The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPD-42-89 DN: 2 5( a) TOWN OF NEWCASTLE REPORT File # 60 3S/ws— Res. By-Law # MEETING: General Purpose and Administration Committee DATE: Monday, February 20, 1989 REPORT #: PD-42-89 FILE #: DEV 88-116 SUKECT: REZONING APPLICATION - 689581 ONTARIO LIMITED PART LOT 29, CONCESSION 2, DARLINGTON FILE: DEV 88-116 (X/REF: 18T-87092) RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PD-42-89 be received; and 2. THAT the application to amend the Town of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended, submitted by G.M. Sernas & Associates Ltd. on behalf of 689581 Ontario Limited be referred back to Staff for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report upon receipt of all outstanding comments; and 3. THAT a copy of Council's decision be forwarded to the parties attached hereto. 1. BACKGROUND: 1.1 On October 21, 1988 the Town of Newcastle Planning and Development received an application to amend the Town of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended. The application was filed by G.M. Sernas and Associated Ltd. on behalf of 689581 Ontario Limited. The rezoning would permit the development of 18.93 ha (46.78 acre) parcel of land through Plan of Subdivision. . . .2 REPORT 00, : PD-42-89 PAGE 2 _______________________________________________________________________________ 1.2 The subject lands are located in Pact Lot 29, Concession %r of the former Township of Darlington, more specifically south of Highway No. 2 and immediately west of Couctico Road (Regional Road 34) . The surrounding land ooea include residential to the north; Boy 0inboIo Car dealership to the north and east; three (2) residential dwellings to the east on the west aide of Courtice Road, and vacant land to the east aide of the road; vacant land to the south and west. 1.3 The rezoning proposal, if approved, would allow the development of 102 single family dwelling lots; 62 semi-detached dwelling lots (I24 semi- detached dwelling units) ; 97 units as part of a Medium Density Block; and blocks for part of the school and parkland. 2. PUBLIC NOTICE: 2.1 Staff would note for Committee's consideration that, pursuant to Council's resolution of July 26' 1982 and the requirements of the Planning Act, the appropriate oiguage acknowledging the application was installed on the subject lands ood^ ooccooudiog property owners were advised of the proposal. 3. OFFICIAL PLAN CONFORMITY: 3.1 Within both the Durham Regional Official Plan and the Town of Newcastle Official Plan the subject property is designated "Residential" . The predominant one of said land shall be for housing purposes in accordance with the relevant policies of the official Plan. The proposed rezoning would appear to conform to the land use designation of both plans. 3.2 The Courtioe South Neighbourhood Plan also designates the subject property as "Residential" and it provides detail policy guidelines to further assist in determining the conformity of said application. REPORT NO. : PD-42-89 PAGE ] _______________________________________________________________________________ 3.3 The subject application is located in Neighbourhood 12C/ of Schedule 6-1 of the Tmvo of Newcastle Official Plan ([bnctice Urban Area) . The population target for this neighbourhood has been established at 2500 people. In order to attempt to achieve this upper limit, development may take place at a maximum of 30 units per net residential hectare, based on the size of the neighbourhood. 3.4 The subject application pzoFmaea an overall density of 26.35 units per net residential hectare. The density of the proposed Medium Density Block is 39.87 units. The application would appear to exceed the maximum density permitted. 4. AGENCY COMMENTS: 4.1 The application submitted by G.M. Sezoaa and Associated Ltd. for a proposed rezoning and related revised plan of subdivision have been circulated to a omnbez of agencies. The following provides a summary of tbe comments relating to this proposal. 4.2 The Town of Newcastle Fire Department has expressed some concern in terms of the potential increase in residential units vvitblo the Conctine Area. The Public School Board has commented that this proposal will increase, by 100, the number of students at Courtioe North and South Public 8cboVIo. Therefore, they would require a sidewalk be constructed along Courtioe Road to 0aab Road for pedestrian traffic. The Ministry of Transportation has requested that permits be obtained for all buildings located within 600 feet of the centre point of the intersection of Highway No. 2 and Cooctioe Road. 4.3 The Separate School 8oazd and the Ministry of Natural Reonocmeo have expressed no concern with respect to the applications. However, Regional Public Works Department, Regional Planning Department, Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, Town of Newcastle Public Works Department, and Town of Newcastle Community Services Department have not yet commented on the application. BDP0IT 0U. : PD-42-84 PAGE 4 _______________________________________________________________________________ 5. STAFF COMMENTS: 5.1 In reviewing the proposal, Staff note the plan does not conform to Regional design policies with regards to reverse frontages on Regional Road 34. Staff also note that u second access from Highway 0n. 2 to the plan will be required. This should be provided in the vicinity of the cul-de-sac at the western boundary of the property, in conformity with the Courtioe South Neighbourhood DIoo. The proposal should be further revised to reflect a maximum of 30 units per net residential hectare. 5.2 Staff further note that a traffic noise impact analysis will be required in order to properly evaluate this application. The analysis should reflect the mature state of development in the Couctioe area, as designated in the Town of Newcastle official Plan. Also the applicant will be required to undertake n well monitoring program consistent with Regional policies. 5.3 Staff note a few enquires have been made with respect to the subject applications and ooucezua raised. In addition a letter of objection has been received as well as a petition signed by nine (9) residents objecting to the proposal. Their main objection is with the proposed Medium Density Block of the application. Other oouoeruo include potential for well interference and restrictions for possible future development of adjacent lands. O. RECOMMENDATION: In consideration of the number of comments which remain outstanding, the issues and nouoecua which have been raised, and the fact this report is for a Public Meeting as required by the Planning Act, Staff raoonuneud that the application be referred until such time as all outstanding comments are received and the Plan of Subdivision has been REPORT 00. : PD-42-89 PAGE 5 _______________________________________________________________________________ revised to deal with the above concerns. At such time Staff will be in a position to make a final recommendation. Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation to the Committee y ( //�Y��~�,�{ �-� (t4- __-__---____--_ Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P. Lawrence EJ taeff Director of Planning & Development Chief &dmioi tcative officer CP*FW* 'ip *Attach. February 7, 1989 CC: 689591 Ontario Limited 26 Millgate Crescent WILLOWD&LE, Ontario M2K lL6 CC: G.M. Gecuao & Associates 185 Brock Street North Suite 287 WHITBY, Ontario Ll0 4H3 CC: Richard Gay Holdings Ltd. P.O. Box 2065 97 Athol Street East O8BAWA, Ontario LI8 7\74 0C; Mr. 6 Mrs. Q. QooIdboru R.R. #G BOWMANVILLD, Ontario LlC 3K7 CC: Mr. 6 Mrs. C. Adema R.R. #6 8OW8&0VILL8, Ontario LlC 3K7 CC: Mr. & Mrs. D. Bactgero R.B. #S BOWMA0VILLE, Ontario LlC 3K7 REPORT 0O. : PD-42-99 PAGE 6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC: Mrs. E. Fields R.R. #6 B0WMANVIL68' Ontario LlC 2%7 CC: Mc. & Mrs. M. 8eoeuer R.R. #6 BOWMA8VZLLE, Ontario LIC 3D7 CC: Mr. & Mrs. G. Goodall R.D. #6 BORMANVZLLE, Ontario LlC 3K7 CC: Mr. 6 Mrs. D. Stairs R.R. #6 8OWMANVILLE, Ontario LIC 3K7 CC: Mr. & Mrs. Mike McCarthy R.R. #6 80WM&0VZLLO, Ontario LlC 3K7 CC: Mc. & Mrs. Frank Reid R.D. #6 B0WM&NVILLE, Ontario LlC 3K7 f % C O NI--CE S S / O 'N 2 O A I_ PROPOSED li 112877 DRAFT PLAN ,I >� � '^7"` •' ._-�.-n. . _a 'y-�Y� (I ` ' n. PART OF LOT .29 ,rz CONCESSION 2 ' m F l 11,Ali t. TOWN OF NEWCASTLE Yl bl— eo +A F t m t�_'� ' ' I• m — REUCM/3. N11QPAUTt OF W .W RM Tom" \ �'- (.•33 na-»twTS ` �to `��t m rrz! ,zz rn i,m I rYY1"na - . 'St� `3+ 'G� SC j ':�� _ { I >.i • ! �AS _RitE`1ANT :NFORVATgr1 INSLNOI �L,•^ _ Li SD �•r a w.en.w ten.". 0 r � -- _ -;_=y- - •.rte\��;� _ '�� ` , 'o' , _ I� I�SY {� t 157Z2-'- ' - ", ii { �� `' w i,` ./ n�"�a `✓)j...r. I .u+�.e x..o..... to 769.SS _ \)t 11fST.NO.�1907 r;�; L'�m°�'��=�." -aa:�•":RS'''"/ � r7Or s, \.i:� 1�-� . +" `= S ..-A'e ~'v2� I .� _ .o." _...._ I - 2 41 W TNd-N-943O , x 1N$1!a 1670 +Op i � .� z. � \, �\ `• ' � 3n� •I 1 't��• m \ re� s�*o•za»v,r•c nw..c "i N / g90 s.r�E • 'I} TS- >.qt • E Er 73 .t% ((�tNST.NO.1788;- � '- ,. (•' �t z1• � n�9a,.'•.'1 _ JT' Aso j.m�a.t •; ,//,1 :`•m o..cvs a.mcrc sw.cRrs ¢>ac•� ursTNO.7jS63 �'{ m m 2O ! 1 \ \�,'"•' / aK I { �__it ttt / 3,k -) j j "• � 11 /`\ \ i`-I ` ` 3 _, n `,`.. � " i '3 /•i /1 ) /v�'t��. 'n 5ev5el ONTARIO Co. 3.1.Ewl✓`+ES�T�EO �: (V \\ °tt-. w' 3$ 33�t r` ° _n.�/ X soy .m� -{• 'Vi-110, 1 1{i' �L i ✓� - A it _ l:a \ 20.217 ` !U[ ,►' .T2/ l �•/// ~,�, ��"*f i 1' — ` - _ -C,=e M O...AA,._.D..S._GE.. V?yS r E L W t HEIGHTS :'k _:ASSOC.LTA t 7 C O N CE S S l O N 2 I :Lam_ is � �l ® SUBJECT - SITE LOT 30 LOT 29 LOT 28 Rl i I H)C R1 NASH ROAD R1 Rl R4 I ! i EP i (H)R4 i Hl�Hwgy EP Rt ! 5 (H)RI Zr ! (H)C-1 C5-5 0 ! Cl R W Rl � ( RI ° �.�? ! EP ' o z ! , 0 R-2 � °a V w I 0 ( U (H) RI i 0 5o too 200 3win KEY ':MAP . Dev. 88- 116