Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-166-90 -"Ww,,y, TOWN OF NEWCASTLE DN: 18T89017 REPORT File # r, c • , -, :. }C Res. # F-�• By-Law # (MEETING: General Purpose and Administration Committee DATE: Monday, May 7, 1990 REPORT #: PD-166-90 FILE #: 18T-89017 SECT: SUBDIVISION APPLICATION - VELTRI AND SONS CORPORATION PART LOT 11, CONC. 2, FORMER TOWN OF BOWMANVILLE FILE: 18T-89017 RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1 . THAT Report PD-166-90 be received; 2 . THAT the proposed Plan of Subdivision 18T-89017 revised and dated November 6, 1989, as per Attachment No. 1, be APPROVED subject to the conditions contained in this Report; 3 . THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized, by by-law, to execute a Subdivision Agreement between the Owner and the Town of Newcastle at such time as the agreement has been finalized to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning; 4 . THAT a copy of this Report and Council 's decision be forwarded to the Region of Durham Planning Department; and 5 . THAT the interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. 1. APPLICATION DETAILS 1 . 1 Applicant: Veltri and Sons Corporation 1.2 Agent: G.M. Sernas & Associates . . . .2 REPORT NO. : PD-166-90 PAGE 2 1. 3 Subdivision Application: Proposing: 10, 18. 0 minimum frontage semi detached/link dwelling units (20 lots) and (2) blocks for future development. 1. 4 Land Area: 1. 15 Ha (2 . 84 acres) 2 . BACKGROUND 2 . 1 In March of 1989 the Town of Newcastle Planning and Development Department was advised by the Region of Durham Planning Department of an application for proposed plan of subdivision submitted by G. M. Sernas and Associates on behalf of Veltri and Sons Incorporated. The subject application was revised in November of 1989 to facilitate additional lands, and to accommodate agency comments . The plan as currently before Committee/ Council proposes a total of 20 residential units . 2 . 2 Staff would note for the Committee's information that, pursuant to Town policy the appropriate signage acknowledging the application was installed on the subject lands . 3 LOCATION 3 . 1 The subject property is located in Part Lot 11, Concession 2, former Town of Bowmanville. The site is roughly bounded by Liberty Street to the east, Concession Street to the south, Saunders Avenue to the north, and Burk Court to the west. 4 EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES 4 . 1 The lands currently house one single family dwelling in proximity to Liberty Street while the balance of the lands remain vacant. 4 .2 Surrounding land uses include: North: Single family dwellings fronting on Saunders Avenue; South: Single family dwellings fronting on Concession Street; East: Three (3) storey brick apartment adjacent the site and single family dwelling units fronting on Liberty Street; West: Single family dwellings. fronting on Burk Court. . . . .3 REPORT NO. : PD-166-90 PAGE 3 6 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES 6 . 1 Within the Durham Region Official Plan the subject lands are designated "Residential" . The predominant use of lands so designated shall be for housing purposes. The application would appear to comply. 6 .2 Within the Town of Newcastle Official Plan the subject lands are designated "Low Density Residential" within neighbourhood "2A" . The application proposes a density of 25.8 units per net Ha. this is in compliance with the low density provisions which state a maximum of 30 units per net Ha. 7 ZONING BY-LAW POLICIES 7 . 1 Within the Town of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended, the subject property is zoned "Urban Residential Type One (R1) " . Within said zone both singles and semi-detached/link units are permitted based on 15 metre and 18 metre minimum lot frontages respectively. The application would appear to comply. 8 AGENCY COMMENTS 8 . 1 In accordance with departmental procedures, the subject applications and various revisions were circulated to a number of agencies and departments for comments and conditions of approval. The following agencies departments in providing comments, offered no objections to the application as submitted: Peterborough Victoria Northumberland and Newcastle Separate School Board; Ontario Hydro; and the Ministry of Transportation. 8 .2 The Newcastle Public Works Department advised that the proponent will be responsible for contributions for down stream storm water detention works being constructed in association with the Schickedanz development; contributions for a future sidewalk along Liberty Street from Concession Street to the south limit of the plan and that all the Town's standard conditions be imposed. iJl . . . .4 REPORT NO. : PD-166-90 PAGE 4 8 . 3 The Fire Department commented that the site falls within the recognized response area of Station No. 1 . The department also notes a concern with the level of development being considered in the Bowmanville area and the eventual impact this will have on the level of service provided. 8 .4 The Community Services Department's review of the application advised that the population can be serviced by the existing Lord Elgin Park. They noted no further objection subject to a five percent (5%) cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication being provided. 8 .5 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Staff have reviewed the application and find it acceptable subject to conditions. The proponent must satisfy the Authority with regard to sedimentation control and storm drainage plans for the site prior to the commencement of development activity. The developer shall further satisfy CLOCA that the requirements of the Northwest Bowmanville Area Master Drainage Plan pertaining to the site. 8 . 6 The Public School Board advised that the Board had some concerns with the application as Central Public School is presently over capacity and has one portable on site. It was further noted that the students from this development would walk to school. 8 . 7 The Regional Public Works review of the proposal advised that services are available to the site from Liberty Street. They noted that with respect to abutting regional road (Liberty Street) the plan as submitted is acceptable. They advised that the applicant would have to satisfy the various standard conditions of approval. 8 .8 Bell Canada's review of the application requested that conditions of approval be included to confirm the applicant has made satisfactory arrangements with Bell Canada for Bell facilities. 56U . . . .5 REPORT NO. : PD-166-90 PAGE 5 9.0 STAFF COMMENTS 9 . 1 The application proposes ten (10) semi-detached/link lots for a total of twenty (20) units. The subject lands are surrounded by existing development and are therefore considered an infilling situation. As noted above the application complies with the Official Plan provisions as well as the existing zoning. Furthermore, the dwelling units proposed are considered to be compatible with single family dwellings which surround the subject lands . 9 .2 In accordance with the Regional policy the applicant has submitted a noise analysis report in support of the proposal. The report identifies noise level criteria as determined by the Ministry of the Environment. Outdoor activity areas are permitted 55 dBA daytime (7 a.m. to 11 p.m. ) and 50 dBA nighttime (11 p.m. to 7 a.m. ) . The study has concluded that the two worst case scenario lots would have a predicted noise level of 52 . 7 dBA daytime and 47 .4 dBA nighttime. Therefore the report concluded that no noise abatement measures are required. 9 . 3 Staff have reviewed the proposal and find it acceptable in terms of compliance to the relevant documents and in conformity with the general housing form of the area. The plan proposes ultimate use of land by providing opportunity for future development of deeper lots south of the proposed cul-de-sac fronting on Concession Street. The proponent has advised that Block 12 is to be retained. Staff have a concern with this irregular Block from a maintenance perspective and would recommend that Block 12 be melded with lot 1 and 0 . 3 m reserve be placed at the Liberty Street frontage. 10 CONCLUSION 10 . 1 In consideration of the comments contained within said report, Staff would have no objection to the approval of the proposed Plan of Subdivision, subject to the conditions of approval as contained in Attachment No. 1 annexed hereto. x')61 . . . .6 REPORT NO. : PD-166-90 PAGE 6 Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation to the Committee Franklin Wu, M.C. I .P. Lawrenc Kotseff DIrector of Planning Chief nistrative and Development Office CP*FW*cc *Attach 30 April 1990 Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision: Mr. and Mrs . Harold Ashton 13 Saunders Avenue BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 2AC Veltri and Sons Corporation 1038 Pinedal-e Court OSHAWA, Ontario L1G 4Y6 G. M. Sernas and Associates Unit 41 110 Scotia Court WHITBY, Ontario L1N 8T7 DN: 89017.DRA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION PLAN IDENTIFICATION 1. That this approval applies to draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-89017 prepared by Donevan and Fleischman dated (revised) November 6, 1989 showing Lots 1 to 10 inclusive for semi-detached or linked dwellings, and various blocks for reserve, road widening, site triangle etc. FINAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS 2. That all streets within the Plan of Subdivision shall be dedicated as public highway and shown as such on the final plan. 3. That all streets shall be named to the satisfaction of the Town of Newcastle and shown on the final plan. REQUIREMENTS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT 4. That the Owner shall retain a qualified landscape architect to prepare and submit a Landscaping Plan to the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning and Development for review and approval. The Landscaping Plan shall reflect the design criteria of the Town as amended from time to time. 5. That the Owner shall retain a professional engineer to prepare and submit a Master Drainage and Lot Grading Plan to the Director of Public Works for review and approval. All plans and drawings must conform to the Town's Design Criteria as amended from time to time. 6. That the Owner shall retain a qualified consultant to prepare and submit a Tree Preservation plan to the Director of planning and Development for review and approval. REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT 7. That the Owner shall enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the Town and agree to abide by all terms and conditions of the Town's standard subdivision agreement, including, but not limited to, the requirements that follow. 8. That all easements, road widening, and reserves as required by the Town shall be granted to the Town free and clear of all encumbrances. 9. That the Owner shall pay to the Town at the time of execution of the subdivision agreement, five percent (5%) cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication for residential development. . . .2 56 _ -2- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D) 10. That the Owner shall pay to the Town, at the time of execution of the Subdivision Agreement, development charge levy and any other charges in effect at the time of execution and further agrees to abide by the Town's payment schedule as amended from time to time. 11. That the Owner shall provide and install sidewalks, street lights, temporary turning circles etc. as per the Town's standards and criteria. 12. That the Owner shall cause all utilities, including, hydro, telephone, Cable TV, etc. to be buried underground. 13. That the Owner shall provide the Town, at the time of execution of the subdivision agreement, Letters of Credit acceptable to the Town's Treasurer, with respect to Performance Guarantee, Maintenance Guarantee, Occupancy Deposit and other guarantees or deposit as may be required by the Town. 14. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Owner shall retain an architect to prepare and submit an Architectural Control Plan to the Director of Planning and Development. The architect shall further certify that the said Plan has achieved the objectives of providing: a variety of housing style; attractive streetscape treatment; harmony of colour, style and exterior materials used, etc. 15. That prior to the issuance of building permits, access routes to the subdivision must be provided to meet Subsection 3.2.5.2(6) of the Ontario Building Code and, that all watermains and hydrants are fully serviced and the Owner agrees that during construction, fire access routes be maintained according to Subsection 2.5.1.2 of the Ontario Fire Code, storage of combustible waste be maintained as per Subsection 2.4.1.1 and open burning as per Subsection 2.6.3.4 of the Ontario Fire Code. 16. The Owner agrees that where the well or private water supply of any person is Interfered with as a result of construction or the development of the subdivision, the Owner shall at his expense, either connect the affected party to municipal water supply system or provide a new well or private water system so that water supplied to the affected party shall be of quality and quantity at least equal to the quality and quantity of water enjoyed by the affected party prior to the interference. . . .3 -3- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D) 17. That the owner contributes to downstream storm water detention works now being constructed, in association with the Schickedanz North development. Costs to this development will be prorated based on lands contributing to the storm water facilities and the final construction costs; 18. That the applicant provide a cash contribution for a future sidewalk along Liberty Street from the south limit of the proposed development to Concession Street; 19. That the Owner shall satisfy Bell Canada for any Bell Canada facilities serving this draft plan of subdivision which are required by the Municipality to be installed underground; a copy of such confirmation shall be forwarded to the Municipality. 20. The owner shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement, in words satisfactory to Bell Canada, to grant to Bell Canada any easements that may be required for telecommunication services. 21. Prior to the commencement of development activity, the owner shall obtain Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (C.L.O.C.A. ) for approval of sedimentation control and storm drainage plans for the site. 22. Prior to final approval of the plan, the C.L.O.C.A. is to be satisfied that the requirements of the Northwest Bowmanville Area Master Drainage Plan pertaining to the site will be carried-out to the Authority's satisfaction. 23. The owner shall agree in the subdivision agreement with the Town of Newcastle to carry-out or cause to be carried-out to the satisfaction of the C.L.O.C.A. : (a) site grading, sedimentation control and major overland flow routing; and, (b) the requirements of the Northwest Bowmanville Area Master Drainage Plan as they pertain to this site. 24. That Block 12 be eliminated and said lands be incorporated into Lot 1. 5 `) 5 - ---^-'' -------------- cw hl AW PLAN AS SUBMITTED F/�G Imo. AIST-�Fio/7�E�ist..p OFl pf'ApQ'T Of"�'-2,8,19A,4,7�IE BLACK C--43;./-v. N^11^ACxs VLAN, n.vw Ary 'rri�C TJpWN CiF NE1nIICASTLE [.OT Ae Lor/a e.vr/e L O r/s Lvr c3 4ra-/7 cow-/s 'e� �T /a RBGs/ON O� GGJRf-1AM J••=N-✓ / s�•��� �•/ Q�OO C/r114 77QiC) Q66 CCi 7s1ri0/49 (m� a a -•.►.vE w.//•7C'i�3 c,..o C ��, }� I \. •r �/ \ �. cam..�ocs��...r.�rto�oiascr-ev � � N'7/•.D9' '6 eOQ.OQ i duAmcoe- .D L T / �\ . O T JI 9 L O sA ��� `0 3 —�-� �•� — .�.—.- __.__ . ,�_. � � � alpp ° � D Q C 3 % 2 aa.eoc aeo h 8 L-L!!OJ. 2 /r 125 Ae. Iro�, ..t) /ynI lrE7�AL�a.N ` !-" I I B[aCK // I -a- h .400/770h/a.L- N�/�CR/'•'�T.O✓.�/ W /ds.0� •`Q' N7/•ao aGt.�.t4� Y J4MATCw.YRiIJ c..•.AGAwR S6v-771c>�i+O N7/•y�ep• � � J ~'� ' � N7/•.id•6` k.:A'' � � GY/Tf4C Af�M/Ih/O aL.T, (�yr I I I -"1 /• f.Y.7 •r�O Nfiy aen/as �� O (� /�/� � 1 -'---� � � If ���/O �� � k. .v �wr✓-ar's'ia•asc c'� � W A���/.tip / �-/TLJA�E ( rn„E�.�.� •.- �'$ �2----- � eer_a AIQ i.fiM�N7'7i � C3CA/CR.e.L.. NOTEC � GL'?ls/-K7 t�LN�/-GaT�+f�'•�CO o¢ � �• •.• // Rcw IKl7iaG1C 06�•crdiHl�ivr ` _, araOC/Q eeao�ea/a-ne ' l Ex/LiTiYKi�,t8� I 1• 4l�h+AE6YA0�/>r*�rY+�1C GEC(R/)••••••�•� ' O /.9A-P LOT�.�Olvsa►1C .Ip„+ OWNERS CER7"/.�/GATE I I CLAI�•I'Q!:G6QT/IriC.�.T6 WC.GLJTY�G1i2/2E / A.4=mwjm`.' �,A6.4^f7'IY pt7•.,yc�.�cti/9c„�r�n�.v./�.L'r7C. _ Trf 7aAC AO�GMa!/6 G>'�•>•�.� 7TD,c1pcA��RC ab Bt+1f3�'!/T>7-/Aa �.i.I�ACi 7C AMW •��-/v/Gts7 a.uc v PLAN AS RED-LINE REVISED V.�LTR/MAO ma.�.o�r/oN Ti18' F GlC' �__ -__ O.t77C C.I.�Y.iAO+✓'•'�1M•h+.Ci..>t. /o>e A�N�/ETlViL ct�+...c^r : Oc.�nLCVtaiv�/rtO�- Oo.tTpt 'fXtt.caz-anly •�=�a0 7 ��70 /' cJN7�►RA�04A►n�O iGh�ACYO�?5 ��= // bb0 ON7i�t/O t7. A'CXa'.G�'nIG�9C>M/N ClX7filt /2 e 7/ OiA+id,�A�,L/d SNP FICXG,tA�.,O-L/v/�� 54 '>'Q3-•/'f'�78,Oi1�.>t1C� O�4-ar�Vb r�sVa.•O vlct-.T7�:,A'aAlp. T't?T,taL t //// 45 Ate.,bAr./qar;7 r,Om.►l�O7'-!