HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-67-92 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
DN: COFA.GPA REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File# Q
Date: Monday, March 16, 1992 Res. #
PD-67-92 A92/010 to A92/014, inclusive By-Law#
Report#: File #:
Subject: MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
FOR THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 1992
FILE: A92/010 to A92/014 INCLUSIVE
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-67-92 be received; and
2 . THAT Council concur with the decisions of the Committee of
Adjustment made at its meeting of February 27 , 1992 .
3 . THAT Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario
Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of
Adjustment in the event of an appeal.
1. 1 The Committee of Adjustment heard five (5) applications on
February 27, 1992 . Application A92/010 was TABLED to the next
available meeting to allow the applicant to consult with the
Town. Applications A92/013 and A92/014 were TABLED to allow
a recirculation due to an error in the applicants
calculations.
1.2 Application A92/011 and A92/012 were both APPROVED.
Application A92/011 was to permit the reconstruction of a
dwelling on Cedar Crest Beach Road having 1.5 m side yard
setbacks as opposed to the required 3 . 0 m. The proposal was
approved subject to satisfying the requirements of the Central
Lake Ontario Conservation Authority.
2
REPORT NO. : PD-41-92 PAGE 2
1. 3 Application A92/012 was submitted to recognize an existing
deck which encroached into the required sideyard setback.
During the site inspection Staff noted that the deck only
encroached 0. 09 m (0. 3 ft. ) as opposed to the 0. 61 m (2 . 0 ft. )
applied for. The application was therefore approved as
amended to a 0. 09 m variance.
1.4 Staff have reviewed the decisions of the Committee and are
satisfied that the decisions conform to the general intent of
the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law and that the variances
sought are minor in nature.
1.4 Council's concurrence with the Committee of Adjustment
decisions is required in order to afford Staff's official
status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the event of
appeal of the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment.
Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
Franklin Wu, M.C. I.P. Lawrence E Kotseff
Director of Planning Chief Ad i istrative
and Development Officer
CP*FW*cc
*Attach
9 March 1992
r
/l /l
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A92/011
********************
APPLICANT: GARY DANIELL
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
101 CEDAR CREST BEACH ROAD
PART LOT: 12 CONCESSION: BF
TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON
PLAN NUMBER: 1OM-318 -H
ZONING: RS & EP
HEARING DATE: 27-Feb-92
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE: 28-Mar-92
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CONSTRUCT A DWELLING ON A LOT HAVING A
SIDEYARD SETBACK OF 1.524M (5 FT. ) , MINIMUM REQUIRED 3M ( 10 FT. )
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT AS THE APPLICATION IS MINOR IN NATURE AND DESIRABLE FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA, THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO
THE COMPLETE APPROVAL OF CLOCA PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING
PERMIT
`-f J
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A92/012
APPLICANT: ERS LTD.
AGENT: IRWIN HAMILTON
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
121 MARTIN ROAD
PART LOT: 15 CONCESSION: 1
TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON
PLAN NUMBER: 1OM-784 -75
ZONING: R
HEARING DATE: 27-Feb-92
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE: 28-Mar-92
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING DECK LOCATED ON A PROPERTY HAVING A
SIDEYARD SETBACK OF 0 . 61M (2 . 0 FT. ) , MINIMUM REQUIRED 1.2M
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT AS THE APPLICATION IS IN KEEPING WITH THE O.P. AND THE ZONING
BY-LAW, ' THE APPLICATION IS APPROVED AS AMENDED, FOR AN INTERIOR
SIDEYARD SETBACK OF 0 .09M (0 . 3 FT. )
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A92/013
********************
APPLICANT: WAYNE CHASKAVICH
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
61 PROSPECT ST.
PART LOT: 12 CONCESSION: 2
TOWNSHIP: BOWMANVILLE
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: Rl
HEARING DATE: 27-Feb-92
DECISION: TABLED
APPEAL DATE: 28-Mar-92
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CREATE A LOT HAVING AN AREA OF 412 .42M2,
MINIMUM REQUIRED 460M2
REASON FOR DECISION:
THE APPLICATION BE TABLED TO THE MEETING OF MARCH 12, 1992 TO
ALLOW THE RECIRCULATION REQUIRED
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A92/014
********************
APPLICANT: WAYNE CHASKAVICH
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
61 PROSPECT STREET
PART LOT: 12 CONCESSION: 2
TOWNSHIP: BOWMANVILLE
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: R1
HEARING DATE: 27-Feb-92
DECISION: TABLED
APPEAL DATE: 28-Mar-92
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CREATE A LOT HAVING AN AREA OF 449 .23M2,
MINIMUM REQUIRED 460M2
REASON FOR DECISION:
THE APPLICATION BE TABLED TO THE MEETING OF MARCH 12, 1992 TO
ALLOW THE RECIRCULATION REQUIRED FOR A92/013
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A92/010
********************
APPLICANT: PHILIP HAMBLIN
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
135 QUEEN STREET
PART LOT: 12 CONCESSION: 1
TOWNSHIP: BOWMANVILLE
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: Rl
HEARING DATE: 27-Feb-92
DECISION: TABLED
APPEAL DATE: 28-Mar-92
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING RESIDENCE WHICH EXCEEDS
THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 40% OF THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF THE MAIN
BUILDING
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE TABLED UNTIL THE NEXT AVAILABLE MEETING TO
ALLOW THE APPLICANT TIME TO CONSULT WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT