HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-169-90 TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
:� STMARY.GPA
REPORT File
Res. #
By-Law #
METING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DATE: Monday, May 7, 1990
REPORT #: PD-169-90 FILE #:
SUg,ECT: ST. MARYS CEMENT
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-168-90 be received for information;
2 . THAT the Minister of the Environment be requested to give top
priority to investigate all environmental issues raised by the
Port Darlington Ratepayer Association as related to the St.
Marys Cement operation in Bowmanville;
3 . THAT is addition to the site plan agreement, St. Marys Cement
is required to enter into a separate agreement with the Town
with respect to those issues raised in Paragraph 5 . 3 of this
Report and the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute such
agreement; and
4 . THAT a copy of this Report be forwarded to the Regional
Commissioner of Planning, the Minister of the Environment, and
the Port Darlington Community Association.
1. BACKGROUND:
1. 1 At its meeting held on January 29, 1990, Council passed the
following resolution:
"THAT Staff investigate the feasibility to hire a
consultant to review the St. Marys Cement application. "
Z . . .2
REPORT NO. : PD-169-90 PAGE 2
1.2 At its meeting held on February 26, 1990, Council passed
another related resolution as follows:
"THAT Council investigate all aspects of the
environmental issues surrounding the 86 homes lying
within the Cove and Cedarcrest Beach area. "
2 . ST. MARYS CEMENT APPLICATIONS:
The following is a list of current planning applications
submitted by St. Marys Cement and a brief status of each
application is provided herein.
2 . 1 SITE PLAN APPLICATION:
Site Plan application was made by St. Marys Cement on
November 30, 1989 for approval of construction of storage
silos and related structures on the existing "dock" area.
Comments from all circulating agencies have been received.
It is noted that the Ministry of Environment suggested to the
Town that site plan approval should be withheld until the
Minister decides on the issue of Environmental Assessment.
The Ministry Staff, in its letter to the Town, also indicated
that they have no legal jurisdiction on site plan matters .
2 .2 OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION:
This application was made by St. Marys Cement on June 9, 1989 .
The application sought to amend the Durham Regional Official
Plan to:
,a) place an appropriate Official Plan designation on the
existing "dock" area so as to allow St. Marys Cement to
continue existing uses on the existing "dock" area.
b) place an appropriate Official Plan designation on the
crown water lot area abutting the existing "dock" area.
It is St. Marys Cement's intention to reclaim the water
lot by filling in that part of Lake Ontario and hence
expand the existing "dock" area.
. . . 3
REPORT NO. : PD-169-90 PAGE 3
The Official Plan Amendment application is in circulation
stage and Staff is unable to report on the said application
until we receive comments from all government agencies . To
date, comments are still outstanding from Ministry of
Environment, CN Rail, Ministry of Natural Resources and
Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority.
2 . 3 REZONING APPLICATION:
St. Marys Cement also filed application with the Town on
June 9 , 1989 to amend the Town's Comprehensive Zoning By-law
so that an appropriate zoning category be placed on both the
existing "dock" area and on the Crown Water Lot.
The status of this application is the same as the Official
Plan amendment application.
3 . FEASIBILITY OF HIRING OUTSIDE CONSULTANT:
3 . 1 In examining Council's direction with respect to the
feasibility of hiring an outside consultant to evaluate St.
Marys Cement proposal, Staff would like to address this issue
in the following manner:
a) the need to hire a consultant
b) the matter to be reviewed by the consultant
c) the financial implication to the Town
3 .2 On the question of the need to hire an outside consultant,
Staff would point out that the Official Plan amendment and
Rezoning application have been circulated to many government
agencies at both the Provincial and Federal levels . These
agencies have experts in various areas that will provide
professional comments to the Region and the Town to assist in
our deliberation of the proposal. To hire a consultant would
. . .4
REPORT NO. : PD-169-90 PAGE 4
appear to be a duplication of effort and money at this time.
The Town receives and processes hundreds of development
applications in any single year and Town Staff rely on
agencies from senior governments to provide us their expert
advice.
3 . 3 If a consultant was to be hired, the consultant should be
retained for a specific purpose. At this time, in our
preliminary examination of the Official Plan Amendment and
rezoning application, Staff have not identified any issue
related to the St. Marys Cement application that would require
consultant to assist us nor have we been advised by any
government agency that there may be an environmental problem
arising out of the St. Marys Cement applications which involve
construction of three ( 3) storage silos on the existing "dock"
area and expanding the "dock" area by reclaiming the westerly
water lot. If and when there is a potential environmental
problem identified by the Town Staff or the Ministry of the
Environment, Staff will be reviewing the situation and report
back to Committee and Council on the issue of retaining a
consultant.
3 .4 Last but not least, is the question of financial implication.
Anytime the Town contracts for an outside consultant, there
is cost implication which will have to be borne by all
taxpayers . This matter must be considered by Council in its
future budget deliberations if the consultant is to be
retained.
. . .5
REPORT NO. : PD-169-90 PAGE 5
4 . ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES RAISE BY PORT DARLINGTON COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
4 . 1 Mr. Gordon White, spokesman for the Port Darlington Community
Association has appeared before Committee and Council
expressing various environmental concerns with respect to the
St. Marys Cement's operation. These include disposal of kiln
dust, ground water contamination, shoreline erosion etc. .
4 .2 For the information of Council, there is no development
application affecting lands owned by St. Marys Cement except
for the area of the existing dock and water lot. Hence, any
environmental problems perceived or otherwise resulting from
the current St. Marys Cement operation on lands with respect
to which there is no development application, the Town does
not appear to have any jurisdiction to deal with such matters.
It is Staff's opinion that environmental matters related to
the operations of an industry such as St. Marys Cement are
government by Provincial Legislation such as the Environmental
Protection Act. They are the responsibility of the Province
and not the Town to enforce.
4 . 3 Staff understand that the Ministry of Environment staff are
investigating the operation of St. Marys Cement. However, we
have no indication from the Ministry Staff as to the timing
of completion of their investigation. As a result of various
concerns raised by the Port Darlington Community Association,
Town Council should urge the Minister of the Environment to
provide top priority to this matter.
. . . 6
REPORT NO. : PD-169-90 PAGE 6
5 . SITE PLAN APPLICATION:
5 . 1 As stated in Paragraph 2 . 1 of this report, St. Marys Cement
has filed application for site plan approval for the
construction of three (3) storage silos and accessory
structures on the existing "dock" area. The Official Plan and
Zoning By-law currently in force in the Town do not apply to
the existing "dock" area. After consultation with the Town
Solicitor, it appears that the only legal control that
presently applies to the existing "dock" area is site plan
control pursuant to Section 40 of the Planning Act.
5 .2 Section 40 of the Planning Act sets out the requirements for
submission of drawings and plans as well as set out those
matters that could be considered in any condition of approval
that may be imposed by the Town. It should be noted that
Section 40 does not deal with the issue of the "use" of the
lands but only covers such matters as layout, design, creation
of building/structure, access, parking, walkway, fencing,
grading, lighting etc. In addition, conditions could be
imposed by the municipality dealing with any of these matters.
5. 3 Through internal review and comments from the circulation
process, Staff is satisfied that those matters to be
considered as stated in the Planning Act will be adequately
addressed in the site plan agreement which will be made as a
condition of site plan approval.
In addition, Staff is recommending a separate agreement to be
entered into between St. Marys Cement and the Town to require
St. Marys Cement to covenant and agree to the following
pertaining to the existing "dock" area:
. . .7
REPORT NO. : PD-169-90 PAGE 7
a) No further building or structure are to be erected
without prior approval by the Town of Newcastle through
site plan approval process and building permit
application.
b) Any flood lights are to be designed and erected in a
manner to direct illumination away from existing
residents .
c) St Marys Cement shall construct and complete an earth
bearm along the easterly limit of the existing "Dock"
area within three (3) years from the date of this
agreement. The location, dimension and vegetation
planting of the berm shall be defined and shown on a site
plan to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and
Development and be attached as a schedule to this
agreement. The performance obligation of the earth berm
is to be secured by an irrevocable and unconditional
Letter of Credit in the amount of $250,000 .00 which will
contain provisions for annual adjustment in accordance
with the Southam Construction Index and be in a form
acceptable to the Treasurer of the Town.
d) St. Marys Cement will continue to persue the amendments
to the Official plan and Zoning By-law in a manner
consistent with its current applications .
5.4 With respect to the suggestion by the Staff of the Ministry
of Environment that the Town should withhold its decision on
the site plan application until the Minister decides on the
issue pertaining to the Environmental Assessment Act, Staff
have been waiting for such decision since January and at time
of preparation of this report, there is no indication or
response from the Ministry Staff as to when such a decision
will be rendered. It should be noted that in its letter to
the Town, the Ministry Staff has stated clearly that it has
no jurisdiction on site plan matters . Staff have written the
Ministry requesting a decision be made prior to mid-May.
. . .8
9
REPORT NO. : PD-169-90 PAGE 8
5 .5 The jurisdiction of site plan approval is solely vested with
the Town and a decision must be made. Council has delegated
site plan approval authority to both the Director of Planning
and the Director of Public Works . Inasmuch as the Town does
not appear to have valid reasons in withholding approval of
the site plan application, Staff feel that the requirements
set out in Paragraph 5. 3 will provide some forms of control
otherwise not available to the Town. In this regard, both
Directors are prepared to give favorable consideration to the
St. Marys Cement site plan application on the conditions set
out above unless otherwise directed by Council.
5 .6 The content of this report has been reviewed and discussed
with the Town Solicitor.
Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
Franklin Wu, M.C. I .P. L rence Kotseff
Director of Planning Chief A 'nistrative
and Development Officer
Walter Evans, P.Eng.
Director of Public Works
FW*jip
*Attach
1 May 1990
90
REPORT NO. : PD-169-90 PAGE 9
INTERESTED PARTIES TO BE NOTIFIED OF COUNCIL AND COMMITTEE'S
DECISION:
Mr. Gordon White, President
Port Darlington Community Association
P.O. Box 100
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario
L1K 3K8
Mr. Cliff Meta, Plant Manager
St. Marys Cement Co.
P.O. Box 68
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario
L1C 3K8
Mr. Dixon Wood
St. Marys Cement Co.
Secretary
2200 Yonge Street
TORONTO, Ontario
M4S 2C6
- L.
A KE� ONTARIO
iEICISTINGI FI E.LD � i I / ;q� SiWE �. .
><. / ' v`� N.\•(.L--75.75«..
I GaAYE� t .y L. L- 73.42- j
IXZJ1Ca:.
\ 9JUDU14 I / .
tVf FLma ` ; �'aC I
I �� ko Et.b2• �/\/ ri/m 4// �
G
s
' oD T-GTOCILOILE ACE6
\� , O/ In PL DQAIJPGE I � A4HaU2
/ DI TF�To DOJO Fog 57000
/
62A1./EL SJEFACG
�_. I _ i.2`�e� r-<' Y+ ems•e.le 7vvlcu
A¢EA-rA,4- I 2-.I sj /• ��REQS cv _ Srsuc
1 TFAr,KFEiz FUSE•\ /r 1E. �SEEI'Vmb• 4� c¢"cE ''`7 , <QC.
�JGa• -1.1E'6^ S r'r ..•! f �`� 3
2-
;�) HETAL LYALS L 2v r .\ 3/. '�n,i,•DOE-. ' n -�- • 1 Gywvfh BAST - t _ NETS ��UIDDI�'�Cr.
a7-
WIC- �-
- -�_5!
yG
Q�E•� d. -13'a2m I X444
x
=•4ox1� i�.l:.: '_-� �fl�'t' 1 T TPV£JP L�J.L �' 3 CCJG¢ETE 51L05-.IB•GG-DIA.
- s• .EL ',�% - "o�nc�U¢E j 'AS m NIGH, 2 Fa-91=0o r
..�� I GRAJEL A4CSZ AaIJJ 030-
WIOE_L-4 NotJ'E OJ P
�` '4`"�?' - - 1 G�c m' L I G•I m�t 52•D-X 5-HIGH. Gc,l'nc 1
PEIJiG1oJ5E oJ -G•�-,t b•8-K I
\ '� '�/� �.N�/'� Gy - d.�. I II•o-HI6N-a.L N£TAL GLAD '
ACICA
F•$—PIA.STEEL PIPE
FIE¢v I•Z- 3-0-D4.TIEEL PIPE GO:-NEYOZ G� �GA IN_��
�1Y GON/pC GALL£¢Y SLOPIJG UP AT �'
c2oH ZIUlT ASOVE GRALE To 1 ao�M flow-¢SICCL EL2-
�" _ ,., JG Gol-IJHw5.f3NS,3P.ta.:: EL 132.00 PT PC,.0tJ5E AM.�E 1 To F1.1o1-lo AT GELL�2
'� / - \• 4 P 1E SILd SNIrL04DIwY TOW£a:
6�
I
P
S 'AP