IV -S V E N -
1 :o r, i � o o " = w• 8 - � _.at: >./ ar \..J� a.......Il �` '
°k/SI1C Ns `�->. •� a »• :M- } 97 -. PROPOSED
M
TART S
1 afST.Nv • •
: 0 ° 1Ot/oo "'•—• •-j ' ,;, ' : ,. .. �' , .•.,.» .. .. DRAFT PLAN
1 rma9t p11 101 ,d .. ,0•aa: _y_ yt_ 1p4-�1ao 96 II
'•-' �. OF 5118DINSION
L——— '.�.. �+ „3 _Sa_ a.i-. t• PART.. LOTS S b7.50.39.60.t RES£R AD 4,LOTS
• •--H .—•� • ' • .j- i 1M� [� • 129&995 ALL•W&PART OF BLOOC T&O PART,
N ...,......,9...�.........��.•I.AI.I..N.}u 1...N.t••..•j•••••• .•: a rr n • I TER&NINNSTANUY STREET:
JJ
�•—i•-{�• t • PORTER&BRAOSNAW PLAN SUNC.
u i „• �L-I i »� PART OF LOT 9. CONC=QN 2
-..—.
IAJTT 1 L„—� y i• ,( Ia' M � n .I a ..['. FORUERLY TOWN OF BOMYANNl1.L}
\ f
KANta-360 L _: �.—.�I �T{' o CONCESSS70N I
„ r
a1ST.I[.. a IJ 21�.: 1 l �TT• > 15 >. y 3 W 1
i y +� TOWN OF NEWCASIL
f16d27 -- u "
— .;,•H, J Q���•��.f�...... •= . ��II »�T„I (. � :3 f� i • i: o y ( • P� a W = '..•.3. ..,.. �• " MQMAL 4MO-MJTY
Cl WW14V `a
co» rt "-o now 7i Jd�
....... ..f. .................. ?!..l
... �.o-.. J bn
dt 02 i 00 i 7a ,st I l 0 6a• �� ,OLY to+It
T 11 /s1al"1 01„ » 56n,I [j
no low/Yr,a
1 •-i- Ii ..a-. i....i, *� QW`��QQ""`f"�11Ytp •t ; say vY[w4 mK •a .ter
.�-• �-
qj
i I �.;-e9-ireZ aJ ;�a)0791,I < '• ra 3° 67�5 6. ..67 •= i M [• BLOfX D ) 1 �,a .w• ...r
r.... .._ U.LL.., -� ..
7—— O[1C96 i .Ji,,,...y�,>s•mot..— s...`✓>�• :wry . .. SRµ ..... .q
L � � I. T�'�'- 1( e: LaSJ y!D 'C'1 fM-;271d� •O� "� •[r,s,..s
31 :St 51 30 .46 '�� �? I 40 •38 i 1:► i J2 JO 28;=16. 11 i 22 10 r� 16 it 12 t0 6 6
26 f 2 —7 i 1 IM.T t 1 i = i ....i V
` 1Y/�� _� I I 1�,1,,� ...�. ••,�1�,..,.(. ...�. ...i_'�'.'�� >�: v ��--r.
� /Z O,� n ; • .. . .`i 1.��9. .�.._Lr.-1—1'1"' (: T;T ,R,o[,A5 MWAAArr A�«5l V* iarTOL...DSNA* 1 ZI
jo 2 fL�f.T sf� ��ir��a_ ��! .J 1 µf(I. !#�'iI i t3 } i� j n i rr n u u i n 3 i 4f
0' t }2o f I I MANN i STREET S = / SS . J. i _ ', 1 ""M Mum lY�
J. �j `• "1
T`. . 7'r r.'. .-I .......................CMA(VN ST• �—— — — ——1 -�
,y `►7k ...I....��. ... J•I o f 71 1..70.( ...f Qa f 67 1 O ^" O .'
>1' 1 .t _I—1 L J tLL WBR OK QARDEN8
'
I
L O T 8
C O N C E S S 1 0 N 2 2
I �odl Fu TUORH—'KOFI Tr II OC KlT1 � I , M\ �`
----------- M E A R N '--S---=----•- U E m
3m.*OAD R�DCK•ac V E'�'N - D«6J ; •' \ fi
40 :
6 a15TR•No. a•I _ �. °> td e�oa�'_ -m0oc�• .... 1 _ PROPOSED
2a•
•) PART 2 o o:�--. 9 �M w- - - 97 -
68769 o0
WST.No. o ° I "w;-1 j 74 .•u: - '--.......
I - DRAFT -PLAN 22 .Z01 ;•�-, 78 _ _e x... 7- 70 ,.: --- - toR- �-
7m796 ° 1 >•+t
——— Q �I-—-= 1——:r .. ._--_,I ^-•t
_--i -- �,o r 2 96 I . OF SUBDNSION
.a u aLoa PAR .. _._.
,60,k RESERVED x LOTS 55, , , ,
9 -
I LOT BL 'D•k LOTS 1,3,5,6,7,8,9,
s _ " s� - .��,, Q -- -- <ae« 10.91.97-93.94. k PART OF LOTS 11,
10 tV......�. �� 43.�..4<..j.45 s6 .. _. •�••�-- .. - 71 --- -- .... it me 95 ALL IN BLOM-'E7&PART
._-.•___.. ........ _
_. _ ..t.. •. - D OF PORTER do WI N TA LEY STREET.
n 1 _ �_�_L y- _ •:j - --- ....-.... CONCESSION 2.
auoocm. - .ui•-7 _
r - ^W1 PORTER a BRAD
PART 1 L_— - _ __ FOR►/ERIY OWN
3e : /\
PLAN 7OR-568 ° tz :�_-- - : $T 2a °\: - - --- 93 COttCESSSION 2 .
�_—.� 37 19 �� - -- 3YED;iD 1D StTT......
�z 3 )I
Bt0° 5a Y
INST. Na „ ; ?�._ �T C; t5 ' sd3\, 27 ' - : eLDO .. 3 ` ,� I TOWN OF NEWCAS
746827
,. -
o -
--�_,�5•�_`�N� a,p. •�•A
0.tn
.e�
t,_aoRio•D
mNtatATn L/Yt•U.,•gvP
At..1.T
C�crDtwwnsn,1Ar.aM
I ----
7 171 Dw
T INFORYAMON 35 c' 7 rrr eo.A 73 _ . E
82 78 0, 47( 511
-A mc n B4 80 _ II
5 -J
� l l - _ .. �O �. 0 I
zD... _
27�2. � � P �. _
23 � 'I-gr spa"p0. •9 - _ 4S it/LOCK DJ/(g�\4L\) ` A._. Taus>R[w
83 00 79 77 5 7,1 71 6 67 ?65 63 6 J `=w 3a ~ as a ' _�.G `� I Rang•r o..0 - ..a .r r
22 --- �:ya y il ._— �,z _ •s _ °9 aiool 77 n, w ,a., „olaR _
...>� . .�............ .... 8....R... A.....D._.�5. H_.A. � 5
- - --- - w;
— 1(r- L
�� / y -- - o�C7 PLAN ❑T =:4
T / '\auc i- �— 4 =J I L 1 7oR,2r7 4 _
:54 :52 S0 5542 1 40 38 36 t=.-3a 32 30 �L28 ��26 -a 2< 22 20 t6 1< 12 r
I��
54 b-.46 s< Ib JO 8 6
5D / \ I:24 !
21:
56 1 mod; 1 PART 1
` 26 �i V1
\/�Q.OQ-- \ y �--{Q; I 57 Imo. �. i _ - — �.......i.......
i...... PART — .....��.,...� �...a
52 T 2 d 3
T7 I I ..a THOMAS'wALLACf H£RRICKS PLAN FOR PORTER 8 BRADSHAW T •arcs cTR1s,Ga� yancygs aRm m
V v� \ 0" 2Tm 58 1 59i 1 60:1 67 ( 62 63 1: 64 1:65 1 i 66 1 :
51 �lv�\ 28 i._53 1¢ �7:< "43 47 19 37 35 33 31 29 27 ry 3 21 /9 17 5 3 7 9 7 5 ---.1--_ ^, -rte •__.r=
25 2 1 J 1 7
O. —
Lj
29 20 Q MANN STREET ............... 7x•3z 1fTAR0 u•7ED
i( F �.< ..JB I—".is.......e......:.....:T.-....._4._..F.-F.-r.T_.... CMANN ST (UNOPENED)
-�-� X30 y F .................................................................... - -- -- -- - -- —
I •R�+�D.°�.d•"r1.m
,,,r �.rw.rtczuR- vo °RQ
77 ( 72 1 71 1 70 I 69 I 68 1 67 I I 1
ILLOWBROOK GARDENS
l lr�'t