HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-2-90 TOWN OF NEWCASTLE "q �
t7
REPORT File #4�U -
Res. #
By-Law #
-__--- PUBLIC MEETING
METING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DATE: January 8, 1990
REPORT #: PD- 2 -90 FILE #:
W&JECT: OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION: 89-67/D/N
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION: 18T-89082
REZONING APPLICATION: DEV 89-104
APPLICANT: ALEXANDRIS INVESTMENTS LTD.
PART LOT 31, CONCESSION 2, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD- 2 -90 be received;
2 . THAT Official Plan Amendment Application 89-67/D/N,
Subdivision Application 18T-89082 and Rezoning Application DEV
89-104 submitted by Alexandris Investments Ltd. be referred
back to Staff for further processing;
3. THAT a copy of this report and Council's decision be forwarded
to the Region of Durham Planning Department; and,
4. THAT the interested parties listed in this report and any
delegation be advised of Council's decision.
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
1. 1 Owner and Applicant: Alexandris Investments Limited
1.2 Official Plan Amendment: From 'General Agricultural' to
'Urban Residential' .
1. 3 Subdivision: 44 single family lots
a 0 .51 block for approximately 20 condominium
townhouses (see attachment No. l)
. . .2
509
REPORT NO. : PD- 2 -90 PAGE . . .2
1.4 Rezoning: From' (H)Rl(Residential Type One-Holding) ' and
'A (Agricultural) ' to an appropriate zoning to
implement the plan of subdivision.
1.5 Area: 3 .28 ha (8. 1 acres)
2. LOCATION
2 . 1 Legal Description: Part Lot 31, Concession 2, former Township
of Darlington
2 .2 Relative Location: west side of Trulls Road, south of
Yorkville Drive; the southern two-thirds of the property lie
outside the defined boundary of the Courtice Urban Area.
3. BACKGROUND
3 . 1 The subject Official Plan Amendment and Subdivision
applications were circulated by the Region of Durham to the
Town on June 19, 1989 and August 10, 1989 respectively.
3 .2 The related Rezoning application was received by the Town on
August 11, 1989 .
4. EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES
4. 1 Existing Use: single faimily residence, remainder vacant.
4 .2 Surrounding Uses:
North: Urban Residential Development
South: Agricultural & Home Occupation
East: Agricultural & Single Family Residence
West: Agricultural & Vacant Urban Residential Lands
5. OFFICIAL PLAN
5. 1 The proposed development would be subject to the policies of
. . . 3
5 10
REPORT NO. : PD- 2 -90 PAGE. . .3
Section 8 of the Durham Regional Official Plan (Major Urban
Areas) and Section 6 of the Town of Newcastle Official Plan
(Courtice Urban Area) . In this regard, low density development
is not to exceed 15 units per net residential hectare. The
number of units for the proposed townhouse block has not been
specified; however, an application to amend the Courtice South
Neighbourhood Development Plan would be required to designate
a medium or high density site.
6. ZONING
6 . 1 That portion of the subject site within the Urban Area is
zoned ' (H)R1 (Urban Residential Type One-Holding) ' , while that
portion outside the Urban Area is zoned 'A (Agricultural) ' .
The 'R1' zone requires a minimum lot frontage of 15 m (49
feet) and a minimum lot area of 460 sq.m. (4950 sq. ft. ) .
Townhouses are not permitted.
6 .2 The proposed rezoning would change the zone category of the
single family lots to 'R21 , while the townhouse block would
be rezoned to 'R31 .
7. PUBLIC NOTICE
7 . 1 Pursuant to the requirements of the Planning Act and Council
policy, notice of the Public Meeting with respect to the
subject applications was mailed to all property owners within
120 m (394 feet) of the subject site. A Public Notice sign was
also posted on the Trull's Road frontage of the property.
7 .2 As of the writing of this report, no verbal or written
submissions had been received in respect of the subject
application.
. . .4
.� 1 1
REPORT NO. : PD- 2 -90 PAGE . . .4
8. AGENCY COMMENTS
8 . 1 The subject applications were circulated by the Region and the
Town Planning Departments to various agencies for comment. The
following agencies have indicated no objection:
- Ontario Hydro
- Ministry of Agriculture and Food
- Separate School Board
- Ministry of Transportation
8 .2 The Town of Newcastle Public Works Department stated that a
Stormwater Management Report for the whole watershed must be
prepared, and the proposed street patterns reviewed in
association with adjacent proposals.
8. 3 The Town of Newcastle Fire Department stated that the site
falls within the recognized response area of Station No.4 on
Trull's Road. Although this application on its own would cause
no difficulty, in conjunction with other growth in the area
it will in time put a strain on the level of service presently
available to the residents of Courtice.
8.4 The Town of Newcastle Community Services Department indicated
that the parkland dedication should be accepted as cash-in-
lieu on the basis of 1 ha per 300 dwelling units .
8.5 The Region of Durham Works Department noted that the subject
property is outside the service area limit for development
charge purposes . Therefore, there is no guarantee municipal
services will ultimately be provided to the site. At present,
municipal water supply can be available to the proposal by way
of extension of the existing zone II watermain on Trull's
Road. However, the necessary sanitary sewer is not immediately
available to the frontage of the subject land. Provision of
. . . 5
X12
REPORT NO. : PD- 2 -90 PAGE-5
sanitary sewer service to the proposal requires a major
extension from the existing trunk sewer in the vicinity of
Bloor Street and Prestonvale Road.
Due to the necessary sanitary sewer extension being such a
major undertaking and the proposal being outside the Official
Plan, the Works Department feels that a development of this
size is not economically viable and is therefore premature.
8. 6 The Central lake Ontario Conservation Authority noted that the
subject site is within the drainage basin of Robinson Creek.
Although the Authority has no objection to the Official Plan
Amendment application, they wish to reserve their comments on
the associated subdivision plan until a Master Drainage Plan
for the Robinson Creek watershed has been adopted.
8.7 The Ministry of Natural Resources indicated no objection to
the principle of development, but requires the preparation of
site specific stormwater plans to ensure that development will
not have a negative effect on water quality and consequently
fish habitat in Robinson Creek.
8.8 The Public School Board noted that the volume of growth in
this area cannot be accommodated by their plans, but that this
objection would be reconsidered when a more comprehensive
study has been prepared by the Board.
8 .9 Comments remain outstanding from the Ministry of the
Environment.
9. STAFF COMMENTS
9 . 1 Although the subject application represents a minor extension
to the Courtice Urban Area, it cannot be dealt with in
. . . 6
513
REPORT NO. : PD- 2 -90 PAGE. . .6
isolation. Issues related to the larger question of the Urban
Area expansion such as urban structure, transportation routes
and ease of servicing are of importance in this review.
9 .2 The subject lands are not immediately servicable with
municipal sanitary sewers from the existing trunk system. It
has not been established whether that portion of the site
outside the designated urban limits can be serviced from the
existing Oshawa-based sanitary sewer system. The lands are
inlcuded in the area being studied in the Courtice South
Servicing Feasibility Study currently being conducted by
Totten Sims Hubucki for the Town. The results of this study
have not as yet been finalized.
9 . 3 If the Courtice Urban Area were to expand southward, the land
use structure, including road patterns, for the newly
designated lands would need to be established in a
comprehensive manner. In particular, a mid-block arterial or
collector in the general vicinity of the subject lands would
appear to be warranted.
10. CONCLUSION
10 . 1 The purpose of this report is to address the requirement of
a Public Meeting pursuant to the Planning Act.
10.2 Consideration of these applications must be undertaken in the
context of the larger question of the Courtice Urban Area
expansion. It is therefore recommended that Official Plan
Amendment application 89-67/D/N, and the related subdivision
and rezoning applications be referred back to Staff for
further processing including the resolution of sanitary sewer,
. . .7
REPORT NO: PD- 2 -90 PAGE. . . . 7
stormwater management, transportation and other concerns
related to the proposed expansion of the Courtice Urban Area.
Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
Franklin Wu, M.C. I.P. darence E. o eff
Director of Planning & Development Chief Administrative Officer
JAS*DC*FW*df
PARTIES TO BE NOTIFIED OF COMMITTEE AND COUNCIL'S DECISION:
Alexandris Investments Limited
39 East Drive
unionville, Ontario. WR 1K7
McDermott and Associates Limited
1305 Pickering Parkway
Suite 406
Pickering, Ontario. L1V 3P2
� 1 �
Attachment + .l
I I , I 1 �
SINGLE Fl.." RESIOF�NTIAL PLANI OF SUBDIVISION FILE 16IT-76027
FUTURE
I I I I I I I I I I
I 1
I II
\\ i FUTURE LOW DENSITY / I MEDIUM DENSITY !
I /
� I
woof E ac.r
i.e.
mar BLOCK 2
44 E 25
zem a zee "
pa•aE \,.
t
•y m O 8 c a r N C<>
E—E E E 37
x 9
N E a f 223 4 43 42 36 30 2 D S
zm
BLOC 1
M
41 29 w
w 34 a0 21
_ I-
35 2
f
Q O
N I szw H szw ll.sw '4, '^
O
Z E E
38 — e 32 26
s4,
i N�y
STREET
u a•
IS• 112e 12w 12w 12m
12. 12w IFw 12w Rm Iii R� Itm liw 1'�• IEw
le E 17 16 I IS 14 I! I 12 11 I 10 ! 0 7 I 6 3 4 ! 2 E F I
I 1
227!2 •rx I. E
RURAL RESIDENTIAL/VACANT AGRICULTURAL
Deve 89- 104 , 18T-89082
15 16
Attachment +2
® SUBJECT SITE
LOT 32 LOT 31 LOT 30
RI R !
EP RI I R'
EP
R2-2 �
(H)R1
EP R-2
R2-2 ;
� o
(H)R1 a
� N
' EP (H)R1 N Z
0
I w
I AZ
� 1 RC i 0
A
� I
C4-2
REGIONAL. ROAD 22 BOOR
KEYMAP W.
Dev. 89- 104
517