HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-125-90 ;�" r••, TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
€ �. iILL 170 .GPA
REPORT File #
Res. #
— t') By-Law #
METING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DATE: April 2, 1990
REPORT #: PD- 125-90 FILE #:
SL&JECT: BILL 170 - AN ACT TO REVISE SEVERAL ACTS RELATED TO
AGGREGATE RESOURCES
FILE: PLN 21. 1
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD- 125-90 be received for information.
1. BACKGROUND
1. 1 Bill 170, entitled 'An Act to revise several Acts related to
Aggregate Resources ' , received Royal Assent on June 20, 1989
and was proclaimed in force on January 1, 1990 . The new Act
replaces other legislation related to aggregate resources,
most notably the Pits and Quarries Control Act.
1.2 The highlights of the new legislation are as follows:
greater municipal input on applications and Ministerial
actions related to aggregate extraction operations;
stronger provisions related to the rehabilitation of
599 10
REPORT NO. : PD-125 -90 PAGE 2
excavated sites and the minimization of the adverse
social and environmental impacts of mineral aggregate
extraction;
financial compensation for municipalities affected by
aggregate extraction operations.
1. 3 On December 19, 1988, Council adopted a resolution indicating
support for Bill 170 .
2. MUNICIPAL INPUT
2 . 1 Bill 170 entitles upper-tier and local municipalities to
receive notice of and to provide comments to the Ministry of
Natural Resources on all new licence applications, and on
other matters such as proposed changes to licensed operations,
transfers of licences and abandoned pit rehabilitation.
2 .2 In addition, each licensed pit or quarry will be subject to
an annual review by the Ministry to determine compliance with
the legislation, the site plan and the conditions of the
licence. Municipal comments will be considered as part of the
review. With every fourth annual review, the Ministry will
request a municipality to provide comments on each licensed
pit or quarry within its boundaries.
3. APPLICABILITY OF MUNICIPAL DOCUMENTS
3. 1 As with previous legislation, municipalities retain full
control over the location of licensed pits and quarries
through the municipal planning process . The Ministry may
issue a licence only if the location of the site complies with
all relevant zoning by-laws .
599 11
REPORT NO. : PD-1-2 5 -9 0 PAGE 3
3 .2 Bill 170 does allow the Ministry to issue a wayside permit
whether or not the location of the site complies with all
relevant zoning by-laws . However, the legislation further
specifies that no wayside permit shall be issued for a site
zoned and developed for residential use or zoned as an area
having particular environmental sensitivity.
4. MUNICIPAL AGGREGATE EXTRACTION OPERATIONS
4 . 1 Bill 170 also affects the Town of Newcastle as an
owner/operator of licensed and wayside pits .
4 .2 The Town currently owns and operates one aggregate extraction
site which was licensed under the Pits and Quarries Control
Act. This pit is located in Part of Lot 16, Concession 2,
former Township of Clarke. As required by the new
legislation, the Town submitted an application for a
replacement licence for this pit prior to the March 31, 1990
deadline. The Town does not currently own or operate any
wayside pits .
4 . 3 The Town will be required to comply with the more stringent
application requirements of the new legislation with respect
to the establishment of any new licensed aggregate extraction
operations or wayside pits . The applications must be
accompanied by site plans providing details in respect of
existing features, extraction operations, and rehabilitation
plans . The level of detail required varies with the type of
application. A Class 'A' Licence (ie. greater than 20,000
tonnes extraction per year) requires the greatest detail. A
Class 'A' Licence Application must also be accompanied by a
report providing information in respect of such matters as the
suitability of rehabilitation plans, social and economic
599 12'
REPORT NO. : PD-125 -90 PAGE 4
impacts, and the main haulage routes and proposed truck
volumes.
4 .4 Public Notice must also be provided in respect of an
application for an aggregate extraction licence, with
provision for referral of an application to the Ontario
Municipal Board upon receipt of an objection.
4 .5 The Town will also be required to comply with the more
stringent requirements of the new legislation regarding the
rehabilitation of excavated sites . As with the Pits and
Quarries Control Act, Bill 170 requires every holder of a
licence or wayside permit to maintain on deposit with the
Province, security for the rehabilitation of the pit, with all
or part of the security forfeited to cover the costs of any
rehabilitation performed by the Province. This levy is
currently 8 cents per tonne of aggregate extracted in the
previous year in the case of a licensed pit and, for a wayside
pit 8 cents per tonne of aggregate authorized to be extracted.
4 . 6 Unlike the previous legislation, Bill 170 specifically
requires every licensee to perform progressive and final
rehabilitation. Holders of a wayside permit will be required
to operate and rehabilitate the site so as to minimize the
inconvenience to the public . With both licensed and wayside
pits, the security deposit is refundable upon proof of final
rehabilitation being submitted.
5. PRODUCTION LEVY
5 . 1 Bill 170 requires every licensee, including municipalities,
to pay to the Province an annual licence fee in an amount
599 1 S
REPORT NO. : PD-125 -90 PAGE 5
equal to the licence application fee or a 'rate per tonne
extracted' fee, whichever is greater. Every applicant for a
wayside permit, again including municipalities is also
required, before the permit is issued, to pay to the Province
a prescribed permit fee or a fee based on the maximum amount
to be extracted.
5 .2 The revenues generated from this annual production fee are to
be distributed on the basis of a formula prescribed by the
regulations that accompany the Act. These regulations
currently provide for an annual production levy of 6 cents per
tonne of aggregate actually extracted, with 4 cents of this
to be disbursed to the area municipality. The levy is to be
based on production for the calendar year beginning in 1990.
In this regard, the Town will receive its first disbursement
in 1991.
5 .3 For the purposes of example only, 2,399,252 tonnes of
aggregate was extracted in the Town in 1989, which would
generate $95,970 . 00 in revenue for the Town. However, the
pits and quarries in the Town were licensed to extract
9,930,000 tonnes in 1989 . Actual production was only 24%
of the maximum permitted. The revenues which would accrue
to the Town from the production levy could therefore vary
substantially from year to year.
5 . 4 The municipal portion of the annual production fee is intended
to compensate municipalities and their residents for the
inconveniences associated with aggregate production. Bill 170
allows for the regulations to specify the purposes for which
the money must be used. However, at the present time, the
regulations do not impose any restrictions on municipalities
on how they use their share of the revenue.
599 14
REPORT NO. : PD- 125-90 PAGE 6
5 . 5 One of the most significant and quantifiable impacts resulting
from aggregate extraction activity is the deterioration of the
Town roads which the aggregate haulers use. In this regard,
it would be appropriate for the Public Works Department to
review the most desireable use for the revenues resulting from
the annual production levy.
6. SUMMARY
6 . 1 Bill 170 addresses many of the inadequacies of previous
legislation related to aggregate extraction, by allowing for
greater municipal involvement in the review of aggregate
extraction operations . The new Act also imposes more
stringent requirements with respect to the rehabilitation of
excavated sites and the minimization of social and
environmental impacts . As the operator of extraction
operations however, the Town will also be subject to these
requirements . The Town will begin to receive revenue from the
annual production levy in 1991. The most appropriate use for
this revenue should be reviewed.
Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
Fra in Wu, M.C. I .P. Lawrence . Kotseff
Director of Planning Chief A nistrative
and Development Officer
JAS*DC*FW*df
*Attach
22 March 1990
599 15