HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-254-90 LIU TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
REPORT File #
- `
LEE.GPA
Res. #
By-Law #
PUBLIC MEETING
SING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DATE: September 4, 1990
REPORT #: PD 5 9 0 FILE #:
SUUCT' REZONING AND NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
TAK LEE ARCHITECT/FINEFIELD HOMES
PART LOT 35, CONCESSION 3, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON
FILE: DEV 90-039; OP 2.2.1 (10)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-254-90 be received;
2 . THAT the Rezoning and Neighbourhood Plan Amendment application
submitted by Tak Lee Architect on behalf of Finefield Homes
for a convenience commercial plaza be referred back to Staff
for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent
report pending receipt of all outstanding agency comments and
the completion of the Courtice West Neighbourhood Development
Plan study.
3 . THAT a copy of this Report and Council's decision be forwarded
to the Region of Durham Planning Department; and
4 . THAT the interested parties listed in this report and any
delegation be advised of Council's decision.
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
1 . 1 Applicant: Tak Lee Architect/Finefield Homes
1.2 Neighbourhood Plan: From - no designation at present
To - an appropriate designation to permit
a 557 .4 sq.metres (6000 sq. ft. )
convenience commercial plaza
REPORT NO. : PD-254-90 PAGE 2
1. 3 Rezoning: From - Urban Residential Type One
Exception (R1-17)
To - an appropriate designation to permit
a 557 .4 sq. metres (6000 sq. ft. )
convenience commercial plaza
1.4 Area: 0. 698 ha (1.725 acres)
2. BACKGROUND
2 . 1 On March 30, 1990 the Town of Newcastle Planning and
Development Department received an application submitted by
Tak Lee Architect/Finefield Homes to amend the Comprehensive
Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended, and to amend the Courtice
West Neighbourhood Development Plan.
2 .2 Due to an error in the circulation of the notice for the June
18, 1990, Public Meeting, a second Public Meeting is
necessitated. Therefore, the purpose of this report is to
fulfill the requirement of a Public Meeting under the Planning
Act.
2 . 3 The zoning of the subject site was changed by amendment from
'Agricultural (A) ' to 'Urban Residential Type One Exception
(R1-17) ' in March of 1986 .
3. LOCATION
3 . 1 The subject site is located in Part Lot 35, Concession 3, in
the former Township of Darlington. The subject site is
located on the southeast corner of Lawson Road and Townline
Road as shown on the attached Key Map.
`„t 1 0
REPORT NO. : PD-254-90 PAGE 3
4. EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES
4 . 1 Existing Uses: Vacant
4 .2 Surrounding Uses: East - Residential
West - Residential
South - Residential
North - Residential
5. PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS
5 . 1 Written submissions have been received from Mr. & Mrs.
Checchia, R.J. Abbott, Newcastle Townline Centre Ltd. and Mr.
Beymon. Mr. & Mrs. Checchia do not believe that a shopping
plaza is an appropriate use of the lands in question for the
following reasons:
1) This site is within one mile of Townline Road and King
Street, which intersection has a large shopping plaza on
the northwest and southwest corners of the intersection,
as well as a new convenience store at the northeast
intersection, and it appears that a commercial use will
be instituted at the southeast corner as well.
2) There are no water and sewer services available at Lawson
Road. Several of the houses on Lawson Road experience
septic problems during a wet spring, and the land in
question is low.
3) The property has just been re-zoned from agricultural to
residential and now a commercial designation is being
sought.
REPORT NO. : PD-254-90 PAGE 4
4) A small plaza will increase the noise, garbage, and
traffic problems at the intersection and surrounding
area.
5. 3 R.J. Abbott and Newcastle Townline Centre ltd. are concerned
that the proposed convenience commercial plaza would
jeopardize the marketability of commercial development within
the Courtice West Highway No.2 Corridor.
5 .4 Mr. Beymon is concerned about the traffic which may be
generated by the proposed plaza. Mr. Beymon also questions
the need for further commercial development in this area.
6. OFFICIAL PLAN CONFORMITY
6 . 1 The subject site is designated 'Residential' within the Town
of Newcastle Official Plan. Section 6 .5.2 iii) c) of the Town
of Newcastle Official Plan allows for convenience commercial
facilities to be located within a designated 'Residential'
area to a maximum gross retail and personal service floor
space of 465 square metres (5,000 square feet) . However, the
Town of Newcastle Official Plan states that this figure is a
general guideline and shall be considered to be approximate.
Minor deviations may be permitted without amendment to this
plan provided that such deviations do not alter the intent of
this Plan. The proposed convenience commercial plaza would
be 557 .4 square metres in size.
7. NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN
I
7 . 1 On October 2, 1989, a Public Meeting of the General Purpose
and Administration Committee considered a draft amendment to
the Courtice West Neighbourhood Development Plan, as per
Attachment 'A' to this report.
'� 12
REPORT NO. : PD-254-90 PAGE 5
The Committee referred the matter back to Staff for further
review and the preparation of a subsequent report upon receipt
of all outstanding agency comments .
7 .2 The subject application by Tak Lee Architect/Finefield Homes
was submitted after the preparation of the October 2, 1990
Courtice West Neighbourhood Development Plan amendment report.
A low density residential designation was proposed for the
site, however, the applicant wishes to have these lands
designated convenience commercial instead.
8. ZONING BY-LAW CONFORMITY
8 . 1 Within the Town of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-
63, the subject property is zoned "Urban Residential Type One
Exception (R1-17) 1 . Consequently, the applicant has applied
to appropriately amend the zoning by-law in order to permit
the commercial uses .
9. COMMENTS FROM AGENCIES
9 . 1 The subject application was circulated by the Town to various
agencies and departments to obtain comments . The following
agencies/departments have offered no objection to this
proposal:
Ministry of Natural Resources
Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority
Town of Newcastle Fire Department
9 .2 The Town of Newcastle Public Works Department feel that this
proposal is premature until such time as urban servicing is
in place for this area.
REPORT NO. : PD-254-90 PAGE 6
9 . 3 The Town of Newcastle Community Services Department has no
objection to the proposal, however, would require the
applicant provide cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication, and
provide a landscape plan prepared by an O.A.L.A. member prior
to site plan approval.
9 .4 Final comments have not been received to date from the
following agencies/departments:
Public School Board
Regional Works Department
Regional Planning Department
Ministry of the Environment
City of Oshawa Planning Department
Region of Durham Department of Health Services
10. CONCLUSION
10. 1 As the purpose of this report is to address the requirement
of a Public Meeting under the Planning Act, and in
consideration of the agency comments outstanding and the
impending completion of the Courtice West Neighbourhood
Development Plan Study, it is recommended that the application
be referred back to Staff for further processing.
Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
Franklin Wu, M.C.I .P. L renc Kotseff
Director of Planning Chief A i istrative
and Development Office
JB*FW*df
Attach
24 August 1990
114
REPORT NO. : PD-254-90 PAGE 7
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's
decision:
Finefield Homes Ltd.
1596 Norwill Crescent,
Oshawa, Ontario.
L1G 7V3
Tak Lee Architect
15 Gervais Drive,
Don Mills, Ontario.
M3C 1Y8
Mr. & Mrs . Checchia
c/o David B. Thomas
90 Simcoe Street North,
Oshawa, Ontario.
L1G 4S2
Mr. Beymon
1357 Belair Cr.
Oshawa, Ontario.
L1K 1N2
R.J. Abbott
c/o 172 King Street East,
Suite 303,
Oshawa, Ontario.
L1H 1B7
® SUBJECT SITE
L0 T• 35 . LOT 34 ' LOT -33
P ,
RE
(H)RI M
Rl E-P z
{H)RI EP.. Q.
R1-�7 cENT 0
R1
a O w
EP �
W HARTSFIELD Z
z_ O c Rl 1( ` O
-� (H)RI '\ U
z EP
. 0 �E�~ O -i1 W (H)R4
w R3-� O
w <1 3 R1 > a,
EP Rl Rl
_ D EP
NASH ROAD
Ri Rl .,
0 50 *0 zoo 300m
KEY MAP
Dev. 90 39 O 2.2. 1 ( 10
Attachment "A"
SCHEDULE " A " TO AMENDMENT #
TO THE COURTICE WEST
NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN
LOT 35 LOT 34 .LOT 33
"........................................... OPOSED AVE ....uuu..u.u..iu..n.u.u..w. .....
Y 1
low
Q
r P•r
- �tC
. rl
r�
<r
.............
4
.f
•-I I.26 ro-
h
�y�.• %:ri
,fJ
f"
!�! 1
:iiit<?:•:ti•i
.i
�f f
r.•/r {
"eo r
r.
( Z
t J•..
M
r=14 r•
n..
L =f
♦ t. �I
f••
ff.
f '�L
v•
f•>
1••
1 •:
•L:
�I f
c
f
I
f
f
f
J�
f•.
f•
f••
Jf
:;ice<•
,.v
t �r
1
•�c
<
b
••s '
L
c
t.
cC-L
"v J.
u�
•'.�ris i�t•
:c
Q
O
`� C•
<r
G
/...
t 'T
c�
P
w
t
o.&Iw �7
-y c
z
z - •�=
H`
•
C
•.r1
�.
J
�f <- 1
z ��f
o-
k
c r
0•{M1a.:
-6-0
t--
P
k.
r_c
k'i• r
Yt �.
t.
f�
cn
�r
W
•4
ii
1`Jl
F
M
C
GE-t
C Y
1 Ex
4
O
G
x\
4,
M�
N
Q r
•5h
i o
•
rr
Y
C
c•
o
ay
U
.L'Y•
. .Z•V
'c.
L
..f
<
b
ti
.p.
<
f•
fatuaau.fafauuaaaaataauuuaaf NASH ua.auaaa�aauauuuaaauauuuafaaaxaf.nunuauaaau:faauu•••.•
_ ROAD aauauua.a.auuuuuaauaua
:::•::...................... :..;..........
:::.:.. ................... :.:::.:.::::..
............................. ..:....:.
AREA SUBJECT OF AMENDMENT
NEIGHBOURHOOD BOUNDARY.,.. ....•-._._, MINOR OPEN SPACE. . . . . ... . . .. . .. . . �3�`
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. .. . . . . .. . MAJOR OPEN SPACE. . .. .... . .. . ......
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. . . . _ . . A ":v; HAZARD LANDS- --_ _ ... . . ...
CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL. . . ARTERIAL. ROAD—TYPE (B(. . . . . . . . .. .---
SPECIAL PURPOSE COMMERCIAL- . _ . . COLLECTOR ROAD . . . . ... . . . . . ..... . . ••.•••.••a•«
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. . 'i LOCAL ROAD. .
PARKETTE.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ® PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE PATHWAY. . . . . . .......•
NEIGHBOURHOOD PARK . . . .. . QN1 DENOTES DENSITY DESIGNATION
DENOTES MAXIMUM NUMBER en
40
COMMERCIAL NODE C OF UNITS PER NET HECTARE
t�